And it’s a flying start to this pivotal Hawks’ offseason

I’d have preferred Eric Maynor, but I’m not going to gripe. The Hawks took the guy they liked at the position of greatest short- and long-term need, and at this point I’m disposed to give Rick Sund and his chief aide Dave Pendergraft the benefit of every doubt.

The Hawks greeted the week not knowing if they’d have anyone to handle the ball next season. They’re covered now. If Mike Bibby and/or Flip Murray signs somewhere else, they’ll be OK. If Bibby stays, they’ll be better than OK. Heck, if they handle Marvin Williams properly, they just might catch and pass Boston as the third-best team in the NBA East.

Jamal Crawford was an inspired acquisition, one of those there-has-to-be-a-catch coups: A guy who scored almost 20 points a game last season for two guys who barely played. And Jeff Teague was only the slightest of reaches with the draft’s 19th pick.

Maynor, who went one spot later, is older and more refined and a truer point guard, but Teague is the greater talent. He spent two years under Dino Gaudio at Wake Forest, meaning he was only lightly coached. Teague has, as they say in the trade, an upside.

There was no big man in the draft apt to offer immediate help at No. 19. B.J. Mullens of Ohio State is at least two years away. He averaged 8.8 points and 4.7 rebounds in a so-so Big Ten. To borrow a description once made of Mean Joe Greene vis-a-vis a lesser defensive tackle: Al Horford would knock B.J. Mullens down and stand on him.

The Hawks loaded up at the place they could conceivably have been understaffed, and now the emphasis shifts: Marvin Williams becomes a greater priority than Bibby (or Flip), and that’s another bit of good fortune/great planning. Because Marvin is a restricted free agent. The Hawks can keep him by matching any offer. Bibby and Flip — and Zaza Pachulia — are unrestricted. They can just up and leave.

The Hawks' offseason to date has been:

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

But they should — “should,” I say — get something for Marvin. (Let’s not forget they should have gotten something for Josh Childress last July and didn’t, but I’m thinking that was a one-off.) The worst that should happen is a sign-and-trade. The more likely outcome is that Williams signs a one-year qualifying offer to remain a Hawk and then becomes an unrestricted free agent next summer, and that wouldn’t be bad, either.

Retaining Marvin would mean five of the top seven players off a 47-win squad will stay together, and then factor in Crawford and Teague. And let’s assume the Hawks find the means to keep either Bibby or Flip. That’s not just stability. That’s a clear upgrade. And there was, given the looming personnel issue, no guarantee headed into the summer that the 2009-2010 Hawks would be nearly as good as their immediate predecessor.

And we’re seeing now that the best move the Hawks have made over the past 13 months had nothing to do with a player. Hiring Sund as general manager was generally viewed as a safe choice — not bad, but not brilliant. He started badly by letting Childress flit off to Greece, but every move since has been expertly handled. (Even the Hawks’ Round 2 pick — Sergiy Gladyr, a 19-year-old shooting guard from the Ukraine — could hit big in a couple of years.)

I’ve lived in Atlanta a quarter of a century, and much of that time I’ve devoted to tweaking the Hawks. But I’m not carping now, not even about the choice of Teague over Maynor. I’ve been given reason to believe this franchise is in capable hands. I’ve been given reason to believe in the Atlanta Hawks.

Yes, it feels a bit weird. But it also feels … nice.

201 comments Add your comment

Neil

June 26th, 2009
4:37 am

Agreed, wanted lawson to fall for us. thought it was a sure thing once philly took their PG of the future with MINN already having took not one but TWO PG’s in the first 6! picks but alas the NBA..Hope Teague continues his scoring dominance, we need to take as much pressure off of Joe and this draft pick with the addition of Crawford will have us averaging AT LEAST 4-5pt’s more per game, as long as Horford and Smith continue to dominate on the defensive end 50 wins doesn’t seem that far-fetched as all..huh..are we really talking about the HAWKS?! great time to be a fan of this up and coming franchise

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
4:42 am

Like I said, Neil … it feels weird. But it’s a good weird.

The Dust

June 26th, 2009
4:49 am

It won’t matter until we get a super star and guys like JJ and JS are gone. That’s the real issue! They’ve gotta go!

jibby

June 26th, 2009
4:52 am

Mark – I was hoping the Hawks were going to follow your advice and grab Garrett Siler with the 49th pick. It doesn’t look like he got drafted though. Any chance the Hawks take a chance at signing this undrafted big guy and see if he can be developed? I saw him play at Augusta State this year and he was dominating.

BrittishAnger

June 26th, 2009
5:07 am

Watch them let Solo go and grab Siler during free agency…I think that was the big gamble they were making not drafting big at all…Picking Teague almost screams “Keeping Bibby” to me, Crawford already makes up for the losing him since he can pick up when either Mike or Joe aren’t performing up to snuff. I look forward to seeing who we retain and who we pick up, and with the weird reserve back-court free agents available (Drew Gooden, Jason Collins, Anderson Varejao), we could make some big steals…let’s just see if the Spirit Group allow these reasonable actions to continue…

BrittishAnger

June 26th, 2009
5:13 am

Watch them let Solo go and grab Siler during free agency…I think that was the big gamble they were making by not drafting big at all…Picking Teague almost screams “Keeping Bibby” to me, getting Crawford already makes up for the potential of losing Flip since he can pick up the slack when either Mike or Joe aren’t performing up to snuff in a similar fashion. I could go either way with Marvin, I would ask him what he wants to do and develop a game plan from there; if he’s been making progress like he did last summer, keep him until he’s a free agent, if he wants to move along, work a sign/trade and make it happen; I don’t know who I’d want there in our scheme besides him, though Caron Butler doesn’t float my boat. I look forward to seeing who we retain and who we pick up with the weird reserve back-court free agents available (Drew Gooden, Jason Collins, Anderson Varejao, heck, even Mikki Moore could bring something to the table), we could make some big steals with some of the undrafted gems who will need the proper shoe shine; until then I’ll just keep quiet for the week and wait for the first free agency stories to wash over us next Wednesday…..

JSS

June 26th, 2009
5:13 am

Mr. Bradley, go get some sleep… Lot’s of questions for Sund regarding the direction from here… And eat something!!!

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
5:35 am

I think there’s a chance they’d invite Siler to rookie camp. But he might have other options.

I slept a little, JSS, and I ate a lot yesterday: Hickory burger and fries at Houston’s for lunch, Insalata Johnny Rocco — salad with shrimp and scallops — at Carrabba’s for dinner. But thanks for caring.

oldman

June 26th, 2009
6:08 am

Well, Rick Sund has made us all think. “Let’s go Hawks”. I’m curious about what comes next. The Hawks still have rights to Josh Childress and David Andersen (a big man playing in Europe). If Josh returns, we add another long lengthy defender with good energy. Looking at servicable undrafted big men…was Alade Aminu that bad? Here is a 6′10″ local guy that I think is athletic enough to play center and run with the team the Hawks are putting together. Sign Marvin, we keep forgetting, he’s just 23 years old. As the team has improved, so has his game.

Ryan

June 26th, 2009
6:13 am

Dust. . go away. If you think JOe JOhnson is the problem with the Hawks, then you should quit sports forever.

Bailer

June 26th, 2009
7:13 am

I wish I knew more aboutthis game so I could sound like I knew something, but after watching on TV I hope the hawks keep Flip

Ernest

June 26th, 2009
7:16 am

You mean you did not get the Hawaiian steak or Prime Rib for lunch at Houston’s Mark? I think you are slipping…..

It will be interesting to see what happens come July 1 when free agency begins. Sund has indicated in several interviews that this will be how the Hawks improve themselves, with a combination of resigning their own free agents and picking up others. One key thing that will need to be done is to expand the rotation from 8 to 9, with that person being another big man. This should help spread out the minutes enabling the team to be fresher heading into the playoffs. It also helps in case of injuries that another player has been getting ’sweat’ throughout the season.

Mark, you may want to do a blog on the free agents you think the Hawks should target. It will definitely get a LOT of posts.

El Bravo

June 26th, 2009
7:17 am

Mark, if Marvin is the top priority, what makes you think we would only tender him and let him walk a year later? Wouldn’t it make more sense to sign him long term? In this economy we stand to get a decent bargain on him. I imagine we can sign him for less years (say four) and a lot less money than Josh while offering him an opt out clasue after the second or third year. Wouldn’t that be the more logical move? The guy is only 23!

smartguy

June 26th, 2009
7:32 am

TRADE JOE JOHNSON

FIRE MIKE WOODSON

rainman

June 26th, 2009
7:40 am

I also believe that Marvin should be signed to a new contract. The Hawks are thin at 3 and MW seems to be finally coming around.

The Sting

June 26th, 2009
7:45 am

SIGN AND TRADE MARVIN FOR A BIG MAN. Were are okay at gaurd now. The solution is to get rid of Woodson. He lost control of the players on the team. JS does what he wants.

MightyQuinn

June 26th, 2009
8:01 am

At least they didn’t draft a 6′7″ wingman because he was the “best available athlete”!

MightyQuinn

June 26th, 2009
8:03 am

BTW, I see you posted this at 4:25 am. Is that when you finished writing this? If so, do you get shift differential pay?

lawton

June 26th, 2009
8:19 am

at first, i was excidted about the crawford pickup. check this out though, if the hawks lose bibby and have crawford tutor teague, how are the hawks BETTER ? in other words, bibby could score, the hawks problem is their half court offense, or lack thereof. woodson for whatever reason, cannot or will not develop a halfcourt post game for smith or horford. are the hawks just spinning their wheels by replacing one perimeter point guard with another because of woodson’s style of play in the halfcourt game?

Marcus

June 26th, 2009
8:20 am

I am leery about that 2nd round pick – what is the logic in the pick?
Is he young insurance for JJ being a FA next year?
Also, what is the scoop on him?

Manny

June 26th, 2009
8:27 am

Since we still didn’t acquire an athletic big man, “Yawn…”

We still have a big hole in the middle.

WPinAZ

June 26th, 2009
8:55 am

Teague is a great talent. But, here’s the rub. Mike Woodson is NOT a YOUNG point guard coach. He’s a VETERAN point guard coach. Check the record. Since he’s been the coach in Atlanta, he has had now 3 “pg’s of the future” (Salim Stoudamire, A C Law, Jeff Teague). Stoudamire and Law “didn’t pan out”, they say. Well….how can you if you get no run? Woodson does not develop point guards. His record indicates he has neither the patience, nor the inclination to do so. He is not interested in “teaching” the game to a young point. He preferes someone who can hit the ground running. Admittedly so, it does require a certain amount of patience to groom a young NBA pg. You have to be able (and WILLING??) to live with the mistakes and bad decisions on the court, which will surely come. But, that’s part of the process. You don’t become Magic Johnson, Isaiah Thomas, or John Stockton overnight. They had to learn the game also. But, they got to play thru all their rookie mistakes and LEARN from them. Case in point – Rajon Rondo. Does anyone believe if Rondo was with the Hawks, he would have blossomed as he has under Doc Rivers? Coming out of college, Rondo and Law were a toss up. Difference is, Rondo got a coach who honestly believed in him and stuck with him thru all the mistakes, all the turnovers, errors in judgment, etc….Law got Woodson, who proudly endorsed him publicly when drafted, then buried him on the bench. Law was allowed few to no mistakes, allowed to NEVER turn the ball over. He didn’t forget how to play coming out of Texas A&M. Niether did Stoudamire after leaving Arizona. Both were dominate college players from major conferences, as was Rondo. The diifference is Woodson. He will not tolerate the indescretions of youth at point guard. The Doc Rivers, the Byron Scotts, the Jerry Sloan’s of the world, they can. They DO. And now look where their young PG’s are now. And look what’s happened to the two we’ve had, and what I feel will happen to Teague as well. If Teague doesn’t develop in Atlanta, point the finger squarely at Mike Woodson. In the words of Bill Parcell’s: “you are what your record says you are”. Check Mike Woodson’s record with young point guards. Facts do not lie. Good luck to Jeff Teague. With Mike Woodson as his coach, he’s certainly going to need it.

Bravedawg

June 26th, 2009
8:58 am

Mark – here’s “the catch” on Crawford. He has a reputation as a “me-first” guy, plays zero defense, and his offensive numbers have been inflated by being either the ONLY talented guy on a team (i.e. Chicago a few years back) or playing on the most up-tempo offense in the NBA (Golden State). Oh, and also the fact that we gave up on Acie Law.

Which leads me to my next point – what would lead us to think that Jeff Teague will see the light of day? Past performance is the best indicator of the future, and Mike Woodson has already buried one 1st round pick PG on the bench in Acie Law, giving up on him in 2 years. And he was a lottery pick!! So what makes us think Woodson knows what the heck to do with Teague? Woodson does not “coach” this team. We win games on our athleticism alone. No one has improved substantially under Woodson. Horford was this good coming out of college. JJ was this good when he got here. Marvin has not turned out to be half the player anyone thought he’d be, and Josh Smith should be playing in the stratosphere with all of that athletic ability – instead, he’s a 2nd/3rd-tier NBA player.

So please, Mark, tell me why I should believe that Jeff Teague will do ANYTHING?

Greg

June 26th, 2009
9:04 am

Mark, I must admit they have made some good moves. My challenge with hawks is we lack aggression in our front office. These moves are safe, but safe don’t win championships. Orlando has 3 all star caliber player with VC in the fold, the Celtics has 3, Clevland with Shaq has 3, Washington with Arenas back has 3 and the added MMiller. The hawks have 1 all star player JJohnson. We are now probably the 6th best team in the east.

ant banks

June 26th, 2009
9:05 am

MARK BRADLEY,

what is the deal with Cenkyl? are the hawks ever goin’ to bring him over?

i still think that we are in a 4 way tie with the 4th seed: hawks, miami, chicago, philly. we have done absolutely nothin’ to compete with the big 3- clev, orlando, boston

Fixing the Hawks IS NOT THAT HARD!!

June 26th, 2009
9:05 am

Mark Bradley please offer your critique but fixing the Hawks is not that Hard, ALL Sund has to do is not offer Mike Bibby ANYTHING, please let him walk, he cant check or stay n front of ANYBODY, he cant create his own shot and he cant penetrate to break down a defense. Then just give Flip and Zaza whatever they want! I hate when teams let PROVEN players who fit the system leave, just so they can gamble on unproven players to come in and take their place, all for a few million dollars. (Example, new management of the Falcons, Michael Jenkins & Babineaux, great job of signing proven players that fit the system)

Lastly, please trade Josh Smith to save salary cap to be able to put an offer for Gortat! Look I love Josh Smith BUT he is not the right fit for the team. Al Hortford will be a very consisten and smart all star Power Forward for years to come. We are killing his offensive development by having him play out of position at the center spot. There is no way he will ever blossom playing against 7 footers. And Josh Smith cant play the 3 position because he CANT dribble!! I mean seriously, he cant dribble NOR can he shoot, try winning n the NBA with a small forward who cant do both.

Hedo Fan

June 26th, 2009
9:11 am

Like Neil, I was crushed when Lawson got picked by Minnesota one spot ahead of the Hawks. Lawson would have been perfect for this up-tempo, transition team. Not sure about Teague, but “explosive first step” seems to be the consistent review of his game. The trade of Vince Carter to the Magic means that Hedo Turkoglu is NOT going to re-sign with the Magic (not enough cash for Orlando). Rick Sund needs to let Bibby and Marvin go and use the $10-15M that those two would have required to sign Hedo. A starting lineup of Crawford/Teague, Joe, Hedo, Josh and Al will be good for 3rd place in the East (ahead of aging Boston). Hedo, Hedo, Hedo.

Paulie OldSchool

June 26th, 2009
9:11 am

Ditto to WPinAZ and props. Made every point I was thinking of while reading your column, MB. If Woody doesn’t play/coach/let Teague make mistakes (i.e., develop naturally), then they might as well have drafted me. I wish the young man good luck in Woody’s shed, I have a feeling he’s gonna be spending a lot of time there.

Volman

June 26th, 2009
9:12 am

Wonderful blog, Mr. Bradley! Keep up the Hawks blogs! Us dedicated fans REALLY appreciate it…and you know what you’re talking about! (for the most part–haha!)

I love the decision to get Teague. Hopefully Sund can resign Bibby as well as Zaza and give the QO to Marvin. Sign another veteran big, and boom! Contender!

mountain_jim

June 26th, 2009
9:13 am

I sent an email to customer service, but I will mention it here also. I have been trying to read Jeff Schultz blogs on these Hawks changes for last 24 hours the web pages don’t render properly with just the ad, title, and a closing javascript tag error with trailing : [endif]–>

I use IE 7 browser, and I know I am not only one with error as some folks mentioned it in other sports blogs.

Rufio

June 26th, 2009
9:20 am

mountain_jim im having the same problems with the Shultz blog’s

although yesterday when i got home from work where i have Mozilla Firefox i was able to view it. but IE at work is not getting it done.

jj

June 26th, 2009
9:20 am

I hope the Hawks do something with Childress.I would hope if they can’t sign him that they would seek Childress out and discuss which teams he would like to play for and trade him and get something for him before he becomes a free agent.I believe Sund has a plan and can’t wait to see it play out.We need a man in the middle along with my fav ZP.

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
9:26 am

The time shown above is indeed the time I finished writing. But I don’t know about shift-differential pay. Sounds scary to me.

And I would point out that Al Horford and Marvin Williams and Josh Smith came here as rookies under Mike Woodson. Didn’t they get to play? (It seemed, at least to me, more a case of this coach not liking Acie Law’s game than an overall abhorrence of young guys.)

ant banks

June 26th, 2009
9:27 am

WPINAZ,

in your comments about rondo and law, you have to look at their coaches. doc rivers was a point guard, so he knew to be patient with rondo. Woody was a 4/5, so he knew to be patient with horford, jsmoove, chills got major burn as rookies.

Dawg A

June 26th, 2009
9:28 am

One thing is for sure with the selection of Teague and that is he will continue to be “lightly coached”. And as far as being in “capable hands” I assume you mean Sund?

Hedo Fan

June 26th, 2009
9:32 am

Mark: Have you heard any mention of Hawks signing Hedo?? This is a no-brainer.

ant banks

June 26th, 2009
9:34 am

we have not done anything to close the gap between clev, orlando, or boston.

and we have done nothin’ to seperate ourselves from miami, chicago, philly, or indy. indy is goin’ to be hella betta this yr

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
9:35 am

Woody wasn’t a 4/5. He was a wing. And a good one.

And the only mention I’ve heard about Turkoglu is on these boards. I think the Hawks will look to keep two of their free agents before looking outside.

Jamaaliver

June 26th, 2009
9:42 am

HEDO FAN,

Picking up Turkoglu would have been a good idea in S&T or free agency, but with Crawford on board it would be overkill to pursue a third offensive wing player. Especially since Marvin averaged the same amount of points in the Regular Season for a fraction of the cost.

Hedo, JJ and Crawford is a dream lineup on NBA Live. But on the court they would be abused defensively and have trouble sharing the ball.

WPinAZ

June 26th, 2009
9:42 am

Agreed MB! But Horford-Williams-Smith are not POINT GUARDS.

ant banks

June 26th, 2009
9:44 am

sorry, mark.

the point that i was tryin’ to make was that with doc rivers bein’ a point, he knew what rondo was goin’ thru and how much leeway to give him. with woody never playin’ point, he did not know how much leeway to give.

ant banks

June 26th, 2009
9:48 am

i know that this is not the forum, but i wanted to offer condolensces to Farrah Fawcett and Michael Jackson’s families.

I LOVE FARRAH BACK IN THE DAY. oh my god!!!

And i loved mj. i had the jerry curl, wore black penny loafers, with white socks, and did the thriller dance with my classmates!!

rip mj and farrah

NC Braves Fan

June 26th, 2009
9:51 am

Thanks for the update Mark. It will be interesting to see how the FA season unfolds for the Hawks and what the organization may have in store.

At a minumum, it seems like they’ve given themselves some options and flexibility, which is a lot better than where they stood heading into last July.

O'Brien

June 26th, 2009
9:54 am

Whether or not Teague gets some PT depends on who is ahead of him. One reason why Acie didnt play much (and I’m a big Acie fan) is because you had Bibby and Flip ahead of him on the depth chart (although Woody could have found time for him).

Also, there were a couple times when Acie could have got some PT, but unfortunately, he wasnt healthy. (I hope he plays well in GS).

I dont think the Hawks will sign both Flip and Bibby, so that increases the chances that Teague gets a few minutes, but it depends on the depth in front of him.

Mark,

Would you prefer Bibby or Jarret Jack or Ramon Sessions (Jack and Sessions are restricted FA).

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
9:56 am

Mike Woodson doesn’t have a problem playing young players. He has a problem playing young guards, but watching the highlights of Teague he could serve as a more athletic Mike Bibby.

Mark,
Your disdain for Marvin is unbelievable. I think Marvin is just as important as Al Horford and Josh Smith. If we can keep these three young guys on long deals then we would have a ridiculous nucleus of young talent. And we could swap and switch and draft to fill the other positions. And is Jeff Teague pans out then it would be a four team nucleus. Now that is staple that can keep your team in the playoffs for a very long time.

Barack Yo Mama

June 26th, 2009
10:04 am

Jeff Teague was a good choice. Oh, also like the Crawford trade, too. And that Sergey Gladyr kid, don’t know much about him but he can knock down the 3 ball.

Jamaaliver

June 26th, 2009
10:08 am

Might Crawford and JJ combine at SG and SF the way Sprewell and A. Houston once did for the Knicks? A thunder and lightning combo who, with Smoove, are unstoppable in transition.

We move Marvin to the bench and have a pretty potent 2nd unit with Teague, Marvin, Mo and Zaza.

sidslid

June 26th, 2009
10:10 am

Teague was the dominant player in the first half of the season in the ACC and then the whole team fell flat. He is a slasher more than shooter, which should help our bigs get open.

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
10:15 am

I’d prefer Sessions to Jack, but I like both.

Pardon me if I’m hallucinating, but didn’t the Hawks just beat the Heat in a Game 7 in which Marvin Williams didn’t play? He isn’t as important as Josh Smith and Al Horford. I’m sorry, but he just isn’t.

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
10:16 am

Truth to tell, I’ve warmed to Jamaaliver’s notion over time: Marvin would be optimized as a sixth man, where he’d get more shots with the second unit.

Tech sucks

June 26th, 2009
10:20 am

WPinAZ – Your PG argument doesn’t work. Salim and Acie are not point guards. They are little 2 guards. Huge difference.

nola hawk fan

June 26th, 2009
10:21 am

Nice work as usual MB.

Agree w/ your point that this draft allowed them to address one of their 2 needs. But I still contend we need BIGs more than guards. If Al was allowed to play his true position, imagine how good he could be. Remember all those offensive rebounds the Cavs had? The hawks need a energy, athletic big (see Verajo, Perkins, etc…)

Any Zaza leaves, anybody know any F.A. “The Rick” will go after?

Jfreak

June 26th, 2009
10:21 am

So far so good for this offseason, but let’s not get too far ahead of ourselves. Remember, Cavs just got Shaq and Orlando just got Carter which I think makes both teams that much better. Also, let’s not forget that the Hawks will have am much harder schedule next season as well.

I’m not concerned about the Hawks winning 50 games. I want to see the Hawks advance further in the playoffs. I know the more games you win the better position you are in the playoffs but I bet the Cavs would have traded a few of their regular season wins for a few more playoff wins??

We need Bibby and or Murray for sure. Too much to ask of a 19th selected rookie to run an offense and Crawford is not a pure point guard. We also need help up front. Horford can’t do it alone! I would like to see maybe a trade of Williams for some inside help if we can get equal value? Williams has in my opinion a huge upside. He really played well last year so giving up his stats would difficult to overcome. Overall, the Hawks are improved and that’s a reflection on the GM. Nice Job!

Tech sucks

June 26th, 2009
10:21 am

Just FYI Lavin said Teague will end up being the best PG taken in this draft.

jeffrey d

June 26th, 2009
10:28 am

Mark – in a blog discussion you said that Law didn’t have a chance to do well under Woodson (or something similar). What’s going to keep the same thing from happening with Teague? Do you think Teague has a chance to be better than Acie?

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
10:32 am

I don’t know what’s going to keep it from recurring, Jeffrey, except that Teague might not get as down on himself as Acie did. (Teague’s pretty confident, but Acie was, too — before he got here. And Acie was the 11th pick overall in 2007, as opposed to the 19th in 2009.)

And thanks, Nola. I haven’t heard any names yet, other than the usual speculation on here — Gortat, Camby, McDyess, Big Z. I wouldn’t mind seeing Anderson Varejao here as a backup, but I don’t think that’s what Varejao has in mind.

Thomas P.

June 26th, 2009
10:33 am

Jeff Teague will be a complete bust. He lacks the ball handling skills and an understanding of the fundamentals to be effective in the NBA. All in all, looks like another whiff for the Hawks in the draft.

mountain_jim

June 26th, 2009
10:36 am

Still hoping for a Jack signing and let no-D Bibby walk.

casey

June 26th, 2009
10:36 am

Sorry for the noob question, but what determines if a player is a restricted or unrestricted free agent?

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
10:43 am

The Hawks played horrible outside of Games 1 and Games 7, and if you want to go off playoff performances then Joe Johnson should be gone and Josh Smith the dubbed the King. Based off of the playoffs there is no way in the world Al Horford makes it in the league as a center. And based off of the teams pass behavior Marvin was injured so he automatically gets a pass.
And I know you don’t believe this, but I am pretty sure Mike Woodson without specifically stating said having his players healthy (Marvin Williams, Al Horford) would have actually won some games against Cleveland.

I just hope that Acie doesn’t make us look bad for Jamal Crawford trade man that would be horrible, right?

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
10:45 am

Has Woody made any promises towards giving Teague minutes?

Ryder

June 26th, 2009
10:46 am

I think the Hawks aren’t done tweaking the roster yet. Bibby is obviously a goner, and in this draft it was difficult to find that big man inside that would immediately help the Hawks. Atlanta still has to absolutely bring back Zaza and obtain some help like Villanueva or Gooden to come off the bench. As for Marvin, if he signs a major offer sheet elsewhere, let him go. He’s not worth a max contract deal IMO and has yet to prove he can be the aggressive offensive force.

All I'm Saying Is...

June 26th, 2009
10:49 am

Bradley you have drunk the kool-aid and obviously are convinced that the Hawks don’t need a more sizable center.

I hope I’m wrong but Al Horford cannot match up with any of the centers for the top eight NBA playoff teams—and never will unless we become a run and gun team which still won’t suffice as you have to have a half-court game in the playoffs. I love Al but he cannot go toe-to-toe with the elite teams and their centers: LA-Bynum, Denver-Nene, Spurs-Duncan/Bonner, Orlando-Howard, Cavs-Shaq & Ilgauskas and Boston-Perkins or even with the playoff teams and their centers: Mavs-Dampier (with BJ Mullens as his successor in training), Rockets-Yao, New Orleans-Tyson Chandler, and 76ers-Dalembert with the exception of the Miami Heat-Magloire/O’Neal (which isn’t saying much and only further serves to illustrate my point—we won’t breakthrough without a center who can D-up versus the big burly guys (Perkins, Shaq/Ilgauskas) and prevent teams from driving down the lane at will (like D-Wade did and LeBron) or be a consistent scoring threat versus the other guys making them work on both ends of the floor (Howard, Bynum).

Mullens may not have been the answer but we need more than Al and ZaZa. I say trade Marvin and get Tyson Chandler. Have you any thoughts, Bradley?

PD

June 26th, 2009
10:50 am

Casey Restricted are usually players in the 3rd year of their rookie contracts. It is a provision added to their contracts to prevent them from bolting to another team and leaving the drafting team empty-handed. They can test the free agent market and sign an offer which the drafting would have 7-days to match.

van

June 26th, 2009
10:51 am

Granted Mike Bibby and Flip should’ve been ahead of him on the depth chart. But, there’s no way he should’ve been behind Tyronn Lue and Anthony Johnson before the Bibby trade.

Did anyone see when they flashed the graphic with his 3.5 assists that led the team? I literally laughed at that. My laughter turned to madness when I looked up his other stats and saw 3.4 turnovers. We may as well let Josh Smith play point forward.

Scott

June 26th, 2009
10:53 am

Sorry Mark, I have watched the Hawks for 25 years and was as disappointed as I have ever been with this draft. Teague is not a true point. He seems to be able to handle the ball, but he has lacks inspiration on the defensive side of the ball and is not a pass-first point guard. I feel they should have traded up to get one of the true PGs that went earlier or taken Ohio St. center BJ Mullens. Sund says he likes guys that can shoot, but he passed on Miami guard Jack McClinton in the second round as well as St. Mary’s PG Patrick Mills. Mills isn’t as good from the 3 as Teague, but Sund could have shored up the post in the 1st round knowing there were still plenty of quality guards in this draft.

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
10:53 am

Flip’s arrival took minutes from Acie, absolutely. You can’t really play three point guards, and Flip was usually the lead guard on the second unit.

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
10:54 am

I’ll say it again: I’d prefer Horford/Josh at 5/4 to Chandler/Horford.

Chris

June 26th, 2009
10:55 am

Mark, Is the plan for Gladyr to be on the Hawks roster next season, or will he be in Europe for a few more years, any idea?

As much as I like Mike Bibby as a scoring threat, he really isn’t much more of a point guard than Crawford is. I remember last year seeing Flip or Joe taking the ball up the court more often than Bibby it seemed. At this point I don’t see a burning desire to keep either of them given we have added a scoring combo guard. I will say I think Flip Murray was the MVP of the Hawks last season an have much love for the guy. I’d like to see us find one more quality bench shooter and lock up ZaZa and Marvin. Unfortunately, there’s not much we can do to catch the Cavs or Magic this season.

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
11:02 am

I’m thinking he’ll be in Europe next season, Chris, though I haven’t heard for sure.

nola hawk fan

June 26th, 2009
11:09 am

shockingly agree w/ you on most things mark, but not on Al/Josh vs Chandler/Al.
Living down here in NOLA and watching the Hornets on cable some, when Tyson is right, he is what I think the hawks REALLY need as far as D and rebounding. We don’t need bigtime scoring on the post (Al, praying Josh will do that). We need what a Verajo, Chandler would bring.

Hamad Meander

June 26th, 2009
11:12 am

Looks like the Hawks are finally coming around on the idea that having someone capable of handling the ball is more important than going 4 deep at the forward position. However, I question the seeming lack of enthusiam for resigning Mike Bibby. Since Bibby came on board, the on-the-court chemistry of the team has been so much more positive. That being said, players move around a lot in the NBA, so it’s good to have a rookie PG ready to go in case you lose your starter.

I haven’t read where the Hawks stand with ZaZa, but I think having him and Horford up top with good talent at the 1 & 2 position allows them to play a lot of different looks with the forwards.

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
11:14 am

If we trade Marvin who is going to guard the teams best perimeter players?
Mo Evans can’t.
Joe Johnson can, but he is only getting older and caring the scoring burden and the defense burden burns him out by mid season.
We said Jamal Crawford can’t play defense not that he has every played for a defensive minded coach.
Josh Smith can’t play defense on perimeter players and why should he have to he is a power forward.
Jeff Teague is to small.

So in a conference with Lebron James, Paul Pierce, Andre Iguadalo, Danny Granger,
And with a division of Dwayne Wade, and gasp the hawks killer vince carter who do we get to guard those guys?

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
11:18 am

Joe’s not a bad defender.

And I have to say Vince Carter doesn’t impress me anymore. He’s just a guy.

Matty Ice-man

June 26th, 2009
11:21 am

Mark, what was your thought of what Kahn did for the Timberwolves? very odd taking two point guards at #6 & #7 and the GM says his intent is on keeping both. From reports, Rubio is very unhappy with Minnesota right now – if he walks and stays in Spain then Kahn/Minnesota look like idiots…..

truhawkfangababy

June 26th, 2009
11:23 am

Teague will work out let’s keep flip and try a sign and trade with bibby but who really needs a pg after this draft.and the obvious of all is js or woody somebody has to pack it up it ain’t gonna work.js for a dominate big sounds good to me.if u haven’t heard amare wants out of d desert

Johnny Hazeltine

June 26th, 2009
11:28 am

There’s no way we can let Bibby walk after drafting a 6′1″ shooting guard.

Volman

June 26th, 2009
11:33 am

Carter doesn’t impress you? I remember him BY HIMSELF beating the Hawks twice (buzzer beater and going off from the 3 point line in Atlanta)

I don’t think he’s the missing piece for Orlando..I like Turkoglu SO MUCH MORE than Carter, but hey… When you’re that close you’re going to reach for whatever you can get (see the Cavs—with Shaq “I’m still in the league” O’neal

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
11:34 am

What’s the difference between Amare and Josh?

Sounder offensive game and a little girth. I think I would keep Josh at this point if that trade presented itself.

However if the clippers said Josh Smith for Chris Kaman and one/some first round picks I might have to say yes. might. If i was keeping Woodson.

If woodson is gone then I probably don’t trade Josh.

“Joe Johnson can.”- realsquawk 11:14 a.m.

Mark,
what’s going on with the Timberwolves. Flynn and Rubio?

AB

June 26th, 2009
11:41 am

Mark Bradley,

With Horford staying at C, is there a chance J-Smoove moves back to SF and the Hawks get a scoring PF down low.

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
11:53 am

Volman,

I am pretty sure Mark was occupied during those games. It wasn’t the playoffs, it wasn’t Lebron, Kobe, Wade, or Howard so why should he care.

Can the magic still sign Hedo?

Nelson, Carter, Hedo Lewis, Dwight? Peitrus now that is line up.

Speaking of line up

Teague/Bibby, Joe, Marvin, Josh, Al? Crawford, Mo, Josh, Zaza. With enough defense and running you could see them in the finals.

Right by the way Everyone is saying bye Bibby, but i think it might be bye flip. I think.

AB

June 26th, 2009
11:53 am

Johnny Hazeltine,

Actually Johnny, Teague is a 6′2 PG, not a 6′1 SG.

brokenarrow

June 26th, 2009
11:56 am

Bravedawg – Who has said Crawford was a me-first player ? certainly not his coaches or teammates.Hes always been considered one of the best lockeroom guys and one of the most coachable players ? The beef with the Warriors was not about his attitude or play it was about Nelson feeling Crawford and Ellis playing the same position and there not being enough minutes to go around .

Do you believe Kevin Durants numbers are inflated by being the only option on a horrible team ? I hate to break it to you you dont get to average 20 points in the nba unless you can play . There is no type of number inflater that gets you 20 and 5 for a season on a bad team simply because when teams lock onto you defensively you are either sink or swim quite fast.

He didnt average those numbers on chicago but on the knicks who didnt play uptempo in 20007-08 now that was a team in disarray because of Marbury and Isiah thomas . But here is the real catch Crawford averaged 20 and 5 on that knicks team but the very next season under a very good coach in Mike D’antoni he was averaging nearly the same thing but with better shooting percentages . That tells me that in a stable enviornment Crawford can be a real asset and his numbers are not as hollow as they may look.

Volman

June 26th, 2009
12:01 pm

Realsquawk, I know what you’re saying. The media comes out when the “big dogs” come to play. I wouldn’t expect Bradley or Schultz to know that Carter torched the Hawks twice this year. I mean, he was on the NETS….the NETS.

We do have to give Bradley some credit for the effort he has put forth towards the Hawks as of late. (He must be realizing that this actually IS a pretty good team) ;)

The Truth

June 26th, 2009
12:05 pm

Since I have been one of Mr. Sund worst critics, I most say I am pleased with his performance (so far) and will give am a one-thumb up at this point. It’s ironic; it was on a previous Mark Blog that I recommended pursuing Crawford when he was stuck in Nellie’s dog house. It was beyond my wildest dreams that Sund was able to acquire a prolific scorer for so little. The Teague pick was nice and as expected. The one-thumb up is to suggest that Sund’s work is far from over. I will caution Sund to pay attention to Defense. As much as I like Crawford and what he brings to the Hawks, we are very weak on the defense side of the ball. As it was also last year, Marvin William is the wild-card of this team. He brings balance to our tweener frontline with his rebounding ability and his style of play is a nice compliment to our mix of players. We don’t need all scorers; somebody has to do the dirty work like a junk-yard dog. Marvin can bring such intangibles not to mention his 3-pt threat. We have fallen in love with Chill, because he also brought complimentary intangibles that the Hawks needed. We all know that offense sells tickets but defense (and rebounding) wins games. Yes we celebrate the addition of Crawford and Teague, but we don’t want to be the team that scores 150 points and lose by 19. This suggests that we cannot just stack the team with ball hogging offense minded players. WE MUST HAVE A BALANCE TO WIN!! It has been mentioned that we should pursue Hedo. I disagree. Yes he brings mismatches and offense but he plays no defense; Orlando loss the series because of defense not offense, plain and simple. If we had a lineup of Bibby, Hedo Crawford, Josh and Al, it would be a recipe for disaster on the defense side of the ball. In a nutshell, WE MUST THINK OF TEAM CHEMISTRY WHEN WE START ADDING PLAYERS. Mr. Sund, you will earn my other thumb-up if you get this done.

AB

June 26th, 2009
12:05 pm

Acie Law always looked to me he could play SG too. I wonder if Don Nelson would let him play some SG? Mike Woodson was too dumb to think about that.

Nuff Said

June 26th, 2009
12:12 pm

MB. Good read but let’s be real here. We have another year with Woody and that stinks. Let’s hope he does not damage the confidence of another good player like Teague.

We need to sign and trade Marvin, sign Flip and ZP and let Bibby go. Go after Gortat or some big man to help in the paint. It is obvious that Woody can not develop young players. He is sad.

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
12:17 pm

Volman,

you are absolutely correct man. And I do appreciate Bradley and his efforts to update us on everything Hawk related recently. Even though I have never said that publicly.

Mark Bradley,

The only reason I am on this blog is because I read your statements enjoy them and then decide to comment. You have a great perspective. I appreciate that perspective. Even though we disagree about Marvin, many of your other comments and statements I agree with completely or at least understand.

So here is to Mark Bradley and his great blogs and articles and insights and responsiveness to blogs.

Go Hawks! go Bradley!

I hope everyone on this blog is subscribed to the AJC newspaper.

Volman

June 26th, 2009
12:24 pm

Realsquawk, do I see you on the Hawksquawk site? I think I remember seeing you from there. I rarely post on there, but I’m a regular on there reading posts. I’m “Volman” on there.

Nookah

June 26th, 2009
12:30 pm

I agree with the sentiments being expressed on this blog. Teague may be an excellent prospect with loads of potential. However, I have a few questions:

1) Will he be allowed to develop or more appropriately do we have the personnel in place to help with his development? If not who will be his mentor? Crawford?
2) Does he have the work ethic to improve his own game? How hungry is he?
3) Is there any corelation between the dramatic end of season collapse of The Deamon Deacons last year and Teague’s leadership? Was it an abberation? After all he was the “General” of that team.
4) So we now have Crawford, Teague and may re-sign Bibby. Based on their tendencies they all play very poor defense……can Woody change their mindset or is it what it is? I guess the philosophy will then have to be if you score 100 we’ll score 101 somewhat like Brazilian Soccer philosphy in the 80’s.

I will agree that we upgraded on the offensive end but I am a little concerned with our defense. That is why we have to re-sign Marvin and get some interior presence. With the re-loading (pun intended) of the Cavs with Shaq, Perkins in Boston, Dwight in Orlando and even Jermaine Oneal from Miami, we need some serious help on the inside. Horford will not be able to handle the centre position effectively against bigger, stronger opposition. I also hope he is working on his offensive game because quite simply it sucks.

I am waiting anxiously to see what we do in FAgency. I hope we get an enforcer with a fair amount of offense. ‘Sheed would be nice but he may want too much money. Drew Gooden or Verajao may be decent additions. Verajao shoots 50% from the field and averages about 7 RPG with 2+ being offensive. He needs to improve his FT %age however, but he adds energy and will be lively on the boards.

Mr. Sund, you have a pretty decent job so far but one thing I would ask you to explore before this offseason is over….Please try to get Chills back, please!!! Now with Chills and the other pending FA’s who we will sign, that would make us a very very dangerous team.

Go Hawks everytime!!!

Hedo Fan

June 26th, 2009
12:34 pm

The Truth: Hedo is not a bad defender (see swat of Kobe in finals) and his offense/size/versatility far outweigh whatever perceived defensive weakness there may be. Josh, Al and Joe can defend … what we need most is someone to take the heat off Joe on the offensive side of the ball, so we don’t stand around watching Joe try to go 1-on-1 with 8 seconds left on the shot clock. With Hedo, Jamal and Joe, we’ve got 3 great shooters (just like Orlando had in the playoffs) and that will force Josh to go to the post where he belongs. With Joe and Al on the blocks and 3 shooters, we can play with anyone.

tohellwithgeorgia

June 26th, 2009
12:38 pm

trade joe for a big man. go out there and get ben gordon if he’s available. problem solved. and maybe marvin for caron butler. and now we present the nba champions THE ATLANTA HAWKS

GM

June 26th, 2009
12:47 pm

Zaza is a beast on the glass and must be resigned. We already have a hole in the paint with him on the team, so you can only image how things would be without him. If we were competing for the high jump competition, I would be opposed to trading J.Smith, but we’re not, so if we could get a solid big man for him, we should. His heart and low Basketball IQ is a dangerous combination. I can’t count how many times he’s turned the ball over bringing the ball up the court where he has two guards alongside him with open arms. Not mention the long ball airballs, and the fact that he doesn’t play hard and is easily shaken on the court off of one or two misses. The reason why Horford is so good is because he knows what he can and can’t do and he has a high Basketball IQ. Those are the type of players I would like to see this franchise built around. Marvin has developed more than anyone on the team in spite of the comparisons to CP3 and Deron, and he just added a deadly 3 to his game so I think it’s a priority to resign him. I would like to see Flip resigned, but I don’t mind if Bibby goes. They both have no conscience which is great, but if Bibby wants what I expect him to want, he’s not worth the money. Do you know what the status of JChills is? Bringing him back would be a huge step in the right direction with a more scrappy, hustling, defensive minded team, because that’s what this team lacks. Crawford was a huge pick up and as much as I’m upset to see Law go, we came out on top in that trade, and I’m glad they were able to dump an overpaid, injury-prone Claxton. And as for my comments about Smith, I like the guy and he has a ton of potential which only adds to his trade value. But he’s also overpaid, and I don’t believe he will live up to his potential, which is why I woudn’t mind letting him go. Plus, I always found it odd that he is one of the few players who doesn’t get along with Woody, and since Woody’s record as head coach has improved, I don’t think Woody is going anywhere. It would also clear up some cap space to make an attempt to resign JJ next year. I still believe this team should be built around him, as he is our best all around player. What is the likeliness of a sign and trade with Mike Bibby? Would anyone be interested, and would his value be high enough to get a solid big man?

GM

June 26th, 2009
12:59 pm

Also, does anyone believe the pick up of Crawford is more of a future replacement of JJ when he becomes a free agent next year than it is a move to upgrade our backcourt or bench?

The Truth

June 26th, 2009
1:03 pm

Hedo Fan
I see where you are coming from about Hedo. I will tone down my criticism of Hedo somewhat because I do also like his offense game. But it is clear to me that Orlando loss the series because of defense not offense. Yes Hedo made a nice defense play against Kobe but he had numerous defense lapses at critical times that negated his fine offense performance. My bone I am picking is more about our team chemistry then Hedo offense game. Somebody has to do the intangible things more than AL. Josh is proving not to be interested in rebounding but scoring and occasional blocking shots. Al can’t carry the rebounding load by himself. I just think from a chemistry prospective, Marvin is a better fit. No disrespect to Hedo.

pete

June 26th, 2009
1:09 pm

Mark,

What do you mean Sund started badly by letting Childress go to Greece? They picked up Murray and Evans for less money than Childress wanted. Don’t you think they were a better team with Murray and Evans than they would have been with Childress? Sund clearly made the right decision by not paying Childress the money he wanted.

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
1:09 pm

Volman,

I won’t lie. I registered for the site and have probably been on there once or twice, but I have found it to be really confusing to use at times so I don’t really go there often.

Joe Johnson, Mike Bibby, Flip Murray, Jamal Crawford, Jeff Teague, Josh Childress
Marvin Williams, Mo Evans
Al Horford, Josh Smith Zaza Pachulia, David Anderson

that right there ladies and gentleman is a championship contending team and a 12 man rotation where everyone deserves at least ten minutes.

That roster is financially impossible, but not really if the pockets of our owners were really really deep it would be possible, but financially irresponsible.

that list is organized in player positions Guard, forwards, and big forward/centers. The guards can’t be forwards and such.

Organize as you like it, but I believe those are the most feasible players for pick up. We have relationships or rights with all of those players.

Unlike in the past we have a playoff team which means we could attract more free agents than usual.

all this is all so random.

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
1:14 pm

Thanks, RealSquawk.

I think the Hawks — I know, actually — the Hawks prefer Horfy and Josh to stay where they are, at 5 and 4.

And I was surprised by Minnesota. But Minnesota often has that effect on me.

niremetal

June 26th, 2009
1:15 pm

RealSquawk,

Bradley always seems to pay attention to the Hawks on draft nights, at the beginning of the season, and during the playoffs. My problem – and please, Bradley, correct me if I’m wrong – is that he doesn’t seem to pay much attention to them during the 82 games that comprise the regular season. It’s tough to take a guy’s impression of Marvin Williams seriously when he only watched him during the playoffs, when he was playing through two injuries. It also makes it tough to take his impression of Josh vs. Joe seriously for the same reason.

So Mark, if you’ll admit that you’re basing your impressions of the Hawks almost entirely on the playoffs – when Marvin, Joe, and Al were all playing through injuries – then I’ll shut up about this. But don’t talk like you watched the Hawks all year if you haven’t. It’s insulting to those of us who spend significant amounts of money to watch every game we can.

hawks & thrash

June 26th, 2009
1:18 pm

so how is the lineup looking to form next year now the the guards?
are we looking at: C Horford
PF Smith
SF Johnson
SG Crawford
PG Bibby/Teague depending on bibby being resigned

it looks good to me but i think we have a bit of a guard logjam where none of them can afford to miss time.

MannyT

June 26th, 2009
1:30 pm

It’s easy to say that Marvin is just a guy, but you need someone of that size to defend the LeBrons, Pierces, Turkoglus at the SF. Until you come up with someone else to do it, you need Marvin. The bonus is that he scores enough that those guys cannot rest all the time on defense.

Show me the just a guy to replace him for less and I’ll back off.

Chills was too sleight to defend the more physical guys. Mo and Mario are too short to do it on a regular basis. If Josh does it, then you need someone that can guard a PF in spurts or you play him at the SF full time and you need a Eurocenter with a jump shot to help with the perimeter offense.

I think too many folks are stuck on that #2 pick thing. Last I recall, players get selected in the draft, they don’t do the choosing.

BWAF

jarvis

June 26th, 2009
1:42 pm

J. Chil wasn’t an error in retrospect. Good thing we didn’t get into the mix with the kind of dough the Greeks were throwing around. It will be intresting to see if he stays over there or if he comes back to the NBA next season.
Having burning flares tossed into his huddle might lead Josh to consider things other than just the green in a return to the League.

niremetal

June 26th, 2009
1:47 pm

Co-sign MannyT.

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
1:49 pm

niremetal,

That may be the case. He isn’t the Hawks beat writer. He does however give an opinion that creates a vivid discussion about the Hawks. We might not always agree with what he says, but at least he is saying something and responding to us from time to time to defend his view. That’s all we can really ask from someone who isn’t the beat writer.

Hawks and Thrash,
Joe Johnson cannot play the three anymore.

MannyT,

I completely agree. (say it fast it rhymes:)

Jarvis,
Josh Childress wasn’t a mistake our general approach to that whole offseason was the problem, but you cannot blame it on Sund completely. He was just getting here if anything the ASG and Woody should have stepped in and said we will handle it. SEE the problem was the wait and get offers instead of lets work on a deal actively while we see what you bring in. Because of our reactionary approach Smith is signed to a relatively cheap contract based on his free agent class, but probably the most difficult to deal with because of extra clauses that require compensation upon trading. Had we just signed him to what grizzlies without the clauses then we might be sitting here with Rubio and Kaman and another first round pick or something like that. Childress felt disrespected by the lack of “we will come to an agreement approach” instead he was met with here are the rules and see if you can change them. Sund forgot Childress went to Stanford I guess and Chillz changed the rules.

Trey J

June 26th, 2009
1:49 pm

RIP Michael Jackson!
Gone to soon……
Now the Hawks they did exactly what they had to do.
No need to get mad at them this time. They also picked up a true scorer in Crawford and God knows we needed help when JJ got triple teamed. Sund get’s the benefit of the doubt from me and so far the dude ain’t made no big mistakes.
Go Hawks!!!

jarvis

June 26th, 2009
2:02 pm

Squawk – Don’t get me wrong, I have no problem with what Childress did; more power to him. I just think it will be interesting to see if he leaves all the rest of that money on the table to come back to the NBA. Things got a hectic to say the least with the Olympiacos.
I doubt he sticks around for that insanity.

jarvis

June 26th, 2009
2:06 pm

J. Chill:

“This did not help (our) team at all … the moment you play and you have found a rhythm, you cannot stop because (of violence) in the stands,” said Childress. “The violence we saw today, will make me think real hard over my future in Europe.”

KG

June 26th, 2009
2:44 pm

I have to disagree with Manny T. Chills is hands down a better defender than Marvin. Last season was the first time Marvin elevated himself from being a defensive liability. Do you remember the Boston series? Chills did a much more better job on Paul Pierce than Marvin. Marvin barely managed to get any minutes in the 4th quarter because Woody knew that Chills was the better option.

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
2:50 pm

Jarvis,
we are on the same page as far as that goes.
he rescinded that comment or said the opposite a couple of days later though, but I think that might have been just to protect his stock when returning to the NBA.

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
2:57 pm

KG,

That is very true, but like you said he elevated his defense he tapped into that potential and became a pretty good defender. So it would be pretty nice to have two excellent defenders who have a sense of an offensive game. ( that combination alone is rare. Ron Artest, Scottie Pippen) Just think about the how Shane Battier, Raja Bell, and Bruce Bowen were so treasured. We would have two of those guys with a better offensive game if we brought them back. (Marvin and Chillz).

BosnianBaller

June 26th, 2009
3:28 pm

I think the Hawks will have a better team than the Magic next year.Primarily because Hedo is gone and Carter is in.Hedo was the pulse of that team he makes everything go.Carter is a ball hog.I hope Hawks go out and sign Hedo and let Marvin go if possible.HAWKS are WINNING THE DIVISION

niremetal

June 26th, 2009
3:32 pm

We can’t sign Hedo, folks. There’s this little thing called “the salary cap” that prevents us from doing so.

BosnianBaller

June 26th, 2009
3:35 pm

We could of gotten him for 3 yrs 10 mill if we didn’t get crawford

MannyT

June 26th, 2009
3:48 pm

KG,

The fact I live with right now is that Chills isn’t available. That might change, but the decision is in his hands. I like Chills game, but he did zero for the Hawks in the 2008-09 season. Nevertheless, he is still too sleight to guard Lebron. By the time he returns (if he does) Pierce might be too old to worry about. Hopefully, Turkoglu heads to the Western conference.

That still leaves guys like Caron Butler, Gerald Wallace,Thad Young, etc. that I prefer that Joe not have to chase around most of the game at the SF. I don’t see smaller guys doing an effective job of it.

Finally, Marvin’s defense improved this past year. He’s not a stopper, but he is disruptive. He also made the 2nd most FT on the team even though he played 61 games.

That’s my take, but I understand some have different views.

BWAF

The Truth

June 26th, 2009
3:51 pm

One comment about Flip; Some on these blogs have suggested that since we have Crawford, we don’t need Flip. I disagree. Flip is a game changer and that is rare in the NBA. How many times have Flip come into a game and lifted the confidence of the team to victory? The suggestion the Flip is a ball-hog is unfair. Flip is a vet and has a high IQ for the game. Flip goes off offensively based on the lineup and timing. He gets a green light from Woody to do so. When JJ and Flip are both in the lineup; Flip plays an entirely different game. He can be a playmaker as well (although he does need to work on that part of his game more). If Flip can play with JJ, then Flip can also play with Crawford since JJ and Crawford have a similar ISO game. From an offensive prospective, can you imagine the scoring threat of having JJ, Crawford and Flip on the floor at the same time? You pick your poison. I’m sorry but Flip is a keeper. As a UFA, I know Flip wants to get paid and that is expected, but Flip also knows that his situation with the Hawks is unique. Very few NBA teams will allow him to play at his style and he knows it.

Volman

June 26th, 2009
4:02 pm

The Truth, +1. Amen to everything you said.

Wabe

June 26th, 2009
4:03 pm

I disagree with you about Maynord Bradley. Teague is a much more explosive gaurd that can shoot it and penetrate the lane. His vision may not be as good as Maynords, who in my opinon is much closer to Acie Law than Teague. But really, we said that we need someone to take some pressure off of JJ. And who knows, if this kid as good with the ball in his hand as advertised, then that should (along witht the addition of Crawford) take some of the scoring pressure off of JJ’s shoulders..

Honestly, I’m a bit happy that Lawson didn’t fall to us, because we need a PG that’s capable of playing within the halfcourt. Lawson is great and would’ve really complemented a team that loves to run, but that’s not something that TEAGUE is not capable of doing. He may not be as quick as Lawson getting from one end of the court to the other, but he loves to push it – so I’m assuming we’ll still be seeing those rim-rackers from Smoove and company. Personally, I see Lawson as being like a PG that also came out of UNC a few years back – RAYMOND FELTON. They both possess amazing speed and love to push. But, I see Teague a better option than Lawson in the halfcourt – where the Hawks struggled mightily this past season.

Now it all depends on whether Woody can actually handle the task of GROOMING A YOUNGSTER. We got some vets around the kid to make it a bit easier for him. I honestly think you throw him in there immediately. Look at guys like Mario Chalmers in Miami, who started the point for Miami this past season as a rookie. He got his share of action this past season on a much less talented team. I think Teague has the talent around him to assert himself pretty well into the offense.

One more note, IF WOODY SHOWS ANY SIGN OF SCREWING THIS PICK UP BY NOT GIVING HIM THE P.T. OR COACHING HIM UP – FIRE HIM. POINT BLANK.

MannyT

June 26th, 2009
4:03 pm

Truth,

I think we should offer Flip a contract, with a player option for yr 2. That job security might work for him. The messy part is that we don’t have Bird rights on him because he has only been here 1 season. So whatever you pay him comes from our MLE allocation. That means less money to sign a big man.

Don’t know if Flip would take the biannual exception. It would only offer him a small raise.

Things get real tricky with Bibby. Probably over the number of years as much as the money. If I am Bibby, I see this as my last good contract, so I’d want 4 or 5 years. I cannot see us offering him a long term deal.

By the end of this summer some of the 2008-09 Hawks that move on might blame you for their situation…because the truth hurts ;-)

BWAF

'Nique be da man

June 26th, 2009
4:04 pm

Jamal Crawford is pumped to come to ATL. Funny to think of someone going to the hawks to try and make their first career playoff appearance.

http://nba.fanhouse.com/2009/06/26/jamal-crawford-excited-about-atlanta/

Wabe

June 26th, 2009
4:06 pm

I also agree Truth.

I don’t know why these people see Crawford as an UPGRADE over FLIP. You keep FLIP and it’s an UPGRADE for the team. It adds depth to the bench, and gives you another scoring option in case some of the other guys are having an off night.

Volman

June 26th, 2009
4:08 pm

I love it Manny, but are you saying the Hawks need somebody to run around and worry about defense so people like Joe can put all of their focus on scoring? Hopefully having someone like Crawford (and maybe Teague to an extent if he can shine this first year) will let Joe be able to do some other things than chuck up a lot of shots, do the Iso-Joe, and play 40+ minutes every night.

Boy that would be nice.

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
4:09 pm

I’ll say this again: No GM likes Flip Murray more than Rick Sund. If Flip doesn’t ask too much, he could well be back here. But I can’t see the Hawks keeping both Bibby and Flip now. That’s too many guards, if you can believe that.

Volman

June 26th, 2009
4:13 pm

Amen, Wabe. (I ALWAYS think about D-Wade when I see your name—AHH!!! haha)

Anyway, I think Crawford is a great ADDITION to the bench. This bench needs ADDITIONS, not replacements. Sure it is great to add Crawford, but it would be even better to get Zaza back and either Flip or Bibby. Crawford, like he said, could be a “missing piece” to this team’s woes in the playoffs. I honestly think he could. He’s not the difference in this team winning championships or not, but he brings a lot of fire power.

Come on BASG, bring back the “core” of this team, and keep up with your “additions” (like Crawford). Make sure Crawford isn’t a replacement…

Just an addition.

Volman

June 26th, 2009
4:15 pm

Speaking who “too many guards”, Mr. Bradley….

I’m SO much more happier looking at Teague, Crawford, Joe, Bibby, Flip than T-Lue, Anthony Johnson, Dan Dickau, and Royal Ivey.

Eek.

Volman

June 26th, 2009
4:16 pm

Ahh..”of”, not “who”…Sorry!

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
4:31 pm

on top of that Flip should be cheaper.

I don’t know Volman, those point guards were nice man!!!

Seriously I was sad to see T-Lue go!

Wabe

June 26th, 2009
4:32 pm

Bibby won’t be back..

Marvin > Bibby.

Plus, the kind of money Bibby’s trying to pull would literally diminish the Hawks chances of landing some key FA’s because the lack of cap space. They should be actively pursuing some BIGS and need the money to do that. And I kinda agree with someone who posted a comment about Bibby being on the market for a long-term deal. I think his mentality at this point would be to get a long term deal because this may be his last chance to get one.

Wabe

June 26th, 2009
4:35 pm

I would rather see a backcourt with Teague, JJ, Crawford, Marvin, and Flip.

Bibby’s been great for the Hawks, but HE’S NOT WORTH THE MONEY HE’S DEMANDING! Keeping Bibby would probably mean Marvin’s gone, and that would just make a smaller line up even smaller.

MannyT

June 26th, 2009
4:37 pm

Volman,

Don’t be a hater…Dickau had a song ;-)

http://impersonator.com/Dan.mp3

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
4:37 pm

Happy Belated B-day Marvin June 19th.

I hope everyone here buys their newspapers. cause somebody stole my Wednesday edition out of my yard.

Wabe

June 26th, 2009
4:44 pm

THE HAWKS ARE AT A POINT THAT TEAMS LIKE ORLANDO AND HOUSTON WERE AT A COUPLE YEARS BACK. THE TEAM AS THEY HAD IT WAS NOT CAPABLE OF DOING ANY BETTER THAN THEY DID LAST SEASON !WITHOUT! ADDING SOME DEPTH. THEY’VE BUILT A SOLID CORE – NOW IT’S TIME TO LOOK FOR GUYS WHO CAN COME OFF BENCH AND COMPLEMENT WHAT THEY’VE BUILT. BIBBY WAS NOT A PART OF THIS CORE – HE WAS A STOP-GAP MEASURE AT THE POINT! YOU DONT GET RID OF GUYS LIKE MARVIN – WHO I KNOW HASN’T LIVED UP TO THE HYPE – BUT IS A CORE PEICE ON THE TEAM TO RESIGN PLAYERS LIKE BIBBY!

LOOK AT WHERE THOSE TEAMS ARE NOW – THEY’RE DEEP AND ARE LEGITIMATE CONTENDERS – NOT PRETENDERS AS THE HAWKS WERE THIS PAST SEASON.

ADD DEPTH! GET SOME BIGS VIA FA! MAYBE MAKE A DEAL FOR A BIG/BACKUP PG IF YOU HAVE TO!

HINRICH AND MILLER? I’M NOT A FAN OF MILLER AND I HONESTLY DONT KNOW IF WE HAVE ANY DEADWEIGHT TO PUll OFF A TRADE…BUT THOSE ARE THE KIND OF DEALS THE HAWKS SHOULD BE LOOKING FOR.

O'Brien

June 26th, 2009
4:56 pm

Mark,

If the Hawks keep Flip, does that signal the end of Bibby?

After all, why would we need Bibby, Flip and Crawford? Flip and Crawford are similar players (they dominate the ball), so I dont think we need both. Personally, give me a PG who passes the ball, and plays defense. We have enough shooters (JJ, Crawford, Marvin). Plus our front court needs more shots. Bibby and Flip would take too many shots.

Mark Bradley

June 26th, 2009
4:58 pm

I think the only deal we’re apt to see now is a sign-and-trade with Marvin. The Hawks like what they have. I do, too.

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
5:26 pm

Could they do a sign and trade with Mike Bibby or Zaza since they have bird rights. Benefits they could sign them for more and pick up a player who has a contract from the non salary strangled era.

Tyger

June 26th, 2009
6:08 pm

Sund has performed admirably during his second offseason so far. I give credit where credit is due, but this 47 game win thing has little to do with Sund, that was BKs brain child, for better or worse. BK built the foundation of this team: Jsmoove, Marvin, Horford, JJ, Woody – any success this team has had over the past two season is owed to BK not Sund. Certainly, he inherited the position after all the hardwork and heartache was done, but that’s status quo.

But to Sunds credit, Crawford and Teague were solid moves. Jamal was homeless and Teague was very safe at 19 and a better pick than BJ Mullens. Why? Bigs take longer to develop so the likelihood of getting a return on your late pick investment is far greater with a lil guy than a big guy at that point. So, good choice there.

Much rather have seen Garret Siler in the 2nd round too, but keeping a kid in Europe saves salary and a roster spot and this is the ATL Spirit. And we all know what happens to ATLs Europeans…we’ll never see them again after last night.

But stashing the 2nd pick, preserves a roster spot for a returning vet or another free agent, which is a better proposition. The Hawks, not counting cap holds, have about $43M on the books, leaving another $15-$20M in cap room before the reach luxury tax territory.

They could re-sign Bibby – for what I dont know, ZaZa, Flip and Solo and add a big bruiser with low post skills like Drew Gooden or sign and trade for Camby, Kaman or Tyson Chandler – now that would be interesting and allow for Sund to really make his mark on this team.

Mo Evans, Flip, Crawford and Teague are foreplay, just a tease. C’mon man, strap up and hit it!

Shamwow Man

June 26th, 2009
6:18 pm

Why do so many of you guys want to get rid of Marvin Williams. He did really well for you all last year. If anything he needs to get a bigger role in the offense. He will go somewhere and be star. I like his game a lot better than Josh Smith.

SaintSparky

June 26th, 2009
6:21 pm

I still think we are too soft in the middle with just Al. With Shaq now coming East, and Dwight and maybe even Boozer, we need more presence in the middle. I hear all these trade rumors with Amare going to GS, why not to ATL ? I say give up Williams, Childress’ contract and next year’s first round pick, if necessary throw in Teague, and we could have an awesome starting five: C Stoudmire, PF Horford, SF Smith, SG Johnson, PG Sessions/Jack/Teague. GS more or less are just giving up Biedrins and bench players ! We need the Spirit ownership to finally spend some money, we’re finally close to something special and need to take that next step, not one step back !

WPinAZ

June 26th, 2009
6:26 pm

Additionally……I like Hedo for the Hawks. Remember…..It’s not where you finish the season….only that you make the PLAYOFFS. (see SAN ANTONIO???) Hedo is a gamer. We could use him, no doubt.

MannyT

June 26th, 2009
6:43 pm

Volman, my bad–I missed the earlier comment about someone focusing on defense. I’d prefer that your best offensive option not have to overwork himself at the SF when he is more of a threat/mismatch for other teams to worry about when he plays the SG.

Joe has an advantage over most SG. He does not have an advantage over most SF. He is bigger and stronger than the guards, not the forwards. Why take away from our best weapon.

No disrespect to the other guards, but they do not create the degree of mismatch that Joe does.

A SF that is bigger & longer also allows us more flexibility. It is better for Marvin to get caught on a PF or C after a pick & roll than Joe. Over the course of a season, I fear that it would be too much wear and tear on him…even if Woody finds a way to limit his minutes to 35/night.

The Lakers have Ariza to chase around SF, the Magic have Pietrus, Houston has Battier & Artest. It is not an odd concept to have a guy that can focus on slowing down the guy that is often the most athletic person on the other team.

BWAF

Volman

June 26th, 2009
8:03 pm

MannyT, Maybe THAT’S why Marvin doesn’t assert himself as much on offense in the games….!

It’s all coming clear now! He’s tired! haha

CaliHawks

June 26th, 2009
8:04 pm

great move 2 go get crawford.. acie never lead up to any of the hype he came out of college with.. Drafting teague im not sold on since we just got crawford i kno he aint a pg but really neither is teague he reminds me of a slash pg/sg that can score but dont like to pass (ben gordon).. I wouldve been happier with BJ Mullens at tha 19th pick and Patrick Mills at the 49th.. We would of gotten a true point and at least a big man to handle some of tha load of rebounds and blocks shots for horford and J smoove……

Wabe

June 26th, 2009
8:18 pm

I agree with Manny T on Marvin.

You can’t let go of Marvin for THAT reason + the versatility he brings to the team. Let’s be honest, IF THE HAWKS had a healthy Marvin, who do you think would’ve been gaurding LBJ? You want a player like Marvin to be able to defend players like LBJ or Hedu that are a bit bigger and pose matchup problems.

However, at the same time, you have to look for him to be more assertive on offense. Let’s be honest, if you had a healthy Marvin against Cleveland, WHO ON CLEVELAND’S ROSTER CAN MATCHUP WITH MARVIN OUTSIDE OF LBJ? Why do you think Orlando beat out Cleveland in the Easter Conference finals? Hedu + Rashard posed matchup problems for a much smaller + less athletic Cleveland front/back-court. If Cleveland put LBJ on Marvin, then you have two guys AS OF NOW that they could not account for – JJ and Crawford.

It makes TOO MUCH SENSE to bring back a natural SF than to put someone at the 3 who would technically be playing out of position. JJ couldn’t stay on the opposing 3 AND be the leading offensive threat for the Hawks.

Marvin, JJ, Crawford, Teague, Smoove, Horford, Flip, Zaza.

Build around that. Get some guys on the bench that could come in and play valuable minutes whenever these guys need a breather. Like I said in a earlier post, if guys like Gardner or Morris can’t provide that bench play, you get rid of them. LOOK AT HOUSTON – they had guys like Landry and Von Wafer coming off the bench providing adequete bench play.

The Truth

June 26th, 2009
8:33 pm

MannyT

I agree, we don’t have Bird Rights (yet) and it will get messy re-signing Flip. I don’t know what Flip made when he was a Pacer, but he made only 1M last year as a Hawk. If we offer him a raise at 125% at 2.25M/year from the MLE and offer him a 2 year option that will put him over into Bird Rights or some derivative starting next season. We could than offer him an extension under Early-Bird in 2010 with 175% raise from the 2.25M salary. It will have to be a level of trust to make this work, no doubt. But it is only 1.25M hit off the MLE. All the other teams over the cap will be faced with the same scenario if considering signing Flip and that’s most of the teams. I’m not sure if Flip wants to be a journey player bouncing from team to team every year. He will never get paid his true value that way and he knows it.

nunna yo bizznezz

June 26th, 2009
8:59 pm

rip mj..love u..
rip ed..loved u 2..
farrah,u know i had a crush on u for da longest..rip babygirl..

woodson is not gonna let teague develope..i don’t believe that sund is that slow to see it!

who on here got the chance to hear woodson on the tnt broadcast when he told his guys,”we need to drive to the hoop and get some fouls on these guys,and get to the line”..he drew no x’s or o’s..didn’t even draw up a play for them to come out of that time out..and hubie mentioned it..then hubie mentioned how the team did the opposite of what woody asked them to do..

they went on the next 4 possesions and shot an out side jumpshot,and 3 missed 3 pointers,by,josh,flip,and bibbs…

its like,they wanted to get him fired..he has no control over this team..

as long as he is good gracious with sund,he will have his job and blame his failures on everybody else…

ant banks

June 26th, 2009
10:05 pm

regardless of who the hawks add, they will are in a 4way tie for the 4th seed: 1.clev 2.orlando 3.boston 4.Hawks, Philly, Chicago, Miami.

we will definitely make the playoffs again, thereby solidyfin’ woody’s existence as coach. woody will get a 2yr extenstion for takin’ the hawks to playoffs 3times!!

RealSquawk

June 26th, 2009
10:30 pm

Wabe,

You speak the words of a wise man.

Dose Of REALITY

June 26th, 2009
10:30 pm

The Deal with Crawford is THIS. He is here to REPLACE Bibby and Hell maybe even JOE year after next. If you think the HAWKS are going to the 2nd round of the PlayOFFs again with the LOSS of Bibby and the addition of Teague and Crawford you should check yourself into REHAB!! Bibby wants 10 mil. The HAWKS are offering 2 mil a GAS card and a Free Pass to Six Flags. The HAWKS were NOTHING REPEAT NOTHING until he came here. To me thats worth at least 7 or 8 mil for that mere fact alone. Money issues are navigating this TEAM. My thing is you cut payroll to save money, but you get a suckazz team that nobody comes to see Play. So you lose the money you saved at THE GATE! Then again u cant get blood from a Turnip. PLUS you still need a Quality big. Say hello to the Lottery Hawks Fans!!! IM DONE!!!!!!

nunna yo bizznezz

June 26th, 2009
11:15 pm

wabe..
i love marvins game too..its sad that woody can’t design an offense that he could take advantage of marvin and jj in the game at the same time..

did u see how he performed when joe was out..averaging 27ppg..

when joe came back,BAMM,marvins production went down..

yes he has quite a few injuries in his tenure here but,i would still keep him..

and as for the bench..who says we don’t have one..
othello,gardner,west,and acie all played well in the cavs lost when they got increased minutes..woody should have built on that,but instead,he had those guys in street clothes the next game and he put out a banged up team that got beaten worse than the previous game..

when they sent othello and gardner to the d-league,they outshined every thing in the d-league for those 3 games..yes i know,its the d-league,but,is that not what u are supposed to do when u play pro,and u are sent down to play in the d-league??

my hawks team for next year?
flip-teague pg
joe-crawford-thomas gardner sg
marvin williams-mo evans sf
josh smith-othello hunter pf
theo ratliff-randolph morris-siler from augusta state CENTER

nunna yo bizznezz

June 26th, 2009
11:18 pm

yo..disregard everything i wrote in the box above me..

everything except me agreeing with wabe…

im drunk,and just went rattling..
godsnite people

Wabe

June 26th, 2009
11:26 pm

Point taken bizznezz.

I agree with what you’re saying about Gardner, Morris, and the others who ride the bench for the majority of the season, and I’m not trying to sound like I’m knocking on their game, but the point I was trying to drive across was this:

If Woody’s not comfortable getting those guys in the game, then Sund needs to get some players he is comfortable with. I’M HONESTLY RUNNING OUT OF PATIENCE WITH WOODY AND HIS EXCUSES. If SUND gets guys on the bench that are capable of providing minutes, then Woody has no excuse to throw at Sund for rotation, lack of depth, or development reasons.

The Hawks cannot rely on a 6 or 7 man rotation. They can’t put so much on the shoulders of just a few.

RA

June 27th, 2009
6:20 am

I guess I’m weighing in a little late on this one. First off, it’s nice to see Marvin Williams getting a little bit of love. Whether he ends up in an Atlanta uniform or somewhere else, he’s shaping into a quality player in this league, and it showed a lot of heart for him to come back from that back (no pun intended) injury the way he tried to do in the playoffs. And I’ll tell you something else, in the regular season,when healthy, he did as decent a job guarding Lebron James as you could ask anyone to do…

As for Acie Law IV, I think that he came into a very difficult situation. He came into an environment where the players had to produce instantly. No problem for Horford, but Law was not nearly as finished a product, and then he got bitten by the injury bug, and that was it. I’m glad he’s getting a chance to start over. As for Claxton, not necessarily his fault, but a disaster from start to finish.

I think Teague is coming into a situation where he can learn and grow and not be expected to contribute majorly in his first year, particularly if we can get Bibby or Murray back. He’s also coming into a situation where, while this is the last year of Woody’s contract, the head coach is not necessarily looking down the barrel of unemployment at the first three game losing streak of the season. I think Woody will be a little more patient with Teague because he can be…

Big Ray

June 27th, 2009
6:45 am

“I’m not knocking Acie Law in any way shape or form,” Woodson said. “But this kid [Teague] is what I’d call a true point guard. I gave Acie some opportunities, and it just didn’t work. That’s no knock on him as a player or me as a coach. Injuries probably hurt Acie the two years he was here, and honestly we just didn’t have the luxury of waiting on him when he first got here. We had to win.

“Jeff Teague has a different situation, and in some ways I think a better situation, in that we have a solid foundation of veterans here that he’ll be able to learn from and lean on. Make no mistake about it, he has the tools, and we need to provide him with the opportunity to become the player we think he can become.”

Interesting comments from Monsieur Woodson. The first paragraph is somewhat revealing (though not for those who were paying attention).

As for the last set of comments, Woodson should be held to that. Came out of his mouth first. At the same time, Teague needs to work hard on his game if he expects to get any playing time and help this team.

RA

June 27th, 2009
8:12 am

No doubt Big Ray, but at least Teague isn’t comming into a situation where the deck is already heavily stacked against his long term success. The emphasis in that sentence being long term…

NY Hawk

June 27th, 2009
8:40 am

If I’m the GM, this is how I approach the summer (in order, until we run out of cap space):

Got to resign Zaza – our only true center

Got to resign Marvin – our best wing defender and 3 point threat. Plus he’s a proven team player (I’d like to see him a little more selfish and aggressive, but that should come). He can be a star and we will rarely get an opportunity to get a star as our team keeps improving.

Have to get a true point to run the team and to mentor Teague – Bibby may be too expensive, and if so, I like J Jack as an option, another solid team player who is tough on D (In fact, I think its his fault we didn’t take C Paul a few years back – C Paul didn’t do jack against Tech).

I’d really like to see us resign Flip – I agree with above, he brings a confidence to the court that even Joe doesn’t have.

We also have to have to have another big man. Resign S Jones if we think he can continue to improve. Trade the rights to Chill and a future pick for one of the Clippers big men.

DHD

June 27th, 2009
9:06 am

Did Michael Jackson die? Wow…I hadn’t heard. of course, I hadn’t hear about Vick. A-Rod, Kobe, Manny or T.O. either.

E43

June 27th, 2009
9:11 am

im sorry but bibby is not coming back, im just being logical. if he did flip wouldnt play at all and at the same time teague would be downgraded to speedy claxton old spot at 3string.

The Truth

June 27th, 2009
9:16 am

For the benefit of Teague and giving him a fresh start, I’m going to reframe from talking about Woody’s stupidly in the off-season. That Acie comment he made was unnecessary. If you don’t have anything good to say, don’t say anything. I know it will be hard, but we have got to turn the page of this guy poor handling of PGs. May the force be with me.

Big Ray

June 27th, 2009
9:22 am

RA,

I hear you.

The Truth,

Everytime you try and lay off him, and give the man the benefit of the doubt, he goes and says something messed up. May the force be with us both.

Mark Bradley

June 27th, 2009
11:01 am

And here y’all thought I was making it up about Woodson not being a fan of Acie’s.

ILL-logical

June 27th, 2009
11:11 am

ZaZa has the option of starting in San Antonio and being coached by Greg Popovich or sitting on the bench in Atlanta and being “coached” by Woodson. You do the math.

Woodson’s remarks about Acie and Joe showing up to greet Teague make me wonder what is going on ! When has Joe ever shown any off court leadership here in Atlanta? And the episode with Amare being wined and dined here and Woodson leaking the trade rumors re Josh foe Amare cannot sit well in certain quarters. There is a disturbance in the force.

ProudTechFan

June 27th, 2009
11:20 am

I could just punch the GM of Minnesota in the face for picking Lawson right before the Hawks pick. Then again he might have saved us the embarassment of not picking him even if he was there anyway. I thought he wouldve been perfect. With that said i still like Teague, dude can shoot, he is very quick i just hope he plays, cant afford to have another draft where the players dont contribute at all, example 06 draft of Sheldon Williams and AC Law, neither are with the team, and i believie Sheldon wont even be in the league in two years..

kd hawk

June 27th, 2009
11:55 am

Amare in a hawks uniform looks good to me

kd hawk

June 27th, 2009
12:01 pm

I like j smith and all, but he doesnt seem to understand he cant shoot. if he just defended and took the ball to the hole every time he would be a all star. but amare can beast down low and that way horford can stay at the 4 spot. if they dont ask for too much i say make the deal happen

Mark Bradley

June 27th, 2009
12:48 pm

To go back to Big Ray’s point about Woodson’s evaluation of Teague: I’m not sure he’s any “purer” a point guard than Acie was. I know positively Teague wasn’t the college player Acie was — though Acie of course had the good fortune of working under the genius Billy Clyde Gillispie.

Kidding about the last part.

wxwax

June 27th, 2009
1:00 pm

Teauge is Jason Terry.

Same upside, same downside. A tweener whose aptitude doesn’t extend to playing point.

His best shot is coming off the bench as a burst of energy. Just like Terry’s role in Dallas. Teague will never be a starter in the NBA.

(Goshdarn, it’s amazing how quickly a man can become an expert by reading a few blogs here and there. Who needs to watch the games? They take too long. :-)
)

Big Ray

June 27th, 2009
1:49 pm

Mark,

I sure found Woody’s words puzzling. But I’ll bet players feel the same way in a timeout huddle….

Uh..anyway, it’s strange that both were shooters in college, though Acie would probably have eaten Teague’s lunch in college. He’s bigger and stronger. Here’s to hoping that not only is Teague’s skin thicker, but he maintains confidence and a great work ethic, and Woody doesn’t do anything to damage him.

Maybe I should just settle for putting it all on Teague…

No More LA

June 27th, 2009
1:57 pm

I like Jamal Crawford – good player with a solid game. But he’s not a point guard. He’s a combo-guard. He’d be a perfect 6th man but he’s not cut out to be the floor general. If Atlanta manages to not re-sign Bibby, they’ll go back to being what they were before he showed up – A talented, under achieving 32-win ball club.

Mark Bradley

June 27th, 2009
2:01 pm

Copy that, Big Ray. I was surprised Woodson was that, er, candid.

I like Crawford, too, and I think Teague has a future, but I’d agree with No More LA and WxWax that the optimum Hawks course is still to re-sign Bibby. (But I don’t know that Teague is as fast as Terry, who did, to be fair — and I was never a JT fan — have a good long run as the Mavs’ lead guard before he became the sixth man.)

RA

June 27th, 2009
2:26 pm

Here’s the bottomline. We’ll never know what Acie Law might have done in an Atlanta uniform because he never got the chance to show it. His first half-season in Atlanta he was stepped over for Ty Lue and Anthony Johnson. That in and of itself tells me that his days were numbered from the second the Hawks called his name on draft night. For whatever reason, Woody seems to like Teague,and that might give him something that Acie Law IV never had while in Atlanta, a fighting chance.

joe

June 27th, 2009
3:31 pm

we need to get stoudimire from the suns.
we give up josh smith and evans.
pg- bibby (teague) sg-joe johnson sf- marvin pf-horford c-stoudimire
bench- crawford, flip

Johnny Hazeltine

June 27th, 2009
3:37 pm

Amare to ATL

If the Hawks were to acquire Stoudemire, then they probably wouldn’t be able to resign Bibby, Marvin, and Flip. Truthfully, unless Evans was thrown in the deal, they probably would have to choose just one of the three.

It’s intriguing. Would you take one year to try and compete for a title, or continue to hope for the future, with good reasoning?

jazzyk

June 27th, 2009
3:49 pm

The Hawks are still undersized inside and need help in the low post. That was really apparent in the playoffs, especially the second round. Who’s available who could offer immediate help?

tree rollins

June 27th, 2009
4:09 pm

Love the Crawford pickup – it was a GREAT trade just to get anything for Acie and Claxton at all! Like the draft pick. Now sign Flip and we’re good to go. If we sign Bibby we might be overloaded at point. Not sure on that one.

The Truth

June 27th, 2009
4:34 pm

Big Ray, ILL-logical

I love these Star Wars analogies. Stay thirsty my friends :)

The Truth

June 27th, 2009
4:53 pm

Without using some kind of Chinese Arithmetic, I don’t see how Amare 17M/yr contract could get done in ATL. However, maybe we could S-T ZaZA and package him with Josh perhaps. Doable only if the Suns eat Josh’s Kicker.

Shamwow Man

June 27th, 2009
4:53 pm

If we get Amare we will have to trade Josh Smith bottomline.

Mark Bradley

June 27th, 2009
4:58 pm

That Amare-to-Atlanta rumor just won’t go away, will it? What is this, the third consecutive summer?

And I don’t trust Stoudemire’s knees. I take a healthier, younger Smoove. But maybe that’s just me.

The Truth

June 27th, 2009
5:04 pm

Mark
I agree, stablity wise, Josh is the best option. However I would entertain Josh for Bosh in a heart beat. He maybe cheaper. But that’s just me.

Mark Bradley

June 27th, 2009
5:13 pm

I’d do Josh-for-Bosh if the contract lengths were similar. But Josh has four years left, and Bosh is a free agent next summer. That’s the dealbreaker for me.

Wabe

June 27th, 2009
5:18 pm

I think some of you need to pop in the tape of the Wake Forest vs UNC games this past season…go see what he did to Lawson in his games vs the Tarheels this past season.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/gamecenter/recap/NCAAB_20090111_NC@WF/sportsprofileplus

I don’t think Teague is getting the respect he deserves. At the begining of the NCAA season, he led his team to an undefeated start running the point and they were the #1 team in the country. At that point, experts wouldn’t STOP TALKING ABOUT TEAGUE. He was often compared to Chris Paul and was being talked of as the best POINT in the country.

I’m not saying any of that is relevant, but go watch some game tapes of his games. He’s still young so he’ll make rookie mistakes, but I HONESTLY THINK he’s capable of stepping in as of NOW and starting for the Hawks. The Hawks have enough talent around Teague to make him rather successfull early.

Of course I’m probably wrong, but comparing him to J.T. is hilarious. He’s not as streaky of a shooter as J.T., and is much better driving to the rack than JT has ever been.

Wabe

June 27th, 2009
5:28 pm

I GAURANTEE IF WAKE FOREST DIDN’T JUST COLLAPSE THE WAY THEY DID AND FINISHED A BIT BETTER OR GOT DEEPER IN THE TOURNY – TEAGUE COULD’VE AND WOULD’VE PROBABLY BEEN A TOP 10 PICK.

Go look at guys like Johnny Flynn. Those guys didn’t necessarily have spectacular seasons – but they shined at the right time. Flynn was instantly put on the national stage after his 6 OT performance against UCONN in the Big East Tourney. He played alright in the tourney, but I don’t think he’s as prolific a scorer as Teague.

Johnny Flynn just reminds me of Rajon Rondo. I think that’s the type of gaurd he’ll be in the NBA. He’ll be thinking pass first – which isn’t a bad thing at the POINT. But I would think the Hawks needed someone whose a bit better creating for himself to help take some pressure off of JJ. A point gaurd with a scorers mentality – and that’s what Teague has over someone like Flynn.

Johnny Hazeltine

June 27th, 2009
5:39 pm

I don’t get it. I just don’t get it. What makes anyone think that Jeff Teague will be an efficient PG in this league? When was the last time a team took a sophomore in the middle of the first round based sole off of the potential that he could change positions when entering the NBA, and it worked? Am I saying Teague has no future in this league, no, but I am saying he’ll never be a starting PG in this league, ever. If the Hawks wanted a PG they should’ve drafted Maynor.

The Truth

June 27th, 2009
5:46 pm

Mark
I’m no expert but if the forces really wanted this thing done, it could get done. I say that because Bosh wants to move and Toronto wants something (anything) for him. Bosh would have to agree to a contract re-work via an extension to match Josh’s terms. Then we do a S-T packaging Josh with something else. The only real issue is Josh’s kicker; who pays for it. No doubt, it would certainly be a bold move by Mr. Sund and fill with mixed emotions from the fans. Talent wise, this is the only deal that makes sense involving Josh.

ILL-logical

June 27th, 2009
6:29 pm

Bosh to Atlanta only happens if Marvin, Josh Childress’s rights and Mo Evans are the deal. Bosh helps but he is not a center however,he gives you the Rasheed like presence that Sund and Woodson’s fantasy team is built around.: Josh Smith becomes Tayshun; Al is a bigger )and better offensively) Ben Wallace; Jamal or Bibby becomes Chauncy and Joe,if he is still here, Rip.I don’t see it but this 2004 Piston thing seems to be both of their stories and so far, they are sticking to it.

My star wars analogy is based upon the naked power play Woodson and Joe are running re :Amar’e for Josh. Both of these guys are short termers with regard to Atlanta and their actions may be tipping their hand to management. After all, it was Joe’s signing that triggered the break up of the BASG; if they believe that he is not producing the return on investment that they calculated-???

I ask again, how much time , energy and money has Joe put into the community since his arrival? Compare that with a Tom Glavine or Keith Brookings; there are leaders and then there are leaders.

Can't wait to see.....

June 27th, 2009
6:41 pm

Maybe a long shot but if we can sign and trade Marvin, Mo Evans, and a future pick to N.O., Phoenix, L.A., or Toronto…… we could look like this

pg/ Crawford
sg/ Johnson, Crawford
sf/ Smith, Johnson
pf/ Horford, Smith
c/ Chandler/ Amare/ Bosh/ Camby

bench/ Flip,Teague, ZaZa, and add a F/A or two

Also if some how we could leave Mo out in a deal like that we could add him back to the bench. Maybe if some crazy chance falls our way maybe Chill would come back. But you can always find a F/A. Just dreaming, but maybe the L.A. deal or N.O. deal could happen. Really doubt the Bosh thing though.

Plus I think Josh at SF would really disrupt a Lebron, Kobe, etc. We forget Josh gets up there and with a brick wall there behind him in Horford PF and a monster Center we will be a good defensive team. Who cares if Josh can’t score from the outside, because we have Joe, Jamal, Teague, and Flip to do that.

Grip

June 27th, 2009
10:11 pm

We have a few issues, Crawford makes way too much money to sit on the bench, everyone knows the spirit group’s situation. Can he man the Point?? Next I love J-smoove, but Al and him Starting is not What’s up!!! At some point one of them has to go to the sixth man spot, Josh is ideally suited for this role, would he do it, or does he make to much money for that type of roll?? Un load him and sign Gortat from Orlando and make him our Center. Marvin,J-Chills/Al/Gortat,Pachulia, that is a damn good Front Line, unload Marvin or Chills, if our money is tight and get 2 solid reserves. crawford,joe,marvin? Al, Gortat, Flip, Chills trade replacement, J-smoove replacement,Teague. 9 ballers all day long at a minimum, we easily could get 2 people in return for J-smoove or Childress, these moves can be questioned, but the jest of the issue is RICK SUND has pieces to move, he has no excuse. Billy Knight put us in position to have a good team, He needs to come thru. I am demanding a solid product this year.

ant banks

June 27th, 2009
10:25 pm

to all of the woody haters, eat crow!! after this season, woody will be re-up for a 2 to 3yrs extension. the hawks will definitely make the playoffs this year. at which seed, i don’t know. but if woody gets them to the playoffs 3yrs in a row, how can you argue against him bein’ the coach for the next 3 yrs?

i have the hawks tied in a 4way tie for the 4th seed. 4.Atlanta, Miami, Chicago, and Philly. don’t sleep on indy and washington this yr. either. i am also worried about new jersey and milwaukee and charlotte, too.

NO MORE BOBBY

June 27th, 2009
11:02 pm

Dang Mark! Do you ever sleep?

The Truth

June 27th, 2009
11:50 pm

Would Josh playing SF be an upgrade? I don’t think so.

mred1943

June 28th, 2009
12:45 am

AL HORFORD 6′10″ 255 lbs can jump KENDRICK PERKINS 6′10″can’t jump so why do the hawks need a bigger center there’s two seven footers playing behind him

Big Ray

June 28th, 2009
6:35 am

Ant,

According to Woody, that’s all Bibby’s doing. Hey, it’s in print, you can read for yourself. :)

Mark,

I agree. Optimal situation is re-signing Bibby. With Crawford around, we really don’t need Flip, whether Sund likes him or not. He’s proven his worth, meaning he should be able to get a job stateside, but if Bibby can be re-signed for around 6-7 mil per, and 3 yrs max, you’re then comparing Crawford to Flip. No contest…

The Josh for Amare (I refuse to put that ridiculous apostrophe in his name) talk will never quit until Amare lands on another team. There’s as much a possibility that he stays in Phoenix, but for some reason I think this is the year he really goes. Two things always hold him up, though. It’s not that he’s moody. It’s not that he’s an arrogant prick. It’s that his continued health is a question, and so is his contract status. No team will sign him as-is contract-wise unless they truly believe they can make a title run with him THIS YEAR.

Guess what? That’s not us. Sure, a lineup featuring him, Horford, Marvin, Joe, Crawford, Bibby, etc, sounds great. But is that REALLY a title-contender? Winning a title is not just about having enough talent, as the Lakers found out against the Celtics a year ago. It’s about having enough of the right talent, plenty of cohesion and chemistry, and a coach/coaching staff that knows how to get the most out of the guys they have. And basically knowing how to orchestrate the whole thing.

When you’re competing at that level, margin for error is very, very small. And you can second-guess everything you do. Do the Magic win if Van Gundy keeps Alston in there, instead of yanking him for Nelson? Just a rhetorical question, but also an illustration of how the Monday Morning Quarterback thing goes.

In the end, we are missing some of the components to a title-contending team. And not all of those components are players.

Shamwow Man

June 28th, 2009
7:59 am

Now with all of these trade MArvin posts I just have a few questions.

Is Marvin an offensive liability?
Is Marvin an defensive liability?
Is Marvin not a team player?
Has Marvin not improved his game every year?
Has Marvin gotten more shots every year?
How aggressive can a 4th option be?
Does Marvin not get to the line effectively?
Is Marvin not a 3pt threat?
Does Marvin turn the ball over alot?
IS this Marvin’s team or JJ’s team?

Shamwow Man

June 28th, 2009
8:11 am

If any of you guys think that Josh Smith can play SF you are out of your minds or you don’t watch real games!!!!!!! Josh SMith is a terrible man on man defender. He becomes more of a liability as a SF. He can’t shoot, he can’t dribble, he can’t play man on man D which are important skills to have as a SF. He needs to stay as close to the basket as possible. You actually want him on the perimeter taking jumpers. Getting one block a game doesn’t make you an all world defender.

Melvin Flowers

June 28th, 2009
9:08 am

We Need A Center, We Might Win 50 Games Or More.
Harford Is A 5 Man.
Hawks Mr Saund Please Bring In Some Needed Help.
We Need Not To See A Season Like The Braves for The Hawks.
Joe Johnson Is Some Times So As Mike Bibby. Keep Flip Trade Joe And Bibby Plus Zar Zar.

Melvin Flowers
Macon Georgia

kd hawk

June 28th, 2009
11:42 am

if anybody think that trading johson is the answer u are crazy. he may not be lebron, wade or kobe but he is the best thing the hawks have had in a long time. its only 2 players we CANT get rid of. Al and Joe. our only all star and our future all star. not unless somebody is gonna give up all star caliber players which i doubt. i been a hawks fan forever. i suffered thru all the garbage teams just like all he other true atl fans. we havent been decent in awhile. just make smart decisions. if we’re keeping the same team for the most part, please dont add anymore small forwards

Wink

June 28th, 2009
1:40 pm

We are off to a flying start, but nothing pivotal has really happened yet:

Rick Sund:
1. Good Move = Obtain Jamal Crawford – swapped two bench players for 20 point scorer. Insurance if he can’t sign Bibby & Flip. Also, insurance if we can’t sign Joe next season (that’s why Crawford has to agreed to not Opt Out his contract at the end of this season)
2. Not Sure Move = Jeff Teague – Woody still the coach. He does not play rookie point guards. Will sap the confidence of this player (see what happened to Stodermire & AC Law)Teague lacks size and does not aid perimeter defense. Woody also will negate the speed he would bring to push the ball.
3. Bad Move = Has not resigned any of our free agents-waiting to play mind games as he did with Chillz last year.

Coaching:
1. Woodson on a one year leash – which insures Teague will not play, guaranteed if Bibby is not resigned.
2. Woodson does not have the ability to develop players – Josh Smith game is not advancing and Woodson has lost control…no reason he should be bringing the ball up the court or putting up untimely 3 point air balls.

Draft:
1. Nothing gained – Teague will be at the end of the bench & Gladys will be in Euro league. (He will join our other wasted draft picks (Cenk – SG, Andersen – Center & Josh Childress – SF/SG)

Money: Is there enough to go around?
1. Our free agents – Marvin, ZaZa, Flip, Bibby, Solo
2. Free Agent as mentioned here: Hedo, Varejo, Chillz, Jack, Sessions, Mikki Moore, Gotat…
3. Who will we let go & will we EVER spend money on a REAL center.

Rebounding & Hustle:
1. Horford and ………….Mario West………..????
2. Who is best available from list above to help????

Defense:
1. On ball = Marvin William (Restricted FA)…..who else?
2. Off ball = Josh Smith…usually last line of defense is a Center….who’s watching basket?????

Playoffs:
1. Who defends the opposing center – Horford not equipped to handle half court post play? (Shaq, Howard, Dalenbert,Perkins, O’Neal…center with height & weight)
2. Who defends the attacking point guards…this usually starts with perimeter defense…Mario is our best & Bibby, Flip or Joe can’t get it done….who?

Yes, pivotal decision have to be made to give us the right balance to succeed in the regular season, and more importantly, to succeed in the playoffs…ie the Cleveland acquisition of Shaq was made with an eye towards the playoffs, same with Orlando bringing in Vince Carter. The good teams make think ahead for a successful result…where is our history says we do the same thing hoping to get a different result – Insanity!!

Welcome to Atlanta, Joe, Bibby, Flip, or I mean Jamal Crawford….remember only one ball is allowed on the court at a time!

ntrigue

June 28th, 2009
3:01 pm

Don’t trade Josh for amare that would be crazy!!!! What are u guys smoking??? If anything you would trade Marvin and rights to childress for Stoudamire. Josh Smith should not even be considered for trading. He’s one of the elite gamechangers on defense. Mark what our your thoughts on this?

HAWKMAN

June 28th, 2009
8:32 pm

WE DONT NEED TO TRADE FOR ANYBODY. ALL WE NEED TO DO IS SIGN ONE OF THE BIGS FROM THIS FA. POOL. R. WALLACE. D. GOODEN. D.ANDERSON. THESE ARE THE ONLY PLAYERS THAT WOULD HELP THE HAWKS. NO E. CURRY.AND PLAYERS LIKE T.CANDLER. M. CAMBY. C.KAMEN. ARE GOING TO COST US LONG TERMS DOUBLE DITGITS CONTRACKS. SIGN R.WALLACE,RESIGN M. WILLIAMS. AND NOW WE HAS BASE UNIT OF A. HORFORD. J. SMITH. R.WALLACE. J.JOHNSON. J.CRAWFORD. AND A BENCH OF M. WILLIAMS. AT THE 3.4.AND SOME 2.5. M.EVANS. 2.3. AND ROOKIE J. TEAGLE. 1.2.THIS UNIT WILL COST AROUND 60 MILLIONS, OR LESS NOT OVER.THATS AN 8 MAN ROTATION, OF ALMOST 6 TO 7 ALLSTARS CALEBURE PLAYERS. AFTER THAT SEE WHAT M.BIBBY AN ZAZA.AND F.MURRY. WOULD COST US. AROUND 10 TO 15 MILLIONS.LESS SEE 65 TO 75 MILLIONS FOR AN NBA CHAMPINSHIP WINNING TEAM. IS ABOUT RIGHT.

HawkKingBibby

June 28th, 2009
9:36 pm

Mark man these AMARE FOR SMOOVE RUMORS FROM ESPN wont go away. Do you think this is all smoke or are we going to have a guy who wears goggles on our roster July 1st ( and I dont mean Bo Outlaw )……

Mark Bradley

June 28th, 2009
9:40 pm

I’d lean toward more smoke right now, HawkKingBibby. But I plan to go to Jamal Crawford’s media session Monday at 1 p.m., and I’ll snoop around there.

Simpdawg

June 28th, 2009
9:41 pm

I agree with HAWKMAN. The Hawks do not need to trade for Amare or Bosh, but they do have some tough decisions on Bibby, Flip, Marvin and Zaza. I would like to resign Zaza, Marvin and Bibby (if possible), and sign either Josh Heytvelt, Alade Aminu, John Bryant or Garret Siler.