You dared me to pose the question in poll form. Being daring, I did. I asked last week, “Do the Braves need a new manager?” I was sure I knew what the majority would say, but it was a thinner majority than I expected.
Sixty percent of roughly 2,000 respondents said the Braves do in fact need a new manager. I figured it would be 70-30, maybe even 80-20. And why did I think that?
Because I read the comments on the ol’ blog.
And I’ve grown accustomed to the anti-Cox rants. How he blew all those World Series. How he’s 1-14 in the final game of the postseason. (Not, mind you, in the final game of a postseason series — let’s not give him any credit for winning the NLCS five times or an NLDS six times — or even in elimination games.) How he’s a terrible tactician. How he shouldn’t have brought in Leibrandt to face Puckett. (Even though Leibrandt had faced Puckett in that World Series twice already — and had twice struck him out.)
I’ve been called an idiot for my support of Bobby Cox so often I assumed I was alone in the universe. Turns out I’m not. Turns out 40 percent of our poll’s respondents — admittedly, this is an unscientific survey, but you could vote only once per computer — decided the skipper isn’t so maladroit after all.
And even though what I wrote wasn’t entirely an endorsement of Cox as manager of the 2009 Braves, I was heartened to see that some folks appreciate a body of work. The old baseball man Rocky Bridges once said: “There are three things the average man thinks he can do better than anybody else: Build a fire, run a hotel, and manage a baseball team.”
Apparently 40 percent of our voters either weren’t quite average — or weren’t men.
224 comments Add your comment
BT
June 23rd, 2009
7:17 am
Make people talk and sometimes even think. Those were great few blogs last week that spurred discussion and people are still talking about it. Way to go Mark.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
7:32 am
Mark,
Congratulations! Finally a writer with the courage to at least discuss the issue. And yes, Mark, I’m the guy who a couple of years back authored the “1-14 last game of the postseason record” (including his loss at Toronto) that you are on record as challenging as possibly not a real statistic. And I think this is every much a statistic as the won/loss record of a team or manager for the opening game of a season that is so often mentioned. In fact, I would consider this to be this most important of statistics in that Bobby just doesn’t have the in-game and strategic skills to manage a short series where the competition is best. Most of his postseason series wins are against inferior opponents in early rounds, but when matched up against the great pitching in the later rounds his is always out managed and his only last game victory was because of Glavine’s one hitter in the 1995 World Series or Bobby Cox would be sporting a perfect 0-15 last game record in the postseason. Anyway you want to spin it, Mark, 1-14 is overwhelming and convincing evidence of a Manager who simply cannot find a way to close the deal and thus we as fans have been left on 14 occasions to watch our opponent celebrate on the pitcher’s mound!
I don’t agree with you, but I respect and applaud your courage and willingness to address Cox’s managerial ability unlike your weak sisters, DOB and Jeff Schultz.
However, I have a question. Your position in your article that the responders seemingly validate your position makes no sense. 60% of those agree that Cox should be replaced, not 60% who think he shouldn’t. So, what is your point? Are you saying that those in the majority are wrong?
With the dominant pitching afforded Cox he won most of his 14 division titles (before the split from the west)over the like of the expansion Marlins, the Expos (Nationals) and the Phillies and Mets. Nice, but not exceptional in my opinion given the talent the Braves’ GM, Scouting Department and Player Development plopped in Cox’s lap for about 15 seasons. However, the true test of a great manager comes in the short series in the postseason when a bright, strategic, in-game decision manager can be the difference in a tight game or series. In this regard, Bobby Cox is absolutely the worst postseason manager in baseball history. Who is the best today? Check out the skipper for the Red Sox who had the courage in 2007 to sit his season long center fielder, Coco Crisp, for the hot bat in the postseason. That’s called courage, Mark, and Bobby Cox would have continued to let Andruw Jones strike out, game after game, even at the expense of losing the series!
1-14! Think about it! 1-14!
Be-little, BeBOLD
June 23rd, 2009
8:00 am
Let’s hear an AMEN BRO for Larry!!! One hundred percent in agreement bro! Cox is TOO loyal to his players. Sometimes you have to kick butt to get production. Entirely too laid back!
Mark Bradley
June 23rd, 2009
8:05 am
The all-time leader in getting thrown out of games is … too laid back?
matt_T
June 23rd, 2009
8:11 am
Anyone who points to the 1-14 record in the playoffs doesn’t have a clue.
In order to win the WS you have to make it to the playoffs, and Bobby had the team in the playoffs each year, until the recent rough patch.
Anything can happen in the short playoff series. Ask the Yankees. And they got rid of Torre, and the next manager didn’t make the playoffs.
Brian
June 23rd, 2009
8:18 am
That “1-14″ stat is kinda shady. The only way you can get a win is to win the World Series. There shouldn’t exactly be a high expectation for that win-loss record. Tony LaRussa is 2-10. Joe Torre is 4-10. Lou Piniella is 1-6. John McGraw was 3-7. Tommy Lasorda 2-6. Earl Weaver 1-5.
Basically the only guys who don’t have really bad records in those games are Casey Stengel and Joe McCarthy managing the great Yankee dynasties.
Michael Scharff
June 23rd, 2009
8:21 am
Wow, Mark – first “avuncular,” now “maladroit” – you’re going to have us keeping a dictionary by our desks before you know it!
I tried to comment the other day, but the comment section was already so full, I said to myself – forget about it – Mark will never see my thoughts among the hundred or more others already here.
I am glad Bobby’s players liek him. And, I do give Bobby some credit for managing the Braves during their unprecedented run of championships. On the other hand, in my opinion, he has always relied far too much on big ball (home runs) and never on small ball. Even when the Braves have had speed, Bobby rarely takes advantage of it. Plus, I’m not sure of the stats, but a) it appears that the Braves hit into more double plays than any other team I’ve ever seen, and b) they appear to leave more men on base than any other team I’ve ever seen.
matt_T
June 23rd, 2009
8:30 am
Thanks Brian. Funny that Genius LaRussa is only 2-10 and that last win was with one of the worst teams to ever make the playoffs. Further proving that the playoffs are a crapshoot. Just getting into the playoffs is what is important.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
8:43 am
Brian,
I agree that you have to get there and the odds are that one will more than likely have a losing record in the final game of the postseason if they’ve been there multiple times. I’m not oblivious to the obvious. However, I’d take a 3-12 record for Cox as this means we would have at least 3 World Series Championships and I believe this is the minimum expectation given the abundance of talent and opportunities afforded the Braves.
What do I honestly think about Cox? I honestly think he is one if not the best regular season managers for a team rich in starting pitching which will always win the majority of 162 games and beat out 4 other teams. But, I also think he is either simply not bright enough, too stubborn or loyal to a fault. or just simply doesn’t have the “knack” or that difficult to define instinct to make the best decisions at the right time and this is why he is the absolute worst in winning the short series or deciding game against other managers matching him with the comparable starting pitching one sees in a league championship series and certainly the world series.
Do you think it a coincidence that the only championship under Cox came against the Cleveland Indians in 1995 who just happened to have perhaps the worst starting pitching in recent world series history?
He’s a good guy, the players love him, but he truly manages like a little league manager by barking out cute little nicknames to grown men and leaving in weaker players struggling at the plate even if it means losing the darn game. He is simply not world championship manager!
UGASlobberknocker
June 23rd, 2009
8:43 am
Cox is a Hall of Famer for sure. Yet sometimes a team needs to hear a new voice. It is my hope that Cox gracefully retires at the end of this season and we bring in someone new. I definately dont think Pendleton is the man. I would be OK with Yost.
McCann fan
June 23rd, 2009
8:48 am
I’m just glad nobody said “First” today like on DOB’s blogs. I don’t feel like my opinion of Cox should count as much as most, as I have only lived here for 5 years and really didn’t grow up with the Braves.
I am a huge fan now, as a product of making Atlanta my home. Semi-objectively I feel like when a team is not living up to the past and to current expectations sometimes it is time for a change. But many times the injection of something (or someone) new provides a quick and short-lived kick that fades faster than it began.
Changes need to be made, but I’m not ready to conclude that Bobby needs to be one of them. I don’t always agree with his in-game strategy, but I think he will know when it is time to step down, or up into the front office as it were.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
8:55 am
matt_t,
This is where you and I differ. While an element of luck is always a part of any sport, I happened to be a of the group who believes that great coaching supersedes luck most of the time.
Letting Leibrandt pitch to Puckett in 1991 was not luck!
Letting Leibrandt pitch to Carter in 1992 was not luck!
Sitting on your duff and watching McMichaels blow saves is not luck.
Sitting on your duff and watching Kolb blow saves is not luck
Sitting on your duff and watching Wickman blow saves is not luck.
And now, having a team who is the among worst at walking, the worst at striking out, the worst at stealing bases, the worst at bunting, the worst at moving runners, and the worst at just about every important category–except the ERA of the starting pitching, as usual–is an indictment of managerial futility–not luck!
Mitch C
June 23rd, 2009
9:01 am
Mark, I know that I was one of the people who said it was time for Bobby to go, and it’s not because I dont have respect for the man, or what he has accomplished. I’ve been a Braves fan for 26 years, and I have a great deal of respect for what he has done for baseball, this city, and this team. I just thought that maybe, after twenty consecutive years as manager, it might be time for a change. Maybe I’m wrong.
The Braves are only a few games out of first. I ‘m hopeful that we can have a seven and three homestand, and do something to get us back into contention. It would be awesome if this team could make it to the playoffs, even as the wild card. With the way the Mets and Phillies are playing, that isnt an unrealistic goal.
If Bobby stays for a while, I will be fine with it.
Mitch
matt_T
June 23rd, 2009
9:05 am
Larry-
I don’t think its luck. My point is in a small series (which the playoffs are) small things are amplified. For example, the Yankees just lost 4 out of 6 to the Nats and Marlins. Does anyone think the Nats or Marlins are better? No, but in a small series they won.
And I completely agree with you that those examples were completely wrong. I invented new curse words for Kolb/Wickman, that was just unexcusable.
Gene
June 23rd, 2009
9:06 am
Those of us who were around in the 25 years prior to Cox’s arrival probably appreciate him more than more recent fans. Lately the Braves’ front office has made some terrible decisions, and I wonder if Cox has had any say so in disasters like the Teixeria trade and the shabby treatment of Smoltz and Glavine. (Regardless of their value to the Braves, their treatment did nothing for team morale.) Hitting, and clutch hitting in particular, has certainly been a weakness, and perhaps it is time that Cox evaluate Pendleton’s performance.
Retch
June 23rd, 2009
9:09 am
The Braves should have more than one World Series title with the talent Bobby had. But this year is his worst managing job ever. The Braves need to rebuild and make changes, starting with Bobby and Terry Pendleton.
Mark Bradley
June 23rd, 2009
9:09 am
I understand completely, Mitch C. I share some of those sentiments, as I tried to articulate the other day.
Mark Bradley
June 23rd, 2009
9:11 am
OK, here’s a question: Who should Cox have brought in to pitch to Puckett in the 11th inning of Game 6?
Frank
June 23rd, 2009
9:15 am
Bobby Cox is the Bobby Bowden of MLB.He built the Braves from nothing.Let him stay as long as he likes.
Outside Robber
June 23rd, 2009
9:18 am
I agree with another’s comments about Mark having the courage to at least broach the topic of Cox continuing as manager. Good, bad, or indifferent, accountability has to be taken into consideration, doesn’t it?
The Braves have been watching post-season games on TV for the past 3 years. Who do you hold accountable for that?
Kentavo
June 23rd, 2009
9:20 am
Anyone but Liebrandt.
P-Man
June 23rd, 2009
9:22 am
It seems that those who don’t remember the past are doomed to repeat it. Do you remember when Cox was fired after the ‘81 season? He said in print that the team was poised to have a great year. Torre was hired (the only major change) and the Braves won the division in ‘82. Then, after 2 straight 2nd place finishes, Torre was fired because we had “reached a plateau”. We all know what happened after that.
The Falcons also “reached a plateau” with Leeman Bennett, and then promptly disintegrated for 10-15 years. Dan Reeves “reached a plateau” and we got stuck with Mora and Petrino. Change for its own sake isn’t always good.
On another note- when did it become all important to win the championship? It seems nowadays, that people aren’t satisfied if we don’t “win it all”. Only titles matter. The braves have given me years of enjoyment, even when they were a pitiful club in the 70s and 80s. It’s about entertainment. Do I want the Braves (or Falcons, or Dawgs, or Hawks, or…) to win every game? Absolutely! Is it realistic? No! Do I want them to win the title every year? You bet! Is it gonna happen? No way! Am I disappointed? Sure! But you know what? Life goes on, and I’ll root for them the next year, WIN OR LOSE, because I am a FAN!
OK, I am climbing down off my soap box now. Thanks for listening (reading).
Braves73
June 23rd, 2009
9:22 am
Larry – You absolutely nailed it. We all applaud Bobby’s regular season brilliance, but his undeniably a horrible tactical manager. It’s very difficult because the one thing that made/makes Bobby great, is that he is such a GREAT players managers. You could argue that without Bobby the Braves would not have even made the post season with such consistency. I believe that’s what makes Bobby so frustrating. We see his finer qualities (which used to get us to the playoffs), but his horrific late-inning decisions have always left us scratching our heads.
7
June 23rd, 2009
9:23 am
Just because you use the F word and get thrown out don’t mean crap. Not a record to be proud of.
When did 40% of something prove you the winner when the other point on view gets 60%.
If 40% of the Fans are happy with the present Braves, losings last 4 years, no fans in stands, etc Great you got it. But for me and 60% of the fans,we want a winner. Bobby is not the future!
Kentavo
June 23rd, 2009
9:27 am
We need a RH bat!
Mac
June 23rd, 2009
9:28 am
I was a Braves fan when they stunk. And, they stunk for a looooooong time. Hating on Bobby Cox is like hating on Santa Claus. He can retire when he wants to. I don’t think the team will contend this year, but I’m far more encouraged about the rebuilding effort now that there are so many quality pitchers on staff.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
9:30 am
Mark,
After 18 years I can’t remember the options over Leibrandt in 1991. But, had this alone happened in only 1991 you just chalk it up to bad luck. It the same “body or work” of poor, questionable or non decisions that STARTED in 1991 that is the issue here, not just that one at bat. And, just because Leibrandt, a slow, deliberate left hander, had struck out Puckett in two previous at bats is not the reason to pick this match up in the 11th inning. Wouldn’t you think that all of the odds would be in Puckett’s favor giving the facts and Puckett’s all star status? Whew!
This is precisely my point–Bobby Cox does not have a knack or the aptitude to make key, in-game strategic decisions in close or deciding games!
What is your excuse, Mark, for the very next year Bobby Cox letting the same left handed Charlie Leibrandt pitch to the right handed Joe Carter who also had the key hit in game six of the 1992 world series? This is blatant ignorance or stubbornness and neither is acceptable for championship baseball
Don’t be so selective, Mark! 1-14 is impossible to ignore!
VICK FAN
June 23rd, 2009
9:31 am
I SUPPORT MIKE VICK AND NOT SOME SORRY OLD MAN !
Whopper Dawg
June 23rd, 2009
9:33 am
I have been a Braves fan since they arrived to Atlanta. I remember when all I had to hang my hat on was Aaron and Niekro. Bobby and John had a great run. Sparkling regular season records, but unfortunately, I think that they will be viewed as underachievers in the post season, fairly or not. When your rotation includes three HOFs, and you close the deal once, I am afraid that is what you get.
That being said, no way you move Cox out. He is a good manager. I don’t think anyone can do better with this lineup. I looked at the standings a couple of days ago and the Braves were fourth in the East and the fifth worse team in the NL. The last five years or so, management has viewed the Braves as being one piece short of the puzzle, when actually the team was in a more severe decline – the result of which has been to trade for the piece at the expense of young talent which further erodes the base.
They need to develop their talent, trade Chipper for youngsters and start to climb back.
Mark Bradley
June 23rd, 2009
9:33 am
Joe Carter didn’t have the key hit in Game 6 of the 1992 World Series. You could look it up, as Casey Stengel used to say.
Bama Aaron
June 23rd, 2009
9:39 am
I have been on both sides of this issue. I have supported him because during most of my adult life they’ve won much more than when I was a kid. And I have railed against him for his inability to be able to manage a pitching staff and for losing more than he won in World Series. For a long time I believed he was the only man who could properly manage the Braves, I don’t know if that’s true anymore. But I still can’t think of anyone who would be better.
Braves73
June 23rd, 2009
9:41 am
Mark, moving forward you have already stated two possible replacements for Bobby. We all appreciate you toting the company line (as to not piss off someone you may have to potentially interview…again), but it’s clear (as even you stated) that this team and Bobby are not a match. We recognize his previous accomplishments, but it’s time to move on.
abudefdef
June 23rd, 2009
9:42 am
I think Bobby needs to use some speed on the base paths…how many runs get generated by stealing bases, or the threat of a SB causing a pitcher to throw the ball away, or walk a batter, etc?
We need a Nixon/Sanders combo in the outfield again…I bet Neon could still play, sign him for the remainder of the season! BRING BACK NEON DEON!
abudefdef
June 23rd, 2009
9:42 am
NEON DEON for manager?
hmmmmmmm
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
9:43 am
Braves73,
Touché!
P-Man,
The Braves were right to fire Bobby Cox as Joe Torre and Bob Gibson were the perfect pair to propel that 1982 team to a division title. Further, had Joe Torre, Cito Gaston, Sparky Anderson, Whitey Hertzog, Terry Francona or several other good managers been at the helm of the Braves from 1991 through 2006 there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the Braves would have celebrated at least 3, and likely 4 or 5, World Series Championships. I agree with you about Leeman Bennett and Dan Reeves, but Bobby Cox should have been asked to retire at least 2-3 years ago.
Lastly, I don’t disagree that some of us–and that includes me–need to learn to just enjoy the game more regardless of the records. However, I will respect your more passive approach to professional sports where spitters and scratchers earn multi millions of dollars to play a kid’s game if you in return respect my unrelenting desire to only accept championship baseball as the supreme goal.
There are followers and leaders in all professions–I willfully choose the latter!
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
9:49 am
Mark,
Okay, you’re right, it wasn’t Joe Carter it was Dave Winfield. Funny how you didn’t have the courage to mention the identical thing happened and you must have learned this when you looked it up.
The summary:
“With the score still tied in the 11th, Dave Winfield came to the plate with two on and two out. Eleven years earlier, Winfield went 1-for-22 as a Yankee in his only other World Series appearance, a four-games-to-two loss to the Dodgers. Now at age 41, Winfield was looking to redeem that stain on his Hall of Fame resume. But it would have to come at the expense of pitcher Charlie Leibrandt, who was looking for some redemption of his own. The previous year, Leibrandt was also handed the ball with the game tied in extra innings of Game 6, and he promptly surrendered a game-winning home run to Kirby Puckett. This time, it was Winfield’s turn to be the hero, as his two-run double down the third-base line put the Jays up 4-2.”
Shame on you, Mark, for your lack of journalistic courage and integrity!
Herschel Talker
June 23rd, 2009
9:51 am
Where’s Robert?
Anyone who thinks that Cox’s loyalty to his players and inability to handle a pitching staff aren’t hurting the Braves just isn’t paying attention.
Ted Striker
June 23rd, 2009
9:53 am
If — prior to 330 B.C. — you’d polled individuals on whether the earth was flat or spherical, nearly 100% would’ve said “flat.”
I’m not impressed by the 60%. Poll the other 29 MLB managers on the question and I’d be surprised by 6% saying replace Cox. (But what do MLB managers know about baseball that folks who’ve never been to the big leagues without a ticket know anyway?)
Space Monkey
June 23rd, 2009
9:58 am
Bobby has been a great in-season manager for the Braves. But he never realized the importance of one game in a post-season series. That’s why Torre skunked him. Torre knew that every game counted. Torre wouldn’t hang on to a faltering pitcher just because he said he still had some left. If the guy was gassed, Torre yanked him. More importantly, Torre went with the hot hand, rather than the lefty-righty percentages. How many times did Cox pull a great hitter just because of a lefty-lefty matchup and replace him with a banjo hitter instead. Those are my two greatest criticisms of Cox: He stuck with pitchers way too long in critical games and he’s a slave to lefty-righty BS. Any smart manager knows you can force him to yank one of his best players by just announcing that you are bringing in a journeyman left-hander.
BugKiller
June 23rd, 2009
9:59 am
Bobby Cox remains, for all the evidence provided ad naseum, the single most overrated manager in the history of baseball.
And the single worst postseason manager in the history of baseball.
Weak sauce, Mark. Weak sauce.
BOB WICKMAN
June 23rd, 2009
9:59 am
THIS IS GARBAGE. I SHOULD STILL BE ON THIS TEAM
abudefdef
June 23rd, 2009
9:59 am
Ted Striker…awesome comment I must say…
I still vote for NEON DEON, bring some personality and speed!!!
J/K, I’m a HUGE Bobby Cox fan, even though I wish the Braves would RUN more (when we do get on base, that is)
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
10:02 am
Ted,
Of course the other Managers like Cox as they hope to meet him in the postseason where he is the easist to outmanage among their peers. What’s so hard for you to understand here? Joe Torre just loeves Bobby Cox!
Last night’s game is the perfect game fo Bobby Cox where he gets shutout pitching and is left only to make the most obvious decision–filling out the lineup card before the game and then pulling the starter after he tires.
BUT, just watch the next three series when Bobby is forced to think now and then and get back to me next week, okay?
Blackberry Cobbler
June 23rd, 2009
10:05 am
Why is it ok to applaud Cox and give him the credit for all the good years but then not blame him for the decline in recent years? If he gets the credit when things are good then he also has to accept the blame when things are not so good. It’s always a 2-way street.
BugKiller
June 23rd, 2009
10:06 am
And it’s not that I believe I could do a better job than Cox, Mark.
But I know who WOULD have done a better job than Cox:
Joe Torre
Tito Francona
Sparky Anderson
Cito Gaston
Tony LaRussa
Whitey Herzog
Tom Kelly
Jim Leyland
Lou Pinella
Dusty Baker
Buck Schowalter
Jim Fregosi
… and dozens, dozens more.
Shoot, Mark… you give BOBBY VALENTINE the teams Cox had in the 1990’s, and HE wins more than one World Series.
BOBBY VALENTINE!!!
Bobby Cox was handed some of the greatest teams in the history of baseball, and squandered every bit of potential they had come October.
Why?
Because he refused to change his approach. He refused to see that October is DIFFERENT than April.
How many hot bats did he leave on the bench?
How many light-hitting veterans did he leave in the line-up?
How many idiotic platoons did he stick Ryan Klesko in?
How many times did he run Glavine and Maddox out there as his No. 1 & 2 pitchers when HISTORY showed us that in October, those two corner nibblers were .500 pitchers?
How many times did the BEST October pitcher in the history of baseball only get to pitch once, maybe twice in a series?
Mark, do you know what Einstein says about insanity?
It’s doing the same thing, over and over, the same way every time, but expecting a different result each time.
Bobby Cox in October is the DEFINITION of insanity.
BugKiller
June 23rd, 2009
10:10 am
Oh, and Mark, ONLY Bobby Cox could take some of the greatest teams in baseball history and lose to guys like BRUCE BOCHY and PHIL GARNER.
Slap Hitter
June 23rd, 2009
10:11 am
Yeah Lou Pinella would have done a better job…… How many titles has he won with the Cubs who have an abundance of talent and 1 of the highest payrolls in the game. Your just a hater. lucky for us nobody who matters and makes decisions cares what you think
Daniel
June 23rd, 2009
10:11 am
the people that complain about Cox have the same tired arguments, and it is really quite boring. There is NOTHING new to this discussion. The only stone left unturned is what Cox has meant to Atlanta sports and its fans. I mean to say that it is because of Bobby Cox that Atlanta is no longer referred to as Loserville. He is the single most responsible figure for bringing an attitude and awareness of winning to Atlanta and for all the Pro sports teams here. Those that continue to complain about him, do so from the position of fans that are used to winning BECAUSE HE PROVIDED THE WINNING. As you stated earlier Mark, some of the players on this team who are not performing operate from a position of being winners even though they have done nothing to earn that legacy. In general, sports fans are very short-sighted with short attention spans. Quite egotistical as well. To continue to bash Cox, and think that you are being interesting and rebelious in doing so, is asinine. It really just makes you sound like a spoiled brat. So quit it, please.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
10:13 am
BugKiller,
You, Sir, have courage!
However, be most careful here, as your facts may tend to interfere with a good story for old Mark and some baseball goobers on here who worship Bobby and gaze with utmost admiration at the unparalleled depths of his nasal mining.
Larry
Mark Bradley
June 23rd, 2009
10:15 am
Charlie Leibrandt won 15 games in both 1991 and 1992, each time with an ERA of under 3.50. Tell me: What better option, as his fourth (in 1991) and fifth (1992) pitcher of the night, did Cox have than a 15-game winner in extra innings of Game 6 of a World Series? Sandy Koufax? Well, duh. But he wasn’t on the roster.
Tell me: Who should Cox have used?
(FYI: In 1992, Cox didn’t bring in Leibrandt to work the 11th inning. He entered the game at the start of the 10th. Worked a scoreless inning, in other words.)
abudefdef
June 23rd, 2009
10:15 am
NEON DEON!!!!
Question is, would he leave his comfortable ananlyst/reporter gig in Football to take over coaching…does he even want to?
At least one inquiring mind wants to know…
NEON DEON!!!
P-Man
June 23rd, 2009
10:16 am
Larry,
You misunderstand me. I am just as intense as the next guy while the game is going on. When it is over, it’s over (and yes, I may rehash it in my mind and with my friends for a day or 2). My point is that I do not brand people failures because they don’t “win it all”. Ernie Banks was not a failure, Ted Williams was not a failure, etc, etc, etc. The Bills of the early 90s were the most dominant team in the NFL, but lost the Super Bowl, what was it, 4 straight times? Still a GREAT team. Disappointing, but still great. Why can’t we enjoy the success without obsessing over “winning it all”? Only one team (or individual) can “win it all”.
One of the things I liked about College Football (before the BCS) was that half of the bowl teams (the winners) went home happy. A whole bunch of other teams were happy to win the rivalry gane and end the season with a win. Now, however, if you don’t make (and win) the BCS championship game, you’re a failure. Witness how Bob Stoops and Jim Tressel are ridiculed for not “winning it all” the last few years, or how Mark Richt and his assistants are villified in blogs for not making it to the championship game. Are these guys failures? Should they all be fired?
Braves73
June 23rd, 2009
10:16 am
Bug Killer, Space Monkey, & Larry – Dead on with every point made. Bobby has too much player loyalty and can’t make the tough decisions in post season play. I can remember Bobby beating T.P. into the ground (in his 2nd Braves stint) when he had nothing left. I remember Tony Grafininno & Danny Bautiste starting in key playoff games in 97-98. I could go on for days…
Slap Hitter
June 23rd, 2009
10:17 am
Also it takes no courage to sit on a blog and comment on how you think someone should lose his job. Maybe we should start a new blog that is calling for you to get fired (if you are employed).
buckhead bob
June 23rd, 2009
10:18 am
It’s amazing to me how many people responding about Bobby Cox say he is too laid back – too close to his players – too this – too that! I am sure none of the posters have ever played for him – or even been close to a major league dugout – remember Little League doesn’t count. While I have to admit the lack of more Championships is a negative, the Braves have one a lot more ball games than the Hawks or Falcons and more than a lot of other major league baseball teams. Bobby will retire when he is ready and then we will see what direction the team will go. Until then, enjoy!
Slap Hitter
June 23rd, 2009
10:19 am
Exactly Mark, what it looks like to me is we have a lot of Monday morning quaterbacks that think Joe Torre or Larussa would have made a different decision. There was no better choice available to pitch in either situation than Leibrandt.
Ted Striker
June 23rd, 2009
10:21 am
Larry — As I said to you yesterday: “I’m sorry. I don’t have time to play with you.”
alsim
June 23rd, 2009
10:22 am
The real issue you need to look at is NOT who Bobby Cox was as a manager in the 1990s. It is who is Bobby Cox, the manager, in 2009 and beyond.
God bless him for his integrity and years of service to the team, but he just doesn’t have it anymore.
You may recall he almost retired a few seasons ago. I don’t question his heart, but how much heart and energy does he still have left in the tank?
.
Mac
June 23rd, 2009
10:24 am
Larry, man you are hyperactive and annoying. I flick a booger in your general direction, before retiring to get work done.
Jfreak
June 23rd, 2009
10:24 am
Cox has been great for the Braves! He helped turn this team into what was the envy of the sports world for many years. However, that is era has come and gone. Nothing last forever and that includes Cox. I can’t see the Braves firing him and don’t believe he deserves to be fired. Cox has earned the right to decide his furture. However, I feel like Cox’s effectiveness is absent with this young team. He can’t hit for them and they wont listen so we are left to decide do we fire half the team or does one man step aside for the good of the team? Not an easy question to answer.
They are playing a little better overall right now and they are a respectable team. If they hit and learn (or allowed) to play small ball a little more they can compete?? IF?
Justafan
June 23rd, 2009
10:26 am
Ted Striker, speak for yourself son. I was at the Park in 70, 80, 90. where were you. I was there till 3 am in morning for longest extra inning game. I was there when Ted called John Mullen to come to his office to fire Torre,after one person had got in Ted’s ear in his box seat . I was there when Ted fell on field drunk. I was there for Hank’s great homer. I was there with Pearl… 7 years without missing a game..Where was you Stricker, Oh without a ticket?
How the hell do you know what nearly 100% would have said in 330BC? Was you there? Alot of ML mgrs are not to smart just lucky. Have a great day.
How in hell do you know
Braves73
June 23rd, 2009
10:27 am
Mark, you stated earlier on “who would you bring in the 11th inning of game 6, 91 world series”. Well, I have two names (who were RELIEF PITCHERS) that should have been brought in….Kent Mercker, Juan Berenguer.
TNJeff
June 23rd, 2009
10:27 am
I always find it humorous when someone clouts their opinion and supports it as agreed upon by public opinion only to be followed by the disclaimer “unscientific poll.”
So basically we still may not have an accurate assessment … Still I fell I’m getting a better, more accurate assessment of your (Bradley’s) opinions in general. Finding less and less to read in the AJC
BugKiller
June 23rd, 2009
10:28 am
Slap Hitter…
… the point is, you give Lou Pinella some of the greatest teams in the history of baseball and 14 STRAIGHT YEARS OF POSTSEASON PLAY…
… and he wins more than ONE World Series.
And sorry, but you proclaim your ignorance to the world when you compare the current Cubs teams to the Braves teams of the 1990s.
Again… you give ANY manager those teams, and they win more than ONE World Series.
You give Joe Girardi from today those 14 teams, and he wins more than ONE World Series.
Are you finally getting it?
If it finally sinking in to your pea brain yet?
Bobby Cox, and ONLY Bobby Cox, could take those 14 teams and only win ONE World Series.
At the very LEAST, the Braves should have won THREE STRAIGHT World Series, 1995-1997.
And been to at least three more than the five they went to: 1993, 1997, and 2001.
What Bobby Cox has done as manager of this team is EMBARRASSING.
Why do you refuse to face facts?
Daniel
June 23rd, 2009
10:28 am
Bug Killer- Hindsight is 20/20. It must be nice to live a world where you get to look at the results then blame the methods after the fact.
It is a really poor way to look at sports and life for that matter. I also want to let you know that no matter how much the Braves win or lose that empty spot in your soul will never be filled that way. You certainly could display more integrity than ripping Bobby Cox and signing your own name.
TNJeff
June 23rd, 2009
10:29 am
Justafan
You were there all those years? Sounds like you need to get a life!
Daniel
June 23rd, 2009
10:30 am
Bug Killer- All of your statements are supposition. You have not stated one “fact”. When do you refuse to face the english language?
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
10:30 am
Ted,
I’m married, my friend, I wife would prefer that you not “play with me” either. Now, go find a single guy to “play with!”
Larry
Ralph The Cat
June 23rd, 2009
10:30 am
It is the nature of writers and fans to take Managers to task when the result we hope for doesn’t happen. So, the criticism of Bobby Cox is not unexpected. But why not take the Ownership to task for limiting what a team can do financially or the players to task for not producing or the players and agents to task for their greed in placing money ahead of team loyalty. We fans don’t jump ship for greater enticements. We’re here every year — loyal, hopeful, cheering. So, when a beat writer loads up on one of baseballs most successful skippers, it is just another of the distractions we fans have to face. Is Cox perfect? No, but he’s one of the best and we are fortunate to have had him all these years.
BugKiller
June 23rd, 2009
10:30 am
Daniel… hahahahahaha.
Oh, I’m sorry… hahahahahahahahahaha.
Okay, thanks for the laugh.
OutlawPete
June 23rd, 2009
10:35 am
Hershel Talker: Larry IS Robert!!!
J-man
June 23rd, 2009
10:38 am
I have to agree with Larry. I’ve been anti-Cox since the ‘99 World Series fiasco. Cox won 1 World Series because the ‘95 one was the only time he ever faced a manager dumber than himself. It’s well beyond time for Cox to retire with dignity and let someone else take over.
O THomason
June 23rd, 2009
10:39 am
When I think back to Sunday’s game and had a chance to win and playing in a Boston. I ask why in the world do you bring in Benett when we as a team needed that game etc.. This makes me question Bobby Cox again? Well just a thought a great hitting team as the Red Sox’s are. I understand our best closers have been worked but I ask why ? This is what Mark seems to understand and I do also, Great Baseball Man, but the times have changed. Retch I agree with you also. Space u get it.
Mark Bradley
June 23rd, 2009
10:40 am
Juan Berenguer wasn’t on the postseason roster in 1991. He was hurt. (That’s why the Braves signed Alejandro Pena.)
Kent Mercker worked 1 2/3 innings in the postseason of 1991 — and gave up the winning run against Pittsburgh in extra innings of Game 4 of the NLCS. So you’re telling me you’d rather have had a young lefthander who hadn’t had postseason success in the 11th inning of Game 6 than a seasoned lefthander who’d won 15 games and who had pitched in postseasons both as a Royal and a Brave?
Justafan
June 23rd, 2009
10:41 am
TN Jeff…I did and have not been to a game in 4 years. Will not go back till BC is gone.
That was my life for awhile, I’ll leave it at that.
DirtyDawg
June 23rd, 2009
10:42 am
Like way too many of folks here, and I include myself in this, we’re long on opinions and criticisms and short on genuine knowledge. The playoffs are a crap-shoot – particularly the first round – where dominating, hard-throwing, pitchers excel (read, John Smoltz). The teams the Braves brought into the post season leading with Glavine and Maddux, were damn good, but both of those guys were just as capable of giving up a ton of hits as not. If you look back at every post season win, and loss, there were plays and calls that went against us that were certainly out of Bobby’s control (and often in the ump’s – Eric Greg, whoever was umping first on that Kent Hrbeck (sp?) thing, veteran Lonnie Smith’s falling for rookie Knoblock’s deke and failing to look to his third-base coach, about a million calls in that million-inning game with Houston, the lame-ass stalling of Houston’s manager Phil Garner claiming the phone to the bull-pen didn’t work while his closer got ready…and many, many more.
I will admit that Bobby seems to have ‘mellowed’ as he has gotten older, and bigger, and knees that still bark at him when he tries to walk fast (and forgetabout running). Given consistent quality play from his team (and no manager wins without that) he wins and will still. The only thing I wish is that he would figure out something else to do with his hands – either that, or make sure they don’t put a camera on him in the dugout.
Go Bobby…hell, we just might win this thing yet.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
10:44 am
Mark,
To answer your question, only a strikeout pitcher with the game on the line against a good right handed pitcher. Certainly not a slow, deliberate, nibbling lefty. You keep mentioning Leibrandt’s regular season record in 1992 and 1992. My God, man, you DO think like Bobby Cox! Who cares about Leibrandt’s regular season record as a starter when the game is on the line in the 11th inning of game six of the World Series and you have an All Star right handed hitter at the plate? I wouldn’t have brought in Tom Glavine either!
Wow! I’m competing intellectually with an unarmed opponent.
Brian
June 23rd, 2009
10:45 am
Larry, you said “Do you think it a coincidence that the only championship under Cox came against the Cleveland Indians in 1995 who just happened to have perhaps the worst starting pitching in recent world series history?”
Are you serious? The Indians had the best overall ERA in the American League by half a run that year. And their starters’ ERA was also best in the AL.
Hilton Head Island
June 23rd, 2009
10:46 am
The Braves certainly enjoyed an unprecedented 14-year run under the management of Bobby Cox. The fact that he’s won 2000+ games as a major league mananger is proof that he must know a thing or two about the game. What concerns me, however,is that the number of games he’s won is more a testament to his obvious longevity than to his real effectiveness. Given the talent he had to work with for much of that 14-year run, it would have been harder NOT to win.
The problem is that the Bobby worshippers can’t have it both ways. They can’t credit him for number of NLCS and NLDS victories and then turn around and excuse him for coming up short of the big prize in every instance but 1995. In my feeble mind, there is something more than just dumb luck to account for the lack of more World Series wins. We wouldn’t even be talking about the Puckett/Leibrandt matchup in game 6 of the 1991 WS if we didn’t see that as the beginning of a pattern of questionable decisions by Cox. The fact is that he’s stubborn, pure and simple. He sticks to the same playbook year after year and never adjusts his style to fit type of team he has. A team’s dynamic changes year after year and the management should reflect that change.
My biggest problem with Cox, though, is in his inability to see when a player can’t do the job. Case in point: Sunday at the Red Sox. Jeff Bennett is not a major league pitcher and he’s demonstrated this time and time again. Yet Bobby puts Bennet on the mound in the bottom of the 9th…and loses on 1 pitch. Some people say that Bobby is just loyal to his players, and that’s fine. But when loyalty costs the team wins as it has soooo many times in the last 18 years, it becomes one of the biggest reasons we’ve only won the 1 lone World Series.
I don’t think that anyone can argue the fact that the Braves were the best team in baseball for most of the 90’s. So why didn’t we win more World Series? The players play the game according to how their manager manages. So, given the talent of the players in the 90s, one can only conclude that the way in which they were managed left something to be desired. The same can be said for the 2009 Braves. And we have the same manager. Go figure.
Braves73
June 23rd, 2009
10:48 am
Thanks for the correction with Senor Smoke.
Now to Mercker…Yes. There’s a reason why a you have a RELIEF pitcher & a STARTING pitcher. While Charlie Liebrandt was a very good starting pitcher, his normal routine/expertise was not relief pitching. As to Merker’s youth, he had pitched in 50 games & 73 innings (2nd most amungst Braves relievers in 91) while posting a 2.88 era. Again, my answer is YES!!!!!!!!!!!
BugKiller
June 23rd, 2009
10:48 am
STOP SAYING THE PLAYOFFS ARE A CRAPSHOOT AS A DEFENSE OF BOBBY COX!!!!!
This is the SAME frakking excuse Bobby has been using for YEARS to cover for his inept handling of his teams come October and it a complete LIE!!!
You know what a crapshoot is?
Winning 4 World Series in 12 tries.
THAT is a crapshoot.
Joe Torre can use that excuse.
Bobby Cox won ONE World Series in FOURTEEN tries!!!
That is NOT a crapshoot!!!
Stop peddling B.S. lies!!!
Mark Bradley
June 23rd, 2009
10:49 am
I say again: Leibrandt had faced Puckett in Game 1 of the World Series in the very same Metrodome — and had twice struck him out.
And one thing more: When you’re tied in extra innings on the road, you’re not looking for a pitcher to get just one guy out. You know you have to get six more outs to win the game. You can’t just go lefty/righty; otherwise you’ll end up with your shortstop pitching in the 14th.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
10:56 am
“And one thing more: When you’re tied in extra innings on the road, you’re not looking for a pitcher to get just one guy out. You know you have to get six more outs to win the game. You can’t just go lefty/righty; otherwise you’ll end up with your shortstop pitching in the 14th.”
I just popped a vessel!
Mark, simple question for you, okay? What does it take to get to “the 14th”? Answer, to get the guy out in the 11th! Now I know why you support Bobby Cox!
Whew!
DirtyDawg
June 23rd, 2009
11:01 am
BugKiller – I suppose you’ve picked that name because you, like many others of us here, aren’t fans of GTech..either that or you work for Orkin or something in which case I don’t believe I’da told that – regardless, every time you make statements and call ‘em ‘facts’ it skins your ignorance even thinner than I thought possible.
Were we disappointed in not winning more, you bet. Would any other franchise in baseball – including their fans – and with the possible exception of the Yankees that threw more money at players than God, not have traded places with the Braves during that run of 14 straight to the post season? Name it (I suppose that the long-suffering Cubs and Red Sox wouldn’t have because they’re so proud of that cross they’re were carrying on their backs – and the Cubs still do.).
Remember, when Bobby and John S. got us started on this run in ‘91 the Braves were among the laughing stock, if not ‘the’ one, of baseball, and long-suffering Braves fans hadn’t been able to enjoy baseball in September and October in forever. They gave us that and what did we do, took it for granted and blamed them for not giving it all to us…shame on us for that.
Come on Braves – give us another pennant run…I can pull for Georgia and the Falcons, ‘and the Braves’ all at the same time. In fact, it’s the most fun you can have with your clothes on.
Brian
June 23rd, 2009
11:03 am
It’s interesting to me that many of the Cox detractors point to these individual “moments” when he may or may not have made a bad decision. It’s because these people have a singular focus…their world revolves around whether or not the Braves win the WHOLE STINKIN THING every year. I’m more pleased with the quality of baseball and consistent success over a very extended period of time. I’d take being a Braves fan over being a Marlins fan who has two World Series and 15 other years of terrible baseball. I have never understood why some people get so bent out of shape when a team doesn’t win a championship every year. My ultimate goal would be to be a billionaire, but I’ll take a six figure salary any day of the week.
The man is more games over .500 than any manger in baseball history besides John McGraw and Joe McCarthy. Fourth most wins of all time. Among 10 managers with over 2000 wins, his win percentage is fourth. Two, count em, two losing seasons out of his last 21 full years as a manager. He has as sterling a reputation as you will ever find among players, colleagues, and opponents. He made the Braves into (still) one of the top five or so most respected and admired organizations in baseball. And some people are worried about whether he brought in the wrong guy to pitch to one batter 20 years ago.
Braves73
June 23rd, 2009
11:04 am
Mark, I normally agree with most of your logic but you have left me almost speechless. Mercker could have easily pitched 2 innings, not to mention that Puckett was a career .300 hitter against Charlie.
Roja
June 23rd, 2009
11:05 am
I would take our shortstop pitching over Jeff Bennett in a tie game in the bottom of the ninth inning ANY DAY! At least Yunel has an arm!
DirtyDawg
June 23rd, 2009
11:07 am
PS Bugman…I’ll stop saying ‘The playoffs are a crapshoot’…if you’ll STFU altogether.
Herschel Talker
June 23rd, 2009
11:12 am
MB – I don’t think you should focus on Leibrandt. That was no way even close to his most egregious bonehead moves. If you want a list, I’ll give you one, but that one wouldn’t even be on there. Can we focus on real bonehead moves, please? For starters, how about starting Danny Bautista in game 6 against the Padres in 1998? That’s just one of many.
BugKiller
June 23rd, 2009
11:16 am
It all comes down to this, as illustrated by others:
The Cox Apologists give him all of the credit for winning 14 straight (largely worthless) division titles.
The Cox Apologists give him the credit for winning the one World Series.
The Cox Apologists blame the players for 13 Octobers ending in ignominy.
Notice the hypocritical inconsistency there?
Also, notice the complete lack of logic?
Okay, here it goes:
In regular season AND post season football, coaching is more important than talent than in any other sport.
Why? Because in the regular season, there are only 16 games, and in the post season of ANY sport, managing trumps talent.
i.e. bad coaching can sink a talented team, etc.
In baseball, managing (coaching) is LEAST important during the regular season, and TALENT is most important.
Why?
Because there are 162 games. The horrible tactical abilities of the manager are smoothed out due to the fact that the season is so long, as long as the team wins more series than it loses, which is based largely on the talent assembled for the team, then the team will either win it’s division or win the Wild Card.
In baseball, the most talented teams OVERWHELMINGLY make the playoffs.
In football, the best coached teams OVERWHELMINGLY make the playoffs.
In football, sometimes the most talented team is done-in by terrible coaching (Dallas, anyone?) during the regular season, and so, don’t make the playoffs.
Are you people finally seeing where this is going?
Okay, so in baseball, after the talented team makes it to the post season, NOW and only now, does the manager become truly important.
How they set up their pitching rotation.
How they set up their line up and bench.
How they approach the short series where they MUST manager like there is no tomorrow, how they MUST take some gambles. Where they MUST play their hot bats.
Again… the Braves had the best pitcher in post season history. But Bobby Cox, going off of regular season results and not post season history, largely started Maddux and Glavine over John Smoltz every year but 1996.
Why? Why would you not pitch the best pitcher in post season history over two guys who are .500 post season pitchers at best just because one of those guys won the Cy Young that year?
Again… this is Einstein’s definition of insanity coming in to play.
Okay.
The San Diego Padres PROVED that Ryan Klesko could hit lefties.
Manny Ramirez is TERRIBLE defensive left fielder.
So why in the hell was Bobby Cox willing to sit his best home run threat in a stupid platoon for some light-hitting defensive specialist all of those years?
The Braves in the 1990’s has speed.
So why was Bobby Cox so unwilling to hit and run, to bunt players over, to CREATE runs?
You know why Joe Torre and Tito Francona have won 6 World Series between them?
Because they use(d) National League management techniques (small ball) in the American League.
Bobby Cox uses American League managerment techniques (wait for the 3-run homer) with a National League team.
Bobby Cox refused to use his pitchers and bench wisely.
How many Octobers did Andruw Jones make the last out, at home, in the bottom of the ninth, in a win or go home game, with a better hitter (like Julio Franco) sitting on the bench?
Bobby Cox, and his horrible decisions in October, doomed some of the most talented teams every put together by one of baseball’s best GM (and himself, when he was GM) because he refused to manager October with any sense of urgency and with any intelligence.
In the regular season, the idiocy of Bobby Cox was covered up by his great talent.
In the post season, his idiocy was laid bare for all to see when his talented baseball team played against almost equal talent and a smarter manager.
The cream rises to the top.
Bobby Cox is not cream.
Are you getting it now? Do you understand?
In short series, a talented team can be brought down by a terrible manager.
i.e, Bobby Cox and the Braves.
In a short series, a less talented team can beat a more talented team if they have a competent manager.
i.e. Jim Kelly and the 1991 Twins, Jim Fregosi and the 1993 Phillies, Joe Torre and the 1996 Yankees, Jim Leyland and the 1997 Marlins, Bruce Bochy and the 1998 Padres, Tony LaRussa and the 2000 Cardinals, Dusty Baker and the 2002 Giants, Dusty Baker and the 2003 Chicago Cubs, and Phil Garner and the Houston Astros 2004 and 2005.
Every single one of those teams were LESS talented than the Braves teams they faced. Maybe the Marlins in 1997 were equally talented, but they’d be the only ones.
The Braves only legitimately lost a post season series to a more talented team in 1992 (Blue Jays), 1999 (Yankees), and 2001 (Diamond Backs).
That’s it.
Mark Bradley, why when discussing Bobby Cox do you REFUSE to mention the fact that in the vast majority of those 13 post season final losses, did Cox lead his team to a loss against INFERIOR talent to the talent on his own team?
People… STOP blaming the players.
There is a PATTERN of incompetence that cannot be ignored.
Why were so many people here for years willing to believe Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens did steriods based on the PATTERNS… yet refuse to see the same PROOF in the patterns surrounding Bobby Cox?
You people are ALL hypocrites.
Or unbelievably stupid.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
11:18 am
Okay, boys, I want to deviate a little from the infamous decisions by Cox over the years that no one could argue were often wrong, bad luck or not.
More than this, my primary dislike of Bobby Cox is actually not his decisions but his style of baseball. Specifically, Bobby Cox WAITS for things to happen versus MAKES things happen.
From 1991 through about 1995 the Braves were the model in baseball and their concept was “great starting pitching and defense wins the regular season and once the playoffs starts anything can happen.” Of course they finally got it all in 1995. However, starting in 1996, the New Yorks Yankees added an additional element to great pitching and defense: situational, contact hitting and overall team speed. In fact, the Yankees did not really have a 40-50 home run type of guy from 1996 though 2000 and they won 4 World Series during this time with pitching, defense and situational, contact hitters–you know, the kind of hitters that make a difference in a must win game when both teams are sporting great pitchers? Also, since moving away from this model in the last 6-8 years and adding a bunch of long ball hackers they haven’t won it have they?
My point is that Bobby Cox continues with the same strategy and player selection with streaky, hot or cold, Free swinging hacks that when they’re cold they can score 8-10 runs 2-3 games in a row; but, when they’re not, they can go several games with fews runs. Sound familiar?
Bottom line is I cannot stand to go to a game and watch Bobby Cox baseball anymore. It is easily the most boring and predictable thing in the world and I can just absolutely predict that Jeff Francoeur, Kelly Johnson or Matt Diaz will swing at pitches over their heads, in the dirt, or a foot outside the next several game.
Give me a team like the Marlins–yes Marlins this year–the Red Sox, anyone who couples speed, situational, contact hitters, bunters, etc., and you can have this style of baseball that Cox employs year after year that always found the inevitable ability to go cold in the post season at the worst possible moment–like games 4,5 6 of the 1996 World Series, and games 1-4 of the 1999 World Series.
I just don’t like Bobby Cox baseball!
Landslide
June 23rd, 2009
11:23 am
In an election, 60/40 is a landslide.
I just don’t understand how people can give Bobby all the credit when the Braves were winning yet are so eager to blame everything and everyone except Bobby when they lose.
Clint Hurdle-Rockies-gone. Went to the World Series 2 years ago.
Willie Randolph-Mets-gone. Made the playoffs since the Braves. Historic meltdown but whose to say a meltdown is worse than a slow death by underachievement year after year.
Joe Torre-gone from Yanks-4 World Championships with the Yanks-Run off from NY. Landed on his feet with the Dodgers. Change of scenary perhaps.
Phil Garner-Astros-gone-beat the Braves twice in the playoffs-went to World Series once.
Managers on the hot seat according to the press.
Eric Wedge-Indians-hotseat. Cleveland has been to the playoffs since the Braves.
Jerry Manual- Mets
Joe Girardi- Yanks
Jim Leyland- Detroit is playing better so his job is less tenuous than it was when the season began.
Ron Washington-The same can be said for Washington as Leyland, since the Rangers have played much better this season his job doesn’t seem to be at risk like it was when the season began.
Cecil Cooper- Astros
I could go on and on but the point is that Cox isn’t on the hot seat. Isn’t rumored to be on the hot seat and seems to have a job in Atlanta as long as he wants one.
It seems that the price for the Braves winning one World Series in 1995 was to give Cox a job until he is 90 if he wishes to manage that long.
That price is too high. Cox obviously can’t motivate and produce like he used to. If he were Tom Glavine or John Smoltz, he would be gone based on the fact that he had nothing of value left to offer the Braves.
Just a shame the Braves don’t use the same performance measurements of their management as they do when evaluating what Braves future HOFamers have to offer.
7
June 23rd, 2009
11:26 am
Larry, I believe you won that round. Loved the “I popped a vessel!” and “competing intellectually with unarmed opponent.”
Beware Mark is armed. He has the Media as his weapon.
Larry I believe you won that round but Mark does have a weapon. He has the media to get his opinion across. It worked for Obama, and what did we get… 3 Trillion more in debt plus.
Missing the Braves of the 90's......
June 23rd, 2009
11:26 am
Bobby is a very good manager………I thank him for helping turn the Braves into a good team for the last 15 years or so. He is probably one of the best regular season managers ever.
He is NOT a very good postseason manager, fair at best. I have watched every playoff game in the last 17 years..and I can honestly say we should have won more postseason games and maybe another 2 world series. Too bad you can’t have one manager in the regular season and another in the Post-season!
Bobby thanks for all the great years. You are a class act! After this year hand the baton to another and enjoy retirement. We might be bad some years but when we get to the World Series someday we will actually win it.
Don
June 23rd, 2009
11:33 am
It is absolutely unbelievable that Bobby Cox has never understood and that baseball writers do not understand the absolute necessity of working the count and making the opposing pitcher throw a lot of pitches – if you are to have consistant run production. This enebles your hitters to see what the pitcher has, adjust to him, get better pitches to hit, make him make mistakes, tire him out within innings and for the game, get into their weak middle relief ect. etc. Right now the Braves are next to last in all of baseball in average number of pitches seen per at bat. This is typical Cox and is terrible offensive management. You will never have a acceptable run production as long as you do not stress and demand that your hitters do this. Granted Cox is one of the best at keeping team in good spirits on and even keel etc.; but is a terrible offensive manager and in game manager. After all the way he won 14 divisions was having an All Star Pitching Staff so dominant and far far superior to the other teams that it made overcame his incompetence as an offense manager and made it almost impossible to lose the Division over the 162 game regular season schedule. Even with this Piching, he won only one W.S. How can anyone manage for 20 plus years and not understand the absoulute necessity for working the count and making the opposing pitcher throw a lot of piches.
Mark Bradley
June 23rd, 2009
11:38 am
If I had one Bobby Cox postseason move to second-guess — and truth to tell, I second-guessed in the next day’s AJC — it would be his starting lineup for Game 3 in San Diego in the 1998 NLCS. With the Braves down 0-2 in the series, he went with his right-handed platoon of Bautista, Graffanino and Gerald Williams against Sterling Hitchcock … and, because Greg Maddux pitched, he also used Eddie Perez as his catcher as opposed to Javy Lopez. (The headline on the MB column in the Sunday AJC: “Let’s start with that lineup …”)
Javy eventually came to bat in that game — against Trevor Hoffman with the bases loaded and two out in the eighth. (This was at the height of the “Hell’s Bells” Hoffman frenzy.) Hoffman struck him out. The Braves lost to go down 0-3 in the series. They won Games 4 and 5 but were eliminated in Game 6. (Hitchcock against the righty platoon again, although Maddux didn’t pitch so Eddie didn’t catch.)
One final aside: After the Braves won Game 4, someone tugged on my sleeve in the clubhouse — Eddie Perez. He’d read the Game 3 column and wasn’t happy with me. “You don’t think I do a good job catching Maddux?” he asked. I said I thought he did, but down 0-2 I thought the Braves missed Javy’s bat. (Even though Eddie had two hits in Game 3.)
I hated that Eddie was upset because he’s a great guy. And I was tickled when, one year later, Eddie Perez was named MVP of the NLCS against the Mets.
Homer
June 23rd, 2009
11:39 am
FIRE BRADLEY!!!
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
11:39 am
Brian,
While Nagy, Martinez and Hershiser may have led the team in the regular season, both Hershiser and Martinez were like 40+ year old pitchers well past their prime. And, I stand behind my statement the Indians had possibly the weakest World Series Starting Pitching in the past 20-25 seasons.
coach joe
June 23rd, 2009
11:44 am
GOOD STUFF. GREAT DISCUSSIION.
BOBBY DOESN’T HIT OR THROW. NOUGH SAID
GO LSU. TIGER BAIT
Braves73
June 23rd, 2009
11:45 am
You took the words out of my mouth…literally! As I stated earlier (which you further elaborated), that was a Bobby classic…truly one for the ages.
P Rose
June 23rd, 2009
11:49 am
Paint it Black
I see the record and I want it painted black.
No 14 happy years, I want them painted black.
Although the Braves won 14 seasons in a row,
I won’t be happy without 14 more of those.
I see a manager, I want him painted black,
With pennants and a ring both never to come back.
I saw 1995 and quickly looked away.
Like a newborn baby, I just whine all night and day.
I look inside myself and see my heart is black.
I saw a series win, I want it painted black.
Maybe then the Braves will fade away and not come back
You can’t enjoy a winning team when your whole world is black.
Ted Striker
June 23rd, 2009
11:50 am
To 10:26 a.m. — (1) You’ve displayed admirable passion for Braves baseball over the years. You’ve watched more games than me so it’s possible – but not assured – you might maybe possibly know a smidgen more on baseball. But it’s doubtful you know more about the game than say, Bobby Cox.
(2) If you want argue it was widely believed that the earth was spherical in 330 B.C., fine. Aristotle and Pythagoras were just following the crowd, eh?
(3) You don’t like Bobby Cox. You don’t like the facts about 330 B.C. Is it really them — or is it that anything with the initials B.C. gets you riled? How do you feel about Boston College, Betty Crocker, British Columbia, birth control, and bacon cheeseburgers?
DirtyDawg
June 23rd, 2009
11:51 am
Damn bugman…I suggested that you STFU and you filibuster the damn place…and Brian, you said what I was trying to say (that the Braves have given us far more to cheer about than any other franchise in baseball over those 14 years) only with far more eloquence.
BUCK
June 23rd, 2009
11:51 am
Maybe you would like to have Chuck Tanner back? What should be pointed out over and over is the true test for any team or manager is the 162 game season. Post-season baseball, thanks to Bud, is a farce. Since the inception of the wildcard 25% of the teams who participated in the post season did not belong there. In a stretch from 2002 – 2004 the three teams that hoisted the once coveted World Series trophy were not even good enough to win their division. I haven’t forgotten ‘97 either. The 5 game division series format is the joke of all jokes. Anybody can beat anybody during a short series. Example: In 2003 the Detroit Tigers fell just shy of being the worst team in baseball history losing 119 games, yet during the final series of the year took 3 of 4 from 90 game winner Minnesota. So logically Detroit was a far better team, and Alan Trammell was a far better manager than Ron Gardenhire. My point is; modern postseason records have no place in baseball record books and these same records should not be used as a yard-stick to measure managerial competence. My confidence is still with Bobby Cox.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
11:54 am
“If I had one Bobby Cox postseason move to second-guess and truth to tell…Eddie Perez. He’d read the Game 3 column and wasn’t happy with me. “You don’t think I do a good job catching Maddux?” he asked. I said I thought he did, but down 0-2 I thought the Braves missed Javy’s bat. (Even though Eddie had two hits in Game 3.)
I hated that Eddie was upset because he’s a great guy. And I was tickled when, one year later, Eddie Perez was named MVP of the NLCS against the Mets.”
Wow! Mark admitted to the entire world he almost, kind of, sort of, criticized a a Cox move and a player decision–once in 20 years!
Please excuse me while I go puke!
.
.
.
.
.
.
Okay, I’m back and feeling better! Come on Mark, I’m starting to like the smidgen of courage from you! Can we have some more?
Bravo
June 23rd, 2009
11:55 am
I have a question, Why won’t the braves look at a possibility of trading for Berkman? I’d think a trade of Kelly Johnson, Kotchman and Stephen Marek? There could also be a possibility of adding a lower level prospect to this deal also. That would give the Braves added power at 1st (badly needed), another switch-hitter behind Chipper (badly needed) and a player that could also play left field. This trade would allow the braves to move Prado to an everyday role while waiting for Infante. This would greatly improve our line up.
tylergmcdonald
June 23rd, 2009
11:57 am
Showing support for Cox headline…brilliant. Are his supporters called the tighty whities?
Mac
June 23rd, 2009
12:02 pm
Responding to a hyperactive buffoon’s baiting is courage? Not. Don’t do it Mark. Larry and the like are like the Vick posters – when you respond, they win. Schultz had an unbalanced, hostile stalker yesterday.
P Rose
June 23rd, 2009
12:07 pm
I agree wholeheartedly with P-Man and Buck.
Brian
June 23rd, 2009
12:07 pm
Larry, I guess you can believe that, but it’s quite a subjective leap. The Indians led the AL in starters’ ERA, and their starters only gave up 9 total runs in the 9 ALDS and ALCS games before the World Series. Just for one example, the 2006 WS Champion Cardinals were 12th in the NL in starters’ ERA.
That Cleveland team was absolutely loaded and dominated in every phase of the game. Only six teams in modern baseball history had a higher win percentage.
JMac12203
June 23rd, 2009
12:14 pm
If according to Matt T weird things can happen in a short series, why did they always happen to the Bravos?? It is because Bobby could lead his team in a 162 game season with many games played against INFERIOR teams. However, in the playoffs everyone is reasonably equal. In general it is fairly well known that in a short playoff series pitching and defense usually will prevail. Who had better pitching than Atlanta? And still they won ONLY 1 of 15 final postseason games. And today… Bobby’s time has passed. HE NEEDS TO GO!!!!
NO MORE BOBBY
June 23rd, 2009
12:19 pm
TOP 3 REASONS DUMB BRAVES FANS STILL LIKE BOBBY COX…..
3. He reminds me of my papa.
2. I love when he gets thrown out of games! Its better than wrastlin (wrestling).
3. If Bobby goes so do those $6 Casino Moon tickets and times are tuff right now.
(In a redneck accent.)
P Rose
June 23rd, 2009
12:26 pm
To say a manager is a failure because he wins 60 percent of the time but goes 1-14 in the last series of the season is flawed logic. Let’s take a similar scenario: The NCAA Basketball Tournament. Of the 64 best teams in the country, 63 lose their final series. Does that mean that all 63 coaches are failures and should be fired? Of the 30 Major League Baseball teams, only eight make the playoffs. Seven of those end their season on a series loss. Are all seven teams, and their managers, therefore deemed failures? Only one team can win it all, and to be the one team out of 30 to do so is not that easy, folks. Since 1991, how many World Series have the Dodgers won? How about the Mets? Only the Yankees, Red Sox, Marlins and Blue Jays have won more World Series than the Braves in the last 20 years. Nineteen of the 30 MLB teams have zero world titles since 1991. In baseball, more than in any other team sport, longevity is what matters. Fourteen straight division titles is an astounding achievement, and a World Series title is nothing to be ashamed of. Thanks Bobby – and Go Braves!
Mark Bradley
June 23rd, 2009
12:29 pm
P Rose — more hits than the Hit King Peter Edward Rose, if you ask me.
Hilton Head Island
June 23rd, 2009
12:31 pm
Buck-
Your points on modern-day baseball are well taken. It’s true that anything can happen in the postseason, especially the best-of-five Division Series. But you see, that’s exactly when a manager has to be willing to try new things and make whatever moves he has to to win games. The formula that Cox used for the regular season in the 90’s obviously worked well over the course of six months and 162 games, but the refusal to adjust his philosophy in a short series cost us dearly. The true test for a manager IS NOT the 162 game season, it’s the ability to adjust and be more flexible with decisions in a short series. You don’t have the luxury of being passive in a 5 or even a 7 game series as EVERY move increases in importance a thousand percent! There is no next week in the postseason. It’s do or die. unfortunately, we died too many times.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
12:36 pm
Mac,
I pity you man!
At least most others here have the ability and willingness to debate, vent, argue, and spar about the solutions and differing opinions. But you, Mac, you’re like the fat little non athletic kid who watches from a distance and because we won’t let you play you scream an insult from a great distance just far enough that we can’t catch you before you lock your door! You just call someone a “meanie” and then flee!
Yes, Mac, you’re a cowardly girly man and I truly pity the likes of you!
Big Al
June 23rd, 2009
12:37 pm
There are a lot of things I was better at when I was younger. Cox has never been nor will he ever be a good tactician.
Anyone could have won all those games in the 90’s with that pitching staff and line-up. Just fill in the card and sit back.
His record in one run games is what gives away his deficiencies.
Tommy Lasorda once said a good manager should be worth one run per game to his ball club. Cox is a negative one run to the Braves.
John OTC
June 23rd, 2009
12:42 pm
For those of you busting up on Cox for running Glav and Mad Dog out there in as #1 and #2 starters in the postseason……Who pitched 8 shutout innings the night we won it all?
John OTC
June 23rd, 2009
12:44 pm
For those of you busting up on Cox saying anyone could have won with that lineup….Who was the GM stocking the farm system prior to ‘91?
Landslide
June 23rd, 2009
12:45 pm
HEY BUCK!
Chuck Tanner won as many World Series as Bobby Cox. So what’s your point? A little more knowledge about the game would help ya, son.
John OTC
June 23rd, 2009
12:47 pm
For those of you busting up on Cox saying that anyone could have won once in 14 years. Go bust your butt, becme a major league manager, win 14 consecutive titles with at least 2 WS wins and when you are inducted into the HOF be sure to mention that you were right about Bobby.
Brian
June 23rd, 2009
12:50 pm
Big Al, the Braves have a winning record in one-run games since 1991.
John OTC
June 23rd, 2009
12:52 pm
For those of you busting up on Cox for playing KJ, GA, JF or anybody….Tell me who on the Atlanta bench is better?
P Rose
June 23rd, 2009
12:52 pm
Winning it all in the postseason is not a 50-50 proposition. There are eight teams in the playoffs (the best eight teams in the majors), so the odds of winning it all – once you get there – are only 12.5 percent. But first you have to get there. Only eight of the 30 teams in the majors even make it to the postseason at all, so the odds of making it are only 26.7 percent. Clearly, the fact that Bobby Cox’s Braves beat the odds by making the postseason 14 straight years is a phenomenon that will be of more historical significance than the “failure” of having won only one World Series title.
John OTC
June 23rd, 2009
12:55 pm
I can’t even guess “heads” or “Tails” right 14 times in a row. The man won with every team he was given for 14 years. Yes, we’ve had some HOF’ers here but he’s managed around injuries, Albie Lopez, John Rocker, Jason Marquis, Bruce Chen and a ton of other flops too.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
12:58 pm
John,
It’s pretty easy to “stock the farm system” when you’re picking 1st, 2nd or 3rd every year from about 1985 though 1990. That’s how the Braves ended up with Glavine, Justice, Chipper, Gant, Avery, Lemke, Blauser and a few others.
But, who was the GM that in 1991 brought in Pena, Pendleton, Otis Nixon, Rafael Belliard, Charlie Leibrandt and Sid Bream to propell this team to their first division title? Mr. Schuerholz! The list including Maddux, McGriff, Devereaux, Wholers, Grissom, Berryhill, Lopez, Klesko, Polonia, Charlie O’Brian,to help win the 1995 World Series was also because of one Mr. Schuerholz!
Landslide
June 23rd, 2009
1:00 pm
It’s all about whether as a fan you want to salute Bobby Cox for the rest of his days or to win baseball games.
If you believe that Bobby Cox was responsible for that run of 14 straight, is he not responsible for the collapse of the team since?
Then there are those here who say that it’s all on the hitting, pitching and defense. That Bobby doesn’t hit, pitch or play defense so he shouldn’t be held accountable.
Geez folks, if all the manager does is fill out the lineup card and sit in the dugout and pick his nose during the game, give me a Playboy Playmate or someone like that to look at during the game in the role of manager!
Selective memory is a great thing. On this blog, selective memory turns down right schizophrenic! He won it for the Braves? He isn’t responsible of losing it for the Braves?
Which is it? Can’t be both ways!
I have to agree with ESPN radio guy Colin Cowherd. Basically he says if you drink the Kool-Aid that team management puts out there for you without question, then you deserve what you get.
The Dude
June 23rd, 2009
1:05 pm
Larry, you’re not a leader buddy, you’re a blow-hard. There’s a big difference. Also, give it a rest, Mark is owning you all over this blog.
BugKiller
June 23rd, 2009
1:06 pm
John OTC
You inability to comprehend logic is laughable.
BOBBY COX HAD LITTLE TO NOTHING TO DO WITH WINNING 14 STRAIGHT DIVISIONS.
TALENT DID.
BOBBY COX HAD ALMOST EVERYTHING TO DO WITH LOSING IN ALL OF THOSE OCTOBERS.
MANAGERS MATTER IN THE POSTSEASON.
THEY DO NOT MATTER IN THE REGULAR SEASON. IT IS TOO LONG.
THIS IS NOT FOOTBALL.
There.
I shouted. I spoke in the simplest terms I could for you.
The next step is for me to really break it down Barney Style for you.
Are you really such an idiot as that, John OTC?
Your arguments are purile and lack an ounce of logic.
“You do it.”
Yeah. Real intelligent argument.
John OTC
June 23rd, 2009
1:12 pm
Larry,
I agree that Schuerholz did a great job. But so did Cox. Also, having the first pick in the draft (twice sine 1965) doesn’t guarentee sucess. If it did, we would all be big fans of Matt Bush (2004), Bryan Bullington (2002) and Matt Anderson (1997) in addition to Josh Hamilton, Joe Mauer and David Price.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
1:15 pm
The Dude,
Man, to state that Mark “owns” me I don’t think even Mark would assert. Honestly, Dude, you are the classic definition of “country dumb.”
Now go spit on your grits!
John OTC
June 23rd, 2009
1:21 pm
Wow, I got to BugKiller? Is that an accomplishment? Buggy, I started out by asking some questions. Not making arguements.
Your argument is that managers don’t matter in the regular season and you think I’m purile (spelled correctly it would be puerile)? I think if you could convince the 30 MLB teams to fire their managers and use smart bloggers in the post season, you could make a few bucks off the money you would save them. Hey, you could use that stack of money from the insurance commercials….
Lefty
June 23rd, 2009
1:23 pm
So, if Bobby were a better manager, Lonnie Smith doesn’t fall for a decoy and Mark Wohlers doesn’t hang a slider. Those two plays are basically all that separate Bobby from being 3-2 in World Series competition. Oh, and let’s not forget Eric Gregg giving the Marlins the pivotal Game 5 of the ‘97 NLCS.
Now the game has apparently passed him by. But didn’t he just win the Sporting News Manager of the Year in 2005 by winning 90 games with a bunch of rookies? Oh yeah, he also won the award in 2004, 2003, 2002, 1999, 1993, 1991, & 1985. He also won the Baseball Writers Manager of the Year Award in 1985, 1991, 2004, & 2005. Of course, the geniuses on this blog know EVERYTHING about being the manager of a baseball team since they’ve mastered the idea behind the “double switch”. Sit back, relax, and accept the fact that playing rotisserie baseball or Strat-O-Matic only qualifies you to be a geek. The idiots that think Bobby is a liability probably think that Joe Torre or Tony LaRussa would be better options because they’ve won multiple World Series titles. Hey, Atlanta ran Joe Torre out of here, too, and it took LaRussa 30 years to get WS number 2, despite having the dominant team in the league for 5+ years with the A’s.
The problem isn’t the manager or the hitting coach. Nobody could win with the players Atlanta has had the past few years. If you put lipstick on a pig….
zincc
June 23rd, 2009
1:31 pm
Hey, NO MORE BOBBY, you are wrong about those of us that like Bobby Cox and want him to stay until he’s ready to retire. He doesn’t remind me of my papa, I don’t like it when he gets tossed but I do appreciate his defense of his players, and I don’t even have a clue about those $6 Casino Moon tickets you were talking about (oh, and I don’t like wraslin!!!). I do, however, have the memories of those long ago games when the Braves were a joke to the rest of baseball (and, yes, I did watch them and root for them even then). Cox has been a great manager and has proven his knowledge of baseball and his players (although I will admit there have been times when I would like for him to move a little more quickly when removing a pitcher that is struggling). At any rate, don’t criticize those of us who continue to support Cox for his efforts. That long dry spell “back in the day” that Cox helped to turn around is enough of a reason to sing his praises, and I will continue to sing them until he makes his own decision to leave/retire. And, when that happens, I’ll be sorry to see him go.
BugKiller
June 23rd, 2009
1:31 pm
Lefty,
For you to even insinuate that Joe Torre isn’t a better manager than Bobby Cox is ridiculous.
The 1996 Yankees were in NO WAY more talented than the 1996 Braves.
Which manager won that Series, Lefty?
Adam
June 23rd, 2009
1:35 pm
Cox is going to the Hall — no doubt. Whether we like it or not he has earned control over his own destiny.
But when you have an offense like the 1966 Dodgers and you get lockdown pitching performances, you HAVE to play more small ball. Three-run homers are not coming.
swhite
June 23rd, 2009
1:38 pm
There’s a great cartoon, I believe from Charles Addams, that is most appropriate here. It’s of a football game, stands packed, players ramming each other on the field. The coach on the sidelines is turned toward the stands, his finger pointing at one particular guy. “You,” he says, “with all the advice. You go in for Kowalski!” While it’s so easy to criticize and belly-ache about the poor managing job Cox has done at times, I wonder how many excellent decisions he has made that none of us remembers or brings up? How many games that should have been lost were won because he made the right decision, brought in the right pinch hitter, brought in the right reliever, stayed with a guy one more time to bolster his confidence, etc. etc.? How many bone-headed decisions has Tony LaRussa made? How many times has he gone with someone too long or played the percentages and got burned? I remember quite clearly when Joe Torre won that division title with the Braves, with Jerry Royster doing a fantastic job for the injured Bob Horner. Horner got well right at the end and Torre put him in to play 3rd base in the playoffs, instead of the hot Royster. Dumb move? Absolutely! Take a look at Torre’s record before he moved to the $200 million, sky’s the limit Yankees. Not too good, very mediocre. Don’t forget, also, that Torre lost to the Wild Card Team three years in a row, once when he was ahead 3 games to none! I guess he doesn’t know how to manage in a short series either. I imagine Cox will retire soon, and you guys will be happy, until the next guy doesn’t do as well as Cox.
varodrunner
June 23rd, 2009
1:41 pm
BugKiller
Sorry dude, but yours is the ingnorant comment here. To say “managers do not matter during the regular season is just wrong. Sure Bobby Cox had great pitching during that run, but he had head cases as witnessed by a young Andrew Jones loafing in the outfield and being pulled out of the field with only one oout in the inning. That’s managing!. Joe CArter’s homerun, kept us from our first WS title, we got beat. As Mark poinnts out, Leibrant had stuck out Pucket twice before in the series, so Bobby made a wise decision that didn’t work out. Pucket was a great hitter. Let’s say Bobby doesn’t bring in Leibrant to pitch to Pucket and Pucket hits the same homerun, people like you would be arguing, he should have broought in Leibrant. Ignorance is ignorance and yours in on display with your comments. Love to all.
Now Mark, I’m unclear on your position on the topic of – Is it time for Bobby to go? Your previous column left me with the impression that you feel for the Braves to win, they need a new managing style with apparently Bobby cannot deliver. Am i correct? No one can argue with Bobby’s sucess, but he seems to has lost his way with the new generation of Braves. He is no longer motivating the team as evidenced by their lacklucter play. The display in the last game with Boston was refreshing. And to see Chipper and O’Flattery (sp) get outwardly pissed is the type of fire we need from this team. Not that we can afford them being thrown out of games often, but it was FIRE.
And then last night with McCann going all out to catch that foul pop up, that too was refreshing. This team needs fire and if some of the guys will follow suit, they might have a chance. Even Franceour took a couple of swings that were clearly not meant to be homeruns and wow, the result was his best night in a long time.
but back to the original question – where do you stand on the Braves needing a new style of managing?
I do not think Bobby can adjust his current managing style, so I guess the real question is – Do you think the Braves can consistently win under Bobby?
Adam
June 23rd, 2009
1:41 pm
If I’m Cox I get Don Sutton to explain to me how those ‘66 Dodgers won games and went to the Series. The Braves’ clubhouse should have a goal of getting to 4 runs each game, even if it means sacrificing, stealing bases, making productive outs. That’s when the team could get back into the black.
jed
June 23rd, 2009
1:41 pm
i think i’d hate it if cox got fired, really, but at the same time, i think he’s as much to blame for this team’s under-achievement as anybody. running JF & KJ out there every day to sap the offense while keeping Infante on the bench? that’s inexcusable. on top of that, he mismanages the bullpen on a nearly nightly basis. being a field strategist has never been cox’s talent. his skill is managing personalities over the course of a long season. when he had the horses, he didnt drop the ball. but the loyalty & patience he showed to those teams just doesnt work with these teams of late. i dont want him fired but he should probably leave after this year, and somebody needs to talk to him about KJ & JF immediately
John OTC
June 23rd, 2009
1:42 pm
Buggy. My point wasn’t simply “you do it.” I told you to go do better.
Since you can’t go win 14 straight and since no one else has ever managed a team to 14 (really 15 if you think about the Jays) titles I’m going to say that Bobby has done a great job. Maybe these particular Braves aren’t winning and maybe they’d be magic for another manager. I just believe that if a team can’t win for Bobby then the team can’t win for anyone.
zincc
June 23rd, 2009
1:45 pm
John OTC, I like your comments. I agree with you 100%.
timthebrave
June 23rd, 2009
1:45 pm
The manager has very little to do with winning world series. Pitching and timely hitting win titles.
timthebrave
June 23rd, 2009
1:48 pm
Who would you suggest be our manager if you don’t like Bobby? I bet money that if you ran bobby cox out of town that pendleton would be our manager…Then you would really be screaming bloody murder. Go Braves!
varodrunner
June 23rd, 2009
1:49 pm
Lefty – OMG – You didn’t bring Eric Gregg into this did you?
I hated that man after that appalling sight. Clearly the Braves were not going to win that game. Eric Gregg made sure of that.
your post is absolutely – Right On! The Braves could easily be 3 – 2 in the WS or better and Bobby had very little to do with the losses. CArter hits a homerun! Pucket hits a homerun – and in the same game, lonnie runs liek a little leaguer.
Nice post IMHO
John OTC
June 23rd, 2009
1:50 pm
Honestly people. If you’re suggesting Cox should play Infante then you should catch up.
Omar Infante #4 Second Base/Shortstop: Injury Note 15-day DL as of May 21, 2009 (Fractured left hand)
Infante = Fractured left hand
You’re joking right? Sit a player so you can play a guy with a broken left hand? If Cox did that then it woulf really be time for him to go.
John OTC
June 23rd, 2009
1:53 pm
zincc. Thanks, you too. I think Lefty has made some great points.
Mark Bradley
June 23rd, 2009
1:54 pm
My position on Bobby Cox: He’s the greatest manager I’ve ever seen, but I’m not sure he’s the right manager for the 2009 Braves. There just seems to be something … missing.
But they’re only four games out of first place, so what the heck do I know?
varodrunner
June 23rd, 2009
1:54 pm
Man o man
I want some of that stuff P Rose is on.
I could stand som dilussion right now.
varodrunner
June 23rd, 2009
1:56 pm
Mark
Thanks for the response – I couldn’t agree more. He had wonderful years and has been one of the most successful managers in the history of MLB. But, I too, think his time has passed.
Bobby Cox
June 23rd, 2009
1:58 pm
Does Larry and the Bug man not have jobs?
varodrunner
June 23rd, 2009
1:59 pm
Mark
Thanks for the clarification and I could not agree more. Bobby has had a wonderful managerial career and is one of, is not the best, manager in MLB history. I sadly say tho, I think his time has passed.
Jeremiah
June 23rd, 2009
2:05 pm
Larry, You sir are an idiot! Bobby Cox is one of the best managers baseball has ever seen, period! I’m am not even going to delve into your pathetic reasoning for disliking Bobby, that would take too long, and I am not going to change your opinion, obviously…You (I can tell), are one of these pathetic fans that think you know more than you really do. You don’t know Bobby at all, you don’t know baseball or strategy, and you are a Monday Morning Quarterback who is an idiot. If I met someone as stupid as you, I’d probably punch you right in your stupid, opinionated face! Do us all a favor, and keep your dumb A$$ posts to yourself…
varodrunner
June 23rd, 2009
2:06 pm
Slow post – sorry for the double post
Bobby Cox
June 23rd, 2009
2:12 pm
Thank you Jeremiah
Justafan
June 23rd, 2009
2:24 pm
Ted Striker, In 330 BC nearly 80 % of the people didn’t know Aristotle and Pythagoras. Today I’d bet 25 % of people still don’t know them and 20 % or more don’t know if world is round or not. I’d bet 40% don’t know the VP of USA. Some don’t know the Pres?
I do like Bobby Cox as a person. Even been fishing with him but that don’t have nothing to do with Baseball. Yes, Bobby knows more baseball than me. So What does that prove?
Now for the rest of the story. Boston College- like soon? Betty Crooker -Yes. British Columbia its ok. Birth Control-Yes. Bacon Cheeseburgers- Love!!!!!!!!!!!
Ted, I even like you. You have a right to your opinion.
P-Man
June 23rd, 2009
2:30 pm
Brian,
I agree with you 100%
ChopHasFlopped
June 23rd, 2009
2:35 pm
I find it laughable that 1992 is being debated. It says something about where this team has been mired in the last number of years. I was pleased last night to see Atlanta do some small things to win the game. I would love to see more of this. Did anyone notice that Martin Prado replaced Kelly Johnson at second and made two really good plays? Did anyone notice that Frenchy had two more hits? If I am not mistaken, Atlanta won without their big two doing a whole lot. This has been the case with Chipper for a while. He’ll be back. I would love to see Atlanta deal for Felipe Lopez of Arizona and insert him at First base. I also notice that Ken Rosenthal says that Atlanta may be a destination for Troy Glaus when he recovers. Let’s see, Glaus at first, Lopez at second, plus another outfielder and we may be hitting on something!
Lefty
June 23rd, 2009
2:38 pm
“MANAGERS MATTER IN THE POSTSEASON.
THEY DO NOT MATTER IN THE REGULAR SEASON. IT IS TOO LONG.”
Okay, for the clown who actually wrote this garbage, do you know anything about baseball? Most baseball people will tell you the EXACT opposite. The post season is a crap-shoot. Tom Kelly never lost a World Series, yet he’ll be the first to tell you that getting there was the battle. Once he was in the ‘87 & ‘91 WS, he rode Frank Viola and Jack Morris to two titles. Read his book! That’s when the manager gets out of the way and lets the players decide the game. His work was in spring training and the regular season.
Even today, many consider Ron Gardenhire to be one of the best managers in baseball. In reality, he hasn’t won much of anything, except the respect of his players, peers, and fans. The Twins are perennial contenders with NO payroll to speak of. How do they do it? They have a great manager who understands the importance of spring training and the regular season. The fact that the Twins haven’t won a World Series since 1991 doesn’t have beans to do with the quality of their manager, and the fact that the Braves only won a single title in 1995 doesn’t mean squat about Bobby Cox either. If Lonnie Smith walks from second to third, the Braves win in 1991 – not the manager’s fault.
Hillbilly Deluxe
June 23rd, 2009
2:47 pm
In my view you can judge a manager by his record in one run games. Those are games where he can make a difference. A manager can’t do much to change a 9-0 win ir a 9-0 loss. (I have no idea what Cox’s record is in one run games by the way).
What I always thought hurt the Bobby Cox teams (both Atlanta and Toronto) in the post season was that they were weak on the fundamentals (base running, moving runners over, etc.). The little things are magnified in a short series aand every play means something.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
2:48 pm
Jeremiah,
Please do not strike me simply because I’m stupid and opinionated. A real man would never hit another over a stupid opinion on a bog so my guess is you’re quite young, brash and quick tempered.
For the record I do not hate Bobby Cox, I actually kind of like him, and he’d be one of the first guys I’d want were I choosing a manager for non compensated players as he is likable, plays everyone, and allows a player to fail and fail giving him every opportunity–to a fault–to correct his swing or delivery. On the contrary, this is professional sports and I have have been paying thousands and thousands of dollars for my “Hank Aaron” seats, parking passes and ludicrous prices for food and refreshments since 1991 so I am completely exhausted at watching little league baseball management in the World Series!
Trust me, Jeremiah, I’m more annoyed and these meek, girl men sportswriters who secretly want to be on radio and TV stations and continue to gain access to the Braves clubhouse buffet and thus choose to avoid tough journalism so they can stay on good terms with certain teams and companies that I am angered by Bobby Cox game decisions. Bobby Cox is what is is, but I think he probably does what he thinks is right even if I happen to disagree or think he’s wrong. At least he has some integrity!
Coach ( 2010 or Bust)
June 23rd, 2009
2:49 pm
Bradley, you must be a Democrat
66 and 66, know what it is?
The complete overall post season record of none other than Bobby Cox. The man has lost more post season games than any other manager in ML history.
Cox is 6 and 5 in the first round of the playoffs.
Cox is 5 and 5 in the League Championship series (he lost one with Toronto).
And last but not least, our venerable Hall of Fame manager is 1 for 4 in the World Series.
That by definition is O-V-E-R-R-A-T-E-D.
Sure, Cox is a great manager, in the regular season. I love the guy and think the world of him. But Bobby is what he is…..a winner and a one trick pony.
TennesseePaul
June 23rd, 2009
2:58 pm
[1-14 last game record] “I would consider this to be this most important of statistics in that Bobby ”
I would disagree. I think it is one of the most assine stats on the planet to judge a good manager. Almost every time this ridiculous stat is brought up the person hoisting it to the top of foolish reasons to fire a manager turns around and says Leyland is a better manager despite being bested by Cox in the post season.
Aside from that, 1-14 also includes games like, oh let’s see… Joey Devine and the great NLDS. But it wasn’t all Joey’s fault. Kyle Farnswoth, the Braves best reliever down the stretch, blew that with his grandslam pitch to Berkman and then his fat homer to Ausmus.
Cox calls on the guys that have done well, and those guys for the most part have failed. But to a “1-14″ type stat, this is irrelavent. Cox should have choose some one else, or done the work himself. If the final charge was left in the hands of Chipper Jones, or even Hank Aaron and Bobby was managing, a loss made final by Jones or Aaron would be ruled Bobby’s fault by these armchair managers.
I have yet to read or hear a valid reason as to why Bobby Cox is not a good manager. I blame the players. It’s the Jeff Francoeur singles-hitters and Kelly Johnson out machines and brick gloves that prevent a team from winning. The Todd Pratt, Corky Miller, and all the rest of the crap that has sat on the bench the last few years.
TennesseePaul
June 23rd, 2009
3:02 pm
Bradley: “My position on Bobby Cox: He’s the greatest manager I’ve ever seen, but I’m not sure he’s the right manager for the 2009 Braves. There just seems to be something … missing.”
I think he’s the right manager for the Braves in 2009. I jus think the team is wrong. I fear the idea of firing Bobby to “spark” the club. His replacement will be Terry Pendelton and that just doesn’t sound good.
ABravesFan
June 23rd, 2009
3:08 pm
Bobby is not the best tactician but a very good manager of people. Nevertheless, he has earned the right to lead the Braves for as long as he wants. I wouldn’t be too disappointed when he does decide to hang it up but the next guy is likely not nearly as good as Bobby.
ABravesFan
June 23rd, 2009
3:09 pm
On the other hand, TP as the manager would mean that someone else is the new hitting coach…that would likely be an improvement.
Poorjeff
June 23rd, 2009
3:10 pm
Tenn-Paul, Just where did infro come from that TP will be next Mgr. Thats just BS, did John, Frank are Bobby say that. Hell no.
Skeezix
June 23rd, 2009
3:15 pm
Put me in the 40%. Are you kidding? I remember the misery of the 70’s and 80’s. He won 14 straight division titles. Has any other pro sports manager done that? If he played chess he’d be a master. A future hall of famer. Just ask Maddux what he thinks. I bet he’s in the 40%. My only complaint over the years – he sometimes hangs with his starting pitchers too long. The problem we’ve had lately has been the result of cheap ownership and poor trade decisons; not Bobby Cox. He can only do the best he can with the resources he is given. For those of you with short term memory issues, last year, he lost most of his starting rotation to injuries-hard for any coach to win in that predicament. Should he have gotten thrown out in that last game against Boston? You’re damn right-that ump was ripping us off. Is it time for him to retire? Maybe, but let’s let him decide when and let him retire in dignity.
varodrunner
June 23rd, 2009
3:23 pm
strong> Coach ( 2010 or Bust)
I have to call you out o this one
The fact that his team was involved in 132 post season games strong>speaks for itself How many managers have a record like that. Apparently you have the time to look that up. 5 game series and 7 game series are a real toss up.
I read a lot of your posts and agree and disagree, but this one really demonstrates your tiring ability to take a stat and SPIN it in your direction.
All I can say to you is 14 years in a row and 132 (based on your stats) post season games speaks volumes to a man’s greatness as a manager.
Go stick your head in the sand, you’d be better off and probably a hole lot happier. Grumpy!.
timthebrave
June 23rd, 2009
3:24 pm
The problem has not been with bobby cox managing this year. He probably cost us 2 wins and pulled out 2 wins with his managing style. The problem is with the hitting. I think that Braves hitters go to other hitting coaches or their parents speaks a lot. I really like Pendleton but he is not getting through to these young hitters. Go Braves!
Adam
June 23rd, 2009
3:24 pm
We are not going to score GOBS of runs this season. This team DESPERATELY needs to work on getting runs in with less than two outs.
THAT DOES REFLECT ON A COACHING PHILOSOPHY.
Get them on, get them over and get them in. One at a time if necessary but without power that is what you MUST do to win.
5-9 in the lineup who drives the ball? Who?
We lose games because of this and until this coaching staff stops trying to make these bottom of the lineup hitters into sluggers we will continue to drop series after series.
Go series by series the last six weeks and see how many games we could have won if players had just made the right kind of out. The pitching has been great for the most part.
An aware coaching staff would have the Braves in first place RIGHT NOW. They would have won most of those series. By aware I mean KNOW YOUR TEAM and KNOW THEIR LIMITATIONS.
Last night, they got the job done. We’ll see from here on.
Sonny Cluster
June 23rd, 2009
3:24 pm
Who did Aristotle and that Pytagora play for.
timthebrave
June 23rd, 2009
3:25 pm
poorjeff….why would they talk about who the next manager is when they haven’t gotten rid of this one. That just doesn’t make sense
varodrunner
June 23rd, 2009
3:30 pm
Tennessee Paul
Who would have on your team?
Glavine is gone
Maddux is gone
Smoltz is gone
Avery is gone
Wohlers is gone
Justice is gone
etc.
So who woould you have?
Let me see…… Aroid, jetter, tex, chipper, Handley, ummmmm, who else.
Cox has a decent team, he has not brought out the best in them and that is the manager and his coaching staff’s job. As Mark mentioned, or I paraphrase in my own words, Bobby’s 2009 style of managing is not working. His decline started when he lost his cy youngs. He managed well in the 90’s, but this is almost 2010.
timthebrave
June 23rd, 2009
3:32 pm
adam, i agree with what you are saying in that the braves have not done enough of the little things to get runs in but I don’t think it is bobby cox’s fault. When they get runners on third with less than 2 outs, everyone knows what they should be doing but they are hitting into double plays or striking out. To me that speaks to the players not being consistent enough and making quality outs. Trust me, these players have played their entire lives, they know what they should be doing. Just need to execute in my opinion
FOXY
June 23rd, 2009
3:36 pm
I think Bobby is a great 162 game manager, however not the best at a seven game series.
Adam
June 23rd, 2009
3:38 pm
Give these guys the bunt sign tim. MAKE THEM GIVE THE AT BAT UP.
If they get pissed and want to leave as free agents, let them go!
An extra 1-2 runs a game puts us well over .500.
If Francouer knew what to do he wouldn’t consistently ground into inning-killing DPs.
If Johnson knew what to do he wouldn’t swing at 1st pitches and roll over.
We all criticize Yunel for this and that but did you see that drag bunt over the weekend. One of the best drags I’ve seen in many years. THAT IS WINNING BASEBALL.
Mix it up. This team, with this inconsistency, needs more of that. If we average 4 runs a game the rest of the season, we will be in the race.
Problem is, we score most of our runs with 2 outs — which means NO big innings.
Poorjeff
June 23rd, 2009
3:39 pm
That was my point, Tim. Where did the rumor come from that TP was next in line. Just don’t believe it. I agree with Mark that next mgr. should be” Brad Mills,” John Farrell are Jose Oquendo. Someone out of Braves system, new Blood.
Alexander the Great
June 23rd, 2009
3:41 pm
Aristole played for Brooklyn and Pythagoras played for the Boston Braves.
The Dude
June 23rd, 2009
3:41 pm
Larry,
I’ve got a bachelor’s degree in engineering. Try again.
Poorjeff
June 23rd, 2009
3:42 pm
Someone from another system, not Braves.
WK
June 23rd, 2009
3:58 pm
I think it is wrong to blame Bobby for all the Braves troubles. and he certainly should not be criticized for every bad decision he has made in the past. However, I do think he is part of the problem with the current team. Let’s just say that his style has allowed this team to become too comfortable. But I do not support firing Bobby under any circumstances at this time. I think he deserves a chance to retire at the end of the season. He is owed that much. The coaching staff is another matter. I think a major shake-up of the coaching staff, starting with the hitting coach, would be a good move to try and change the team attitude.
Ken
June 23rd, 2009
3:59 pm
Bobby won a World Series against a team that had a .694 winning %, that batted .291, hit 207 HRs in only 144 games, and had a team ERA of 3.84 in a league that uses the DH. The team he won with batted .250 and had an ERA of 3.54 in the NL regular season, and yet in the WS outscored, outhit, and outpitched one of the best teams in recent history.
Nobody can ever accuse Bobby Cox of not being able to get the best from his team. He can manage us till he keels, for all I care.
Hillbilly Deluxe
June 23rd, 2009
4:02 pm
Until 1969 there were a maximum of 7 post season games a year. To compare win totals of John McGraw, Casey Stengall, etc. to win totals of Bobby Cox or any modern manager is comparing apples to oranges.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
4:13 pm
The Dude,
Yeah, sure, and I’m a dancer at the Chetah at night but during the day I’m enrolled at Georgia Tech pursuing my degree in Algorithms, Combinatorics, & Optimization.
Want to see how flexible I am?
The Dude
June 23rd, 2009
4:35 pm
Larry,
It was Polymer and Fiber Engineering for the first 3/4 of my credit hours, then Apparel/Textile Eng. for the last 1/4. I steered clear of the nerdatorium just west of Russ Chandler when at all possible. And it’s Cheetah, but surely you already knew that.
sidslid
June 23rd, 2009
4:45 pm
No Bobby Cox superfan here, but the 1-14 last game in post-season means nothing. All else being equal, there would only be a 1 in 8 chance of winning it all.
I beat Cox, Maddux and Glavine up together. After the Leyritz home run these three were post-season disasters for the rest of the run, with particular scorn in 97. Is not Glavine the losingest post-season pitcher in history. Maddux lost the last game to that awful Philly team in 93 and after losing only twice during regular season, coughed up a big loss in game 5 in 95
eagleeye
June 23rd, 2009
4:46 pm
Well said, 7
Mike in VA
June 23rd, 2009
4:52 pm
As best I remember, Cox went with a three pitcher rotation in the playoffs, which usually killed us at the end of the series when pitching on short rest.
GTSteve
June 23rd, 2009
5:01 pm
Bobby was the right man in 1991, and the wrong man in 2009…time to move on
john law
June 23rd, 2009
5:37 pm
What are the statitics of wins vs loss when Cox puts his closer in the game when the score is tied vs when the Braves are in the lead? Game after game the “closer” does his job, is removed from the game, and the Braves lose while the opposition feeds off the next reliever. Am I the only one out here who wonders about this?
Mark Bradley
June 23rd, 2009
5:40 pm
Sometimes Cox went with a three-man rotation, but more often with a four-man. Neagle started the infamous Game 4 against New York in 1996 and couldn’t hold half of a six-run lead. Avery won the key Game 4 against Cleveland in 1995. Neagle threw a shutout against the Marlins in Game 4 of the NLCS in 1997, one day before Maddux lost in the Eric Gregg game. The rotation for the 1999 World Series — over in four — was Maddux, Millwood, Glavine and Smoltz.
Fred
June 23rd, 2009
5:49 pm
Good debate. Both sides have valid points.
For what it’s worth, the ‘91 Game 6 Puckett homer is a moot point if Lonnie Smith doesn’t get deeked in the 8th inning of Game 7 by Gagne and Knoblach on Pendleton’s double.
And they probably win Game 4 of the ‘96 series if Wohlers doesn’t throw a 2–2 slider to Leyritz. That still kills me. Why did he go to the slider? I highly doubt Bobby told him to go away from the heat.
Dawg A
June 23rd, 2009
6:12 pm
If I don’t produce in my job now then I am history! My boss don’t say that I did a good job four or five years ago and a “decent” job now! in the real world …. you produce or you are gone. Why is this so hard to understand and so defended by the “experts” ?
Adam
June 23rd, 2009
6:16 pm
Fred it was his “forkball” — the same forkball Raul Mondesi hit a 450-foot shot off of him earlier in the season. Should have learned from that. Pitch to Leyritz was the worst called pitch in 43 years of following this team because they did not learn from the Mondesi HR.
GamecockBrave
June 23rd, 2009
6:17 pm
Am I the only one who thinks its absurd that the four letter network is going to break in and out of the CWS to see Manny hit against minor leaguers? Taking breaks between SportsCenter to see him stand around the cage is insanely idiotic. ESPN seems to be trying to get into the reality tv market i suppose…
J Humphries
June 23rd, 2009
6:32 pm
Why don’t you go somewhere else and write you stupid and ugly columns.
And take your smart asses with you.
Mitchell
June 23rd, 2009
6:34 pm
I don’t get why people are so pent up these days about the Braves. Face it, we’re not as good as we used to be… there’s an understatement. The ‘98-’99 Braves would destroy the Braves of the late first decade of the century. How we’re even as good as we are now compared to then is rather astonishing.
But we are getting better, you have to admit. Slowly, to be sure.
It’s not like it’s even remotely reasonable to expect this team to be World Series bound which is not to say that playing like anything less than a team that wants to make it to the playoffs is acceptable. They are who they are. As much as I might often like to have a more animated or vocal leader of this team who calls out his players or the fans I don’t think we’d be better off in any way with somebody else.
I also am not one to blame Bobby Cox for any of the usual criticisms he receives for the losses in the World Series. Let’s face it (yet again), we were about 90 feet (Lonnie Smith) and a few outs (Reardon, Liebrandt, Wohlers, Remlinger… so on and so forth) away from winning at least two or three world championships. With a couple added clutch hits which was often also lacking we easily could have won four. I just can’t blame it on Bobby. Joe Torre made all sorts of moves that should have backfired but he always got away with it. Our problem is that we were never fortunate to have a definitive curse, or more likely that we had too many.
The thing that still pisses me off though… other than the fact that of all the walk-off homeruns and base hits we gave up in the playoffs over the year we only had one (homerun, that is)… is that the Cubs haven’t won a damn thing in over a hundred years, the Dodgers lost year after year to the Yankees, the Red Sox suffered crushing losses in a world series in almost every decade of the 20th and yet none of that stops baseball writers or documentary filmmakers from endlessly fawning and rhapsodizing over those teams.
And… in spite of losing two World Seires(es) and two NLCS’s in the ’70s the Reds are still considered the greatest team ever for only winning in back to back years in ‘75 and ‘76.
And… oh I’m not done… people still talk about the ‘85 Bears as being one of the greatest football teams but they couldn’t even get to another Super Bowl?
Say what you want but Bobby Cox and the Braves just don’t get the credit they deserve. The things people seem to remember or not remember or look at objectively is insane.
Mike
June 23rd, 2009
6:43 pm
This just means that 60% of those surveyed don’t know their rear from first base. Anybody remember Leeman Bennett of the Falcons. Hope I spelled it right.The next coach was going to take us to the next level. It took years to recover from that firing. Back to the Braves. Our fans are fickle. Was it coaching that made that pop fly drop in the field between Escobar and Chipper? The list goes on and on. Wake up Atlanta. You have one of the best managers in baseball. Maybe giving him some support instead of whining would help.
Shane (The original)
June 23rd, 2009
7:03 pm
This blog is why Braves fans have the reputation as some of the worst fans in professional sports. Its amazing how ill informed most braves fans are. I personally blame the Georgia education system.
Number of Wins for Bobby Cox 2,005
Number of Wins on this blog 0
Only in a city like Atlanta would a HOF manager be so butchered. Ive seen Cox manage for years and he is a GREAT manager. Any team would be lucky to have him.
Here are the people who in the history of baseball have won more games than Cox.
1 Connie Mack
2 John Mcgraw
3 Tony Larussa
Thats It. If you morons and metal midgets honestly believe that someone could win that much and not know what he is doing then there might be a bed in Millidgeville for you.
Could the Braves have won a couple more WS. Sure. Last I checked Bobby Cox didnt tell Lonnie Smith to stop running. Heck thats one more right there. Last I checked too Cox didnt say ” Hey Wholers how about hanging a slider to Leyritz and lets see what happens !! ” Thats another one there.
And for everyone who says 1 for 14 while that is statistically correct in all honesty the last 3 or 4 the Braves didnt have the horses to go far in the playoffs. The only reason they even got to the playoffs those years is because of Cox.
Atlanta sports fans are for the most part idiots.
Shane (The original)
June 23rd, 2009
7:04 pm
Did Cox throw the slider to Leyritz that cost us one WS? Did he tell Lonnie Smith to stop running costing us another?
farmer
June 23rd, 2009
7:04 pm
I love bobby, I really do. He has done so much for this team as a manager and even general manager before that, drafting Glavine, trading for Smoltz, drafting Chipper, etc. He built the foundation for this club duirng that great run they had. But, I do believe he is to blame for some of the decisions madr during the postseason, especially some highly questionable moves in those World Series which they lost. We should have had at least 3 titles during that span. I do believe it is time for him to step down and let some new blood run hte team. He is a hall of famer, no doubt, a true pioneer of the game, and a beloved figure to most fans. Bobby, you are a great person manager, but the writing is on the wall, pal.
hal
June 23rd, 2009
7:08 pm
somone suggested tommy and mad dog shouldent have started game one and two this genius would have started liebrandt and there would have been no need for micmichels or wohlers lol
TennesseePaul
June 23rd, 2009
7:22 pm
varodrunner: Nice, list all the retired players. That proves the point well. Babe Ruth, Hank Aaron, Mickey Mantle, etc…
No need for the list of retired souls. Since we are playing “would-a-could-a-should-a”…. This past off-season the team could have done better with a trade of, or demotion of, Kelly Johnson and Jeff Francoeur. Kelly could have been replaced with Orlando Hudson. Francoeur could be replaced with any number of guys capable of slugging over .350, like say, Nick Swisher or X Nady.
McLouth
Hudson
Chipper
McCann
Yunel
Kotchman
Swisher
Anderson
Pitcher
You can jumble that line up almost any way you want and it is increasingly better than the current gig.
William, Pasadena, CA
June 23rd, 2009
7:49 pm
I had to comment. I can’t believe Mark and all the Cox supporters. I agree with Larry and Bug Killer. I grew up in South GA and have followed the Braves since 1966. That should qualify me as an expert on the Braves. BOBBY COX IS A TERRIBLE MANAGER. Heck, I could have won 1 WS with 3 Cy Young winners and Steve Avery. He can not manage close games, and that’s usually what you have in the WS. Ever since he lost his Cy Young pitchers, Cox’s incompetency has shown through. A good manager should be able to manufacture a run or two in a game. But not Cox. He doesn’t know what hit & run or a stolen base is. Two playoffs stand out: the WS where Morris beat Smoltz in 10 innings, Cox played Bream at 1B when Brian Hunter was a much better hitter, and that atrocious game where he started the weak hitting bench against San Diego instead of his best players. I wanted to drive down from L.A. and kick his butt myself. Mark, your logic sucks. To make the points in support of Cox. Yeah, he leads in getting thrown out of games. H e’s always whining and arguing balls and strikes when he continues to trot out sorry relief pitchers. And Charlie Liebrandt, oh please! Obviously you and Bobby don’t realize that soft tossers get lit up in the WS. That’s why Smoltz was much more successful than Maddox in the playoffs.
Again, if you give Cox the credit for success, then you should give him credit for the failures. If the game is close in the 8th or 9th, guess who usually wins? He is trying to make Escobar the scapegoat, but ignores the errors of Chipper (15+ years of experience). If any positive changes are made, it appears to be the GM. Bobby runs the same hitters out every game even when they are batting under .100. COX NEEDS TO GO.
Larry
June 23rd, 2009
9:12 pm
Shane (The original),
I know you’re trying to come off as a real bright kind of guy and perhaps we “metal midgets” couldn’t possibly comprehend such elevated cognitive abilities you possess. However, should you review the syntax, diction and basic spelling of your post prior to tapping that “submit” button you may just get away with a more convincing argument of your intellectual superiority.
Which of our distinguished Atlanta Public Schools did you attend, Shane (The original)?
Ted Striker
June 23rd, 2009
9:56 pm
Justafan — I respect anyone who’s been as faithful to the Braves as you. I admire your enthusiasm for the game and appreciate you taking a stand on something important to you, even if we don’t agree on that particular point. You might be right and I might be wrong.
chrismcd
June 23rd, 2009
11:47 pm
And for those who suffered through the worst years of Atlanta history sports wise in the 1970s and 1980s let me be the first to tip my hat to Bobby Cox for getting this team TO the playoffs 14 straight years. Yes we’ve had a rough patch recently but those who appreciate how hard it is for teams to win year in and year out especially in the modern era of free agency I think Bobby has done one hell of a job. I think the most striking thing about him is even during the past few years he’s managed the same with less talent. He steps on the field to win and thats what you expect from a manager. Baseball is not rocket science and things happen with injuries, a hit there, an error there, a missed call and an entire season can go down the toilet. Give the man his due. The day will come when someone else will sit in the dugout managing this team and we’ll see then just how all these calling for Bobby’s head will respond when someone new comes in and finds out Bobby was not so bad a manager after all. I remember when we fired Torre after three fairly good years of baseball only to have Chuck Tanner, and Russ Nixon making us realize just how stupid that move was. ONly in Atlanta do we see 14 straight years of winning baseball as a failure. Sad.
jeffrey d
June 23rd, 2009
11:49 pm
I appreciate most of Bobby’s body of work, but he just makes too many moves that leave you saying “What the heck?!?”
For instance – we’re up by 5 or 6 runs agains the BoSox on Friday, and he uses our top 3 relievers. We’re tied in the bottom of the 9th, and he puts in Jeff Bennett (whose WHIP is nearing 2) with Rafael Soriano fresh in the bullpen.
Jeremiah
June 24th, 2009
1:02 am
Shane (The Original), may be some jerk from up north, but he is right about two things: 1. The Georgia education system is pathetic, (but all US Govt. Schools are by comparison to the rest of the world). 2. Bobby Cox is one of the best of all time, Larry and the rest are just plain WRONG! The stats alone prove this point! While, I am definitely a Braves fan, I am also ashamed at the idiotic, poor Atlanta fans in general. Since I travel for work, I see lots of games in other cities, and particularly in the northeast, the fan support is amazing!
Larry, I would not punch you, I was exaggerating for effect at how ridiculously illogical your point of view is. That being said, the more of your posts I read, the more you seem like the type of dude that needs a good punch in the face. It is obvious you are full of yourself. I’m not impressed…and I am pretty sure Mark Bradley is not either. It’s not just that your viewpoints make no sense, other than to show your true lack of baseball knowledge, it’s the way you say (write) them…You come off like a jerk, and I imagine that you are.
Bobby's Cox
June 24th, 2009
4:47 am
I would argue that Bobby is a better postseason manager than a regular season manager and that Bobby got better toward the latter years of the postseason runs even though they hadn’t advanced past the 1st rounders.
Bobby totally outmanaged Phil Garner in 2005. In fact, as the season went along, it seemed as if Garner was learning from Cox. The players just didn’t produce, and the playoffs, especially in their current format, are a crapshoot. If you ask every MLB manager (and it’s been done), the consensus is to get to the playoffs. The Cards winning it all, the Rockies making the World Series, etc.. is proof that it’s all a crapshoot.
Bobby did a lot more to build this organization than draft #1 draft picks. Back in the day, #1 draft picks themselves were crapshoots, nothing like today. But, Bobby restructured the whole farm system top to bottom by bringing in the right people.
Where it was a system wide strategy to “throw low and away” that same strategy needs to be implemented with hitting. The hitters we produce suck, and I think that should start with Cox, like Torre did wtih the Dodgers last year when emphasizing “good at-bats”. Bobby needs to create some kind of offensive strategy or get guys moving on the basepaths. He could also make a few changes (2nd/RF?) to help this ballclub.
In conclusion, I do think that a change can be good for this team. But, Bobby has earned the respect to coach as long as he desires. The man is a living legend.
John OTC
June 24th, 2009
7:39 am
If we fire Bobby, we deserve whatever we get.
BUCK
June 24th, 2009
9:05 am
LANDSLIDE – I was under the impression that Chuck Tanner had a winning percentage of .424 with the Braves, while Cox has a .556. I must have slept through the WS he won while he was in Atlanta. And I’m not your son; if I were I would have you committed.
Don
June 24th, 2009
9:28 am
Why do baseball writers, commentators etc. protect Bobby Cox when he is one of baseball’s all time worst offensive managers – failing to understand or implement the most basic absolute essential of offensive management. They hide the fact that Cox’s offensive management or lack thereof has the Braves next to last in all of baseball in average number of pitches seen per at bat – guaranteeing that they will not product runs effectively or be competitive. By far the most important essential in offensive management is developing an approach by your hitters that works the count – makes the opposing pitcher throw a lot of pitches which has multiple advantages – enables your hitters to see what he has, adjust to him, get better pitches to hit, makes him make mistakes, wears him down both within innings and for the game, gets you into their weak middle relief, etc. etc. How can Cox (and baseball writers) not understand this. It’s like 2 + 2 = 4. Cox seems to have absolutely no understanding of this or seems to make no effort to this end. This is absurd.
Marc Schneider
June 24th, 2009
9:35 am
Larry, Do you really think that Bobby Cox is entirely to blame for 1-14? Even assuming, for argument, that it’s a legitimate statistic, how much effect do you think a manager can have in a single game? You can take absolutely any manager’s record and break it down like that. It’s fair enough to argue that he has made tactical and strategic blunders, but to say that’s the reason that the Braves lost all those games is the height of absurdity. As you acknowledge, they were playing pretty good teams and there was a good chance they would have lost regardless of what Cox did. Was it Cox’s fault that Lonnie Smith didn’t score on a double in the gap against the Twins or that the heart of the order couldn’t get a run in with runners on second and third and no outs? Was it Cox’s fault that Mark Prior and Kerry Wood dominated the supposedly great Braves offense?
It’s also ridiculous to ignore the games he won. You are saying that the only reason he won in 1995 was because of Glavine but you don’t seem to blame the players for the losses. That’s simply unfair.
My feeling is that baseball manager is the most overrated position in sports. A manager isn’t like a football or basketball coach, whose strategy and tactics really make a difference. In baseball, it makes very little difference. No one claims Cito Gaston is a great tactical manager but he won two World Series. Why? Because he had great players.
As for talent, I don’t think the Braves had exceptional talent, except for the pitching. The lineups were nothing to write home about and this was proven year after year in the playoffs when they failed to hit. Was that Cox’s fault? David Justice was a good but not great player, same for Ron Gant, etc. If anyone is to blame, it’s John Schuerholz for ignoring the bench and the bullpen–he consistenly focused on the starting rotation to the exclusion of other parts of the team that became real weaknesses in the post-season.
I agree that Bobby is not the greatest tactician in baseball, but it’s utterly unfair to blame him for those losses.
Marc Schneider
June 24th, 2009
9:37 am
Homer,
There’s a genius comment–fire anyone that writes something you disagree with. Glad you are so open minder.
Marc Schneider
June 24th, 2009
9:42 am
To the person that mentioned “U.S. Govt Schools”–you do understand, don’t you, that the U.S. Government does not run any schools other than the Service Academies?
Re Cox: I think he has his problems, especially now, but I can’t understand the willingness to apparently blame Cox 100% for the playoff losses. You can argue that he contributed to them but how can you say ANY
Marc Schneider
June 24th, 2009
9:56 am
Continued–I accidentally hit the submit button.
I don’t understand how someone can give a MANAGER 100% of the responsibility for losing a game. Baseball managers do not have nearly as much impact on the game as do football and basketball coaches. Even if Bobby made mistakes–which he certainly did and as essentially every manager in the history of baseball has done–it’s absurd to say that he is THE reason they lost.
As much as people here want to pooh-pooh the notion that the playoffs is a crapshoot, it’s true. All you have to do is look at teams like the Cardinals that were lucky to get in the playoffs and then won the WS or the Rockies–basically a .500 team that got hot at the right time and went to the World Series–to realize that. No one wants to acknowledge that much of what happens in baseball is random, but it is, at least in the playoffs.
I don’t understand how you can simply exonerate the players. Is it Cox’s fault that Lonnie Smith didn’t score on the hit against Twins, or that Mark Wohlers hung a slider to Leyritz? Larry might have a point that Cox was too conservative in a lot of the playoff games–I certainly think he is today–but the fact is, if the players had performed the way they were supposed to, it wouldn’t have mattered.
Also, contrary to conventional wisdom, the Braves talent during the 90s, other than the pitching, wasn’t that exceptional. In general, they had a bunch of good players but they were hardly juggernauts. They weren’t nearly as good as, say, the Blue Jays and the Yankees or, for that matter, the Marlins, who had handled the Braves pretty well in the regular season. Yes, they lost to some teams that were arguably inferior–the Phillies, Astros, Cubs–but, in most cases, the teams that beat them were simply better.
IMO, if anyone is to blame, it’s Scheurholz. Throughout the run, he consistently shortchanged the bench and the bullpen in favor of the starting pitching. When the playoffs came, the Braves had relatively weak lineups with especially weak benches and bullpens. The one time they won, they had a substantially better bench, with Devereau and Polonia and a solid bullpen. For most of the run, they did not have this and these lacks probably contributed to Cox having to put in guys in the wrong situations.
I think it’s silly to give a manager credit for his wins but no blame for his losses. But it’s just as silly to ignore his wins and blame him entirely for the losses, especially when it’s so selective.
DMac
June 24th, 2009
10:25 am
Thank you Bug Killer for your 11:16 post. You put into words, what I have been struggling with for years. Thank you!
jarvis
June 24th, 2009
10:40 am
By Larry’s logic Mike Krzyzewski is 3-17 and Dean Smith is 2-23 in “last games of the season”. I don’t follow the validity of that statistic.
P-Man
June 24th, 2009
11:37 am
Lots of good debate here! I want to address the “working the count” issue. If you take a pitch, and it’s a strike, you’re down 0-1. Behind in the count. You take another, or foul it off, you’re down 0-2. Now you’re hitting defensively. You can work the count by fouling off pitches (if you can, but the whole at bat is played defensively, where your chance for a hit goes down.
There is nothing wrong with swinging early in the count, if they are good pitches. What frustrates me is when a pitcher walks 2 in a row, and the next batter swings at the first pitch, either missing, fouling it off, or grounding or popping up into an out or double play.
You can try to work the count all you want, but the key is hitting YOUR pitch and not the pitcher’s. When Francouer or Diaz swing at the ones in the dirt (or over their head), and take (or foul off) the one’s down the middle, it’s hard to fault Bobby. He could sit them down, but for who? Blanco? Does Blanco give us a better chance for an RBI with a runner on base than Francouer?
P-Man
June 24th, 2009
11:38 am
You can only play with the cards you’re dealt!
Barbara Reynolds
June 28th, 2009
1:38 pm
Mark, I totally agree with you on Bobby Cox. I think he should have been gone several years ago. I also think the Braves need to clean house at the top. I’m not impressed with Frank Wren. Terry Pendleton isn’t getting the job done either! I’ve never seen a team where no one was hitting! And the mental errors have been costly. They are not playing good fundamental baseball and it has cost games. Time to clean house and get a new regime going. Maybe then we will make some progress back to a good, winning team.
Atlanta Braves: Bobby Cox vs. Lou Piniella - Which managerial approach works best? | ajc Sports Talk
June 29th, 2009
1:17 pm
[...] AJC columnist Mark Bradley asked readers if the Braves needed to say goodbye to longtime manager Bobby Cox, he found that although most fans who responded to his poll said they would like a change at the [...]