The annual chorus is in fine voice. “The Hawks,” goes the full-throated refrain, “won’t get any better until they find a superstar [meaning LeBron James or Kobe Bryant] or a true center [like Dwight Howard].”
And there’s no rebuttal. Sure, the Hawks would be better with LeBron/Kobe/Dwight. Any team would. But the cold truth is that the Hawks won’t find such a transcendent talent unless Dame Fortune smiles an outrageous smile. That’s the way of the NBA.
“You don’t trade for superstars,” says Rick Sund, the Hawks’ general manager. “You draft them.”
The lottery is, by design and definition, pure luck. The Hawks were participants in 2003 (LeBron’s year, when their No. 8 pick was made by Milwaukee as part of the Glenn Robinson trade) and 2004 (Dwight’s year, when they settled for Josh Childress with the sixth pick), and both times went unblessed by the ping-pong balls. There’s no strategy involved. It’s the bounce of ball in a hopper.
A little exercise: Take one player – any one, from Josh Smith to Speedy Claxton – off the Hawks and replace him with LeBron/Kobe/Dwight. Know where the Hawks would be? Preparing for Game 1 of the NBA finals. This is a very good team that lacks only one great player, but that’s a massive lack.
We tire of the NBA’s blather about its stars, but nobody can deny that it’s a star’s game. And stars are hard to get. Of the 15 men who comprised the 2009 All-NBA teams, 13 were top 10 draftees – the exceptions are Kobe Bryant, taken No. 13 when high schoolers weren’t yet the rage, and Tony Parker, who arrived from France as the 28th pick in 2001 – and 10 went in the top five.
Only three of the 15 have changed teams since their NBA debuts. (The three: Shaquille O’Neal, Pau Gasol and Chauncey Billups.) Moral of our story: If you find a star, you keep him. And if you have a chance at one and you whiff … well, you wind up being the Hawks, forever chasing the game.
They couldn’t have had James in 2003 or Howard in 2004 because they didn’t win the lottery. But they had a shot at Chris Paul (second team All-NBA) in 2005, and they had another at Brandon Roy (also second team) the next year. To harp on those dire drafts is to flog a horse deader than Man ’o War, but the Hawks haven’t yet — and might never — outrun those lapses.
They could have had a backcourt of Paul and Joe Johnson way back in 2005. No, they wouldn’t have landed in the 2007 lottery and wouldn’t have Al Horford, but they’d have made the Eastern Conference finals by now and still had Mike Bibby’s money to spend on a big man.
Billy Knight deserves credit for building a 69-loss roster into a robust entity, but the best player he acquired — Johnson — hasn’t made the All-NBA team. Twice Knight had the opening to draft a star, and twice he took a guy named Williams. (Though not, alas, Deron Williams.) And even now, as the Hawks come off their finest season in a decade and Sund seeks to model his club after the starless 2003-2004 Pistons, those failures are the horse that keeps on dying.
178 comments Add your comment
ATL living in NYC
June 1st, 2009
3:45 pm
Mark,
That is very true. You either draft superstars or you pay millions of dollars to obtain them. I understand he isnt a superstar but Joe has been great for this franchise. Do you see the hawks trading Joe Johnson at the deadline next year or actually will try and resign him?
Obama hates Cheney's bald head the most
June 1st, 2009
3:45 pm
Well said, go get a star Sund!!!
Kenbud
June 1st, 2009
3:47 pm
I could not agree more …. that’s why last year, I said they should have offered the sun, moon and a couple of stars for the #1 pick and Derrick Rose. Had it been any other team, I’m sure the team would have bitten, but the hometown Chicago Bulls really wanted him.
I can’t say I would do the same for Blake Griffith this year, though. It’s a guard’s league now, and you need the great guard play.
Mac
June 1st, 2009
3:49 pm
Man, you’re a blogging machine. I love it. Yeah, Billy Knight’s work put together a roster good enough to back into the playoffs and somehow take the Celtics to seven games. With a little tweaking, Sund took a step forward. Now, the Hawks seem like they are probably stuck … maybe never to have that ascendant star. Unless, unless Josh Smith can grow into that player. A guy named Williams cannot. But could a guy named Horford?
Daniel
June 1st, 2009
3:57 pm
Mark-
I like your stuff and I really appreciate the attention that you keep focusing on the Hawks. But, the Hawks need a player like LeBron, Kobe, or Howard to make the finals? Really? Wow, now that is some cutting edge insight. What team doesn’t need that? BTW- Having LeBron, Barkley, Ewing, AI, or the mighty CP3 does not mean that you will win either. So what does that mean? Only super-super stars can win an NBA championship or do you become that once you have won. Carmelo Anthony? Deron Williams? Tracy McGrady? not super super stars? Is Kevin Durant? The story is not over on these Hawks… Marvin, Josh and Al have as much upside as any combo in the league. We need veteran depth and we can make a run. Also, Kevin Garnett changed teams.
The Real Fan
June 1st, 2009
4:06 pm
You cannot trade the #1 pick in the NBA so those proposed trades were not possible. The Hawks need a scorer in the draft, one who can get his own shot off. Not a point guard. As long as Joe is the only pseudo-scorer we will see what happened in the playoffs to his numbers. We need more consistent scoring options. We can trade for a usable center for say two years. Trade Marvin. Move Al to strong forward (his natural position). Then we aren’t beaten up by teams with real center size.
tyger
June 1st, 2009
4:07 pm
Dang Mark,
As soon as you start regaining your credibility, you go and shoot yourself in the foot. My 5 yr. old knows we would be better with Lebron/Kobe/Dwight. I guess anything is better than nothing.
gte268p
June 1st, 2009
4:21 pm
I only read the caption under the picture on the sports page, but why do we have to keep bringing up the past for the Hawks? We know all this, we know they could have had Chris Paul as a superstar. But why keep dwelling? The future is looking pretty good! We have a star in Joe Johnson. And he is far better than any other star on other teams because he is low key, down to earth, doesn’t neet attention, does his job, and doesn’t complain. He should be the one fathers want kids to have as a role model. I don’t want a muppet superstar that has to be coddled!
Joe
June 1st, 2009
4:26 pm
Stop your shoulda, wouda, coulda, and deal with reality, the Hawks are what they are, stop living in the past and concentrate your thoughts and energy on what we should do now to improve the team, who we should draft, or how we can sign and trade to improve the team, what affordable free agents should the Hawks sign, how can we train and make our big men play better both offensively and defensively, how can we coach better and stop running all plays through Johnson, how can we spread the ball around to run plays inside for the big men to score and be there for the offensive rebounds, how we can improve our players’ medium range jump shots, how can we reduce the deadly turnovers, find three point shooters. Those are the things the Hawks coaches, players and GM should be discussing and planning for implementation.
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
4:34 pm
That was kind of my hope with this one. I was always uncomfortable after “regaining my credibility.” Couldn’t wait to get rid of it.
Volman
June 1st, 2009
4:39 pm
Good article, Mr. Bradley…but very obvious. We all know that the Hawks didn’t get Deron Williams or Chris Paul…and that the team would be SO MUCH BETTER with them right now (I don’t even want to think about it)
I don’t think Roy is better than Joe…but I’d rather have Roy than Shelden Williams (what a terrible pick) or what came of Shelden (Bibby). If you say that the Hawks drafted Paul over Marvin, then the Hawks would not have Marvin OR Horford.
Let’s just hope they can get some more “semi-stars”..I guess.
I don’t know why any superstars want to come to Atlanta.. the fans bow down to them anytime they show up.
Google Alert – Atlanta « Atlanta Locksmith (404) 348-4348
June 1st, 2009
4:40 pm
[...] Why the Atlanta Hawks are still wishing upon a star Atlanta Journal Constitution – GA, USA Give the Hawks the guy on the left and they might be playing the guy on the right for the title. The annual chorus is in fine voice. … See all stories on this topic [...]
Volman
June 1st, 2009
4:41 pm
Whoops, I don’t know why any superstars DO NOT want to come to Atlanta. My fault!
ATLien78
June 1st, 2009
4:42 pm
How about give the Hornets the guy on the right, and maybe they’ll be in the finals as well. Didn’t the Hornets draft and trade Kobe for Vlade Divac back in ‘96? For as much grief as the Hawks get for not taking Chris Paul, the Hornets should get double that for not keeping Kobe. When Chris Paul came out, he had so many questions (height, frame, character issue during the ACC tournement) about his playing ability. Marvin was the consensus best player that year. The year Dwight came out, Billy Knight was trying to move up to grab him (or Okafor) by trading both first round picks, but neither Charlotte or Orlando would move. And as much as I thought Brandon Roy was a good pick for the Hawks, he was nothing more than another Joe Johnson.
Kent
June 1st, 2009
4:49 pm
Arghhhhhhhhh! Can’t we please just move on? How many different ways can it be said that the Hawks should have drafted Chris Paul?
II-Logical
June 1st, 2009
4:51 pm
I believe that the point Mr. Bradley was trying to make is that POOR MANAGEMENT decisions have doomed the Hawks in the past and he is WARNING current management AND fans not to repeat the past!
But with the current incumbant GM’s track record ?????
Astro Joe
June 1st, 2009
4:53 pm
Other than AI’s Philly team, I’ve been trying to think of a team that has won the conference without big-time All-Star front-court player. Detroit had Ben Wallace who was the dominant force in their dominating defense. Until CP3 brings a golden trophy to Nawlins (with a front court that made $32M last year vs. the Hawks at around $20M), I find it a little challenging to believe that he would have led us past last year’s Celtics or this year’s Magic. Unless, of course, CP3 was going to shut down KG or Dwight. And let’s not even discuss CP3 vs. Billups… I’m guessing the little man is still having nightmares about that 50+ point loss. Yes, we definitely would have been better (and far more entertaining), but I doubt the trophy shelf would have looked any different.
Melvin
June 1st, 2009
4:54 pm
Mark,
If the Hawks want to land a star. They better draft John Wall in the 2010 draft. He’s next best thing. Not sure how they will have the opportunity to do that, when they should be good enough to make the playoffs next season… I know wishful thinking. That kid will be wearing a Knicks Jersey in 2010 (can you say Pat Ewing conspiracy all over again).
newkid
June 1st, 2009
5:10 pm
Okay, let’s say you do ‘draft them’. Before you draft them, you must first properly evaluate their attributes and determine who will or won’t be a star. The Lakers pursuit of a young Kobe was far more about effective player evaluation than about luck. Our numerous fumbled opportunities to select difference makers (i.e., a #2, a #3, a #5, and a #6 within what a 4-year span) says our system for evaluating players is about as effective as our offensive schema. Don’t know if Sund brought along his own player evaluation system, or retained the poor excuse that was in place when he inked the contract last year, but his draft history says it doesn’t matter much which is in fact true. If results are any indication, Stevie Wonder would have been as optically astute as have Knight and Sund in critically observing and selecting star talent (love ya Stevie, but there’s a reason you leave the driving to others isn’t there?).
If we had demonstrated an ability to properly evaluate talent, I’d argue that we – provided we had identified a sure fire star – should make the moves necessary with several ‘wanna be star’ players we currently have so as to position ourselves to acquire that REAL star in the draft. But we’d blow the pick sure as hell, and be left with a side even less well suited for competing.
Regarding the draft, if our recent past is prologue, we’re in deep, deep ….
freshd
June 1st, 2009
5:15 pm
Mr. Candace Parker(SW) now plays for the Minnesota Timberwolves. Williams was BK worst draft pick. The hawks could have had a superstar in that draft, but all they got was a LANDLORD who played like a slumlord.
rms
June 1st, 2009
5:16 pm
Those guards such as Roy, D. Williams, CP3 would far better if they were playing in the East vs playing in the West. Just like the Hawks would have never made the playoffs last season with their record if they were in the West and even this year would easily have been a lower seed had they been in the West. I just think the competition is far more competitive from an individual standpoint in the West than in the East.
Dejay
June 1st, 2009
5:23 pm
Yep, right on cue. I knew folks would be here harping about ‘moving on’ and not ‘dwelling on the past’. That’s the problem, Mark. This is the same franchise who has the longest run of not drafting an All-Star/Pro-Bowl player in North American pro sports (25 years and counting) yet we’re supposed to gloss over the fact that we had not one but TWO shots to get a game-changer and blew it? Those blown picks have a direct corolation as to why they couldn’t even compete with Cleveland and the Labrons in the second round, much less why we had to sit through nearly a decade of wretched basketball before they finally back-doored into an 8th seed a year ago.
That’s what makes being a lifelong Hawk fan so frustrating. We’ve seen Miami win a world title. We’ve seen other teams from the expansion era make deep playoff runs. We now see Orlando going to their SECOND NBA Finals. We see all this while our team, whose been here for 41 SEASONS, haven’t sniffed a conference finals since Nixon was in office. In the long-term scheme of things, are we really at the point where we’re supposed to be doing backflips over 37 and 47-win seasons right now?
My question to you and the rest of Hawk nation is how much longer do we have to wait? How many more years do we have to suffer from blown Babcock and Knight draft picks of the past? When are we going to get our payoff for all the years of watching scrubs like Koncak, Glover, Keefe, Gray, Claxton, Edwards, and Shelden Williams collect millions while countless other teams pass us by, all in the name of the ‘process’? How many more Chris Paul commercials we have to sit through before we realize just how bass-ackwards Billy Knight was for 1) passing on him in the first place, and 2) breaking off $25 million to his injury-prone backup a year later, knowing full well that ownership was already having $$$ issues.
I get that they’ve climbed a long way from the Babcock/Kasten/Kruger/Stotts error (spelled correctly). I get that they advanced to the second round. But if you’re satisfied with just that, you may want to talk to a Hawk fan from 1999 or 1988 who watched their teams get stale while the front office blew picks and sat on their hands when the iron was still hot; if you can find any.
Astro Joe
June 1st, 2009
5:24 pm
How many teams won less than 35 games in the West vs. the East? Is it because the teams are so good at the top or because they feast on the likes of the Clippers, Thunder and T’Wolves? Well, if the Bucks, Nets and Bobcats played the Clippers, Thunder and T’Wolves, I’d put my mortgage payment on those Eastern teams.
freshd
June 1st, 2009
5:28 pm
If Ty Lawson or Eric Maynor falls to the hawks they better draft them. Hope they dont screw up again.
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
5:31 pm
I’ve said it before, but even the Hawks insiders who will defend the pick of Marvin Williams to this day have never understood why Billy picked Shelden.
Big Ray
June 1st, 2009
5:33 pm
Mark,
Yes, Billy’s draft gaffes haunt us still. Hard to escape that ghost, but then, some people will always be happy with just making the playoffs every year, and never doing any better than that.
Yeah, two all-star level guards would definitely have gotten us nowhere. Yes, most teams who have won the championship have had a superstar big or something of that ilk. However, I’d rather have two all-star guards and be able to pay money for good solid bigs than have one all-star guard and one guy who is getting paid like one, while not even using the good bigs that we have to the best of their ability.
Welcome to the world of the Hawks….and some of their fans.
jhan
June 1st, 2009
5:33 pm
If all the teams in the West were so good how did so many of them end up with great records? Seems to me that the West was pretty weak after the first tier of playoff teams. Didn’t the Hawks have a winning record against the West?
Big Ray
June 1st, 2009
5:36 pm
Mark,
I don’t understand EITHER pick. I mean, how can you defend the Marvin Williams pick? Even if you CAN, then you HAVE to condemn the coach immediately.
Our highest pick in who knows how long is STILL THE 4TH OPTION ON OFFENSE!!!
Is it because he was never a talent worthy of that pick, or because Woody doesn’t know how to use him?
Pick your poison, I guess….
BrittishAnger
June 1st, 2009
5:38 pm
A star helps, but reliance on star power alone is a failure in and of itself. There is no denying what teams like the Lakers, Cavaliers, and others have with them, but the reliance on star power alone if a failing strategy for this league or any league. Lebronny just got ousted, not because of his star performance or Dwights for that matter, but for what their respective benches did as a back-up for their star. The Laker’s best teams have never been one-man shows; Shaq and Kobe, Magic and Kareem, go back further into those champion teams and it isn’t a result of ONE superstar, it’s several, and a squad backing them up with enough potential power to step up when necessary (Big Shot Bob every bloody time). Look at the years of A.I. in Philly, and the numbers he put up: nobody doubts what a star power he was and still is, but he always did it alone, never with the proper back-up or strategy to get them that elusive championship. While a superstar would help our ranks, it doesn’t make up for a supporting cast which doesn’t support, for lack of better terminology. On the chess board of life, there are pawns, rooks, knights, bishops, along with the Queen and King…and the best player uses each piece effectively, not just one….
on a side note: anybody know how much money Cleavland, in association with Nike and whoever else is fronting the cash, spent in the last two years in Advertising? Seems like such a waste to spend all that dough and not see the results of it….diminishing returns is a mug, ninjas….
Rufus1
June 1st, 2009
5:38 pm
Superstars are not just drafted, they are made. We have and offensive system that wants 5 players to average 15 points a game. What star averages 15 points
Big Ray
June 1st, 2009
5:39 pm
….strange, I don’t remember US feasting on the Bucks, Nets and Bobcats….is it because they were so tough, or because we weren’t as good as we should be?
BugKiller
June 1st, 2009
5:40 pm
Mark, this is something that’s the ultimate catch-22 for the Hawks and Hawks fans.
Because I KNOW for a fact, that Al Horford can become a 20-10, or even a 25-15 SUPERSTAR in the next few years, and if the Hawks got Paul, D. Williams, or Brandon Roy, they wouldn’t ever have had the chance to draft Horfy.
There is one caveat to Al Horford becoming the guy that I (and you) knows he can be: Mike Woodson.
Horford is a four. He’s a power forward. He NEEDS to be playing power forward. NOT center. He will never reach his offensive potential playing center.
But Woodson seems to be immovable on this. I understand, the Hawks don’t have a “true” center, so they must rely on Horfy at the five.
But how much better would this team be with Zaza at center, Horfy at pf, Josh Smith at sf, Johnson and Bibby in the backcourt, and then Marvin Williams coming off the bench with Flip to create an amazingly deep second core of players?
This is what the Hawks must do next year. Find a center / power forward who’s good for 15 minutes a game as a reserve, so Zaza and Horfy can be on the floor at the same time. Then make Williams, a scorer and defensive liability the new Josh Childress, with Flip providing the spark.
A team like that can beat the LeBrons.
Horfy at the four. Imagine the possibilities. I have visions of a more svelt Barkley, or a less ball-hoggy Karl Malone.
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
5:45 pm
Didn’t the Boston Celtics win a title with Kendrick Perkins at center? Is Al Horford not a better player than Kendrick Perkins?
Here’s another exercise. (It’s one Sund asked me to do in our interview two weeks ago.) Name 10 better centers than Al Horford. And I’ll spot you Howard, Shaq and Yao.
Rufus1
June 1st, 2009
5:48 pm
Marvin williams IS best the best player BK drafted. If we had a coach who could develop players, we would know that by now. The best Smooth will ever be is KENYON MARTIN. Marvin has the potenial to be a 240lb Rashard Lewis, who can rebound and defend….If watched the Game against the T’wolves, when he scored 30 points.
Please Rick don’t trade Marvin, YOU WILL REGRET IT!!!!
Dawgs2009
June 1st, 2009
5:49 pm
Thank GOD we don’t have to endure another couple of weeks of his majesty. I have had all I can handle of the LeBron James show. It was so nice to watch the Cavs get humiliated by the Magic, especially after watching the series with the Hawks.
BugKiller
June 1st, 2009
5:52 pm
Mark, I’m not saying he’s not good at center.
But are you telling me he wouldn’t be better at power forward? ‘Cause if you are, you better watch out that your nose doesn’t grow too big.
Al is a tremendous athlete and has a competitive drive on par with the greats, like MJ or Tiger Woods. This is what makes him a good player playing out of position.
He’s a GOOD center.
He’d be a GREAT power forward.
Don’t you see how that hampers him?
Kevin Garnett would have been a good center.
You see where I’m going with this line of thought?
Why hold back someone who’d be truly great at another position just because you can’t work around finding someone serviceable (whom they already have in Zaza) at center?
Zaza is at least as good as Kendrick Perkins.
So let Horford become Garnett. Let him reach his potential.
Otherwise, he’ll just be another good center in this league who’s easily forgotten or lumped in with vast number of “eh” centers from the last ten years.
Mr. Phil (formerly Scoobysnacks)
June 1st, 2009
5:56 pm
You state that you don’t want to beat a dead horse, and then you brutalize the same expired equine. Mark, *hello* the man who made those decisions is gone. Doesn’t anybody know that yet. Why are we rehashing this cow manure. Tell me what we are going to do now, otherwise shut up! Jeez.
Rufus1
June 1st, 2009
5:58 pm
MARK
I agree with you about AL…So who is causing the rebounding problem?
cdog
June 1st, 2009
6:04 pm
MARK, A SUPERSTAR WILL HELP BUT YOU NEED PLAYERS WHO ARE WILLING TO PLAY AS TEAM AND COMMIT TO DEFENSE. DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS.WE HAVE A BUNCH OF PLAYERS WHO DON’T KNOW THEIR ROLES ON THE TEAM.THEY TRY TO DO TOO MUCH ON BOTH ENDS INSTEAD OF PLAYING WITHIN THEIR SELVES. THEY ARE NOT COMMITED TO PLAYING DEFENSE. JOE JOHNSON IS A SUPERSTAR WHO LIKE LEBRON NEEDS HELP. A GOOD BIG MAN WILL ELEVATE NOT ONLY HIS GAME BUT THE WHOLE TEAMS.THATS WHY LEBRON IS REALLY MAD. THE MAJIC PUT THAT DEFENSE ON HIM AND HIS GROUP WHO EVERYONE THOUGHT WAS INVINCIBLE. DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS. LOOK AT DETROIT IN THE PAST.THE HAWKS ARE A GOOD BIG MAN WHO CAN CONTROL THE MIDDLE AWAY FROM TURNING THE CORNER TO AN NBA TITLE
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
6:06 pm
I don’t know why it happened, Rufus, but Josh Smith’s rebounding average dropped from 8.2 to 7.2 from 2007-2008 to 2008-2009.
And I know exactly what you’re going to say: “Because he was out there shooting 22-footers!” Actually, no. His offensive rebounding numbers were essentially the same. It’s the defensive rebounding that suffered. And it shouldn’t have.
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
6:09 pm
And I don’t agree about Horfy being better at 4 than at 5. He looks more comfortable to me with his back to the basket than facing up. (He’s OK facing up, but I really like his post moves.)
I think this is one of those topics we Atlantans will debate for years. KInd of like, “Why doesn’t Bobby Cox play Ryan Klesko against lefthanders?” Or, “How come Jerious Norwood doesn’t get the ball more?”
Brad
June 1st, 2009
6:14 pm
The Chris Paul situation has been run into the ground. We all know about it. No sense beating a dead horse. Just have to look forward to the future.
BugKiller
June 1st, 2009
6:20 pm
Okay, we’ll agree to disagree.
As to Bobby Cox, well, the answer there is that he’s not only the worst post-season manager in the history of Major League Baseball (a historical fact based upon his inept handling of some of the best teams in baseball history in October), he’s also the single most overrated manager in baseball history, the beneficiary of the talent assembled by the greatest GM in baseball history.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 1st, 2009
6:24 pm
You know, watching the Cavs, you know what they lack? A Joe Johnson. Just sayin is all…
Edo River
June 1st, 2009
6:30 pm
While you do safely repeat that the underlying theme of your song is “to flog a horse deader than Man ’o War,” you basically resort to that throughout your article. How many times do you think repeating this will do any good? It is basically sour grapes. This is the issue where you become another splinter under a toe nail to read Mark, it prevents you from rising to a higher rank in sports journalism. I felt the same way about Terrence. It isn’t your technique, its what you focus on. Whining is not going to get you more than the votes that another famous trash radio host gets. Yet, I grant you, you can get a Mc Donalds feast from it. So keep on whining Mark, because that’s the god you have set your talent towards. I hope it makes you satisfied.
willie
June 1st, 2009
6:31 pm
It has nothing to do with not having a center…Horford is more than adequate there. We are missing that one more star player and that will be very hard to find, while keeping Joe at the same time.
rms
June 1st, 2009
6:32 pm
Nice post Dejay, 5:23pm, I agree wholeheartly. I think we are just content with mediocrity all in the name of “process”.
BRAD
June 1st, 2009
6:33 pm
I’ve said this before. Hindsight is 20/20. but if the Hawks had drafted Chris Paul, they would not have HORFORD, BIBBY, or MARVIN. Is Paul better than these 3 players combined–HELL NO!! Perfect example, look what happened to the Hornets against the Nuggets. They were destroyed–including a 58 point loss at home!!!!! Billups was the best point guard on the court during that series. Paul is great, but if he were a Hawk, we would be talking about some kid named Horford, who plays for another team. Horford will be holding down the interior for the Hawks for the next 10 years.
Jody
June 1st, 2009
6:37 pm
Mark,
I’ll have to agree with BugKiller on this one. Horford at the four, with his back to the basket, would have a size advantage and would force double teams as opposed to now. In fact, look at the monster game that he had against Chicago in Chicago as evidence of what he could do nightly with a size advantage in his favor instead of trying to outmuscle guys who are bigger.
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
6:38 pm
Dejay, having experienced both of those Hawks “plateaus” — Rankin Smith word — I can report that part of me wonders if we’re about to happen on another. Given the number of free agents on this roster; given the difficulty in finding immediate help at No. 19 in the draft; given the Atlanta Spirit’s in-flux status … this could easily go wrong in a hurry.
And that — dead horse again — was kind of my point. A franchise only gets so many swings.
Birddawg
June 1st, 2009
6:44 pm
The Hawks may have had there star if they had the right staff to develop them. Is there any doubt that if Joe had Phil Jackson as a coach, he would have at least been second team all NBA, maybe scratching at the door to a championship. This team is much more talented across the board than that star-less Pistons team that won the championship, but if you don’t have proper coaching to take advantage of all that talent, develop the young talent, put players in the best position to be successful and install an offense around the talent that you have, it doesn’t mean anything. This team has several players with the talent to be stars and at least two with the talent to be superstars, but what does it matter if you have a coach that doesn’t know how to use them. Forget paying millions to bring in a superstar, or having the luck to draft one, how about bringing in a real coach that knows how to use the immense talent that they have. The Hawks have improved each year and reached the second round of the playoffs this year in spite of Woodson, not because of him. How far do you think they could have gotten with a real coach?
rms
June 1st, 2009
6:46 pm
Horford would be playing for Phoenix since we still would have traded for Joe Johnson for some strange reason. I think Paul could have helped make some of these players on our roster better like he did for Chandler and West. Being a scorer and a true assist/facilitator is better than Bibby and Marvin. I would have missed Horford though!!!
Brad
June 1st, 2009
6:47 pm
Maybe so Mark. I think we all agree things would be different if we had Chris Paul at PG. But we don’t so lets move on! Dont make things so depressing for us Hawks fans!!
BrittishAnger
June 1st, 2009
6:51 pm
I don’t think I could name 10, but I’ll try….using your three first…
Dwight Howard (best big in overall size and body structure)
Yao (Best in terms of pure height)
Shaq (his record speaks for itself)
Big Z (better shooting center than Horford)
Brook Lopez (every game we faced the Nets, he made Horford look ineffective at center)
Ben Wallace (is everything Horford hopes to be one day for that size of a center, though he lacks the offensive numbers Horford has put up)
Mike Batiste (Euroleague equivalent to Ben Wallace with offensive numbers to back it up, watch some Panathiniakos games and tell me otherwise).
Carlos Boozer (he came as the last great Duke center, and still has the ability to be great, but the same argument (move from 5 to 4) does step into consideration).
That the best I could do, and I had to pull one from Euro to do it, but there are others that I won’t list because of their crappy situations (Chris Kaman, Marcus Camby, Tyson Chandler*). If you look at Horford with Florida, who was behind him at center with the extra wingspan to help control the inside? Jo’ Noah, that’s who. He accepted the role of center because we have been understaffed at that position (Zaza is a great 2nd-team center, and would be a great linchpin in any 1-3-1 defensive scheme either as the 4 or 5, though Randolph Morris and Solo Jones will never amount to anything at a backup center role). I don’t think we could put him back at 4 without some serious lineup changes (depending on how the summer goes, maybe we could). He’s doing alright at that role, but I believe he would contend far better with the PF’s rather than a litany of centers in the league right now (and with Hasheem Thabeet coming in, he’s more undersized than ever). For a running team, he’s a great center, but against any legit half-court team with a taller center, he’s far better playing PF.
Goldie31206
June 1st, 2009
6:54 pm
I understand the statement but with the excepetion of adnormalities like a Lebron James, championship teams have history more than anything, a history of smart decisions. Case in point How can the braves every year pull out gems like a hanson, mccan, and Medlen drafting low but the Pirates can’t put anything together with all the high picks. The answer is history and legacy if you build a culture of winning that’s what you will have. we are in recovery from horrible history. Everyone screams for the Cp3 or Brandon Roy, but how about rebouning from decisions from previous management to wait trade Paul Gasol for Shareef abdul Rhaeem, or hey we need antoine walker for jason terry. Hey how about Steve smith for Isaiah Rider and well keep Dominque from being involved with the club. Not to mention we had a quality 7 footer pass away, Jason Collier anyone. And were complaining after 46 wins. No stars are not the answer ask miami with Dwade, or Lebron James, or Toronto with Chris Bosh, or even San Antonio with Duncan and Parker. It takes a team and history on your side. History brings in A sam cassel and good role players after the trade deadline after their contracts are bought out. IT’s all about team plus who wants to really play with lebron anyway if you win it’s because of him and if you loose it all your fault. Talk about no win If stars won than Pheonix, and Dallas, not to mention those Portland teams remeber they had a front court of sabonis, grant, wallace, bonzi wells, jermmaine oneal. They would have been won multiple championships. SO don’t worry all were on the right path. Out of all those free agents we need Charlie Villanueva the most or a Carlos Booze and watch out. Much love to all
Jay
June 1st, 2009
6:55 pm
The dark legacy of Billy Knightmare continues to haunt the Hawks. He only got two picks right with Smith and Horford. In every single other case, he took a bust (Shelden, Acie) or reached (Marvin, Chills). I dont see us getting over the hump anytime soon unless one of Marvin-Horford-Smith takes a huge leap. Either that or we get EXTREMELY lucky in the draft.
ATLien
June 1st, 2009
7:22 pm
I disagree that you can’t trade for superstars. That’s exactly what Boston did two years ago and they won a championship because of it.
Rather than dreaming about some unobtainable all-star PG or C or some lottery pick we’d have to give up too much to get, why don’t we package a SnT Marvin together with Mo Evans and Speedy and trade them to Milwaukee for Michael Redd. Slide JJ to SF. With Bibby (or Felton if the Bobcats don’t match our offer), Redd, Johnson, Smith and Horford, we’d have a nasty starting 5, and with Redd, other teams would seriously have to second-guess double-teaming Joe.
O'brien
June 1st, 2009
7:24 pm
Najeh Davenpoop, I agree with you. Cleveland would have been great with another Batman like JJ. Speaking of JJ, his contract is up next year, and so is Lebron. if you are Danny Ferry, wouldnt you go out of your way to keep Lebron (and sign another batman like JJ or DWade).
Also, next year is when the big name free agents are available. If a team misses out on Lebron, Bosh, Wade, they might go after JJ as a consolation prize. I think the Hawks need to offer him an extension from now.
BrittishAnger
June 1st, 2009
7:27 pm
I almost forgot…
*Tyson’s situation isn’t as bad as one might ponder, considering people think we’d be a powerhouse with Chris Paul as our PG, but I am not familiar with his stats and can’t make that claim without them.
chas
June 1st, 2009
7:33 pm
The Hawks will remain in the mezzanine level relative to the Nba elite until they overhaul the team. They aren’t bad enough for a lottery pick so they’ll have to get lucky with a trade or dismantle what they have working and start over. The great teams in the past had someone you absolutely had to double team (think Jordan, Olajuwon etc) and had a supporting cast that could knock down threes or drive and score. I think it all starts at the top with Bibby. When was the last time a John Stockton or Chris Paul or a Steve Nash played an entire game with fewer than 3 assists? Bibby has done this numerous times in the regular season and playoffs. Sure, Bibby can fill it up the treys when he is open but a point guard needs to get his teammates easier shots. And this is not a strong enough offense to overcome a point guard who cannot drive and dish. If I were the opposing team diagramming how to stop the Hawks it would be pretty simple:
1) Double team Joe Johnson and make him pass the ball
Don’t worry about the rest of the gang
2) Don’t give Bibby an open three, but make him drive and dish which will not lead to an easy deuce
3) Give Josh Smith any open jumper and make him drive. When he drives get some help if needed… do or don’t foul him and block his shot. He cannot make a free throw or an open jumper so Hack a Shaq if he beats you
4) Let Zsa Zsa do his dance, but block his trash ..you don’t even have to jump
5) Don’t worry too much about Horford. He is a great all around player, but doesn’t have great post up moves because he is a forward posing as a center
6) Force Starvin Marvin to drive or get a hand in his face when he shoots a jumper
7) Help out if Flip Murray beats his defender and make him pass
As an armchair GM and Hawks fan for the last 30+ years, I still have no idea where you go from here. Hawks have never advanced past the second round in the playoffs and it doesn’t appear they will anytime soon.
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
7:41 pm
Chandler isn’t as good as Horford. Ilgauskas isn’t as good as Horford. (Can’t defend.) Ben Wallace isn’t as good as Horford. (Can’t score.)
I’d count Tim Duncan as a center, even though the Spurs have always called him a power forward. And I’ll give you Boozer, even though he’s listed as a PF, too. So that’s five. Brook Lopez? He averaged 1.5 more points a game (but took 250 more shots). Horford averaged more rebounds and assists. So I’d call that a push.
So that’s five centers better than Horfy, with Lopez being in the neighborhood. See what I mean?
lawton
June 1st, 2009
7:41 pm
the lottery is fixed. the first time they trotted out that “accounting firm” to make you think it was above board, i knew it wasnt. sterns runs the nba like a circus. its a TRAVELING circus. every team (market) must have a superstar. know way billy knight was that dumb to wiff on paul, williams and roy. sterns made those decisions, the same one he made when he used the hawks to get wallace over to detroit.
RA
June 1st, 2009
7:43 pm
You know, it must be a figment of my imagination, but I could have sworn that the Hawks survived the first round of the playoffs, and Chris Paul didn’t…. Or did I blink?
You know, this isn’t really what I do, but I’ve got a new hat idea for Nike to be maketed in the Orlando area. In the center it should read WITNESS 4-2! And on the sides there should be some fancy design on it that says EASTERN CONFERENCE CHAMPS. And on the back, and this is completely optional you understand, they could say something like LBJ is a classless punk. Like I said, not exactly what I do, but the design came to me in a dream. God I hate Cleveland!
Melvin
June 1st, 2009
7:47 pm
What about Andrew Bynum? I would add Bynum to that list. Matter of fact, I would do a Horford for Bynum swap….
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
7:47 pm
And David Stern wanted Deron Williams in Utah, as opposed to Atlanta? And Brandon Roy in Portland? And Chris Paul in New Orleans?
Uh, no.
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
7:51 pm
Bynum’s a talent. But he has also been in the league four years to Horford’s two. (Horford is a year older, though.) And he plays with Kobe and alongside Gasol. And he hasn’t done much of anything this postseason. (He’s averaging 6.3 points in the playoffs.)
LouHudson
June 1st, 2009
7:53 pm
First of all for the record, Karam Adual Jabbar was the best player in NBA player ever. 6 titles in the modern era along with the most dominate shot ever. Forget Jordan, Magic, or Bird, If you ask any GM what player he would take first to build a team, it would be Jabbar hands down. The Center is foundation to building a championship team until the Hawks accept this reality, they will never compete for a title. The Hawks must control the lane to win big playing Horford out of position is not the answer. Marvin, their 19th pick, and Law are all trade bait for obtaining the best possible options for solving their main problem(no inside persent). Trading for Thabert (not likely), but Kamam or Pryszilla are real possiblities neither are great, but both can rebound on both ends as well as bang/defend. Again S & T with Marvin and Claxton(expiring contract), resign Flip & JChillz, resign Bibby at a reduced rate(or him let go), Jarrett Jack an option, resign Solo.
Become a defensive team and win a championship!
Sund, go make it happen!
Harpie
June 1st, 2009
8:16 pm
Why have the Hawks crapped on Acie Law?
Melvin Flowers
June 1st, 2009
8:25 pm
Move the Hawks out of town. Its to many owners fighting makeing the news yearly.
We need a new team with a one man show Authur Blank. He’s a Winner a great owner my choice in Macon Georgia. Falcons owner Mr. Blank does what it take to be champions. The Braves needs to roll out of town also.
pete babcock
June 1st, 2009
8:31 pm
Jay,
Acie Law is not a bust, when he leaves and go to a team with a decent head coach he plays his bench, he will suceed.. the pick that will hunt us for ever is the Shelden Williams0 over Brandon Roy…Roy will be a top 10 player in 2 years…Marvin over Paul was not a terible pick hell how far has paul got? Acie could be just as productive if given the fair chance..People talk s… about Marvin but he has been solid without plays called for him..Childress is better all around than deng and AI so who should we had taken it was a weak draft.We need to trade up in the draft and get Thabett.
BrittishAnger
June 1st, 2009
8:38 pm
Next year, I might give you Ben Wallace as not being in that list (Horford is one season away from a legit double double average and a +1 to his blocks as well), but Wallace this year was as legit of a defensive player as you can get for being on a team where you aren’t even the starting center. If the Detroit Pistons had kept the original Larry Brown core, Ben Wallace would still be among the top Centers in the league, even with Kwame and McDyess being there ….I’ll buy your argument in one year, but Wallace has a championship and didn’t need the scoring potential to help make it happen….
And Ilgau’ is a better center than Horford, though Horford would be a better player if he were still playing at PF….Ilgauskas scores more efficiently for a minor drop in rebounds and their block numbers were pretty comparable. Zydrunas’ numbers aren’t without their own little asterisk, considering Varejao is really a 2nd center playing effective 3-2 schemes with Big Z alongside him…if the Cav’s don’t resign Z, next year Varejao will be huge and worth putting on that list….
And Bynum is a far greater bust in the long term than having Al at the position…he should be a lot bigger, a lot stronger, a lot more of an influence, but if the Lakers lose this series, he’ll be the reason why…
RICHIE RICH
June 1st, 2009
8:40 pm
EMEKA OKAFOR, MARCUS CAMBY, CHRIS KAMAN, MARC GASOL, TIM DUNCAN, NENE, AL JEFFERSON, MEHMET OKUR, RASHEED WALLACE, & ANDREW BYNUM…..THAT’S MY TEN
niremetal
June 1st, 2009
8:44 pm
Uh….if we had Chris Paul, HE’D have Bibby’s money. So we wouldn’t have a big man. I’m not missing Chris Paul. Deron Williams yes, Chris Paul no. And we still wouldn’t have a big man, so I promise you – we wouldn’t be in the East finals.
I would not trade Marvin Williams and Al Horford for Chris Paul.
brent a.
June 1st, 2009
8:50 pm
The Hawks have done quite well in terms of year-over-year improvement over the last 5 years.
What they need, now, in lieu of a superstar, is a grizzled veteran who can come in and teach this team how to win the big games.
Even championship-caliber teams need these guys, which is often how they become championship-caliber teams in the first place.
When Phil Jackson got to LA in 1999, he brought along both Ron Harper and John Salley, two guys who had won titles with him in Chicago. Their presence on that young, talented Lakers team was invaluable as the Lakers went from an annual play-off disappointment, to the best team in the league in Jackson’s first year.
Remember the impact Sam Cassell had on both the Timberwolves (2004) and the Clippers (2006)? The Hawks are already a good team. Add a tough-minded veteran who can come in and be a coach on the court (like Chauncey in Denver was this year), and we could actually see the Hawks in the ECF a year from now.
haleydawg
June 1st, 2009
8:50 pm
bradley, i thought basketball was a team game, lebron is slowly becoming a me player like kobe, i was sorry to see la go to the finals, denver is a bettew team and orlando should run away, kids should be taught the virtues of a team play as the game of basketball is going extinct on mainstream because of showing off like a iverson
brent a.
June 1st, 2009
9:00 pm
Mark,
Bynum “hasn’t dome much of anything this post-season”, because once again, he’s coming off an injury.
He was never able to get into a flow in the first two rounds due to early foul trouble, which were largely the result of him not being in (play-off) game shape.
He was fine in the Denver series (check out his numbers from the series-shifting LA win in Game 3 at Denver). He’s not always going to put up big numbers every night, as the Lakers objective with Bynum, Gasol, and Odom, is to throw something different at you almost every game, especially coming off of a loss.
In LA, in particular, his (scoring) numbers don’t tell the whole story of the impact he has on that team. His presence alone, always requiring a big defender, does wonders to free up his teammates. It is his sometimes loafing on defense that has gotten him pulled from so many play-off games (when fouls weren’t the issue).
Which brings me to Horford. He is never an issue defensively, and his offense is coming along just fine. Horford probably actually brings more over-all skill to the court than does Bynum. Bynum was actually a late-bloomer, and really hasn’t played basketball that long. He was drafted at 17 and was put to work with Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. Each time he has appeared to get into a flow offensively, his season’s have been cut short by knee injuries.
Horford, OTOH, is a 2-time college champion and a world-class athlete. He was ready to step in and play in the NBA right away.
Each player has the potential to become a big star. But if the two were to be traded for each other right now, I think that Horford’s career would continue to flourish, while Bynum’s development would likely take a step back.
brent a.
June 1st, 2009
9:03 pm
If you want to see team basketball, then LA is a fine example to watch. Regardless of any issues (perceived or otherwise) Kobe may have had in the past, LA runs a beautiful offense in which multiple players are scoring threats.
People should get past their pre-conceived notions about Kobe and realize that LA is a great TEAM.
That’s not me saying that they will beat Orlando, that’s just me pointing out the facts.
Denver lost 2 of 3 home games against LA. It’s time to quit saying they were the better team.
JK
June 1st, 2009
9:06 pm
why is everybody hatin on the HAWKS!!! MY GOD, we won 47 games and reached the second round. its very possible that we could have made it to the conference finals this year if half our lineup wasnt hurt. we proved we could play with the cavs when we beat them in december and shattered their 11 game winning streak. we have a solid team. one of the youngest teams. with a STAR in JJ. KG said it himself that he is the most underrated player in basketball. Josh Smith will be star and marvin williams has a lot of potential. yall r crazy..
JK
June 1st, 2009
9:08 pm
and dont forget horford. hes a beast that just needs a chance to become a force offensively.
rms
June 1st, 2009
9:11 pm
Matchups make a huge deal. You cant compare one team playing against another and say that the Hawks would do better. Certain teams match up better against the other. The Hawks barely made it past the second round but if they played maybe the Bulls that probably would have been an upset of maybe the Pistons it wouldnt have been close. It just depends on how your team matches up with other teams. The Hornets just didnt match up well against their opponent, just like the Cavs didnt match up well against the Magic. The Bulls vs. Celtics was just about even it just came down to execution and knocking down key shots.
Granger
June 1st, 2009
9:21 pm
You say you want to get Eric Maynor, but he won’t be there. Trade up and get the man. Trade Marvin Williams to move up in this years draft and get a first round draft pick next year. Take Maynor and with your 19th pick, take Tyler Hansborough. He is as good as Marvin Williams, right now. He will bring life to this lazy bunch. Only one person has outplayed Tyler in four years and that would be Blake Griffin, the first player picked in this years draft. Your starting five would be, Josh Smith, Hortford, Zsa Zsa, Joe Johnson, and Bibby. Your first two players off the bench would be Maynor and Hansborough. Yall want to get players on potential. Hansborough plays hard every night and maybe this would rub off on the all the other lazy ones. Law had potential, and where has he been? On the bench!! You act like you can’t move off of the 19th pick. Tyler brings hustle and toughness that this team needs. You can’t count on Williams. Every little injury he gets and he is out of the game. Just make the trade!! It is not that difficult!!
rms
June 1st, 2009
9:21 pm
aint nobody hatin on the Hawks, they just got some serious roster issues to address this season or else that 47 win season will be just a distant memory. As far as Marvin is concerned, having lots of potential and actually maximizing it are two different things. How long are we going to be saying Josh and Marvin are going to be a star vs saying they actually ARE STARS!!
kool kid
June 1st, 2009
9:24 pm
they need to stay together not lerf anybody go
Red Boy
June 1st, 2009
10:16 pm
Marvin Williams is going to be a star. I just got a feeling rick Sund will do something stupid and trade him.
kool$kat
June 1st, 2009
10:36 pm
Its the curse of Dominique…Hawks have sucked since he was traded.
Big Ray
June 1st, 2009
10:42 pm
Again, naw we don’t need one of those great pgs. We’ve got Bibby. Hurray.
I love this “if we got this person, we wouldn’t have THAT person.”
Tell me, what are Marvin and Al doing now (no offense to them) in Woody’s wonderful offense. Nothing CP3 or Deron couldn’t do, that’s what.
And guess what? Woody values the pg spot a hell of a lot more than he does the 3 or 5. Get the drift?
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
10:54 pm
Big Ray knows the game. Just sayin’.
UGA
June 1st, 2009
11:02 pm
Superstars?
Dwayne Wade, Vince Carter, Iverson, Danny Granger, Derrick Rose—–
The Hawks had a better record than all of these teams!!
O'brien
June 1st, 2009
11:02 pm
I agree rms. We keep saying how Josh and Marvin are still young, and if they had gone to college, then blah blah blah. I understand that part of the problem might be the offensive system (or lack thereof), but how long do we continue to wait on their potential to be maximized?
The Hawks have a #2, #3, #5 and #6 pick, and none of them are allstars, not even close (Horford has a good chance to become one, given time). And Horford might be a top 10 center, but the Hawks will continuosly struggle against teams that have legit 7 footers (Brook Lopez gave us trouble), especially with Woody’s system (and Bibby’s defensive deficiencies), because Josh, Al and Marvin are only 6-9. We need a defensive presence in the front court (like Gortat from Orlando), even if its off the bench.
Mr. Bradley, I raised this question on Sekou’s blog, and I would like to get your thoughts. Given that Toronto is worried about losing Bosh when his contract expires next year, what do you think it would take to get Chris Bosh to Atlanta (I assume Josh Smith would have to be included)…And do you think that’s a move Sund would make (given we dont know if Bosh will sign an extension with us)?
Dan
June 1st, 2009
11:05 pm
Enough of the Chris Paul stuff already!! God!! Mark, you were doing so well on your Hawks coverage only to write this garbage. There is no insight to be gained by this. You’re telling us that the Hawks would be better if they had Lebron/Kobe/Howard….OK….Stay tuned next week, everyone! Mark will tell us that the sky is blue.
You could go back over the draft history of any team and find mistakes. Joe Dumars gets credit for being a terrific GM, but he drafted the only bad player in the ‘03 draft. It happens.
At least Marvin can contribute. You want to rip Billy Knight for a bad pick? You should be focusing on the Sheldon Williams pick. That was far worse. He took a player at #5 that could not even play in the league.
Mark, c’mon….push yourself a little harder than this…
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
11:08 pm
O’Brien, that’s a good one. (And please, call me Mark.) Bosh is mighty tempting, but your point about him not re-upping is massive. Would you gamble four more years of Josh Smith, who’s a year younger, against what could be one year of Bosh?
I wouldn’t. I say it again: In two years Josh Smith will be the best player on this team. (And that’s even if Joe Johnson stays.)
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
11:09 pm
I believe I made reference to “two guys named Williams.” I wasn’t forgetting the Landlord.
kirkinga
June 1st, 2009
11:19 pm
Yes having a superstar seems to be the path to glory in June, but that’s just a surface level question. The real question is having the right mix of superstar(s),role players, and health. That;s the way it is in all professional sports.
There are teams with more superstars than either the Lakers or the Magic. The Rockets have two, the Celtics have 3, the Spurs have 3, the Suns, arguably have 2, the Mavericks at various times had 3.One wonders if the Lakers and Magic are in the Finals if the Celtics, Spurs, and Rockets are fully healthy?
A quick note on Marvin, the reason he was drafted was because the consensus was he had the most upside of any player in his draft. Better basketball minds than Billy Knight felt the future pay off of a Marvin Williams beat any immediate (and possibly limited) help from a PG.So if we are going to be flawless in our hindsight, we best take more than just the Hawks to task for an incorrect evaluation of Marvin Williams.
The Truth
June 1st, 2009
11:19 pm
Mark here are 11 centers that are better than Horford right now:
Dwight Howard, Yao Ming, Shaquille O’Neal, Al Jefferson, Marcus Camby, Pau Gasol, Nene, Chris Bosh, Brook Lopez, Tim Duncan, Amare Stoudemire.
We can debate where Al Horford fit in this group but if Sund is satisfied with our center being in 10th place in the league, than it validates a perception we may have about him. Maybe bold and aggressive should not be the appropriate words to describe his tenure but rather complacent, satisfied and conformity should be a better depiction of him. I hope I’m wrong about him but we shall see. The litmus test for Sund is a simple question; is he planning to win a championship or just being competitive?
Ted Striker
June 1st, 2009
11:21 pm
Mark — I kinda liked the ‘flogging a dead horse’ reference
brent a.
June 1st, 2009
11:24 pm
I think I would definitely trade Josh Smith for Chris Bosh.
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
11:27 pm
Hey, Ted. Long time no hear. I referenced you (affectionately) on another blog installment earlier.
Mark Bradley
June 1st, 2009
11:29 pm
Brent, I would, too, if all things were equal. But would you trade Josh, who’s under contract for four more years, if you weren’t sure Bosh would stick around the ATL after 2010?
Ted Striker
June 1st, 2009
11:30 pm
Truth: I wouldn’t mind having the 10th best center if my guards and forwards were top ten too.
rms
June 1st, 2009
11:31 pm
UGA: Two of those players have at least been to the finals or won a championship and had to start all over. There was a time when they were better than us but who’s counting that. You got D. Rose who led his team to the playoffs in their first year and gave the NBA and the watching world to witness the best opening round in a long time if not ever! and by the way just because you hire the assistant coach of a team that won a championship doesnt mean you can duplicate the same thing. The Pistons didnt have like 30 owners trying to sue each other and fighting in court and despite blotching that 2nd pick (and passing over D-Wade and Carmelo the GM has a good idea of running a team. Only now is that mistake starting to catch up with them. Atlanta on the other hand has a GM who in my opinion is questionable at best and ownership truly is a joke and even more of a joke when they try to justify themselves in the newspaper and on the radio. Just saying….
Gravy Train
June 1st, 2009
11:35 pm
The solution is simple: Get Birdman from Denver and draft a guard with speed who can play D and pop treys. Birdman can shut down the paint with the help of Horford and Smith. Then LeBron and such, doesn’t get a free pass through the lane. A PG who can play tight D and get out and run could really open things up. Too bad Iverson carries so much baggage with a big price tag. Bibby has to go. No D and no wheels is a liability in today’s NBA.
UGA
June 1st, 2009
11:38 pm
And with the ownership and GM , that’s what makes the job Woodson did and this team somewhat remarkable……and some of those guys are not “superstars”, but ESPN sure makes them out to be one
rms
June 1st, 2009
11:39 pm
The only legit Superstar you listed up there is D-Wade. lets not forget, they won only 15 last year and this year they won like 43 games. It didnt take them 6 years to do it. They did it in a year. None of that crap about “Well, last year we won 15, and then after that we won 19, then after that 25, then 30, then 37, now we won 43. So you see we have gotten better every year”. Those guys we that young talent went from 15 games to 4o+ wins and gave the 4th seed Hawks a run for their money almost single handely by one guy. Dwayne Wade-a REAL SUPERSTAR!!
Ted Striker
June 1st, 2009
11:39 pm
Mark — I’ve been cleaning out the sock drawer. (It’s a big drawer). But I always catch up on your columns.
niremetal
June 1st, 2009
11:40 pm
kirkinga,
You hit the nail on the head re: the Marvin selection.
ed
June 1st, 2009
11:41 pm
mark,
they need someone else who can help take the scoring load off of joe in the halfcourt offense score not necessarily a superstar, preferably at the small forward or point guard position. Not to mention having josh childress next year would help
The Truth
June 1st, 2009
11:44 pm
Ted Striker
Name me the last NBA championship team who won the title with the 10th or worst center? Yes you can compensate with better rating starters but that can only take you so far during the regular season. During the playoffs, it’s all about matchups.
GT
June 1st, 2009
11:49 pm
Not sure I agree though I can see where you are coming from. I want to hold judgment until they stop getting better ever year. You are saying it won’t happen and I am saying you may be right but as long as they are improving which I guess their season record and second round in the playoffs would indicate they are I am giving them some room. I have to admit there is nothing in their management resumes that would separate them from the pack. You might say it is luck of the draw but LA and Orlando have both been to the finals in recent years with different players but the same management a lot like the Braves use to do.. But you have to be honest this last year surprise all of us so maybe we owe them a little respect anyway and it is fun watching long shots beat the odds.
ed
June 1st, 2009
11:51 pm
marvin williams wasn’t a bad pick, shelden williams over brandon roy was the miss. what the hawks need is someone that can score either at the small forward or point guard position, to take the pressure off of joe in the hawks half-court offense. The return of Josh Childress wouldn’t hurt either.
Rufus1
June 1st, 2009
11:54 pm
Mark
The best JSmooth will ever be is KENYON MARTIN. He has no offensive skill set and he is 60% from the line, 29% from 3. He needs a uptempo PG(i.e,Jason Kidd)just like KENYON. Marvin has the potenial to be a 240lb Rashard Lewis, who can rebound and defend. Marvins Skill set works in any offense. The moment we get a coach with an offense system Josh’s stats will look just Kenyon,s(11pts and 6rbs) and just like denver WE OVER PAID!!!
D-Nice
June 2nd, 2009
12:06 am
The Hawks were short a point guard but Billy said he liked the “Potential” of Marvin Williams. Dude can somebody tell him CP3 played 2 years in college versus one for Williams and was he POY in ACC and the exact position they needed not some untapped potential that still has not been tapped. I could have been a scientist but its still untapped at 33 years old (LMAO). Then tell me who was going to draft Shelden Williams especially when everyone said Brandon Roy was the truth including me. We could have saved the money we spent on JJ, which is another story in itself. Phoenix was not going to resign him, too much money so wait and keep Diaw and your draft pick and you still could have gotten Roy and JJ. Imagine (CP3, JJ, Roy, J Smith, Zaza (prob dont get Horford). Thats a pretty impressive squad there.
Ted Striker
June 2nd, 2009
12:47 am
Truth — Elden Campbell at center might have struck fear against high school players, but never in the NBA. Yet, his team won it all. It’s a team sport, my brother.
Mitun
June 2nd, 2009
12:59 am
I think we do good this year if we keep Bibby, Zaza and Flip but get rid of Marvin for a decent backup.
The Truth
June 2nd, 2009
1:43 am
Ted Striker
If you are referring to the Detroit Piston 2004 Championship in which the Piston starters consisted of:
Chaunncey Billups – PG
Richard Hamilton – SG
Tayshaun Prince – SF
Rasheed Wallace – PF
Ben Wallace – C
Elden Campbell was the backup center on that team. The starter, Ben Wallace was one of the elite centers in the league at the time. However, I will agree it takes a team to win a championship. But that eventual championship team is the creme of the crop.
HawkKingBibby
June 2nd, 2009
2:00 am
Some of those awards are BS anyhow. You cant tell me that Joe hasnt had some years here where he could have been 2nd team nba but he wasnt because he is on the HAWKS. Brandon Roy hasnt done anything better than Joe Johnson and Roy is on a team with real bigs.
BrittishAnger
June 2nd, 2009
2:02 am
Please you guys, give up on J-Chill ever coming back…he’s got no reason to until his Olympiakos contract ends. He’s only 10 Million Euro rich at this point, with another 20 million euro coming to him if he sticks around, and that team went to the FIBA championships and the Greek national championships this year. That team makes a small tweak to fight against Batiste’s inside presence, they’re FIBA champs guaranteed. Olympiakos has a better chance of getting Chris Andersen to play with J-Chill that we have in bringing him back before 2010. Give it up.
HawkKingBibby
June 2nd, 2009
2:08 am
90% OF THE LEAGUE WOULD HAVE TAKEN MARV #2. There were some teams who would have taken him #1. I can tell you flat out why Billy took Shel #5. Woody wanted a veteran pg and they knew they could get a vet pg to start cheaper than they could get a starting center in FA. Shelden was the best big man in college and they thought he could play pf/c. The problem was even tough he had the physical stature to be a Dale Davis like banger, he didnt have the talent or the heart.
MannyT
June 2nd, 2009
2:26 am
While they may have been slow to develop, that 2003-4 Pistons team had a #3 pick (Billups), a #4 pick (R. Wallace), and a #7 pick (Hamilton). They had the draft pedigree, BUT none of them found success with the team that drafted them.
Does that mean that the Mark Bradley view of the world for Rick Sund to rebuild is with top ten drafted players that don’t have success with their original teams?
If you want to throw some luck into all of this, recall that in 2005 when the Hawks drafted Marvin, they had the worst record. If the ping pong balls fall to form, we might have picked up Andrew Bogut. Not that he is a star, but he would have put to rest questions of needing a starting center. Once that was addressed, it is easier to say that we could have picked up the best player available in future drafts…i.e. no Shelden, maybe Brandon.
While it is easy to say, we should have done better with top 5 picks, I think most of you would accept this team of players drafted later than Kobe, no more than 1 per year for last 10 years.
1999 – Ron Artest – 16th
2000 – Michael Redd – 43rd
2001 – Mehmet Okur – 38th (Would have taken Parker, but moved on as he was mentioned in Bradley’s opening. Needed a center, so Arneas gets snub–but he qualifies for the team)
2002 – Carlos Boozer – 34th
2003 – Mo Williams – 47th
2004 – Kevin Martin – 26th
2005 – Danny Granger – 17th
2006 – Rajon Rondo – 21st
2007 – Glen Davis – 35th
2008 – Courtney Lee – 22nd
Because there are only 10 there, I can still pick up some free agents. Given the low draft value used to make this team, I will fill it out with some undrafted players.
1999 – Chris Andersen
2001 – Andres Nocioni
2002 – Udonis Haslem
2005 – Jose Calderon & Kelenna Azubuike
I am confident that my rejects would make the playoffs. They could have a shot at a title with the right coach. How about one that was a reject as a coach…some CBA & foreign coaching jobs before he could even get a shot as an NBA head coach…maybe that Phil Jackson can do something for my squad.
BWAF
Ted Striker
June 2nd, 2009
4:32 am
Truth: Your NBA knowledge likely triumphs mine. That said, Wallace was not a true center during the year you reference. Wallace alternated between power forward and center. The aforementioned Campbell played 65 games at center, starting at least 27, fairly integral.
Your original post read “here are 11 centers that are better than Horford right now: Dwight Howard, Yao Ming, Shaquille O’Neal, Al Jefferson, Marcus Camby, Pau Gasol, Nene, Chris Bosh, Brook Lopez, Tim Duncan, Amare Stoudemire.” I don’t necessarily agree with that but I still say it’s not necessary to have a “top 10” center to win a championship.
Since you didn’t like the Elgin Campell example, here are a few more recents: Kendrick Perkins of the Celtics (2008 champs), Matt Bonner of the Spurs (68 games for the 2007 champs) Alonzo Mourning (65 games for the ‘06 champs).
We probably agree on far more than we’d ever disagree on. I’m all for getting the creme of the crop, as it’s possible.
On your side, I am,
Ted Striker
bibz
June 2nd, 2009
5:56 am
can’t we get someone like kaman or camby?they’re gonna be loaded frontcourt bc theyll gonna pick griffin. what do u think?
Nef
June 2nd, 2009
6:31 am
Uhh… news flash, that money that Bibby will be getting is the same amount that we would use for CP3. I think we should draft a true big man and move Al back to his reg. position at PF. Get Smoove a solid mid-range game (like it or not the guy’s shooting is getting better) and put him back at SF. Bring back Flip, Zaza, Marvin, and Bibby. Bibby is a must, without him nobody uses there talent. Have Joe, Bibby and Flip rotate while AC progresses. Smith at SF with Marvin coming off the bench. Al at the 4 and Solo from the bench. Either Zaza or the rookie starts or trade the picks for another decent Center. There’s your core while you find or raise more talent.
JustAThought
June 2nd, 2009
6:40 am
Just like I’ve said……………In a free fall, with no life rope or chance.
Stan
June 2nd, 2009
7:00 am
The Cavs really played a winning hand when they got King James, Lebron James; a home grown – what a play.
The Hawks should have played such a move, then they would have had, The High Priest, Dwight Howard; a home grown. It should have happened.
J
June 2nd, 2009
8:29 am
Liked the article … it would be nice to have a super star, but after seeing Lebron get demolished by the Magic, I’ll take my chances with the current team we have (a current HEALTHY team)
Matt
June 2nd, 2009
8:53 am
You know, Shelden William was a bad pick and we all know it, but this is the same organization that chose Priest Lauderdale as well. The idea was that he was a big guy (literally) that had dominated in the paint for rebounds in college and all indications (at least in the Hawks’ mind) was that it would happen in the NBA.
Glenn
June 2nd, 2009
8:56 am
Joe Johnson isn’t getting it done . I would ditch him & Mike Bibby . We can get someone cheaper & more effective in both those positions . Maybe we can get either Rayfur Austin or Jamier Nelson from the Magic . I think I would rather have Von Wafer than Joe Johnson . Yes after his playoff performance that is how down I am on Joe Johnson .
PMC
June 2nd, 2009
8:59 am
Oh hey, let me just pluck a superstar off this superstar tree here.
Really… the Hawks need a superstar…. GM.
Jim
June 2nd, 2009
8:59 am
What happened in drafts past are done-can’t be changed. What can be changed is roster and coach. If we keep Woody and Bibby we will be doing this next year. We have a front line that is 22-22-23 years old and got to top 8 teams this year with a coach that doesn’t use these guys at all. Maybe we have a star here but don’t know it because the entire offense is Joe & Bibby shooting jump shots. Bring in new coach, somebody like Joel Prizbilla to help in the paint, and find a point guard that can push the ball up the court.
PMC
June 2nd, 2009
9:00 am
They need deep pocketed superstar ownership from 1 figure too.
oh and I need 10 million dollars.
Outhouse
June 2nd, 2009
9:26 am
When does footbal season start????
Mark Bradley
June 2nd, 2009
9:28 am
JIm, you’re right. You can’t undo what’s done. But that is, I submit, why the Hawks and Sund are facing an uphill fight to get from 47 wins to, say, 60. They missed their cue way back when.
Bigeasy830
June 2nd, 2009
9:36 am
Great article Mark Bradley, we do need a star and that Pistons team had 3 stars, Billups, Rasheed and Ben, The Hawks passed on two stars twice in CP3 and Deron, and then again in Roy. Both times everyone and their grandmother knew that those players were to best choice for the Hawks but BK screwed it up. I think some are down on al because of his play-offs performance but the man was playing on one leg. Al was the second best player in that draft and we got him at #3. I thought last year we had a chance a Carmelo, we could have sent them J-Smoove or Chill or Marvin and sent them someone else, but many fans disagreed. I still believe we can go out and get Allen Iverson, he give us exactly what we need and that is a player that can score at will. Yes, there is risk to getting AI but look at the potential in the reward.
esaun
June 2nd, 2009
9:42 am
cant believe this; hawks give up someone and get James or Kobe and there in the play-offs. The hawks are several pieces away. James could not do it with a better cast in Cleveland and Kobe has 2 marquee players this year. C. Paul talk needs to stop. Johnson signed with the Hawks because we were going to let him play pg, so drafting cp3 was out of the equation. I am not so sure cp3 would be an allstar if Hawks picked him. W e forget he had issues(nut punch) coming out of Wake and was not over dominate. cp3 went to the right situation, if playing for Woodson more than likely would of had a non-spectacular rookie season. Speedy also looked like a monster in the N.O. dribble penetrate offense. My only gripe with the hawks is the taking of Shelden over Roy. Roy/Joe backcourt would have been a nightmare for the NBA.
Jfreak
June 2nd, 2009
10:25 am
If you’re drafting 19th it means you had a good year but it also means you’ll probably be getting a role player not a star. The Hawks wont spend the money to get the super star and in my opinion they don’t have to. Two big issues to address:
First, we need someone to call our offensive plays. Woodson is terrible! He has no idea how to make adjustments that WORK.
Second, Josh Smith has got to mature. Right now he is a kid with no real idea how the GAME is played. He can jump, dunk, and block but his critical thinking skills are less than average.
I would really like to see Horford become a bigger part of the Hawks offense but all in all if they tweak this team “some” we have a shot??
Truth-serum
June 2nd, 2009
10:40 am
This is why I call Mark Bradley MO Dumb. It’s so crystal clear that NUMBER 1 ISSUE facing the Hawks is a CENTER!! We have a center that was brought here (ZA-please do your show dunk on my non athletic butt-ZA), who has melted down to reserve minutes off the bench. The power forward who we drafted as a power forward is now a power forward playing the center position. So Instead of addressing our number one issue, MO DUMB is behaving like a little kid making his Christmas list rather than an ADULT making a responsible decision. DUDE?!?!!
JUST FOR THE RECORD, BEING A TOP TEN REBOUNDER, DUMB AND MO DUMB (SUND AND BRADLEY), DOES NOT MAKE YOU A CENTER. WAS DENNIS RODMAN A CENTER? DAN ROUNDFIELD? KARL MALONE? CHARLES BARKLEY? NEITHER IS HORFORD. A CENTER PLAYS NATURALLY WITH HIS BACK TO THE BASKET AND HAS TERRITORIAL CONTROL. HORFORD NATURAL INSTINCTS ARE FACING THE BASKET AND YES HE IS WELL UNDERSIZED IN HEIGHT AND WEIGHT, WHICH FORCES HIM TO EXPEND EXCESSIVE AMOUNTS OF ENERGY TO DO WHAT A NATURAL CENTER WOULD DO ALMOST EFFORTLESSLY-(SEE TIM DUNCAN).
BECAUSE OF THIS HE WILL NEVER REACH HIS BEST AT THE CENTER POSITION… AND NEITHER WILL THE HAWKS.
CTrim
June 2nd, 2009
10:41 am
Trade Joe Johnson and next year’s #1 pick to Memphis for OJ Mayo and this year’s #2 pick overall. Draft Thabeet #2 and Ty Lawson, Maynor or Teague at #19. Resign Flip, Zaza and Bibby without overpaying (Bibby 8 million for 3 years max). Bring Childress home from his European field trip and match any contract for Marvin up to 9 million. Then wake me up because I know I’m dreaming.
Hawksgirl
June 2nd, 2009
10:50 am
Great article, we do need a superstar but not the kind everyone thinks we do. I believe we need a superstar bench! Our starting five can be changed around a bit with marv coming off the bench to make the second unit more effective and etc. As for jj, Nef please dont say that. I was at first dissappointed but he wasnt the only one being inconsistent. Yes he is the captain but he came through when we needed him. He tried in the cleveland series but he was getting triple teamed and i felt no one was rotating to him to get the ball out of his hands. We need another star beside jj to make things happen. But not at the expense of bibby or marv. I hope we get lucky in the trade because we need a derrick rose like player.
As far as j chill, let us hawksfans dream pleeeeease! I want him to come back desperately just like eveyone else. If he comes back i think he will be a problem solver with rebounding and defensive schemes.
Just my thoughts
Truth-serum
June 2nd, 2009
11:02 am
Truth-serum
May 27th, 2009
9:16 pm
TO MO DUMB BRADLEY DAVID ROBINSON WAS A CENTER WHEN DUNCAN ARRIVED AND HE WAS MOVED TO THE POWERFORWARD SPOT TO MAKE ROOM FOR DUNCAN AS A CENTER. YOUR COMMENT” Ilgauskas isn’t as good as Horford” MAY BE TRUE IN SOME SENSE BUT ILGAUSKAS IS A BETTER CENTER AND ALTERS SHOTS AND DEFENSE THE LOW POST MUCH BETTER AND IS A TERRIFIC FINISHER. I WILL ACKNOWLEDGE THAT HORFORD IS A BETTER POWER FOWARD THAN ILGAUSKAS BECAUSE OF HIS ATHLETICISM AND HIS MID RANGE SHOT.
2007-08 Boston Celtics- Kendrick Perkins/Kevin Garnett
2006-07 San Antonio Spurs Tim Duncan
2005-06 Miami Heat Shaquille O’Neal
2004-05 San Antonio Spurs Tim Duncan
2003-04 Detroit Pistons Rasheed Wallace
2002-03 San Antonio Spurs Tim Duncan
2001-02 Los Angeles Lakers Shaquille O’Neal
2000-01 Los Angeles Lakers Shaquille O’Neal
1999-00 Los Angeles Lakers Shaquille O’Neal
1998-99 San Antonio Spurs Tim Duncan
1997-98 Chicago Bulls Luc Longley
1996-97 Chicago Bulls Luc Longley
1995-96 Chicago Bulls Luc Longley
1994-95 Houston Rockets Hakeem Olajuwon
1993-94 Houston Rockets Hakeem Olajuwon
1992-93 Chicago Bulls Bill Cartwright
1991-92 Chicago Bulls Bill Cartwright
1990-91 Chicago Bulls Bill Cartwright
1989-90 Detroit Pistons Bill Laimbeer
1988-89 Detroit Pistons Bill Laimbeer
1987-88 Los Angeles Lakers Kareem Jabbar
1986-87 Los Angeles Lakers Kareem Jabbar
1985-86 Boston Celtics Robert Parish
1984-85 Los Angeles Lakers Kareem Jabbar
1983-84 Boston Celtics Robert Parish
1982-83 Philadelphia 76ers Moses Malone
1981-82 Los Angeles Lakers Kareem Jabbar
Just to enlighten you, have you looked at the hawks salary cap this up coming season? Did you look at who was undercontract and for how much? Why do I think you are just making blanket statement with no knowledge of facts? The Hawks are very capable of adding the two missing pieces and would have money left over. Im not going to waste my time dealing with your non issues while you try to fix what aint broke. You totally disregard the fact that you dont build a team around a back up center….Duh, what are you thinking? He wasnt brought here to be a back up and we dont need a slow ackward turnover machine picking his nose when we are trying to win a championship.
I Hope you enjoy this side bar:
NBA’s Top 10 Centers
By Terrell James
NBA Jun 18, 2007
Remember when big men ran the NBA? In the ’90s, superstars like Hakeem, Ewing, Robinson, Young Shaq and Young ‘Zo had a huge impact on the League’s balance of power, and even second-tier guys like Rik Smits, Brad Daugherty, Vlade and Elden Campbell put in work.
Those days are ancient history. Now it’s the era of Jerome James and Adonal Foyle, where all 7-footers have to do is look like they can play and they’re almost guaranteed a fat contract. That’s why Greg Oden has been so hyped since early in his high school career; if he doesn’t usher in a new era of dominant centers, he’ll at least destroy most of the fives in the League on his way to multiple championships. Who will be Oden’s top comp? We ranked the League’s 10 best centers…
10. Zydrunas Ilgauskas — He’s slow and methodical, but Big Z gets the job done, as he showed throughout the Cavs’ run to the Finals. When he gets involved in the offense, he’s a decent scorer (11.9 ppg) who can draw the opposing big man away from the basket. Z is a great offensive rebounder (7.7 rpg) — you saw all the tip-ins — and a decent shot-blocker (1.3 bpg). Of course there’s that nonexistent quickness and lateral movement, which exposes him against bigs with any kind of speed, but Z has a niche and fills it well.
9. Mehmet Okur — Definitely not the prototypical center; he spends all game on the perimeter, but then again, he’s one of the best shooters in the League, so why not? Memo hit on 38 percent of his threes this year and put up 17.6 points a night while making his first All-Star team. His problems are: one, he’s a shameless gunner, and two, he gets destroyed on defense sometimes. While he was good against Yao at times in the Houston series, Tim Duncan took Memo to daycare.
8. Ben Wallace — He got off to a rough start in Chicago (stats-wise and the whole headband thing), but eventually got back to that blue-collar style fans and teammates know and love. As always, he was amongst the League leaders in boards (10.7 rpg) and blocks (2.0 bpg), and as always, the offensive game was somewhere between minimal and comical (6.4 ppg, 40 percent at the stripe).
7. Eddy Curry — The Knicks haven’t had a decent center since Marcus Camby, so Curry’s breakthrough ‘06-07 season was like winning the Lottery for Knicks fans. E-City came into training camp in the best shape of his career (all jokes aside) and it showed; he went for 19.5 points a night and was a borderline All-Star. Curry commands a double-team, but still turns the ball over too much trying to pass out of it, and his rebounding (7.0 rpg) could stand to improve.
6. Tyson Chandler — A prime example of how a change of scenery and system can change someone’s career. After five lackluster years in Chicago, Chandler made an impact right away with the Hornets, and was one of the NBA’s best rebounders (12.4 rpg). He also put up 9.5 points and 1.8 blocks and shot 62 percent from the field — which makes sense seeing as a lot of his buckets come on alley oop finishes and putbacks. He was in the discussion for Most Improved and Defensive Player of the Year.
5. Marcus Camby — See what he can do when he’s healthy? Playing an iron-man-ish (by his standards) 70 games this year, Camby copped Defensive Player of the Year after averaging 11.7 boards and a League-high 3.3 blocks a night to go along with 11.2 points. He’s the only reason Denver’s D doesn’t give up 120 a game. He scored an invite to Team USA’s training camp, but the Nuggets understandably wanted Camby to stay home — and healthy — this summer.
4. Dwight Howard — Getting better every year. 2007 saw Dwight’s first All-Star appearance and his first playoff experience. After getting a lesson from the Pistons in a first-round sweep, Howard should be that much smarter and better next year. Physically, Howard is an animal who blocks shots (1.9 bpg), dunks on everyone in sight (17.6 ppg), and dominates the glass (12.3 rpg). If you were starting a team from scratch and were looking long-term, Dwight would be one of the Top 5 players you’d have to consider.
3. Shaquille O’Neal — Don’t get it twisted; Shaq is still one of the best in the game. When D-Wade went down with his shoulder injury this year, Shaq showed he’s still capable of being the most dominant player on the floor, helping carry the Heat from what looked like a Lottery season into fourth-place in the East. He put up 17.3 points, 7.4 boards and 1.4 blocks in an injury-shortened regular season, and upped his numbers to 18-8-1.5 in Miami’s first-round loss to Chicago. Yeah, he’s getting up there in age and misses more and more time on the bench in a suit, but there’s still few players who are harder to stop 1-on-1.
2. Amare Stoudemire — Not only did STAT come all the way back from the knee injury (playing all 82 games), he was better than the last time we saw him at his peak. Amare dropped 20.4 points and 9.6 boards on his way to getting All-NBA first team, went for 25 and 12 in the postseason, and added a 15-footer to his repertoire that makes him a certified problem for any defense.
1. Yao Ming — Instead of dominating for a few minutes here and there, Yao took over entire games this year, averaging 25 points, 9.4 boards and 2 blocks a night and entering the MVP discussion before a leg injury limited him to just 48 games. Yao’s conditioning has improved since he first came into the League, allowing him to stay on the court and avoid senseless fouls. Houston is still T-Mac’s team, but no way they even challenge Utah in seven games without the best center in the League.
Honorable mention: Emeka Okafor, Chris Kaman, Andrew Bogut, Nenad Krstic, Brad Miller
I DID NOT SEE ZA “THE CONTINUING TURNOVER” ZA NAME MENTIONED, EVEN AMONGST THE HONORABLE MENTIONED AND THIS ARTICLE WAS FROM THE LAST YEAR WHEN HE WAS STILL A STARTER. WE HAVE BACK UPS WHO NEED DEVELOPEMENT SINCE YOUR VISION IS TO DEVELOP BENCH PLAYERS. WE HAVE TWO YOUNG AND INEXPERIENCED CENTERS TO HANDLE THE SCRUBB MINUTES,…FOR LESS!!
You Woody haters dont have a clue,nor facts or knowledge. All you do is hate. Instead of learning and researching you try to blame Woody because a player doesnt step up or doesnt take advantage of his opportunities. Nobody can play for you!
Its not Woodys fault Paschulia is a slow non athletic turnover factory. What? You expect Woody to make him into Tim Duncan? Get real. The NBA is litter with players on every team that have the physical ability and will not step up to the task. Paschulia is equal to Koncak!
Real players step up and make good.
MBZ
June 2nd, 2009
11:03 am
Even the 2004 Pistons had a go-to guy….Chauncey Billups. But they ran an actual offense at the end of quarters instead of just playing iso basketball. I literally pray to God that Sund makes the right moves this offseason. Gortat was quoted in an article saying that he wants to go to a team where he gets more touches. He is a free agent and we are one of the few teams that have the money to throw at him. He can rebound and defend and is an upgrade over Pachulia in terms of athleticism and length. I also believe that Eric Maynor will be available with the 19 pick. Minnesota seems to be high on BJ Mullins and Philly seems to be zeroing in on Ty Lawson, which means Maynor should fall. But none of that matters if we have a coach that wont allow his players to make mistakes for the benefit of experience because he is trying to “save” his job.
Jay
June 2nd, 2009
11:09 am
Mark,
Whether there are 10 better Centers in the league than Horford is certainly up for debate but I think the general consensus is that he is a talented but undersized Center; which is why some think he would be a great PF. As such, he should be partnered with an oversized PF (like KG with Perkins in Boston)for optimum success but Josh Smith is not an oversized PF.
Fans who complained all season about Josh Smith’s play as a PF should have recognized a very important fact–he doesn’t want to be a PF! He doesn’t want to bang on the boards or always stay in the low-post on offense. He prefers to be a perimeter player where he, and the team, can maximize his athleticism. A quick aside–any possibility that the dust-ups between Smith and Coach Woodson stem from Smith’s desire to play SG or SF conflicting with Woodson’s need for Smith to play PF? IMO, moving Smith to a perimeter position, either SF or SG, must happen before this team can take the next step toward achieving a championship.
And since we’re talking about guys playing out-of-position, did anyone else notice that Joe Johnson, like Chris Paul, Deron Williams and LeBron, led his team in scoring and assists? Mike Bibby, and his back-up Flip Murray, are listed as the team’s PGs and they received much of the credit for the Hawks resurgence. However, their veteran presence and shooting skills helped the Hawks more than their playmaking skills. In fact, Johnson was really the team’s only facilitator because how many times did we see the Hawks offense call for Johnson to handle the ball (ISO Joe) and set up Bibby or Murray to take a shot?
I’d love to see the Hawks move Josh Smith to the backcourt with Joe Johnson, keep Horford at Center with Marvin Williams at SF and get a 7-Foot PF like Charlie Villenueva, Channing Frye, Troy Murphy or Jared Jefferies to complete the starting line-up. Then trade Speedy Claxton for Earl Watson (PG), sign Malik Rose (PF), re-sign Pachulia (C) and Murray (SG) to go with Maurice Evans(SF) to give Coach Woodson a veteran bench to police the locker room and give adequate rest to his starters.
Truth-serum
June 2nd, 2009
11:11 am
ZAZA was our starting center for the previous 4 years. He lost his job to a powerforward and now you want to make a powerforward into the center. No, the powerforward was drafted as a powerforward and will always be powerforward. Pachulia hasnt panned out for what was expected. He is a non athletic turnover factory with 2″ vertical leaping ability. Leave the powerforward at powerforwad and replace the center who didnt measure up with a center who has and will.
Truth-serum
June 2nd, 2009
11:16 am
The Truth
June 1st, 2009
11:44 pm
Truer words were never spoken! Great post.
I cant understand why so many are oblivious to the reality of the fact. I guess they have a hidden agenda. I agree 1000% you dont compete for the finals without a center and you wont win with a powerforward as your center.
Its really a no brainer.
Truth-serum
June 2nd, 2009
11:18 am
Jay
June 2nd, 2009
11:09 am
Its not that he would be great as a power forward… THATS WHAT HE IS AND THATS WHAT HE WAS DRAFTED AS. ARE YOU JUST COVERING FOR THE FACT THAT ZAZA OUR FORMER STARTING CENTER HAS HAD A MELTDOWN AND NEVER PANNED OUT ALA KONCAK?
Mark Bradley
June 2nd, 2009
11:24 am
I might be dumb, but isn’t it kind of silly to keep running a list of the NBA’s top 10 centers that was compiled before Al Horford was even drafted?
Dejay
June 2nd, 2009
11:30 am
‘90% of the world would’ve taken Marvin #2′….
Really? I must have been in the minority because I was railing the Marvin pick from the jump (as well as the Childress and Shelden selections). I also remember the entire ESPN staff, including Vitale, spending the entire night of that draft roasting BK for passing on CP3 and Deron as well.
That ‘90 percent’ who would’ve taken Marvin over the other two didn’t have Royal Ivey and Tyronn Lue manning the point.
What makes the pick more asinine is the very next offseason, what does BK do? Spend millions on Paul’s injury-prone backup, who has played about a dozen more games for them than I have since arriving in town. He drafts one year on potential (Marvin) instead of need when the difference in talent was obvious, then turns around and drafts on need (Shelden) instead of talent when the difference is obvious yet again.
See my point? The Hawks’ MO has always been on opportunities lost because of standing still, poor scouting, and horrid drafting. We can lock up entire websites discussing the scrubs this team has selected over the years.
I’m just wondering how this team is going to be able to get from 47 to 55 and in the elite class with a fractured ownership, a 19th pick, and a need for more talent? Just wondering….
Jay
June 2nd, 2009
11:52 am
Truth Serum–
I’m not covering for Zaza Pachulia in anyway. I think he is what he is-a tough-minded guy who has limited speed, quickness or offensive skill but bangs the boards and gives you what he has.
My point regarding Horford is that Ben Wallace, Dave Cowens and Wes Unseld were undersized starting centers who were partnered with an oversized forward for teams who have won championships. The reality is that there’s no Center available by trade or in the draft who can turn this team into a championship contender and it is easier to find a good oversized PF than to find a legitimate Center.
However, my main point is that solving the Josh Smith conundrum is more important to the long-term succes of the team because Smith does not want to play PF, he shouldn’t play PF if Horford is at Center and, more importantly, this team will not win a championship with him at that position.
All I'm Saying Is...
June 2nd, 2009
11:54 am
Once again, it’s (still) all Billy Knight’s fault for not drafting Chris Paul or Deron Williams or Brandon Roy. HUGE miss for sure but its 2009 people and figuring out how this team gets to the Finals going forward means moving on and addressing what we need today and what we need today is…..
1) Get a legit big man in the middle: either trade up (trade Marvin, Acie and throw in Solo or Randolph Morris) and draft Thabeet or BJ Mullens or go after an established big man via a trade with either Tyson Chandler or the versatile big man with Golden State (they have a new G.M. who may be looking to revamp his team now that Chris Mullins is out) as options; Plus, I don’t know if he’s available, but if he’s unrestricted, I’d even sign Dwight Howard’s backup Gortot [sp.] as the dude has shown he can play in the playoffs
2) Re-sign Bibby, ZaZa, and Flip for bench strength (and welcome back J-Chill if he wants to return stateside)
3) Sign unrestricted free agent Andre Miller as our new starting point guard (we don’t need a young dude fresh to the NBA as our window is the next five years)
4) Tell Woody its a make or break season for him (which he already knows)
And that, sports fans, is a prescription for success in 2009-2010 and you read it here first! Now go get it done Rick Sund as I’ve done all the thinking for you, my man! <just kidding, Rick as we all have faith in you…for now, otherwise you’ll be our new Billy Knight punching bag and even Bradley will have to criticize you.
(By the way, Bradley, how much longer do we have to put up with Don Waddell? Seriously. He should be gone by now and don’t give me that Heatley sob story, okay, as challenges come and go)
TRUTH-SERUM
June 2nd, 2009
1:04 pm
Jay
June 2nd, 2009
11:52 am
That’s a fair point from your perspective. I agree that Za Za is rough and tumble. The point is…and I hope you have you ears open Mo Dumb Bradley. Za the perpetual turnover up until last year was our STARTING CENTER. He was supposed to be the big center we needed to build on, kind of like Koncak. So for 4 years he was the center and now he’s is a bench player. He lost his starting role. He can’t run, he’s slow, he can’t jump, he’s slow, he can’t finish, he’s slow, he can’t score so he’s no threat and his man therefore is free to roam and play havoc on JJ and josh. I’m not sold on Bradley willful ignorance that Z was our center and lost his job and now we have a power forward spelling center. How about let’s trade Pachulia and get a center that’s proven and won’t turn to KONCAK!!
Mark Bradley
June 2nd, 2009
11:24 am
I might be dumb, but isn’t it kind of silly to keep running a list of the NBA’s top 10 centers that was compiled before Al Horford was even drafted?
I agree with you that you are dumb.(but you are probably a nice man who is willfully ignorant) The list is written during ZaZa reign as the Hawks starting center. Al Horford was a power forward at UF, HE WAS DRAFTED AS A POWER FORWARD and he still is a power forward and he always will be a power forward.
I see you are willfully ignorant to the point that since Pachulia lost his position and can’t cut it as the starter. He should be traded and lets go get the center he was suppose to be. Let’s not take survivors mentality of Center by committee. It is too great an impacted position to fill by committee by saying “hey let’s move the power forward there and go get a point guard. Let take the position that we are on the verge of being a serious contender and a true center away from being there. Let s build aggressively with expectations of winning rather that complacently, experimentally to see if we can wear out a power forward trying to be a center. Trade ZaZa for a center that can run, jump, finish and block and alter shots.
What Za has done
Playoffs Tea G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
First Round ATL 7 0 23.7 0.429 0.000 0.767 2.7 4.4 7.1 0.4 0.6 0.1 1.14 3.60 7.6
Semi-Finals ATL 4 1 23.5 0.389 0.000 0.750 2.3 4.3 6.5 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.50 3.80 5.8
Playoff Ave ATL 11 1 23.6 0.415 0.000 0.762 2.5 4.4 6.9 0.3 0.4 0.3 1.27 3.60 6.9
Season Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
08-09 ATL 77 26 19.1 0.497 0.000 0.709 2.2 3.4 5.7 0.7 0.4 0.3 1.18 2.70 6.2
Career 422 162 21.2 0.457 0.000 0.737 2.2 3.4 5.6 1.0 0.7 0.3 1.44 2.70 7.7
Not exactly making progress!
TRUTH-SERUM
June 2nd, 2009
1:07 pm
Jay
June 2nd, 2009
11:52 am
I DISAGREE WITH YOU ON THE POINT THAT THERE ARENT ANY CENTERS AVAILABLE TO HELP US COMPETE AT THE FINALS LEVEL. THERE ARE QUITE A FEW.
Mark Bradley
June 2nd, 2009
1:12 pm
Three things: Zaza hasn’t been the Hawks’ starting center for four years. He has only been with the Hawks four years, and Horford started at center the past two. Zaza was the full-time starter only in 2005-2006 and for half of 2006-2007. Here are his career stats.
Next point: The Hawks can’t trade Pachulia. He’s an unrestricted free agent.
Third point: Why are you always harping on Paculia? The guy is what he is — a backup center, and an OK backup center at that.
Bigeasy830
June 2nd, 2009
2:30 pm
I say the Hawks make a gutsy move and go get Allen Iverson. Let Bibby go and get AI to run the point. We win 50 plus with AI and Joe in the back court for us next season. and offer Chill 6 mil per to help shore up the bench or let marvin go and Chill start at the 3. Chill gave us what Turkoglu gives Orlando and that is a 6′8″ guy that is quick and can handle the ball and initiate your offense. Marvin is just a jump shooter.
Mark Bradley
June 2nd, 2009
2:39 pm
I wouldn’t touch Iverson. A little man who’s slowing down? No, thanks.
ant banks
June 2nd, 2009
3:05 pm
Mark and et al, i have been reading, ad infinitum, mind you, about what the hawks should do, etc., but none of the recommendations would have them competing next year with:
1. Wizards will be much improved, coaching changes and Arenas had them down this year.
2. Indy was oft injured, but they will be back with a vengeance.
3. Philly will have Brand back and a new coach, look out.
4.Chicago will definitely be back in the mix.
5.Boston and Garnett will be alive and well.
6.Charlotte is a scary team. Brown will have them ready thiz year.
7. MIAMI
8. CLEVELAND
9. ORLANDO
re-signing Flip, ZaZa, Chills, or Bibby don’t help with problems 1-9
cdog
June 2nd, 2009
3:16 pm
I AGREE WITH LAWTON. I’M FINALLY GLAD SOMEONE HAD THE NERVE TO SAY THIS. LOOK AT OVER THE YEARS, KAREEM,MAJIC AND SHAQ ENDING UP IN LOS ANGELES,LARRY BIRD IN BOSTON,NOW LOOK WHAT HAPPENED, GARNETT GOES TO BOSTON. I REMEMEMBER JULIUS ERVING WAS SUPPOSE TO COME TO THE HAWKS BUT THE NBA KNEW THIS WOULD TAKE AWAY FROM THE BIG MARKET TEAMS SO THEY BLOCK THE MOVE AND SENT HIM TO PHILADELPHIA. THEY HAVE AND ARE STILL TRYING TO TAMPER AND BRING NEW YORK BACK FROM THE DEAD. THAT’S WHERE LEBRON WILL PROBABLY BE SENT NEXT. THE LOTTERY IS DEFINITELY RIGGED.THEY RIGGED IT SO THAT BACK THEN, THE KNICKS COULD GET PATRICK EWING. THEY USE TO CONDUCT IT OUT IN THE OPENING TO THE PUBLIC COULD SEE IT BUT TO ASSURE THE RIGHT TEAMS GET THE BEST PLAYERS, THEY GO BEHIND CLOSE DOORS AND PICKS THE TEAMS IN THE ORDER IN WHICH THEY WANT THEM. I AGREE LAWTON, THE NBA HAS BECOME A CIRCUS.WHY DON’T THEY DO LIKE THE REST OF THE PRO LEAGUES AND LET THE WORST TEAM PICK IN THE ORDER IN WHICH THEY FINISH?WHY DON’T THEY HAVE MORE ROUNDS THAN JUST TWO? THIS IS CRAZY.7-10 ROUNDS WOULD BE THE RIGHT AMOUNT. IN THE OLD DAYS THEY HAD 17.
MBZ
June 2nd, 2009
3:16 pm
Fire Mike Woodson. Sign Gortat and Brandon Bass, Draft Maynor and Alade Aminu. Resign Marvin and Flip. Let Bibby and Pachulia go. I GUARANTEE a better team.
O'brien
June 2nd, 2009
3:27 pm
Mark, One comment a blogger has made (and I agree with) is that Horford is fine at center, but because of Josh Smith’s size, our front court is undersized (and sometimes overmatched). And Zaza is not a defensive center either. All we have is Josh’ help defense, and thats not enough, especially when Bibby’s man has a good chance of getting in the paint.
Thats one reason why I like the backup center from orlando (Gortat). Tall defensive presence.
ant banks
June 2nd, 2009
3:38 pm
i am really scared of the cavs next year. they have wally, big ben (retirement), and Zydranus coming off the books, 40mil!! they will have boat loads of money this yr to offer to a FA.
I do believe that Lebron will wait until the end of NEXT year to re-sign with cavs. He won’t do it this summer.
Rufus1
June 2nd, 2009
4:20 pm
BIBBY IS NOT THE FUTURE
We do not have the size in the front court to offset Bibby’s defensive issues. I think he is a solid back-up on a championship team(i.e,SAM Cassell), but that is not the Hawks. If we sign Bibby, what are we really trying to accomplish? Are we really that much better with Bibby? If I were bibby I would want to stay in ATL and get 40min a night. Bibby has stablized our PG position, but he has not solidified it.
I would rather have a young, inconsistant, quick PG putting pressure on the defense who is able to defend(i.e, Aaron Brooks)..instead of Bibby=Sam Cassell. As long as Woodson is a LAME DUCK COACH he will sacrifice the future to win 40 games now.
PS Just like ANT BANKS stated re-signing Bibby does not make a better in 2010.
PS Bibby CAN’T GUARD ANY OF THOSE PG ON ANT BANKS LIST.
BrittishAnger
June 2nd, 2009
4:58 pm
Hey Bradley,
Most of the centers I listed were from a preseason list, I’ll admit that, but I think back to the fact that some of the simplest losses we incurred were from a lack of true depth at center, and why I just can’t deny putting him a spot up and drafting for somebody to stay with him in the trenches when the game slows down. I’ll admit what a good Point Guard can do for a team, Denver showed us that and what Bibby has done for us since the trade is admirable to a level of respect I only had for him during those great battles against the Lakers. We can’t keep on denying the obvious, that Al would have many greater battles against Garnett at PF than he will ever have against Brook Lopez, Amare Stoudamire (and I’m a fool for forgetting him), or any other pure center in this league (and yes, that means Big Z). The team as it stands with our starters from last season is good for a running team, but the slightest adjustment in the right place early on in a game would deter any possibility of being out-manned inside if the run game is being clogged like it did against the Cav’s during the 2nd round. To make that adjustment, you need the pure team design, which our team is not right now short of Zaza seeing increased minutes and a monster summer of improvement in deterring his foul rate, and interchanging Josh and Marvin depending on what you need (a driving force in Josh, or a Shooting Wizard in Marving). It is a wretched puzzle to piece together, how to maintain the balance of run and gun with something sufficiently stand-still that when the guns aren’t blasting, theirs aren’t either. Al Horford should be in a lot of top ten center lists for what he’s done in the last two years, and he’s a great piece of our puzzle and I want him to stick around for as long as possible; I just want to see him in a place where he can thrive all year ’round, and PF would benefit his size and footwork far better than he would at center where he is on the inside looking out of a tuna can against teams with a legit 4 and 5 inside. We’re a team of swing forwards, with some swing guards, so our 2, 3, and 4 spots are filled to the brim, with the right PG (I’ll say Acie could do it, but Acie doesn’t play like Bibby, and Bibby will make Josh Smith a better player everytime they’re on the floor) and the right center depth, this team would equal the nightmare that Cleavland is and will be next year….
Also, while I feel for your intangible dream of a dream-like return of Josh Childress, I just hate the odds against it, and for this team to grow, bad odds need to be removed: Speedy Claxton’s contract and those international rights open up some big opportunities for the management to make some serious improvements without bad odds looming about, and Claxton’s contract alone opens up room for a third PG to fill spot eleven and Solo as a swing forward/center to play spot twelve.
All I'm Saying Is...
June 2nd, 2009
5:03 pm
“Chandler isn’t as good as Horford. Ilgauskas isn’t as good as Horford. (Can’t defend.) Ben Wallace isn’t as good as Horford. (Can’t score.)”
Bradley: Were you not paying attention when LeBron and Company (and D-Wade as well for that matter) drove down the lane at will against the Hawks? Were you not paying attention when Horford and ZaZa were useless defensively despite their best efforts?
What you fail to understand is that history proves that the Hawks would be better off with a Ben Wallace or Ilgauskas at center as it would mean having either a rugged,defensive minded center or a tall body in the middle. And moving Horford to PF would make Marvin even more expendable while upgrading our starting lineup. And it doesn’t matter if Horford plays a center-like game at PF (i.e. back to the basket) –that’s irrelevant and it is fine if he does for we’ll take it especially if Wallace does his job (rebound and defend) or Ilgauskas shoots jumpers (which is all he really does offensively).
Again it is not a question of finding a more skilled center than Horford—its a matter of finding a more appropriate big man for the Hawks capable of complementing his teammates and matching up well against the likes of Dwight Howard, Kendrick Perkins, Andrew Bynum, Ilgauskas, Nene, Yao Ming, and Erick Dampier. Horford is too short and/or not rugged enough to play the one against any of these centers who were part of the other final seven playoff teams.
I don’t know what he has left in the tank five years later but Ben Wallace proved in 2004 that he could handle a center as big as Shaquille O’Neal in taking Detroit to the championship and Ilgauskas is over 7′ tall which matters despite his defensive shortcomings when you are talking about match-ups and the possibility of clogging the middle.
As for Tyson Chandler, he, again, would provide us with the defensive presence in the middle (and enough offense) and be a better complement to the rest of the team as we would not need him to score since Horford, Josh, JJ, and Andre Miller (who again I say we should sign as our new point guard) could do plenty of that with Bibby and Flip coming off the bench along with ZaZa.
(Also, we could trade for Rafer Alston and install him at the point but I digress from educating Bradley on the center position.)
Mark Bradley
June 2nd, 2009
5:20 pm
Ben Wallace is 6-foot-9, 240 pounds. Al Horford is 6-foot-10, 245 pounds. You’d rather get … smaller? (And let me remind you that Wallace and Ilgauskas together limited Dwight Howard to 40 points in Game 6 of the Eastern Conference finals.)
And let me also remind you that Horford was playing on a bad ankle from Game 5 of the Miami series on. Had it been the regular season, he’d have missed three weeks. As it was, he missed only two full games. He’s a tough guy. He’s also a center. Go ask Rick Sund, who’s a basketball lifer, if you don’t believe me.
Jay
June 2nd, 2009
5:35 pm
While we continue to debate about what the Hawks should do, I think that the move GM Sund has already made gives us a clue about what will happen this off-season. Does GM Sund’s decision to not extend Coach Woodson’s contract mean that he will wait until summer 2010, when the contracts of Joe Johnson, Marvin Williams, Speedy Claxton and Coach Woodson come off the books, to make any serious moves ?
Since you’re keeping Coach Woodson for one more season, you’ve got to give him a team he likes. So, expect Bibby, Murray and Pachulia to be re-signed but expect them to draft a shooting guard with this year’s first round draft choice. But with Washington, Miami, Chicago, Charlotte and Indiana improving, it is unlikely that the Hawks will still be the number four seed in the East, giving Sund the cover he needs to terminate Woodson.
He’ll have Horford, Smith, Evans, Law and this year’s first round draft choice under contract while Childress will still be Hawk property. Then he can hire his type of coach, bring in a free agent PF like Chris Bosh or Amare Stoudamire, add another first round draft choice and a couple of vets for the bench strength. Thoughts?
Jones
June 2nd, 2009
6:18 pm
Really? Are we still doing this? Can’t you think of something else to write except how the Hawks should have drafted Chris Paul? Give me a break.
BrittishAnger
June 2nd, 2009
6:35 pm
He’s become a center…he wasn’t originally, but whether anybody likes it or not, he is now…most basketball video games worth their merit still have him listed as a PF, if not FC if they have the listing….and there is a difference between a Forward-Center and a pure Center….I wouldn’t take Ben Wallace over Horford at this stage of the game, but Horford at center would have to revert to that kind of game, all defense and no offense, to maintain an edge at that position for lack of his size, and we don’t need that from him….We have find a legit third back-up for when him and Zaza are in foul trouble, and Solo, bless his heart, is not that guy. Even an old guy like Mikki Moore could pick up that role, it’s just an issue of seeing where we need to shore up…with Flip and Acie we have plenty of PG depth, but until we get a legit center, every loss against a bigger team is going to prove me right….
Mark Bradley
June 2nd, 2009
6:39 pm
Woodson’s money doesn’t count against the salary cap. I don’t know that that’s a consideration.
And we’re debating real center credentials on the strength of … video games?
Blast
June 2nd, 2009
7:14 pm
I disagree. I believe that Josh Smith will end up a far better player than Kenyon Martin ever will be. In fact, I believe that if Josh Smith can get his head together and play every possession as if it were the last, as if his life depended on it, and shoot at least 70%+ from the line, and develop a jump shot, he can be a superstar in this league. Josh has what it takes to average 25 a game, he just has to want it. It’s his for the taking.
Birdman in the ATL? That would be NICE! Gortat too.
Al Horford is not a center. Hawks lose anytime they play teams with centers bigger than AL. He is being asked to guard and score against men that tower over him. He might be able to mask as a center, along with others in a big man deprived league, but Al is playing out of position.
Can it, people. Josh Childress is not coming back to the NBA until he cleans up all those millions. Hell, he might not even return after his contract ends! He might sign with the Greek team again, cos right now, the NBA cannot afford to match the money he is making.
Go, Hawks, Go! Get it right this off season!
Jay
June 2nd, 2009
8:11 pm
OK Mark–you got me.
We all know that Coach Woodson’s salary doesn’t count against the salary cap and that the Coach’s salary will not have any impact on the roster. But does your silence about the rest of my post speak volumes as to its accuracy?
Sund inherited Woodson and these players but don’t most GMs want their own head coach and players who fit the system his (Sund’s) head coach will implement? Did you really believe him when he said he cares only about results and not how they are achieved? Since Woodson’s record was better than the previous year and 3 injured starters made a legitimate evaluation of the playoffs impossible, why not let Woodson finish his contract and start anew in 2010? Will this year’s first round pick give us an indication of the direction in which Sund has decided to travel?
One last comment about the Center position. There once was a NBA Center who played for 13 years and won 11 Championships even though he was 2 to 3 inches shorter and 20 or more pounds lighter than his opponents on a nightly basis. It is not about the size of the man in the fight; it is about the size of the fight in the man–and while he’s not Bill Russell, Horford brings plenty of fight to the arena.
Patrick
June 2nd, 2009
8:45 pm
Asking “name 10 centers better than Horford” is semi-misleading because Horford is playing out of position. I’m sure there are plenty of power forwards who would be more effective at center than Horford is. Once we’re allowed to add people like KG, Al Jefferson (another PF out of position), and every other PF who could play center, I don’t think Al cracks it. Maybe down the road he does, but not right now
Mark Bradley
June 2nd, 2009
9:22 pm
I think Flip will be back. That’s all but a lock. Bibby could go either way. Same with Zaza. I think the Hawks keep Marvin if he’s willing to sign a one-year qualifying offer and become an unrestricted free agent after next season; otherwise he’s a sign-and-trade.
I don’t think Rick Sund has any inclination to blow up this roster. I believe him when he says he likes this team. His history hasn’t been one of bold moves but of caution.
And Jay, I wasn’t trying to be flip. (As opposed to Flip.) I just didn’t understand the lumping of Woodson’s contract with Johnson’s and Claxton’s and Marvin’s.
You make salient points. I don’t want you going away mad. OK?
truth-serum
June 2nd, 2009
9:49 pm
Mark Bradley
June 2nd, 2009
1:12 pm
At least we agree that Pachulia was the starting center who lost his Job and for the last couple years we have a powerforward from UF drafted as a powerforward filling in. Yes. Ive already mentioned that Z is a meltdown. We again agree. Did you say hes a four year pro and lost his job 2 years ago? Well close…
Zaza Pachulia #27 Center – Forward
2009 Playoffs Statistics
PPG 6.9 RPG 6.90 APG 0.3 Born: Feb 10, 1984
Height: 6-11 /
Weight: 275 lbs. / 124,7 kg.
From: Georgia (Europe)
Years Pro: 5
This is what the hawks are saying about the guy that was our starting center before he lost his job.
I do believe that he is a five year pro, not four.
You are also intentionally evading the point. If I buy a car that turns out to be a lemon and won’t run, I should replace it because transportation is essential. I should not take my sons car although he lives with me he need to contribute to the household.He needs his car for the households contributions, that’s his role. I’m not going to take his car and make it mine. Pachulia was not intended to be a failure. He was brought he to be our center he lost his job and yes, two years ago we had to put a power forward in the position to have a decent response there.
It’s taking it toll on Horford, wearing him down. He has to exert so much energy and athleticism to try and be a full time center. He nearly broke his ankle trying to go up against the big boys in the playoffs. He will be expired buy the time he’s 28 or 29. Meanwhile the bum who is supposed to be the center is wasting away on the pine. Let’s give his time to Randolph Morris and see if he can develop. Z has already peaked.
Have you ever heard of sign and trade? If he has any networth lets sign and trade him. Im just trying to get something for the nothing we got from Koncak…I mean Pachulia. I m also trying to get a center not a power forward masquerading as a center! How wont become injury prone as he wears down from over exertion!
truth-serum
June 2nd, 2009
9:54 pm
Patrick
June 2nd, 2009
8:45 pm
Well said Patrick.
How many powerforward are better than Horford. He reminds me a little bit of Mchale with Boston. A powerforward who can give you minutes at the post. Of course the cheif Robert Parrish was the center an and excellent one at that!
Jay
June 2nd, 2009
9:58 pm
Mark,
I didn’t think you were being flip. I only included Woodson’s contract with those of Johnson, Claxton and Williams-if he signs the one year qualifying offer–because the expiration of those contracts allow Sund to move in a different direction–sorry for the confusion.
I try to make salient points and if I go away, I won’t go away mad. Any idea who or what position (PG-PF) Sund would want in a sign and trade for Williams?
Ariose
June 3rd, 2009
10:54 am
Does anyone else find it fishy that Austin Daye tested at last week’s NBA Draft Combine in Chicago as the slowest, least athletic player in the entire Draft class?
It wasn’t a shock that the Gonzaga sophomore forward was the only player who couldn’t even lift the 185-pound bench press once. After all, he’s 6-foot-10 and only 192 pounds. But, when has Daye ever been described as extremely slow and unathletic? He did it all for Gonzaga over the past two seasons. He scored inside and outside, handled the ball, scored and dished in transition, threw down exciting dunks, blocked shots, and really gave Gonzaga a long, versatile player in its lineup.
Daye has loads of potential to be a terrific player in the NBA. He has Rashard Lewis, Tayshaun Prince, Lamar Odom, Thaddeus Young and Josh Howard (insert any other long, versatile small forward here) written all over him.
NBA executives have been raving lately about how impressive Daye has been in workouts. He’s been praised for his ability to do so many things exceptionally well. He’s been steadily rising up draft boards over the past few weeks. And he’s certainly impressive in interviews.
If everyone has been so excited about Daye, how is it possible that he tested as the slowest, most unathletic player out of EVERY SINGLE PLAYER at the Draft Combine?
To be fair, Hasheem Thabeet didn’t participate in the testing, and Ricky Rubio and Brandon Jennings weren’t in Chicago. But that doesn’t change much. Hopefully, for Daye’s sake, Thabeet is slower than Daye, but he would still then be the second slowest, the weakest, and the most unathletic player at the Combine.
Daye’s no-step vertical was 25 inches. The only player with a lower no-step vertical was Maryland guard Greivis Vasquez, who had a 24.5. Taj Gibson and Omri Casspi were next with 25.5.
Daye’s max vertical tested at 28 inches, which was tied with Vasquez as the absolute lowest at the Combine. No other player tested at less than 30 inches (Taj Gibson measured at 30).
As stated above, the bench press issue was no surprise. Daye is easily the skinniest player in this Draft class and he showed by not being able to lift the 185-pound bar once. Vasquez lifted the bar just one time, while Casspi did two reps.
When it came to the lane agility test, which tested players’ speed moving quickly in various directions around the lane, Jordan Hill (12.23 seconds) was the only player who finished slower than Daye (12.11 seconds).
The 3/4 court sprint is just a straight sprint down the court. Daye’s 3.5 seconds was good enough for dead last. Vasquez finished .02 seconds faster. Even BJ Mullens and DeJuan Blair (3.45 seconds) were faster than Daye.
Greivis Vasquez is a whole different issue. Most wouldn’t guess he’s the strongest, most athletic guy on the court at any time, but it’s going to be tough to play point guard in the NBA without being able to beat centers up and down the court.
But this is about Daye, the guy who has been so impressive lately in his workouts.
Is Daye really slower and less athletic than the likes of Blair, Mullens, Luke Harangody and Jeff Adrien? Is he really the slowest, weakest, least athletic player in the entire 2009 NBA Draft class?
Or was Austin Daye dogging it?
Was he told by an NBA team to perform as poorly as he could in order to make other teams not want to draft him because that certain team doesn’t want him to be drafted before that team’s pick?
Would Daye really do that?
Think about it. How many solid first round, maybe even lottery, prospects have ever been the worst or second worst in every single test? It’s one thing if he was only the weakest or only the slowest or only the least athletic, but all three?
We’re not talking about an out of shape big man here. We’re talking about Austin Daye.
Can a wing player who is the slowest, weakest, most unathletic player in the entire Draft class be a lottery pick? Apparently, it might be possible.
The question really isn’t whether or not a player like that could be a lottery pick. It’s whether or not the player in question is really what he made himself out to be last week in Chicago.
OTHER COMBINE TESTING SURPRISES AND NOTES
Stephen Curry did very well at the Combine, much better than most would have expected. He measured at a legit 6-foot-3 in shoes and 181 pounds, which is heavier than Patty Mills, Darren Collison, Jeff Teague and Eric Maynor, and only two pounds lighter than Toney Douglas.
Curry’s biggest knock has been that he is weak. Well, the former Davidson guard bench pressed 185 pounds 10 times, the same as Jonny Flynn, BJ Mullens and Tyler Smith, and more than Terrence Williams, Gerald Henderson, Tyreke Evans, Jrue Holiday and Earl Clark.
People also have said that Curry is unathletic. Well, he registered a 35.5 inch max vertical, more than Henderson, Evans, Holiday, Clark and Sam Young.
Curry did everything perfect at the Combine. He tested well, shot well and interviewed well. He could easily find himself in the top five when the Draft rolls around.
Who had the highest max vertical? It wasn’t DeMar DeRozan, Gerald Henderson, Jermaine Taylor, Blake Griffin, Derrick Brown or Tyler Smith. To the surprise of many, the only player at the Combine with a true 40 inch vertical was Jonny Flynn.
There was a lot of debate in Chicago about which point guard was the fastest of the bunch. The names thrown around were Darren Collison, Ty Lawson, Patty Mills, or maybe even Jonny Flynn. But, none of them were even the second fastest. Toney Douglas blazed through the 3/4 court sprint with an impressive 3.03 seconds, while even more surprising was the fact that Damion James was second with a 3.09. Matching Lawson and Mills’s time of 3.1 was the out-of-nowhere Jodie Meeks.
Everyone knows Blake Griffin and DeJuan Blair are beasts, but how about Luke Harangody and Derrick Brown? Harangody topped Griffin by one (23-22) for the most bench presses. That shows how hard Harangody has been working lately to get in incredible shape. Brown was third with 20 reps. The Xavier forward is not only strong and athletic, but fast, finishing with a 3.13 in the 3/4 court sprint.
Watch out for Rodrigue Beaubois, the young French point guard who is looking to make a name for himself in the NBA. He measured just an inch short of Flynn with a 39 inch vertical. The 6-foot-2 guard has a 6′ 9.75″ wingspan and had the third quickest lane agility time with a 10.49.
Former high school teammates and college rivals Wayne Ellington and Gerald Henderson both participated at the Draft Combine. Ellington has always been known as the shooter, while Henderson is the athletic one. But how about the fact that Ellington measured a 38 inch vertical, while Henderson had just a 35.5? What’s that all about? Who knew that Ellington was one of the most athletic players in this Draft class? Shooters can be deceiving. Ellington’s vertical is much like Jodie Meeks’ speed, as Meeks came in as the third fastest player at the Combine.
Link:
http://www.thehoopsreport.com/article.aspx?id=273
Ariose
June 3rd, 2009
11:01 am
In the 2008 Olympics, as the youngest player in the history of Australian basketball, Mills averaged a team-best 14.2 points a game and had two assists and 1.7 steals in 23 minutes. As a 19-year-old, leading a team with players mostly in their mid-30s, Mills went for 20 points, three assists, two steals and no turnovers in the quarterfinals against the U.S. team.
Link:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/06/01/SPUM17V3VO.DTL
…yup
All I'm Saying Is...
June 3rd, 2009
2:10 pm
Bradley say: “Ben Wallace is 6-foot-9, 240 pounds. Al Horford is 6-foot-10, 245 pounds. You’d rather get … smaller? (And let me remind you that Wallace and Ilgauskas together limited Dwight Howard to 40 points in Game 6 of the Eastern Conference finals.)
And let me also remind you that Horford was playing on a bad ankle from Game 5 of the Miami series on. Had it been the regular season, he’d have missed three weeks. As it was, he missed only two full games. He’s a tough guy. He’s also a center. Go ask Rick Sund, who’s a basketball lifer, if you don’t believe me.”
First, I don’t care if Rick Sund is a basketball lifer: the man can still be flat-out wrong (and if you don’t believe me, then do some actual work and research the success of his draft picks —and with that info in hand then you might, I repeat, MIGHT not continue to point out the one pick Billy Knight didn’t make)).
Second, so what if Dwight Howard scored 40 on Wallace and Ilgauskas—imagine how many he would have had against Al and ZaZa. That’s what we are talking about Bradley: how to improve on what we have and I have yet to read any real suggestions from you, just your typical criticizing everybody else’s ideas while offering nothing original in return.
Third, Al Horford is an excellent NBA player (and a great pick by Billy Knight) but he is not what the Hawks need at the center position. It’s not just a question of size (although we definitely need a 7 footer who is wide, rugged and defensive oriented), it’s also a question of match-ups, playing style, and role being played on the floor. I used Ben Wallace merely as an example of how someone’s style could be complementary to the other players. If we added a Wallace or Ilgauskas or Tyson Chandler or Gortat or Andris Biedrins (Golden State’s versatile big man)and then move Al (who is not 6′ 10′ by the way, I don’t care what the media guide says—this is the same instrument that use to list Charles Barkley as 6′ 8″ when he was never taller than 6′5″) to PF, then we can create match-up issues for this year’s final eight NBA playoff teams and their respective centers (Howard, Perkins, Ilgauskas in the East and Bynum, Nene, Dampier, and Yao in the West). With Al’s back to the basket game and size, we can’t. With Wallace (if he has anything left) Chandler or Gortat we can go toe to toe while significantly improving our interior defense and rebounding (plus Gortat and Chandler can finish and score). With Bierdrins or Ilgauskas, we can pull their center outside since both can shoot and pass. With either, we can move Al to PF where he can really perform and not miss Marvin at all.
The bottom line is the Hawks are not going to go from 47 wins to 60+ or, more importantly (since the Cavs showed how important regular season wins were Bradley), are not going to go to the Finals without a legitimate big man preferably defined as 7′, widebody, defensive minded rebounder who can finish—-does not have to be superstar as an Erick Dampier type would do nicely….so once again I say either trade up and get BJ Mullens or Thabeet and or go out and get Chandler, Gortat, Biedrins.
Sund and I agree on one thing: we do not need to blow up this team. Get a center (see the above) using Marvin, Acie, and Solo or Morris. Re-sign ZaZa and Flip. Keep Bibby if he takes a pay cut and a non-starting role. Sign Andre Miller as our new starting point guard.
PD
June 3rd, 2009
4:43 pm
Come on get over the Chris Paul thing. It was not meant to be……..Woody probably would have benched and destroyed his confidence like he did Acie Law’s confidence. But I am just peeing in the wind like Mark and these coulda woulda shoulda stories about Chris Paul and Deron Williams.
Mark, how about you do a really detailed story about the upcoming draft? Tell us more about the potential picks of the Hawks in this draft so you can start writing your next article about the players the Hawks missed again
BrittishAnger
June 3rd, 2009
7:06 pm
Just pointing out a source of commentary, though I believe EA’s franchise also has Randolph Morris listed as a 7′ PG….
Truth-serum
June 4th, 2009
1:15 pm
All I’m Saying Is…
June 3rd, 2009
2:10 pm
At least there are two people on here with some sense!! I don’t know where Sund proclaims himself “basketballer for life.”
1st I’ll bet I can take him and Bradley to the rack!
2nd if he were such a basketballer how is it he can be so lost to what this good Hawks team needs to become great?
3rd this team is pretty much built just needing a couple pieces so why does he want to reinvent the wheel when his philosophy of building around a guard is untested and untimely( considering the hawks are where they are in progression)?
Let the nucleus of this team remain together for 4 or 5 years and lest support them and see where they go. Give coach woody what he needs and we may have a Championship here. Sund can rebuild later. It is unwise to try building around a point guard when this young team is practically built.
Ditto on the major need for a center who is a force in the paint.