Much has to happen. The Hawks need to re-sign Mike Bibby, to work a sign-and-trade with Marvin Williams and to draft a guard, preferably Eric Maynor of VCU, in Round 1. But for this team to climb from pretty good to really good, something more must be done.
The Hawks must wean themselves from their reliance on Joe Johnson.
Almost every bit of the Hawks’ offense since 2005 has run through Johnson, and it’s past time for an adjustment. It’s not that he isn’t a fine player; it’s that this team has two younger players who require room to grow.
Come 2011, Josh Smith and Al Horford should be the Hawks’ best players. (And this assumes Johnson re-ups next summer.) Together, Smith and Horford took 1,443 shots this regular season. By himself, Johnson took 1,420. Save the occasional lob, the team doesn’t run many plays for Smith. It runs almost none for Horford.
Johnson isn’t a ball hog – he led the team in assists, ahead of Bibby – but he’s the focal point. You can be a focal point if you’re LeBron or Kobe or D-Wade, but Johnson isn’t quite. The Hawks would be better served if he played fewer minutes – he led the NBA in those – and took fewer shots.
Would Johnson be amenable? “I would,” he said Tuesday. “But I don’t know if that’s going to be the case. I have a passion and love for the game. Sometimes the coach tries to take me out, and I tell him to leave me in. It’s not that I’m selfish – it’s just my passion for the game.”
Is the goal to stoke Johnson’s fire or to win more games? He was demonstrably fatigued in the postseason and admitted as much. Save for the final three quarters of Game 7 against Miami, he was never the Johnson whom co-owner Michael Gearon Jr. calls “the greatest Hawk since Dominique.”
Sorry, there are no polls available at the moment.Johnson has filled an essential role. More than anyone else, he lifted the Hawks up from squalor. For this team to go further, he needs to work as well with Smith and Horford as he does with Bibby. He needs to become a leader, not just a scorer.
Horford won two NCAA titles with a team famous for sharing the ball. He’s not one to make requests. But here was his reaction when asked if he’d like more shots: “Yeah, every player would. Count me in for that.”
Do the Hawks run much for him? “They don’t,” said Horford, who took fewer shots than Flip Murray. “But I understand. I know what it takes: I have to work on my game and make them give me the ball a little more.”
Would Mike Woodson be willing to work Johnson less? “Without a doubt,” the coach said. “Did I wear him down? Sure. But I needed to ride him to get us where we needed to go.”
For this team to reach the next level, Smith and Horford must pull more of the load. They’re 23. (Johnson is 27.) They’re the future.
Williams is not. So long as he’s here, he’ll always be the guy who isn’t Chris Paul, and there should be teams willing to work a sign-and-trade. Bibby should stay because the Hawks went too long without a point guard. And another guard should be the focus of this draft because there won’t be a big man around when the Hawks pick.
But the big transition has to be internal. Johnson cannot be the lone star any longer. For the good of all, he must become one of the gang.
259 comments Add your comment
matt r
May 12th, 2009
1:31 pm
Nice work MB
Dan
May 12th, 2009
1:41 pm
Marvin Williams is the only player on this team with any semblance of an inside-outside game. This team needs a coach to cultivate that out of him. Trading him would be a HUGE mistake.
truth-serum
May 12th, 2009
1:48 pm
Trade that sorry scrubb know as the” turnover waiting to happen” ZaZa is a scrubb and a loser. The reason the Hawks did not go further is we dont have a center. It would be nice to trade Za-scrubb for sump-ting….any thing grilled chicken for KFC sumpting,. He is like a green lite under the board. He stops no one!~!
Dennis
May 12th, 2009
1:49 pm
Fire Woodson, and bring in a coach that will let these guys run. They are too athletic to be bogged down in a half court style offense for the majority of the game. )One reason the Hawks do so well against Western Conference teams is that they able to run with them.
Joseph
May 12th, 2009
1:49 pm
I agree that the Hawks should not dismantle the team but build key components. Fans were frustrated with the series but the last two games were in reach with better offense. Williams may come through but I think Smith and Horford are the key stones, who need more shots (and less erratic play Mr. Smith) to drive the Hawks forward. A yonger PG who could defend as well as shoot would be nice too to win 55 games next year.
HHBO
May 12th, 2009
1:49 pm
What would we call ‘em?
“Smoove ‘n the gang”?!?
nola hawk fan
May 12th, 2009
1:56 pm
nice work mark. enjoyed your coverage of the playoffs.
Question – have you looked at what bigs are out there for possible sign and trade or FA? To me, that is the biggest hole right now. Whether it was Z or Sideshow Bob grabbing endless offensive rebounds this series, it was apparent, the hawks need a real center and let Al play the 4.
And if Marvin can be the bait to get a Big, I agree, he would be the one to trade.
freshd
May 12th, 2009
1:57 pm
It wouldn”t hurt for WOODROW to play AC LAW and develop him into the rotation, and see what he has. RICK SUND has said he likes AC and WOODY needs to throw him into the fire and quit trying to save his job every season by playing JOE 40 minutes a game. He should take a look at ORLANDO and how they threw COURTNEY LEE into the fire, and he”s a rookie.
Desmond
May 12th, 2009
2:00 pm
What do U mean by “Johnson needs to step back for the Hawks to step forward?” Joe Johnson may not played as well this postseason but Joe Johnson put the Atlanta Hawks back on the map and without Joe Johnson, there would not be no Atlanta Hawks, Atlanta Hawks will not be successful, and Josh Smith, Al Hortford, and everybody else would not play as good without Joe.
Josh Smildress
May 12th, 2009
2:05 pm
Hey Mark, covering the Hawks for the past two weeks does not entitle you to an opinion about how the Hawks play. All you columnists who watch only 11 games of the season have no idea how the team plays. Marvin is good and played well all season, can we work a sign and trade with you?
Timothy
May 12th, 2009
2:08 pm
While everybody being so damn critical on Joe, watch out for Joe Johnson next season. Once again Joe Johnson is gonna prove everybody wrong and everybody gonna jump back on his bandwagon. BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR JOE JOHNSON NEXT YEAR EVERYBODY.
Harry Hawk
May 12th, 2009
2:11 pm
I’m actually leaning toward Schultz’s column today. Joe might be the guy to move. His knees may very well be close to shot (a 40 minute-per-game average over the last six seasons can do that). Do we wait another year, make the playoffs, and then sign him to a near-max contract? Would it make any sense to do that for a complementary star player who will be turning 30 in 2011? Will the Hawks be acquiring a true superstar for Joe to play with?
Here are my answers to those three questions: I hope not; not much; not likely.
Oh, and don’t forget that Bibby turns 32 next year. Wanna pay him big money? For these two reasons, I think we have an interesting offseason ahead of us.
(Don’t get me wrong. I like Joe. He’s really helped this organization out. We’re back to the Smitty/Mutombo/Mookie days. Unfortunately, teams like that usually get blown up because they aren’t good enough to be elite.)
2PacFan4Life
May 12th, 2009
2:12 pm
WITHOUT JOE JOHNSON, ATLANTA HAWKS IS NOTHING POINT BLANK. REAL TALK.
BDubs
May 12th, 2009
2:17 pm
Agreed more with Schultzie. Trade Joe J. and keep Marvin.
RealSquawk
May 12th, 2009
2:22 pm
That’s a great argument letting a player go because he was picked before somebody. Like he had control over that.
Without you noticing you picked more bones at Woodson then you did Joe. Woodson said he rode Joe so he could keep his job, Woodson said he let Joe tell him what to do, and when you spoke about Marvin you forgot to mention that Woodson doesn’t like small guards and gave chris paul a no vote.
Really I feel sorry for Billy Knight he got a lot of venom spewed his way. When I honestly think most of his perceived poor decisions came from trying to appease Mike Woodson. Who will all know won’t play someone he doesn’t like.
Big Ups to Salim Stoudamire for getting another chance with the Bucks and Royal Ivey for finding his place in the league.
Actually Mark you probably went after Woodson in this column on purpose (no sarcasm there)
Dan
May 12th, 2009
2:24 pm
Mark,
I am one of your biggest critics. I have to say, however, that I agree with everything you wrote. The Eric Mayner suggestion, in particular. Hope he is still around.
A sign-and-trade with Williams is needed. He is a good player, but I feel the team is just the same with him as they are without. If someone has to go, it makes sense that it would be him. We’ll see…
Don’t forget…resign Flip Murray, too…
freshd
May 12th, 2009
2:28 pm
Any chance the hawks could trade for MARK GASOL who averaged 11.9 points and 7.4 rebounds this year for MEMPHIS. He is 7 feet tall and weighs 280 lbs and only 24 years old. The HAWKS could then move AL to power forward. They need some bangers and some beef in the middle.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
2:28 pm
Thanks, Matt. Thanks, Nola. Thanks, Dan.
Let me note that the Hawks won a playoff series with virtually nothing from Marvin Williams. He has been here four seasons and has become that incongruity — an inessential double-figures scorer.
Keepin it 100
May 12th, 2009
2:29 pm
Mark Bradley gone with all that mess bra!!!! Joe Johnson is the Atlanta Hawks and he aint going nowhere you know that i know that he know that the whole A-town knows that. This team has build themselves up from a 13 game winning season to a 47 winning season, 4th place in the eastern conference, and went to the 2nd round of the playoffs!!!! breaking this team will be like breaking up the lakers JOE JOHNSON WILL BE HEAR NEXT YEAR YALL!!! MARK BRADLEY JUST TRIPPIN
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
2:30 pm
Acie Law has no future here. None.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
2:32 pm
I didn’t say Joe should be traded. I don’t believe Joe should be traded. (You’ve finally won a playoff series, and now you’re going to dump your leading scorer?) What I said — at least what I thought I said — was to have Joe shoulder less of the offensive load and become a part of the offense, not the whole shooting match.
Astro Joe
May 12th, 2009
2:36 pm
Just because some in the media and some fans can’t get over Marvin’s draft position, that shouldn’t be the reason you get rid of a 23 year-old with a high basketball IQ, a great work ethic and contributes within the team concept on both ends of the floor. Carmelo Anthony was drafted before Dwayne Wade. And Carmelo did so little for his team that they had to experiment with Iversen before acquiring Billups to make them into a true winner. Oh, and not to mention that whole sucker punch thing that Melo did that led to a lengthy suspension. I guess by your logic, Denver should have dumped Melo for a six pack of Coors because he wasn’t Mr. T. Mobile.
Oh yeah and if you’re going to draft a rookie PG and start scheming for the future then you better have a Head Coach with more than 1 year left on his contract. Moving some eggs from the JJ basket to that of any of these “they have potential” players screams of a semi-rebuilding effort and why would any coach with a single year left on his deal want to do that? Woody isn’t some crazed UGA professor looking to commit (professional) suicide.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
2:37 pm
I’m sorry. But Marvin just isn’t what the Hawks thought he’d be. And I don’t think he’ll be worth what he’s apt to ask as a restricted free agent.
mj23
May 12th, 2009
2:38 pm
Joe, will be back, but i don’t think Bibby will. If he agrees to a 1 yr. deal, then bring him back, but Bibby’s best days are behind him and he is a liability on defense. Woody has stunted Acie’s development because he doesn’t trust him Woody prefers to play vets, and Acie plays like he’s scared. Bring in a Jarret Jack or Javaris Crittenton to run this team.
smartguy
May 12th, 2009
2:39 pm
To those saying: “watch out for Joe next year,” I would say, I wanted to watch Joe this year. If he’d played worth a darn, we could still be watching him play.
TRADE NO SHOW JOE.
FIRE STUPID WOODSON.
Magic
May 12th, 2009
2:39 pm
Mark you wimped out with Bill Martin
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
2:41 pm
trave Marvin. Release speedy. keep joe and zaza…Im not sold on Horford but maybe because hes still young(rookie here was real good thoug) as much as i like bibby to stay I would let him go only if ACIE can step up or we trade for a much better point guard(why point guards we sign or draft never work out for us?) overall I would love to keep this team chemistry together
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
2:42 pm
OK, let’s say the Hawks trade Joe. For whom?
jg
May 12th, 2009
2:43 pm
i would just like to thanks these hawks for making my basketball season very interesting. i watched every tv game that was on from my home in chattanooga, tn with my three boys ages 7, 5 and well 9-months. we were also able to watch one game in philips arena–a W against a very good Denver team in January. we really had a blast all year!
personally i enjoyed this team a lot! i feel like they’re a good group of guys who are still developing their basketball skill and IQ. i’m not going to make much of this series with cleveland because i knew we weren’t quite good enough to win a series against them especially without home court..my only problem is that we didn’t play our best ball. i truly think we peaked a little early and the injuries really hit us at a horrible time. yea we got through injuries here and there during the season–but two or three during the same time is too much to overcome. i really thought us playing our best basketball could extend the cavs series to atleast 6 or even 7 games. i hate that we didn’t give our best play to the national fans that now might see this hawk team as over-rated. we won 47 games because of really good team play and hustle and i’m sad no one got to see much of this in the playoffs.
for the future–i hope we keep most of these guys together. obviously i would love to add a quality center such as a chris bosh. if it means we lose a marvin or even joe i think we have to do it. marvin was really playing well before the injury and i think that injury really destroyed our chemistry late in the year. as far as joe goes–yea i really love jj too–but it’s so painful to watch how much effort he has to put forth to score. some guys make it look real easy–but poor joe has to scratch and claw for everything. and that’s really not his fault per say–but i feel like his outside shot is declining and his ft percentage is going down as well–probably because of fatigue!
finally, whoever we bring in or keep–know this–me and my three sons will be rooting hard for the hawks up here in chattanooga. you guys should have seen them when we knocked out miami!!!!!!
jg
chattanooga
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
2:43 pm
And don’t say LeBron. Or Kobe. Or D-Wade.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
2:45 pm
Bibby’s not going to take a one-year deal.
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
2:45 pm
people keep saying trade joe like its fault but yall wasnt saying trade him when he was on yop of his game(bandwagon fans) coach worked joe to hard he was tired. If we had a better bench and better role players joe wouldnt be so tired and have played better but dont forget he was double teamed meaning it was his job to hit the open players which he did but the players couldnt hit the open shot most times…Horford not comfortable in his mid range shot. I seen him pass up the wide open shot to much.
STRETCH
May 12th, 2009
2:46 pm
freshd,
Good point! You got a 1st round pick point guard sitting on the bench…found out what the guy has next season. Bibby needs to take a pay cut for sure. And Joe needs less minutes next season as well, so that when he comes back in the game, he has that killer instinct he showed last season.
Gotta get a big man like Sir Charles said last night. Until they get big, the are always gonna lose big.
Harry Hawk
May 12th, 2009
2:47 pm
LeBron, Kobe, and D-Wade.
The Cavs, Lakers and Heat can work out a timeshare deal for Joe.
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
2:47 pm
if i had to trade joe for a player it would be LaMarcus Aldridge
Barry
May 12th, 2009
2:47 pm
Mark, I completely agree. How many Hawks possessions wound up with Joe dribbling and dribbling, then either a turnover or someone heaving up a desparation shot. And that is no knock on Joe. I think Joe is a really good player, and a good offensive player. But he isn’t a dominant player that commands the attention of a LeBron or DWade. He can score, but within the context of the offense. He can’t consistently force the action. There is no way the Hawks will go to the next level with this basic roster if they don’t share the ball any better. I like Marvin Williams, but he doesn’t really make much of a difference. What do you think they could get for him if they were able to trade him? Mike Bibby absolutely needs to stay, and they either need to get another, younger point guard, or allow Acie Law to play and develop. What’s up with him? It seemed to me he played alright when given the chance. He’s different than Bibby, but more up tempo.
allan in texas
May 12th, 2009
2:50 pm
Mark, what or who can we get for Marvin Williams? Any ideas? Thanks and have a nice day.
Harry Hawk
May 12th, 2009
2:50 pm
I’m sure I could figure something out on the ol’ ESPN Trade Machine.
mountain_jim
May 12th, 2009
2:55 pm
Replace Woodson, bring in the 7 footer from Euro, trade Chills rights and change for another defensive Center and Joe and Marvin probably get a whole lot better. Or if it takes either of them to get a real Center then do that trade also.
Woodson burned out Joe and did not develop Acie. He needs to be replaced with a coach willing to build for the long term, not just burn everybody out pre-playoffs just to keep his job each year.
Ellis St. John
May 12th, 2009
2:59 pm
If you don’t at least try to trade Joe now, he walks next summer (unrestricted free agent) to play second fiddle (his desired role) with D-Wade or Lebron or Bosh. Move him now if you can.
Larry
May 12th, 2009
2:59 pm
Mark,
The Hawks can become elite with addition without major overhaul.
1. Resign Flip & Bibby to reasonable short term deals, 2 years.
2. Trade Marvin, we need a Tyson Chandler, or Andris Biedrins type player. Who need few touches, rebounds and block shots, and can finish (Unlike ZaZa, Solo)
3. Draft a PG, I’m not sold on Maynor yet, but he is an excellent shooter for a PG and that always transitions well.
4. Make NICE with Josh Childress.
5. FIRE WOODY, because no matter how well the Hawks play from here on out, we will always be out coached. He doesnt deserve to be fired for this season’s performance, but this team is alteast 1 year behind schedule, if not two.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:00 pm
OK, let’s say the Hawks do find a big man. Does Horford move to power forward and Josh to small forward? Where would Marvin play then? And wouldn’t you like your small forward to have some capacity to make a jump shot? Wouldn’t the redone front line be too much bulk and not enough quicks?
BoricuaHawkFan
May 12th, 2009
3:01 pm
Nice article and perspective. That just sounds like a nice dream, which I’d take any day if it came true. It seems like most high-scoring stars do tend to pick up the bulk of minutes and shooting. Mark: Any comparison (mins. & shots) numbers with the likes of say DWade, Kobe, Dirk? My guess is that they also tend to carry their teams and will likely have comparable numbers.
Great season though a bit dissapointed at the lack of fight during the playoffs.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:02 pm
Good idea. Trade the leading scorer off a playoff team because he might — might — leave in a year. That’s not the way it happens in the NBA. This isn’t baseball.
mike
May 12th, 2009
3:04 pm
Mark,
Good article. I agree with your theory about Joe but I dont agree with the idea about Marvin. I think he has made great strides this past year with his shooting and rebounding. A healthy Marvin produces numbers and his size and length is great (sorry for using the favorite word of Billy Knight, length). Who is the weakest link then? Josh Smith! (And Bibby’s defense.. and Woody’s offense). Josh Smith does not make enough good plays to make up for his bad plays and turnovers. He has a big enough name to get some trade value, perhaps a big man (i refuse to use the word “true center” because there are virtually non-existant anymore). Then we can move Al to his true position at 4. What’s your take on that MB?
Dan
May 12th, 2009
3:07 pm
I really do not think the Hawks need a superstar big man. I think they just need one that can come in and do the dirty work, bang people around, get boards, and score a few hoops a game. Kawamie (sp?) Brown would have fit that role perfect, but the Pistons outbid the Hawks in the end.
It would be great to land a superstar big, but that is not going to happen. There are only like three of them on the planet anyways. Just get a big player (or two) to come off the bench and be able to hold their own. The big does not have to start.
And, if the big does start, like Mark said, do you really want Josh Smith playing the 3. I am in the not only no, but h#ll no catagory on that one. I can’t stomach anymore of his possession killing jump shots.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:09 pm
Good question, Boricua. Joe took 1,420 shots. Kobe took 1,710. D-Wade took 1,739. LeBron took 1,613. Nowitzki took 1,614.
But let me also note that those four were the league’s top four scorers. Joe finished 16th. And played more minutes than anybody.
Gerald Williams
May 12th, 2009
3:09 pm
Bradley needs to step back for this paper to move forward!
How about those Gwinnett Braves-
http://minorsandmajors.com/2009/674/gwinnett-braves-win-medlens-streak-intact
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
3:09 pm
Larry none of that is possible..first you are assuming that the players will accept a short term deal. “Trade Marvin, we need a Tyson Chandler, or Andris Biedrins type” come on now lol
shannon
May 12th, 2009
3:09 pm
We finally make it back to the 2nd round and get beat by a Cavs Team that is Really Dominant right now and everybody wants to get rid of Johnson.. Celtics and the magic wont stand a chance either.. He was constantly doubled team.. U know why Lebron wasnt Doubled team? Because he can dish it out to someone else to score..Think about it. The cavs picked up Mo Williams and that changed the way they played because u have a consistent 2nd option in Mo williams.. Josh Smith isnt Consistent enough.. The Cavs kept giving him the Open Jumper cause they knew it would be a bad shot.But yet he still would take it.Joe Johnson is the Star not on Kobe or Lebrons Level,he Got us here but until the Hawks have a True 2nd threat he will always be doubled team when we play better teams because they will make someone else beat them.
Gerald Williams
May 12th, 2009
3:13 pm
Marvin Williams is arguably our second (or third) best player. I can’t see just throwing out a #2 draft pick with the bathwater. Sounds dumb to me, Bradley.
Dave
May 12th, 2009
3:13 pm
MEGADEAL Williams, Josh, Law, Zaza for Chris Bosh, who wants out of Toronto and Toronto’s #1. Use their #1 to get Thabeet and our #1 to get a combo shooting point guard. Move Joe to the three spot and resign Bibby. Thabeet, Horford, Bosh, and Jones rotate at 4 and 5. Evans, Murray, Bibby and rookie rotate at 1 and 2. Finally Joe and Bosh rotate at 3. If you don’t want to resign Bibby or you really want a championship contender go after Ben Gordon as a free agent! Starting line up: Bosh, Horford, Johnson, Gordon, and Bibby with a nice bench with plenty of height for defensive matchups. Tons of firepower and good passers who all crave a championship! May even swap first round picks with Toronto to do the deal!
freshd
May 12th, 2009
3:14 pm
You can let the big man come off the bench, or let MARVIN be the 6th man if he is not traded. As WOODROW would say, “it”s all about the matchup in this league MAN”.
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
3:16 pm
Dave did you think about money getting all these players???
Astro Joe
May 12th, 2009
3:18 pm
I doubt that any of the teams with the elite superstars had 6 players averaging double-figures like the Hawks. In other words, the Hawks are an ensemble cast (think Law & Order) as opposed to a star vehicle (24). So when too many members of that ensemble are injured or don’t show up, guess what, the team loses and the few healthy ensemble members come off looking like they can’t carry the entire load.
Hollywould
May 12th, 2009
3:19 pm
Stick a fork in them. These guys play the dumbest of any team I have ever seen. May be the coaching or maybe just don’t know how to play.
It is not the playground. They were outhustled in every game. None of them can play man defense. None of them can help each other. They have their millions and play like it. Horford needs to gain 40 lbs to bang around all year long. Bibby can’t guard my gmaw in her wheelchair. Zilgakis9or whatever his name) must have beat jj to 5 loose balls himself. They stand around waiting for a rebound to come to them
while the Cavs sense where the ball might be bouncing to and go get it.
Sickening
Larry
May 12th, 2009
3:19 pm
JJM,
Bibby is 32, no one is going to get in a bidding war over him.
Flip will be easy to sign, he made 1.5 on a one year deal, he is deserving of a raise.
The Hornets basically gave Chandler away for a ham sandwich to Ok. City, and only was veteoed because of concerns of his injury.
Why isn’t any of this possible? What’s preventing it, do you really understand the NBA or just watch basketball. There is a difference you know?
JASon
May 12th, 2009
3:19 pm
Joe is a great player who gets a lot of negative press because he often wavers in the big games. Mike Bibby, on the other hand, thrives on the big games. I agree that we maybe need to re-evaluate how we structure the offense, but a 7 foot shot blocker would be a bigger priority for me than a guard.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:19 pm
Kwame Brown isn’t the answer.
Just for fun, let’s name five true (and effective) NBA centers. Ready? OK, Shaq. And Dwight Howard. And Yao. I count Duncan as a center, even though he’s listed as a forward. So that’s four. Who else? Is Pau Gasol a center? Is Chris Bosh? Is LaMarcus Aldridge? Is Zach Randolph? Would you rather have Andrew Bogut playing center than Horford?
Hawks are closer than you think
May 12th, 2009
3:20 pm
If we trade Joe Johnson for a big man and get Al (4 man) – Marvin (3 man) Josh (3 man, both are 3’s but they seem to alternate injuries so it works fine) – Bibby (1-2) zinging the rock around I think the Hawks will go deeper into the playoffs next year. So here is my question to the guys who know: what big man could the Hawks the get if we trade Joe (who is a great great player, but we have 3 guys that do almost the same thing) ??? and I agree with drafting a young point guard
kj
May 12th, 2009
3:22 pm
Mark Bradley what are you smoking. Keep Bibby. He is slow, can’t play defense, and he is getting old.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:22 pm
Marvin Williams isn’t the Hawks’ second-best player. He’s not even fourth-best.
BoricuaHawkFan
May 12th, 2009
3:23 pm
Thanks Mark. Good information. I do look forward for the day that JSmith and Horford blow it up. They certainly have the potential. I do wonder (OFTEN) what life would be without Woody. He’s had a good run when they didn’t have anywhere to go but up. I think he exceeded most of our expectations with a 47-win season. I’m certain they could’ve gone over 50 with the last second losses (Cavs, Boston) and THREE early loses to the Nets that should’ve never happened. I feel it’s a great time to part ways, the team gets a fresh perspective for the talent we have and he goes with a much improved resume. It’s a win-win. I hate the fact he never gave Acie a fair shot. He showed a slight chance of belonging to the league at the beginning of his first season and Woody has made him ride the bench without much chance to improve with experience.
shannon
May 12th, 2009
3:23 pm
i like the Josh Smith for Chris Bosh Trade…
RickNole
May 12th, 2009
3:24 pm
Sign and trade Marvin, bring back J-Chills, find someone similar to a big man to clog the middle, re-sign Bibby, and Flip. We would be in the ECF.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:25 pm
I’m not going to pretend Bibby is my ideal point guard. (He doesn’t penetrate and doesn’t defend.) But after so many years of looking for someone just play the position, are the Hawks going to let this one walk away? Especially when he works so well with Joe Johnson?
And don’t say, “Well, Acie Law could take over.” He couldn’t. Not for this coach, and maybe not for any coach.
diego
May 12th, 2009
3:26 pm
The Hawks offseason needs to have: Josh Smith spending 8+ hours in a hot as hell gym working on his medium to outside shot. The doors should be locked until he makes 1,000. This’ll give him a good outside/inside; inside/outside game to go with his stellar defensive skills. Plus it’ll also… hopefully… make him grow up and learn some discipline. It was embarrassing, as a Hawks’ fan, watching him b$tch and moan about every call or non-call.
I completely agree with Marvin Williams being traded. What a 2nd pick bust! Wasn’t happy when they picked him years ago and now I’m really upset. Just look out the Hawks’ season/playoff record when he didn’t play. Hopefully we can get a pick or a veteran for him.
For the draft, I think we need to get a solid big man rather than a point guard. Horford would be better at the 4. Josh could raise hell as a 3. We need a big man who can bang and defend. He doesn’t have to be too offensive minded. We have enough weapons on the floor. This will also move ZaZa to his better position of coming off the bench at either 4 or 5. I wish Law would have been something solid but he’s turning into a bust if not there already, but I think we could sign or trade for some up and coming PG to back up Bibby. Call Portland, they have a few international PGs that can play but are sitting on the bench.
Hawks need to feel embarrassed about getting swept bad by the Cavs and losing big to the Heat when they did lose. They can’t play like that, especially in the playoffs. The Cavs and D-Wade have swagger, but they also have confidence in themselves. We need that. Like we’re better than the other team… and actually be better than the other team.
Hawk Str8Talk
May 12th, 2009
3:26 pm
Mark,
I won’t say that I think Marvin is the answer, but as presently constituted – none of this works unless you fire Coach Woodson. there’s nothing in Coach Woodson’s philosophy to date that shows a willingness to play through the post. The fact that he admitted this season to playing Joe more minutes, so he would get into the All Star game is all we need to know about his loyalties.
So, I agree that if we can get something for Marvin (I was an advocate of making a super sub (a la Jason Terry or Manu Ginobili) and letting Evans start all season), re-sign Bibby with the ONLY purpose being a mentor to a drafted point guard (though again, you’d have to convince me that Coach Woodson is going to play the point guard – Law may have no future here, but it’s only b/c they have ruined him for this franchise, not b/c he doesn’t have talent that could have been developed). Under those conditions, your premise works to great effect. The problem is I seriously question whether our organization has the gonads to actually do the most important part of that, which is to force Coach Woodson to accept those changes and some assistant coaches who would design an offense and defense around your young forwards’ talents. Of course, that’s something I’d accept as a secondary option to just firing him altogether.
If we did that, I reject the trading of Marvin Williams just yet – I think a good coach can produce a team out of this bunch that could challenge every team (save Cleveland) in the East.
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
3:29 pm
Larry flip will get a big deal not a 2 year deal. bibby wants at least 3 or 4 to finish his career off. marvin for chandler sureee. yes i watch basketball but i also think like a GM. I think about the future also…meaning thinking about having plenty of money to keep my future players such as Horford and joe and maybe marvin williams but i would trade him now for more money and extra role players…Trading marvin to the bobcats for D.J Augustine or Raymond Felton and a draft pick is what i would do…most hawks fans are trying to fill the rosters with all these great players and not thiking about how much each player contract will be and not having money to re sign our future players.
steve
May 12th, 2009
3:29 pm
I agree wholeheartedly except I would keep Marvin. I think if healthy he can be an 18ppg – 9rpg kind of guy – not Chris Paul, but not bad either.
Dave
May 12th, 2009
3:30 pm
J.J.M. actually, one of the owners was talking about how solid they were financially the other day. If you got these guys you also deduct big payrolls with Williams and Josh and maybe the swap of first round picks makes sense economically as paying two first rounders plus Gordon would be too much! The other factor would be sellouts every game and very increased season ticket sales and marketing deals! With this line up the Cavaliers and the Magic would be the only other contenders until Lebron jumps ship for NY or New Jersey in 2010. Boston is just about done! The other option is not to resign Bibby and go with a younger and lower priced alternative!
Will The Thrill
May 12th, 2009
3:31 pm
Why trade Joe Johnson? Are you people crazy or are you just caught up in the “winning hype”? Its okay to expect our team to win but you have to understand that our team isn’t ready player wise. Bradley has a point. Joe shoots most of the shots but who does he have that’s consistent enough to take up the number two load. I bet if Josh Smith, Horford, and Evans were consistent at the mid-range Joe Johnson could lead the NBA in assists. He’s just worn-out guys from heavy minutes during the season. The man is human. Lebron, Kobe, and D-Wade have excellent supporting casts. We need a Center and J-Chills, our energy man off the bench..
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:32 pm
Can’t see the Bobcats parting with Augustin. And Felton is just so-so. (I thought he’d be better, but I was wrong.)
freshd
May 12th, 2009
3:34 pm
ANDREW BOGUT, are you kidding me? The guy has a stress fracture in his lower back. Check Marc Gasol”s stats, and there are no injuries. He played overseas before coming to the NBA. and is the same age as BOGUT the BUST.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:34 pm
And we should, at this point, take a reality check: The Hawks were the No. 4 seed. They beat the No. 5 seed. They lost to the No. 1 seed. As nice as it would have been for them to do more, they wound up going precisely as far as their record suggested they should go.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:35 pm
Consensus among Hawks insiders is that they really didn’t miss Childress during the regular season — but they did in the playoffs.
Ron
May 12th, 2009
3:36 pm
I was frustrated that so many times when Joe would pass the ball, the other Hawks made no attempt to get it back to him..I would much rather have Joe taking the shots in the fourth quarter than Flip Murray,,,how many off-balance, low percentage shots did Flip Murray take when the game was close,,,,Hawks need another scoring threat so the other teams can’t double and triple Joe at playoff time..
Shannon
May 12th, 2009
3:37 pm
Fire Woodson and get a coach in here that can COACH UP these guys. Mark I have always loved your work but you are way off on thinking we should keep Woodson. All he does is pout on the sidelines to the refs and is blaming the players instead of himself. Why do you think Joe Johnson is playing so bad. He wants Woodson to go. I am at every game so I feel like I am qualified to feel this way!!!!!! I didn’t become a fan just recently!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:38 pm
We can say this with no fear of contradiction: Flip isn’t ever going to lead the league in assists.
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
3:38 pm
Dave are you sure? last time i checked owners of the teams were always in court over money or something like that
Rob
May 12th, 2009
3:38 pm
I think for the Hawks to go further, first you sorry fans need to stop booing as soon as they don’t do well. I mean I could not believe I heard boos for Josh Smith because of a couple of bad 3’s. Really? Really? I mean, Really? And to speak of the practical, let’s throw out the talk about getting a center or weening themselves of too much Johnson. How about for once since the Wilkins era, that the Hawks actually try to find a superstar or draft a college player with superstar ability and cultivate him? The last time any NBA team won a championship WITHOUT a superstar was the 1979 Seattle Supersonics. The Pistons and Spurs are the only exception since then.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:39 pm
I don’t think Joe wants Woodson gone. I’ve never once gotten that impression.
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
3:39 pm
I still like solo hes our best shooting big. only if the coaching staff spend more time with him he would be nice off the bench
dap01
May 12th, 2009
3:41 pm
We could trade everyone but if we have Woody, we will still have the stagnant offense, the same lack of adjustments and the same iso, pound, pound, shoot a three offense.
We need changes starting with the coach.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:42 pm
Rob makes the key point. The easiest way to win a title is to luck into a superstar (or two). Otherwise it gets tough. But the Pistons did it in 2004, with the Billups-Rip-Tayshaun-Rasheed-Ben Wallace starting five. And Woodson was part of Larry Brown’s staff.
Dan
May 12th, 2009
3:42 pm
Mark,
You missed my point on Kwame Brown. He could have come off the bench and helped. He had a decent year with Detroit. He would have been usful here.
Don’t fall into the crowd that thinks the guy is useless just because he was the #1 pick. The Hawks would not need him to be a #1 pick player. They would just need him to knock heads and hold down the fort while the stater(s) rested. He could get that done. He would have to get that done, however, on the cheap. If not, screw him…
Shaq is on the way out. So, like I said, three dominate centers. Bosh is not a center. Alridge is not a center, but he is good (just not a banger). Hard to find a great center. So, don’t hold your nose up to the Kwame Brown types. There is a use for them in the league.
Guy I think would fit here is Fransisco Ellison. I have never understood why the Hawks have not gone after him. He is big, physical and can run.
Rob
May 12th, 2009
3:42 pm
SHANNON
Are you serious. I think you need to look at Woodsons’ record again. Since he has coached the Hawks, his record has improved by VERY noticeable margins EACH season. No other coach since Fratello has done this well. Be satisfied that he isn’t coaching against you with your division rivals Miami Heat.
Larry
May 12th, 2009
3:43 pm
JJM,
If you think Flip will get more than a two year deal ANYWHERE, I will concede the fact you are a basketball guru.
Hawks had a successfull season and the mere fact we are debating this on Mark’s blog is a testament of a great season.
Finally Hawks fans believing we can be better, now we just disagree on how to become better. Talk about progress from 2 years ago.
I still think the style of play is the Hawks primary problem. We play to slow, we are in bottom half of offensive pace for a team that excels in the open court. Woody is the problem.
Dan
May 12th, 2009
3:44 pm
I would love to see Childress back here. I hope the Spirit Group will make that happen.
P Gills
May 12th, 2009
3:44 pm
I think that you give Woodson 1 more year, but he really isn’t a coach that can take the hawks past round 2 in the playoffs. I don’t think you can trade JJ unless you can get a great player for him. Trading marvin doesn’t make too much sense, Marvin looked good in the regular season, and who will play three, we would still have the issue at PF with smith and horford. I think you keep JJ and Marvin, trade smith, and draft Mcmullens at center. What about signing artest of andre miller?
JT
May 12th, 2009
3:45 pm
This team won’t transform, in MY opnion, until they get rid of Woodson. You can’t win with his style of play. They play pretty good defense(good would be better) and they have no identity on offense. They can’t play half court(and no, giving it to JJ and isolating is NOT half court offense). And they don’t need to trade anyone but one of those clones they have, all those players the same size, plays the same position. Keep Bibby and draft a big man or point, so the rookie guard can learn something. Nothing against Woodson and i’d never advocate anyone losing their job but…….
Hawk Str8Talk
May 12th, 2009
3:45 pm
Here’s what you don’t want to see this offseason – Josh Smith working on jump shots or Al Horford working on jump shots, which are the things they said they wanted to work on this offseason. You need both of them to say – we’re going to work on our low post game, which would allow them to play through the post and by extension provide them with better positioning for rebounding.
And for the record, I agree that Acie Law IV is ruined as a point guard here, but I don’t agree that it’s due to his talent. I think it’s due to never been given a role, never being given consistent minutes, and being lied to by Coach Woodson about his importance to the team. I have seen no lack of effort or ability on the part of Acie Law other than the fact that he isn’t a shooter like Bibby. He is a better defender and better penetrator, so it stands to reason that it’s Coach Woodson who isn’t utilizing him for some reason. What that reason is would be great for the fans to know? I think it’s a glaring weakness of Coach Woodson’s that no player has gotten better as a result of playing for Mike Woodson. Basically, all the players are who they have always been under his tutelage.
cp
May 12th, 2009
3:45 pm
Mike Woodson is a joke. He admitted he ran his best player in the ground so he could make an all star game then ran him in the ground trying to secure the 4th seed. If he wanted other guys more involved in the offense why didn’t he just run plays for them? This cat still cant make adjustments, still makes silly substitutions, and still cant develop some of the young talent we have…What is our offensive system? Its time for a new coach…. I like Marvin but its plainly clear that he will never be what many thought he would be. He just is not aggressive enough. He is happy with being the fourth option on a team.. I’m all for a sign and trade of Marvin… Moving Horford to the pf spot makes no difference to me other than defensively. I like the kid but he has no offensive game. When he was playing the pf position when Josh was out he pretty much put the the same numbers he was putting up from the center position. He really needs to work on his post game this off season. I’m kind of split on Bibby. On one hand I like him because of his ability to hit shots but his defense is so terrible and I know he wants a long term deal where as I would only offer him a short team deal… I see Law being moved too but only if Woodpecker is back… He is not going to give the kid a shot so if he is back Law will probably be moved.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:47 pm
I would never trade Josh Smith. No way.
And the ball, as we say, is really in Childress’ court. He can walk away from Olympiakos. That’s the way the contract was done. But he’d have to come back to the Hawks, who’d either have to re-sign him or work a sign-and-trade.
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
3:48 pm
Larry oh i still love my hawks no matter what. I have never said anything negative about them on here. I even went to two playoff games against the heat to support, but after the hawks lost game 4 i was watching barkley and the tnt crew they said flip will get a big deal somewhere
KC in Smyrna
May 12th, 2009
3:48 pm
I am hoping Childress gets homesick and returns to he states next year. We missed his perimeter defense and baseline rebounding in both series. He also gives us another long defender to play against Lebron/Wade/Pierce/etc. He can’t stop them, but he was a good piece. I want him back after he is done stealing money in Greece.
BTW. The US Dollar has bounced back so he’s not going net as much $$$ as he originally thought.
My Plan:
- Resign Bibby for 2-3 years (he will not sign for less)
- Or go heavy after Jarrett Jack. He plays defense, drives to the hole, and has all around game although not quite the shooter that Bibby is.
- We need one of those old Centers to come off the bench. Sign one of Tony Battie, Maglore, Adonal Foyle, etc. Some large big man to provide some resistance off the bench.
- We really need some toughness. Someone should have put Lebron on the court after some of those drives. If you can’t guard him, hit him hard enough to make him shot jump shots. Can’t believe how soft we were.
Rob
May 12th, 2009
3:49 pm
Everyone is saying get rid of Woodson. I want someone to point out to me why a team should get rid of a coach after that coach improves his team each and EVERY season he’s been here.
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
3:49 pm
KC in Smyrna i forgot about jack
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:49 pm
I’ll have to disagree. Josh Smith is hugely improved. Is he as good yet as he can be? No. But he’s way better than he was in 2004.
Rob
May 12th, 2009
3:50 pm
In fact, this is the first time the Hawks have been out of the 1st round in 10 years. Right?
Larry
May 12th, 2009
3:50 pm
Mark,
Why can’t he sign for a one year qualyfing deal, if I”m not mistaken he was a RFA? We don’t necessarily have to sign him long term?
diego
May 12th, 2009
3:51 pm
Kwame Brown is a waste of basketball talent. Why would you wish him upon our Hawks? We replaced Childress with 2 quality guys, Evans and Flip. He can stay in Greece and keep making his money.
For the people calling for Woodson’s head, even though he got us into the playoffs last year… home court and a series win this year, how about you look at some of the guys he has to coach, or should I say babysit. We all know about Josh Smith’s lack of maturity and Mr. Lazy Acie Law’s lack of motivation as he slides deeper down the bench.
Instead of Joe cutting back on the floor, he needs to step up and be that true superstar type leader out on the court and in the locker room.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:51 pm
Jarrett Jack is a realistic option, I’d say. Adonal Foyle? Jamaal Magliore? Tony Battie? Not so realistic.
J Who?
May 12th, 2009
3:52 pm
Hey Mark, do you think their would be a way to move up in the draft through some kind of Bibby sign and trade or maybe moving Josh Smith in order to get to a position to draft Rubio? I think he will be an ALLSTAR level point guard and would improve the chemistry of the team. Rubio, Johnson, Marvin, Horford, and Free Agent or Zaza. My only other concern would be Woodson’s inability to develop talent or get the most out of his players but I think Rubio’s ability combined with extensive experience would compensate for that since I don’t think it is likely the ASG gets rid of Woodson.
Hawks are closer than you think
May 12th, 2009
3:52 pm
I agree with the guy who wrote that the Hawks need to anticipate where the rebounds are coming off and hustle and fight for them.. . the thing that stood out to me the most about the Cavs is that they are playing with URGENCY and this mantra seems to be in their heads and on their “sleeves”: I’m tougher / quicker /smarter than you … I agree with coaching change, I think that a young assistant with lots to prove from an established team would do wonders in tapping Marvin’s and Josh’s repective “sense of urgency”
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
3:52 pm
Josh is not going anywhere. if they wanted Josh gone they would have did a sign and trade for him.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:53 pm
Childress can take the one-year deal, Larry. Same as he could have last summer. But I don’t know why he would. He’s got two more years on the Olympiakos deal. That would be more security at a higher salary.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
3:54 pm
Don’t think that’s possible, J Who. The draft comes before negotiations with free agents are allowed to begin.
Hawk Str8Talk
May 12th, 2009
3:54 pm
Rob, you are clearly not watching the games if you believe that Mike Woodson is the answer. I will say this – he served his purpose. He managed a roster through a very tough transition and I will give him credit for that, but as soon as this team turned from ‘hope we make the playoffs’ to ‘want to be a force in the playoffs’ – he became the wrong coach for this team. It’s laughable to use Coach Brown and the Pistons as a feather in his cap b/c the value he brought to that team hasn’t be replicated here. This isn’t a great defensive team and we certainly aren’t emulating the good offense that the ‘04 Pistons displayed.
So, we have to look at the reality. Beating the Heat is no great feat – if you wanted credit for that, you had to sweep that team. The Heat are horrible, essentially the Hawks in ‘04 with D Wade and a gimpy Jermaine O’Neal added on. So, do we reward him for being the captain of the ship while the players were growing up and together or do we get someone in here who can design a gameplan that works for this team. No one who has watched this team can tell me that you’d want Mike Woodson as your coach based on offensive or defensive philosophy, team motivation, player development, leadership, or in-game adjustments. No one. If you can, tell me what he’s specifically what he’s doing or has done that you think is good. I’m open to hear it.
Wink from Lithonia
May 12th, 2009
3:54 pm
It will be an interesting off season, to say the least. I think what is being said regarding Joe is that he is not a franchise player…ie Kobe, Wade, Howard or LeBron! He was a third option with Phoenix that became a first option, on a team that had no options. He is a second tier player, he need more help. He does not outwardly display any leadership skills, that the others can see. He is like Robin with no Batman. He has super skills, but elite players are his krytonite!
We need to acquire a post presence, that can score or protect the paint (Bosh or trade up for Thabeet). We need a beast in the middle. If you notice all the teams remaining in the playoffs have a legimate post presence the exception might be Denver with NeNe, but even he is active around the basket.
We need to acquire a guard who can defend & break down a defense, maybe not a star, but a star in waiting similar to Billups or Devin Harris.
I say we need a coach, but Woodson appears secure, as team has improved each year, which is enough for the Spirit Group. We need the ownership resolved, which may resolve the coach issue.
Barring a coaching change, this team need players with dedicated roles, a supporting cast similar to the Lakers bench; then release the hounds to run, no more half court, Joe pounding the clock, resulting in force jumper from someone who is not your best player in that situation. We need knockdown shooters, with cold blooded intentions like Flip ( a must sign).
P Gills
May 12th, 2009
3:55 pm
Mark, if you trade Marvin, what player would be ideal, and how do we explain the lack of rebounding in the playoffs. I watched Varejeo box Smith out well over half of the plays. I agree Josh is much imporved and good, but he can’t play the 3 so we still have too many PFs.
KC in Smyrna
May 12th, 2009
3:55 pm
Why the strong opinion on Law? I see enough out of him to warrant more PT. Same with Solomon, but Woody doesn’t play either of those guys enough IMO. I think Woody and all head coaches get too caught up in what doesn’t do well. They should focus on the strengths of their players and put them in positions to succeed.
Bernie Matt
May 12th, 2009
3:58 pm
Marvin should take less money and become the best 6th man in the league, or trade him for Channing Frye and Travis Outlaw. Josh Smith goes to the 3 and Al goes to 4. Draft B.J. Mullins who can make the outside shot and run the old Pistons offense where they posted up the 3 and 4 man Dantley or Aguire. Mullins plays the role of Laimbeer. Let Bibby stroll out of town, start Flip at the point. Joe assumes a lesser role at the 2. Develop A.C. as backup to Flip, but draft another point in second round just in case. Then you have second unit of A.C., Mo Evans, Marvin, SoLo, and Zaza.
I think this can be a strong 10 man rotation with the right coach. Woody is not him. If anyone is more responsible for the stagnant growth of Josh Smith, Marvin, and Chill before he left it is Woody. The man can not develop players, he could probably win a championship if he walked into the right situation, but I would never leave him in the same room with a young talent.
I would bet money that if the Hawks had drafted Paul or DWill they would not be the players we know today, because of Woody and Joe.
Joe has gotten a pass by the organization, but it was Joe who cried about playing with a rookie point guard that didn’t give him the ball everytime he asked for it. Imagine where the Celtics would be if K.G., Pierce and Ray Allen (all future Hall of Famers) had reacted that way to Rondo, who had the same knock on him as A.C., he couldn’t shoot.
Shannon
May 12th, 2009
3:58 pm
Rob
How does it feel to be on a island by yourself???? You can’t do anything but improve when you are so stinking bad!!!! It is amazing that we will settle for simply improving each year. The talent is here we just need someone that won’t simply do ” a little better ” and will win a championship. But maybe that’s alright for some but I have been a season ticket holder for several years and have spent thousands of dollars on this product. So I am there so I feel like I can comment on what is going on and improving is not cutting it with me…
Mark
I doubt any player is going to throw his coach under the bus if he has to play for him. But you know that he knows that Woody’s job might be on the line SO HIS PLAY SPEAKS VOLUMES.
HawksFan
May 12th, 2009
3:58 pm
A couple thoughts….
1. Joe Johnson, Acie Law, Marvin Williams, or any other player is NOT the problem with this team. The problem with this is team is it’s coach. Players aren’t put in position to be successful and very few are allowed to show what they really can do. All of them, in the right offensive system with better spacing, better movement, and better actions would be allowed to have greater success. Instead, our offensive movements push us into another defender and it’s not a coincedence how many contested and nonrhythm shots that we put up versus teams we lose.
2. Defensively, it took us 3 freaking games to figure out that we may actually want to play help defense on the best player in the leauge in Lebron. That’s just freaking brilliant and was 3 games too late. Who makes those decisions? Hmmm, Woodson again.
3. This team is built to run the floor. What the heck do the Hawks do to play to their strengths? Once again, scheme and design are conflicting.
Give Doc Rivers this team and the Hawks would not only be immensely better, I think they’d at least give Cleveland a run for their money. Simply playing help defense last night allowed them to stay in the game. If they had any clue about how to run an offense, and didn’t have so many empty posessions with atrocious shots coming an unexpected times due to designed plays being blown up then you’d see a great efficiency in their shot making ability. Instead, you get awful movement, atrocious spacing, and a sheer inability to design and run plays in a manner where a player can actually best utililize his skill set. Our offense is made up about 75% of the team. Only complicated by our inability and lack of commitment to create easy transition offense by deploying various defensive schemes to produce such scenarios. All the more muddied by our jumbled up sets.
4. As this team is put together right now, it’s not a NBA championship team. It’s not going to be without a real superstar. However, even if you put a true superstar on this team, you still can’t get around the fact that we’ve got a subpar coach leading this team whose schemes are JV’ish at best so if you really want to allow this team to move forward, then our owners and GM need to get a clue and go hire an actual good coach who knows how to get it done on both ends of the court. Then go from there with personnel moves, but the coaching move is priority #1.
Not understanding that is just not being realistic about where we’re at as a team. All the talk about different and varying players is only attempting to put a bandaid on a gashing wound.
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
4:00 pm
I wonder if woodson even wants acie law
E
May 12th, 2009
4:00 pm
The Hawks will be $20 million under the salary cap, when Mike Bibby and Za-Za’s contracts come off the books. They will probably offer Speedy Claxton a buyout or trade his expiring $5 million contract to a team trying to get under the cap for the 2010 free agency sweepstakes. The Hawks will be in great position to go after restricted and unrestricted free agents. I wouldn’t offer M.Bibby a contract, even at a reduced price. He’s 32 and a liability on defense. I would go after one of the young point guards who will be restricted free agents, like Raymond Felton or Jarrett Jack.
Marvin Williams will be a restricted free agent, I would offer him a contract in about the $ 7-8 million range, it won’t be many teams trying to steal him away this off-season. Lastly, I would go after a young true Center, that can rebound and play defense. Like a Chris Andersen from Denver or a power forward like Paul Millsap from Utah who will be a restricted free agents. I would only keep Za Za at a reduced price as a back up Center..
J Who?
May 12th, 2009
4:01 pm
O.k. maybe, depending on team that drafts him, we could make a deal with whomever drafts him. I’m probably livin’ in a dream world but I would figure out a way to get him regardless of who we had to move.
Rob
May 12th, 2009
4:02 pm
Hawk St8Talk
Where do you get your sources from? You and some people like you don’t like Woodson as the coach. You have your right to your opinion. But don’t tell me that Woodson is not the coach for this team. Anyone is the coach for a team when they can continually make improvements season after season. Show me some sort of digression in his performance from last year, then we can talk. But until then, your reasoning is just that…. Your reasoning. The Hawks need a superstar player. That’s it. Capable players come a “dime a dozen”… Exceptional players come at higher price tag. Remember that.
Larry
May 12th, 2009
4:03 pm
Granted he has more financially security in Greece, however it’s not like the Hawks were outbid by another NBA team. I think Josh Childress left for Greece because of pride, not money.
Hawk Str8Talk
May 12th, 2009
4:06 pm
I thin the point that Rob wants to hear is – why would you get rid of Woodson? I can give chapter and verse on that (and I will), but I want to know why you want him to stay based on the simple – we won more games each and every year argument. Here’s the rebuttal to that – first, if you start at 13 games – you don’t have to do much each season to create more wins. The fact that you’re just growing up together means you’ll win more. And that’s happened. Remember there are a LOT of bad basketball teams out there. On talent alone, the Hawks won about 40 games.
The reason to get rid of Woodson is that the brand of basketball that we are playing and the tactical acumen necessary to move from ok to good and good to elite is large. Coach Woodson hasn’t shown that he knows that he needs to develop his bench, that he can’t play Joe the most minutes in the league and THEN expect him to explode in the post season, that he can’t design an offense that leaves Josh on the perimeter, that he can’t switch on every screen and leave players who aren’t good at one-on-one defense exposed EVERY single play, that his locker room speeches that leave us flat to start the game or after halftime need work…I could go on, but I’ll stop here. My point being – I wanted Coach Woodson to succeed and if we gauge it based on where we are today – he’s been successful, but if we base it on his ability to get us where we need to be or go – he’s not the coach to take us there. I’d love to hear what you think specifically he’s done that we’re not seeing. All I see is that the talent grew up and they won, but not b/c Woody did much to accelerate or aid that process based on his coaching decisions and acumen.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
4:07 pm
Here, from ESPN.com, is the list of impending free agents.
And if you’re asking about a sign-and-trade, there are two guys on Golden State I kind of like: Ronny Turiaf (banger bench type) and Brandan Wright (a little like Marvin, only bigger).
Jones
May 12th, 2009
4:08 pm
To me the big question for the Hawks is the health of these guys. If Marvin is healthy he is a very good player (though not a max-money player). He’s already a very good defender, and his range and back-to-the-basket game is really improving. Acie Law also looked good at the end of the year, in particular shooting from outside, but he just can’t stay healthy. But if you are going to re-sign Bibby then I would keep Acie as a back-up and draft a big man rather than a PG.
Look, it’s hard to talk about this in the abstract. They should absolutely keep Bibby, Marvin, and ZaZa, and sign Childress — AT THE RIGHT PRICE. The question is how much? Marvin probably isn’t worth $10 mill a year like Josh, but no one else is likely to offer that anyway. I would even trade Joe, but only for the right player, and realistically you aren’t going to get a deal that makes it worth it.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
4:09 pm
Anderson Varejao, you’ll note, is indeed a free agent. I like him, too.
Jones
May 12th, 2009
4:11 pm
Oh, come on! Turiaf for Marvin? Turiaf isn’t even a legit NBA starter! And Brandan Wright is not like Marvin at all. He has no outside shot at all, and is too skinny and weak and basically useless in the half court. Wright is basically a skinny, weak version of Josh Smith. *If* Marvin is healthy then that is crazy talk. On the other hand, I am worried about his back….
J Who?
May 12th, 2009
4:11 pm
Even if you are of the delusional belief that Mike Woodson can coach, that point if void because the team does not listen or hear what he’s preachin’. The only half court set we run is JJ dribble, create, kick out, Bibby dribble kick out, Flip, dribble create, kick out. Those kind of sets don’t fly in the NBA. Oh, and let me know when Woodson develops a player to his full potential because when he does it will be his first.
Jones
May 12th, 2009
4:12 pm
Varejao is only a free agent if he opts out. More importantly, he doesn’t fit in the Hawks’ system, unless he is willing to play a back-up role like ZaZa. He’s a half-court player, and the Hawks need to run.
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
4:13 pm
wow mark thers alot of nice players out there. this will be a nice 09 off season leading to 2010 off season.
Hawks are closer than you think
May 12th, 2009
4:17 pm
Joe Johnson is the only guy on the Hawks we can trade and get “full money” for, he’s reached his fullest potential and even a little beyond (I respect the guy alot, but in putting my Dimitrof GM hat on, he is the best trade bait for a offensive minded big man that I need) … which team would secretly love to have an all-star 2 guard, and be able to trade us a decent big man in the trade?
Hawk Str8Talk
May 12th, 2009
4:18 pm
Rob, I’ve blogged about the Hawks for a complete season. I have written repeatedly about the fact that I want Coach Woodson to be successful – he’s from my favorite college basketball team and went to school with some of my family members. By no means do I want Coach Woodson or the Hawks to be unsuccessful. Not to inject race as a fire-starter, but I wanted the black GM and black coach combination to work, so this is not about an agenda. It’s only what I and so many see. I’ve only asked you to provide what you think Coach Woodson does well for this team.
I’ve articulated what I think he does poorly. I think our talent took us as far as it could go on its own. It’s my belief that their talent matched with a top tier coach could go further. I don’t absolve the players of their duty to play hard every night despite the coach, but I think the coach has to share in that. You obviously haven’t read or watched these games, post-game conferences, articles, etc. I didn’t give you an emotional response. I’m saying that after 5 years of watching an offense that isn’t built for playoff success, a bench that’s not ready for post season minutes, talent that is overworked before the postseason, and a defensive switching strategy that can’t work with the personnel we have – that Woodson should be fired. There’s no ax to grind here. I also stated that a secondary option (not my preferred, but acceptable nonetheless) is to bring in assistant coaches who can design an offense and defense that works to our strengths. You have still failed to say anything that matters regarding what you think Coach Woodson brings to the table other than the team’s record got better and that’s just not going to cut it. I’d be happy to talk to you about it further – http://www.hawkstr8talk.com. Holla at ya folk
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
4:18 pm
I would pick up Trevor Ariza. I dont think the lakers will re sign him if they wanna keep odom
Jones
May 12th, 2009
4:19 pm
Don’t start drooling over those players. The Hawks will have very little cap space if they re-sign Bibby (even if he takes a big paycut). They basically will be 18 or so million under the cap, but that’s without counting anything for Bibby, Williams, ZaZa, Murray, or Childress. Even if you are willing to let someone like Williams go, that doesn’t leave any cap room.
I wonder what people think the Hawks should do in the draft. I like a couple of the PGs like Maynor, but those guys are likely to be gone, and if they are going to re-sign Bibby then they should probably go after front-line help. It looks like DeJuan Blair or BJ Mullins might still be available at 19.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
4:19 pm
Would you take a Turiaf/Wright package for Marvin/Acie? I think I would.
Those two would comes cheaper than Marvin will. And they’d add some size and some bench help. (Woodson was talking today about the need to have a longer bench. Well, here you go.)
Not saying that would ever happen. Just throwing something at the wall, with names attached.
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
4:23 pm
what position does wright play?
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
4:24 pm
Here’s NBAdraft.net’s mock draft. Doggone it if Eric Maynor doesn’t move up every time I check.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
4:25 pm
Brandan Wright is a skinny power forward. Also from Carolina.
Rob
May 12th, 2009
4:26 pm
SHANNON… The island I live on is called “reality”. Obiviously, you could take a dose of that.
Hawks St8Talk… Let’s kick the ballistics.
The Hawks were dealing with Horford who was not 100%. So essentially the Hawks were playing without a “dedicated” point forward. Also, Let’s not relegate Woodsons’ accomplishments to mediocrity. No matter how far the Hawks go, the “Holy Grail” which is an NBA championship title is the only goal. There are no other goals. It doesn’t matter if the Hawks were to go on to win the Eastern Conference title. If they don’t win it all, they don’t win. Look at Boston, they might not make it past Orlando. What will people say then? That Rivers is not the coach that can take them further? Of course they will.
And just for kicks and giggles…. Here’s Woodsons’ coaching record… But I guess you’re still stuck on his record from 4 seasons ago…. huh?
Team Year G W L W–L% Finish Result
————————————————————-
ATL 2004–05 82 13 69 .159 5th in Southeast — — — Missed Playoffs
ATL 2005–06 82 26 56 .317 5th in Southeast — — — Missed Playoffs
ATL 2006–07 82 30 52 .366 5th in Southeast — — — Missed Playoffs
ATL 2007–08 82 37 45 .451 3rd in Southeast 7 3 4 Lost in First Round
ATL 2008–09 82 47 35 .580 2nd in Southeast 11 4 7 Lost in Conference Semifinals
Gaylon Nickerson
May 12th, 2009
4:26 pm
The unresolved Atlanta Spirit Group ownership squabble will preclude any “excessive” spending – in other words, Woody will be retained for the final year of his contract and we will not bring in any big dollar free agents – I am in favor of retaining ZaZa for the same amt. he’s making now (unless we can find a Marcin Gortat-like player for the same) ditto for Mario West – Marvin’s athleticism will enable him to draw fouls and take his 80 plus Ft percentage to the line – but he will need to work on some moves-to-the-hoop this summer – I think he’s worth retaining for a price tag around the mid-level exception – unless Bibby is willing to give us a hometown discount, show him the door and we can take our chances with Speedy and our rookie, freshly drafted PG – Acie is playing out of position – he was a Ben Gordon/Delonte West type player in college who we tried to convert to a PG but somewhere along the line he lost his swagger and will have to find it elsewhere – according to reports Speedy is healthy and we are stuck with him for another year so Woody needs to find something to do with him …. like play him – Flip needs to be resigned as soon as possible – Flip gets dealt a lot not because of a lack of ability or desire but because he has mental lapses that result in untimely turnovers
J.J.M.
May 12th, 2009
4:27 pm
If we did make that trade who would be our PG if bibby isnt signed or who would back up bibby? flip?
Hawk Str8Talk
May 12th, 2009
4:28 pm
And so you don’t think this is a pissing contest, Rob, can you tell us what has gotten better as a result of COACH WOODSON, not the fact that we went from 13 to 26 to 30 to 37 to 47. If your players get better and you add better players, then YES – the team will win more. If you were showing us that the exact same team did that and that the players played the same way over 5 years, then I’d say – it’s Coach Woodson, but since that’s absolutely not the case.
If you want some Coach Woodson kudos, here it is – he actually coached those early teams well. They just didn’t have the talent to win, then. So, it’s not always about wins and losses. The Suns were going to win 45 games with Terry Porter, but were not going to be a better team (or even make the playoffs), so they decided to make the change to Alvin Gentry and now, will be giving him a full season to see if he can get them back on track. There was a tangible difference between him and Porter in being able to coach that team. Terry Porter may be a good coach, but not for the Suns. I will say the same for Mike Woodson. He may be a good coach for a veteran team, but not for these Hawks. He’s not the coach for this franchise and I’d be happy to hear any ways that you think he should be. I’ve been reading and watching all season and I’ve YET to hear one person give a good reason other than your ‘they won more games than the last’ reasoning.
Rob
May 12th, 2009
4:32 pm
Hawks St8Talk…
Basically, there’s NOTHING anyone can say to to you to make you vacate your position. I too have watched the entire season of the Hawks thanks to the NBA channel. I too have attended numerous games. But I see this completely different than you. And that’s cool because I’m just as “bull-headed” as you in my point of view of the Hawks and the direction they need.
Rob
May 12th, 2009
4:34 pm
Hawks St8Talk
In fact, I’ve answered a couple of your questions. Instead of going about a diatribe on Woodsons’ performance this season, answer this question for me….. If Woodson took the Hawks to the ECF would you say that he is the coach for the Hawks?
Hawks are closer than you think
May 12th, 2009
4:36 pm
I wonder if we could get a Chris Bosch for Joe Johnson trade done…. if a deal with Toronto isn’t possible, I think that Charlotte would do a deal with us: sending one of their bigs + a better draft position in exchange for Joe Johnson
Big D
May 12th, 2009
4:39 pm
The Hawks have maxed out with this core group. They have too many guys playing out of position and they also have repetition and PG & SF. They need to either trade Marvin or Josh, although you would get more for Josh, get a quality big. Draft a PG, offer Bibby a short term deal and find more experienced role players via FA. Right now the Hawks bench is suspect and their starters are too small to compete against the teams that go big. In order to be a contender vs just a playoff team, tough decision must be made, see Denver Nuggets if you need examples.
braveshater
May 12th, 2009
4:40 pm
Marvin is outta here. He’s a mistake and will never have the feet or coordination to be a dominant player. He falls down everytime he’s drives to the basket. Somebody will take him though, sign and trade for whoever. Let bibby go, resign flip, find a point guard in the draft, and a Samuel Dalenbert type big man. Al moves to his natural position, after a summer of working on his offensive game. Josh moves to his natural spot at the 3, Joe at the 2, now the team is set to win 50 plus games.
Hawk Str8Talk
May 12th, 2009
4:44 pm
Well, I’m not saying that there’s nothing that anyone can say to make me vacate my position. What I’m saying is that you haven’t said anything to validate your position. I have provided you with ample evidence for why I think he’s the wrong coach. Let me repeat – our offense is not tailored to the strengths of the players (a point that almost every commentator, TNT studio guys, fans in the three cities I’ve visited to watch the Hawks mention to laughs and jokes, even Joe said we are a transition team, yet we run a half court offense 90% of the time), our defense is not based on sound fundamentals (no elite team switches on every screen), the team stopped listening to Coach Woodson (which may or may not be his fault, but not listening to your coach can’t be an endorsement for the coach), there are rarely tactical adjustments during the games when plan A isn’t working (and yes, I’ve counted how many times Coach Woodson has changed tactics during a game – this season it was twice vs. Denver on the road and vs. Utah at home).
So, again – don’t put words in my mouth…I’m simply asking you to make your case with some substance. I explained why I didn’t think the ‘we won more games each season’ argument was a good one. You can reject that, but I would think that you’d be able to communicate other reasons why he’s a good coach than – the team won more games. Under that analysis, Doug Collins would have been the coach of the Bulls throughout the Jordan era. They got rid of him b/c MJ and the organization didn’t think he could take them further. I’m saying the same about Mike Woodson. Doesn’t make him a bad guy, just unable to get the best out of the talent available to him.
Jones
May 12th, 2009
4:51 pm
Mark, I don’t like that trade for the Hawks at all. Wright averaged 8 points and 4 boards a game this year. That was only in 17 minutes, but it was also in Nelly’s up-tempo style. He has no strength, no offensive game other than dunks, and no defensive game other than blocking shots as a help defender. Turiaf is a decent role player, but no more, and guys like him are not hard to find as FAs (much like ZaZa).
People are being much too hard on Marvin. When healthy, he is an excellent defender who can get to the free-throw line a lot, and who is developing 3-point range. He’s also getting stronger and filling out a legit NBA body, but is still young. He runs the floor as well as Wright but also can play half-court offense.
He does have two big problems: he needs to stay healthy, and he needs to be more aggressive. But he’s a nice third or fourth scoring option and a very good defender. If they can sign him for around 8 mill a year they should do it no question.
Hawks Fan 33
May 12th, 2009
4:52 pm
Thanks for the column Mark. Here is my $.02. I really see flashes with Marvin; however, I think Marvin defers to Joe, and Josh more often than not. I really think Marvin has a legitimate chance to average 18 and 10. I think two things that seem to be prevailing (maybe not on here, but the “local morning show” is adamant. Trading Josh would be a mistake (unless it is for CB4). Trading Joe would be a mistake. We need two things. AA point guard who can consistently bring the ball up the court, taking the pressure off of Joe to do it all (Jarret Jack….or, how about this one anyone: Raymond Felton?)…and of course a big. They don’t grow on trees, but possibly we can get one via the draft.
My second qualm is with Woodson. We have naturally progressed, but either he needs to give the offensive reigns to someone, or we need a new coach. Given the legal issues with the Spirt Group, lets be realistic: I don’t think that is going to happen. Mike is cheap, and on the surface he has produced results.
That is my little bit. So, keep Marvin, Josh, Joe. Make a move to get either Jarret Jack or Raymond Felton. Try to find a big. Resign Flip, Solo (yes Solo), West (defensive stopper….why wasn’t he used more? oh, Woody trying to save his job. That is why). I think we may not be too far off….
Robert
May 12th, 2009
4:52 pm
Give Joe Johnson some help. Double teams killed him and no one could consistently make the opponent pay. Who on this team can beat their man off the dribble and pressure the D? Who can consistently hit a jump shot? Joe Johnson can’t do it by himself.
O'brien
May 12th, 2009
4:55 pm
Mr. Bradley, the reason why JJ took so many shots, played so many minutes was mostly due to Woody. Woody kept riding him, instead of designing some plays to get others involved. And Woody had very little confidence in his bench. I think Woody has had the biggest effect on Joe’s game.
Another reason why Joe is worn down is because too often he is guarding Bibby’s guy. And Joe is forced to create his own shot and create for others.
Right now, we still dont know what we have in Acie, but he can penetrate. His biggest weakness is his jumper. But lets not forget he was Mr. Clutch in college. However, he never got consistent 12-18 minutes a game, and combined with his injuries, we just dont know how good he can be.
Mr. Bradley, people should also talk about Woody’s lack of an offense. If the Hakws played more uptempo, Josh and Al would get more shots, and Joe wouldnt have to work so hard. Plus Woody has no plays to get Joe an easy shot. Woody is a big part of the problem, not just Joe.
Jones
May 12th, 2009
4:55 pm
Also, Mark, where does a guy like Brandan Wright play on the Hawks? With Josh Smith? Who scores on that team? As you note, they need someone to help Joe carry the load. He’d be a nice player to have off the bench, but Marvin is a legit NBA starter even if he may never be an all-star. You don’t trade a 22-year-old starter for a bench guy who can’t defend his position or score.
I do realize that Wright is just one idea, but it goes to show how talking about trading these guys is one thing in the abstract, but it’s hard to make the specifics make sense (for both teams). If they could trade him for Lamarcus Aldridge — Marvin is from Washington and Portland needs a small forward — I would do that, but I doubt Portland would.
Hawk Str8Talk
May 12th, 2009
5:05 pm
I will answer your question, Rob, though you didn’t really answer mine. If the Hawks made the ECF, I would reconsider my stance on Mike Woodson based on results. The thing is though – I said at mid-season that we were headed for a possible first round loss and a sure second round sweep if we continued to not do the things that you need to do in the playoffs. So, I don’t think I’m ever going to be confronted with the fact that I’ll need to reconsider it.
My predictions regarding the season have come to fruition. We would have been swept regardless of Al Horford’s injury status. Horford hasn’t been the contributor he can be b/c he’s an afterthought on offense (i.e. we don’t work the post as a coaching decision) and is limited by the fact that we don’t play sound defense. His biggest contribution right now is as a leader on this team. Unfortunately, that’s muted due to his youth and deferential demeanor. So, you can give Coach Woodson and the Hawks credit for winning a playoff seriesm, but I do not. The Heat were awful. simply put. I would have given them credit if they won in 4 or 5, but not 7 (and certainly not when you are getting blown out by a bad team). There’s something wrong when each of your 9 losses in the postseason are by double digits. You can’t blame that on injuries or players totally. What is it about your team that makes them disappear at the sign of an impending loss when other teams are having injuries and are competing or (in the Rockets, Magic, and Bulls cases) winning. That toughness also comes from your coach. What’s your explanation for Coach Woodson’s admission after Game 1 where he said ‘I probably didn’t coach my best and I need to put them in better positions to win basketball games.’ In essence saying, in the biggest game of my professional coaching career – I didn’t coach my best. Huh? I could go on for days, but I won’t. I’m not trying to convince you of anything. You seem to be convinced that you are right. I used to be convinced that Josh Smith would learn to stop jump shots – I’ve been corrected REPEATEDLY.
What I’m saying is..I have an answer besides I don’t like Coach Woodson. I am pointing out consistent patterns that have caused the Hawks to perform less than their best. Even Joe’s injury was a mistake on Coach Woodson’s part in my opinion. For a player who went to the media the day before and said ‘I’m tired’ to be in the game when you’re down 30 in the second half is beyond short sighted.
So, I ask you again, Rob. What besides your we won more games argument are you giving credit to Coach Woodson for? I’m saying that I don’t buy your wins argument. Even if that’s something you want to give the coach credit for – you can’t ignore the fact that any coach would have had similar results years 1-4 due to the fact that they were playing rookies and NBDL level players regular up until year 3. So, it’s not fair to simply use that measure, though I admit that you can’t take that away from Coach Woodson totally, so I’m again saying do you have another measure that I’ve missed that would lead you to believe he’s going to take this team further? Are you saying that his offense is good, his defense is good, his motivational tactics are good, his player development is good, his in-game adjustments are good? What is the thing you’re saying that makes Coach Woodson a good coach for this team?
jake
May 12th, 2009
5:05 pm
The hawks don’t need to trade marvin… what they got to do is get a guard in the draft to back up bibby and big man free agent veteran to put at center and move horford to PF smith to SF KEEP joe at SG and bib at PG and use marvin as a 6th man like j-chill a year ago… this team doesn’t need to get rid of everyone, they made it to the second round of the playoffs. They have improved under mike woodson every year… there at there peak where they’ll shine the next year. Why break a atl b-ball team playin in the playoffs. GO HAWKS!!!
Reggie
May 12th, 2009
5:08 pm
Mark
think this hawks team reminds me of the Nuggets from last year..{talented ,but immature}..see if you can get a leader similar to what Denver got with Chancey Billips..{Antonio Mcydess comes to mind}..if we can get a leader like that this team can take that next step..also resign Mike Bibby..{3yrs 21 million,& Flip Murray]..trade Marvin Williams….. a young PG{Ty Lawson}..get Josh Childress to come back here..and here is a sleeper name for the hawks….Marcin Gortat from Orlando..he is their backup center & he is a restricted free agent..GET HIM!!
Hawk Fan
May 12th, 2009
5:19 pm
Big man or guard, what the Hawks need is a leader. Look at Denver with Billups (see article) as what leadership can do for a team.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/eticket/story?page=090511/billups
niremetal
May 12th, 2009
5:27 pm
Mark,
Gotta say that I’m just amused at this point by your takes on Marvin vs. Josh. You and Schultz really do sound like people who didn’t tune into Hawks games until the playoffs. Marvin scored 28 and 30 in the two games that the Hawks played without JJ. As soon as JJ was healthy again, Woodson had him go back to being a spot-up shooter. He also had become our top perimeter defender before he got hurt this year. The regulars on Sekou’s blog remember when played a game of stifling perimeter D against LeBron, with Lebron scoring 12 of his 26 points during the 10 minutes that Marvin was out of the game. LeBron even tipped his hat to Marvin after the game, but I guess you weren’t paying attention then.
Marvin is a combo forward who has a smoothness to his game that Josh never will develop. He also has a much more team-oriented approach – he’ll step up and score big when other guys are cold or injured, and will play his role in the offense otherwise. I’m not saying he’s a star, but he’s worth the $8M/yr that he’ll probably be offered in free agency.
As far as him being inessential, he’s our best perimeter defender. Name me another 6′8+ guy with his wingspan, quickness, and on-ball decisionmaking who can guard the vast majority of players who play at 1-4. Seriously, LeBron and Battier aside, who?
As for Smoove? He is what he is – a supremely athletic power forward who shows flashes of brilliance, but who makes mental lapses all too often. He improved on the latter flaw during his first 3 years in the league. But the last two, he hasn’t shown any improvement. Marvin on the other hand showed the greatest progress of any Hawk from ‘07-09 – but that’s something that people only would notice if they watched the games instead of simply reading the box scores, checking the stat sheets, and reading Hollinger’s column.
It’s like Astro Joe said – you’re too hung up on his draft position. And it’s not necessarily a knock against you and Schultz that you obviously don’t watch all the games – if I had to cover 4 pro sports teams plus tons of college teams, I wouldn’t have time to watch the Hawks every day either. But I trust Sund watches the Hawks more carefully than you or Schultz do, so we’ll see what he does. Something tells me he and most other GMs will view Marvin as more valuable than you do.
preston
May 12th, 2009
5:28 pm
Mark-
I completely agree with your assesment of the team and your thoughts on Marvin……it has become painfully obvious to admit that the returns on him for being a no.2 pick are modest……not the worst pick, but just not the expected dividends for such a pricey investment. Well I guess if Acie doesnt have a future here, he should be given a chance elsewhere, but I am still not convinced that he could not have played here. Law showed some promise last year with his quickness and range, but Woodson never really gave him a chance, and now he appears to be damaged goods. How realistic would it be for us to get Boozer and Jack…..I think both of those guys would bring really solidify this team and get us to the next level.
Briefs
May 12th, 2009
5:30 pm
First order of business, the Hawks need to let Zaza go and sign the Birdman to rebound, block shots and finish for 15 minutes off the bench.
niremetal
May 12th, 2009
5:32 pm
That was supposed to be “guard the vast majority of players who play at “2-4,” not “1-4.”
PS – I agree with your take on JJ. We ask him to do way too much on offense. It both exhausts him and makes the team predictable.
B-rad
May 12th, 2009
5:34 pm
I agree with briefs…Chris Anderson “birdman” would be a pretty great pickup. Right now in the draft the Hawks are projected to take jeff teague which I think could fit them nicely. I also don’t mind the idea of a sign and trade with Marvin to possibly get Jarret Jack and maybe find a way to get Roy Hibbert. He is a big body that could possibly help.
freshd
May 12th, 2009
5:35 pm
The NBA.NET mock draft has the HAWKS drafting JEFF TEAGUE from Wake Forest. He would be a good pick, but he would spend most of his playing time on the bench, because WOODROW doesn”t know how to develop young guards. See SALIM, AC LAW. ROYAL IVERY.
Briefs
May 12th, 2009
5:39 pm
Hawks should either trade Marvin or Joe for a young big man like Marc Gasol, Roy Hibbert or Andrew Bynum. Notice how I mentioned all Centers, this would move Horford back to his natural position as a Power Forward. The only problem is that Josh Smith would need to improve his jumper by leaps and bounds otherwise this trade would be a waste.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
5:40 pm
For what it’s worth, I’m not big on Jeff Teague. I’d rather have Tywon Lawson. Or Tyreke Evans, even though he’s more a combo guard.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
5:41 pm
I do like the Birdman, however. And he is a free agent.
freshd
May 12th, 2009
6:01 pm
What about DARREN COLLISON or TONEY DOUGLAS. EVANS and LAWSON are predicted to go before the HAWKS pick.
Reid Adair
May 12th, 2009
6:01 pm
Mark, I agree 100 percent – especially about “backing down” on Joe Johnson’s offensive dependency.
There was a time when Johnson was all the Hawks had for offense; that time has past. Let Josh Smith and Al Horford take more of the offense.
Cuz
May 12th, 2009
6:01 pm
Birdman was one of my favorite cartoon shows when I was a kid also Mark.
tomshoupe
May 12th, 2009
6:03 pm
The Hawks will not win and NBA title until they step up and aquire a key player. They donot have a Wade, Bryant, or James type player who can cause a team to win when they need to. they have only had one in their history and we know what they did with him. Get a name brand coach who has won a championship. They have had that opportunity and did not pursue them.
The Real Fan
May 12th, 2009
6:22 pm
Marvin Williams is NOT the answer at small forward. We need a consistent scorer at that position. He is not it. Move on.
niremetal
May 12th, 2009
6:31 pm
Unless your name is Joe Johnson, the words “consistent scorer” have no meaning when you’re playing under Mike Woodson. Woody relegated Marvin to the role of spot-up shooter, just like he relegated Horford to the post…and then never called a play for him.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
6:32 pm
Collison is awfully small. And Toney Douglas isn’t a point guard.
Xavier
May 12th, 2009
6:40 pm
1st I want to congratulations to the Hawks on a great season. I think the Hawks have a major decision to make. If Woody stays as coach, Josh Smith has to go. If Josh stays, Woody has to go. I lean toward trading Josh for a PG and a draft pick and/or 6th man type of player. I think Josh makes entirely too many mental mistakes(after 5 yrs. in the league) and his jump shooting has regressed to the point that defenses don’t even close out on him when he’s wide open. That should embarrass any NBA player that shoots as many jumpers as he does. I just don’t think Josh will ever fulfill the potential people have placed upon him while Woody is the head coach. They just don’t mesh. Now one player that I do like, and I think that the Hawks should look into is the backup center for the Magic, Gortat. He’s a big and that would allow Horford to move to PF and Marvin to SF. Josh can be traded for a PG or combo guard allowing Bibby to leave. Now I have faith in Marvin. Each season his game has expanded. I just think in 2 more seasons, Marvin will put everything together(Outside game, attack the basket, and defend better than most SF). Let Flip go(he making some major dollars next season) bring back Childress and David Andersen from overseas put AC in the mix. And last but not least change the offensive philosophy and I like our chances.
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
6:43 pm
One thing that needs to be said before we venture any further: We on the ol’ blog are playing with Monopoly money. What remains to be seen is if the owners will spend what it takes to move this team from 47 wins to 55. And it will take quite a bit of spending.
MBZ
May 12th, 2009
6:53 pm
The trade question is an appropriate one…. I think Mike Bibby is the one who should leave, and Josh Smith is the one who should be traded. Most teams would kill for wings like Marvin and Joe. You cant pickup defending, 240 pound wing players that have such a good offensive skill set everyday. I think Josh Smith has one more season to put it all together. If he ever gets serious about developing his shot, he would be one of the best finishers in the League. It’s hard to see that happening and i think everybody feels Horford’s future is at the Power Forward. Mike Bibby cant penetrate or play defense. I think Rick Sund needs to light a fire under Smith in his end of season interview to get in the gym with Mark Price and develop his midrange jumper. If that doesnt happen, trade him for a legit Center. Or a promising project center like DeAndre Jordan. We need to get a guy who can run a team to free up Johnson so he can run off screens and take quick shots. Whether that is Eric Maynor or Acie Law is something Sund will have to decide. The offense needs to be run a little more through Marvin Williams because he gets to the line and can penetrate. EVERY SINGLE ONE of our starters, with the exception of Mike Bibby, can be an all star if they are used properly. We need a coach who will create an offense that works for the players we have. Chicago simplified the HECK out of their offense to accommodate derrick rose. We need a Coach who will believe in his players, believe in his bench, and run sets that utilizes the strengths of this team.
gclcpa
May 12th, 2009
6:55 pm
Well, you got one part right. Josh Smith SHOULD be one of the teams top players in 2011. However, it should be intuitively obvious to the most casual of observers that Smith will never realize all that “potential.” He has phenomenal physical abilities, but unfortunately he makes dumb decisions, doesn’t rebound with any consistency whatsoever, and insists on being an outside shooting PF. We got beat on the boards this year and especially in the playoffs. We need a PF who will get in there and fight for rebounds, not hang out by the three point line and hang around whining at the referees.
Cliff Levingston
May 12th, 2009
7:05 pm
I say…
• Dump Bibby, re-sign Flip and move him to the point (I was a Bibby supporter for a long time, but his defense really is holding this team back).
• Sign a combo guard who’s capable of guarding a 1 (Joe’s a little too big to guard a point)
• Move Joe to small forward.
• Keep Josh and Horford where they’re at.
…The easy answer is to say “sign a dominant big man.” But this is 2009 and they’re not a dime a dozen.
Najeh Davenpoop
May 12th, 2009
7:05 pm
This was a very good article, and the central message rings true. We all know at this point that Joe Johnson is not a superstar, and if this team is going to improve it cannot rely on him as if he is one. Barring a trade, this team has to employ a spread-the-wealth offense where the ball is shared evenly and the front court and back court get a roughly equal distribution of shot opportunities. We’ve been clamoring all year on Sekou Smith’s blog that Josh Smith, and to a lesser extent Al Horford, don’t get the ball enough in the post — not that either one is a very polished post scorer yet, but both are pretty good passers when there is some structure to the offense, and getting the ball inside always initiates greater ball movement and open looks for the Hawks.
In order for Woody to fully rely on Josh and Al inside, though, Josh absolutely has to become better at using his right hand, and Al has to develop a post move that takes him towards the basket in a position to get fouled. As it is, Josh is very good with his left hand and almost useless with his right, and Al is not bad at nailing his turnaround jumper but doesn’t really have any moves that draw contact. Both those things have to change in order for them to become truly reliable post options.
I also agree that Marvin has more trade value than he does value as a member of this team. I’m a little on the fence as to whether Bibby must be re-signed; on the one hand, it would probably take Acie a while to learn the ropes and become as reliable at that position as Bibby currently is, but on the other hand starting Acie would be a defensive upgrade, and looking at how Rajon Rondo has developed in Boston with more accomplished players around him leads me to believe Acie probably wouldn’t be much worse than Bibby by the end of one season.
The only thing to which I take exception is the suggestion to draft another young point guard that Woody would bury on the bench behind Bibby. Maynor is nice, but he definitely didn’t accomplish anything more in college than Acie. There’s no point wasting a draft pick on something we already have. Draft a guy like DeJuan Blair who will instantly add toughness, physicality, and depth inside without requiring the ball in his hands in order to make an impact, and you’ll see this team improve instantly. Draft a guy like Maynor, and who knows whether you will ever see the returns you expect on draft day.
freshd
May 12th, 2009
7:10 pm
I think AARON BROOKS of the HOUSTON ROCKETS has shown that if you have a quick small guard, you can cause matchup problems. C. PAUL is small and he won a GOLD MEDAL. Toney Douglas would make a good shooting guard who can get to the basket.
cp
May 12th, 2009
7:19 pm
Great post by Hawk Str8Talk and HawksFan….This draft is pg heavy the only problem is we have a coach in Woody who does not like rookie pgs. I feel like it will be Salim and Law all over again if we take another young promising guard. There are not many quality big men in this draft so pg will probably be our pick. I don’t want to waste another pick on a guard we wont play. If Woodpecker is here again which I believe he will be then he really has to change his ways.
WR
May 12th, 2009
7:39 pm
Mark I think you said it best without really saying it, the best that Joe Johnson will ever be is a role player. He’s the type of player that can keep you in games or maybe even help you win a few games when your go to guy-star player is struggling. Funneling everything through Johnson will lead to Woodson’s demise. He likes to compare things to the Detroit team he was a part of as a assistant but he fells to realize that, that team played inside out. R.Wallace, B.Wallace, and Tayshaun Prince worked the post, yes R.Wallace and Prince had the range to step out but primarily when the team was in trouble they worked the ball inside and found their shooters outside. Sadly Woodson fells to realize the Hawks have the same makeup without the proper coaching. Personally I agree trade Marvin, but realistically Tayshaun and Marvin have the same game, Josh and Rasheed Wallace have very similar game with Josh having a better upside, Horford just as Ben Wallace was, is an undersized center but he has a far better game then Ben Wallace. Now look at Joe Johnson in comparison to Rip Hamilton,Joe is a far better player he can post, shoot the three and dish out the ball,the only shortcoming is that Chauncey Billups is far better than Bibby both offensively and especially defensively but for the most part this team compares favoritably to that Championship Detroit team without the coaching. The days of centers dominating Championship games are gone, everyone wants to point at the center position because they don’t see a 7-footer down there, but the reality is that a dominate center hasn’t been a part of a Championship team sense the Shaq led Heat won the title, before that it was the Shaq led Lakers and before that it was the Tandem of David Robinson and Tim Duncan. Its not that the Hawks are missing a center its that they have focused their leadership in the wrong place, funny how ironic it is that the Hawks have a leadership problem when considering the state of their ownership.
Simpdawg
May 12th, 2009
8:15 pm
The Hawks need to let Mike Bibby, Solomon Jones, and Speedy Claxton sign elsewhere as free agents; resign Flip Murray and reacquire Josh Childress and David Andersen from Europe; Draft a point guard who knows how to run a team with their first pick, or use it to acquire Ramon Sessions or Jarrett Jack. They should use their second pick on the best center available, either Josh Hevtvelt or Garret Siver; sign and trade Marvin Williams for a pure shooter or an enforcer; last but not least we need to acquire a head coach who knows how to develop young players and a bench. I would have to say, the Hawks have their work cut out for them this offseason.
v8dreaming
May 12th, 2009
8:17 pm
seems to me that joe WAS a smaller part of the offense during the playoffs. that’s why it went to 7 games with miami and why we got swept by cleveland. he didn’t score, he wasn’t aggressive at all and he wasn’t a leader. the “i’m tired” excuse is lame. kobe avgs. 36 mins a game. lebron avgs 37.7 mins a game. are they tired? no. i seriously doubt that 3-4 minutes a game really matters that much.
trade marvin williams? you mean the one forward that has a jump shot, can hit 3’s and isn’t so one dimensional on offense and defense and doesn’t pout like a 3 year old when he doesn’t get a call?
trade josh smith and his bad attitude for a center. all he can do is dunk and block a shot here and there. he has NO jump shot what so ever. every time he tried a three i wanted to throw something at my tv. don’t get me wrong, he can be exciting, but he is vastly overpaid and with his attitude, he needs to go. we can get more for him than williams and williams is a smarter player. move horford to smith’s spot and put in the center we get for smith. resign bibby for one year, maybe two for a smaller amount than what he’s making now, he is not an elite pg, and either start playing ac or draft a true pg somehow.
D.Ellis
May 12th, 2009
8:44 pm
I would:
-Trade Smith/Law/#1 for Bosh
-Bring back Chills as our 6th
-Move Joe to 3
-Resign Flip and start him at the 2
-Move Horford to 4
-Move up in draft to get back up point
-Make a play for a 2nd tier Free agent.
-THATS INSTANT OFFENSE
-Bench-Solo/ZAZA/CHILLS/EVANS/
D.Ellis
May 12th, 2009
8:45 pm
I would:
-Trade Smith/Law/#1 for Bosh
-Bring back Chills as our 6th
-Move Joe to 3
-resign Bibby
-Resign Flip and start him at the 2
-Move Horford to 4
-Move up in draft to get back up point
-Make a play for a 2nd tier Free agent.
-THATS INSTANT OFFENSE
-Bench-Solo/ZAZA/CHILLS/EVANS/
D.Ellis
May 12th, 2009
8:49 pm
WHAT ABOUT CHRIS KAMAN?
D.Ellis
May 12th, 2009
9:01 pm
-Trade Smith/Law/19th pick to Raptors for Bosh/#9 pick and draft Lawson or Maynor
Jay
May 12th, 2009
9:05 pm
Here’s what you have to consider if we trade Marvin…can we get someone better for cheaper? The answer is probably no, plus I still believe his best games are yet to come.
I’m more open to trading Smith or Horford as part of a package for a second scorer. Why? Because we eventually have to decide which player will make us a better power forward. Both can’t co-exist because Horford isnt a true center, and the Cavs exposed this weakness. He didnt have a chance against Z, except to shoot jumpers. So he has to play power forward to be correctly used. And Josh cant hit a jumper consistently enough to play sf. So he has to play power forward as well.
Horford, we get better rebounding and a leader, but what looks like a limited offensive game. With Smith we get a potential all-star, a rare athletic talent, but also a bad attitude, a penchant to be lazy, and a love for bricking jumpers.
I would also be open to a JJ + Horford for Bosh and filler, then sign Chills to be our shooting guard.
Xavier
May 12th, 2009
9:21 pm
And one more thing. Everyone is saying Joe is not this or that. Sounds kinda like the way Boston fans were talking about Paul Pierce before K.G. and Ray. Put some better talent around Joe and he will lead the way,
Shannon
May 12th, 2009
9:25 pm
Rob
I wish you would say something that makes sense. You are yet to answer Hawk str8talk’s question. Again starting at with so few wins and getting more each year is not the barometer for success. It is how the players you have been dealt get better.
Forget what your opinion and that of the rest of us that want him to go is………. but google Mike Woodson and what ESPN and Fox Sports have said about him over the past week. All of the experts have said he needs to be let go since he has not gotten the best out of the players he has been given. Also, last week I Tivo the game ( I actually go to them all) and TNT ate Woodson alive for the way he coaches.
So maybe what we think don’t matter….. but ALL OF THE EXPERTS THINK HE HAS DONE A BAD JOB. BUT WHO ARE THEY????? THEY ONLY DO IT FOR A LIVING !!!!!!!
Jay
May 12th, 2009
9:39 pm
Mark, what makes you so sure Acie Law has no future here, or in the league? Are Hawks officals/scouts that down on him? Or just your own observations?
BravesFan79
May 12th, 2009
10:04 pm
“Did I wear him down? Sure. But I needed to ride him to get us where we needed to go.”
So does this statement include when he played him while losing by 32 in Cleveland?? Or giving a clearly hurt Horford starters minutes over ZaZa in game 1?
Face it….. Woodson make Hewitt look like a great coach in comparison. He MUST GO!!
I wonder if Lenny Wilkens would like another shot?
dean
May 12th, 2009
10:19 pm
Trade Woodson for Avery and things will be better
Mark Bradley
May 12th, 2009
11:06 pm
Let’s be clear about this: Joe is more than a role player, a lot more. But he’s not one of the five best players in the league. And unless you have one of those five — LeBron, Kobe, D-Wade, Howard, Paul — you’d better maximize all available assets. The Hawks have gotten close to maximum value from Joe, but they’re only scratching the surface with Smith and Horford.
TheHawksFan
May 12th, 2009
11:34 pm
Im trying to figure out How did Mo and Morris get 2 year deals and Flip got a 1 year deal?? That really ties the Hawks hands. BUT to beat the Best you have to Be the Best. Forget the Woodson leaving talk, unless your willing to pay to buy him out. Forget ANY rookie PG out there. Woody is not gonna play em, why waste the time and money. We need BIGs. Take ZaZa’s 6 mil to after Big ILL from the Cavs or the Birdman in Denver. Bibby is the key. Will he take 6 mil a year for 3 years? I think thats plenty. Give Flip the other 6 mil. Create a package from Law/Speedy/Evans/Morris and/or Draft Pick can give you a ten mil option in sign n trade too if you wanna keep ZaZa and try to STEAL House or Powe away from the Celts. Barnes from the Suns is another option also. I just think how ever you work it, You have to go after some of the best players on the remaining Playoff teams.
Xavier
May 12th, 2009
11:37 pm
Mark I’m curious as to why do you think Smith has a higher ceiling than Williams. I love Josh like the next fan but I refuse to blinded by his athleticism. Smith to me seems miles away from being a cornerstone (reliable) of our franchise. Offensively he can’t handled the basketball so I don’t see him as a person we can post up yet or even isolate on the wing. He has zero outside game and the free throw shooting is unexplainable(from 71% to 58%?) He’s just an athletic 4 that plays great weakside defense(as an on the ball defender he is below average to me). I mean he was exposed in the Miami series when Beasley decided to take him off the dribble. I guess the better question is do you think Josh has the commitment to improve upon his weaknesses. I look at the improvement Williams has made each season and I’m pretty sure Williams will add another dimension to his game.
Najeh Davenpoop
May 12th, 2009
11:43 pm
“And one more thing. Everyone is saying Joe is not this or that. Sounds kinda like the way Boston fans were talking about Paul Pierce before K.G. and Ray. Put some better talent around Joe and he will lead the way,”
Excellent point.
Moon Man
May 12th, 2009
11:49 pm
GET RID OF WOODSON AND THEN ——————————BLOW IT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
T. Scott
May 12th, 2009
11:56 pm
Take this: if he opts out, how about Jamal Crawford as our pg?
The Peach
May 13th, 2009
12:01 am
I agree with MB. I have been watching the Hawks since 1996-1997 season when we had Steve Smith, Deke, D-Lock, Laettner and Corbin etc and continue to watch them today. I’ve watched Joe Johnson ALL season on either FSS or CSS…not just the post season. He is a first option at best but second option at worst.
Why?? That’s due to his ability to score in a variety of ways, his talent, basketball IQ ,versatility and solid perimeter defense. I can list his skills.
He can post up, great 3 point shooter, great mid-range shooter, great ball-handler, great isolation player, excellent passer, can score with EITHER hand at the rim IF he gets to the rim (I’ve seen him do it many times this season), can dribble left OR right, can pull up in transition and half court, can create his own shot off the dribble, can play pick and roll (but Woodson refuses to call many pick and roll plays, just ISO Joe or screen and roll) and he can defend the perimeter players as well… thought he did a nice job on Dwyane Wade IF the Hawks didn’t switch. He might not be the most athletic player but he was way more athletic when he was with the Suns.
These qualities he has are the assets of superstars and he has superstar talent. But you can’t win championships with only one supertar talent. You either have to have two players that demand a double team or just a solid all-around starting five (like the 2004 Detroit Pistons). The Hawks don’t have a complete starting five…
The Peach
May 13th, 2009
12:05 am
Xavier is right…Josh Smith is and will perhaps be no better than Derrick Coleman. A very athletic player with all the raw talent in the world but LACKS the discipline and hard work it takes to become an elite player…
HawksFan
May 13th, 2009
12:22 am
Once again, all this talk about Joe, Josh, Horford and Marvin is just a waste of time.
They are sports car with 5 speeds driven by Woody who is the equivalent of a 15 year old who doesn’t even know what a clutch is.
The players are the second part of the equation.
Joe Johnson should be used in a similar format to the way Boston uses Ray Allen.
Josh Smith should NEVER be on the perimeter.
You win games with a guy like Marvin. If you question him then question his ability to be healthy, but you’re a damn fool if you can’t see the ability this kid has. As someone stated before, when others have deferred to him or been out, then he’s repeatedly stepped up and had big games. Reading some of ya’lls take, you’d think you just thought that was just a coincedence.
If you’re going to trade anyone, you trade Josh Smith. REAL basketball guys don’t win championships with guys like Josh Smith because you can’t count on what this guy is going to give you game to game. His game is pathetically underdeveloped from the wing and is just a great athlete who makes plays off his physical abilities. The problem is, good teams who go deep in the playoffs easily negate that over the course of a series. His negatives BY FAR outweigh his positives minus the couple nights a year he actually puts an all around effort together. You’d get the most by trading him and getting a quality PF or even C in exchange.
In a perfect world, you’d trade Josh Smith for someone who can ball from the PG spot, and sign someone like the Birdman to play the 5 for you and be that intensity/energy guy who plays mad defense and boards like a Godzilla and gets all the garbage buckets. Then you develop Horford at the PF position and mold him to be similar to Elden Brandt’s game. You have to resign Flip because he’s the only guy that comes off the bench and provides a consistent spark.
BEFORE all that, you get a real coach who knows what the hell playoff winning basketball looks like on the offensive and defensive end. Personally, I think we could do a heck of a lot worse than a guy like Avery Johnson or someone similar. That would most definitely be an upgrade from where we’re at.
You don’t even have to know the game to understand our 1/2 court offensive approach is nothing short of a 3 ring circus. It’s violates so many fundamental rules of basketball that it’s not even funny. I know HS coaches that run better conceptual stuff than Mike Woodson.
Seriously. It’s that bad.
Out Of Town
May 13th, 2009
12:35 am
I know we all love Al Horford, but is he not better trade bait right now than actual potential? Everyone loves Horford, but it seems his mechanics are too stiff to be an effective offensive (18-22 ppg) type of guy. Wouldn’t be possible for the Hawks to look at trading Horford, Marvin, and the 19th pick to the Raptors for Bosh and Kapono?
Also, what are the chances the Hawks make a run after RFA Ramon Sessions?
Side Note – I love Brandan Wright, and think he’d make a great addition to this roster>
Najeh Davenpoop
May 13th, 2009
1:38 am
“You win games with a guy like Marvin.”
The Hawks were 14-7 without Marvin this year. They were 6-7 without Josh.
“REAL basketball guys don’t win championships with guys like Josh Smith because you can’t count on what this guy is going to give you game to game.”
Sounds like what they said about Rasheed Wallace before Detroit acquired him in 2004.
“His negatives BY FAR outweigh his positives minus the couple nights a year he actually puts an all around effort together. ”
Josh had 20 double-doubles this year. Marvin had six. Yes, there are more ways to measure all-around contributions than stats, but this is one very easy way. Here are a few others: for all the talk of Josh’s poor shot selection and decision making, he shot a better percentage than Marvin over the course of the season and had the same assist/turnover ratio. And it goes without saying for anyone who watches Hawks games that Josh’s defensive impact far outweighs anything Marvin contributes on that end.
Serious question: can you name one thing, other than outside shooting, that Marvin does better than Josh? Because I can’t. Does he rebound better? No. Does he post up better? No. Does he play better defense? No. Does he pass better? Not even close. Does he handle the ball better? You could make an argument that he does since he uses his off hand better, but considering the number of times he gets stripped when he drives inside, I’d still say no.
Funny how every one of Josh’s mistakes is magnified and blown out of proportion, but when other players take equally bad shots, or make other equally damaging plays like missing box-outs, not rotating properly, driving into traffic and losing the ball (all things Marvin has done over the last few games) they go unmentioned.
blonju
May 13th, 2009
5:33 am
the argument to trade marvin would have been good after last season .. and although his stats may not seem higher this year, he has gotten noticably better .. it would be ludacris to trade some one because they picked before cp3! marvin could turn out to be a 20 point scorer on a team that gave him more shots – we should be that team .. HERE’s what we do: let bibby go, unless we can get him for 7 million or less .. resign marvin for 4 years / 30 million – which would be a steal! also, he’s the youngest player on the team. draft eric maynor or johnny flynn if we are lucky! keep flip for 2 years / 7 million. bring over david andersen, the australian who plays in the russian league (7 footer who could be scola-esque, or better). look to trade joe to one of the top teams in the west for 2 or 3 great role players – or, keep him and let him play out the last year of his contract because he won’t resign here in ‘10-’11 SMOOVE will be star if everyone will just shut up about him for a second .. we are still so young! Another coach would probably help, but woodie did an above average job this year and i’m proud of him .. the hawks are 1 key piece, or several great role players away from greatness .. right now they’re very good and usually inconsistent, but i love them .. RISE UP FOR NEXT YEAR! I’ll be in the front row behind the bench.
blonju
May 13th, 2009
5:45 am
couple things about the playoff games since i’m on here: we were absolutely decimated by injuries .. our guys should be given major props for gutting it out .. if marvin and al had been 100 percent, the cleveland series would have been a different story .. everyone, including atlanta fans, have gotten caught up in the lebronocity of the nba .. cleveland is great and they will beat kobe in the finals, but the hawks are closer than y’all think .. if you watched every single game this season, you would know we only had our starting 5, in 41 contests .. additionally, during the 41 games we had our 5 strong, one, or even two, would be coming off an injury .. therefore, they would end up playing limited minutes, and shaking the rust off for a few games .. i’m proud of the effort we sustained for much of the season, and i look forward to seeing how much i will love or hate rick sund this summer .. GO HAWKS! STEVE HOLMAN RULES!
Mo
May 13th, 2009
5:58 am
Fire Woodson. Trade Johnson. Draft a point guard which they should of have done back in 2005. This team we have now is a FRAUD. Only reason they made the playoffs because they are in the East. They need to get players with HEART. Oh yeah PLEASE DO NOT BRING BIBBY BACK!
Mac
May 13th, 2009
8:45 am
Speedy should be plenty rested by now. That makes Bibby expendable, right?
Mac
May 13th, 2009
8:46 am
Actually, I like Bibby a lot. Liked his dad as a player, too.
preston
May 13th, 2009
8:59 am
Najeh, I couldnt agree with you more……Marvin’s contribution to the hawks are just not as good as Josh’s. Marvin has a nice consistent jump shot to his game, but he is a very awkward player…….his ball handling and feet moving skills are not good at all….how many times did we see him trying to take his man of of the dribble just to see him lose the ball or get his feet tangled up and falling to the floor? Everybody wants to dog Josh about certain aspects of his game, but other than his jumpshot, Marvin hasn’t really been any more impressive, especially for a no. 2 draft guy.
gdg73
May 13th, 2009
9:02 am
I say re-sign Bibby and either give Acie some playing time or trade him. In addition, I say draft Harry Douglass’ brother from FSU, Toney Douglass. He is the perimeter player/shooter that the Hawks sorely need. He is a combo guard a’la Ben Gordon with a sweet stroke. He also is one heck of a perimeter defender. And he will be sitting right there when we pick. You see how well his bother came in and helped those other birds across the street.
Mark Bradley
May 13th, 2009
9:03 am
Why do I think Smith has a greater upside than Williams? Because he’s more talented and more forceful. Because he changes games in a way Williams never does.
Thanks to Najeh for quantifying the point.
j
May 13th, 2009
9:08 am
wow, i actually agree with bradley, this is a first … somebody has been doing their homework
j
May 13th, 2009
9:14 am
Najeh, right on … that was probably one of the better posts i’ve read, with tons of facts to support your case … I still think Marvin has some major upside but are we willing to risk continuing developing him with the lame injuries he keeps getting? it’s like one step forward and 2 steps back with marvin
Mister C.
May 13th, 2009
9:15 am
If the Hawks’ opportunity is through the draft (which I don’t think it is), take a look at the draft board and see what Atlanta needs that other teams don’t. By the way, whoever drew up this draft board is clueless! There are misfits and potential trades up and down this list! But if it is accurate, Atlanta should take a serious look at trading up in the second round to get Toney Douglas. He was the best player in a league that actually plays basketball, could be a combo guard, is a hometown product, and his brother (and longtime support system) is also here…
kreedham
May 13th, 2009
9:18 am
If they are going to continue to play Al at center, we need a better back up than Randolph Morris or Solomon Jones. Keep Zaza, he has a passion for the game and gets incrementaly better each year.
RickNole
May 13th, 2009
9:19 am
Toney Douglas would be bad azz in a Hawks uni!!
Best player in the ACC last year.
j
May 13th, 2009
9:19 am
i give marvin credit though, this would technically be his first season out of college had he stayed, so his development is not bad at all … depending on what he’ll be asking, we can easily find another 14/15 pt scorer who’s less injury prone (childress was another nice scorer for the team but also very injury prone, he needs a little more bulk on him … maybe he can load on carbs in greece) … ah, man i do miss the backdoor lay-ups that woody would run for j-chill … i don’t know if j-smoove has the basketball iq yet to fit into those plays
Peter
May 13th, 2009
9:22 am
Marvin doesn’t appear to have a drive in him………After seeing him in public, I thought……does this guy even lift weights, he is so soft on the floor !
Please get a Big and a Point……Houston got dismantled last night because Ming is out. There was nobody to put a hurt on a guy driving to the rim in the playoff series. Plus no easy baskets from a post up big.
Our Defense was good, but wow the Offense is all one on one……….. terrible passing and not sharing of the ball.
Hopefully the Hawks will work on free throw shooting…….. I wonder how many games they would have won, had they shot the ball better at the line ?
Mister C.
May 13th, 2009
9:27 am
Let’s stop ignoring the obvious here. Al Horford is as big as the Hawks are going to get if you want to see him and Josh Smith on the floor at the same time. Josh Smith is not a SF nor is he a sixth man. What they both have is a lot of legs and ability to catch balls on the rim. This lineup is built to run like NY but plays in the half court like Detroit. If you get bigger, you get slower, so either get a coach that supports the wide open style or be willing to part with either Josh or Marvin. Bottom line.
Law
May 13th, 2009
9:35 am
Acie Law, Marvin Williams, and hopefully Josh Childress should be used as trade-bait to get another legit star. I prefer Chris Bosh with Amare Stoudemire as a second option if we cant get Bosh. They will be willing to deal when they figure out that Bosh isn’t gonna re-up, because they have to get something for him. Lastly, I would resign Bibby but I think he needs to play the Jason Terry role as a backup to the point and 2 guard positions. They need to draft a point, but Im not big on Maynor. I would prefer Flynn because he is gonna be deadly off of pick and rolls because of his speed and ability to finish, he also has crazy elevation on the jumper, and he loves to push which will help Al and Josh a lot.
WR
May 13th, 2009
9:40 am
Mark you claim that Joe is clearly more than a role player which contradicts your idea that Joe’s offensive focus needs to diminish. In the NBA your either the focal point or a role player. Take San Antonio for instant, in Tim Duncan’s earlier years he was the focal point of their offense as he has aged that role has shifted more toward Tony Parker. The Shaq-Kobe led Lakers went through the same process, Shaq was the focal point and Kobe played a role. Going back even further the Magic-Kareem led Lakers went through the same process. In his earlier years Kareem was the focal point and Magic played a role, as Kareem got older Magic already serving as the engine to the team became the focal point and Kareem played a role. Being a role player doesn’t take away from your skills or abilities and doesn’t necessarily make you any less of an all-star which Joe has been for the past few years. Some of the 50 greatest players in the NBA were role players, James Worthy, Kevin Mchale to name a couple. Thats the problem with today’s NBA, people,such as yourself, missunderstand what a role player is,players take being a role player as a bad thing, as if its some scarlet letter that says your not that good. The great Micheal Jordan couldn’t win a championship until he was surrounded with good role players. As an example here’s a championship team breakdown:
1988 Lakers
Magic Johnson-Superstar
James Worthy-role player(superstar’s wingman)
Kurt Rambis-role player(banger,did the dirty work)
Micheal Cooper-role player(Spot up shooter,could post-up or drive if needed)
Kareem Abdul Jabar-role player(former superstar,now a reliable post threat)
90’s Chicago Bulls
Micheal Jordan-Superstar
Scottie Pippen-role player(superstar’s wingman)
Horace Grant-role player(reliable inside-out post player)
John Paxson-role player(Spot up shooter)
Bill Cartright-role player(reliable post player)
Both Pippen and Worthy are amongst the NBA’s fifty greatest players but without Jordan or Magic the teams weren’t that good. Without Worthy or Pippen the teams were still good maybe not championship caliber. Point is the players in the two era understood roles, being a role player doesn’t mean you can’t be a star, your a star with a role, that role is just not the focal point of your team. Now here’s a Hawks breakdown:
Joe Johnson-(Focal point but doesn’t want to be,could be a great Star’s or Superstar’s wingman)
Mike Bibby-role player(Spot up shooter who occasionally drives)
Josh Smith-role player(Superstar talent missing the mental aspect to become one)
Al Horford-role player(good post player not given an actual role)
Marvin Williams-role player(good inside-out player, also with no clear role)
Mark Bradley
May 13th, 2009
9:49 am
Superstars aren’t made, WR. They’re born. You’re either one or you’re not. Taking more shots won’t make you an MJ or a Magic.
Joe is a fine player. But he’s not a superstar.
Hms
May 13th, 2009
9:52 am
Mark,
You’re right. But for this to work, it has to be both encouraged and enforced by Mike Woodson. If he continues to ride his star pupil, then his star pupil will continue to do what he does. Namely, put up over 20 points a game, but not lead this team anywhere in particular.
It’s easy to say that guys like Horford and Smith have to work on their games, as so many people will say. They have been. They need to work more. But Mike Woodson has to begin extending that trust to them. If he does not, then his star pupil will not, either. He says he is not selfish. Prove it. But he can’t prove it. Not with Woodson riding his jock and his jumpshot. It’s really that simple.
By the way, Joe Johnson was the Hawks leading scorer during the regular season, and he should be with the entire offense revolving around him. How nice. But the leading scorer for the Hawks in the playoffs? Josh Smith. By a landslide. Also rated highest in player efficiency, and that was even with all of the stupid things he does. What does that say about Johnson? The excuses have to stop somewhere. He’s tired. He’s asked to do too much. Blah, blah, blah. He and Woody have the situation monopolized. This time it backfired. They should have beaten Miami 4 to 2. They should have lost to Cleveland 4 to 2 or 5 to 1. Yes I know, injuries and more injuries. Joe Johnson wasn’t injured against Miami, and he didn’t get hurt until getting beaten to death in the first two games against Cleveland. I tell you, it starts with Woodson. Then Johnson. Otherwise it doesn’t start at all.
Chrome Dome
May 13th, 2009
9:55 am
“Funny how every one of Josh’s mistakes is magnified and blown out of proportion, but when other players take equally bad shots, or make other equally damaging plays like missing box-outs, not rotating properly, driving into traffic and losing the ball (all things Marvin has done over the last few games) they go unmentioned.”
AINT THAT THE DAMN TRUTH
Mark Bradley
May 13th, 2009
9:58 am
I agree completely, HMS.
j
May 13th, 2009
10:06 am
these are some great posts i’ve been reading today … bradley, i think you struck a genious nerve w/ your article today … for too long i’ve been reading blogs bashing the hawks but not actually giving facts on why certain things need to be changed … can we get this on parchment paper, write up a petition, and send to the owners/coach?
Veteran Fan
May 13th, 2009
10:36 am
Chrome Dome, it is true that Joe and Marvin were doing some of the same things against the Cavaliers, but the problem was that Josh was focused and unfocused at different times in the game. His second half fade outs in both games at home were too obvious! Josh is very vocal in his assertion that he is a star, but a star works on his weaknesses. Both Jordan and James couldn’t shoot outside when they came into the league. They worked hard and the results speak for themselves. Josh has matured and puts forth exceptional effort when things are going good and got the nice contract. But, where is the hard work and improvement with going to his right, 15 ft jumper, man defense, running the baseline, fundamental rebounding, conditioning, and (this is real bad) above the rim finishing! The Hawks had a chance to win games 3 and 4, but Josh kept walking away from LeBron when he got hot and he stood aound and watched after having good first halves in both games. Cleveland said that Josh couldn’t score consistently to beat them and they were right! The problem is we cannot wait on his potential anymore. Take the dunks to Toronto where they need people in the stands and he can work off of Calderon and let Chris Bosh come here and take the pressure off Joe Johnson. Swap #1s with them and go after Thabeet. Do not resign Bibby and go after Ben Gordon. Sign and trade Marvin and Law for a decent point. Instant contender! Time is running out!
E343
May 13th, 2009
10:55 am
i think that bibby has to return, hes old and what not but acie law will get better. Joe johnson should also return people double team him fast just load the bench up with at least one good mid/3 shooter. make teams think about the deep factor. speedy has to play but id cut him at this point i mean if u do hell still not play but you free up the space for maybe an offensive mario west type person.most of you are banking on keeping smith and trading everybody else but this is the same person that signed to play for another team, what if he leaves? your stuck with no one all over again.when the hawks won all starters In the playoffs had some sort of pecking order. NO STARTER SHOULD LEAVE load the bench.
Mark Bradley
May 13th, 2009
11:04 am
Why, thanks, J. But I’m afraid I’m all out of parchment.
NEW CARS
May 13th, 2009
11:07 am
We finally have some marketable assets and we need to use them…I don’t believe Joe is the linchpin to getting to the next level…But if you could put him with little more dominant point guard (Bibby’s more of a scorer-shooter than a distributor) then he might be more of a Paul Pierce type and that’s ok. The question is, what can we turn Josh Childress into and do we want David Andersen..He has done well in Europe and could be a good alternative for more depth.
My problem with Woodson is the same on I have with Roger McDowell. He doesn’t develop his young talent…Diaw, Law, Solomon Jones, Horford, Williams…None have improved at a respectable rate. The first three because he has refused to play them. That flaw and the fact that I still don’t feel he has the team has me thinking that this summer is the time for a move, rather than early next season
ILL-logical
May 13th, 2009
11:31 am
A modest proposal:
Because the Hawks assistants all of 1 year contracts that expire soon, why not replace them with people like Paul Westphal and give him COMPLETE control of designing an offensive scheme that is built around the skills and abilities of the players and allows them the opportunity to perform well consistently. For player development, hire someone like Antonio davis who can develop our bigs into productive assets rather than just passers to /rebounders for iso Joe.And finally if trades are made and my guess is that there will have to be some because Houston will offer Bibby a better deal, think in strategic terms(3-5 years) rather than a quick fix.
Championship caliber organizations are not developed overnight and there is a core of talent on the current roster that can and should be developed into a championship team; they just need a better system and better leadership.
ILL-logical
May 13th, 2009
11:32 am
clarification: Because the Hawks assistanta all HAVE i year contracts
WR
May 13th, 2009
11:50 am
Mark actually read the post I made and in this case read it again, superstars are born not made, whats your point, and beyond that what does that point have to do with my post. Of course taking more shots won’t make you a MJ or Magic,but as I recall Magic rarely shot unless he had to. Thats when your Superstars show up, when the team needs them. With all of Jordan’s numbers what stood out most is how he preformed when the team was in trouble,specifically in the 4th quarter,same goes for the Magic,Bird,Wilkins,Thomas,Malone, of that time period,maybe not Malone. As a sports writer can you honestly observe Josh Smith and say he doesn’t want the ball in the 4th quarter, no you can’t because its obvious that he does. As far as superstars not being made, we apparently have not watched the same NBA over the years, because as I remember Micheal Jordan came into the league as a hot-shot scorer, with time he developed his game on both ends of the court and most importantly he developed the mental aspects of his game. As I also recall Kobe did the same thing, he was an extremely talanted player straight out of highschool who wanted to be a Superstar before he developed his game at both ends of the court and the mental aspect of the game, what happened, he fell on his face. He thought he was a superstar before his time, after a couple of years of putting of outrageous numbers but continuing to lose he begin to listen to what players told him about building up his mental aspect of the game, one of those players was his former coach, Magic Johnson. Even as a young talented player himself Magic was pulled to the side by Kareem Abdul Jabbar, he was told that talent will only get you so far, you have to develop the mental aspect of the game and that was after leading the Lakers to a Championship over the 76ers where he played all five positions. To say that superstars are born not made is ignorant,Superstars are born with the talent,but it takes someone or something to bring it out, at the same time you have to want to be a superstar. If you can honestly watch Joe Johnson and say he doesn’t have superstar talent you shouldn’t be writing for Cox Enterprises, the problem is that its not what he wants its a role a coach has tried to force on him. Once again read the blog before you respond, I can see why theres such a negative tone to this blog, when the head of the blog is not actually reading the post before they respond.
Mark Bradley
May 13th, 2009
12:13 pm
Joe does not have superstar talent. He has All-Star talent. There’s a difference.
Mz. Surprise Me!
May 13th, 2009
12:33 pm
This is what I think:
1. every player has potential to be a star
2. when you draft and/or trade a player, it’s always gonna be a gamble, life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you gonna get. (bust or star) (better team or worst team) example: A.I. for Detroit/Billups for Denver- Kwame Brown/Lebron James
3. let say we get rid of woodson and the team finishes with a worst record, then what, lets say we keep woodson and still end up with a losing record, again what then. you just never know what is gonna happen. Isn’t that what makes life so great? The surprises.
4. No matter what decisions are made in the off season , there is always some one that gonna be unhappy. (which josh did you want to keep more than the other)
5. There is no guarantees in drafting and trading. (refer to the above examples or think of your own)
We are now down to the most irritating part of the season, the off season. Who stays, who goes. What’s best for the team? Who knows? All I know I’m glad I don’t have to make those decisions!
Now, who should have plays designed for them? I say everyone on the team since you never know when you’re gonna need to call upon them when times get ruff (injuries, sickness(flu)).
So yep Mark, I agree with you on this one. It’d be nice for the Hawks offense to be spiced up. I mean only use the Iso Joe plays when the situation calls for it. Let others on the team get more involved.
Just suprise me!
Xavier
May 13th, 2009
12:33 pm
Hey Najeh:
“The Hawks were 14-7 without Marvin this year. They were 6-7 without Josh.”
**That is no indication of a player’s worth. If that’s the case, then next you will be telling everyone is that Mo Evans is better than Marvin based on Mo taking Marv’s place in those 21 games.**
“Sounds like what they said about Rasheed Wallace before Detroit acquired him in 2004.”
**True Detroit did win a title with Rasheed. But Detroit also had Billups, Hamilton, Wallace, Prince and Brown coaching. The Hawks in its current state is not that team. Also if I remember correctly Rasheed did lose a Finals against San Antonio.**
“Josh had 20 double-doubles this year. Marvin had six. Yes, there are more ways to measure all-around contributions than stats, but this is one very easy way. Here are a few others: for all the talk of Josh’s poor shot selection and decision making, he shot a better percentage than Marvin over the course of the season and had the same assist/turnover ratio. And it goes without saying for anyone who watches Hawks games that Josh’s defensive impact far outweighs anything Marvin contributes on that end.”
**Well I expect my power forward to have more double doubles and shoot a better percentage than my small forward. And at this moment in time Josh contributes more statistically than Marvin. But Josh’s shot selection and decision making and attitude negates some of those positives. And honestly I think Marvin plays decent defense and is improving. I kinda compare Josh to A.I. A.I. led the league in steals many years but as an on ball defender he was a liability. Statistics can lie. And I just feel Josh freelances on D which can be a good thing and a bad thing.**
“Serious question: can you name one thing, other than outside shooting, that Marvin does better than Josh? Because I can’t. Does he rebound better? No. Does he post up better? No. Does he play better defense? No. Does he pass better? Not even close. Does he handle the ball better? You could make an argument that he does since he uses his off hand better, but considering the number of times he gets stripped when he drives inside, I’d still say no.”
** Can Josh even dribble and pass better than you? Seriously? One thing you forgot was free throw shooting and a player can be all world shooting, dribbling etc. but in the 4th quarter if you are shooting 58% from the line, your not on the court in crunchtime.**
“Funny how every one of Josh’s mistakes is magnified and blown out of proportion, but when other players take equally bad shots, or make other equally damaging plays like missing box-outs, not rotating properly, driving into traffic and losing the ball (all things Marvin has done over the last few games) they go unmentioned.
**I don’t see how you can compare a hurt player to a healthy player(if you are using the playoffs as your only reference). I know Josh at his best is a terrific player. The only problem is when will we get that player on a night to night basis. I’m sick and tired of Josh complaining after ever foul call (he’s worse the Perkins from the Celts), shooting wide open jump shots when clearly he should attack the basket, trying to be Magic on fastbreaks( Josh it’s O.K. to be Worthy. Make the outlet pass and run!). If you come to a Hawks game it’s hearing the crowd moan when Josh attempts a jumper. I just don’t see Josh working on the little things. I hope he can prove me wrong**
I just think Marvin is not a player we should trade cause thinking long term, what if Joe decides to move on? Does Atlanta hold onto Joe throughout next season like Bibby and risk the chance of getting nothing in return or do you trade him this summer? That’s another reason I think Marvin is so valuable to the Hawks.
Mz. Surprise Me!
May 13th, 2009
12:37 pm
Every player has a value to his or her team. I wonder what way that value will be used? Just surprise me!
Xavier
May 13th, 2009
12:42 pm
HMS was Josh even double teamed at all? Cleveland even double teamed Flip in game 4. The fact that Josh was the leading scorer doesn’t mean alot. Honestly he should have had a higher scoring average with all the great looks he had.
Mz. Surprise Me!
May 13th, 2009
12:45 pm
Johnson needs to step back for the Hawks to step forward. Yeah Mr. Bradley, I like this blog a lot. You actually present a solution to the Hawks’ problems that may actually work and certainly we fans can agree with. Well at least I do! It has a team feel to it! You know that there’s no I in team feel to it. I’m just getting excited just thinking about it. It would give other opponents a new look and perhaps they won’t be able to figure us out quite so easily.
Xavier
May 13th, 2009
12:46 pm
And for those of us who thinks Woody is a bad coach and good coaches are a dime a dozen. Be careful what you wish for. Take a look at Orlando.
Steve
May 13th, 2009
12:57 pm
We need to move Joe. Period. Shooting guards are a dime a dozen in the NBA. Point guards and bigs are NOT. Should be able to move him for a pikc and an expiring contract or two. If you cannot get a pick then fine, we have a HUGE contract that will come off the books in one season.
Resign Bibby if we don’t think AC is the answer, but don’t pay him top dollar. If AC isn’t the answer, then we need to make sure we get a TRUE point guard in the draft.
Losing Marvin will be a big mistake. He is a tremendous threat offensively (if we start letting him be the GO TO guy) and he has a long wingspan allowing him to D up fairly well. If we let him go via sign and trade we WILL regret it. He is still very young and has had two good years in a row. Hawks need to take the brakes off him and let him dominate.
The core you HAVE to keep: Horford, Marvin, Smith, ZaZa (tough big man off the bench, which is hard to find in the NBA). That’s it. That’s three guys that can play multiple positions and a backup big man that is cheap. Then we need a true center and true point guard. Johnson is expendable. ZaZa is undervalued for what he brings the team off the bench, as he is one of the few Hawks that plays hard almost every time he hits the court.
Johnson is extremely expendable. He is a class act and a team player, but the reality of the NBA is that shooting guards are easy to find compared to other positions.
Jones
May 13th, 2009
1:22 pm
If the Hawks don’t resign Marvin, or if they trade him, what about a guy like Lamar Odom? He’s not worth nearly what he made the last few years, but he might fit in nicely with Horford and Smith at the right price. He’s a good rebounder, pretty good defender (he fits well with Woodson’s switch-on-everything plan), and somewhat versatile on offense without needing lots of shots. And you might get him for around what Marvin would cost.
WR
May 13th, 2009
1:25 pm
Joe doesn’t have Superstar talent, are you kidding me. The man is a 6′8 shooting guard with unworldly long distant shooting range, he can drive and take anyone off the dribble when he wants to, and he can post up any one in the league, besides Kobe,Lebron,and D-Wade who else in the league can do that, its mentality Mark, you can duck and cover behind your AJC title but the truth is the truth, ever heard of the truth will set you free. When Joe wants it, he’s unstoppable,do some research and you will find that Boston traded Johnson to Phoenix because players felt that way about him, Phoenix brought him off the bench because they knew he had the talent but he wouldn’t use it in a starring role. Yes periodically he shows it more so in Atlanta but thats because he has a coach who is constantly trying to force him to do so, but when he’s needed, where is Joe, he’s somewhere caught up in his mental world of do I or don’t I. His talent is unquestionable,his mindset begs to differ. I can’t believe that you can’t see this man has superstar talent, basically you are pulling a Joe Johnson,coming up with excuses as to why a player so talented chooses not to be the superstar that he could be. I guarantee if it was possible to switch Josh Smith’s demeanor with that of Joe Johnson’s the superstar talk would involve Kobe,Lebron,D-Wade and Joe Johnson. Josh wants to be a superstar,but mentality wise he’s slow to understand what it takes,he is five years removed from highschool so thats to be expected, Joe has the mentality to know what it takes, he just doesn’t want it. Joe would be satisfied being the second option on a contender but he doesn’t want the glamour,praise,or accolades that accompany a superstar and thats okay. Whats not okay is to say that the man doesn’t have the ability.
Jones
May 13th, 2009
1:28 pm
Xavier, I agree with you about Josh Smith’s value, especially in the playoffs. But I also think you are too hard on Marvin. Josh comes up with more spectacular blocks, but Marvin is more sound in one-on-one defense, at least when healthy. He did a nice job on Lebron earlier in the year. He is also very good at getting to the rim and the free-throw line, and converting at the line once he gets there. He needs to be much more aggressive, but some of that has to do with their stagnant offense in the half court. The ball really stops when it gets to Joe or Smith. If I had to choose I would certainly keep Smith, but Marvin is a good player and getting better.
Jones
May 13th, 2009
1:36 pm
Here’s an interesting fact for all of you who are so eager to bust this team up. The Hawks were the sixth youngest team in the league this year, and the youngest team in the playoffs. (http://www.emptythebench.com/2008/12/10/whos-old-and-whos-not-in-the-nba/)
Keep in mind that of their top 8 or 9 guys, only Bibby is clearly past his prime, and some of their key pieces are not even close to their prime (Horford, Williams, Smith). Factor in the injuries, too, and it’s amazing that the Hawks were one of the last 8 teams playing. I say keep the main guys (if you can keep the free agents at a decent price), try to build a deeper bench, and let these guys continue to develop. This team was *awful* just two years ago, and it takes time in the NBA to turn things around.
j
May 13th, 2009
3:12 pm
New Cars – Diaw actually was given conserable playing time by woodson … he didn’t flourish though until he had steve nash dishing him the ball … don’t believe me, looks up his stats before, during, and after Phoenix … i like to call him sandbagger diaw
i am not an advocate of woody by any means, but give him credit … there is a reason guys like salim, sheldon, diaw, & t-lue are no longer part of this team … the same reasons now that acie isn’t seeing playing time … he knows something we don’t
SWAT Native
May 13th, 2009
3:18 pm
I posted this on Schultz’s blog, but I’m going to post it here, too:
I’ve been following the Hawks since the Hubie Brown era. To me the lesson of the Hawks (and the reason they stayed in the lottery for ten years) was that they decide that they have gone as far as they can with their team and decide to trade some key players rather than adding to what they already have. Look at their history:
Moving Tree Rollins and Randy Whitman to get Moses Malone and Reggie Theus
Moving Doc Rivers, John Battle and Spud Webb to get…I can’t even remember what they got back
Moving Smitty and Mookie to get JR Rider and Jason Terry
Moving Dikembe to get Toni Kukoc, Theo Ratliff (btw, wasn’t Speedy Claxton in that trade but he went back to Philly?)
Do I need to mention Dominique for Danny Manning for half a season?
I wouldn’t trade Joe, Marvin or Smoove unless someone came with an unbeatable offer. I would trade Acie Law if I could get something good for him – he really needs a change of scenery. I would re-up Bibby (for less money), Flip and Zaza. I’d like to see the Hawks add one or two veteran big men/enforcer types, a veteran backup point guard and get a quality player in the draft. Those moves would put you in the mid-50’s in terms of wins which would be a good next step.
wtf
May 13th, 2009
3:50 pm
If you think Diaw played better because of Nash then it is clear you did not watch any of those Suns teams. Diaw flourished because he was not forced to play out of position and do things he was not comfortable doing like he was asked to do in Atlanta. They moved him to the pf position where he had a mismatch almost nightly against slower big men. He is also a great passer so they also took advantage of that… What a concept, a system that actually plays towards a players strengths rather than their weaknesses. I wish we had that here in Atlanta. I know someone is going to say this isn’t true but look at what Diaw did once he was traded to the Bobcats. He once again put up good numbers because he wasn’t forced to try and be something he was not like he was in Atlanta. It was painfully obvious that he was not a pg but they tried to force him to be one because of his great passing skills. And how in the hell is T lue brought up? If anything that destroys your argument because T lue even when hurt played more than Salim and Law. The reason Lue is not here because he was involved in a trade to get Bibby. But if you honestly look at it they are damn near similar players. They love to shoot the 3 and play no defense what so ever. Sheldon was just garbage so whatever… I just find it crazy that so many players can leave here and become better once they are not playing under Woodson….And if we want to keep it real here since a lot of people don’t, Salim had a better Rookie year than Marvin. The difference is Salim was never given the same opportunities year in and year out as Marvin. Marvin was pretty much handed the starting job after the Harrington trade. Salim couldn’t get any pt even when we needed scoring or had injuries… I’m willing to bet that a healthy Salim next year will put up numbers for the Bucks. I really don’t know how some fans can call players horrible or bust when the players don’t even get consistent minutes. Ive seen games where Salim would come in and score 20 and not see the court again for the next week. Ive seen law come in score 10 and get about 5 dimes and wont get 10 minutes worth of pt over the next few games. Hard to produce when you don’t play. And as far as Marvin. He is what he is… A nice sf that’s about it. Do you see how many guys who have came in with Marvin or after Marvin who are already better. Danny Granger was in the same draft is way better… Rudy Gay came out a year later and is better. Hell Travis Outlaw could put up Marvin numbers if given the same pt. Marvin is replaceable.
Mark Bradley
May 13th, 2009
5:01 pm
Thanks, Surprise Me. We do try to confuse everybody and offer up a solution now and then.
Blast
May 13th, 2009
5:18 pm
Top centers in the league. Howard. Yao. Shak. Duncan. And the Nets Lopez. If New Jersey ever attains prominence again, everybody will be talking about Lopez.
newkid
May 13th, 2009
6:02 pm
The Smith deal that I’d like to hear discussed more is Smith/Speedy to Phoenix for Amare’. He’s likely to opt out of his deal with the Suns after the next campaign, and the Suns will likely want a young athletic PF to replace him if they’re going to re-sign Nash and continue to run the floor with Barbosa and others. Can’t be certain Amare’ wouldn’t bolt Atlanta after next season, but pairing him with Joe – and perhaps a re-signed Bibby – just might give the Hawks the best chance of retaining them both beyond next year.
With a 2-3-4-5 quartet of JJ, Hedo, Amare’, and Horford, a moderately priced Bibby, a few solid complementary pieces, and a good draft and we’re perhaps ready for the next leap.
ayersling
May 13th, 2009
6:44 pm
I strongly disagree with trading Marvin Williams and strongly agree with weening off of Joe Johnson. Johnson is an All-Star but Williams won’t reach his full potential with Joe dominating the ball. Williams has the skill set to be our best player. He needs to work on his handles and eventually on being a leader. I don’t think we’ll need to draft a guard either if Acie does what Marvin did last year which work on his range and as mentioned earlier, we do still have Chills. The inside is where we’re getting killed. We need a center that is a legit size and more athletic than Pachulia. No offense to Big Z but he just doesn’t have a lot of lift in his legs.
HawksFan
May 13th, 2009
7:30 pm
Najah Davenpoop…..
Sorry I didn’t get back to your retort before now, but did you actually compare Josh Smith’s overall situation to Rasheed Wallace? Are you serious?
While Rasheed seems chemically imbalanced at times with his obsessiveness for getting T’ed up, he was also a very developed PF unlike Josh Smith who is just a good athlete with zero offensive game other than put backs, finishing in transition when no one pressures his dribble, and general offensive situations where he’s set up by someone’s elses dribble penetration.
“How is Marvin better than Josh other than outside shooting.”
…. Again, do you even watch basketball. The fact that Marvin can dribble and chew gum at the same time qualifies him to be a master of dribbling compared to Josh. The fact that he’s the best FT shooter on the team makes him a HUGE asset to this team in the 4th quarter in tight ball games or with the lead. The fact that he’s got a mid range game and developed his 3 point shooting to a moderately high level. The fact that he’s shown when given opportunities that he can score in the upper 20’s when Joe was out and he was given more opportunities. Translation: The offense could be run through him because he has MUCH better decision making abilities than Josh AND because he’s a much better passer than Josh.
Need I go on or is your sophomoric understanding of the game going to present some actual challenge.
Josh Smith is a tremedous athlete who can impact the game on the glass and defensively when he actually decided to play with effort. He also is a turnover waiting to happen, a bad decision waiting to happen, and only God knows what you’re going to get out of him every other night and yet we’re supposed to build around him.
Truth be told, I’d be for keeping him if we brought in the right coach who knew how to actually use the weapons that are on this team.
It’s nothing short of funny for anyone to throw stats out in a comparison like this because it’s all based on the opportunities that you’re given. Both Marvin and Josh would be benefited greatly if they were put in a better position to be successful. But they’re not and that’s the real point.
However, this part of the dicussion started with trying to figure out how we could add the pieces to actually beat Cleveland challenge for a championship. If we have to let someone go, either Josh Smith or Al Horford would be the guys I’d consider because every team needs a better guy at the 5, and a PG who can get it done. To me, those guys would bring enough value to possibly go after someone to fill those voids.
Simpdawg
May 13th, 2009
8:12 pm
The problem with the Hawks is they have too many players, playing out of their natural position. They need to decide, which player there’re going to build around, whether it is Josh Smith, Joe Johnson or Al Horford? They really need to figure this thing out. I think they need to make a decision on maintaining either Josh Smith or Marvin Williams. A decision need to be made regarding Acie Law’s future in Atlanta? They need to acquire Josh Childress and David Andersen. I would allow Mike Bibby to walk as a free agent and go after Ramon Sessions or Jarrett Jack, resign Flip Murray and ZaZa Pachulia and draft a center or low post power forward who can draw double teams.
Take your time Hawks, do it right! | Hawks Blog
May 13th, 2009
11:48 pm
[...] larger problems (their paper-thin depth, their flawed offensive scheme the wordsmith Mark Bradley nailed in his recent column and their inability to get ball pressure on the ball at the outset of offensive possessions, just [...]
house divided
May 14th, 2009
12:23 am
Sign and trade Marvin Williams with Utah for Paul Millsap and then sign him, resign Murray, trade Acie and Childress’s rights to Indiana for Jarret Jack’s rights and then sign him, resign Pachulia, let Bibby walk. Draft Eric Maynor or Paul Harris. Starting 5: Jack, Johnson, Smith, Horford, Millsap. Bench Murray, Pachulia, Evans, Maynor,and in free agency sign a guy like Francisco Elson. To compete we need a relentless player who never gives up inside. Paul Millsap is a force and he plays with the biggest heart of any available bigman and he is far better than his teammate Boozer in value and heart.
Hawks Fan 90
May 14th, 2009
1:12 pm
Mr. Bradley, your silence amidst all the calls for Mike Woodson’s head is conspicuous. You have evaluated every player, but not so much the coach. I think we can read between the lines that you think he’s taken the team as far as he’s going to take it and that the Hawks would best be served letting him go now. I say this because you change the players all you’d like, but Woodson is going to be Woodson and that means he’s not going to do things differently than what has got him this far.Are you holding your tongue on Woodson because of an access thing?
Thanks.
Gilley
May 14th, 2009
4:13 pm
First I will say GREAT ARTICLE and talking points Mark Bradley and I am glad you actually talk with the bloggers and have the discussion. I appreciate that.
Furthermore, I agree Joe Johnson is NOT a superstar. That is obvious. Superstars get double-teamed often and still finish with 20 plus points, because they force their will and are aggressive and find other ways to get their points, i.e. free throws, fast break, etc. Joe Johnson does not have that knack to get any shot he wants and to takeoever a game at will. He showed a small flash of it last year against Boston when he scored 35 points and he also showed a small flash once against the Cavs in Game 3 when he got aggressive and angry and was pushing and shoving LeBron and driving. But he is far too inconsistent to even be considered a Superstar and whoever says otherwise needs to watch some more Hawks game.
Furthermore, I think Marvin is a good player and has a nice stroke and has the talent to be a 20 ppg scorer in this league but he is expendable and has become injury-prone. He can do without him and the problem of too many wing players come to mind when we consider re-signing him. I like Marvin but a trade and sign deal with him is in the horizon and I think we can get good value off of him and I hope to see him flourish on his future team. I like Acie Law and feel Mike Woodson and injuries are the reasons why he has yet to flourish. Lack of minutes and injuries = Lack of confidence. The same thing occured with Salim Stoudamire. Sometimes Mike Woodson can be a player killer and hurts the development of his players. Which brings me to my next point.
Does Mike Woodson deserve to stay or go?
I personally cannot stand him as a coach because he is too stubborn and he hasn’t even accomplished anything. He overplays Joe Johnson and is way too hard on his younger plays and it impedes them from growing. Josh Smith has grown but he still hasn’t reach a level where he should be and I think Mike Woodson has something to do with that. Smith has overcome but other players (Salim, Acie, Solo, etc) have not.
I think the Hawks are headed in the right direction and I think fans should not expect us to defeat the Cavs when we just got our first winning season in years. Not saying have low expectations but be real. We have come a long way and we must make adjustments and changes to make us better each year.
But great dialogue guys and discussions
Mark Bradley
May 14th, 2009
5:00 pm
Thanks, Gilley. Glad to be of service.
As for Woodson: There was a time when I thought he should be fired, but I’ve changed my mind. He did just fine this season.