Welcome to Atlanta, Mr. President. Now about pre-k . . .

President Barack Obama is expected in Atlanta today, to pitch a problem to a solution.

No, I don’t have that backward.

The president’s planned visit today to a Decatur pre-k school comes on the heels of his lauding Georgia’s preschool program during his State of the Union address Tuesday night. He wants to use it as a model for a federal effort “to make high-quality preschool available to every child in America.”

While I join Obama in applauding educational innovation in the states, I can think only of reasons a federal preschool program is a bad idea. Not least is the fact that the existing federal preschool program, Head Start, has been declared a failure by the very agency that administers it.

Head Start, a program for low-income children, has been around since 1965. But three years ago, after four and a half decades and $166 billion spent on the program, the Department of Health and Human Services concluded first-graders who had been in Head Start held virtually no advantage over their peers who hadn’t.

It’s an expensive failure, costing more than $7.5 billion per year to serve fewer than 1 million kids. At $7,838, Head Start’s cost per student in 2011 nearly doubled the $4,302 Georgia spent on each pre-k student that year.

But if Georgia is getting better results at roughly half the price, shouldn’t we want to see its model copied in other states?

Maybe so. Or maybe other states have different needs. Either way, they won’t match our success — and we won’t maintain it — if the feds take over pre-k.

As U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss put it to me last month: “There are too many people in Washington who are entrenched in the idea that if the federal government’s going to be involved in a program, we need to control it. And the way you control it is with money.”

Chambliss was talking about obstacles to devolving federal programs such as k-12 education and Medicaid to the states. But this fact of life in Washington is also a certain preview of how pre-k will turn out if it’s federalized.

There will be money, but also strings: regulations, stipulations, expectations. Even in Georgia the program won’t look like it does now, because the feds will craft policies for Savannah and Seattle, and everywhere in between. Successive agency heads for the program will want to put their stamps on it, if only to justify their jobs and budgets.

And, as clearly as Georgia’s elected leaders should see this coming, they’ll be hard-pressed to avoid it. The money will be too hard to pass up.

Georgia spends about one-third of its lottery proceeds on pre-k, about $312.4 million in next year’s projected revenues. The rest goes to the HOPE scholarship. How tempting will it be for a Georgia governor one day, if the value of HOPE continues to shrink relative to the cost of tuition, to take the federal pre-k dollars and devote all lottery revenues to college students?

But it will be fool’s gold, and not only because there’s no such thing as “free money” from the feds since taxpayers foot the bill sooner or later.

There’s also this: Those folks who rate government programs chiefly by how much money we spend on them will declare this a good deal — at first. Eventually, though, they’ll bemoan the falling quality of pre-k in Georgia and beseech Atlanta or Washington to cough up more money so that it can regain the effectiveness it once had … back when it was a cheaper, state-run program.

Washington this year is projected to borrow $7 billion (almost the annual cost of Head Start) every three days. Yet, Democrats and some Republicans are wringing their hands about the so-called sequester budget cuts that would trim that figure by barely one-tenth. So, you’d think this is exactly the wrong time for the feds to take on yet another role the states have proven themselves capable of handling.

That Obama is holding up Georgia’s pre-k program as a reason for Washington to get more involved in pre-k, rather than as evidence the states can handle more roles the feds can’t afford, shows just how backward he has it.

– By Kyle Wingfield

Find me on Facebook or follow me on Twitter

418 comments Add your comment

Aynie Sue

February 14th, 2013
5:53 am

States are corrupt dysfunctional political institutions that may occasionally stumble upon “pilot programs” that are worthy of extension. But 50 states with 50 bureaucracies and 50 sets of rules is no way to administer anything of value.

Kyle’s mistrust of federal administration is a deeply embedded prejudice, not a well thought out observation. Improving education for America’s children, especially for those in third-world states like Alabama and South Carolina, can only be done by the national government.

blahblahblah

February 14th, 2013
6:08 am

“That Obama is holding up Georgia’s pre-k program as a reason for Washington to get more involved in pre-k, rather than as evidence the states can handle more roles the feds can’t afford, shows just how backward he has it.”

This all day.

Stephenson Billings

February 14th, 2013
6:35 am

Aynie Sue, a glaring example of the increasing inept education system…

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
6:35 am

if only to justify their jobs and budgets.

Sadly true. The last thing on obozo’s mind is the welfare of the children. It’s just another power grab and another way to grow the federal government. How many buildings in DC will have to be built to administer this new bureaucracy? How many mindless, whining pinkos will inhabit these new gigantic buildings? Will each pinko need his own department? What can we have the IRS do to “help?”

What kids?

Cappycat

February 14th, 2013
6:51 am

Aesop, Pinko??? Save us from people who still use these terms.

Cherokee

February 14th, 2013
7:02 am

“Not least is the fact that the existing federal preschool program, Head Start, has been declared a failure by the very agency that administers it.”

Intereesting Kyle that you don’t link to the study itself. Your links are to an article by the very conservative Cato Institute, and Joe Klein? Very convenient that they agree with your innate distrust of the federal government.

An honest commentator would link to the study itself, then ask his readers to make their own decision, instead of just tossing out red meat for those who hate all things Obama – or obozo – as our self appointed “Christian” scold loves to call him.

Cutty

February 14th, 2013
7:22 am

I doubt Kyle will reprimand Stephenson for his personal post at Sue. Kyle is such a snarky lad. Name on federal program that republicans have ended? The control the executive and legislative branches of government during W’s pain, I mean reign. How did they limit the size of government?

Did Saxby introduce one bill to this effect?

Wingfield has nothing left but to complain about anything Obama does, period. Just like his party, no solutions just complain like old, white men do about how their country USED to be.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
7:24 am

The lamestream media doesn’t report that a government program is failing so it must not be failing, there’s some deep logic at work.

Mary Elizabeth

February 14th, 2013
7:30 am

I am glad that President Obama has placed value and focus, nationally, on the importance of pre-k education for all students. That program is a primary way in which to create more educational parity among students.

President Obama complimented Georgia in regard to its pre-k program in national, and perhaps even worldwide, broadcasts of his State of the Union Address. Georgia’s politicians should, as the President rightly stated, place priority upon the national interests more than upon partisan interests. It would be helpful to students, and to Georgia’s citizens as a whole, if Georgia’s Republican politicians would stop resisting almost every program which the President initiates. To obstruct his intiatives, in behalf of all Americans, for partisan reasons appears to be petty, and even destructive, in the eyes of many.

Welcome to Georgia, Mr. President. Thank you for highlighting the need for pre-k programs in Georgia and throughout our nation.

gm

February 14th, 2013
7:37 am

Thank you Mr. President for even having a planned visit to kyle and confederate country, no matter what you do to in trying to improve these gomers in Georgia it is always something negative. These gomers dont care about education they only care about blacks playing football at UGA.

I bet if the President was comming to honor UGA football team Kyle and the right nut jobs would be lining up to praise that, never mind some of those black kids at UGA football program cant read and Pre K builds a foundation.

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
7:42 am

Intereesting Kyle that you don’t link to the study itself. Your links are to an article by the very conservative Cato Institute, and Joe Klein?

You expected an actual link to the study? BWAH! Kyle doesn’t want melted brains all over his blog.

Numbers-R-US

February 14th, 2013
7:46 am

Since 2000, federal funding for No Child Left Behind has increased 73 percent, but student achievement has remained flat. We’re just not getting enough bang for our buck: American high school students, who spend approximately 1,000 hours in school each year, are being outperformed in math and science by Polish high school students, who spend just 595 hours in high school per year.

The bottom line–if it doesn’t work, get rid of it. NCLB doesn’t work. That said, the failure of one program is hardly justification for not striving for a better life for our offspring. Oh no! The lure of a tax cut is needed to accomplish that goal.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
7:52 am

I guess these libs don’t know how to open Kyle’s link, so I help them -

Even the best-intentioned programs are allowed to languish in waste and incompetence. Take, for example, the famed early-education program called Head Start.

It is now 45 years later. We spend more than $7 billion providing Head Start to nearly 1 million children each year. And finally there is in-di-spu-ta-ble evidence about the program’s effectiveness, provided by the Department of Health and Human Services: Head Start simply does not work.

These results were so shocking that the HHS team sat on them for several years, according to Russ Whitehurst of the Brookings Institution, who said, “I guess they were trying to rerun the data to see if they could come up with anything positive. They couldn’t.” – Time Magazine

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 14th, 2013
7:54 am

Hey, what was that silver thing Boehner had in front of him during the speech? Looked like a set of salt and pepper shakers.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 14th, 2013
7:58 am

take the federal pre-k dollars and devote all lottery revenues to college students?

BINGO! We have a winner. Speaking as someone with a 14 year old.

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
7:59 am

Aesop, you may need “lamestream media” to grind up science and put it on a wittle-bitty spoon so the choo-choo train can go whoot! whoot! and feed your little brain all up!

The rest of us don’t.

Maybe pre-K would have helped you but it’s too late now. Maybe you should be included in the President’s visit schedule as a comparison case.

Del

February 14th, 2013
8:00 am

Just another example of Obama’s big government mentality. This is the most radical minded president since FDR.

midtowwn

February 14th, 2013
8:02 am

Straw men, straw men everywhere.

sailfish

February 14th, 2013
8:04 am

kyle

How can pre-k be turned sour by any type of funding? I mean really, talk about an argument that has clay feet. A young mind of only 48 months or so being exposed to reading, writing, alphabet how is money going to corrupt that? Ridiculous.

bookman parrot

February 14th, 2013
8:04 am

gov’t … please do everything for me … wipe my nose, kiss my backside, … give me money …

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
8:12 am

I can think only of reasons a federal preschool program is a bad idea.
————————-

A blasphemy against Dear Leader and liberal fascism!

rwcole

February 14th, 2013
8:12 am

Once again, Kyle, if you read the comments posted here, how can you not feel like you are on the team of stupid, not to mention mean and unchristianlike? Still waiting for a response.

stands for decibels

February 14th, 2013
8:15 am

there’s no such thing as “free money” from the feds

Well, not if you’re a prole. If you’re a bankster, there is plenty of it.

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
8:17 am

put it on a wittle-bitty spoon so the choo-choo train can go whoot! whoot! and feed your little brain all up…Maybe pre-K would have helped you but it’s too late now.

—-

rwcole: Kyle, if you read the comments posted here, how can you not feel like you are on the team of stupid, not to mention mean and unchristianlike?

—————————————-

You were saying?

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
8:19 am

If you’re a bankster, there is plenty of it.
—————-

One difference: the banksters (well, except GM’s financial arm) paid theirs back. The Obozo receptacle “takers” never do.

stands for decibels

February 14th, 2013
8:19 am

I ctrl-F’d this piece, and did not see the words “civilized nations.”

as in, “when do civilized nations begin to publicly fund their children’s educations”?

Shouldn’t that be a question we should be asking?

stands for decibels

February 14th, 2013
8:20 am

The Obozo receptacle “takers”

Please ride that fabulous talking point to victory in 2014 and 2016, GOP. It is a winner.

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
8:20 am

Still waiting for a response.

Don’t hold your breath, his general response to his slympitters is “not my problem, and besides, my comment section would be empty.”

http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2013/02/11/debate-about-gay-members-unlikely-to-end-well-for-scouts/?cp=2#comment-183784

stands for decibels

February 14th, 2013
8:22 am

By the way, phone guy, those “takers” do this thing called “working,” or “labor,” if you like–generally for lousy, artificially depressed wages. I don’t expect you to be able to do the kind of math required to understand that the banksters benefit from that, along with all their lovely fluffy free money.

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
8:23 am

stands for decibels: “when do civilized nations begin to publicly fund their children’s educations”? Shouldn’t that be a question we should be asking?
——————

Go ahead and ask. Georgia is already doing it, and without federal taxpayer money.

Obozo: Traveling to a state that’s already fixed the “problem” he’s pretending to solve, and without his help. Moron.

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
8:25 am

the banksters benefit from that
———————–

The banksters also PAY for the resources they use. The Obozo receptacle takers do not.

Whatever

February 14th, 2013
8:26 am

Aynie,

What is the federal government doing so well and under budget that we’d want them to expand?

Once they have their budget under control I’d love to listen to what they have to say. Until then it’s a joke. There is not money to fund anything.

BW

February 14th, 2013
8:27 am

Kyle

While I can see your point about the President being pro-government, we know that already. The Republican party is as well. There is no real dichotomy between the two parties when it comes to big government solutions.

BoneHead

February 14th, 2013
8:27 am

Aynie Sue;

Are you on drugs? The federal government can’t balance a checkbook, make a budget, and spends twice as much as it takes in, do you see a problem there?

stands for decibels

February 14th, 2013
8:30 am

Washington this year is projected to borrow $7 billion (almost the annual cost of Head Start) every three days. Yet, Democrats and some Republicans are wringing their hands about the so-called sequester budget cuts that would trim that figure by barely one-tenth. So, you’d think this is exactly the wrong time for the feds to take on yet another role the states have proven themselves capable of handling.

Well you would, if you believed the Beltway nonsense that there is some kind of “deficit crisis” — that, blessedly, the rest of the country appears to be rejecting.

I think you guys who continue to do this hand-wringing (and I include Dems here, including the skinny black guy in the White House, don’t get me wrong) have worked that long con long enough. We are not going broke. Pay for stuff we need and get people working again, and educated properly, for crying out loud.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 14th, 2013
8:33 am

the banksters (well, except GM’s financial arm) paid theirs back

LOL, riiight. We still don’t even know where a big chunk of the money went.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 14th, 2013
8:34 am

The federal government can’t balance a checkbook, make a budget, and spends twice as much as it takes in, do you see a problem there?

In what world do you live? We appear to still be the top dog on the world stage. I don’t see a problem.

BoneHead

February 14th, 2013
8:36 am

Aynie Sue;

Ok, one more look, Obozo and his cronies gave almost 900 million to friends in companies that went bankrupt in less than a year, but ever executive got millions in bonuses…Then the banks that caused a housing meltdown are bailed out with taxpayer monies, and all got bonuses for all their “good” work. Even better the unions, who are only less than 8% of the population, get taxpayer bailouts so they can keep their pension plan and benefits paid for by the other 92% of the population….Oh wait then there is the social security funds that somehow made it into the general funds, exactly where it was NOT supposed to be, now it is running out of funds…. So tell me again why we should trust the federal government?

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 14th, 2013
8:36 am

By the way, phone guy, those “takers” do this thing called “working,” or “labor,” if you like

Phone guy just has no respect for our military personnel, the elderly, the young, the mentally retarded, etc.

Just me me me me me me me me me me me…..

stands for decibels

February 14th, 2013
8:37 am

Georgia is already doing it, and without federal taxpayer money.

Is that supposed to be worn like a badge of honor?

Why should anyone care if a program is funded locally or from the Feds?

Weird, weird obsessions some have. I guess I could try to figure it out, but I gave up trying long ago.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 14th, 2013
8:38 am

So tell me again why we should trust the federal government?

If you can’t trust or respect your own government, why do you continue to live here? Surely there is another country more to your liking?

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 14th, 2013
8:40 am

Why should anyone care if a program is funded locally or from the Feds?

Its the control thing. Once the Feds start throwing money around they want to control the program so they set up a program that is supposed to work exactly the same in all 50 states but we know only a few of the 50 states are anything like another state. I can see the argument here.

bu2

February 14th, 2013
8:41 am

Based on how Georgia keeps sinking in the educational rankings, has the pre-K program been a success? Have there been any studies that show it has done any better than Head Start? I knew idealistic people who worked in Head Start in the 70s who thought it was a collosal failure. It just takes the government a long time to figure things out.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
8:41 am

Kyle – Why do you associate your self with government workers who use your blog to promote their cronyism and corruption? Are you a crony too? You should immediately ban any of these people, there are easy to spot, and open this blog up to discussions that aren’t weighted down with whiny little anti American diaper fillings. When will I get an answer?

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
8:42 am

There is no real dichotomy between the two parties when it comes to big government solutions.
——————-

Which part of the federal government are Republicans currently working to expand?

stands for decibels

February 14th, 2013
8:42 am

Even better the unions

Oh FFS.

If anyone knows about how civilized countries handle early education and wants to share I’ll be back to have a look. Otherwise, pleasant day to all.

rwcole

February 14th, 2013
8:45 am

I think the questions we should all be asking is, ” Does Lil Barry have a job? Or a life? Or is Kyle really Lil Barry?” I’ve never seen the two of them together. Kyle obviously agrees with the hate Barry spews here every day and Barry obviously thinks trolling the AJC blog is his job so….. This inquiring mind would like to know.

stands for decibels

February 14th, 2013
8:47 am

Which part of the federal government are Republicans currently working to expand?

Why, the all important monitoring of lady parts.

/drive-by

indigo

February 14th, 2013
8:52 am

A country’s leadership that truly cared for the future would spare no expense in caring for its most precious asset, children.

As much as is possible, every child would get good parenting, schools, healthcare and safety.

College and trade schools would be avaliable, at no cost, to every high school graduate.

This would, as much as possible, insure that every child could grow up to be all they can be.

Because selfishness and greed rule in America’s ruling circles, you may be sure the above will never happen.

MarkV

February 14th, 2013
8:53 am

Happy Valentine’s Day, Dusty!

May you feel today as happy as if the national debt had been paid off.

Thomas Heyward Jr

February 14th, 2013
8:55 am

Actually, federal involvement in our education system has been WILDLY successful…………for Washington.
Hence the election of Obama-types.
.
Don’t be fooled by Obama’s “official” reason for visiting Georgia.
.
Georgia is one of the top Libertarian voting states in the union. That frightens TPTB.
He’s only doing damage control.Must………get………….to…….even…….YOUNGER…..livestock…..children.
The younger the mind ………..the easier to mold into little democrats or controlled opposition republicans.
.
lol

gm

February 14th, 2013
8:58 am

Kyle and the right wing idiots prove why Georgia is the bottom of jokes around the world, and why gomers of Georgia voters are never taken serious during election time. No one around the country care about the idiots of the conservatives confederates, just look at the last election.

Bush never came to confederate land in Georgia to praise these gomers for anything, once again President Obama shows class and grace something these bubbas, and still fighting the civil war idiots will never have.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 14th, 2013
9:00 am

The seminal study of the minimum wage, done by economists David Card and Alan Krueger, found that job creation was actually strengthened by an increase in the minimum wage. This result has been found time and time again. So Rubio and Ryan have the history exactly backwards: raising the minimum wage results in higher wages and more purchasing power for workers, not job losses.

http://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/njmin-aer.pdf

Ignorant Georgians

February 14th, 2013
9:01 am

We don’t need no edjumication! That thar’s socialism.
I dont know what socialism means, but thats what they tell me on Redneck radio.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 14th, 2013
9:02 am

You should immediately ban any of these people

Not hard to show the Cons don’t really care about anyone’s FREEDOM but their own.

Road Scholar

February 14th, 2013
9:04 am

When first conceived , didn’t this preschool idea work? The latest study I am aware of said that the gains originally made have been reduced and now only last to the 3rd grade. Why?

Instead of the snarky responses, mostly from the right, why not be constructive and make suggestions on how this program can be improved? Take Fed dollars and let the states administer it? No fed involvement besides funding and creating the programs purpose.

It’s so easy to throw rocks at any program, but how about finding ways to improve this and other programs? Or, Kyle, are the cons unable to grasp and comment on positive change, esp on education?

Waiting until high school/college is too late as evidenced by our states’ stellar school rankings! Something has to be done now. Dumbing down the grade point for technical schools ain’t it. Hell, most of the kids coming out of high school in this state couldn’t graduate from schools in other states!!! Think about it! My wife is a professor and each year the majority of her students are not prepared for college!!!

U-asked

February 14th, 2013
9:06 am

Third Grade Follow-up to the Head Start Impact Study

Key Findings

Looking across the full study period, from the beginning of Head Start through 3rd grade, the evidence is clear that access to Head Start improved children’s preschool outcomes across developmental domains, but <b<had few impacts on children in kindergarten through 3rd grade. Providing access to Head Start was found to have a positive impact on the types and quality of preschool programs that children attended, with the study finding statistically significant differences between the Head Start group and the control group on every measure of children’s preschool experiences in the first year of the study. In contrast, there was little evidence of systematic differences in children’s elementary school experiences through 3rd grade, between children provided access to Head Start and their counterparts in the control group.
In terms of children’s well-being, there is also clear evidence that access to Head Start had an impact on children’s language and literacy development while children were in Head Start. These effects, albeit modest in magnitude, were found for both age cohorts during their first year of admission to the Head Start program. However, these early effects rapidly dissipated in elementary school, with only a single impact remaining at the end of 3rd grade for children in each age cohort.
With regard to children’s social-emotional development, the results differed by age cohort and by the person describing the child’s behavior. For children in the 4-year-old cohort, there were no observed impacts through the end of kindergarten but favorable impacts reported by parents and unfavorable impacts reported by teachers emerged at the end of 1st and 3rd grades. One unfavorable impact on the children’s self-report emerged at the end of 3rd grade. In contrast to the 4-year-old cohort, for the 3-year-old cohort there were favorable impacts on parent-reported social emotional outcomes in the early years of the study that continued into early elementary school. However, there were no impacts on teacher-reported measures of social-emotional development for the 3-year-old cohort at any data collection point or on the children’s self-reports in 3rd grade.

Parents like the free babysitting.

MarkV

February 14th, 2013
9:07 am

It is quite amazing how many things the United States, the richest country in the world, cannot afford, that most other developed countries in the world can. It is equally amazing that the same people who believe the US to be best in everything also believe that the US is incapable to administer a universal pre-school program.

Jefferson

February 14th, 2013
9:15 am

Are you half empty folks always grumpy ?

gm

February 14th, 2013
9:17 am

Anytime you can reward Mark Richt for subpar standards but can not put money in our Pre K shows how backwards and what prioties these conservative idiots and clowns of Georgia leader ship.

MANGLER

February 14th, 2013
9:20 am

Maybe the Federal Govt should just allow parents, neighbors, friends, and anyone who wishes to divert their income tax dollars directly into “scholarships” paid to new privately run for profit out of State commercially backed Pre-K charter schools. GOP would go for that one, right? After all, it’s for the underprivileged minority kids, just like the high school scam, er, scholarship program.

MarkV

February 14th, 2013
9:21 am

Kyle’s (and others’) thinking is quite straightforward: If one federal program in a certain area is not successful, no other program in that area can be successful. What else to call it other than straightforward? Simplistic? Defeatist? Simple-minded?

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
9:22 am

Wow. Have the bars opened early today in honor of President Incompetent’s visit?

‘Cause the left is unusually vicious in the responses today.

Ivan

February 14th, 2013
9:27 am

“That Obama is holding up Georgia’s pre-k program as a reason for Washington to get more involved in pre-k, rather than as evidence the states can handle more roles the feds can’t afford, shows just how backward he has it.”

/standing applause

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
9:29 am

The latest study I am aware of said that the gains originally made have been reduced and now only last to the 3rd grade. Why?

The actual report HHS did on Head Start is strange, many of the cognitive assessments done in the pre-K years were marked “NA” at the third grade level because they weren’t collected. It appears they only used a couple of measurements in 3rd grade. The types of tests varied by age, which makes some sense but for a comparative assessment of the same kid it seems problematic.

The HHS study has another issue in my book–it was a comparison of Head Start vs. other kinds of programs, not Head Start vs. nothing.

Some of the education-soaked people over in Maureen’s blog might understand the study but I’m not gung-ho enough for a dip in that alphabet soup.

A long-range study done on a group of pre-K’ers (man that’s an awkward handle) in the 1960’s followed them to adulthood. The pre-K group had a lower arrest rate and more HS diplomas and jobs. I personally like those metrics better than some BBQEXS score on the IOKIYAR Comprehensive Assessment of FUBAR.

EMMA

February 14th, 2013
9:32 am

To my Educators: If headstart is such a failure…why don’t we do away with the program instead of spending millions????

Ivan

February 14th, 2013
9:39 am

OBAMA: “I urge this Congress to pursue a bipartisan, market-based solution to climate change, like the one John McCain and Joe Lieberman worked on together a few years ago. But if Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will. I will direct my Cabinet to come up with executive actions we can take, to reduce pollution, prepare our communities for the consequences of climate change and speed the transition to more sustainable sources of energy.”

Translation: You need to work with us. If you don’t, I’ll do it my way. How’s that for compromise the left is always whining about?

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
9:40 am

Not hard to show the Cons don’t really care about anyone’s FREEDOM but their own.

No kidding, the lib passes by fifteen calls for censorship without a peep and seizes on the one written in total sarcasm of the others, so which is it, are they ignorant or just ate up?

sailfish

February 14th, 2013
9:41 am

“Have the bars opened early today in honor of President Incompetent’s visit?”

As if your own arrogance equals competency, keep trying.

Mary Elizabeth

February 14th, 2013
9:41 am

Road Scholar, 9:04 am

“The latest study I am aware of said that the gains originally made have been reduced and now only last to the 3rd grade. Why?”
===========================================================

I attempted to answer your question, above, recently on another thread on this blog. I’ll repeat my response, here, for any readers who did not read that post, and I’ll add a few additional thoughts at the end of this post, to further answer your question.

“. . .students should be taught on their precise, individual instructional levels – regardless of their grade levels – as they continue to advance through the curriculi of a 12 grade-level, lock-step, educational design. In other words, we must become more sophisticated in educational delivery for all students, according to students’ individual needs, regardless of their grade levels, in the grades post pre-k. However, we should not fail to fund pre-k programs because we are not, now, fully successful in addressing targeted instruction for all students in the later grades. The answer is to address instruction in the later grades more effectively on a continuous progress, mastery learning format, rather than holding to a rigid grade level curriculum criteria for all students, as well as to continue building the pre-k programs for all students.

For more of my thoughts on how to accomplish this, please read the link below from my personal blog:”

http://maryelizabethsings.wordpress.com/2013/01/19/educational-essay-9-my-thoughts-for-improving-public-education/

In addition, poverty needs a more focused targeting for impoverished families within our nation, as assertedly as it had been targeted during the 1960s. I have not seen that kind of focus on poverty since the 1960s. These two approaches (targeted instruction to individual functioning and targeting poverty) will help to improve the academic standing of significantly more students post pre-k programs. Moreover, offering technical education earlier in high school, and coordinating these technical courses to colleges for technical degrees earned earlier than occurs presently, will help decrease the high school drop-out rate.

the red herring

February 14th, 2013
9:46 am

The federal government the last time i looked was 16.5 trillion in debt and climbing. Georgia has a Pre-K program already that is functioning and funded. We do not need more Federal Govt. control over our state. The Federal Govt. should first fix those programs which are going broke—medicare and social security. Let’s see the Federal Govt. learn to run programs such as those in a financially responsible manner before we give them anymore tax dollars and before we let them take over anymore government programs. Rest assured there is Union money behind Obama’s push for more and more control.

resno2

February 14th, 2013
9:52 am

Welcome to Georgia Mr. President. Now please get your pictures taken and leave.

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
9:52 am

Typical liberals. Clearly the Head start program DOES NOT WORK. And yet the libs still want to keep wasting money on something that DOES NOT WORK. And they try to justify continuing to waste money on a program that DOES NOT WORK with emotional appeals and comments about a civilized nation educating its children and other rhetoric. And therein lies the problem. We will continue to fund a program that DOES NOT WORK because if you try to end this boondoggle that DOES NOT WORK then the libs will scream that the Rs are anti-child and that the meanie ole Rs hate children and all that nonsense. And so hence we will continue to waste money on a program that DOES NOT WORK- all because libs think with their emotions as opposed to rational, logical thinking.

curious

February 14th, 2013
10:01 am

The reason most other industrialized countries can afford the social programs we say are too expensive is they don’t spend as much on defense as we do.

Maybe our priorities needs to be reexamined.

Thomas Heyward Jr

February 14th, 2013
10:05 am

In this ObamaNation………..Education is overrated anyhoo.
.
If you get free cheese and money from the government, then all you need to know is the letter D.
Vote accordingly.
.
Likewise, if you’re still crazy enough to work for a living and then to have the government seize 70% of your paycheck through taxes and inflation…….to pay for above AND to kill brown people 10 thousand miles away, then all you need to know is the letter R.
Vote accordingly.
.
KISS.
Keep it Simple Sheeple.

ex-teacher

February 14th, 2013
10:09 am

“first-graders who had been in Head Start held virtually no advantage over their peers who hadn’t.”

you take a bunch of “poor dumb kids” and 2 years later they are equal to the middle class kids.
seems like a success.

Mary Elizabeth

February 14th, 2013
10:12 am

Yesterday, I read an article in “Time” magazine, December 17th (or 12th), 2012, page 27, by Joe Klein entitled, “Obamacare vs. Medicare” (actually the content described the benefits of combining the two medical programs, making both Democrats and Republicans happy). I copied the following words from Klein’s article because I would like to see educational practices model medical practices in the need for a similar record keeping, diagnostic approach to solving medical or educational problems. Having each student’s precise instructional functioning level, especially in reading and math, placed within computer programs – via standardized test scores – will allow teachers to “pull up” individual score variances among their students, in seconds, and, thereafter, instructionally address effectively the wide range of these instructional variances that will invariably occur within each grade level. This state-of-the-art record keeping will lead to more successful instruction and more successful students. From the “Time” article:

“The nation’s hospitals are discovering that the information culled from electronic record keeping can lead to best practice procedures that save money and provide more effective care.”

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
10:13 am

“I have not seen that kind of focus on poverty since the 1960s. These two approaches (targeted instruction to individual functioning and targeting poverty)”

Mary Elizabeth,

Specifically what do you mean by “targeting instruction to individual functioning)? No offense but that just sounds like some lofty, vague notion. If you’re talking about lower class sizes which offer more individual instruction we already have that.

My sister teaches 5th graders in Alabama and her max class size is 17 because the law states that in a majority minority class that the teacher to pupil ratio cannot exceed 17 to 1. When I went to the same elementary school 30 years earlier our class size was 30. Yet we still all learned.

These kids my sister teaches are disadavanted not by poverty, not by lack of individual instruction, but by a subculture where education is a low priority, where most come from a single parent household, there is no discipline in the family, no reading materials, the parent doesn’t give a crap about helping the child with his homework, and on and on.

The uncomfortable truth is that the biggest obstacle to learning in many cases is the culture and values of the family and community the child comes from. And the sad truth is that there is not a whole lot we can do about it.

As for your comments about poverty it seems that you erroneously automatically equate poverty to failed academic performance. If that were true then Ben Carson would never have achieved his status as one of the world’s foremost surgeons since he came from a poor background with an illiterate mother. The difference between he and other kids was that his mother cared deeply about his education though she herself could not read.

And in addition to Carson history is replete with examples of poverty stricken peoples who rose through society and through education and the right set of cultural values and became quite prosperous. Look at the Jews in this country who started out in the Jewish ghettos. Look at the Asian kids today filling up California colleges. Many of them went to the same tough inncer city high schools that blacks and Hispanics attend. Where they separate is in their cultural values and their high emphasis on education not to mention family.

You seem to have the idea that there is a cause and effect relationship between poverty and poor academic achievement. The evidence doesn’t agree with you.

Dusty

February 14th, 2013
10:22 am

Dear MarkV

Happy Valentine’s day to you,too, my friend. That’s a nice start to a fine day.( I have to leave in a few minutes.)

IN the meantime, Kyle has given us some very straight forward facts. Please consider the fact that Headstart has been pronounced a failure by the agency itself. Three year olds need babysitters if they don’t have parents to raise them. I don’t think the government is constructed or designed to be babysitters. There are bigger things to be managed than teaching little ones how to tie their shoes, etc.

Maybe we should teach kiddies how to “budget” since they aren’t going to have much money on which to live when they are adults and the government is still deep in debt. (You thought I wouldn’t mention THAT. Fooled ya!)

Bye…

sailfish

February 14th, 2013
10:28 am

Tiberius

Sorry for that snarky comment, not necessary. Besides, you know how much I hate sharks anyways.

doom

What on earth has happened to you? Libs this, libs that, really? Like some of the goobers on your side of the aisle don’t wear depends? Where’s that sense of humor? Wheres’s that clever intellect that deals with the facts mam, just the facts? No, you’ve gone done ideology avenue getting lost. Look up please it’s really a dead end!

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
10:31 am

And in addition to Carson history is replete with examples of poverty stricken peoples who rose through society and through education

If you were educated in one of the 20+ nations ahead of us in math and science I probably wouldn’t have to point out the obvious: the plural of anecdotes is not data.

wallbanger

February 14th, 2013
10:32 am

This guy loves to come and talk to his welfare recipient and liberal crowd about how he can spend more taxpayer money. It is only this generation who has had pre-K and frankly, they haven’t turned out so well. All this program is is a baby sitting program for families that don’t want to be bothered to raise their own children in their infancy and toddler-hood. It seems rather sick to me and as a taxpayer I hate having to fund yet another bought and paid for Democrat vote.

Road Scholar

February 14th, 2013
10:33 am

Thank you Mary Elizabeth! I agree with both your posts. Schools aren’t diploma mills.

yuzeyurbrane

February 14th, 2013
10:38 am

Kyle, I am sure you cherry picked your Head Start opinion. I have read of many evaluations which rate it is an overwhelming success and have known a number of teachers in the program who likewise gave it high marks.

sailfish

February 14th, 2013
10:46 am

“You seem to have the idea that there is a cause and effect relationship between poverty and poor academic achievement. The evidence doesn’t agree with you.”

Absolutely, positively incorrect!! The evidence sir most certainly does not agree with you and I’m talking empirical evidence not to mention good old common sense!

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 14th, 2013
10:47 am

What the federal program lovers like Aynie Sue, Cherokee, and Mary Elizabeth always forget is that it is the United “STATES” of America, not as they wish, the United People of America. This lunacy of only the feds can educate, feed, house, train, support, and brain wash our children effectively is the biggest problem, outside the debt, facing America. Government efforts work best when controlled at the local and state level.

We desperately need a Constitutional convention to restore the rights of the states, as was intended by the framers. The courts have so eroded the 10th amendment, it is as if, it is no longer contained in the Constitution. We need to repeal the 17th Amendment, and allow the State Government to appoint Senators. This amendment did more to disenfranchise states than any other thing we have ever done. Now, the state governments have no representation in the US Govt and the Feds have taken over most everything, to America’s detriment.

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
10:48 am

“If you were educated in one of the 20+ nations ahead of us in math and science I probably wouldn’t have to point out the obvious: the plural of anecdotes is not data”

Aquagirl,

And if you broke down our educational data by groups you would see that some groups such as Asians, are probably right near the top when compared to those 20 other nations who score higher. In my view it comes down to cultural and values more so than anything else and I think that data would pretty much support my view.

Also if we are spending more on education per person that practically anyone on Earth then why are you folks in favor of just throwing more money at a system that clearly is not working according to the international testing scores that you just presented? Seems that’s the knee jerk liberal solution to everything- more programs and more wasted money. And at a time when we are broke and spending more than ever on education with lesser results.

Steve

February 14th, 2013
10:53 am

I also agree and am wondering why Kyle tolerates the childishness, the insults, the racism etc that fills up this blog? Certainly paints a poor picture of the Confederates that frequent here. It’s truly embarrassing.

And I agree, why doesn’t Kyle point directly to the study instead of worn out extremist anti government ideology?

Georgia

February 14th, 2013
10:55 am

The GOP would have children not in pre-k, but in pre-kkk. or pre-k rations, that is, learning how to invade other countries and kill the pre-k’s of any country not involved in 911, as long as they look like they coulda, woulda or shoulda been involved. The GOP is very special-k. Notice all the fruit loops?

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
10:55 am

“Absolutely, positively incorrect!! The evidence sir most certainly does not agree with you and I’m talking empirical evidence not to mention good old common sense!”

Nope. If that were true then how do you explain the fact that many Asians in California colleges in the past and present came from lower income households and went to tough inner city schools? And as I explained earlier how do you explain the successes of minority groups such as the Jews who were dirt poor when they came into this country and lived in the Jewish ghettos. There is no direct cause and effect link between poverty and education.

Do some historical reading on cultures and migrations and you will see that the world has numerous examples of poor peoples who started out with little to nothing and became very prosperous and highly educated in their adopted nations.

Steve

February 14th, 2013
10:55 am

So, where DOES Georgia stand compared to other states when it comes to education? Pretty low, right? So why does this Federal plan to educate our very young stir up so much opposition? Ignorance? An I hate anything Obama proposes mentality? Stupidity? Stubborness?

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
10:58 am

“No, you’ve gone done ideology avenue getting lost.”- Sailfish

Irony…

Steve

February 14th, 2013
11:00 am

Georgia’s Pre kindergarten program: (from the AJC)

NIEER’s report also predicts Georgia’s quality rating will fall next year because of decisions by the governor and Legislature to cut 20 days from the pre-k school year and to increase class sizes by two students for the current school year.

Teachers, who were facing the prospect of 10 percent pay cuts, quit the program in record numbers between the legislative session’s end in spring 2011 and the start of this school year. Gov. Nathan Deal pushed through a proposal in the recent General Assembly session to restore 10 of the 20 days for the next school year.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
11:02 am

“So why does this Federal plan to educate our very young stir up so much opposition?”

1. An acknowledgement that the program currently in place is a failure according to the agency who runs it.

2. States have proven they can run programs better than the Feds and actually pay for them.

3. The Federal government is awash in debt and can’t pay it’s bills today.

4. The promises of Obamacare are, each and every one of them, being proven to be errors or lies. Why should an education initiative be any different?

5. The failure that is President Incompetent.

Need any more valid reasons, Steve?

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
11:07 am

sailfish,

Also as for the lack of humor this is the adult table so we do have to behave ourselves. I can’t call Fred a peanut headed ensemble of nature’s carelessness over here and get away with it like I did next door.

Mary Elizabeth

February 14th, 2013
11:08 am

Thulsa, 10:13 am

“Mary Elizabeth,
Specifically what do you mean by “targeting instruction to individual functioning)? No offense but that just sounds like some lofty, vague notion. . .”
========================================================

“Targeting instruction to individual functioning” is not “some lofty, vague notion.” In fact, that educational design is the opposite of a lofty, vague notion.” Its successful implementation requires great cohesion and mastery of detail. I practiced that instructional principle, firsthand, for almost a decade when I was an Instructional Lead Teacher, leading directly under the principal’s guidance, an ongoing instructional program of that design, in a model school of grades 1 – 7. Later in my career, I used what I had learned in that model school to help teachers in a high school of 1,800 students to more closely target their instruction for the wide range of functioning levels of students in their English, mathematics, social studies, and science classes. I served as a schoolwide Reading Department Chair for that school.

I cannot possibly answer your question of me on this blog, with all of the knowledge and implemented details that I learned and practiced both in graduate school and in my educational career, which spanned 35 years.

I will, however, urge you and others, who may be interested in learning more about instruction in greater depth and detail, to read the nine educational essays that I have written on my personal blog. I will link you to the first essay, below. My ninth educational essay was linked in my 9:41 post, above.

http://maryelizabethsings.wordpress.com/2012/01/15/about-education-essay-1-mastery-learning/

———————————————————————————

You write: “You seem to have the idea that there is a cause and effect relationship between poverty and poor academic achievement. The evidence doesn’t agree with you.”

I cannot agree with you on that. Practically every educational article that I have read has confirmed a strong causal relationship between poverty and the lack of academic success.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
11:09 am

Thulsa, please don;t remind us about Fred. Anything he does is best left unsaid.

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
11:09 am

In my view it comes down to cultural and values more so than anything else and I think that data would pretty much support my view.

Good, then I don’t have to convince you that exposing young children to a different culture where learning is emphasized is an awesome idea. And here I was thinking we disagreed. Sorry, my mistake.

Sailfish is right, what’s happened to you? The old Doom would have never stuck his head in a verbal noose like that.

sailfish

February 14th, 2013
11:13 am

doom

Do you actually read what you say? Asian families? Yes, they have a family and that is the point. Ever visit a place where a child comes home to where the mother is cracked out or they live with an elderly sibling or an old tired out grandmother???
If you really think that a program like head start doesn’t positively help that child, then nothing will break through your concrete ideology.
So you think I represent irony? Maybe thats partially true but I am not monolithic and independent enough to swim against the current.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 14th, 2013
11:13 am

Steve
Certainly paints a poor picture of the Confederates that frequent here.

As Dr Carson pointed out the other day, the efforts to stifle free speech, with political correctness is killing the country. We need to openly discuss problems without you branding everything you don’t agree with as hate speech, racism, and bigotry. Most of the accusations and insults come from the left on this blog, other than a few parasite, takers, and leeches comments, which you may take as racial, but those targeted people make up all the races. So, you just go on with your insults, kkk and confederate talk, and call for civility all you want, but coming from you it is just more blather.

Jefferson

February 14th, 2013
11:18 am

Simply fix the fed program.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
11:18 am

Liberals don’t want debate, Rafe. They just want control.

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
11:21 am

Mary Elizabeth,

I took the time to read your essay. Sounds to me like what my sister already does. She breaks her class into several groups and works with the different groups at their particular instructional levels.

“Practically every educational article that I have read has confirmed a strong causal relationship between poverty and the lack of academic success.”

Then you need to broaden your horizons and read articles other than from a left leaning educational perspective. Read some basic history or perhaps some studies of different cultures. History disagrees with you on this subject and the everyday evidence right before our very eyes also disagrees with you.

beanster

February 14th, 2013
11:22 am

10:13 a.m. is spot on. In addition to Ben Carson, I’d offer Thomas Sowell as an example of one who defied the argument that poverty equals poor academic achievement.

Trillion dollar deficits and some believe there’s no problem spending more money that we don’t have on pre-k nonetheless? Are there not more important issues we face today other than “investment” that is at least a 20 year payback, assuming it works, which is highly questionable at the very least? At what percent of our GDP do we begin to become concerned about our debt? When does the rest of the world begin to lose confidence in the good ol USA? If we’re so sure of Keynesian theory, why tax anyone at all? Why not print millions for every household? Problem solved?

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
11:31 am

“Ever visit a place where a child comes home to where the mother is cracked out or they live with an elderly sibling or an old tired out grandmother???”

Sailfish,

Thank you for making my point. Because your comment there ties right back in with what I was saying about culture.

“If you really think that a program like head start doesn’t positively help that child, then nothing will break through your concrete ideology.”

Speaking of concrete ideology it appears you’re the one who simply dismisses the evidence if it doesn’t fit your pre-conceived narrative. As it plainly states in the article the Health and Human services report itself states very clearly that whatever gains may be made by Head start are wiped out by the 1st grade I think it was. Either you simply chose to ignore that part of the report or you cannot understand a fact when it is presented to you. Fact immunity disorder is what I call it. Its a psychological disorder that liberals have where facts just don’t matter.

If there is no concrete advancement that sticks with the kids through grade school then the reality is what it is. And that reality is that Head start is possibly nothing more than a baby sitting program for parents to lazy to watch after their own kids.

Mary Elizabeth

February 14th, 2013
11:32 am

For readers, below is an assessment, done in 2006, which demonstrates that poverty is causally related to lack of academic success.
—————————————————————————————–

Two of the three major international tests—the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study and the Trends in International Math and Science Study—break down student scores according to the poverty rate in each school. The tests are given every five years.

The most recent results (2006) showed the following: students in U.S. schools where the poverty rate was less than 10 percent ranked first in reading, first in science, and third in math. When the poverty rate was 10 percent to 25 percent, U.S. students still ranked first in reading and science.

But as the poverty rate rose still higher, students ranked lower and lower. Twenty percent of all U.S. schools have poverty rates over 75 percent. The average ranking of American students reflects this. .
————————————————————————

Those Americans in poverty increased from 31 million to 46 million within the decade from 2000 to 2010

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
11:36 am

other than a few parasite, takers, and leeches comments, which you may take as racial,

Well golly, I don’t know why we’d take comments like this as racial:

“it would be nice to see more minorities support the Republican Party. But if the freebies aren’t forthcoming from the R’s (FREE healthcare, FREE smartphones, FREE ID cards, FREE EBT cards) forget it.”

Or would you prefer zeke’s “Blacks and other minorities, IF THEY WOULD ONLY LOOK WITH A LITTLE INTELLIGENCE AT THE DIFFERENCES”

And then there’s the classic “All these so-called minority groups band together to vote Democrat. Each seperate group are self absorbed, entitled zombies.”

Put that in your oh-so-offended pipe and smoke it, Rafe. Y’all got some sewage here and your frantic spraying of Lysol is almost comical.

Mary Elizabeth

February 14th, 2013
11:43 am

To Readers:

If you care to read in greater detail of the causal relationship between poverty and education, you may want to “google” the “Progress in International Reading Literacy Study” and the “Trends in International Math and Science Study.” These well-respected international studies have, no doubt, published their 2011 studies by now, which will give you the latest data to demonstrate the relationship between poverty and education.

Politico

February 14th, 2013
11:46 am

Thulsa

To call this the “adult table”, you must certainly ignore the consistent insults and namecalling that is done consistently here by Aesop, Barry and several others.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
11:50 am

“which will give you the latest data to demonstrate the relationship between poverty and education.”

That poverty has a negative relationship on education isn’t exactly a news flash, Mary Elizabeth.

The problem is the Federal government’s ineffectual attempts to reduce poverty, even after spending trillions of dollars to attack it.

And despite their abject failure to eradicate poverty (or even effectively reduce it’s rate), you want to put them in charge of our children’s education.

Pitiful.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 14th, 2013
11:50 am

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 14th, 2013
11:52 am

Aquagirl

Do you have to parse my statement in order to fuel your anger. Here is the whole statement.

Most of the accusations and insults come from the left on this blog, other than a few parasite, takers, and leeches comments, which you may take as racial, but those targeted people make up all the races.

Most leeches and parasites are white, is that more clear for you? If you want work and prefer that someone else work harder, so you don’t have to, you can be of any race, but still a lazy worthless parasite.

You just can’t get away from grouping people as Dems always do. If some one posts something you don’t like, you immediately imply that it is because they are confederate, bigots, haters,yahoos, racist, hicks, kkkers, blah, blah.

Maybe, just maybe, they have a different view than you do and you should just deal with the difference in opinion, and not get off into your preconceived ill informed generalizations.

why

February 14th, 2013
11:52 am

This is just another tactic to avoid the main issue that our country is beyond bankrupt. He knows the Federal Gov’t doesn’t have the money to fund these programs, and when they don’t pass he’ll blame the Republicans

Every Speech Obama has ever made: Promise, Blame, Exploit Something, Tax, Spend

sailfish

February 14th, 2013
11:57 am

“And that reality is that Head start is possibly nothing more than a baby sitting program for parents to lazy to watch after their own kids.”

That comment is flat out ignorant! But hey, don’t take my word for it or cite some self justifying report, go see with your own eyes. If you don’t think that a structured program to introduce those kids to education is NOT better than nothing, then…there’s no hope for the likes of you! You nor I can’t control the conditions of a child born into this world but we can at least ATTEMPT to do something to get them started in the right direction. I wish it weren’t so, but reality bites and doing nothing is simply unnacceptable.
If you had a loving mom & dad and a great childhood, count your blessings, some are born into hell with their first breath.

billy ray

February 14th, 2013
11:57 am

Don’t forget that the lottery continues to shrink also because the good little repub boys and girls were mandated into the legislation that originally was needs based. If there is a program that is meant to help the poor and disadvantaged, the good little repubs will find a way to get their share of those funds-you can count on it.

getalife

February 14th, 2013
11:57 am

That EU austerity thingie failed really bad Kyle.

getalife

February 14th, 2013
11:59 am

Those kids do not stand a chance because they are not wealthy to donate to the gop.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
12:00 pm

“Do you have to parse my statement in order to fuel your anger.”

Yes, she does, Rafe.

The only way a lib can make an argument on here is if they parse the statement or create an alternate reality of your stance.

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
12:00 pm

Mary Elizabeth,

Nope. There is a correlation between poverty and academic success. But there is no direct causal relationship. If that were true then every student including folks like Ben Carson, Thomas Sowell, and millions of others would have been academic failures since they came from poor backgrounds. I myself have 2 degrees and my family was low income until high school.

I think you need to understand the difference between correlation and cause and effect. Poverty in and of itself does not automatically cause poor academic performance. Period.

getalife

February 14th, 2013
12:03 pm

I think the only way to “fix” the gop is for the gop to surrender to our President and get out of the way of free commerce.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
12:04 pm

Just another chance for the libs to brainwash the children with all their filthy ideas.

It’s truly sicko.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
12:06 pm

God didn’t create you in His likeness, you evolved from the worms and maggots. Now let’s learn how to install a condom, class.

billy ray

February 14th, 2013
12:06 pm

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America Back up your statement that most takers(parasites and leeches) are white. You seem to throw out loads of opinions expressed as facts but without any citing. Your opinions, while excellent to you, mean nothing to me. Give us some true facts that did not arise in the bowels of Rush or faux news.

beanster

February 14th, 2013
12:07 pm

“You nor I can’t control the conditions of a child born into this world”

Perhaps, though, we could stop contributing to the conditions which exacerbate the societal problems created by such conditions.

billy ray

February 14th, 2013
12:08 pm

Aesop’s Fables and other Lib Economic Theories You are the real sicko here. Why don’t you do something truly useful to society instead of running people down that think differently than you. You really are not worth wasting my breath -.forget I said anything

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
12:09 pm

“That comment is flat out ignorant!”

If that’s true then provide a link or something from the Human health and services report to dispute my statement. The report flat out states that whatever gains were possibly made were lost by the 1st grade I think it was. How many times does this need to be reiterated to you sir?

Interestingly you went on a long diatribe against my statement but provided no proof to back up your diatribe. I on the other hand keep referring to the conclusion from the report which is that any gains made are lost by the time grade school comes around. Your subjective opinion does not outweigh the report. Now try again with something more substantive please.

Don't Tread

February 14th, 2013
12:09 pm

“There are too many people in Washington who are entrenched in the idea that if the federal government’s going to be involved in a program, we need to control it. And the way you control it is with money.”

There are too many people in Washington who are entrenched in the idea that the federal government should be in control of everything, period.

getalife

February 14th, 2013
12:10 pm

“That comment is flat out ignorant!”

Of course, it is doomy.

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
12:12 pm

Most leeches and parasites are white, is that more clear for you?

Oh, so the poster complaining minorities won’t vote Republican really meant “white people won’t vote Republican?”

Well, thanks for clearing that up, I’m not sure why I thought “minorities” meant “minorities.” No wonder conservatives and Republicans are so tragically misunderstood.

getalife

February 14th, 2013
12:12 pm

Stay the course cons.

You are doing a heck of a job.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
12:14 pm

getalife, this President wouldn’t know free commerce if it bit him on the backside, which of course would never be allowed to happen because only he is allowed to have people with guns around him for protection.

Mary Elizabeth

February 14th, 2013
12:16 pm

@ Thulsa Doom, 11:21

“Mary Elizabeth,
Then you need to broaden your horizons and read articles other than from a left leaning educational perspective. Read some basic history or perhaps some studies of different cultures. . . .”
=========================================================

Actually, Thulsa Doom, I have written an article on my personal blog entitled, “Poverty and Education” which incorporates history. Your unwarranted condescension toward me aside (which I have previously stated to you reflects more poorly upon your insight, than upon mine), you may find that you have learned something from having read my article in the link, below.

http://maryelizabethsings.wordpress.com/2013/01/27/poverty-and-education/
—————————————————————————————–

Also, you might want to “google” the name of Dr. Frank Laubach, who well knew of the problem of poverty and literacy, worldwide, and who spent his life working against them both for the betterment of humankind. Moreover, the English writer Charles Dickens well expressed in his 1843 novella “A Christmas Carol” the following warning to humankind which we, today, would be wise to heed:

“They are Man’s and they cling to me, appealing from their fathers. This boy is Ignorance and this girl is Want. Beware them both, and all of their degree, but most of all beware this boy for on his brow I see that written which is Doom, unless the writing be erased.”

why

February 14th, 2013
12:16 pm

“I think the only way to “fix” the gop is for the gop to surrender to our President”

Sorry, Obama isn’t a dictator…yet

Scooter

February 14th, 2013
12:16 pm

Well Kyle, The Obama is a man who encourages job creation by consistently introducing uncertainty into the labor market and tops it off by telling employers they may soon have to pay a minimum wage of $9.00/hour. Of course people who support those actions will demagogue us for knowing it is counterproductive. But heck, they probably believed Obamacare would bend the cost curve down and we could keep our insurance, all in spite of the video showing Obama stating his preference for single payer and envisioning a ten to fifteen year transition period to it.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
12:17 pm

How ironic is it that the “forever” stamp I used to mail a check into my useless state government has the word “Freedom” printed on it . . .

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
12:17 pm

“If you had a loving mom & dad and a great childhood, count your blessings, some are born into hell with their first breath.”

Sir, my mom used to tell me about the times when I was a child and we didn’t have milk or bread. And she used to tell me about how my parents would get paid once a month and worry about how they were going to make it till the end of the month again. And we didn’t have food stamps either because this was in Spain where U.S. food stamps weren’t used. Enough with the empty rhetoric crap about poverty. Been there. Done that. And perhaps you need some education on what real poverty is. Take your butt down to Central America with me and I’ll show you real poverty.

Then take a look at the last U.S. census report and learn the difference between real poverty and relative poverty. You will understand through the census that the average person in the U.S. classified as “poor” has more material wealth and more square footage of living space than the average Frenchman or German. And while you’re at it take a look at how many of those “poor” people own x boxes, flat screen tvs, have internet access, cell service, automobiles, etc. relative to their European middle class counterparts. You might just learn something other than empty liberal rhetoric and hyperbole.

Matz

February 14th, 2013
12:23 pm

Hatin’ on the lil’ chee’runs again, I see. Well, they deserve it. They CHOSE to be born into poverty, addiction, abuse, or dysfunction, or worse: working parents who have several part time jobs just to make ends meet. After all, a person needs to make his or her mind up before he or she is enters a womb to be born to a family with values. Good Republican, gubmint-hating values. If the donor vessels in question cannot afford private school (in a state that provides vouchers), nannies, or to have a college-degreed mom stay home and teach the kids herself, then don’t climb into her zygote to be born of her in the first place!

Personal responsibility, people. Who cares if we’re ALL better off when our populace is educated? Enough this this nanny-state education nonsense, already!

getalife

February 14th, 2013
12:25 pm

Yeah, our President is one giant regulation of self inflicted wounds to our economy to give us our first downgrade.

The only way to save your failed party is for the gop to surrender and get out of the way of free enterprise.

Matz

February 14th, 2013
12:28 pm

Mary Elizabeth,

Years ago I became a Laubach literacy instructor and worked with adults. It was awesome. I should get back into it.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
12:28 pm

Free enterprise is another term getalife doesn’t understand.

sailfish

February 14th, 2013
12:30 pm

doom

Aren’t you the scholar? What’s better something or nothing? Stick to the reports to find your validation but I challenge you to visit and draw your own conclusion.
By the way, there is a huge difference between a family in poverty as opposed to no family at all, the operative word being family. How could it possibly be wrong headed to TRY as opposed to do nothing? I prefer to err on the side of caution.

getalife

February 14th, 2013
12:31 pm

But the gop will stay the course until the party splits.

These are great blogging times.

The gop are divided and conquered.

President Obama is annihilating the gop.

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
12:32 pm

Mary Elizabeth,

Sorry that you took it that I was being condescending to you. That was no my intention and I apologize if you felt it was. I was simply making the point that most of your educational articles are probably going to have a liberal bent to them. And that you should read some articles and authors that don’t fit your narrative- and not that’s not meant to be condescending. Just an observation. For example instead of reading Paul Krugman all the time try reading a conservative economist. I read liberal economists like Krugman and Yanis Varoufakis all the time.

And yes. I’ve read Dickens. And if you’re honest with yourself you will note that the U.S. and its treatment of children today vs the 1800s when kids worked in coal mines is completely and wholly different. Most of the kids that my sis teachers get free breakfast, free lunch, their parents get food stamps to help with dinner, many get medicaid so health care is not a concern, Section 8 subsidized housing, welfare and or unemployment, and on and on.

Having lived in real poverty and having witnessed real abject poverty in Central America I think we do about as much as can reasonably be done for children of poor families. And these kids and supposedly poor parents here in the U.S. have absolutely no clue as to what REAL poverty is. There are very few of them that don’t have food, shelter, modern day conveniences, clothes, free education, and other amenities that kids in 3rd world nations can’t even fathom.

sailfish

February 14th, 2013
12:37 pm

doom@12:17

You are so full of it, yet it is people like you who will wail and moan about abortion to get them into this world unloved and unwanted, and then the likes of you will tell them its better than europe or s. america and pull up those bootstraps? Talk about loony tunes, with you there is no forest or trees, just a desert full of sand complete with mirages.

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
12:40 pm

Sailfish,

I never claimed to be a scholar- You did.

“How could it possibly be wrong headed to TRY as opposed to do nothing? I prefer to err on the side of caution.”

Again. If it doesn’t work then it doesn’t work. End of story. You can prefer to err on the side of caution but do it with your own money. To me if the evidence is that its just a waste of money then it is what it is- a waste of money and nothing more than an expensive baby sitting service. Why you can’t wake up and see what is obvious I can’t understand. And since you have your anecdotes let me bring in one. I had spoken with my sis over the Xmas holidays and asked her about things like Head start. She told me that when these kids get to 1st grade they know absolutely nothing. Nada. Zilch. Zero. I asked her to explain. She said they don’t know the most basic things like colors, shapes, etc. In other words they really aren’t being taught hardly anything in head start. It is what it is. And at a time when the nation is going broke we have folks like you who let their emotions get in the way of rational thought. The rational, logical thing to do is to end the program if it does not work. For the 17th time sir- if it doesn’t work then it doesn’t work.

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
12:44 pm

“You are so full of it, yet it is people like you who will wail and moan about abortion to get them into this world unloved and unwanted, and then the likes of you will tell them its better than europe or s. america and pull up those bootstraps? Talk about loony tunes, with you there is no forest or trees, just a desert full of sand complete with mirages.”

That’s a whole lot of gobbledeegook and hyperbole in one paragraph. Not to mention that now you are deflecting to the abortion debate which has nothing to do with what we are talking about. So if I read you right now you are saying that if you believe in the sanctitity of life then you should be responsible for paying for the raising of other people’s kids. You love yourself some pretty twisted logic don’t you?

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
12:47 pm

Let’s review:

The Federal government goes into debt in order to fund a program that doesn’t work, and the liberals want to continue it and enhance it.

The state of Georgia does a better job at the same task, and doesn’t go into debt making it work, and the liberals don’t want to repeat it anywhere.

Questions?

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
12:48 pm

Good grief. So now sailfish is deflecting to the abortion argument cause he can’t win this one. And now his logic is that if you believe in the sanctity of life that you should have to pay for raising someone else’s child. Libs do love they twisted logic they do.

Kat

February 14th, 2013
12:48 pm

I agree with you Kyle. I’ve always felt that the education system in this country has gone backwards the more the Feds are involved. Each state, county, and local school districts know what is needed in their area. Lets put it back in their hands.

Thulsa Doom

February 14th, 2013
12:50 pm

Tiberius,

Take over please. There’s only so much I can do to educate a liberal. Besides I’ve got some work to do. Its all up to you now. Its a tall order but see if you can’t learn sailfish a thing or 2.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
12:54 pm

“So if I read you right now you are saying that if you believe in the sanctitity of life then you should be responsible for paying for the raising of other people’s kids.”

Actually, Thulsa, if you are going to force people through legislation to have kids they didn’t want, then it is perfectly appropriate for that same government to pick up the tab.

This is a perfect example of “two wrongs don’t make a right”.

Mary Elizabeth

February 14th, 2013
12:57 pm

Thulsa Doom, 12:00

“Mary Elizabeth, I think you need to understand the difference between correlation and cause and effect. Poverty in and of itself does not automatically cause poor academic performance. Period.”
——————————————————————————————-

Thulsa Doom, from your writing, I can tell that you are think ing in generalities and in stereotypes. First, I never used the word “correlation” once today, nor did I compare the word “correlation” with the words “cause and effect.” You must be generalizing about my remarks with the remarks of some other poster with whom you may have had a recent exchange. I said only that there was “a strong causal relationship between poverty and the lack of academic success,” which is true. I did not say that poverty was THE cause of lack of educational success. You are falsely misrepresenting my words.

Moreover, you state: “Poverty in and of itself does not automatically cause poor academic performance. Period.” I, in fact, agree with that statement, as I indicated above. Thus, perhaps, you now see how you have generalized my thinking and have perceived – or at least you have desired to present – my thinking in erroneous stereotypical ways, as a result of your own generalized thinking. Go back and re-read my previous posts in greater detail, and you will see, for yourself, that I never used the word “correlation” in any of my posts today. You entirely misrepresented that.

I appreciate your stating, in your next post, that you did not mean to be condescending but, in fact, your were condescending, Thulsa Doom. I think it is wiser if I not respond to your posts for awhile into the future. Your posts to me, today, have been both unjustifiably condescending and disingenuous, in my opinion. As a result, I do not care to spend my energy or time writing defensively within a personal exchange of that calibre. Perhaps, another day, we can simply discuss the ideas presented.

sailfish

February 14th, 2013
1:01 pm

doom

I guess your sis can speak as the qualified expert for every headstart program in the US? The two issues have a connection but I’ll stick to the point and please don’t lecture me or tie this into money because thats always the bottom line with the conned and as far as I’m concerned even if in some cases as your sister witnessed it’s a glorified baby sitting service, so what? There are legitimate, I repeat legitimate poor out there who genuinely need the help and if a minimum of one out of every ten grow up to be a productive citizen it’s worth the cost!

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 14th, 2013
1:04 pm

Let’s review: The Federal government goes into debt in order to fund a program that doesn’t work, and the liberals want to continue it and enhance it.

Let’s review: The job of federal government and it’s departments isn’t to make a profit; it’s to provide a service for the citizens. How much you are willing to support an endeavor depends on your own personal preferences.

I’d prefer to not have a military base in Italy. Others think differently.

The point is: All US government endeavors SPEND money; they all contribute to the debt. You have to decide where your priorities are.

Has the program of this discussion been a bust? Some say yes. Does that mean we should stop trying? Only if you’re a quitter.

md

February 14th, 2013
1:04 pm

Typical solution from the left, let’s take some money from the states, pay some middle do nothing employee in the federal ranks to handle the money and ship it back to the states, and watch as we all look on in amazement as to why we are 16 trillion in debt and the economy is sputtering.

How in the world does it make sense to buy something from the government at retail when the states can do it on their own wholesale?

sailfish

February 14th, 2013
1:06 pm

“This is a perfect example of “two wrongs don’t make a right”.”

Without getting sappy, when you hit the bullseye, it stings.

only in Georgai

February 14th, 2013
1:09 pm

Is lack of education.. “no problem”

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
1:10 pm

That Finn thinks he can accurately define the Constitutional role of the Federal government is simply laughable.

TBone

February 14th, 2013
1:11 pm

Democrats can’t start the indoctrination process early enough if they are to succeed in give-away programs aimed at the poorly informed voters. This is tax payer funding too, what a bonus.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
1:24 pm

BTW, Welcome to Atlanta, President Incompetent.

Don’t let the door hit you on the way out of town.

beanster

February 14th, 2013
1:25 pm

“Thulsa Doom, from your writing, I can tell that you are think ing in generalities and in stereotypes. First, I never used the word “correlation” once today, nor did I compare the word “correlation” with the words “cause and effect.” You must be generalizing about my remarks with the remarks of some other poster with whom you may have had a recent exchange. I said only that there was “a strong causal relationship between poverty and the lack of academic success,” which is true. I did not say that poverty was THE cause of lack of educational success. You are falsely misrepresenting my words.”

I think I can answer for Ms. Doom. Her intention wasn’t to misrepresent what you stated. She was simply pointing out that there is a correlation between poverty and poor academic achievement, not a direct causal relationship. In other words, the two go hand in hand however they are not dependent on one another.

For the record, and I doubt I am alone here, as a fiscal conservative who is critical of the current administration’s policies, despite my moral reservations to the subject, I have no issue with and sincerely hope that abortion remains safe and legal in this country.

Mary Elizabeth

February 14th, 2013
1:25 pm

@ Matz, 12:28 pm

“Mary Elizabeth,

Years ago I became a Laubach literacy instructor and worked with adults. It was awesome. I should get back into it.”
=========================================================

Matz, I am delighted to read of your renewed interest in Laubach’s literacy method, and I compliment you for having worked previously to help others build their literacy through this program. Dr. Laubach’s group merged with Literacy Action, Inc. in the Atlanta area. The telephone number for Literacy Action, Inc. is: (404) 818-7323. Press option 4 to volunteer to help at Literarcy Action, Inc. There is much need in the greater Atlanta area for volunteers to help others improve their reading skills through this worthwhile program.

JDW

February 14th, 2013
1:31 pm

Aquagirl has it right…

“The HHS study has another issue in my book–it was a comparison of Head Start vs. other kinds of programs, not Head Start vs. nothing. ”

The real question is what happens to these kids if they don’t have Head Start…what do you think Kyle should we leave them at home by themselves or ask thier parents to sign up for welfare because they can’t afford the childcare bill?

Steve

February 14th, 2013
1:37 pm

Wow, it really, truly is just a couple of wingnut crazy 8th grade Confederates in here that have ruined any chance or real discussion in here. And Kyle sits by blindly. At least Bookman doesn’t put up with this crap.

Steve

February 14th, 2013
1:39 pm

I’m truly glad that the Confederacy (the right wing racist rural parts) are quickly becoming an irrelevant minority in this country. Don’t you think it’s time you people seceded again so we can whip your third world butts?

sailfish

February 14th, 2013
1:39 pm

I think the president is perfectly competent; the house and senate – not so much.

JDW

February 14th, 2013
1:39 pm

“That Finn thinks he can accurately define the Constitutional role of the Federal government is simply laughable.”

Actually the laughable or really sad bit depending on your perspective, is that Tiberius really truly BELIEVES that he is the ultimate authority on the Constitution. Mind you that is without any formal education and training on the subject. Tiberius is a “self -taught Constitutionalist”.

It is kind of like defining President’s as historical figures…the folks that have studied for years, received Doctorates and do it for a living are wrong and our very own self- centered taught Tiberius is right.

md

February 14th, 2013
1:41 pm

“The point is: All US government endeavors SPEND money; they all contribute to the debt. You have to decide where your priorities are.”

Yes, they do. But adding in unnecessary costs to get the job done is redundant and costly. The problems arise from those that think the feds can somehow do it better than the states…….BOTH are governments, one just happens to cost more……

Steve

February 14th, 2013
1:42 pm

md – perhaps we don’t need to have the ability to blow up the world 10x over, and we should consider modernizing and streamlining our bloated military industrial complex that eats up much of our taxes…for failed wars.

Mary Elizabeth

February 14th, 2013
1:45 pm

@ beanster, 1:25 pm

Please refer to my post at 11:32 am, and my follow-up post at 11:43 pm, where you will read results from the “Progress in International Reading Literacy Study” and the “Trends in International Math and Science Study” which break down student scores according to the poverty rate in each school.

There you will read of “a strong causal relationship between poverty and the lack of academic success” in schools, as I had stated earlier.

Steve

February 14th, 2013
1:45 pm

Where do you people want your tax dollars spent? Money spent such that grandma can afford hip surgery and not have to eat cat food to survive, or money spent on more wars?

TBone

February 14th, 2013
1:45 pm

Steve your rantings about Confederates and butt whippings ring hollow in this neck of the woods. If you are the enlightened one, get off your high horse. We southerners don’t really get much out of kicking yankee, pencil-neck geek ass when we are blessed with the most beautiful women in the world. Have a Happy Valentines Day.

md

February 14th, 2013
1:48 pm

Is it just me, or is there some irony in a poster complaining about having real discussions while at the same time contributing to the unnecessary adjectives?

Steve

February 14th, 2013
1:50 pm

TBone, I’m not on any high horse, but you people are acting like such moronic, childish, clowns – compared to anyone we’d be on a high horse next to you, I suspect.

The South needs to grow up.

md

February 14th, 2013
1:52 pm

“md – perhaps we don’t need to have the ability to blow up the world 10x over, and we should consider modernizing and streamlining our bloated military industrial complex that eats up much of our taxes…for failed wars”

Did I miss something? Did I post somewhere where I’m against cutting the defense budget? I must be getting old, I sure don’t recall saying anything on the matter……..

TBone

February 14th, 2013
1:56 pm

Steve … Down here we have a saying for name callers like you, Delta is ready when you are.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
1:58 pm

“Wow, it really, truly is just a couple of wingnut crazy 8th grade Confederates in here that have ruined any chance or real discussion in here.”

And yet you, Steve, keep posting about the people, rather than the topic.

You’re as much to blame as those you vilify.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
1:59 pm

It is far better to be a self-taught Constitutionalist than a self absorbed jerk such as yourself, JDW.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
2:02 pm

“I think the president is perfectly competent;”

At getting elected – absolutely.

At leadership and results?

Not so much.

TBone

February 14th, 2013
2:03 pm

Steve … One last question before I have to go teach emag to my hick and hayseed students. When you write, “The South needs to grow up.”. What did you have in mind as our mentor? Maybe Detroit or Chicago or possibly even New York? I think we’ll pass.

southpaw

February 14th, 2013
2:03 pm

Tiberius @12:54

Doomy had it right. Somebody who doesn’t want kids would be wise not to start a pregnancy. I know that some are violently forced into it, but I’ve got to start somewhere. Tell you what. In the spirit of compromise, I’ll volunteer to pay extra tax, if a government will use it to buy pants for the people who don’t want kids. As far as I know, pants have a 100% success rate at preventing pregnancy when used properly. If someone can’t–or won’t–use them as designed, that’s not my problem, or yours, or Doomy’s.

JDW

February 14th, 2013
2:05 pm

@md…”The problems arise from those that think the feds can somehow do it better than the states”

In many cases they can. Nobody debates the need to spend money wisely and demand value for the expenditure. Education is one investment that provides an outstanding return. It seems to me that you and many of your “Conservative” brethren here have lost sight of the proposal. The President has found a program in Georgia that works…thank goodness the program started in 1995 because the current crop of Legislators would never have done so…and seeks to replicate it nationwide.

So what part is it you find objectionable..the education of children or the diversion of funds equal to about 1/5 of 1% of the federal budget?

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
2:07 pm

You’re as much to blame as those you vilify.

Don’t disturb Tiberius, he likes having the sandbox all to himself.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
2:08 pm

Tiberius – pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
12:17 pm

How ironic is it that the “forever” stamp I used to mail a check into my useless state government has the word “Freedom” printed on it . . .

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. The national socialists hung a sign over their busiest concentration camp that said “work will make you free.” I guess we can thank the libs for keeping the tradition.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
2:09 pm

“So what part is it you find objectionable..the education of children or the diversion of funds equal to about 1/5 of 1% of the federal budget?”

How about the fact that the Federal government is likely to screw up a program that works far more likely than not, and that the odds of it costing far more per person than the state equivalent.

That’s enough for me to be against it. A track record of Federal failure.

md

February 14th, 2013
2:10 pm

” The President has found a program in Georgia that works…”

And there is your clue JDW………

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
2:11 pm

“Don’t disturb Tiberius, he likes having the sandbox all to himself.”

Not so, Aquagirl. I enjoy an intelligent discussion.

Which is why I don’t usually respond to your posts . . . .

CC

February 14th, 2013
2:11 pm

Has he left yet?

I certainly hope so!

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
2:11 pm

I’m just curious, but how did not wanting to pay to raise other people’s children become the extremist view?

And for the bimbo threatening to “fix the Cons” by making obozo a dictator, what do think we’re waiting for?

Bring it on, punk. The sooner, the better.

JDW

February 14th, 2013
2:12 pm

“self absorbed jerk”

You mean like the arrogant a$$ that makes this sort of comment….

“BTW, Welcome to Atlanta, President Incompetent….Don’t let the door hit you on the way out of town.”

Or

“The only way a lib can make an argument on here is if they parse the statement or create an alternate reality of your stance.”

Or

“this President wouldn’t know free commerce if it bit him on the backside”

Or

“Have the bars opened early today in honor of President Incompetent’s visit?”

Or

“Liberals don’t want debate, Rafe. They just want control.”

Or my personal “favorite”

“I accept your surrender”

Boy that guy needs some help…see to it would you?

md

February 14th, 2013
2:13 pm

“So what part is it you find objectionable..the education of children or the diversion of funds equal to about 1/5 of 1% of the federal budget?”

Go back to my initial comment, why pay retail when you can pay wholesale for the same product?

The States are quite capable of doing it on their own, or GA wouldn’t have a successful program. Now, you seem to think we need to add a middleman to deliver the same product…….makes no sense.

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
2:13 pm

The national socialists hung a sign over their busiest concentration camp that said “work will make you free.”

180 comments before the Godwinning, y’all are a bit faster than yesterday but still way behind Free Republic or WND standards.

Matz

February 14th, 2013
2:15 pm

The pix are so cute! Mr. President with the little Pre-K’ers. Awwwww!

JDW

February 14th, 2013
2:15 pm

@Tiberius…”A track record of Federal failure.”

Point being that said track record is mostly a figment of your imagination. The Federal Government doesn’t do everything right but as government track records go it’s pretty good.

Why don’t you stop whining and be part of the solution?

getalife

February 14th, 2013
2:17 pm

The American people do not even bother to listen to the weak and pitiful right any longer in our country.

The right are toast and will probably split divided and conquered.

I tried to help you but now you are stuck without leaders, flailing in the wilderness.

Personal responsibility so don’t blame others for your failures.

JDW

February 14th, 2013
2:17 pm

@md…”And there is your clue JDW”

I must admit that finding a program the works in Georgia takes works…good thing this one was locked in back in 1995…you know when we actually made some progress around here.

JDW

February 14th, 2013
2:20 pm

@md…”The States are quite capable of doing it on their own”

The states are capable of doing lots of things on thier own…problem is they mostly don’t (see health insurance). There need to be standards.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
2:22 pm

JDW, I WAS part of the solution at one time.

You?

Never mind. Don’t bother to answer that. The answer is all too apparent. The term “service to your country and community” is likely a foreign concept to you.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
2:23 pm

“There need to be standards.”

Yes, Let’s LOWER the standards so that all may comply. That’s what government does.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
2:24 pm

“The Federal Government doesn’t do everything right but as government track records go it’s pretty good.”

Yeah, until you have to pay for it.

getalife

February 14th, 2013
2:24 pm

” I WAS part of the solution at one time.”

I have a YouTube clip that says you was part of the problem.

ATL Tiger

February 14th, 2013
2:25 pm

Did you really expect anything else from the Campaigner in Cheif?

President Obama lives in an academic world, a perfect world, that doesn’t take into account the irrational behavior of humans. No one in his administration has worked in the real world, which is why the economy is stagnante. Case in point, Steven Chu a professor who successfully threw billions of dollars away into failed energy companies because he had no idea how businesses operate.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
2:25 pm

I see that getalife has turned into an internet stalker.

JDW

February 14th, 2013
2:26 pm

@Tiberius…”I WAS part of the solution at one time.”

As I recall the voters thought you were part of the problem. As for myself I try to be part of the solution…creating jobs and all that jazz.

mike

February 14th, 2013
2:27 pm

I see it really hurts your conservative hearts to see President Obama come here and make a special visit to this Decatur school. At least he is trying to find ways to hopefully make a difference in some childs life. What have you repubs done other than be hateful, disrepectful and have tried to blame this man for any and everything under the sun. Georgia’s education system has been on the bottom long before President Obama came on the scene. Who was responsible for that? They certainly did not look like the President. Sometimes if all you got to say is negative and spiteful, try not saying anything at all. Still have not learned anything from the last election.

getalife

February 14th, 2013
2:27 pm

As a matter of fact, there are several clips saying you was the problem.

sailfish

February 14th, 2013
2:27 pm

tiberius

I hear that charge time and again about this presidents leadership and your opinion is subjective only to your perception; obama’s leadership capabilities are just fine with me, it’s his negotiating skills that are more suspect.

JDW

February 14th, 2013
2:31 pm

@Tiberius…”Yeah, until you have to pay for it.”

You get what you pay for and right now we are on the short end of the stick.

In 2010, the Federal government of the USA spent an average of $11,041 per citizen (per capita). This compares to the 2010 average spending of $16,110 per citizen for the World’s 20 largest economies. Of the 20 largest economies, only six spent less per citizen: South Korea ($4,557), Brazil ($2,813), Russia ($2,458), China ($1,010), and India ($226). Of the 13 that spent more, Norway and Sweden top the list with per citizen spending of $40,908 and $26,760 respectively.

Nice company we keep…real bunch of role models…wonder if they whine about taxes as much as you?

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
2:40 pm

“What have you repubs done other than be hateful, disrepectful and have tried to blame this man for any and everything under the sun.”

And of course, that never happened with previous Presidents . . . . . :roll:

Save your poutrage for the masses, mike.

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
2:46 pm

And of course, that never happened with previous Presidents . .

Not to this degree….no nominee for Secretary of Defense has ever been filibustered. The idjits are reaching new heights of obstruction.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
2:46 pm

Hey, creeper, leave those kids alone!

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
2:48 pm

JDW, in case you missed it, we are the United States of America and many of us still value freedom and personal responsibility here, even if it is in short supply on the left.

Given our population numbers and sociological makeup, I’d expect nothing less than to have our per person spending be lower than many countries.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
2:51 pm

Just in time for Valentine’s Day, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control released data Wednesday revealing that 20 million new sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are diagnosed each year nationwide, costing some $16 billion in taxpayer funds.

Now how in the hell can it cost us 16 billion dollars a year because some nasty lib can’t keep it’s pants on or at least wash itself every once in a while.

I know how we could save some money.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
2:55 pm

“Not to this degree”

I see that selective memory problems run in your family, Aquagirl.

“no nominee for Secretary of Defense has ever been filibustered.”

Of course, maybe since no Secretary of Defense has ever put in such a poor performance in front of the Senate committee might just have something to do with that.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
3:00 pm

Wow, some sanity emerges from illinois -

“Sheriffs from across the state of Illinois believe that it is their responsibility and duty to uphold the Constitution including the Second Amendment. Rational law abiding citizens are not the cause of random acts of horrific violence in our communities. The focus should be primarily on the lack of mental health services in our country,” the group just announced.

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
3:00 pm

since no Secretary of Defense has ever put in such a poor performance in front of the Senate committee might just have something to do with that.

You have the wrong answer, as usual.

JDW

February 14th, 2013
3:02 pm

@Tiberius…”I’d expect nothing less than to have our per person spending be lower than many countries.”

Doesn’t have anything to do with freedom or responsiblity…it’s more of a level of service thing. I would expect the US the be in the top 1/3 or so…especially given the inordinate amount we spend on the military.

Politico

February 14th, 2013
3:02 pm

Let the delay tactics continue. Hagel will still be confirmed

Jefferson

February 14th, 2013
3:02 pm

Some of you sad sacks won’t follow the leader.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
3:06 pm

“You have the wrong answer, as usual.”

No, just the answer you don’t like, Aquagirl.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
3:07 pm

“Doesn’t have anything to do with freedom or responsiblity…it’s more of a level of service thing.”

Not with you it would be about those things, JDW.

Foreign concepts to you.

getalife

February 14th, 2013
3:18 pm

“Former White House Adviser: ‘Alternative Fox Universe’ Is ‘Crumbling’” HP

Can you cons handle reality and living in the real world?

Nope.

It is fitting watching your party self destruct because cons are self defeatists.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 14th, 2013
3:19 pm

for billy ray

First of all, do your own research for a change, a little educational reading is good for you. I know they don’t teach that in Gov schools, but it can be enlightening. But here is what I found on Food stamp recipients by race in 2011.

Whites make up 36.6% of recipients
Blacks 2.28%
Hispanics 9.6%

So, you were wrong to accuse me of making stuff up. Your apology is acceptable.

Aquagirl

I am not a Democrat therefore not a member of any group, organization, movement, or political party, so don’t try to hold me accountable for what someone else posted. I am not my brothers keeper.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 14th, 2013
3:20 pm

oh billy ray

Forgot the link, I’m sure you want to school yourself so you don’t make a fool out of yourself, again.

http://www.trivisonno.com/food-stamps-charts

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
3:21 pm

“Can you cons handle reality and living in the real world?”

Who are you to pose such a question?

Your tenuous hold on reality is well documented on this blog.

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
3:22 pm

No, just the answer you don’t like,

Lindsey Graham and John McCain don’t agree with your answer either, but don’t let that slow your 50 ton ego down, certainly you have better inside info.

You better get busy on that press release for the media since the entire Senate is held up due to incorrect info from other Senators.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 14th, 2013
3:25 pm

“Lindsey Graham and John McCain don’t agree with your answer either,”

And their opinion means about as much to me as yours does, Aquagirl.

Politico

February 14th, 2013
3:29 pm

Aqua

Why are you even bothered with these bs delay tactics? The talking heads get to get in a few talking points and pretend they won some victory, yet in the end Hagel will be confirmed.

That is much more assured than the President Romney predictions form a few months ago.

CC

February 14th, 2013
3:30 pm

“At least he is trying to find ways to hopefully make a difference in some childs life”

Hussein could make a tremendous difference in many children’s’ lives if only he would. Since a resignation will not be forthcoming from him, he could have brought every large transport aircraft the government owns with him when he came to load up and relocate the mental defectives who voted for and support him. That action alone would make a huge difference in the lives of the remaining children of Georgia and would have won my applause!. That action would also have dramatically reduced the number of parasites in Georgia.

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
3:42 pm

so don’t try to hold me accountable for what someone else posted. I am not my brothers keeper

I’m holding you accountable for your post, where you claimed “Most of the accusations and insults come from the left on this blog, other than a few parasite, takers, and leeches comments, which you may take as racial, but those targeted people make up all the races.”

I didn’t make you open your mouth without engaging your brain, and I am not accountable for your brainless posts that are easily shredded. If you don’t like making incorrect statements your only course of action is to not make them.

You’re really on the wrong track in not joining a group, try a Republican or Tea Party meeting. Nobody will disturb your personal version of reality. Added bonus: the wimminfolk there will fetch your coffee while nodding along enthusiastically to your lies.

And man, what is wrong with all y’all, Doom isn’t the only one who’s slipping here. It’s like shooting fish in a barrel.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 14th, 2013
3:45 pm

Aquagirl

So, what was the incorrect statement. I read the bile, just did not notice the substance.

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
3:51 pm

indigo: A country’s leadership that truly cared for the future would spare no expense in caring for its most precious asset, children. As much as is possible, every child would get good parenting, schools, healthcare and safety. College and trade schools would be avaliable, at no cost, to every high school graduate. This would, as much as possible, insure that every child could grow up to be all they can be. Because selfishness and greed rule in America’s ruling circles, you may be sure the above will never happen.

Thank you for your mindless, stereotyped response, indigo. You, Matz and Mary Elizabeth should get along fine.

In the meantime, over in the real world, mature people understand that we all pretty much share the same hopes and goals for our country, though we may strongly disagree with how to accomplish those lofty goals. Over in the real world, people understand that we are always working with limited resources, and that financial prudence and accountability are necessary at each step of the way. In your Lib world, however, there are only two possibilities. Either you agree that the “government” should provide a cradle to grave life to everyone, including food, shelter, education and a phone, all free of charge, or you are a heartless, un-Christian-like, racist, homophobic, child-hating REPUBLICAN.

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
3:53 pm

Rafe, you could save time by simply posting LALALALA CAN’T HEAR YOU. You’re clearly second fiddle to Tiberius’ comic retreat anyhow, so your efforts aren’t worthwhile.

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
3:56 pm

Happy V-day to all of you who have a sweetheart to share it with. For the rest of us:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVuuatjHGnY

Michael H. Smith

February 14th, 2013
4:00 pm

That Obama is holding up Georgia’s pre-k program as a reason for Washington to get more involved in pre-k, rather than as evidence the states can handle more roles the feds can’t afford, shows just how backward he has it.

And this is the “dear leader” of the party that claims the slogan of FORWARD

Truth is Kyle, we of the conservative persuasion know that obama and his crowd have gone far off the constitutional path since Woodrow Wilson and the swapped roles of the federal government with the role intentionally reserved for the States.

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
4:07 pm

For the rest of us:

Geez Bruno, here I was thinking you don’t tell flimsy lies….. and you put up a fake Lisa Stansfield video with some white chick. :)

Is somebody gonna try and sell me the Brooklyn Bridge next?

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
4:08 pm

since Woodrow Wilson and the swapped roles of the federal government with the role intentionally reserved for the States.

MHS–It seems to be one of life’s little ironies that members of the political party which constantly touts “diversity” are never satisfied until we have a centralized, one-size-fits-all solution to every problem that comes down the pike.

CC

February 14th, 2013
4:11 pm

Michael H. Smith:

Haven’t you heard? The Constitution is no longer relevant under Hussein and the Obamabots. The new order is, “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his ‘wants’.”

In truth, we are in the era of decline and very predictable near-future collapse.

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
4:15 pm

and you put up a fake Lisa Stansfield video with some white chick.

Actually, Aquagirl, it was the only youtube version available which didn’t have one of those annoying 15 second commercials attached. I’m considerate of my blogging buddies that way. ;-)

It’s too bad that I can’t refer you to a picture of me receiving a commendation from the military Tuesday night on behalf of my office for our service to the troops. You might like me a little better if you could see it. Unfortunately, too many crazies on the blog to link it for you. Last year, Gov. Deal dropped by to commend us as well. It’s nice to be able to give something back.

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
4:20 pm

Aquagirl–If I haven’t made you barf yet, this one goes out to you and all the ladies here. It came out about the same time as the Lisa Stanfield song:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vmGcr7d7fE

CC

February 14th, 2013
4:24 pm

“In 1904 Scottish playwright J.M. Barrie introduced to the world a play entitled: “Peter Pan, or the Boy Who Wouldn’t Grow Up”. Similar to the central character in that stage production the American left is primarily made up of those who will not grow up. However, unlike the central character in the play, far too many on the left are self-centered, willfully ignorant and lazy.”

“Winston Churchill touched on this subject matter when he said: “If you are not a socialist at 20, you have no heart. And if you are not a capitalist at 40, you have no brains.” Fortunately, he did not live to see the vast bulk of the so-called progressives, of any age, in America of 2013, who are still in their adolescence.”

“Among the traits expected of those in their adolescent years is the conviction that they are always right and the rest of the world is wrong — that they are, in fact, much smarter than those silly and inane adults around them. However, being part of the in-crowd is really, really important thus they must look for guidance to the cool guys to establish what they are supposed to believe in. And, as in the fairy tales relayed to them while in childhood, there will always be some monolithic entity that will be there to rescue them and insure joy and happiness. Therein are the basic personality parameters of the entity known as the modern American left.”

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
4:25 pm

Covering you all with thick, sweet syrup:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFIOu2sYxoc

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
4:31 pm

It came out about the same time as the Lisa Stanfield song:

There was a spate of “she’s WHITE?!?!” singers around then, wasn’t there? Lisa Stansfield, Taylor Dane, Michael Jackson…..

Congrats on the commendation, it’s nice to know some people don’t think “support the troops” is covered by a bumper magnet. And if Gov. Deal was in your office last year I hope you eventually got your wallet back. :)

md

February 14th, 2013
4:35 pm

“I see it really hurts your conservative hearts to see President Obama come here and make a special visit to this Decatur school”

Shoot, even the kids had to make a special visit to the school today…..I’m not sure if that’s funny or sad.

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
4:40 pm

And if Gov. Deal was in your office last year I hope you eventually got your wallet back.

I don’t know if you’ve ever had the chance to meet Gov. Deal, but he definitely has a presence about him, almost like a Mafia don or something. He’s not a very tall fellow, but something about him says “Don’t mess with me”.

Politico

February 14th, 2013
4:47 pm

Valentine’s Day Speed Dating?

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
4:51 pm

he definitely has a presence about him, almost like a Mafia don or something.

I’ve never met him, but I remember his commercial spots with his grandkids. They looked like somebody was just off-camera with a cue card and their pet hamster as hostage. I’m sure he’s a nice man to his family but I don’t think he plays Santa at the family gatherings.

Ah, time to run, you and the fake white Lisa have a good evening. :)

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
4:57 pm

Michael Jackson…..

The only problem I have with Michael Jackson love songs is that I can’t figure out who he’s singing to. And I definitely don’t want to find out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaDvlJ-PoiE

Do you remember
When we fell in love
We were young
And innocent then
Do you remember
How it all began
It just seemed like heaven
So why did it end?

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
4:58 pm

Ah, time to run, you and the fake white Lisa have a good evening.

My left hand thanks you.

curious

February 14th, 2013
4:59 pm

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

“Whites make up 36.6% of recipients
Blacks 2.28%
Hispanics 9.6%”

What group accounts for the 51.52% ?

Politico

February 14th, 2013
5:03 pm

Enter your comments here

Aquagirl

February 14th, 2013
5:11 pm

Couldn’t leave ya without a little something for your special evening, Bruno…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDW25nrnQpk

Dusty

February 14th, 2013
5:17 pm

Well, I don’t know whether I can address Bruno what with him getting all kinds of commendations and running around with governors.

Actually,Bruno, I think that was great to get a commendation for serving the troops. Way to go!

I like Gov. Deal, not that I have met him in person. He sounds practical to me . And the Democrats don’t like him. That proves something (and it isn’t bad.).

indigo

February 14th, 2013
5:50 pm

Tiberius – 11:02 “the Federal Govt. is awash in debt and can’t pay it’s bills”

But but but but but I keep hearing we’re the richest country in the world.

If we’re actually practically broke, why are we still spending billions trying to convert Afghanistan to truth, justice and the American way?

md

February 14th, 2013
6:05 pm

“If we’re actually practically broke, why are we still spending billions trying to convert Afghanistan to truth, justice and the American way?”

Might want to ask Obama, he is the one that had the choice to end it 4 years ago…….

cj

February 14th, 2013
6:22 pm

I don’t get you conservatives… you expect everyone to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, but you refuse to teach them how. So typical of your “I got mine so screw the rest of you!” mentality.

MarkV

February 14th, 2013
6:22 pm

Dear Dusty,

I hope your Valentine’ Day has been as happy as you expected it to be.

I am glad that Kyle has chosen as his subject for today something RELATIVELY less likely to incite furious fighting.

As you might know I am selective in choosing the subjects I comment on. Pre-school education is not one I feel comfortable enough to deal with in any detail, and I bow to your superior knowledge.

Still, I have some lingering doubts after reading you post @10:22 am. One is regarding “the fact that Headstart has been pronounced a failure by the agency itself.” If we fail in something, should be simply give up, or try to do better next time? Or are you fundamentally against the goals of HeadStart?

indigo

February 14th, 2013
6:30 pm

md – 6:05

Bush got us into the Afghanistan war.

McCain said he would not mind if we stayed there 100 years.

Obama promised, in 2008, to get us out.

Now, in 2013, we may get out next year.

It seems that, no matter who we vote for, a powerful faction in the Govt. keeps getting us into costly, bloody useless wars.

I wonder why that is?

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right

February 14th, 2013
6:31 pm

Indigo, save your poutrage for someone who actually supported the Afghanistan war. I supported the initial incursion to take out the training camps, but not the extended stay.

And as was pointed out Obama could have shown some leadership and changed the timetable, but chose not to.

md

February 14th, 2013
6:38 pm

“I wonder why that is?”

Off the top of my head…..jobs.

Unemployment just went up to 7.9%. The realities of war include the fact that if/when ended, jobs will also be lost, both in the military and private sector. I’m guessing the numbers wouldn’t look too good.

md

February 14th, 2013
6:43 pm

“I don’t get you conservatives… you expect everyone to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, but you refuse to teach them how. So typical of your “I got mine so screw the rest of you!” mentality.”

cj – do you know the difference between letting the States do it and letting the feds get involved? Some of us understand it and are opposed to that aspect of the situation…..

As for greedy, 50% of tax filers pay zero income tax. We ALL got a tax cut under Bush AND Obama, yet when it came time to give them back the only outcry was for others to give them back……..that sounds like greed to me…….

Hillbilly D

February 14th, 2013
7:06 pm

I’m in the camp that sees Pre-K as an issue for the states and not the Feds.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 14th, 2013
7:07 pm

curious

My bad, decimal error, should read Blacks 22.8%. Had you gone to the website you would have been able to figure that out. Little knowledge gained in a little amount of time.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 14th, 2013
7:14 pm

cj
pull themselves up by their bootstraps, but you refuse to teach them how.

Well, I’ll let the secret out here for the first time cj. Gather everyone around, it is so simple, if you can follow instructions.

1. Go to school every day, do your homework, respect your teacher, read often, and graduate on time.

For the few that make it that far.

2. Do not get married before your education is complete, you have a job, and can provide for a family.

3. Save and invest the money you earn. Pay yourself first. Deny yourself things that depreciate quickly.

Wish you would have asked sooner, think of how many we would have saved.

md

February 14th, 2013
7:21 pm

Geez Rafe, and miss out on all that fun in between? You need to remember this is the “I want it and I want it right now” society…….to heck with that turtle pace, we now have a bunch of hares……..

CC

February 14th, 2013
7:24 pm

“2. Do not get married before your education is complete, you have a job, and can provide for a family.”

Do NOT produce children until you have accomplshed both steps 1 and 2 even though the thought of the government handouts is tempting!

Hillbilly D

February 14th, 2013
7:31 pm

Off-topic but food for thought.

What worked for privileged, educated women hasn’t worked so well for those at the other end of the socioeconomic spectrum.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/opinion/views/os-ed-kathleen-parker-021313-20130213,0,1684144.column

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 14th, 2013
7:45 pm

When Harding died in August 1923, Coolidge had not seen him since March, but the new president, assisted by a splendidly named former congressman, C. Bascom Slemp, continued Harding’s program of cutting taxes, tariffs and expenditures. “I am for economy. After that, I am for more economy,” said the 30th president, whose administration’s pencil policy was to issue one at a time to each bureaucrat, who if he or she did not entirely use it up had to return the stub.

This, of course, returned 13.4% growth and 3.6% unemployment in 67 some months.

Better known as the good old days.

CC

February 14th, 2013
7:51 pm

Rafe:

Let me add just a bit more to your response to cj:

Get an alarm clock. Sounds silly, doesn’t it? It is important to get to work EARLY and not just “on time”. Unless sick or attending a genuine family emergency, go to work EVERY day. Being dependable is a highly valuable asset.

Develop and ALWAYS utilize a strong work ethic. Perform your task the very best you possibly can.

Do not be a “clock-watcher”. If it takes you longer than your assigned work time, stay until the job is as near perfect as you can make it. This will pay dividends you can’t begin to imagine!

Don’t be a complainer. Leave that to the true ‘losers’.

Don’t belittle co-workers in an attempt to enhance your position. This is an easily recognizable scam that is nearly always recognized and rewarded accordingly.

indigo

February 14th, 2013
8:09 pm

Rafe – 7:14

And, after you graduate from college and can’t find anything but minimum wage clerical work, try to get along, as an adult, with Mommy and Daddy, since you’ll be moving back in.

And, wonder why Big Business could not possibly care less for you.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right

February 14th, 2013
8:17 pm

And if you do get a job, remember that no task is beneath you. And always look for things to do, even if it’s not your specialty.

Make yourself invaluable to the person who pays you.

CC

February 14th, 2013
8:18 pm

indigo:

Could it be that the college is substandard, or maybe the dgree field isn’t particularly suited to the job market?

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right

February 14th, 2013
8:24 pm

Yeah CC. That degree in French lit will really take you far, won’t it?

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 14th, 2013
8:44 pm

And, wonder why Big Business could not possibly care less for you.

Not their responsibility to care for poor little indigo. Their responsibility is to make money for the owner or shareholders. No wonder you are living with mommy, indigo, you don’t understand the free enterprise system.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 14th, 2013
8:50 pm

We could go on all night with how to be successful, but if you follow the three things I said, you will be successful. To be valued and respected as well, follow CC’s steps. I would add one, NO WHINING. If the job is not to your liking, move on to a better one, just don’t whine and complain. You took the job so do it and don’t whine until you can find something else.

Of course, no whining, has to be a learned behavior for the Dems.

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
9:13 pm

Politico: the consistent insults and namecalling that is done consistently here by Aesop, Barry blah blah blah
————————-

Take your beatdowns like a big girl and quit whining.

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
9:15 pm

Welcome to Atlanta, Mr. President. Now about pre-k . . .
———————

Doesn’t the fact that Georgia has done pre-k without federal taxpayer help give Obozo a clue about how it should be done?

Oh, forgot, it isn’t a real solution unless it’s a liberal fascist solution…and then it’s a failure.

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
9:27 pm

Kudos to the heroes in San Bernardino who put down that worthless thug and, as a bonus, spared taxpayers the cost of a trial.

CC

February 14th, 2013
9:49 pm

Tib:

“Yeah CC. That degree in French lit will really take you far, won’t it?”

French Lit, Urban Life and African Studies offer such a panorama of opportunities!

CC

February 14th, 2013
9:53 pm

LBB:

Don’t forget the years of housing costs (likely the remainder of his life), legal costs to counter his appeals and the cost of the execution (unlikely in la la land!).

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
9:56 pm

Crispy Chris Dorner: He’s toast.

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
10:38 pm

Couldn’t leave ya without a little something for your special evening, Bruno…

LMFAO @ Aquagirl.

Just in case my “ex” pokes her head in, just wanted you to know that you will have my heart forever.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMHemXOO-PU

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
10:43 pm

Kudos to the heroes in San Bernardino who put down that worthless thug and, as a bonus, spared taxpayers the cost of a trial.

I guess the only commendable thing to come out of it all is the story the person told who was carjacked. From what he said, Dorner let him walk away unharmed, even though he didn’t have to. Dorner’s target was law enforcement officials. As someone who has dealt with dirty cops before, I can partly relate.

Quick note to the armchair tough guys here: You’re not impressing anyone.

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
10:44 pm

Never thought I’d be singing this song:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmCscz2Ev_c

md

February 14th, 2013
10:46 pm

“And, wonder why Big Business could not possibly care less for you.”

They are padding your 401k indigo, hope you are participating. That is their job along with keeping their doors open……..unlike Uncle Sugar, when they run out of money they go bye bye…..usually forever. And ironically, Uncle Sugar goes on forever after taking what they could from these mean ole businesses that went bye bye……

JDW

February 14th, 2013
10:48 pm

@Bruno…”I don’t know if you’ve ever had the chance to meet Gov. Deal, but he definitely has a presence about him, almost like a Mafia don or something.”

He IS a Mafia Don or something…how else do you explain one of the most corrupt congressmen of all time getting elected Governor, which pays about $130K if I remember correctly, while tottering on the edge of bankrupcy with millions in debt and then two years later…why it just all seemed to…shall we say vanish.

Hillbilly D

February 14th, 2013
10:53 pm

Chris Dorner deserved what he got but he likely had family, who had nothing to do with this and they have to suffer for his actions, too. People forget that when things like this happen. So i’m just happy it’s over with no more evil than had already occurred. No celebratory dancing for me.

Hillbilly D

February 14th, 2013
10:54 pm

Since Nathan Deal got mentioned, if anybody ever wonders what a classic middle Georgia accent sounds like, just listen to him; he’s got one.

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
10:54 pm

JDW: how else do you explain one of the most corrupt congressmen of all time
——————-

For a minute there I thought JDW was going to go off on Harry Reid, who has made some, shall we say, amazing profits on real estate deals where he had no skin in the game, and has become a multi-millionaire on a Senator’s salary. Scumbag.

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
10:56 pm

Nothing wrong with a little celebratory dancing to celebrate the end of the celebratory dancing the Democrats were doing over a POS murdering innocents.

JDW

February 14th, 2013
10:59 pm

@Aesop…”When Harding died in August 1923, Coolidge had not seen him since March, but the new president, assisted by a splendidly named former congressman, C. Bascom Slemp, continued Harding’s program of cutting taxes, tariffs and expenditures. “I am for economy. After that, I am for more economy,” said the 30th president, whose administration’s pencil policy was to issue one at a time to each bureaucrat, who if he or she did not entirely use it up had to return the stub.

This, of course, returned 13.4% growth and 3.6% unemployment in 67 some months….Better known as the good old days.”

Hummm…now just what is August 1923 plus 67 months…why that would be January 1929…nice strategy the “good old days” lasted until October then we got Depression for 10 years. Kind of like the Duhbya approach…cut taxes, spend like a drunken sailor, fall asleep at the switch all for 8 months of great economy followed by 10 years of Depression/Recession and you idiots want to do it again.

:roll:

CC

February 14th, 2013
11:01 pm

“For a minute there I thought JDW was going to go off on Harry Reid”

. . . or maybe Queen Pelosi whose husband has profited amazingly because of her once mighty position in the House?

JDW

February 14th, 2013
11:04 pm

@LBB…let me know when Harry resigns rather than face the music then fires the ethics oversight in his new job in a stunning bit of deja vu…then we will have an apples to apples comparison. Till then you are comparing apples (of the rotten variety) to seeds.

CC

February 14th, 2013
11:05 pm

““For a minute there I thought JDW was going to go off on Harry Reid”

. . . and we won’t even mention the Clintons, Al Gore and “Other Famous Dimwits We Have Known and Loved” who have profited immensely from their public office.

JDW

February 14th, 2013
11:06 pm

@CC…see my 11:04 it applies to you as well.

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
11:10 pm

. . or maybe Queen Pelosi whose husband has profited amazingly because of her once mighty position in the House?

Hillary’s magical investment returns come to mind as well, along with Michelle Obama’s cushy hospital job, although a few hundred grand isn’t much compared to what some of these other cats have raked in. I know Wayne Hill didn’t walk away empty-handed from his job as Gwinnett County chairman, and I wouldn’t trust Charles Bannister any further than I can throw him.

CC

February 14th, 2013
11:10 pm

JDW:

“Kind of like the Duhbya approach…cut taxes, spend like a drunken sailor”

“spend like a drunken sailor”?

I can’t believe you actually wrote this! You don’t want a comparison of spending between Bush and Hussein! I am also sure that “drubken sailors” resent your remark because they quit spending when they run out of money, unlike your master Hussein.

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
11:13 pm

JDW–I’m feeling a little generous tonight, so I’ll extend an olive branch to you. We haven’t gotten into it too badly here, but I’ve gone out of my way to be abrasive to you due to your Lib tendencies. I think you sincerely have well wishes for the country, however, so will cut you some slack in the future.

md

February 14th, 2013
11:13 pm

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
11:18 pm

Wonder if the Pope has 2nd thoughts?

I dunno, md, it may have been God’s way of saying “Good riddance, sucker”. ;-)

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
11:19 pm

CC

February 14th, 2013
11:31 pm

After the last few days, this seems appropriate . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dM3ZSGDCF_0

Bruno

February 14th, 2013
11:33 pm

Well, I’ll let the secret out here for the first time cj. Gather everyone around, it is so simple, if you can follow instructions.

1. Go to school every day, do your homework, respect your teacher, read often, and graduate on time.

For the few that make it that far.

2. Do not get married before your education is complete, you have a job, and can provide for a family.

3. Save and invest the money you earn. Pay yourself first. Deny yourself things that depreciate quickly.

Rafe–I’m not sure why these Libs seem to think that the path to success is so hard. Obviously, not everyone is going to earn a 6 figure salary, but it’s very possible to live a good life in the US with a little effort and discipline. I understand climbing out of poverty first hand, from my own experiences growing up in a poor family, and from watching others in similar circumstances who didn’t do what was necessary to better themselves. Hint: Even though I’ve earned a few million dollars over the course of my lifetime, I still have a 27″ CRT television and a prepaid cell phone that costs me around $3 per month. Pardon me if I don’t have more sympathy for the “poor” folks with big-screen plasma TVs and $100 per month cell phones.

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 14th, 2013
11:48 pm

Poor JDW…we reminded him of all the Democrat scumbag hypocrites and made his talking points go bye bye.

Bruno

February 15th, 2013
12:22 am

There you are
Makin’ it up but you’re sure that it is a star
When all you’ll see
It’s an illusion shining down in front of me
There you’ll say
Even in time we shall control the day
When all you’ll see
Deep inside the day’s controlling you and me

And one peculiar point I see
As one of many ones of me
As truth is gathered, I rearrange
Inside out, outside in
Inside out, outside in
Perpetual change

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI0zkakitMQ

Bruno

February 15th, 2013
1:07 am

Politico

February 15th, 2013
7:13 am

Barry

You are not administering too many beat downs from a high chair and step stool, but do carry on with the. blah, blah, blahs if that in someway boosts your self esteem and ego

bookman parrot

February 15th, 2013
7:43 am

i think BHO needs to stop the grandstanding and the community organization and start staying in D.C. and work toward getting real jobs … i.e. not government jobs.

Georgia

February 15th, 2013
7:44 am

How did that Russian asteroid miss that cruise ship/train wreck? Did they have a casino on that ship?

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 15th, 2013
7:50 am

jdw -

When the Wall Street Crash of 1929 struck less than eight months after he took office, Hoover tried to combat the ensuing Great Depression with government enforced efforts, public works projects such as the Hoover Dam, tariffs such as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, an increase in the top tax bracket from 25% to 63% and increases in corporate taxes.[

Sound familiar?

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
7:57 am

I guess drugs and imaginary deities go together quite well:

Anti-depressants weren’t the only medication being doled out in the most religious states. In fact, a state’s level of religiosity correlates with a state’s overall medication rate. Of the top ten most religious states in the Union, six are also on the list of top-ten most medicated states.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/160415/mississippi-maintains-hold-religious-state.aspx?utm_source=google&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=syndication

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
8:02 am

Aesop, please post your link for that Hoover information.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
8:11 am

Prior to the start of the Great Depression, Hoover’s first Treasury Secretary, Andrew Mellon, had proposed and seen enacted, numerous tax cuts, which cut the top income tax rate from 73% to 24% (under Presidents Warren G. Harding and Calvin Coolidge). When combined with the sharp decline in incomes during the early depression, the result was a serious deficit in the federal budget. Congress, desperate to increase federal revenue, enacted the Revenue Act of 1932, which was the largest peacetime tax increase in history.[120] The Act increased taxes across the board, so that top earners were taxed at 63% on their net income. The 1932 Act also increased the tax on the net income of corporations from 12% to 13.75%.

wikipedia

Sound familiar? Sounds like 2001-2003, don’t it?

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
8:12 am

And remember, GDP was back to pre-1929 levels by 1937.

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 15th, 2013
8:22 am

Sounds like 2001-2003, don’t it?
—————–

No, not at all. Our President Bush enacted modest tax cuts for all tax payers, and revenue, growth, and unemployment all improved. And then Democrats stopped paying their mortgages, en masse. Our President Bush enacted TARP, bequeathed a recovery to his successor, and tax revenues returned to pre-recession levels in three years. Unfortunately, during those same three years, Obozo increased spending and deficits to levels not seen since WWII.

indigo

February 15th, 2013
8:32 am

Rafe – 8:44 pm

Looks like taking care of number one is your only concern.

Right, boy?

Lil' Barry Bailout - OBAMAPHONE!!!

February 15th, 2013
8:36 am

Taking care of number one should be everyone’s top priority. Once you’ve got that mastered, you can start thinking about taking care of others.

The mass of Obozo supporters who take from the makers and contribute nothing to the funding of their country can’t even handle the first part of that.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
8:41 am

Everyone pays taxes, Lil Barry. Even your momma on her house where you live scot free in the basement.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
8:49 am

Cons don’t need facts:

Georgia congressman Paul Broun claimed after Tuesday’s State of the Union address that “There are more people killed with baseball bats and hammers than are killed with guns.” Explainer readers may remember Broun as the congressman who believes the Earth is 9,000 years old. What about his hammer and baseball bat claim?

He’s wrong again, but he’s getting warmer. According to FBI data, 8,583 people were murdered with firearms in 2011. Only 496 people were killed by blunt objects, a category that includes not just hammers and baseball bats but crowbars, rocks, paving stones, statuettes, and electric guitars. Broun was off by a factor of at least 17 this time, a significant improvement on his estimate of the age of the Earth. The blue planet is 4.54 billion years old, or more than 500,000 times older than Broun believes it to be.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2013/02/paul_broun_says_hammers_and_baseball_bats_kill_more_people_than_guns_is.html

indigo

February 15th, 2013
9:02 am

Finn – 8:49

And yet, you’d be surprised, and dismayed, at the number of cons who see him as the next political messiah.

JohnnyReb

February 15th, 2013
9:07 am

I’m late to this party. That nasty old work gets in the way, sorta like The Constitution to Progressives and especially little Barry.

Good piece, Kyle. Can you move your desk closer to Bookman so that a little common sense will rub off?

I posted on Bookman’s blog that pre-K has proven to be of no advantage, but was belittled and provided links to pieces by Liberals applauding it. Talk about denial.

When the Feds of all people find no advantage by the third grade, it’s time not to make it bigger, modigy it, or try to do better. It’s time to can it. That’s right. Stop it.

Pre-K is baby sitting paid for by taxpayers. Enough.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
9:08 am

O’ yes I do…in a big way. Take off those redneck colored glasses and smell the coffee. The federal budget is made up of three parts Entitlement Spending which functions on autopilot and is not part of the appropriations process (psssst that means unless Congress acts it happens all by itself), interest which is also an autopilot expenditure and everything else which is called Discretionary spending. That includes military and all the other programs you are so fond of railing against. This is the part that the President and Congress control on an annual basis.

So lets look at the two of them shall we. The source here is your favorite Wingnut Organization, except of course when it comes to individual mandates, The Heritage Foundation.

In 2011 dollars you can see that The first President Bush’s (o would that the apple had stayed close to the tree) budget in FY 1992 had $803 billion in Discretionary spending and President Clinton’s last in FY 2001 had $825 billion. That’s an overall growth rate of about 3.75% and an annual growth rate of LESS THAN 1%.

Now lets look at “Mr. I Am The Worst President in History” that duty shirking bundle of good cheer from Texas Duhbya. His last budget in FY 2009 contained a WHOPPING $1.3 TRILLION in 2001 dollars of Discretionary Spending. That is a staggering growth rate of almost 58% and an annual growth rate of 7.1%. Now yeah yeah yeah you cons like to claim, in the fact of facts that Obama ran that number up. So lets use 2008 (pssst…that’s before Obama was elected even you cant whine about that). In 2008 old Duhbya spent $1.205 trillion so much as you would like the news is no better. That only cuts his annual growth rate to 6.6% per annum.

Now for the real world. In the real world President Obama had discretionary spending of 1.289 billion. That is actually a REDUCTION of $11 billion from 2009 and if you want to measure from 2008 that is an annual growth rate of LESS THAN 1% in the worst Recession in History, brought to you courtesy of that aforementioned duty shirking bundle of good cheer from Texas. So in spite of all the programs you like to whine about Obama had increased spending at a rate of about 1/6 that of Duhbya.

So by all means lets have that conversation shall we?

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/10/federal-spending-by-the-numbers-2012

JDW

February 15th, 2013
9:09 am

Opps forgot the reference in the prior post…

@CC…”You don’t want a comparison of spending between Bush and Hussein!”

Madmax

February 15th, 2013
9:13 am

Where does Ga rank in high school education? If this is such a success wouldn’t we rank higher in the following grades? Isn’t that the point of this or is it really just a good day care system. As for the Feds taking it over, really, we want another level of bureaucracy on top of the state? Assuming this is a good program, (which as noted above, the high school results don’t prove out yet) there is nothing to stop other states from modeling it without creating another federal program. This is no different than fire, police, etc. It is a local and state issue. If you force this program on all states, you are driving out the very forces that created this program. Need breeds innovation and standardization breeds stagnation.

Aquagirl

February 15th, 2013
9:13 am

I posted on Bookman’s blog that pre-K has proven to be of no advantage, but was belittled

You were belittled for an ignorant statement, that’s what happens in life.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
9:18 am

@Bruno…”I’m feeling a little generous tonight, so I’ll extend an olive branch to you. We haven’t gotten into it too badly here, but I’ve gone out of my way to be abrasive to you due to your Lib tendencies. I think you sincerely have well wishes for the country, however, so will cut you some slack in the future.”

Well thanks Bruno, I shall try to respond in kind.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 15th, 2013
9:19 am

Finn – Coolidge and Hoover were two entirely different presidents. Coolidge left office with the economy roaring at such a pace, as a result of his tax cuts, that he was worried government would take the excess revenue and grow itself.

Enter Hoover -

Hoover expanded civil service coverage of Federal positions, canceled private oil leases on government lands, and by instructing the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service to pursue gangsters for tax evasion, he enabled the prosecution of mobster Al Capone. He appointed a commission that set aside 3,000,000 acres (12,000 km²) of national parks and 2,300,000 acres of national forests; advocated tax reduction for low-income Americans (not enacted); closed certain tax loopholes for the wealthy; doubled the number of veterans’ hospital facilities; negotiated a treaty on St. Lawrence Seaway (which failed in the U.S. Senate); wrote a Children’s Charter that advocated protection of every child regardless of race or gender; created an antitrust division in the Justice Department; required air mail carriers to adopt stricter safety measures and improve service; proposed federal loans for urban slum clearances (not enacted); organized the Federal Bureau of Prisons; reorganized the Bureau of Indian Affairs; instituted prison reform; proposed a federal Department of Education (not enacted); advocated $50-per-month pensions for Americans over 65 (not enacted); chaired White House conferences on child health, protection, homebuilding and home-ownership; began construction of the Boulder Dam (later renamed Hoover Dam); and signed the Norris – La Guardia Act that limited judicial intervention in labor disputes.[

Big government, no?

The Wall Street Crash of 1929, also known as the Black Tuesday[1] and the Stock Market Crash of 1929, began in late October 1929 and was the most devastating stock market crash in the history of the United States. Economist and author Jude Wanniski later correlated these swings with the prospects for passage of the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act, which was then being debated in Congress

And then he over reacted and raised taxes, among other mindless progressive principles.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
9:28 am

@Aesop…”When the Wall Street Crash of 1929 struck less than eight months after he took office, Hoover tried to combat the ensuing Great Depression with government enforced efforts, public works projects such as the Hoover Dam, tariffs such as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, an increase in the top tax bracket from 25% to 63% and increases in corporate taxes.[”

You aren’t real smart are you? First off the Smoot-Hawley act was a REPUBLICAN act…they were both Republicans. Yep it was a real downer and thankfully we did not try that this time around.

By the time Hoover got round to public works in 1932 his goose was cooked….if he had moved earlier it might have had more impact. Instead he spent three years attempting to get private charities to pick up the slack…sound familar?

Since I am pretty sure you won’t be reading the history books try the Cliff Notes.

http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/The-Beginnings-of-the-Great-Depression.topicArticleId-25238,articleId-25205.html

JDW

February 15th, 2013
9:34 am

@Aseop…”And then he over reacted and raised taxes, among other mindless progressive principles.”

Taxes were not rasied until 1932….again well after the train left the station.

“With a $2 billion deficit during annual year 1931, Hoover felt that he had to do something in the next year to combat it. Deficit spending is indeed an evil, but a balanced budget is not necessarily a good, particularly when the “balance” is obtained by increasing revenue and expenditures. If he wanted to balance the budget, Hoover had two choices open to him: to reduce expenditures, and thereby relieve the economy of some of the aggravated burden of government, or to increase that burden further by raising taxes. He chose the latter course. ”

The whole point being that you don’t try to balance the budget DURING the crisis by either means…who is it that can’t seem to understand that.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
9:37 am

Funny, that Bush’s recession was so short, and the Obama recovery is sooooooooooooooo long. It seems to me we were better off in the recession, than in the recovery. Guess when you pattern your recovery after the one that lasted the longest (Roosevelt), you reap the same results. I will wonder always, how much shorter it may have been had Barry patterned it after those recoveries that worked quickly. But, ulterior motives, I believe, were involved in his choices.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
9:38 am

indigo, if everyone concentrated on taking care of themselves, we would not be a nation of entitlements.
We have too many people that have decided it is easier to vote for government to give them some of what those who work hard make, so they don’t have to work at all.

md

February 15th, 2013
9:41 am

“So by all means lets have that conversation shall we?”

Yes, let’s do. I find it quite interesting that you want to compare Bush’s numbers (which admittedly are not that wonderful and many here have said that many times) to 7 years earlier, yet then you compare Obama’s numbers to Bush.

If we are going to have the conversation, we need to compare apples to apples…..to do that you also have to compare the Obama numbers to 2001 as you did with Bush.

What that will tell you as we are spending way more than we have year over year…..those pesky fundamentals.

If both spouses run up the credit card, it matters not which one spent more when the bill comes due……what matters is getting the bill paid and stopping the behavior that created such a big bill.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 15th, 2013
9:47 am

Yep, Bush cut taxes, recession ends. obozo and hoover raise taxes, recession drags on for eva. Some of us can be quite mindless when put our empty heads to it, right, jdw?

sailfish

February 15th, 2013
9:56 am

aesop@9:47

If you actually believe that, then it’s quite apparent people like you are the problem!
Republicans, keep them in the minority where they belong, governing is not for the stupid.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
9:59 am

@Md…”If we are going to have the conversation, we need to compare apples to apples…..to do that you also have to compare the Obama numbers to 2001 as you did with Bush.”

No you don’t. The point is that NO ONE Republican or Democrat is going to cut the budget in a meaningful way. You can’t, it is simply too big of a jolt for the economy at large and the time a segment of our government spends pushing an untenable idea is wasted time.

The way you bring in in balance is to grow revenue faster than spending and it takes time, lots more considering how badly Duhbya screwed it up. He changed the dynamic and swung the pendulum, as did Reagan before him, to a state where spending grew really fast and revenue shrunk (tax cuts) and several years later resumed it’s normal path. That creates deficits.

Obama has been able to recreate a situation where revenue is starting to grow faster than spending and that will solve the problem over a long term. Numbers in billions…

2012 deficit -1,326.9
2013 deficit estimate -901.4
2014 deficit estimate -667.8
2015 deficit estimate -609.7
2016 deficit estimate -648.8
2017 deficit estimate -612.4

Personally I would like to see more acceleration by growing revenue a bit faster, tweaking some of the entitlement programs and some targeted spending freezes but given the current dysfunction of the Republicans I don’t see that happening any time soon.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
9:59 am

It seems to me we were better off in the recession, than in the recovery.

I guess you don’t own a house, own stocks, or have a 401k/pension? Figures. You gotta get out of your mammas basement, son. Get a job.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
10:01 am

@Aseop…”Some of us can be quite mindless when put our empty heads”

Indeed you are.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
10:02 am

@Rafe…”Funny, that Bush’s recession was so short”

:roll:

Guess you missed that whole financial system meltdown thingy…it complicates matters.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 15th, 2013
10:06 am

Here is all you need to know -

You aren’t real smart are you? First off the Smoot-Hawley act was a REPUBLICAN act…they were both Republicans.

Ever notice how liberals are like totally amazed that someone could criticize the wrong headed policies of their own party? That were not all lock step mindless zombies like they are? How much critical thought process do you think they expend, babbling on behalf of rachel maddow?

md

February 15th, 2013
10:06 am

“The point is that NO ONE Republican or Democrat is going to cut the budget in a meaningful way. You can’t, it is simply too big of a jolt for the economy at large and the time a segment of our government spends pushing an untenable idea is wasted time. ”

The problem with that scenario is the hoping and wishing aspect. Growth is never guaranteed, and the more we spend the more we take out of the private sector that needs to do the growing.

And we just had a negative quarter, so that growth seems to be a mirage……

Sometimes, tough medicine is required, such as working to spend what we have vs spending what we don’t have with our fingers crossed that the growth will occur……

md

February 15th, 2013
10:08 am

2012 deficit -1,326.9
“2013 deficit estimate -901.4
2014 deficit estimate -667.8
2015 deficit estimate -609.7
2016 deficit estimate -648.8
2017 deficit estimate -612.4″

Do I need to put up the Obamacare “estimates” for reference, or do we both know those numbers mean very little…..

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
10:09 am

Sometimes, tough medicine is required

unless you are in the business of getting re-elected every 4 years. you can’t push a round peg through a square hole. Get outta yer mamas basement, too!

CC

February 15th, 2013
10:26 am

JDW:

It must be exhausting to research and pick various pieces of information to fit your arguments. Why make the simple complex unless your point is to make false claims? Look at the overall spending figures between the Bush and the Obama administration, including the huge payback slush fund laughingly referred to as ’stimulus’. How much is the federal government spending each year through the term of Bush compared to the term of Obama? How much is BORROWED under the Obama administration compared to the Bush administration?

Your game playing does not impress . . .

Dusty

February 15th, 2013
10:31 am

Well, not much point in posting this morning. Seems the name calling is complete. The president went back to Washington to plan another trip. All’s right with the world!

It certainly was yesterday. I’ve got enough chocolate candy to gain twenty pounds and flowers enough for a small funeral. They are so pretty, flowers that is.. I just love Valentine’s Day. All politicians should celebrate that lovely day and send valentines saying “I just lowered your taxes! (signed) Your Washington sweetie!”

I tell you, I’d feel a lot better about that place of guv’ment!

indigo

February 15th, 2013
10:38 am

Rafe – 9:37

FDR was not contending with a Recession. He was trying to overcome The Great Depression. A Recession is missing a day of work with a cold. A depression is two weeks in the hospital with the flu.

FDR, and the Republicans as well, tried every way possible to recover from the Depression. Nothing really worked. It took WWII to finally get us out of it.

md

February 15th, 2013
10:52 am

“Get outta yer mamas basement, too!”

Seriously? Come on man….

Dusty

February 15th, 2013
10:52 am

Rafe,
You are safe
With your wise comments.
While many of us
Do nothing but fuss,
You keep right on making sense.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
10:58 am

@Aseop…”Ever notice how liberals are like totally amazed that someone could criticize the wrong headed policies of their own party?”

No that’s not what amazed me…what amazed me is that you tried to link a past Republican response to the Democrats of today that specifically repudiated said response. There was never a move to foster protectionism among today’s Democratic leaders.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
11:01 am

@md…”Growth is never guaranteed, and the more we spend the more we take out of the private sector that needs to do the growing. And we just had a negative quarter, so that growth seems to be a mirage……”

O Dear…well by all means lets cut spending by .01% in the next quarter….year on year growth is not as you say “guaranteed” however based on past experinance one can say with complete certainty that over the long term it will in fact happen. In fact out of lets say the last 75 years or so it has in fact happened what…90% of the time. Making the claim that our economy is going to stop growing over the longterm is simply not realistic.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
11:02 am

@md…”Do I need to put up the Obamacare “estimates” for reference, or do we both know those numbers mean very little…..”

Except for the tiny little fact they are included.

Dusty

February 15th, 2013
11:06 am

md

Don’t mind Finn,

He can’t win.

He missed PreK

So that’s to say,

His brain cells neglected

And here that’s reflected.
.
It’s the best he can do, md.

Aquagirl

February 15th, 2013
11:07 am

All’s right with the world!

I’m glad you enjoyed your Valentine’s day Dusty, but the folks around Chelyabinsk might not agree with that statement. :)

JDW

February 15th, 2013
11:07 am

@CC…”Why make the simple complex unless your point is to make false claims? Look at the overall spending figures between the Bush and the Obama administration, including the huge payback slush fund laughingly referred to as ’stimulus’. How much is the federal government spending each year through the term of Bush compared to the term of Obama?”

O yes by all means lets look at data in a vacuum… :roll:

Point is not always what the numbers are…point is how they got there and more importantly how they get back (your remember the surpluses Clinton left Duhbya) which is what I have pointed out. If your mind can’t wrap around such basic concepts then by all means blather on…you will find yourself in a vacuum.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
11:16 am

Dusty

Thanks for the poem it made my day. Probably made JDW retch however, hah, which in itself might be good.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
11:27 am

indigo

Glad you admit that it took WWII to get Roosevelt off the hook. So, everything he tried did not work, none of the regulations, chickens in every pot, make work programs, government stimulus, etc. Obama seems to have missed the part about, it not working.

As Finn points out almost daily, it is demand that drives the economy. No demand, no jobs, no discretionary spending by consumers. Seems to me the only way government can have any positive effect on the economy is to stimulate demand. You can only do that on a temporary basis and hope it is enough to kick start the economy. In my opinion, the best way to temporarily get the economy moving is to let people keep more of the money they earn. They then have a little “extra” for some wants, vice needs, and go out and spend, which creates demand, which creates jobs, which creates revenue for the government.

Obama seems to spin his wheels arguing over how to divide the pie, rather than trying to grow the pie. Just my opinion, I’m not some economic savant, but those who are advising Barry aren’t doing so well either.

Dusty

February 15th, 2013
11:28 am

Now comes JDW

Who elucidates on his repudiates!

He says the economy does accelerate

Yet it seems to slowly deliberate!

But let not worry enter your mind.

In 75 years, it will all be fine!

So says our JDW.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
11:29 am

@Rafe….”Thanks for the poem it made my day. Probably made JDW retch however, hah, which in itself might be good.”

Nah that didn’t faze me…however, the continued obstructionism from the Repugnicans in Congress…why that does it everytime.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
11:30 am

It took WWII to finally get us out of it.

wrong, look at which year (1936) GDP was back to pre-crash levels. What happened at that point was that FDR scaled back his spending programs and went to austerity and then it dipped again. After that we were already in our military build up for WW2 (and really took off with the lend-lease program)

md

February 15th, 2013
11:31 am

“year on year growth is not as you say “guaranteed” however based on past experinance one can say with complete certainty that over the long term it will in fact happen.”

Yep, Japan has been saying the same thing for 2 decades. And I don’t know if you noticed, but the world economy isn’t quite like it has been for the past 75 years. We now have bigger players coming onto the scene and it is and will remain a fact that growth is NOT a guarantee, regardless of past history.

Past and future have 2 totally different definitions……

As for Obamacare being included, that was the point. They missed BIG on ONE program and we are to believe the numbers for ALL the programs put together are going to be right??

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
11:34 am

the best way to temporarily get the economy moving is to let people keep more of the money they earn. They then have a little “extra” for some wants, vice needs, and go out and spend, which creates demand, which creates jobs, which creates revenue for the government.

Depends on which “people” you are talking about. The poor, working, and middle class will spend the majority of what they keep. The upper class will just toss that money into the market. That tossing of the money into the market is what causes the casino effect we see within several years of any big tax breaks. 1929, after Reagan, after W.

md

February 15th, 2013
11:35 am

“It’s the best he can do, md.”

Probably, but I try to point it out with a bit of hope that s/he may see the absurdity of that type comment and in which direction that absurdity points.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
11:37 am

After that we were already in our military build up for WW2

What I mean is, his programs worked the first time. After he switched to austerity and saw the economy sinking again, he couldn’t act faster than history (the beginning of WW2) to make his changes bail him out a 2nd time. World events took over.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
11:38 am

Awwwww…you didn’t have to “Right” one for little ole’ me…

:oops:

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
11:38 am

in which direction that absurdity points.

it’s just meant as a dig. Absurd, maybe, but in the case of Raife, spot on.

md

February 15th, 2013
11:39 am

“That tossing of the money into the market is what causes the casino effect we see within several years of any big tax breaks. 1929, after Reagan, after W.”

The tossing of that money into the market is called “capital”, of which is the fuel that runs our economy……….we are dead in the water because that capital has been on the sidelines or offshore (2T). If the dems had a clue, they would do everything in their power to repatriate that offshore capital and run it through OUR system, but alas….they are clueless.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
11:47 am

The tossing of that money into the market is called “capital”

yes, but an influx of new capital chasing an existing supply of products/investment vehicles which are already priced out and stable. That “new capital” wants to be spent on those existing products so the prices on those investments balloon causing bubbles. The market dynamics goes into absolute flux and everyone scrambles to make money on the discrepancies. The normal, everyday, investor saving for retirement or a rainy day is left to watch since they don’t have an inside track. And this usually leads to them getting the short end.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
11:49 am

I guess I could try to go a full day without the needless digs at the Cons but….but….but, what fun is that?

JDW

February 15th, 2013
11:50 am

@md…”Yep, Japan has been saying the same thing for 2 decades. ”

That’s almost as bad as yelling Greece…way too many strucural differences for Japan to be an apples to apples possiblity…did we learn from it sure…are we in danger of repeating…not unless we make critical errors like for instance forced austerity or jacking up interest rates.

“We now have bigger players coming onto the scene and it is and will remain a fact that growth is NOT a guarantee, regardless of past history.”

While our percentage of world GDP may decline I think the next 75 years will be more fruitful than the last…we aren’t at the end we are at the beginning.

Bottom line is you see the glass half empty and spend your time worrying that you will lose more. I see it half full and spend my time looking for another glass to have handy when it starts overflowing.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
11:54 am

@md…”The tossing of that money into the market is called “capital”, of which is the fuel that runs our economy”

Nope that is what is called gambling…capital is money that goes directly into companies not markets. As for the repatriation argument, this has become systemic…companies leverage the infrastructure of the US to build products then shelter the profits abroad and wait for folks like you to beg them to repatriate the money. The only way to really fix it is to create a VAT which I think we should do.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
11:57 am

That influx of new capital chasing too few established assets/investment vehicles leads to poor investment vehicles rising in value as well. This is where the mortgage crisis enters: the desire of that new capital to find investments with good returns led to the bundling of subprime mortgages into mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDO’s). Not only were these toxic, they were sold as “safe investments” and were given the seal of approval by the rating agencies. It was one big scam and we all payed for it – and we are all still paying for it.

Dusty

February 15th, 2013
11:59 am

Dear Aquagirl,( our Russian minsk?),

Now worries about Chelyabinsk.

And there is much to worry

Ten flaming tons in a mighty hurry!,

THAT valentine was OVERDONE

A meteorite, heaven’s stun gun!

So our hearts go out to each Russian friend

And hope their sad travail will quickly end.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
12:00 pm

Follow the money trail on the savings and loan scandal in 1988-1991. Influx of capital mixed with gambling and shady bankers. Bingo, we bought a bridge in Brooklyn.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 15th, 2013
12:10 pm

“I guess I could try to go a full day without the needless digs at the Cons but”

. . . you’re incapable of doing anything but, Finn.

indigo

February 15th, 2013
12:15 pm

Rafe – 11:27

The Great Depression was a worldwide one. And, it took the outbreak of a world war to get us out of it. No American President, FDR or anyone else, could have done it.

Finn – 11:30

“The arms buildup of 1939, and the war which began in Europe later that year, ended The Great Depression”

Source – History of The American People

Author – Norman J. Risjord

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
12:15 pm

however, the continued obstructionism from the Repugnicans in Congress…why that does it everytime.

Well you see JDW, what you call obstructionism, I see as a guard rail. When the car is speeding toward the grand canyon (of debt), a guard rail serves to divert the car and avoid the calamity.
Thank goodness for the GOP House, or our freedoms, economic and otherwise, would be in for a crash landing.

Dusty

February 15th, 2013
12:18 pm

Well, I hope KYLE has finished his lunch

And bringing fresh meat to this rowdy bunch!.

I’m leaving to munch on some chocolate crunch

(And I confess, you are really…… a respectable bunch!)

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
12:20 pm

indigo, even tho you are Finn are liberal blood brothers, you are not going to get far trying to school Finn.

Finn says that Roosevelt had us turned around temporarily by 1936, and permanently by 1941, hope Obama doesn’t take that long, but I see no sign that we are making any progress. 11 years of “recovery” is a long one, but Obama would be pushing to snatch that record if not for the 8 year limitation on his “service”.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
12:23 pm

Dusty, it must be that Valentine spirit, that has provoked this rhyming inspiration. Glad you had such a good one!!!!

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
12:24 pm

hope Obama doesn’t take that long

this is exactly why Krugman was upset the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was big enough.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
12:29 pm

err, “wasn’t” big enough

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
12:32 pm

I don’t see anything on the horizon that could turn around all the economies of the world like a WW2.

Maybe we need to attack Canada……?

“Hey, Canuck’s, we don’t need a pipeline. We’ll just take over those fields and set up some refineries right there.”

indigo

February 15th, 2013
12:41 pm

Rafe

Eight years of GW Bush is what got us into this mess in the first place.

“Thank goodness for the GOP House” indicates you are an incredibly slow learner.

sailfish

February 15th, 2013
12:47 pm

JWD twisting cons
into a knot
Lower IQ’s and bluster is
is all they’ve got
Fiction is their
truth,
stupidy is there
creed,
Keep blowing them up
whenever you feel
the need!

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
12:47 pm

Indigo, I wasn’t talking about the rest of the world. Germany and a lot of other countries spent the entire 1920’s in a depression due to WW1. For Germany, the arms buildup during the Third Reich was what led to nearly 0% unemployment and led them out of it – again, a jobs/work program not totally unlike what Roosevelt did with his WPA/New Deal stuff.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
12:48 pm

Kyle enjoying that 3 day weekend life of the roving reporter?

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
12:51 pm

uh oh:

A documentary aired in Germany and flagged by British newspaper the Independent claims that Amazon employed security guards with neo-Nazi ties to oversee immigrant workers in its German packing and distribution centers.

where will this end up?

JDW

February 15th, 2013
1:06 pm

@Sailfish…now that was funny.

:lol:

JDW

February 15th, 2013
1:16 pm

@Rafe…”Well you see JDW, what you call obstructionism, I see as a guard rail. When the car is speeding toward the grand canyon (of debt), a guard rail serves to divert the car and avoid the calamity. Thank goodness for the GOP House, or our freedoms, economic and otherwise, would be in for a crash landing.”

O’ dear you aren’t going to like this…seems that in some quarters of the Repugnican Party there is a resurgence of sanity…

From Politico titled “Behind closed doors, GOP tries to find its way”

“It’s simple: House Republicans say that if they spend the next two years like they spent the past two, they’ll become irrelevant. So for the past few days, GOP leaders have met behind closed doors to both craft an agenda that confronts the ghosts of Congresses past and figure out a way to sell it to the American people.”

Darn I was kind of hoping they weren’t going to figure that out until 2015.

Wait there’s more….

“There are some widely accepted fixes emerging from the weeklong talks.

Rule one: Stop talking like the world is going to end. Budgetary politics is important to the GOP, but voters are going to stop voting for a party that talks about gloom and doom around the clock.

Rule two: Stop repealing regulations no one has heard of. It’s nice to be the party of cutting red tape, Republicans say, but no one has heard of boiler MACT or utility MACT. So spending time throwing these bills on the floor is absolutely useless.

Rule three: Sand down the party’s rough edges. Pass education bills and immigration legislation. Stop screaming about red ink and spending too much. ”

Interesting…wonder what else they got going on…I am sure this is causing heads to burst all over…why look there goes Rush now…

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/behind-closed-doors-house-gop-tries-to-find-their-way-87712.html#ixzz2Kzccf9mX

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 15th, 2013
1:35 pm

JDW links to a puff opinion piece from Politico with absolutely NO substantiation of what is going on behind closed doors – just PAST random quotes cherry-picked from a few Republicans.

In short (as usual), JDW doesn’t really know what he’s talking about.

No surprise there.

JohnnyReb

February 15th, 2013
1:38 pm

Where’s that Water Girl ? No, I was belittled because its not what Libs want to hear. The AJC had an article that stated pre-K no help once at 3rd grade level. The same has been on the National News stories. Very few clapped at the STOTU speech when Obama stated how great is pre-K. Kyle repeats it here, yet you and your Moonbat buddies think pre-K is the best thing since sliced bread.

Pre-K is baby sitting, especially for dead-beat parents and/or single mothers. It’s not something taxpayers should be paying for.

I know that hurts your tender, bleeding heart, but it’s reality.

What does your champion want to do? Create another entitlemment program to make up for all the “wrongs” inflicted by white people.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
1:55 pm

Ahhhh….the view from Tiberiusville…now that is how I was hoping the Repugnicans would attack thier problem…without even reading the link.

Psssttt….it wasn’t “PAST random quotes cherry-picked from a few Republicans.”

Please do continue to embrace your destiny…as part of the problem

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 15th, 2013
2:17 pm

You can always tell when the libs have been thoroughly outclassed intellectually, because they high five and grab each others rear ends -

JWD twisting cons
into a knot

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 15th, 2013
2:18 pm

Kyle must be up in his asteeroid shelter, which must not have the internets.

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 15th, 2013
2:22 pm

NASA missed that Roid by a hour and fifteen minutes, aren’t these the same jackasses that say we’re all gonna burn up and drown in the sea?

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
2:48 pm

JDW,

Your article bears no resemblance to this one. I think this is more accurate.

http://news.yahoo.com/unyielding-gop-politicians-doing-voters-ask-084659707–politics.html

They can do whatever makes them feel is right, but if they are going to become Little Barry Democrat, they can prepare for a primary fight.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

February 15th, 2013
3:05 pm

fan the flames:

Raising the minimum wage from $7.25 to $9 should be a no-brainer. Republicans say it will cause employers to shed jobs, but that’s baloney. Employers won’t outsource the jobs abroad or substitute machines for them because jobs at this low level of pay are all in the local personal service sector (retail, restaurant, hotel and so on), where employers pass on any small wage hikes to customers as pennies more on their bills. States that have a minimum wage closer to $9 than the current federal minimum don’t have higher rates of unemployment than do states still at the federal minimum.

salon.com

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
3:14 pm

States that have a minimum wage closer to $9 than the current federal minimum don’t have higher rates of unemployment than do states still at the federal minimum.

Blue state dwellers all. Their competition for jobs, all have moved South, for the lower taxes and lower cost of living.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
3:22 pm

As usual Finn doesn’t provide any information that he doesn’t personally agree with.

Only two states with minimum wages above the federal level have youth unemployment rates that rank among the best-performing 10 states in the nation. Of the 10 states with the highest teen unemployment rates, six have higher minimum wages than the federal standard. About 30 percent of teenagers are out of work in Washington state, the only state with a minimum wage above $9 an hour.

http://freebeacon.com/destroying-jobs-to-save-them/

JDW

February 15th, 2013
3:26 pm

@Rafe…yeah…good thing most places aren’t like Podunk Utah…I especially like that part about “damaging the GOP brand and pushing the nation repeatedly to the brink of fiscal chaos.”

Well I guess in thier mind they accomplished something…something not very laudable but something.

Jefferson

February 15th, 2013
3:39 pm

I guess work is subjective, is this the same subject as yesterday ?

Mary Elizabeth

February 15th, 2013
3:54 pm

Some readers may be interested in the study by Dahl and Lochner (2005) which verifies causal relationship between poverty and academic achievement. Link below:

http://www.nber.org/papers/w14599.pdf

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
4:07 pm

Excellent article written after minimum wage hike in 2009, on its harmful effects on our youth.

As the minimum wage has risen, the gap between the overall unemployment rate and the teen rate has widened, as it did again last month. (See nearby chart.) The current Congress has spent billions of dollars—including $1.5 billion in the stimulus bill—on summer youth employment programs and job training. Yet the jobless numbers suggest that the minimum wage destroyed far more jobs than the government programs helped to create.

Congress and the Obama Administration simply ignore the economic consensus that has long linked higher minimum wages with higher unemployment. Two years ago Mr. Neumark and William Wascher, a Federal Reserve economist, reviewed more than 100 academic studies on the impact of the minimum wage. They found “overwhelming” evidence that the least skilled and the young suffer a loss of employment when the minimum wage is increased. Whatever happened to President Obama’s pledge to follow the science? Democrats prefer to cite a few outlier studies known to be methodologically flawed.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203440104574402820278669840.html

indigo

February 15th, 2013
4:08 pm

Finn – 12:47

In fact, the Great Depression of 1929 directly affected Germany and was one of the principal reasons Hitler was able to come to power.

indigo

February 15th, 2013
4:12 pm

Aesop – 2:22

NASA predected the asteriod would come close.

It did.

What are you talking about?

indigo

February 15th, 2013
4:14 pm

Mary Elizabeth

Has it ever occured to you, even once, that poor people just might not be as smart as middle class people and may be likely to produce children who are not very bright?

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
4:16 pm

ME

I never knew anyone questioned that children from poor families struggle competing against affluent kids. The question is, is pre-k and other early childhood education effective in reducing the struggle? Since these gains evaporate after the third grade, maybe we would be better off if we studied why poor children start falling behind in their teens and preteens. Spending more on preschool education doesn’t seem to be the way we solve this problem, based on what we know.

Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America

February 15th, 2013
4:21 pm

Finn’s boss must have let him go early today, to grab one of those discounted valentine flower arrangements for his poor wife.

Kyle Wingfield

February 15th, 2013
4:22 pm

I’m sorry y’all have been stuck with yesterday’s topic all day, but I’ve been out of the office interviewing people all day. That didn’t help y’all today, but it will provide some good content for next week.

That said, there’s (finally) a new post upstairs.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

February 15th, 2013
4:23 pm

“Psssttt….it wasn’t “PAST random quotes cherry-picked from a few Republicans.””

Pssssst, it WAS random past quotes cherry-picked from Republicans.

Too bad you read too much into the opinion piece, JDW.

md

February 15th, 2013
4:24 pm

“companies leverage the infrastructure of the US to build products then shelter the profits abroad and wait for folks like you to beg them to repatriate the money.”

And a good number of them actually make that profit offshore. And it is asinine to expect them to pay double the taxes on it if they want to bring it home.

It’s a basic math problem. If they don’t bring it home, we get 0%. We can do a tax holiday, still get the 0% and what is the difference?

We have about a trillion dollars now in OUR system. And what does that mean?

TAXES…….that money will get taxed just rolling around in the system. It will never be taxed if corps leave it offshore.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
5:03 pm

@Tbieruis…I guess you are struggling with your reading comprehension today…better keep up with your meds…

You must not have caught this part…

“So for the past few days, GOP leaders have met behind closed doors to both craft an agenda that confronts the ghosts of Congresses past and figure out a way to sell it to the American people.”

Please note the part about the “past few days” indicating a current event. Then of course there is this part….

“there are some widely accepted fixes emerging from the weeklong talks.”

Indicating the currency of the material…you may resume blathering now.

Mary Elizabeth

February 15th, 2013
5:14 pm

indigo, 4:14

“Mary Elizabeth,

Has it ever occured to you, even once, that poor people just might not be as smart as middle class people and may be likely to produce children who are not very bright?”
=========================================

Indigo, in all due respect, you are asking a question that is based on stereotypical perceptions. I do not agree with your perceptions because they do not match my 35 years of teaching experiences with students from backgrounds ranging from the highest to the lowest socioeconomic groups. There are bright children in all groups, and there are also slower children from all groups. There are many reasons why some families are in poverty besides IQ quotient. Moreover, from the 2005 study that I linked, above, you will read that disadvantaged children made more significant gains in academic improvement, when family income was increased, than did the children from higher economic groups.

JDW

February 15th, 2013
5:14 pm

@md…”And it is asinine to expect them to pay double the taxes on it if they want to bring it home.”

But it is not asinine to expect them to allocate the profits accordingly. Software companies in particular transfer the product out a zero cost then book 100% of the revenue as profit abroad.

Now for this part…

“It’s a basic math problem. If they don’t bring it home, we get 0%. We can do a tax holiday, still get the 0% and what is the difference?”

Not really, most likely it will come home eventually anyway and just bringing it home doesn’t force them to spend. Realistically not a single one of those companies is spending a dollar less here than they would anyway…all you are doing is rewarding bad behavior…over and over again.

Mary Elizabeth

February 15th, 2013
5:24 pm

Rafe, 4:16 pm

Yes, pre-k has been proven to be very effective in creating greater academic parity among students. I had previously given some reasons that some pre-teens and teens do not advance in academics, in parity with their peers, in one of my earlier posts on this thread. I do hope that you will look back at that post for my analysis of how that situation can be improved, based on my in-depth firsthand experiences with the instructional delivery for thousands of students in grades 1 -12, over a 35 year period of time.

Jerry Eads

February 15th, 2013
6:37 pm

md

February 15th, 2013
7:56 pm

“Not really, most likely it will come home eventually anyway and just bringing it home doesn’t force them to spend. Realistically not a single one of those companies is spending a dollar less here than they would anyway…all you are doing is rewarding bad behavior…over and over again.”

Nowhere close to correct…..plenty of multi-nationals are investing offshore with the profits BECAUSE they can’t bring it home. It goes against their duty to the stockholder, which is to maximize profits. Why settle for 75 million when they can keep 100 million…..

Mary Elizabeth

February 15th, 2013
11:38 pm

“NC Students Among Highest Achievers on International Math Assessments, Science Scores National Average. . . .

‘These results offer proof that North Carolina students can be competitive with their peers across the globe, especially in the critical areas of math and science,’ said State Superintendent June Atkinson. ‘Our efforts in early childhood education, providing professional development for teachers, and setting higher expectations for students are paying off, as measured by TIMSS. The fact that our scores were comparable to scores from countries such as Singapore is a tribute to the work underway to remodel public education in this state.’ ”

http://www.hcpress.com/education/nc-students-among-highest-achievers-on-international-math-assessments-science-scores-national-average.html

Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories

February 16th, 2013
2:03 pm

test

Guess who used to own Heinz’s. Dat’s right, bandaid kerry’s old lady did. And which side of this deal would benefit from inside trading information, the buyer or the seller? Correct, the seller would. And, is insider trading legal? Of course not. Do liberals ever go after corruption and malfeasance within their own political party? Bwahahahahaahahahaha, yeah, I know.