My colleague Jim Galloway drops a mighty big political bomb for a Friday morning more than 21 months before the next election: Saxby Chambliss reportedly has told his senior staff members he will not run for re-election next year. (Update at 11:40: An announcement from Chambliss’ office just arrived, making it official. He’s not running.)
There’s been plenty of speculation about this possibility in the past, and just a couple of weeks ago he told me — in probably the strongest terms he’d used to that point — that he was seriously considering it. Now that it’s set to become official this morning, we can begin speculating in earnest about who might run for that seat.
In my mind, the list is not short. Here are some possible names, in alphabetical order and with some thoughts about their respective likelihood of running:
Paul Broun: The congressman from Georgia’s 10th District is first on the list alphabetically but probably would be first on the list if I were ranking the possibilities by likelihood of running, too. He has been not-so-coy about giving consideration to running for the seat. Update at 1:25 p.m.: A statement from Broun says he is still “prayerfully considering my own future.”
Casey Cagle/Brian Kemp/Sam Olens: Georgia’s lieutenant governor, secretary of state and attorney general, respectively, all appear to be lining up for a battle royale in Georgia’s 2018 gubernatorial primary (i.e., after Gov. Nathan Deal would have served two terms). Might one of them see an open Senate seat and give serious thought to making his move four years earlier? If so, it would almost certainly be just one of these three — and quite possibly none of them. Update at 12:35 p.m.: Olens did not rule out running when asked.
Herman Cain: The erstwhile presidential candidate ran for U.S. Senate in 2004, losing in the GOP primary to now-Sen. Johnny Isakson, and the local rumor mill has been churning about his possible interest in challenging Chambliss. That said, he is already publicly denying he has any interest. Of course, he did just start a job this very week as Neal Boortz’s replacement at WSB radio, so he’d pretty much have to say that, right? Keep an eye on him just in case.
Phil Gingrey (new addition to the list at 5:12 p.m.): The congressman from Georgia’s 11th District. I had heard mostly that Gingrey wasn’t really interested in running statewide, but a spokeswoman emails to say he “is receiving lots of encouragement and leaving all options on the table.” So, he’s on the list.
Newt Gingrich: I wouldn’t have put him on the list, but his spokesman did not at all deny the former U.S. speaker and presidential candidate might have interest when my colleague Daniel Malloy asked about it. So, here he is. (Update at 12:35 p.m.: A spokesman says Gingrich is not running.)
Tom Graves: The congressman from Georgia’s 14th District is a tea-party favorite and widely believed to have higher ambitions. He might be less inclined to run if Broun gets in.
Karen Handel: She’s a former Georgia secretary of state, past gubernatorial candidate and, famously, a central figure in the dispute over Susan G. Komen for the Cure’s short-lived decision to end subsidies to Planned Parenthood. At this point, I think she’s less likely to run for this seat than a lot of the early buzz would have it. I think it’s more likely she would run in the 6th Congressional District if Tom Price were to run (see below). But if Price doesn’t run for Senate, I suppose that could change.
Jack Kingston: The congressman from Georgia’s 1st District indicated in a statement today that he’s considering a run. That’s somewhat surprising, given how much trouble his fellow Savannah resident Eric Johnson had in simply gaining name ID for a gubernatorial run in 2010. But Kingston is on TV a fair amount and has a plum spot on the House Appropriations Committee, so maybe he likes his chances.
Barry Loudermilk: The state senator from Cartersville is believed to have interest, but most likely if Broun does not run. At this point, and with so many other big names likely considering the race, it’s possible we won’t see any state legislators running for the U.S. Senate — but participation by those big names could draw a lot of state legislators to run for the U.S. House.
Sonny Perdue: Put Georgia’s immediate past governor in the Gingrich-ian “not ready for the retirement home” category.
Tom Price: One of Georgia’s most visible congressmen, and the former head of the House’s Republican Study Committee, Price has been a much-discussed potential candidate. He might decide to keep trying to rise through the ranks in the House — particularly if Speaker John Boehner shows vulnerability — or he might try to switch chambers. One caveat: Whereas Deal might remain neutral about the other candidates in the race, the word is that a Price candidacy would spur him to choose sides — against Price, who infamously switched his allegiance to Handel in the 2010 GOP gubernatorial primary. Update at 1:25 p.m.: A Price spokesperson says he is “speaking with a number of folks across the state of Georgia and listening to their observations and advice.”
Austin Scott: The congressman from Georgia’s 8th District is the only South Georgian on the list, and he’s a very strong possibility to run now that Chambliss is out of the race.
U.S. Rep. Lynn Westmoreland would be an instantly serious candidate if he were to get into the race, but he’s given no indication in the past he’s interested. Update at 1:25 p.m.: In a statement, Westmoreland says he is considering running. So I’m giving him his own spot on this list.
Wild cards: And there may well be a non-politico who surprises everyone by choosing this as his/her moment to get into politics (no, I don’t have anyone in mind).
How about on the Democratic side? There already was a feeling among Georgia political observers that Georgia’s severely weakened Democrats would choose to concentrate their resources on one statewide race, and that this would be it. Now that it’s an open seat, I think that’s even more likely.
For now, the Democrats’ list begins and ends with Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed. He was one of President Obama’s most prominent surrogates during last year’s election, and there’s a lot of talk here that the White House really wants Reed to run for this seat. That talk is bound to soar now that it’s an open seat. Reed is up for re-election this fall and isn’t expected to draw any opponents who are serious threats to him. If he wants to run, other Democrats almost certainly would stay out of the race, and he wouldn’t have to leave his current job to do so. A win would be a huge step up for him, earlier than most expected (Georgia’s demographic trends regarding white and minority voters mirror but lag behind those nationally). If he lost, he’d still be Atlanta’s mayor, working famously well with Deal and GOP state legislators, and would have even more name ID statewide for a 2018 run.
Update at 12:35 p.m.: In a statement, Reed said today is not about politics but honoring Chambliss for his service.
In the event he doesn’t run, the Democrats’ chances of winning this seat drop sharply. Possible candidates might be state House Minority Leader Stacey Abrams, U.S. Rep. John Barrow, state Sen. Jason Carter (President Carter’s grandson) and former Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin. Only Barrow hails from anywhere outside Atlanta.
Update at 12:35 p.m.: Former DeKalb County CEO Vernon Jones says to “stay tuned” about his plans in 2014.
Oh, and here’s a name completely out of left field, just for fun: How about former state Chief Justice Leah Ward Sears? I have no idea if she’d ever entertain the thought, but she might turn out to be a very strong candidate.
What say y’all?
– By Kyle Wingfield
156 comments Add your comment
Just Saying..
January 25th, 2013
12:49 pm
“Those attacking Chip Rogers ignore his personal and political appeal. He is young, good looking, polite, intelligent, a family man, and a terrific speaker.”
I’ve heard of drinking the Kool-aid, but…
Dusty
January 25th, 2013
12:50 pm
Well, Saxby is doing a fine job and I hate to see him go. He worked with a joint committee over a year to make a good plan for fiscal improvement which is our major problem.. Did anyone pay attention? NO. It made too much good sense.
You see here why we are losing our best in Congress. They are working with a deaf & dumb administration supported by the same kind of Senate. Any “advances” are only efforts that increase the stupendous USA debt load, something that seems invisible to many government “leaders”..
So the smart ones leave and wait for the chips to fall.; We’ll just have to wait awhile, about four more years. Only then will we have a return of a governing body of truly intelligent and practical people.
Rush
January 25th, 2013
12:50 pm
Midtownguy…..I don’t think it is possible to be a bigger fool than Cynthia….unless Hank Johnson throws his name in the race.
Beauregard Fulton
January 25th, 2013
12:51 pm
Although there are a lot of good potential GOP candidates, I expect the nomination to end up going to Early Cuyler of Ellijay.
And although there is little chance of a Dem winning anything state-wide, I would expect a vigorous campaign by State Supreme Court Justice Carol Hunstein.
Bruno
January 25th, 2013
12:55 pm
They are out of options on the economy so that should make you happy
Hard to say that I’m happy with all of the new debt that will saddle generations to come, especially since we have basically 0 to show for it. And please spare me any junk about Obama saving the auto industry, etc. Many companies have survived bankruptcy and reorganization in the past.
I have to throw out a PW dedication to Aquagirl. I’m sure this one will make her puke:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyv71DcD7PU
getalife
January 25th, 2013
12:56 pm
The party of stupid will say the stupidest things to get you cons to vote for them
They will try to out crazy each other.
Should be fun to watch and laugh.
Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America
January 25th, 2013
12:56 pm
Since Herman Cain says he is not running, Austin Scott would be my preferable choice, second choice Sam Olens, however, I think Broun and Price will fight it out, with Price getting the nomination. I’m afraid he will be branded a right wing nut, by the Dem controlled media, and have a tough general election battle, before winning.
The Dems are going to have a hard time fielding a candidate that can draw votes outside of the large cities. Being a non Presidential election, their base is hard to mobilize unless they can instill more than normal really hyped fear on steroids that a right winger is going to ………………………………………………….. (fill in one of the usual Dem fears used each election cycle, we know them by heart).
JJGALT2
January 25th, 2013
12:57 pm
DRAFT NEWT.
HE WILL WIN. AN IDEAL OFFICE FOR HIS TALENT.
getalife
January 25th, 2013
12:59 pm
Bruno,
Yes, the failed occupations and saving the bush depression was expensive but it was fixed.
Deficit reduction is on the President’s agenda but your party walked away from a 4 trillion dollar cut.
He will keep trying to lower our debt.
bluecoat
January 25th, 2013
12:59 pm
Chip off the old bank?
Joey
January 25th, 2013
12:59 pm
Time for Jack Kingston!
Will
January 25th, 2013
1:00 pm
The shifting demographics of Georgia will flip this seat to the democrats but not now. The republican is who wins this open seat may be a one-term senator, possibly holding on for two terms but certainly within 12 years the Party of the Pale Male will no longer win statewide races unless the expected changing demographics do not materialize or unless repubs expand their appeal.
For now I would guess someone from the secessionist\birther\radical right will win this seat unless multiple candidates from this wing of the party chew up each other in the primary, thus allowing a more moderate (relative to Georgia repubs) voice to win.
Trolls Bane
January 25th, 2013
1:01 pm
Could we see a repeat of the republican mistakes in senate races elsewhere, were the republicans nominated a extreem right wing nut-job only to lose to a moderate democrat?
Bruno
January 25th, 2013
1:01 pm
One last Paul Williams dedication to Dusty, @@ and HD:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1zgmC-i4sU
Aynie Sue
January 25th, 2013
1:02 pm
God help us! Shambliss is “frustrated” by the gridlock in Washington, which he helped create, is afraid of the bruising he will suffer from the crazies, and has found himself a cushy job peddling his Washington influence for big bucks.
Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America
January 25th, 2013
1:07 pm
Saxby hit the nail on the head when he said Washington’s gridlock was caused by no leadership from the WH. If you have a President, who is trying to destroy one party, rather than craft together solutions that can be supported by both parties, i.e. stuff like Simpson-Bowles, you can’t expect peace and harmony to reign in Congress.
Dusty, had Barry supported his own debt reducing commission, Saxby’s gang of six, would have not been necessary, and without Barry’s support, why did Saxby think the Gang of Six fiasco was going to be successful.
Barry has no intention of reducing the deficit or debt, so give up the charades.
You can keep playing games and hoping for Barry to see the search beacon and change, or you can face reality and just try to oppose him where you can. I don’t think ole Sax had the stomach for either choice, he will not be missed.
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
January 25th, 2013
1:09 pm
Except for calling conservatives names, has getalife contributed anything to this thread?
Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America
January 25th, 2013
1:11 pm
He will keep trying to lower our debt.
Yeah right, he is going to start in ………………………………………………………….. what his ninth year?
Bruno
January 25th, 2013
1:12 pm
Deficit reduction is on the President’s agenda but your party walked away from a 4 trillion dollar cut.
He will keep trying to lower our debt.
getalife–I think you’re astute enough to tell the difference between a sincere proposal vs. the dog-and-pony show the Dems have been putting on for the past four years. Because the Dems (with the full support of the press) have been successful in pinning the blame for our budget woes on the Republicans in the court of popular opinion, they have absolutely no interest in solving the problem. Sadly, political gain trumps love of country right now.
Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories
January 25th, 2013
1:12 pm
Obviously his base eats it up, but IMO he and other “journalists” like him accomplish nothing other than keeping the pot stirred up.
Bruno – You forgot to add “Tea Party” to the list of code words employed in one blog title.
While it’s true that kookman gets more comments, you could add all of them together and get a negative IQ factor as a result. Incessant babbling coddles and caresses the weak minded.
getalife
January 25th, 2013
1:12 pm
“has getalife contributed anything to this thread?”
Who are you to judge others?
Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories
January 25th, 2013
1:15 pm
Maybe the libs really do believe that increases in spending are “cuts.” Really, they’ve been pretty much fooled on everything else, so why not this one?
Politico
January 25th, 2013
1:16 pm
getalife is also Aesop?
“Aesop’s Fables and other Lib Economic Theories
January 25th, 2013
11:44 am
It’s just a waste of time to discuss the dummycrat candidates; too fringe, too whacked out.”
Don’t let that selective condemnation and hypocrisy flair up too much?
@@
January 25th, 2013
1:20 pm
Geez! It’s like a game of musical chairs with these politicians.
If we can’t find an outsider (Herman?) then I’d go with the most recently elected….a newbie.
getalife
January 25th, 2013
1:24 pm
Bruno,
It was a good proposal and it is corporate media that helps the gop.
Hopefully, cnn’s new President will fire all the failed bushies on cnn.
wallbanger
January 25th, 2013
1:25 pm
I like Tom Price.
Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories
January 25th, 2013
1:29 pm
Many feel that gossip is merely harmless chatter, but Reed isn’t feeling his new found popularity on the gossip blawgs. In fact, he’s taking it all to heart and recently filed suit against a popular gossip website after they dug a lil too deep into his sexual history.
SandraRose notes that Reed sent his legal goons after LipstickAlley, a gossip forum
Reed isn’t a whackjob? Sending city attorneys after a gossip website?
Ronald Reagan
January 25th, 2013
1:29 pm
The mere mention of Newt will send the Liberals in a frenzy.
bluecoat
January 25th, 2013
1:29 pm
most post on here are allslop’s.
SB Atl
January 25th, 2013
1:32 pm
Out of all these names John Barrow is the only one I would consider voting for. Broun, Price, and Gingrey are justplain wackos (especially Boun). Of course a number of Georgians are wackos right along with him.
HDB
January 25th, 2013
1:36 pm
Rafe Hollister preparing for an Obamanist America
January 25th, 2013
1:07 pm
Saxby’s wrong when he said Washington’s gridlock was caused by no leadership from the WH. If you have a Republican Senate who publicly stated that their priority was to make Obama a “one-term President”,a Republican House that stated that any of the President’s proposals were “DOA” who is trying to marginalize minority voters, who have YET come up with economic ideas to grow the economy….and now, want to rig elections…..you can’t expect peace and harmony to reign in Washington.
In many cases, Republicans don’t even think of voters like me as CONSTITUENTS…won’t campaign in the inner cities, and persist in using tactics to eliminate my vote….
Question: Why should I vote FOR you when you persist in IGNORING ME???
Dusty
January 25th, 2013
1:36 pm
getalife,
If you in your nutcase fantasies, says “bushie” one more time, I shall have to call you “getObamie” or just plain old “balmy”..
This is a blog for people with good sense. (Conservative!) Try to fit in.
jconservative
January 25th, 2013
1:42 pm
I would guess that several Republicans would get into the race with no incumbent with a trunk full of money in the race. But I would caution Republican voters to be smart on their choice. I give you the following as a reason to be smart:
Sharon Angle of Nevada
Christine O’Donnell of Delaware
Linda McMahon of Connecticut
Todd Akin of Missouri
Richard Mourdock of Indiana
nofreecheese
January 25th, 2013
1:48 pm
Unfortunately, “FranInAtlanta” made a prediction that is likely to come true: The Republicans will nominate someone worse than Akin/Mourdock. If Republicans want to ever increase their female and youth voting block, they are just going to have to step over dead babies to do so. It’s REALITY–and they need to concede this issue on a public legislative/judicial level. In their personal lives and through their personal outreach, they can strive to convince women to voluntarily carry unwanted pregnancies to term–they stand a much better chance than trying to legally compel them (that will never happen).
This will enable more conservatives to get elected and be in position to implement some fiscal sanity.
Kyle Wingfield
January 25th, 2013
1:54 pm
HDB: I’d push through that comment of yours, but you left in the parts which say “do not cut and paste this article” …
Try again with a paraphrase and a link.
JB
January 25th, 2013
1:55 pm
How has John Kerry, who has been in the Senate since 1985, amassed 193,000,000 dollars? TD Ameritrade…?…..Term limits please. Ask Rangle the same question. Came in with bus fare, now a millionaire. Two homes and making a buck and a quarter a year or less for most of his terms. I think we ALL know the answer
JB
January 25th, 2013
1:57 pm
And no, that’s Kerry’s worth, not his Catsup wife’s
michael smith
January 25th, 2013
1:59 pm
JOHN LINDER has a half million dollars in his FEC congressional account. Neal Boortz just quit his day job. You all figure it out.
Old timer
January 25th, 2013
2:09 pm
Too bad Hermann or Newt are not interested in running
Dusty
January 25th, 2013
2:09 pm
HDB 1:36
Republicans campaigned in many large cities for all the people in those cities. Not just the “inner city” but all citizens.
Saxby did not think that the first four years of Obama’s administration were successful. He only said what many said:”we don’t four more years of this.”. Those who felt that way were only slightly outnumbered in the final election count.
May I ask what tactics the GOP used to keep you from voting? Voter ID at the polls? Are you afraid to identify yourself in an election? Why?
Nobody ignored you. You had the radio, the internet, the TV, and the newspapers telling you exactly what everybody stood for. You had a choice.
If you were “ignored” by GOP, it was your own fault.. I suspect Democrats offered you more “goodies” than Republicans and you took the bait. If “goodies” are all you were looking for, then you made the right choice. Democrats have paid for such things with a huge increase in the national Debt. That came with the “goodies”. Don’t blame anyone else for this financial fiasco. You did your part with your vote.
Dusty
January 25th, 2013
2:15 pm
Kyle, I did not see your comment to HDB until I had posted mine. Not that it matters . I’m not sure we were even mentioning the same post.
Retired
January 25th, 2013
2:17 pm
Politico,
Isn’t Broun one of the ones who said women can control their bodies in a rape so they don’t get pregnant?
That’s a real sharp mind we have sitting over there in Athens. Yep, real sharp mind.
Kyle Wingfield
January 25th, 2013
2:20 pm
Dusty @ 2:15: You weren’t. The one I was talking about was never published.
Aesop's Fables and other Lib Economic Theories
January 25th, 2013
2:21 pm
Let me see if I’ve got this straight – the liberal political strategy in Georgia is to hope that all the white people die off so that they can add it to their list of failed socialist plebiscites? Isn’t there a psychiatric term for this?
I’m afraid to ask what their fall back plan is.
Anyway, I’ve got two words for them; Marco. Rubio. hahahahahaha, bozos.
MarkV
January 25th, 2013
2:27 pm
Dusty @ 2:09 pm
To HDB: “May I ask what tactics the GOP used to keep you from voting? Voter ID at the polls? Are you afraid to identify yourself in an election? Why?”
That is an interesting attitude. I am sure there is a name for it – but I will set names aside. But let’s remember it when Dusty criticizes the President for some action, and let’s ask then: How does it hurt you, personally?
Just Saying..
January 25th, 2013
2:30 pm
I realize I’m reading this blog just to see what Aquagirl has to say…
Dusty
January 25th, 2013
2:31 pm
@@
At this point, I begin to feel that a good “stirring up” in the Senate might be a fine fight to watch. How about NEWT?? Not only is he a survivor, he can tap dance and do the fandango better than most He makes a good speech without even a teleprompter. His dirty laundry has been washed and rewashed many times. Nothing new there. He is smart. He can tell a lie with a straight face ( a political asset.)
Lel’s give ‘em a good time in Washington. Go NEWT!! Get the fireworks going!
Kyle Wingfield
January 25th, 2013
2:34 pm
Dusty @ 2:31: Newt says he’s out. Lots of updates in the OP.
HDB
January 25th, 2013
2:35 pm
Dusty
January 25th, 2013
2:09 pm
NO Republican came to the inner city of Atlanta…..Vine City, Adamsville, Collier Heights, et. al.,….all of the Republican rallies were in the SUBURBS!! Plese show me ONE Republican candidate that came INSIDE THE PERIMETER to campaign….you’d be pressed to find ONE!!
You ask what Republicans did to keep me from voting…or marginalizing my vote?? Start with Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”…..continue with changing the voting laws….changing the early voting hours….and now, look at what Virginia is trying to do!! It’s not JUST me….but others LIKE me…(and I’m FAR from being afraid of letting my voice be known electorially!)
Mitt Romney already said he was ignoring me…since he considered me as being one of the 47%…..Republicans have already ignored me since they won’t campaign in the inner cities! I’m not looking for “goodies”….I’m looking for a cogent set of policies that can positively affect me, my community, my city……and so far, the GOP has failed MISERABLY at attracting me!!
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/01/24/gop-attracting-minorities.html
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
January 25th, 2013
2:36 pm
“Who are you to judge others?”
Someone who posts considerably more substance than you do, getalife.
But given that’s not very hard to do . . . .