WATCH VIDEO NOW: My 2012 presidential election chat with Jay Bookman

Jay and I got together with AJC political reporter Aaron Gould Sheinin in a Google Hangout to discuss last night’s presidential debate and our thoughts on how the race is going as of today — and where it’s leading us. Enjoy!

–By Kyle Wingfield

Find me on Facebook or follow me on Twitter

331 comments Add your comment

Georgia

October 23rd, 2012
11:52 am

Kyle opens very strong. He looks great, too. Jay is more animated. Both impressive.

Junior Samples

October 23rd, 2012
11:56 am

Jay needs a better webcam

Will

October 23rd, 2012
11:56 am

Kyle:

I want you to know that, no matter how this election turns out, no one could have tried harder and done more to advance the republican candidate than you.

Day in and day out, regardless of the issue or concern, you have steadfastly stood by the nominee. You have always found the positive in “all things Romney” while at the same time always finding something to fault the President.

You are a standout and standup republican newspaper writer. Republicans should be very thankful they have such a reliable source to get out the word!

Georgia

October 23rd, 2012
12:04 pm

Kyle plays the voter fraud card first. I guess the whole country is thinking another 2000.

Henne

October 23rd, 2012
12:10 pm

Of course, you should realize that you two having identical blogs at the same time is, um, dumb. A little planning as late as 3 p.m. yesterday could have put the to of you together for this one event.

stands for decibels

October 23rd, 2012
12:11 pm

That was fun to watch–thanks for participating in/posting it, Kyle.

Henne

October 23rd, 2012
12:12 pm

Bookman is out of focus, like most of his thoughts.

Kyle Wingfield

October 23rd, 2012
12:13 pm

Will,

And I want you to know that means a lot coming from someone who posted those thoughts before it would have been physically possible to watch the entire video.

Kyle Wingfield

October 23rd, 2012
12:15 pm

Henne @ 12:10: We were planning it well before 3 p.m. yesterday. We have different audiences, so we both posted the video on our respective blogs.

As for the “put the [two] of you together”…do you mean physically in the same building? Because that’s kind of the point of a Google Hangout…

Georgia

October 23rd, 2012
12:15 pm

Great question from moderator: “Do americans want gridlock and status quo.” Sometimes doing nothing is better than doing too much?

@@

October 23rd, 2012
12:18 pm

Good job, Kyle. You displayed some critical thinking skills, while jay was simply critical.

Not surprising.

Congrats on your math skills too. Even jay conceded to your prowess.

(ISH)

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
12:18 pm

Not bad Kyle.

You are not unhinged like the your cons and low keyed with original thoughts.

Kyle Wingfield

October 23rd, 2012
12:18 pm

Georgia @ 12:15: Sometimes, yes. Maybe even often. But the so-called fiscal cliff looms, and gridlock means we go over it. Which wouldn’t be optimal, as Obama might say.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
12:21 pm

The President will cave again on tax cuts for the wealthy so there will be a deal and no fiscal cliff.

Georgia

October 23rd, 2012
12:24 pm

What a kick it was to see the personalities behind the opinions we’ve only read for years and years. Kyle has a great delivery.

Brosephus™

October 23rd, 2012
12:32 pm

Kyle

I have to commend you on presenting logical arguments on behalf of conservatives across this country. It’s much more refreshing to hear actual thought being hashed out as opposed to rabid rhetorical regurgitations.

But the so-called fiscal cliff looms, and gridlock means we go over it. Which wouldn’t be optimal, as Obama might say.

I haven’t heard hardly any pundit take on Obama’s comment in regards to the fiscal cliff where he stated the cuts wouldn’t happen. I wonder if that comment got lost in the whole bayonet and horse stuff.

md

October 23rd, 2012
12:35 pm

Well Kyle, you looked…….Presidential, and I’ll withhold any other opinions on the other guy.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
12:36 pm

Another thing…while jay is critical of Romney’s flip from far-right to moderate center, he also calls it smart and intelligent.

We are a center-right nation and will remain so, regardless. Romney’s aware of that. Obama? Not so much. He’ll go far left if the door is open. Let’s hope the GOP maintains control in Congress. Gridlock against a leftist would be welcome from my perspective.

Aquagirl

October 23rd, 2012
12:36 pm

I can’t reconcile the calm, rational guy in that video with the one who voted for Newt Gingrich.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
12:38 pm

Aquagirl:

Many conservatives saw Gingrich as moderate. I know, I did.

Kyle Wingfield

October 23rd, 2012
12:40 pm

Thanks for the kind words, everyone. I thought both Jay and Aaron did a great job. If there’s interest, we may try to do it again sometime soon. (Though we’ll probably try to keep it to less than 23 minutes…)

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
12:40 pm

Wow! The camera really does put on 10 lbs. . . . . ;)

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
12:41 pm

Bro,

I caught it.

The wealthy will get their tax cut.

It is very obvious he will make the deal.

They BOTH suck

October 23rd, 2012
12:41 pm

@@

Is Newt moderate in terms of economic policy, social policy or both?

They BOTH suck

October 23rd, 2012
12:42 pm

Kyle

Good job indeed. Thought both Bookman and yourself articulated your thoughts very well.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
12:43 pm

I couldn’t help but laugh when jay said “It’s up to Fred in Ohio.”

Hopefully, he’s not talking about the Fred he recently banished.

I could do without THAT Fred.

Kyle:

Don’t know if you have a subscription to STRATFOR but they have an excellent piece about Presidents and their limitations on foreign policy…circumstances beyond their control and such. We don’t live in a vacuum.

md

October 23rd, 2012
12:43 pm

“It is very obvious he will make the deal.”

If it was that obvious, then why did he back of of the last deal after Boehner had agreed to it??

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
12:45 pm

Our President pointed out the facts when mitt was dead wrong on his original positions.

Our President ended mitt in this debate.

Buried him.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
12:46 pm

md,

Your crybaby walked away because of tax cuts for the wealthy.

He can’t walk away if our President caves on it.

Not complicated md.

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 23rd, 2012
12:47 pm

getalife
The President will cave again on tax cuts for the wealthy so there will be a deal and no fiscal cliff.

Man, you finally took one of those smart pills. I said that months ago, and you libs disagreed. Obama knows that to raise taxes in his abysmal economy will send us into a deeper recession. He has been on his get the rich campaign as just something to rile his voters. Once the election is over, he will extend the Obama Tax cuts in their entirety.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
12:48 pm

TBs:

Social policy.

Bombastic though he may be, Newt has always appealed to me as an innovative thinker.

When it comes to fiscal policy, I’m more of a Ryan fan than a Romney fan.

I’ll be voting for Ryan/Romney in November.

They BOTH suck

October 23rd, 2012
12:49 pm

@@

Thanks for the reply. What social policies is he moderate in your opinion?

Henne

October 23rd, 2012
12:49 pm

No, I mean put the two of you together in one blog. Wouldn’t you two like to see your audiences mix it up one time?

Henne

October 23rd, 2012
12:51 pm

Aquagirl

October 23rd, 2012
12:51 pm

Many conservatives saw Gingrich as moderate.

And that’s why I no longer consider myself conservative. A thrice-married “family values” guy who made compromise a dirty word and shut down the government is not moderate. YMMV.

Brosephus™

October 23rd, 2012
12:52 pm

getalife

And just as predictable as always, he’ll roll over like a too friendly dog that’s in need of a belly rub. Not that I think Romney is any better, but this country needs better than that in a leader.

Del

October 23rd, 2012
12:55 pm

Kyle, good debate and your points were made objectively. I still see better momentum for Romney coming down the wire and with both Gallup and Rasmussen having Romney at the 50% mark ahead of Obama I wouldn’t bet on Romney not pulling out a win.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
12:56 pm

Bro,

It is bad policy that increases the deficit but it is what it is.

When the gop will allow us to go back to a recession unless they get their tax cuts, there is no choice.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
12:57 pm

Del,

You can bet on it at Intrade.

Kyle Wingfield

October 23rd, 2012
12:59 pm

Del @ 12:55: As of today, it looks like it all comes down to Ohio. And, as of today, Obama has the edge there.

But we still have two weeks to go…

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
1:02 pm

The debate over Ohio is about the auto bailout.

mitt said government should not help our President helped them.

mitt lost this debate for Ohio.

Del

October 23rd, 2012
1:03 pm

Kyle,

Rasmussen only has Obama up by a point and I’ve seen a few polls that have it dead even. I agree that Romney must win Ohio to win the election.

Gee

October 23rd, 2012
1:04 pm

Romney’s flop sweating performance was telling. I always thought he was a pathological liar but apparently he has some embarrassment or remorse when he lies.

They BOTH suck

October 23rd, 2012
1:05 pm

Del

Rasmussen is probably more dependable.

Gallup has the name and history but looking at the last 4 election cycles, they haven’t done such a great job.

2010: way overstated Repub victory
2008: way overstated Obama victory
2006: understated Dem victory
2004: way overstated Bush victory

They do not seem to favor any party in terms of their predictions, but there seems to be more reliable sources.

Who knows. They could be on the money and Obama is heading for beat down.

md

October 23rd, 2012
1:06 pm

“Your crybaby walked away because of tax cuts for the wealthy.”

“Obama succeeded in getting Boehner to tentatively agree to as much as $800 billion in new revenue, a major concession, only to surprise the speaker with a request for an additional $400 billion as their negotiations neared the final stages. ”

Sorry big guy, Obama played a bit of bait and switch and screwed up the whole deal……..

H.E. Pennypacker

October 23rd, 2012
1:07 pm

Kyle,

Thanks for posting and well done to all involved. I have always suspected that even though you and I don’t always see things through the same lens that you were more than a party line marcher and this video confirmed as much. Even though recent research indicates post debate spin actually works, thanks for not engaging in as much and for presenting realistic and well thought out points.

I think more videos like this might serve to reduce the vitriol and name calling often times present in these forums…….as your candidate stated last night, “We want a peaceful planet”.

They BOTH suck

October 23rd, 2012
1:09 pm

Del

I have looked at several studies on polling accuracy. Gallup is usually middle pack. Not even close to the top in recent elections.

I would say the the Gallup which has Romney up by 6 or 7 and the IBD (which was ranked fairly high in 08) which has Obama up by 4 or 5 are both outliers.

Brosephus™

October 23rd, 2012
1:14 pm

getalife

We’re going to have another recession regardless. The current upswing has very little to do with demand increasing. It’s not as big of a bubble as we’ve had before, but we’re going to go back down again. Until we put the job infrastructure in place to handle the baby boomer retirement and SS, we’re only extending the pain we’re going to have to endure anyway. I think it’s better to do it now while other countries are struggling as opposed to waiting until everybody else is doing better.

They BOTH suck

October 23rd, 2012
1:16 pm

Bro

I have said that for months. Economy is going to limp along for sometime.

md

October 23rd, 2012
1:16 pm

“A thrice-married “family values” guy who made compromise a dirty word and shut down the government is not moderate. YMMV.”

Ummm…….that WAS compromise. By holding Clinton’s feet to the fire, we ended up with the proverbial “surpluses”……I doubt seriously that compromise would not have come about otherwise.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
1:19 pm

Bro,

Without government spending, we will go back to a recession like the EU.

I think we will add 12 million jobs if the gop do not screw it up like economists predicted.

Slow steady job growth is the best you can get after a financial collapse.

The key to help middle class spending is 12 million good paying jobs.

md

October 23rd, 2012
1:20 pm

“The market got smacked right from the opening bell on Tuesday as the third quarter earnings season continues to come in even worse than expected. ”

Brosephus™

October 23rd, 2012
1:22 pm

Economy is going to limp along for sometime.

Considering there was a net 0% increase in new jobs in the 2000’s, limping along is an understatement.

Independent

October 23rd, 2012
1:22 pm

It has come down to voting for the lesser of 2 evils. Obama did not live up to all his 2008 promises but did a good job on national security and foreign affairs. Also Obama kept us from entering a deep economic depression but created a massive amount of debt. Romney initially appeared as a solid alternative but his changing positions on almost every issue – gun control; Roe vs Wade; mandated health care; spending; etc – rules him out for me since I have no idea now of where he really stands and what kind of policies he will pursue.

md

October 23rd, 2012
1:23 pm

And once again get, the private sector has to generate the capital to pay for those gov’t jobs……and right now it looks as if they are going backwards……..hardly the time to ask them to shell out even more……….so your answer is to add how much to the credit card balance of 16 trillion??

They BOTH suck

October 23rd, 2012
1:27 pm

Bro

I have mentioned before that we have been limping for sometime now. While history is what it is, take away the military build up and technology push in the 80s, internet bubble of the 90s and housing / construction bubble of 2000s and we might have been in trouble for sometime.

Granted many people made some good money during those “bubbles”, but many individuals and businesses also saw and are seeing the downside now.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
1:27 pm

Our President recovered 5 million of the 9 million w lost.

Add 12 million in the next four years and we are still behind.

The w disaster has consequences.

We screwed up.

Don’t do it again.

md

October 23rd, 2012
1:28 pm

” Romney initially appeared as a solid alternative but his changing positions on almost every issue – gun control; Roe vs Wade; mandated health care; spending; etc – rules him out for me since I have no idea now of where he really stands and what kind of policies he will pursue.”

Maybe you should read up on what HE says vs relying on the talking points from the media.

R v W……says his personal opinion is that abortion is wrong, but also says he will offer no legislation to change the law…….simple enough.

Mandated healthcare……….another simple concept, as he believes it should be up to each State, NOT shoved down our throats by the Feds………..

Brosephus™

October 23rd, 2012
1:30 pm

Without government spending, we will go back to a recession like the EU.

Well, that idea has been analyzed, and I don’t think many people would agree with the results.

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2012/07/31/government-cutbacks-separate-this-expansion-from-others/

The recoveries and expansions that occurred in the Bush, Clinton and Reagan eras all saw government spending increase along with most other major drivers of growth. But in the current Obama recovery, which began in 2009, total public outlays have decreased at an annualized rate of 1.5%, according to a Dow Jones/Wall Street Journal analysis of newly revised government data.

In the previous five expansions, dating back to 1975, government spending grew a yearly average of 1.9%.

The current pull back in government spending, which is most pronounced at the state and local level, helps explain why on annualized basis, the gross domestic product has grown by just 2.2% since the recovery began. By that measure, the current rebound is the weakest of the post World War II era.

md

October 23rd, 2012
1:31 pm

“We screwed up.”

yes we did, we should have listened to Bush way back in 2001 when he said there were major issues concerning Fannie and Freddie and we did nothing about them……….of course now they are in receivership, but a bit late for that.

They BOTH suck

October 23rd, 2012
1:32 pm

md

Actually Romney does have some “flip flops” on positions via his own words. He also has some positions were the Democrats say he changed but he didn’t.

Might be best for you to look them up an dnot rely on talking points yourself.

Granted I doubt there have been many running for Presidnet who didn’t “flip” on this or that issue, but Romney has been no differnt

Take a few minutes and look it up. Google can lead the way for you.

stands for decibels

October 23rd, 2012
1:34 pm

says he will offer no legislation to change the law…

And he’s also said he’d be delighted to sign a law that will surely be offered to him if there’s a majority in both Houses.

so… vote for Romney, because he probably won’t get a chance to do what he’d personally like to do? Ain’t working for me.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
1:35 pm

Bro,

It is true, we have decreased spending and that does not help.

It is what it is.

We have obstruction in congressional spending so our President has to act alone and the fed is out of bullets.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
1:37 pm

md,

Senator Dorgan predicted the collapse and wanted to act.

congress vote no.

Kandy Krowley

October 23rd, 2012
1:38 pm

“Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.” – William F. Buckley

They BOTH suck

October 23rd, 2012
1:39 pm

md

Don’t be selective in your research. The information is out there and will not take long to locate.

You are welcome to defend it all you like. Say he meant this or that, however it will not change the facts that he has “flip flopped” on several issues.

Obama has done the same and it can also be located for easily.

Don’t let your rose colored glasses deter you from seeing the truth.

Not saying this in any effort to change your vote. Do not care who you vote for, but I am saying it because it is fact, regardless if you wish to admit and acknowledge it. It will not change either way.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
1:39 pm

TBs:

Oops! Sorry for the delay. It’s Tuesday after one of my difficult Mondays. The parents of my little charges aren’t as engaged as those I’ve had in the past. I am determined to get them engaged.

You have only to look at “Solutions” offered by Gingrich to see his innovative thought processes.

Socially moderate? Immigration…climate change to name a few.

It was, afterall, Gingrich who said this during his effort to establish a notable GOP majority in Congress:

“The Republican Party has to be the conservative party if it is to mobilize the 61 percent of the country which calls itself more conservative than liberal. However, this conservatism has to be moderate if the party is not to be isolated from the bulk of the population which rejects either extreme.”

Now you COULD say his enthusiasm (ego?) got the best of him in the end. That’s not to say his moderate approach to solve problems did.

Aquagirl:

Thrice-married?

That pretty much describes today’s family values. There are exceptions to the rule…me being one of them.

I’m outta here for now.

Brosephus™

October 23rd, 2012
1:40 pm

getalife

My position is this… let them (the GOP) do what they want to do. If they’re right, the country will improve and hopefully so will the lives of everyone here. If they’re wrong, the country will crash and those ideas will go the way of the dodo bird. Sometimes, you have to actually let people fail in order for them to realize the mistakes in their thinking. I’ve had people teach me lessons that way, and I’ve done the same thing to others. However, if they’re right, then those who think the GOP is wrong will have to rethink their own thought process.

md

October 23rd, 2012
1:41 pm

“And he’s also said he’d be delighted to sign a law that will surely be offered to him if there’s a majority in both Houses.”

And there in lies the difference………..IF Congress takes it up and makes changes with majorities, then the people must have sent enough representatives to do so………..

curious

October 23rd, 2012
1:42 pm

I thought Romney said he’d sign in a law overturning Roe v Wade.
Also thought he recommended to Obama to use the Massachuetts law for healthcare.

Not sure what he wiould do. Are you?

He knows the best way to build the economy is to bomb Iran at the first suggestion of his Bush defense experts. WW3 will either get us to full employment or a few nukes from Russia will reduce the labor pool.

They BOTH suck

October 23rd, 2012
1:43 pm

@@

Climate change. He was for it before he was against it.

Lets be honest here. He said at one time he thought it was real, until he ran for President then he back tracked.

I would say he is a moderate on a few things, but overall he is a social conservative.

Thanks for the reply

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
1:44 pm

Bro,

We did that and it crashed. They did not learn anything.They want to do it again. Not going to happen.

We will focus on the middle class instead of Americans that need no help..

That is a change in focus like he did with aq.

md

October 23rd, 2012
1:45 pm

TBS…….that post on was specific points brought up in the prior post. I addressed what he posted.

As for some shifting positions, I’m well aware that some positions change, or shall we say “evolve”, but let’s take them one at a time if you like.

They BOTH suck

October 23rd, 2012
1:45 pm

md

Nice spin on the “if”.

I give you credit, you can spin with the best of them when defending or deflecting any given Republican being discussed or the party in general. You are one of the best, no doubt

Have a great day.

Peace

curious

October 23rd, 2012
1:46 pm

What’s Romney’s position on Evolution?

Kyle Wingfield

October 23rd, 2012
1:50 pm

getalife: If government spending kept recessions at bay, European economies would never shrink.

md

October 23rd, 2012
1:52 pm

“Nice spin on the “if”. ”

Merely reality……….and if done by congress, the will of a majority of people at that given point in time.

Unlike how Obamacare was handled……….using reconciliation in never a solution in my book and represents all that is wrong with Congress, regardless of which party uses it.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
1:53 pm

mitt and his wealthy friends will be just fine without any American or government help.

They don’t need it and it is waste.

Time to shift focus on Americans that could use some help.

romney says it but the gop never votes for it.

The choice is clear, vote to reelect the President and the dem party that actually votes to help the middle class.

Lets use some common sense folks.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
1:56 pm

Kyle,

You are still clinging to the idea Europe did not cut?

The people are protesting for nothing in Europe ?

Seriously?

Dusty

October 23rd, 2012
1:57 pm

Well, I did not watch last night’s debate of the two magnificents. . I guess there were no fireworks or I would have heard..

Kyle and Jay were smooth as silk. It’s downright despressing . No arguments!! (Kyle, what happened to your Southern accent? Did you lose it in Brussels?)

Let’s all send bouquets of beautiful flowers to Ohio. Tthe card will say “We love you. Let uis vote together!” Signed,” Your loving Republcans!”.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
1:58 pm

Kyle,

Not only did some of Europe cut, they raised taxes on the wealthy.

md

October 23rd, 2012
1:58 pm

Gee Get, didn’t Greece use that same common sense? Vote to give, and give, and give until the funds are all gone??

Yes, let’s use some common sense, starting with the fact that the private sector is the golden goose that lays the golden eggs and we need to make IT the priority, NOT the gov’t entity that makes no money.

Kyle Wingfield

October 23rd, 2012
1:59 pm

getalife: Clinging to … the data? Yes, yes I am.

And what’s more, European government spending has been high for decades now.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:00 pm

Dusty,

I know, mitt sounded like a dirty freaking hippie peace loving kumbaya singing liberal.

md

October 23rd, 2012
2:00 pm

“The people are protesting for nothing in Europe ?”

Actually, they are stomping their feet because they ran out of other peoples money and are still demanding more……….and they have their sights set on Germany.

You are a hoot.

Brosephus™

October 23rd, 2012
2:01 pm

If government spending kept recessions at bay, European economies would never shrink.

I don’t think it’s simply blanket spending, but I think it has more to do what or where the spending is done. Republicans have typically funded the increased spending into defense spending, which does create some jobs and it puts money back into the economy. The faster money circulates and the more of it there is to circulate will determine how fast the recovery comes.

Our economy isn’t influenced as much by manufacturing as it is by consumption. The more we spend, the better the economy does. I haven’t found anything to date that shows a difference in whether the money comes from the private or public sector. If the private sector isn’t spending/consuming, then somebody has to pick up the slack or we’ll never pick up out of a recession.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:01 pm

Kyle,

Yes,their spending was high like us.

Without government spending, what happens Kyle?

stands for decibels

October 23rd, 2012
2:03 pm

IF Congress takes it up and makes changes with majorities, then the people must have sent enough representatives to do so………..

“The people”, or the people who won the Great Redistricting Lottery of 2010?

Vote Democrat,,,Beats Using Your Brain

October 23rd, 2012
2:06 pm

Seems getalife has been drinking the class warfare Kool Aid Obama has been making, Thought he would have educated himself by now.

Dusty

October 23rd, 2012
2:09 pm

getalife,

Yes, the Europeans did make cuts. They have even dragged out the guillotine.

That may be a rumor but some guys in Mexico want to know if they can borrow the head whacke for more efficiency to get ahead. .(Whoops! Sorry! Just a weak moment..).

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:09 pm

Bro,

“If the private sector isn’t spending/consuming, then somebody has to pick up the slack or we’ll never pick up out of a recession.:

I would use the word depression but you got it right. The public sector does the spending or we get a depression like last time. Ben studied the depression and stop that gop austerity plan that failed in Europe.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:12 pm

Dusty,

They are already socialist so no need for head whacking.

That happens when the income and wealth gap is so large the people revolt.

If the gop win to grow that gap, it could happen here.

td

October 23rd, 2012
2:12 pm

If you ever want to see proof positive as to how much the LSM is in the pocket of Obama then all you have to do is watch this news story on CBS of an after debate group of undecided voters in Ohio.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/10/23/romney_wins_cbs_focus_group_in_ohio.html

md

October 23rd, 2012
2:13 pm

“Not only did some of Europe cut, they raised taxes on the wealthy.”

Yes, they did, and it is doing a fine job of scaring off businesses:

http://www.france24.com/en/20121007-rich-businessmen-pulling-out-france-tax-hit-looms

How about we do it here too? What say you Will Smith:

“Smith explained why he supported the idea of paying higher taxes, saying, “I have no issue with paying taxes and whatever needs to be done for my country to grow. I believe very firmly that my ability to sit here — I’m a black man who didn’t go to college, yet I get to travel around the world and sell my movies, and I believe very firmly that America is the only place on Earth that I could exist. So I will pay anything that I need to pay to keep my country growing.”

The interviewer then said, “Do you know how much in France you would have to pay on earnings above 1 million euros [French President Francois Hollande's proposal]? Not 30 percent – 75 percent.”

At that point, Smith said, “75? Yeah, that’s different, that’s different. Yeah, 75. Well, you know, God bless America.””

@@

October 23rd, 2012
2:14 pm

TBs:

When it comes to climate change, Newt’s only deviance from his original position was that it’s unproven that man in the sole contributor. In light of “Climategate” that’s true.

Cue the sofa ad where Pelosi said: “We need cleaner forms of energy…” In response, Newt had this to say: “If enough of us demand action from our leaders, we can spark the INNOVATION we need.” Nothing about Cap & Trade.

Alternative energy remains on his list of things to pursue.

Now enough about Gingrich, since he’s not the nominee.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:14 pm

Vote Dem,.

I agree vote Dem that vote to help the middle class but it is not class warfare.

The wealthy won that war.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:15 pm

md,

How else will pay for the collapse?

The only people that can afford it.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
2:16 pm

“mitt said government should not help our President helped them.”

Mitt proved once again last night that Obama was lying about Mitt’s plan for GM, getalife.

Too bad you didn’t pay attention.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:19 pm

“Mitt proved once again last night that Obama was lying about Mitt’s plan for GM, getalife.”

He lied. The only one that would loan the money to our auto industry was the government.

mitt said the government should not do it. Fact.

jconservative

October 23rd, 2012
2:21 pm

In looking at the Politico version of the Real Clear map and poll data I have Obama with 277 electoral votes if the election is today. I have Obama with Iowa, Ohio, Nevada and Wisconsin among the 9 close states. I have Colorado, New Hampshire and Virginia as to close to call.

As Kyle notes, 2 weeks is 2 weeks.

md

October 23rd, 2012
2:22 pm

““The people”, or the people who won the Great Redistricting Lottery of 2010?”

I do believe we voted in 2010 too……right? Both “sides” had a chance to “win” that lottery……so yes, the people, at that given point in time.

md

October 23rd, 2012
2:26 pm

“How else will pay for the collapse?

The only people that can afford it.”

How else to pay for it? I’d suggest they best figure that out if those with the cash are now going elsewhere……….it’s pretty stupid to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs and then demand it lay some more.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:26 pm

I would suggest Kyle and Jay read the transcript of the debate and debate every issue our President said mitt got wrong.

That would liven up the discussion but our President told the truth.

mitt got it wrong like the gop normally does.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:28 pm

md,

You want the middle class to pay for it?

Why?

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
2:28 pm

“mitt said the government should not do it. Fact.”

Sorry, getalife, but you and your boy were proven wrong once again.

Obama claimed Romney wanted to “liquidate” Detroit. Romney never said that.

Obama claimed that Romney wouldn’t use government to bail out GM. Romney ALWAYS said he’s use government guaranteed loans if the private sector didn’t step up.

Romney claimed (rightly) that a properly managed bankruptcy would force GM to make the systemic changes needed to succeed in the future without government help. They never had to do those changes with the bailout.

Your President is a failure from top to bottom, getalife.

And neither of you can accept reality.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:31 pm

mitt wanted the private sector to loan them the money . Fact.

Private sector would not so government did. Fact.

Nice spin but bs.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:33 pm

It would lose another 1 million jobs.

Your party already lost 9 million jobs.

They are good at that.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
2:36 pm

Getalife:

Romney proposed federal assistance but only AFTER GM went through bankruptcy.

The American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk.”

As it stands now, GM is still at risk of failing. The collapse of A123 brings their eventual demise even closer.

And we paid for ^^^ both?????

@@

October 23rd, 2012
2:38 pm

Why do my slanties persist after I’ve closed them off?

Dusty

October 23rd, 2012
2:38 pm

I just read Kyle’s last comentary and he said that George W. Bush won last night’s debate.

If I had known that, I would have been watchng. Romney is excellent presidential timber but George W. Bush was the strong one in the storm. Republicans know how to find good men to lead when the going gets rough and believe me, the “going’ is very rough now.

curious

October 23rd, 2012
2:40 pm

From CNN Money, 23 OCT

“But in the 2008 piece, Romney said the money needed to keep General Motors (GM, Fortune 500) and Chrysler Group alive during bankruptcy should have come from the private sector, with the government providing only “guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing.” Those guarantees would have made lenders whole if the automakers subsequently defaulted.

The problem was that there was no one available to write checks for the automakers other than the government in late 2008 and early 2009.”

If no money from the private sector, then what?

Dusty

October 23rd, 2012
2:43 pm

@@

Are you sitting on a crooked chair? Slanting floor? Aboard ship?

Just trying to diagnose your “slanties”.

I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...

October 23rd, 2012
2:45 pm

kookman looks like an electrocuted Tom Petty with Alzheimers, and then he rolls right into the DNC talking point babbling lunacy freak show, so I guess nothing has changed.

She’s still in love with her little token, regardless.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:46 pm

“The reality is that if the feds hadn’t put up the loans needed to keep those two companies afloat, they would have gone into liquidation, not reorganization. Chaotic sell-off, not managed bankruptcy. And such a collapse could have taken with it companies that provided critical parts to all U.S. auto factories” LATimes.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
2:50 pm

I see, getalife.

@@ and I provide facts to back up our (and Romney’s assertions, and you put up your opinion, and that of the LA Times.

There is a difference between fact, getalife, and opinion.

And you don’t know that difference.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:51 pm

mitt was dead wrong like our President said but losing another million jobs to make it 10 million lost jobs does not bother him. Bain made money that way. He loves to fire 47% of the American people.

He would be worse than w.

Dusty

October 23rd, 2012
2:52 pm

getalife,

In case you haven’t heard, Bookman has a “nice” blog where you can rant and rave, stretch the truth and canonize Obama. .It’s a perfect fit for you.

Don’t miss such a golden opportunity by posting here.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
2:57 pm

Getalife:

Chaotic sell-off, not managed bankruptcy.

Romney wasn’t proposing a chaotic sell-off. He’s was proposing a MANAGED BANKRUPTCY!

See: A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs.

Other companies have done it and lived to see a better day.

Are you saying GM was/is incapable?

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
2:58 pm

mitt’s first position was “Let Detroit go bankrupt”.

After the bailout worked the spin and bs began .

You cons are easily fooled.

.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
3:00 pm

Getalife used to see the flaws within both parties. Now he only sees the flaws in one…the GOP.

I fear Getalife has fallen off the cliff into the left’s Utopian Valley.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
3:01 pm

“mitt’s first position was “Let Detroit go bankrupt”.”

Again not true.

That was a title of the opinion piece, not his plan.

You are easily fooled.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
3:04 pm

Getalife:

Mitt’s original statement was made in 2008….

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/opinion/19romney.html?_r=1&

last two paragraphs.

md

October 23rd, 2012
3:06 pm

“If no money from the private sector, then what?”

Guess we’ll never know since this president is a gov’t as a first option kind of guy…….that is unless they need to do it again a la Chrysler…….how many times should a gov’t bail out a single company?

Now that Obama sold them to the Italians, I sure hope we’ve eliminated the 3rd time is a charm possibility.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
3:06 pm

I liked the other Getalife better. I could, at least, agree with some of what he said.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
3:07 pm

The truth is that Romney was advocating for private bankruptcy at a time when banks weren’t lending. Credit was frozen.It would fail.Government loan was the only solution.

w agreed with our President but wanted no strings attached like with the banks. Our President’ s bailout had strings attached. Do you know what the strings attached are since you think you are informed?

Do tell cons.

JDW

October 23rd, 2012
3:07 pm

@Tiberius…”Romney ALWAYS said he’s use government guaranteed loans if the private sector didn’t step up.”

Of course you leave out the small fact that NO ONE was willing to make a guaranteed loan at the time and IT WAS TRIED…

What Mittens himself said was….

“The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk.”

Please note the “post-bankruptcy” part, without government financing there is no post bankruptcy. Of course Tiberius won’t be able to grasp that fact so from Bob Lutz, Republican and Romeny supporter…

“”He thinks we didn’t try to borrow money from the banks?” Lutz told the Detroit Free Press in February. “The banks were even more broke than we were. Who had the money?” ”

Romney’s plan would have led to liquidation pure and simple.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
3:09 pm

@@,

The old getalife will be back after this election.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
3:09 pm

““If no money from the private sector, then what?””

curious, you DO know what government guarantees do to money availability, don’t you?

It frees up money in tight times.

‘Cause it’s, you know, guaranteed.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
3:13 pm

Getalife:

I regret to say that my view of you has been tainted over the years.

If anything, you SHOULD be a libertarian looking to free yourself from government.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
3:13 pm

Ohio will vote for our President because he saved their jobs.

Keep lying and trying but they already made up their minds.

Our President will win Ohio and this election.

16 is not too far away.

Try honesty and patriotism.

It is the American way.

stands for decibels

October 23rd, 2012
3:14 pm

I do believe we voted in 2010 too……right? Both “sides” had a chance to “win” that lottery…

Obviously I was indulging in a bit of snark, but I do bristle a bit when I hear “the people” invoked to describe a process that can be incredibly anti (small “d”) democratic.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
3:15 pm

See my 3:09 for a reality check,JDW.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
3:15 pm

@@,

Sadly, I watched you move right way out of the main stream.

Come back to the left a little in the real world @@.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
3:16 pm

Well, getalife has been caught and has run out of arguments, so he brings out the same, tired patriotism meme.

md

October 23rd, 2012
3:18 pm

“The truth is that Romney was advocating for private bankruptcy at a time when banks weren’t lending. Credit was frozen.It would fail.Government loan was the only solution.”

Must be forgetting that romney comes from the land of “private” equity……..banks aren’t the only option.

md

October 23rd, 2012
3:20 pm

“Obviously I was indulging in a bit of snark, but I do bristle a bit when I hear “the people” invoked to describe a process that can be incredibly anti (small “d”) democratic.”

I guess it wasn’t as obvious as intended, but even that process was voted on…….the “people” had the option of showing up in droves to make the difference……one side chose not to.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
3:21 pm

md,

Private sector said no so government said yes.

Do you know the strings attached for this bailout?

@@

October 23rd, 2012
3:22 pm

Getalife:

And if you wanna be truly objective, Obama was just riding George Bush’s coattails on GM’s bailout. Bush provided short-term bridge loans

I parted company with Bush when it came to bailing out anyone.

Bailouts ain’t my thang!

md

October 23rd, 2012
3:27 pm

“The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk.”

“Please note the “post-bankruptcy” part, without government financing there is no post bankruptcy. Of course Tiberius won’t be able to grasp that fact so from Bob Lutz, Republican and Romeny supporter…”

Bad assumption……..the “post” part merely refers to after it is taken into bankruptcy…….and I’d hazard to guess there would have been several takers on gov’t guaranteed loans from private equity, to include foreign investors………..what did most of them do with their money anyhow? Put it into gov’t treasuries paying next to nothing in the way of return………seemed to be a no brainer if the feds were going to backstop it.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
3:27 pm

@@,

There ya go.

This is a good opportunity for w to set the record straight but he is chilling in Dallas.

Ford was upset because they had money but would lose auto part industry and that would end Ford.

Private equity like Bain said no loans so w agreed to bail them out with no strings attached like the banks. Our President took over the bailouts and added strings. Do you know what they were?

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
3:28 pm

“Private sector said no so government said yes.”

Private sector said no because there were no government guarantees offered, getalife.

It was much easier for Obama to short-circuit the private-sector solution and put together a sweetheart deal for his union backers and stick it to the investors of GM.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
3:29 pm

Getalife:

GM can now make fewer cars and remain profitable. The big question remains…who can afford those cars? Not many.

The Treasury Dept has admitted that $23 billion of that loan will never be paid back. That’s $23 billion in taxpayer loans. Perhaps that’s because $21 billion went to the union’s retiree health benefit fund.

I don’t belong to a union. Why the heck am I paying for one?

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
3:32 pm

@@,

No, try again.

What strings are attached to the auto bailout?

@@

October 23rd, 2012
3:34 pm

Getalife:

Did you miss the part where I said I parted company with GWB over his bailouts. I don’t show favoritism when it comes to bailouts. At some point they become a permanent solution to what would otherwise be a short-term problem.

GM dilly dallied far too long. They could’ve fixed their own problems long ago.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
3:38 pm

Here’s a nice take on what really happened with the GM bailout. Biased, to be sure, but it has some meat on it.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/316379/democrats-gm-fiction-editors#

JDW

October 23rd, 2012
3:38 pm

@Tiberius..which part of they tried the guarantees and no one bit are you missing? See Lutz for perspective.

Just because you believe your own nonsense doesn’t mean the rest of us will…

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
3:40 pm

The dems added the strings to the auto bailout and you will enjoy more miles to the gallon and green energy jobs to produce green energy cars.

We are second to China in investing in green energy but some will fail like the Internet. Look at the ones that are making it not the ones that fail.

Those are job creators.

Vote Democrat,,,Beats Using Your Brain

October 23rd, 2012
3:41 pm

Don”t you guys know better than to engage getalife? He has his head so far up Obama, if getalife sneezed, he would hit Obama’s hemorrhoids. He’s just too far gone :-)

@@

October 23rd, 2012
3:42 pm

Getalife:

What strings are attached to the auto bailout?

They had to contribute to contribute to Obama’s campaign?

Bush’s bridge loans were temporary. He was on his way out.

Obama was in it for the big haul.

schnirt

Hillbilly D

October 23rd, 2012
3:43 pm

No matter which of these two wins, the doo doo is going to hit the fan about March or April, in my opinion.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
3:43 pm

Vote Dem,

I agree to vote Dem.

Grow up son.

Vote Democrat,,,Beats Using Your Brain

October 23rd, 2012
3:45 pm

Romney’s plan did not involve buying off the unions so taxpayers could lose billions of dollars. End of story.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
3:46 pm

@@,

Unions already vote dem because the gop wants to end them.

They always will unless the gop changes.

That will not happen and the gop will not vote for the middle class.

You are middle class so you vote against yourself.

Vote Democrat,,,Beats Using Your Brain

October 23rd, 2012
3:47 pm

You prove my point, you choose to vote Democrat because you are not using your brain. Game, Set, Match.

Vote Democrat,,,Beats Using Your Brain

October 23rd, 2012
3:48 pm

Class Warfare Much? MIddle Class yayayayayayaya

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
3:48 pm

You mean Bob Lutz, he of the “defending the Chevy Volt” fame, JDW?

I’ll point out that your quote from him doesn’t doesn’t mention any loan guarantees by the government at all, since, you know, they had never been offered by the Obama administration.

So another epic fail on your part.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
3:48 pm

I proved my point.

Game over,

You lose.

bu2

October 23rd, 2012
3:49 pm

What happened in Italy is what would happen in the US if we have 4 more years of liberal government and judges:
http://blogs.voanews.com/breaking-news/2012/10/23/italian-scientists-resign-to-protest-earthquake-ruling/

Maybe the President of McDonalds would be convicted for making coffee too hot and not warning people.

Hillbilly D

October 23rd, 2012
3:50 pm

Who’s that doing all that jabbering in the background around the 11:00-12:00 minute mark?

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
3:50 pm

The mindless drudgey attack on the Volt is self destruction.

Another job killer.

Pitiful, you have no idea what you are doing fighting against American jobs.

Wake up.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
3:51 pm

Getalife:

Without Cap & Tax, Obama ain’t got squat when it comes to green energy jobs.

Just like California, states will collapse under the regulatory and financial burden of green energy.

Vote Democrat,,,Beats Using Your Brain

October 23rd, 2012
3:53 pm

You certainly did..that a vote for a Democrat is evidence of not using your brain. If you read Romney’s op-ed there is no way you can say what you are saying and you believe government spending is the answer. Government does not creates jobs and every dollar they spend is taken from YOUR MIDDLE CLASS and spent inefficiently.
Now whose voting against themselves?

@@

October 23rd, 2012
3:53 pm

Hillbilly:

Who’s that doing all that jabbering in the background around the 11:00-12:00 minute mark?

A bunch of women on break?

(ISH)

JDW

October 23rd, 2012
3:57 pm

@Tiberius…”So another epic fail on your part.”

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

md

October 23rd, 2012
3:58 pm

“What strings are attached to the auto bailout?”

Some of the profits now go to Italy??

@@

October 23rd, 2012
4:15 pm

We can talk about Europe’s financial collapses all day long but we have only to look to our far-left coast for the proof of failed dem policies.

They’re goin’ down!!!

California budget hole swallows mortgage aid
Foreclosure relief funds diverted to perennial budget gap.

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/housing-375029-state-settlement.html

@@

October 23rd, 2012
4:17 pm

And

…while Democrats like to present themselves as defenders of the little guy, they don’t seem to mind that small businesses are being mugged by large unions and corporations. In fact, they’re leading the assault.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203406404578071061978710082.html

Big corporations AND unions killing off the little guy.

cc

October 23rd, 2012
4:23 pm

@@, you are absolutely on point with regard to CA and failed dem policies. In fact, that is a very good example of what the USA would look like if the dems are left to their own devices.

It would be difficult, but the dems would find a way to clain that it was “all George Bush’ fault!”

md

October 23rd, 2012
4:36 pm

The real fireworks will start when CA is deemed ‘too big to fail”…….and balanced budget States like GA are forced to step in and pay for their bad choices………..

I demand to see Cheesy Grits Birth Certificate- Long Form Please

October 23rd, 2012
4:37 pm

Before Obama took over the economy was in free fall. Unemployment was skyrocketing.

Now things are beginning to turn around and you guys wanna go back to Bush 2.0

Thanks but no thanks

cc

October 23rd, 2012
4:43 pm

Cheesy:

Just become accustomed to hearing and saying, “President Romney”. You’ll be hearing that pretty often 2013-2020.

Kyle Wingfield

October 23rd, 2012
4:45 pm

Hillbilly @ 3:50: I’m withholding the names to protect the guilty, but it’s my fault for not properly asking everyone at nearby desks to remain quiet. If we do it again, I’ll make sure it’s better.

I demand to see Cheesy Grits Birth Certificate- Long Form Please

October 23rd, 2012
4:45 pm

One thing you can count on for sure.

Look at the Electoral map.

The red states. High on welfare and food stamps ( Georgia a deep red state has 2 million on food stamps alone ). Highest on those not paying taxes. Lowest ranks in education.

The blue states. Less of the above and a much higher percentage of college graduates.

In many cases it comes down to education.

The more educated a society the more liberally they vote. They are less likely to be fooled by people like Multiple Choice Mitt.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
4:46 pm

@@.

United States are number two in investing in green energy.

Google it.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
4:51 pm

mitt had no idea what he was talking about last night.

Mali?

Syria does not have a coast?

Way out of his league.

He got schooled by our President.

Game over.

cc

October 23rd, 2012
4:54 pm

“In many cases it comes down to education.”

No. In many cases, it comes down to liberal indoctrination.

“The more educated a society the more liberally they vote.”

Indoctrinated by liberal college teachers who were themselves indoctrinated by liberal college teachers, most of them educated far beyond their intelligence and unable to perform any tasks necessary for survival in the real world.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
5:01 pm

Getalife:

And what have we got to show for those green energy investments?

President Obama’s Taxpayer-Backed Green Energy Failures

34 faltering, failing or already failed.

Obama’s three Fs.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
5:01 pm

bu2 @ 3:49: that might well be the most nonsensical post I have ever read anywhere. Please explain to me what that has to do with anything liberal? You must have really had to dig deep to find that.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
5:03 pm

Getalife:

Do you have a response to my 4:15 and 4:17?

cc

October 23rd, 2012
5:04 pm

YOUR ATTENTION PLEASE!

Bookman’s blog is missing an idiot. Would the missing idiot please return to Bookman’s blog?

Thank you for your attention. You may now resume normal blogging.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
5:07 pm

cc: “Bookman’s blog is missing an idiot. Would the missing idiot please return to Bookman’s blog?”

And who might that be?

They BOTH suck

October 23rd, 2012
5:13 pm

cc

But you are not a Bookman regular.

Why say that you are?

mike

October 23rd, 2012
5:17 pm

It’s obvious now that this is just another nut-case day on Kyle’s right-wing nut-case blog. All the live-long day they extol the virtues of George W. Bush and why we need to elect George W. Bush II to “finish” what George W. Bush the first started. There are still jobs that need to be outsourced. There are still tax cuts to be enacted. There are wars that remain as yet un-started. There regulations that need to be dismantled. Don’t forget about all those green energy projects that Obama started and failed. Yes, hypocrites are us here on Wingfield’s blog.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
5:21 pm

Ellen DeGeneres Celebrated in D.C. as She Claims Top Humor Prize

“Ellen has one of those universal, observational, non-mean-spirited comedy voices,” said Sean Hayes. “When the country has become so cynical…she is one of the few that we look to make us laugh,” he added.

I wholeheartedly agree.

http://entertainment.time.com/2012/10/23/ellen-degeneres-celebrated-in-d-c-as-winner-of-mark-twain-prize-for-american-humor/

Congrats to Ellen. She deserves it.

md

October 23rd, 2012
5:23 pm

Hey Mike, quick question……..are you an advocate for giving back your tax cut or just those of others??

clem

October 23rd, 2012
5:27 pm

romoney has more positions than the kama sutra

mike

October 23rd, 2012
5:27 pm

I am an advocate of:

1. returning taxes to the Clinton era

2. returning military spending to the Clinton era

3. repealing tax laws that favor offshoring of American jobs

4. abandoning the neo-con policies of hegemony

5. enacting a tariff on Chinese goods

6. adopting a balanced budget amendment

How’s that?

@@

October 23rd, 2012
5:28 pm

I guess Getalife didn’t have a response to what dems were doing out in California.

Big corps and unions attacking small business owners?

Talk about self-deportation.

Could be subversive xenophobia. Stranger things have happened out there.

Government stealing from distressed homeowners?

Since it’s dems what’s doin’ it….no protest from Getalife.

Alrighty din! Let the little man be damned in Cali!!!

schnirt

mike

October 23rd, 2012
5:34 pm

@@:

“Big corps and unions attacking small business owners?”

“Government stealing from distressed homeowners?”

@@: could you do us all a favor and post a link that backs up those claims? I know everyone on the blog would appreciate it.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
5:36 pm

“Syria is Iran’s only ally in the Arab world. It’s their route to the sea.” mitt

Freaking out over Mali?

mitt is a joke.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
5:38 pm

@@,

List the companies that are doing green energy business.

Focusing on the negative made you a very negative person.

Try to look at the positive to be happier.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
5:39 pm

“romoney has more positions than the kama sutra”

Good one :)

md

October 23rd, 2012
5:41 pm

I can agree with some of those, but I don’t think it’s a good idea to raise taxes on everybody in a sluggish economy that is slowing down, nor do I think it is a good idea to reduce military spending at a time when the world seems to be catching on fire, and I definitely think it is a bad idea to get in a trade war over tariffs……..

And the offshoring of jobs has more to do with our own buying habits than anything else……talk to your neighbors if you want that to change……

md

October 23rd, 2012
5:45 pm

md

October 23rd, 2012
5:46 pm

“Syria is Iran’s only ally in the Arab world. It’s their route to the sea.” mitt

And get, you need to expand your comprehension a bit, did he say anything about ships or water going vessels? He said…..”route to the sea”, which it is.

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 23rd, 2012
5:47 pm

Try to look at the positive to be happier.

Yep, I agree, Rasmussen and Gallup both have Romney over 50%, can’t get much better than that!

md

October 23rd, 2012
5:48 pm

mike

October 23rd, 2012
5:49 pm

md: “I don’t think it’s a good idea to raise taxes on everybody in a sluggish economy that is slowing down”

That’s exactly what they said to Bill Clinton. Amazingly, when he did raise taxes, the economy took off. And he presided over the longest PEACE time expansion is the history of the United States. Coincidence?

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 23rd, 2012
5:50 pm

Romney passes Barry in likeability; now that is positive!

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 23rd, 2012
5:51 pm

And he presided over the longest PEACE time expansion is the history of the United States.

Mike, I think you got the wrong President there, should be Reagan holding that title.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
5:52 pm

md: “I definitely think it is a bad idea to get in a trade war over tariffs……..”

md: let me ask you a question. If we were to get into a trade war with China, who do you think would lose? Conversely, we have everything to gain from a trade war with China since they are killing our country.

MarkV

October 23rd, 2012
5:52 pm

Kyle has claimed in his debate with Jay, that the Romney’s flip flops claims “that the Obama campaign tried to push” had not had really that much effect.

I wonder, how does or did Kyle know that?

MarkV

October 23rd, 2012
5:54 pm

And perhaps even more importantly, what does it say about Kyle that the flip flops do not bother him?

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 23rd, 2012
5:55 pm

Were we not busy saving the Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo during Clinton’s regime. How could it be called Peace Time, Mike. Slick Willie thinks highly of that war, as it brought us love and admiration, from all the Muslims throughout the world. Don’t you see how that conflict changed the world?

md

October 23rd, 2012
5:56 pm

You might want to read up on those Clinton tax hikes, the economy wasn’t exactly as dormant as it is now………and then check the growth AFTER the tax cuts in 1997. I think you have some faulty info.

Going home……..

md

October 23rd, 2012
5:58 pm

“If we were to get into a trade war with China, who do you think would lose?”

last one……we’d both lose, as the reason our consumers buy all the cheap crap from offshore is because it’s all they can afford……….

Now out.

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 23rd, 2012
5:58 pm

MarkV

What does it say, about MarkV, that Obama’s evolution (that is what he calls his flip/flops) on issues does not bother him?

@@

October 23rd, 2012
6:03 pm

Getalife:

@@: could you do us all a favor and post a link that backs up those claims?

I already did—The OC Register and WSJ.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
6:05 pm

md: “the reason our consumers buy all the cheap crap from offshore is because it’s all they can afford…”

Now the irony in statement is overwhelming. Let’s turn that statement around shall we?

The reason cheap crap from China is all our consumers can afford is because all of the decent paying jobs have been outsourced to China.

MarkV

October 23rd, 2012
6:16 pm

Nobody other than Romney can know now how Romney would govern if elected. He has shown himself to be so thoroughly unprincipled, that electing him would be buying a pig in a poke. His supporters certainly cannot say the same about Obama, after telling us all the time what his policies are.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
6:18 pm

“Kyle has claimed in his debate with Jay, that the Romney’s flip flops claims “that the Obama campaign tried to push” had not had really that much effect.

I wonder, how does or did Kyle know that?”

Because Kyle can actually read polls, MarkV. Months of attacking Romney, and all it took was ONE debate to destroy the entirety of the Obama attack machine.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
6:21 pm

“Nobody other than Romney can know now how Romney would govern if elected.”

Actually, many people can, because many people have taken the time to research the overwhelmingly successful record Mitt Romney has as Governor of Massachusetts and running the Salt Lake City Games.

“He has shown himself to be so thoroughly unprincipled, that electing him would be buying a pig in a poke.”

Opinion. And wrong opinion to boot.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
6:23 pm

“The reason cheap crap from China is all our consumers can afford is because all of the decent paying jobs have been outsourced to China.”

Let’s see if mike can play the “Cause and Effect” game.

What caused those jobs to go overseas, mikey? Hint: It is a one-word answer that begins with the letter “U”.

MarkV

October 23rd, 2012
6:29 pm

People who think that being a Governor of Massachusetts and running the Salt Lake City Games shows what kinds of policy would Romney pursue as the President, after he has changed his position so thoroughly on most important issues during the campaign, would believe anything.

MarkV

October 23rd, 2012
6:31 pm

Polls a half day after the debate – yeh, sure, they are telling us.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
6:33 pm

People who think Romney has changed positions so many times based on cherry-picked and parsed sound bites are idiots.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
6:39 pm

Polls like Gallup are tends, MarkV. Just like Rasmussen’s. Over time, they tell a narrative of where a campaign is heading.

Add into the mix the one-time polls following the debates, which showed ZERO movement in how the electorate feels, and the tea leaves are looking better and better for a Romney victory.

Bob Beckel knows politics, and even HE says that if Romney stays above his current 50+% number, it will be almost impossible for Obama to win. Internal polls (usually more accurate than public polls) are beginning to be discussed in the media, and they are unanimously bad news for Obama.

In short, a picture is being painted of a Romney ascendency, and an Obama decline.

And that is only good for America.

MarkV

October 23rd, 2012
6:39 pm

People who do not recognize Romney’s changes in position are idiots.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
6:41 pm

Tiberius: “What caused those jobs to go overseas, mikey? Hint: It is a one-word answer that begins with the letter “U”.”

Try short-term profits. Short-sighted policy. That policy is coming home to roost. Notice the stock market down by 250 points today. Outsourcing jobs can’t help but outsource demand. There’s no getting around it. Can you say the Law of Diminishing Returns?

By the way, Kyle, I hope you noticed that Tiberius called me by other than my log-in name.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
6:41 pm

If you think you are a car guy but write a op ed titled “Let Detroit go bankrupt” you have romnesia,

Knock out.

Down goes mitt in Ohio.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
6:44 pm

@@,

Where is the lost of green companies that made it?

Think positive @@.

Be happy.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
6:44 pm

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
6:44 pm

mikey, you listed “effects”, not causes.

Man up and admit the cause.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
6:46 pm

“Where is the list of green companies that made it?”

I’m sure it should be easy to find.

It’s not as if it’s a long one.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
6:46 pm

“What caused those jobs to go overseas”

Cheap labor to increase profits.

Duh.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
6:47 pm

“I’m sure it should be easy to find.

It’s not as if it’s a long one.”

Prove it con.

Show me con.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
6:48 pm

Face it, mitt lied and got called out and destroyed.

He lost.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
6:50 pm

You are wrong Tiberius. Take the most recent well-publicized case of Sensa. There’s was a non-union shop. The company was wildly profitable. Yet, its owner — Bain Capital — decided to close the shop down and send it to China to make even more profits. That left 170 workers without jobs right here before Christmas. What’s more disgusting is that the American workers were forced to train their Chinese replacements. You are trying to paint this issue with a broad brush and you are wrong.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
6:55 pm

My apologies. The name of the company is Sensata Technologies if you want to Google it.

@@

October 23rd, 2012
6:56 pm

Getalife:

It’s hard for me to be happy when so many families have lost their jobs or are in fear of losing their jobs.

I’m out for the night.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
6:57 pm

And you ALMOST got there, mikey!

And I had so much hope for you.

Do you think union wages paid in other shops don’t have an effect on wages in non-union shops, mike?

Cause and Effect. Something libs need schooling on each and every day.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
6:58 pm

“Face it, mitt lied and got called out and destroyed.”

And yet he didn’t.

On either point.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
7:02 pm

Tiberius: if you think a condescending or patronizing attitude is going to win any argument with me you are incorrect. It wouldn’t have mattered if those workers were making minimum wage, their jobs would have still be shipped to China.

What’s more telling is that the right is so brainwashed that they believe that shipping jobs to a communist country is better than paying their own citizens a living wage.

But, like I said, the outsourcing strategy is reaching is logical conclusion: a permanent destruction of demand in the developed countries of the world.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:08 pm

“What’s more telling is that the right is so brainwashed that they believe that shipping jobs to a communist country is better than paying their own citizens a living wage.”

Define a “living wage”, mike.

Please use the “cause and effect” model to make your point. I’ll shoot it down when you’re done.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
7:11 pm

Well, let’s start with this, Tiberius: how much does it cost you to live every month? How much is your mortgage, your car payment, your health insurance, your grocery bills, your utilities? Add all of those up and give me a number.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
7:17 pm

The most important part of the story is that Sensata Technologies is profitable operating in Illinois. Net income last year was $355 million, up 16 percent from 2010. The company reported total revenues of $1.8 billion in 2011, up almost 19 percent from the year before. According to a company financial statement, “both 2011 net revenue and adjusted net income represent record levels for the company.”

Forget all that, we’re sending your jobs to China.

http://truth-out.org/news/item/12151-romneys-bain-capital-is-sending-many-jobs-to-china-the-day-before-the-election

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:17 pm

Once again, mike, you use “effect”.

Why are home prices so high?

Why do cars cost so much?

Why is health care so expensive?

Once you can answer the “why”, your enlightenment can begin.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
7:21 pm

No, Tiberius, you answer the question I put to you in my 7:11 or admit defeat. It’s an easy question. You shouldn’t have any problem with that. It’s simple arithmetic. You’re just obfuscating.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:23 pm

“Net income last year was $355 million, up 16 percent from 2010.”

Careful here, mike. “Net income” does not necessarily mean “profits”.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:24 pm

Too bad, mike.

And here I thought you might be here to learn something, but your mind is obviously closed tighter than a clam.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
7:29 pm

Tiberius: I personally feel really sorry for you. You and many of your brainwashed right-wingers are trying to defend the indefensible. There is no logical reason for outsourcing except for short-term, short-sighted greed.

But you’re all so brainwashed by Rush, etc. that you feel outsourcing is justified by those evil unions. Time to wake up, America, before your job</strong is outsourced.

Thankfully, outsourcing, like food poisoning is a self-limiting disease. Once enough demand is destroyed, corporate profits decline. We are now at that point.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:35 pm

“But you’re all so brainwashed by Rush,”

As usual, you’re wrong on that as well. I don’t listen to Rush.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:36 pm

Oh, and I’m early retired, too, so my job (as it were) can’t be outsourced.

You’re on a roll with being wrong tonight, mike.

Liz

October 23rd, 2012
7:38 pm

If Obama wins, it will be because the freedom to make “the choice” with regard to reproductive rights was seen as at great risk if Mitt Romney/or any Republican won. Allowing the Governor of Virginia to be the primary author of this year’s Republican Convention platform, given what Virginia nearly passed into law (requiring the most intrusion/ invasive/transvaginal type of ultrasound), did not go unnoticed by women, who care deeply about their rights.

The Republican party has tried to spin this election as a referendum on the slow recovery of our world wide economy. China’s cheating and Obama let him get away with it. Romney holds the secret to increasing take home pay, and jump starting the US and North America economies. Just wished he had shared it with members of Congress, earlier. I understand he wants to eliminate taxes on most of his investment income, and others. Wondered who might that might impact the most, and how many decades before the monies held in the Caymans make it back to America?

cc

October 23rd, 2012
7:38 pm

“There is no logical reason for outsourcing except for short-term, short-sighted greed.”

How does Obama explain HIS outsourcing?

I’m not going to play your “provide a cite” game. You can Google as well as any lib can (I’m strictly guessing at that).

mike

October 23rd, 2012
7:39 pm

I want each and every one of you to think about what is going to happen to those 170 workers who have been laid off from the Sensata Technologies plant. Once their unemployment runs out, (or before) they will be forced to take a minimum wage job (if they can find one). Minimum wage is $7.25/hr. (or around $14,000 a year or $1,166 a month. Let’s see how far that $1,166 goes. Subtract $800 for rent. Subtract $300 for a car payment. Well, now we have $66 to pay for groceries, health insurance, utilities, medical expenses, etc. Any questions?

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
7:40 pm

Like Biden said, cons are full of bs.

No doubt about it.

Vice President Biden told the truth then laughed in ryan’s face.

That was the highlight of this cycle.

cc

October 23rd, 2012
7:41 pm

“If Obama wins, it will be because the freedom to make “the choice” with regard to reproductive rights was seen as at great risk if Mitt Romney/or any Republican won”

I believe that the majority of women of child-bearing age are now pro-life rather than pro-death.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
7:42 pm

cc: “How does Obama explain HIS outsourcing?”

cc: The last time I checked Obama doesn’t own any companies. Unlike Romney and Bain Capital.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:42 pm

“The Republican party has tried to spin this election as a referendum on the slow recovery of our world wide economy.”

Spin, Liz? As in, there isn’t a slow recovery going on?

Most normal people would call it a fact, Liz.

“Romney holds the secret to increasing take home pay, and jump starting the US and North America economies. Just wished he had shared it with members of Congress, earlier.”

Actually, it’s no secret, Liz, and Congress knows what it is. However, there’s a little blockade in the road called the U.S. Senate and a Presidential veto waiting after that. But don’t worry; at least one of those will be fixed in January of 2013.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:44 pm

“Vice President Biden told the truth then laughed in ryan’s face.”

And yet Romney’s poll numbers continue to climb.

Looks like America isn’t buying yours or Biden’s so-called “truth”, getalife.

cc

October 23rd, 2012
7:46 pm

” The last time I checked Obama doesn’t own any companies. Unlike Romney and Bain Capital.”

. . . and we ALL know that he has no influence on work awarded by the fed, and he has no impact on either bailout or stimulus spending.

Nice no-answer . . .

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:46 pm

Hey, mike, have you figured out whether Sensata is making any profit yet?

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:47 pm

Why can’t Mitt own companies?

It’s not as if he doesn’t own Obama right now . . . :D

mike

October 23rd, 2012
7:49 pm

Tiberius: “Hey, mike, have you figured out whether Sensata is making any profit yet?”

That kind of puerile, imbecilic comment is about what I would expect from you.

Nothing to say, just noise.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:51 pm

“Attacking me is not a policy, Mr. President” – Mitt Romney, October 22, 2012

President Obama, meet your Daddy . . . :D

cc

October 23rd, 2012
7:52 pm

Tib, Mitt owns Obama lock, stock and barrel. Next, he will training Obama to sit up and beg!

Oh, I forgot! Obama is already begging . . . for another four years because he hasn’t completed the destruction of America yet.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:52 pm

“That kind of puerile, imbecilic comment is about what I would expect from you.”

So I guess that would be a “No”, mike?

Thanks.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 23rd, 2012
7:56 pm

Well, it’s time to get a quick snack and sit down to watch the CBS Tuesday night lineup – the best on TV.

Keep misrepresenting Romney, getalife and mike (and could you guys please learn to use capital letters?) and I’ll be back later tomorrow to debunk them all with facts.

I’d say you know what facts are, but you really don’t.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
8:01 pm

I think you on the right are counting your chickens before they hatch.

I’ve got Obama with 201 locked in.
Add Iowa with 6
add Mighigan with 16
add Nevada with 6
add New Hampshire with 4
add Ohio with 18
add Pennsylvania with 20
add Wisconsin with 10.

That gives President Barack Obama 281 electoral college votes. More than the 270 needed to win.

md

October 23rd, 2012
8:06 pm

“The reason cheap crap from China is all our consumers can afford is because all of the decent paying jobs have been outsourced to China.”

Not quite……consumers dictate wages through their buying habits. It’s a simple concept……don’t buy it and it will not come.

Do you think all these companies shipping in their goods would be doing so if the consumer wasn’t buying them? The answer is obviously no……

And since we do buy all that stuff, we drive down the cost of goods……which does what? Yep, drives down wages……..OUR wages.

A good starting point if you want to read up on the truth:

http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/tdrc/hearings/09sept99/rscott.pdf

cc

October 23rd, 2012
8:09 pm

“I’ve got Obama with 201 locked in.”

. . . and you also believe in the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus!

By the way, I wasn’t speaking of Biden when I mentioned the Tooth Fairy!

md

October 23rd, 2012
8:12 pm

And Mike, our quest for everything cheap started back in the 70’s……remember Datsun and Toyota?

Go to the chart on page 4 of that link and notice when our wages began their decline………

mike

October 23rd, 2012
8:13 pm

cc: “‘I’ve got Obama with 201 locked in.’

. . . and you also believe in the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus!”

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/2012_elections_electoral_college_map.html

Here’s your tooth fairy, cc. Enjoy.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
8:15 pm

md: I don’t think I have ever read a more illogical post. So let me get this straight: all of you on the right are defending outsourcing. You really believe that outsourcing is good for this country? Be honest.

md

October 23rd, 2012
8:21 pm

Illogical? Or unable to comprehend?

Where do you need help? I’m more than willing to help you see the light.

md

October 23rd, 2012
8:22 pm

Let’s try it from another angle…..where do corporations get their “power”?

I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...

October 23rd, 2012
8:23 pm

Better fasten your seat belts, Cons, cause the libs are fixing to go full metal spastic and there’s no telling how deep it will get.

ew

md

October 23rd, 2012
8:25 pm

And to answer your question, outsourcing can be good, depends on the situation. Our mutli-nationals have many plants/factories/etc all around the globe, and they ship the product back here to a waiting employee group that may not have jobs if those plants weren’t out there……the number of jobs may depend on the cost of making the product.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
8:35 pm

md: I want you to go back and re-read your 8:25. That is the definition of pretzel logic. In other words, complete nonsense!

mike

October 23rd, 2012
8:39 pm

md: “they ship the product back here to a waiting employee group that may not have jobs if those plants weren’t out there.”

Wouldn’t they have jobs if the plants were here? No offense, but that has to be the dumbest argument I have ever heard — bar none.

Hillbilly D

October 23rd, 2012
8:40 pm

I think outsourcing is a bad thing but in many ways, I also believe we’re doing it to ourselves. How many people here check labels for country of origin, when buying something? If so, does it affect what you buy? Anybody ever think about that when they’re in the big box stores?

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 23rd, 2012
8:46 pm

mike

You outsource to make money (profit). You say that is a short term gain, because workers here will not be able to afford the product if they lose their job. That is your argument, but here is where it fails.

WE LIVE IN A WORLDWIDE ECONOMY NOW!!!!!!

You guys bring this up constantly when oil is involved, but can’t seem to grasp the same concept when the product is kitchen faucets.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
8:47 pm

HD: that’s a great argument. However, it is of no use to check labels when literally everything is imported from low-wage companies. Recently when I bought new tires, I called and called and found Cooper tires which were “Made in the USA.” If there were cheaper imported tires, I didn’t care. They weren’t cheap, by the way.

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 23rd, 2012
8:50 pm

Outsourcing is not good, but profit is what runs this country. Without profit, there is no America. If you can make your goods overseas and make a profit and sell them in India or Europe at a profit, you have done good. No business exists long unless they figure a way to sell something for more than it costs to produce, and yes taxes are a cost.

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 23rd, 2012
8:52 pm

Hillbilly

I look to see where these products are made and often it is impossible to find that item made in America. So many products are new and they were never made in this country, i.e. I-pads, tablets, smart phones. Hard to get something back that you never had to begin with.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
8:54 pm

Rafe: first of all the arguments you make are all valid. But if you read a lot you begin to realize that the worldwide economy is in a slowdown. One which I firmly believe is due to the fact that outsourcing has reached that critical mass where worldwide demand has been severely impacted. It’s an inescapable conclusion that cannot be avoided. I believe that the collapse of the housing bubble was, in part, due to this reduction in demand. Especially since outsourcing went into high gear with the admittance of China into the WTO and our MFN (most favored nation) treatment of China in the early 2000s.

Hillbilly D

October 23rd, 2012
8:55 pm

Rafe

That’s a good point but I buy very little electronic stuff. None of us can buy 100% U.S. made stuff but I do, as much as I can find. I’d rather pay a little more and keep folks working than to pay taxes for unemployment, etc.

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 23rd, 2012
8:56 pm

Ask the people of Albany, GA if they would buy Cooper Tires, even though they are made in America, after what Cooper did to that community.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
8:58 pm

Rafe: fill me in. What happened in Albany?

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 23rd, 2012
9:01 pm

mike

I’m afraid you can’t blame the terrible world wide economy on outsourcing. I think that Government has caused most of the economic problems, too much demand for government services adn entitlements, not enough wealth to pay for all that excess.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
9:05 pm

OK, Rafe: Cooper closed it’s Albany, GA plant but moved production to Tupelo MS. That was back in 2008. In 2008! Just be glad they kept production in their 3 U.S. plants.

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 23rd, 2012
9:06 pm

Cooper announced that they were going to close a plant and said they couldn’t make up their mind which to close. They had Albany compete with a plant in MS, to see who could give them the most benefits and cater to their needs. Albany went overboard catering to what they wanted and was told they were in the lead. Turns out the decision had been to close the Albany plant from the get go. They played with the emotions of the community and the workers. This whole threat to close went on for more than a year. I have forgot many of the details, but Albany may have had higher wages/union?, not sure, but they knew all along that they were going with MS, as the plant there was cheaper to operate. They were the largest employer in Albany, so hundreds of people were left unemployed.

mike

October 23rd, 2012
9:09 pm

Rafe: “I’m afraid you can’t blame the terrible world wide economy on outsourcing.”

Oh, yes I can! If you take a man’s job away who’s making $25/hr ($50,000/yr) and give to another man who’s making $200/mo ($2,400/yr), then you have just destroyed $47,600 of worldwide demand. This is just simple arithmetic. Now multiply that one man by millions and millions of men worldwide you begin to get the picture.

Hillbilly D

October 23rd, 2012
9:13 pm

Rafe @ 9:06

That sounds like the same games these plants play when they get tax breaks out of state and local governments. They know all along where they’re going to put it and then they approach another community or two and play them all for suckers.

Free Market

October 23rd, 2012
9:17 pm

Rafe

Don’t blame it all on the government. Based on your example, seems that company was going to do exactly what they wanted to do

And they did it.

What exact roll did the government play in making them play Albany as you claim they did?

Free Market

October 23rd, 2012
9:18 pm

HillBilly D

Exactly. It is just a leverage ploy to get the best deal they can get from the already picked site location.

td

October 23rd, 2012
9:31 pm

Mike,

If we built everything here in the US for the union wages you are talking about then your $50,000 a year job would only be worth the $14,000 a year when you add the increase in prices of all good and services.

td

October 23rd, 2012
9:34 pm

Mike,

We live in a world economy and have to compete with world wages. Unskilled labor is not worth $25 per hour on the world market. Plain and simple.

G Mare

October 23rd, 2012
10:20 pm

Hi, Kyle. I don’t come here often because some of your posters really scare me. Just want to let you know that I appreciated your debate with Jay which gave me a better picture of you as a thinking man & I have a better understanding of why you sometimes have to shut down your blog. I hope you & Jay will do this again. Getting more than one view of a subject benefits all.

adam smith's invisible hand

October 23rd, 2012
11:15 pm

So, now that Romney has endorsed Obama’s foreign and domestic policies, I guess everyone will be voting for Obama.

getalife

October 23rd, 2012
11:16 pm

“GOP SENATE CANDIDATE: RAPE PREGNANCIES ‘SOMETHING THAT GOD INTENDED TO HAPPEN’” Aol headline

Your thoughts cons?

Kandy Krowley

October 23rd, 2012
11:39 pm

Romney will win Georgia. If you live in Georgia, go to bed. It’s over here. I tried to help him, just check the transcript.
Love Kandy

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right

October 24th, 2012
7:07 am

My thoughts are that anyone still using AOL is stuck in the 1980’s

@@

October 24th, 2012
7:24 am

Your thoughts cons?

He’s obviously a Calvinist as was John Brown, the abolishionist.

John Brown’s body lies a-moulderin’ in the grave

Predestination vs Pervenient Grace. It gets complicated, Getalife.

Perhaps you should attend church to learn the difference?

The candidate should’ve responded with something similar. i.e…”I’m running for political office, if you want an answer to a moral question, join me in church.”

The political “gotchas” serve no one.

JDW

October 24th, 2012
7:53 am

@Tiberius…”People who think Romney has changed positions so many times based on cherry-picked and parsed sound bites are idiots.”

Really? Here I thought the idiots were those without the intellectual capacity to understand that statements like…

“I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country.” Mitt Romney 1994 live debate vs Ted Kennedy
 
And
 
“yes I would sign a federal ban on all abortions” Mitt Romney 2012 live debate in GOP Primary season

are diametrically opposed.

stands for decibels

October 24th, 2012
8:23 am

late to this, but md, if you’re around:

I guess it wasn’t as obvious as intended, but even that process was voted on…….the “people” had the option of showing up in droves to make the difference……one side chose not to.

Believe me, I have spent plenty of time berating those who couldn’t be bothered to get off their ass and vote in 2010, the folks who decided that would be a great time to haz a sad that Obama didn’t personally deliver ponies to their doors… “like he promised!”

/drive-by

MarkV

October 24th, 2012
8:47 am

Romney’s “beliefs” depend on which office he seeks and whether he runs in a primary or general election campaign.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 24th, 2012
8:53 am

JDW, your capacity to understand the English language using cherry-picked sound bites remains diminished at best.

The key word you and the mindless myrmidons on the left continue to omit in the discussion about Romney’s stance on abortion is “funding”.

I know that the nuances of intelligent conversation are lost on you, but that’s why I’m here; to correct your deficiencies in knowledge across a whole spectrum of issues.

You’re welcome, btw.

MarkV

October 24th, 2012
9:03 am

“The key word you and the mindless myrmidons on the left continue to omit in the discussion about Romney’s stance on abortion is “funding”.”

Romney:
“I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country.”
“yes I would sign a federal ban on all abortions”

I wonder where the key word “funding” is hidden in those statements, which do not even remotely refer to the question of funding.

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 24th, 2012
9:07 am

Mike, in a worldwide market you can’t pay someone $50,000/yr to assembly box fans. If you inflate the price of the fan to cover the taxes, wages, insurance, raw materials, etc, the fan costs more than it is worth. The Indonesians, Indians, or Chinese will have a fan on the shelf next to yours selling for half the price of the US made fan.

Outsourcing creates wealth in those countries, rather than destroy wealth as you say. People move into the urban areas from the farms and go to making $6000 per year as opposed to previously making $600/yr. Yes, folks in the US will not and should not accept those wages, but we have to get past that. We don’t like in a guaranteed salary world or a guaranteed standard of living world. If we impose that the rest of the world will leave us in the dust. Our challenge is to find a way to get some of the wealth created in other countries and bring it back home. We need to produce things that we can export and make a profit on, it is the only way, I am afraid. We have to be smarter, more efficient, and more creative than the rest of the world, or learn to live with a lower standard of living I’m afraid.

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 24th, 2012
9:11 am

What is the big difference in Romney evolving on abortion and Obama evolving on same sex marriage? I could post contradictory quotes from Obama on same sex marriage.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 24th, 2012
9:16 am

“I wonder where the key word “funding” is hidden in those statements, which do not even remotely refer to the question of funding.”

MarkV, we’ve already talked about this. Your capacity to read beyond the sound bite level is rather disturbing.

Most intelligent people actually read position papers, work their way through tedious but necessary transcripts, and look for layers of thought when figuring out who they are going to vote for.

Not cherry-picked and parsed sound bites.

This link is especially appropriate for you and JDW:

http://news.yahoo.com/people-arent-smart-enough-democracy-flourish-scientists-185601411.html

I’d suggest you read it, but since it can’t fit on a bumper sticker your eyes will be glazing over within a minute at best. But it was written with you libs in mind.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

October 24th, 2012
9:24 am

but that’s why I’m here; because I have no friends cause I have a nasty habit of talking down to everyone – no matter who they are.

fixed yer typo. You’re welcome.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

October 24th, 2012
9:27 am

LOL, Rafe. Romney isn’t evolving on abortion. Romney beliefs depend on who his audience is at any given moment.

Do you not watch the debates? One belief is given in person on the stump to the conservative base. The Romney on national television, on the other hand, is more of a centrist who accepts that he has 100% of his base’s vote so they should ignore him at the moment.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 24th, 2012
9:32 am

Liberal heads are about to explode.

Rasmussen has Romney and Obama tied 48%-48% today in Ohio.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 24th, 2012
9:35 am

“I have a nasty habit of talking down to everyone”

Well, it’s true I do not suffer fools gladly, Finn.

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 24th, 2012
9:49 am

Finn, I can say the same about the Mistake. On the debates he is a centrist, who talks tough on foreign policy, and actually mentions the deficit and fiscal responsibility. On the stump, he is all about class warfare, tax the rich, never mentions the deficit or debt, never mentions foreign policy, and complains about how unfair America is. When he is overseas, he apologizes for American action and gives the impression of an appeaser. When he talks to Wall Street, he sounds like a wealthy industrialist or a banker. A man for all seasons, is Barry.

So, the choice is a flawed candidate or a flawed President. You have an employee at work, who despite much counseling and instruction is just not getting the job done after four years and his action is harming the company’s prospects. First decision, should be to let him go. Then you worry about who you hire to replace him. The Marlins decided that they just could not get better anytime soon with Ozzie Guillen, did they worry about finding someone else, before they fired him. Nope, fire him and then start looking. We have a candidate who has demonstrated his excellent ability to be successful at anything he has tried. A great candidate on tap, no need to tarry with the firing.

MarkV

October 24th, 2012
9:53 am

Tiberius @ 9:16 am

Tiberius, since your intellectual capacity is not sufficient to comprehend the meaning of two simple, declarative statements, I am not interested in your “arguments.”

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 24th, 2012
9:54 am

The Romney on national television, on the other hand, is more of a centrist who accepts that he has 100% of his base’s vote so they should ignore him at the moment.

Yep, someone I heard yesterday agreed with you. He said it looked like Romney had his base sewed up and was working on the undecideds. He said it looked like Obama was trying to rally his base. He said if you are worried about your base, at this late point, you are in trouble. Yes Romney sounded Presidential, Barry sounded like a candidate trying to make up a big support deficit.

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 24th, 2012
9:59 am

MarkV

Stalking off mad, just because you are losing the argument?

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 24th, 2012
10:08 am

“I am not interested in your “arguments.”

Of course you’re not, MarkV.

Arguments require information (which you refuse to accept) and intelligence (which you do not possess).

MarkV

October 24th, 2012
10:10 am

Rafe Hollister @9:11 am: “ What is the big difference in Romney evolving on abortion and Obama evolving on same sex marriage? I could post contradictory quotes from Obama on same sex marriage.

The big difference is that Obama openly revealed the state of his belief and how it has been changing. Romney, on the other hand, was pro-life when he stated his “belief” that abortion should be safe and legal in this country, reversed that “belief” when it suited better his political chances in the primaries, and now is making another “modification” of his position.

Winky Dinky Dog

October 24th, 2012
10:11 am

“but that’s why I’m here; to correct your deficiencies in knowledge across a whole spectrum of issues.”

Translation: I have already any friends, no hobbies and have nothing better to do, except play blog bully because it makes me feel better about myself.

:-)

MarkV

October 24th, 2012
10:13 am

Rafe Hollister@ 9:59 am: “Stalking off mad, just because you are losing the argument?”

Losing an argument? Only in your dreams. Are you another one who lacks either the intellectual capacity to comprehend those statements in question, or the integrity to admit their conflict?

JDW

October 24th, 2012
10:15 am

@Tiberius…”The key word you and the mindless myrmidons on the left continue to omit in the discussion about Romney’s stance on abortion is “funding”.”

O’ Dear the Grand Poohbah of Tiberiusville (an alternate reality where Tiberius is ALWAYS right) has spoken….please dear sir could you point out the missing word for me?

“In a televised debate, Romney was asked “If Roe vs. Wade was overturned and Congress passed a federal ban on all abortions and it came to your desk, would you sign it, yes or no?”"

“Let me say it. I’d be delighted to sign that bill,” Romney said.

http://www.pnj.com/article/20121019/ELECTIONS/121019013/PolitiFact-guide-Mitt-Romney-abortion?odyssey=tab%7Ctopnews%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE

JDW

October 24th, 2012
10:22 am

@Rafe…”What is the big difference in Romney evolving on abortion and Obama evolving on same sex marriage? I could post contradictory quotes from Obama on same sex marriage.”

The difference is an evolution along the same line of thought vs. an about face.

In Obama’s case he moved from supporting same sex Civil Unions to Gay Marriage. That is not an about face but simply a stronger position.

In Romney’s case he went from a “belief that abortion should be safe and legal in this country” to happy to sign a federal ban on all abortion. That is an about face.

Now we are keying on abortion because it is an important issue but Romney has done so many about faces he should have a chiropractor on staff to treat whiplash.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 24th, 2012
10:25 am

I think the liberal’s obsession with getting Obama re-elected all boils down to avoiding embarrassment.

They went out on a limb by electing the least qualified person to ever run for President from one of the two major parties based on the dumbest slogan ever – “Hope and Change”

Now, despite 4 years of failure after failure, and a record even the President himself hasn’t run on, they’re facing the realization that the rest of America has finally caught on to this charade. They see a surging Romney, someone they and their slobbering minions in the media created as this unlikeable, uncaring corporate vulture caricature taking the lead with days to go, and they’re in denial.

How can our Messiah be losing to this guy?

Well, when you don’t run against the real guy, and only focus on the caricature you created, reality rises up and bites you on the behind. And when you don’t have a record to run on, and the only strategy is to tear down the other guy, you’d better be going after the real guy and not your fantasy creation.

‘Cause the real guy just showed up, and he’s nothing like your creation. He’s talking about jobs, the economy and the future, while you’re stuck on Big Bird, binders and Romnesia.

Romney goes big, and your guy stays small.

No wonder you’re coming unglued.

md

October 24th, 2012
10:26 am

“Wouldn’t they have jobs if the plants were here? No offense, but that has to be the dumbest argument I have ever heard — bar none.”

Not if one understands the income to expense equation…….

Yes, if the plant was here there would also be jobs, but the number of jobs would more than likely be less and corps only have xx number of dollars to spend on labor and make a profit. If you have all high dollar jobs here in the States, you will NOT be able to have a competitive price on the world market.

And then, one must also be looking at the back end of the equation…….profit for the shareholders and investors. That would be US……and we also want our 401k’s and pensions to do well as SS is not and never will be a living retirement wage…………

Like it or not, our labor rates are not competitive on the world market especially when we have a monthly trade imbalance of 50 billion…….which means WE are buying everything cheap from offshore and that drives down the cost of goods……..LABOR is a component of the cost of goods, so as we the consumer drives down the cost of the goods, we are also driving down the cost of labor.

JamVet

October 24th, 2012
10:27 am

Howdy from Denver, gang. So BHO won the last debate and now we must endure another fortnight to see if Willard can pull this thing out of his ***. Good times and hang tough, cons. 2016 will be here before you know it…

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 24th, 2012
10:28 am

JDW, JDW, JDW.

Most people, when they find themselves in a hole, simply stop digging.

You, on the other hand, continue digging with relish.

What part of “Most intelligent people actually read position papers, work their way through tedious but necessary transcripts, and look for layers of thought when figuring out who they are going to vote for.” did you NOT understand?

Let me answer that for you – ALL of it!

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 24th, 2012
10:34 am

Let’s keep it simple for the libs out there, since you have neither the intellectual capacity nor the patience to do actual research on important issues.

Vote for Obama.

The rest of us will save the country by doing our jobs and thinking before we vote.

md

October 24th, 2012
10:34 am

In numbers for you Mike:

If a corp can only afford to pay $20 in total wages, and the cost of labor here is $5 and the cost of labor over there is $1, then a corp has a choice.

They can employ 4 people over here, 20 people over there, or a combination of the two……..odds are the 4 people here are not going to be enough to get the job done at a competitive price with those companies offshore that are doing it with 20 people………..

JDW

October 24th, 2012
10:34 am

@Tiberius…interesting article. I have been familiar with the premise for some time. As a matter of fact I have and continue to do a great deal of work in the corporate environment that helps people understand this sort of dynamic and improve their skills.

I suggest you spend a lot of time analyzing these two points in the context of your life.

“people are self-delusional when it comes to their own intellectual skills.”

“To the extent that you are incompetent, you are a worse judge of incompetence in other people,”

As for me, I am one of the most well tested and vetted people you will every encounter. I know EXACTLY where I rate on the bell curve on a variety of things ranging from raw intelligence to critical thinking to an ability to make decisions on limited data.

My big blind spot…I really struggle with those that are shall we say…a bit slower.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 24th, 2012
10:36 am

“I know EXACTLY where I rate on the bell curve on a variety of things ranging from raw intelligence to critical thinking to an ability to make decisions on limited data. ”

I know where you rate as well, JDW.

Incredibly low.

JDW

October 24th, 2012
10:37 am

@Tibierus…”What part of “Most intelligent people actually read position papers, work their way through tedious but necessary transcripts, and look for layers of thought when figuring out who they are going to vote for.” did you NOT understand?”

No part…found any mention of funding yet…nope didn’t think so.

JDW

October 24th, 2012
10:39 am

“Incredibly low.”

Only in Tiberiusville…

Winky Dinky Dog

October 24th, 2012
10:48 am

JDW

Let Tiberius have his fun. It makes him feel better about himself.

Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed

October 24th, 2012
11:03 am

“found any mention of funding yet…nope didn’t think so.”

Let’s get this straight.

I argue against using sound bites to make an intelligent argument about a candidate, and JDW wants me to use a sound bite to make my point.

Got it.

Is there any wonder why these rubes bought into “Hope and Change”?

Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy

October 24th, 2012
11:11 am

Mark, JDW, yes, Romney has changed his mind on positions, but his opponent is also a flip/flopper, like a beached perch on the sand. Just a few examples,
He believed that legislation should be discussed on C-Span, before the vote.
He believed in traditional marriage
He believed that Bush was unpatriotic and irresponsible for creating a 4.5 T deficit, now……………
He believed in ‘transparency”, now he is deceptive and secretive.
He believed in gun control until he “evolved” and now “says” he supports the second Amendment, a political conversion, much like Romney’s conversion on Abortion, as he ran for MA governor. Most everyone with a working brain, knows that Barry is lying about his second amendment support.

I just don’t see much difference in their “consistency”.

So, we are left deciding, do we want to reelect someone who has proven to be a failure, or try someone else. If all you have is the flip/flop argument, you have run out of arguments, that one is a draw, at best.

Bruno

October 24th, 2012
11:18 am

Well, when you don’t run against the real guy, and only focus on the caricature you created, reality rises up and bites you on the behind. And when you don’t have a record to run on, and the only strategy is to tear down the other guy, you’d better be going after the real guy and not your fantasy creation.

Ti–Good post. In case you were unaware, Bookman has been accusing us Cons of living in an echo chamber the past 4 years, framing this election in terms of one’s basic grip on reality. The implication being, of course, that Obama is such a standout candidate in comparison to Romney, that only a crazy person would consider voting for Romney.

I don’t see it that way. I think Romney presented himself well in all three debates, and would likely make a good President. In the end, each person has to decide which candidate best represents their interests and core values. For me, helping the economy grow again is at the top of the list, so Romney is getting my vote.