Dear Class of 2013:
Next spring, much ink will be spilled with advice for you: to work hard, but not too hard; to laugh but also to cry; to love; and, perhaps most practically, to wear sunscreen.
I am not jumping the gun in writing to you now. If anything, I worry I’m too late.
In fact, if you are in the collegiate Class of 2013, I am too late. This message is for high school seniors. And that message is: Don’t wind up like Katie Brotherton.
Brotherton is a young woman from Cincinnati who last month wrote in her local newspaper that she’s overly indebted and rather hopeless, because she made bad decisions about her education.
OK, she didn’t write that last part. In her telling, she met “societal expectations” by earning bachelor’s and master’s degrees. But now she owes nearly $190,000, lives in her parents’ basement and “want[s] answers.”
She has a point, sort of. When she was in your place seven years ago, there might not have been anyone warning her against attending such expensive colleges or borrowing to pay for them.
Americans long have been told furthering their education is the path to prosperity, that the surest path involves attending the very best college they can get into, and, more or less, that the best college is the one that costs the most.
The first part is still true: You owe it to yourself to continue your education past high school. It’s the next two parts of the story that are coming into question.
Thirty years ago, it was different. Even 16 years ago, when I was a senior, and attending Harvard cost about $30,000 a year less than it does now, it was different. Since then, tuition has increased so sharply as to make the housing bubble and health-care inflation look like flat lines.
Is it still better to graduate from college than not? Yes: Housing prices peaked in 2006 and then plummeted, but people still pay for shelter.
But it does mean, if we could go back to 2005 and advise potential homebuyers, we would caution them about which house to buy, how much to spend on it, and not to believe home prices can only go up.
You, the Class of 2013, are like homebuyers circa 2005.
Yes, many of you should go to college. But you should also think deeply about which college and which major, including job prospects in that field. Others should consider technical school more strongly than they might have before now. In choosing a route, think very hard about the debt you stand to incur.
Washington politicians have made a big deal out of whether the federal student loan interest rate should return to 6.8 percent or remain 3.4 percent. On a $100,000 loan, that’s the difference between paying $1,151 a month or $984 a month … every month … for the next 10 years.
But halving the interest rate doesn’t make nearly as much difference as halving the principal: A $50,000 loan at 6.8 percent would bring a payment of $575 a month for 10 years.
You know what $576 a month (the difference between $1,151 and $575) would pay for? The better part of an apartment’s rent in Atlanta. Or a pretty nice new car. Over the course of 10 years, you could save up the down payment on a $350,000 house.
This is not a call to lower your educational ambitions. You still can, and should, try to make the most of your God-given talents. Nor is it a call to view everything in terms of money, only a reminder that money is the way you’ll have to pay back whatever you do borrow. Just ask Katie Brotherton.
– By Kyle Wingfield
306 comments Add your comment
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 12th, 2012
5:24 pm
They seriously need to consider trade school, to learn a specific skill that will be useful in future years. I speak as a father with a son, who is working as a cook, who has a masters degree in public administration.
$50,000 a year jobs to sit in a cubicle and play around with a computer are last decades news. Employers are overstocked with those employees. Employers now want you to be able to contribute something, that is not readily available in their current employees.
Gravy Train
October 12th, 2012
5:26 pm
Kyle, I agree with your views here. Great job. I guess you’re not going to attempt to break down Willard’s economic policy? I keep waiting for the details of how he is going to cut revenues and increase spending without increasing the debt or raising taxes on the middle class. Ryan was asked repeatedly last night to give us the details and he just couldn’t do it. Willard is even more evasive on the issue. I’ll hang up and listen.
Gravy Train
October 12th, 2012
5:30 pm
Hearing stories like this makes me thankful that my step dad taught me how to work with my hands, use tools and machinery, maintenance our cars, equipment and our home. I can always get a job using these skills.
Gravy Train
October 12th, 2012
5:32 pm
Plus, I’m saving lots of money not paying someone else to do things I can do myself.
Gravy Train
October 12th, 2012
5:36 pm
It’s baffling that Willard has an army of accountants to fix his tax return, but they can’t come up with one detail on how their economic plan will work. I guess the magic underwear just aren’t that powerful?
Gravy Train
October 12th, 2012
5:40 pm
Rafe, your son would be better suited going back to school and getting a Communications degree. If his grades are good he can get Hope. The Communications degree is not much different than what he has, so he probably will only have a year of classes. Companies are hiring people to handle public relations and social media networking.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 12th, 2012
5:40 pm
Gravy
I would respond to your nonsense at 5:26 and 5:36, but I think Kyle would like us to stay on/respect his topic for at least a few minutes, before you start one of nonsensical screeds.
Old timer
October 12th, 2012
6:08 pm
Kyle, good article. I, too, received an excellent education. I paid for it years ago. No loans or family help I also have two masters degrees. But, today I would not choose history as a major. I loved it and made a good living, but even most college professors struggle to make a living as very few are hired full time. Liberal arts are useful, though you must be prepared to be poor. I also learned with my children, if you do well more money is available after you prove yourself. Also college students today live much better than I did. Dorms, meal plans, can all be a good learning experience. You do not have to have an apartment.
Don't Tread
October 12th, 2012
6:16 pm
Nowadays, if you don’t have plans for a medical or legal degree, you’re better off with a skilled trade that teaches you to build or fix things most people can’t. (HVAC, auto/diesel/boat mechanic, metal fabrication, etc.)
The salary to educational cost ratio works in your favor.
Li'l Aynie
October 12th, 2012
6:30 pm
No problem. Just borrow the money from your parents! (by courtesy of Mitt Romney)
Li'l Aynie
October 12th, 2012
6:51 pm
If you didn’t inherit millions, and your parents can’t loan you the money, then take the government loan, but invest it in an education that will prepare you for the future.
If you are intelligent and diligent enough to pursue a degree in mathematics, do that! The manufacturing processes of the present and the future are controlled by computer programs. Programming these processes requires a knowledge of higher calculus and spherical geometry.
Simply learning to use and program a computer is not nearly enough.
Avoid pursuing the easy studies: law and business management. Leave these over-crowded professions to people of lesser intelligence. The only advancement for a lawyer is politics. The only advancement for a business managment major is a dreary second and third-level management position.
getalife
October 12th, 2012
7:05 pm
Vice President Joe Biden stood up in front of the world, called the gop full of crap and laughed at them.
I am going to follow his leadership.
Show me something gop to prove you want to help the middle class or shut up about that lie.
getalife
October 12th, 2012
7:09 pm
I have a message for the young folks,
Never, ever let the gop destroy our country again.
Thanks.
MoJo
October 12th, 2012
7:20 pm
Ah don’t worry with all this advise. Join the “MOOCHER CLASS” and laugh your silly assets off like Joe Biden all the way to welfare office. Obama will take care of you, why do you need to do anything hard, like WORK and PAY FEDERAL INCOME TAX !?
Michael H. Smith
October 12th, 2012
7:28 pm
Here are two items you can credit to the GOP’s account that directly aids the poor, the working poor and the middle class.
The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA)
The Earned Income Credit (EITC)
Michael H. Smith
October 12th, 2012
7:39 pm
Wynn On Obama: “I’ll Be Damned If I Want To Have Him Lecture Me”
On the Tuesday broadcast of the nightly Nevada political program “Ralston Reports,” Steve Wynn, CEO of Wynn Resorts sat down with host Jon Ralston to discuss the presidential election.
Wynn, an outspoken critic of President Obama, didn’t hold back in his latest criticism of the incumbent president seeking a second term.
“I’ll be damned if I want to have him lecture me about small business and jobs. I’m a job creator. Guys like me are job creators and we don’t like having a bulls-eye painted on our back,” Wynn said about Obama to Ralston. An excerpt of the interview is below.
WYNN: I’ve created about 250,000 direct and indirect jobs according to the state of Nevada’s measurement. If the number is 250,000, that’s exactly 250,000 more than this president, who I’ll be damned if I want to have him lecture me about small business and jobs. I’m a job creator. Guys like me are job creators and we don’t like having a bulls-eye painted on our back.
The president is trying to put himself between me and my employees. By class warfare, by deprecating and calling a group that makes money ‘billionaires and millionaires who don’t pay their share.’ I gave 120% of my salary and bonus away last year to charities, as I do most years. I can’t stand the idea of being demagogued, that is put down by a president who has never created any jobs and who doesn’t even understand how the economy works.
Wynn on a scrapped business plan: “I’m afraid of the president. I have no idea what goofy idea, what crazy, anti-business program this administration will come up. I have no idea. And I have to tell you Jon that every business guy I know in the country is frightened of Barack Obama and the way he thinks.”
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/10/09/steve_wynn_on_obama_ill_be_damned_if_ill_have_him_lecture_me.html
Good luck Class of 2013 you and the rest of us will need all of it you can get when the some of best and most successful business minds in this country are too scared to invest and create jobs because of Obama and the Democrats. By the way, Steve Wynn is a Democrat and former Obama supporter.
@@
October 12th, 2012
7:57 pm
Mike Rowe lends ‘dirty jobs’ cred to Romney in Ohio
Mike Rowe of The Discovery Channel’s reality hit “Dirty Jobs” lent Mitt Romney some working-class cred in Ohio on Wednesday — but no official endorsement.
His appearance with Romney grew out of an open letter the TV star wrote the Republican candidate about his effort to remove the stigma from manual labor.
“If you read the whole thing, I’ll vote for you in November,” Rowe promised in his missive, which pushed for a “national conversation” about the way American society treats some crucial career paths like “vocational consolation prizes.”
Rowe noted that he wrote a similar letter to Obama 2009, but didn’t get a response.
Probably because this is what Obama thinks of those vocational careers
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-09-27/news/34131857_1_romney-campaign-mitt-romney-dirty-jobs
I LUVS me some Mike Rowe.
Lil' Barry Bailout - Vote American
October 12th, 2012
8:27 pm
Li’l Aynie: Just borrow the money from your parents!
———————-
Uh, isn’t that what families are for, to help each other? Responsible parents plan and save for their childrens’ education.
Of course, libtards think those who feel responsible for paying their own way are chumps.
Which explains Obozo’s unprecedented, un-American legacy of debt.
Hillbilly D
October 12th, 2012
8:27 pm
My advice to these kids would be this:
You’re going to make some money (right now you’re probably spending Mom and Dad’s but they had to make it), some of you a lot, some a little and most somewhere in between. As soon as you start making a little money, people are going to be trying to separate you from it. Beware, proceed with caution and assume that everybody (especially if money is involved) is a liar until they prove otherwise. You’re going to have your screw-ups and failures and nobody is going to care enough to feel sorry for you. To sum it up, life ain’t for the faint-hearted, get smart quick.
Hillbilly D
October 12th, 2012
8:30 pm
@@
If you haven’t seen it……
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NwEFVUb-u0
JF McNamara
October 12th, 2012
8:38 pm
This is actually good advice. Be whatever you want, just understand that you should not spend a lot of money if your chosen career does not pay a lot.
If you want to work on Wall Street or to be a lawyer, then spend the money and go Ivy League. It’ll pay back. Otherwise, UGA and Tech are much cheaper and will get you in the door of 99% of the companies in America. After getting in the door, you make your own destiny. The only reason anyone cares is when they talk college football.
Gravy Train
October 12th, 2012
8:39 pm
Everything Mikey H. Smith just posted is a complete piece of wingnut propaganda. They can’t win with ideas, so they resort to fear and lies. You need to be aware of people like Mikey here. They are always trying to trick you into voting against yourself. The whole higher public education support system we have was built and is protected by Democrats. You took US History classes, so you already know that. Despite these so called “patriots” poor mouthing America, this is still the greatest country in the world and you will be just fine without them. Getting ahead requires two things, skills and determination. Never let them make you believe that you have to be a sheep or a ditto-head to make it.
td
October 12th, 2012
8:39 pm
Hillbilly D
October 12th, 2012
8:27 pm
Wise advice. A little more advice:
Just because you get an education does not mean you do not have to work and work hard. If you have prepared yourself with an education and have the mindset to out work the next guy then you will succeed. The one last piece of advice is to always be in control of your emotions in business as well as your personal life. As soon as you show anger or emotional weakness then the other guy/gal has won half the battle.
Gravy Train
October 12th, 2012
8:47 pm
If you get in a bind, you can promise to vote for Willard and get a job with this guy. If you don’t value your soul.
The man above is David Siegel, owner of Westgate Resorts, allegedly the largest time-share company in the world, with his wife Jackie. After a financial setback during the recession, Siegel now brags that “we’re the most profitable we’ve ever been.” He and Jackie have resumed construction on a 90,000-square-foot home, called Versailles, that they are building in Florida. If and when it is completed, it will be the largest private home in the country.
According to the Wall Street Journal, when completed Versailles will boast “13 bedrooms, 23 full bathrooms, a 6,000-square-foot master suite (with plans in place for a bed on a rotating platform), a banquet kitchen plus 10 satellite kitchens, a 20-car garage, three pools, a two-story wine cellar and a grand hall with a 30-foot stained glass dome.”
With that background established, this is the email that Siegel sent to his employees yesterday:
Subject: Message from David Siegel
Date:Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:58:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: [David Siegel]
To: [All employees]
To All My Valued Employees,
As most of you know our company, Westgate Resorts, has continued to succeed in spite of a very dismal economy. There is no question that the economy has changed for the worse and we have not seen any improvement over the past four years. In spite of all of the challenges we have faced, the good news is this: The economy doesn’t currently pose a threat to your job. What does threaten your job however, is another 4 years of the same presidential administration. Of course, as your employer, I can’t tell you whom to vote for, and I certainly wouldn’t interfere with your right to vote for whomever you choose. In fact, I encourage you to vote for whomever you think will serve your interests the best.
However, let me share a few facts that might help you decide what is in your best interest. The current administration and members of the press have perpetuated an environment that casts employers against employees. They want you to believe that we live in a class system where the rich get richer, the poor get poorer. They label us the “1%” and imply that we are somehow immune to the challenges that face our country. This could not be further from the truth. Sure, you may have heard about the big home that I’m building. I’m sure many people think that I live a privileged life. However, what you don’t see or hear is the true story behind any success that I have achieved.
I started this company over 42 years ago. At that time, I lived in a very modest home. I converted my garage into an office so I could put forth 100% effort into building a company, which by the way, would eventually employ you. We didn’t eat in fancy restaurants or take expensive vacations because every dollar I made went back into this company. I drove an old used car, and often times, I stayed home on weekends, while my friends went out drinking and partying. In fact, I was married to my business — hard work, discipline, and sacrifice. Meanwhile, many of my friends got regular jobs. They worked 40 hours a week and made a nice income, and they spent every dime they earned. They drove flashy cars and lived in expensive homes and wore fancy designer clothes. My friends refinanced their mortgages and lived a life of luxury. I, however, did not. I put my time, my money, and my life into this business —-with a vision that eventually, some day, I too, will be able to afford to buy whatever I wanted. Even to this day, every dime I earn goes back into this company. Over the past four years I have had to stop building my dream house, cut back on all of my expenses, and take my kids out of private schools simply to keep this company strong and to keep you employed.
Just think about this – most of you arrive at work in the morning and leave that afternoon and the rest of your time is yours to do as you please. But not me- there is no “off” button for me. When you leave the office, you are done and you have a weekend all to yourself. I unfortunately do not have that freedom. I eat, live, and breathe this company every minute of the day, every day of the week. There is no rest. There is no weekend. There is no happy hour. I know many of you work hard and do a great job, but I’m the one who has to sign every check, pay every expense, and make sure that this company continues to succeed. Unfortunately, what most people see is the nice house and the lavish lifestyle. What the press certainly does not want you to see, is the true story of the hard work and sacrifices I’ve made.
Now, the economy is falling apart and people like me who made all the right decisions and invested in themselves are being forced to bail out all the people who didn’t. The people that overspent their paychecks suddenly feel entitled to the same luxuries that I earned and sacrificed 42 years of my life for. Yes, business ownership has its benefits, but the price I’ve paid is steep and not without wounds. Unfortunately, the costs of running a business have gotten out of control, and let me tell you why: We are being taxed to death and the government thinks we don’t pay enough. We pay state taxes, federal taxes, property taxes, sales and use taxes, payroll taxes, workers compensation taxes and unemployment taxes. I even have to hire an entire department to manage all these taxes. The question I have is this: Who is really stimulating the economy? Is it the Government that wants to take money from those who have earned it and give it to those who have not, or is it people like me who built a company out of his garage and directly employs over 7000 people and hosts over 3 million people per year with a great vacation?
Obviously, our present government believes that taking my money is the right economic stimulus for this country. The fact is, if I deducted 50% of your paycheck you’d quit and you wouldn’t work here. I mean, why should you? Who wants to get rewarded only 50% of their hard work? Well, that’s what happens to me.
Here is what most people don’t understand and the press and our Government has chosen to ignore – to stimulate the economy you need to stimulate what runs the economy. Instead of raising my taxes and depositing that money into the Washington black-hole, let me spend it on growing the company, hire more employees, and generate substantial economic growth. My employees will enjoy the wealth of that tax cut in the form of promotions and better salaries. But that is not what our current Government wants you to believe. They want you to believe that it somehow makes sense to take more from those who create wealth and give it to those who do not, and somehow our economy will improve. They don’t want you to know that the “1%”, as they like to label us, pay more than 31% of all the taxes in this country. Thomas Jefferson, the author of our great Constitution, once said, “democracy” will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
Business is at the heart of America and always has been. To restart it, you must stimulate business, not kill it. However, the power brokers in Washington believe redistributing wealth is the essential driver of the American economic engine. Nothing could be further from the truth and this is the type of change they want.
So where am I going with all this? It’s quite simple. If any new taxes are levied on me, or my company, as our current President plans, I will have no choice but to reduce the size of this company. Rather than grow this company I will be forced to cut back. This means fewer jobs, less benefits and certainly less opportunity for everyone.
So, when you make your decision to vote, ask yourself, which candidate understands the economics of business ownership and who doesn’t? Whose policies will endanger your job? Answer those questions and you should know who might be the one capable of protecting and saving your job. While the media wants to tell you to believe the “1 percenters” are bad, I’m telling you they are not. They create most of the jobs. If you lose your job, it won’t be at the hands of the “1%”; it will be at the hands of a political hurricane that swept through this country.
You see, I can no longer support a system that penalizes the productive and gives to the unproductive. My motivation to work and to provide jobs will be destroyed, and with it, so will your opportunities. If that happens, you can find me in the Caribbean sitting on the beach, under a palm tree, retired, and with no employees to worry about.
Signed, your boss,
David Siegel
Gravy Train
October 12th, 2012
8:50 pm
We should all fall to our knees and thank David Siegel and Willard Romney for allowing us to exist. SMH
YouLibs
October 12th, 2012
9:09 pm
Kyle
Hope you enjoyed the wedding. Sorry it sucks so bad to have to come back and try to rationalize your party’s positions.
Forty years ago I made the decision to be a blue collar worker all my life so I wouldn’t have to be in that kind of position. Most folks would say I was foolish. I’m not SURE I disagree with them, but I’m feeling pretty good at 63 about my life choices.
When you know you’re getting close to the end, that becomes more and more important.
So, welcome back. How was it?
Centrist
October 12th, 2012
9:32 pm
Sorry Class of 2013 – Our politicians for the last couple of decades chose the path of re-election instead of stewardship or our country. They bought votes with debt which you are now saddled with. Our economic engine is lacking oil, and needs a major overhaul. There are many free riders which the belabored engine can not possibly haul. It will be your job to get the able bodied out of the vehicle and push it to the shop. Then you will have to pay the bill.
cc
October 12th, 2012
9:33 pm
“I’ll hang up and listen”
Why don’t you hang up, step outside and search for a very busy highway. When you find it, go out and play in traffic ON FOOT. See just how close approaching traffic can get to you before you jump out of the way. I hope you move VERY slowly.
“We should all fall to our knees and thank David Siegel”
Yes you should . . . for telling the truth. You’re just too brain-dead to understand it. In short, Gravy, you’re a loser. You’ve probably always been a loser and you certainly show no signs of improving. I’ll bet you’d be a riot at a party IF you could find anyone who would want you around. Your life is pretty lonely, isn’t it Gravy?
Bruno
October 12th, 2012
9:35 pm
Forty years ago I made the decision to be a blue collar worker all my life
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZup5YLOWLE
Lil' Barry Bailout - Vote American
October 12th, 2012
9:37 pm
Why the interest in someone else’s home? Did you already finish your People magazine?
@@
October 12th, 2012
9:37 pm
Hillbilly:
Thanks. I went looking for that testimony (?) when I read the story I linked.
Rowe, if you’ve ever seen him in interviews, is super intelligent. I wouldn’t begin to guess where his IQ rates. That being said, his common sense is off the charts.
And FUN-NEEEEEEEEE.
Not to mention HOT….in my humble opinion.
(ISH)
Dusty
October 12th, 2012
9:39 pm
Gravy Train,
Anybody (like you) that posts something that long ought to fall to their knees.
Envy of the rich is an ugly thing!
By the way,Kyle’s message is right on. My children knew it some time back. The five of them have seven degrees altogether.. The last one finished her studies about four years ago and not one of them owes a cent for education. They made good plans and good choices.
Of course I’m bragging. I love ‘em to pieces and proud of them too. Loving your children is the best thing you can give them ( besides education, of course)…
Bruno
October 12th, 2012
9:40 pm
The Bros kicked ass on this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkBdtjq_26s
@@
October 12th, 2012
9:42 pm
Another thing, Hillbilly. I’ve read your opinion on charter schools. We have an open campus high school (charter) here in Clayton County. A lot of their focus is on vocational training. It seems to be thriving.
Hillbilly D
October 12th, 2012
9:43 pm
That being said, his common sense is off the charts.
Common sense is how I measure intelligence……..but I’ve always looked at things differently than most folks. Many times I’ve heard people referred to as “an educated fool”. Seems like there’s no shortage of those, these days.
Hillbilly D
October 12th, 2012
9:46 pm
@@
Back in my day, that was regular schools. (IWH)
Hillbilly D
October 12th, 2012
9:47 pm
Bruno
When that transitions from the first song to the second one, it’s something to see Jaimoe and Butch get those cross rhythms going, in person.
cc
October 12th, 2012
9:59 pm
Hillbilly:
“Many times I’ve heard people referred to as “an educated fool”. Seems like there’s no shortage of those, these days.”
I raised two children. Both of them are very intelligent. One attended a very expensive college here in Georgia, and then did her post-graduate work at Princeton. The other had no interest in college and elected to attend a vocational school. After finishing his vocational training, he continued to study and learn in his field of interest. The college graduate does better financially, but my vocation trained child is happier by far. The oddest thing to me is that I would have wagered that the child who elected vocational training would have been the college graduate if only one was to achieve that end.
College is not for everyone, regardless of ability. What interests the child and earns his/her affection should always be the prime consideration.
Bruno
October 12th, 2012
10:03 pm
Oh Well……
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8RhZDGLEXM
Dusty
October 12th, 2012
10:06 pm
@@
I was hoping that your husband was the Clayton County man that won the lottery. You did not mention it. Well, what’s a lil’ ‘ol’ million $$$ after all…
Bruno
October 12th, 2012
10:08 pm
The original version of “Black Magic Woman”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRu7Pt42×6Y&feature=related
Bruno
October 12th, 2012
10:21 pm
For my sweetie:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj3vayL4buo
@@
October 12th, 2012
10:29 pm
Dusty:
Someone from Clayton County won the lottery!!??!!
Good for him or her!!!
It wasn’t my husband though. It’s blackjack and poker that puts money in his
pocket. Those and his job.
G’nite.
Tall
October 12th, 2012
10:35 pm
Gray Train:
What is your point? Mr. Siegel is obligated to no one. No one is forcing people to work for him. He makes very good points. I have recently tried to start a business with tow former co-workers. Government regulation has crushed all margin out of it. We gave up. If that’s what you want, it is here.
Bruno
October 12th, 2012
10:37 pm
Somebody Up There Likes Me:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60wfkuZVxOU
Bruno
October 12th, 2012
10:44 pm
I can hear you when you dream……
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUhkXFpyV6c
Lil' Barry Blowhard
October 12th, 2012
10:52 pm
Just go to school and sell your stock to pay for your housing, food, and tuition? Sometimes when you are poor and destitute you have to live off your stock.
Lil' Barry Blowhard
October 12th, 2012
10:53 pm
Snark…
Bruno
October 12th, 2012
11:02 pm
Here’s my message to the class of 2013:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yo8_U2sCA74&feature=related
That we don’t even care
As restless as we are
And we found pull
In the land of a thousand guilts
And poured cement, lamented and assured
To the lights and towns below
Faster than the speed of sound
Faster than we thought we’d go
Beneath the sound of hope
Bruno
October 12th, 2012
11:38 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB8G7TUod1U
Bruno
October 12th, 2012
11:44 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDGGvxBqfkg
Hillbilly D
October 12th, 2012
11:51 pm
Gluten free water??? There really is one born every minute.
http://health.yahoo.net/articles/nutrition/photos/10-sketchy-enhanced-watersmdashexposed#6
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 13th, 2012
12:15 am
What Kyle exposed with his column is that we are raising a generation of functional idiots.
People used to have what was known as common sense. Sadly, it is all too uncommon these days. Lots of reasons for it; absentee parents, government education to the lowest denominator, and a shift to an entitlement society all contribute to this increasing mess.
Karl Rove
October 13th, 2012
12:18 am
Great Job Kyle- get them liberal college moochers to lower their expectations and quit borrowing money when they should be out working. If they can’t get a good job it is all the Chinese fault with that unfair labor stuff
.
Here is the kind of nonsense that gets published about our boy Mitt and his eight billion dollars invested in Bain Funds where he is just trying to make an honest buck :
“”"”"”"”"”"”"Mr. Romney also has millions invested in a series of Bain funds that have a controlling stake in Sensata Technologies, a manufacturer of sensors and controls for vehicles, aircraft and electric motors that employs 4,000 workers in China. Since Bain took over the operation in 2006, its investment has quadrupled in value. Bain continues to own $2.6 billion worth of Sensata’s shares.
Two years ago, Sensata bought an operation that made automobile sensors in Freeport, Ill. At the first meeting with the plant’s 170 workers, Sensata managers announced that by the end of 2012 all the equipment and jobs would be relocated, mostly to Jiangsu Province. Workers have staged demonstrations, pleading for Mr. Romney to intervene on their behalf.
Chinese engineers, flown to Freeport for training on the equipment, described their salaries as a pittance compared with Freeport wages. Tom Gaulrapp, who has operated machines at the factory for 33 years, said he fears he will go bankrupt after he loses his job on Nov. 5.
“This goes to show the unbelievable hypocrisy of this man,” he said of Mr. Romney. “He talks about how we need to get tough on China and stop China from taking our jobs, and then he is making money off shipping our jobs there.”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”
Can you imagine the nerve of these people they are just victims!
”
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/us/politics/as-romney-repeats-trade-message-bain-maintains-china-ties.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Just remember if you pass gas always blame it on the other guy.
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 13th, 2012
12:29 am
You DO realize, Karl, that Mitt Romney’s investments are held in a BLIND TRUST, don’t you?
Of course you didn’t!
fair and balanced
October 13th, 2012
1:14 am
Tiberius – you mean this blind trust???????????
“”"”"”"”"tNever mind that Mitt Romney has an estimated net worth as high as $250 million, or that some of it has been invested in offshore accounts of a sort never held by any previous presidential contender. He assures us that his assets are held in a “blind trust” over which he exerts no control.
But just how blind are such trusts, anyway? In Romney’s case, apparently not quite blinkered enough to keep his trustee—who is also his personal lawyer and longtime friend Bradford Malt—from investing more than $10 million of Romney’s money in an investment fund managed by Romney’s son Tagg.
In 1994, when he was running for the Senate against Ted Kennedy, Romney attacked Kennedy for disclaiming any responsibility for his investments, declaring at one point: “The blind trust is an age-old ruse.” He takes a different tack today, but even his own spokeswoman, Andrea Saul, has acknowledged that if he’s elected, he’ll move his wealth into a new, stricter blind trust, governed by federal rules.”"”"”"”"”"”"”"
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/purdum/2012/07/mitt-romney-age-old-ruse-blind-trust
:
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 13th, 2012
1:43 am
Blind trusts are blind trusts, neither fair nor balanced.
It’s not as if he has to worry about your vote, you know.
Chris Sanchez
October 13th, 2012
8:14 am
Kyle,
Your well-written article make no mention of the parents of the Class of 2013. In general, what of their responsibility to assist their children in making good educational choices. Of course these young adults are free to make those decisions but mom and dad still have a tremendous influence in their lives. Education changes lives and I always encourage others to get as much as they can stand AND afford. Going into such crushing debt is more than unwise, it is foolish.
carlosgvv
October 13th, 2012
8:28 am
In today’s world, high math and science apptitudes are worth a great deal and liberal arts apptitudes are worth very little. Unfortunately, most college students don’t have high math and science apptitude and liberal arts leanings are found in the majority.
I would say go to college if you can do the math and science. A BS degree will likely get you a good job. If you can’t do the math and science, go to a good trade school or go in the military and do the best you can.
It’s a cruel and unfair world for the liberal arts person these days and will probably remain so for the foreseeable future.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
8:29 am
Hey Tiberius, Bradford Malt has a bridge that he would like to sell you from Romney’s blind trust. He can’t meet right now though he is having dinner with Mitt picking up investment ideas.
As you should well know, a blind trust is only as blind as the relationship between the Trustee and and Beneficiary. When they are life long friends that interact on a regular basis thats really investment management.
curious
October 13th, 2012
8:43 am
Personal responsibility. Quit whining and get a job; they’re out there. It might not be your first choice, but maybe your first choice was a bad one.
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 13th, 2012
9:06 am
And what are this weekend’s lottery numbers, JDW?
I mean, since you know so much about someone you’ve never met and all . . .
Just Saying..
October 13th, 2012
9:06 am
As a country, we should continue to cut education funding. We can find all the scientists we need in India…
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 13th, 2012
9:27 am
Just Saying, it is not the money, it is how the money is spent. Biden was whining about cuts for Embassy security even after the State Dept Security chief testified that money played no part in lack of Security in Libya. The State Dept spent much of their Embassy Security Money “going green” aka, supporting GM by mandating purchases of Chevy Volts for Embassy Personnel.
Education is the same, it seems to do poorly no matter how much money we give them. Math and Science is where the emphasis needs to be and where our schools are doing the worse. Giving them more money, that they will choose to spend for better facilities, higher salaries and benefits for the administrators, band uniforms, and new stadiums, doesn’t help Math and Science education.
Dems always choose to throw money at a problem, rather than make hard choices needed to achieve success. Maybe we need to do some politically incorrect things, like segregate by ability, in order to improve the math and science skills of those able to absorb the knowledge. Dems will vote no on that and continue to spend money that accomplishes little.
independent thinker
October 13th, 2012
9:38 am
Love how the cons will not talk about tax benefits for corporations that outsource and pay little or no corporate taxes overseas in one of those offshore corporations Mitt loves so dearly. When Obama proposes taxing that overseas profit and rewarding companies that insource with tax breaks, the cons act like it is welfare and fillibuster the bill to death. But oh yeah just past a trillion dollar in tax cuts for the rich, cut corporate tax rates and the rich will create instantly twelve million jobs. One word for that ———MALARKEY!
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 13th, 2012
9:51 am
“When Obama proposes taxing that overseas profit”
Yeah, ’cause it’s so great to control activities not within our own borders.
As if we don’t screw up enough companies here with our rules and taxation.
“But oh yeah just past a trillion dollar in tax cuts for the rich, cut corporate tax rates and the rich will create instantly twelve million jobs.
Given that that isn’t the platform of Romney/Ryan, there is only one word for that analysis ———MALARKEY!
You’re neither independent, nor a thinker.
redneckbluedog
October 13th, 2012
9:58 am
Dear Class of 2012…..When you sign someone’s yearbook, don’t sign “Keep Jesus #1 and you’ll go far……”….if you intend to support a polytheist culstist for the White House 20 years later….!!!!! You’ll look stupid….!!!!
redneckbluedog
October 13th, 2012
10:01 am
As a country, we should continue to cut education funding. We can find all the scientists we need in India…
==========================
To that end…we should cut taxes even lower, especially on millionares….especially during this time of record deficits….Then, when China forecloses….we will all have socialized health care….plus, the government will be all up in our women’s vaginas…and that’s what we’re after here, right…!?!?!?
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 13th, 2012
10:04 am
Looks like some of the libs on here are members of the class of 2013 already.
Severe lack of critical thinking skills and no initiative to research information or develop opinions on their own.
Oh, and deep into religious bigotry as well.
Stupid beyond belief.
Just Saying..
October 13th, 2012
10:08 am
“Education is the same, it seems to do poorly no matter how much money we give them.”
“Math and Science is where the emphasis needs to be and where our schools are doing the worse.”
Agree.
Agree absolutely.
Have close to 10 teachers in the family, and from their accounts, there’s a cultural issue here. And taking politically incorrect a step further, I mean American culture, Honey Boo Boo on high…
ragnar danneskjold
October 13th, 2012
10:16 am
We hear politicians criticize banks for making house loans to people unable to pay, Perhaps it is time for us to criticize politicians who commit taxpayer funds to students who cannot pay.
Ragnar solution: abolish the student loan program. Set up a government grant program that will pay up to $500 per semester hour for courses in mathematics, chemistry, physics, biology, mechanical engineering, and maybe civil engineering. Nothing else, Anyone who wants to take something less useful would be able to do so, but without taxpayer funds. In the meantime, the taxpayers would be getting more bang for the buck, with fewer students in critical studies in basket weaving and more in fields with inherent value. Pay for the education grants by abolishing all other Federal research grants.
Otherwise Kyle’s advice is good, but I suspect most high schoolers who stumble across it will not bother to read it.
ragnar danneskjold
October 13th, 2012
10:19 am
Dear Thinker @ 9:38, the Obama program you cite is the worst idea since – and for the same reasons as – the Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930, which led directly to the breakdown of international trade and fostered a depression. We know Obama is clueless on economics, but we thought better of you.
JamVet
October 13th, 2012
10:20 am
Youngsters, get the best education you can afford and then move to Communist China, India, Singapore, Mexico, etc, where the Trickle Downers have sent the jobs.
40,000,000 of them since 1973…
JDW
October 13th, 2012
10:20 am
@Tiberius…”since you know so much about someone you’ve never met and all”
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 13th, 2012
10:27 am
So, once again, JDW, you’ve got nothing.
More unfounded accusations and nothing else.
Thanks for living down to my expectations.
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 13th, 2012
10:34 am
AmVet: Proving every day he knows nothing about economics or job creation. A singularly stunning ignorance rarely achieved by even the most uninformed liberals on this blog.
Kamchak - "Socialism" is just a code word for "fear," the monster under you bed ~ Kamchak
October 13th, 2012
10:35 am
Brotherton is a young woman from Cincinnati who last month wrote in her local newspaper that she’s overly indebted and rather hopeless, because she made bad decisions about her education.
OK, she didn’t write that last part.
When you have to lie to make a point, you really don’t have a point.
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 13th, 2012
10:38 am
When you have to call obvious sarcasm a lie, you really don’t have a functioning brain.
Kamchak - "Socialism" is just a code word for "fear," the monster under you bed ~ Kamchak
October 13th, 2012
10:40 am
When you have to call obvious sarcasm a lie, you really don’t have a functioning brain.
When your bar is set this low, you get kicked off of Jay’s blog.
cc
October 13th, 2012
10:44 am
“When your bar is set this low, you get kicked off of Jay’s blog.”
That blog is primarily for whiners and losers . . .
Georgia
October 13th, 2012
10:44 am
190k is a shocking burden for a grad.
JamVet
October 13th, 2012
10:55 am
Sunspot Tibby, go change your diapers and start taking responsibility for your enraged, brattish self, OK?
The day you stop making excuses will be the day you finally start making some headway in life.
And at least change your idiotic, cartoon name to Liar – never pulling the tail of the right.
Or don’t.
Watching you slobber endlessly on this blog is damn funny!
My advice to the unfortunate children of people like sunspot tibby is that you’re correct – they are hopelessly full of 1950s crap and you are wise to not listen to them.
Black people are stupid to not understand that neocons are their best friends.
Most Americans are lazy and don’t want good jobs.
American Jews are pinko leftist anti-Semites.
A devastated ed middle class is good for American capitalism.
The world’s most brilliant scientists are liberal tools who are trying to destroy the world.
Don’t worry, Donald Trump and Mitt Romney are going to take care of you.
Uncle Sam can do nothing right, is your enemy and needs to be drowned in a bathtub.
EVERYBODY is out to get us Republicans.
The list is endless…
MarkV
October 13th, 2012
11:03 am
“Setting a bar this low …” was a too generous euphemism for a denial of what was quite correctly called a lie, and what has become Kyle’s trademark – rephrasing statements to give them a meaning of his choice. In this case, he stated that the young woman WROTE that she was indebted” because she made bad decisions about her education.” She did not write that, there was no sarcasm, just a pure, unadulterated lie.
td
October 13th, 2012
11:45 am
You can tell when the Dems are losing and they know they are losing but are still in denial. They get mean, nasty and personal. Just read the blogs over the last week for evidence.
Obama is going down and you will be saying President Romney after the election.
bluecoat
October 13th, 2012
12:01 pm
We may not be saying President Romney.We may be as disrespectful as TD and all his aka’s are against President Obama.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
12:25 pm
@tc…”Obama is going down and you will be saying President Romney after the election.”
Possible but a more likely scenario is that Mittens goes on a nice long extended vacation to visit his money in the Caymans and we can get back to digging our way out of the hole left by the prior Republican Administration.
cc
October 13th, 2012
12:57 pm
Kamchak and MarkV:
“because she made bad decisions about her education.”
I believe that is quite obvious . . .
“OK, she didn’t write that last part. In her telling, she met “societal expectations” by earning bachelor’s and master’s degrees. But now she owes nearly $190,000, lives in her parents’ basement and “want[s] answers.”
Kyle immediately set this straight and clearly used this only as a lead-in to his column.
Lie:
1: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2: to create a false or misleading impression
I don’t believe that either of you have enough to keep you busy, and you obviously lack the aptitude to engage in intelligent discourse.
shon
October 13th, 2012
1:12 pm
Everyone keeps giving advice but what high school seniors are actually reading this? I doubt very many if any are. It’s just adults telling their advice to each other and then bringing politics into it which leads to text arguments. Geez people.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
1:25 pm
O’Dear more math…
A nonpartisan analysis conducted by the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation found that eliminating all deductions, taxing municipal bonds and ramping up levies on investments would only net enough revenue to cut tax rates by 4 percent.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82366.html#ixzz29CVtypT9
Now where is that other 16% going to come from? Hey Tiberius, could you call your bud Mittens and ask him?
The Austrian Brotherhood
October 13th, 2012
1:30 pm
Thanks Kyle, that was hilarious. Love the end…she’s “owed answers”.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. That’s too rich. It’s 99% not her fault. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
cc
October 13th, 2012
1:36 pm
JDW:
Did you really read the article?
Centrist
October 13th, 2012
1:49 pm
@ JDW – oh dear, you left this out of the article you linked – quotes from the guys Obama heralded during his debate fiasco:
“The JCT analysis assumes the Bush-era tax cuts expire for everyone at the end of the year. Romney’s tax plan works off of the understanding that those breaks will remain in place.
Then the one sided experimental study has this: “Repealing itemized deductions generates almost $2.5 trillion over a decade. But a huge chunk of that — almost $986 billion — would be lost immediately to a repeal of the alternative minimum tax. Another $378 billion would be lost to the elimination of limits on itemized deductions for high earners. Taxing capital gains and dividends as traditional wages is another big revenue loser — to the tune of $850 billion — in part because of behavioral changes that would result for higher levies on investment.
A spokesperson for House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) criticized the report for assuming that taxes would rise on investments so much that money is actually lost: ‘Not only did they leave out base broadeners, they include policies that lost revenue,’ the spokesperson said. Like most static tax analyses there is no change in behavior for those who get the reduction in tax rates – like now willing to work more (productivity) to keep more.
“The authors of two leading approaches to deficit reduction — Alan Simpson, Erskine Bowles, Pete Domenici and Alice Rivlin — criticized the JCT’s report.
‘There is a growing bipartisan consensus for an approach that broadens the base, lowers rates and raises revenue as part of a comprehensive fiscal plan,” they said in a joint statement. “The JCT study looks at only a subset of the tax expenditures we reformed or eliminated, thereby leaving out a substantial amount of savings that were included in our proposals. Most notably, the JCT study does not address the employer health exclusion, the largest tax expenditure in the code, as our plans would.’ “
Centrist
October 13th, 2012
2:12 pm
Obama/ Biden are pretending (for partisan reasons to obscure) that ALL tax rates are scheduled to rise at the end of the year. Of course, they will not – a lame duck Congress and Obama will sign another extension of the current rates. They will NOT get just an increase in the top rate.
MarkV
October 13th, 2012
2:18 pm
cc @12:57 pm
You obviously lack the aptitude to distinguish between a truth and a lie. Kyle wrote that the young woman had written that she was indebted” because she made bad decisions about her education.” She had not written that, it was not true, it was a lie. As a matter of fact, she did not even write anywhere that she believed her education decision was “bad.” She admitted a mistake of “negligence and lack of awareness, over-borrowing,” but not a mistake of getting the education she got.
MarkV
October 13th, 2012
2:21 pm
Centrist @ 2:12 pm
“Obama/ Biden are pretending (for partisan reasons to obscure) that ALL tax rates are scheduled to rise at the end of the year. Of course, they will not – a lame duck Congress and Obama will sign another extension of the current rates.”
Do you understand what the word “scheduled” means?
Guest
October 13th, 2012
2:48 pm
“Unfortunately, most college students don’t have high math and science apptitude and liberal arts leanings are found in the majority.”
First of all, math and the natural sciences are, in fact, liberal arts majors. Secondly, according to Georgetown’s Center on Education and the Workforce, only 9.7 percent of students major in the liberals arts. Business management, accounting, and nursing are the three most popular majors.
cc
October 13th, 2012
3:08 pm
MarkV:
Lie:
1: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2: to create a false or misleading impression
Please point out where there was an “intent to deceive”, or where Kyle created “a false or misleading impression. After adding that single line he IMMEDIATELY wrote, “OK, she didn’t write that last part.” If you were “deceived” or “a false or misleading impression” remained with you as you read the column, I submit that you must be suffering from a mental deficiency or you are bored on a Saturday with little to do but nitpick. Which is it, MarkV?
the red herring
October 13th, 2012
3:28 pm
people who go to college must learn that going to college doesn’t mean squat. going to college and getting an education in a field that is hiring and will hire means something. many years ago i went to college and got a professional degree and worked for 34 years in order to get a retirement. i earned little early on but was able to work part time work at my profession until i saved enough to invest in a business and i purchased a 1/3 interest in that business—-later i purchased both of the other partner’s shares —i continued to work my regular job (40 hrs per week plus on call hours) and i also continued to work part time work—-i managed and did purchasing for my business—- now will someone explain to me why i should pay more taxes and my employees and the people who don’t want to work should pay less?? i don’t understand that logic. if you work 9 to 5 —–five days per week and take home no responsibility and none of your company’s headaches/heartaches then you will not become wealthy—- and you should not. but if you do all of that and work and extra job and invest then you should be allowed to succeed—- people earning a living and making wealth in this fashion should not be punished…..
cc
October 13th, 2012
3:41 pm
the red herring:
“people earning a living and making wealth in this fashion should not be punished”
No, you should not . . . but try telling that to a dimocrat!
JDW
October 13th, 2012
3:46 pm
@Centrist…indeed I read the article and they go to great pains to make this point…
“it’s a reminder of how tough it would be for Romney to stay true to his plan of slashing marginal rates by 20 percent while preventing a tax increase on investments and ensuring that the U.S. economy generates the same amount of revenue as it does today”
See that is the point Romney is selling smoke and mirrors. BECAUSE of this…
““Repealing itemized deductions generates almost $2.5 trillion over a decade. But a huge chunk of that — almost $986 billion — would be lost immediately to a repeal of the alternative minimum tax. Another $378 billion would be lost to the elimination of limits on itemized deductions for high earners.”
It is impossible to cut taxes by $5 trillion and make it up on reducing deductions…Romney’s plan is snake oil.
MarkV
October 13th, 2012
3:49 pm
cc @3:08 pm
This is not the first time when Kyle’ put words into the mouth (even if not literally mouths) of somebody, and then pretended that what he added was what that person had in mind. He has done it again in this case, and therefore, he intended to deceive and to create a false or misleading impression.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
3:51 pm
O’ and Centrist…this is the one Romney doesn’t want touch…
“Most notably, the JCT study does not address the employer health exclusion, the largest tax expenditure in the code, as our plans would”
Because this one takes money right out of Middle Class pockets and puts it in the pockets of the wealthy…now mind you I am not saying it is an idea that should not be considered.
I am saying it is mathematically impossible to cut rates by 20% and make it up in limiting deductions while not impinging on the Middle Class
carlosgvv
October 13th, 2012
4:18 pm
Guest – 2:48
I was refering to majors such as Math, Physics, Chemistry, Engineering and Biology. The majority of college students do NOT have a high apptitude for these subjets, and yet, they are the ones that are most likely to get you hired.
The top eight college majors are:
1. Business
2. Anthropology
3. Economics
4. Geography
5. Sociology
6. Political Science
7. History
8. Education
Of these, only ONE, Economics, requires some higher math.
Guest
October 13th, 2012
4:57 pm
@ carlosgvv
Math, physics, chemistry, and biology are all liberal arts majors. And please cite the source of your list.
Centrist
October 13th, 2012
5:01 pm
Our income tax system is a total mess, and few think it is fair. 47% legally don’t pay any income tax. There is a huge untaxed underground economy. Those in the higher tax brackets have incentive to cheat. There is no doubt that expanding the base and lowering the rates with equal amounts of deduction removals is possible, and would reduce the incentive of cheating in what is considered an unfair system. Partisans can argue whether a 20% reduction in rates is possible to obscure the point. Nobody is claiming the middle class is exempt from both rate and deduction reductions – it is meant to be revenue neutral except for the wealthy and those who are improperly exempt from having any skin in the game.
Gravy Train
October 13th, 2012
5:08 pm
cc: or whatever your name is: Being called a “loser” by an old, lonely, narrow minded, xenophobe means I’m doing my job. Now continue your usual plutocrat lap dog duties and your ditto-head whine.
Centrist: What about Willard’s over seas tax shelters? The amount of US capital hidden over seas make the 47% claim you make a drop in the bucket.
Gravy Train
October 13th, 2012
5:10 pm
They have no incentive to repatriate the money until the have zero tax liability. Even if the tax rate was .000000001% they would still cry about it being too high. Greed is not patriotic.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 13th, 2012
5:19 pm
I posted some of this earlier on Dupree’s column, sorry if you read it there. One of the posters there was whining about how regressive the Romney policies were. America has really changed for the worse, if traditional American solutions are now off the table, for some voters.
I never knew America was such a rotten place, prior to Barry telling us how we ain’t going back to that. I have lived here for more than half a century and until this recent unpleasantness I thought we had the worlds best economy. We had some differences on social issues, but I thought we all enjoyed the American lifestyle. America still has the best standard of living in the world. Our poor are better off than the middle class in most other countries.
But, I guess all these liberals were miserable all those years, whoda thunk it? I thought I was doing great, working hard, saving my money, and getting slowly more wealthy. Never been rich, started out with $65.00 and a new job, been wonderful ever since. I guess some folks couldn’t do that or didn’t want to go through the effort.
We sure had and still have the best standard of living compared to anywhere else in the world. Guess Liberals are complainers and whiners, because most of America did great from WWII to about 2008, ups and downs, but on the whole getting more prosperous as we aged. Not sure if the complainers are upset because they didn’t do well, or they are just envious of those who did better.
Romney wants to take us back to that great economy, but seems some want to wander around in this current miasma. Obama has no answers, that is obvious, or he would have tried them, so we elect him and we continue with the status quo. Remember 2008 and hope and change, when the status quo wasn’t good enough, now it is all Barry can talk about. Stay the course, stay the course (status quo), can you believe it, Obama likes the status quo of 23 million Americans either unemployed, under employed, or not looking for employment.
I am voting for returning to prosperity. This current situation is nothing to live with, much less strive for.
Gravy Train
October 13th, 2012
5:19 pm
The mormon missionaries that came through my neighborhood today were very disgruntled by the fact that Lyin’ Ryan soiled Willard’s magic underwear (on loan) on worldwide television. They are very down about it.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 13th, 2012
5:42 pm
Gravy do you wake up everyday obsessed with your non magic underwear? I am sure your wife can attest to the fact, that there is no magic there!
You should change your handle to Latter Day Gravy or Mormon Gravy.
cc
October 13th, 2012
5:57 pm
MarkV:
“!and what has become Kyle’s trademark – rephrasing statements to give them a meaning of his choice . . . there was no sarcasm, just a pure, unadulterated lie.”
“She had not written that, it was not true, it was a lie”
“This is not the first time when Kyle’ put words into the mouth (even if not literally mouths) of somebody”
I believe (if I were you) I would move on to greener pastures rather than continuing to contribute to the blog of such a “liar”, MarkV. Every time you post something on Kyle’s blog, it draws a response adding to the verbiage of a very successful blog. Why continue to reward someone whom you claim lies?
cc
October 13th, 2012
6:01 pm
Rafe:
Gravy’s obsession with Romney’s underwear tends to indicate that he might be fixated on getting into Mitt’s underwear. I don’t think Mitt swings that way so Gravy will be left to his dreams.
cc
October 13th, 2012
6:06 pm
Gravy Goober, or whatever your name is:
“cc: or whatever your name is: Being called a “loser” by an old, lonely, narrow minded, xenophobe means I’m doing my job”
Your job? Who is your employer? Who signs your paychecks? What is your job description? I might have known what you just admitted.
Del
October 13th, 2012
6:16 pm
Four Americans died and Obama/Biden lied. This should be the final spike into this incompetent administrations hard-left heart. Hope for change fellow American’s. We can’t afford four more years and we’ll be cleaning up from the last four many years to come.
td
October 13th, 2012
6:16 pm
cc
October 13th, 2012
6:06 pm
Do not worry about people like Gravy because they know they are losing and are not happy that their gravy train is about to end.
MarkV
October 13th, 2012
6:26 pm
cc @ 5:57 pm
Are you trying to be funny? Perhaps you would like to see anything that Kyle and you write to remain unopposed, just a blog for sycophants. It won’t happen.
cc
October 13th, 2012
6:31 pm
td@6:16 pm:
You’re right, of course. Gravy Goober is just so transparent, inane and irritating; I’ve never seen anyone post so often, so much and say so very little.
Del
October 13th, 2012
6:37 pm
Obama’s friends…Frank Marshall Davis (a card carrying communist and Obama’s mentor), William Ayres and Bernardine Dohran (two radical’s from the communist Weatherman movement), Rev. Wright a radical far-left Black theologian) and his own father Barack Hussein Obama ( a hard left anti-West radical). Get this slime out of America’s White House.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
6:39 pm
@Centrist…”Our income tax system is a total mess, and few think it is fair”
That I agree with, I think we need fewer deductions, limits on those deductions and 3 to 4 tax bands with the highest at 35%
“47% legally don’t pay any income tax”
As do most you miss the real issue…the “47%” aren’t paying income taxes BECAUSE THEY DON’T MAKE ENOUGH MONEY. At the same time they pay SS tax, Medicare tax, sales tax etc… THEY PAY TAX.
“There is a huge untaxed underground economy.”
Yep, I think we should have a combination consumption/income tax to account for this.
“Those in the higher tax brackets have incentive to cheat. ”
And always will
“There is no doubt that expanding the base and lowering the rates with equal amounts of deduction removals is possible, and would reduce the incentive of cheating in what is considered an unfair system. Partisans can argue whether a 20% reduction in rates is possible to obscure the point. ”
I think that the system should be reformed but am not for wholesale lowering of the rates until financial stability is reached. Another 20% on top of tax rates that were ALREADY cut from those that made sense is LUDICROUS.
“Nobody is claiming the middle class is exempt from both rate and deduction reductions ”
Au contraire that is EXACTLY what Mittens is claiming 20% tax cut with no impact on the Middle Class and he is LYING
“It is meant to be revenue neutral except for the wealthy and those who are improperly exempt from having any skin in the game.”
Actually Mittens claims it is revenue neutral all in…which of course by definition negates any GDP growth from a stimulus effect which he has baked in to his lie…IT WON’T WORK…it will reduce revenue, make loads of money for rich and increase the deficit.
Del
October 13th, 2012
6:41 pm
Forgot to mention, Khalid al-Mansour and Louis Farrahhan, two radical Islamic Muslims.
TomnSuwanee
October 13th, 2012
6:42 pm
Kyle
I know how hard you try to educate the readers but some are just too dense. Bush had some pretty good years, but Chris Dodd & Barney Frank did not want to listen to him and let Freddie Mac & Fanny Mae run
wild with undocumented loans. This is what cause the financial implosion. Bush warned them 17 times but still the dems/libs want to blame him for their failures !
Gravy Train
October 13th, 2012
6:56 pm
It’s always someone else’s fault with the ditto-heads. No personal responsibilty that Willard talks about. “Talk” is all it is.
cc: Don’t worry about me, worry about yourself. Who’s gonna pay the difference when Willard’s vouchers run out for you? Dumb old coot. Like it or not, people like me are the future. Your party is shrinking by the day. No fresh recruits. Young people don’t care about your 30+ year old agenda. Really, it goes back to the 1930’s. Well, I’ll be here on November 6th when you all get your rude awakening again. It makes me happy watching you whine. By the way: My employer is People Against Grumpy Old Racists and Xenophobes. Our mission is to promote the further destruction of the modern GOP. Our job is very easy because you are all so eager to destroy yourselves. Our best recruiters are George W Bush, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, and now includes Todd Aiken, Willard and Boy Blunder, Lyin’ Ryan. We want to personally thank brainless wonders like yourself that vote R no matter what. The more you whine, the stronger we become. So keep it up.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 13th, 2012
7:14 pm
Gravy
You had better enjoy the next 24 days, your depression will arrive on 7 Nov, the day of America’s restoration.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
7:19 pm
@Rafe…”the day of America’s restoration”
Wow you think the Dems will carry that House too! That’s agressive. I was thinking we will pick up 8-10 seats.
cc
October 13th, 2012
7:20 pm
Del@6:37 pm:
I couldn’t agree more!
JDW:
“the “47%” aren’t paying income taxes BECAUSE THEY DON’T MAKE ENOUGH MONEY”
If they make ANY money, they should pay some small amount if for no other reason than having some “skin in the game”.
“At the same time they pay SS tax, Medicare tax, sales tax etc… THEY PAY TAX.”
Yes, and they draw Social Security, use Medicare and the services sales taxes provide.
Del
October 13th, 2012
7:22 pm
Gravy and Cheesy ,
Are both the consummate cut and pasters from left wing Web sites.
cc
October 13th, 2012
7:24 pm
Gravy Goober:
Just get some help with your little fixation problem. You need to get that resolved, and get it resolved quickly. Election day and your guaranteed depression loom large on the horizon.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
7:25 pm
@td…”If they make ANY money, they should pay some small amount if for no other reason than having some “skin in the game”.”
Remember that load of horse$hit next time someone is cutting your grass, making your bed, prepping your food or dying in a foreign land. They have skin in the game, what they need is a more level field to play on.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
7:27 pm
@td…and while I am at it…the net effect of what you just said is to take food from people’s mouths so folks like Donald Trump can keep a few more bucks in the bank.
Shame
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 13th, 2012
7:29 pm
“Frankly if an incumbent is under 45-46 percent who feel that he deserves to be re-elected, that’s normally trouble for the incumbent,” Zogby says. “When we first started in Ohio, it was 45 percent who felt that he deserved to be re-elected. Then . . . time for someone new is at 48 percent — just not good news for the president at this moment.”
Read more on Newsmax.com: John Zogby to Newsmax: Ohio Momentum ‘Clearly With Romney’
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama’s Re-Election? Vote Here Now!
cc
October 13th, 2012
7:32 pm
Gravy:
“Your party is shrinking by the day. No fresh recruits. Young people don’t care about your 30+ year old agenda”
As usual, you are wrong: Obama and you dimocrats have done more for the increase in the Republican Party than any other single factor since Ronald Reagan was a presidential candidate.
For that, I thank you and those like you. In this aspect, and this aspect alone, Obama has not been a TOTAL failure.
Del
October 13th, 2012
7:34 pm
Oh yes…the level playing field and everybody needs to have a fair shot. Far-left talking points. The truth is that the far- left leadership in this country couldn’t care less about fair shots. What they’ve really been striving for is a weakened America where poverty is the new normal with only the ruling class on top of the food chain. The left has been a cancer in American society and hopefully America will turn them back in November.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
7:34 pm
@Rafe…quoting Newsmax…
That’s kind of like asking Iran to write the UN position on nuclear proliferation.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
7:37 pm
Yo Del…that’s some good weed you got going there…you have completely lost touch with reality.
“What they’ve really been striving for is a weakened America where poverty is the new normal with only the ruling class on top of the food chain”
Yeah baby you are all over it.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 13th, 2012
7:37 pm
JDW
I feel confident that status quo folk will remain in the minority in the House. It is going to be close in the Senate, but I doubt the prosperity party will be able to pick up enough seats to overthrow lazy ole Hairy the Reed. I think the GOP will be fine with the House and President Romney. He can work with the less ideological Dem members and craft together a functioning Senate. He will have to fight Hairy at every turn, for sure.
Centrist
October 13th, 2012
7:43 pm
@ JDW – Financial security will only come via a robust economy. High tax rates stifle productivity (time off, satisfaction with the status quo instead of paying increased tax rates) is a drag on job creation and the economy.
The payroll tax is meant to pay for Social Security and Medicare benefits – not national defense and all other government functions that 100% (not just 53%) enjoy. Without skin in the game, those who don’t contribute are freeloaders. The truly indigent (if not able bodied) should and are taken care for – it is the other element that cheats and has their votes bought.
Politicians will never agree to a consumption tax – they can’t buy votes or payoff campaign contributors via manipulation of the tax code. That goes for both Republicans and< Democrats. The talk about a millionaire/billionaire fairness tax is just that – electioneering talk. The Democrat Senate couldn’t/wouldn’t pass it.
Del
October 13th, 2012
7:43 pm
JDW…Hopefully, you’re only a a sad tool for the far-left and not among their leadership of what many of us recognize as overt anti-Americanism. Because of your blog rhetoric I’m pretty sure it’s the former.
td
October 13th, 2012
7:44 pm
JDW
October 13th, 2012
7:25 pm
First, I made that point (and still believe it) several months ago so I really do not understand where the attack is coming from today.
Second: The playing field is level. What you are asking is that the playing field should be guaranteed and that my friend it the major difference between the libs (socialist, social justice, communist or progressives) and conservatives. Everyone has the opportunity to get an education and then take that education, work harder and longer then the next guy and make it in this country if they choose too. For example just look at most of the immigrants that come here. If you do not want or are not willing to put in the effort then that is on the individual not the society.
cc
October 13th, 2012
7:46 pm
Del:
“What they’ve really been striving for is a weakened America where poverty is the new normal with only the ruling class on top of the food chain.”
Precisely, and the Obama sycophants such as JDW are just either too blinded by their messiah or too intelligence-challenged to grasp it. (How did you like the “political correctness?)
bluecoat
October 13th, 2012
7:47 pm
I thought Norway had highest standard of living.
Del
October 13th, 2012
7:50 pm
cc,
I’m pretty sure that JDW, Gravy Brain and Cheesy are among the sadly duped and know not what the speak or post. We should try to help them although that may be an impossible undertaking.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 13th, 2012
7:50 pm
@td…and while I am at it…the net effect of what you just said is to take food from people’s mouths so folks like Donald Trump can keep a few more bucks in the bank.
JDW
1. No one in America is without food, Donald Trump and others like him provide enough in taxes to assure that anyone who wants one, has an EBT card. Trump’s taxes alone, I’m sure, are sufficient to support the dietary habits of thousands of poor people. How many more is he supposed to supused his money to buy over priced Chevy Volts, for the folks at the Austrian Embassy.port? He has no control over how his tax money is spent, if someone is hungry, it may be that the Government chose to use the money to buy over priced Chevy Volts for the Austrian Embassy instead.
cc
October 13th, 2012
7:52 pm
Del:
I do believe “impossible” to be an apt analysis.
Dusty
October 13th, 2012
7:53 pm
Well, I see we have a nice crowd here tonight. Off sub;ject but going forth with vigor!!
As you can tell, I have just returned from a delightful dinner of the evening (which I did not prepare). That creates happiness for almost everyone. Let’s see.
Rafe: I liked your all America post. Good to read appreciation for our great country.
Del: Hold their feet to the fire!!
cc: Just throw Gravy a biscuit. That quiets him a bit.
Tomnsuwanee: You are so right! Bush was a strong, honest leader.
MarkV: Haven’t you heard? Calling folks “liars” is not the way to win friends and influence people. ‘Tis true..
Well, I did a little reading today. Reviewed Dante’s Inferno! Not all of it. That man should have been a blogger. He could give ‘em hell..
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 13th, 2012
7:53 pm
Whoa, major malfunction at 7:50, sorry I didn’t proof read.
How many more is he supposed to support?
Del
October 13th, 2012
7:58 pm
Care for the poor, sick and even the lazy should be delegated down to the local level where it can be administered most effectively by local business the churches and the community at large. Administered by the federal government is ineffective for two reasons, first of all the federal government is too far removed and worse yet it becomes a vote focused function. Socialism doesn’t work.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 13th, 2012
8:01 pm
Thanks Dusty! Enjoy your poems, immensely.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
8:04 pm
Yo Del…better lay off the weed you are going to be sick.
Del
October 13th, 2012
8:05 pm
Hey Dusty,
Have to go watch the adult version of Snow White on our Red Box DVD. Kick some lib butt as you’ve proven many times over your great capability to do so. Out
JDW
October 13th, 2012
8:07 pm
@td…”First, I made that point (and still believe it) several months ago so I really do not understand where the attack is coming from today.”
Because you made it again and ITS JUST WRONG. IT WAS WRONG THEN, IT IS WRONG NOW AND WILL BE WRONG TOMORROW.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 13th, 2012
8:07 pm
should be delegated down to the local level where it can be administered most effectively by local business
Del, so true, my mother would confirm. Her church provides for any have not who comes and asks. She said they not able to keep the account supplied with cash, until someone suggested they started following up on the donations. They now visit the ones they have donated to and ask how the money helped, see the results, roof leaking, where are the repairs? Just by asking a few questions, they now have a surplus in the account, as they have fewer requests.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
8:08 pm
@Rafe…”No one in America is without food”
You need to get out more. Do some volunteer work. Make some new acquaintances.
cc
October 13th, 2012
8:10 pm
Dusty, Del, Rafe, td and all fellow conservatives: Have a pleasant evening! I’m off to watch a little football.
td
October 13th, 2012
8:15 pm
JDW
October 13th, 2012
8:07 pm
I did not make it bud, cc did and I agree with him 100%.
It is only wrong for you socialist and the lazy that do not want to go out and take advantage of what is put before them. If people can come to this country, not speak English and make it then any natural born citizen has no excuse.
cc
October 13th, 2012
8:16 pm
JDW:
“Because you made it again and ITS JUST WRONG. IT WAS WRONG THEN, IT IS WRONG NOW AND WILL BE WRONG TOMORROW.”
I guess td was laboring under the false assumption that you could actually read. It was I who made the comment about which you have been scolding td. I guess that is to be expected from a liberal.
td
October 13th, 2012
8:19 pm
cc
October 13th, 2012
8:16 pm
JDW just can not deal with the thought that people have to be responsible for themselves and not the government responsible for the peoples basic needs. Total socialist.
Gravy Train
October 13th, 2012
8:27 pm
Circle the wagons
Raise the white flag
Plutocrats laugh all the way to the bank
While ditto-heads carry their bag
Gravy Train
October 13th, 2012
8:29 pm
Circle the wagons
Clear the path
Plutocrats are cashing in
Because ditto-heads have no math
JDW
October 13th, 2012
8:31 pm
@td…” Total socialist”
Yep that’s me..20 years in corporate America. President of two companies. Unblemished record of hitting the numbers. Yep I am a socialist in the vein of Gates and Buffett. Not that rich but am one of those that should pay more.
Dusty
October 13th, 2012
8:33 pm
JDW
Please give us your first hand account of helping the starving in our country.
I believe there may be hungry people in our country. That is because they do not use the facilities and programs available to them. Almost every church I know about has a food pantry or a connection to a community food bank. Children are fed at school, many of them for breakfast and lunch. We all know about other government programs such as food stamps, etc.
Not only are churches reaching out to the needy among numerous other programs, they reach around the world (Would you like to hear about Lutheran World Relief and others?)
To make needy people in the USA a political “bone’ is almost rediculous. With millions beyond our shores dying from malnutrition and starvation, it is hardly plausible to talk about “starving Americans” when one of our biggest national health problems is obesity.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
8:40 pm
Well Dusty, I spent most of today packing meals for them. Last week we launched a program that provides kids coming into homeless shelters welcome kits of books and toys. We do a program a week along with helping host via the church homeless families with young children.
I can also give you 20 years international experience. See before I lived overseas and learned I was just as clueless as many of those here, but I learned.
td
October 13th, 2012
8:41 pm
JDW
October 13th, 2012
8:31 pm
Yes and I am a small business owner and knows what is like to pull a payroll out of you butt by begging my local banker for a 30 day loan or by putting a 2nd mortgage on my house when times are hard and know what it is like to pay the government an extreme amount of money before I can pay myself. I know what is like to have a good employee that has to leave because I had to pay for some stupid new regulation guideline instead of being able to give him the raise he earned.
You may have been able to hit you production numbers but you sure do not know how to do math. If you did then you would know that if we taxed those evil rich like you at a 100% level then we would not even be able to balance the budget much less pay down the debt. Yes, you are a socialist.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 13th, 2012
8:46 pm
JDW
Dusty at 8:33 said it better than I could. I have poor friends, none are starving, but they sure could use some of your money to help with the rent, since you said you are “one of those who could pay more”.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
8:53 pm
@td…”Yes, you are a socialist.”
And you need to learn the definition of words before you start tossing them around like you know what you are talking about.
As for the rest of your bit…
Bankers can be a pain, but if you have a solid plan at the end of the day they want to give you money if they can make money from the exchange.
If you are paying taxes before paying yourself you need a better accountant because it doesn’t work that way.
You might think you lost that employee solely because of money but fact is that isn’t why most people leave…it is a convenient excuse.
As for the “evil rich” and the debt…I kind of liked the 90’s and think that ought to be the model…not Snake Oil from Mittens.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 13th, 2012
8:53 pm
Well, off to watch LSU thump the Chickens.
I will leave Kyle’s Poet Laureate, Dusty to parry with JDW over America’s hungry/obese.
MarkV
October 13th, 2012
8:54 pm
Dusty @ 7:53 pm
Dusty,
Where did you get the idea that I make comments here to make friends and influence people?
I was a little hard on Kyle today, but I am getting tired of his twisting what people say and use that as a foundation for an expression of his political philosophy. I hope to write a better comment on the subject of this article, because education is one of my interests, but it will have to wait until later.
G’nite.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
9:01 pm
@Rafe…”Well, off to watch LSU thump the Chickens.”
That would be nice but those damn Chickens are not getting with the program
Dusty
October 13th, 2012
9:12 pm
JDW
Your service at church is commendable. But would you say that even the homeless people were “starving”? I was under the impression that you thought many Americans were starving (thus would need more government help which only Obama would provide). Was I wrong?
Oh yes, I believe that every Christian should help needy people to their fullest extent. That is a personal commitment. When the matters of government are depleted by services which should be done by by non-governmental agencies, I think we have gone beyond personal commitment.into the realm of communistic care.
American citizens are the most generous in the world. I think they have reached the zenith of caring for fellow citizens. The need for fair and equal government for all, rich or poor,should not be depleted by any program. We have reached the time for a decision on that matter. .
Dusty
October 13th, 2012
9:21 pm
WOW RAFE!! My head is swelling! Kyle’s Poet Laureate! That ’s the nicest compliment I’ve had in a long long time.( and I bet it made others laugh!) Thank you very much.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
9:24 pm
@Dusty…malnourished might be a better choice of words.
Americans of the past were generous. This country took a turn for the worse that was started by the Gingrich led Republicans in 1994. The Republican Leadership of today is small minded and dangerous.
Our middle class is disappearing. If we follow their lead we will be left with the modern version of16th century France.
Dusty
October 13th, 2012
9:39 pm
Mark V
Of course you make comments here to influence people. Don’t we all post just to pass along our “great intelligence” to the ignorant world? (That’s a joke, honey!)
Well, folks do listen a little better when not called liars. Were you the one in sixth grade who proclaimed “Liar! Lair! House on fire!”? Come on now. Were you?
Anyway, I look forward to reading your new comments on education.
Goodnight.
JDW
October 13th, 2012
9:39 pm
@Dusty…”The need for fair and equal government for all, rich or poor,should not be depleted by any program. We have reached the time for a decision on that matter”
Alright its halftime…damn Chickens need to roll over…I can switch to a keyboard.
We have a problem in this country…we spend more than we take in by about $1 trillion. We have to solve that problem and there are two ways.
First we have the Republican position, which BTW does not solve the problem. Cut taxes by $5 Trillion, try to pay for it with limiting deductions and hope like hell against all evidence to the contrary that we grow our way out. We tried that twice. Clinton cleaned up Reagan’s mess and our current dilemma remains unsolved. Current Republicans also tweak Social Security and toss Medicare to the Vouchers.
Then we have the Democratic positions, which BTW does not solve the problem. Raise taxes back to the 1990’s level on the more wealthy and cut the gap. Make some stride on controlling health care costs. Tweak Social Security. Then hope like hell we eventually grow our way out.
The answer is, as always in the middle and as voters we don’t have the luxury of a candidate that actually solves the problem. For my money the Dems take one step forward while the Republicans take two steps back. Our best hope is that Obama is elected and the Dems control the Senate but not the House ( though it would be helpful if they made some gains). That should bring the Republicans to the table to negotiate a framework along the lines of the Clinton era combined with a Simpson Bowles type framework that will solve the problem…until of course someone (ahem George W. Bush) screws it up again.
td
October 13th, 2012
9:51 pm
JDW
October 13th, 2012
9:24 pm
I have to call your statements about starving and malnourished due to the government is full of crap. My wife works for DFCS and I did for a couple years (many moons ago) and can tell you that the amount of Food Stamps, WIC, school lunch and breakfast program and churches make our poor more well nourished the most of the middle class is the rest of the world. If you make no money and have a family of 4 in America then you receive $573 per month is FS, if you have a child under one then you get about $200 per month in WIC and how much is Breakfast and lunch worth at our schools? Now tell us how much a middle class worker in China makes per month?
Now if people choose not to get government assistance then why should we care? Should we force them too? How many people come and get food from our churches so that they can sell their FS (EBT cards) for 50 cents on the dollar or for drugs?
If you see children hungry and you are not reporting that to DFCS then you are to blame for their hunger.
td
October 13th, 2012
10:01 pm
JDW
October 13th, 2012
9:39 pm
“Raise taxes back to the 1990’s level on the more wealthy and cut the gap.”
There is that math problem again. If you raise taxes on everyone making $250,000 per year back to the Clinton era rates then you only raise $80 billion per year on a $1 trillion deficit. In other words you are taking care of 6 days worth of excess government spending.
You forgot to mention that there is a third way and the way we must go and that is to cut spending. Repeal Obamacare brings in more money per year then raising taxes on the rich. There is already a plan that will balance the budget and it is called the Penny plan. Go look it up and study it a little. It basically says to stop all automatic increases in the Federal budget for 6 years and then actually cut (not decrease the amount of projected increases) 1 penny or 1% per year for 6 years and the budget will be balanced. If each department can not find 1% per year in waste, fraud and abuse then there is something wrong with the department.
Bruno
October 13th, 2012
10:06 pm
This country took a turn for the worse that was started by the Gingrich led Republicans in 1994. The Republican Leadership of today is small minded and dangerous.
Somehow your demonization of Republicans/conservatives overlooks the fact that, as a group, conservatives are far more generous with their time and money than liberals are. The only thing that Libs seem to be good as is using others misfortune to score cheap political points.
Libs = Talkers, Cons = Doers.
Dusty
October 13th, 2012
10:07 pm
JDW
What country do you consider more generous than the USA? I don’t believe there is one. And what in the world makes you want to blame Gingrich for any and every problem? He is an intelligent and highly gifted man who knew how to make a balanced government budget.
Of course he was imperfect in many human ways, but still a leader. Believe me, we are all aware of imperfect leaders of every political persuasion. But to pick one and only one is hardly cognizant, ’specially one who now has no influence or power.
Considering America’s indebtedness, I would say that fiscal problems are wrecking our country. It is not only what happened in the past but what has happened recently. You have obviously ignored the past four years.
The guillotines are not ready but we must get our finances in shape with those who are more able to do it. I have hope for the future because we live in a free country where changes are legal and necessity will lead us to make them. I look forward to that day.
G’nite…
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 14th, 2012
5:22 am
“Like it or not, people like me are the future.”
Stupid, liberal bigots are our future?
Who knew?
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 14th, 2012
5:30 am
“Our middle class is disappearing.”
Great sound bite, JDW, but WHERE is it disappearing to?
Government statistics show that the “poor” (percentage of people living in poverty) hasn’t really changed in the nearly 50 years since Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society programs. So the first thing is that all these government programs that have been instituted to help the poor have largely failed to move the needle on eradicating poverty.
The second point is that if the middle class is, indeed disappearing, and the percentage of people living in poverty hasn’t changed, where did they go?
The only direction is up, JDW.
So the next time you read that DNC talking point, go out and thank an employer for providing the job that enabled that middle class person to move up in life.
Tool.
@@
October 14th, 2012
8:18 am
….they are hopelessly full of 1950s crap…
And AmVet’s full of the 1960s crap.
Poor Johnny one-note
yelled willy nilly
Until he was bleu in the face
For holding one note was his ace
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
cc
October 14th, 2012
9:05 am
@@@8:18 am:
Eureka! I do believe you have found the truth!
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 14th, 2012
9:34 am
@@ you are too late, a great poem,but Dusty has already been nominated as Poet Laureate.
JDW Indeed the chickens were thumped and plucked, hooray! You seem to like Clinton a great deal, but you do know that most of his success, occurred after he abandoned the notion of big Government and embraced some GOP positions of lowering taxes and growing the economy. I believe he said the “era of big Government is over”. I will not get into the unsustainable explosion of the dot com bubble that infused his government with revenue, many would argue that this accounted for much of his success.
Romney is talking about those things, lowering taxes and growing government, Obama is talking about “fairness” and making the rich pay more in taxes. I think we will achieve more success with encouraging growth by lowering tax rates for all and eliminating all these tax breaks, where the government tries to pick winners and losers, and more times than not picks the losers.
@@
October 14th, 2012
9:56 am
Rafe:
Mine was a musical interlude for our resident “ninner-ninnerloper.”
(ISH)
TRUTH
October 14th, 2012
9:57 am
Actually, good piece, Kyle. (And, welcome back from the European nuptials you attended…). Although the push has been on to attend college/university for years, we now have grads WHO CAN’T FIND WORK, because corporations have decided to move their productions off-shore for cheaper labor, the banks have shut down loaning to new biz start-ups, and if you can find venture capital, good luck (and tell us where!!).
The GOP wants dumb citizens so they can continue to shove the archaic policies down our throat and justify not paying fair wages to those of us with the education and skills, and send those opportunities abroad. SHAMEFUL. Crazier, its not the President’s fault for private biz doing so.
Wake up, folks. The GOP are obstructionists!!
Jus’ sayin’…
carlosgvv
October 14th, 2012
10:43 am
Guest – 4:57
http://www.campusgrotto.com/most-popular-college-majors
Apparently, you’ve never heard of the academic term “Arts and Sciences”.
I wonder why that is?
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 14th, 2012
10:43 am
Let’s just say that anyone who uses the word “truth” in their blog name rarely, if ever, posts any.
cc
October 14th, 2012
10:51 am
TRUTH@9:57 am:
The TRUTH is that business will do what is in the best interests of the owner/shareholders. The purpose of business is not to pay inflated wages and furnish infinite benefits to union goons. Taxation is another factor that must be considered. If a business must move off-shore in order to return a decent profit, it certainly will do exactly that. Business start-ups are very slow because no one in their right mind would attempt to begin a business now with the knowledge that Obama and his political worshippers have targeted you for higher taxes and created a very uncertain future.
“Crazier, its not the President’s fault for private biz doing so.”
Oh, yes, it IS the president’s fault. Any sane, thinking person recognizes that fact.
bluecoat
October 14th, 2012
11:32 am
CC you reek a heap.We need to tax the rich more.Put more stringent rules and regulations on these companies that pollute our air and streams.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 14th, 2012
11:45 am
@@
Great lyrics, but hard to dance to!
cc
October 14th, 2012
11:47 am
“We need to tax the rich more.”
Yep, and watch the “rich” stop investing in companies and corporations. That will be a boost to the economy!
“Put more stringent rules and regulations on these companies that pollute our air and streams.”
There aren’t enough regulations in place now? By all means, let’s add some more . . . and watch these companies close or move off-shore to avoid having to pay the personnel necessary just to do the damn paperwork for the federal government.
Do you have any idea what government regulations cost businesses now just to comply with the necessary paperwork?
Get back to me when you have investigated this aspect of your wonderful idea.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 14th, 2012
11:48 am
bluecoat
CC you reek a heap.We need to tax the rich more.Put more stringent rules and regulations on these companies that pollute our air and streams
So, you want to move more industry and rich people overseas? I thought the goal was to bring jobs and money back home?
bluecoat
October 14th, 2012
11:56 am
Showing concern for the union GOONS being paid inflated wages,and infinite benefits.Then giving no thought to paying politicans high salaries,perks,expense,and infinite benefits,shows how any sane thinking person recognizes that fact.
cc
October 14th, 2012
12:09 pm
bluecoat@11:56 am:
Why not stick to one subject at a time? Why do I get the impression that you fail to understand how a free market economy works and the necessity for a concern to be competitive in pricing?
bluecoat
October 14th, 2012
12:46 pm
I thought we were on the same subject.You r’s want the corps. to pay less tax and get richer.I want the union”Goons” and middle class to be paid a fair wage.I have no problem with making money.Just don’t exploit the people to do it.
@@
October 14th, 2012
1:13 pm
Must be a man thing.
Guest
October 14th, 2012
1:17 pm
@ carlosgvv
Hahaha! CampusGrotto? Are you kidding? Hardly a credible source, seeing as how their findings aren’t actually based on empirical data. And you don’t even get the rankings right: CampusGrotto claims, without explanation, that the top ten most popular “categories” of majors are business, social sciences and history, psychology, nursing, communications, biology, engineering, English, and computer science.
Plenty of math and science in that mix.
To you second comment, from Merriam-Webster: “In modern colleges and universities, the liberal arts include the study of literature, languages, philosophy, history, mathematics, and science.”
I suspect you’re ignorantly conflating “liberal arts” with “humanities.”
cc
October 14th, 2012
1:26 pm
@@, that is not this man’s thing!
getalife
October 14th, 2012
1:44 pm
I never read Dowd at the NYT until she wrote about the neocons in mitt’s foreign policy team.
Sadly, not many writers are writing about neocons so Iraq is the forgotten disaster and doomed to repeat it..
” Ryan ended up simply parroting Senor, who made his name as spokesman for the botched Iraq occupation. That’s a scary thing unless you want to go back to the messianic mind-set of imprinting our “values” in the Islamic world, an attitude that brought us interminable wars and trillion-dollar deficits.
Ryan echoed the bankrupt neocon philosophy of going to war to prevent war. With Iran, he said, the best thing to do is threaten war. “The key is to do this peacefully,” he said, sounding as woolly as Paul Wolfowitz. Ryan didn’t seem to understand what much of the world does: The administration has worked with allies to strengthen sanctions, which have turned Iran into an economic basket case.
Biden also boxed Ryan into looking as though he wants to send more American troops to Afghanistan and to intervene in Syria, which isn’t so appealing to war-weary America.
Ronald Reagan knew how to bluster for peace. Neocons do not. When they run the show, threatening a war is followed by going to war and that is followed by bollixing up the war and that is followed by our troops’ dying at war and money-pit nation-building to end the war, and that is followed by economic disaster for America.” Dowd NYT.
cc
October 14th, 2012
2:25 pm
getalife, here’s your response . . .
“People who haven’t been paying attention were surprised to learn of this week’s debate moderator’s (Martha Raddatz) close connection to the President. He was a guest at one of her three weddings and a she was invited to his wedding and a visitor to the vice-president’s home just months ago. Other bloggers have made lists of the substantial number of media figures married to Administration appointees and Democratic Party figures. I don’t know why this should be surprising. The incestuous relationship between the media and the Democrats is of such longstanding that you could say the Capitol is like Deliverance with better clothes and haircuts.”
“In this week’s dueling banjos (vice presidential debate) she played her role, working in tandem with vice President Biden to block Congressman Paul Ryan from having an uninterrupted sentence of consequence. Still, Biden could not exercise even a modicum of restraint and his constant heckling, inappropriate laughing and smirking, certainly brought to mind Lonnie, the inbred banjo playing boy in the movie.”
“Despite the best efforts of these two, Congressman Ryan held his own and suggested a maturity and gravitas no one in the present administration has.”
getalife
October 14th, 2012
4:06 pm
I stand with our Vice President to tell the world the gop are full of crap and only vote for the wealthy that needs no help. I fight for the middle class to save SS, Medicare, Medicaid and all programs that help the people that do need help. Join us and vote D.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
4:09 pm
My message for the younger generation is pay attention to politics and vote for your future. Vote.
td
October 14th, 2012
4:23 pm
getalife
October 14th, 2012
4:09 pm
My message for the younger generation is pay attention to politics and vote for your future. Vote.
We agree on something. Young people need to realize if they do not vote for Mitt Romney to get this debt under control then they will not have a future.
cc
October 14th, 2012
4:24 pm
getalife, you are hopeless. Your lack of knowledge as to how the economy works, what drives it and what you derive from it when it works well is abundant. You fail to understand that dimocrats stifle the economy, and Obama has had much more of a damaging effect on it than any dimocrat president since Carter. There are reasons why the economy under Clinton did well, and one of those reasons is that a Republican House forced him into welfare reform and holding back the increase of the size of the federal government. Should Obama be re-elected (he won’t be), the economy will continue its downward spiral and many more jobs will disappear. My prayer is that dimocrat voters pay the heaviest price in such a scenario.
Halftrack
October 14th, 2012
4:40 pm
The only thing that makes the above article worse is the fiscal cliff the USA is about to edge over. All the taxes in Obummer care and the low tax rates now for 10 years from the Bush administration will go back up ( tax hike). Also the cost of transportation and other energy costs. Unless our Congress gets off their hands and get their thinking caps on, there won’t be any way that College will be an avenue of higher education for a lot of people. Only the necessities of existence will then be important.
barking frog
October 14th, 2012
4:58 pm
Young people should get
involved in politics as soon
as possible and stay involved
all their lives. Nothing gets
done without politics. More
participation by the public
could cure many of our
problems.
MarkV
October 14th, 2012
5:18 pm
It is quite amazing how many clairvoyants there are among the people commenting on this blog. They know so well what will happen if Obama is reelected that I am sure they will make a killing on the stock market by selling short.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...
October 14th, 2012
5:21 pm
If you call what the dummycrats provide you with “a future,” your drug habit must only run you about $200 a week, just sayin…
Or $250, if you have six kids.
ragnar danneskjold
October 14th, 2012
5:40 pm
Just got out of Atlas Shrugged Part II, really well done. Think my message to the Class of 2013 would be to read Atlas Shrugged. Knowing how kids are now, perhaps it would be sufficient to have them watch the movies. My younger son read it in the 8th grade, his older brother never even started it.
ragnar danneskjold
October 14th, 2012
5:42 pm
Suspect even the movie would be beyond the comprehension of leftists.
MarkV
October 14th, 2012
5:51 pm
To force young people to read Atlas Shrugged would be against the Constitution, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
5:56 pm
They can fight for the wealthy that do not need any help from anyone and waste their lives or they can stand up and fight for who they are.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
5:57 pm
The movie bombed.
The obl movie will not.
October job report will be good.
md
October 14th, 2012
6:13 pm
I’d advise young people to live in mom and dads basement the first 2 years while going to a community college vs running off to these 4 yr institutions, staying drunk, not giving a crap about classes, having to take those classes again, and have debt out the wazoo because of that new found ill advised freedom of choice.
Beats the heck out of 5-6 years of student loans and then move into the basement………..it also might send these bigger schools a message that the kids will NOT be paying all these overpriced professors and administrators………..
I have to love the irony of these 1% liberal professors/administrators making it unaffordable for the 99%………….
cc
October 14th, 2012
6:32 pm
“October job report will be good.”
Yep, the way they’re cookin’ the books, it ought to be marvelous!
Speaking of cooking the books, Obama’s deportation of illegal aliens is a classic case! They count illegal aliens caught attempting to cross the Mexican/American border as ‘deported’ when they’re merely turned back.
Yes, Obama has cooked the books on the jobs created, unemployment, illegal aliens, the cost of ObamaCare, the number of jobs ‘saved’, the deficit and the amount he has added to the national debt. There isn’t much more left for him to lie about that involves numbers, but he’s doing a great job of lying on the Libyan 9/11 terrorist attack which killed four Americans.
@@
October 14th, 2012
6:43 pm
Arlen Spectre died!!??!!
carlosgvv
October 14th, 2012
6:49 pm
Guest – 1:17
If you read it carefully, their actual top 10 are as follows:
1. Finance
2. Marketing
3. Accounting
4. Anthropology
5. Economics
6. Geography
7. Sociology
8. Political Science
9. Education
10.Psychology
How do you know “their findings aren’t actually based on empirical data?
Shall I just take your word for this?
I made it clear what I meant by liberal arts and science. Do I have to simplify it even more?
You apparently lack basic reading and comprehension skills. Are you some 8th grade blogger trying to be a grown-up here?
MarkV
October 14th, 2012
6:50 pm
There is a simple test of rationality and sanity. Those who believe that the Administration has ”cooked the books” about unemployment are beyond help.
@@
October 14th, 2012
6:55 pm
You apparently lack basic reading and comprehension skills. Are you some 8th grade blogger trying to be a grown-up here?
those two insults are old and moldy.
Think fresh!!!
cc
October 14th, 2012
6:58 pm
@@:
Spectre? Really?
@@
October 14th, 2012
7:03 pm
cc:
Yep. He was 82.
cc
October 14th, 2012
7:05 pm
MarkV:
I know this is a waste of my time and energy, but . . . did you know they do not include those unemployment who still haven’t found employment after they dropped off the unemployment compensation roles? Do you not also know they make no allowance for the ‘under-employed’?
I’m sure you knew all that, didn’t you?
The last report did not have the unemployment claims for the whole state of California and thus did not square the ‘new jobs’ figure, but you already knew that, didn’t you?
cc
October 14th, 2012
7:06 pm
@@:
I believe I’ll hold a . . . wake!
MarkV
October 14th, 2012
7:20 pm
cc @7:05 pm
I realize that you are beyond help but do you realize that the BLS has been using the same methodology all the time? And when you are making the slanderous accusation of “cooking the books,” who are you accusing? The independent, professional people at the BLS?
td
October 14th, 2012
7:39 pm
MarkV
October 14th, 2012
7:20 pm
You mean the two chief economist for BLS that are huge Obama contributors? Now can you tell us how those samples are drawn each month?
While you are telling us about those samples how about addressing the fact that Obama has not asked for extensions to unemployment in over a year because he knew what the numbers would say right before the election with them not counting the people that has dropped off the rolls. Talk about how you are being manipulated.
MarkV
October 14th, 2012
7:45 pm
td @7:39 pm: ”You mean the two chief economist for BLS that are huge Obama contributors? Now can you tell us how those samples are drawn each month?”
This is all people like you can do. Make accusations with no evidence, and insult the huge number of professional people of all political persuasion that would have to be involved. It is disgusting, and I have no desire to discuss it with you and your ilk.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
8:10 pm
“Here is a list of companies we’ve confirmed are “Exporting America.” These are U.S. companies either sending American jobs overseas, or choosing to employ cheap overseas labor, instead of American workers.”
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/popups/exporting.america/content.html#o
Imagine if all these jobs are home.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
8:17 pm
cons,
Self reflect for a moment and tell the younger generation why you fight for the wealthy that does not need any help from any American.
Do tell.
td
October 14th, 2012
8:24 pm
MarkV
October 14th, 2012
7:45 pm
Well if you “professional” government people would stop maxing out your contribution limits to Democrats every time then there would be no appearance of impropriety.
The number 2 contributing group to Obama is the Government workers and they have a huge stake in this election because they know Romney is going to come in a cut their jobs. It is not a far stretch to then think they will cut a few corners to make Obama look as good as possible.
td
October 14th, 2012
8:28 pm
getalife
October 14th, 2012
8:10 pm
“Here is a list of companies we’ve confirmed are “Exporting America.” These are U.S. companies either sending American jobs overseas, or choosing to employ cheap overseas labor, instead of American workers.”
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/popups/exporting.america/content.html#o
Imagine if all these jobs are home.
Now this is funny as h3ll coming from you libs. This was a crusade taken on by Lou Dobbs that got him fired because it was making Obama look to bad.
@@
October 14th, 2012
8:29 pm
Getalife:
…tell the younger generation why you fight for the wealthy that does not need any help from any American.
Most of the younger generation are looking to become wealthy. When they do, they’ll vote conservative.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
8:35 pm
@@,
That does not answer the question.
Not them . You.
Tell them why you fight for Americans that never need your help.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
8:37 pm
td,
dobbs hated bush like he hates immigrates.
The hate got him hired at fox where he belongs.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
8:43 pm
I would tell them I fight for them to have cheaper interest rates on their college loans. I fight for them to level the playing field to give them a shot at the American dream. I fight for good paying jobs in our country not China.
Guest
October 14th, 2012
8:46 pm
@ carlosgvv
Verbatim from CampusGrotto:
Top 10 Majors:
1.Business – Business Administration and Management is the most popular selected major. Business also includes finance, marketing, and accounting, which has a high demand right out of college. This can get you a good paying job right from the start, especially with a business degree from a top business school.
2.Social Sciences and History – This includes anthropology, economics, geography, sociology and political science.
3.Education – Elementary Education is the most popular, as many of these majors go on to be K-12 classroom teachers.
4.Psychology – There seems to be two types of Psych majors. Those who are really into psych and those who see psych as an easy major and therefore an easy way to graduation. Many psych majors don’t technically go on to work in the psych field, but other related careers where the skills of such major can come in handy (ex: human resources, public relations, market research and sales).
5.Nursing – The nursing field is competitive, and some programs may have wait lists. However, you are pretty much guaranteed a job when majoring in nursing due to the severe shortage of nurses.
6.Communications – also includes journalism, communications is one of the fastest growing majors in college.
7.Biology – Biology majors do a lot of research and development and work in a laboratory or the field. Common employers of biology majors include: hospitals, national & state parks, universities, pharmaceutical companies, research firms, aquariums and zoos.
8.Engineering – A major that usually produces a high salaried job from the start. But, plan on taking very aggressive math and science courses with this major.
9.English – An English major can be involved in copywriting, editing and teaching, but not just limited to that. Also a good gateway degree to graduate school, or law school.
10.Computer Science – A highly technical field involving a lot of advanced math and computer courses. Though, many universities have seen sharp drops in their computer science majors
The CATEGORY of business–which includes business administration and management, finance, marketing, and accounting–is ranked most popular. This doesn’t mean business administration and management, finance, marketing, and accounting are ranked first, second, third, and fourth overall as individual majors. Ditto for social sciences and history. If one “major” comprises half a dozen or more fields of study, of course it’ll appear popular.
“How do you know ‘their findings aren’t actually based on empirical data’? Shall I just take your word for this?”
How do you know that they are? Shall I just take your word for this? By your logic, any ranking that’s unsubstantiated would be accurate.
md
October 14th, 2012
8:54 pm
“Self reflect for a moment and tell the younger generation why you fight for the wealthy that does not need any help from any American.”
Maybe one can tell the younger generation why one thinks the wealthy are not paying their “fair” share when they already pay most of the income taxes in this country.
For me, it comes down to choices, we ALL live here and should ALL have to pay regardless of what we make as our own choices play a very large role in what we make but what we make does not diminish each of our responsibilities to society……….
Why should an individual that never wants to make much money not have to help pay for society just because they choose not to participate??
fair and balanced
October 14th, 2012
8:55 pm
Two days of comments and nobody has picked up on the fact that Kyle Wingfield has written an excellent campaign piece for President Obama. Obama has championed funneling higher education dollars into community college and vocational training partnerships:
“”"”President Barack Obama on Monday proposed substantial new spending on education with a $69.8 billion education budget heavily focused on boosting vocational training, both at the high-school and college level.Overall, Obama asked for an increase of 2.5 percent, or $1.7 billion, in discretionary spending on education as part of his fiscal 2013 budget proposal to Congress.
The centerpiece of the education budget was an $8 billion Community College to Career Fund, which aims to train 2 million workers for jobs in fields such as high-tech manufacturing, clean energy and healthcare.The initiative would encourage partnerships between two-year colleges and local businesses to identify in-demand skills and develop courses that help build them. It would also finance online and in-person training for up to 600,000 aspiring entrepreneurs.
The fund would require congressional approval, which is far from assured. In 2009, when Obama called for an aggressive $12 billion investment in community colleges Congress allocated just $2 billion.”"”"”"”"”"”"
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/13/us-usa-budget-education-idUSTRE81C1Z620120213
So how many job training programs have the cons actually sponsored?????????????And Romney’s solution is what????????? – tax cuts for the rich.
md
October 14th, 2012
8:56 pm
“dobbs hated bush like he hates immigrates.”
Dobbs is married to a Latino you silly goose…….which is why he has a problem with those that have no regard for our system……….
getalife
October 14th, 2012
8:59 pm
Nice dodge md.
It is a tough question that calls for self reflection that cons can’t answer.
I have asked many cons and most reply by but Obama, blah, blah, blah.
So, you did better than them but failed like the rest.
md
October 14th, 2012
9:00 pm
“President Barack Obama on Monday proposed substantial new spending”
“Spending” being the operative word…….Greece “invested” heavily, until it ran out of money…..now it wants to see if Germany will let them spend some of theirs……..
getalife
October 14th, 2012
9:02 pm
md,
I know, I watched dobbs on cnn and he hates immigrants. His wife bosses him around at home so he takes it out at the office.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
9:05 pm
md,
Yes our President proposes but it is congress that spends the money.
congress built the deficit yet they get a free pass and you blame the President.
Weird and bizarre. Makes no sense md. Do you have any common sense?
md
October 14th, 2012
9:06 pm
No get, I recognize it’s not a valid question……how can it be if they are already paying the lions share of the revenue??
I’d say we should ALL be on their side if we had any ethics and character……..or does the word “fair” not really apply?
How can you justify 50% of the population NOT paying income tax when we choose everything we do??
How can a street thug not have an equal responsibility to society?
How can a garbage man that never betters himself not have an equal responsibility to society?
How can an individual that chooses to be a high school drop out not have an equal responsibility to society?
Just because they made the CHOICES to not make more money??
I don’t think so……….
getalife
October 14th, 2012
9:09 pm
mitt does not give any details to pay for his tax cut on the wealthy because he wants the middle class to pay 8 grand to pay for it. 8 grand, do you have 8 grand to give to government? That is what you are voting for. Is mitt worth 8 grand a vote? Wake up.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
9:10 pm
md,
It is about you.
Think and try again.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
9:15 pm
It’s simple question md.
You can do it.
Just tell the truth why you fight for Americans that need no help.
It is a personal answer.
Dusty
October 14th, 2012
9:26 pm
getalife,
I am disappointed in you. You believe that discrimination is OK in the USA.
Rich Americans have the same equality and freedom that all Americans have. No where in our constitution does it say that citizenship is curtailed or changed by riches or poverty, age or ability. . We are equal in the rights of citizenship.
So why do you wish to discriminate against rich people? You call for it almost every day. It isn’t fair or legal.
md
October 14th, 2012
9:27 pm
Because I have morals get…..and i KNOW that WE choose everything we do. So sorry, I’m not joining your crusade to have others pay for my share of anything……..
getalife
October 14th, 2012
9:57 pm
Morals is not helping others that need no help nd.
Lets try another simple question.
Why will you pay 8 grand to pay for another tax cut for the wealthy?
Is a vote for mitt worth 8 grand?
You have skin in this game.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
9:58 pm
Dusty,
It is not about me. I don’t help others that do not need it. It is about you.
Can you answer it?
td
October 14th, 2012
9:59 pm
getalife
October 14th, 2012
9:57 pm
What in the heck are you talking about? Who is paying 8 grand? What kind of lib junk are you buying now.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
10:13 pm
td,
Economists say it not me.
Are you willing to pay 8 grand to pay for another tax cut for the wealthy if you are middle class?
md
October 14th, 2012
10:13 pm
Me thinks someone bought the 8 grand lie hook line and sinker.
Now, if one were to add up all the new taxes and changes just in Obamacare, I could see one approaching that number. Changes in fsa’s, hsa’s, taxes on providers (read us), medicare cuts, etc etc………add those up get and see what you have.
td
October 14th, 2012
10:22 pm
getalife
October 14th, 2012
10:13 pm
What economist? Klugman and other libs?
MarkV
October 14th, 2012
10:23 pm
Dusty,
I missed you earlier, and will not be in tomorrow, but I want to answer your earlier comment, as well as write the promised thoughts about Kyle’s article. The comment first..
Dusty @ 9:39 pm: “Of course you make comments here to influence people. Don’t we all post just to pass along our “great intelligence” to the ignorant world?”
Dusty,
My deeply ingrained modesty does not allow me to believe that my incisive and brilliant comments might influence anybody, even though I am always right (when I am not wrong).
td
October 14th, 2012
10:23 pm
md
October 14th, 2012
10:13 pm
Do not forget about that little 3.8% Obamacare tax if you ever decide to sell your house. That means $3,800 for every $100,000 you get out of it.
MarkV
October 14th, 2012
10:25 pm
Dusty,
Here are my promised thoughts:
After reading Kyle’s article my first impression, like of many others, was positive. After all, who is against apple pie, motherhood, and thinking about consequences of your decisions?
What alerted me to think deeper about what Kyle was saying was his twisting the words of that young woman. OK, he did not openly lie in this case, but he implied by his “she wrote – well, she did not write that” that she believed she made a “bad decision about her education.” She did not write anything that would mean that she thought her decision to get the education she received was bad. Kyle also implied that she made that decision to meet societal expectations. She did not write or think that either, as you can see from the last line of her article, where she writes about her right to pursue happiness.
In spite of Kyle’s disclaimer, the gist of his article is to view everything in terms of money, and he shows it most clearly when he compares choosing education with buying a house. Choose what you can afford. You want to get a PhD and it would cost too much? How about a technical school?
So let’s think about consequences of that approach. In spite of exceptions, there is a general correlation between the quality of higher education and cost. And again with exceptions, there is a general correlation between the educational level and financial success. Those who cannot afford high quality/cost education will have less financial success, therefore their children will have to choose cheaper education and have less financial success, etc. The result, again with exceptions, would be a permanent underclass of less educated and less paid people.
I believe it is in the interest of the society to make the best education possible to people with best talent, ambition and willingness to work hard for it, rather than based on financial conditions, legacy and other similar considerations.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
10:30 pm
Our President cut taxes many times and if the gop want to prove to Vice President Biden that they are not lying to help the middle class, just pass a bill to prove it.
They won’t because they only vote to help the wealthy. Fact.
You cons support that so I asked a simple question but it was too tough for your minds to handle it.
md
October 14th, 2012
10:31 pm
“Those who cannot afford high quality/cost education will have less financial success, therefore their children will have to choose cheaper education and have less financial success, etc.”
You are aware that the current system is set up to favor those with lower incomes, right?
Pell grant, institutional grants and many other grants are designed just for the poorer among us. And for those in GA, HOPE does not discriminate at all…….all one need do is seize the opportunity we provide in a “free” education and make good grades their top priority……..
getalife
October 14th, 2012
10:32 pm
The 8 grand has nothing to do with ObamaCare.
You can’t answer that question too.
You cons need to take a break for self deflection to see what you are doing.
You are hurting yourselves and I am trying to help you understand this fact.
md
October 14th, 2012
10:34 pm
“They won’t because they only vote to help the wealthy. Fact.”
What a twisted filter you must have to arrive at that conclusion……..the facts of the matter are simple, we ALL got tax cuts and the gop says we ALL get to keep them. it’s not a difficult concept.
And please do remember that we also have a progressive tax structure in place that if anything is unfair to those that make more since choices are never even factored into the equation…….
md
October 14th, 2012
10:37 pm
“You are hurting yourselves and I am trying to help you understand this fact.”
If it comes down to voting for others to pay my share, I’m already not worth a dang……….can’t hurt myself any worse than that.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
10:37 pm
What a load of crap md. Your party wants the bush tax cuts to expire. Our President tried to keep the middle class tax cut but your party said no so we are back to letting them all expire. Fact.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
10:41 pm
“If it comes down to voting for others to pay my share, I’m already not worth a dang……….can’t hurt myself any worse than that.”
The me generation thinks it is all about them. If you are middle class , mitt’s tax plan costs you 8 grand to pay for his tax cut on the wealthy.
That is about you paying a higher share for voting for mitt.
md
October 14th, 2012
10:45 pm
Nice spin there get…….so the dems use class warfare in an effort to have others pay for you and that’s a good thing??
As I said, if it comes down to voting for others to pay my share, I’m not worth a dang. I have no problem with them all expiring, we ALL got them to start with …..didn’t we??
All you are doing get is voting for your neighbor to work harder……..I don’t want to be your neighbor.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
10:46 pm
md,
It is the truth and the reason mitt ran from it in the debate.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
10:49 pm
BTW, the class warfare comes when the income and wealth gap causes the people to lose hope and the Revolution is here. They confiscate wealth and turn to socialism.
md
October 14th, 2012
10:50 pm
And you really do need to lay off the 8k number, it makes you look like you are in left field. Obama uses 2k in is lie, you might want to get closer to that one to at least not look so far out there.
And all those economists are guessing as Romney said he wouldn’t even be the one deciding which loopholes and credits get cut, those would come from congress……on both sides. So you are basically peddling a very bogus premise to begin with.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
10:53 pm
md,
2k a year times a 4 year term equals 8 k.
mitt thinks you cons are suckers and he is right about that fact.
md
October 14th, 2012
10:56 pm
Wealth gap? If the american consumer would quit sending their money to China, Vietnam, Indonesia, India, etc, maybe they would make each other wealthy vs making all those folks on the other side of the planet wealthy.
Don’t tell me you’ve fallen for that lie about the wealthy here taking money from the masses??
The masses have given it to others around the globe……are current trade deficit is 50 billion a month………I’ll say that again, a month………gone out of this country…….that’s going to be an awful long flight for that revolution.
md
October 14th, 2012
11:00 pm
“2k a year times a 4 year term equals 8 k.”
Well at least you clarified your fictitious numbers…..you are aware that those ‘economists” that came up with those particular numbers had to assume a lot of data….right? Much like all that data they assume when they make their case for MMGW……….it’s called guessing………
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 14th, 2012
11:03 pm
“You cons need to take a break for self deflection to see what you are doing.”
We’re trying to save this nation from the destruction you and your party are doing to it, getalife.
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 14th, 2012
11:04 pm
“Your party wants the bush tax cuts to expire.”
Only in your alternate reality, getalife.
getalife
October 14th, 2012
11:20 pm
md,
It is up to congress and watch them vote and debate on C-Span.
The only party that votes for the middle class are the dems.
That is why I will vote for them.
If the gop ever decide to start voting for the middle class, I will take them seriously but now they vote to help Americans that need no help. It is what it is and that is the truth.
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 14th, 2012
11:26 pm
Why should any “class” be treated differently from another, getalife?
Aren’t we all equal?
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...
October 14th, 2012
11:36 pm
You can see the desperation setting in with the Hate America Crowd just by reading getalife’s comments.
I’d like to say I feel his pain but that would make me a liar.
He’ll come to like President Romney, after a while.
@@
October 15th, 2012
6:31 am
Getalife:
Tell them why you fight for Americans that never need your help.
Because they’re among the many that CAN offer help…many times better than others. I can help and do, but not to the extent (financial) that they can.
We’re all in this together, Getalife.
iggy
October 15th, 2012
6:43 am
Latest polls show NH now had moved into the Romney/Ryan column and this is great news as R/R will be able to bring new ideas to the table for these college students.
fair and balanced
October 15th, 2012
8:13 am
All I want to know from Romney about his phantom tax reduction plan is how much his taxes for 2011 would go up or down if the plan is implemented. Right now I see them going down to zero. If that is the case he is unqualified to be president based on conflicts of interest, end of story for me.
carlosgvv
October 15th, 2012
8:27 am
Guest – 8:46
I did not make any claims, one way or the other, as to the accuracy of thise site. YOU are the one who said they were questionable.
Bachelor of Arts vs Bachelor of Science
http://www.com/search?q=bachelor+of+artstvs+bachelor
Read and learn
JDW
October 15th, 2012
8:33 am
@Tiberius…”We’re trying to save this nation from the destruction you and your party are doing to it”
You should had that thought before the last Adminstration ran it in the ground…now what party was that again…hummmm…whatever we do we should leave those guys out.
JDW
October 15th, 2012
8:47 am
“Great sound bite, JDW, but WHERE is it disappearing to?”
My God you are a Maroon…since 1980 it has been marginalized as the more wealthy take a larger and larger piece of the pie. Jobs sent overseas to maximize earnings, minimum wage increases forgotten, health care costs run amok and educational opportunities increasingly expensive.
And the response of the Party of No…why let them eat cake of course! More tax cuts, more whining, more obfuscation and above all more “morality”.
Funny thing is about half the Party of No’s support (in the South at least) comes from those that are acting in their own economic disinterest.
Get out and read man…poverty higher than in the last 52 years, income gap widest in 50 years…doesn’t that tell you anything?
JDW
October 15th, 2012
8:50 am
@TD…” If you make no money and have a family of 4 in America then you receive $573 per month is FS”
Yes you do…of course, according to the Department of Agriculture that doesn’t quite cover the “low end” cost of feeding a family of four and folks like you want to cut the program.
“Now tell us how much a middle class worker in China makes per month? ”
So China is your basis for comparison when in comes to quality of life… you need to think bigger.
JDW
October 15th, 2012
9:04 am
@Rafe…yes the chickens got it…now we have to actually hope for the hated Gators to give us a direct line back.
“You seem to like Clinton a great deal, but you do know that most of his success, occurred after he abandoned the notion of big Government and embraced some GOP positions of lowering taxes and growing the economy. ”
Interesting view…as I remember Clinton raised taxes never lowered and it was his positions in opposition to the Republicans that were proved effective. From an economic perspective there were two key ones…first he raised taxes (O’ don’t your remember the howling about how the economy was going to implode
) and by doing so raised revenue. Then he embraced PAY GO and in doing so controlled spending.
Net result is he accomplished what any good businessman will tell you…the key to driving growth is to raise revenue at a faster rate than spending. That is the point that is lost on today’s Republicans. They prefer to tilt at windmills like reducing spending…hint IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN…you just can’t do it because of the impact on the economy. Why just look at the blathering on the Sequester, anyone that wanted to reduce spending would just let it happen but they won’t. Actual spending reductions are a waste of time. What you have to do is slow the rate of growth so that the economy and revenue grows faster. Then the problem takes care of itself over time…that is until the next Duhbya that doesn’t understand….you know the guy that lowered taxes and tossed PAY GO.
“Romney is talking about those things, lowering taxes and growing government, ”
See that’s the problem with Mitt…here we are, taxes lower than the were the in 90’s, government revenues at their lowest percentage of GDP in 50 years and Mitt wants to lower taxes claiming he will then pay for it and lower spending…it’s a pipe dream…net effect of Mitt will be the same as Reagan and Duhbya…lower revenue, higher spending and higher deficits.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 15th, 2012
9:26 am
JDW
Clinton lowered the capital gains rate, something Obama says he will not do, as it is not “fair”, even when he was provided figures that showed it raised Fed revenue. Lowering Cap Gain rate boosted the economy significantly under Clinton, as lowering taxes usually does.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 15th, 2012
9:30 am
JDW
Check out GDP growth and job growth under Reagan. If only he had gotten the spending cuts he was promised by Tip O’Neill, the deficit would have dropped significantly. I blame the Dems for the debt increase as Reagan brought in the revenue he promised, but the Dems just spent it all instead of applying it to reducing the debt. Hopefully Romney has learned the lesson of promised cuts.
md
October 15th, 2012
10:01 am
“you know the guy that lowered taxes and tossed PAY GO.”
Thanks for the chuckle…….the dems passed the new Pay Go when they walked in the door 4 years ago and proceeded to stick it in the draw. What good is pay go when an admin is running 1.5T yearly deficits??
And cutting expenses/spending is a proven method even today……..all this complaining about corps sitting on record profits…….it tends to happen when they cut 23 million employees and benefits…..
Want to boost the economy? Reduce the tax rate to 0% on the 2T of offshore profits and bring that money home to our system……..it WILL get taxed once it’s in the system vs the $0 we’ve been getting from it the past 4 years because the dems “understanding” of how things work.
Oblama
October 15th, 2012
10:04 am
Never worry……… vote Obama and he will “pardon” their debt at the expense of the few remaining tax payers.
Oblama
October 15th, 2012
10:06 am
Colleges are expensive because pay of college teachers has tripled in the last 20 years.
Oblama
October 15th, 2012
10:13 am
“Cutting spending is a waste of time”………. and that mindset has given us a $16 T R I L L I O N dollar deficit. You socialists are brain dead zombies for Obama.
JDW
October 15th, 2012
10:41 am
@Rafe…”Clinton lowered the capital gains rate, something Obama says he will not do, as it is not “fair”, even when he was provided figures that showed it raised Fed revenue. Lowering Cap Gain rate boosted the economy significantly under Clinton, as lowering taxes usually does.”
First off, that was changed in 1997 well after the budget was under control. Second, I have no issue with tax cuts WHEN WE CAN AFFORD THEM as we could then. Third, I think it’s effect is debatable…the most likely effect was to reduce revenue.
Lastly you want Clinton capital gains rates Whoopeee….they are 20%…see you can’t keep cutting…sooner or later to you get to zero or as we are today in the toliet.
JDW
October 15th, 2012
10:42 am
@Rafe…BTW…if it were my choice we would go to Clinton era taxes circa 1996 across the board. That is not on the table so I have a choice between cutting all or raising some…I go with raising some.
JDW
October 15th, 2012
10:45 am
@MD…”Thanks for the chuckle”
Glad you got a chuckle…I didn’t find it so funny. Net result was a budget deficit of $1.4 Trillion that was in turn passed on to the current Adminstration where it has been cut about 20% over the last 3 years.
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 15th, 2012
10:53 am
JDW, just a suggestion: righteous indignation is NOT an effective debate skill. Countering arguments is.
Income disparity has nothing to do with the middle class disappearing, which is the DNC talking point I was debunking.
So poverty levels are highest in 52 years, hunh? Care to do the research and see what percentage of our population is in poverty according to government figures? Here’s a clue: It has always been hovering between 13% and 18%, with 15% being the average. Despite over 50 years of income redistribution policies by YOUR party, we haven’t moved the needle lower than those two numbers. Including now.
Oh, another effective debate trick – answer the question being asked. If the poverty needle hasn’t moved, where is the middle class supposedly disappearing to, JDW? They aren’t getting poorer according to the government you are so enamored with, so if they aren’t moving downward, where have they gone?
The ONLY direction is – UP.
JDW
October 15th, 2012
10:55 am
@Rafe…”Check out GDP growth and job growth under Reagan. If only he had gotten the spending cuts he was promised by Tip O’Neill, the deficit would have dropped significantly. I blame the Dems for the debt increase as Reagan brought in the revenue he promised, but the Dems just spent it all instead of applying it to reducing the debt. Hopefully Romney has learned the lesson of promised cuts.”
See problem is thats just not true…Reagan could have vetoed anything he didn’t agree with and did not. Other point you fail to note is that all that spending drove growth way more than those “tax cuts”. Reagan’s record is really due to spending growth in combination with a reduction in revenue.
Other problem is you are misrepresenting the impact of Reagan’s tax cuts…the rates really didn’t change until AFTER the recovery. Top rates went from 70% to 50% in 1982, from 50% to 38.5% in 1987 and to 28% in 1988. All WELL after the recovery…psssttt it was the spending.
http://taxfoundation.org/article/us-federal-individual-income-tax-rates-history-1913-2011-nominal-and-inflation-adjusted-brackets
Now I don’t think we should go back to 50% but the 1996 rates sound about right.
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 15th, 2012
10:59 am
Barack Obama finally finds a job he’s qualified to do:
http://multimedia.heraldinteractive.com/images/20121015/641478_obama101512.jpg
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 15th, 2012
11:02 am
JDW
If we lowered the cap gains rate to about 10%, made the Obama Tax Cuts permanent, and lowered everyone’s income tax rates the economy would boom, from all the money going into investments (true investments, not government spending which Obama calls “investments”) and people feeling a little more comfortable and willing to spend. A growing economy plus some serious spending cuts are the only way we ever avoid this fiscal cliff. Raising taxes like Obama proposes is going to send us in the other direction, recession, slow economy, and more increase in debt.
We will not get out of this economic mess unless we get government growing, nothing else is going to be sufficient. BTW, without the artificial dot com bubble and the GOP holding Clinton’s checkbook, the budget cuts necessary to bring the deficit down would not have happened. It also helped that he left Iraq to Bush to deal with. Clinton did not come into office as a budget cutter, he was hell bent on healthcare reform and other big government initiatives, until he learned he couldn’t get them through congress. He was the reluctant fiscally responsible President.
Obama could have followed Clinton, and put the country first, but he choose to pout instead of deal with reality.
JDW
October 15th, 2012
11:02 am
@Tiberius…”The ONLY direction is – UP”
I don’t have much time for your nonsense today…Google is your friend…in 2000 the Poverty rate for families was around 9.3% today it is north of 15%…that’s a change and not a good one. That’s where the middle class is going. It’s real simple if you read a bit…the bottom 80% of the country is doing worse the top 20 better…the middle class, according to historical norms is shrinking.
Now live in a fantasy world if you like but my guess is if you spent the day going through your own financial situation over the last 10 years you would see the same trend…not because you are unique but because that’s what is happening everywhere.
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 15th, 2012
11:10 am
JDW
If Gov spending caused the economy to grow, we would be on Easy Street during the last four years.
The tax cuts, allowing people to have more money in their pocket, causes them to spend, which stimulates and grows the economy. Even a proposed tax cut that people feel is going to come, will boost economic activity. Consumer spending creates demand for products, which creates jobs, which create individual wealth, which creates revenue for the Gov.
md
October 15th, 2012
11:19 am
Gov’t spending as a cure? Japan has been doing it for 2 decades…….debt to gdp ration now at 200%.
It worked so well for Greece that they are now using Germany’s money to do it some more……..
Borrow and spend is a gamble at best, and does nothing but make the hole deeper if the gamble does not pay off………..a bit like borrowing money to gamble to pay the bookey, and getting ones legs broken when that bet also goes bad .
Rafe Hollister, suffering through Oblamer's ineptocracy
October 15th, 2012
11:21 am
I thought this was interesting, wonder what % Obama/Biden tax returns would show.
Obama’s team has mocked the 14.1 percent tax rate that Romney is in as shirking his responsibility. But Charlottesville, Va.-based Marotta Wealth Management, which pens a widely-followed research blog, found that when Romney’s tax burden and charitable gifts are included, he paid out 57.9 percent of his income.
So, he has 42 % left to live on, is that fair?
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 15th, 2012
11:28 am
Take a gander at the first chart in this link, JDW:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/07/11/poverty-in-the-50-years-since-the-other-america-in-five-charts/
Not the poverty level, as complied by the government you worship, has NEVER been anywhere near 9% (unless you’re cooking the books as well). Note that it has hovered between 18% in 1965 to lows of about 11% (once again, the average is around 15%) but it’s always been there, despite trillions of dollars of income redistribution by your party.
Epic, epic, fail.
Tiberius - pulling the tail of the left AND right when needed
October 15th, 2012
11:30 am
That would be “Note” the poverty level.
Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)
October 15th, 2012
11:50 am
Wow, even Fox News is tired of the Romney/Ryan incessant lying.:
On Sunday, Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace pressed senior Romney adviser Ed Gillespie on the credibility of these six studies, noting that each of them have serious issues:
GILLESPIE: Six different studies have said this is entirely doable.
WALLACE: Those are very questionable. Some of them are blogs, some of them are from AEI, an independent group.
GILLESPIE: These are very credible sources.
WALLACE: One of them is a blog from a guy who was a top adviser for George W. Bush. These are hardly non-partisan studies.
GILLESPIE: Look Chris these AEI and other studies are very credible sources of analysis
md
October 15th, 2012
12:24 pm
Sources not trustworthy?
Yet when Obama’s own medicare appointee says Obamacare will add to the deficit he gets poo pooed by the left…….so which is it? Who DO they believe??
tiredofIT
October 15th, 2012
12:39 pm
td
October 14th, 2012
10:23 pm
md
October 14th, 2012
10:13 pm
Do not forget about that little 3.8% Obamacare tax if you ever decide to sell your house. That means $3,800 for every $100,000 you get out of it.
++
The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act does include a 3.8 percent tax on investment income for wealthy people, specifically individuals making more than $200,000 a year or married couples earning more than $250,000 a year.
Even if you’re a member of these two percent, there’s not a sales tax on home sales. The tax is assessed only if you make more than $250,000 on the sale (or $500,000 for couples), and even then it applies only to the amount of profit over that limit.
JDW
October 15th, 2012
1:15 pm
@Tiberius…”Not the poverty level, as complied by the government you worship, has NEVER been anywhere near 9% (unless you’re cooking the books as well). ”
Not only are you a maroon…YOU CAN’T READ. Pay close attention to the detail in Chart A from the 2000 census report…the one that pegs the Poverty rate for FAMILIES at 9.3%…the same one that is over 15% today AS I STATED…then reformulate your blather and get back to me.
http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p60-214.pdf
Frank Arnold
October 15th, 2012
11:41 pm
Although I do appreciate his understated style, there are not too many time I feel compelled to express my agreement with Mr. Wingfield. But here is one: Students and Parents, please do not yield so easily to the “college or bust” propaganda machine. Certainly extend your education beyond high school, but know that a traditional 4/5 year BS/BA degree should be the goal for only around 25% of high school graduates; about the same percentage as careers that require such. Skilled workers are in great demand but short supply and the degrees come with a much smaller price tag. If you do not enjoy the academic challenges of high school, you will almost certainly not suddenly find a love for them in college. Instead of tilting at windmills, go learn how to do something!