Romney closes out the primaries by attacking Obama’s unfairness
The news from last night was not that Mitt Romney easily swept the five states that held primaries; that was assured once Rick Santorum left the race, if not before. Nor was it the prospect, which is being confirmed this morning, that Newt Gingrich would also drop out of the race as a result.
No, the news is that Romney finally gave the speech some of us have been waiting for him to give. (Click here to see a video of the speech, which lasted about 13 minutes, or here to read the prepared remarks; he didn’t stray too far from them.)
The heart of it was the contrast he drew between himself and President Obama. First, what he said about the president:
Government is at the center of his vision. It dispenses the benefits, borrows what it can’t take, consumes a greater and greater share of the economy. You know, with Obamacare fully installed, government would have control of almost half of the economy, and we would have effectively ceased to be a free enterprise society.
This President is putting us on a path where our lives will be ruled by bureaucrats and boards, commissions and czars. He’s asking us to accept that Washington knows best — and can provide all.
We’ve already seen where that path leads. It erodes freedom. It deadens the entrepreneurial spirit. And it hurts the very people it’s supposed to help. Those who promise to spread the wealth around only ever succeed in spreading poverty around. Other nations have chosen that path. It leads to chronic high unemployment, crushing debt, and stagnant wages.
And then there’s his counteroffer:
I have a very different vision for America, and for our future. It’s an America driven by freedom, where free people, pursuing happiness in their own unique ways, create free enterprises that employ more and more Americans. And because there are so many enterprises that are succeeding, the competition for hard-working, educated, skilled employees is intense, so wages and salaries rise.
I see an America with a growing middle class, with rising standards of living. I see children even more successful than their parents — some successful even beyond their wildest dreams — and others congratulating them for their achievement, not attacking them for it.
The repeated mentions of free enterprise, and the good line about congratulating people on their success rather than attacking them for it, are welcome. But here’s where Romney signaled an important theme leading to November:
This America is fundamentally fair. We will stop the unfairness of urban children being denied access to the good schools of their choice; we will stop the unfairness of politicians giving taxpayer money to their friends’ businesses; we will stop the unfairness of requiring union workers to contribute to politicians not of their choosing; we will stop the unfairness of government workers getting better pay and benefits than the very taxpayers they serve; and we will stop the unfairness of one generation passing larger and larger debts on to the next.
When an opponent — as Romney correctly said Obama would do — wants to run not on his record but on distractions and distortions and fuzzy notions of “fairness,” you hit back at what other people might consider unfair. And there is a great deal of unfairness to be found in Obama’s conventional liberal positions, some of which Romney catalogued.
This is a promising start to turning Obama’s raw populism on its ear.
– By Kyle Wingfield
Tell us what you think about the site
Customer Care »
Vacation stops, manage subscriptions and more
AJC Services
Sections
Other Editions
Visitor Agreement | Privacy Statement
© 2013 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
693 comments Add your comment
Lil' Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
2:02 pm
Dang, carlosgvv, that was lame, even for you.
Lil' Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
2:06 pm
GM and Chrysler have found that it really isn’t that difficult to run a “successful” business with billions in taxpayer money propping them up, andonor having to pay their income taxes.
Lil' Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
2:07 pm
Should read “and not having to pay their income taxes”.
Partisay
April 26th, 2012
2:28 pm
“The mere presence of an America-loving majority in one chamber buoyed the spirits of the job creators.”
I’m still laughing. So this is your reason unemployment went down when the GOP won the house? And of course, you right wingers are always saying how democrats are trying to divide the country. But your “America-loving majority” comment – I guess the other side does not love America – shows your true colors.
I can’t think of any better way to divide a country than one side telling the other “you don’t love this country.”
My father was a democrat all of his life. He was shot out of a plane in WWII and spent 366 days as a prisoner of war, weighing 98 pounds and suffering from Malaria when he was released. He spent 9 months in a hospital when he returned to the states just to return home. I would LOVE for you to have walked up to him and even insinuate in the slightest bit that he didn’t love his country because of his politics. Even at 85 years old, he would have mopped the floor with you. During the Bush years, when some republicans were insinuating they loved this country more because of their politics, while calling democrats unpatriotic, he said it made him sick to his stomach.
So go ahead Burnout, wave your flag and keep saying your side loves this country more. Then complain the democrats are trying to divide the country. But be careful. You may be standing beside an old democrat war veteren that will put you on the ground.
Michael
April 26th, 2012
2:29 pm
I guess I’ll have to vote for Obama. In 2009 the chairmen of the big auto firms went to DC saying they were broke and the industry would collapse without help from the government. The Obama administration provided that assistance, and most if not all of the money has been paid back. Romney opposed that plan, so he was wrong.
In 2008 the heads of the money center banks went to Washington and said the economy would collapse without help from the government. Bush’s secretary of the treasury worked with congress (mostly democrats) to enact TARP. The economy did not collapse, and many banks have paid back their TARP funds. From the 1930s to the 1980s regulations and the insurance funds (FDIC and FSLIC) protected the financial system without bailouts. Deregulation led to the S & L bailout and the TARP bailout. Romney opposes government regulation, so he is wrong.
A sergant coming back from his fourth tour in Iraq has a higher tax rate than an investment banker. Romney supports this, and he is wrong.
When vets apply for assistance, they are applying for an entitlement they have earned. Giving them a voucher is a slap in the face. Romney supports this, and he is wrong.
Lil' Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
2:39 pm
But be careful. You may be standing beside an old democrat war veteren that will put you on the ground.
———–
I wonder what your Dad would have said about Harry Reid claiming “this war is lost” while our troops were fighting in Iraq. Or Dick Durbin equating our troops with the Soviets running their gulags. For me, those kinds of statements and the support they recieived from your fellow travelers made me question the patriotism of Democrats and their ilk.
Republicans do love their country more. They want America to succeed. For that to happen, the enemies of free people and free markets must fail.
Penny Pincher
April 26th, 2012
2:55 pm
carlosgvv
April 26th, 2012
1:37 pm
Tiberius
I haven’t named one actual policy of Obama’s because he doesn’t really have a good, solid
program for leadership. His appeal is to the common people who make up the voting majority of the Democrats and, knowing this, he doesn’t have to come up with anything but smiles and empty promises. Those are the Obama facts of life, sport.
fixed your errors
Partisay
April 26th, 2012
2:59 pm
Again, would love for you to had been able to stand – face to face – with my father, and tell him republicans do love this country more and that democrats want this country to fail and just watch the show.
Think about it, you would have been telling a man that gave up a year of freedom from his life that YOU love this country more than he does and that HE wants the country to fail.
This shows how brainwashed and utterly ridiculous you are – for you to truely believe that. I check this blog out every now and then just to get a good laugh. And post some things just to get you riled up. Just for fun.
But you guys that are on here everyday, spouting the same crap over and over, day in and day out. It’s pathetic. What kind of lives do you lead? Is this what you need everyday? You have nothing better to do daily but insult people? I feel sorry for the people that must interact with you on a daily basis.
But I’m done. It was fun while it lasted. But when someone like Burnout can say republicans love this country more and they want America to succeed more than democrats, and actually BELIEVE it? Why would anyone want to interact with such an unstable, ridiculous man, even on a blog?
How miserable your life must be.
Tiberius - Banned by Bookman and proud of it!
April 26th, 2012
3:07 pm
Never before have so many liberals run from a simple task. And Partisay, your father would be ashamed of your lack of response to a simple challenge and your ignorance of the real issues.
Lil' Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
3:18 pm
The Democrat party left your Dad.
They fear free people and despise capitalism and free markets.
Michael
April 26th, 2012
3:18 pm
Lil BB
I’m not too worried. I’m a democrat and a war veteran, so we would have a lot in common. We would also share a disdain for civilian super patriots.
gm
April 26th, 2012
3:20 pm
Lil’ Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
I guess the Iraqi people are running their business, and the whole country is prospering thanks to Bush and Cheney oh and dont forgot the billions of dollars tax payers contributed.
According to you Anti Americans it was ok to help Iraqi people and not Americans in the good old USA.
Lil' Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
3:22 pm
Clean up on aisle 3:20.
St Simons - we're on Island time
April 26th, 2012
3:24 pm
To the people who got crapped on the last 30 years of neocon
supply-side jaysus glorah, Fairness aint some fuzzy notion.
You’ll see.
Now slow-jam the next news article, like Obama the black Mammmba
Twelve mo years. Dig it.
gm
April 26th, 2012
3:27 pm
The dem party need to start calling these fake patriots out, the right sat silently while GW destroyed this country, you did not hear a word from losers like Hannity who now distance himself from Bush.
Any one notice these losers skip over both Bush as President and go to Reagan, who increased the debt his first term and had one of the highest poverty rate in history.
gm
April 26th, 2012
3:30 pm
Lil’ Barry Bailout (Revised Downward
No answer for hard true facts
AmVet
April 26th, 2012
3:37 pm
Wow.
Double wow.
That 2:59 is one for the ages, Partisay.
A truly spectacular job.
Kudos, sir. And a salute to your dad.
Lil' Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
3:52 pm
Democrats love America. They just need the “flexibility” after the next election so they can show it.
Democrats: Selling out America’s national security.
@@
April 26th, 2012
4:12 pm
Partisay/AmVet/Sockpuppet
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...
April 26th, 2012
4:18 pm
One of Mr. Romney’s trickiest challenges will be how to handle Mr. Obama’s, er, veracity. More than any President we’ve seen, this incumbent is willing to say things that aren’t in the area code of the truth. Thus he gives himself credit for the natural gas drilling boom, the deficits are still Mr. Bush’s fault, Mr. Obama has never raised taxes, and “green jobs” in his dream economy are blooming by the millions.
The only thing blooming is your average obozoidiot.
@@
April 26th, 2012
4:30 pm
lllinois moves toward state of insolvency
Higher percentages of government employees who are unionized, and larger Democratic shares of state legislative seats, correlate with increases in state borrowing costs.
It do seem to work out that way.
Illinois is breaking wind. The dems’ final hoorah.
schnirt
@@
April 26th, 2012
4:40 pm
A href=”http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/26/us/new-homes-beckon-for-city-chickens-in-retirement.html”>A retirement home for chickens!!??!!
“We name them and we hold them,” he said. “I know it sounds kind of crazy, but we kiss them.”
Sounds crazy??? How’bout IS crazy!!!
I’d be willing to bet those guys vote Dem.
@@
April 26th, 2012
4:41 pm
Oops!
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/26/us/new-homes-beckon-for-city-chickens-in-retirement.html
@@
April 26th, 2012
4:44 pm
I know Hillbilly said he loves chicken but kiss ‘em?
No way!
(ISH)
Tiberius - Banned by Bookman and proud of it!
April 26th, 2012
5:00 pm
Wow. Over 4 hours since I issued the Romney policy challenge, and not a single liberal has picked up the gauntlet. Just amazing.
Always knew you libs didn’t have the brains.
Sadly, you’ve also confirmed you don’t have the b@lls either.
All it takes is one factual Romney policy position and your reasoned logical argument against it.
Tiberius - Banned by Bookman and proud of it!
April 26th, 2012
5:03 pm
I haven’t seen this many liberals turn tail and run away since they saw a sign that said ” employment office ahead”.
Real Athens
April 26th, 2012
5:13 pm
Tibby:
Is mom out of the house today?
Where are you employed?
ld
April 26th, 2012
5:16 pm
The candidate that wins will have BOTH a specifically stated core set of values AND a number of specific policies relevant to our nations current problems and/or national debates that are in accord with those policies–which, importantly, turn out to be the same agenda as the “silent” majority of the voters.
On healthcare, Romney is going to need a specific and viable alternative to Obamacare –at least an overview–to successfully argue against it.
On economics, Romney is going to need to NOT support the Reaganomics “trickle down” policies that have p*$$ed on the so-called 99% for quite some time. He is going to need some very specific policies that can be sold as friendly to the 99%. Hint: not taxing either the corporations or the rich, individually, is NOT a policy that is likely to pass w/any but the one-issue “values voters”. If he wants business to thrive and he feels not taxing them is the answer, the he needs to tax that income using the same tax tables as “earned income” –the same rates paid by the educators, the first responders, the members of the military, the white collar workers, the construction workers and the unskilled laborers–people that risk their lives and/or sanity doing their jobs while the rich moneyed investor/employer class just risk money* (the love of which* is supposedly a root of evil).
The so-called “war on women” is not really a GOP thing as much as it is an evangelical puritan-like “women should be submissive” and “life is sacrad” thing. For Romney to win the women vote, he would be well-served to relate his philosophy on the subject by stating SPECIFIC policy decisions/plans and explaining how they adhere to the philosophies of “individual liberty”, “equal right under law” and/or “separation of church and state”.
For example: If either candidate wants to add a caveat that he personally opposes/supports abortion BUT as president of the entire nation he must act in the best interest of the nation in futherence of “individual liberty”, “equal right under law” and in order to respect every individual’s right to their own religious beliefs, must support “separation of church and state” and, for this reason he proposes………..?………..whatever. Then hope that most of the voters paying attention agree.
The candidate that best makes this argument in favor of his positions will get the women’s votes.
“Change” alone likely will not sell again. The candidate that wants to win is going to need to get specific.
Romney has been quoted as saying that if he tell people what he will do, he will not get elected. The reality is that if he does NOT tell people what he intends to do and hopes this election will be an up or down vote on Obama, it will not make Romney more electable.
Given the extreme mistrust of Mormens by many of the evangelicals upon which the GOP depends for votes, many may sit out this election. In that case and if they decide the devil they know is better than the devil they don’t, Romeny has no hope of winning if he cannot convince the independents with specifics.
Wouldn’t having presidential candidates set forth very SPECIFIC policy plans instead of a fistfull of slogans designed to appeal to different constituencies be a breath of fresh air?
Lil' Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
5:17 pm
Tib, it’s in keeping with the whole Obozo election strategy. Can’t run on his amazing record of success, so it’s time to divert attention to Romney’s dog, Romney’s successful business career, Romney’s wife, etc.
Obozo: Epic fail.
independent thinker
April 26th, 2012
5:23 pm
I listened to Willard’s speech for about ten minutes and heard nothing of any substance that I can remember that told me definitely how he was going to solve any of our major problems. I thought I was listeneing to an Obama speech in 2008 about hope and change.
I get it that he disagrees with Obama on everything and belkieves government cannot solve our economic problems.However It is also clear that Willard will do everything possible to give big business more breaks and ability to profit without regulation- what the heck does that have to do with fairness for anyone other than the companies. but Kyle tell me how the public will react when the insurance companies start rebating over a billion dollars in excess profits due to Obmacare that would have gone to their executives? And how will the public react if the five conservatives on the Supreme Court cut off those rebates.? I do not see that scenario playing into Willard’s portrayal of himself and Republicans as models of “fairness.”
Give me a break- the Ryan budget is not about “fairness”. It is about economic survival. That fainess nonsense is no different than saying Willard can relate to Southerners because he ate grits for breakfast or Obama saying he will bring hope and change..
Lets hear some specifics .Where does he stand on student loan repayments besides making them harder to get in the future. ? Where does he stand on our real estate crisis? What exactly will hhe do besides eliminate Obama’s programs?
saywhat?
April 26th, 2012
5:24 pm
“Wow. Over 4 hours since I issued the Romney policy challenge, and not a single liberal has picked up the gauntlet. Just amazing”
________________________________________
Perhaps it is because if somebody is so lame as to get banned at Bookman’s, and even lamer to be proud out it, their posts aren’t really worth reading, let alone responding to? There. Now you’ve wasted my time.
Lil' Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
5:26 pm
Wouldn’t having presidential candidates set forth very SPECIFIC policy plans…be a breath of fresh air?
——————-
Obozo submitted his budget plan for next year. It was voted down 414-0.
Every Democrat decided that it was not so much a breath of fresh air as it was a stale f@rt trapped in their seat cushion.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...
April 26th, 2012
5:27 pm
Today, just one in three has a favorable view of the federal government — the lowest level in 15 years, according to a Pew survey.
Yeah, the “one in three” that works for the federal government.
Lil' Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
5:28 pm
how will the public react if the five conservatives on the Supreme Court cut off those rebates
—————-
Pathetic. Selling out our freedom and our health care system for a few shekels.
Lil' Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
5:29 pm
LOL @ 5:27!
@@
April 26th, 2012
5:43 pm
Every Democrat decided that it was not so much a breath of fresh air as it was a stale f@rt trapped in their seat cushion.
Never heard that one before.
Funny!
Rockerbabe
April 26th, 2012
5:56 pm
Lil’ Barry Bailout (Revised Downward:
I am a lot of things, but a lawyer is not one of them. Nonetheless, lawyers are needed to get citizens caught up in the “justice system” a fair shake. We have way too many folks in prison, whose fate was to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. The Innocence Project has proven that time and time again. We need lawyers to craft our contracts and civil/legal documents. We need lawyers to help protect us citizens against a elected legislature that is hell-bent on undoing women’s rights, minority rights and upgrading corporations to personhood, while simultaneously stripping women of their actual human personhood, treating immigrants like disposal trash, etc. Lawyers do a lot of good and sometimes not so good; but if you happen to get into trouble with the police; a lawyer is your best friend for awhile.
Lil' Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
6:12 pm
We need lawyers to help protect us citizens against a elected legislature that blah blah blah….
——–
And we need psychiatrists to help protect us against the dangerously delusional.
md
April 26th, 2012
6:16 pm
To answer your question Partisay, does he want to cut pay for federal workers?? I would certainly hope so…..it makes no sense for private sector workers to work longer hours with less pay in order to prop up their counter parts that are supposed to be “serving”……once the peons realize how it really works, they’ll pull an ows or the like……..
Or, they’ll call for a strike like they did in greece having no clue that a strike actually is against their own best interests……when there isn’t enough money to pay for the freebies, it isn’t logical to quit generating money…….
md
April 26th, 2012
6:20 pm
Lawyers……what a scam they have going on huh?
Follow the bouncing ball…….they write the laws, they enforce the laws, they interpret the laws, then tell the commoners they best be represented in order to get through the system they designed……and encrypted the language so the commoners have no idea what anything says…….
Talking about a brotherhood………
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...
April 26th, 2012
6:26 pm
Egypt Plans ‘Farewell Intercourse Law’ So Husbands Can Have Sex With DEAD Wives Up to Six Hours After Their Death”
Let’s all hope michelle doesn’t croak while obozo’s still in office.
ew
ld
April 26th, 2012
6:28 pm
Thomas Hayward Jr. (re: fascism), I agree with you. The terms “free market capitalism” and “free enterprise” is a gross misnomer for what actually exists in this country and on a global scale.
Years ago I watched a documentary on Joe Kennedy and his ilk and the decisions that were made by the moneyed investor/employer class that had created the collapse of 1929. They decided to seek control of government because their calculation was that government, not just money, would begin to be the power in the next era.
It now seems that after government began to respond to “we, the people” in a way that served to limit profits (EPA, social safety net, etc.), they began to redirect power toward the financial institutions–including the repeal of Glass-Steagall–while deliberately consolidating political power to maximize profits. (”How the GOP Became the Party of the Rich” Rolling Stone NOV 2011). The Dems were abusing power during the “cold war” to hold and increase their own political power–they just lost the favored status support of “big business” because, in their pursuit of votes, they supported the policies big business found impeded their ability to make huge profits.
Now, government is too bankrupt for “we, the people” to have the power via vote alone that existed even a couple of decades ago. With Citizens United in force, the moneyed can legally focus their money on undoing environment laws and any other laws that limit profits. Advertising is an extremely profitable industry because it works and gullible people will often vote for the most familiar name. The devil you know supposedly being better than the devil you don’t. The economy makes people more willing to not object to reversing the progress in environmental laws and/or social safety net. Combine this with the citizen apathy borne of no draft, a re-invigorating of racism and bigitory by the federal government’s refusal to address the illegal immigration problem (in pursuit of cheap labor), and apply that to several generations of youth taking it for granted that their generation would be better off than the prior generations, then combine that with the war-mongering and fear-mongering of the neo-cons and the military industrial complex, and you have the making of Big Brother. (As someone else commented in response to a blog and/or news article recently, if Wells had named his book 2012 instead of 1984, he could have been a prophet.)
Big Brother is government encroaching upon the privacy and individual liberty of the people, with government controlled by big business for the profit and power of the few over the many.
It is not beyond the possible that we are on the cusp of a modern “feudal” society with a relative few landed gentry and almost everyone else working for them, barely subsisting as they struggle to survive. In fact, since so few people actually own their own land debt free, and given the ongoing foreclosure rate, it can be argued that we have already begun that new era.
We can hope that this silent “crisis” situation hits a serious number of formerly “comfortable” people in an up-close and personal way jolting the “silent majority” of Americans out of voter apathy before it is too late–before the corporations can regularly steal elections with impunity –as, arguably, they may already have begun to do.
The problem is that because big business has, for quite some time now, been controlling both the Democrat and Republican parties and, thus the rules to control who controls government, we already seem to have no VIABLE alternative to the bought-and-paid for status quo.
If Big Brother can continue to control the message to control the panic when those that formerly considered themselves (economically) “middle class” are forced by circumstance to shake off the apathy, big business will have “won” their ongoing “class warfare” against “we, the people”.
The GOP has already co-opted the “Tea Party” protestors and the influence of businesses not wanting interference with profit are already shutting down OWS protestors. Now there is a move afoot to control the internet.
Unfortunately, “We, the people” that love freedom, may well have already lost to economic fascism.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...
April 26th, 2012
6:30 pm
“Hillary Warms Up to Spanx”
AAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooooooooo, please, nnnnnnoooooooooo!!!
Mitt Rob-Me and Ann Wannabe First Lady
April 26th, 2012
6:36 pm
@Lil’ Barry Bailout (Revised Downward)
April 26th, 2012
6:12 pm
We need lawyers to help protect us citizens against a elected legislature that blah blah blah….
——–
And we need psychiatrists to help protect us against the dangerously delusional.
***************************************************************************************************
From your mouth to God’s ear?
The dangerously delusional like Romney, Ann, Cantor, Ryan, Boehner, McConnell, Rubio, Hannity, O’Reilly, Bachmann, Gingrich, Calista, 999 Herman Cain, McCain, Perry, Wingfield, Bailout, Demint, Tea Party, Birthers, Congress………………………………………………………
Mitt Rob-Me and Ann Wannabe First Lady
April 26th, 2012
6:38 pm
@I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin…
April 26th, 2012
6:30 pm
“Hillary Warms Up to Spanx”
AAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooooooooo, please, nnnnnnoooooooooo!!!
**************************************************************************
BREAKING NEWS 2016
HILLARY CLINTON WINS PRESIDENCY.
heeheeheeheeheeheeheeeheeheehee
Tiberius - Banned by Bookman and proud of it!
April 26th, 2012
6:39 pm
Real Athens, I retired at 55 and just work when I want to. Thanks for asking.
And thanks, libs, for showing us on Kyle’s blog how lightweight and insubstantial you all are.
Tiberius - Banned by Bookman and proud of it!
April 26th, 2012
6:43 pm
I see Trashman is back on board. Must have some sort of work release program at his institution.
Mitt Rob-Me and Ann Wannabe First Lady
April 26th, 2012
6:54 pm
@I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin…
April 26th, 2012
6:26 pm
Egypt Plans ‘Farewell Intercourse Law’ So Husbands Can Have Sex With DEAD Wives Up to Six Hours After Their Death”
Let’s all hope michelle doesn’t croak while obozo’s still in office.
ew
***********************************************************************************
YOU people are SICK (mad, raging, furious, frantic, frenzied, infuriated, berserk, maniacal).
You are so full of HATE AND RACISM that you are becoming RABID (going to extreme lengths in
expressing or pursuing a feeling, interest, or opinion).
Obviously you DID NOT GET THE vaccine.
Mitt Rob-Me and Ann Wannabe First Lady
April 26th, 2012
7:06 pm
@Tiberius – Banned by Bookman and proud of it!
April 26th, 2012
6:43 pm
I see Trashman is back on board. Must have some sort of work release program at his institution.
************************************************************************
I just got back from VACATIONING IN Barbados.
Real Athens
April 26th, 2012
7:15 pm
Tibby:
As you remain unsubstantial. You’re welcome.