So much for the Republican Party being the party of the South and nowhere else.
Just when social issues returned to the fore of the national debate, with both the Obama administration’s health insurance mandate for contraception and the Susan G. Komen/Planned Parenthood funding flap in recent weeks, the Bible Belt is taking a back seat. Instead, this GOP presidential campaign is shaping up for the real action to be everywhere except Dixie.
Ours is the region that, you may recall, overly giddy liberals less than four years ago labeled the last bastion of a dying conservatism. But the sudden demise Thursday of CNN’s Super Tuesday debate, to have been broadcast March 1 from right here in Atlanta, was another primary blow against the region. Consider:
The candidate’s name you haven’t read until now is that of Mitt Romney, whose withdrawal from the March 1 debate prompted CNN to pull the plug on it. The former Massachusetts governor has raised a lot of money in Atlanta, but he may have decided he wasn’t going to fall too far or rise too high in Georgia — and might as well deny his rivals free national air time. We’ll soon find out if that was worth the risk of alienating supporters here.
Instead of a Southern route, the path to the GOP nomination this year appears to run through the Midwest.
Santorum won the Iowa caucuses to keep his hopes alive, then got a boost from wins in (non-binding) contests in Missouri and Minnesota. Suddenly, he’s strongly challenging Romney in the latter’s birth state, Michigan. If he does so, Ohio just might steal Georgia’s thunder on Super Tuesday.
And if that happens? Southern Republicans ought to sit back and smile: Better to be along for the ride in a big party than driving solo in a small one.
– By Kyle Wingfield
207 comments Add your comment
Tiberius - Your lightning rod of hate!
February 20th, 2012
6:17 pm
The problem, Michael, is that you are arguing about equal results when they don’t apply to your argument.
Not when the state can be the final arbiter on what sex you may marry.
Michael H. Smith
February 20th, 2012
6:57 pm
I understand what you are saying, it’s just not a good argument.
Nah, my arguments are very good, very accurate and very true, you simply refuse to accept them as such.
Michael H. Smith
February 20th, 2012
7:15 pm
You are wrong on all counts Tiberius. Again my arguments are very good, very accurate, very true and they do apply completely.
It is the right of the State to be the final arbiter on any license it issues: Drivers, hunting, professional and yes, even a marriage license.
If you think differently just let your drivers license expire and keep driving until a cop stops you, then just tell the nice officer that a driver’s license is your RIGHT and the state cannot be the final arbiter of any of your RIGHTS. Let me know how you come out or let me rephrase it this way… tell me when you post bond and your court date. I’ve always enjoyed watching Judge Judy and I got a hunch you will encounter justice with and attitude when some Judge informs you that a state issued license is not your RIGHT, it is the Right of the State and the State is the final arbiter of all terms and conditions it sets on any of its’ RIGHTS when obtaining and maintaining the PRIVILEGES the State grants under its RIGHTS to the license holder.
Rick
February 20th, 2012
7:53 pm
Drivers, hunting, and professional licenses are all a matter of public safety. All of those activities can pose a risk to the public if not regulated. Allowing gays to get married will not affect your life in anyway.
Michael H. Smith
February 20th, 2012
8:29 pm
None of that has anything to do with or does it diminish the RIGHTS of the State to set the terms and conditions whereby it will issue anyone a license, irregardless of any results or how it affects the life of anyone.
Your problem is you base your arguments on your emotions and not the Constitution.
Fact remains you have exactly the same rights as I do. You can’t legally marry (in this State) anyone of your sex and neither can I, so our rights are equal.
But you have every right marry anyone of the opposite sex just as I did and the State will grant you a license, so again your rights and mine are equal.
Again you don’t want equal rights you want equal results which is something government can’t and shouldn’t try to guarantee or should it try to provide equal results.
In any event it does not stop you from a relation with a same sex partner of your choice or should it keep States from issuing domestic partnership licenses rather a marriage license. Oh and by the way, when I say I’m Pro-life, well, I really mean it unlike Santorum and probably Gingrich… I support gay adoptions for domestic partners over abortions.
Just saying..
February 21st, 2012
9:45 am
Linda @ 3:39: “The Bible was written long ago & will never change.”
Are you serious? Are you seriously acknowledging that is the depth of your biblical scholarship?
harley 1
February 23rd, 2012
10:30 am
when southern ladies are hosting newt and his “oh”…do the real ladies throw their coats at her and treat her like the “oh” she is…or just try to be fake nice?