2012 Tuesday: A (light-hearted) look at why each GOP candidate is thankful this year

The Republican candidates will have their last “national” debate tonight, before a string of debates in Iowa begins in mid-December. The topic is an important one, foreign policy, and tomorrow we’ll rehash what the various contenders say.

Until then, and in the spirit of this week’s holiday, let’s visit the lighter side of politics and review what each of the candidates has to be thankful for — including which of their rivals they ought to mention while giving thanks.

Just to be clear, this is not Jon Huntsman (Source: Screen shot from Huntsman campaign video)

Just to be clear, this is not Jon Huntsman (Source: Screen shot from Huntsman campaign video)

JON HUNTSMAN: The former Utah governor can be thankful the threshold for participating in most GOP debates hasn’t been higher than 2 percent. In more than 80 national polls taken since February, Huntsman has risen above 2 percent exactly 10 times; he’s recorded zero percent, or been left off the survey, 15 times since then. But hey, four of his 3 percent showings have occurred this month — Jonmentum! ** The candidate Huntsman is most thankful for: Actually, it’s Herman Cain’s campaign manager, Mark Block, who famously took a drag of a cigarette at the end of a Cain ad — sparking a parody ad by Hunstman’s daughters, a.k.a. the Jon 2012 Girls, that got as much attention as anything the Huntsman campaign has done. (The fact that most of you probably didn’t even see that parody should tell you something.)

RICK SANTORUM: The erstwhile senator from Pennsylvania has spent the most time of any candidate, perhaps save Michele Bachmann, courting the social-conservative vote. And he’s actually been quite eloquent on that topic from time to time. So, he can be thankful the rest of the field has more or less ceded that issue to him. On the other hand, the fact that his courtship of the soc-cons hasn’t translated into much opinion-poll or fund-raising support suggests that he picked the wrong year to run such a campaign. ** The candidate Santorum is most thankful for: Whoever happens to say something in a debate with which he can violently disagree, allowing him to snatch more speaking time without having to complain about how little speaking time he’s getting.

"No, I can't take your bags to your room. I'm talking about Obamacare." (Source: AP)

"No, I can't take your bags to your room. I'm talking about Obamacare." (Source: AP)

MICHELE BACHMANN: The Minnesota congresswoman rose as high as second in the polls for 25 glorious/frightening days (depending on your perspective) from mid-July to early August. Her rise pretty much ended as soon as it became clear Rick Perry was getting in the race, and her attempts to bring him down — particularly over the issue of HPV vaccinations in Texas — undid her campaign more than his. In fact, she’s never really recovered, and probably isn’t in line for the “second look” other candidates have gotten, even if someone falls out of the top tier. That would seem to leave her with a lump of coal in her cornucopia, to mix metaphors. Ah, but she can join the rest of us in being thankful that she realized she needed only one debate appearance wearing a get-up reminiscent of a bellboy/naval officer/third-world dictator/Michael Jackson in the early ’90s. ** The candidate Bachmann is most thankful for: Ex-candidate Tim Pawlenty, the sparring partner whose ease of being beaten up allowed Bachmann to go as far as she did.

RICK PERRY: The Texas governor shall, barring a Gingrich-esque renaissance, be known henceforth as the March Candidate: In like a lion, out like a lamb. He had a Texas-size rise and a Texas-size fall, and a Texas-size stumble with his infamous “oops” moment in a debate a couple of weeks ago. But Perry can be thankful that, unlike some other candidates who faltered badly in a debate or interview, he had a staff with the wherewithal to help him make Letterman lemonade out of his verbal lemons. Probably not enough lemonade to save his campaign, mind you, but at least it was something. ** The candidate Perry is most thankful for: Bachmann, for making him look good by comparison in the early going.

RON PAUL: The longtime Texas congressman probably isn’t going any farther in 2012 than he did in 2008. But he can be thankful — “grateful” might be a better word — that Democrats and big-government Republicans in Washington have so fouled up our nation’s finances that Paul’s relatively radical, small-government liber-conservatism has continued to attract fans as a comparatively sane alternative. ** The candidate Paul is most thankful for: Rand Paul 2016! (if Barack Obama is re-elected) or 2020! (if not).

HERMAN CAIN: We’ve finally reached a candidate in the “top tier” — although we can’t be sure how much longer that’ll be an accurate description of the Georgia businessman. Cain has run a highly unorthodox campaign, and it didn’t hurt him until his fumbling responses to sexual-harassment allegations and routine questions about foreign-policy matters revealed the reason for some of the orthodoxy. He can be most thankful that a used-car salesman in Toledo, or someone, came up with a catchy tax-reform plan that sounds a lot better than it would probably be. ** The candidate Cain is most thankful for: Newt Gingrich, for playing nice with Cain while walking him toward the political trap door.

"Just one more month, Herman ..." (Source: AP)

"Just one more month, Herman ..." (Source: AP)

NEWT GINGRICH: The former speaker of the House, like John McCain before him, can be thankful that modern presidential campaigns run so long that a perennial candidate has the better part of a year to recover from a disastrous early campaign. That, and for a field of competitors that left him the opportunity to do just that. Oh, and for the debate moderators and formats that result in exactly the kind of preposterous questions (”In 30 seconds, tell us how you’d reform the health-care sector, which makes up one-sixth of our $15 trillion economy.”) that Gingrich swats down with winsome disdain. ** The candidate Gingrich is most thankful for: Mitt Romney circa 2008, whose poor primary campaign is one reason Obama got to run against the economically clumsy McCain in the middle of a financial meltdown, thus leaving the door open to a Republican challenger in 2012.

MITT ROMNEY: Are you kidding? Just read the foregoing litany of mistakes other campaigns have made, consider that such formidable opponents as Mitch Daniels and Jeb Bush and Chris Christie didn’t run, add the inability of anyone so far to make Romney really pay politically for his history of flip-flopping, and you need only ask: What doesn’t the former Massachusetts governor have to be thankful for? ** The candidate Romney is most thankful for: Barack Obama, the only man running for president who can make Republicans passionate about Mitt Romney.

– By Kyle Wingfield

Find me on Facebook or follow me on Twitter

65 comments Add your comment

Dusty

November 22nd, 2011
9:48 pm

Man behind the curtain

Very good! You might turn out to be a swan yet.

.

JDW

November 22nd, 2011
9:52 pm

@Dusty…could FDR have prevented Pearl Harbor…maybe maybe not but he damn sure had meetings on the subject and was prepared for the eventuality. In fact he moved the fleet to Hawaii from San Diego in early 1941 in part to create a forward front line.

The other thing FDR has going for him is we won and his strategy resulted in maybe the greatest period of prosperity in recent history. Duhbya on the other hand read My Pet Goat and led us into the abyss.

Chris C.

November 22nd, 2011
10:22 pm

“(The fact that most of you probably didn’t even see that parody should tell you something.)”

What, exactly, should this tell us? That the media enjoys covering characters rather than serious people? Look at how much time Perry and Cain got tonight to demonstrate that they have no idea on anything related to foreign policy. In contrast, Huntsman showed he both knows things and can propose coherent strategic policy, but rarely got questioned by obviously unbiased media superstar Wolf Blitzer. Smart policy isn’t good for the ratings, you see.

Huntsman would’ve had a hard road in this election for any number of reasons, but it’s disappointing that many of his obstacles have come from members of the media not giving him a fair shake.

Hillbilly D

November 22nd, 2011
10:35 pm

his strategy resulted in maybe the greatest period of prosperity in recent history.

The fact that most of the rest of the industrial world had been laid to waste and needed to rebuild had a whole lot to do with it, too. For 10-15 years, we were basically the only game in town, when it came to a strong manufacturing base.

JDW

November 22nd, 2011
10:40 pm

@Dusty…”"My mother is calling me, so I’d better go back and study for my 5th grade test tomorrow.”

Good luck…I think you need it.

JDW

November 22nd, 2011
10:43 pm

@Hillbilly D…”The fact that most of the rest of the industrial world had been laid to waste and needed to rebuild had a whole lot to do with it, too. For 10-15 years, we were basically the only game in town, when it came to a strong manufacturing base.”

No doubt…but in fact a large part of the strategy was to keep the fighting off our shores. That was the whole point of Lend Lease, fight by proxy.

Dusty

November 22nd, 2011
10:43 pm

JDW,

You really got it” in” for George W. Bush, haven’t you? There was very little difference in Pearl Harbor and 9/11. Still you go out of your way to praise one president and indict the other one.

Either your politics have burned your brain or you turned into an anti-war drone as you got older. Or worse.

I guess you expected President Bush to read the Constitution to little children and fling himself out the door. Instead he stopped a minute at the terrible news and gracefully left the scene. There was no way he was going to scare a bunch of little ones.

And the abyss? Can you say the word terrorist? Can you not realize the groundwork for breaking that network was laid by Bush and is still in effect today to keep us safe? That Obama is essentially following many of Bush’s leadership moves?

Too bad you are so blinded as to be extreme. Extremely ignorant and partial that is. I hope it is not a health issue with you.

Dusty

November 22nd, 2011
10:51 pm

Poster @ 10:15

Not nice to use the ID of someone else. That’s a move used by nincompoops.

“Bad boy, bad boy, whatcha gonna do when they come for you?”"

[...] 2012 Tuesday: A (light-hearted) look at why each GOP candidate is thankful this year [...]

Hillbilly D

November 22nd, 2011
11:04 pm

JDW

That’s true but I think Lend Lease was a whole lot more about winning the war than winning the peace. Our manufacturing base had a lot to do with winning the war and is one reason I hope we never get into another conflict of that size. Where would we get our tanks and planes, given that we’ve destroyed our manufacturing base?

I think a great deal of credit for winning the peace goes to Truman and George Marshall. Of course, FDR wasn’t around, so we can only speculate as to what might or might not have been different, if he’d lived.

Dusty

November 22nd, 2011
11:37 pm

HillBilly D,

I think we are making our own planes and tanks, but not in the quanity needed for a great conflict.

The fact that we are in a conflict seems almost forgotten by the American public. We do remember Afghanistan in our church as we have two young members there in the military. The Christmas box from members has already been sent. Yet, besides a few parades on holidays and a few privileges offered to our veterans, I don’t think the average person here thinks much about the action there.

We are so involved in politics that important things are being pushed aside. It is almost like election efforts go on around the clock with nothing else important. I hope that changes when the next election is over.

G’nite…

Ron Paul

November 23rd, 2011
1:37 am

every position he holds makes sense to me… and of course you have to realize that no president can get us back to the gold standard or make some of the huge, audacious changes that you hear on the campaign trail.

that being said – Paul has a clear vision, a clear guide (the Constitution) and a fiscal responsibility that the others lack.

JDW

November 23rd, 2011
8:20 am

@Hillbilly D…

Yes agree with you on all of that. Lend Lease was about winning the war and as secondary objective it helped to contain the fighting away from our shores. Our manufacturing base was a huge factor. Interesting that you brought up Marshall and Truman…they did it right and the results were great. One only has to compare the process they followed to what was done in Iraq and Iran to see the stark differences.

JDW

November 23rd, 2011
8:43 am

@Dusty…Duhbya is simply one of the worst, if not THE worst, presidents in the history of this country. BTW its not just me the Siena University poll of Presidential scholars has him at 39 out of 44. NOTE:FDR…Number 1.

At a macro level he:

-Turned a surplus into a “way of life threatening” deficit by cutting taxes, ending PAYGO and then spending like a drunken sailor. Were some Dems along for the ride, sure, but he was driving the bus off the cliff.

-Exhibited maybe the worst decision making process of all time. He surrounded himself with yes men, did not look at multiple points of view, and fired those that disagreed with the fantasy.

-Approved the torture of prisoners

-Ignored clear warnings of potential danger to this country from Al Qaeda (see Clarke’s memo of 1/25/01) and finally got around to holding a strategy meeting NINE MONTHS after taking office. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB147/index.htm

-Swaggered around like a drunk cowboy after a bar fight while conducting the most arrogant foreign policy in history…”Mission Accomplished” indeed.

-Presided over the single worst job creation record in history.

I could go on but you get the idea.

larry.333

November 23rd, 2011
9:07 am

NEWT’S VISION FOR AMERICA !!
————————————————————–
Cartel violence hits Houston
In stunning developments, Monday’s shootout in Harris County involved Mexico’s Zeta cartel and friendly fire hit a sheriff’s deputy.

Houston and Texas

Comments (131)
Larger | Smaller
Printable Version
Email This
Font
More Information
FOUR CHARGED IN SLAYING
Four men, all believed to be citizens of Mexico, are charged with capital murder. They are Eric De Luna, 23; Fernando Tavera, 19; Ricardo Ramirez, 35, and Rolando Resendiz, 34.
The mission was supposed to be a textbook “controlled delivery” – a routine trap by law enforcement officers using a secret operative posing as a truck driver to bust drug traffickers when their narcotics are delivered to a rendezvous point.

Instead, things spun out of control. Shortly before the marijuana delivery was to be made Monday afternoon, three sport-utility vehicles carrying Zetas cartel gunmen seemingly came out of nowhere and cut off the tanker truck as it rumbled through northwest Harris County, sources told the Chronicle.

They sprayed the cab with bullets, killing the civilian driver, who was secretly working with the government. A sheriff’s deputy, who was driving nearby in another vehicle, was wounded, possibly by friendly fire.

The Chronicle has learned that investigators believe the deputy’s shooting was the result of confusing radio communications between the multiple agencies that responded. Some of the arriving officers may have thought the deputy was one of the culprits when in fact he was a member of the surveillance team watching the truck………………………………