T-SPLOST list doesn’t spend the money where the traffic is

If local poohbahs want to derail a regional transportation sales tax, they should give DeKalb CEO Burrell Ellis what he wants. Shift tens of millions of dollars away from road projects where traffic is heaviest, put them toward a MARTA extension where it isn’t — and watch the T-SPLOST crash and burn.

It’s one thing to devote 55 percent of the tax’s projected proceeds to mass transit, now used by 5 percent of commuters. But the current project list, due for final approval within one week, compounds the error by spending money completely out of proportion to where the traffic is.

The Atlanta Regional Commission produces maps of the top 10 percent and top 25 percent most-congested roads in the region. Among surface streets, the lion’s share of the congestion takes place in the northern suburbs of Cobb, North Fulton and Gwinnett counties, plus Dunwoody. Among freeways, six of the nine worst stretches are along I-75 in Cobb, I-85 in Gwinnett, Ga. 400 north of the perimeter, or the top end of I-285.

In short, the vast majority of traffic congestion in metro Atlanta occurs between I-75 in Cobb and I-85 in Gwinnett. Only the Downtown Connector can hold a candle to the top end’s troubles.

What’s more, 46 percent of the people in the 10-county region live OTP in Cobb, North Fulton, Dunwoody and Gwinnett. Likewise, 46 percent of the T-SPLOST’s projected revenues — $2.83 billion out of $6.14 billion — come from that northern swath.

Yet, the current project list would leave this region well short of its proportional take. Even if we include some federal funding tabbed for projects in the northern suburbs, they’d get shortchanged by $150 million. And you may as well ignore another $132 million for studying future transit along 400 and 85, since those two projects would be hundreds of millions of dollars and a decade or more away from existence.

Worse, about one in four dollars devoted to the area would go to a single rail project that would barely cross into Cobb.

Still, we are only now reaching the coup de grace. That would be Ellis’ wish to suck yet another $33 million out of the 400 corridor.

Doing so would leave an area that provides almost half the population and revenues for the T-SPLOST — and way more than half of the region’s traffic congestion — with barely one-third of the proceeds.

And for what? Insistence that transit along I-20 in DeKalb be not buses, but heavy rail — the mode that transit advocates pooh-pooh as too pricey, until there’s real money on the table.

What this and other problems with the T-SPLOST process have revealed is that local officials are unable, or maybe just unwilling, to divide the funds in a way that tackles traffic congestion regionally.

So, we get up to $700 million for a train from the Lindbergh MARTA station to Emory University, another $600 million for Atlanta’s BeltLine, and a sales pitch about providing “last mile” transit connectivity to regional job centers. Neither of those projects is bad, per se. At the same time, neither one will do much good for all the people who will still lack “first mile” connectivity.

They’ll be left to seethe along Jimmy Carter Boulevard, Holcomb Bridge Road and Windy Hill Road, wondering why they’re paying a tax to improve mobility where it’s already comparatively good.

If, that is, they don’t first defeat it as a wasted opportunity.

– By Kyle Wingfield

Find me on Facebook or follow me on Twitter

112 comments Add your comment

I Report (-: You Whine )-: Thee Magnificent!!! mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...

October 8th, 2011
4:56 pm

I mean, forget the United States Border Patrol guys who were killed with these Fast and Furious guns. Real live, or previously live citizens of third world countries, the kind of people that NPR and the New York Times claim to love, are dead because of this. Why isn’t that a national scandal? This is absolutely amazing. Iran Contra didn’t rack up that kind of body count. Watergate didn’t rack up a body count. Sarah Palin’s daughter’s boyfriend’s mother, or whatever stupid story they were chasing around Wasilla for months, that didn’t rack up a body count. There are hundreds of dead Mexicans from a gun running program run by the United States.

Yeah, like they care about dead Mexicans.

Comrade MarxistV

October 8th, 2011
5:30 pm

To my fellow comrades in New York presently engaged in our struggle against the “bourgeoisie” that have created the immoral disparities of wealth equality among the working class people of our land under this current evil capitalist economic system of oppression emanating from Wall Street, for the moment our fight must continue as unions members pledge unity with us in the socialist workers cause to overthrow the evil rich “bourgeoisie” that refuse to pay their fair share to the state, we shall prevail victorious in delivering “social justice” to them comrades.

@@

October 8th, 2011
7:47 pm

HUGE mistake!!!

Obama sticks with his staff despite slumping poll numbers.

He appears less willing than previous presidents to resort to shake-ups when the going gets tough.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-staff-20111009,0,6138617.story

Far be it from me to offer my advice.

Waheema

October 8th, 2011
7:54 pm

Over the weekend, Obama comes clean and admits another 1.4 trillion dollar deficit. It seems that with Obama we only have to look forward to endless deficits as he and his democrat buddies can’t keep from wasting money.

I Report (-: You Whine )-: Thee Magnificent!!! mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...

October 8th, 2011
8:12 pm

Now the rest of the world knows why we laugh at the liberals in Atlanta-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QZlp3eGMNI

These are the people that think they can run the country.

How sad.

@@

October 8th, 2011
8:27 pm

Why are they repeating everything that’s said?

It reminds me of an elementary school assembly.

Weird!

And the wiggly fingers thing…what’s that about?

Lil' Barry Bailout (Unexpectedly Revised Downward)

October 8th, 2011
8:36 pm

Demitard liberals (oops, redundant) think they’re going to recreate the protests of the sixties.

Maybe one day they’ll figure out what it is they’re protesting. For the moment they’ve decided to protest a noun.

“Corporate greeeeeeeeed”

Losers.

@@

October 8th, 2011
8:48 pm

What the heck is “the agenda”.

They keep talking about continuing with “it” but never get around “to it”.

I don’t see how the left can’t be embarrassed by what they’re seeing. I work with kids who have more going for ‘em that those folks.

I Report (-: You Whine )-: Thee Magnificent!!! mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...

October 8th, 2011
9:09 pm

@@- The worst possible thing you could do is to try and comprehend the purpose of liberalism and what it is attempting to achieve, your mind may be drug down into the ignorance that has befallen them and you may never escape it.

You will become a zombie!

For God’s sake, please don’t do it!

I Report (-: You Whine )-: Thee Magnificent!!! mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...

October 8th, 2011
9:13 pm

And then you will

And then you will

chant stupid platitudes

chant stupid platitudes

like a moron at a

like a moron at a

cult gathering

cult gathering

for the common good

for the common good

we must defecate on this cop car

we must defecate on this cop car

power to the people

power to the, ooops, almost let it get me.

Uh, no I didn’t.

@@

October 8th, 2011
9:23 pm

Andy:

I used to be one (liberal) kinda. I never knew they were THAT slow. It’s a whole new ball team full of bench warmers.

Don’t worry about me, I’ve grown up and apart.

==================================

It appears some democrats aren’t pleased with Harry’s 5% surtax on millionaires, saying it won’t be enough. Lower incomes will have to be taxed as well. They like the $250,000 better. They’ll go with the millionaires for the time being but later??????

Obama’s threshold was based on broad principles, including the desire to leave the middle class untouched by higher taxes while collecting “enough” tax revenue, Bernstein said, although even he quibbles with the president’s cutoff and suggests that a broader tax increase may be needed in the future.

Going in the other direction — aiming for incomes of $1-million-plus — would yield far too little revenue to fund “a recognizable government,” Bernstein said. While the Democrats’ surtax proposal may make sense to pay for a jobs bill, “it’s actually quite important that $1 million does not become the new $250,000 when it comes to the permanent tax base,” he added.

Democrats say they haven’t given up on the lower number.

$250,000 for someone living in a high-rent area of the country? New York, NY? Honolulu, HI? San Francisco, CA? Santa Ana,CA? Stamford,CT?

I Report (-: You Whine )-: Thee Magnificent!!! mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...

October 8th, 2011
9:33 pm

Federal officials begin major crackdown on marijuana operations
“It’s coming out of left field as far as we’re concerned,” said Joe Elford, the chief counsel for Americans for Safe Access, which advocates for medical marijuana use. “I really don’t know what inspired this. It’s a complete about-face from what [Obama] said when he was campaigning.”

He’s got your vote, moron, he needs the Law and Order vote now. Like they are stupid enough not to see what’s going on.

Re elect the clown and we will all be smoking dope.

@@

October 8th, 2011
9:36 pm

“I’d vote for $250,000, but it may be that we don’t have the votes politically,” said Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.). “A million is better than nothing.”

Barney Frank, founding father of the economic collapse.

@@

October 8th, 2011
9:43 pm

Obama to Hispanic leaders last week: “I think there’s been a great disservice done to the cause of getting the DREAM Act passed and getting comprehensive immigration passed by perpetrating the notion that somehow, by myself, I can go and do these things. It’s just not true.” Obama on immigration at a town-hall meeting at Facebook headquarters in Palo Alto last April: “I can’t solve this problem by myself.” Obama, around the same time, speaking to a group of climate-change activists at the White House: “I can’t do this alone.” Obama, last November: “The responsibilities of this office are so enormous… sometimes we lose track of the ways that we connected with folks that got us here in the first place.” Obama, at a press conference in April 2009, “I can’t press a button and have the banks do what I want, or turn on a switch and Congress falls in line.” Obama, speaking at the United Nations in September 2009: “[The world] cannot now stand by and wait for America to solve the world’s problems alone.” Obama, two years ago, on the military overthrow of the democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya of Honduras: “[I] can’t push a button and suddenly reinstate Mr. Zelaya.”

So now it’s “Yes, he can’t?”

Lil' Barry Bailout (Unexpectedly Revised Downward)

October 8th, 2011
9:50 pm

Air and Space Museum closes after guards clash with protesters

The Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum on the Mall was abruptly closed Saturday afternoon after a “large group of protesters” tried to push past security guards and enter the museum, a spokeswoman said.
—————————————–

Heckuva job, self-absorbed losers. A whole bunch of kids didn’t get to see the air & space museum because you could only think of yourselves. Greedy, inconsiderate putzes.

@@

October 8th, 2011
10:25 pm

Trying to get his jobs bill passed with little white lies.

Obama: I had a chance to meet a young man named Robert Baroz. He’s got two decades of teaching experience. He’s got a master’s degree. He’s got an outstanding track record of helping his students make huge gains in reading and writing. In the last few years, he’s received three pink slips because of budget cuts. Why wouldn’t we want to pass a bill that puts somebody like Robert back in the classroom teaching our kids?

He never left.

Baroz has in fact received three pink slips in four years, but in each case, his job was saved, either through stimulus funds or the 2010 Congressional Jobs Bill. He now works as a literacy and data coach at the Curley K-8 School in Jamaica Plain, analyzing MCAS data and applying it to teachers’ everyday lessons.

White House spokeswoman Joanna Rosholm said: “The President highlighted the story of a great Boston teacher who is NOT in the classroom today — because his school, like so many across the country, is facing a budget crunch. If Congress will pass the American Jobs Act, then we can put thousands of teachers like Mr. Baroz back in the classroom.”

Doesn’t sound like he’s in the classroom. He’s a data analyst.

And the teacher of whom he spoke?

Baroz, who supports Obama and his efforts to restore the public sector, told the Herald yesterday he doesn’t mind if the president — or his speechwriters — took some liberties with the facts. It was all in aid of a higher truth, he said.

says it’s okay to lie.

MCAS is tied into NCLB. Wonder if Jamaica Plain’s test scores are legit?

Ron

October 8th, 2011
11:00 pm

Why are the powers that be STILL punishing for the Northern Arc? You can change the name, but the project is STILL the same. It amazes me that they figured out a way to use this TSPOLST proposal to fund it! See : http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/print-edition/2011/10/07/road-project-resurrects-fears-of.html?ana=e_ph for details. Argh!!!

tjatl

October 9th, 2011
1:52 am

Kyle, as one who has worked in urban planning across the metro area, one of the biggest deficits the “OTP” areas have in terms of traffic management is a lack of connected surface streets. In many areas, the dendritic “feeder” system is a major contributor to congestion – cul de sacs lead to feeder streets, which lead to collectors, which lead to arterials. There is a lack of cross-connections (otherwise known as a street grid).
Interconnected surface streets, which alleviate congestion far more efficiently than widening lanes on arterial roads or highways, are a LOCAL responsibility. In my experience, the OTP municipalities and county governments have not been willing to invest their own money into these types of street improvements, nor are they willing to adopt a mapped streets program to compel private developers to implement them. That is mostly a lack of political will and poor urban planning. Instead, they prefer to compel state taxpayers from other areas to widen arterials and highways (a method that most traffic planners will tell you is short sighted at best) for them.
There are exceptions, of course, but when these OTP jurisdictions start investing adequately to address the problems of their own creation perhaps they will have earned a ride in the saddle of their high horse.

Will the last Democrat in Georgia please turn off the lights?.....

October 9th, 2011
6:34 am

tjatl

October 9th, 2011
1:52 am

You make a great point about Metro Atlanta’s inadequate surface road network being a major contributor to gridlock and congestion.

But one reason why the surface road network lacks connectivity and continuity is because many of the major, principal, primary and collector roads that the area is dependent upon are based on ancient networks of meandering Indian trails guided by our rolling to hilly and even mountainous, in some places, valley-and-ridge topography.

I can think of maybe a few places where local governments are straightening and realigning roads to have better connectivity, but for the most part the road network is meandering and discontinuous (hence the reason why some roads may change names multiple times).

Will the last Democrat in Georgia please turn off the lights?.....

October 9th, 2011
6:59 am

tjatl

October 9th, 2011
1:52 am

“That is mostly a lack of political will and poor urban planning.”

So, so very true as land spectulators and developers have almost literally ruled over, controlled and dominated local governments during much of the post-World War II era (see Cobb and, ESPECIALLY, Gwinnett).

“Instead, they prefer to compel state taxpayers from other areas to widen arterials and highways (a method that most traffic planners will tell you is short sighted at best) for them.”

Also very true, but widening of local suburban and exurban roads has not taken place as much in Georgia as many think as GA is 49th out of 50 states in overall transportation investment (including roads) with GA being outspent by places like Texas and Florida by almost a 2-1 margin or more in some cases.

Both Texas and Florida in particular have major cities in Dallas, Houston, Miami and Orlando that are based on grid systems on flatter terrain with major roads with alot more right-of-way that are alot easier to widen from two-lane country roads to 4-6 lane suburban collector roads and major arteries.

Metro Atlanta and North Georgia features very hilly and heavily wooded terrain in many places which makes the widening of existing roads and the building of new roads a little less popular of a concept (see the erstwhile-Northern Arc).

Of course there is a traditional aversion to mass transit in much of suburban and exurban Atlanta, but in many of those same places one will find almost just as much of an aversion to widening collector roads that are also lined with residential development, unlike in Texas and Florida where many collector roads have been widened to 4-6 lane roads.

If mass transit (commuter rail, bus, etc) is politically and socially unpopular and we can’t widen or straighten or existing surface roads and we can’t build any new toll roads (hence the overdependence on our freeway system), then we are just plain screwed,

At this point, Georgia is basically sitting around refusing to and seemingly not knowing how to make investments in its infrastructure while our neighbors and main economic competitors in North Carolina, Florida and Texas are actively and aggressively continuing to make massive maximum investments in theirs.

Will the last Democrat in Georgia please turn off the lights?.....

October 9th, 2011
7:18 am

Ron

October 8th, 2011
11:00 pm

“Why are the powers that be STILL punishing for the Northern Arc?”

Because they are a bunch of crazed, delusional bureaucrats who are not capable of having any original thoughts in their warped minds.

Not to mention they have lost whatever little they had of their warped minds to begin with which leaves them with nothing but their delusions-of-grandeur (HOT lanes, Northern Arc, etc) to guide them in what is a sorry excuse for transportation planning.

I guess that they didn’t learn the lesson back in 2002 when an entire ruling party that had been in power for 140 years and was thought to be unbeatable was unceremonious kicked out of power, head-first for backing the Northern Arc, which had a proposed route that ran through and near some very exclusive country club communities and high-dollar residential real estate owned by some very politically and socially-influential people in exurban Bartow, Cherokee and Forsyth Counties.

Warped and misguided concepts like HOT lanes (or HOT mess as most Northeast Metro residents are calling them) and tired retreads like the Northern Arc are but further proof that the state has run completely out of constructive and COMPETENT ideas for increasing mobility and reducing congestion in the Atlanta Region.

The HOT lane (HOT mess) is so bad that a largely conservative voting constituency is seriously threatening to vote out the seemingly unbeatable do-nothing Republican majority, replacing them with Democrats or other Republicans.

Yeah…It’s really gotten THAT bad.

Will the last Democrat in Georgia please turn off the lights?.....

October 9th, 2011
7:35 am

Ron

October 8th, 2011
11:00 pm

I read the article link that you provided and there is not much to fear as far as a reprisal of the Northern Arc in that particular case as the extension to Sugarloaf Parkway from just below 316 to Peachtree Industrial Boulevard is a county-funded project, that while it will run in the right-of-way of the erstwhile Outer Perimeter/Northern Arc, will only be built in Gwinnett County.

The Gwinnett County government never permitted any development to be built in the right-of-way of that previously proposed road intending to build their own local controlled-access parkway in case the plans for the Outer Perimeter fell through, which they did as a way to alleviate the Highway 20 choke point above the Mall of Georgia and using the road as an exit ramp/connector between I-85 southbound and I-985 northbound.

Though I have been hearing of bone-headed proposals to resurrect that erstwhile lightning rod of a proposed highway.

The proposal drawing the most ire from locals right now is a GDOT proposal to connect I-75 with Hwy 411 in Bartow County that would cut directly through some mountain range and the very valuable property of some very politically-influential landowners along and close to the route of the erstwhile Northern Arc north of Cartersville.

Jefferson

October 9th, 2011
8:57 am

Put all the gas hogs in 2 lanes only.

MitlonMan

October 9th, 2011
10:51 am

TSPLOST is nothing more than yet another program to divert money away from more affluent area to dumps like ATL, DeKalb & Clayton.

I will be voting NO!

tjatl

October 9th, 2011
12:00 pm

@ Will the Last Democrat – a street grid doesn’t have to be straight OR flat. You’re thinking of midwestern grids.
It can be meandering, wavy and hilly. As long as the streets connect.
Think Ansley Park — that’s a grid – it’s just wavy (and very hilly also).
And surface streets in more sparsely populated areas would be expected to connect at farther intervals than say, Ansley Park.
Woodstock, just as one example – would be far better served having more north/south surface street connectivity between Route 92, Towne Lake and Sixes Road than by widening 575. (The new right lane on northbound 575 that exits at Towne Lake is a lame and very expensive attempt to do that – if many of those cars could make that connection without having to clog the on ramps to get onto 575 it would have alleviated the congestion more effectively.
The other problem is the sheer size of the GDOT-proposed connections. They’re usually huge, high-volume routes that are doomed to eventually fail. Why? – because very high traffic counts invite large-scale commercial development along those routes, which exponentially increase the volume. In 20 years it will be worse than it was before.
More, smaller streets are better for many of the congestion issues in the suburban areas (with exceptions, of course).
Illustration: adding three smaller surface street connections to a major road at logical intervals processes far more vehicles than adding three left-turn lanes onto that major road. It also provides outlets for traffic when the inevitable accident occurs on said major road.
Bottom line is that most of the OTP areas need *more* routing options, not bigger roads. Surface streets are also less expensive to build and less disruptive to the character of the communities.
But again, surface streets are a local and county responsibility.
The local and county officials are going to pat the citizens of Bartow county on the head while winking at GDOT – because it’s politically much more expedient to have the “locals” mad at GDOT than at them.

Bob Ross

October 9th, 2011
12:40 pm

The 10-county metro area simply doesn’t have the population density to support transit.

Urban planning expert Alain Bertaud (over 30 years of international experience and 19 years with the World Bank) and others find that transit works in cities with a density of about 35 people per hectare (2.5 acres). In 1990, our metro area density was 6 p/ha.

Bertaud projected our earlier 3.14% growth rate forward 20 years to 2010; even then, our density only increased to 10.9 p/ha- and that assumed no additional space would be used for residential purposes. Our actual population growth was 556,000 fewer than Bertaud’s 2003 study projection, so the actual 2010 density is even less: 9.6.

Is there any reason to think the next 20 years will see more robust overall growth? Not even the wildest estimates project it to increase our density 3.5x what is now- and that which is necessary to sustain transit (if you’re keeping score, that’d be 14.4m with zero additional residential footprint). We’re simply too spread out for the transit option to make sense here, so let’s get on with the tough business of figuring out other solutions that actually give us some meaningful bang for our buckis.

Build The Outer Perimeter

October 9th, 2011
1:03 pm

@Bob Ross-good information. In my mind, more reason to build the Outer Perimeter. Some readers comment that southbound I-75 traffic is much lighter inside 285. With the Outer Perimeter, much of this same “outside 285″ traffic (interstate trucking etc.) would never get anywhere near the existing “inner perimeter”, thus greatly lessening traffic on it.

tjatl

October 9th, 2011
1:19 pm

@ Build – an outer perimeter will not solve the inner suburbs’ congestion problems. Interstate truckers and through-traffic vacationers aren’t using Windy Hill Road or Johnson Ferry.

@@

October 9th, 2011
1:25 pm

transit works in cities with a density of about 35 people per hectare (2.5 acres)

35 people per 2.5 acres!!??!!

My worst nightmare.

Politi Cal

October 9th, 2011
2:25 pm

And the fools in south Atlamta wonder why people in the northern areas want OUT of this nonsense. Atlanta would be a dead zone without the northern areas to pump money into it.

Hillbilly D

October 9th, 2011
3:26 pm

Building an Outer Perimeter-Northern Arc or whatever one wants to call it, would just result in more sprawl and a repeat of the process that we’ve seen many times in the last 50 years. It would just be another developmental highway, farther out.

Waheema

October 9th, 2011
3:56 pm

People who think roads “cause” develoment have no been on the Camp Creek extension.

Growth has already come. We are choking on the traffic and some of us want concrete steps taken to allieviate the congestion. Others, apparently including some of the politicians, are more interested in ideology and the money honey-pot they can raid.

Tim Lee, the soon to be former politcian from Cobb, decided to put his idelolgy above the real transportation needs of his constituents with the half backed Cumberland to the Arts Center line. I don’t oppose transit per se but do demand that the transportation money be spent to actually help resolve the congestion.

TSPLOST is dead.

tar and feathers party

October 9th, 2011
5:08 pm

Fat, black and stupid is no way to go through life people…..

I Report (-: You Whine )-: Thee Magnificent!!! mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...

October 9th, 2011
5:38 pm

Remember when the Urinal blubbered and whined about the Republicans shutting down government over the debt deal, and with it the National Museums? Looks like they’ve gotten over that faux outrage-

The Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum on the Mall was abruptly closed Saturday afternoon after a “large group of protesters” tried to push past security guards and enter the museum, a spokeswoman said.

evil museum!

evil museum!

space and air bad!

space and air bad!

look, a drone!

look, a drone!

evil drone!

evil drone!

attack the drone!

attack the drone!

No, the thing hanging from the ceiling not the guy with the loudspeaker, get off of him!

No, the thing hanging from the ceiling not the guy with the loudspeaker, get off of him!

mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!

mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!

allah akbar!

allah akbar!

just sayin….

Build The Outer Perimeter

October 9th, 2011
5:52 pm

@Hillbilly D–the sprawl is already there.

@tjatl–building the Outer Perimeter would not preclude other projects such as the Windy Hill projects.

Will the last Democrat in Georgia please turn off the lights?.....

October 9th, 2011
6:27 pm

Bob Ross

October 9th, 2011
12:40 pm

“The 10-county metro area simply doesn’t have the population density to support transit.”

It’s true that Metro Atlanta when the population is averaged out over a 10-county area or the Atlanta Region when the population is averaged out over the 28-30 county area of its boundaries (an area that is larger than the state of Massachusetts other Northeastern states that are smaller in land area) has what may just be the LOWEST population density of any major metropolitan area/population center on the planet.

But that statement can be kind of misleading as the population of the metro area and region is not uniformly spread out over all 5,000-plus square miles of the 10-county metro area or 8,000-plus square miles of the region as some areas, especially along major transportation nodes like interstates, major surface roads and existing freight railroad lines close to or near historic town and neighborhood centers that originally were settled and grew up on those railroad lines.

We should also keep-in-mind that different transit solutions can be used for different types of developed areas as transportation is not and should not be approached as a “one-size-fits-all” thing.

Modes of transit like local bus routes, cable cars (streetcars), heavy rail (subways and elevated trains) and light rail (surface trams) are much better fits for densely-populated urban areas inside I-285 and densely-populated mature, established aging suburbs closer to I-285.

While modes like commuter rail on existing freight rail lines that parallel the interstate spokes and express commuter bus routes on those interstate and freeway spokes are the best option for less densely-populated outlying suburban and exurban areas farther out and on the fringes of the metro area and region.

But make no mistake that transit in differing modes absolutely must be a part of the conversation moving forward because of the sheer volume of traffic that is forced to be overdependent on our limited freeway system and surface road network.

There’s no way that a major metropolitan region of six million people can be expected to effectively function without being multimodal as, especially on the Northside of the metro area, the freeway system has seemed to be reaching or to have already reached build-out status.

There doesn’t necessarily seem to be a very big appetite to widen those freeways much more or build alot of new roads beyond just widening some of the few major arterial roads that there are in the region.

As it stands now the Atlanta Region is basically trying to function on the same amount of transportation infrastructure that it had in 1990 when it had half the population of today.

We also should keep-in-mind that the auto-focused sprawl that has dominated the Atlanta Region for the last 60-plus years in the post-World War II era will likely not continue to do so in the face of rising gas prices, worsening gridlock and increasingly lengthy commutes.

In many places in the five-county core of the region that the trend of sprawling auto-dominated development is starting to reverse as there have been alot of Northeastern-style townhome and row house type of developments popping up next to existing transit lines and major roads alike.

Transit lines like heavy local bus service, streetcars, light rail, heavy rail and especially commuter rail lines on existing freight rail lines that already run through existing historical neighborhood and town centers built to human scale (as opposed to car scale) can and will serve to guide future development to be concentrated along transit lines close to stations and stops.

The Atlanta Region has doubled in population with a virtual 100 percent population growth rate in the last 20 years growing from 2.9 million in 1990 to 5.8 million people today on what basically the same infrastructure.

When you think about it, it’s like adding the population of a Denver, a city with its own set of transportation challenges, traffic jams, etc, to Metro Atlanta in a very short period of time.

You can’t add three million more people to a metro area of three million that was already struggling with traffic congestion and expect to get by with little or no investment in your infrastructure, it’s just not happening.

Atlanta’s past was with automobiles. Atlanta’s present is a hard-luck transition in a bewildered transportation and mobility-challenged obvilion.

But make no mistake that Atlanta’s future as the mega-city that it has become is in rail transportation.

As a city blessed with an overbundance of rail infrastructure, the sooner we realize that the future will not be like our sprawling auto-dominated past, the sooner we will get ourselves moving again both transportation-wise and economically.

Will the last Democrat in Georgia please turn off the lights?.....

October 9th, 2011
6:41 pm

Build The Outer Perimeter

October 9th, 2011
1:03 pm

“@Bob Ross-good information. In my mind, more reason to build the Outer Perimeter.”

There is virtually zero political will and appetite to build an Outer Perimeter (even though many other North American cities, even those that are transit-heavy and transit-dependent cities like Chicago, Boston and Toronto, have them as bypasses), ESPECIALLY, anything with the term NORTHERN ARC in it.

There are just too many prominent Republicans who own homes and residential real estate who make big political contributions and vote heavily in GOP primaries and general elections for that road to ever comeback as a serious transportation proposal, especially after seeing what happened to the seemingly unbeatable Democrats who backed the proposal during Roy Barnes one term in office as governor.

The Northern Arc doesn’t even have the backing of Atlanta’s business community anymore which is a sign of how politically radioactive that thing is.

If the current ruling Georgia GOP were to back the Northern Arc in combination with the burgeoning backlash over the HOT lane mess on I-85, they would seriously risk finding themselves in the dustbin of Georgia political history just like the Democrats have been increasingly finding themselves since they lost control of state politics in 2002 after over 140 years of impenetrable power.

Will the last Democrat in Georgia please turn off the lights?.....

October 9th, 2011
7:15 pm

Build The Outer Perimeter

October 9th, 2011
5:52 pm

With the Northern Arc/Outer Perimeter being politically radioactive, the next best thing that could be done would be to double-stack the top-half of I-285 from I-20 on the westside back around to I-20 on the eastside.

Interstates 75 and 85 on the northside could also be double-stacked outside the perimeter out to their junctions with I-575 and I-985, respectively with the top level restricted to car traffic only and the bottom level for both cars and trucks.

Though, these days, the Georgia Department of Transportation would be laughed off of the podium and out of the building or maybe chased with torches and pitchforks if they actually presented that proposal to the public and the media, especially after the growing backlash to HOT lanes.

Lynnie Gal

October 9th, 2011
8:06 pm

If we just had all those millions wasted on the HOT lane crap, that money could have helped to build some decent transit alternatives. Instead, all that money for cameras, extra patrolmen, signs, painting, computer setup, etc. is down the toilet. Now, the poorest among us who work in minimum wage jobs to ring up our crap at supermarkets and drugstores have to pay $2.50 to ride Marta one way instead of $2. It’s sickening what these so-called leaders are doing to our state.

Hillbilly D

October 9th, 2011
8:10 pm

Build the Outer Perimeter

Actually, the last proposal I heard, was to build an outer perimeter, well north of the Northern Arc that failed. That’s a developmental highway and no, the sprawl isn’t already there. There are well connected people who own land along the route though.

Hillbilly D

October 9th, 2011
8:13 pm

Last Democrat

Interesting idea about double stacking. I wonder if such a project ever took place, what about having a portion of I-75 and/or I-85, contain a portion with no exits. In other words, for people who are passing through and not stopping in Atlanta, route them on their own, and not mix them with the local traffic. I have no idea what the logistics or cost of that would be, but I’ve always wondered about it.

Will the last Democrat in Georgia please turn off the lights?.....

October 9th, 2011
10:41 pm

Hillbilly D

October 9th, 2011
8:10 pm

I’ve also heard about the latest proposed route for a revived Northern Arc that you are talking about as well.

I’ve also heard that the latest proposed route may be even more unpopular because the route is closer to the mountains and runs through some very pristine and somewhat unspoiled land in the foothills and southernmost reaches of the Blue Ridge Mountains.

Will the last Democrat in Georgia please turn off the lights?.....

October 9th, 2011
10:55 pm

Last week’s HOT lane debacle seems to have had the unintended effect of reducing public support for the upcoming T-SPLOST referendum to even less than what it was in the I-85 Northeast Corridor.

A lot of voters in that area, especially in Gwinnett, have been remarking that if an increase in traffic from projects like HOT lanes are what they can expect to get in return for paying higher taxes then they won’t and can’t support the T-SPLOST

Corey

October 9th, 2011
11:25 pm

San Antonio had an outer perimeter way back in the early eighties. I understand the idea of public input and the value of it, but more often than not public input leads to paralysis and bickering. The transportation tax measure will fail. Georgians always vote to protest against something. Rarely do Georgians vote for something.

Build The Outer Perimeter

October 10th, 2011
6:09 am

@Last Democrat & @Hillbilly D–Lots of good information and food for thought.

Sounds like the idea of building the Outer Perimeter might be as toxic as the push for expanding MARTA into Cobb, Gwinnett etc.

Will the last Democrat in Georgia please turn off the lights?.....

October 10th, 2011
6:35 am

Build The Outer Perimeter

October 10th, 2011
6:09 am

Building an Outer Perimeter road on its face is not a bad idea as lots of other very major cities have those types of outer suburban loop and bypass roads.

It’s just that with the public paranoia about increasing sprawl and the well-connected developers that would likely benefit from the road, the Outer Perimeter/Northern Arc is about as dead as a road can be politically.

Karl Marx

October 10th, 2011
6:52 am

The “Outer Perimeter” is being built. The northern section will follow Highway 20 from I75 to I85 which is in the process of being 4-laned now. It will not be a limited access road and commercial development will be all along it not limited to on and off ramps. Call it what you want but it is being built.

Will the last Democrat in Georgia please turn off the lights?.....

October 10th, 2011
7:00 am

Karl Marx

October 10th, 2011
6:52 am

Highway 20 is a surface state highway route that isn’t anywhere near the lightning rod that the proposed toll road through Bartow, Cherokee and Forsyth was back in the early 2000s.

Hwy 20 also won’t have any measurable effect in taking heavy though truck traffic off of I-285 as the Northern Arc/Outer Perimeter would have had, at least in theory as Atlanta is still one of the top trucking and logistics centers and one of the top destinations for heavy truck traffic on the entire continent.

Don

October 10th, 2011
8:12 am

The T-SPLOST project list is a mushy bunch of dubious projects spread too thin to do much good.

The Belt Line is a good idea, but it is mostly about development and not transportation. It won’t add any capacity in lanes where there is significant congestion.

Light rail lines are a good idea, except we need to figure out how to do them on the cheap rather than the gold-plated versions that usually get built. Instead of asking “how much to build a line from A to B”, the question should be, “Here’s X dollars to go from A to B. How much can I get?”

Many of the project on the list are really local projects that have no regional impact at all. They are there to woo local officials into supporting T-SPLOST. A good example is a widening of a short section of Five Forks Trickum Road buried deep in Gwinnett County. Gwinnett should do this one on their own if it’s so important to them.

Complete abandonment of commuter rail along existing freight lines is almost inexcusable. This, and express bus service are the most economic ways to add capacity along the lanes were there is significant congestion. It can be done is short order, too, if someone would put their mind to it.

The T-SPLOST list, like every highway project, was not subjected to any sort of cost – benefit analysis. Enough time and money was spend preparing the list. Why wasn’t this done?

The problem with T-SPLOST is that there is an unholy alliance of local gov’t, DOT, consultant agencies, real estate developers and builders/suppliers of highway and transit that give us goofy, overpriced, gold-plated solutions to problems we don’t have. Instead, what we need are simple, plain-Jane, cost-effective solutions to real problems.

With all of its flaws, however, T-SPLOST is better than nothing. I will likely vote for it.

DawgDad

October 10th, 2011
8:36 am

“Among freeways, six of the nine worst stretches are along I-75 in Cobb, I-85 in Gwinnett, Ga. 400 north of the perimeter, or the top end of I-285.”

You’re right about MARTA, but is the solution to spend millions in taxpayer money, not to relieve congestion on these arteries, but to add HOT lanes??? No. A million times NO!

I will NOT vote for the TSPLOST. I haven’t waited almost 15 years for improvements to I-575 and I-75 to see my tax dollars spent on HOT lanes which will make traffic even worse.

HOT lanes are a horrible misuse and waste of public funds. Public transportation funded by the taxpayers must provide equitable access of use. Taxpayers should be outraged and heads should roll.