Our state government has become creative in devising ways to take more of your money without raising “taxes.” Chief among these methods is inventing or increasing “fees” that are for all practical purposes a different stream of general revenues — rather than a charge for, and carefully priced to cover, a particular service.
Substitute another T-word — tuition — for taxes, and you have what Georgia’s Board of Regents did Tuesday.
The headline on the press release from the University System of Georgia, which oversees the state’s public research universities and four- and two-year colleges, read: “Regents Approve Three Percent Tuition Increase for Fall 2011.” Three percent probably sounded pretty good to students and their parents, given that tuition has been rising much faster in recent years. It wasn’t until the 13th paragraph of the statement that one realized the overall increase, including a big increase in mandatory fees, comes out to 9 percent on average. It’s even higher for students at two-year colleges (who will see a 10.5 percent increase) or Georgia Tech (12.2 percent).
The difference between the headline and reality has been covered in other places. Here’s what’s equally alarming:
Created just two years ago, these “special institutional fees” have gone from zero to constituting anywhere from 9 percent to 15 percent of a student’s base-line cost of attending a public college in Georgia (i.e., not counting room and board). The 45,000 students attending college on the now-closed Guaranteed Tuition Plan have gone from owing nothing, beyond what their parents paid into the plan during their childhood, to facing a bill of $200 to $550 per semester.
Fifteen months ago, the regents adopted a sufficiently vague “statement on the philosophy behind student fees: ’student fee revenues are to be used exclusively to support the institution’s mission to enrich the educational, institutional and cultural experience of students.’ ”
The press release from 15 months ago also included this explanation:
Mandatory fees are fees charged to all students at an institution and which cover the cost of specific services provided for students that are outside the academic programs covered by tuition. For example, such fees cover student activities, technology, intercollegiate athletics programs, healthcare, parking and transportation, and new facilities.
Never mind if you don’t participate in or attend “student activities” or “intercollegiate athletics programs,” or whether you have a car to park on campus. You’re going to pay the “fee” regardless.
At least the regents haven’t attempted to call them “user fees,” as state officials have done in other cases even if the amount of the “user fee” has little or no relation to the cost of providing a service to that user. But they surely know that students and parents tend to compare colleges on the headline cost of “tuition” — and that tacking on mandatory fees, rather than raising tuition by the same amount, makes Georgia’s college look better on that score than they deserve.
In that respect, they’ve followed the lead of other state officials very well.
– By Kyle Wingfield
54 comments Add your comment
Jon Rann
April 20th, 2011
3:59 pm
After 5 years of imposed austerity, our once nationally-admired & recognized University System is now falling apart. Great faculty are leaving in droves for better funded systems elsewhere in the USA. The state can’t honestly expect educated professionals to work for less & less salary each year indefinitely. (Our elected representatives certainly haven’t taken any pay cuts lately.) One can only work smarter not harder for so long. The USG needs *at least* COL raises to pace inflation NOW. Their insurance premiums are rising another 25%. Raising tuition is the only option to make up this shortfall, unless Deal & Co. care enough to refund the USG. And you know what? Not even smart students can, should or “have the right to” a college education. What’s wrong with learning a trade? My parents saved and scrimped for decades to send me to college. I worked through college also. Only an idiot would go hundreds of thousands of dollars into debt for a second rate degree from second string faculty.
Rafe Hollister
April 20th, 2011
4:19 pm
Kyle, it is not just Georgia students who get surprised by the fees added to their tuition. Since Emperor Michael Adams’ regime moved into Athens, the primary admission goal has been “diversity”. When the University was created it was to educate the sons and later the daughters of Georgia residents.
Now, you have a better chance of getting admitted if you are from another state, foreign country, or are in the US illegally.
So, all those taxes we Georgians pay to support these elites that teach and run the State University, do not guarantee admission for our qualified Georgia students, to the nations oldest state charter educational institute.
Georgia Voter
April 20th, 2011
4:26 pm
If I understood Jon Rann correctly, college is a privilege of the privileged—those who parents can afford to pay, or at least contribute. The rest of you…learn a trade…if you can scrape up the funds.
Seriously, it’s crazy to consider whether some other guy’s kid has a right to go to college. People truly seem to believe that we’re all independent beings that fend for ourselves—that what happens in one family doesn’t impact what happens in our family hundreds of miles away or even on the other side of the globe. That’s entirely false.
If fewer people get a good education, fewer people can join the middle class, fewer people can afford to pay taxes, fewer people can purchase from our businesses and employers’ businesses, fewer people can contribute to advances in providing for a basic everyday needs, more people take from society in the form of crime and social services, and ultimately, we all suffer and end up paying more on the back end.
For my family’s benefit, I want my neighbors’ kids and the kids of families living hundreds of miles away to get the best education and the most education they can muster. Again, we all benefit, and it’s extremely cost-effective for society to contribute to the cause.
carlosgvv
April 20th, 2011
5:14 pm
Dan
If you wish to refer to something, like projecting, it helps to know what that actually is and not just pick the word out of a book.