<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What part of &#8216;non-partisan&#8217; don&#8217;t Borders, Reed, state Dems get?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/11/02/what-part-of-non-partisan-dont-borders-reed-state-dems-get/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/11/02/what-part-of-non-partisan-dont-borders-reed-state-dems-get/</link>
	<description>Political commentary from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution&#039;s 30-something conservative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:04:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Repukes ALL Suck Eggs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/11/02/what-part-of-non-partisan-dont-borders-reed-state-dems-get/comment-page-1/#comment-2933</link>
		<dc:creator>Repukes ALL Suck Eggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=405#comment-2933</guid>
		<description>I am shocked that the ajc has chosen to sit out what may very well be the most important election in Atlanta over the last 40 odd years.  Why?  The AJC has refused to cover with their own reporters the corruption trial of the Mayor of Birmingham, despite the obvious similarities to the Atlanta water and sewer situation, instead downplaying Associated Press articles concerning the trial on the back pages. Why?  What is the ajc afraid of that they refuse to do their self identified job of keeping government honest?  We already have one recent two term Mayor of Atlanta on parole from Federal prison for corruption, a Mayor who tried to get Atlanta into the same mess as Birmingham with Sewer and Water bonds, and the corruption of kickbacks and bribes among his cronies.  The so call guardian of our freedom has been reduced to running TV ads for the Sunday paper hyping all the coupons contain within to save the readers multiples of the cost of the paper!  Worthless and pathetic in my opinion.  The AJC is even being scooped by the New York papers and CNN,  in their own back yard, on the election.  The airport is the biggest cess pool of corruption I have seen in the state of Georgia, yet nothing is written in the ajc about that corruption.  Most of us outside the beltway are ready, willing, and able to support a new international airport in Chattanooga, denying ALL of our business to the criminal city and its corrupt airport.  We will never pay one red cent to bail out the thieves in the crooked city of Atlanta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am shocked that the ajc has chosen to sit out what may very well be the most important election in Atlanta over the last 40 odd years.  Why?  The AJC has refused to cover with their own reporters the corruption trial of the Mayor of Birmingham, despite the obvious similarities to the Atlanta water and sewer situation, instead downplaying Associated Press articles concerning the trial on the back pages. Why?  What is the ajc afraid of that they refuse to do their self identified job of keeping government honest?  We already have one recent two term Mayor of Atlanta on parole from Federal prison for corruption, a Mayor who tried to get Atlanta into the same mess as Birmingham with Sewer and Water bonds, and the corruption of kickbacks and bribes among his cronies.  The so call guardian of our freedom has been reduced to running TV ads for the Sunday paper hyping all the coupons contain within to save the readers multiples of the cost of the paper!  Worthless and pathetic in my opinion.  The AJC is even being scooped by the New York papers and CNN,  in their own back yard, on the election.  The airport is the biggest cess pool of corruption I have seen in the state of Georgia, yet nothing is written in the ajc about that corruption.  Most of us outside the beltway are ready, willing, and able to support a new international airport in Chattanooga, denying ALL of our business to the criminal city and its corrupt airport.  We will never pay one red cent to bail out the thieves in the crooked city of Atlanta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJC Columnist Asks What Part Of &#8220;Non-Partisan&#8221; Doesn&#8217;t Jane Kidd Get &#187; Blog for Georgia - A Fair &#38; Balanced Look At Georgia Politics</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/11/02/what-part-of-non-partisan-dont-borders-reed-state-dems-get/comment-page-1/#comment-2927</link>
		<dc:creator>AJC Columnist Asks What Part Of &#8220;Non-Partisan&#8221; Doesn&#8217;t Jane Kidd Get &#187; Blog for Georgia - A Fair &#38; Balanced Look At Georgia Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=405#comment-2927</guid>
		<description>[...] Kyle (2009-11-2). What part of ‘non-partisan’ don’t Borders, Reed, state Dems get?. Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kyle (2009-11-2). What part of ‘non-partisan’ don’t Borders, Reed, state Dems get?. Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norman ravitch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/11/02/what-part-of-non-partisan-dont-borders-reed-state-dems-get/comment-page-1/#comment-2926</link>
		<dc:creator>norman ravitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=405#comment-2926</guid>
		<description>Do I mean what I just wrote?  You bet your swinging booty!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I mean what I just wrote?  You bet your swinging booty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norman ravitch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/11/02/what-part-of-non-partisan-dont-borders-reed-state-dems-get/comment-page-1/#comment-2925</link>
		<dc:creator>norman ravitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=405#comment-2925</guid>
		<description>In Atlanta party affiliation doesn&#039;t mean a thing.  What matters is race. We should consider repeal of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Atlanta party affiliation doesn&#8217;t mean a thing.  What matters is race. We should consider repeal of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Walker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/11/02/what-part-of-non-partisan-dont-borders-reed-state-dems-get/comment-page-1/#comment-2924</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=405#comment-2924</guid>
		<description>I have been on the state Democratic committee since the winter of 2004 and to my knowledge, the state Democratic Party chairman has never overstepped their bounds to this magnitude.

The highest authority of the Georgia Democratic Party is the state Democratic committee.

The state Democratic committee last met on Saturday, October 3, 2009.

At that meeting, the state Democratic committee elected a new Secretary; adopted the Party platform; and discussed amending the Charter &amp; Bylaws.

At no time did the state Democratic committee authorize or approve any of the anti-Norwood mail pieces.

While I cannot speak for any other state Democratic committee members, I believe what Jane Kidd has done constitutes an intentional misrepresentation of the positions and/or policies of the Georgia Democratic Party [Article II, section 8, paragraph two; Bylaws of the Democratic Party of Georgia].

The state Democratic committee has not taken a position on the nonpartisan Atlanta mayoral election. And for Jane Kidd to explicitly proclaim that, “As far as we [the Georgia Democratic Party] are concerned, Mary Norwood’s a Republican,” grossly misrepresents a position –or the lack thereof– of the state Democratic Party [Galloway, Jim (2009-10-28). &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/10/28/state-democrats-jump-into-atlanta-mayors-race-against-mary-norwood/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;State Democrats jump into Atlanta mayor’s race against Mary Norwood&lt;/a&gt;. Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved on 2009-11-1.].

I would say that Jane Kidd’s actions violated the Georgia Democratic Party’s charter &amp; bylaws, and that some sort of disciplinary action might need to be taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been on the state Democratic committee since the winter of 2004 and to my knowledge, the state Democratic Party chairman has never overstepped their bounds to this magnitude.</p>
<p>The highest authority of the Georgia Democratic Party is the state Democratic committee.</p>
<p>The state Democratic committee last met on Saturday, October 3, 2009.</p>
<p>At that meeting, the state Democratic committee elected a new Secretary; adopted the Party platform; and discussed amending the Charter &amp; Bylaws.</p>
<p>At no time did the state Democratic committee authorize or approve any of the anti-Norwood mail pieces.</p>
<p>While I cannot speak for any other state Democratic committee members, I believe what Jane Kidd has done constitutes an intentional misrepresentation of the positions and/or policies of the Georgia Democratic Party [Article II, section 8, paragraph two; Bylaws of the Democratic Party of Georgia].</p>
<p>The state Democratic committee has not taken a position on the nonpartisan Atlanta mayoral election. And for Jane Kidd to explicitly proclaim that, “As far as we [the Georgia Democratic Party] are concerned, Mary Norwood’s a Republican,” grossly misrepresents a position –or the lack thereof– of the state Democratic Party [Galloway, Jim (2009-10-28). <a href="http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/10/28/state-democrats-jump-into-atlanta-mayors-race-against-mary-norwood/" rel="nofollow">State Democrats jump into Atlanta mayor’s race against Mary Norwood</a>. Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved on 2009-11-1.].</p>
<p>I would say that Jane Kidd’s actions violated the Georgia Democratic Party’s charter &amp; bylaws, and that some sort of disciplinary action might need to be taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Ball</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/11/02/what-part-of-non-partisan-dont-borders-reed-state-dems-get/comment-page-1/#comment-2921</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=405#comment-2921</guid>
		<description>Yeah right. As if Republicans like Mitch Skandalakis, Newt Gingrich, Bob Barr, Matt Glavin (remember him?) and the Cobb County commissioners who refused to let an Olympic team from Africa train there ever cared about their relationship with Atlanta. Like the GOPers who have spent decades trying to take over MARTA and the airport, trying to convince the Braves and Falcons (BUT NOT THE HAWKS!) to move to Gwinnett County, denying funding for Atlanta projects etc. ever cared about their relationship with Atlanta. Like the GOP congressman who tried to shut down Georgia&#039;s black colleges cares about having a good relationship with Atlanta.

Look, the Georgia GOP built itself up over bashing Atlanta. And it was never about corruption, because the GOP (and the Democratic Party that conservatives like Perdue switched over to the GOP from in the 80s and 90s) were notorious for corruption. It wasn&#039;t about incompetence, because hey this is Georgia we are talking about. And it wasn&#039;t crime, because crime has always been a problem in Atlanta, and it is also a problem in Columbus, Macon, Savannah, Augusta, and even Albany.

Instead, it was resentment against the middle and upper class blacks: professionals, business owners, etc. And that was how people like Newt Gingrich built the Republican Party up from five or six guys to taking over the legislature. As a matter of fact, Gingrich kept running for Congress as a pro-civil rights moderate Republican and lost every time. It was only when he ran as a Jesse Helms/Strom Thurmond Dixiecrat and ran ads and sent out flyers linking his opponent to Andrew Young (a tactic that he learned from Helms) that he finally won. And the only reason why the Georgia GOP ever abandoned overt race-baiting was because a former Democrat who raises black foster kids (Perdue) is now running the party. The guy who Perdue beat, Bob Irvin, was cut from the same Rudy Giuliani/Frank Rizzo cloth.

And enough with the &quot;it&#039;s a nonpartisan election!&quot; nonsense. Georgia GOPers spent TONS of money backing their candidates in the nonpartisan Supreme Court races, and Jim Wooten supported it 100%, remember? Or have you forgotten how hard the Georgia GOP tried to get Leah Ward Sears off the bench? Granted, I supported the effort to get Sears removed, but it shows how hypocritical stuff like this is. 

Fact: Mary Norwood WILL NOT represent the interests of most Atlantans, but instead will represent the interests of suburbanites who detest most Atlantans.
Fact: the only reasons why Mary Norwood has a shot are A) because Bush and Perdue made a mess of the national and state economy and B) Shirley Franklin did a good enough job governing the city that white voters - including those from the suburbs - felt comfortable moving into the city.
Fact: a Mary Norwood administration, which again will be used as a springboard for Norwood&#039;s higher office aspirations, will cause many residents ignored by her administration to move not only to DeKalb, but to Gwinnett and Cobb counties seeking leadership that is actually responsive to their needs.

Get real, folks. The reason why the suburbanites support Norwood is because they are convinced that she is going to fire a ton of black city workers and make the city more hostile to black business owners. And since these are the people that Norwood will be courting when she runs for Senate or governor later on, that is precisely what she will do. OK ... so where will all these black folks that Norwood kicks off the city payroll or drives out of business go? That&#039;s right: to the suburbs to find work or reopen their businesses. 

Well, I hope that the people who hate Atlanta will get what they want: a mayor who hates Atlanta as much as they do, and will give the city the leadership that the white flight crowd wants Atlanta to have as opposed to the leadership that Atlanta actually needs. You know, people like Wingfield, who prioritizes laying off city employees over addressing the crime wave. Do you know how Rudy Giuliani dramatically lowered crime in New York? By hiring more police officers. Oh, and Giuliani didn&#039;t drastically reduce the size of the New York City workforce either. He only cut the departments that had the most black workers. The departments that had the most white workers, he actually expanded those AND increased spending on them. That was why he endorsed Mario Cuomo for governer ... he wanted more money from the state so he could keep buying the support of the Irish and Italian dominated unions with new jobs. More evidence that for the GOP, &quot;fiscal conservatism&quot; simply means firing black government employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah right. As if Republicans like Mitch Skandalakis, Newt Gingrich, Bob Barr, Matt Glavin (remember him?) and the Cobb County commissioners who refused to let an Olympic team from Africa train there ever cared about their relationship with Atlanta. Like the GOPers who have spent decades trying to take over MARTA and the airport, trying to convince the Braves and Falcons (BUT NOT THE HAWKS!) to move to Gwinnett County, denying funding for Atlanta projects etc. ever cared about their relationship with Atlanta. Like the GOP congressman who tried to shut down Georgia&#8217;s black colleges cares about having a good relationship with Atlanta.</p>
<p>Look, the Georgia GOP built itself up over bashing Atlanta. And it was never about corruption, because the GOP (and the Democratic Party that conservatives like Perdue switched over to the GOP from in the 80s and 90s) were notorious for corruption. It wasn&#8217;t about incompetence, because hey this is Georgia we are talking about. And it wasn&#8217;t crime, because crime has always been a problem in Atlanta, and it is also a problem in Columbus, Macon, Savannah, Augusta, and even Albany.</p>
<p>Instead, it was resentment against the middle and upper class blacks: professionals, business owners, etc. And that was how people like Newt Gingrich built the Republican Party up from five or six guys to taking over the legislature. As a matter of fact, Gingrich kept running for Congress as a pro-civil rights moderate Republican and lost every time. It was only when he ran as a Jesse Helms/Strom Thurmond Dixiecrat and ran ads and sent out flyers linking his opponent to Andrew Young (a tactic that he learned from Helms) that he finally won. And the only reason why the Georgia GOP ever abandoned overt race-baiting was because a former Democrat who raises black foster kids (Perdue) is now running the party. The guy who Perdue beat, Bob Irvin, was cut from the same Rudy Giuliani/Frank Rizzo cloth.</p>
<p>And enough with the &#8220;it&#8217;s a nonpartisan election!&#8221; nonsense. Georgia GOPers spent TONS of money backing their candidates in the nonpartisan Supreme Court races, and Jim Wooten supported it 100%, remember? Or have you forgotten how hard the Georgia GOP tried to get Leah Ward Sears off the bench? Granted, I supported the effort to get Sears removed, but it shows how hypocritical stuff like this is. </p>
<p>Fact: Mary Norwood WILL NOT represent the interests of most Atlantans, but instead will represent the interests of suburbanites who detest most Atlantans.<br />
Fact: the only reasons why Mary Norwood has a shot are A) because Bush and Perdue made a mess of the national and state economy and B) Shirley Franklin did a good enough job governing the city that white voters &#8211; including those from the suburbs &#8211; felt comfortable moving into the city.<br />
Fact: a Mary Norwood administration, which again will be used as a springboard for Norwood&#8217;s higher office aspirations, will cause many residents ignored by her administration to move not only to DeKalb, but to Gwinnett and Cobb counties seeking leadership that is actually responsive to their needs.</p>
<p>Get real, folks. The reason why the suburbanites support Norwood is because they are convinced that she is going to fire a ton of black city workers and make the city more hostile to black business owners. And since these are the people that Norwood will be courting when she runs for Senate or governor later on, that is precisely what she will do. OK &#8230; so where will all these black folks that Norwood kicks off the city payroll or drives out of business go? That&#8217;s right: to the suburbs to find work or reopen their businesses. </p>
<p>Well, I hope that the people who hate Atlanta will get what they want: a mayor who hates Atlanta as much as they do, and will give the city the leadership that the white flight crowd wants Atlanta to have as opposed to the leadership that Atlanta actually needs. You know, people like Wingfield, who prioritizes laying off city employees over addressing the crime wave. Do you know how Rudy Giuliani dramatically lowered crime in New York? By hiring more police officers. Oh, and Giuliani didn&#8217;t drastically reduce the size of the New York City workforce either. He only cut the departments that had the most black workers. The departments that had the most white workers, he actually expanded those AND increased spending on them. That was why he endorsed Mario Cuomo for governer &#8230; he wanted more money from the state so he could keep buying the support of the Irish and Italian dominated unions with new jobs. More evidence that for the GOP, &#8220;fiscal conservatism&#8221; simply means firing black government employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalling Kyle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/11/02/what-part-of-non-partisan-dont-borders-reed-state-dems-get/comment-page-1/#comment-2920</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalling Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=405#comment-2920</guid>
		<description>Kyle - you lost all credibility re Atlanta politics the moment you said Norwood should be elected Mayor.  Have you MET this woman?  Spent any time with her?  Seriously?  She is a nut and unintelligent.  A real winning combo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle &#8211; you lost all credibility re Atlanta politics the moment you said Norwood should be elected Mayor.  Have you MET this woman?  Spent any time with her?  Seriously?  She is a nut and unintelligent.  A real winning combo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/11/02/what-part-of-non-partisan-dont-borders-reed-state-dems-get/comment-page-1/#comment-2918</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=405#comment-2918</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t mind at all - so long as people are being truthful, which they don&#039;t seem to be

i don&#039;t get the whole concept of a political race being non-partisan - party affiliations give us an immediate idea of who&#039;s who without having to know their specific verbiage regarding every single issue

for instance - i&#039;m so far left, most democrats are too conservative in my book - so if i know a candidate is republican, i immediately, without a doubt, absolutely know that i don&#039;t want them in office</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t mind at all &#8211; so long as people are being truthful, which they don&#8217;t seem to be</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t get the whole concept of a political race being non-partisan &#8211; party affiliations give us an immediate idea of who&#8217;s who without having to know their specific verbiage regarding every single issue</p>
<p>for instance &#8211; i&#8217;m so far left, most democrats are too conservative in my book &#8211; so if i know a candidate is republican, i immediately, without a doubt, absolutely know that i don&#8217;t want them in office</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/11/02/what-part-of-non-partisan-dont-borders-reed-state-dems-get/comment-page-1/#comment-2917</link>
		<dc:creator>blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=405#comment-2917</guid>
		<description>Will your next blog be titled, &quot;What part of non-partisan doesn&#039;t Jim Wooten understand?&quot; Ask him to explain to you that this is a political contest, and in politics people pick sides.
Wooten (and conservatives across the country) has deliberately targeted state supreme court races — including Georgia&#039;s non-partisan judicial elections — so that activist Republican judges are placed on the bench instead of activist Democrat judges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will your next blog be titled, &#8220;What part of non-partisan doesn&#8217;t Jim Wooten understand?&#8221; Ask him to explain to you that this is a political contest, and in politics people pick sides.<br />
Wooten (and conservatives across the country) has deliberately targeted state supreme court races — including Georgia&#8217;s non-partisan judicial elections — so that activist Republican judges are placed on the bench instead of activist Democrat judges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daedalus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/11/02/what-part-of-non-partisan-dont-borders-reed-state-dems-get/comment-page-1/#comment-2916</link>
		<dc:creator>Daedalus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=405#comment-2916</guid>
		<description>Best to paraphrase Will Rogers here -- I don&#039;t belong to an organized political party, I&#039;m a (Georgia) Democrat (party member).  I&#039;m not actually a member of the DPG -- but you get the idea.  If the DPG thinks the next Mayor will have to go through them to get state-funding they need to cut down on the kool-aid.   Mostly because this is an election year and there is zero chance that the State GOP will do any &quot;favors&quot; for the City.  Such as let Atlanta keep more of the taxes generated here or let MARTA control its funds. The State GOP wouldn&#039;t even take a vote on a message to Obama congratulating him on being elected President.  So the notion that the next Mayor will get any help from the state, whether the DPG likes the Mayor or not, is a non-starter.  

Best we can hope is that the State Legislature doesn&#039;t screw up more than usual.  

As for the Shirley Franklin&#039;s robo-call about firehoses and attack dogs during the Fulton Commish race a few years ago -- that was dumb, dumb, dumb. The GOP will never forgive or forget on that one.  Just shows that she can be a petty person. 

I could support a Republican for Mayor of Atlanta -- but they&#039;d have to find a moderate Republican in Georgia, a rare species. But a Georgia Republican cannot admit to anything like moderation on social issues, tax policy, transit, etc.  We only get Wingnuts like Westmoreland and Broun -- and they don&#039;t have a chance ITP. 

Maybe Bloomberg will move to Atlanta and run.  I&#039;m sure the State GOP would get the bloody flux at the notion of Bloomberg using the word &quot;Republican&quot; -- but he&#039;d certainly fit into a truly non-partisan race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best to paraphrase Will Rogers here &#8212; I don&#8217;t belong to an organized political party, I&#8217;m a (Georgia) Democrat (party member).  I&#8217;m not actually a member of the DPG &#8212; but you get the idea.  If the DPG thinks the next Mayor will have to go through them to get state-funding they need to cut down on the kool-aid.   Mostly because this is an election year and there is zero chance that the State GOP will do any &#8220;favors&#8221; for the City.  Such as let Atlanta keep more of the taxes generated here or let MARTA control its funds. The State GOP wouldn&#8217;t even take a vote on a message to Obama congratulating him on being elected President.  So the notion that the next Mayor will get any help from the state, whether the DPG likes the Mayor or not, is a non-starter.  </p>
<p>Best we can hope is that the State Legislature doesn&#8217;t screw up more than usual.  </p>
<p>As for the Shirley Franklin&#8217;s robo-call about firehoses and attack dogs during the Fulton Commish race a few years ago &#8212; that was dumb, dumb, dumb. The GOP will never forgive or forget on that one.  Just shows that she can be a petty person. </p>
<p>I could support a Republican for Mayor of Atlanta &#8212; but they&#8217;d have to find a moderate Republican in Georgia, a rare species. But a Georgia Republican cannot admit to anything like moderation on social issues, tax policy, transit, etc.  We only get Wingnuts like Westmoreland and Broun &#8212; and they don&#8217;t have a chance ITP. </p>
<p>Maybe Bloomberg will move to Atlanta and run.  I&#8217;m sure the State GOP would get the bloody flux at the notion of Bloomberg using the word &#8220;Republican&#8221; &#8212; but he&#8217;d certainly fit into a truly non-partisan race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
