What part of ‘non-partisan’ don’t Borders, Reed, state Dems get?

Both parties are engaged in scorched Earth tactics, for which they blame the other side. Apparently, winning is the only goal. If you have to poison the well to win, well, they figure that’s OK.

• Link
• Report this comment

“Editor’s note: Given the impending Atlanta mayoral election, instant commenting has been closed for this post.”

WTF!

• Link
• Report this comment

Kyle,

I had a good laugh this morning. This is an ad being run by the RNC in New York State (re: the 23rd district), where the Conservative candidate is being embraced by the Republican party. The joke is, and what gave me a good laugh, is the absolute hypocrisy of the statement. It’s about trying to win an election and regaining power, period.

“The eyes of the nation are on the North Country,” the announcer says. “What we decide on Tuesday, will echo from Albany to Washington.”

“Whose side are you on?” the narrator continues. “The Pelosi/ Patterson tax and spend train wreck? Or do you believe in Republican conservative values, like thrift, personal responsibility, and family. Let’s tell the liberals, enough is enough. No more bailouts, taxes and budget busting spending. It’s time to create jobs, with proven conservative ideas like lower taxes. Let your voice be heard, join the movement to bring real conservative change. Tell the politicians, no more, we won’t let you bankrupt America.

“We need conservative leaders who stand up for our values. Fight Back! Vote conservative, it matters like never before.”

• Link
• Report this comment

I have seen the ads that say Norwood is a republican. I vote democrat more than republican, but it wouldn’t bother me one bit if the mayor of atlanta was a registered republican. It actually wouldn’t bother me if she was a member of any party. Political parties, whether they be Republican, Democrat, green, Libertarian, Communist, or whatever, are generally not concerned with local politics.

So, Norwood could subscribe to the political ideaology of Nazi-ism for all I care. What I want to know is, how are you going to make the city safe, attract business, effect transportation, fix the water system, and how are you going to pay for it.

• Link
• Report this comment

Best to paraphrase Will Rogers here — I don’t belong to an organized political party, I’m a (Georgia) Democrat (party member). I’m not actually a member of the DPG — but you get the idea. If the DPG thinks the next Mayor will have to go through them to get state-funding they need to cut down on the kool-aid. Mostly because this is an election year and there is zero chance that the State GOP will do any “favors” for the City. Such as let Atlanta keep more of the taxes generated here or let MARTA control its funds. The State GOP wouldn’t even take a vote on a message to Obama congratulating him on being elected President. So the notion that the next Mayor will get any help from the state, whether the DPG likes the Mayor or not, is a non-starter.

Best we can hope is that the State Legislature doesn’t screw up more than usual.

As for the Shirley Franklin’s robo-call about firehoses and attack dogs during the Fulton Commish race a few years ago — that was dumb, dumb, dumb. The GOP will never forgive or forget on that one. Just shows that she can be a petty person.

I could support a Republican for Mayor of Atlanta — but they’d have to find a moderate Republican in Georgia, a rare species. But a Georgia Republican cannot admit to anything like moderation on social issues, tax policy, transit, etc. We only get Wingnuts like Westmoreland and Broun — and they don’t have a chance ITP.

Maybe Bloomberg will move to Atlanta and run. I’m sure the State GOP would get the bloody flux at the notion of Bloomberg using the word “Republican” — but he’d certainly fit into a truly non-partisan race.

• Link
• Report this comment

i don’t mind at all – so long as people are being truthful, which they don’t seem to be

i don’t get the whole concept of a political race being non-partisan – party affiliations give us an immediate idea of who’s who without having to know their specific verbiage regarding every single issue

for instance – i’m so far left, most democrats are too conservative in my book – so if i know a candidate is republican, i immediately, without a doubt, absolutely know that i don’t want them in office

• Link
• Report this comment

Yeah right. As if Republicans like Mitch Skandalakis, Newt Gingrich, Bob Barr, Matt Glavin (remember him?) and the Cobb County commissioners who refused to let an Olympic team from Africa train there ever cared about their relationship with Atlanta. Like the GOPers who have spent decades trying to take over MARTA and the airport, trying to convince the Braves and Falcons (BUT NOT THE HAWKS!) to move to Gwinnett County, denying funding for Atlanta projects etc. ever cared about their relationship with Atlanta. Like the GOP congressman who tried to shut down Georgia’s black colleges cares about having a good relationship with Atlanta.

Look, the Georgia GOP built itself up over bashing Atlanta. And it was never about corruption, because the GOP (and the Democratic Party that conservatives like Perdue switched over to the GOP from in the 80s and 90s) were notorious for corruption. It wasn’t about incompetence, because hey this is Georgia we are talking about. And it wasn’t crime, because crime has always been a problem in Atlanta, and it is also a problem in Columbus, Macon, Savannah, Augusta, and even Albany.

Instead, it was resentment against the middle and upper class blacks: professionals, business owners, etc. And that was how people like Newt Gingrich built the Republican Party up from five or six guys to taking over the legislature. As a matter of fact, Gingrich kept running for Congress as a pro-civil rights moderate Republican and lost every time. It was only when he ran as a Jesse Helms/Strom Thurmond Dixiecrat and ran ads and sent out flyers linking his opponent to Andrew Young (a tactic that he learned from Helms) that he finally won. And the only reason why the Georgia GOP ever abandoned overt race-baiting was because a former Democrat who raises black foster kids (Perdue) is now running the party. The guy who Perdue beat, Bob Irvin, was cut from the same Rudy Giuliani/Frank Rizzo cloth.

And enough with the “it’s a nonpartisan election!” nonsense. Georgia GOPers spent TONS of money backing their candidates in the nonpartisan Supreme Court races, and Jim Wooten supported it 100%, remember? Or have you forgotten how hard the Georgia GOP tried to get Leah Ward Sears off the bench? Granted, I supported the effort to get Sears removed, but it shows how hypocritical stuff like this is.

Fact: Mary Norwood WILL NOT represent the interests of most Atlantans, but instead will represent the interests of suburbanites who detest most Atlantans.
Fact: the only reasons why Mary Norwood has a shot are A) because Bush and Perdue made a mess of the national and state economy and B) Shirley Franklin did a good enough job governing the city that white voters – including those from the suburbs – felt comfortable moving into the city.
Fact: a Mary Norwood administration, which again will be used as a springboard for Norwood’s higher office aspirations, will cause many residents ignored by her administration to move not only to DeKalb, but to Gwinnett and Cobb counties seeking leadership that is actually responsive to their needs.

Get real, folks. The reason why the suburbanites support Norwood is because they are convinced that she is going to fire a ton of black city workers and make the city more hostile to black business owners. And since these are the people that Norwood will be courting when she runs for Senate or governor later on, that is precisely what she will do. OK … so where will all these black folks that Norwood kicks off the city payroll or drives out of business go? That’s right: to the suburbs to find work or reopen their businesses.

Well, I hope that the people who hate Atlanta will get what they want: a mayor who hates Atlanta as much as they do, and will give the city the leadership that the white flight crowd wants Atlanta to have as opposed to the leadership that Atlanta actually needs. You know, people like Wingfield, who prioritizes laying off city employees over addressing the crime wave. Do you know how Rudy Giuliani dramatically lowered crime in New York? By hiring more police officers. Oh, and Giuliani didn’t drastically reduce the size of the New York City workforce either. He only cut the departments that had the most black workers. The departments that had the most white workers, he actually expanded those AND increased spending on them. That was why he endorsed Mario Cuomo for governer … he wanted more money from the state so he could keep buying the support of the Irish and Italian dominated unions with new jobs. More evidence that for the GOP, “fiscal conservatism” simply means firing black government employees.

• Link
• Report this comment

In Atlanta party affiliation doesn’t mean a thing. What matters is race. We should consider repeal of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution.

• Link
• Report this comment

[...] Kyle (2009-11-2). What part of ‘non-partisan’ don’t Borders, Reed, state Dems get?. Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved on [...]

• Link
• Report this comment