<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Night of the living public option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/10/27/night-of-the-living-public-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/10/27/night-of-the-living-public-option/</link>
	<description>Political commentary from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution&#039;s 30-something conservative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:04:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Public Awareness</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/10/27/night-of-the-living-public-option/comment-page-4/#comment-2984</link>
		<dc:creator>Public Awareness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=385#comment-2984</guid>
		<description>The opt-in plan is essentially how Canada did it.  Following the success of the first universal health care plan in one of the provinces, the federal government offered to pay half of the cost (in a block grant) to any province putting together a plan for universal health care.  Note that the federal government does not provide the plan itself, only the funding, leaving it up to the provinces to run their respective plans as they see fit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The opt-in plan is essentially how Canada did it.  Following the success of the first universal health care plan in one of the provinces, the federal government offered to pay half of the cost (in a block grant) to any province putting together a plan for universal health care.  Note that the federal government does not provide the plan itself, only the funding, leaving it up to the provinces to run their respective plans as they see fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/10/27/night-of-the-living-public-option/comment-page-4/#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=385#comment-2680</guid>
		<description>Saywhat, the reason we have private schools is because the government is inefficient &amp; ineffective in almost everything it does. Private schools are considered to be superior in quality of education. Only rich &amp; moderate-income people can afford them &amp; receive no tax rebates. Only 11% of our children attend them.

The post office &amp; the 3 carriers you mentioned are not in the same category. Since DHL, FedX &amp; UPS don&#039;t deliver our mail door to door, they are able to make a profit as global delivery companies. They are also more efficient &amp; effective than the PO. The PO doesn&#039;t even have its own aircraft. Although the PO has started to pick up packages, pickups are made only during normal mail delivery. Prior to that, customers had to wait in line at the PO. The delivery workers at the private companies are paid under an incentive program &amp; don&#039;t close their windows when it&#039;s time for a break. DHL stopped all their domestic shipments 1/09 &amp; laid off thousands of workers. 

If there is socialized health care, there will still be a few private health care workers since the legislature, unions &amp; federal employees will probably be exempt, allowing for the rich to also patronize them.

I think we should all care about our fellow Americans being able to keep their jobs. It&#039;s sad when anyone looses a job, worse when a business goes under &amp; devastating to our economy when almost an entire industry shuts down, especially when it&#039;s replaced with more govt. bureaucracy. Personally I believe in capitalism &amp; took an oath in my profession to preserve the free enterprise system.

PS The PO still uses typewriters &amp; ditto machines but thankfully gave up the horse &amp; buggies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saywhat, the reason we have private schools is because the government is inefficient &amp; ineffective in almost everything it does. Private schools are considered to be superior in quality of education. Only rich &amp; moderate-income people can afford them &amp; receive no tax rebates. Only 11% of our children attend them.</p>
<p>The post office &amp; the 3 carriers you mentioned are not in the same category. Since DHL, FedX &amp; UPS don&#8217;t deliver our mail door to door, they are able to make a profit as global delivery companies. They are also more efficient &amp; effective than the PO. The PO doesn&#8217;t even have its own aircraft. Although the PO has started to pick up packages, pickups are made only during normal mail delivery. Prior to that, customers had to wait in line at the PO. The delivery workers at the private companies are paid under an incentive program &amp; don&#8217;t close their windows when it&#8217;s time for a break. DHL stopped all their domestic shipments 1/09 &amp; laid off thousands of workers. </p>
<p>If there is socialized health care, there will still be a few private health care workers since the legislature, unions &amp; federal employees will probably be exempt, allowing for the rich to also patronize them.</p>
<p>I think we should all care about our fellow Americans being able to keep their jobs. It&#8217;s sad when anyone looses a job, worse when a business goes under &amp; devastating to our economy when almost an entire industry shuts down, especially when it&#8217;s replaced with more govt. bureaucracy. Personally I believe in capitalism &amp; took an oath in my profession to preserve the free enterprise system.</p>
<p>PS The PO still uses typewriters &amp; ditto machines but thankfully gave up the horse &amp; buggies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Road Scholar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/10/27/night-of-the-living-public-option/comment-page-4/#comment-2669</link>
		<dc:creator>Road Scholar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=385#comment-2669</guid>
		<description>Afraud: Wow, that hurt. Do you feel better now? Wow, a whole hour between posts! Ooops! Your verbal diareaha is back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Afraud: Wow, that hurt. Do you feel better now? Wow, a whole hour between posts! Ooops! Your verbal diareaha is back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Axelfraud</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/10/27/night-of-the-living-public-option/comment-page-4/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>David Axelfraud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=385#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>The Godfather speaks. VDH

All Falling Down . . .

Obama’s mega-borrowing is predicated on a rather thin margin of safety. We can service nearly $2 trillion in additional debt this year—on top the of the existing $11 trillion—only because interest rates are so low.

But as a veteran of the near usury of the 1970s and early 1980s, I see no reason why interest rates won’t shoot up to 10% once the economy recovers and the U.S. has to convince lenders to buy our paper in an inflationary spiral. In other words, we could fork out each year about $150-200 billion in interest costs on our annual red ink, in addition to paying annually another trillion dollars to service the existing debt. (We forget that many of us young people in the 1970s and 1980s simply never bought anything new due to high interest: my first new car was not purchased until 1989 when interest was only 7.2% on it; my parents bought a small condo in 1980 for the unbelievably low rate of 8.8%, due only to redevelopment incentives in a bad neighborhood of Fresno. Inflation will be back, even in this quite different age of globalized competition and low wages.)

When Obama talks of a trillion here for health care, a trillion there for cap-and-trade, it has a chilling effect. Does he include the cost of interest? Where will the money came from? Who will pay the interest? Has he ever experienced the wages of such borrowing in his own life? Did he cut-back and save for his college or law school tuition, with part-time jobs? Did he ever run a business and see how hard it was to be $200 ahead at day’s end?

http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/allfallingdown/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Godfather speaks. VDH</p>
<p>All Falling Down . . .</p>
<p>Obama’s mega-borrowing is predicated on a rather thin margin of safety. We can service nearly $2 trillion in additional debt this year—on top the of the existing $11 trillion—only because interest rates are so low.</p>
<p>But as a veteran of the near usury of the 1970s and early 1980s, I see no reason why interest rates won’t shoot up to 10% once the economy recovers and the U.S. has to convince lenders to buy our paper in an inflationary spiral. In other words, we could fork out each year about $150-200 billion in interest costs on our annual red ink, in addition to paying annually another trillion dollars to service the existing debt. (We forget that many of us young people in the 1970s and 1980s simply never bought anything new due to high interest: my first new car was not purchased until 1989 when interest was only 7.2% on it; my parents bought a small condo in 1980 for the unbelievably low rate of 8.8%, due only to redevelopment incentives in a bad neighborhood of Fresno. Inflation will be back, even in this quite different age of globalized competition and low wages.)</p>
<p>When Obama talks of a trillion here for health care, a trillion there for cap-and-trade, it has a chilling effect. Does he include the cost of interest? Where will the money came from? Who will pay the interest? Has he ever experienced the wages of such borrowing in his own life? Did he cut-back and save for his college or law school tuition, with part-time jobs? Did he ever run a business and see how hard it was to be $200 ahead at day’s end?</p>
<p><a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/allfallingdown/" rel="nofollow">http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/allfallingdown/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Axelfraud</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/10/27/night-of-the-living-public-option/comment-page-4/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>David Axelfraud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=385#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>Road Scholar, meth? I&#039;m not a trailer trash baby like you and Stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Road Scholar, meth? I&#8217;m not a trailer trash baby like you and Stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayn Rand Was Right</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/10/27/night-of-the-living-public-option/comment-page-4/#comment-2666</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayn Rand Was Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=385#comment-2666</guid>
		<description>And yes, saywhat? Medicare does...they don&#039;t rescind the patient from care, they simply rescind the payments to the providers.  In a big city, no problem for some time, in a small town...BIG PROBLEM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes, saywhat? Medicare does&#8230;they don&#8217;t rescind the patient from care, they simply rescind the payments to the providers.  In a big city, no problem for some time, in a small town&#8230;BIG PROBLEM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayn Rand Was Right</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/10/27/night-of-the-living-public-option/comment-page-4/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayn Rand Was Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=385#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>Good point saywhat?  however, with private companies there is recourse via the BBB or the Insurance Commission.  Ask any doctor who has filed a complaint with their elected representatives against Medicare/Medicaid how that worked out for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point saywhat?  however, with private companies there is recourse via the BBB or the Insurance Commission.  Ask any doctor who has filed a complaint with their elected representatives against Medicare/Medicaid how that worked out for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saywhat?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/10/27/night-of-the-living-public-option/comment-page-4/#comment-2664</link>
		<dc:creator>saywhat?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=385#comment-2664</guid>
		<description>Ayn Rand was right wrote &quot;Users like free plans…providers do not. Medicare recipients on the whole really like their plans. Doctors do not. Why, you may ask. Because doctors on the whole are paid 40 cents on the dollar for Medicare filings. Not because Medicare does not provide a fair payment structure, but because they refuse to pay…regularly. If a doctor hires a consultant (read: former employee of The System), he or she may receive around 70 cents on the dollar.&quot;

but forgets to mention private insurance companies do the same thing, but more frequently and with less cause. Then, they rescind people from their rolls whom they determine might cost them more in benefits than they bring in premiums. Does Medicare do that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ayn Rand was right wrote &#8220;Users like free plans…providers do not. Medicare recipients on the whole really like their plans. Doctors do not. Why, you may ask. Because doctors on the whole are paid 40 cents on the dollar for Medicare filings. Not because Medicare does not provide a fair payment structure, but because they refuse to pay…regularly. If a doctor hires a consultant (read: former employee of The System), he or she may receive around 70 cents on the dollar.&#8221;</p>
<p>but forgets to mention private insurance companies do the same thing, but more frequently and with less cause. Then, they rescind people from their rolls whom they determine might cost them more in benefits than they bring in premiums. Does Medicare do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saywhat?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/10/27/night-of-the-living-public-option/comment-page-4/#comment-2663</link>
		<dc:creator>saywhat?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=385#comment-2663</guid>
		<description>Linda wrote &quot;There’s no way private health care co’s can compete with gov-run health care. Businesses can’t compete with govt., non-profits &amp; charities.&quot;
 Why is it then that despite free public education, there are thriving private schools throughout the country? Why is it that Federal Express, UPS, DHL, etc all exist despite the US Postal service? Most importantly, why do you care if private health insurance companies exist, if they prove to be obsolete or unable to compete? Are you shedding tears over the horse and buggie industry, the type writer industry, the companies that made ditto machines too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda wrote &#8220;There’s no way private health care co’s can compete with gov-run health care. Businesses can’t compete with govt., non-profits &amp; charities.&#8221;<br />
 Why is it then that despite free public education, there are thriving private schools throughout the country? Why is it that Federal Express, UPS, DHL, etc all exist despite the US Postal service? Most importantly, why do you care if private health insurance companies exist, if they prove to be obsolete or unable to compete? Are you shedding tears over the horse and buggie industry, the type writer industry, the companies that made ditto machines too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Road Scholar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/10/27/night-of-the-living-public-option/comment-page-4/#comment-2662</link>
		<dc:creator>Road Scholar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=385#comment-2662</guid>
		<description>Did Afraud run out of meth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Afraud run out of meth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
