<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F-22 still needed to secure skies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/07/15/f-22-still-needed-to-secure-skies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/07/15/f-22-still-needed-to-secure-skies/</link>
	<description>Political commentary from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution&#039;s 30-something conservative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:04:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: No Chinese rival for F-22? Think again &#124; Kyle Wingfield</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/2009/07/15/f-22-still-needed-to-secure-skies/comment-page-1/#comment-3822</link>
		<dc:creator>No Chinese rival for F-22? Think again &#124; Kyle Wingfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/kyle-wingfield/?p=18#comment-3822</guid>
		<description>[...] in July, when Congress was weighing whether to extend production of the F-22 Raptor, one of the frequent arguments against doing so was that top military brass didn&#8217;t even want [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in July, when Congress was weighing whether to extend production of the F-22 Raptor, one of the frequent arguments against doing so was that top military brass didn&#8217;t even want [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
