
Missouri's James Franklin will be facing a depleted Georgia secondary. (Associated Press)
The disciplinary action taken by Mark Richt against starting cornerback Sanders Commings suddenly has UGA fans viewing that early-season trip to Columbia, MO, in a different light. Along those lines, let’s dip into some of this week’s Junkyard Mail. …
Travis Gordon writes: With transfers, dismissals and little depth at cornerback, and also the suspension of Commings, should we be worried about Missouri’s air attack and DGB?
That SEC opener certainly is looking a lot more interesting than we first thought, isn’t it? In fact, it’s likely that it’ll wind up getting one of the conference’s Sept. 8 national television slots because of the high interest generated by it being Mizzou’s first SEC game, the possible playing debut of the nation’s No. 1 receiver prospect, Dorial Green-Beckham, and Georgia likely being a Top 10 team. The only other SEC games of national interest that week will be Washington at LSU and Florida at Texas A&M, one of which probably will get the other national spot. Anyway, yeah, the combination of Commings sitting out the game and Georgia being thin in the secondary will probably have Tigers QB James Franklin slinging the ball pretty frequently to T.J. Moe and Marcus Lucas, regardless of whether DGB makes it onto the field that early in the season. Fortunately, I don’t think Missouri’s defense is going to be anywhere near as tough as Georgia’s, so Aaron Murray is likely to do plenty of slinging on his own. And if the Dawgs also manage to get their running game on track, they should be able to give the Tigers the same sort of welcome to the SEC that South Carolina got in 1992. It’d sure be nice not to start out conference play 0-1 like the past two years!
Brett Miolen writes: What’s going on with our secondary? With the 2-game suspension of Sanders Commings and Nick Marshall and Chris Sanders being booted from the team, our DB situation is at DEFCON 4. What can we do to be ready for some of the passing offenses we will face this season? Should we move guys around or just try to use who we have? Either way it’s not a great situation.
I don’t think Buffalo, the season opener, will be much of a threat. Aside from the Missouri game, when Commings will be serving his suspension, Georgia will have one of the nation’s best starting secondaries, and as long as no one gets hurt it shouldn’t be a major problem. For Missouri, I imagine the Dawgs will make do with the supporting cast of Damian Swann, Marc Deas, Corey Moore, Quintavious Harrow and Devin Bowman, with incoming freshman Sheldon Dawson a longshot that early. I don’t really see the Georgia coaches using ace receiver Malcolm Mitchell on defense unless the situation gets really dire later in the season.
Jake Fleming writes: Why is it taking so long to extend Mark Richt and Todd Grantham’s contracts? Do you feel those contracts hurt us on this year’s recruiting?
Why is it taking so long? Lawyers. Last I saw, though, it was reported they were 98 percent there on the contracts, and the 2 percent still to be hammered out was minor stuff. What hurt in this season’s recruiting was all the Mark Richt “hot seat” talk early in the season. But UGA is on record as wanting both coaches to have contract extensions, so I doubt very much the recruiting situation for next year will be impacted at all.

Departing senior tight end Aron White majored in management/kinesiology. (University of Georgia)
C.A. Hopkins writes: Asking, because I don’t know: Is it possible to “major” in football? This is a serious question as the sport has evolved into a huge business. Not just the NFL, but all over the world. Billions of dollars in revenue. There needs to be classes on agents, finance, facilities, etc. The people that love the sport and are focused on that as a major part of their life should be able to get a focused education on making them professional, educated football graduates. It may sound silly, but years ago, being an Internet analyst was silly.
I don’t know about other schools, but UGA doesn’t have a football major, though there are sports-related majors, including exercise and sport science, athletic training, and sports management (which is really aimed at preparing future coaches/administrators). The closest to a football major is probably what Isaiah Crowell and Alec Ogletree are taking: health and physical education. Otherwise, Georgia’s football players have a pretty diverse list of majors. The nonsports majors showing up most frequently appear to be journalism, psychology, speech communications, housing, and child and family development, but you also have players majoring in international affairs, business/management, anthropology, family financial planning, health promotion, finance, biology, pre-med, economics, athletic training, management information systems, agricultural engineering, risk management and insurance, marketing, real estate, biomedical engineering, sociology, agricultural and applied economics, agricultural and environmental sciences, education, history, consumer economics, criminal justice, recreation and leisure studies, forestry and natural resources, and theater. As for whether a true football major might develop in the future, I’d say that’ll probably only happen in the unlikely event that the NCAA OKs paying the players.
Andy Trundle writes: Other than a soft schedule and some quality players returning, what actually justifies our high preseason ranking in football? Of course, preseason rankings are somewhat bogus, but how high do you honestly feel we should be ranked before play even starts?
The combination of a relatively soft schedule and quite a few quality players returning is as good a reason for a high preseason ranking as any. It all comes down to execution, of course, but I think the 2012 Dogs are easily a Top 15 team and if they play up to their full potential should manage to keep the Top 10 ranking that they’re likely to start out with.
Travis Hill writes: Special teams … I have no clue what or how this is going to change. Since Warren Belin left for the NFL we have had a drop-off for sure. This has to be addressed. I am interested in what Richt will do … if anything? This is especially scary since we will have a freshman kicker and punter.
Richt hasn’t indicated what he’s going to do but he has indicated that special teams will be a priority, so I imagine we will see some sort of change. Whether he names a position coach to also serve as special teams coordinator or simply loads up the special teams with starters and devotes more time to preparing them in practice, you’re right that Georgia can’t afford to let the status quo continue in that very important aspect of the game.

Recruiting remains the biggest challenge for Mark Fox. (AJC file)
Garrett Kee writes: Hey Bill! Hope you’re doing well! Again, condolences to you family for the loss of your father. He seemed like a great man and a Bulldog till the end. I wanted to kind of change the subject around from the traditional football talk to the action on the hardwood. Since it is basketball season and getting close to March, wanted to get your opinion on our basketball team this year. Do you think Mark Fox is the man who can lead this program to something more then an afterthought when college football ends to something to occasionally to watch before spring practice starts? Let’s face it, Georgia is a football school and will always be one; it’s our bread and butter. Fox has done tremendous things since he has gotten here. No doubt with the departures of [Travis] Leslie and [Trey] Thompkins, Fox was dealt a huge blow for this season, mainly no big threat in the inside. My question to you is do you think Fox can get this program to a point where every year an NCAA tourney birth is expected and occasionally a Sweet 16 birth is not a bizarre thought? [Kentavious] Caldwell-Pope and [Nemanja] Djurisic look to be great building blocks for the future. With our facilities and the talent that is in the state of Georgia for basketball, I don’t see why we can’t be with the Floridas of the world who are successful at football and basketball. Disappointment [this week] with the 1-point loss to South Carolina off the huge weekend upset of Mississippi State. Hopefully they can regroup and finish strong. Go Dawgs!
Thanks. You’re right on the mark when it comes to my Dad. As for Georgia basketball, I really like Mark Fox. I think he’s a good game coach, and I think if he’s able to put together a team with more than just one or two quality players, Georgia can indeed become a regular in the NCAAs. But that’s the big question mark still looming over Fox — his ability to recruit at the level needed to move the program up into the top half of the conference. I think he’s still got a year or two to get it done before Greg McGarity starts to get impatient for more progress.
Finally, our Redcoat Band buddy Brett Johnson writes: Hey Bill, If you haven’t heard or seen the news about the Band Bowl, the UGA Redcoat Band dominated a team wearing white who all coincidentally participate in the Georgia Tech band 21-6. Fox 5 did a very fun piece.
Yes, I did see that, Brett. I don’t know what your major is, but if it’s not public relations you’re missing your calling. You did a great job of getting the word out and drumming up interest in the Band Bowl. Congratulations on yet another UGA victory over the guys from the NATS!
Got something on your mind concerning UGA athletics or a question for the Junkyard Blawg? Send it to junkyardblawg@gmail.com.
Find me on Facebook.
Follow me on Twitter.
— Bill King, Junkyard Blawg
174 comments Add your comment
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
10:55 am
The game that worries me the most is Georgia Tech….oh wait…nevermind….that game is getting boring to the Georgia Bulldog Nation!….on a SERIOUS NOTE, South Carolina in Columbia is our biggest threat IMO. But SC almost always sucks in the 2nd half of the season and we don’t play them first in the SEC for the first time in a while….that’s why the games are always good and close, because it’s the first SEC game, well this time it won’t be.
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
10:57 am
If our O-line plays well this season and dominates up front, we’ll win the SEC. No doubt about it. The 2012 season will rest upon how our O-line plays and outworks the opponent. My boy John Theus needs to bust his tail, Mark Beard you too buddy. GATA! and make us proud. If they can bust open holes for the RBs and give Murray time, we’ll be lethal on offense…and well….you already know how nasty our defense is….it should be a GREAT season to be a Dawg!
GO DAWGS!
SSIgator
February 17th, 2012
11:05 am
“Aaron Murray is likely to do plenty of slinging on his own”
Yeah, but therein lies the problem for UGA. Murray the Midget usually has no idea who is going to catch it, on offense or defense, when he throws it up for grabs.
zbulldawg
February 17th, 2012
11:06 am
You know if you look hard enough for something negative you will find it ! Let’s do a WHAT IF Sandres would have went to the NFL ? UGA would not have fallen apart !!!! Give the rest of the defense some credit ! And don’t forget about Chris Conley he is also a DB . Swann can hold his own He is a future starter for sure ! I know one or both of those dismissed will be back ! AS far as contracts for coaches YOU CRY when they didn’t have one now your’e crying when they do ! And before you wanted Richt fired ! UGA fans are so WISHY WASHY
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
11:08 am
@ SSI Gator AKA Social Security Income Gator, Don’t bash Murray when your QB Brantley couldn’t throw for more than 20 touchdowns in his career. You don’t throw for over 3,000 yards, break the UGA single season TD record, and become an All-SEC QB by not having an idea who your throwing the ball to.
Dap01
February 17th, 2012
11:09 am
We have a coach dedicated to defensive tackles, surely “defensive tackles” don’t influence a game as much a special teams. UGA’s special teams are very below average.
Do something CMR.
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
11:16 am
Oh and SSI Gator, I’d rather have a 6′1 QB who can barely see over his huge O-lineman and break records and become a successful QB, than have a 6′4 QB like Brantley who never makes a name for himself other than the guy that could never replace Tebow. You know what, people that bash Murray are actually giving him high praise. How does a 6′1, “midget” QB throw for over 3,000 yards and 35 touchdown passes in one season and become All-SEC?
Beats me
GTBob
February 17th, 2012
11:17 am
Missouri isn’t used to the SEC speed and strenght
Do SEC fans really think that if they say this over and over again then it will eventually become true?
Jacket99
February 17th, 2012
11:25 am
Saban has the advantage in Georgia do to the power of mass mailings.
http://footballrecruiting.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1332534
“When you control the mail, you control information.” – Newman
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
11:26 am
GTBob, it’s been proven. 5 straight national championships.
Jacket99
February 17th, 2012
11:26 am
Saban has the advantage in Georgia due to the power of mass mailings.
http://footballrecruiting.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1332534
“When you control the mail, you control information.” – Newman
—————————
due not do….derp
SSIgator
February 17th, 2012
11:29 am
“UGA doesn’t have a football major”
Yes they do. It is called National Signing Day and it just occured a few days ago.
GTBob
February 17th, 2012
11:32 am
GTBob, it’s been proven. 5 straight national championships.
Nah, proof would be showing that the 40 second times and weight training numbers of all SEC players are drastically higher then any other conference. Do you have those numbers?
SSIgator
February 17th, 2012
11:35 am
Rough Neck -
“I’d rather have a 6′1 QB who can barely see over his huge O-lineman and break records and become a successful QB”
Wouldn’t you like one of his attributes to also include beating a team with a winning record?
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
11:36 am
Don’t need those numbers @GTBob….all you need are winning totals. That’s the name of the game. I do have these numbers though…1-10…does that ring a bell?
SSIgator
February 17th, 2012
11:37 am
“Richt hasn’t indicated what he’s going to do”
That’s because he doesn’t know what to do. Otherwise he would have corrected the problem long before now.
GTBob
February 17th, 2012
11:39 am
Don’t need those numbers @GTBob….all you need are winning totals. That’s the name of the game
Winning doesn’t prove strength and speed advantages. Were the NY Giants the fastest and strongest team in the NFL this year?
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
11:39 am
@ SSI Gator, didn’t Auburn have a winning record, Georgia Tech, Florida? I know your a Tech fan dressed up as a Gator, who did Tech beat this season?
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
11:40 am
@ GTBoob, maybe they were…never know.
SSIgator
February 17th, 2012
11:41 am
“I think he’s still got a year or two to get it done before Greg McGarity starts to get impatient for more progress”
That’s easy to fix. Just downgrade the quality of opponents like they did in football and his winning percentage should go up.
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
11:42 am
But we’re not talking about the NY Giants…we’re talking the SEC which rules college football. Tech knows it, and so does everybody else. Howcome Tech seems to play so well against VT, Miami, Clemson, etc but get thrashed by UGA every year? And don’t let the close scores fool you, it wasn’t close, especially this past season…you guys were LUCKY to lose 31-17.
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
11:44 am
Remember that 51-7 thrashing UGA put on GT? I do….the closest Tech came to beating us was back in 2006 I believe when the score was 15-12…that’s the most nervous I’ve ever been in a UGA-GT game.
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
11:46 am
@ SSI Gator, I just found something out…did you know that YOUR GATORS were a grand total of 0-6 vs. winning teams this past season….hahahaha
SSIgator
February 17th, 2012
11:48 am
“Thin secondary has some UGA fans worrying about Mizzou”
Being thin is one thing UGA fans never have to worry about regarding the players. Moving those massive mountains of fat in an agile manner is quite another story though.
GTBob
February 17th, 2012
11:48 am
Howcome Tech seems to play so well against VT, Miami, Clemson, etc but get thrashed by UGA every year?
You think we play well against VT and Miami? Both of those teams dispose of us with little problem almost every year. We do have Clemsons number though. I guess it’s because we have so much more strength and speed then they do, right?
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
11:49 am
Here’s some numbers…the Gators were 113th nationally out of 120 teams in the turnover margin. Only forcing 14 turnovers all season and turning the ball over 26 times…that’s a little over twice a game….not good….
In the losses to Auburn, Georgia, and South Carolina, Florida was 1 for 7 in the redzone for scoring touchdowns.
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
11:52 am
@ GTBob, your in the same conference as they are so you should have the same amount of speed and strenght…it’s like this…the ACC is more powerful than the WAC, the SEC is more powerful than any other conference…we recruit, coach, play at a totally different level. THATS why we have more strength, and speed and better players. Our facilities are 2nd to none as well.
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
11:54 am
@ GTBoob, your right about not playing well vs. Miami and VT…let’s say Duke and Wake Forest…better?
GTBob
February 17th, 2012
11:55 am
@ GTBob, your in the same conference as they are so you should have the same amount of speed and strenght
Well, we don’t, and it’s not even close. Clemson dwarfs us in those areas. Do Alabama and Kentucky have the same amount of speed and strength?
PrimeTime
February 17th, 2012
11:58 am
Geez Bill!!! Do you know what is involved in Health and Physical Education degrees? It is the most difficult education degree to get. Health and PE majors follow a similar track as pre-med. Exercise and Sports Science are the same. I would be proud of Crowell and anyone else if they finished their degree requirements in Health and PE.
GTBob
February 17th, 2012
11:58 am
let’s say Duke and Wake Forest…better?
That would be more accurate but doesn’t exactly help your argument that the SEC has super human physical attributes.
Go DWAGS
February 17th, 2012
11:59 am
And you weren’t worried about Boise State last year either.
Albert
February 17th, 2012
12:00 pm
UGA will handle Missouri and Tech with ease this year.
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
12:02 pm
Didn’t say superhuman….but we are better. Case closed.
SSIgator
February 17th, 2012
12:02 pm
Rough Neck -
“Our facilities are 2nd to none as well”
So UGA finally got that indoor practice facility?
Nothing Could Be Finer
February 17th, 2012
12:04 pm
Ga needs to worry about that thin O-Line as well.
Mizzou Man
February 17th, 2012
12:11 pm
We are all terrified about playing Georgia. Franklin only looked so good because of the quality of our competition. We never had to face anything close to a SEC Defense and the heralded SEC speed except on a rare occasion.
Personally I wish we had gone to the acc. That is easily the most pathetic conference in college football. We would have been Champions our first year and dominated for years.
Texas Tough
February 17th, 2012
12:16 pm
Our team and fans are excited about joining the SEC. Everything we have seen about the florida lizards or turtles or whatever they are has A&M anticipating a beatdown on those losers. I can’t believe that those clueless wimps actually used to win a fair number of games.
Obviously Tebow was the best college QB of all time because he must have won games single handed. Also how ghey are those jorts those little sissies wear?
GTBob
February 17th, 2012
12:23 pm
Didn’t say superhuman….but we are better. Case closed.
Then prove that the SEC has more strength and speed. It should be as simple as as what I said earlier. Give me some numbers that show that these attributes of SEC teams are much higher then other teams. Also, how long does Missouri and Texas A&M have to wait before their SEC speed magically appears?
Rough Neck
February 17th, 2012
1:06 pm
@ GTBob when Mizzou and A & M start to recruit like the SEC does then that’s when they’ll develop the SEC speed and strength…until then they’ll be doormats.
harold
February 17th, 2012
1:24 pm
UGA HAS THE WEAKEST SCHEDULE IN UGA HISTORY NEXT YEAR. IF RICHT CAN’T GO 13-0 WITH THIS “PATSY SCHEDULE” IT IS TIME FOR RICHT TO GO!
GTBob
February 17th, 2012
1:30 pm
@ GTBob when Mizzou and A & M start to recruit like the SEC does then that’s when they’ll develop the SEC speed and strength
Ah, so its based on recruiting rankings. Only two SEC teams had classes in the top 10 this year. Does that mean the other 8 teams in the top 10 will have SEC speed or better?
anotherdawg
February 17th, 2012
1:32 pm
This blog seems very similar to the one last year where most UGA fans gave Boise State virtually no chance to win. After all, we had beat them badly a few years ago with a swarming defense and their qb’s worst game of his college career, and we were the mighty SEC. We would simply be too fast, too strong, etc. for their little finese team. Well, we got a rude awaking then, and if we take Missouri lightly, it can happen again. If you look at our history in the last decade, you will see a trend of the same stuff every year. First, we have the stupid suspensions, leaving us shorthanded at the beginning of the season. Consequently, we lose a pivotal game early on, and then we’re behind the eightball for the rest of the season. A few years ago, the early hiccups probably cost us at least a shot at a NC, and last year, we were very fortunate to get some help from others in winning the SEC. Don’t get me wrong, I’m die hard Ga. I like our team and our coaches, but I hate we have to play a team that put up 41 points in their bowl game, a team that will be playing at home, and a team that will be out to prove to the world that they belong in the SEC. It will be one of our toughest games.
JB
February 17th, 2012
3:09 pm
MO lost a fair amount of starters and, more importantly, they’ve never seen a D like they’ll see when we show up. As has been mentioned, our O aint that shabby either.
Bottom line, if we show up and play to our abilities, it aint remotely close.
Per usual, time will tell.
HBTD!!!
Bill Lee
February 17th, 2012
3:09 pm
I predict that, two weeks into football season, DAWGS will be 1 and 1 overall, and 0 and 1 in SEC.
JB
February 17th, 2012
3:11 pm
Anotheredawg, MO aint remotely close to BSU and this D is much better, and has far more of a clue, than did the one that played in game one, last season.
Again, if we come to play, it aint close.
HBTD!!!
bitter dawgs fan
February 17th, 2012
3:43 pm
a above average running game, allows for time control, or ball control, ensure’s your defence
Wet Willie...keep on smiling
February 17th, 2012
3:46 pm
UGA will not beat Mizzou nor is UGA a top 10 football team. As usual run that mouth until August and then you have to play…end of story.
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH
February 17th, 2012
4:18 pm
But..but..UGA will win the national championship. UGA fans said so.
Charlie Hayes
February 17th, 2012
4:27 pm
The secondary will not be an issue, so long as no one else gets suspended or injured off the field. Cross your fingers and hope that no scooter accidents occur!
With Commings out the starter will be Damian Swann. Swann has the makings of a shutdown corner and showed his raw talent last year on special teams and as a backup. Nick Marshall was a major hurt as far as depth goes for the 2012 team. However, with Smith/Commings at corner and Rambo/Williams at safety, this is a very solid, sure tackling secondary. Swann will be the nickel back position starter this year and will fill-in at boundary and short corner when Smith or Commings are hurt or suspended. Scott Laktos has got to be more comfortable now, even with Marshall gone, than he was last season.
With the pressure that the D-Line will put onto Mizzu it will take the pressure off the secondary a lot. Good DE’s and DT’s make DB’s look like NFL stars.
The 2012 Dawgs don’t have much to worry about in regards to the D. Its the inconsistent O and the O-Line that we need to be worried about. Murray might be good, but too many sacks and too much pressure throws his game into the toilet quickly. Worry about the O and the O-Line Dawg People, the D will be fine! Go Dawgs!