Revised 13-team SEC schedule shouldn’t endanger Georgia-Auburn rivalry

The revised SEC logo has 13 pennants. (SEC)

The revised SEC logo has 13 pennants. (SEC)

As MrSEC notes, you could easily get a headache trying to figure out how the SEC is going to make a 13-team schedule work next year, but from all indications that’s just what the league is going to be doing.

Georgia athletic director Greg McGarity told Bulldogs Blog “that’s the direction we’ve heard, is that we’re moving along with 13,” and with Texas A&M now officially in the conference the SEC even issued a photo of the rejiggered logo with 13 pennants.

Indications are that the SEC probably will be sticking with eight conference games until a 14th team is added at sometime in the future. That leaves seven teams in one division (most likely the West) and six in the other.

The problem with handling unbalanced divisions, as MrSEC explains, is that while normally a schedule with eight conference games includes five division opponents and three games against opponents from the other division, with 13 teams three teams in the larger division must play six division games (and just two non-division contests).

So the conference has to decide which previously scheduled West vs. East games won’t take place next year.

The assumption everyone appears to be working under is that all of the current “permanent” East-West rivalries, including Georgia-Auburn, Alabama-Tennessee and Florida-LSU, will be maintained.

“It’s critical that the Georgia-Auburn series stay intact in football,” McGarity told the Macon Telegraph last week. “I can’t imagine that being displaced or being discontinued. I think your traditional rivalries are always going to be there. Tennessee-Alabama, count on that.”

I hope he’s right. Of course, if Missouri winds up being the eventual 14th team in the league, it’s quite likely that Auburn will move over to the SEC East and the Georgia-Auburn rivalry won’t need protecting.

But until then any schedule changes that would interrupt the Deep South’s Oldest Rivalry need to be vetoed by Michael Adams and McGarity, if necessary.

Got a question for the Junkyard Blawg? Send it to junkyardblawg@gmail.com.

Find me on Facebook.

Follow me on Twitter.

287 comments Add your comment

DawginLex

September 27th, 2011
10:50 am

Go get Notre Dame I say.

That would be a trip

Fridawg

September 27th, 2011
10:52 am

Almost first…

Gordon

September 27th, 2011
10:59 am

When the SEC goes to 14 and if Auburn moves to the East, its true the Auburn/UGA rivalry will be protected, but what about Tennessee/Alabama? Alabama’s permanent opponent will be Auburn. Or will the SEC go back to 2 permanent opponents and a slower rotation of the non-permanent opponents?

It will also be interesting to see who UGA’s new permanent opponent(s) will be.

Logan Walker

September 27th, 2011
11:00 am

I really don’t like the idea of unbalanced divisions. It can’t be that difficult for the SEC to add a 14th member. I’m sure schools are salivating at the chance to join us.

bdawg

September 27th, 2011
11:03 am

The new structure will favor the East for a year or however long it takes to add the 14th

GT79

September 27th, 2011
11:04 am

Please invite Georgia Tech….we would love to be in the SEC and quiet all the talk about us playing in an inferior conference.

Jeremy

September 27th, 2011
11:04 am

Having divisions with 13 teams doesn’t work. If the SEC west only plays 2 out of division games with the east then the East will only have 7 games to play.

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
11:04 am

Wait a minute. I thought that the SEC would take A&M only if the Big 12 took UGA? I guess the Big 12 caught on to that slight of hand even though OK, OK State and the rest were licking their chops at that possibility. I guess UGA could try the Big East. They appear to be looking for some teams.

reebok

September 27th, 2011
11:05 am

I don’t think this SEC will get anyone from what’s left of the Big 12, which rules out Missouri, and now that the ACC has expanded to 14 teams and added a steep Penalty for Early Withdrawal of $20 MM, I don’t think any ACC team will jump…so who is going to be the SEC’s 14th team? Somebody from the ragged remnnants of the Big East?

Dawg Man

September 27th, 2011
11:05 am

This conference expansion is stupid—bring back the SouthWest Conference. I guess since TCU is a Big East, then Hawaii and New Mexico will wind up in the ACC

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
11:06 am

@Gordon

Auburn would simply exchange Georgia for Alabama as their permanent cross-division rival and Alabama would continue their permanent rivalry status with Tennessee. The only problem for Auburn and Alabama is that their game has historically been the final game on their regular season schedule. Since Alabama and Auburn would now have the opportunity to meet in the playoff game, that creates problems for keeping the Iron Bowl as the final game.

Dontsufferfools

September 27th, 2011
11:07 am

I bet the SEC has a 14th member before Christmas, even if they “settle” for West Virginia. 13 schools gonna’ cause a lot of scheduling stink. The longer they hold the announcement of the new schedule the more certain adding a 14th becomes.

DawginLex

September 27th, 2011
11:08 am

Mizzou is the odds on favorite

Clemson and FSU will get blocked by in-state SEC members

I wish Notre Dame would get asked first.

Then Oklahoma

Then Texas

16 team super conference

Alphare

September 27th, 2011
11:08 am

Is it possible SEC may query some member to voluntarily give up its membership? and compensate the member with $20million?

Vandy or Kentucky may take the bait. The only problem is where can they go if they relinquish their membership.

USCndaATL

September 27th, 2011
11:08 am

If they add Missouri as the 14th member, I think they would move Alabama and Auburn to the Eastern Division. That would preserve the Auburn/UGA, Alabama/UT and Iron Bowl rivalries.

LHM1509

September 27th, 2011
11:10 am

Can someone please explaint to me how Missouri is a better fit for the SEC than FSU, Clemson or even WVU or VT. All of which are either in or very close to the “South East”? I still don’t get that. I understand about TV ratings, but how many SEC East fans will travle to Texas, much less Missouri?

Richard

September 27th, 2011
11:11 am

I know this will go NO WHERE, but it can’t hurt to ask….if anyone out there knows how to, or who to convince, or who needs to talk to who……but Florida State needs to, has to, MUST leave the ACC. As an FSU fan and alum, I am begging my SEC football brothers, fans, alumni groups, and SEC College Administrators…..please, please, please, please, please take us. Even Christ forgives sinners, can’t the SEC forgive us for making a HUGE mistake back in 1991? After my President voted to increase the buy out and THEN voted to add Pittsburgh School of the Deaf and Syracuse School of the Blind for our “SuperConference” (although I do not think of SUPER anything when I think of Pitt and Syracuse, except maybe SUPER cold in winter….and talk on the street is to bolster our SUPER Conference we will bring in the mega programs of UConn and Rutgers) SEC people, help a brother out. On behalf of FSU fans and alumni, our administration IS NOT LISTENING TO US….Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa…..Yeah I’m a Catholic too with LOTS of guilt!

DawginLex

September 27th, 2011
11:11 am

SSI

This will be my last direct comment to you so have someone read it to you.

Can you not discuss anything without taking a stupid classless shot at UGA?

I know you are only doing it to get under our skin so you and Pollyanna are now on my ever growing official IGNORE list.

I am asking you to not copy and past my comments anymore and respond to them. If you have any speck of class, you will agree to my request.

If not, then you confirm my opinion.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
11:11 am

@reebok

The $20 million exit fee is obviously an attempt to keep Clemson, VA Tech or FSU from bolting to the SEC, but it is not likely a steep enough penalty to have the desired effect. Adding more schools doesn’t magically convert the ACC into a football super-conference. The 14th SEC team will probably be one of those three.

DawginLex

September 27th, 2011
11:13 am

Likely candidates

Mizzou
Virginia Tech

Mizzou will likely get it because you can’t leave A&M as the only school that far west.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
11:14 am

@USCndaATL

That doesn’t work mathematically. Do you know how to count?

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
11:15 am

“I bet the SEC has a 14th member before Christmas, even if they ’settle’ for West Virginia.”

WVU is the wrong pick for a lot of reasons. A media market that’s smaller than Mississippi, academic credentials that are far weaker than any existing SEC member university, darn few other competitive sports programs, and no national fanbase.

Bottom line: WVU is the sort of program that will reduce each member institution’s share of SEC revenue because their 1/14 share will be larger than what they contribute in terms of added television revenue—-and that’s not going to happen on Mike Slive’s watch.

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
11:18 am

“Mizzou will likely get it because you can’t leave A&M as the only school that far west.”

If adding Texas A&M was a home run, adding Missouri would be a solid triple. Missouri would another solid overall athletic program, a middle third SEC football team, and the St. Louis and Kansas City media markets.

Question is, are the University of Missouri administrators and fans ready to make the jump?

Gordon

September 27th, 2011
11:18 am

PigIron,

Alabama and Auburn will be in different divisions, so how will they play during the regular season every year unless they are permanent opponents? And if Auburn is Alabama’s permanent opponent, how can Tennessee be? The only way is to go to 2 permanent opponents.

Historian

September 27th, 2011
11:18 am

Hey GT79 you may not have been following the game long enought to know that GTech was once in the SEC and withdrew in order to escape the superior competition.Something about”Auburn played too rough”.

Hounddogman

September 27th, 2011
11:18 am

The best move for UGA would be to add Ga. Tech. Already play them in everything and wouldn’t have to add another conference game.

Moron dawg fan

September 27th, 2011
11:18 am

As long as our academic program continues to be internationally recognized as the finest in the land, I’m happy either way. When a person has a degree from uga, it really says something about themselves!

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
11:19 am

@DawginLex

If Mizzou comes, then Auburn will move to the East Division. VA Tech is a much better fit.

Duh

September 27th, 2011
11:19 am

Pigiron, it would work if you moved Vandy to the west, where they belong.

coachx

September 27th, 2011
11:23 am

USCndaATL

September 27th, 2011
11:08 am
If they add Missouri as the 14th member, I think they would move Alabama and Auburn to the Eastern Division. That would preserve the Auburn/UGA, Alabama/UT and Iron Bowl rivalries.

Please learn basic Math
6 +2 -2 = 6
6 = 2 = 8

In other words…….if you add Mizz and A&M to the West and put Auburn and Alabama in the East you wind up with a 6 Team West Division and a 8 Team East Division.

Learn to add and get caught up with the rest of us.

Had It

September 27th, 2011
11:23 am

It’s ALL about $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

coachx

September 27th, 2011
11:23 am

Sorry for typo
6+2 = 8

Vandy in the West

September 27th, 2011
11:25 am

coachx, move vandy to the west, that makes it 7 and 7. Math is easy!!

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
11:25 am

Richard -

You have the Bowden clan to thank for that move. FSU was asked years ago to join, but Mr. Dadgumit wanted nothing to do with the SEC. Enjoy going to Pitt in November.

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
11:25 am

“Is it possible SEC may query some member to voluntarily give up its membership? and compensate the member with $20million?

“Vandy or Kentucky may take the bait. The only problem is where can they go if they relinquish their membership.”

Your suggestion demonstrates absolutely no knowledge of or respect for the shared history of the SEC whatsoever. You might as well suggest that we force Florida or Georgia to join the ACC. This is exactly the kind of one-school-as-overlord crap that Texas A&M joined the SEC to get away from.

Why is it that the SEC is as strong as it is? Because every program has an equal vote and gets an equal share. The SEC has no buy-out clause or exit fee because we don’t need one.

Question

September 27th, 2011
11:26 am

If there are 13 teams, with 7 in the west and 6 in the east, 4 east teams will play only 7 conference games. I say, lets play 2!!! UGA vs UF in Atlanta and Jacksonville in 2012!!

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
11:27 am

Don’t think the increased exit fee in the ACC is that big of a deal. It only increased $4 million (from $16 to $20 million). From what I read, the powers that be wanted to raise it to $34 million, but is was FSU that balked and they all settled on the new $20 million.
The big question is, if FSU is so happy in the ACC, then why balk at the increased exit fee?

Get the hate out!

September 27th, 2011
11:28 am

ssigator, I would like nothing more than to meet you in person. So I could kindly introduce myself. Think you could get permission from mommy and put the child porn down long enough?

LHarding Dawg

September 27th, 2011
11:28 am

Bill, if Auburn moves over to the east, who would be Georgia’s permanent lock in the west?

Birmingham Jacket

September 27th, 2011
11:28 am

Yippee!

New SEC shouldn’t change DAWG parties on the Peanut Farm!

LeftCoastDawg

September 27th, 2011
11:28 am

Go get Baylor, they’re the best of the rest. The rest doesn’t include Texas, OU, or OK St. Academically, Baylor offers more than the rest, as well. I’m sure they would love to piggy back on TX A&M into the SEC.

Tom

September 27th, 2011
11:29 am

I like the idea of adding Mizzou as the 14th team. Or to make 12 teams again, get rid of Arkansas.

Gordon

September 27th, 2011
11:29 am

I’m not sure Missouri even wants to come now that the Big 12 is holding together. The ACC’s move really changed Slive’s “16 teams in 15 minutes” scenario. I think the ACC members are holding out to see who the 15th and 16th teams there are. If they can land Notre Dame, Penn State will follow. If that happens I’m not sure FSU, GT, Clemson, or anyone would leave even if there were no exit fee.

The SEC should land a solid 14th team and stand pat. What about UCF?

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
11:29 am

DawginLex -

A little sensitive today are we? Cheer up. Whenever UGA wins another football game you will feel much better.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
11:29 am

@Gordon

You’re right. The most recent rule change wouldn’t allow Alabama and Auburn to continue their rivalry if Auburn moved to the East Division. I really don’t see the SEC adding Mizzou anyway. I suspect that they would prefer to add an additional Eastern school.

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
11:29 am

“I say, lets play 2!!! UGA vs UF in Atlanta and Jacksonville in 2012!!”

Works for me…..we could use the 2 “W’s”!!

Mike

September 27th, 2011
11:32 am

I would think that the best scenario is for everyone to treat Texas A&M as a rotational game. Stick them in the West, but that doesnt mean they will play all the West teams. Both the East and West teams will add the Aggies as one of their rotational opponents. It means the rotation will be stretched out and say UGA will not play LSU quite as often, but it preserves the current cross division rivalries. A&M’s conference record will count against the SEC West.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
11:32 am

@Gordon

Why should the ACC limit themselves to PSU and ND?

They should just purchase the Falcons. Then maybe they could actually compete in football.

GTfan

September 27th, 2011
11:33 am

Richard.
Pitt and Syracuse were brought in mainly for basketball. I dont understand why FSU would want to move to the SEC. They are a cosntant contender in there division for the ACC championship every year and in a BCS AQ conference. I dont understand why they would want to give that up to move to the SEC where the competition even harder to get through. It is easier to get to a BCS game in the ACC than in the SEC. Being in the SEC wont have the same effect on recruiting that it will with Texas A&M because Florida already has that argument. Texas A&M moving to the SEC was a must for the schools recruiting because of the Longhorn network. They needed something to offer that Texas didn’t have (playing in the SEC). FSU doesnt have much to gain and has alot to lose

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
11:33 am

For a 14th team, my preferene would be for Mizzou.
I want nothing to do with the couch-burners from West F#*&ing Virginia!

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
11:33 am

“Clemson and FSU will get blocked by in-state SEC members”

This is a myth, at least in regards to FSU. Florida was gun-ho to have FSU in the conference in 1990-1991. Having FSU in the SEC would require FSU to play opponents of equal caliber to those of Florida, and would simplify Florida’s football scheduling.

While adding FSU would not expand the SEC’s media footprint, it would add a major football program and a large national fanbase. It would also enhance the conference’s television revenue because it would another four or five national televised football games to the SEC’s line-up every fall.

Clemson, frankly, would add very little except the restoration of the 1980s rivalry with UGA.

Gordon

September 27th, 2011
11:33 am

@PigIron,

I think it would be the Alabama/Tennessee rivalry that would be in danger. I think a more likely scenario if Missouri were added would be that each team would have 2 permanent opponents in the other division. It wasn’t that long ago that UGA had both Auburn and Mississippi.

GeoffDawg

September 27th, 2011
11:34 am

Mizzou is the probably leading contender. Their board of curators is holding off approving this Big 12 tv rights scheme to handcuff the remaining members. I think we might hear something sooner than Slive’s indicated.

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
11:35 am

“Why should the ACC limit themselves to PSU and ND?

“They should just purchase the Falcons. Then maybe they could actually compete in football.”

That’s funny enough that it’s worth repeating.

How about.

September 27th, 2011
11:36 am

USF? A good team on the rise. Expand the league even further into FL. Everyone would enjoy going to Tampa for a road game too. (Not in MIZZU)

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
11:36 am

@Gordon

Auburn also had both Georgia and Florida. The 1 cross-division limit reflects a recent rule change.

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
11:37 am

Atlanta Gator,
I used to disagree about FSU, but I have come around to see it just as you posted above. It really would be in UF’s favor, since we already have to play them every year.

Maintaining tradition in SEC/college football?

September 27th, 2011
11:37 am

Are you kidding me??? Tradition is gone and everyone might as well embrace the new world of college football, driven by greed and TV (ESPN/FOX). TV will now dictate what teams play and at what time….

Dallas Dawg

September 27th, 2011
11:38 am

A $20 mil buy out is nothing if a new deal is negotiated with the addition of new television markets. The SEC was already big in the Texas market and TAMU didn’t bring much more than what the SEC already had. Based on numbers I have seen, I believe North Carolina is a bigger market than Kansas City, MO. Forget Missouri, and get a NC school. I do not believe UNC would move because of basketball and “academics”, but maybe NC State. I think NC State would jump at the chance to join the SEC. If not, then a VT or Miami (VT doesn’t bring the DC TV market, but it would be great to see if they can complete in the SEC). GT will never be invited, they had their chance.

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
11:39 am

“Revised 13-team SEC schedule shouldn’t endanger Georgia-Auburn rivalry”

No it shouldn’t. The only endangerment to that series is the Comedy Club that is currently the coaching staff at UGA. But then again, everyone needs a little comic relief from time to time.

The Ghost of Wally Butts

September 27th, 2011
11:42 am

The headline reads “13th Team will not endanger rivalries”….

…Hell, the current Dawgs won’t endanger any rivalries either…the only teams we’ve beat have been a middle school team from SC and a Division I Team that was manhandled by Vandy.

RAMBLE ON!!!

September 27th, 2011
11:44 am

Did I get banned?!?

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
11:45 am

FSU missed their chance in 1991. I wouldn’t want either FSU or Miami in the SEC today. Neither had any previous football history and both have gone downhill since joining the ACC. Maybe Va Tech or Clemson.

My $.02

September 27th, 2011
11:45 am

So in the wishful thinking catagory, MAYBE A&M IS JOINING THE CONFERENCE TO TAKE AUBURN’S PLACE WHEN THEY GET THE DEATH PENALTY??? Then it could stay an even 12 and all the problems are over.

Enjoy the FCS Auburn, or whever you end up!

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
11:47 am

“Did I get banned?!?”

We can only hope!

JDawg1785

September 27th, 2011
11:48 am

This expansion stuff is getting a little goofy. Since the league has to add someone now anyway, it should be a logical addition like FSU or Clemson. Huge “no” to Missouri and West Virginia.

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
11:48 am

“I used to disagree about FSU, but I have come around to see it just as you posted above. It really would be in UF’s favor, since we already have to play them every year.”

Smart Beast.

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
11:50 am

RAMBLE ON: “Did I get banned?!?”

A: Not yet. But there’s still time.

65dawg

September 27th, 2011
11:52 am

Hey Moron Dawg Fan, when you say ” A person has a degree from UGA” it should be followed by “it really says something about HIMSELF (singular, not plural)! So much for your “internationally recognized” degree!

TallyDawg

September 27th, 2011
11:53 am

In some of these scenarios of Alabama and Auburn moving to the East…Florida, Bama, Auburn, Georgia, and Tennessee..The East would be the Who’s Who of the SEC. Would be very unbalanced (team strength wise).

dawg rule

September 27th, 2011
11:55 am

hopefully, with the expansion, Ga can get an easier SEC schedule than they have now until they get good again. Playing auburn, florida and USC is too much.

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
11:56 am

“Huge “no” to Missouri and West Virginia.”

JDawg1785,
I agree on the couch burners, but why not Missouri? They have a pretty strong athletic department, add new TV markets and are a member of the AAU (which would be the 4th with Vandy, UF and now Texas A&M). What’s not to like?

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
11:57 am

@TallyDawg

Division of the traditional powers was certainly one of the criteria in determining the divisions back in 1991. I’m not sure that either A&M or Mizzou would be an adequate replacement for Auburn regarding team strength. It would be much simpler to add another school in the East.

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
11:58 am

dawg rule,
How’d you like to be UF and your permanent West opponent is LSU? Or UT who has to play Bama every year on top of UF, USC and UGA?

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
11:59 am

@Beast from the East

“What’s not to like?”

The football program and the fan-base (or lack thereof).

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
11:59 am

TallyDawg -

“In some of these scenarios of Alabama and Auburn moving to the East…Florida, Bama, Auburn, Georgia, and Tennessee..The East would be the Who’s Who of the SEC. Would be very unbalanced (team strength wise).”

Agreed. There would go any chance of UGA ever winning the SEC East title. Unless, of course, they actually hired a real coaching staff for football.

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
11:59 am

Well, actually, 65dawg, the larger error with Moron Dawg Fan’s statement is the illogical assertion that having a degree says something about himself/herself/theirself. Apart from Moron Dawg Fan’s tortured grammar and syntax, how can the act of having a degree speak for the person?

I wouldn’t sweat it too hard, though, big dog. I believe it was intended as a parody.

Prognosticator

September 27th, 2011
12:02 pm

Now that the Big 12 has stablized and the members have assigned their 2nd and 3rd Tier media rights to the conference, none of their current members will be going anywhere. The Big East as a football conference will dissolve, once UConn and Rugters move to the ACC. Notre Dame will remain independent in football and still play hoops in the Big East.
All that having been said, West Virginia will be the SEC’s 14th member.

JDawg1785

September 27th, 2011
12:02 pm

Beast, I guess I just don’t like the distance involved in a trip from a place like Gainesville or Athens to Columbia, MO. But, then again, I was opposed to Arky for the same reason back in the early 90s and that worked out OK.

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
12:05 pm

Atlanta Gator -

“how can the act of having a degree speak for the person”

At UGA, getting a degree means a trip to Walgreen’s and shopping for deodorant.

harold

September 27th, 2011
12:06 pm

AUBURN HAS A CHAMPIONSHIP COACH AND A CHAMPIONSHIP COACHING STAFF. UGA HAS NEITHER! BUT UGA CAN STILL “DREAM!”

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
12:07 pm

PigIron,
Fanbase? They have a 71,000 seat stadium which is larger than 4 current members (Ole Miss, MSU, Vandy and UK) and only 1,000 seat shy of Arky. Their football program is on par with half of the current SEC members.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
12:07 pm

Deodorant is futile in the Swamp — but at least it doesn’t smell like corndogs.

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
12:10 pm

Easy, SSI. Don’t get me involved in your shooting match our Dawg friends. I have to live with these Dawg folks as my friends, neighbors and clients. And you should show some respect, too; after all, UGA is the third-ranked institution academically in the SEC.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
12:10 pm

@Beast from the East

Sure. They’re on par with the bottom half… Maybe. What good is an “expanded television footprint” in a state in which the majority of the citizens aren’t even aware that they have a college football team?

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
12:11 pm

“Corndogs?”

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
12:12 pm

JDawg1785,
I see your point, but it’s only about a 2-2 1/2 hour plane ride. Besides, only about 7,000 fans of their opposing teams would be able to get tickets. I think they would be a great fit. It would also be the start of a new rivalry for Arkansas. Currently, I feel like LSU is their only “rivalry” game.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
12:12 pm

Never been to an LSU game?

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
12:15 pm

PigIron,
That would change quickly with Bama, LSU, UT, UGA, UF, Arkansas, etc coming to town. You don’t think that would generate some excitement?

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
12:16 pm

PigIron,
I’ve been to Baton Rouge several times. What’s your point?

LawDawg

September 27th, 2011
12:16 pm

SSiGaytor,

getting a degree from Flori-duh means wearing jorts with a blue and orange tank top while sporting the newest mullet hair-do.
BTW, deodorant is needed BADLY in Gainesville to rid the cheesy stench that is Flori-Duh!

TallyDawg

September 27th, 2011
12:17 pm

We are so stuck on this East-West thing. They can do some other sort of division. North-South, traditional-new, etc…Like PigIron said, I’m sure they will divide the divisions up evenly as possible with the traditional power teams while keeping rivlaries in tact.

reebok

September 27th, 2011
12:17 pm

Guys, I’m pretty sure now that the Big 12 (which has 9 members, but whatever) has rejiggered the way they distribute the TV $$, no one else will leave soon…if Texas and Oklahoma are staying, they will certainly be able to hold on to Missouri. In fact, the Big 12 has to decide who to lure in to get back to 10 members…I think they have to give back some of the TV $$ if they don’t. Nobody in the ACC is going to jump to the SEC at this point. So if the SEC wants to get to 12 teams, they may want to reconsider West Virginia.

reebok

September 27th, 2011
12:17 pm

Sorry…I am a moron…if the SEC wants to get to 14 teams, not 12.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
12:17 pm

I’ve spent a lot of time in Missouri. The people are great, but they don’t know or care anything about college football. They belong in the Big 12 — holding down the mediocre center of that conference.

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
12:18 pm

LawDawg -

As I told you before, on your next trip to Gainesville, stay out of the landfill. Or are you just homesick?

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
12:18 pm

Ah, I get it. I have been to an LSU home game, but by kickoff my sense of smell was pretty well overwhelmed by a raft of other smells and sensations . . . including fear for my physical safety.

onedawg

September 27th, 2011
12:19 pm

Auburn would not be moved over to the East. It’s my understanding there’s a “state stipulation” requiring that they remain in the same division as Alabama, fwiw.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
12:19 pm

Beast from the East
September 27th, 2011
12:16 pm

PigIron,
I’ve been to Baton Rouge several times. What’s your point?

It’s a joke man! Please don’t take everything that I say on a football blog seriously. ;-)

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
12:20 pm

PigIron,
I’ll take you word for it, since I’ve never had the need to visit Missouri. Who would you suggest as a 14th member?

JDawg1785

September 27th, 2011
12:21 pm

Good point on Arky, Beast. Although it would be a huge shame if they had to move Auburn to the East and cancel Bama/UT as a result. That’s always been one of my favorite rivalries in the SEC.

By the way, do WV fans really burn couches? Yikes!

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
12:21 pm

1. VA Tech
2. Clemson
3. ???

robodawg

September 27th, 2011
12:21 pm

Wish just one school had vetoed A&M. But since we got em, I think the 14th team needs to be added in the East. Then you keep one permanent cross-division rival and drop one of your rotating cross-division rivals and you’re done, and all the rivalries are protected.

The most vulnerable rivalries are Alabama’s. If we add Mizzou and Auburn slides to the East, then Bama has to maintain two rivalries on the east side — UT and Auburn. Either one will get chopped, or we’ll add a conference game and have two permanent cross-division rivals.

The SEC should not go to 9 conference games. If you add a conference game to everybody’s schedules, you make the nation’s toughest schedules even more grueling and you beat up your own teams more, making it harder to make the SEC champ a shoe in for the BCS. Plus, with 7 more league games, you absorb 7 more losses within the conference, endangering how many teams the SEC sends bowling every year.

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
12:22 pm

“getting a degree from Flori-duh means wearing jorts with a blue and orange tank top while sporting the newest mullet hair-do.”

Or a white polo shirt with Brooks Brothers khakis. Whatever. LOL

59bulldawg

September 27th, 2011
12:24 pm

@DawginLex: LSU and Arkansas are closer to A&M than Missouri . . . and Ole Miss and Miss State are probably not a great deal further than Missouri. So A&M wouldn’t be all alone if we didn’t offer Missouri. I wouldn’t be unhappy with Mizzou but had rather us take Va Tech, Clemson, or Florida State. Heck I might even take Southern Mississippi or East Carolina! LOL!. The trouble, I guess, with adding any of those first three is that we would be making the SEC schedule even more of a murder’s row. I don’t have an idea where we will find the 14th member but it makes more sense to add two next year instead of one then and another one later. Still I would love for it to be VA Tech! Just saying . . .

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
12:24 pm

@robodawg

I agree regarding 9 conference games. If we allow that, then the next push will be for 14 regular season games. Maybe I’m just a hopeless traditionalist, but I don’t want to see CFB morph into the NFL Lite.

EGM

September 27th, 2011
12:25 pm

UCF would a great addition to any conference, including the SEC!!!

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
12:26 pm

@EGM

Balderdash!

EGM

September 27th, 2011
12:27 pm

Pigeon? What do they not offer?

David in Louisiana

September 27th, 2011
12:27 pm

Something’s going to have to give. I can see 13 teams working poorly for a single season but after that the SEC may have to seek a team that doesn’t fit previous qualifications. It may have to be lower tier academically such as WV, or in our existing footprint, such as Fl St or Ga Tech. I think for what the SEC gains in Tx A&M they can be a little less selective in choosing #14. I also think they would prefer to add a team that doesn’t require shifting any teams from their existing division. I suspect the SEC will spend the next year lobbying hard for such as NC or Va Tech. That would be more ideal.

beebee

September 27th, 2011
12:27 pm

South Florida is a GREAT idea!

It would further help elevate that program.

NO to Missouri.

bee (also an Alabama fan)

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
12:28 pm

Atlanta Gator -

Sorry to hear about your troubles in Baton Rouge. We go every other year when UF plays there and have never had any problems at all. In fact, it is one of our favorite road trips. Sure beats going to Lexington.

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
12:29 pm

JDawg1785,
I offer proof. This is one of their fan’s websites.
http://www.wemustignitethiscouch.com/

Richt`s Hammer

September 27th, 2011
12:29 pm

I want to play Valdosta. We may lose but who cares, maybe I can get another dream team to lose 6 games a year.

Any of these schools b4 WVU

September 27th, 2011
12:31 pm

NC State
GA Tech
FSU
Wake Forest
USF
Tulane
UCF
ODU
GA State
Appalachain State
Univ of Memphis

Sam Robards, Dawg Fan

September 27th, 2011
12:32 pm

When we add a 14th team (I dunno who, I’d like OU or VT, but I’d settle on Mizzou, I guess) and move Auburn to the East, I want Texas A&M as the annual cross-division rival.

That’s really all I have to say on this matter.

Go Dawgs!

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
12:33 pm

“UCF would a great addition to any conference, including the SEC!!!”

“South Florida is a GREAT idea!”

I’m pretty sure that the University of Florida would quietly put the kibosh on both of those ideas before they ever came to a vote. Florida State has its own unique logic for SEC membership; Florida regional universities, not a chance.

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
12:33 pm

beebee,
Adding USF, UCF or any ther team from Central or South Florida would only create another monster to deal with in the SEC. The SEC already has the Florida television market. Let those schools build their programs like everyone else had to do….not off the coat-tails of others.

Loyal Door

September 27th, 2011
12:33 pm

Hay historian. Don’t let the facts get in the way of your stupid posts. Georgia Tech left the SEC because of issues related to scholarships and over signing. Auburn, “rough play” and “fear” had nothing to do with it. Hell, we already had 5 SEC titles compared to 4 for the dawgs when we left. Now my question for you is – which comes first being terminally stupid or being a dawg fan?

Sam Robards, Dawg Fan

September 27th, 2011
12:34 pm

Though if we add VT, the Auburn move won’t be necessary.

And if we add OU, I want OU as the cross-division rival.

Too many possibilities!!!

JDawg1785

September 27th, 2011
12:34 pm

Beast- funny, yet scary, stuff. Thanks for the laugh!

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
12:34 pm

Any of these schools b4 WVU -

UCF? Are you kidding? UGA doesn’t want any more of that action.

Sam Robards, Dawg Fan

September 27th, 2011
12:37 pm

And I’ve heard a couple different theories relating to why Tech left the SEC.

One says that they thought they could get more money as an independent.

Another said that Bobby Dodd got into a (figurative) pissing match with Bear Bryant and left the conference.

I think it’s probably a mix of all these factors. Either way, Tech burned their bridge to the SEC, as far as I’m concerned!

Go Dawgs!

JDawg1785

September 27th, 2011
12:37 pm

Beast, did you also see that according to their little survey on the website, 62% of WVU fans want to join the SEC? Definitely a scary thought!

truedawg

September 27th, 2011
12:42 pm

VT, or FSU in the East. And most wanted NC. We have to not jump and act without thought. VT or NC would make the most sense. NC would open more markets and help their football, as they help our basketball. This makes most sense. Go Dawgs!!!

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
12:43 pm

We could go for Lees-McRae in NC. They’ve been undefeated in football — since they stopped playing.

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
12:43 pm

“Sorry to hear about your troubles in Baton Rouge. We go every other year when UF plays there and have never had any problems at all. In fact, it is one of our favorite road trips. Sure beats going to Lexington.”

The “rowdiness” of the LSU crowd has a lot to do with whether it’s a day game or a night game in Death Valley. If the locals have been drinking for six to ten hours before game time, it can get a little ugly. In fairness, I saw a few home crowds like that at Florida Field in the 1980s before the administration clamped down on drinking and half-time trips to the Purple Porpoise in the ’90s.

Regarding football games in Lexington, just be happy when they don’t play the Florida-Kentucky game in November in Lexington. It can get d*mn cold there.

murfdawg

September 27th, 2011
12:46 pm

Go after Navy! Capture the Washington market now that MD got routed by The Battling Bill Cosbys. Navy may have a little trouble in basketball(height restrictions for cadets) but baseball is really good. No one can question the academics and it would be good to send a share of the SEC money for national defense. Bring on Navy!!!

LawDawg

September 27th, 2011
12:46 pm

SSiGaytor,

Isn’t Gainesville a big landfill? Can you say V-E-L-V-E-T-T-A ?

Loyaldoor,

Rough play had everything to do with it. Also, look at the SEC titles again. Seems the mighty Jackettes won 4 of those titles when they, unlike any other conference team, refused to send their players off to 2 wars that were going on. Bunch of losers!!!!

rational

September 27th, 2011
12:47 pm

If Missouri was really interested then they would have already begun the process. The only real option for the SEC is WVU. That is probably why they are staying at 13 for now. They are hoping something a little better will present itself.

Gordon

September 27th, 2011
12:48 pm

That’s right Lawdawg. GT is so powerful they can decide they don’t want their players to go to war.

Geez.

LawDawg

September 27th, 2011
12:49 pm

Uh Gordo, it wasn’t because of GT being “powerful”.

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
12:49 pm

JDawg1785,
I saw that. Just say NO to WVU!

gbal

September 27th, 2011
12:50 pm

On scheduleing, could go to 9 confrence games (6 divisional and keep 3 non divisional games) and go to 2 non confrence games from 3. UGA would be locked with the bugs and then only have one other non confrence.

If AU moved east, that takes care of the UGA/AU rivalry …. But then Bamer has a problem with AU&UT rivalry Couldnt keep them both unless they did 2 LOCK games.

UGA guy here and I love rivalries but may be best to give them up and to to a straight rotation outside division.

LawDawg

September 27th, 2011
12:50 pm

Gordo, when you have a chance, do some research on the matter….gotta go.

truedawg

September 27th, 2011
12:50 pm

The joke next to Coke. Never again will they be in the SEC.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
12:51 pm

@rational

The SEC is holding at 13 because they aren’t going to poach a school from another conference. If a school wants to join the SEC, then they’ll have to first make arrangements to abandon their current conference affiliation.

just a fan

September 27th, 2011
12:53 pm

I have 2 extra tickets to the game this weekend if someone is interested you can email me at
fantasynfl3100@yahoo.com

Atlanta Gator

September 27th, 2011
12:53 pm

“Rough play had everything to do with it. Also, look at the SEC titles again. Seems the mighty Jackettes won 4 of those titles when they, unlike any other conference team, refused to send their players off to 2 wars that were going on. Bunch of losers!!!!”

LawDawg, no Georgia fan should ever bring up those circumstances. Wally Butts owes the 1942 national championship and Frank Sinkwich’s Heisman Trophy to the fact that virtually the entire UGA team was exempt from the draft because they were enrolled in the UGA ROTC program and playing against other SEC teams depleted by early volunteers and the draft. The Gators played their 1942 schedule with a team of freshmen and a handful of 4F upperclassmen.

Glass houses, my friend.

Toss Sweep It Dadgummit!

September 27th, 2011
12:53 pm

So what are the chances that A&M coming in will give UGA a less challenging schedule by taking Bama off for next year?

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
12:54 pm

@gbal

I hope that we never see a 9 conference game schedule. Traditional rivalry games offer huge financial gains from television revenue. It’s not just about nostalgia.

47-40-2 vs Florida-61-39-5 vs Tech

September 27th, 2011
12:55 pm

Mark Dooley

September 27th, 2011
12:55 pm

Take your pick: Clemson, Florida State, Missouri, Louisville. Me? I’d go after Clemson; they’re a natural!

thwgt

September 27th, 2011
12:56 pm

I guess it’s official, the greatest conference in college athletics has been ruined. I don’t understand the logic in creating super conferences. All we end up with is a diluted bunch of nonsense. Common geographic characteristics and other similarities are the elements which make conferences compelling. Not “Media Market” motivated grabs which yield a bunch of nonsense similar to the path chosen by NASCAR, not that I’m a fan. Sad day for the SEC, or is it SEC with southwest influence, or will it be SEC with SW and Mid-West flair?

Gordon

September 27th, 2011
12:56 pm

Lawdawg,

My research has shown that UGA is still angry about being beat in ‘43 and ‘44 and say those games shouldn’t count. There is no way to know how they would have felt if they had won those games or why they played them if they didn’t think they should count.

It also showed that GT left the SEC because of the 140 rule.

really???

September 27th, 2011
12:59 pm

There are a few good articles floating around about NC State being the best fit for the SEC. It would get the Wolfpack out from under the UNC-Duke umbrella and it would give the SEC a foothold in North Carolina. I’d call that a win-win and no current teams have to switch divisions.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
12:59 pm

There is no relevant place for Georgia Tech in this discussion. It doesn’t really matter why they left the SEC. They aren’t coming back.

ATLER (RAMBLIN WRECK)

September 27th, 2011
1:01 pm

@Historian
Tech left the SEC because Bear Bryant had a dirty player that permanently put a Tech player out of football because of an illegal punch. Bryant wouldn’t discipline, plus the recruiting practices that the SEC wouldn’t correct. A couple of schools would over recruit so the other schools wouldn’t get them. When the school started they would then cut the player and the player couldn’t play for the other SEC schools. That’s why Tech left the SEC.

Nashville Dawg

September 27th, 2011
1:01 pm

I agreed with one of the post earlier that we can keep the tradition/rivalry of AU/UA, UGA/AU, UT/UA by moving the UA & AU to the East. They just need to get the 14th team to the West and I think it should be Mizzou.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
1:01 pm

@really???

North Carolina has nothing to offer in the way of football. The SEC doesn’t need to add a bottom feeder just to make a grab at a television market.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
1:03 pm

@Nashville Dawg

So… You can’t count either?

Buzzer

September 27th, 2011
1:09 pm

If the ACC is so inferior, why are all the posters on here intent on raiding the ACC for a 14th team?

New Moon Rising

September 27th, 2011
1:12 pm

Miss State 31, UGA 24

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
1:16 pm

“If the ACC is so inferior, why are all the posters on here intent on raiding the ACC for a 14th team?”

Buzzer,
Do you disagree that the ACC is inferior in football? They certianly aren’t in baseball, basketball or academics, but football pays the bills for all of the non-revenue sports.

AceDawg

September 27th, 2011
1:17 pm

Division One football needs a playoff system. That is more important than the division realignment discussions across the nation. New conferences will add a couple diverse matchups for a couple years, but then once new teams become a part of their conference identity, we’ll probably see less out of conference marquee matchups since conference schedules may be bigger or the quality of conference games increases slightly.

Gordon

September 27th, 2011
1:18 pm

How about this:

Add Missouri. Drop the divisions. Every team gets 3 permanent opponents. Those teams will not have all the same permanent opponents you do. For example, Georgia gets Florida, Tennessee, and Auburn. Florida gets Georgia, Auburn, and LSU. Auburn gets Alabama, Georgia, Florida. Etc.
You play the other 10 teams every other year.

This plan:

1) Preserves all the rivalries.
2) Keeps the conference schedule at 8 games.
3) Ensures every single team plays in every single stadium once every 4 years (it is 5 years now).
4) Ensures that every team plays every other team once every 2 years (it is twice in 5 years now).

Misty From Macon

September 27th, 2011
1:18 pm

Is it possible SEC may query some member to voluntarily give up its membership? and compensate the member with $20million? Vandy or Kentucky may take the bait.

You’re thinking as if the only game in town is FOOTBALL. Kentucky is a basketball powerhouse, Vandy consistently has a Women’s Basketball team that makes the Sweet 16 every year and has won a few SEC Championships.

Don’t be so quick to let these schools go all in the name of FOOTBALL. There are more sports on the agenda than that..

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
1:19 pm

AceDawg,
My hope is that once we do get to 4 16 team “super conferences”, then we will have some type of play-off format.

Misty From Macon

September 27th, 2011
1:19 pm

They certianly aren’t in baseball, basketball or academics, but football pays the bills for all of the non-revenue sports.

Dawg crap!

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
1:20 pm

Misty From Macon,
Then who foots the bill for all of those, if not the revenue from football?

Bo in NorthCarolina

September 27th, 2011
1:22 pm

What about Cincinnati? They took NC State to the woodshed and laid it on hard. Those who keep bringing up VT, forget it. The legislature of the Commonwealth of Va. has already put a stop to that. They will never allow it to happen

gbal

September 27th, 2011
1:32 pm

Gordon –
And do you suggest dropping the SEC championship game?

I like the idea but I just cant see that divisional champ to the championship game being dropped?? Guess you could do like the old days and have confrence records determine 1 & 2 and have them play in the SECC game/

SECInsider

September 27th, 2011
1:35 pm

I have been told in confidence that TCU will be the 14th team and that Auburn will slide to the east… The SEC wants a smaller school like Vandy in the west for balance, but they want a smaller school in good market like Dallas with good athletics… I like it!

TexasDawg

September 27th, 2011
1:42 pm

I welcome Texas A&M to the club for selfish reasons. As a Georgia Alumni in Houston, who married an Aggie, it will be nice to go up the road to Kyle Field to see Georgia play every few years. The Aggie fans are much more classy than the LSU fans. I much rather go to see my dawgs play in College Station than to travel to Baton Rogue and dealing with all the insanity there. Plus, just to have SEC football that close again is great, no matter who comes in to play.

Misty From Macon

September 27th, 2011
1:43 pm

Then who foots the bill for all of those, if not the revenue from football?

All revenue goes into a combined pot. However basketball with its tournaments that climaxes with the Final Four has a huge economic footprint for television, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), advertisers and the colleges that are part of the tournament.

Basketball tournaments are also important to the NCAA, the tournament brings in 90% of the organization’s revenues. Interest over recent decades in the “brackets” — a term used for the grids that separate the 65 teams in the tournament into 16 different groupings — and in the eventual winners has greatly increased the tournament’s economic impact.

Colleges get direct payments from the telecast based on a complicated formula that takes into account the school’s athletic conference, how many teams from that conference make it to the tournament and how far each advances. Sometimes, these payments are split evenly throughout the conference, allotted even to those teams that do not make the tournament. For example, Morgan State University, one of the lesser teams in the tournament, got $291,000 for appearing one year. The 12 schools in the Atlantic Coast Conference — which includes previous year’s winner, the University of North Carolina — evenly split a hefty $15,863,538.

Basketball has more games, more tournaments, and more television appearances (which brings the school money) than does Football.

Gordon

September 27th, 2011
1:43 pm

gbal,

The SECCG would be the two top teams (conference record). It is possible they would have already played, but that is possible now. What is good about this plan is that any student or player who goes through 4 years at UGA will see every team at Sanford stadium at least once (except Florida).

Scorekeeper

September 27th, 2011
1:47 pm

DawginLex -

A little sensitive today are we? Cheer up. Whenever UGA wins another football game you will feel much better.

That’s a pretty harsh response. UGA isn’t going to win many more games, not while Richt is in Athens.

Gordon

September 27th, 2011
1:48 pm

SECInsider,

Any idea on how the permanent opponents will work? Will the SEC go to 2 or does Alabama/Tennessee go away?

Half Century Dawg

September 27th, 2011
1:55 pm

SSIgator, Gainsville is a landfill

Gator Bob

September 27th, 2011
1:57 pm

No to FSU
Yes to VA Tech, GT or TCU

Misty From Macon

September 27th, 2011
2:00 pm

That’s a pretty harsh response. UGA isn’t going to win many more games, not while Richt is in Athens.

Way harsh! UGA still has to play Vandy, New Mexico State and Kentucky.

So What?

September 27th, 2011
2:05 pm

What about Central Florida? South Florida? Or Louisville?

GSO Dawg

September 27th, 2011
2:06 pm

@SSIgator

Tough day in the office today? You did not graduate from the University of Florida.

The reason why Missouri is the better fit than all the rest of the schools mentioned on this thread (especially FSU), is that it will open the television markets in St. Louis and Kansas City. These moves are strategic strictly for money in TV ratings. I don’t like the move any more than the next person…

Priester John

September 27th, 2011
2:07 pm

Add Rice University to the SEC West to balance Vandy in the SEC West.

Priester John

September 27th, 2011
2:09 pm

Vandy in the SEC East that’s SEC EAST! Sorry for the typo.

GeoffDawg

September 27th, 2011
2:10 pm

You were told in confidence SECInsider? Are you sure you know what “in confidence” means? Probably not sharing on a public blog.

Misty From Macon

September 27th, 2011
2:10 pm

Louisville is a great up and coming team, however their fan base is not that tried and true. I’m for West Va. OR Notre Dame. If we’re going to be on television, we have to have FANS to be in the stands.

gbal

September 27th, 2011
2:14 pm

Id really hate to see teams go to 2 permanant out of division games. That could say that a team NEVER plays a group of teams in the other division….NEVER >>>>> that is unless we went to 9 game SEC schedule – 6 Division and 3 non division and then 2 out of confrence games. If two of those are permanant the we play the other 5 non division teams once per 5 years. I dont care for that. I say some rivalries are going to have to be broken…. Hate to say it!. But as a UGA guy I would have a hard time choosing between giving up playing AU every year and never having the chance to play LSU, BAMA, Miss, Ark again.

GeoffDawg

September 27th, 2011
2:16 pm

WVU adds very little to the common SEC pie. They don’t justify divvying it up further. Louisville is what Louisville is. They consistently have decent, sometimes good teams and don’t particularly have a large following. Notre Dame isn’t going anywhere they would have to actually compete with quality teams on a week to week basis. If they were to actually join a conference, smart money would be on the ACC.

Gator Bob

September 27th, 2011
2:19 pm

Also welcome to Texas A&M!

really???

September 27th, 2011
2:20 pm

Actually, bringing in NC State would, from a media perspective, bring you the Charlotte metro area (about 500k to 700k population) and the Winston-Salem area (approx. 200k population), plus the rest of North Carolina and parts of Virginia.

From a sports perspective, you get NC State, not UNC. The Tar Heels are suffering under potential NCAA investigations at the moment. You also open up yet another state for recruiting.

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
2:21 pm

Misty from Macon,
I just heard recently that UNC makes more money from football than basketball. Can’t remember the exact source, but it was an alum of UNC on The Herd. Football pays the lion share of the bills in all big-time sports programs. Mabe not in the example you showed about Morgan State, but in all big time conferences.
If you think for one minute that 12 teams splitting $15,863,538 in revenue from the NCAA tournament will support all of the non-revunue sports, then I have a 2,900 sq ft home in Henry County I’ll sell you for that exact same price. FOOTBALL PAYS THE BILLS!

gbal

September 27th, 2011
2:23 pm

If AU shiftsed to the east, bama UT rivalry gets cut out as a permanant game. I see that as the only loss, but it just cant be avoided. Bamer has to keep the Iron Bowl!

GeoffDawg

September 27th, 2011
2:28 pm

Isn’t it the stated expansion preference of the SEC to admit state “flagship” universities? I guess you could quibble on what flagship means – A&M / Va Tech may or may not meet that definition but that’s definitely not TCU or NC St. Mizzou definitely would.

It’s likely coming down to Mizzou/Va Tech on the SEC wishlist. Everything else being equal, it costs $20 mil to get Va Tech and $0 to get Mizzou. Unless they decide to stay put, Missouri is the likely 14th member.

GeoffDawg

September 27th, 2011
2:31 pm

BTW – just read that the MU Board of Curators is likely meeting this Friday to vote on seeking SEC membership. Apparently, Mizzou fans have been lobbying them hard to leave the Big 12.

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
2:32 pm

GeoffDawg,
Hope you’re right. I think they would be the best choice at this point in time.

SCarolinaFan

September 27th, 2011
2:33 pm

I do not love the idea of Alabama and Auburn moving to the east with Vandy moving to the west if Mizzou is the 14th team. This appears to be the most likely scenario to protect the Iron Bowl and keep an 8 game conference schedule. 6 divisonal games with 2 rotating other divsion games. Playing a permanent other division team would go away until the SEC can see what a 9 game conference schedule will do to the 9 SEC bowl slots. I would much prefer to add a team to the east and NC State makes the most since to me. Dear NC State, would you like to ge out from the shadow of UNC? UNC is the Texas of the ACC. Imagine what 15K visiting fans from SC, GA, TN, and FL would do for your bottom line. Even UK travels for football. What would you rather see, NCSU vs Syracuse or NCSU vs Alabama? Imagine what having an SEC defense will do with your rivalry with UNC? Your recruiting will improve, your revenues would improve and you would have the money to improve your facilities to SEC standards. Yes, for the first 5-7 years, it may be painful, but look at what has happened to South Carolina since joining the SEC. South Carolina, once one step above Vandy and UK in football, has now played in the SEC championship game and is now competitive with every SEC football power. This could be you NC State so start saving your $$ to pay that $20m ACC exit fee, and when the invite comes write the check to the ACC with a smile on your face.

Gator Bob

September 27th, 2011
2:36 pm

Notre Dame should be B10 – after that, ACC.

I would like to keep some geographical integrity to the all of this.

That is why TCU makes great since for our brothers out in the SEC West – Arkansas, TX AM, LSU – not too bad of a trip to Dallas for baseball, soccer, swimming, etc.

GeoffDawg

September 27th, 2011
2:37 pm

SCarolinaFan, if you add 2 western teams, only 1 needs to move to the East for balance. If that’s Auburn, they’ll take Bama as their permanent rival, preserving the Iron Bowl and Georgia and Tennessee will split the two new entries. The only true sacrifice on the schedule would be the annual Bama-UT game. Unfortunate, but they gave up the Auburn-UF rivalry during the last expansion in ‘91.

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
2:48 pm

GSO Dawg -

And you think you know this to be true because . . .

octavian

September 27th, 2011
2:52 pm

The best move would be to add NCSU, assuming the Wolfpack could be persuaded. Of course, the Pack isn’t all that great in football but it has a great basketball tradition – and NCSU’s addition would give the SEC a wedge into the NC market, which is substantial.

USCndaATL

September 27th, 2011
2:56 pm

My bad, people. I forgot to mention that they would move Vanderbilt to the Western Division to keep all rivalries intact.

Are we cool now?

Cupcake City

September 27th, 2011
2:58 pm

Why does UGA hardly ever schedule LSU, Alabama, and Arkansas?

Never mind, the answer is obvious. They’d rather play cupcakes.

Gordon

September 27th, 2011
3:04 pm

If you move both Auburn and Alabama to the East, you should change the name of the SECCG to the LSU Invitational.

GeoffDawg

September 27th, 2011
3:05 pm

USCndaATL, if you did that, you can pretty much chalk up LSU winning the West every 2 out of 3 years. Going through the East will amount to a death march. Kentucky may never win a division game again.

Lausch P.

September 27th, 2011
3:05 pm

It doesn’t matter how the SEC divisions shake out. UGA will still be mired in the second tier, irrelevant and forgotten. That’s never going to change.

Tech=highSchoolOffense

September 27th, 2011
3:06 pm

listen retards, if Auburn moves to the East they would play UGA every year anyways like everybody else on our side….stupids….who cares about Tenn and Alabama

ASSESSOR

September 27th, 2011
3:06 pm

Maryland has been mentioned, but VA Tech makes the most sense.This would be the most balanced approach. Bammer and aubbie stay in the west and VA Tech in the east problems solved.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
3:11 pm

Didn’t take long for this discussion to devolve into inanity, did it?

Eye on the prize

September 27th, 2011
3:12 pm

Mississippi State 37, Georgia 24

Bye bye to Richt.

Nick

September 27th, 2011
3:18 pm

All this BS is exactly why it needs to be left alone.

really???

September 27th, 2011
3:20 pm

Cupcake City -
I’m assuming you’re trolling, but the SEC uses a rotation schedule for interdivisional games, with each team having a permanent cross-division rival. Therefore it would be foolish for them to schedule teams they’ll play every few years anyway.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
3:22 pm

Buzzer
September 27th, 2011
1:09 pm

If the ACC is so inferior, why are all the posters on here intent on raiding the ACC for a 14th team?

That’s not really the case. The SEC needs to add another school now that TAMU has joined the conference simply to maintain numerical balance in the divisions. In order to add a quality football program that is actually within the SE geographical region one has to consider the three ACC schools that have reasonably good football programs. Those are FSU, Clemson and VA Tech.

The only other options are WVU and Mizzou. Either of these schools would represent a mid-tier football program in the SEC, but both are at the extreme boundaries of the SEC’s geographic footprint. The best solution for the SEC would be to add one of the three ACC schools, but one of them will first have to leave the ACC. The SEC will not likely lower itself to poaching teams from another conference under the table, as did the ACC with Pitt and Syracuse.

Will

September 27th, 2011
3:23 pm

College football is starting to suck! I am now more interested in the NFL. I don’t think it’s just me as well. I have noticed several games this year on TV with lots of empty seats. The Ole Miss game last week was not even close to capacity.

Is the Miss St game sold out?

THE Dixie Redcoat Band

September 27th, 2011
3:24 pm

We can hardly wait to travel to Columbia and tailgate.

War Eagle

September 27th, 2011
3:25 pm

East
UGA
Tenn
FLA
kentucky
SC
Vandy
Clemson

West
Auburn
Alabama
LSU
Miss
Miss State
Ark
Tex A&M

Clemson has SEC atmosphere with stadium and campus, plus the minor sports will be easier travel and more competitive.
Replace Clemson with South Florida or Conn. in ACC

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
3:25 pm

@Will

Conference realignment is hardly the most significant problem on the Ole’ Miss radar.

Columbus

September 27th, 2011
3:30 pm

We are going to need 2 divisions OR the top 2 from each division go to conference playoff system. Its not like there isnt a month between the season and bowl games for the playoff teams to play one more game.

Its going to happen anyway. Its inevitable. All sports are doing it with wildcard playoff teams. You cant stop it might as well go ahead and do it now. It will lead to a national playoff system faster also and get the money from the BCS to the schools where it belongs.

As far as another team or 3, how about one or 2 that are mediocre half the time? I mean the league is more than tough enough. Like a North Carolina, East Carolina, Virginia, etc. Missouri would work too. I would certainly rather have them instead of Oklahoma.

War Eagle

September 27th, 2011
3:32 pm

East- UGA, TENN, SC Vandy Kentucky Fla Clemson

West Auburn Bama, Miss, Miss State LSU Ark. Tex A%M

Clemson has more SEC atmosphere, campus, stadium, plus other sports would have less travel and be competitve

Replace Clemson in ACC with South Florida or Conn.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
3:33 pm

@Columbus

Why not UAB? It’s inevitable anyway… Right?

ARdawg

September 27th, 2011
3:36 pm

Well, not much need to comment. The ajc blog nation has it all figured out

Buzzer

September 27th, 2011
3:37 pm

PigIron, my point is that it’s easy for the SEC folks to diss the ACC, but then these same folks see these terrible teams (VT, FSU, NC, NC State, Clemson, Maryland) as good possible 14th teams. You can’t have it both ways.

And Syracuse and Pitt came begging. If FSU came begging to the SEC, you don’t think it would take them?

Joe

September 27th, 2011
3:40 pm

SSIgator

Since you’re all about stats and history…Could you please answer the following questions:
1. Who has won more SEC titles UGA or UF?
2. Who leads the all time series UGA or UF?
3. Who has more Heismann winners UGA or UF?

Joe

September 27th, 2011
3:41 pm

maybe DawginLex can help SSIGator out…..since he is likely a coward and wont answer but will spew more sewage from his mouth….

Carl Gump

September 27th, 2011
3:46 pm

UGA
FLa
FSU
Clemson
GT
Tenn
UNC
NC State

Aub
Bama
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss St
A & M
Notre Dame
KY

Thar’s ya a 16 team super conference in football and basketball.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
3:49 pm

Buzzer,

It’s easy to diss the ACC because they just aren’t very good at football. That’s not an opinion. The numbers back it up. They have poached schools (mostly from the Big East) attempting to become a football power, but it has backfired every time. Both Miami and Florida State have gone downhill playing in the ACC. It might have looked like an easy path to a championship game, but playing against a lower level of competition only brings a good program down to the level of their competition over time.

There are only three schools in the ACC that would qualify for entry into the SEC, and they would be middle tier schools in the SEC at best. Pitt and Syracuse are currently members of the Big East. Texas A&M was no longer a member of the Big 12 when they were invited to join the SEC. You might not understand the difference, but it is significant.

Gator got SSIgator's tongue????????????

September 27th, 2011
3:50 pm

SSIgator

Since you’re all about stats and history…Could you please answer the following questions:
1. Who has won more SEC titles UGA or UF?
2. Who leads the all time series UGA or UF?
3. Who has more Heismann winners UGA or UF?

Can ANY Gator help your SSIgator??

September 27th, 2011
3:52 pm

Since you’re all about stats and history…Could you please answer the following questions:
1. Who has won more SEC titles UGA or UF?
2. Who leads the all time series UGA or UF?
3. Who has more Heismann winners UGA or UF?

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
3:52 pm

Joe -

Stats are for the Richtite KoolAid drinking gang. But since you brought it up, what will you refer to when UF overtakes UGA in the categories you mentioned? Oh, I know. Then it will be “moral victories” since that is what UGA is now reduced to taking comfort in.

BTW, DawginLex is going through that “male time of the month” right now so he is not in a good mood and doesn’t want to play. He should be better in about three days if he stays on his Midol tablets.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
3:52 pm

16 team super conferences are the wet dream of CFB losers. Only the ACC bought into such nonsensical rumors, which is ironic, because the whole “4 16-team super-conference” fantasy never included the ACC to begin with.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
3:56 pm

If you want to discuss historic SEC statistics, then everyone representing Georgia, Florida or (God forbid) Georgia Tech need to line up behind The University of Alabama and The University of Tennessee.

Sheesh…

Buzzer

September 27th, 2011
3:58 pm

PigIron, I would agree that the SEC is superior in football to all conferences no doubt. However, many of the ACC teams would be competitive in the SEC which is why they as being discussed as potential 14th teams. Whether they are middle tier or top tier, I would leave for experts like yourself to determine. The quality of fottball in the ACC is much better than most SEC fans want to give credit.

My point was the Syracuse and Pitt came BEGGING. The ACC did not poach them, as you previously stated. Whether the SEC poached Texas A&M, well I leave that to you to defend, lol.

Buzzer

September 27th, 2011
4:01 pm

And PigIron, unfortunately, like most in here, you are too wrapped up in your biases to fully apprecaite the nuances of the discussion.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
4:04 pm

Buzzer
September 27th, 2011
4:01 pm

And PigIron, unfortunately, like most in here, you are too wrapped up in your biases to fully apprecaite the nuances of the discussion.

That’s not the problem. I’m not sufficiently rude to explain the problem to you in great detail.

Buzzer

September 27th, 2011
4:05 pm

No, based on your posts, you clearly are.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
4:07 pm

Okay then, here you go. You’re an idiot.

QED

Buzzer

September 27th, 2011
4:08 pm

RawDawg

September 27th, 2011
4:08 pm

Regardless of who number 14 ends up being I cant see both ‘Bama and Auburn coming to the east. LSU and Arkansas would have a cake walk in the west every year, and the east would be brutal. Too unbalanced, traditional rivalries preserved or not.

Buzzer

September 27th, 2011
4:09 pm

Thank you for proving my point about the average SEC fan.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
4:09 pm

At least you’re happy. That’s something, isn’t it?

Buzzer

September 27th, 2011
4:10 pm

Well we can agree on that LOL

SSIgator??

September 27th, 2011
4:12 pm

SSIGator….can you just answer the questions? Geez…you spew your sewage but when someone call you out and ask legimate questions you cant answer??????? when UF passes uga? Ha! it took you 60 years to win the first one…….Dude….football did not start in 91 opps…my bad…..that is for everyone EXCEPT UF.

GeoffDawg

September 27th, 2011
4:13 pm

Buzzer, in case you haven’t been paying attention the last few weeks, competitiveness in football is a mitigating but not a driving factor in expansion. If it was, FSU would be the top target instead of a 2nd or 3rd tier choice. Revenues from market share are king which is why the 14th team will likely come from either the St. Louis/KC or the DC metro area.

For goodness’ sake, even Maryland and NC St. have been mentioned and not even their Head Coaches’ wives would claim they could be competitive with an SEC schedule.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
4:17 pm

For goodness’ sake, even Suwanee and Tulane can be “mentioned” on a football blog. That doesn’t mean that either of them will be joining the SEC anytime soon.

Football is not really important, but anyone who thinks that Maryland or NC are serious contenders in CFB has no business offering an opinion on this matter.

GeoffDawg

September 27th, 2011
4:30 pm

PigIron, the only schools that have concrete ties to expansion are Missouri (board meeting late this week) and West Virginia (already told “thanks for applying but your skill sets don’t match our needs”). Everything thing else including Va Tech, FSU, Notre Dame, Louisville, TCU, Maryland, NC St. and Clemson are all fevered blog rumors.

PigIron

September 27th, 2011
5:01 pm

@GeoffDawg

No disagreement there. There are plenty of rumors, including the ones regarding WVU and Missouri. My only point is that these rumors have no substance. When the conference makes an official announcement, then I’ll be interested. Until such time… Not so much.

Alphare

September 27th, 2011
5:37 pm

SSIGator, let me help you out. Since gator football didn’t start until 1990. Here is the overall stats between FL and UGA:

1. Who has won more SEC titles UGA or UF?
Answer: UF
2. Who leads the all time series UGA or UF?
Answer: UF
3. Who has more Heismann winners UGA or UF?
Answer: UF

dawg4ever

September 27th, 2011
6:04 pm

SSIGator, come back in two weeks after your powerhouse team has actually played a team with an SEC calibre defense and spew about how great Fatass Weiss and your head coach, OOPS, i mean your cheerleader without his pompoms, and your 2 all world midget running backs are. Florida will get their asses handed to them in the next 2 weeks, and then you will know what it feels like to play 2 top ten teams like UGA has. I doubt Florida will dominate one of the 2 teams like UGA did S.C., but we will see how great your gators are now that they actually play a decent team in the SEC. You pathetic gator fans that are beating your chests after beating Tenn, which may be the worst team in the SECE, will get a touch of reality about where your program is with your high school head coach in 2 weeks. Just one other note, your midget running back has the same stats after 4 games as UGA’s stud freshman. The only problem is that crowell has done this against 2 top ten teams, sorry, but the gators once again have no SEC calibre running back, and UGA as usual has one. See your make believe team and it’s coach in Nov.

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
6:22 pm

dawg4ever -

I don’t think I would compare BSU and SC to Alabama and LSU if I were you, but whatever floats your boat.

dawg4ever

September 27th, 2011
6:55 pm

Really brilliant one, BSU had the # 3 ranked defense last year, and S.C has as good a defense as either LSU or Bama. Last time i checked S.C. dominated Bama last year, and i think they dominated your mighty gators last year also. Keep dreaming, and keep bragging about beating Tenn. and Ky. And do everyone on this blog a big favor, big your big mouth on this site in 2 weeks, and bring your big mouth buddy beast from the east with you. Your big bubble will burst in the next 2 weeks, and the mighty gators will be looking at 4 or 5 losses. S.C. will beat the mighty gators in Columbia, and florida state will dominate the gators again this year, UGA will be a toss-up again between 2 wannabe programs.

WalDawg

September 27th, 2011
6:55 pm

You know, I feel a bit more ignorant now. Thanks Dawg Fans! Go Dawgs!

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
6:56 pm

“I doubt Florida will dominate one of the 2 teams like UGA did S.C”

Yeah, total domination. It’s a shame that doesn’t go in the win column.

Southern Man

September 27th, 2011
6:58 pm

If GT wants back in the SEC, it will get back in the SEC. Their program has more history and pagentry than most of the current SEC schools. GT-UT, GT-AU, GT-ALA, and GT-SC are great rival games.

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
6:58 pm

dawg4ever,
UGA and UF won’t be a toss-up. And it won;t be pretty, either.

Beast from the East

September 27th, 2011
7:00 pm

dawh4ever,
Since you live off of others success (Bama and LSU), I have a question. Did you put a nothch in your bedpost when one of your buddies scored with a girl while growing up or is this just a recent development?

Dawg48

September 27th, 2011
7:02 pm

I would love to see tech back in the sec! Want ever happen though

Dawg48

September 27th, 2011
7:10 pm

It would be nice to go to just 4,major conferences. Sec acc big 10 @ PAC 16. If 4 conferences had 16 teams each and a conference champion ship that way you would not loose the importance of the regular season. You have tradition with rivalries between acc & sec also big10 & PAC 10 with the rose bowl. Sec champ vs acc champ in the sugar or orange bowl and big 10vs pac10 in the rose then the winner of each play for the national championship. And get rid of the stupid bcs! That keeps tradition and gives you a simple play off and want take away from the regular season.

Southern Man

September 27th, 2011
7:11 pm

@Dawg48

I would also like to see them back…their attendance started to decline when schools like WF and VA starting to coming to town.

SSIgator

September 27th, 2011
7:13 pm

Beast from the East -

Two observations: First, I did not know you had a big mouth and second, I did not know we were buddies. I guess you learn something new every day. BTW, don’t irritate dawg4ever – he sounds really mean.

Dawg48

September 27th, 2011
7:14 pm

@ southern man…….. It would add to a already great rivalry and show the nation how big of a rivalry tech and ga are.

Flat Tire on I-95 in Jacksonville

September 27th, 2011
7:31 pm

I rather see West Virginia any day before Missouri

LakeDawg

September 27th, 2011
7:45 pm

Who cares. The SEC has become just a conglomoration of teams. Its only purpose to raise revenue. Now its just a league you have to win in order to play for the MNC. The SEC doesn’t care about tradition, why should UGA? I say play the easiest teams in the league. Vandy, Ole Mz., Kentucky, Miss St., A&M, SC, Ark., AU.

More Kool-Aid, anyone?

September 27th, 2011
8:08 pm

Since dawg homers seem to love living in the past, how about remembering the Jan Kemp trial, which exposed UGA and Vince Dooley for the jokes that they were. My favorite quote from the trial was this one:

O. Hale Almand Jr., a lawyer for the defense, offered a justification for the favorable treatment accorded the athletes, citing a hypothetical player. “We may not make a university student out of him,” he told the jury, “but if we can teach him to read and write, maybe he can work at the post office rather than as a garbageman when he gets through with his athletic career.”

The best thing about the trial was that it completely killed Vince Dooley’s shot at Congress, since he was exposed as a fraud and a cheat during the trial. Make no mistake – Dooley knew everything that was going on.

Nothing has changed in the almost three decades since the trial. If anything, the abuses are even worse. Exhibit #1: Jim Harrick and son.

Today the players are even more illiterate and felonious and, well, just plain stupid, as evidenced by their arrest records and record number of penalties. Even Vince Dooley couldn’t have controlled this mob, much less Mark Richt.

UGA Dawg 97

September 27th, 2011
8:35 pm

Dawg in Lex is retarded.

alpha male

September 27th, 2011
8:36 pm

bobby bowden on the finebaum show today said fsu probably stays where it is…its happy in the acc…says too that west virginia adds nothing to the sec, doubts they get an invite…then again, what does he know…

alpha male

September 27th, 2011
8:43 pm

hey lakedawg…the funny thing is that Vandy, Ole Miss., Kentucky, Miss St., A&M, SC, Ark., AU…have uga on their easy list…

LakeDawg

September 27th, 2011
8:54 pm

alpha male

September 27th, 2011
8:43 pm

hey lakedawg…the funny thing is that Vandy, Ole Miss., Kentucky, Miss St., A&M, SC, Ark., AU…have uga on their easy list…
———————————————————————————————————————————–

I know. :(

Back to the future

September 27th, 2011
9:19 pm

Texas A&M will be just one more team to put a regular beatdown on the hapless, uncoached dawgs. But looking at this week, it’s Miss State 37, Georgia 24.

The Diesel

September 27th, 2011
9:21 pm

It;s pretty much a given that the best part of SSIGator ran down the crack of his mommas butt.

Barf

September 27th, 2011
9:52 pm

It want matter when Auburn gets the death penalty for being the cheaterenest program ever

P. Bull Terrier

September 27th, 2011
10:12 pm

I’m wondering why nobody seems to be considering the University of South Florida as a possible 14th member of the SEC. Va Tech would be the best addition for the SEC based on bringing in the Washington DC area TV market, but if that doesn’t happen a second team in Florida might make more sense (and more money) than adding Missouri. USF is based in the #13 TV market in the country – Tampa/St. Petersburg – and the state of Florida contains 3 of the top 20 TV markets in the country.

I’m sure the University of Florida would rather have the entire state to themselves, but if adding a second team in Fla would bring in more money, I’m sure UF would rather have that even more.

Burma Shave

September 27th, 2011
10:14 pm

The SEC Schedule Next Fall

Brings Trepidation For All

To Balance The Load

Has Us Scratching Our Crania

And Slowly Succumbing

To Triskaidekaphobic Mania

Might Just Give West Virginia A Call

Burma Shave©

jack smith

September 27th, 2011
11:05 pm

Just add Mizzou or WVU. WHo cares. The sec got what it wants in A&M. Both Mizzou and WVU are another Miss. state. THey will have some good years and go to bowl games. MIzzou would be my first pick, but I wouldn’t wait on them. Give them a deadline. SO we can get this schedule fixed.

Dawg Fan

September 27th, 2011
11:41 pm

Permanently dropping gt from our schedule would result in the following:

(1) Allow flexibility in our scheduling
(2) Would be a major financial blow to the nerds bottom line

Pollyanna

September 28th, 2011
6:35 am

Just wait.

You will all figure out real soon that we are going to have a far tougher time moving forward than we enjoyed – say in 2002

joe taxpayer

September 28th, 2011
7:18 am

Drop the GT game.

TallaDawg

September 28th, 2011
9:36 am

I do not understand why SEC schools do not want to add their in-state rivals (for that reason alone). Wouldn’t this actually help. If FSU joins the SEC, the FSU-UF game would be a conference game. UF would then be able to add another out of conference rival. Also, in a 14 or 16 team league, how is anyone going to be guaranteed an OOC rival? Having your rival in conference seems to be the only way to ensure the continuation of the series. Being in the same conference (and Division) does not seem to bother the UA-AU rivalry.

TallaDawg

September 28th, 2011
9:39 am

I also like the Univ. of So. Fla. idea. Sew-up the whole Florida market while UM is down.

Rich

September 28th, 2011
9:53 am

WVU brings in the Pittsburgh TV market (only 2 slots below the Kansas City market that has everyone in a wad about Mizzou) and the entire state of West Virginia.
Moreover, just like Syracuse with respect to New York, Mizzou fans aren’t as relevant within their footprint as West Virginia is wihtin their TV footprint

PureEvil

September 28th, 2011
9:55 am

Texas A&M….. Great another team we can lose to every 3 to 4 years!!!

PureEvil

September 28th, 2011
10:09 am

SEC should get TCU as the 14th team and move Auburn to the East and be done with it!!

duronimo

September 28th, 2011
10:19 am

I do think that distance between schools is important now that more people are going by car to avoid the hands down their pants at airports. The nearest state where the SEC does not have a member is North Carolina. What about taking UNC? Joining the SEC would upgrade their football recruiting and make them a worthy member. They’re already a legendary basketball school. It would open up the Charlotte TV market as well.

PureEvil

September 28th, 2011
10:26 am

duronimo

UNC cares too much about Basketball… they would never leave the ACC for the SEC.
They can’t even win football games in the ACC!! Why would they want to get there brains beat in every week in the SEC??

PureEvil

September 28th, 2011
10:29 am

The only school in the ACC that I think would leave for the SEC would be Clemson. IMO

Tom, Resident Georgia Fan

September 28th, 2011
10:36 am

DawginLex … Notre Dame wants no part of the SEC. They like their cupcake schedule as is.

Toe meets leather

September 28th, 2011
11:22 am

Best of luck to the Dawgs this Sat

Questions

September 28th, 2011
11:28 am

A few salient comments:

1. Four different SEC teams have won the last five BCS championships.

2. UGA was not one of those teams.

3. During that period, UGA did not win the SEC championship.

4. During that period, UGA did not even win its SEC division.

5. Red panties.

In other words, UGA has sunk into total irrelevancy both regionally and nationally.

So why is UGA paying Mark Richt millions of dollars a year?

Delbert D.

September 28th, 2011
12:04 pm

Get $20 million fans to contribute a dollar and FSU might leave the ACC. I don’t know why, though; they are sitting pretty with the ACC TV contract.

Bazooka Joe

September 28th, 2011
12:06 pm

Regardless of why Tech left the SEC, the fact remains, they left the SEC and should NOT have the opportunity to return. End of story…..

Still@theBAR

September 28th, 2011
12:14 pm

Why is time being wasted on this subject? The SEC will have a 14th before this schedule will ever be printed.

DawginLex
You know Notre Dame would never even answer the phone if the SEC called. The SEC doesn’t have the academics.

Delbert D.

September 28th, 2011
12:15 pm

According to numerous news reports, the SEC has rejected WVU as a potential member. Maybe it’s because they are only 50 miles from Pittsburgh.

Still@theBAR

September 28th, 2011
12:20 pm

The SEC thinks they are to Classy and Smart to have WVU as a member. Now isn’t that the funniest thing you have ever heard?

Delbert D.

September 28th, 2011
12:22 pm

The West Virginians wouldn’t be able to understand the southern folks and vice-versa.

Just Move 2 teams East

September 28th, 2011
12:43 pm

At least the hillbillies in WV know how to count to 14.

WV Hillbillies

September 28th, 2011
12:46 pm

Yep!

That’s how many matches it typically takes to ignite a couch. :-)

JR1967

September 28th, 2011
3:59 pm

I guess with all of the geographical changes to the SEC, I guess that means Hawaii will eventually become a member of the SEC West.

WV Hillbillies

September 28th, 2011
4:41 pm

Oh heck no. We want Hiwayee in our division. I bet them grass skirts burn REAL good.