
Dogs defenders will have to earn playing time, Todd Grantham says. (Associated Press)
This time last week, we were examining what little we’d heard so far from new UGA defensive coordinator Todd Grantham and getting excited about his pronouncements that he favored an aggressive, attacking style.
Over the past few days, Grantham has been making the rounds of the sports talk stations and sat down Friday with reporters to elaborate. And he’s still saying what we want to hear. Of course, it’s often a big leap between talking the talk and producing on the field and we’ve yet to see how Georgia’s players will execute what Grantham wants.
But from what I’m reading and hearing, reaction across the Bulldog Nation has been very positive to what he’s saying. Grantham thinks recruiting successfully close to home is the answer to winning the SEC and beating elite teams like Florida. He embraces the passionate, impatient fan base and says he understands who Georgia needs to beat.
And he is stressing to his players that they’re going to have to compete and produce if they want to take the field for the Red and Black.
He said his first message to the team is “we want to be physical, aggressive and relentless in our approach. … To do that, you’ve got to be in great condition and I think you have to have great preparation.”
More importantly, he said, “I think it’s important that you find ways to get your best players on the field. … Ultimately, you have to make plays on defense and to do that you have to have guys that are playmakers. I think you do that by getting your best players on the field.”
And players won’t be on the field just because they’re a senior or have started in the past. Grantham says he’s opening up all the positions and playing time will be earned. “I think competition makes everybody better, and I think you have to work to win a position before you can help us win a game. … The bottom line is you’re going to put the players out there that are going to be the most productive.”
As for which current SEC defense Dog fans can expect Georgia’s D to resemble, Grantham said exactly what I wanted to hear: “Alabama.”
All good stuff. Now we’ve got to see if he coaches as good as he talks.
WILL RICHT EMBRACE SPECIAL TEAMS?
On another note, Grantham also said that while it’s “not etched in stone right now,” the final member of the coaching staff still to be hired likely will join him in coaching linebackers, meaning no full-time special teams coach.
Considering the task ahead in fashioning a new defensive scheme, I can understand that thinking. I assume the special teams coaching will still be split up among various coaches and one of them will be asked to be the special teams coordinator in addition to his regular duties, as has been done in the past.
But what that really means is that if Georgia’s special teams play is going to improve and become more consistent, the onus is going to be on Mark Richt, who to date has never appeared to attach as much significance to that aspect of the game as some other coaches do. If Georgia’s special teams play is going to improve, that means more time spent on it in practice. Upgrading the personnel on the kickoff coverage team. And demanding a higher level of execution.
It’s not enough to have a terrific placekicker and punter if you’re populating your kick coverage team with walk-ons and regularly give up great field position on returns. Or if you consistently fall for fake punts. Or if your return men don’t seem to know when to run it out of the end zone and when to take a knee.
At the schools where special teams are truly special and viewed on an equal footing with the offense and defense when it comes to winning games, that mindset starts at the very top.
Richt needs a come-to-Jesus moment with himself about what he’s going to do to make sure that special teams play becomes a strength for the Dogs across the board.
155 comments Add your comment
shane#1
January 24th, 2010
11:40 pm
exNFLplayer, IMO, the theory behind directional kicks is sound. Kick the ball high and into the corner and pin the opposistion inside the twenty. Unfortunately, the kickoff coverage team at UGA lacked the speed to get downfield in time and a young kicker lacked the skill to get the ball high enough or place it in the right spot. So what was sound in theory did not work in practice. For Fabris to continue using a scheme that hurt the team was bullheaded and wrong. People that know Fabris tell me that he is extremely smart, so possibly he had been in control of special teams too long.
Dawg Fud
January 25th, 2010
10:07 am
let’s see some tangible evidence before we go annointing Grantham the second coming of Erk.
like the hire but let’s see what he can do first
Dawg Fud
January 25th, 2010
10:08 am
good point about special teams
many like to reference how great they were against Texas A&M but i believe it was more of a case of how bad TAMU was at special teams. they made three huge blunders.
so before we go patting ourselves on the back, let’s have an honest look at the opponent
Vick=Dog killing thug
January 25th, 2010
12:17 pm
Lets hope for less penalties and good solid defense. Hard hitting tackles made by kids who know where to be and what to do. Also, cut the stinkin Shuck and Jive nonsense. I hope our new DC knocks the head off the 1st dawg that starts dancing and acting the fool when he makes a play.
We need play makers, not showboats.
THWGT (30-24)
AltamahaDawg
January 25th, 2010
11:17 pm
Shane I agree with that. Look at nearly any college or pro team and see that they do exactly the same thing. Although I don’t believe the goal was ever kick it high and NOT deep enough. The problem in my mind was a freshman kicker (who admitted his leg tired as the season went on) and a very depleted roster in 2008. Notice the problem really only became obvious later in the year. Wilting kicker and no back-up LBs ain’t a good recipe.
However you cannot contend that Fabris stubornly stuck with a high and shallow kick because they simply did not do that in 2009. Kicks were easily inside the 10, and usually inside the 5. By my totally unrecorded count, he kicked the ball to the goaline or beyond more often that he didnt. That’s textbook as far as placement, isnt it? And lead the SEC in touchbacks by far over anyone else.
The coverage stunk, whatever the problem was. The ball placement was not a problem in 2009.
So, I would have to disagree with exNFLplayer. (and why wouldn’t formerNFL player be prefered? “ex” always sounds like your not invited to the reunion) about the geometry. Given the poor coverage/tackling/tenacity/speed, whatever it was, doubling the size of the field to cover does not seem like a good answer.