<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A hard but fair look at stumbling Dogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/2009/11/23/a-hard-but-fair-look-at-stumbling-dogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/2009/11/23/a-hard-but-fair-look-at-stumbling-dogs/</link>
	<description>Lifelong Bulldog Bill King offers a fan&#039;s perspective on UGA sports. Share your views!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:34:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chazzo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/2009/11/23/a-hard-but-fair-look-at-stumbling-dogs/comment-page-8/#comment-52863</link>
		<dc:creator>chazzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/?p=3664#comment-52863</guid>
		<description>2010,

I hope you are right.  I will be pulling for them 100% either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010,</p>
<p>I hope you are right.  I will be pulling for them 100% either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2009 Was Like Wooden's 1965 for Richt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/2009/11/23/a-hard-but-fair-look-at-stumbling-dogs/comment-page-8/#comment-52659</link>
		<dc:creator>2009 Was Like Wooden's 1965 for Richt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/?p=3664#comment-52659</guid>
		<description>Losing will teach Richt how to succeed. He will never repeat the mistakes that happened this year. The pain is too much.

Richt will go on a run of Natl&#039; Championships, and Heisman winners like the USC years.

Georgia is absolutely LOADED with top tier talent, SO many Heisman candidates:
Murray, Ealey, Brown, Green, Charles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Losing will teach Richt how to succeed. He will never repeat the mistakes that happened this year. The pain is too much.</p>
<p>Richt will go on a run of Natl&#8217; Championships, and Heisman winners like the USC years.</p>
<p>Georgia is absolutely LOADED with top tier talent, SO many Heisman candidates:<br />
Murray, Ealey, Brown, Green, Charles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2010 Looking Good for Georgia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/2009/11/23/a-hard-but-fair-look-at-stumbling-dogs/comment-page-8/#comment-52658</link>
		<dc:creator>2010 Looking Good for Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/?p=3664#comment-52658</guid>
		<description>Bernie Kosar had a great year as a Freshman starting QB. One of Georgia&#039;s QB&#039;s could also fall into that type of QB. 

I think Richt was on the same team Kosar was on when that happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernie Kosar had a great year as a Freshman starting QB. One of Georgia&#8217;s QB&#8217;s could also fall into that type of QB. </p>
<p>I think Richt was on the same team Kosar was on when that happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2010 Looking Good for Georgia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/2009/11/23/a-hard-but-fair-look-at-stumbling-dogs/comment-page-8/#comment-52632</link>
		<dc:creator>2010 Looking Good for Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/?p=3664#comment-52632</guid>
		<description>Chazzo,

You&#039;re wrong. 2010 will be THE year. Oklahoma won a Natl&#039; Championship with a FRESHMAN QB with very similar skills to Murray&#039;s. When you look at the Offensive guys alone, Ealey RB, Brown/Green/Wooten WR, Charles TE/WR, Murray QB, it adds up to the right combination. And when you consider BOTH times Richt has had a bad year, he went either 11-2 or 13-1 the NEXT year. 2010 is looking good for Georgia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chazzo,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re wrong. 2010 will be THE year. Oklahoma won a Natl&#8217; Championship with a FRESHMAN QB with very similar skills to Murray&#8217;s. When you look at the Offensive guys alone, Ealey RB, Brown/Green/Wooten WR, Charles TE/WR, Murray QB, it adds up to the right combination. And when you consider BOTH times Richt has had a bad year, he went either 11-2 or 13-1 the NEXT year. 2010 is looking good for Georgia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urban Meyers to Notre Dame!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/2009/11/23/a-hard-but-fair-look-at-stumbling-dogs/comment-page-8/#comment-52631</link>
		<dc:creator>Urban Meyers to Notre Dame!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/?p=3664#comment-52631</guid>
		<description>Can you believe Meyers is heading to Notre Dame? Without Tebow, I knew he&#039;d take the money and run. I guess since Meyers is Catholic and was named after Pope Urban, and he mentioned coaching at Notre Dame was his dream, and the big cntract, he just couldn&#039;t pass it up. Meyers, after Tebow leaves, you better get Lois Lane on the phone and call for Superman again. How many Natl&#039; campionships ya got without Tebow? What&#039;s that? Your cell phone line is b...r...e...a..k..i...n..g. up. Ha ha ha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you believe Meyers is heading to Notre Dame? Without Tebow, I knew he&#8217;d take the money and run. I guess since Meyers is Catholic and was named after Pope Urban, and he mentioned coaching at Notre Dame was his dream, and the big cntract, he just couldn&#8217;t pass it up. Meyers, after Tebow leaves, you better get Lois Lane on the phone and call for Superman again. How many Natl&#8217; campionships ya got without Tebow? What&#8217;s that? Your cell phone line is b&#8230;r&#8230;e&#8230;a..k..i&#8230;n..g. up. Ha ha ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chazzo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/2009/11/23/a-hard-but-fair-look-at-stumbling-dogs/comment-page-8/#comment-52627</link>
		<dc:creator>chazzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/?p=3664#comment-52627</guid>
		<description>How can there be decay?  The guys turning it over are first year starters.  The team, for that matter is loaded with freshmen and sophomores. 

Here is the one, two punch that got us:

1) Richt fired all of the guns at once with Stafford and Moreno.  He put together the team that was going to win the NC (Donnan comparison valid here), and things fell apart.  A rash of season ending injuries, legal and academic problems, and early exits to the pros... well, it just kind of deconstructed.  He never had the whole team together and was patching holes all season.

2) The biggest problem with this season is last season.  That team that he put so much stock in is gone with the exception of a few. This is naturally a rebuilding year (contrary to popular opinion Richt has not had a true rebuilding season at UGA, not to this extent), and we all expected it to be hit or miss with the exception of a couple of overconfident people predicting an undefeated season.  It is just hard to suffer through a rebuilding season after last years deconstruction.

3)  While great players are recruited, there may be some questions about the right players being recruited.  There were four or five scholarship QBs at one point.  I don&#039;t know enough about it to comment, but it seems that recruiting a few seasons back was heavy on O and skill positions.

3) Whoever handles scheduling needs a kick.  Is this a coaching thing?  If so, then maybe I do have another criticism of Richt.  It is not so much the teams UGA plays, although a couple of tune ups would have been nice this season.  It is the arrangement of the schedule over the last couple of seasons:  back to back big games, flying across the country before big games, no home games for a month.  This season was a baptism by fire for a bunch of guys playing on Friday nights last year.  Next season&#039;s schedule is no cakewalk either.

4)  The dawgs are a couple of plays away from 8-3.  They are also a couple of plays away from 4-7.  I wonder what affect one of those wins would have had on the overall season.  If there wasn&#039;t the bogus unnecessary roughness call that set up the OK-St TD, maybe UGA pulls out a victory.  I don&#039;t have to mention LSU.  I am not writing this to say woulda, shoulda, coulda.  I am merely pointing out that this season, hinging on personal fouls, miscues, and turnovers could easily have very different complexions.  The core elements and the raw talent are there, though.

Richt loosened up on the reigns and let the program do its thing after Hawaii.  I think that is honest criticism.  I think his ego got a little out of joint, considering it was Hawaii for Pete&#039;s sake.  Does everybody get that now?  It was frickin&#039; Hawaii.  

Honestly I think he has tightened it back up.  He cut his losses, learned his lessons, and he&#039;s going with these young guys.  It doesn&#039;t happen over night.  There are a couple of stragglers, but they have been slowly getting replaced.  Now is the time to build, shape, mold.

1)  I think sticking with Cox was a great long term decision.  It sends a message to the young guys that they have to earn it (unlike Stafford who knew he owned the place as a recruit).  It also sends a message that the coaches are going to stand by you.  Despite the results, I think it was the right thing to do, and UGA will be a better team for it.  

2) This season was a path of pins or a path of needles. There were no answers that were going to please everyone.  Lots of lessons were learned.  This offseason is the time to lower the boom, seize power, clean house, move forward.  This offseason (including recruiting) is the Richt test.  The jury is out until next year.

3) Whether the change involves coaching changes or not, the dawgs are in good shape for next season.  Lots of good, young players with some experience.  Only losses on O are Cox, Vance, and Moore.  The D backfield, in my opinion, has slowly been evolving with lots of good, younger players coming along.   The weak spot and the question mark will be the interior D-line.  

Next year probably won&#039;t be THE year.  But, the year after, if everyone stays healthy, eligible, and amateur will be an NC contention year.  It dawned on me during the UGA/ Auburn game that these two teams could be playing for the SEC in a couple of seasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can there be decay?  The guys turning it over are first year starters.  The team, for that matter is loaded with freshmen and sophomores. </p>
<p>Here is the one, two punch that got us:</p>
<p>1) Richt fired all of the guns at once with Stafford and Moreno.  He put together the team that was going to win the NC (Donnan comparison valid here), and things fell apart.  A rash of season ending injuries, legal and academic problems, and early exits to the pros&#8230; well, it just kind of deconstructed.  He never had the whole team together and was patching holes all season.</p>
<p>2) The biggest problem with this season is last season.  That team that he put so much stock in is gone with the exception of a few. This is naturally a rebuilding year (contrary to popular opinion Richt has not had a true rebuilding season at UGA, not to this extent), and we all expected it to be hit or miss with the exception of a couple of overconfident people predicting an undefeated season.  It is just hard to suffer through a rebuilding season after last years deconstruction.</p>
<p>3)  While great players are recruited, there may be some questions about the right players being recruited.  There were four or five scholarship QBs at one point.  I don&#8217;t know enough about it to comment, but it seems that recruiting a few seasons back was heavy on O and skill positions.</p>
<p>3) Whoever handles scheduling needs a kick.  Is this a coaching thing?  If so, then maybe I do have another criticism of Richt.  It is not so much the teams UGA plays, although a couple of tune ups would have been nice this season.  It is the arrangement of the schedule over the last couple of seasons:  back to back big games, flying across the country before big games, no home games for a month.  This season was a baptism by fire for a bunch of guys playing on Friday nights last year.  Next season&#8217;s schedule is no cakewalk either.</p>
<p>4)  The dawgs are a couple of plays away from 8-3.  They are also a couple of plays away from 4-7.  I wonder what affect one of those wins would have had on the overall season.  If there wasn&#8217;t the bogus unnecessary roughness call that set up the OK-St TD, maybe UGA pulls out a victory.  I don&#8217;t have to mention LSU.  I am not writing this to say woulda, shoulda, coulda.  I am merely pointing out that this season, hinging on personal fouls, miscues, and turnovers could easily have very different complexions.  The core elements and the raw talent are there, though.</p>
<p>Richt loosened up on the reigns and let the program do its thing after Hawaii.  I think that is honest criticism.  I think his ego got a little out of joint, considering it was Hawaii for Pete&#8217;s sake.  Does everybody get that now?  It was frickin&#8217; Hawaii.  </p>
<p>Honestly I think he has tightened it back up.  He cut his losses, learned his lessons, and he&#8217;s going with these young guys.  It doesn&#8217;t happen over night.  There are a couple of stragglers, but they have been slowly getting replaced.  Now is the time to build, shape, mold.</p>
<p>1)  I think sticking with Cox was a great long term decision.  It sends a message to the young guys that they have to earn it (unlike Stafford who knew he owned the place as a recruit).  It also sends a message that the coaches are going to stand by you.  Despite the results, I think it was the right thing to do, and UGA will be a better team for it.  </p>
<p>2) This season was a path of pins or a path of needles. There were no answers that were going to please everyone.  Lots of lessons were learned.  This offseason is the time to lower the boom, seize power, clean house, move forward.  This offseason (including recruiting) is the Richt test.  The jury is out until next year.</p>
<p>3) Whether the change involves coaching changes or not, the dawgs are in good shape for next season.  Lots of good, young players with some experience.  Only losses on O are Cox, Vance, and Moore.  The D backfield, in my opinion, has slowly been evolving with lots of good, younger players coming along.   The weak spot and the question mark will be the interior D-line.  </p>
<p>Next year probably won&#8217;t be THE year.  But, the year after, if everyone stays healthy, eligible, and amateur will be an NC contention year.  It dawned on me during the UGA/ Auburn game that these two teams could be playing for the SEC in a couple of seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flowery Branch Yellow Jacket</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/2009/11/23/a-hard-but-fair-look-at-stumbling-dogs/comment-page-7/#comment-52610</link>
		<dc:creator>Flowery Branch Yellow Jacket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/?p=3664#comment-52610</guid>
		<description>Rome-Dawg ... you must be an idiot!  Have you actually LOOKED at what Tennesee has done?  They fired a coach who had a winning percentage of 76.9%, who had won a national championship for the Vols, and who had a widespread recruiting network throughout the southeast.  What did they get in return?  A loud-mouthed coach who has led the team to a 6-5 record, with only three wins in the conference ... and no one is particularly confident that they&#039;s be able to beat Kentucky this weekend!  As a Jacket fan, I suppose I should WANT the Dogs to be so shortsighted that they would repeat Tennessee&#039;s mistakes, but frankly, I would like to see our rivalry with the Dogs become competitive again, with two strong teams playing games that MEAN SOMETHING every season.  CMR gives you a much better chance to do that than someone like Lane Kiffen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rome-Dawg &#8230; you must be an idiot!  Have you actually LOOKED at what Tennesee has done?  They fired a coach who had a winning percentage of 76.9%, who had won a national championship for the Vols, and who had a widespread recruiting network throughout the southeast.  What did they get in return?  A loud-mouthed coach who has led the team to a 6-5 record, with only three wins in the conference &#8230; and no one is particularly confident that they&#8217;s be able to beat Kentucky this weekend!  As a Jacket fan, I suppose I should WANT the Dogs to be so shortsighted that they would repeat Tennessee&#8217;s mistakes, but frankly, I would like to see our rivalry with the Dogs become competitive again, with two strong teams playing games that MEAN SOMETHING every season.  CMR gives you a much better chance to do that than someone like Lane Kiffen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROME-DAWG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/2009/11/23/a-hard-but-fair-look-at-stumbling-dogs/comment-page-7/#comment-52606</link>
		<dc:creator>ROME-DAWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/?p=3664#comment-52606</guid>
		<description>i really don&#039;t care if they fire the whole damn coaching staff. just look at what tenn. done with a loud mouth coach,who by the way coached his team, with far less talented player&#039;s. saw somewhere, that cmr. just wanted to get in 10 year&#039;s. then go on mission&#039;s.why is he not just as commited to doing his job? he takes the money for half a** doing it. and just when was the last time anyone
out in the bulldawg nation dared their boss to just fire them? the way cmr. did? they should have 
done it ( fired him ) on the spot. he think&#039;s without him our beloved uga. will crumble. he need&#039;s a reality check that uga. made him, not the other way around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really don&#8217;t care if they fire the whole damn coaching staff. just look at what tenn. done with a loud mouth coach,who by the way coached his team, with far less talented player&#8217;s. saw somewhere, that cmr. just wanted to get in 10 year&#8217;s. then go on mission&#8217;s.why is he not just as commited to doing his job? he takes the money for half a** doing it. and just when was the last time anyone<br />
out in the bulldawg nation dared their boss to just fire them? the way cmr. did? they should have<br />
done it ( fired him ) on the spot. he think&#8217;s without him our beloved uga. will crumble. he need&#8217;s a reality check that uga. made him, not the other way around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wooden in 1965....</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/2009/11/23/a-hard-but-fair-look-at-stumbling-dogs/comment-page-7/#comment-52601</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wooden in 1965....</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/?p=3664#comment-52601</guid>
		<description>When you think of a Champion, Wooden is one of the greatest coaches ever. In 1966, Wooden went on a run the likes of which no one had ever seen and won 7 CONSECUTIVE Natl&#039; Championships. CONSECUTIVE.

What you don&#039;t hear a lot about is the year BEFORE he went on the run. 1965. Wooden finished 18-8, a terrible year compared to some of hus undefeated 31-0 years. In 1965 a Champion Coach was born who would turn into a legend.

Losing taught Wooden how to succeed. And for the next 7 seasons, he never forgot the lessons he learned from the bad season of 1965. And he never repeated his mistakes. He eliminated every cause of poor performance.

Would there have been a 7 season consecutive Natl&#039; Championship run without 1865? I doubt it.

Humility always comes before honor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you think of a Champion, Wooden is one of the greatest coaches ever. In 1966, Wooden went on a run the likes of which no one had ever seen and won 7 CONSECUTIVE Natl&#8217; Championships. CONSECUTIVE.</p>
<p>What you don&#8217;t hear a lot about is the year BEFORE he went on the run. 1965. Wooden finished 18-8, a terrible year compared to some of hus undefeated 31-0 years. In 1965 a Champion Coach was born who would turn into a legend.</p>
<p>Losing taught Wooden how to succeed. And for the next 7 seasons, he never forgot the lessons he learned from the bad season of 1965. And he never repeated his mistakes. He eliminated every cause of poor performance.</p>
<p>Would there have been a 7 season consecutive Natl&#8217; Championship run without 1865? I doubt it.</p>
<p>Humility always comes before honor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cox vs. Joe Montana</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/2009/11/23/a-hard-but-fair-look-at-stumbling-dogs/comment-page-7/#comment-52593</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cox vs. Joe Montana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/junkyard-blawg/?p=3664#comment-52593</guid>
		<description>Joe Montana, 1978
54% completion rate, 9 int’s, 10 td’s, 2010 yards

Joe Cox, 2009
56% Completion rate, 14 Int’s, 21 td’s, 2350 yards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Montana, 1978<br />
54% completion rate, 9 int’s, 10 td’s, 2010 yards</p>
<p>Joe Cox, 2009<br />
56% Completion rate, 14 Int’s, 21 td’s, 2350 yards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
