Ovie Mughelli's contributions to the Falcons were outweighed by his salary. (Curtis Compton/AJC)
In the least surprising move of the Falcons’ offseason, they have released fullback Ovie Mughelli, effectively saving them $3 million on the salary cap.
In doing so, the team also eliminated one of the final remnants of the abbreviated Bobby Petrino era.
Few recall this but when Falcons owner Arthur Blank made the ill-fated decision to hand over the reins of his football team to Petrino in 2007, a major move that offseason was the signing of Mughelli. Petrino wanted a bulldozing fullback for his offense.
The former Baltimore Raven was a logical choice. What wasn’t logical was that Blank and then-general manager Rich McKay gave him a six-year, $18 million contract, a record for a fullback.
Mughelli wasn’t an awful player. But when you weigh his salary vs. his contribution to the team, it was a bad signing.
It didn’t figure that Mughelli would see the final year of his contract. The Falcons need the cap space and they drafted a fullback (Wisconsin’s Bradie Ewing) in the fifth round. Further, the team is holding a mini-camp this week and logically didn’t want to have to deal with questions about Mughelli’s status.
With the NFL recently granting the Falcons a $3 million salary cap credit for Michael Vick’s contract, the team is pretty decent shape with the cap. Conceivably, the might even have some space to sign a player who is cut from another team for cap reasons over the next few weeks.
Bottom line: Five years later, one mistake is now off the books.
By Jeff Schultz
104 comments Add your comment
Jeff Schultz
May 8th, 2012
6:10 pm
PreyDawg — Thanks. I’m had to go back again and read what I wrote to see if I missed/overstated something. Think some folks clearly read something the wrong way, but sports is about passion and people have their opinions.
Jeff Schultz
May 8th, 2012
6:11 pm
Choke — Welcome back. Still a one-trick pony I see?
Firsttimer
May 8th, 2012
6:47 pm
I liked DLed’s article much better. Of all the awful things that came out of the Petrino era; Ovie was the one bright spot. To refer to him as a mistake off the books is an insult to the player who laid it on the line every Sunday. His salary for what you estimate as thirty percent of the time was far more beneficial than the Ten Million tied up in Grimes. I like Grimes but fact is fact. The one constant that makes us winners is the balance on our offense. Trust me, Turner would not have had all those lofty yards without Ovie leading the way. Send him out with honor…not dismissed as a mistake off the books. Your article sucks!!!!
Eric
May 8th, 2012
6:50 pm
Jeff,
Take a look at your last sentence. “Bottom line: Five years later, one mistake is now off the books.” There is no way to read things the wrong way. You’re saying Ovie was a mistake. I’m not going to punish Ovie because he got a job during the Petrino era. I judge the man by his own actions. He is a great fulback who was part of the reason why Michael Turner has ended the year as a top 5 rusher 3 out of 4 years.
I wouldn’t speak ill of a player because I don’t like the guy who picked him.