Drew Brees looks like fool for not acknowledging bounties

Drew Brees' conflict of interest is undermining player safety issues. (AP photo)

Drew Brees' conflict of interest is undermining player safety issues. (AP photo)

Drew Brees has been one of the faces of the NFL, one of the best ambassadors the league has had. He is a premier player at the centerpiece position (quarterback) who led his team to a Super Bowl and also helped heal a city (New Orleans) after a disaster.

But the guy has lost it, and he should be removed from any executive board position he holds with the NFL Players Association. In short, Brees still refuses to acknowledge the New Orleans Saints had any bounty system, even though former Saints defensive coordinator Gregg Williams (who orchestrated the whole thing) admits it existed.

“We didn’t get any meaningful evidence, or any meaningful truth or facts,” Brees told NFL.com when asked about any discussion on the bounty program at Monday’s meeting between the league and union. (The league has yet to announce penalties for players involved.)

There are two problems here: 1) That Brees, probably out of loyalty to his team, still hasn’t publicly admitted that the Saints had a program. It makes him look foolish; 2) Because of that loyalty, and an obvious conflict of interest, he should not be allowed to sit in any meeting as an NFLPA executive board member when penalties for Saints’ players are being discussed.

In fact, a case could be made he should be removed from the board altogether. Think about it: One significant reason for the uproar of the program is it undermines player safety. There is evidence of Saints players being told to head-hunt or take out a opposing player’s ACL. But Brees, a union representative, refuses to acknowledge that, despite evidence and confirmation from a figure involved, effectively giving his blessing to the program.

How does Brees rationalize that to his union brethren?

Let’s briefly go through a few reasons why commissioner Roger Goodell has disciplined the Saints organization, Williams, coach Sean Payton and assistant Joe Vitt:

– Via the NFL’s findings, the Saints operated the bounty program for three seasons, largely funded by players but “also occasionally” by Williams.

– Payments were made when opposing players were injured. Specifically, the investigation showed bounties had been placed on four opposing quarterbacks: Brett Favre, Cam Newton, Aaron Rodgers and Kurt Warner. Defensive captain Jonathan Vilma offered $10,000 to any teammate who knocked Favre out of the NFC title game in the 2009 season.

– Via the official NFL release: “Coach Williams acknowledged that he designed and implemented the program with the assistance of certain defensive players.”

–  Also via the NFL: “Vitt admitted that, when interviewed in 2010, he ‘fabricated the truth’ to NFL investigators and denied that any pay-for-performance or bounty program existed.”

But Drew Brees wants evidence. He doesn’t look like a leader. He looks like a fool.

By Jeff Schultz

258 comments Add your comment

falcons

April 21st, 2012
12:12 pm

I dont think it really matters, the saints D sucked already. Drew’s gonna be back and that means trouble. Why should he acknowledge the bounties either? The only thing we can prove is Williams wanted them to do those things. I haven’t seen anything saying the players actively participated in it. There is no evidence money exchanged hands…. im just saying

Donna Eckhart

April 21st, 2012
10:08 pm

Enter your comments here

Guest

April 22nd, 2012
4:04 am

Great hit piece, Jeff Schultz. You are a scumbag journalist. YOU are what is wrong with this country.

In the tank for Goddell, no doubt. Now, offer up some facts, not just your exalted opinion.

redcoat

April 22nd, 2012
7:19 am

falcons………..Brees, Leader of a team or just the offense with no communication with Defense? Odd don’t you think? “I haven’t seen anything saying the players actively participated in it. There is no evidence money exchanged hands…. im just saying” So they were just “talking bad”, they really didn’t mean it? I’m adding your “defense sux” to the excuse list.

Guest……..So is lying a good thing? Covering up rule violations that promote player injury a good thing? No conflict of interest with committee leadership in this? You don’t see that point?…….. Unbelievable!

SJS Eagle 85

April 23rd, 2012
3:42 pm

It’s not Brees’ place to confirm or deny the existence of any bounty program. All of the associated Saints employees have been implicated and/or punished at this point and at no time has Drew Brees’ name has been mentioned as a party to knowlege or existence of a bounty program prior to the NFL’s investigation.

BdT

April 23rd, 2012
7:51 pm

This article takes what Brees said out of context. What he said was that in regards to the allegations against the players (Vilma, Smith, Harper), rather than the allegations against coaching staff, they haven’t received any “meaningful evidence.” At this point we’ve all heard the crazy rant from Gregg Williams, but nothing has been produced suggesting that his speech had any effect on the players or that anyone ever cashed in on the bounty. The incident involving Vilma offering $10,000 is, as of yet, unsubstantiated. That’s all Brees said. If anyone looks like a fool, it’s you Schultz.

redcoat

April 24th, 2012
5:59 am

Eagle 85……punishment has been handed out with evidence, please explain “meaningful”. Is Brees calling a lot of multiple sources……. “unmeaningful”?

BdT……..a coach of your team admits a bounty system existed……Brees, leader of the team, does not acknowledge it existed. Surely he knows players are involved……..why would the coaches even accept what has been dealt to them if no one participated for how many years? Evidence wasn’t “meaningful” against the coaches? Brees should be running for a political office when retired. All of them sound like fools too, don’t you agree?

What’s your take on the conflict of interest?

Unbelievable!

redcoat

April 24th, 2012
6:01 am

i forgot to add that Brees is a great quarterback!