
The Georgia-Auburn rivalry includes this battle: Uga vs. Robert Baker. (Montgomery Advertiser)
There is a chance that SEC conference expansion will claim one significant victim: The Georgia-Auburn series.
Georgia athletic director Greg McGarity said Wednesday that SEC athletic directors will meet near the end of the month to discuss future football scheduling. With the conference’s addition of Texas A&M and Missouri, the two biggest questions: 1) Will the SEC go to a nine-game conference schedule? 2) Will expansion force for the end of the SEC’s annual East-West rivalry games of Georgia-Auburn and Alabama-Tennessee?
Answer to No. 1: Probably not.
Answer to No. 2: Possibly.
Georgia-Auburn is known as the “Deep South’s Oldest Rivalry,” dating back to 1892. They have played every year since 1898, with three exceptions: 1917, 1918 and 1943. The reasons: World War I and World War II. It appears “Conference Armageddon” may have an equal impact.
The ACC recently announced that teams will begin playing nine-game conference schedules when Pittsburgh and Syracuse officially join the league. McGarity is against the SEC increasing from eight-game schedules and does not sense there’s any movement in that direction. He said nine conference games might necessitate schools dropping a traditional local rivalry. Examples: Georgia-Georgia Tech, Florida-Florida State and South-Carolina-Clemson.
The future of Georgia-Auburn is less certain. Expansion will lead to schools playing six games against division opponents and two against the opposite division. (The current breakdown is five-three.) But there are only two traditional East-West rivalries in the SEC, which could lead to schools rotating opponents from the opposite division.
“I think if you ask Alabama and Tennessee, like us and Auburn, we’d like to retain the games,” McGarity said. “But does that work? What do the other 10 schools think? Those four schools like having those games but there’s no other East-West match-up that has that piece of history to it. So I don’t where that fits in.”
He said athletic directors will study “numerous models” when they meet.
“With 14 teams, not everybody will be happy,” he said. “Some will have a problem with everything. But we’ll make decisions based on the best situation of the league.”
By Jeff Schultz
522 comments Add your comment
MDawg
February 8th, 2012
3:16 pm
Completely worth losing the Deep South’s Oldest Rivalry so that we can add Mizzou and A&M to the Conference. Great plan. Really excited.
(Dripping with Sarcasm)
Coach Cool
February 8th, 2012
3:17 pm
Another layer of dirt on college sports.
Bryan G.
February 8th, 2012
3:19 pm
It would be a shame. Georgia-Auburn is a great game every year and one of the better “friendly rivalries” in sports
Abnerish
February 8th, 2012
3:19 pm
I don’t see the problem with a 9 game conference schedule. I’d rather keep Auburn and lose Tech. Even if that makes our schedule tougher.
Hollywould
February 8th, 2012
3:22 pm
Man, as a Auburn man that would suck even though the Leg Humpers have been wearing us out lately.
After all these years I believe it is even or a one game advantage. War Eagle
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
3:22 pm
Why would a nine game conference schedule affect one non-conference game?
FJR
February 8th, 2012
3:24 pm
Kinda sad, but probably necessitated. When things go down to just two cross division games, it’s way too big of an advantage for teams who get traditionally weak rivals. Add in the fact that only 4 teams in the league really give a crap about their cross division rival (the four schultz mentioned), and it’s almost a no brainer. Though it will obviously upset those four schools a lot.
As a South Carolina fan, I can tell you that Arkansas is just another team to us. I’d just assume get to see the other cross division teams more often as play them every year. As it stands we’d only play Auburn once every six years, which is way too long, especially considering I care about Auburn just as much as I care about Arkansas. If you do away with the permanent rivals you’d play each cross division team once every 3 years, which is more palatable.
Old Dawg
February 8th, 2012
3:25 pm
This is a great game for the players, fans and the media. There’s no reason to end the series. It’d be like ending Michigan-Ohio State, Southern Cal-UCLA or South Carolina-Clemmons.
On a sad note, the Oklahoma-Nebraska game is no more.
On an up note, there’s always Newt vs the Ex-wives Club.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
3:27 pm
I think McGarrity is one one of the major ones who’d oppose a 9 game SEC schedule, as it goes firmly against his “play the weakest schedule possible and win as much as possible” theory. Also I’m sure McGarrity doesn’t want to deal with playing 5 SEC road games every other year, which would not only be tough, but would also really put a dent in the checkbook, being forced to play at least 5 games outside of the 90K Sanford Stadium money making machine.
LHarding Dawg
February 8th, 2012
3:29 pm
FJR – That’s why SC has no tradition and Georgia, Alabama, Auburn, Tennessee and even Georgia Tech has tons of tradition.
bardawg
February 8th, 2012
3:29 pm
I think I need to check my calender .Is today April Fool’s day? This has without a doubt one of the most hair-brained and idiotic things in college football I’ve heard to date. If Mr. McGarrity pulls this one off, I’ll personally come to Athens with a large bucket of tar& a huge bag of feathers with his and Mike Slime’s name all over it. Please tell me you’re just pulling our collective chain!
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
3:29 pm
Why would a nine game conference schedule affect one non-conference game?
Because the SEC will drop their out of conference rivalry games before they will drop their guaranteed win cupcake games.
fred smith
February 8th, 2012
3:30 pm
I personally would be very dissapointed if that game got cancelled. I think that game is either number 1 or 2 for most Auburn fans living in Atlanta.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
3:32 pm
@LHarding Dawg – I’m not arguing otherwise. I’m talking pure numbers here. There are 10 schools that don’t really give a crap about their cross-division rivals. There are 4 that do. You’re only looking at it from UGA’s perspective. Consider the perspective of TAMU, Missouri, LSU, UF, USC, Arkansas, Vandy, Kentucky, Ole Miss and Miss St. If those 10 schools want to end traditional rivalries, there’s a good chance that traditional rivalries will be ended.
JacketFan
February 8th, 2012
3:33 pm
@LHardingDawg – or you guys could drop such power houses as UL-Lafayette, UAB, Coastal Carolina, Idaho State, Tenn Tech, Western Carolina, or any of the other numerous OOC cupcakes y’all play like every other team in the SEC ….
TDone
February 8th, 2012
3:33 pm
Sort of makes up for all those years the SEC had a six conference game schedule.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
3:34 pm
@GTbob Its hard for you to talk too much crap when the entire ACC conference schedule is a cupcake schedule. Or did you just forget about what happened to your CONFERENCE CHAMPION in the Orange bowl? Of course you guys are loving playing 9 conference games, it probably makes your schedules even easier.
Lon Stotts
February 8th, 2012
3:36 pm
I’m 24 years old and have been to 25 consecutive UGA-AU games. How, you ask? I was in my mother’s belly in ‘86 and got baptized by the Jordan-Hare fire hoses, and haven’t missed a game since. I grew up an Auburn fan, went to UGA undergrad and am currently in UGA Law School. I’ve been to Final Fours, Gold medal Olympic events, World Series games, EPL soccer matches, and a dozen Iron Bowls, and I can honestly say nothing holds a candle to this game every year (yes, even the Iron Bowl). The proximity and similarities of the fan bases and schools makes for such an uncomfortable juxtaposition of hate and begrudging respect. Not to mention, aside from the past few years the rivalry has been one of the most competitive and evenly matched in all of sports. Auburn leads by what, one game in over 110 match-ups, and UGA leads in points by about 50???
In a sport that’s received more bad press and negative vibes in the past couple of years than over the course of my lifetime, ending this series would signal the death of the last unadulterated aspect of the sport: the sanctity of the games themselves.
But hey, $$$ right?
Gordon
February 8th, 2012
3:37 pm
What they are doing is dropping the permanent cross division opponent so the rotation of the other cross division opponents goes faster. If you have 14 teams and only 8 conference games, that is the price you pay. The ACC got it right – 9 conference games. You keep the permanent opponent and rotate the other 6 in 2 at a time. You play everyone in the other division twice every 6 years.
For teams like UGA, USC, and UF that have a permanent in-state game, you just have 2 games to play with instead of 3. One could be a BCS opponent (e.g. Colorado) and one could be a cupcake, or you could have two cupcakes.
If it ever gets to 16 teams, I think you have to go to 4 pods.
Dawg in gatorville
February 8th, 2012
3:37 pm
UGA-Auburn friendly rivalry?? I hate Auburn! Those trashy inbreeds! I want UGA to play them and BEAT the snot out of them every year!!
LHarding Dawg
February 8th, 2012
3:37 pm
Jacket Fan – Do you really want to compare schedules. I mean 10-1 against Georgia and you want to talk trash. Get real, for Georgia it’s a cupcake game.
82Dawg
February 8th, 2012
3:38 pm
Good to see the troll GTBob is on the UGA blog again.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
3:38 pm
@jacketFan Sorry that we don’t get to play Duke, Wake, Maryland, UNC, BC, etc every year. If we could put cupcakes like that on our schedule, sure we might beef up the OOC games. Talk crap about the SEC’s OOC scheduling when your conference schedules stop being a joke. Clemson looks like the best team in your conference when they’re playing ACC teams and then gets manhandled by a middle of the pack SEC team (South Carolina) and the Big (L)East champion destroys them.
LHarding Dawg
February 8th, 2012
3:40 pm
What about the Florida and LSU game. I’m sure both sets of fans love that game and would like to see it continue.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
3:41 pm
Pretty sure Tennessee doesn’t think UNC is a gimme, FJR.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
3:43 pm
@LHarding Dawg Most of the LSU and UF fans I know don’t really care about it. Only the ones in the panhandle really care about it, but the panhandle is mostly FSU territory at this point anyway. The mid florida UF fans don’t really care about the LSU game. UF fans consider Alabama just as big of a rival as LSU and they don’t want to go 6 years between playing Alabama. There’s not really any tradition there that’s even remotely comparable to UGA Auburn.
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
3:44 pm
Sorry that we don’t get to play Duke, Wake, Maryland, UNC, BC, etc every year.
Is that list really worse then Ole Miss, Miss St, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Vandy? UGA will probably only play one ranked team this year. Wow, what a tough schedule.
no dog
February 8th, 2012
3:44 pm
Appalachian State would be mad at you guys if you dropped them…
Frontman
February 8th, 2012
3:45 pm
The truth hurts, doesn’t it, FJR? You’re a bit touchy about it…
FJR
February 8th, 2012
3:46 pm
@George Stein Sure, but most of the other contenders in the SEC would. Again, when your conference champ stops getting blown out by their SEC rivals and then DESTROYED in their bowl game, then come and talk to me about how the SEC schedules patsy OOC games. The two best teams in your league looked AWFUL out of conference this year. Tech was one of the better teams in the ACC and has been one of the better ACC teams and they’ve done what against UGA recently?
Bluestreak
February 8th, 2012
3:46 pm
I’d rather give up the GA – GATech rivalry than GA – Auburn. More tradition and better competition in the South’s Oldest Rivalry than in Good Ol’ Fashion Hate.
But, I’d be glad to get rid of another game and keep both.
Interested Bystander
February 8th, 2012
3:47 pm
I still think moving Auburn to the East and Missouri to the West makes the most long term sense. Then that Auburn/Georgia game gets preserved and the geography works better .
FJR
February 8th, 2012
3:47 pm
@Frontman What the heck are you talking about? Sure the SEC schedules relatively weak OOC schedules. But as a conference we more or less dominate the ACC on the field. Clemson is perhaps the premier team in the ACC right now and South Carolina, a middle of the pack SEC team, has beaten them soundly three years in a row now. Tech is one of the better teams in the ACC, what have they done against UGA?
ACC Apologist
February 8th, 2012
3:48 pm
But, but, but…….
Jay in VA
February 8th, 2012
3:48 pm
Why not a 9 game SEC slate to preserve these traditional games and add more excitement into the season lineup? I don’t see how that would doom the Georgia Tech rivalry game. By my math, 9 conference games and the GT matchup would still allow 2 slots for the little sisters of the poor.
ozzfest
February 8th, 2012
3:48 pm
GREAT, THAT MEANS ONE SEASON…REAL SOON…GREG McGARRITY IS GOING TO HAVE US PLAY A WORSE HOME SCHEDULE THAN THIS DREADFUL 2012 SCHEDULE.
MY GOD.
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
3:49 pm
The two best teams in your league looked AWFUL out of conference this year.
Virginia Tech’s only OOC loss was in overtime in a BCS game. That is considered awful?
LHarding Dawg
February 8th, 2012
3:49 pm
FJR – They have played 58 times. Florida ownes the series with 30 wins vs. 25, with three ties. Pretty good rivals with a lot of tradition.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
3:50 pm
We haven’t done much against UGA, FJR. No question about it. But UGA is also going through the longest period of sustained success in their history, so we have to keep things in perspective.
As to Clemson, South Carolina was not a middle of the pack SEC team. They went 11-2 and are so pissed they didn’t play in the SECCG that they want to change the rules.
Lastly, the point I was trying to make about UNC was that a middle of the pack ACC team is typically just as mediocre as a middle of the pack SEC team.
RxDawg
February 8th, 2012
3:50 pm
Meh, chances are this won’t happen.
I’m actually in favor of moving to a 9 game conference schedule… but I know the coaches aren’t. Still, I’d rather see another SEC game added to the slate then San Jose St.
If they don’t do that, it’s possible they would scrap the east and west divisions. Each team has 6 “permenent” SEC teams they play plus 2 rotating. I’m not in favor of this, but I’ll understand if they do it.
If anything is in danger, I’d say it’s the out of conference rival games. Those UGA vs GT or UF vs FSU at the end of the season. The ACC has already made a 9 game schedule. If the SEC does the same then they will really be in danger. And… I’m actually ok with that.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
3:51 pm
@GT Bob – So you’re going ahead and granting that GT isn’t going to be ranked at the end of the year when they play UGA and is going to have another failure of a year? (there’s no way South Carolina won’t be ranked when they play UGA, they’re going to start top 10 and couldn’t fall fast enough to be non-top 25)
Dang, it must suck to be a Tech fan, when you use the fact that you, yourself, believe your year is going to be a failure as a way to attack UGA.
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
3:51 pm
I still think moving Auburn to the East and Missouri to the West makes the most long term sense.
What do you do about the Auburn – Alabama game then? There is no way that game is getting sacrificed.
Jay in VA
February 8th, 2012
3:53 pm
Amen Ozzfest! I’m starting to yearn for the days of Damon Evans, panties in his lap and all. At least he had the cajones to schedule an interesting lineup of games.
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
3:53 pm
Dang, it must suck to be a Tech fan, when you use the fact that you, yourself, believe your year is going to be a failure as a way to attack UGA.
Sorry, it’s called being realistic. I know UGA fans aren’t used to the concept.
SOGADOG
February 8th, 2012
3:55 pm
Who would have thought ten years ago the Texas AM vs Texas and Oklahoma vs Nebraska games would end. Money trumps tradition everytime.
Gordon
February 8th, 2012
3:56 pm
If I were a UGA fan, I would be furious about dropping either Auburn or Tech to keep a cupcake. Auburn is a great rival, and even though UGA has won 10 of 11 against Tech the game is almost always competitive. Some recent final scores are 20-14, 14-7, 15-12, 42-45, 30-24, 45-34. That is a lot more interesting than beating New Mexico State 56-7.
82Dawg
February 8th, 2012
3:56 pm
I thought every year sucked if you were a Tech fan….
FJR
February 8th, 2012
3:56 pm
@george Stein
Combining east and west, SC was certainly middle of the pack. And I’m a South Carolina alum, grad and fan. But we clearly were well behind Alabama, LSU and Arkansas and were more or less equal with UGA. Tie for fourth in a 12 team league is certainly middle of the pack.
I also enjoy that you’re trying to put UNC who was 3-5 in the ACC as the same exact tier as Tennessee (1-7) in the weaker division of the SEC. UNC was middle of the pack in the ACC (and got dominated by a future SEC team in their bowl game). Tennessee was arguably the worst team in the SEC this year. Their lone conference win was an overtime home win against Vandy, in overtime, on senior day, that Vandy lost more than Tennessee won. Equivocating Tennessee and UNC as both “middle of the pack” shows you’re reaching there.
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
3:58 pm
I thought every year sucked if you were a Tech fan….
Nah, its not so bad because we never have unrealistic expectations.
HighTech
February 8th, 2012
3:59 pm
Hate to see tradition going away. Tech vs Auburn used to be a good rivalry. It never gets old beating Auburn. The UGA vs Auburn game is the one time a year I can feel happy for the Dawgs.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
4:00 pm
Conference records of 2010 UNC and Tennessee: UNC 4-4, Tennessee 3-5
RxDawg
February 8th, 2012
4:01 pm
“Combining east and west, SC was certainly middle of the pack…But we clearly were well behind Alabama, LSU and Arkansas and were more or less equal with UGA.”
lol USC fans… you do realize that UGA is historicly the 3rd best SEC team of all time behind Bama and UT right? And if UGA could of played the 2nd half against LSU like the first, we’d be tied with UT for 2nd.
corkylovesbeer
February 8th, 2012
4:02 pm
We need to ask Clay Travis what he would do
Gordon
February 8th, 2012
4:03 pm
How’s this for an idea:
You eliminate the divisions entirely, and each team gets 3 permanent opponents. UGA’s would be Auburn, Florida, and maybe Tennessee or USC. You then play each of the other 10 teams once every other year. The top 2 teams, after tiebreakers, play in the championship game.
That is 8 games, you keep your most important games, and get to see everyone else in the league at least every other year and once every 4 years at home. Every student at UGA would see every other team in Athens during the time they were there.
What do you think?
FJR
February 8th, 2012
4:03 pm
@RxDawg Silly UGA fans, confusing a statement clearly referring to LAST YEAR with it being about ALL TIME.
Mike
February 8th, 2012
4:04 pm
I think this is money talking again. If they played a nine game conference schedule, it will be more difficult to schedule enough home games to make as much money. It still makes no sense to me why they cant do it either way.
Nearly every SEC team is playing a home and home with some other BCS conference school. UGA will play a team like Oklahoma St. in addition to Ga Tech. South Carolina typically plays someone like NC St. in addition to Clemson. Florida will play South Florida or Miami in addition to FSU. Bama just got done playing PSU home and home. LSU is playing WVU, on and on.
The ninth conference opponent could just take the place of this extra out of conference home and home everyone is playing anyway. UGA could still play Tech, Clemson/USC and FSU/UF could still be played. Its not rocket science.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
4:05 pm
@George Stein – LOL, I just realized you were bringing up a game from two years ago (UNC-Tenn). You know your point is weak when you have to use one single game from two seasons ago to make it.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
4:06 pm
@Gordon I actually like that idea a lot, if the presidents could get it to work. Though it would be hell trying to get all 14 teams to agree on the 3 permanent rivals.
Gordon
February 8th, 2012
4:09 pm
@FJR,
Another advantage is that you actually get the best two teams into the championship game. This year for example, it probably would have been an Alabama/LSU rematch. Then OSU would have had their shot at the winner. Currently if one side or the other is loaded, somebody sneaks in from the weaker side. I’m sure that’s happended to UGA before.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
4:11 pm
@Mike It’s a pure money thing. For every team except UF-UGA, they would be forced to play 5 road games every other year. SEC teams don’t want to ever play 6 road games. So, considering USC/Clemson (just by way of example, it’d be true of any team with an out of conference rivalry) even if they manage to get that scheduled so that one year they play 4 SEC road games + clemson on the road and the next 5 SEC road games plus clemson at home, they then wouldn’t have the power to schedule ANY home and homes. EVERYTHING else would be patsy games where we don’t have to pay a return visit. SEC Presidents and ADs just aren’t going to do that. SEC stadiums make too much money to be forced to play 6 or more road games, and they don’t want to give up their freedome to play OOC home and homes.
Sam Robards, Dawg Fan
February 8th, 2012
4:12 pm
Losing UGA/Auburn and UT/Bama is UNACCEPTABLE. Those rivalries help make the backbone of the conference.
And threatening the out-of-conference rivalries (UGA/Tech, SCar/Clemson, UF/FL. State) in the wake of a potential 9-game conference schedule is like the non-logic that accompanies certain politicians when someone says they’re going to cut government funding. “We’ll fire all the policemen and schoolteachers!” Really? THAT’S the first thing you think to get rid of?
How about you drop one of the cupcake games that EVERY TEAM IN THE CONFERENCE schedules EVERY YEAR.
Rivalries make college football different from every other sport. You take those away for the sake of expansion revenue and CFB really WILL just be the NFL Lite.
RxDawg
February 8th, 2012
4:15 pm
“SEC stadiums make too much money to be forced to play 6 or more road games, and they don’t want to give up their freedome to play OOC home and homes.”
That’s a good point… until the TV money trumps it. And the TV money is getting good.
P.S. If your talking about last season then yes, that statement was correct. But in it’s context it felt like you were speaking of the programs as a whole. My mistake.
War Eagle
February 8th, 2012
4:16 pm
You can say one thing about McGarity, he`s the Bear Bryant of schedules. Who`s replaces Auburn, Cumberland College? Tech beat them 220-0 several years back.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
4:17 pm
@gordon I 100% am on board with you. My only point is just think about the logistical nightmare of trying to get all 14 teams to agree on which teams are their 3 rivals. Think about Mississippi State, for instance. Sure you’ve got Ole Miss, but what two other teams would agree to be their permanent rivals? Bama is going Auburn, LSU, Tennessee. UF is going UGA, Tennessee, and maybe USC. You get the drift. I’d love for it to work, I just think it’d be a logistical nightmare to get teams to agree on that. And we’re not even talking about what two teams are going to agree to take on Missouri as permanent rivals (assuming they have to take TAMU).
Sam Robards, Dawg Fan
February 8th, 2012
4:17 pm
Reading some of the comments, I like Gordon’s idea.
Kill the division and give every team 3 or 4 permanent rivals, with the two best teams going to the SECCG in December.
That way’d we keep the rivalries while being able to see more teams more often. I honestly don’t see how that could possibly lose.
Truth
February 8th, 2012
4:17 pm
UGA’s AD is a Gator. He could care less about UGA traditions.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
4:17 pm
It points out the flaws in your beliefs, FJR.
SEC vs ACC since 2007: 23-19
Rabun Dawg
February 8th, 2012
4:19 pm
I know the coaches probably would not be in favor of a nine game conference schedule, but why the heck not? Then, in UGA case, nine conference, keep GAT, and two OOC games. Who the heck wants to see more of New Mexico St., Coastal Carolina, etc., etc. Many give those tickets away or just do not go to them. Then the EvsW rivalry games mentioned can be preserved. But I am sure our AD really wants more of those “patsy” games so CMR can win his nine or so every year. At least he hopes he can!
FJR
February 8th, 2012
4:21 pm
@RXDawg But the TV money is going to be the same regardless. UGA brings in, what, like $5 Mill in revenue for every home game? Ask the AD or president what they care about more, $5 million they’d lose in an additional home game lost or rivalries that only 4 of the 14 teams really care about. As sad as it is, $5 Mill is more important to them, especially when you consider all 14 teams. Because that buys stadium expansions, upgraded facilities, etc. Which gets recruits, which win games, which brings in more money.
jvillebil
February 8th, 2012
4:21 pm
Gordon, I like you idea, but it makes too much sense and we all know making sense in such as a BCS 8 team playoff makes too much sense thus it won’t happen.
Trojan
February 8th, 2012
4:21 pm
GTBob is the name of the haircut that most girls at GT have. Did you see those shots of the student section at the UGA/GT game. Yikes!
Old Dog
February 8th, 2012
4:22 pm
“You can say one thing about McGarity, he`s the Bear Bryant of schedules. Who`s replaces Auburn, Cumberland College?”
I think they are scheduling the Lowdens County High School Girl’s marching band. Richt is hopeful that they can win that one so as to keep his record up.
Gordon
February 8th, 2012
4:23 pm
@FJR,
We have reached a situation where everyone is not going to get everything they want. In this system, I’m sure everyone would get the one they wanted the most, and probably the top 2. All 3? Probably not in most cases. But if you want 8 games, you either are going to have a VERY slow rotation or are going to have to drop permanent opponents. Either of those is going to upset a lot of people too. This plan only drops the divisions, which haven’t been in place long enough to really say its a tradition.
Think of the SEC conference emblem. A hub with 14 spokes coming out of it representing the teams. The team opposite to you and to either side of you are your permanent opponents. If you sit down and work out the must haves, I think most people will be mostly happy, which is all you can ask for at this point.
Mizzo and A&M within the SEC
February 8th, 2012
4:23 pm
My wife is a St. Louis girl, having been born there BUT she is an UGA alumna, growing up in ATL. She has never considered that she is a Show Me State Gal but she is. Beyond this, there is in my mind, no way that over 5 ydears or even 30 years, MIZZO and A&M will or can ever replace Auburn.
Families in this area usually have a divided house. Some attend GT ( sad too ) and some matriculated at UT or Florida ( my dad) or Alabama (the slow ones in our family) or at Vandy ( the ones that THINK that they are smart) and so on.
To lose the rivalry with Auburn can affect recruiting and all kinds of usual college or SEC area traditions and bragging rights and RECRUITING> with Georgia HS kids maybe not going to AU, because they will not be able to come home to Georgia and compete home and away.
A&M and Mizzo will be just games for us all. A&M does have a fairly decent LONG TERM history but just not since maybe the 70s with Bubba Bean and that crowd. MIZZO except for that Chas Daniels QB of 2 years ago ………………has not had any players that I recall, although the Falcons did draft one LB kid last year …………..Witherspoon?
Who in the SEC will benefit and have a good schedule? Arkansas and possibly LSU. THEY are closest to these states and they ( Arkansas) had a HUGE SWC rivalry at one time with A&M. Arkansas and MO will be a natural. That is it!
Go Dogs.
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
4:24 pm
GTBob is the name of the haircut that most girls at GT have. Did you see those shots of the student section at the UGA/GT game. Yikes!
I thought GT didn’t have any girls?
Rabun Dawg
February 8th, 2012
4:27 pm
Truth, the AD at UGA is a UGA grad. He only worked at Gatorville,and thinks as they did while he was there. Foley taught him well, I guess.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
4:28 pm
@george Stein Arbitrary endpoints much? Why not list the last 3 years? Why not list the last 10 years? Why not list last year? Or did you just pick 2007 because then the best two year period in history for the ACC against the SEC JUST SO HAPPENED to be 2007 and 2008. Over 2007-2008, mostly on the strength of a few teams, the SEC managed to actually have a winning record against the SEC. Outside of those two years, the SEC has DOMINATED the ACC.
All-Time the SEC is 263-130-10 against the ACC
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
4:29 pm
How many of those losses were by South Carolina when they were in the ACC?
I chose 2007 because it was as far back as simple Google search would yield data for. By the way, the ACC went 3-6 against the SEC in 2007, which was our weakest showing.
7576DAWG
February 8th, 2012
4:29 pm
When the SEC AD’s and President’s meet this year in Destin
FJR
February 8th, 2012
4:30 pm
in the last posting I meant to say in 2007-2008 the ACC had a winning record against the SEC. Outside of those two years, the SEC has DOMINATED.
damn good dawg!
February 8th, 2012
4:31 pm
GTBob….did I hear you right??? Tech never has unrealistic expectations?????? OMG you ARE deluded!
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
4:34 pm
GTBob….did I hear you right??? Tech never has unrealistic expectations?????? OMG you ARE deluded!
Please give me an example of GT fans having unrealistic expectations.
Albert
February 8th, 2012
4:35 pm
GTBob likes to get on here every day and argue with these college kids. Makes him feel important, I guess.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
4:35 pm
alright, @george Stein, I gave you better numbers then. All-time we’re talking 263-130-10 in favor of the SEC. If you want to count all records for teams CURRENTLY in the SEC v. all teams CURRENTLY in the ACC, the SEC leads 875-705-72 (though a lot of that was done by Miami, and GT when they were not in the ACC).
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
4:36 pm
So you don’t see any value in trends, FJR?
timthebrave
February 8th, 2012
4:37 pm
9 conference games and 2 non conference games. I think this would work out better
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
4:37 pm
I thought GT didn’t have any girls?
They have em but man are they dogs.
P.S. Please stop comparing the SEC to the ACC. It makes you look stupid.
Buzzed
February 8th, 2012
4:39 pm
GTBob; Here’s an example of unrealistic expectations: You – thinking your opinions matter to anyone but yourself and your type.
Dumbo
February 8th, 2012
4:39 pm
GTBob…just go away…better yet go hang on Manboobs at the Coke Joke
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
4:40 pm
Please give me an example of GT fans having unrealistic expectations.
Ill give you 2.
1. After CPJ initial burst of success with Gaileys players we were told that ” there was a new sheriff in town ” That everything had changed now. That Tech had flipped the script on UGA and would begin dominating the series. How did that work out ?
2. Again after initial success we were told by Tech fans that ACC titles were nothing. That the program would be chasing BCS titles very soon and that CPJ walked on water.
Neither came true.
jvillebil
February 8th, 2012
4:41 pm
Can anyone tell me how all this conference jumping/swapping/adding/deleting got started several years ago? The problem with today’s generation is they actually know or care very little about tradition. In 25-years from now, there will be so many changes some kid from Vanderbilt’s CLASS OF 2037(which will now be playing in the ONLY 4.0 GPA LEAGUE) will be saying, “Hey I remember hearing that in the good ole days when we played in the ACC, & my daddy actually said, and can you believe this, we played in the SEC at one time. Georgia Tech will be playing in the (SCIENCE AND ENGINEER’S LEAGUE) Georgia and Florida will be playing in the (PARTY SCHOOL LEAGUE).
Tradition, well to the new society of college football organizers, it will just be a thing of the past. Their motto = SHOW ME THE MONEY!
Steve
February 8th, 2012
4:41 pm
A pox be upon the house of Mike Slive and the current ADs and Presidents for their naked greed. And let’s be honest here, college sports administrators would put heroin dealers to shame for all the ethics they have shown in the conference realignment dog’n'pony.
Bogey
February 8th, 2012
4:41 pm
FJR–I don’t see how the seven teams in the west would cycle through every 3 years if you are playing home and home in back to back years and that’s doing away with the traditional rival games. Can you explain?
7576DAWG
February 8th, 2012
4:43 pm
When the AD’s and the President’s of the school’s that make up the SEC meet this year in Destin I sure hope they will invite a couple of ESPN representative’s so they will know what to do or more importantly what not to do. We wouldn’t want to upset our money machine.
A better idea would be for the school’s not to have a meeting and just pay for an ESPN representative for each school of the SEC to meet in Destin themselves and decide how THEY want the SEC to handle thing’s. Then our AD and President wouldn’t have to waste their time or our money . Just let ESPN decide and let us know what we are suppose to do.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
4:44 pm
@george Stein um, sure. last year the ACC won, what, one game against the SEC? Florida State over Florida? I’ll take that trend of last year’s 5-1 trouncing by the SEC. (3-1 in the end of the year games, SEC 2-0 in bowl matchups).
Buzzed
February 8th, 2012
4:44 pm
Bigger loss to tek if they do away with the Georgia game. Except for the score, the game is a no-win for the Dawgs: strength of schedule suffers, Dawg fans suffer every other year in a small and more-confined dangerous environment, have to see the yellow fellas, etc.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
4:45 pm
2011 ACC vs SEC record: 2-3
Steve
February 8th, 2012
4:46 pm
GTBob it really is true! You really don’t have a life! Wow! Did you notice this article has nothing to do with the bees? This is the second UGA blog you have been on today. Poor little boy.
Dumbo
February 8th, 2012
4:46 pm
Buzzed…you’re right…Tek would lose their only sell out every other year
FJR
February 8th, 2012
4:47 pm
@bogey
The home and homes wouldn’t be in consecutive years, I’d guess, under such a scenario. Though it wasn’t my idea to begin with.
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
4:47 pm
Even comparing the SEC ( Considered the best BCS Conference by far ) to the ACC ( which gets consideration as the worst BCS conference along with the Big East ) is asinine.
Tech fans often look at their record for the season as a measure for success but they don’t put it in the context of the ACC.
For example. 7 or 8 wins in the ACC would equate to 3-4 in the SEC.
Techs best year of late the 2009 10 win team would equate to around 7 or 8 wins in the SEC.
You have to put things in the proper context
Boss Hog
February 8th, 2012
4:49 pm
Walking on water? Nah, frying fish? Sure.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
4:49 pm
You can never prove that’s true, headley.
FJR
February 8th, 2012
4:49 pm
@buzzed
Where Tech’s stadium is, it’s probably safer than Athens on game day. it’s not like it’s near Turner Field or the Georgia Dome. It’s more or less in midtown. Unless you’re scared of wealthy gay people or 20 something attorneys, it’s pretty safe.
Chuck
February 8th, 2012
4:50 pm
Not going to happen. Alabama and Tennessee already raised hell about this very same issue and it is why Mizzou ended up in the East Division. I am no even sure why the AJC decided to publish this.
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
4:57 pm
You can never prove that’s true, headley.
No because Tech will never have to play an SEC schedule.
But we can project based on what we know.
Take these numbers for instance.
In BCS games where the match ups are “even” ( i.e. Not Va Tech playing Vanderbilt )
SEC – 16 – 7
ACC – 02 – 13
Its pretty much obvious to everyone which conference is superior.
Groundhogday
February 8th, 2012
4:59 pm
@ FJR…
You’ve obviously never been past Coke HQ on North Ave headed west…..try Googling “The Bluff” in Atlanta and look at it on a map….
Ghost
February 8th, 2012
4:59 pm
IMHO PJ would drop Georgia from the schedule in a hot minute if he could.
Boss Hog
February 8th, 2012
5:00 pm
headley lamar for SEC commissioner! He’ll get it straightened out. Then he could become the GOV.
Michael
February 8th, 2012
5:01 pm
I like GORDON”S plan !!!!!!!!!!!!!
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:01 pm
Those numbers don’t do anything to help project the record of an ACC team playing an SEC schedule, headley.
2012 Preseason Fulmer Cup Champs
February 8th, 2012
5:02 pm
Well, if UGA loses Auburn they can always replace them with GA Southern or West GA college. It would make it easier to get to the SEC Championship and then lose to Auburn, Bama or LSU.
Techster
February 8th, 2012
5:04 pm
The crime dogs ran away from Bama. So is anyone really surprised that they want to duck Auburn too?
Texas Dawg
February 8th, 2012
5:06 pm
Well, I can tell you all from living in Texas, if they got rid of Texas vs. Texas A&M, they will do ANYTHING in college football these days. I’m telling that game meant the whole world to Texas A&M folks, and half the world to Texas folks and if that goes, it is not beyond comprehension that UGA vs. Auburn could be on the chopping block. Greed ruins everything.
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
5:06 pm
Now lets look at the bowl games. Again no homecoming games here. The match ups are supposed to be even ( although the SEC often plays its lower ranked teams against higher ranked teams from other conferences. Ala Chick Fil A bowl where ACC #2 team plays SEC #5 )
SEC Record last year
6-3
ACC
2-6
Now lets look at all time bowl records.
SEC 201 – 157
ACC 88 – 92
Finally lets look at the one bowl game that matches an ACC vs SEC opponent every year.
Even though the SEC plays a team 3 seeds lower from its conference it still wins that game.
10 of the last 16.
Case closed.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:08 pm
Of course #2 vs #5 is not based on ranking, headley, but don’t let facts get in your way. Last year, by way of example, South Carolina won their division and played in the Peach Bowl. And lost.
Paul in NH
February 8th, 2012
5:09 pm
I agree with Jeff that the SEC will likely not go to more than an 8 game schedule. If they go to 9, that makes it less likely that mid tier teams will become bowl eligible – meaning less $$$ for the conference. Rivalries and tradtion go out of the window when “amateur” athletics show their true reason for existence.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:09 pm
Additionally, bowl games are a terrible means by which to measure a team. You don’t get a month to prepare or have teams that are completely uninterested in the game during the regular season.
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
5:10 pm
Those numbers don’t do anything to help project the record of an ACC team playing an SEC schedule, headley.
Not precisely but ill bet its pretty close.
What say you ? How well would Tech do in the SEC.
They would probably dominate right.
I can see Tech beating Alabama, LSU, Georgia (lol), Auburn, South Carolina, Arkansas, Florida, etc etc on a regular basis. Cant you lol.
Bottom line take whatever win total a team has in the ACC and knock 3 or 4 off it if they played in the SEC.
Those numbers don’t lie.
Bolt Dog
February 8th, 2012
5:11 pm
Pure dilution of college sports… makes no sense. Right out of the gate, instead of taking a three hour or so drive to Alabama to see how we match up against the best, we get to go a place 700 miles away. How is that good? I’ve hoped this mess would help us to divest ourselves of the Tech game 47 years too late, but losing the Auburn game would hurt. It’s one of the games that epitomizes what college football in the south is all about.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:12 pm
Last thing, headley. Let’s assume that you’re right about the #2 vs #5 thing. Doesn’t that pretty much cut to the heart of the idea that an 8 win ACC is a 4 win SEC team?
Jesus christ
February 8th, 2012
5:13 pm
The IQ of Auburn and Dawg grads equals minus 43.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:14 pm
What numbers, headley? You’re making this stuff up as you go.
I have no idea how well Tech would do in the SEC. If we played Tennessee’s schedule, probably not too hot. If we played UGA’s schedule, probably about 6-2.
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
5:15 pm
Of course #2 vs #5 is not based on ranking, headley, but don’t let facts get in your way
No its based on picking order.
Its not absolute but pretty close.
I think you are the one letting facts get in the way.
The very fact you would even compare the two conferences shows you are.
1. Just a homer stirring up an argument even though you know its a false one.
2. Blind
How has Tech ( ACC ) done against an SEC Team ( UGA ) the last 10 years.
Was Tech uninterested in those games too ? Bigger fish to fry ?
Either way ive won this argument hands down. If this were a fight they would have called it.
If you were a horse they would have shot you by now.
Its all over.
Fell free to continue spinning it though.
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
5:16 pm
If we played UGA’s schedule, probably about 6-2.
LOL.
What numbers, headley? You’re making this stuff up as you go.
Nope sorry. Those are the real numbers. Look it up.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:17 pm
In your own mind you have, headley. You don’t deal with facts.
How’d the women of Troy do this season?
Fair n Balanced
February 8th, 2012
5:17 pm
I was not for this expansion in the first place! If this game is sacrificed and removes us further from the traditions of the SEC…..not much else is sacred. One day they will put Auburn in the East (it’s more east than MO) and then Bammer won’t be playing Auburn either!
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:18 pm
Let’s think this through. We probably beat Kentucky, Tennessee, Ole Miss, Miss State, and Vandy. I think we would definitely lose to South Carolina. Florida and Auburn are tossups, so I split the difference.
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
5:19 pm
Last thing, headley. Let’s assume that you’re right about the #2 vs #5 thing. Doesn’t that pretty much cut to the heart of the idea that an 8 win ACC is a 4 win SEC team?
If anything it validates it.
The SEC using a much lower ranked, seeded, picked team from its conference routinely beats a much higher seeded, ranked, picked team from the ACC.
duronimo
February 8th, 2012
5:19 pm
I would rather see the tech game go if it’s a choice between them and auburn.
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
5:20 pm
Florida and Auburn are tossups, so I split the difference.
LOL.
What about UGA. Is that a “tossup” too ?
LOL
Dawg Haus
February 8th, 2012
5:20 pm
The mere thought of seeing those classic rivalries sacrificed makes my stomach churn. Why don’t they stick the newbies in the West, along with Vandy, and put Bama and Auburn in the East? That way, Georgia-Auburn won’t be touched, Bama-Tennessee won’t be touched.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:21 pm
ACC is 10-9 in the Chick-fil-A bowl against the SEC. They only started getting the #2 pick four or five years ago.
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
5:21 pm
I would rather see the tech game go if it’s a choice between them and auburn.
Me too.
For one its an ACC team which unless its Va Tech isn’t really any competition.
Secondly Tech really is light years behind us and will be lucky to win once a decade.
Doesn’t make for much excitement. At least Auburn has a chance of winning.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:22 pm
UGA didn’t play UGA this year, headley.
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
5:23 pm
I think we would definitely lose to South Carolina.
I don’t know George. After watching the South Carolina vs. Navy game I really don’t think their defense would have much of a chance against us.
Paul in NH
February 8th, 2012
5:23 pm
“The SEC using a much lower ranked, seeded, picked team from its conference routinely beats a much higher seeded, ranked, picked team from the ACC.”
Routinely beats??? The record in the last 10 Peach Bowls is 5-5.
Dumbo
February 8th, 2012
5:24 pm
George Stein…some of your comments are about as good as Ben Stein’s
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
5:24 pm
ACC is 10-9 in the Chick-fil-A bowl against the SEC. They only started getting the #2 pick four or five years ago.
umm wrong.
They have lost 10 of the last 16.
they did win the first 4.
January 2, 1993 North Carolina 21 Mississippi State 17 notes
December 31, 1993 Clemson 14 Kentucky 13 notes
January 1, 1995 North Carolina State 28 Mississippi State 24 notes
December 30, 1995 Virginia 34 Georgia 27 notes
December 28, 1996 LSU 10 Clemson 7 notes
January 2, 1998 Auburn 21 Clemson 17 notes
December 31, 1998 Georgia 35 Virginia 33 notes
December 30, 1999 Mississippi State 17 Clemson 7 notes
December 29, 2000 LSU 28 Georgia Tech 14 notes
December 31, 2001 North Carolina 16 Auburn 10 notes
December 31, 2002 Maryland 30 Tennessee 3 notes
January 2, 2004 Clemson 27 Tennessee 14 notes
December 31, 2004 Miami (Florida) 27 Florida 10 notes
December 30, 2005 LSU 40 Miami (Florida) 3 notes
December 30, 2006 Georgia 31 Virginia Tech 24 notes
December 31, 2007 Auburn 23 Clemson 20 (OT) notes
December 31, 2008 LSU 38 Georgia Tech 3 notes
December 31, 2009 Virginia Tech 37 Tennessee 14 notes
December 31, 2010 Florida State 26 South Carolina 17 notes
December 31, 2011 Auburn 43 Virginia 24 notes
Better count again.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
5:25 pm
But that was the WHOLE reason MIZZOU came to the SEC east instead of Auburn.
Stephen
February 8th, 2012
5:25 pm
All I can say is they need to think long and hard about this. It takes a hundred years to build a hundred year tradition. Can’t unbreak a streak.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:25 pm
I don’t know if that’s a compliment or a dig, Dumbo.
Maybe, Bob, but I think we’d lose to them.
Facts, Paul.
Ghost
February 8th, 2012
5:26 pm
Hypothetically give tech Missouri’s 2012 SEC schedule. Find 6 conference wins , Replace Bama with ole miss. Losses UGA, SC, Florida, Tenn. Vandy, Texas am , Toss up Kentucky, likely win Ole miss.
Kentucky and Ole Miss have more depth.
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
5:26 pm
When you fudge the numbers you lose all credibility.
Again case close.
Goodnight and good luck.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:26 pm
Do you have trouble adding, headley?
Bill Bass
February 8th, 2012
5:27 pm
This is why the league will HAVE to expand to 16 teams. Then, you go to 4 pods of 4 teams each, and play the three teams in your pod and two teams from each other pod. A nine conference game slate, but you get to play EVERYONE much more often…there will then also be a semi-final and a SECC that will be a defacto ticket to the BSCCG.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:27 pm
Take off the SEC colored glasses, Ghost.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:29 pm
I agree, headly. The case is very close.
Dumbo
February 8th, 2012
5:30 pm
Well, as usual the peckerwood society idiots have arrived….the North Ave Boys….time to go
Paul in NH
February 8th, 2012
5:31 pm
headley lamar
February 8th, 2012
5:26 pm
When you fudge the numbers you lose all credibility.
————
This is coming from the man who claims that the SEC “routinely beats” the ACC in the Peach Bowl.
Who knew that headley lamar understood the concept of irony
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:34 pm
He’s a complete dolt, Paul. It’s almost too easy.
SEC Fact Finder
February 8th, 2012
5:35 pm
Would hate to see the traditional rivalry die. Several of them. This could have been avoided if some of our conference members had allowed Auburn to cross over to the East where they geographically belong, and still held their Alabama game as their permanent cross division game.
Time is rolling along and times change, but in the big picture those of us who have been to all of the present day SEC Stadiums( including TAM, Mizz,) we welcome the change if it makes us better.
Ghost
February 8th, 2012
5:37 pm
I am being serious George, I could see Tech in SEC easily 2-6.Techs not big ,physical or deep enough to compete in the SEC. 3-5 would be a best case scenario and one of the 3 would be an upset.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
5:37 pm
Play 9 Conference games keep the UGa v GT and punt the Ga Southerns to the curb. Looks like the Big Bad SEC is scared of itself now and have to keep the lil babies on the schedule.
WHY didn’t they move Auburn to the EAST in the first place?
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:40 pm
Then we’ll have to agree to disagree, Ghost.
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
5:41 pm
I am being serious George, I could see Tech in SEC easily 2-6.
When are SEC fans going to realize that outside of the top 2-3 teams who are usually great, the rest of the conference is average at best? Quit riding Bama’s coattails.
Ghost
February 8th, 2012
5:43 pm
Average in the SEC is well above average in conferences like the ACC.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
5:44 pm
Ghost TECH would get SEC type recruits too, if they could handle the course load. More of the kids Leaving the state to play in other SEC schools might consider TECH more than they do now.
Dumbo
February 8th, 2012
5:44 pm
5150 UOAD ……..Better watch the Ga Southern comment…I mean look at the Turds schedule in the coming years…Elon, Ga Southern,Wofford, Middle Tenn, SE Louisiana….yeah like the Turds are really picking up some toughies with that list
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:46 pm
No, it isn’t, Ghost.
BUZZ 2011
February 8th, 2012
5:46 pm
Maybe the Dawgs can get Kentucky and Vandy removed as well. They will lose to them as well as Arkansas.. I guess if Auburn goes Arkansas will be the only other tough SEC team the Dawgs will play
Greene Hornets
February 8th, 2012
5:46 pm
“When are SEC fans going to realize that outside of the top 2-3 teams who are usually great, the rest of the conference is average at best? Quit riding Bama’s coattails.”
We’ll do that as soon as Ga Tech quits riding Va Tech’s coattails…
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:47 pm
You forgot BYU, Ole Miss, Alabama, Auburn, and South Carolina, Dumbo.
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
5:48 pm
Average in the SEC is well above average in conferences like the ACC.
No, I meant average in the country. Not average in the conference. If you really think that teams like Florida and Vandy are light years ahead of teams like Miami and UNC then you are just blind with bias.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:48 pm
That’s 5th grade logic, Greene Hornets. Plus, we don’t ride their (nonexistent) coattails.
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
5:49 pm
We’ll do that as soon as Ga Tech quits riding Va Tech’s coattails…
What GT fan has ever claimed conference superiority because of the accomplishments of VT?
Ghost
February 8th, 2012
5:52 pm
Don’t try to pull the academic card, tech recruits the same players everyone else does.Pj could never attract the players it would require to compete in the SEC.
Dumbo
February 8th, 2012
5:53 pm
Ben Stein…..I’ll bet you there is no way ManBoobs keeps Bama, Auburn or SC on the schedule now that the All Crap Conference goes to 9 conference games…wanna bet
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
5:55 pm
Ghost that is your opinion. Tech doesn’t go after the same kids. There have been a few articles in the AJC explaining that FACT. We do go after some of the Same kids but not as many as you are implying.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:55 pm
Well, Johnson doesn’t make the schedule, Dumbo. ManBoobs, All Crap Conference? Are you ten years old?
Dumbo
February 8th, 2012
5:56 pm
+35
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
5:57 pm
DUMBO. I guarantee DRad keeps trying to keep SEC teams. ManBoobs? Are you talking about Todd Grantham? What size Manzier doe Grantham wear.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
5:58 pm
Time to grow up then, Dumbo.
Boss Hog
February 8th, 2012
5:59 pm
Over 35 huh? IQ?
Cdpridg
February 8th, 2012
5:59 pm
Bob…tell us all what exactly has VT done….this should be interesting…as a matter of fact tell us what any ACC team has done in the last 3,4 or 5 decades outside of bringing down FSU once they joined the conf
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
6:00 pm
Dumbo you have HC Helen Hunt, OC Dobie Gillis, and DC Choke ManBoobs and you think you have room to talk? Funny.
gtfanfrom1951
February 8th, 2012
6:00 pm
Georgia Southern played Bama better than most SEC teams!
Dumbo
February 8th, 2012
6:02 pm
5150 UOAD……………nah…you ain’t worth the time
Terry
February 8th, 2012
6:02 pm
This is a no brainer. Everyone should rotate equally across divisions. I doubt that the other 10 teams in the conference give a flip about the Auburn-UGA & Tn-Bama games. Those are the two games that are holding back a balanced schedule for ALL teams.
Stinger2
February 8th, 2012
6:04 pm
GTBob is a sad case. He came out today and admitted on another blog that he has no friends and that he likes men.
I feel sorry for him and for the UGA fans who have to
be subject to his constant nonsense. He obviously only wants attention.
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
6:06 pm
Who cares if he’s gay, Stinger2?
Bitchin Bill
February 8th, 2012
6:07 pm
These teams greatness are cyclical. Alabama was like playing Kentucky when Shula was there. Not that long ago people. If it is so important for the Dawgs to keep Auburn and Alabama to keep Tennessee why not swap their divisions from east to west and visa versa
Gordon
February 8th, 2012
6:08 pm
I proposed a plan at 4:03. Here is one stab at the permanent opponents. There would be 3 for each team. The first two make sense, the third isn’t a natural rival but that is what you have to do to make it work. I think the most important games are preserved.
UGA – AU, FL, MSST
AU – GA, AL, MO
AL – AU, TN, TAM
TN – AL, VN, ARK
VN – TN, KY, LSU
KY – VN, MS, SC
MS – KY, MSST, FL
MSST – MS, MO, GA
MO – MSST, TAM, AU
TAM – MO, ARK, AL
ARK – TAM, LSU, TN
LSU – ARK, SC, VN
SC – LSU, FL, KY
FL – SC, GA, MS
The advantages are:
1) 8 games, which most AD’s want for OOC scheduling flexibility.
2) Most important rivalries preserved.
3) You play everyone in the league at least once every 2 years, and at least once every 4 years at home.
4) The best two teams get into the championship game every year.
Wet Willie...keep on smiling
February 8th, 2012
6:08 pm
Georgia Southern played Bama better than most SEC teams!
Bingo…1951….I found myself pulling for GS for awhile and then I stopped drinking! Trying to stop the fullback in the Bone takes men and discipline. I can’t believe Les Miles and staff based the NC plan off the success GSU had when they didn’t even use the FB! So what we’re saying is GSU’s success vs Bama helped LSU lose the game. LOL
FAN
February 8th, 2012
6:09 pm
http://www.atlantahaulitallinc.com/Bird_Houses.php
Bama fans get your #14 championship house
Dawg fans get a UGA helmet house or an Uga history Dawg House
Any team helmet can be done.
WDE
February 8th, 2012
6:13 pm
It’s more likely that Auburn would move to the EAST, with Mizzou and A&M going to the West. This would put a more nationally competitive team in the East, allowing for a more interesting SEC Championship.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
6:19 pm
WDE.. the problem is that people have said they don’t want to see maybe a Bama v Auburn rematch a week later in the SEC CG.
AUnation, even in Georgia, Louisiana, and Arky
February 8th, 2012
6:20 pm
I’d rather juat drop Florida or South Carolina, than Bama, LSU, or Georgia. Neither SC or Florida are going to be competiyion in a few years again.
Ghost
February 8th, 2012
6:25 pm
5150, over 30 players on the Georgia roster last year had offers from Tech coming out of high school.
7 out of 19 of the 2012 class had offers from Tech. Think Pj would have been flying players in in from Australia if he would’ve been able to sign Atkins, Deloach, Jenkins and Taylor. I hope Tech keeps Pj forever, O’leary and Gailey teams had more talent .
George Stein
February 8th, 2012
6:27 pm
So about 30 players (assuming your data is correct) had offers from Tech. What about the other 55?
AUnation, even in Georgia, Louisiana, and Arky
February 8th, 2012
6:31 pm
Also, those who say Auburn should be in the East…all they have to do is keep on putting down SC and UF, then beat Georgia, and they’re guaranteed to always be in the SEC Championship.
Contractor
February 8th, 2012
6:43 pm
I just love how tradition in all I facets of life are being squashed. If there isn’t room in the schedule, make freaking room. Less take Buffalo or Southern University off of our schedule and suck it up to play the extra SEC game. The schools will make even more money with another SEC conference game, not to mention the TV aspect. McGarity needs to get out of that Florida mentality and grow a set. You don’t win Championships by playing Division II teams.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
6:49 pm
Ghost please post link to the list of 30 players. Many get EARLY offers but through more screening, evaluation, and test scores many of those kids no longer have a tech offer.
Ghost
February 8th, 2012
6:49 pm
So what about them? Either they weren’t recruited by Tech , they weren’t interested in tech or tech wasn’t interested in them. Theus the 5 star Tackle from Bolles in Jacksonville didn’t have a Tech offer , Why Pj wouldn’t offer a 5 star offensive tackle with good grades and test scores is beyond me, maybe no interest from either but to insinuate that Tech can’t sign or recruit many of the same players is ridiculous. Too many kids leaving the state that both tech and Georgia miss on, just don’t play the academics card.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
6:51 pm
Ghost post a list of players TECH & UGa were still actively recruiting late in the process that both UGa and Tech wanted.
WarEagle
February 8th, 2012
6:57 pm
I didn’t realize Mizzou would be ruining SEC traditions along with our reputation. I hope it’s worth getting the non-existent Missouri College Football market. #awesome #onetoomanytigers
Beast from the East
February 8th, 2012
6:57 pm
Contractor,
Excuse me but “that Florida mentality” has won 3 NC’s in the past 16 years along with 7 SEC titles in the past 20 years. How many has “that Georgia mentality” produced?
Beast from the East
February 8th, 2012
7:00 pm
“You don’t win Championships by playing Division II teams.”
You don’t win championships by not being able to beat a ranked team for 3 consecutive seasons. Need proof? See UGA.
LakeDawg
February 8th, 2012
7:00 pm
Instead of the SEC, its now the $EC. Get used to it. Nothing else matters. This is no longer intercollegiate athletics, its pro football. Drop the pretense. Let Tricky Nick recruit however he wants. But the players should form a union and take some of that cash.
Beast from the East
February 8th, 2012
7:03 pm
LakeDawg,
It’s been about the money for many years…in all major conferences. While we may lose some traditional rivalries, we’ll all still shell out our hard-earned dollars to watch. Suckers, aren’t we?
Annoyed by SEC Posturing
February 8th, 2012
7:05 pm
Call it what it is. SEC would rather drop 100+ year old rivalries so that they can keep an extra cupcake on the schedule.
LakeDawg
February 8th, 2012
7:05 pm
Beast from the East,
You’re right of course. Its just reached a tipping point for me. And yes, I’m a sucker.
Boise Dawg
February 8th, 2012
7:06 pm
The SEC should already be playing 9 conference games. Other conferences do and to me that is the small price of expansion. In fact, what is the point of conference expansion if you aren’t going to play a nice sample size of teams from your conference? Playing 8 conference games in a 14 team conference means you play 62% of the teams in your conference each year. Pathetic!
LakeDawg
February 8th, 2012
7:11 pm
“In fact, what is the point of conference expansion if you aren’t going to play a nice sample size of teams from your conference? ”
The point is increased revenue. Period. Nothing more.
Beast from the East
February 8th, 2012
7:13 pm
I think you’ll see the conference expand to 16 teams within the next 5 years and possibly a 10 game conference schedule to go along with it.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
7:15 pm
Play 9 Conference games keep the UGa v GT and punt the Ga Southerns to the curb. Looks like the Big Bad SEC is scared of itself now and have to keep the lil babies on the schedule.
WHY didn’t they move Auburn to the EAST in the first place?
Fans are FORCED to pay a ton of money for home games against Ga Southern, Ga State, & Troys of the world. No thanks Play 9 Conference games and punt the Pi$$y to the curb. Stop Robbing the fans for a JOKE win.
Ghost
February 8th, 2012
7:17 pm
5150, I am not going to go through the lists over since 2008. Go to rivals or scout the info is there. But I will give you some names. B. boykin, t. King, j Owens, B rambo, C robinson, d tyson,m gilliard, D lee,B smith, K houston, alec ogletree, , garrison smith, tj stripling, Mike Thorton, S. bailey, Chris conley, watts dantzler, z de bell, ray drew, A. herrera, Nick marshall (just got kicked off the team) Js wesley, X ward, Jordan jenkins,john atkins, ja, deloach, quayvon hicks, Keith marshall, J. taylor.
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
7:25 pm
GTBob is a sad case. He came out today and admitted on another blog that he has no friends and that he likes men.
Hmm. This is a little fishy. You typed word for word the same thing that a UGA fan said on another board. Care to tell us the name you normally post as?
Beast from the East
February 8th, 2012
7:25 pm
5150,
They will never stop “robbing the fans” when the fans continue to fill the seats. It’s all about the money.
Serious???
February 8th, 2012
7:26 pm
dump UGA-Auburn because texas a&M or missouri are in the SEC??? are you serious??? mcgarity needs to lay off the drugs if he’s thinking of that.
Will Smith
February 8th, 2012
7:27 pm
This has got to be the lamest idea in the history of the conference. Just move us (Auburn) to the East, which any dummy who made a “C” in geography can figure out is a natural fit. We can still play the Tuscalosers every year. Once a conference reaches a certain size, it makes no sense to insist on playing “x” games against teams in the other conference anyway. The SEC title game becomes more like a World Series (before the god-awful inter-league play started), even more exciting. Basketball and baseball have more games so rivalries could build up across divisions.
A conference without traditions is just moneyball, I don’t want to watch that at all!
Contractor
February 8th, 2012
7:28 pm
Beast from the east,
Florida has been rather good, but if you knew anything about Georgia, you’d know our teams don’t play to their potential, but keep games close and never stretch their legs. There is no pride poin beating Florida International and playing The Citadel 7 games in. We all outta be ashamed for scheduling more than two Division II teams outside of the first two games. Georgia played a soft schedule and we got worked in the SEC Championship game because we hadn’t played that level of competition and wasn’t sure how to respond. The Florida mentality has been well documented and allows Florida’s teams to gain full strength throughout the year by beating up on cupcakes. Argue all you want, but your schedules have been pathetic under McGarity, and Georgia’s is showing now and in future seasons. Boise State is a test we outta have to face every year early, not try and back our way into a BCS bowl.
phil
February 8th, 2012
7:29 pm
Dump Tech.
Keep Fraudburn. At least it’s a real opponent.
Coach
February 8th, 2012
7:30 pm
Actually, your opening is wrong. Bama-UGA is already a victim, and the Auburn series is next? Just because you won’t play 9 conference games? Boy, this expansion is really great. Who cares about A&M, Mizzou, Syracuse or UConn.
Delbert D.
February 8th, 2012
7:30 pm
If the SEC plays only 2 opposite division schools every year, they may as well split into 2 separate conferences. I guess I was wrong in assuming the 6-2 schedule was temporary, to accommodate the 2 new schools’ immediate scheduling conflicts.
Contractor
February 8th, 2012
7:30 pm
LSU and Alabama have shown that beating quality opponents like Oregon and Penn State prove to be more beneficial than Buffalo and The Citadel.
phil
February 8th, 2012
7:32 pm
Fire CMR!
Beast from the East
February 8th, 2012
7:40 pm
Contractor,
LSU and Bama don’t have to play each other at a nuetral site every year, thus losing a home game every other year. They also do not have to play an in-state rival from OOC every year, thus losing another home game every other year. That is why they play those patsies. You can’t get a quality opponent to come to your place without a return trip. That is why both UF and UGA play so many cupcakes.
adamwareagle
February 8th, 2012
7:45 pm
this is how delusional acc fans are acc teams play creampuff non conference games too plus that crappy conference schedule. and what moron defended va tech who have they beat in the last 4 years that meant anything they got drug by clemson twice last year lost boise and lets not forget about being beat by james madison sure ole miss lost to a div 2a team or whatever they call it know but not the bigdogs of the sec you acc fans are morons trying to talk about sec football. you know why sec guys dont talk bad about acc basketball because we know yall are ahead of us in basketball because we are not stupid.
Ghost
February 8th, 2012
7:46 pm
Beast you are correct and many people don’t understand it about $ tough to take away 93,000 paid attendance.Take a look at Bama and LSu schedule for 2012 not very intimidating either.
Falcon Man..
February 8th, 2012
7:50 pm
AU UGA is one of the better rivalry games played EVER…We have played AU for over 100 years and AU has a 1 game advantage. That is about as good of a rivalry as there is, this would be HORRIBLE losing that game. So we would rotate a Miss State or a Arkansas in place of AU in some years? College FB has JUMPED the SHARK..
Beast from the East
February 8th, 2012
7:50 pm
Ghost,
Something will have to give as the conference expands and the conference schedule moves to 9 or 10 games. Either UF/UGA will have to go to home and home or the UF/FSU and UGA/GT games will end. Who knows, maybe both will happen over time.
Falcon Man..
February 8th, 2012
7:52 pm
Move AU to the East and Missou to the West..UT/Bama hasn’t been relevant in 15 years…AU to the east makes too much sense
bamaonline
February 8th, 2012
7:52 pm
Ga has the easiest schedule in the nation and now they are trying to get out of a game stay lose more than half the time. Why not play Vandy twice every year and call yourself champs.
AU in Vestavia
February 8th, 2012
7:56 pm
AU really tried to move to the East this past season, UGA,bammer,UF did not want it..
Jakeau24
February 8th, 2012
8:14 pm
Athens is my second favorite place to tailgate and play other than Auburn. Not playing THUGA would suck. Auburn should be in the East anyway….
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
8:15 pm
Looks a little like the SEC brain trust didn’t do as much Thinking about this expansion thing as we were lead to believe.
Ghost
February 8th, 2012
8:18 pm
Bamaonline, Things are cyclical and do shift the east could be much better next year the west could decline a little who knows that why they play the games. But please don’t be so condescending like Bama plays a a tough game every week W. Ky, Fl. Atlantic,W. Carolina, 1 tough out of conference game. Tenn and Mizzou from the east.No Georgia, Florida or South Carolina and all 3 will be good next year.
Floyd
February 8th, 2012
8:41 pm
Georgia is 31-11 against Georgia Tech dating back to 1970. Why drop the Trade School and pickup a non-BCS opponent when we already have the perfect cupcake?
pttc
February 8th, 2012
8:48 pm
Would have been sad to see it go before Auburn sold their soul to the devil to rent Cam Newton for a year and plucked that thug Fairly out of Juco. He and Suh took much of the “feel-good” out of the Lion’s turnaround season. Auburn can wallow in the slime with Nick Satan and the other toothless redneck nutjobs over in Alabama. Face it, their is nothing else in the whole state for them to be proud of, so I guess let them have their football but otherwise the fewer times those hicks head east the better.
IL Jacket
February 8th, 2012
9:00 pm
If this were to come to fruition it would be a sad day for both UGA and Auburn. College football is in large measure about tradition and the ” Deep South’s Oldest Rivalry” should be sacrosanct. Otherwise, it becomes like NFL where teams change leagues for financial reasons.
It hasn’t come to the point of dropping Auburn yet, but, in my mind, it is just another example of the fan being ignored and having an inferior product foisted upon the long suffering season ticket holder. Remember the rationale for the 12th game was so there could be more intersectional OOC games. And yes, I fault my own team for its “strategic” scheduling. I mean who wants to watch MTSU, Coastal Carolina, Samford, even Ga. Southern for that matter. I harken back to the days when Tech played USC Trojans, ND, UT. That is the way to get better-play better opponents.
IL Jacket
February 8th, 2012
9:05 pm
Moving AU to the East wouldn’t solve the math problem of not having a traditional cross sectional rival on your schedule ever year. Then, if AU moved East, it would mean it would not play Bama every year and I don’t think they are going to settle for that.
Matt the Brave
February 8th, 2012
9:09 pm
Could we drop Kentucky or Vanderbilt? Of course, this may be a moot point if Auburn and Alabama move over to the SEC East after next year. I doubt that will happen, though..can you imagine UF, UT, UGA, Bama, AU all in the same SIDE of the conference?
Dawg48
February 8th, 2012
9:12 pm
How are you going to tear down the foundation of what your conference is built on?
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
9:16 pm
48 because what they are Building On now has NOTHING to do with Students or Institutions of Higher Learning, but MONEY.
Dawg48
February 8th, 2012
9:19 pm
These games have been a part of all our lives since we where born! This tick’s me OFF!
Dawg48
February 8th, 2012
9:24 pm
It’s not just UGA Auburn, it’s Alabama Tennessee, Fla LSU as well, if they end these games it would be no problem to end the Fla GA game or Bama AU or any of the traditional games. History may repeat it’s self if these conferences get to big. The Old southern conference broke up when it got to big and formed the SEC. If they take away the traditional games and the conference gets to big what’s to say some of the founding teams jump ship and start another conference down the road.
JB
February 8th, 2012
9:30 pm
We ought to drop Tech and pick up another SEC foe. What’s left to prove?
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
9:31 pm
48…Texas v Texas A&M, Pittsburgh v WVU, Kansas v Mizzou and many other game are looking to disappear so Conferences will keep the pansy teams instead of good tough games.
Dawg48
February 8th, 2012
9:33 pm
5150, I know and it’s sad.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
9:33 pm
JB that will draw the same fire that USC V Clemson is drawing. The State Politicians will start to make laws to keep these games.
If you had guts would would say drop Ga Southern but we know you don’t have the guts to play a hard schedule. McGarity has no balls.
JB
February 8th, 2012
9:35 pm
5150. Compare where we’ve been and who we’ve played the last 4-5 years….say vs the mighty Gators. Do it.
Dawg48
February 8th, 2012
9:38 pm
The old southern conference…..
The conference was formed on February 25, 1921 in Atlanta as fourteen member institutions split from the Southern Intercollegiate Athletic Association.[1] Southern Conference charter members were Alabama, Auburn, Clemson, Georgia, Georgia Tech, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi State, North Carolina, North Carolina State, Tennessee, Virginia, Virginia Tech, and Washington & Lee. In 1922, six more universities – Florida, LSU, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tulane, and Vanderbilt joined the conference. Later additions included Sewanee (1923), Virginia Military Institute (1924), and Duke (1929).
The SoCon is particularly notable for having spawned two other major conferences. In 1933, thirteen schools located south and west of the Appalachians (Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, Georgia Tech, Kentucky, LSU, Mississippi, Mississippi State, University of the South, Tennessee, Tulane, and Vanderbilt) departed the SoCon to form the Southeastern Conference (SEC).[1] In 1953, seven schools (Clemson, Duke, Maryland, North Carolina, North Carolina State, South Carolina, and Wake Forest) withdrew from the SoCon to form the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC).[1]
JB
February 8th, 2012
9:38 pm
Arizona …There……………Olklahoma St…..There……………..Boise St, ranked #5 pre season…in the dome………………………………..Non of the these look like Charleston Southern driving over in a church bus to play.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
9:44 pm
Okie St was an easy WIN when UGa made the contract. Arizona hasn’t been that good in years. UGa dropped the H-n-H with Oregon so that is why the Boise St game happened.
JB
February 8th, 2012
9:46 pm
5150……….spin it all you want. The Mighty Gators have never been on a plane.And Tech’s first 6 wins last year were embarrassing.
Steve
February 8th, 2012
9:53 pm
5150 UOAD what’s it like to have no life? I just did a quick look at this blog and you have been on all afternoon and night. AND YOU ARE NOT EVEN A GEORGIA FAN! Talk about pathetic. You and GTBob need to get together and have a milk or something.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
10:06 pm
JB are these the teams you call a step up from the lil sisters of the blind?
2005 Boise St 13 v UGA 48…………BSU was 9-4
2006 Colorado 13 V UGA 14……….CU was 2-10
2007 Okie St 14 v UGA 35…………..OSU was 7-6
2008 Arizona St 10 v UGA 27………ASU was 5-7
2009 Okie St 24 v UGA 10…………..OSU was 9-4
2009 Arizona St 17 v UGA 20………ASU was 4-8
2010 Colorado 29 v UGA 27………..CU was 5-7
2011 Boise St 35 v UGA 21…………BSU was 12-1
Tell me about how TUFF these teams were again Boise St was good both times and Okie St was good one year, but the rest were crapy.
Brainiac(Dawg For Life) / (CMR fan for life)
February 8th, 2012
10:07 pm
@ FJR:
Been keeping up with D-1 Football long???
I didn’t think so. The first thing McGarity did when UGA hired him was cancel a scheduled game with a pushover and scheduled Boise State but don’t let the facts get in the way of your single digit IQ creations.
Nick
February 8th, 2012
10:07 pm
It’s necessary for the SEC to move to a 9-game schedule in the future. 6 divsional, 3 inter-league games. Sure, you drop a non-conference game, but that will mean that Georgia probably won’t be killed by teams like Boise State in the future. Also, NO MORE TEAMS PLEASE!!! Mizzou and Texas A&M were unecessary in my opinion, but two more teams is ridiculous. 14 teams with a 9 game schedule and a protected inter-league rivalry will work. Don’t fix what’s not broken.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
10:11 pm
Thanks STEVE. I finished a job this morning and got done around lunch. been watching some Basket ball tonight.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
10:15 pm
Brainiac….a PUSH over? a Home & Home with OREGON was a Pushover. Hahahaha that is rich. UGA would have gone to the Left Coast last year and OREGON in Athens this year. So what PUSHOVER did McGarity drop? Don’t let the facts get in the way.
Monkey
February 8th, 2012
10:15 pm
From Michael Adams:
“My best guess is we’re going to end up with either a four- or eight-team playoff by the time we get to ’14,” he told the executive committee of the UGA Athletic Association’s board of directors Wednesday.
Adams’ assessment came during the regularly scheduled winter meeting of the board, which also received an update in closed session on contract-extension negotiations with football coach Mark Richt.
_____________________________________________________________________________
This clown has NO business discussing Football. He is what is wrong with UGA football. He wants the spotlight on “HIM” and he finished ruining Georgia Football by forcing Vince Dooley out as AD.
I am not at all a UGA fan, but look at the successful programs around and you see a Strong AD who lets his football coach run the program and the President stays in the background and out of the spotlight.
Michael Adams needs to leave the conference and leave college sports alone.
Brainiac(Dawg For Life) / (CMR fan for life)
February 8th, 2012
10:23 pm
@ AU in Vestavia:
The War Chickens need to move out of the D-1 Conference and find a Junior College Conference.
They are history unless they fire Chizik and hire St. Saban.
No Cam The Scam = No championship
GregGamePlan
February 8th, 2012
10:27 pm
don’t you remember when McGarrity was hired from Fla. He said then the plan was to play 12 games–8 SEC, Tech (due to the rivalry) and 3 Pushovers like UF did every year, since the SEC schedule was so brutal. So now what I am understanding is he is saying that if we go to 9 SEC games, we’ll have to drop Tech to make room for the 3 pushovers. Huh?
Keep Ga Tech and cancel Fla Atlantic or Buffalo. He won’t because as Greg learned at UF, winning records bring in the donors. It’s all about the Money !!
Monkey
February 8th, 2012
10:27 pm
Do Georgia Fans realize that Mark Rich is:
30-27 against Top 25 Opponents?
While:
Nick Saban is 32-17
Les Miles is 33-26
Steve Spurrier is 18-21
Bobby Petrino is 14-17
Kinda puts it into perspective.
Ron
February 8th, 2012
10:29 pm
So Richt is the third best sec coach. Your point?
Dawg48
February 8th, 2012
10:33 pm
Do Bama fans realize Nick Saban is
0 and1 vs loisiana Monroe?
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
10:34 pm
MONKEY that is Spurrier at So Carolina. What is his record including Duke and Florida?
Dawg48
February 8th, 2012
10:39 pm
Doubt Spurrier played any top 25 teams at Duke. They are in the ACC.
Dawg48
February 8th, 2012
10:40 pm
Well, maybe in a bowl game or a OOC game.
AUAlum
February 8th, 2012
10:42 pm
I love the UGA game, it is generally a good rivalry. I define that as usually a good game and even if some fans don’t like the other school everyone at least acts there mother gave them some manners. I agree with GTBob in that tv won’t let the Iron Bowl go away nor will the Alabama legislature because of the money it brings into the state and the schools on marketing and press attention. If they intefered with sponsor companies for years they’ll certainly pressure the SEC. Let’s go to nine games, we’ll dump NESW Louisiana and everyone else dump a patsy.
As for the SEC v. ACC, I have no ill will towards the ACC as I’ve had good experiences at several of their stadiums. However, we are the only conference with a winning record in the BCS Championship game with an 8-1 record (and the loss was to another SEC school). The ACC is 2-4. We are also 16-7 in BCS bowls and the ACC is 2-13.
Brainiac(Dawg For Life) / (CMR fan for life)
February 8th, 2012
10:46 pm
@ 5150:
I have refrained from picking on you but since you keep begging for it I will try to accomodate you even though you have no dog in this fight. Are you saying Boise was not a step up from Oregon? At the time the Boise State game was finalized they were ranked No.5 in the nation so that pretty well disqualifies your nerdofthemonth statement about McGarity trying to schedule ALL easy games.
If he wants an undefeated season all he would have to do is schedule your Junior College-like Bunglebees all 12 games.
Why are y’all having so many NCAA problems yet are still having problems acquiring an above .500 season?
And why are y’all even still talking football Oh, now I remember. Your BB team is even worse than your Middle School Offense running football team
HOUDAWG
February 8th, 2012
10:59 pm
Hey JacketFan …….. You forgot to include Tech among ….. “UL-Lafayette, UAB, Coastal Carolina, Idaho State, Tenn Tech, Western Carolina, or any of the other numerous OOC cupcakes y’all play ” !! DumbA$$ …… !!!!
Brainiac(Dawg For Life) / (CMR fan for life)
February 8th, 2012
10:59 pm
Little publicized facts from Red Elephant Country(Things you will never hear from a Bama fan)
UGA/CMR owns St. Saban ………………………..SS has lost 3 of 4 to UGA/CMR
Louisiana Monroe owns St. Saban………………SS has lost 1 of 1 to LM
Can I get an AMEN??????????????????????
Life is good in Dawg Nation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
intheknow
February 8th, 2012
11:00 pm
Monkey been playing with your Banana again? or have you been in your bathroom all day worshiping Saban?
Lee
February 8th, 2012
11:00 pm
Come on PEOPLE,,,,,,the AU/UGA game shoule always be played. The Bama people act as people in Tennessee see their game in the same light. Thats BULL BULL BULL. The new UT athletic director owes his career to Mal Moore, the athletic director at alabama. Thats the only reason UT is concerned about that game.
Monkey
February 8th, 2012
11:12 pm
Dawg48
February 8th, 2012
10:33 pm
Do Bama fans realize Nick Saban is
0 and1 vs loisiana Monroe?
Got to love a dumba$$ who wants to go back to the first year of a coaches tenure, while easily forgetting that losing to Colorado and UCF in his 9th year, and to EVERY Final TOP 25 Team they played in his 10th year.
Let’s not forget losing Blackout. Easy to win an argument with UGA fans.
Lets not even get into the last 4 years of graduation rates. Alabama/Saban has seen theirs go from 6th in the conference to 3rd, while UGA has gone from 4th to 7th in that same period of time.
UGA wins one title, The Fulmer Cup. Their only title.
Thanks for playing but you lose again.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
11:13 pm
Brainiac Boise State isn’t better than Oregon. They are give or take pretty even. Oregon plays better competition year in year out. What McGarity did was to lose 2 hard games for 1 in the DOME.
Monkey
February 8th, 2012
11:19 pm
http://coachesbythenumbers.com/coach-rankings/?reportId=22
Monkey
February 8th, 2012
11:26 pm
Steve Spurrier was 54- 12 verse top 20 teams(not top 25) teams while at Florida…just answering the question.
5150 UOAD
February 8th, 2012
11:28 pm
Monkey I figured his numbers had to be higher since he has coached so long.
Monkey
February 8th, 2012
11:30 pm
Brainiac(Dawg For Life) / (CMR fan for life)
February 8th, 2012
10:59 pm
Little publicized facts from Red Elephant Country(Things you will never hear from a Bama fan)
UGA/CMR owns St. Saban ………………………..SS has lost 3 of 4 to UGA/CMR
Louisiana Monroe owns St. Saban………………SS has lost 1 of 1 to LM
Can I get an AMEN??????????????????????
Life is good in Dawg Nation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
_____________________________________________________________________________
The real record:
Nick Saban vs. Mark Richt
Record against Mark Richt since 2000: 3-2
Last home loss against Mark Richt: September 22, 2007
Last road win against Mark Richt: September 27, 2008 Season Nick Saban School Mark Richt School Outcome Location
2008 Alabama Georgia Win, 41-30 (see details) Away
2007 Alabama Georgia Loss, 23-26 (see details) Home
2004 Louisiana State Georgia Loss, 16-45 (see details) Away
2003 Louisiana State Georgia Win, 34-13 (see details) Atlanta, GA
2003 Louisiana State Georgia Win, 17-10 (see details) Home
Mac
February 8th, 2012
11:40 pm
I think we mu$t remember that thing that i$ mo$t important to college football, and it i$ not tradition, nor fan $ati$faction, but $omething much more $erious and $acred to Univer$ity Pre$idents, athletic director$ and tru$tees.
Ckgator
February 8th, 2012
11:49 pm
Money first, and us fans second.
Simple as that.
Dawg16
February 8th, 2012
11:54 pm
I would hate to see the UGA/AU game lost…. Because the SEC added to sorry a$$ programs like A&M and Mizzu…. They should have gone and gotten Clemson and FSU, but I know that it was all about money and the different TV markets….. But make no mistake about it the vote that will matter the most will be Alabama!!!! If they want to keep Tennesse (which I think they will) they will keep Tennesee on their schedule and then the Georgia/Auburn game will be saved….. as much as it pains me to say…. The rest of the conference does not care about what Georgia and Auburn have to say…..
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
12:08 am
That is right. The 100K+ at Bama and UT will still buy tickets so the presidents don’t care. The 80K+ at UGA and Auburn will still buy tickets so the presidents don’t care. Until the FANS don’t send in checks to renew season tickets the fans will not get what they want. Fans of all these schools are too afraid of losing their season tickets so they will continue to be force fed crappy OOC games and dropping Traditions because the presidents can do what they want to you sheep.
Tony B
February 9th, 2012
12:13 am
Gotta keep the Auburn-Georgia game annual no matter what. I’m an Auburn grad happily married to a Georgia grad and we look forward to that game every season. War Eagle!
Jeff Kirk
February 9th, 2012
12:28 am
If the AU v UGA game is dropped so will my season tickets. This is ridiculous!! Until we make the “leaders” of the SEC feel the pain, they will continue to do stupid things like let expand the conference to levels which destroy all traditions. It’s time we put a stop to this garbage and make our voices heard through the only method that SEC hears … $$$$.
Tybee Island
February 9th, 2012
12:38 am
Enter your comments here
Tybee Island
February 9th, 2012
12:39 am
This would be a BAD move by the SEC.
For Info on tybee island vacations visit: http://www.sandysbytheshore.com
$$$EC
February 9th, 2012
12:41 am
I agree totally, we sports fans have created a bold and pompous group of individuals that are running these teams and University’s now….. We pay these coaches and University Presidents way to much money for the job they do….. And we wonder why they don’t listen to us, because they are a bunch of arrogant pricks….. They don’t care if people stop buying their season tickets or not renew their sky box contracts, they will just move the next guy in line in your old spot…. It has gotten out of control….. I played football in the SEC and have had a sky box for over a decade at my beloved school, and I know I am complaining about the very problem that I am contributing to, but the truth is the truth, these a-holes that are calling the shots you would not let them run a popcorn stand for you, but they are the ones in charge and they are making decisions without any regard for the fans, alums or contributors. It is a bunch of garbage if you ask me.
Chuck UGA
February 9th, 2012
1:20 am
Wow, this is a disaster. I do NOT want to lose the Auburn game. I am especially against this change in scheduling because we as UGA fans can now count on one annual SEC loss for Tennessee (to Bammer, at least until Nicky leaves) which helps us in the division.
sting_em
February 9th, 2012
1:36 am
At the very lease, I see the GT UGA, CLEM USC, and UF FSU moved to a more suitable week. UGA should be playing UF or USC last week. TECH should play Clem or NCSt, and UF should play TEN, FSU and Miam. It would make for a great week of football. Most would have some say in who goes to the Conf championship. GA could just keep their GT game alive (Sometime in Oct). Now if they ever go back to 11 games all bets are off.
UGAKEV
February 9th, 2012
2:07 am
Drop Georgia Tech and keep Auburn as a non conference game. Simple as that.
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
2:24 am
ugakev…how stupid is that statement. How can you make a conference team a Non Conference Game? You UGa education is showing.
Buckeye
February 9th, 2012
7:04 am
Auburn has a women’s gymnastics team?
ekd
February 9th, 2012
7:34 am
why would you lose rival games by going to 9? goog grief you have 12 total. just move the rival games to the first 1-4 weeks of the season.
We didn’t ask for this, fellas. | Get The Picture
February 9th, 2012
7:38 am
[...] guess this is my day to crap all over Greg McGarity, but really, I can’t let this comment pass. “I think if you ask Alabama and Tennessee, like us and Auburn, we’d like to retain the [...]
AU Eagle
February 9th, 2012
7:51 am
After losing to Georgia 45-7, can we play Texas A & M instead?
Good Grief
February 9th, 2012
7:54 am
Whole problem could’ve been solved by moving Auburn to the East. If you wanted to maintain traditional cross-division rivalries, then Auburn-Alabama becomes the full-time rivalry game. Georgia and Tennessee would need new cross-division rivals, but the SEC jsut added two new teams. Tennessee gets Mizzou and Georgia gets Texas A&M. By moving Auburn to the East, you also renew the yearly rivalry game between Auburn and Florida.
Yes, I know moving Auburn would’ve been difficult, but they are the easternmost SEC West team, they have a history with many East school, and it makes more sense for them to be in the East than Missouri.
chilidawg
February 9th, 2012
7:54 am
If it ain’t broke, fix it until it is.
Kramer
February 9th, 2012
8:16 am
The bottomline is with all this conference shake up going on UGA-UA is not the only rivalry that is gone. Look at Oklahoma-Nebraska for example and Syracuse-Georgetown in basketball. I am sure I missing others for both sports. Not good in my opinion.
GT Dude
February 9th, 2012
8:43 am
would hate to see this happen; it was sad for the GT faithful when Auburn was replaced on our schedule as perennial opponent
Hope it works out for tradition’s sake
crusher dawg
February 9th, 2012
8:45 am
Personally I would rather play Auburn than Tech. They are a better program and would make things more challenging. In the long run it would make UGA a better team. And when you think of Tennessee-Alabama, when was the last time that the game was even interesting.
bulldogbubba
February 9th, 2012
8:50 am
It’s all about the “money” honey. Plain and simple.Tv and money are now in charge.Tradition is now a dirty word.I say GO DOGS and WAR EAGLE!!!!
flagboy?
February 9th, 2012
8:53 am
. . why is anyone wasting time typing about anything regarding the ACC and this article? Comparing the SEC and the ACC, especially the ACC going through a 7-8 year stretch when even Miami and FSU are down, is laughable.
I hope the SEC finds a way to keep the UGA-auburn game going. If not, this realignment stuff, trying to keep up (?) with other conferences, (remind me why we’re trying to do that again? TV money?) will be the first mistake made by the conference in some time.
TallaDawg
February 9th, 2012
8:54 am
God forbid that the college money grubbers sacrifice a Buffalo or Ga So. game instead. When money is the top priority in everything, QUALITY is lost.
McDawg
February 9th, 2012
9:03 am
everyone should let Adams and the SEC know how they feel
bill mann
February 9th, 2012
9:10 am
as a paying customer and UGA fan, would rather pay my money to see a competitive game against auburn(and maybe a loss) than to see these garbage 56-3 drubbings against the likes of buffalo and ga. southern etc..greg mcgarity you are rapidly losing me as a lifelong season ticket holder
matt
February 9th, 2012
9:15 am
People need to realize that this country is run by politicians. School presidents, atheltic directors, commisioners and the NCAA are politicians. Politicians are self serving, ego driven, power hungry, scratch my back and i’ll scratch yours people who don’t give a crap about the common person. They don’t care about what the public wants, they are only concerned with how to make the most money and keep the most power.
When you vote, you aren’t voting for the person who is going to do more good, you are voting for the person who is going to screw you the least.
Politicians will run this country into the ground and probably will ruin sports in this country as well.
Roll Tide with Pride!!!
February 9th, 2012
9:24 am
NOT Good.
3 teams UGA should play every year are Auburn, Florida, and GT.
3 teams that Auburn should play every year – UGA, Alabama, LSU (and to be honest – the Auburn/Tennessee and Aubrn/ FL games used to be a must see).
Is Auburn a better fit in the SEC EAST?
IF so, how to accomplish this and keep the IRON Bowl alive.
RTR
1eyedJack
February 9th, 2012
9:25 am
The rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer. If you eliminate one of the “cupcakes” from your OOC schedule, how do those schools make up that revenue? Some of those programs survive on the money they get for having their brains beat in two or three times a year by the “big boys”.
Roll Tide with Pride!!!
February 9th, 2012
9:32 am
Best way to keep these games is to go to 9 conference games.
1. Play your 6 division games
2. Play 1 perm. cross division opponent.
3. Play 2 rotating cross division opponents.
Comes with the territory of expanding.
Pac 10 played 9 divisionals – that’s what I liked about that confernence as there was no doubt who the champion is. Yet, USC still played Notre Dame and would take on Auburn, VT, Ohio State and others. Respected that about USC.
UGA , Florida and USCe could still play their ACC state rivals.
Phillip E. Norris
February 9th, 2012
9:33 am
SIMPLE solution! After the 2012 season, switch Auburn and Alabama to the East. Switch Missouri to the West, which it should be anyway. Traditional rivalries are preserved, and old rivalries like Aurburn – Florida can be resumed. Must I think of everything? THIS solution, is idiot proof, and if the SEC does not agree, then they are idiots.
flagboy?
February 9th, 2012
9:34 am
Auburn is a better fit in the East. . but dang, that makes for one side of the SEC to potentially be more difficult year in year out than the other. Granted, Bama and LSU are heads above the rest of the conference at the moment, but that won’t last. We’re less 10 years removed from Alabama having Shula as a head coach. And the talk a few years ago was Miles leaving LSU to go to michigan. . . the East having UGA, FL, Tenn, and Auburn (as well as South Carolina at the moment) versus the West having Bama, LSU . . . and A&M? It’s not even.
2012 Preseason Fulmer Cup Champs
February 9th, 2012
9:39 am
“IF so, how to accomplish this and keep the IRON Bowl alive.”
The Iron Bowl should be suspended. Period. Bama fans poisoning trees, tea bagging other fans etc have ruined that once great rivalry.
Bama fans are pathetic and sick in the head.
DawginLex
February 9th, 2012
9:42 am
It would really blow to not play Auburn every year.
Hopefully, some traditions will survive this $$$$ scheme.
William Smith
February 9th, 2012
9:42 am
Why not get the NFL to pay part of the cost of college football programs since it is there minor league. Then go to sixteen games with three divisions in the SEC. One division will be Georgia,Tennessee,Auburn,Alabama, and Florida. Each of these teams play a home and away each year. Then have the playoffs for the conference championship. Some will say this takes away from the purpose of education. However. from what I see and hear education is not the purpose of college football. Let’s play some football where money rules and players are paid big time.
matt
February 9th, 2012
9:44 am
1EYEDJACK- it is not UGA’s or any other major schools obligation or responsibilty to keep the lower tier schools’ programs above water. That why it is called “major college football” or the “major v.s. minor leagues”.
THis is one of the problems in this country. It is not the successful man’s job to help keep the poor man above water.
robodawg
February 9th, 2012
9:45 am
The St Louis TV market is not worth losing Georgia-Auburn. Fight it McGarity! Don’t even put it on the table!
Leonard Brown
February 9th, 2012
9:48 am
GTBob-
How big a boy are you? I believe I’m gone a hafta come over thar and whoop yur arse-
WnE
February 9th, 2012
9:49 am
Would the author of the article care to explain WHY the SEC refuses to go to 9-game Conference schedules?
Did he even ask UGA’s AD why the Conf. doesn’t want to go to 9-game conference schedules?
Big Crimson 75
February 9th, 2012
9:51 am
This is the biggest problem with SEC expansion.
UGA & the Barn is the South’s oldest rivalry. The Game should always be played.
I have a feeling our 3rd Sat. in Oct. game may be shut down as well.
Expansion is great. I’m all for it.
But these traditional Southern rivalry games must continue!
Dawg Tired
February 9th, 2012
9:52 am
No Georgia-Auburn during football season just ain’t right.
Good Grief
February 9th, 2012
9:52 am
Like I said, if you moved Auburn to the East and went to a 9-game conference schedule (which i still don’t understand the SEC’s abhorrance of a 9-game conference slate), then Auburn’s schedule would look like this:
6 Division Games: Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Vanderbilt.
1 permanent Cross-Division Game: Alabama
2 rotating Cross Division Games: LSU, Alabama, Ole Miss, Miss. State, Mizzou, Texas A&M (pick two)
The Permanent Cross Division Rivals would be:
Auburn-Alabama
Florida-LSU
Kentucky-Mississippi State
South Carolina-Arkansas
Vanderbilt-Ole Miss
Tennessee-Missouri
Georgia-Texas A&M
Good Grief
February 9th, 2012
9:53 am
Sorry, I put ‘Bama on there twice. Oops.
Gator Mike
February 9th, 2012
9:55 am
FJR, with all due respect, since you are a Gamecock, you are basically new to SEC rivalries. I am a long time Gator and you are wrong about the UF-LSU rivalry. LHarding Dawg is correct in that both LSU and UF look forward to the annual game. Maybe in 10 years you and your SoCar bretheren will be able to pontificate about SEC rivalries which existed before you entered the conference. You are a welcome member, but you still do not have any SEC tradition as does UGA, LSU, UF, UT and BAMA. If it were not for Spurrier who is a UF grad, you would still be at the bottom of the pack.
Big Crimson 75
February 9th, 2012
9:55 am
WnE —- $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
9:56 am
1eyedJack
February 9th, 2012
9:25 am
The rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer. If you eliminate one of the “cupcakes” from your OOC schedule, how do those schools make up that revenue? Some of those programs survive on the money they get for having their brains beat in two or three times a year by the “big boys”.
1eyedJack so you are of the Democrat state of mind? The RICH are supposed to Support the POOR? If thos weak OOC teams can’t survive without the BIG schools paying for a WIN then maybe just MAYBE those weak teams need to DIE and stick to playing Soccer.
Big Crimson 75
February 9th, 2012
9:59 am
The teams like Miss ST, Ky…… will not have as good a chance at a Bowl game with a 9 game conf. schedule.
1eyedJack
February 9th, 2012
9:59 am
Absolutely not a democrat. I would just hate to see the smaller schools go by the wayside. Then we would have….the NFL.
Gator Mike
February 9th, 2012
10:04 am
FJR, as a long time Gator, I disagree with your assessment of the UF-LSU rivalry. LHarding Dawg is correct. As a SoCar grad, you are still new to the SEC and you have not yet achieved any dominant SEC tradition. Once you achieve the tradition of UF, UGA, AU, LSU, BAMA and UT in football you can pontificate. Until then just be happy that you have a UF grad as your coach who lifted you from the bottom of the ladder.
Anon1
February 9th, 2012
10:06 am
Why not lose one of the cupcake games and go to the 9 games schedule? Oh, that would change McGarity’s plan to be in the top 10.
Alphare
February 9th, 2012
10:08 am
I agree money talks.
As a result, I agree with one post above: eliminate 6 permanent division games. Instead, create 3 permanent conference opponent games and rotate the 5 other conference games.
In case of UGA, AU/UF/USC can be your permanent conference opponents.
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
10:11 am
1eyedJack I wish they still made the Olds 442 but times change and the weak product goes away.
RedandBlackDAWG
February 9th, 2012
10:13 am
The south is all about traditions. It is part of the heritage and a part of what makes it so special to live in the south. The SEC has enough money and enough TV coverage. When will the boneheads that run the SEC, quit trying to ruin the SEC?
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
10:15 am
1eyedjack if you want the weak to survive then do what Institutions of Higher Learning should do in the first place. Set admissions standards the SAME for EVERY Student and stop letting stupid ball players get in college. Let some semi pro league start for the Morons that don’t deserve a chance at a college degree.
Gator Mike
February 9th, 2012
10:21 am
RedandBlackDawg, I totally agree with you. The newbies such as SC, AR, A&M and Mizzou need to establish some SEC tradition by their own merit. We need to leave the traditional games such as UF-LSU, UGA-AU and UT-BAMA alone.
flagboy?
February 9th, 2012
10:22 am
It’s just annoying the SEC brass felt they had to jump on board with every other conference that was trying to keep up. The fact of the matter is all the other conferences were trying to keep up with the SEC. I understand the idea of contract money for TV. And everyone can trash TV contracts and the money, but the fact is that money and that exposure is pretty important. . .
Just seems like the SEC could have done nothing in the way of expansion and still have remained head and shoulders above everyone else. . .
WEST GUY
February 9th, 2012
10:24 am
Know UGA is breathing easier that they didn’t move Auburn and Alabama to the East and allow TAM nd MIZZOU to both be in the west, They would have never had another oppoortunity at a championship game, Whew…….
WDE
February 9th, 2012
10:29 am
Major blow to the SEC if we quit playing he games that are so steeped in tradition…it would be a damn shame if there were no UT vs Bama , Auburn vs UGA..what next end the Cocktail Party…oh the horror !
SupremoDawg
February 9th, 2012
10:31 am
Folks seem to forget that GT WAS a charter member in the SEC until 1964. Coach Dodd didn’t much care for Bama hitting them in the mouth & had grand designs of being the Notre Dame of the South. His delusion, lack of foresight and mainly greed left GT begging to get in the basketball dominated ACC in 1978. He wanted to be an Independent, and not have to share all that TV money with the other SEC members. He couldn’t have dreamed of how big money has taken over College Football today. So, if GT had the kahunas to stay in the SEC we wouldn’t be having this discussion now, but Bobby Dodd (RIP)caused all of this almost 50 years ago. I say keep it at 8 conference games, keep GT and DROP a cupcake!
SupremoDawg
February 9th, 2012
10:32 am
PS keep Awbarn too!
Joe 12-Pack
February 9th, 2012
10:42 am
I’d hate to see those games go but even worse would be to have the rotation be such that they only play every 8 years or something. Skipping one year might be okay but these rivals should at LEAST play twice every three years.
WDE
February 9th, 2012
10:45 am
…
shamyinathens
February 9th, 2012
10:46 am
Here’s an idea why not let the season ticket holders for all the schools vote on the what the conference schedule should be, somewhat like a proxy vote. Since the people who pay a large percentage of each team’s budget were not consulted about this dumb-ass expansion as well as the continually changing game times dictated by the TV deities they should at least have some say in this mess. Adding schools to a conference based on size of their potential television market is despicable; with this logic we should throw Ol’ Miss and Mississippi State out of the conference to add Central Florida and SMU.
WDE
February 9th, 2012
10:48 am
What in the world are these morons thinking? No UT vs Bama , no Auburn vs UGA…what next morons no Cocktail Party oh the horror !!
beachdog
February 9th, 2012
10:49 am
I ‘d rather drop TECH, it’s an easy win but we could pay them to come to Athens every few years.
WDE
February 9th, 2012
10:49 am
What in the world are these morons thinking? No UT vs Bama , no Auburn vs UGA…what next morons no Worlds Largest Cocktail Party oh the horror !!
WDE
February 9th, 2012
10:52 am
What in the world are these morons thinking? No UT vs Bama , no Auburn vs UGA…what next morons no UGA vs UF oh the horror !!
WDE
February 9th, 2012
10:54 am
@WEST GUY don’t let the fact that we are 5of the last 6 vs Auburn and 3-1 vs Bama under CMR get in your way with that rant.
gcs
February 9th, 2012
10:57 am
Has anyone posited the idea of going to three or four divisions in the SEC?
With three divisions, you would have three division winners and a wild card.
2011 would have looked like this:
LSU vs. Arkansas and Alabama vs. Georgia. The winners play in Atlanta.
West: Texas A&M, Missouri, LSU, Arkansas
Central: Alabama, Auburn, Mississippi St, Mississippi, Vanderbilt
East: Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky
I based this on geography. This also leaves room for future expansion.
Mash
February 9th, 2012
10:59 am
Basically, our AD’s are saying that rather than sacrifice one of the 3 current cream puff money games they would rather lose a rivalry game.
Well done. I knew trying to fix something that wasn’t broken would be the SEC’s undoing.
BigGAdawg
February 9th, 2012
11:07 am
Keep Auburn–Period. It is idiotic to even suggest that the oldest rivalry in the South be put aside FOR ANY REASON. I guess that is why Jeff is bringing it up.
MCDAVIDDAWG
February 9th, 2012
11:23 am
Gee, we won’t be able to play as many high schools.
Expansion Sucks
February 9th, 2012
11:25 am
Expansion Sucks
Bud Fox
February 9th, 2012
11:26 am
How many yachts can you ski behind?
HighTech
February 9th, 2012
11:28 am
There’s a big difference between an easy win and a consistent win. Georgia has beaten Tech on a consistent basis the past ten years. However, I don’t think one could say many of those games have been easy. Typically, the score is fairly close. Likewise, only delusional Florida fans would say the game (né Cocktail Party) between the Gators and the Dawgs is easy.
blazer
February 9th, 2012
11:30 am
could you put Auburn in the East and Missouri in the West?
Be careful glass house
February 9th, 2012
11:32 am
mcdaviddick…..playing auburn is like playing a high school?
Strength of schedules are cyclical….only a very few years ago GA had the toughest rated schedule in nation. It changes for every team, even yours, whichever that might be.
Delbert D.
February 9th, 2012
11:33 am
There is an easy solution. Since Alabama and Auburn don’t play a traditional OOC opponent complicating their schedules, move Auburn to the East and Mizzou to the West.
HighTech
February 9th, 2012
11:34 am
beachdog
February 9th, 2012
10:49 am
I ‘d rather drop TECH, it’s an easy win but we could pay them to come to Athens every few years.
—————————————-
There’s a difference between an easy win and a consistent win. The Dawgs have beaten the Jackets consistently for the past ten years. However, I don’t think anyone who watched those games would classify many of the wins as easy. Likewise, only the most delusional Gator fans would call wins over Georgia easy during a similar time frame.
1eyedJack
February 9th, 2012
11:39 am
5150, let’s just say that I’m a traditionalist. As for your suggestion that follows:
“1eyedjack if you want the weak to survive then do what Institutions of Higher Learning should do in the first place. Set admissions standards the SAME for EVERY Student and stop letting stupid ball players get in college. Let some semi pro league start for the Morons that don’t deserve a chance at a college degree.”
I certainly agree, though it will never happen as those Universities that are the “haves” are hooked on the crack.
Gordon Gekko (GG)
February 9th, 2012
11:41 am
Adams tells Athletic Board “we have more money than God”!
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
11:42 am
The SEC Brain Trust ain’t looking so smart after all. Or smart as a fox getting you fools to pay Top Dollar for wins at home over High School teams. if the SEC is so Big and Bad why are they wanting to play a bunch of high school teams? Tennessee is the BEST of the SEC at scheduling Real Tough/High Profile OOC GAMES consistently.
tardawg
February 9th, 2012
11:46 am
The article said when Syracuse and Pitt come in to the league when did that happen, don’t need them 2 schools, besides we should’ve taken southern miss and a NC school like wake forset to stay in the sSe region.
1eyedJack
February 9th, 2012
11:48 am
tardawg, Syracuse and Pitt joining the ACC. You know, the basketball conference.
Just sayin
February 9th, 2012
11:49 am
Vandy 41 – Wake 7
Bama fan
February 9th, 2012
11:50 am
I agree with MDOG completely ! I have been to several Ga-Auburn games and its one of the best games in the sec. How bout keeping the 1 traditional rival from other side and rotate the other 6 on a yearly basis. The home-away trade off will have to be every 12 years. ANYTHING but dropping Bama-Tennessee and Georgia-Auburn.
we can spend it in crazy ways cause we got it
February 9th, 2012
11:53 am
My high school has first divs on the 1 year old “outdated” million dollar scoreboard, when they replace it with the soon to be outdated billion dollar scoreboard.
How big is big? We ain’t there yet
Bama fan
February 9th, 2012
11:54 am
Traditional Rivals could be ;
1 Bama-Tennessee
2 Georgia-Anburn
3 Florida-LSU
4 South Carolina-Arkansas
5 Tex A&M-Missouri
6 Ole Miss-Kentucky
7 Miss St-Vanderbilt
money, money, money makes the football world go round and round
February 9th, 2012
11:58 am
Hope scholarships are going away kids. Better come up with some money or play something really, really well, cause the only scholarships left are gonna be of the athletic kind.
entitlement babies
February 9th, 2012
12:02 pm
Abolish all athletic scholarships….make em all pay for entry…..weed out the crap.
Missouri to the SEC West
February 9th, 2012
12:04 pm
Missouri should have been put in the SEC west and auburn to the east, but alabama would not permit it, since they wanted to keep their annual game with tennessee and auburn. Alabama runs the conference–the rest of the chump teams have to do what they want.
Dawggone Truth
February 9th, 2012
12:13 pm
College football is heading for an inevitable decline. It built up a huge following (with tons of money), but the universities just doesn’t know when to stop. The rivalries that built college football are being sacrificed in the name of “bigger and better.” Each year college football moves further from its roots and more toward NFL-Light. I’ve loved college football for as long as I can remember, but I can now imagine a day when I find other (better) things to do with my fall Saturdays. It’s a shame.
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
12:20 pm
Texas is getting a laugh right now. They are screwing with Bama, Auburn, Georgia, and Tennessee just by making Texas A&M mad enough to leave their league.
bulldog 82
February 9th, 2012
12:22 pm
why not bring auburn over to balance out the 2 new schools and just keep 5-3 format
Jim
February 9th, 2012
12:22 pm
The UGA – AU is my favorite football rivalry game in the SEC. Losing the Deep South’s Oldest Rivalry to accomodate Mizzou and A&M would be a shame. As an Auburn fan, I’d like to see Auburn moved to the SEC East. Then this would be a non-issue. And yes, I’d rather keep UGA as a rival over Bama any day! Plus Auburn would get Florida and UT back which were great rival games also. The AU-UGA rivaly is special. The Auburn-Bama rivalry has turned into one of hate for far too many people.
awful mc dougal
February 9th, 2012
12:23 pm
who cares about uga and auburn…two loser programs…
Tom in ATL
February 9th, 2012
12:27 pm
http://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/ranking/strength-of-schedule-by-team
How much whining have we all heard about UGA”s “Weak Scheduling” – well sorry – don’t let actual facts get in the way. Yes UGA missed Alabama, LSU, and Arkansas in the regular season – not by their choosing but as dictated by the SEC Schedule- but their final strength of schedule in 2011 season- 10th – out of 120 teams. South Carolina by comparison was 21st. If you go back 9 years – which pretty much evens things out, as some years you get tougher matchups and some easier – UGA average strength of schedule is 18th Nationally. Alabama has finished among the top during their run with Saban, but going back the same 9 years – their Avg stregth of schedule – 22nd.
jim
February 9th, 2012
12:29 pm
Tradition is going to be history in college football….$$$$. Ga Tech and Ga game are next!
what of it?
February 9th, 2012
12:30 pm
Is nothing sacred?
at least the curmudgeons who run the NCAA and SEC will have more money to line their pockets.
Maybe instead of games we could just have 4 hours of commercials and then watch a vote on who will be the national champion each year
BigTimeTECHFan
February 9th, 2012
12:38 pm
FIX
SEC East
Georgia
Florida
Auburn
Alabama
Tennessee
Vandy
SEC West
South Carolina
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss State
Texas A&M
Mizzu
That should solve all issues
Patrick Tuohy
February 9th, 2012
12:41 pm
Dvision 1-A teams should be limited to playing one 1-AA game per year. It would allow some traditions to continue and eliminate the TURDITION of padding schedules with teams that have almost no chance of winning the game.
josh
February 9th, 2012
12:46 pm
Let me get this straight. 12 game schedule. Right now have 8 conference games. Add 2 teams to conference. Options now keep 8 games and lose one of college footballs biggest rivalry games, or go to 9 games and risk loosing in -state rivalry game. I graduated with a degree in international affairs not math, but it looks like a 9 game schedule is the better option. That leaves 3 games let. In-state rivalry and 2 other games. So you lose a game against one of the single A high school football teams we play.we can have our cake and eat it too.
GT Fan
February 9th, 2012
12:46 pm
McGarity is gutless … don’t believe me? Check out his football schedules while he was at UF!
His idea of football scheduling is like the Seinfeld episode where Kramer (McGarity) was DOMINATING his KA-ra-TAY class vs. 9-year-olds.
Just look at the 2012 schedule … he’s so afraid of a possible loss to GT that he’s got GA SOUTHERN, GA freakin SOUTHERN, in game ELEVEN (11)! Does he not realize that UGA is 3-1 vs PJ/GT? The AD must know something we don’t.
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
12:51 pm
If the SEC Commissioners and Presidents were Hindu I swear they would have the Sacred Cow on the Grill before sundown.
josh
February 9th, 2012
12:58 pm
There’s a simple solution to get them find a solution without cutting rivalry games, and that is to threaten donations. They will start listening if they think they will lose money.
NICK
February 9th, 2012
12:58 pm
BUCKET OF CRAP.
gbal
February 9th, 2012
12:58 pm
Lets drop the fixed “East West” divisions. Set a new division lineup each year, shuffling the 7 team divisions each year. Each team could then keep 2 rivalry games and would play every other SEC team every 4 years. UGA keeps UF and AU. Stay on an 8 game SEC schedule with the other 6 games rotating each year. Every year, one team rotates off your 6 game divisional schedule and a new one comes on. Once on the schedule, you play for 6 consecutive years (good for 3 home and 3 away); then go 5 years without playing until you rotate back on again.
Still have division champs and a SECC game each year with the two division winners.
Anyone follow this????
gbal
February 9th, 2012
1:04 pm
We have two SEC brackets basically each year that are fixed, with two additional games out of division that rotating (now with the 7 team division).
I’m saying lets fix 1-2 rivalry games to be played each year and shuffle the divisions from year to year to insure all play each other on some regular basis.
gbal
February 9th, 2012
1:11 pm
Enter your comments here
BiggDawgK
February 9th, 2012
1:13 pm
gtbob
You are the typical ga text fan.
gbal
February 9th, 2012
1:21 pm
.
gbal
February 9th, 2012
1:28 pm
Or rotate 3 new teams on and 3 off your schedule each year, changing up the divisions or brackets each year. I’m liking the idea. Why do we need fixed divisions?
Good Grief
February 9th, 2012
1:29 pm
We could keep all the cross division games if the SEC wasn’t so afraid of a 9-game conference schedule.
Nothing Could Be Finer
February 9th, 2012
1:32 pm
Georgia might as well just move to the ACC.
LOL
February 9th, 2012
1:54 pm
Goodbye College football, it was good knowing you. We had some fun there for a while, but these last few years, and these retarded changes, are just killing a great sport.
Pierce
February 9th, 2012
1:57 pm
I can’t believe dropping Georgia-Auburn is even being considered. At least the SEC is consistent in it’s unconscionable thought processes (e.g. the addition of Mossouri and Texas A & M). Simply unacceptable.
Ellijay dawgcatcher
February 9th, 2012
2:05 pm
how about breaking the divisions into north/south? north: UK, UT, Arky, Vandy, Mizzou, SC, Ole Miss…south: UF, LSU, Bama, Barn, TAMU, MIssy St, and UGA…that would insure that uga plays a legitimate football schedule…
dawg4life
February 9th, 2012
2:42 pm
I can definitely understand the ACC going to a 9 game conference schedule. Adding GT, UVA, Duke, BC, Maryland, or Wake to your conference schedule is the equivalent of a Buffalo or Georgia Southern… IMHO, if we drop a rivalry game, it should be Tech. When we beat them, we drop in the polls. Although, it is nice to have a guaranteed W at the end of the year….
gbal
February 9th, 2012
2:42 pm
elaj – UGA plays the same schedule that every other SEC team plays… They play all their division teams and then rotate the non division as everyone else in the confrence does… Whats your problem … u an ACC guy? now talk legitimate schedule. No team in the ACC plays a schedule even close to as tough as any team in the SEC. Just the facts!/
gbal
February 9th, 2012
2:45 pm
dog4life — Exactly… the ACC going to 9 games was the best thing they could do to pad records. at least half the teams will have another win now. Much better than risking going out of confrence.
Lakedawg
February 9th, 2012
2:57 pm
McGarity’s main concern if keeping 7 home games, period. If you went to 9 that becomes inpossible because we play tech home and home and Florida on the road every year. Add another road game every other year and with Clemson and Ohio State home and home. Does anyone want to play 3 home and 6 away SEC games some years.
Can’t pay the bills that way, either have to lose Aubur, or Tech, or play Fla home and home only way to play 9 SEC games.
Ellijay dawgcatcher
February 9th, 2012
3:10 pm
not an acc guy, just callin it like I see it…
Drop the patsys!!!
February 9th, 2012
3:13 pm
McGarrity says that some of the regional rivalries might have to be sacrificed for scheduling purposes. There is a much easier solution to the problem.Tell the teams to quit scheduling out of conference cupcakes and they will be able to keep the “TRADITIONAL” regional rivalries. If the SEC is truly the best conference, then it makes no sense to go out and schedule the LA Monroes of the college world. Do as the ACC did and go to a 9 game conference schedule and keep your main out of conference or regional rivalries. So what if you lose a game during the season, if SEC teams are so superior then it won’t matter come bowl time cause they will just dominate anyway, right?
There is more to this than money. You have long time rivals that play for pure pride and that kind of tradition doesn’t need to be sacrificed.
harold
February 9th, 2012
3:18 pm
GOT TO KEEP THE OLDEST RIVALRY IN THE SOUTH AS WELL AS THE THIRD SATURDAY IN OCTOBER. AUBURN vs. GEORGIA AND TENNESSEE vs. ALABAMA!
NOBODY CARES...............
February 9th, 2012
3:21 pm
IF 2 SECOND TIER TEAMS IN THE SEC QUIT PLAYING EACH OTHER!!!!!!!!!
Devil's Advocate
February 9th, 2012
3:34 pm
Oh hell no! Ending UGA-AU and Bama-UT is the beginning of the end. Those 4 schools are among the Top 5 SEC programs in wins (LSU sits between UGA and Auburn). To put it in perspective from a fan’s point-of-view, moving UGA-UF home-and-home is an option worth considering despite my preference for it to stay in Jax. Ending the annual rivalry with Auburn is not an option to be considered at all!
Bronc62
February 9th, 2012
3:36 pm
GTBob….yes we in the SEC have a couple of cupcake games( Boise State sure) however other conferences(ACC) have 6 to 8 cupcakes..
Steve
February 9th, 2012
3:37 pm
FJR, you are a moron.
UGA has probably had the toughest OOC slate of ANY SEC team over the last decade. While we play GaTech every year, which on its own is as tough as all but maybe a couple of SEC teams entire OOC slate, we have also added BCS schools such as ASU, Colorado, OkSt, Oregon State, and also perennial BCS Contender Boise State.
Now, ASU and Colorado were down when we played them, but when they were added to the schedule Colorado had just won it’s 4th straight Big 12 North titles and ASU had just tied for the best record in the Pac 10.
The last time SoCarolina played more than one decent team in OOC was .. well .. before you were likely born. Crawl back under your rock.
Now – as for the UGA v. Auburn rivalry it would certainly help UGA’s chances to get to play a cupcake team more often instead of having Auburn who finishes in the top half of the West more often than not. Same for Auburn. That being said, it is about as big a rivalry game as you can have for non-division teams and I would hate to see it go away so we can face Ole Miss, MSU or Arkansas an extra time every six season.
dagadawgs
February 9th, 2012
3:38 pm
GTBob
February 8th, 2012
3:58 pm
I thought every year sucked if you were a Tech fan….
Nah, its not so bad because we never have unrealistic expectations.
Yet I am such a loser I will troll big brothers blog everyday! Get a life dude! Nobody and I mean nobody cares about GT and that 1950’s offense you run. Friggin loser! Don’t go away mad, just go away.
wareagle
February 9th, 2012
3:38 pm
its not gonna happen. the fans will revolt. just look at this page.
Devil's Advocate
February 9th, 2012
3:40 pm
GT Fan,
You lack intelligence. UGA plays GA Southern every 4 years as a matter of policy now. It’s better to give a big payday to an in-state school when you can than always to an out-of-state school. The Eagles have been wanting to play Tech for a long time and were denied despite Tech loving to bring in Furman and the Citadel. At least you guys finally broke down and scheduled them for 2015. The only reason this game was moved to later in the season is to accommodate the new SEC schedule (playing Mizzou). We’re no longer playing South Carolina as our SEC opener either so stuff is changing.
raleturn
February 9th, 2012
3:43 pm
They need to do the right thing and put both Missouri an Texas AM in the West and put Auburn in the East. Putting Missourin in the West makes about as much sense as putting the Braves in the West in baseball.
chad
February 9th, 2012
3:47 pm
Could we not drop Louisiana Lafayette or Arkansas State. Why give up Tech or Auburn…
Techster
February 9th, 2012
3:49 pm
The dogs will probably replace Auburn with Elon or Catawba College.
This weakness of the schedule is obvious, yet dog fans expect us to accept their football program as being great.
mistermak
February 9th, 2012
3:50 pm
There is no reason not to go to a 9 game conference schedule. All that has to be done is each SEC school drop one of their non-conference cream puff schools that they play. Those games are so lousy they don’t even make the TV schedule so why not stop playing them?
Darrell Meece
February 9th, 2012
3:50 pm
Here is a link to a petition to the SEC administrators and athletic directors: http://www.change.org/petitions/sec-conference-administrators-and-athletic-directors-preserve-the-annual-auburn-vs-georgia-football-game-3
I’d rather say something before they do it to us than wait and complain and feel bad I didn’t take a minute to say something.
G-Dawg
February 9th, 2012
3:56 pm
Tech football should be in D-II anyways with that crappy offense they run!!
reality gator
February 9th, 2012
4:01 pm
As a gator why Missouri? they have no history in the SEC, greed of the Sec will destroy the SEC”
Look how far teams from the deep south will have to travel to play this school, this was a dumb move, why mess with something that is working?
Devil's Advocate
February 9th, 2012
4:04 pm
Techster,
Shouldn’t beating you guys regularly be good enough?
Whiskey Breath
February 9th, 2012
4:04 pm
Let’s see, who else can we eliminate on Ga’s schedule to make CMR look good?
How many crappy teams can Ga play? So go ahead and declare the National Championship
Ga like you have for the last 30 years.
tired of it
February 9th, 2012
4:05 pm
This is pathetic. The Presidents and ADs refuse to go to a 9 game conference schedule b/c it will eliminate one of their 3 or 4 creampuff games that they get to schedule every year.
Hooray for scheduling East Bumblef*** U!
ozzfest
February 9th, 2012
4:12 pm
I’LL TAKE A TRIP TO HOUSTON AND ON TO COLLEGE STATION ANYTIME OVER A TRIP TO AUBURN….AND A&M ALUMNI ARE LOADED, UNLIKE THE COUNTYR BUMPKIN DRUNKS WHO MAKE THE TRIP TO ATHENS EVERY OTHE YEAR.
GREAT NEWS FOR ALL DOGS WHO ARE NOT AFRAID TO GET ON AN AIRPLANE!!!
Jake
February 9th, 2012
4:14 pm
Can see the Vols not playing Bama each year.
The Diesel
February 9th, 2012
4:19 pm
Would hate to lose the AU-UGA game.Nothing I enjoy more than seeing The East Alabama Goat Humpers get beat by the Dawgs.
Boss Hog
February 9th, 2012
4:20 pm
or Boise State and SDSU in the Big East?
Really?
February 9th, 2012
4:24 pm
Regular season scheduling – the real problem with college football. Oh, that and 120+ teams in the same division trying to claim a mythical title given out by ESPN/ABC/USAToday/etc. UGA-Clemson and AU-GT had some tradition as well, but no more.
show me kid
February 9th, 2012
4:25 pm
The Missouri-Kansas rivalry is as old as the Georgia-Auburn rivalry.
Thogwummpy
February 9th, 2012
4:25 pm
Blood feud rivalries have long been the meat of what makes college football superior to the pros. It would be foolish to torpedo these passionate games just to enable wider league play. Hopefully, the Conference boards aren’t that stupid.
KnowSauced
February 9th, 2012
4:27 pm
Necessitated?
this stinks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
February 9th, 2012
4:28 pm
Expect a riot if this happens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dr Seuss
February 9th, 2012
4:35 pm
Cats and dogs sleeping together! What next?
Stinger
February 9th, 2012
4:38 pm
First it’s Alabama, now Auburn, will Tech be next? I can see it now NE Louisiana, Norfolk State, and Clark on your schedule.
Jerry
February 9th, 2012
4:38 pm
This would be a mistake of monumental proportions, and would be the final straw for a lot of people. Yeah, let’s drop the Auburn game because we can’t fit it in to the schedule, but we can still manage to play Florida Atlantic, Georgia Southern and Buffalo. Makes a lot of sense. I’m about done with all of this crap.
atlfan
February 9th, 2012
4:38 pm
9 game schedule = automatic bcs national title game bid for SEC Champs
Uga fan Sandy Springs
February 9th, 2012
4:39 pm
as a season ticket holder since 1993, this new Athletic Director is making me want to attend less and less home games. I for one would like for you to return to Gainesville. ugh!
BoTiger
February 9th, 2012
4:46 pm
Don’t end the UGA vs. Auburn game….they are like two brothers who go outside and fight it out, then shake hands and get up….there is no hatred between these two, just good ole SEC tradition….too much similarities between the two schools to end this storied tradition
The Governors
February 9th, 2012
4:49 pm
I don’t believe this will happen.
Auburn Jacket
February 9th, 2012
5:12 pm
If the SEC is so good, man up and play a 9 game conference schedule and keep your traditional rivalry games. Yes, you are 10-1 against Tech, but if you think that is an automatic win then why do you want to stop playing that game? Keep scheduling all of those weak OOC games and you might lose your Attendance Championships or your consecutive sell outs streak…
christophorm
February 9th, 2012
5:14 pm
I’d trade any rivalry for a playoff, so that, the special ones (alabama) would NOT be placed in the BCS game without winning their side of the SEC west.
News | MrSEC
February 9th, 2012
5:19 pm
[...] Additionally, McGarity makes it clear that some of the league’s oldest, most-stories, most-important rivalries could still go away: [...]
danny
February 9th, 2012
5:20 pm
Auburn and Georgia should not be sacrificed, by the way Lharding, what a moron.
Joe
February 9th, 2012
5:20 pm
It is real simple. With a 9 game schedule, Half will have 4 home SEC games per year and half will have 5 home games per year. That in itself will cause a home game schedule loss of money with the scheduling of just three games. With Tech on the schedule that game will have to fit as a home game the year GA has 4 SEC home Games. Therefore leaving two games to be added as home games. Thus some years they may have seven home games others they can only schedule six home games. So it all comes down to money for the home games. If that is not the case they could have at least six away games the year they have six home games. If you move Auburn to the east that will put Auburn and Alabama game on a rotational basis. It will also put the Tennessee Alabama Game on a roation basis too.
The national champions- 2 in 3 years
February 9th, 2012
5:21 pm
Eliminating AU-UGA and Bama-UT ought to be against the law. Something aint right about that. If Mike Slive gets those 2 games eliminated then I will personally cane pole him 4 million times.
ugab
February 9th, 2012
5:24 pm
Who cares about Auburn? Scam Cam!1
Beaker
February 9th, 2012
5:26 pm
UGA should play AU, FL, SC, and Tech every year; and perhaps TN. These are the most important games. All other games are much less importance to the fans. I personally wouldn’t travel to Athens to see Vandy or Miss State or similar teams.
Big Jim
February 9th, 2012
5:29 pm
As a tech fan, I will admit our coach sux, our offense is silly, and uga owns us…hard to say, but true none the less.
uga fans should also admit they are a middle of the pack, maybe upper middle, but middle none the less sec team. 5th best team in the sec last yr.
Represented themselves quite well in the championship game, as well against the only 3 other good teams they played last yr. Swap Ark and Bama for Vandy and Ole Miss, and you are 6-6, and watching bowl games on TV.
Most of the SEC is weak yr in and year out, uga scares no one..well maybe GT…admit it, it makes life easier.
SabanNation
February 9th, 2012
5:32 pm
There is no way that Alabama and Tennessee will stop playing each other. Maybe the rest of the Conference can play a 3 team rotation, but on the Third Saturday in October you will see Alabama and Tennessee playing each other. We can just rotate the other one. No team from the west gives a crap about playing Mizzou, Kentucky, USCe, or Vandy anyway.
2012 Preseason Fulmer Cup Champs
February 9th, 2012
5:39 pm
As an Auburn fan, I really don’t have a problem with it. I get sick of ignorant leg humper fans trash talking every year about how they’ll win the national title and NOT having to go to Athens would be just fine with me.
Have fun playing Ga Community College, leg humpers.
2012 Preseason Fulmer Cup Champs
February 9th, 2012
5:40 pm
“Who cares about Auburn? Scam Cam!1″
Exactly why I wouldn’t mind the series ending. Leg humper fans are ignorant trash.
ColumbDawg
February 9th, 2012
5:43 pm
The rest of the SEC teams need to realize that the Premier SEC Teams who are in these games are the reason the SEC can expand in the first place. Taking those games away would be dangerous and water down the appeal of the SEC. Like it or not, there are the “big boys” and the “others”
Auburn – Georgia
Alabama – Tennessee
Florida – LSU
The rest need to get in line and be quiet and accept their checks from the conference every year. The “others” may have a good run every once in a while but the above teams are the ones that pay the bills both historically and in the future.
Calico
February 9th, 2012
5:45 pm
Jacket Fan – those are bold words coming from the fan of a team that would NEVER make it in the SEC. How did the ACC fair in the BCS this year? Oh, that’s riiiiiiiiight…those were BOTH SEC teams in the championship.
Sting_em
February 9th, 2012
6:12 pm
In order to keep their osc/in state rivals intact. The SEC and ACC will have to work together. It makes scheduling much less flexible for all teams involved. The rest of the SEC & ACC have three dates to schedule home away series. UF FSU Clem USC GT & UGA will only have two games to work with.
endzn
February 9th, 2012
6:20 pm
As an AU grad..I say keep UGA and lose Bama. AU/UGA is a heated rivalry, but not spiteful, petty and malicious, as the UAT rivalry has become.
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
6:37 pm
endzn…..grow a pair.
Dawg48
February 9th, 2012
6:42 pm
5150, you still hear?
Rooty Tooty
February 9th, 2012
6:51 pm
Why not drop Auburn so you can add Ft Valley State to your fluffy schedule
Delbert D.
February 9th, 2012
6:54 pm
Somebody proposed the SEC changing to North and South. It is unimaginable that the SEC would include the word “North” in any conference structure. Top – Bottom, Up – Down, Left – Right, Militia – Regulars, Brave – Bold, anything but “North” and South. That would be tantamount to Blue and Gray.
Perhaps Rhett and Scarlett Divisions? Gump and Pyle? Hither and Yon?
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
7:00 pm
Delbert D. how about Hatfield’s & McCoy’s.
Dawg48
February 9th, 2012
7:01 pm
The Hatfields are my kin folk.
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
7:03 pm
They must be the Possum hunters and the McCoy’s are the moonshiners.
Dawg48
February 9th, 2012
7:05 pm
Lol, I’m am serious though. 5150, do you have any quail on your property?
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
7:12 pm
no quail that i have seen.
luxomni
February 9th, 2012
7:15 pm
There’s a poll on one of the Auburn forums which asks, if one rivalry must be dropped, who would you rather drop, bama or Georgia. Right now more would choose to drop bama, by a 178 to 29 vote margin.
Auburn fans enjoy the historic rivalry with Georgia and want it to continue. Longstanding rivalries with Georgia Tech, Tennessee, and Florida have already been lost.
Dawg48
February 9th, 2012
7:16 pm
They are hard to find now a days. My buddy up the street has put some out in the back two fields over the past few days, we put the dogs on them this after noon and ran some up. Surprised the coyotes have not got them yet.
Lakedawg
February 9th, 2012
7:24 pm
Whiskey–Check all SEC teams OOC schedule and let us know who has any tougher than UGA.
Bad to be sauced and not know of which you write.
sting_em
February 9th, 2012
7:59 pm
I find Saban and Miles disgusting. Being a life long Tech fan, my hatred for UGA has never been lower. I would love to beat you guys sometimes, but I hate what the scumbag coaches are doing at Bama and LSU. Unfortunately Richt wont lower himself to that level just to win at all costs. I just find it amazing that so many dumbass kids want to be associated with them, but I guess they think its the best way for them to get to the NFL and get paid.
Newt Gingrich is a rock star
February 9th, 2012
8:16 pm
I hear you Lon Stotts (first page), I was 2 weeks from birth when my parents took me to the ‘68 Cocktail Party, a 51-0 beatdown on the Gators. I’m sure the muffled cheers of 40,000 Georgia fans and the groans of 40,000 Gator fans were quite pleasing, even if I can’t remember.
Georgia and Auburn needs to survive, but if Nebraska-Oklahoma didn’t make it, then nothing’s sacred. Nothing that happens in college football surprises me anymore. The powers-that-be seem determined to ruin a great game.
Phil
February 9th, 2012
8:22 pm
They should put Missouri in the SEC West and Auburn in the East. That would solve the problem and reduce transportation costs. Missouri is a few hundred miles west of Auburn anyway. Why didn’t they think of that from the beginning? Think of all the jet fuel to be burned transporting eastern teams to Missouri, and the gasoline burned by thousands of fans who would drive.
j.wolfe
February 9th, 2012
9:28 pm
Missouri v Kansas football rivalry dates back to the civil war. Because of politics the border was the scene of guerilla warfare. Missouri Confederate William Quantrill led the retaliation again John Brown. Not much time passed before the football rivalry replaced the actual war. A notorious Kansas coach continued to spew life and death hatred about the game as recently as a couple decades ago. One time Kansas was so desperate to keep the series close that they even brought in a ringer from Texas A&M a couple weeks before a game that decided the National Championship for #1 Missouri where Kansas was only ranked 10th. Most fans can handle the game respectfully but the ones who can’t sometime make it look like losing this oldest football rivalry might actually be positive. My feeling is that the conference should not eat up the entire year for it’s teams. Its ok if cross division games only happen every 2nd, 3rd, or 4th years, and it’s ok if rivalries only happen every other year instead of every year. What’s missing in college football are evenly matched inter-conference games during the regular season. What we have too much of are unevenly matched inter-conference games during especially the early season. A fourteen team conference is really two conferences and so is twelve team conference. It’s still cool if the divisions have some cross play but it’s shouldn’t be more than two games per year. 9,10, 11 conferences games might be too much rivalry.
aw
February 9th, 2012
9:53 pm
Hey, why not drop Auburn and add Alabama? JK UGA needs a chance to win the SEC!
James
February 9th, 2012
10:10 pm
Clemson was 1-1 in the SEC. Don’t for get outscoring Auburn 31-3 from the second quarter on. And they own South Carolina 65-40-4, 6 of the las 10 and 10 of the last 15.
RJ
February 9th, 2012
10:10 pm
Why does GTbob feel like he can speak for all of the GTfans and pigeon hole all of the Dog fans. Talk about unrealistic. Anyway I have learned over the years you can never reason with an unreasonable person, it is pointless because when you try to actually have a real conversation you quickly realize even facts can be bent in any direction wanted by taking a lot of liberties. I think Bob must be a politician or still is in the 8th grade.
bubba4dawgs
February 9th, 2012
10:24 pm
Who the hell even wants to see a Texas Tech or Missouri game? Certainly not at the expense of giving up our lifelong rivalries!!!!! You’ll find few if any fans that agree with such an idiotic plan!! GO DAWGS and while you’re at it take this stupid idea and bury it out in the backyard and use it for your toilet!! Sic’em!!
drop auburn
February 9th, 2012
10:30 pm
get auburn off the Dawgs schedule and get some west division creampuff every year like ole miss or miss state. Auburn’s going to be good in the next few years and Ga needs to get them off the schedule, aSap!
5150 UOAD
February 9th, 2012
11:28 pm
Brainiac(Dawg for life/Richt fan for life)
February 8th, 2012
10:45 am
@ Wreckmainiac:(10:20 am)
What are you smoking child? CMR owns Saban. Want some proof? Check out the won/lost record between CMR and Saban in head to head games.
Be sure and let us ALL know which coach has won 3 out of 4 head to head games. I would tell you but it will keep you and your single digit IQ out of our hair for a couple of days or maybe weeks.
Good luck and don’t forget to let us know what you find.
Fact: Saban has lost 3 out of 4 games when his teams have played CMR’s
Fact Debunked
2003 Sat, Sept 20 #2 LSU w17-10…Saban 1-0 Richt
2003 Sat, Dec 6 #2 LSU w34-13…Saban 2-0 Richt
2004 Sat, Oct 2 LSU L16-45…Saban 2-1 Richt
2007 Sat, Sept 22 BamaL23-26…Saban 2-2 Richt
2008 Sat, Sept 27#8 Bamaw41-30…Saban 3-2 Richt
Brainiac(Dawg for life/Richt fan for life)
Fact: Only ONE active coach in America has a winning record against CMR
Active
George O’Leary (UCF) against Richt. 1-0
Nick Saban (LSU & Bama) against Richt. 3-2
Urban Meyer (Florida) against Richt 5-2
Tom O’Brien (Boston College) against Richt 1-0
Lane Kiffin (Tennessee) against Richt 1-0
Rich Rodriguez (W. Virginia) against Richt 1-0
Not Active
Zook 2-1 against Richt
So which coach did you say has the ONLY Winning Record against Richt?
doug
February 10th, 2012
12:02 am
Bad move. Rivalries are the essence of the game. I knew money would eventually wreck the game. Just like everything else. If they dont kill the rivalry now they will kill it later. I cant believe how little outrage their is. You all should be totally pissed. Socialism in America and now no Aub/Uga. Nobody cares. Your all gutless.
JJ
February 10th, 2012
12:53 am
UNC vs. Tennessee? LMAO. The game that UNC “won” by a call considered so bad that it changed NCAA rules? That game is your comparison? I’m a Tennessee fan and we haven’t been close to “middle of the pack” since LK fled in the middle of the night pilfering recruits and leaving us under investigation. We used to be elite and we will be elite again but we flat out sucked in 2010 and even then UNC only won because of a call so bad the NCAA made sure it could never happen again.
preferredduck
February 10th, 2012
2:01 am
I would personally see the UGA auburn game go away. That game and going to jax every year is awesome, even though uf has been on a roll I still love going. The game is usually nationally televised and most of the time and the winner of the game usually iced their season. Money does talk on this matter, bit I think their are a lot more people who would hate to see this game go away. I have been to many UGA -AU games and I love it.
get ur facts straight
February 10th, 2012
2:36 am
This sucks. UGA-AU needs to be preserved. UA-UT and UF-LSU should be too.
Drop Georgia tek from our Schedules
February 10th, 2012
3:41 am
There is absolutely no reason to play a school whose only purpose in Life is to beat us, when there is everything to lose and nothing to gain.
Auburn Georgia Game, our Oldest Rivalry ?
Get real Jeff Schultz. Look, you are a Florida grad, right ? Why don’t AJ-C sportswriters have to put up their bio ? You don’t know a thing about our Rivalry with Auburn. It is not just about Robert Baker and UGA biting him.
If there is one game besides Florida that will NEVER be dropped, it is Auburn.
Georgia tek ?
Happy to see that one go.
Will Georgia drop Tech?
February 10th, 2012
7:55 am
[...] Georgia drop Tech? Will Tech/Ga become a casualty of conference expansion? Headlinin Georgia-Auburn game could be sacrificed in SEC scheduling | Jeff Schultz Reply With [...]
aw
February 10th, 2012
8:10 am
@drop auburn “yeah because UGA doesn’t have enough Creampuffs on their schedule already. No LSU, Alabama, or Arkansas; not to mention UGA is 4-22 in that quote unquote rivalry with Florida!!!!!!
FLA DAWG
February 10th, 2012
8:12 am
I hate to see this happen.
What a great rivalry we’ve had.
Michael
February 10th, 2012
8:24 am
This is completely ridiculous!!! A 9 game conference schedule is necessary, and you can still keep outside conference rivalries, and still have 2 cupcakes on your schedule!!! SEC powers that be need to do whatever it takes so that rivalries that have been around longer than they have, continue to be around long after they’re gone. IT’S CALLED CLASS!!, HAVE SOME!!!
TonyT
February 10th, 2012
8:26 am
We play WELL enough cupcakes to drop one and add a 9th SEC game – thus talk of dropping the Tech game cause we add an extra SEC is just a scare tactic.
What we are really asking is that instead of (out of the 4 non SEC games) can we go from perhaps one decent non-SEC game (UGA-Tech, Tenn-UCLA, Bama-Penn St, ect) and three cupcakes, moving to one extra SEC game, one decent non-SEC game, and TWO cupcakes….. sounds reasonable to me….
LHarding Dawg
February 10th, 2012
8:41 am
aw’s an uniformed idiot!
BulldogBen
February 10th, 2012
9:10 am
This is completely shameful and more proof the powers that be COULD CARE LESS about tradition and the fans (you know the people who support this stuff) and look at TV contracts and money. McGarity should show a freaking backbone and tell every other team “sorry, on this point we aren’t negotiating”. Same with Bama/UT. To me, this would be like Harvard/Yale not playing. It’s absolute madness and sad.
All of these people making the decisions are RUINING the sport.
Flo-Ri-Duh
February 10th, 2012
9:35 am
Keep Auburn and get rid of South Central Podunk “U”. Besides last year’s game against Auburn wasn’t as challenging as Podunk “U”.
mark
February 10th, 2012
10:06 am
Get rid of AM, Missou,S.Carolina, and Ark. Return to a real SEC conf.
savannadawg
February 10th, 2012
10:35 am
Enter your comments here
savannadawg
February 10th, 2012
10:39 am
Keep Kentucky, or move Vanderbilt between Auburn and GT or just extend the season through February and play every other weekend with the conference sides playing on the others off weekend. Gives guys plenty of rest before they go kill each other again. And it gives us football for two more months.
savannadawg
February 10th, 2012
10:46 am
Oh, and if teams want to go down in level to play a 1-AA team thats OK. But there has to be value placed on the teams one chooses to play. I’m talking a serious point value per level of competition. Which in turn would be considered when bowls, playoffs or what ever is decided for your teams ranking at the end of the season. If you play a cup-cake that team should only be worth what it is ranked. In other words, lets score it like GOLF. The lower the score means the higher the competition a school played.
macrotech
February 10th, 2012
11:25 am
It’s getting to where there are NO sacred cows in college football….it’s a sad day when a rivalry like this is lost. SMH
sting_em
February 10th, 2012
11:33 am
A college playoff instead of the BCS would help with out of conference scheduling. Top teams wouldn’t feel the need to schedule creampuffs to preserve their perfect record.
5150 UOAD
February 10th, 2012
11:36 am
sting_em I don’t think that is right. The SEC will CRY even more to play as many cremepuffs so they will be Healthy for the second season/playoffs.
DawgByte
February 10th, 2012
11:58 am
I would argue there is no more important rivalry in college football worth saving than UGA and Auburn!
I defy anyone to identify a more COMPETITIVE series across college football than that of Georgia and Auburn, with a single win separating the two teams. AU owns the series lead by one game, while UGA has scored more points. This is also I highly unique rivalry, which includes mutual respect and a classy relationship amongst fan bases.
If a choice has to be made I would argue for dropping Georgia Tech. Tech has proven year-after-year that they can not compete against Georgia on the football field. Moreover, their fan base does not support their program with enough enthusiasm to warrant allowing them the privilege to play UGA.
AUUGA
February 10th, 2012
12:11 pm
Join the movement to save the game!
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Save-the-Deep-Souths-Oldest-Rivalry/253742484700300
TDF
February 10th, 2012
1:39 pm
5150 UOAD
February 10th, 2012
11:36 am
Cry???? We play in the best conf in football. We have earned the right to schedule easy OOC games. Why do you think GT gets on there every year!!!
The Deep South's Most Futile Game
February 10th, 2012
2:34 pm
Georgia vs. The Dorks
We all know the outcome years in advance, and one team’s fans never show up (even at home for free food).
Jf
February 10th, 2012
2:42 pm
Hell no we need to keep playing this rivalry . We all need to speak up and tell the sec we want to keep it going. Us Auburn fans and Georgia fans alike.
The Deep South's Most Futile Game (Tech)
February 10th, 2012
2:49 pm
The UGA – AU game must stay. With the exception of the occasional douchenozzle AU troll, I respect Auburn. At least they can win or lose without killing trees or recording a post game sack at Krystals.
no go
February 10th, 2012
2:54 pm
dump the ga-tech game and keep au-ga–the oldest game in the south.
TDF
February 10th, 2012
3:08 pm
The Deep South’s Most Futile Game (Tech)
February 10th, 2012
2:49 pm
Can we get a comment of the day button! I almost spit my water all over my computer when I read this.
Georgia-Auburn, Alabama-Tennessee In Danger, Georgia AD Acknowledges | Alabama News | Alabama Breaking News Headlines | Alabama News Directory
February 10th, 2012
3:32 pm
[...] are being about a futures of a Deep South’s Oldest Rivalry and a Third Saturday in October. As quoted by Jeff Schultz, here’s Georgia Bulldogs jaunty executive Greg McGarity, in box we missed [...]
Austin
February 10th, 2012
4:28 pm
This was my only problem with SEC expansion! Why ruin a good thing? If it ain’t broke don’t fix it! We were a great conference before this blunder!! Why not have a nine game conference schedule? Who cares about going to see our team play those smaller schools that are rarely a contest that’s not what I pay my money to see! If this happens thanks for screwing up a good thing Mike Slive and whoever else had a hand in it!
Drop Tech
February 10th, 2012
6:22 pm
Thanks
end on a high note
February 10th, 2012
6:54 pm
Well, I don’t want the rivalry to end. I remember sitting on the 50 yard line after the 1980 game, and our group of 4 was politely asked by the remaining security guard in the stadium if we could consider leaving. If it has to end, at least it was with a drubbing of Auburn!
jc-dawgs
February 10th, 2012
7:02 pm
To me….it makes no difference. In fact….until they fix what we currently have….which is a 2 team highly subjective playoff system…..all the other decisions take a back seat.
uGa
February 10th, 2012
9:31 pm
” I’d just ASSUME (?) get to see the other cross division teams more often as play them every year.”—FJR
Hmmm, so this guys a SC fan?
uGa
February 10th, 2012
9:33 pm
“guy’s”, that is.
wild one 13
February 11th, 2012
7:26 am
I think a Alabama player said it best a few years ago ” We hate Auburn because we have to, we hate Tennesse because we want to”!
To cancel this game would be a crying sheme.
The Governors
February 11th, 2012
10:17 am
“sheme” or scheme?
Something for the young GT crowd
February 11th, 2012
5:15 pm
I am 63 now and I do recall being BOTH a GT and UGA fan as a kid. My grandfather was a GT alum AND a PROF there. I leaned toward GT in HS but once I went to Athens and viewed UGA whupping NC in a regional football game, I decided that is where I would attend and so, I did for 6 years. I have never regretted this and retired at 57 to boot!!
So, GT’s biggest rivals for folks my age were ……………… UT and AU and Alabama and sometimes but not often, Florida, where Bobby Dodd’s son played third string QB.
As a young man by the time GT dropped their three big rivals………..AU and UT and sometimes Florida, they began their spiral down and except for the pro rata share of the MNC in 1990, it has been nothing exciting in GT football. I really hated seeing Tech lose Auburn and UT especially. THEY WERE HUGE GT traditions. As big nearly as UGA then.
Nowadays, UGA does not consider the GT game as of world shattering importance, like we once did, along with Auburn, Tennesse and SEC squads.
Now? GT looks to Clemson and VA tech and that is about it. Maybe, maybe NC.
UGA man
class of 71 & 73
traditions
February 11th, 2012
9:18 pm
hope we can keep them
@TDF
February 11th, 2012
9:22 pm
Spitting water all over your computer sounds about right for you.
OK
February 11th, 2012
9:33 pm
and Donnan was a great coachster
9 game conf. schedule = no more great matchups
February 12th, 2012
1:56 am
Will the SEC go to a nine-game conference schedule?
pfft, 9 game conference schedule? HA. If the SEC had a 9 game conference schedule we’d never see the great matchups like what we saw last year: Florida vs Furman; Alabama vs Kent State; Western Kentucky and LSU? From what I recall that was a classic game. Lets not forget UGA vs Coastal Carolina … such a memorable game, what was it … 59-0.
A 9 game conference schedule would rid us of these great matchups! So I say, drop Auburn! Coastal Carolina is where all the fun is at now
TennFanForLife
February 12th, 2012
8:16 am
If there was a real playoff system in place all these arguments would poof just go away,,,,
mizzou
February 12th, 2012
9:36 pm
putting missouri in the east to make alabama happy–maybe the dumbest thing I’ve seen in sports in 9 years. Auburn should be in the east, missouri in the west. Hello???? look at the map.
Gooddawg
February 13th, 2012
7:57 am
There is plenty of room for a nine game SEC schedule and still retain the good rivalries. Let me see, Buffalo, Florida Atlantic, Georgia Southern. There’s at least two we don’t need.
Auburn-Georgia, Alabama-Tennessee, And Antebellum Yeoman Farmers « Sports Greatest Rivalries
February 13th, 2012
9:15 am
[...] rumored demise of the Auburn-Georgia and Alabama-Tennessee rivalries has me thinking about those Southern yeoman farmers and the fear of being sucked into the vortex of [...]
Auburn-Georgia, Alabama-Tennessee, And Antebellum Yeoman Farmers | SEC Football
February 13th, 2012
9:25 am
[...] rumored demise of the Auburn-Georgia and Alabama-Tennessee rivalries has me thinking about those Southern yeoman farmers and the fear of being sucked into the vortex of [...]
@mizzou
February 13th, 2012
10:07 am
Geography means nothing in sports, especially in today’s college football. I still remember when the Atlanta Falcons and Braves were stuck playing in the western divisons for years.
JRsec
February 13th, 2012
2:03 pm
There is a solution, but the Bammers want Auburn seperated from UGA and recruiting in the state of Georgia. Move Kentucky and Missouri to the West and Auburn and Alabama to the East. Bama would have UT & Auburn would have UGA and the conference could stay at 8 games without affecting longstanding, longloved rivalries. The conference has been tilted West for football and East for basketball for some time now. This should give the East a slight advantage while allowing A&M and Mizzou time to catch up. LSU and Arkansas are plenty tough and MIss State is catching up. Football would be balanced in a couple of years and basketball even sooner.
italian_29
February 13th, 2012
4:34 pm
George Stein, I think that the overall record of
263-130-10 (.665) all-time advantage is a more telling stat than to just pull a random year I.E. 2007.
Read more from original site: http://www.secsportsfan.com/sec-vs-acc-football.html#ixzz1mIeQOP85
Tony
February 13th, 2012
11:01 pm
The Dawgs need to keep this rivalry. Why not get rid of Western Carolinal or Georgia Southern?
C3P
February 15th, 2012
1:47 pm
When the SEC went to 2 divisions, Auburn sacrificed its tradition of playing GA Tech ( the other long rivalry in southeast). We also lost out on a budding rivalry with FSU. Now we are told to sacrifice the longest rivalry in the southeast. Really? For what, greed of media revenue? Well why not look at the revenue generated by 110 year old tradition with two 85+K stadiums that sell out? I think that alone is good enough reason to start putting tradition and rivalries before division play. We are losing the very nature of what makes college football better than NFL. Wake up commissioners! You’re gonna kill the golden goose.
Mike Bradford
February 15th, 2012
4:54 pm
I didn’t want to add two more teams to the conference anyway. Keep Alabama-Tennessee and Georgie-Auburn.