
Nick Saban: Practicing his secret play?

Les Miles: Something's up his sleeve.
NEW ORLEANS — The Falcons need to fire everybody. (Not really. But I’ve felt left out in the last 24 hours of venting since I’m covering the BCS title game. I promise to weigh in on the Falcons later this week, which still will be long before the flames on Arthur Blank’s head are extinguished.)
Now, back to the BCS. It’s LSU vs. Alabama. Please, no more whining. It SHOULD be LSU vs. Alabama. These aren’t just the two best teams in the SEC, they’re the two best teams in the country.
I’ve heard and read complaints from fans and media in every time zone. Some say this match-up completely devalues the regular season and makes LSU’s win in Tuscaloosa back in November meaningless. OK. That’s a a legitimate argument.
Some say that two teams from the same conference shouldn’t be allowed into the title game. I get that viewpoint.
Some say only conference champions should be eligible for the BCS title game. Perfectly understandable.
Here’s the problem: The rules don’t stipulate any of that. If the BCS or conference presidents or college presidents or whomever it is that actually set up this stupid system wants to tweak the set-up and attach those rules, that’s fine. Then we won’t have this problem.
But those rules aren’t in place and this is what you get — which are still the two best teams with the two best defenses. There’s no doubt about it in my mind. I covered that game in November and left Bryant-Denny Stadium still believing they were the two best (in fact, even after LSU won 9-6 in overtime, part of me still thought Alabama, after missing four goals, was the better team).
Some voters in the Associated Press

LSU fans (not Alabama cheerleaders) wouldn't mind repeat of Drew Alleman's overtime field goal in November.
poll — which is not a part of the BCS’s formula – are leaving the door open to voting LSU No. 1 even if Alabama wins, based on the Tigers’ win in the last meeting and going through their regular season schedule unbeaten.
Sorry, but that’s just stupid. Apply that logic to any other sport. So, if Denver Broncos win the Super Bowl, do you vote the Green Bay Packers champions, just because all evidence says they’re a better team. This is a playoff game. What happened before wasn’t a playoff game. It shouldn’t matter if the the loser of tonight’s game has 450 yards in offense and lost 7-6 on a 99-yard fumble return with 12 seconds left. Tonight’s winner should be recognized as the champion.
Now, about my outlook: I have no idea. You know that cliche that goes, “If they played 100 times, they’d each win 50″? It applies here. But just because “black” should come up half the time on a roulette wheel doesn’t mean “red” doesn’t hit 12 times in a row. (I speak from experience. But we really don’t need to go any further.)
I don’t expect another 9-6 game (and neither do the coaches). I do expect expect another close, low-scoring game. I find it hard to believe LSU coach Les Miles – who went vanilla in the last meeting — will be able to go four quarters again without so much as one trick play. In championship games, it’s expected that you play and coach aggressively so my guess is Miles does something, and the biggest question is whether it works or backfires.
It’s hard not to be impressed with the toughness and resilience of both teams. LSU went 13-0, won five road games (plus “neutral” site wins over Oregon in Dallas and over Georgia in the SEC championship at the Georgia Dome), has beaten eight ranked teams and has overcome some off-field issues, including offensive coordinator Steve Kragthorpe stepping down in August after being diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease. (He remained on Miles’ staff as quarterbacks’ coach.)
Alabama wasn’t really tested after the LSU game (wins over Mississippi State, Georgia Southern, Auburn). But the Tide is one overtime field goal away from being unbeaten and comes in with that knowledge that it could’ve one that game if their kicker didn’t miss four field goal attempts. I’m sure coach Nick Saban has used that as motivation.
That’s enough for now. I’ll check back here as we get closer to game time. Straw poll: LSU or Alabama?
By Jeff Schultz
965 comments Add your comment
5150 UOAD
January 10th, 2012
12:10 am
CFB read my 12:08 post
CFB FAn
January 10th, 2012
12:11 am
smartdawg, I’m not questioning Bama’s performance tonight, I’m questioning whether they deserved the inivitation to play in this game. Many teams get hot late in the year, as did Bama. But, in my opinion, they did not deserve to be at this dance. Good discussion though. If you are a Bama fan enjoy the win!
smart dawg
January 10th, 2012
12:12 am
What does a young girl from Miss/Ark/La say after making love?
Get off, daddy, you’re crushing my cigarettes
pakbeats
January 10th, 2012
12:15 am
bcs championship game r u serious they didnt even kick a field goal n these r the two best wat a joke i done wit college football ill stick to da pros
CFB FAn
January 10th, 2012
12:15 am
5150, I understand your concerns about season length but Div II does it, and, if having a playoff means shortening the season I’m for it. Let’s go to eight or ten games, each conference names a champ and all champs get a ticket to the dance. Teams like Bama, who lose at home (for whatever reason or excuse) miss the playoffs. Every game matters. The whole season becomes a playoff. And, most importantly, every school gets a fair chance. As I’ve said in other posts, only Bama or USC or perhaps TExas gets the dance card Bama got tonight. I did not watch game but Bama must’ve played well. That doesn’t matter. They took someone else’s dance card and until the politics are removed from football the integrity of the game cannot be restored. I do appreciate however your concerns about academics.
smart dawg
January 10th, 2012
12:15 am
CFB, no other team deserved it more than Bama
CFB FAn
January 10th, 2012
12:18 am
That’s debatable smartdawg, I’d say Ok. STate did as they won their conference. If I were Auburn I’d be really upset because they can go 13-0 and win the conference and not get invited while Bama doesn’t even win its division and they get their ticket punched? My point is that a playoff where only conference champs got in would elimate all the politics. It would be like baseball used to be. There were many good, hot teams, that didn’t make the playoffs. There were no wild cards. And I really believe OK. ST. deserved a dance card more than Bama did. Sorry to disagree, but, I’m not alone on this one . . . I just might be the only one on this blog brave enough to state my opinion.
CFB FAn
January 10th, 2012
12:23 am
One more thought, Florida STate, when they were still good, probably didn’t deserve all the invitations they got BUT they at least won their conference. Bama might’ve been better than OK ST. We will never know. But Bama should’ve been eliminated when they didn’t even win their division. Stuff happens, and there should not be wild cards. I rather see a champ from a weaker conference get a bid than see a team get a mulligan because of who they are and the influence they pedal. All that said, Bama must’ve played great tonight, I’m not questioning that, I am questioning the integrity of their invitation to this game. This system is corrupt. At any rate, appreciate all the opinions. I’ll leave it with yall . . .
smart dawg
January 10th, 2012
12:28 am
CFB, I can’t argue about the BCS crap. However, that’s the world we live in. Under the current rules, Bama was still the team deserving of the opportunity to play for the NC. They dominated tonight, they piteched a shutout. If Bama had played Boise, etal, each of those FG’s might have been TD’s.
Mase
January 10th, 2012
2:12 am
No doubt, Alabama might not have “deserved” to be in the national championship game, but they, after all, were the best team. Can you imagine Ok. St. or Stanford or anyone else, for that matter, going up against that defense?!
It wouldn’t have been pretty. The SEC team (LSU or Alabama) would have destroyed whomever they played. RTR!
Supersize that order, mutt
January 10th, 2012
2:22 am
I’m not taking anything away from the Bama defense, but the way LSU played tonight, pretty much any really good team could have stood a chance of beating them.
enterprise mony business - Live blog: Alabama blanks LSU for BCS title – USA TODAY (blog)
January 10th, 2012
5:01 am
[...] LIVE BLOG: LSU, Alabama meet for legit (yes, legit) BCS titleAtlanta Journal Constitution (blog)BCS Championship Live Blog: LSU-AlabamaWall Street Journal (blog)Bleacher Report -Dothan Eagle (blog)all 4,242 news articles » [...]
enterprise mony business - Live blog: Alabama blanks LSU for BCS title – USA TODAY (blog)
January 10th, 2012
12:02 pm
[...] LIVE BLOG: LSU, Alabama meet for legit (yes, legit) BCS titleAtlanta Journal Constitution (blog)LSU-Alabama: Rematch a dudNewsOK.com (blog)Bleacher Report -Dothan Eagle (blog)all 5,122 news articles » [...]
Arthur Tamburo
January 11th, 2012
7:27 pm
I am still learning about ZUmba but this far I enjoy what I see!
Ewa Lawery
January 11th, 2012
7:27 pm
I am still learning about ZUmba but this far I love what I see!