Paul Johnson needs to rally Georgia Tech back from a 6-7 season. (Johnny Crawford/AJC)
(This appears in the AJC’s college football section on Sunday.)
(Click here to read Georgia’s game-by-game prediction and how they’ll finish 9-3.)
♦
In Paul Johnson’s first two seasons at Georgia Tech, he went 20-7, won an ACC championship, beat Georgia, was named national coach of the year once, ACC coach of the year twice and probably even led some to think, “Wow, I guess that goofy offense can work in a BCS conference after all.”
Season 3 wasn’t a reality check. It was a 2-by-4.
“We definitely were walking on air going into last season,” wide receiver Tyler Melton said. “Not now.”
The Jackets went 6-7 in 2010. That punctured their ego. They saw the NCAA slap them with probation and strip them of the 2009 ACC title. That just made them angry. So they’ve gone from cocky and happy to humbled and bitter.
This is an important season for Johnson. He doesn’t need to win the ACC title to prove himself. But if he can get a young team with significant questions to compete, make things interesting in the conference and at the end wind up in a better bowl city than Shreveport, it will comfort the fan base on North Avenue.
Johnson says he likes this team in a way that suggests he wasn’t enamored of last season’s. “They get along, they have a great attitude and they work hard,” he said. “That’s really all a coach can ask for. We had good kids last year, too, but sometimes the chemistry just isn’t there.”
It was clear from the time the Jackets lost at Kansas in Game 2 — and the Jayhawks’ only two other wins came over New Mexico State and Colorado — that something was wrong. Leadership was an issue. So was arrogance. (And how strange does that sound for a Georgia Tech football team?)
“I think we might have had a sense that the Kansas game was a fluke,” running back Roddy Jones said. “We didn’t have enough of a sense of urgency after that game to propel us to more wins.”
Players pulled apart instead of coming together. Running back Embry Peeples suggested the leadership from the older players probably wasn’t as good as it needed to be.
“Some people would listen to certain people last year,” he said, not getting specific. “This year, the older guys speak positive things to the younger guys, as opposed to yelling at them, beating them up, telling them they stink.”
That happened last year?
“Yeah, there were comments. People talking each other down and stuff,” he said.
The running game, led by Jones and Peeples, won’t be an issue. But Johnson needs junior quarterback Tevin Washington’s ability to run the offense with limited mistakes. If the team can just cut back on turnovers — the Jackets’ 20 lost fumbles were tied for most in the nation — and improve the defense in Al Groh’s second season as coordinator, it will go a long way.
The ACC is not a wrecking ball of a conference. Things fall off significantly after Florida State and Virginia Tech. So while some project the Jackets to finish only fourth in the Coastal Division, an eight- or nine-win regular season is hardly a stretch.
Motivation certainly shouldn’t be an issue. There is the sting of last season. The NCAA’s punishment for Tech’s actions in a recent investigation. The low expectations.
“What people are saying about our entire team — we’re using all of that as motivation,” Jones said.
That pleases Johnson.
“Competitors want to win, and they realized how fragile that is last year,” he said. “You don’t just roll your helmet out. They got a good understanding of that.”
Nobody is walking on air anymore.
By Jeff Schultz
♦
57 comments Add your comment
RambleOn84
August 28th, 2011
1:27 pm
Tech will return to form this year and post a good, but not great, season.
There is too much youth and inexperience to hope for a conference championship in my opinion.
But next year, the sky is truly the limit.
Coloradojacket
August 28th, 2011
1:28 pm
I find the discussion here quite humorus at best. Considering I have been watching and going to Tech football since 1969, I think I can add to this. Chan Gailey was a pro coach and tried to coach a college team like a pro team. He won games with his defenese not his offense. Do you remember how many times Tech won by 3 points in his career. Paul Johnson came in and it has been the best thing for Tech. His offense is perfect in this situation because the facts are Tech will never be able to recruit the numbers and types of players a “Pro” style offense requires. Also, there will be plenty of very good players that will come to Tech and play in this offense.
Nesbitt, would have never played well in a Pro style offense and I agree with the comment about the offense making Dwyer. The reason Dwyer did not get drafted higher was because he went to the combines out of shape.
I hope CPJ stays and finishes his career at Tech.
Ramblnwrek
August 28th, 2011
2:08 pm
Colorado: I agree. I think that Tech could benefit from a similar situation to VT. Where if we can keep our coach around for a long term commitment he will be a very good coach. So by the time CPJ has to leave/retire, Tech will be a consistent winner and then able to get the types of recruits that would help the next coach, assuming there is no other Triple Option successor out there.
bhamwreck
August 28th, 2011
2:42 pm
If the defense improves even to the point of being a top 30 defense then it would be a dramatic improvement and Tech could easily compete for a conference title and beat UGA also. The offsense is proven. Keep an eye on the defense early if you want to see how the season will go. If we beat MTSU 53-35 then its gonna be a long season.
Done with the Blogs
August 28th, 2011
3:02 pm
This isn’t clean, old-fashioned hate. This is vitriol for its own sake, devoid of any sportsmanship or mutual respect.
I actually just came to the AJC site to find the article and comments on J. Crittenton to show my 17-year-old son the worst I’ve ever seen on the AJC if not the internet, but it seems to have been taken down.
I’m done. I know you won’t miss me.
roughrider
August 28th, 2011
8:42 pm
Yes UGA had a down year last season but we still beat Tech like we do 90 % of the time.
Brent
August 29th, 2011
6:26 pm
“Roughrider” must not know that his name is slang for “butt-f**ker.” lol. It’s such a tough world on these interwebz, gotta make sure to never show any weakness. INTERNET THUG.