SEC didn’t go nearly far enough with ‘oversigning’

Mike Slive handed out $18.3 million checks to conference members Friday, but the numbers in oversigning issue still don't add up. (AP photo)

Mike Slive handed out $18.3 million checks to conference members Friday, but oversigning numbers don't add up. (AP photo)

Nick Saban, apparent guiding light for the nation’s oppressed and downtrodden — or at least those with a really good time in the 40 — is blaming the media for making too much of this “oversigning” issue.

“You all are creating a bad problem for everybody,” he said. “You’re going to mess up kids’ opportunities by doing what you’re doing.”

Yes, that is my purpose here on earth — to prevent potential student-athletes from fulfilling their dreams. And I’m certain if Nick Saban’s son were to be offered a football scholarship one year, only to be told months later after he had enrolled that there was no room after all, or to be pressured into leaving a season or two later when coaches suddenly determined that he wasn’t good enough, papa bear still would be perfectly fine with all this.

I don’t mean to put this all on Saban, although he and Houston Nutt have been two of the biggest abusers of oversigning, a “morally reprehensible” practice in the words of Florida president Bernie Machen. Only in the past year has the issue been drawing the attention it deserves.

The SEC, as the highest-profile college football conference in the nation, had a chance to make a loud statement at its meetings this week. It kind of wimped out. Rather than attack the oversigning problem with significant legislation, it decided only that it would lower the annual scholarship offer cap from 28 to 25.

Let me translate: Coaches now have a lower limit as to how unethical and morally reprehensible they can be. Feel better?

This was sort of like the real SEC passing a rule: “We recognize that insider trading is a problem. So we’re going to cap profits from said illegal transactions at $2.7 million.”

According to the rules, if a coach has 18 scholarship openings he can still sign 25 kids, then massage the numbers over a certain period, coerce kids into quitting or taking a “grayshirt” — postponing going on scholarship — or working some medical hardship magic (albeit, the SEC will have some oversight now). In the end, the coach gets the 18 players on the roster he wants and other seven are dropped into a black hole.

Welcome to the NCAA’s mission: Winning and making money, moral compass be damned.

College coaches don’t want to be held accountable for their mistakes. They don’t want to pay the price if a five-star defensive back devolves into a one-star punt coverage guy, or if a recruit fails to qualify academically, or if the kid backs out at the last minute to sign elsewhere.

Get a helmet, coach. Everybody takes the same risks.

Georgia athletic director Greg McGarity acknowledged in an interview Friday that the lowered scholarship limit doesn’t close the loophole. He also stated there was significant pushback from coaches who believe they would be at some competitive disadvantage in recruiting against other conferences should the SEC adopt tougher standards, like the obvious one: a hard cap, which would allow a coach to sign only as many kids to letters as he has scholarships available.

“That’s the perception some have. I’m not sure that’s true,” McGarity said, alluding to coaches’ concerns.

But he still considers this progress, saying, “There’s no question it was a good day for the SEC. At the end of the day, the presidents’ vote was a move in the right direction. Does it solve the problem? No. But it does help.”

The fix needs to come at the NCAA level. But the SEC could’ve done more and not damaged its product or brand. Commissioner Mike Slive just handed out $18.3 million checks to member institutions. Business seems to be pretty good.

Mark Richt, in supporting elements of grayshirting, wondered the other day about the recruit who just really wants to go to Georgia and there’s no scholarship available. How about this: Go the “Rudy” route. Enroll as a student, try to make it as a walk on and maybe get a scholarship the following year. But no promises, no signatures, no funny numbers.

See how easy that was? And sorry, Nick: Nobody will be denied an opportunity. There are 119 Division 1 football programs not named Alabama.

When asked if he would like to see a hard cap on scholarships, McGarity said: “In a perfect world, yes. But we’re not in a perfect world.”

No. But we could’ve been a little closer.

By Jeff Schultz

Earlier post: SI says Richt has a better job than Saban (Alabama)

Earlier post: Spurrier’s pay petition meaningless but concept has merit

Follow me on Twitter @JeffSchultzAJC; friend me at Facebook.com/JeffSchultzAJC

200 comments Add your comment

Bryan G.

June 3rd, 2011
6:30 pm

I guess my problem with lowering the limit is…what if a team has 26 or 28 scholarships available?

boog

June 3rd, 2011
6:30 pm

Jeff… are you underestimating the conferences involvement in overseeing medical disqualifications and simply running players off to open up scholarships. I view this aspect of the new rules as the most important. I agree with you the 25 limit does little to stop the “cutting” of players. But are you saying the SEC oversight of “cutting’ players is simply fluff?

Worm

June 3rd, 2011
6:31 pm

Ah, Nick Satan…The Napoleon of College football…How about a draft system like the NFL…If you finish first you can only sign 16 and prorate it down the line..Just kidding folks!

Habersham Dawg

June 3rd, 2011
6:33 pm

Like you said, Schultz, this has to be addressed on a national level.

Andrew

June 3rd, 2011
6:46 pm

Bryan G.,

Per NCAA rules you can only bring in 25 per class even if you have room for more. Signing more than that means you HAVE to greyshirt or have early enrollees, assuming all qualify.

Ethics Committee

June 3rd, 2011
6:48 pm

Richt will continue to cheat no matter what the rules are. Jan Kemp uncovered the tip of the iceberg in the 1980s, but the cheating and unethical practices at UGA continue to this day.

cahopkins

June 3rd, 2011
7:09 pm

This started years ago when the first college looked the other way in order to admit personnel who did not meet the entrance criteria of the school, but they were gifted athletes and they could help the school win. And that started it all. Winning became more important than anything else and coaches that did not win, and did not get on TV; well, they just did not stay at the school very long. We now teach openly how to cheat to win, how everything is OK as long as you don’t get caught. And if you do, deny and offer up excuses and your lawyer will make a statement later. – Suppose the colleges went back to strict rules of admission. Scholarships were issued only to those capable of meeting the standards of admission and schools that issued scholarships to kids were required to graduate that student or that scholarship was un-available for the next 4 to 5 years. No exceptions. Once you sign on the dotted line, that scholarship is no longer available. It would be difficult at first, but you would find that in the fall of the year, when colleges played games; one team would win and one would lose; it used to be a game; now it’s a drug for an emotional high. Red Bull anyone? Too many kids are lost in the shuffle for the drive to be #1. And it is everywhere. Just look at the Department of Justice; they want a playoff so #1 can be crowned. Don’t they have other things to do? Today, too much rides on the kid that is gifted; until he or she is no longer capable of carrying the load. And when they are, like the rest of us, they are replaced with the latest, fastest, newest edition of what people will pay to watch. And the adults let it happen. You would think they would know better…..Go Team!!! Win one for TV. Get the rating up – keep the cash coming. As long as greed makes the rules – nothing will change.

Nick

June 3rd, 2011
7:10 pm

CMR has not been the problem in oversigning; this change will cause problems for Msrs Nutt, Spurrier, Saban, Miles, and Chizik. But I’m sure that there are some loopholes on page 6, paragraph five, subsection c, lines two and three that they will exploit.

tulevol

June 3rd, 2011
7:11 pm

I wish football season would hurry up and get here. The doldrums are tough this time of year!

Bryan G.

June 3rd, 2011
7:24 pm

@Andrew – well, you can sign more than 25 if you can enroll them early and count them on “last year’s” total

jUMPER21

June 3rd, 2011
7:26 pm

Jeff,

Fired up? Appreciate the passion. And you’re right. Saban is morally bankrupt. I think Forbes named him in their top 10 list of ‘the most hated people in sports’. Not exactly the top 10 list you want to be on. Saban doesn’t get the concept of win-win, for sure. True, although a move in the right direction, ultimately, the SEC caved into to Saban’s theatrics AGAIN. He throws his little temper tantrums and tries to change minds that way. Remember what happened when his player got suspeneded and Saban villified agents? Unreal.

1eyedJack

June 3rd, 2011
7:34 pm

This’ll help the Gramblings, A&Ms and A&Is of the world.

Somewhere over the Dwayne Bowe

June 3rd, 2011
7:46 pm

Of course the SEC wimped out. Anyone bothered to check their non-conference schedules? It’s what they do.

Blackoutanyone?

June 3rd, 2011
7:47 pm

Jeff Schultz…..When the discussion is oversigningand and grayshirting all people want to write about are the very few instances of a kid not having a spot once he gets to school. Nevermind the guys like John Parker Wilson. Wilson a backup QB for the Atlanta Falcons wouldve never played a down of college football if not for a gray shirt opportunity at Alabama. Was not offered by anyone else. Why not do some research and look into kids who were grayshirts and see how that worked out for the majority. Naa too easy to pander to the UGA crowd and take shots at a rival coach.

david

June 3rd, 2011
7:48 pm

You want to solve the problem? The player can’t sign till they are admitted to the university or college. This will postpone signing day till June, and removing any possibility of over signing.

Blackoutanyone?

June 3rd, 2011
7:59 pm

Lol “I don’t mean to put all this on saban” but u just did even though the numbers show Bama is behind 4 or 5 other SEC schools for “oversigning” in the past 4 years. Well get in line. Everyone likes to pin oversigning on saban even though there are some 18-20 worse offenders through out the country.

jim

June 3rd, 2011
8:04 pm

blackout – take your blinders off. your coach is a rotten scumbag. a heck of a coach, but a rotten scumbag.

i think the uga-pandering sports writers have already shown that richt is in favor of a grey shirt, so just shut up your whining.

Russ, the Temporary Mascot

June 3rd, 2011
8:06 pm

Enter your comments here

Russ, the Temporary Mascot

June 3rd, 2011
8:08 pm

Sorry about the post above. Remember, I’m a dog. Over-signing players is a lot like over-signing mascots. Georgia has me and is already working on getting another little dog ready even though I am working my a$$ off as mascot. That’s called over-signing and I don’t like it a bit.

jdawg

June 3rd, 2011
8:10 pm

Ethics Committee, you are an idiot. Please add some facts behind your bullsh1t post, or go back to beating your wife. Blackout, that’s really clever, did you think of that name yourself. How about you name yourself “Decade of NCAA Sactions and Absolute Mediocrity”. Or “8 straight losses to Tennessee”. It’s funny how short the memory you Alabama folks have. Your beloved Saint Nick, split the series with UGA. I’m sure through even your hazy Koolaid/Vodka drinking memory you remember the 1st pass from scrimage in OT at your hallowed ground. Dig deep, come on!

Dawglasville

June 3rd, 2011
8:14 pm

Outside of Vandy, Florida, and Georgia the rest of the conference could care less about the “student” athlete. And yes I have the nerve to say that even after all of the arrests at Florida and Georgia. The rest of the conference is run with a “Forget Hell” mentality.

@Ethics Committee

June 3rd, 2011
8:40 pm

Get over it, tool. TECH has no chance regardless. Get some new material, jerk.

Captain

June 3rd, 2011
8:45 pm

A limit of 25 does nothing to resolve the so called over signing. If there are 20 openings yet 25 are signed then 5 have to be pushed out the door. To solve the problem, if indeed there is a problem, the suspension of the 85 maximum over the summer needs to be closed. As it now stands a school could have 90 players enrolled on scholarship from early June until August 1. During those 3 months evaluations can be conducted in what is essentially a tryout camp. August 1 5 players can be effectively “cut”, ala NFL cutdown. This is the practice being used primarily by Saban and Petrino, both former NFL coaches.

Until the NCAA closes the 85 loophole and enforces its rules related to coaches observing “voluntary” summer workouts abuse will continue.

GstateBen

June 3rd, 2011
8:48 pm

More proof that little research before half cocked columns. Jeff, you are better than this.

An athlete signs a scholarship that is renewable annually. Even better a school and the a coach are penalized when a player transfers through the moronic measure of APR.

It is the players choice where to sign. If coaches over sign or force attrition then do not sign with them. The information is out there. Do some research.

Bawbie

June 3rd, 2011
8:52 pm

FIRE PERNO! This guy chokes in tight games. He looks like a caged spider monkey in a zoo as he paces the dugout.

#1bamafan

June 3rd, 2011
8:54 pm

JDAWG – I remember the first play in OT as well as the first half beating between the hedges. Maybe you should help your team figure out a way to run the ball and play defense. Coach Saban is not a Saint to me but he is my coach, and a good one. He does not deserve to be the poster boy for everything that is wrong with College Football, the way Jeff Shultz like to make him. RTR

Let's Go

June 3rd, 2011
9:15 pm

I still don’t know why any kid would trust Nutt or Spurrier when they recruit them, they lie as much as a politician, but once EPSN ran that very negative story on Les Miles a couple of months ago you knew something would be done. The SEC Presidents hate bad publicity almost as much as they love BCS money.

Rudy

June 3rd, 2011
9:33 pm

Why not lift the 85 cap? Seriously. Relax the transfer rules to prevent hoarding if you like, but can we admit this problem arises solely from scholarship limits well beneath what the free market in the SEC can afford?

“One size fits all” isn’t fair. It’s stupid. Boise State can’t afford 100 football scholarships in a Title IX world? Tough.

Tide Rising

June 3rd, 2011
9:49 pm

The ignorance of Jeff and the folks on here is nothing short of astounding. In Saban’s tenure Alabama ranks 6th or 7th in the conference in terms of oversigning. Those are the facts which I will post shortly.

As for Saban “cutting” and “running players off” to make room what a obscenely asinine statement. Not one person on here can point to one single Bama player who was “cut” or “run off” for anything other than disciplinary problems. Those are the FACTS.

Now, about that oversigning BS the dawg fans keep spouting.

Perhaps you would be better served spending your time worrying about Troy since they lead the nation in oversigning at 32 players a year on average. According to the real stats Alabama is 6th in the SEC – middle of the road- in oversigning. If we include the 2011 recruiting class Bama falls to 8th in the SEC since the Saban era began in terms of oversigning. But why let the facts get in the way of your argument.

By the way can’t wait to see your ranting about Troy oversigning at 32 players per year on avg.

In past five years, 25 of 120 FBS programs averaged more than 25 signees
That list includes eight of 12 SEC schools and five of current Big 12 teams
Troy has signed 164 players over that span, a staggering average of 32.8

Team-by-team look at class size over five-year span

School Conference 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Total Average

Troy Sun Belt 34 40 33 32 25 164 32.8
Ole Miss SEC 25 37 31 22 30 145 29
Auburn SEC 32 28 29 30 25 144 28.8
Mississippi State SEC 26 27 27 34 24 138 27.6
Kansas State Big 12 17 25 32 33 30 137 27.4
Temple MAC 25 28 26 30 27 136 27.2
Southern Miss C-USA 26 22 27 32 28 135 27
Arkansas SEC 25 31 25 27 26 134 26.8
Kentucky SEC 26 29 20 29 30 134 26.8
Alabama SEC 26 27 32 25 23 133 26.6
Iowa State Big 12 28 25 25 25 30 133 26.6
LSU SEC 29 24 26 26 26 131 26.2
Baylor Big 12 23 28 23 29 28 131 26.2
Tulsa C-USA 25 25 26 31 23 130 26
Oklahoma State Big 12 27 24 27 23 29 130 26
Florida State ACC 25 21 33 20 31 130 26
South Carolina SEC 23 29 22 31 24 129 25.8

A greater sense of excitement

June 3rd, 2011
9:52 pm

The Tide was not rising when Auburn won it all.

and?

June 3rd, 2011
10:07 pm

HOW ABOUT sign as many as you want, but only dress current restrictions and all of those that don’t play still get a free education???

Tdawg

June 3rd, 2011
10:11 pm

Blackoutanyone are you retarted or just plain stupid? I’d go for retarted if I were you. That would explain a lot. No one is arguing against greyshirting at least as long as the kid knows what he’s getting himself into. Fool Georgia has offered grayshirts before so your BS rant against Georgia fans attacking that classless piece of garbage you call a coach is just another example of a Alabama fan not knowing what the crap he is talking about. No Saban is not the only one that does this, over signing that is, but he is the fool thats crying the loudest. I’ve heard that they are starting a new major at Alabama this year. Why don’t you sigh up for it. It’s called, HOW TO MURDER A TREE CORRECTLY.

jdawg

June 3rd, 2011
10:11 pm

#1. Good for you. I also remember a too little too late comeback in the second half between the hedges. I was merely responding to “Blackout” and his little insinuation. Saban is notorious for over signing, and has been since his days at LSU. I have met him personally, know several people who have worked for and with him, and will just say that he is a competitive individual who puts winning above all (and I do mean all) else. He is a dictator that is best suited for a school like Alabama that will overlook all of his negative qualities for winning at all cost. He didn’t leave Miami for nothing, he had mutiny on his hands, and that is a fact. Enjoy while you can. We’ll see Alabama, and him, in a similar Sports Illustrated/NCAA investigation as OSU in a few years.

LakeDawg

June 3rd, 2011
10:14 pm

Saban is such a tender guy. He’s all worried about those players who run a 4.4 forty not getting a chance if he doesn’t sign them.

Tdawg

June 3rd, 2011
10:22 pm

#1bamafan no one has said that Saban was not a good coach. If I had a son that he was recruiting I wouldn’t believe a word that came form his lips. In his past life he must have been a snake oil salesman. No he is not the biggest offender in oversigning, but like I told that idiot, Blackoutanyone. He’s the one doing all the ranting about how it would ruin football if they( the universities ) were to actually grow a pair and put a stop to scewing over some of these kids by stopping him and the other lying coaches from oversigning. Like I said. No Saban isn’t the only coach doing this, but he is the one screaming the loudest.

icallbs

June 3rd, 2011
10:27 pm

Reality is the SEC has been dominating college football for the past several years and that is a trend unlikely to end anytime soon – unless. “Unless” other conferences and TV (in particular ESPN) decide “something” must be done. My bet is something/anything is going to be done to reach more parity. The “oversigning”, roster management is an obvious step. Because life should be forced to be perfectly fair, and it is so unfair the Southeast has more than its fair share of talent, it’s only fair that talent be “redistributed” to areas less fortunate – what a concept.

When reading these articles consider the source(s) and authors.

The entire concept or serving the “student” athlete is laughable. The “student” football player has a better opportunity and infinitely more resources provided by the schools than the non-athlete to enable them to major in anything they choose. At some point in life you have to assume some responsibility for your choices.

I laud the Ge Tech and Georgia scholars. I don’t give a rat’s patookie about Isiah Crowell’s major, or how well he does in school. Just tote the rock and don’t flunk out, get arrested, fondle women, wreck cars, etc., etc. If along the way he graduates with a degree in rocket surgery, super.

Harsh? Nope. Reality.

Gen Neyland

June 3rd, 2011
10:29 pm

Maybe the kids should be offered a cash out severance package if they’re told to hit the bricks..? For the millionth time : It’s a business that deals in sweatshop labor. Win out and win out…

superDawg

June 3rd, 2011
10:29 pm

I guess 88 is flying under the radar.

trupert

June 3rd, 2011
10:31 pm

@Blackoutanyone, there you go again, always talking out your you know what.

Alabama comes in third behind only Auburn and Mississippi.

Four year numbers for players signed.

Miss. 122……#1
Aub. 113……#2
Ala. 112……#3
Ark. 111…..#4
SC. 105…..#5
MS. 102…..#6
LSU 100…..#7

Now the numbers for the teams that don’t oversign.

Tenn. 91.
UGA. 88.
FLA. 85.

Blackoutanyone?

June 3rd, 2011
10:33 pm

Tdawg and jim… my post was not a shot at UGA. I respect the UGA fan base as most are very passionate and show alot of class. Something you two milkduds appartently lack. At any rate… hate on haters…

22 SEC Championships….13 National Championships ROLL TIDE!!!

#1bamafan

June 3rd, 2011
10:35 pm

JDAWG…OK Competitive and winning are two words that we like to use at BAMA and would be required of our coach. My father-in-law attended Georgia and I do pull for the DAWGS. All I was saying is Jeff Shultz and the Georgia fans put too much effort into beating up on Coach Saban, when most of it is not factual. I am happy with our coach and if Georgia fans are happy with Richt, everything should be OK. RTR

superDawg

June 3rd, 2011
10:38 pm

Blackout anyone go back in history and see who either beat or stopped the tide from getting a NC and you will be surprised.

SEC Fact Finder

June 3rd, 2011
10:40 pm

Jeff,

You are so far off base, your general statements are completely wrong and your statement about Nick Saban’s son has NEVER happened at Alabama, LSU or Michigan St. To make such a statement is poor journalism and you and your college professors know it.

You may sit in the media center on Saturdays and visit the local schools for sound bites and try to find stories for your readers, but you NEVER have been involved in a major college program, worked in a major college program and have ZERO understanding of what 7 of the 12 coaches were saying when they fought to keep the numbers at 28 instead of the 25.

As a guy who has worked in 4 major programs over a 20 year career, and professional sports for 10 years I can emphatically say you are clueless on what a student athlete really goes through to get a scholarhsip offer, then compete at the next level while maintaining his core classes, study hall, weight training, film study, meetings, all while attempting to be a high school then college student.

Spend a little more time researching your articles before sitting in front of your SONY notebook and spewing information that is wrong. You are better than this.

gcs

June 3rd, 2011
10:40 pm

The crybabies win again.

.

Tide Rising

June 3rd, 2011
10:41 pm

And I’m certain if Nick Saban’s son were to be offered a football scholarship one year, only to be told months later after he had enrolled that there was no room after all, or to be pressured into leaving a season or two later when coaches suddenly determined that he wasn’t good enough, papa bear still would be perfectly fine with all this.- Jeff Schultz

Really Jeff? Show me one single Alabama player who was run off after 1 or 2 seasons for reasons other than disciplinary or legal issues. Or at another SEC school for that matter.

I don’t mean to put this all on Saban, although he and Houston Nutt have been two of the biggest abusers of oversigning- Jeff Schultz

Seriously Jeff. I just provided the numbers showing that Bama is at worst 6th in the SEC in terms of over signing under Saban and factoring in 2011 signees Bama is actually probably 7th or 8th. Care to remand your BS rhetoric that Saban is one of the 2 worst offenders?

a “morally reprehensible” practice in the words of Florida president Bernie Machen.
And what the hell does Machen know? He’s the president- not the coach or AD and frankly like you he has no clue what the hell he is talking about. He should stick to academics and stay out of football.

According to the rules, if a coach has 18 scholarship openings he can still sign 25 kids, then massage the numbers over a certain period, coerce kids into quitting or taking a “grayshirt” — postponing going on scholarship — or working some medical hardship magic (albeit, the SEC will have some oversight now). In the end, the coach gets the 18 players on the roster he wants and other seven are dropped into a black hole.- Jeff Schultz

Jeff, can your shoddy reporting possibly get any worse. Just how ignorant can you be? Players getting shoved down a black hole? Hyperbole and fact less rhetoric?

Coerced into quitting? Really? Care to back that up with some evidence?

Grayshirting? Seriously? John Parker Wilson was a greyshirt and things worked out pretty well for him I’ld say. What’s funny is that Shula had more greyshirts than Saban has had- Saban has had maybe 1- 2 at most in a year and a couple of years had none. Funny but nobody complained about Shula- only Saban. Wonder why that is Jeff?

And also if a player has a greyshirt offer at say his dream school and a full ride at UK or a mid tier program like UAB its his choice as to what he wants to do. He can wait for 1 semester or go to another program like the 1 greyshirt offer Bama had done this year. He was Bama’s lone player that it was explained to him that he might have to take a greyshirt and at the last moment he decided to go to UK where he had an immediate full ride. Good for him. Your ignorance on this subject precedes you.

When Saban signed his biggest class of 32 for example in 08 Bama actually came in 1 player under the 85 man limit in the fall because of that 32 man class 4 didn’t qualify, 2 went pro baseball, and 2 delayed enrollment because they suffered severe high school injuries that would have meant spending their freshman year redshirting and rehabbing. This is why coaches oversign Jeff- to account for normal attrition such as this and because on the current roster there will probably be players who are booted due to legal or disciplinary trouble, transfer of their own accord due to lack of playing time, flunk out, or take a medical scholly in the case of Prothro.

There is no “massaging” the numbers. Attrition happens Jeff. If a coach has room for 18 but signs 25 its because he knows that there will be natural attrition of players already on a team and players just signed. Some will not qualify to get in- happens every year and in Tommy Tubberville’s last recruiting class 40% of his signees never even made it to campus. More on that in a moment.

Did those signed players get pushed into a black hole? Um. No. Several of them just won’t meet the NCAA qualifying numbers. This happens everywhere.

And how about players like Zach Mettenberger or Jimmy Johns? Did they get thrown down a black hole? Um. No. They and numerous players around the conference get shown the door when they get in legal trouble and break rules and laws that embarrass the institution. This is another reason for attrition- legal and disciplinary problem players currently on a roster.

And players like Logan Gray who transferred? Did they get thrown down a black hole? Um. No. They simply were buried on the depth chart and chose to transfer somewhere where they could get playing time. This happens EVERYWHERE and accounts for attrition.

Medical scholarships? Um. Next you’re going to tell me that Tyrone Prothro was really ok to play and didn’t need a medical scholly. And then you’re going to tell me that you moonlight as an orthopedic surgeon and that other players such as Ivan Matchett really didn’t completely blow their knees out.

Here is why you oversign. 3 years after Tubb’s last recruiting class AU has 53 players on scholarship for 2011 and with 25 coming in the fall AU will still be 7 under the scholarship limit of 85. They will have 78 on scholarship. That’s 7 schollies, most of which usually go to young black men, that will go to waste all because of holier than thou ignoramuses like yourself who complain about over signing. You don’t have a clue sir.

When this unusual attrition to AU and the same attrition hit UT in Kiffin’s first year due mostly to transfers both AU and UT played with 17 and 13 fewer scholarshipped players than everyone else. 30 schollies going to waste and 30 young men- mostly poor and mostly black- who didn’t get to live the dream of big time college football. Get off your moral high horse and explain to me why you think its ok for 30 schollies to go to waste all because a coach can’t oversign to compensate for unusual years of attrition.

So now unfortunately there will be more young men who lose out on scholarship opportunities all so that a morally self righteous blowhard like yourself and some of these other fools can talk about curbing some sort of evil practice.

The single point that you have in your favor is that at LSU and S. Carolina the head coaches oversigned and players that they didn’t think would qualify qualified and hence 1 or 2 players at LSU and Carolina thought they had schollies when they didn’t- never mind that they still could have greyshirted and just come 1 semester later. This was just poorly handled by both Spurrier and Miles. You can criticize the 2 of them but no Saban.

In Saban’s case only a handful of players have greyshirted in his 5 years- 3 or 4 I think, and in each case all of them were 100% aware of the possibility of a greyshirt if every other player qualified. There were zero surprises to these players.

Next time look at both sides of an issue before spouting nonsensical hyperbole.

al.com

June 3rd, 2011
10:42 pm

Hey bama boy explain to us all how $aban has 8 more players on the team than he has room for.and how every year about this time he always has a lot of medical hardships to be announced. How about bama’s record of medical hardships. Why does bama get so many players hurt and off the team each year. Maybe all these medical hardship are due to a coach abusing his players and the rules!!!

Coach Grohbo

June 3rd, 2011
10:45 pm

Do you realize the 25 scholarship limit only counts from December 1 – August 1? SEC schools can still oversign as many players as they want from August 2 through November 30.

The SEC established no yearly limit on signees.

The SEC West schools are very happy with this outcome.

LakeDawg

June 3rd, 2011
10:45 pm

SEC Fact Finder…..so your saying that the kids who get a scholly to Bama due to oversigning wouldn’t get a chance anywhere else? I didn’t realize Saban was in effect signing walk ons. All his recruits are big time players who would get a scholly somewhere else.

LakeDawg

June 3rd, 2011
10:48 pm

I see you also failed to mention all those players who lose their scholly due to oversigning. I think you’re too close to the athletic side of college athletics and have a biased perspective.

Blackoutanyone?

June 3rd, 2011
10:52 pm

al.com… will ask for the 1,000th time. Where are you getting your numbers? LOL Saban does not release scholarship numbers or which players are on scholly. If the media can’t get those numbers… you certainly don’t have them.

Tide Rising

June 3rd, 2011
10:54 pm

Tdawg

June 3rd, 2011
10:11 pm

Blackoutanyone are you retarted or just plain stupid? I’d go for retarted if I were you.- Tdawg

Priceless- a dawg fan calling a Bama fan retarted twice and not realizing that its actually spelled retarded.

trupert

June 3rd, 2011
10:31 pm

@Blackoutanyone, there you go again, always talking out your you know what.

You might want to check your stats trupert. Bama is 6th in the SEC in oversigning during the Saban era and if you include the 2011 class which only has 22 or 23 signees Bama is probably 7th or 8th in the conference.

SecGuy

June 3rd, 2011
10:54 pm

Even Richt said over-signing is ok if the kids know about it up front. That has always been the only uncomfortable issue with the practice, and it is largely a phony issue since the schools who use over-signing and gray shirting lay it all out in the beginning to the kids and parents, a fact that was largely unreported by the media. In the last two years, the only known instances of a kid being blind-sided in the SEC was LSU last year and South Carolina this year. Two instances out of hundreds of signees, yet Schultzy and the rest of the media have demagogued it to the point you would think it is a chronic problem. In the LSU case, the kid affected actually returned to LSU on his own volition after leaving in protest. Obviously he wasn’t as scarred-for-life over the disappointment as the hand-wringers in the media would have us believe. This was a feel-good decision for the media and presidents and nothing more, and much to the chagrin of many, will have no impact on Saban’s continued success.

SEC Fact Finder

June 3rd, 2011
10:54 pm

Just to clarify an argument that continues to flaw any conversation. Signing a player and enrolling a player are two separate issues. According to a report written 3 years ago by Stanford University and funded by the NCAA, the average number of players who qualify academically, Cleared by the Clearing House is 3.8 athletes less than the number of players signed by the SEC Schools on average. The ACC numbers were 3.4, the Big 10 was 3.2 and the PAC 10 was 4.1, while the Big 12 was 3.9. Those numbers were reflective of the years 2004- to 2007 and were before and after the 28 rule number was put in place.

The differences is that in most cases the recruiting coordinators and head coaches know certain players will never make it unless they attend a JC or a Prep school.

Does anyone on this blog have any idea of how many Football signees were drafted in Baseball and never put on shoulder pads at the school they signed with? In 2008 there were 11, in 2009 there were 8 and that is just the SEC. How many went to prep schools? 17, How many went to JC? 29
How many did not qualify and still never went to JC? 7 all in 2009.

During the years of 1998 to 2008 how many UGA signees went to Prep schools? I think the number will surprise you. For many many years the Hargrave Military school was known as UGA jr college for many many people looking for a way for a kid to get back home with a little extra help on the academic side.

Tide Rising

June 3rd, 2011
10:57 pm

LakeDawg

June 3rd, 2011
10:48 pm

I see you also failed to mention all those players who lose their scholly due to oversigning. I think you’re too close to the athletic side of college athletics and have a biased perspective.

Wrong lakedawg, If there isn’t room the player didn’t lose their scholly- they just have to defer enrollment by 1 semester. And often if a player can’t fit in at a power like LSU they usually have offers at places like UAB or South Florida and can go to those programs.

For the Love of....

June 3rd, 2011
11:01 pm

@Tide Rising
Buddy, get a life!
Who the hell is going to read that? It”s longer than War and Peace or Moby Dick for gosh sakes…..
I’m sure Paul Finebum will get to the bottom of the facts – right?

Tide Rising

June 3rd, 2011
11:01 pm

SEC Fact Finder,

Good point on the number of signees who end up not qualifying- almost 4 in the SEC. Somehow facts like this seem to escape Jeff and some of the other folks who whine about oversigning.

Tide Rising

June 3rd, 2011
11:02 pm

For the love of…

Few people will read it. But I guarantee jeff will read all of it.

Tide Rising

June 3rd, 2011
11:14 pm

al.com

June 3rd, 2011
10:42 pm

Hey bama boy explain to us all how $aban has 8 more players on the team than he has room for.and how every year about this time he always has a lot of medical hardships to be announced. How about bama’s record of medical hardships.

al.com,

Bama has had more than unusual medical schollies. So what? Its an anomaly that happens. Last year or the year before dawg fans on here were saying that UGA was crippled with something crazy like 20 or 30 season ending injuries. It happens. I also remember one Shula year where our first 3 tailbacks all were lost for the season with severe knee injuries. By the AU game we were literally down to Aaron Johns our 5th team tailback who was slated for a redshirt season. Unusual circumstances like that happen.

Also if Bama signed 8 more players than what it has room for its because of expected attrition due to recruits not qualifying, backcounting towards the previous class which is fine, and the fact that bama has 4 or more players- I wont name them, who come from wealthy families whose fathers can pay their tuition if need be in order to help the program. Nothing wrong with that. Also at least 1 player a year gets into legal or disciplinary problems and gets the boot. We don’t put up with 12 players a year getting arrested.

Tide Rising

June 3rd, 2011
11:15 pm

I’m out and have definitely said my piece. My Jeff and some of you numbskulls actually learned something about why coaches oversign. Its called attrition and it happens to every program.

Blackoutanyone?

June 3rd, 2011
11:17 pm

trupert…. your counting commits not actual players who signed a letter of intent and made it to campus. Many of those kids never stepped foot on the UA campus due to an inability to make the grades or pro baseball. You call me out and yet your counting commits? lol

Tide Rising… I feel we are waisting our time. The facts are lost on some and the SEC has done many of these people a great favor today. By not implementing a hard line on “oversigning” most of these people will continue to have that as their excuse of choice as to why Saban is out recruiting Richt. It’s all because of OVERSIGNING by evil Saban. Makes you wonder why kids line up to come to Bama if Saban is such a bad man.

SecGuy

June 3rd, 2011
11:27 pm

Schultz, I think the thing bothering Saban is that you and others never offer an objective viewpoint. You always portray it as kids being duped, which is basically a lie. They know the risks, you just take them for idiots. But I do enjoy how Saban gives you so much heartburn.

Blackoutanyone?

June 3rd, 2011
11:32 pm

jdawg…lol yes I did. I can only imagine how long it took you to come up with yours.

jumbeauxtiger

June 3rd, 2011
11:46 pm

Good to see you back Tide Rising, with a vengeance :D

Reid Adair

June 3rd, 2011
11:48 pm

Wow, Jeff. After all this time, I had no idea that was your purpose.

Thanks for allowing Coach Saban to share that with us!

SEC Fact Finder

June 3rd, 2011
11:48 pm

LakeDawg,

Name a player that lost a scholarship that signed with Alabama? There is none.

I just want to clarify one point that someone keeps repeating that is a total inaccurate statement.

Currently in the SEC, there are 107 Football players who play football but are NOT on Football scholarship, they are on academic scholarships. Vanderbilt leads the conference with 19, Florida has 8 or 9 depending on which report is correct, Alabama has 7, UGA has 4, Auburn has at last report 4. On top of that it is a fact that over 5 football players on Alabama’s 2010 roster are in school being paid by their parents who are very well to do families with histories at the University of Alabama.

Throwing the number 88 out there is a bold face fabricated number. Not going to argue a point that is opinion, just wanted to make sure some numbers reflect the truth to some degree.

trupert

June 3rd, 2011
11:52 pm

@Tide Rising. per Alabamas unhappy castaways.

At least 12 times since coach Nick Saban took over the program in 2007, Alabama has offered players a “medical” scholarship, according to public statements made by the team. These scholarships, which are allowed under NCAA rules, are intended to make sure scholarship athletes who are too injured to play don’t lose their financial aid. A player who receives one of these scholarships is finished playing with that team.

Three Alabama players who’ve taken these exemptions say they believe the team uses the practice as a way to clear spots for better players by cutting players it no longer wants. These players said they believe Mr. Saban and his staff pressure some players to take these scholarships even though their injuries aren’t serious enough to warrant keeping them off the field.

“I’m still kind of bitter,” said former Alabama linebacker Chuck Kirschman, who took a medical scholarship last year. Mr. Kirschman said Mr. Saban encouraged him to accept the scholarship because of a back problem that he believes he could have played through. “It’s a business,” Mr. Kirschman said. “College football is all about politics. And this is a loophole in the system.”

trupert

June 3rd, 2011
11:59 pm

Alabama rising, Why do you think the SEC is now going to monitor these medical hardships. It will forever be known as the Saban rule, and for good reason.

Rudy

June 4th, 2011
12:03 am

Yes, fewer medicals. I want to see more players nutting up and playing hurt, because football’s really become a sissy sport. If a kid can’t go 100%, put him on the scout team and beat on him until he quits. That’s the way they used to do it.

SEC Fact Finder

June 4th, 2011
12:04 am

trupert,

Did you know that Mr. Kirschman actually had to have surgery after his medical scholarship was accepted? That is a fact, reported that somehow goes unplublished that his back was far worse than even he realized less than one year later. Look it up, he recanted this story less than a year later and apologized for his aggressive tone in the article.

Rudy

June 4th, 2011
12:19 am

See? Kid got a free undergraduate and graduate education, plus medical care. He’d have been MUCH better off getting worked in practice until he quit or completely broke down. Builds character.

But a medical? Reprehensible.

i'm ga

June 4th, 2011
12:23 am

Schulz. I realize its part of your job description to be a whiny b_watch. However, this was a move in the right direction to equalize the sec playing field. As a UGA fan its my job to be happy about something that pulls saban back to the field

PTC DAWG

June 4th, 2011
12:25 am

The number of signees really seems to bother the Bama fans….they oversign…the SEC did something to address it…deal with it.

Out with it

June 4th, 2011
12:37 am

Let me guess, Jeff – you want 4 years, guaranteed, no matter what. Once granted, never revoked? For any reason other than a string of Fs or a felony?

If that’s not what you want, what’s an acceptable criteria? What’s your desired solution? Speak up. If they didn’t go far enough, who would you like the SEC to look like in their roster management and why?

yep

June 4th, 2011
12:47 am

congrats dawg fans…..this is the biggest win you have had in a while. Now it’s all fair huh……you bunch of cry babies.Just do something….please!!!!! anything!!!!

Tdawg

June 4th, 2011
12:48 am

Blackoutanyone?, so your statement about it being to easy to pander to the UGA crowd was not a shot at Georgia fans? Could have fooled the heck out of me. I’ve read a great deal of your post and you are one wishy washy poster. One post you’re berating Georgia and the very next post you are somewhat giving it some credit. I think that I read that statement correctly. That was not one of your ” giving Georgia fans credit” post.

Tdawg

June 4th, 2011
12:58 am

yep you beaten us one time in the past how many games? Yep we Georgia fans think that its a cold hearted you know what that will tell a kid. Come to my school. play some football, get a good education, blab, blab, lie, lie. A couple of days before signing day. Coach to kid. Sorry son, but we don’t have a opening for you.

To the idiot that says that they can always go to another school. Yea right. Just not a school that they would have chosen had the school that told them that they had a scholarship for them not lied to them.

Why are you Bama fans so dead set about doing the right thing? You accuse us of whining when all we are trying to do is look out for the kids. Obviously their parents aren’t doing so. We’re not doing half the whining that the Bama folk are doing now that the SEC has decided to do something about it, even though they have actually done nothing.

Recruitnik

June 4th, 2011
1:09 am

I just laugh at the bama fans commenting in this blog. You are freaking clueless.

yep

June 4th, 2011
1:18 am

Tdawg, thanks for your reply. I don’t really care how many times we have beaten you or you us. your school is so insignificant now and even dating back as far as you would like …… I also appreciate the fact that you are so supportive of the KIDS….seeing as that your team has probably spent more time in community service than any in the SEC.
This oversigning mess is so overblown….. But it is a way for your team to justify how much they have sucked. Your team can’t even beat the other “we dont oversign”.
RTR. it won’t matter..your the pretender!

Tdawg

June 4th, 2011
1:24 am

Tide Rising what does spelling have to do with being stupid or retarted or retarded? If I read all of your post and find an error which I would eventually do even if you are using your spell check. Would that make you stupid or retarded? Don’t think so. You could be a rocket scientist and still make errors. I wasn’t criticizing his pronunciation or his spelling. I was questioning his state of mind so get over yourself. You make mistakes no matter what you say.

yep

June 4th, 2011
1:26 am

fill us in recruitnik

A-Ville Ranger

June 4th, 2011
1:31 am

Yes there is still room for manipulation but much less than before. Having only a maximum of 100 signees over 4 years doesn’t leave that many players per year to cull. Normal attrition will make the numbers close to 85 without running people off.

Tdawg

June 4th, 2011
1:43 am

yep, refresh my memory a little. Just how significant was Alabama last season? Seem’s to me that Bama is doing a little bit of pretending themselves. You’ve had two very good years. The way you Bama folk talk BS you’d think that it was a ten year run. You’re on your way back down to, what was that? Oh yea, you’re well on your way to being insignificant.

As far as our kids getting in trouble with the law. Kids will be kids and if you think for one second that the Bama kids aren’t doing the same as the Georgia kids then sir your’re, well lets just say that you are most assuredly in another realm of reality. The biggest difference Between Georgia and Alabama is that the law in Georgia is actually doing their job while the Bama law is turning their backs to the crimes committed by your kids.

Kdj

June 4th, 2011
2:15 am

Enter your comments here

Kdj

June 4th, 2011
2:20 am

Nice hatchet job. Don’t mention that Saban discusses all options with the kids and families beforehand. Don’t mention, that if the SEC decides a kid doesn’t get a med scholly approved by the SEC, he gets cut for lying about a physical ailment and gets no college education. Don’t mention that theater is no valid argument

Dawg48

June 4th, 2011
3:06 am

It’s all about the money!

Dawg48

June 4th, 2011
3:17 am

Get rid of verbal commitments. If a kid is ready to commit to a school let him sign a letter of commitment then and when a school has reached the maximum numbers of openings then their recruiting is over for the year. So many times a kid will commit to a school then on signing day change schools and the school is left out. They over target kids to make sure their needs are met and if you also move back signing day to enrollment time for schools their would not be any mistake if a kid can get in academically. This way their will be no oversigning or loose a kid on signing day Or to academics.

Homepage | MrSEC.com

June 4th, 2011
5:52 am

[...] 2. Jeff Schultz: “The SEC, as the highest-profile college football conference in the nation, had a chance to make a loud statement at its meetings this week. It kind of wimped out.” [...]

It Ain't Rocket Science

June 4th, 2011
7:08 am

Ethics Committee,

You have probably posted about the dumbest statement on these blogs I have ever seen. It is apparent,your hate of UGA has affected you mentally. If you really are a tech. fan, I would say their mentality has managed to drop about ten points, if you are a student. It is bad enough if you are just a fan.

[...] The SEC didn’t go nearly enough, writes Jeff Schultz of the AJC. [...]

saban haters club

June 4th, 2011
7:29 am

hope all the boys and girls got all of that angst out. now, is there anyone who’d like to say something nice about CNS?

Gatorman

June 4th, 2011
7:34 am

Will everyone just calm down! So they move people in and out based on their talent level, and student-athlete is a joke. Now they want to pay athletes to come and get an education (that cost an over $100,00 loan otherwise). Education dumbed down a long time ago, so don’t be morally indignant now folks, that boat has already sailed. If college football wasn’t the most lucrative sport (save the NFL), then changing rules and enforcing rules would be easy. College football is a college business because we started bringing in non-students to play the game decades ago. So shut up and enjoy the game!!

GR82BAG8R

June 4th, 2011
7:34 am

Simple solution to this problem: When you sign someone to an athletic scholarship, it for a degree, not for one year at a time. As long as the the athlete is in good academic standing you cannot withdraw the scholarship. If they decide to leave, you get your scholarship back. If they do something stupid (as some college kids are prone to do) you can revoke the scholarship. Otherwise, no exceptions.
Once you put that in place, raise the limit of those on scholarship to 100. If this is about giving kids an opportunity to get an education, then allow the athletes to get one, without looking over their shoulder at a bigger/faster/stronger/etc. player about to be signed.

Uncle Ricky

June 4th, 2011
7:38 am

Do you think this gives Corch Richt more time to work on his fabulous tan? Or what about more time to pursue his diving expertise?

GR82BAG8R

June 4th, 2011
7:39 am

Gatorman, the less challenging fields of study were not invented by the athletic departments, but by the academic elite in the 1960’s in response to the Vietnam War. As long as you were in college you could get a draft deferment. Basketweaving courses and majors were created to provide sanctuaries for those drafted or high on the Selective Service list. The athletic departments took advantage of this situation.

Matt

June 4th, 2011
7:46 am

I generally don’t get fired up over comments on blog postings, but when Dawglasville places UGA and UF in a category with Vandy regarding academics, I had to post after I stopped laughing uncontrollably for a few minutes.

Give me a break, dude. Vanderbilt is a top-20 institution and UGA is a top-100 institution. Comparing them academically is like comparing Vandy and UGA in football. UF and UGA are football factories andgood state schools, but they are not in Vandy’s class academically. We know our role – know yours.

Saywhut

June 4th, 2011
7:47 am

Amen! People like Saban are nothing more than overpaid hypocrites. Student-Athletes? Pah!

Matt

June 4th, 2011
7:50 am

This is not a Bama v. the SEC issue. This is an SEC/Big 12 v. Big Ten/Pac 12 issue. My opinion is that SEC and Big 12 schools (outside of Vanderbilt and Baylor) have to resort to oversigning because the kind of kid they sign is a greater risk to flunk out, so the SEC schools need the wiggle room. Pac 12 and Big Ten schools generally don’t do this. Big 12 and SEC schools do. The SEC and Big 12 are trying to push the media and NCAA back without losing an advantage they know they need.

Saywhut

June 4th, 2011
7:53 am

Hey Matt: Florida and Georgia are harder to get into than Vanderbilit. It’s a fact!

[...] that a big deal?  Eh, I’m not sure it’s as big as some make it out to be, at least in a conference where roster evaluations like the one we recently saw take place at [...]

Cloudodust

June 4th, 2011
8:04 am

Isn’t it weird that a game that began for fun has gotten so convoluted…

bamaguy

June 4th, 2011
8:14 am

I don’t read the ajc expecting any fair treatment of my alma mater. The primary purpose of sports writing is to sell newspapers and advertising in the circulation area.

The success of Florida, Auburn and Alabama football gnaws at the heart of the UGA faithful and the ajc panders to that pain.

Ben

June 4th, 2011
8:15 am

They called Coach Bryant a scumbag and every other name in the book too so nothing’s changed there. Just more sour grapes from the losers in the SEC. College football is like politics, if you can’t stand the heat, move on.

Buckeye

June 4th, 2011
8:24 am

Seems to me the SEC is all about abusing a kid…..”sorry, son, you just ain’t good enough”

Tressel was out to protect a kid albeit by sordid methods.

Who’s the villan?

DAWG

June 4th, 2011
8:41 am

The NCAA is trying to build a better mouse trap in regards to over signing. Be assured a coach will find a way around this. As far as I can see the NCAA could not find their way out of a paper bag, illegal recruiting and players being paid still exists in the SEC, not all but some.

Boobie Bowden

June 4th, 2011
8:43 am

“Mark Richt is a good man and a lousy football coach.” Anonymous dawg on the radio last week.

Jenny

June 4th, 2011
9:16 am

“Forrest, have you ever been with a woman?” “I sit next to them in my Home Economics class.”

dmr

June 4th, 2011
9:35 am

“NCAA moral compass be damned.” It is the NCAA who should be damned. Spare me the idea that the NCAA has a moral compass. I never had complete faith in the NCAA. However, I completely lost all faith in the Organization when, after the Ohio State FIVE were originally found to have committed wrongdoing, they were allowed to play in the Sugar Bowl, only to have their punishment pushed out a year.

I keep hearing that Ohio State needs to be a winning team for College Football to be “good”. Hogwash. Alabama went through poor times recently and so has Michigan. It hasn’t killed the game.

Over-signing may be a problem, but the NCAA is the bigger problem. Prove yourself to be a neutral party regardless of who commits infractions. Then I’ll believe in your “moral compass”.

It Ain't Rocket Science

June 4th, 2011
9:47 am

Buckeye,

You are making a blanket statement when you say the SEC is out to abuse a kid. Not all schools in the SEC disregard what is best for the kid.
And to try and pass along that Tressel was trying to protect a kid. Which one would that be. Tressel was trying to cover his lower posterior area and it back fired on him. Give me a break.
You may not like the state school that you live in, but do you honestly think that CMR is cut throat and only out for his best interest? If OSU is forced to sacrifice 2010 due to his “trying to Protect” a kid,” who indeed is the villain.

bamaguy

June 4th, 2011
10:05 am

I don’t think Mark Richt is cut throat but I do think he is out for his own best interest. All coaches are out for their own best interest. Coaching is their profession. Loyalty is for fans who have no financial stake in the success of their team.

Muschamp didn’t go to Florida as an act of disloyalty to UGA, he did it to advance himself in the coaching profession and thereby provide for his family. If RIcht leaves or is fired Kirby Smart will likely return to UGA. It will not be due to his love of UGA, it will be because it would be a career advancement. He might end up going to Ohio State if Richt remains at UGA.

How many of you have turned down a promotion opportunity because you were “loyal” to your old boss?

Lol

June 4th, 2011
10:06 am

Is this Jeff or Cynthia Tucker?

MikeP

June 4th, 2011
10:22 am

12 SEC coaches, a unanimous number, voted against this legislation. The reason is very clear, this does NOTHING to address the oversigning issue and puts the league at a competitive disadvantage with the other conferences.

It may make the league presidents feel good to raise their hands and shout “Look at us, we’re Mr, Goody two-shoes”, but that’s all it accomplished beside making it easier for ACC and other teams to win games vs the SEC.

I think the SEC presidents are gutless wonders that caved in to pressure from the media to “do something, even if it’s wrong.”

CLINTON (I lied too--so what)

June 4th, 2011
10:30 am

Jan Kemp was a weirdo in the 80s and the lack of ethics committee is even weirder with the negative comments that make no sense. You just don’t like UGA and are using any chance to make negative remarks. You are a skank my friend.

you bama boys

June 4th, 2011
10:36 am

tide rising and the rest of you RTR’ers……

I agree with what you say regarding all of this. Thank you for the enjoyable and educational reading. WDE!

The issues are not oversigning, but over-enrolling, not attrition, but forced attrition. I don’t believe the problem is widespread, with only a few isolated cases (LSU/USCe). The media missed the ball completely with this….missed the entire ballpark rather.

It Ain't Rocket Science

June 4th, 2011
10:36 am

Mike P,

Perhaps you could explain why you think it puts the SEC at a disadvantage. If it is only that they will not be able to freely distribute red shirts and gain an advantage by basically dismissing a player, who turns out not to be the next great player, I don’t see that as a disadvantage. I call that returning some integrity to the SEC, and considering all the hits the SEC gets from the NCAA, I don’t consider it a bad thing. If anything, this change will put every coach on the same level playing field when it comes to this area.
By tightening the rules on the number of signees each year, all you are forcing the coaches to do, is evaluate a little better, and be honest with the kid you recruit. The kid makes a commitment as well as the coach and both should be required to honor it. Granted the players, can always transfer but if it is to another DIV. 1 school, he has to sit out a whole year before he has a chance to play for his new school.

Joe

June 4th, 2011
10:42 am

Tide Rising, you’re a scumbag of epic proportions, and Bama is a cess pool

bamaguy

June 4th, 2011
10:45 am

and I hope Joe isn’t an actual UGA alum but rather just a fan. It is usually easy to tell them apart (and that goes for all schools, not just Georgia)

Dr. Phil

June 4th, 2011
10:52 am

The SEC Presidents’ meeting resembles a parle of pirates in a Jack Sparrow movie. They aren’t gutless when it comes to advancing their own self interests. I do not understand how a coach can deny a scholarship to a player who signs with a school and meets admission standards. There is an interesting book called The Thin Thirty about Charlie Bradshaw forcing players to quit at UK and tricking them into giving up their scholarship. I understood that, at least in the past, the scholarship was a permanent agreement between the player and the school and was void only if the player flunked out or committed a crime. If that is not the rule now, it should be.

GR82BAG8R

June 4th, 2011
10:52 am

Buckeye, are you serious???? Do you really believe Tressel was trying to protect the “kids”? He was hoping and praying no one would find out. They did. He paid. Now THE Ohio State University will also pay.

Bodda Getta

June 4th, 2011
11:38 am

Richt won’t be around next year to whine about this anymore.

This issue is closed.

MassiveDawg

June 4th, 2011
11:43 am

Finally, Schultz writes a decent article…

Blackoutanyone?

June 4th, 2011
11:44 am

Tdawg…. I usually only post in the recruiting blog as it relates to Bama prospects and try to avoid the mudslinging but it can be fun from time to time. I think your taking this a little too serious. Bama fans will defend our program just as any other SEC fan base will. That is usually when I get drug into a crap throwing contest with individuals like yourself. I respect your passion for the Bulldogs. Calling me “retarted” lol…is just part of talking football in the SEC. As for last years team. Something you need to understand. While preseason rankings mean very little… it is very important to be in the conversation. Alabama was and will be in the conversation for the BCS national championship for many years to come. Hopefully Richt will turn it around this year and UGA will be in the conversation by week 3. That is actually my prediction and I have been on record for many months. As for pandering to the UGA fan base… that’s exactly what Schultz did. Oversigning has been a hot topic in Georgia as Richt was on record a few weeks ago saying he would never do it. Most fans on these forums have jumped in line and love to use it as the reason Richt has lost Georgia prospects to Alabama. So I feel it was a cheap shot at Saban and an attempt to pander to the UGA crowd. Not sure why you take exception to that… not like calling you retarted or something. ROLL TIDE

Mike

June 4th, 2011
11:44 am

Schultz,

You’d bitch if you were hung with a new rope. The real world is tough. Ask all of us that have lost our jobs in this economy. If you don’t like the way football is run, then go report on something else. There are several others at the AJC you can take with you. Bad journalism is why I finally dropped my paper subscription after 20+ years.

heartofdarkness

June 4th, 2011
11:54 am

Jeff, the lesson seems to be: “If it ain’t broke (i.e., you’re caught, indicted, and can’t find a jury you can buffalo), don’t fix it (i.e., rules will bend around a football like light in the presence of mass). You never seem to learn. I did like the analogy to the Securities and Exchange Commission and it’s ostensible purpose to provide the illusion of legitimacy in a similar ethical vacuum. Maybe the best solution is to have all roster management activity made public and accessible, and take measure of the public’s capacity to accept the sausage.

Bama Ramma

June 4th, 2011
11:55 am

This new rule is terrible. Coach Saban is furious! Look for this rule to be changed back next year with some bigtime pressure from the Alabama AD and president.

Paul in RDU

June 4th, 2011
12:04 pm

Old SEC math 28 + 28 + 28 + 28 = 85
New SEC math 25 + 25 + 25 + 25 = 85

Tide Rising

June 4th, 2011
12:21 pm

trupert

June 3rd, 2011
11:52 pm

@Tide Rising. per Alabamas unhappy castaways.

At least 12 times since coach Nick Saban took over the program in 2007, Alabama has offered players a “medical” scholarship, according to public statements made by the team. These scholarships, which are allowed under NCAA rules, are intended to make sure scholarship athletes who are too injured to play don’t lose their financial aid. A player who receives one of these scholarships is finished playing with that team.

Three Alabama players who’ve taken these exemptions say they believe the team uses the practice as a way to clear spots for better players by cutting players it no longer wants. These players said they believe Mr. Saban and his staff pressure some players to take these scholarships even though their injuries aren’t serious enough to warrant keeping them off the field.- Trupert

WRONG Trupert. The info you got was from a WSJ article on oversigning. That’s what it says in the headlines. When you actually READ the article you will see that 2 of the 3 players had nothing negative to say about Bama or the medical redshirts they received. They did not say that Bama pressures players into taking medical redshirts. Only the author claims that. READING is fundamental my friend. And also 12 career ending medical injuries over 4-5 years is really not that unusual. It just means we had a bad run of injuries like Tyrone Prothro’s injury. Are you going to dispute the medical staff? Are you an orthopedic surgeon? And did you ever consider the flip siding? Looking at a kid’s future health and realizing that even if its possible for him to come back and play that its really not worth re-endangering his health? No. Obviously you didn’t.

“I’m still kind of bitter,” said former Alabama linebacker Chuck Kirschman, who took a medical scholarship last year. Mr. Kirschman said Mr. Saban encouraged him to accept the scholarship because of a back problem that he believes he could have played through. “It’s a business,” Mr. Kirschman said. “College football is all about politics. And this is a loophole in the system.”- Trupert

Trupert, as a fellow bama blogger noted Kirschman had to have back surgery a year after his medical redshirt. The injury was far more severe than he thought. He recanted his negative statement and apologized for being wrong about the extent of the injury. Incidentally he had been on the team 4 years and the medical redshirt didn’t come until his 5th year. Bama paid for him to get his masters degree- took him 5 1/2 years and if I remember correctly and Bama paid for the extra semester over his 5 years of eligibility in order for him to finish his masters. And as I’ve said he is the one single Bama player on record for criticizing medical redshirts and the man recanted.

ClassicDawg

June 4th, 2011
12:23 pm

“People bring it up that I’ve medical-ed more people,”Nick Saban said in response to criticism about his practices. “Well, yeah, I medical them so they can stay in school and graduate where other people just get rid of them.”

Tide Rising

June 4th, 2011
12:27 pm

Joe

June 4th, 2011
10:42 am

Tide Rising, you’re a scumbag of epic proportions, and Bama is a cess pool- Joe

Joe,

My, I guess when the facts aren’t on your side you just resort to name calling. Is that all you got?

Jumbeauxtiger,

Glad to see you’re back also buddy. 91 days till kickoff. Something tells me the national title game could well come down to LSU at Bama on Nov. 5th. Both programs are freaking loaded. And lets not forget Ark and MSU which both are going to field some really good teams.

I had to vent on this subject because there’s so much ignorance and misinformation out there on this oversigning issue. There is a reason why all 12 coaches- even Richt- voted to keep the signing limit at 28 as opposed to 25. You would think that would tell Schultz and the other ignoramuses on here what the coaches are saying. You would think anyway….

Dawg Tired

June 4th, 2011
12:30 pm

Good points Jeff. The obvious answer, as you understand, is you should never be allowed to have more than 85 kids on scholarship. Nevertheless, as I stated in response to your other article on this subject. as long as the policing of the scholarship process is in the hands of the SEC office this will not be effective. Anyone who can read knows that Cam Newton was ineligible under the current SEC rules as written. As long as folks who can’t read are in charge of overseeing the scholarship process, Nick Saban will do exactly as he pleases. As I also stated in my earlier comment, Nick Saban is a whole lot smarter than anyone in the “SEC office.” Houston Nutt? Not so much.

Tide Rising

June 4th, 2011
12:33 pm

Dawg Tired

June 4th, 2011
12:30 pm

Good points Jeff. The obvious answer, as you understand, is you should never be allowed to have more than 85 kids on scholarship.- Dawg Tired

Dawg Tired,

It sounds like you misunderstand the issue. Nobody plays with more than 85 scholarship players. Not Saban, Nutt, or anyone. When fall comes everybody will be at 85 or less scholarship players.

Dawg Tired

June 4th, 2011
12:34 pm

Obviously – The point I was trying to make, apparently not clearly enough, was that you can only sign a number in any given year that, when added to those already on scholarship, equals 85. Like I tell my law students, I can explain to you but I can;t understand for you. Either you see it or you don’t.

Tide Rising

June 4th, 2011
12:47 pm

Dawg Tired,

And apparently you are completely lacking in understanding as to the other main points of the entire article. Coaches oversign by a significant amount because there is going to be natural attrition. If you sign 85 players over 4 years you will probably only end up with about 65-70 players. Why? Because several that you sign in a freshman class won’t even qualify academically. In the SEC it averages right around 4 signees per year which over 4 years means you will lose 15-16 players right there. Then there are signees who make it on campus but who end up not being on the team for all sorts of reasons such as being booted because of legal or disciplinary trouble, career ending injuries, voluntary transfers due to being buried on the depth chart. The natural attrition in many cases is far more than 15 players over 4 years and that sir is the problem. Now do you understand? AU and UT had a couple of years of unusally high attrition and both are still well under the scholarship limit of 85.

Dawg Tired

June 4th, 2011
12:53 pm

I do agree with Saban on a key point. Here’s the problem illustrated by a hypo: Suppose Ole Miss has 60 guys on scholarship. Then they sign 32 the next year on signing day. They oversigned because 8 to 10 of their signees may not actually qualify. Let;s say that only 4 do not qualify. Now Ole Miss has to do something to get down to 85. In the past they might grayshirt 3 guys or lose 3 guys already on campus to academic attrition, etc. With a hard number approach like I have proposed, kids who are potentially non-qualifiers will not be getting as many offers because of the lack of wiggle room. That bothers me, but so long as some coaches openly abuse the process, I would rather simply let those kids be recruited only by the jucos and let them get recruited later (after they actually qualify). Admittedly a tough call. I suppose that was a concern of the presidents and may explain why they opted for the 25 a year limit.

Dawg Tired

June 4th, 2011
12:55 pm

TR _ I understand that. See my previous comment. Admittedly the problem is not all that simple. I am primarily concerned about abuse. Most coaches are able to work under the present system without abusing it, i.e., using it to get rid of those who turn out not to be as good as originally projected. It is quite clear that “stuff happens” that is beyond the control of the coaching staff such as transfers, injuries, academic attrition, non-qualifiers, etc. Oversigning by 2 – 4 to cover such stuff seem ok to me. I believe most coaches have operated in good faith. However, the pressure to win has obviously caused some to abuse the process and that is the problem.

dawgster

June 4th, 2011
12:57 pm

I’m not going to dwell inot the specifics of what coach is or is not doing, bottomline it evidently is a problem and certain schools, which seem to choose to make excuses for it have a problem..I think the NCAA needs to address the situation but I think the SEC has at least made an effort to prevent some of the abuses that are going on…Its amazing though to read some comments that Shultz is pandering to UGA…Are you kidding me…He is and has always been one of our biggest critics, so I can’t buy that one…

I don’t pretend to have the answer as so many on here seem to have, but hopefully kids that want to come to your school can still have that opportunity whether by grayshirting or walk-on…Thats the way it should be and there should be no pressuring a young man to leave, unless its due to grades on off field issues, etc…Anyone having a problem with whats going on or has been going on is in denial in my opinion…But I will agree this is not all about Saban, Nutt, or Spurrier….At some point I’m sure all schools have sat down with a young man and had some discussions…What the SEC is trying to do is addressing some of the abuses by some coaches, and yes there have been some, no need to deny it, and make it a level playing field…but again, to think Shultz is pandering to the dawg nation…read most of his negative articles towards UGA and Coach Richt…I have and I totally agree with Shultz on this one….go dawgs

Tide Rising

June 4th, 2011
12:59 pm

The only coach who openly abused the process was probably Houston Nutt when he signed 37 players. He knew most of them weren’t going to qualify but signed them anyway to build rapport with the JC colleges he sent them to and to mentally give them the idea that when they got their grades up and qualified that they were still mentally committed to Ole Miss. Saban signed over 30 one time only. That was in 08 and of those 32 he knew 4 were borderline and they ended up not qualifying. 2 of them he knew there was a good chance of them playing pro baseball depending on the draft and sure enough they ended up playing baseball. 2 other casualties meant that when the freshman class reported in the fall that bama came in 1 scholly under the 85 man limit. And this was with the largest class Saban has ever signed.

Dawg Tired

June 4th, 2011
1:01 pm

TR – What would you propose to prevent abuse such as you describe by Nutt? You seem to have thought about the problem in some depth.

Tide Rising

June 4th, 2011
1:07 pm

Dawgster,

What abuses do you refer to? Your statement seems vague. There are only 2 abuses I’ve seen- 1 is Nutt signing 37 players to build relationships. The other is that Miles and Spurrier oversigned and had several borderline guys that they didn’t expect to qualify academically. All of them qualified and that meant 1 or 2 players couldn’t enroll and would have to defer enrollment by 1 semester. All that happened here is that the coaches did a poor job of explaining to 1 or 2 players that if every single player qualified that they may have to take a greyshirt and defer enrollment. That’s it. That’s been the only real problem- 2 coaches who didn’t do a good job of explaining to 1 or 2 recruits that there was a possibility of a greyshirt if everyone qualified. Bama under Saban has had 1 or maybe 2 greyshirted players in the last few years but in the recruiting process it was carefully explained to each of them that this was a possibility if everyone qualified.

Delbert D.

June 4th, 2011
1:08 pm

Will Roster Management be offered as a major at SEC schools?

Blackoutanyone?

June 4th, 2011
1:18 pm

Tide Rising… thank you for the fact based and educational posts. For every poster like Joe there are 20 others who have read your posts and are much more educated on the situation as a whole. Hope to see you on the recruiting side. Do you think moving signing day into early June after these kids have qualifed or not would make a difference?

Dawgster… in Alabama we have Kevin Scarbinsky. He spends alot of time taking shots at Saban in his poorly researched articles. From time to time he will pander to the UA fan base as well. It’s about selling papers and viewers to their respective web sites. Again my post was not a shot at the UGA program or fanbase. Just my opinion of this article.

Tide Rising

June 4th, 2011
1:19 pm

Dawg Tired,

The imposed limit of 28 was just fine- there was no reason to mess with it. Here is my big issue with this whole thing- its 2 fold. As you pointed out players on the academic fringe now may not be offered because a coach has less wiggle room- so that means these players may lose out the opportunity for a scholly even if they do end up qualifying. And that’s a shame.

Secondly I think its a moral issue. Most of these schollys go to young black men- many of them from disadvantaged backgrounds. When you have hard caps there are going to be years when unusual attrition hits certain programs and those programs end up way under the limit.

2 good examples. When Kiffin came to UT 11 players transferred and there was unusual attrition. UT actually played with only 68 scholarship players Kiffin’s first year. That’s 17 schollies, most of which go to underprivileged young black men, that go to waste. If you can’t oversign the next several years to catch up to the 85 man limit then that’s nothing more than unused schollies going to waste.

Same thing happened to AU. In Tubbs last class 40% of his recruits never made it in. AU has been oversigning like crazy the last 2 years and even with a 25 man freshman class reporting in the fall AU will be 7 under the limit at 78 total players in the fall. That’s 7 schollies going to waste and the same year that Kiffin had only 68 players I believe AU had only 72 players on scholly.

With the new 25 man cap it will probably still take AU and UT a few more years of hoping everyone qualifies to get up to the 85 man limit like everyone else. That’s just wasted schollies. If they were allowed to oversign then sure 1 or possibly 2 players a year would maybe have to greyshirt and delay enrollment 1 semester but what’s worse? That 1 or 2 players that needed development time anyway sit out a semester and work on building their bodies at a gym? Or lots of scholarships going unused all because some self righteous blowhards whined about oversigning? In the case of UT and AU in 1 year alone that amounted to about 30 schollies 13 at AU and 17 at UT that just went to waste. And that is not right.

Tide Rising

June 4th, 2011
1:26 pm

Delbert D.

June 4th, 2011
1:08 pm

Will Roster Management be offered as a major at SEC schools?

Saban has a Phd in it. Saban does have a little trick up his sleeve also. He has a minimum of 4 Bama players that come from very wealthy families where their fathers are alumni. It is rumored that at least a couple of these players families are paying or have paid their kids own way in order to help out Alabama with schollies for other players. Perfectly legal but in all the ranting about Saban’s numbers people don’t know things like that. Also as much as Bama oversigns Saban came out and publicly stated that last year Bama was actually under the 85 man limit. He probably left a couple of spots open so that he could back count some players this year if he oversigns. As it is though he only signed 22 or 23 players this year instead of his average of 26-27 players a year.

Dawg Tired

June 4th, 2011
1:28 pm

TR – Thanks for your thoughts.

Tide Rising

June 4th, 2011
1:34 pm

Blackout,

I wouldn’t want to move signing day to June. The recruiting process is already so intense that it would just put too much pressure on both coaches and recruits. If anything I think they should have an early signing period for the kids that absolutely know where they want to go- such as Dec. 31st. But that idea got nixed of course. As much as Scarbinsky takes shots at Bama I still read him.

This isn’t the first time Jeff has poorly researched an issue. If he was going to call Saban one of the 2 worst offenders you would think the least he could have done was look at the facts. And the fact is that in the Saban era Bama is at worst 6th and probably more likely 7th or 8th in the sec if you include the 2011 class in terms of oversigning. But I guess Jeff doesn’t bother with pesky things like FACTS.

SecGuy

June 4th, 2011
1:35 pm

Well, at least it’s over now for a while. The most disappointing aspect of this whole issue was how Schultz and the moralizing media at large deliberately told only half the story of over-signing. They created a fictional narrative and passed it off as fact. Blogs were repeatedly used to construct a heartbreaking story of poor, unsuspecting recruits having the rug pulled out from under them at the last minute, losing their scholarships, having their lives wrecked, destroying any chance at success in life.
The whole story was rarely offered — that signees are told up front about the policies and risks and that they are perfectly free to opt in or decline. In other words, taking a real life decision and living with it. For some reason Schultz considers such a concept to be immoral, yet neither he or his supporters ever explains why. It was also never mentioned that the worst case scenario for these kids is that they could wind up transferring to another school, still on scholarship so their educational opportunities and dreams would still be intact, just at a different location. Hardly a tragic outcome. They created uproars over two mistakes made at LSU and South Carolina the last two years and ignored the over five hundred other signees without issues during the same period. But to acknowledge such facts would seriously weaken the “poor victim” thesis of the sham.
By not telling the whole story, Schultz is essentially a liar. He chooses to demagogue on one side. And at first glance it appeared that his efforts had prevailed. But it’s clear the changes weren’t nearly as radical as the he had hoped for, after all Schultz is a nanny and nannies are never be satisfied until everyone has a trophy. But maybe now “Nanny” Schultz can move on to “fix” other burning issues, such as the cowbells of Miss. St.

Tide Rising

June 4th, 2011
1:36 pm

Dawg Tired,

One other thing. Those recruits that you pointed out that are on the fringe as far as qualifying academically? As you stated if the coaches have less wiggle room to sign players on the fringe of qualifying academically then these players will fall through the cracks and just end up in JUCO.

An unintended consequence is that if these players know that a coach won’t offer them because its questionable as to whether or not they will qualify then what incentive do they then have to do the right thing and hit the books and study hard to qualify if they know they’re not going to be offered?

Did Jeff or any of the other blowhards railing about oversigning think about that? Probably not.

Anyway I’ve done my own share of railing so I’m out to hit the pool. You guys have a good weekend.

Tide Rising

June 4th, 2011
1:46 pm

SecGuy,

Don’t forget also that although mistakes were made in the recruitment of 1 or 2 guys at LSU and South Carolina that those guys still had offers to greyshirt. They would simply have had to enroll 1 semester later if they wanted to play at their dream school. It wasn’t the end of the world for these guys. And if they are the marginal, last guys in a class- usually lineman- then they could use that extra time to bulk up in the gym and get a head start before enrolling. As you stated its not anywhere near as bad as Jeff makes it out to be. Anyway I’m out.

The SEC Fans

June 4th, 2011
2:05 pm

We just want to see the best players play.

If a player is not good enough, then welcome to the real world.

Richt can continue to live in his fantasy world.

Vulture

June 4th, 2011
2:24 pm

Alabama Whiners Blog – Too Funny!
I bet if you Saban fans read the blogs in some other SEC states you will be whining there too.

Whiskey Breath

June 4th, 2011
2:44 pm

Jeff, I have never seen you work this hard. Is your editor putting the screws to you? You have always been lazy, so I am a little perplexed. For a lazy man to call anyone morally reprehensible, I want to laugh. If the rule was morally reprehensible, the SEC sure as hell took their time putting it in. The SEC has been around for 60 plus years. So now that get a conscience? So now you have decided what is moral. Go back to writing your short, safe, articles. You do realize, only in Ga would you still be around?

SEC FAN>

June 4th, 2011
5:26 pm

Nick Saban doesn’t care about hurting these kids feelings if he tells them no scholly after one year, the guy just wants to WIN and will find every loophole possible to do this, he is the Anti_Richt. But he has one two MNC so he has the respect…

Maddox

June 4th, 2011
5:33 pm

It would be so refreshing if so-called journalists would actually work for a change and get the facts rather than trying to create controversy to get attention. The whining about over signing is another attempt to socialize college football. How has that worked out for our economy? It won’t make champions of smaller schools any more than the current ridiculous litany of imposed rules has. Grow up, take responsibility for yourself, work hard. Stop trying to bring the successful down, that won’t make you a winner.

5150 UOAD

June 4th, 2011
6:38 pm

85 scholarships divided by 4yrs is 21.25 shouldn’t the limit just be 23 and be done with it?

Dawglasville

June 4th, 2011
7:18 pm

Matt – you may or may not see this. According to US News Vandy is 15, and UGA an UF are tied at 56 (maybe 54). All of the rest of the schools in the SEC are not even in the top 100. All three of these schools are fighting to put an end to this oversigning business. That was the point I made yesterday. I understand that Vandy is a superior school to UGA and to UF but all three schools are making and effort to fix this mess and put an end to this plantation mentality. Now, if you are a Vandy grad, which I am sure that you are not, because if you were you would probably have much better things to do than to belittle someone on a sports blog, but if you are, I’m sorry that my blog touched a nerve.

Saban

June 4th, 2011
7:53 pm

SEC Fan,

Name one player saban has ran off after a year or even 3 or 4 years for reasons other than for discipline or legal issues. You can’t.

Dawglassville,

Plantation mentality? And that applies to oversigning how? If you’re going to bloviate about “plantation mentality” then we might as well just get rid of college football and b-ball period.

luxomni

June 4th, 2011
8:01 pm

If the conference really wanted to end the practice, they would set a yearly limit, at say 25, and also not let a school sign more players than the 85 scholarship ceiling allowed — assuming the school was not on probation with scholarship sanctions. To allow for some attrition, you might consider raising the limit to 88.

BobDawg

June 4th, 2011
10:29 pm

….Hopefully this topic will enter the recycled bin/trash heap shortly… I say sign all the players you want and let’s get it on! We need about 10 more lineman on the O-line…. Anyone got some to spare???

MikeP

June 4th, 2011
11:00 pm

Quoting Rocket Science: “Perhaps you could explain why you think it puts the SEC at a disadvantage. If it is only that they will not be able to freely distribute red shirts and gain an advantage by basically dismissing a player, who turns out not to be the next great player, I don’t see that as a disadvantage…”

Nothing was done to address the issues you mention. Redshirt rules were not changed, or even mentioned. A coach can still dismiss a player that he believes to be under performing. All he has to do is refuse to renew the kid’s scholarship for another year. Happens all the time.

If other conferences can allow themselves to sign 28 and have a little wiggle room, that’s an advantage. If other conferences can count early enrolees back on last year and the SEC schools can’t that’s an advantage.

You claim to know that the Lemay kid was an early enrolee at UGA this January and his scholarship counted back on last year’s class because Richt did not enroll the maximum 25 in 2010.. Now that option is shot. Only get 24 in? Tough, you just lost out, while if Tech or FSU only gets 22 in, they can pick up three early enrolees that will count back. If you don’t think that’s an advantage for the non SEC schools you haven’t thought this thing through.

It Ain't Rocket Science

June 5th, 2011
8:08 am

Mike P,

The red shirt process as I understand must now be officially looked at per individual case by the SEC office and that case must be presented by the coach, athletic director of the school, as well as the team doctor. Don’t know that this changes anything.
Perhaps, they could have helped the whole situation out if they would have required that no one can be signed until they are academically qualified for college. It seems sad to me, that the kid gets a letter, and yet in a lot of cases, he hasn’t even taken the SAT or ACT and if he has, he has to retake it again to get a higher score. This is a problem that coaches have to put up with and they should not have to.
The problem of course lies with the high school, their coaches and the parents in a lot of cases. It is bad enough that they have different standards they have to meet, to remain qualified under the rules of the athletic scholarship as it is. Athletic scholarships standards almost guarantee that most of the athletes will not get the required amount of course work to graduate in the first place. Every team is guilty of offering scholarships to people who are not academically qualified with the possible exception of Vanderbilt, but let’s face it, people go to those type of schools for the most part to receive a good education.
Over all, the whole darn business involved in with recruiting these kids needs to be over hauled. I doubt though, this will ever happen though, since it really is all about the money. Few of these presidents and even fewer of these coaches really give a darn about the player as it is.
I do not see this as an SEC problem, and I don’t see it as any more of a problem for the SEC than any other school. The advantage, if there is any, would be done away with if the NCAA would just institute a rule that states, no scholarship can be tendered or letter offered officially until the athlete is qualified to attend school academically.

MikeP

June 5th, 2011
9:56 am

The medical redshirt rules were already exactly as you stated above. No changes were made. The Medical Scholarship rules, the circumstances by which a player is supposedly injured and can no longer play but stays in school on a medical scholarship is what was toughened up.

That’s one point I agree with the presidents on. If a kid is not injured the coach shouldn’t be able to save face by putting him on a medical scholarship to make room for a better player. The coach should have the guts to put the kid on the street and say “you ain’t good enough to play here”. Do it in public, instead of hiding his action behind the guise of Medical Scholarship.

It Ain't Rocket Science

June 5th, 2011
10:22 am

Mike P,

That probably is the one point we don’t see eye to eye on, and that is releasing the kid, if he is not all you thought he was, when you evaluated him. I realize that a scholarship is one year at a time, but for some of these kids, going to college through a scholarship is their only way to get to college. I would rather, there be some type of scholarship awarded them, if they don’t measure up athletically, than just kicking them off the team and consequently, out of college. I know that this would of course lead to abuses but at least the kid might be able to get a better shot at life this way. Of course, this might be a problem also, as a lot of these athletes, do not progress in their pursuit of a degree at anywhere near the pace of the normal student. I guess, I just think more of the kids future, and less about the school’s team.
It seems to me that our kids are falling further and further behind the world in education, and although I am one die hard football fan, I hate to see a kid not have a chance, no matter what. Who knows, maybe once the kid is away from the football team, he might be able to pick up his academics to a normal level. Putting him on the street, almost assures him of being in trouble and a less than productive member of society.

ET

June 5th, 2011
10:23 am

Total BS. The kids who are signing & causing the overages are the ones being helped mostly here. These kids haven’t met the guidelines for submission and are being offered contingent on making the grades. They would not be signing at all with this new regulation. No school will offer a kid who hasn’t qualified now. These kids will have their options reduced if they don’t have the grades & scores to qualify. It’s when more kids end up qualifying then the school projected that the problem occurs in over-signing. The school then asks the kid to wait until January to enroll (gray shirting). This kid would probably have ended up at a school like Georgia Southern instead of the SEC.

The second part to this equation is the kid who commited but backed out at the last minute leaving the school short on recruits. It happens every year with no repercussions to the kid. People like Jeff think the school has to abide by their promise, but the kids can do what ever they so desire. If you limit the signing to 25 then you need to make the commitment official…meaning the kid has to keep his promise or pay a price… just like the school is bieng asked to do.

FanSince59

June 5th, 2011
11:03 am

Shultz, if you don’t realize by now that money is the bottom line, there is no hope for you. All your worthless moralizing will never trump Title 9, the real cause of the problems with college football.

Blackoutanyone?

June 5th, 2011
11:25 am

It ain’t Rocket Science… you make alot of good points and I agree with you. I would take exception with one thing. At this level of college football if a player is buried on the depth chart and wishes to find more playing time there are plenty of smaller programs with higher education opportunites waiting to hand out scholarships. Alabama players B.J. Scott (South Alabama) and Demetrius Goode (North Alabama) are two recent examples. Two good players seeking more playing time.. nothing more nothing less. To say they are kicked off the team and thrown out on the street is highly inaccurate. I think many people share your view and this is the reason for much of the outcry.

mark

June 5th, 2011
12:39 pm

Would somebody please explain to me how Ala can claim 13 Nat’l Championships?

short-sighted

June 5th, 2011
1:27 pm

article is foolish – john parker wilson took a greyshirt for Bama and then went on to be a multi-year starter…a chance he would have never had if Shultz were to have his way – if coaches are up front w/ players from day 1, then players should be able to make an informed decision – it’s really as simple as that -plenty of kids who would probably rather have a grey-shirt offer in the SEC w/ a chance (not a guarantee) to compete as a sophmore or junior than who would go play for bottom 50-75 of the other division 1 schools…you limit “oversigning” and you take that opportunity away. others may already know they will have to go the juco route – again – ok, as long as there is a plan that everyone is aware of and has signed off on…This is not some chronic issue other than one example out of LSU and a WSJ article…

Tide Rising

June 5th, 2011
2:18 pm

A coach can still dismiss a player that he believes to be under performing. All he has to do is refuse to renew the kid’s scholarship for another year. Happens all the time.- MikeP

MikeP,

Um. Really? I’m calling BS on that one. Please show me a player at Bama, AU, Georgia, etc who had his scholly non renewed after a year or 2 for the simple reason that the coaches deemed that he wasn’t good enough. Happens all the time huh? That is a statement on your behalf of truly breathtaking ignorance. As a Bama fan I can tell you that you can’t find one single player who was cut after a year or two “because he wasn’t good enough”. Same at other schools. Your assertion that this “happens all the time” is utter nonsense.

Dawglasville

June 5th, 2011
3:07 pm

Saban – Well, I felt stupid not knowing the definition of bloviate until I looked it up. The definition started with it being a “Midwestern term” so being from the deep south I didn’t feel so bad about not knowing it. I think that college football can and should be a healthy experience for all of the players. I think that promising a scholarship to a young man and then taking it from him is a bunch of crap. I don’t see how that is fair to the kid at all. That is not a win-win relationship. That is an “I hold all of the cards” relationship in which a lot of kids get hurt. I don’t like the term “plantation mentality” but in this case I believe it fits.

UH

June 5th, 2011
5:01 pm

Did bradley get taken in the rapture?

Saban

June 5th, 2011
6:46 pm

I think that promising a scholarship to a young man and then taking it from him is a bunch of crap. I don’t see how that is fair to the kid at all.- Dawglassville

Dawglassville,

None of these kids had a scholly yanked. In the case of the 2 players at LSU and S. Carolina they simply would have had to defer enrollment until the next semester. That’s not that big of a deal.

Team Dream

June 5th, 2011
6:51 pm

“Welcome to the NCAA’s mission: Winning and making money, moral compass be damned.”

That should read “… the SEC’s mission”.

Perhaps its time for schools to answer a simple internal question: Are we offering scholarships to play, or are we offering scholarships to play AND get a college degree?

Sid

June 5th, 2011
8:45 pm

Team Dream

June 5th, 2011
11:01 pm

I just don’t agree with the whole premise of a scholarship to play football ACTUALLY being four 1-year contractual agreements. It inserts the whole “take advantage of them before they take advantage of me” attitude that is rampant in today’s NCAA sports (particularly Football and Basketball). How can you expect a kid to have a 4-year allegiance and commitment to a school and an education when right off the bat they have to sign a business-like contract in order to do it???

MikeP

June 5th, 2011
11:15 pm

Quoting Tide Rising: “Um. Really? I’m calling BS on that one. Please show me a player at Bama, AU, Georgia, etc who had his scholly non renewed after a year or 2 for the simple reason that the coaches deemed that he wasn’t good enough.”

You made it too easy. I’ll show you the 13 kids Saban put on medical scholarships at bammer. Over the same period of time the rest of the SEC averaged 1.1 such scholarships per school. You can look up the names of the 11.9 (round it to 12) that Saban dumped for non-performance.

Tide Rising

June 6th, 2011
1:22 am

MikeP,

Are you just stupid?

Tyrone Prothro was one of those players. Is your mind going to tell me Tyrone Prothro was run off the team. The man now has one leg shorter than the other. Freshman Ivan Matchett completely shattered his knee. I suppose you are going to tell him and the orthopedic staff that his knee is a okay and that Saban just ran him off. Same with Keith Mckellar’s son- a promising 6′6 290lb tackle recruit. He had his wrist operated on three times before ever even playing as a freshman. A couple of orthopedists determined that his wrist would never hold up as an offensive tackle who uses his hands quite a bit.

The single player who complained publicly about a medical redshirt was Charlie Kirschman in a wsj article on over signing. Kirschman thought his back was fine and that he was ok to play despite the staff’s insistence that he take a medical redshirt. As it turned out he had to have a back operation a year after the medical scholly. He publicly recanted the story and let everyone know he was wrong about the extent of the injury.

Are you so profoundly stupid that you don’t understand that Bama just had an unusual number of career ending injuries over 4 1/2 years Saban has been there. You automatically think if someone has a career ending injury that its really just saban running the guy off? Please show me where you are an orthopedic surgeon who personally examined all 13 players and then maybe you will have some credibility. Until the just STFU you blithering idiot.

UH

June 6th, 2011
8:42 am

So winerpeg sold 13k tickets? isnt that less than the thrash averaged last year? they must have a small arena. they will be just like the thrashers in 6-7 years and 8k in attendance and looking to move them. i cant beleive a pro sports team leaves a city with a philips arena and over 4 mil people to go to a small town 600k city.

Trojan

June 6th, 2011
8:43 am

Yep, when I think of someone who sincerely cares for Students/Athletes, I think of Saban.

(And the government creates jobs!)

Chi Town

June 6th, 2011
9:54 am

Saban owns you, Schultz.

MikeP

June 6th, 2011
10:51 am

Tide Falling: Prothro was hurt before Saban got there. You named four injured players, which is still four times the number of other schools. What about the other nine Saban put on medical scholarship?

You asked for names, here ya’ go: Corey Grant and Petey Smith have both been “processed” in the last few days. Processed at bammer means cut from the team to make room for better signees under the 85 rule. Saban still has six more to process before fall term starts at UAT. Happy now? Are you taking bets on which six will have their scholarships yanked as were the two I just named?

Note to those cheering the new rules: Nothing was passed that will prevent what’s happening in Tuscaloosa this year from happening again next year.

Buckeye

June 6th, 2011
10:55 am

Seems all y’all are AWOL.

How ’bout some new material??

Druid City

June 6th, 2011
11:10 am

Even though he is gone next year, Richt’s name will live in infamy in SEC circles for a long time, like Bobby Dodd.

The other conferences just sent a big “thank you” to RIcht for crippling the SEC competitively.

It Ain't Rocket Science

June 6th, 2011
11:45 am

Blackoutanyone,

Good point about smaller schools and scholarships offered to athletes at them. The only problem with that is the will the timing be right for the athlete. If the coaches are upfront with them and tell them, they have no chance of playing on the team, say, like the end of a season, then the young man has a chance to get his paperwork in and get a scholarship. If they wait until after spring practice it is harder, but not impossible, depending on the schools opening. But if they wait until just before the season start or half way into it, then the kid is in no where land. Sure the kid should have some idea of where he fits in the teams plans but, it is up to the coach to be straight with the kid. In the case of a guy like Ealey, the problem was he wanted to be a star and take all the snaps, so JSU will probably work out well for him. I hope he displays the proper work attitude and and dedication, and he can do well there. All he wants is a chance at the NFL, so he should get that, if he works hard and performs on the field.

Spurrier

June 6th, 2011
11:48 am

I know UGA fans are pushing hard for this, as your football relevance is waning with each passing day. It will not matter, you will still get dominated by the true ballers in this league. It is over UGA, you lost. I talk you listen.

[...] Earlier: SEC didn’t go nearly far enough with ‘oversigning’ issue [...]

Spurrier

June 6th, 2011
11:56 am

Maybe once I am done with South Carolina, I will go coach Tech from a wheelchair. I would love to do it just to piss you off. UGA should build a statue of me outside your dump of a stadium. I am bigger than your football team, and it will show that you respect the man that is single handidly driving your once proud program into the ground

Druid City

June 6th, 2011
12:23 pm

Sorry Steve,

The honor for burying the UGA program goes to Mark Richt and Damon Evans, with a huge 31-0 assist from Nick Saban.

You haven’t been relevant since you left Florida.

Spurrier

June 6th, 2011
12:26 pm

I was quite relevant when I outcoached your boy Saban last year. Don’t worry, you wont have to see my team till the SEC title game. Perhaps then we shall revisit the relevancy argument. I talk you listen.

It Ain't Rocket Science

June 6th, 2011
12:43 pm

Spurrier,

You TALK too much. Just what is the 10 year record of UGA and Alabama against your might lamecocks. Get off the board, if you have nothing of any relevance to add to the discussion. And I assure you, given what you have already written, you don’t.

It Ain't Rocket Science

June 6th, 2011
12:51 pm

Spurrier,

Since you have been at S C you have forever tarnished your reputation in the eyes of SEC fans. You used to be straight up as a coach but now, it is win at any cost for you. One half decent year and all of the sudden you are the toast of the SEC? What a joke of a coach Spurrier has become. I think you spent too much time at the redskins, and it affected your mind and honesty.

Spurrier

June 6th, 2011
1:13 pm

The only joke is your coward coach. He better pray a lot this summer. My pinky finger has more coaching ability than your whole staff of reject coaches. Once I come to Sanford and kick your ass yet again, Ol Boy Richt will be spreading his religious nonsense to a third world country. I talk you listen.

Dawg Gone

June 6th, 2011
3:34 pm

Spurrier what exactly again is your record vs CMR…yeah I know where you can put that pinky…

MarineDawg

June 6th, 2011
3:55 pm

There have been valid points made on both sides of this discussion; those who agree that oversigning is a problem and those who regard it only as a media ploy. However, in reading all of these posts, there’s one thing that I’m having a very difficult time in understanding: how does a coach know how many players are not going to qualify? If you have 70 players on scholarship that YOU KINOW that haven’t been medically or academically ineligble, not declared for the NFL, not transferring; then you sign 25 or 28, what happens if not enough players fall in the above mentioned categories? and now your number IS above the 85 limit, what do you do in order to get to that 85 limit?

How can you sign that many players every year and it be so ACCURATELY PROJECTED on a yearly basis without the coach using some questionable measures in order to get below that 85 limit?

Tell the truth

June 6th, 2011
4:01 pm

Jeff thanks for your article; this is not the college sports action that I grew up with and loved; not the one I watched firsthand as an underclassman at a major college institution. The greed and desire for fame , money and power continues to proliferate. I am embarrassed by it all and by the fans who have bought into the madness.

Tell the truth

June 6th, 2011
4:10 pm

Spurrier My Seminoles saw your Gamecocks in Atlanta- great day for the ACC.

Spurrier

June 6th, 2011
4:31 pm

My record is 2-4 against preacher boy. He can only beat me when UGA fields a teamwith vastly superior talent. That is not the case anymore, so prepare for a shellacking that has never been seen before at Sanford in September. I talk you listen

Tell the truth

June 6th, 2011
6:38 pm

Spurrier I am a seminole not a dawg fan- but I hope you have the guts to be on here after the Dawgs annihilate your team this fall- and they will!!! PS come on down to Tally any old time- we didn’t get to finish your butt licking in the Chic Fil A bowl last year.

Tell the truth

June 6th, 2011
6:41 pm

Spurrier

June 6th, 2011
7:41 pm

We will see Tell the Truth, someone will get destroyed, and it will be the pups. If Lattimore doesn’t get hurt we would have beaten the criminals. You know it, I know it. I will be back to rub it in, dont worry bubba.

tsmonk

June 6th, 2011
8:08 pm

@ Dawglasville – “Matt – you may or may not see this. According to US News Vandy is 15, and UGA an UF are tied at 56 (maybe 54). All of the rest of the schools in the SEC are not even in the top 100.”

http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/spp%2B50/page+2

Alabama is at 79. Wow, what a gulf between 56 & 79 for colleges across the nation. Feeling a little stupid now? I would.

LHarding Dawg

June 6th, 2011
10:18 pm

How about 100 scholarships, 25 per year. If someone leaves for whatever reason, tough for that particular school. 25 per year is all that can be offered for that year.