Minus NHL, did Atlanta just drop to Triple A of sports towns?

Here's a word we didn't see in banners very often at Thrashers' games: playoffs.

There's a banner we did not see very often in Philips Arena for Thrashers' games: playoffs.

Good morning. Did Atlanta just drop out of the majors?

This probably would carry a little more weight if Los Angeles still had an NFL team (which remains the funniest thing in sports, only because it drives Roger Goodell nuts). But when Atlanta was officially mugged by Atlanta Spirit, LLC and the NHL on Tuesday and the Thrashers were sold and moved to Winnipeg, the city dropped out of an elite group. There are only 12 remaining metropolitan areas that still have teams in all four pro sports leagues (MLB, NFL, NBA, NHL). Those 12: New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Dallas, San Francisco (San Jose), Boston, Washington, Detroit, Phoenix (until the Coyotes move), Minneapolis, Denver and Miami.

Atlanta is now the second-biggest market (behind only Los Angeles) that doesn’t have teams in all four leagues. The second tier group of seven cities with teams in three leagues: L.A. (no NFL), Atlanta (no NHL), Houston (no NHL), Tampa (no NBA), Cleveland (no NHL), St. Louis (no NBA) and Pittsburgh (no NBA).

What I’ve done below is list every U.S. city with at least one pro sports team. This was kind of a tedious exercise, so if I missed a team let me know and I’ll recommend you for an editor’s opening.

I’ve ranked the cities by what Nielsen refers to as “designated market area,” which factors in some secret combination of population, media outlets and I think number of Wendy’s. Atlanta is the No. 8 media market in the country. The only others in the top 15 without teams in the four sports are No. 2 L.A., No. 10 Houston, No. 13 Seattle (which has only two teams after the Sonics were highjacked) and No. 14 Tampa-St. Petersburg.

Here’s the list. And here’s my question for you: Did Atlanta just become less of a major sports city without the Thrashers?

Let me know what you think.

(Market rank, metropolitan area (sports): MLB, NFL, NBA, NHL.)

1. New York-New Jersey (4): Yankees, Mets, Giants, Jets, Knicks, Nets, Rangers, Islanders, Devils.

2. Los Angeles (3): Dodgers, Angels, Lakers, Clippers, Kings, Ducks.

3. Chicago (4): Cubs, White Sox, Bears, Bulls, Blackhawks.

4. Philadelphia (4): Phillies, Eagles, Sixers, Flyers.

5. Dallas/Ft. Worth (4): Rangers, Cowboys, Mavericks, Stars.

6. SanFran/SJ/Oak (4): Giants, A’s, 49ers, Raiders, Warriors, Sharks.

7. Boston (4): Red Sox, Patriots, Celtics, Bruins.

8. Atlanta (3): Braves, Falcons, Hawks.

9. Washington (4): Nationals, Redskins, Wizards, Capitals.

10. Houston (3): Astros, Texans, Rockets.

11. Detroit (4): Tigers, Lions, Pistons, Red Wings.

12. Phoenix (4): Diamondbacks, Cardinals, Suns, Coyotes.

13. Seattle (2): Mariners, Seahawks.

14. Tampa-St. Pete. (3): Rays, Buccaneers, Lightning.

15. Minneapolis-St. Paul (4): Twins, Vikings, Timberwolves, Wild.

16. Denver (4): Rockies, Broncos, Nuggets, Avalanche.

17. Miami (4): Dolphins, Marlins, Heat, Panthers.

18. Cleveland (3): Indians, Browns, Cavaliers.

19. Orlando (1): Magic.

20. Sacramento (1): Kings.

21. St. Louis (3): Cardinals, Rams, Blues.

22. Portland (1): Trailblazers.

23. Pittsburgh (3): Pirates, Steelers, Penguins.

24. Charlotte (2): Panthers, Bobcats.

25. Indianapolis (2): Pacers, Colts.

26. Raleigh-Durham (1): Hurricanes.

27. Baltimore (2):Orioles, Ravens.

28. San Diego (2): Padres, Chargers.

29. Nashville (2): Predators, Titans.

31. Salt Lake City (1): Jazz.

32. Kansas City (2): Chiefs, Royals.

33. Cincinnati (2): Bengals, Reds.

34. Columbus (1): Blue Jackets.

35. Milwaukee (2): Bucks, Brewers.

37. San Antonio (1): Spurs.

45. Oklahoma City (1): Thunder.

47. Jacksonville (1): Jaguars.

50. Memphis (1): Grizzlies.

51. New Orleans (2): Saints, Hornets.

52. Buffalo (2): Bills, Sabres.

70. Green Bay-Appleton (1): Packers.

(Canadian cities with teams not included: Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Ottawa, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg.)

By Jeff Schultz

Follow me on Twitter @JeffSchultzAJC; friend me at Facebook.com/JeffSchultzAJC

279 comments Add your comment

JV

June 1st, 2011
9:35 am

Hot Carl

June 1st, 2011
9:37 am

FIRE RODNEY HO!!!

Smitty

June 1st, 2011
9:39 am

No NHL team really makes you think that??? Who cares. The spelling bee and women’s college softball get better ratings.

Hot Carl

June 1st, 2011
9:39 am

Also…

DID NOT READ

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
9:40 am

Smitty — Really? That’s the best ya got?

nobody

June 1st, 2011
9:41 am

Im not sure if this is just male teams, but we do have the Dream….

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
9:43 am

JV — Fixed, thanks.

PMC

June 1st, 2011
9:44 am

It just kind of sticks out as an outlier. Houston is similar, but then, it shows just how poorly it’s gone for the NHL when it comes to growing interest in the sport.

They do some things well like the outdoor classics… but seriously, the teams worth paying to see in the league only add up to about 8.

P C

June 1st, 2011
9:45 am

Milwaukee still had the Brewers in MLB last time I looked. Easy to overlook in that long list!

ATL

June 1st, 2011
9:47 am

Perhaps Metro NY can spare a hockey team since they have three(?)– The NHL traded a major market of 5.5M for one (albeit Canadian) of less than 700K that will play in an arena with a capacity of 15,000 (in all but their worst years the Thrashers drew at least this many)– perhaps the NHL has a burning desire to now own two teams in bankruptcy, otherwise its not a move that makes much sense…

Hockey In Florida

June 1st, 2011
9:49 am

Heck, I live in Florida and didn’t realize that Miami had a NHL team. But then, a lot of people who live in Miami don’t know that they have a MLB team.

PMC

June 1st, 2011
9:49 am

Perhaps there just isn’t enough talent in the NHL? Atlanta sure couldn’t find it, although DWad could fall in a bucket of talent and come out with a loser.

Still, 8 out of what 30 or so with a legitimate shot to win?

The NBA is similar in that you have teams like the Hawks, with no hope of ever eclipsing the 2nd round because they don’t have the stars to win with.

Going to see pro sports has become a luxury item, it’s not worth sitting so far away when it’s better on TV. In reality, it’s simply not worth paying $75 a pop to see a bunch of above average non stars night after night.

The NFL is only 8 games. Hockey and Basketball are horrible in terms of value. It’s one reason the NBA is in for probably a year off next year…. just when they are getting really fun to watch again.

Remarkable

June 1st, 2011
9:49 am

NO. We did not drop to AAA of sports towns. We are just not that in to Hockey. It is the least of the five major sports (If you consider NASCAR a sport?). We are a major college spots area amd have arguably some of the best pro sports teams as a whole in the country. The Braves are always in the hunt, the Hawks did get into the second round of the playoffs, and the Falcons look to be on the verge of a Super Bowl run.
How foolish to even consider that we are not a major sports market just because we don’t have enough yankees to support a hockey team. Show me one team on that list besides Dallas that is in the south and has a thriving major league hockey team. Florida teams do not count, they have a large northern population to draw from.

Lowcountry Bulldawg

June 1st, 2011
9:49 am

The Thrashers moving means nothing to how the nation perceives the city of Atlanta. The city is thought of as Braves, Falcons and college football. That speaks volumes as to why they are no longer here along with pitiful ownership. Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda type of franchise the Thrashers where.

Kdawg

June 1st, 2011
9:50 am

Is MLS still not considered a major sport Jeff? Regardless, there is no denying that this is a major setback despite the fact most sports fans in Atlanta showed a disregard for hockey. Your list of cities with less than 4 sports teams speaks volumes about the state of Atlanta pro sports teams and fans today. We’re not in a class with NY or Chicago or God forbid even Phoenix. We’re now on par with Tampa.

Luke

June 1st, 2011
9:50 am

You gotta have a market for hockey in order for it to matter. Had it been the Braves or the Falcons, people would have been up in arms against them moving. But for some reason, only a couple hundred people showed up to “buy” season tickets. Its just too damn hot down here for ice.

Remarkable

June 1st, 2011
9:51 am

Send us a minor league hockey team and everyone should be happy. Either that or encourage everyone to go see the UGA and Ga. Tech club Hockey teams play. They are actually pretty good.

[...] See the original post here: NHL News: Minus NHL, did Atlanta just drop to Triple A of sports towns? – Atlanta Journal Constituti… [...]

Backwater of Irrelevancy

June 1st, 2011
9:51 am

Atlanta will always be a minor league backwater as long as the Georgia Bulldogs are included in its teams.

Worst to First

June 1st, 2011
9:52 am

more like cutting the dead horse from the buggy, they were bad and stayed bad since they got here, loosing the team will most likely help rather than hinder.If a team doesn’t win and has no chance of winning a championship ever then its like its not here anyway. Same thing is happening to the hawks,slower of course because they win regular season games but they cant contend for it all so whats the point?

Chris

June 1st, 2011
9:52 am

If the NHL is such a great product, why do they have a revenue sharing contract with NBC to broadcast their games? The last sports organization to have that is the old Arena Football League.

Losing the NHL does not make the greater Atlanta area a AAA town. It makes the NHL a nitch sport that only gets ratings when they play holiday games out side on football and baseball stadiums.

The NHL moved a team from a top ten market to a market that makes them a small market team. They will have problems bringing in free agents just like Calgary and Edmonton. When the Canadian dollar falls the roof will cave in on these teams.

I am glad I stopped going to games after the ASG bought the team. Hockey is a great sport, but the NHL is run worse then baseball.

Remarkable

June 1st, 2011
9:54 am

Don’t sign the petition to keep the Thrashers. Even their name was lame

Puck Like A Porn Star

June 1st, 2011
9:54 am

YES!!! This is officially a third tier city.

Look out below: soon Atlanta won’t even be the capital of the Southeast, and the provincial idiots here want it that way.

Truly pathetic.

PMC

June 1st, 2011
9:54 am

Atlanta is KILLING in College Football which is a vastly more popular sport in this region than Hockey.

ATL

June 1st, 2011
9:54 am

To be fair– try counting the WNBA and MLS– we are 1 and 1 on that count…

Remarkable

June 1st, 2011
9:55 am

Don’t sign the petition. We will not miss hockey.

IceColdATLien

June 1st, 2011
9:55 am

My guess is that 95% of America doesn’t know which station to turn on for an NHL game, and most of the rest probably didn’t know the ATL even had a team… much less that we lost one. Nobody cares about hockey below the rust belt unless they have nobody else to care for (Nashville anyone?).

I just wish the Atlanta Spirit Group were banished to middle-of-nowhere Canada, too!

Let NONE in

June 1st, 2011
9:56 am

The only thing that matters to me now is UGA Football. Hawks, Falcons, Braves and Atlanta Dream are DEAD to me.

Billsen

June 1st, 2011
9:57 am

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/saveourthrashers/signatures

Sign the petition to the NHL Board of Governors to keep the Thrashers in Atlanta.

Chris

June 1st, 2011
9:58 am

Smitty does bring up a good point, Jeffy. When ESPN had the NHL, the World Series of Poker got better ratings.

IceColdATLien

June 1st, 2011
9:59 am

A bit late for that, Billsen. Hate to be the one to inform you…

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
10:01 am

Nobody — Yes, just male pro sports teams.

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
10:02 am

Smitty, Chris, other — I won’t debate NHL TV ratings. They’ve always been awful. Two long-standing problems: 1) Sport has never translated well on TV; 2) NHL doesn’t know how to market its product. Neither of those two things means it’s not a great sport or entertaining product.

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
10:03 am

Kdawg — Nope, not throwing MLS into this equation either (no offense to MLS fans). Most would agree there are four major sports leagues.

[...] Post By Google News Click Here For The Entire Article June 1st, 2011 | Category: [...]

Puck Like A Porn Star

June 1st, 2011
10:05 am

Btw, WNBA is in its 15th year, and MLS is around 13 years old, so including those franchises in this list would provide a clearer picture of the sports landscape. Women’s Pro Soccer is still in its infancy since it returned, but give it time (especially with the Atlanta Beat’s beautiful new stadium).

WNBA and MLS are on ESPN, unlike hockey, so at least they get exposure, rather than a few games on NBC and a cable network no one can find.

Triple L

June 1st, 2011
10:05 am

Last I checked we are in the south football is king baseball is our summer sport and basketball is what we watch when neither football or baseball are on. As long as we are not losing any of those three sports I belive most georgians could care less. For crying out loud I think college baseball gets better ratings then then hockey here ever did.

IceColdATLien

June 1st, 2011
10:05 am

The real question should be, “Minus Atlanta, did the NHL just become a minor league?”

How can a league lose a team in a top-10 market and still call itself real? I know the NFL isn’t in LA, but that’s more politics than anything else and they have other close-by teams for football fans to get their fix. Seriously, the combo of pathetic owners and apathetic fans spelled ultimate doom for the Thrashers.

This has nothing to do with ATL’s status as a sports town. It actually might be a better sports town now that resources won’t be wasted supporting that sad sport. I don’t think there’s any reason to even be discussing this. Losing an NHL team didn’t hurt ATL the first time around, and I don’t see any negatives the second time.

Tirpitz

June 1st, 2011
10:06 am

Interesting list. However, from a Canadian perspective, I have to point out there is one significant sports category which is completely different between the US and Canada – college sports. Up here, university athletics are a niche interest, football being the only one with any regular national TV exposure, while basketball, volleyball, and hockey are noticed only during the national finals. On the other hand, March Madness is a major Canadian TV property, and many people are busy following their favourite US college football team, despite never having attended any US college. meanwhile, you know where college sports ranks in your own interests.

As for your list of covering the four ‘major’ pro sports, the only Canadian city to have a foot in all four camps is Toronto, which has the Blue Jays (MLB), Raptors (NBA), Maple Leafs (NHL), and Argonauts (CFL). As well, the NFL’s Buffalo Bills play one game per season in Toronto, and covetous eyes are being cast south at the possibility of buying the franchise the instant Ralph Wilson dies. (Not all vultures live in Winnipeg.)

One other note – the Raptors, Maple Leafs, and MLS’s FC Toronto are all owned by the same conglomerate, MLSE, which is probably at least as hated as Atlanta Spirit. So far, fan disapproval has been expressed by ugly soccer fan chants and some schmuck throwing a box of waffles on the ice at a Leafs’ game.

Finally, while I am happy to see hockey back in Winnipeg, I wish a way could have been found that did not cost other hockey fans their franchise. RIP Thrashers, gone too soon.

Chris

June 1st, 2011
10:07 am

By the way Jeffy, does this make you a AAA writer?

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
10:08 am

IceColdATLien: ”The real question should be, “Minus Atlanta, did the NHL just become a minor league? How can a league lose a team in a top-10 market and still call itself real?”
… Funny. I never thought of it that way.

Billy Bob

June 1st, 2011
10:08 am

Nobody here gave a darn about Hockey quit crying. When I found out that only 200 people showed up to the Thrashers Rally told me all I needed to know.

Time

June 1st, 2011
10:10 am

I wish our supposed Atlanta columnists would quit trying to tear down this city all the time with the “not a good sports city” and junk like that.

The NHL is a second rate league, with a third rate commish. The NHL doesn’t deserve Atlanta. Not the other way around. And if we’re going to take away points for losing a meaningless NHL team, the city and surrounding state should get points for the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of people we put into various college stadiums across the south every football weekend. If you include college football in the mix, that puts maybe only Dallas ahead of Atlanta.

2mins

June 1st, 2011
10:11 am

Losing the Thrashers will change nobodys thoughts about Atlanta. First off, most of the U.S. didn’t even know or care that Atlanta had NHL hockey, and in 2 weeks, nobody will care that they did.

CLD

June 1st, 2011
10:13 am

How can Houston be a smaller media market when it has 500K more residents than Atlanta?

Mike Wilcox

June 1st, 2011
10:14 am

What do you mean “until the Coyotes move”? Low blow man.

elroy

June 1st, 2011
10:14 am

Keep the NHL in Canada & the northern half of the U.S. The NHL should get out of Florida, Arizona & Texas. Give Alaska, Seattle, Utah & Indy a team.

Barry

June 1st, 2011
10:15 am

This is more of a reflection on the NHL than Atlanta. People here just are not into hockey. I love sports and will at least stop my channel surfing for at least a few minutes to peak in on lesser sports…but never hockey…which i never see anyway. I am only aware the NHL playoffs are on when Barry Melrose starts showing up on First Take on ESPN….I immediately turn the channel until that segment over.

Hayseed Dixie

June 1st, 2011
10:15 am

I love Atlanta, and I have no problems with college football being king here. I’m solidly in the majority.

Local flavor, you can’t escape it. Not every place needs to be the Exact Same™, with four major sports.

A Falcon Super Bowl victory is really the only thing truly lacking in this town.

TylerThe Creator

June 1st, 2011
10:15 am

I’d rather have an MLS Soccer team than a Hockey team any day. The Thrashers have always been terrible, could care less about them leaving.

Irish Thunder

June 1st, 2011
10:16 am

For the folks out there who hate hockey, let it go. There was a portion of Atlanta who loved hockey. There are people from Canada and areas up North that took to the team. One playoff in 11+ years will kill attendence even in the Bostons, Chicagos,etc. If the Thrashers were given an owner like Arthur Blank (remember when the GA Dome had empty upper decks in Football crazy South?) the Thrashers would be a playoff team drawing 18k a game. This city should have 4 teams, when a city like Denver supports four teams, Atlanta would as well. Denver has owners who put out a good product. Atlanta fans just want a good product. ASG, you let us down big time. Maybe a Arthur Blank type will appear and buy the Coyotes and move them to Atlanta? I can wish.

Shug

June 1st, 2011
10:17 am

NEWS FLASH!!! 99.9999% of Americans, including 99.98% of American hockey fans had no idea Atlanta ever had a hockey team. The Thrashers departure won’t move the needle on the public’s perception of Atlanta.

5150 UOAD

June 1st, 2011
10:17 am

The NHL got $60 million in relocation fee to move the Thrashers. The NHL needed the money other wise they would have fought HARD to keep the team in Atlanta like the NHL has done with other teams.
This is less about and more about the League.
I remember in “91″ how the whole City was alive with Braves Fever. People were Chopping to each other while driving in Traffic. People were half awake at work after the late games on the left coast. That Spirit lasted for about 5 years them we were so used to going to the Playoffs it became no big deal.

Puck Like A Porn Star

June 1st, 2011
10:18 am

Just read your comment, Schultz. Stopping at the perceived top four leagues seems arbitrary, especially since soccer is very popular in certain U.S. markets and globally, but it’s your blog. *shrug*

mark louis

June 1st, 2011
10:19 am

Considering the NHL is itself a AAA sports league, I don’t think it hurts the city too much. Seriously, what kind of commissioner allows a team to leave a top 10 market, an international city, for a city a fraction of its size? Bettman has got to be the worst commissioner in sports.

Van Dammit

June 1st, 2011
10:19 am

We were “less of a major sports city” even with the Thrashers. The fan base just isn’t there. I really can’t tell you why either. Maybe it’s the lack of championships. Maybe it’s the dominance of college sports in the south. Maybe it’s the overly fickle fans. Or all the above. But whatever it is, I’m not surprised that the ATL can’t keep a hockey team. The next time there’s an expansion, the powers that be in Atlanta should just say, “pass”.

IceColdATLien

June 1st, 2011
10:19 am

Tru dat, Hayseed

5150 UOAD

June 1st, 2011
10:22 am

Remember how the Knights did in Atlanta as a minor league team? People loved to go to those games because the Knights were winners. The Knights became the Tampa Bay Lighting where they are still winning. If we had the Knights and their ownership there would be plenty of people going to the games.

PureEvil

June 1st, 2011
10:23 am

Is MLS still not considered a major sport?

Absolutelty not!!!! Not even close……WNBA and poker rank higher.

Elvis the Peacock

June 1st, 2011
10:23 am

Shug, you speak truth to power.

Horsehockey

June 1st, 2011
10:23 am

While it’s never a good thing for a city’s image to lose a pro franchise – and even worse for it to happen twice – this says more about the NHL than it does about Atlanta.

Not enough SubWay franchises either

June 1st, 2011
10:24 am

So there you go…..

Sleeze

June 1st, 2011
10:25 am

Jeff, Since you’re kinda anal for hockey, any chance you’ll move to Winnipeg too? Right now, Atlanta’s in the low Class A league when it comes to sports columnists.

Matt Ryan

June 1st, 2011
10:26 am

Who cares its HOCKEY

Its not the owners fault. Braves have consistently put a top product on the field for almost 20 years and they get half capacity if that during the week.

If we cant sell out a Braves PLAYOFF games, no way we can sell out a REGULAR SEASON Hockey game. Good move for the Thrashers

Mid Town Joe

June 1st, 2011
10:27 am

Jeff, Pittsburgh having the Steelers counts for at least 2-3 teams.

The Listener

June 1st, 2011
10:28 am

If losing a hockey team is all it takes to drop you from the Big League to Triple A, then those classifications are distinctions without a difference.

PureEvil

June 1st, 2011
10:28 am

Send us a minor league hockey team and everyone should be happy.

Gwinnett Gladiators only 30 min north of Atlanta.

Doug

June 1st, 2011
10:30 am

Nordic/Slavic sport in a Southern US town. This is not hard to figure out, and the onus is on the NHL as with any business to demonstrate why people should purchase their product. IceCold is right: if the NHL can’t figure out how to get a cut of people’s entertainment dollars in a metro area of 5M then the problem is the product, not the city. The “Versus” network? Give me a break.

More broadly, Atlanta sports venues are located in-town when the majority of people with lots of discretionary cash are in the northern burbs. It is what it is, and just wait until gas punches thru the $4/gal resistance point for good.

Chris Goltermann

June 1st, 2011
10:31 am

Goodbye Thrashers
Sung to Supertramp’s “Goodbye Stranger”

It was around noon yesterday
The Thrashers said they’re gone
The ASG and Bettman do not care
So now they’re moving on

Like a fan without our Blueland
Like a commish without a brain
Atlanta’s without an NHL team
They’ve left for his own gain

Now don’t believe in what the owners say
As the undisputed truth
I believe things didn’t have to be this way
To keep us happy in Duluth

Like a ship without an anchor
Like a slave with a chain
Just the thought of the ASG’s words
Sends a shiver through my veins

And we will go on wearing
Our jerseys all brand new
We’ll remember what could have been
If only we weren’t owned by you

Goodbye Thrashers it’s been nice
Hope you find your paradise
Tried to see the Spirit’s view
Too bad they failed to come through
Goodbye Pavy, Goodbye Kane
Will we ever see you again
Feel much sorrow, feel much shame
Come next year, no more games

Now some they do and some they don’t
And some you just can’t tell
And some they will and some they won’t
With ASG, it’s sure has been hell

You can laugh at our behavior
That’ll never bother me
Unable to find our savior
At Philips,you won’t find me

And we will go on wearing
Our jerseys like brand new
We’ll remember what could have been
If only we weren’t owned by you

Goodbye Thrashers it’s been nice

Carl Brewer

June 1st, 2011
10:33 am

NHL= Penny wise and pound foolish. In the long run the NHL would better off with teams in all the major markets. The NHL or owners have never had a long term plan for the league. Allowing fighting to remain in the game is the best example. Unfortunately the most visible representative of hockey is run by nitwits. I am sure the entire world will be glued to their TV’s if we ever have an Ottowa/Winnipeg finals.

jon

June 1st, 2011
10:34 am

…. at trhe end of the day it’s sad about the thrashers.. Many jobs are now lost becuase of it… Shame on Bettman for not even trying to assist an keeping them in ATL. BTW… No one mentions how Don Waddell ran the franchise into the ground, iV’e never seen a GM so unsuccessful and keep his job… I stand corrected… Matt MIllen was in Detroit to long!

jcwhitingjr

June 1st, 2011
10:38 am

Yes, Atlanta is just a bad sports town. If a team isn’t winning then people aren’t showing up. Look at the attendance when the Braves were bad, the Falcons were bad an the Hawks were bad. Even when winning 15 division titles there were empty seats at playoff games for the Braves!

Let NONE in

June 1st, 2011
10:38 am

GOOOOOOOOOO….GEORGIA…..BULLDOGS………screw the NHL. Getting back to my roots…college football.

Former Hawk Fan

June 1st, 2011
10:40 am

LA lacking an NFL franchise is an anomoly. Nonetheless, I consider New York, LA, San Fransico/Oakland, Chicago, Philidelphia and Boston to be mega-markets. Not only are these markets large, they are also historically valuable to the four major professional leagues.

The next tier, which can be classified as large markets, includes Dallas, Atlanta, Houston, and Washington DC. There’s not nearly as much historical value in these cities, but all of them have established teams with “permanance” (franchises that span 40 or more seasons) in at least two of the leagues. Among these markets, Dallas is the only one that has not lost a franchise (not counting the Texans move to KC). Washington lost MLB in 1971 when the Senators moved; Atlanta lost the NHL in 1980 when the Flames moved; and Houston lost the NFL in the late ’90’s when the Oilers moved. Nontheless, all of the lost teams were eventally replaced. Atlanta is the first of these cities to lose its “replacement” team, so the loss of the Thrashers does suggest that something is amiss in the Atlanta market. Like Houston, we appear destined to be at the top of the heap of 3-team cities. Not exactly minor league, but disappointing because even an average NHL franchise could have taken hold and established “permanance” here.

The loss of the Thrashers to Winnipeg is causing me to mourn the loss of the Flames back in 1980 all over again. How I wish Ted Turner has saved them. Had they stayed, they would have soon be celebrating 40 years in Atlanta (2012-13 season), and an NHL tradition in Atlanta would have been long-established by now.

Atlanta is now a permanent 3-sport town — not bad, but certainly not up to our potential.

athdog

June 1st, 2011
10:40 am

The NHL is broadcasting games on Versus, for crying out loud. It’s the triple A of sports!

Mr. Phil

June 1st, 2011
10:41 am

I have been saying this for 12 years and nobody has heard me yet. But here goes again. There are more of us who do not like hockey and never wanted the Thrashers here to begin with than the rest of you. It is a fact. We still don’t care.

PureEvil

June 1st, 2011
10:41 am

Jeff, Whats going to happen to Chris V Thrashers beat writer?

J-Man

June 1st, 2011
10:41 am

I like hockey I liked the thrashers, but this was an up-hill battle.
Here are the reasons the Thrashers couldnt survive here.
1. Hockey is a cold weathered sport and we as southerners have never played it so we don’t have any emotional connection like we do the “Big 3″ sports.
2. The Atlanta Spirit ownership
3. Not being able to keep Kovalchuck
4. The Dany Heatley accedent
5. NOT WINNING…….how can you not make the playoffs in the NHL, geez
6.Getting sweept in their only playoff appearance
7. Lack of advertisement……..I never knew when a Thrashers game was on unless i checked espn
8.Lack of a connection with the players. The players we had never seemed to make any public appearances or if they did we didnt know about them. We have to have that emotional connection with these guys inorder for people to attend games.
9. The “Curse” of Atlanta sports………I do think mentality played a factor in the move
10. The media…….You guys never had the Thrashers as top priority, hence lack of awareness by the average fan.

John

June 1st, 2011
10:42 am

Losing a large media market may hurt the NHL (doubtful). While I hate to see the Thrashers go, the issue is are the teams really competative. ASG has failed to put together a team that is capable of doing just that. At least ATL three remaining teams have put themselves in position to have a chance in their respective sports.

Mr. Phil

June 1st, 2011
10:42 am

@jcwhitingjr I submit that we would not have supported the Thrashers wins or no wins. Look at the year the made the playoffs and then the attendance the following season. No change. Hockey is unwanted in this town now and was 30 years ago and will be 30 years from now.

Horsehockey

June 1st, 2011
10:42 am

Come to think of it, the WNBA and MLS actually have games broadcast on ESPN and ABC as opposed to Vs. Calling hockey “Big 4″ is out of date. It goes back to the days before big network TV contracts.

Anyway, I’m sorry to see the Thrashers leave. Not a huge fan, but it was nice knowing they were here. Not going to lose a lot of sleep over it though. Wouldn’t be surprised to see the entire league fold eventually they way things are going.

BufordKing

June 1st, 2011
10:42 am

To answer your question – “NO” – Atlanta is not relegated to minor sports league by losing a crappy franchise.

I have attended to about 20 hockey games up to about 2 years ago- and have seen the Trashers win only THREE games. I really rooted for this team – but commitment was not there to give the fans a great product – so I quit going to games and lost interest.

Meanwhile – I still go to Braves and Falcons games. Even took in a few Hawks games this year.

I also need to mention that I go to several UGA football home games. Even go to a couple of GT games if I can – depending on UGA’s schedule. GT – Clemson – GT VT are good games to go to.

So there are plenty of competing teams going after my sports dollar – without the TRASHERS.

This town will not miss Hockey.

Now onto something different – I wish GT was back in the SEC.

Here is why (and for selfish reasons):
– great school with great college football history
– ATL is in the heart of SEC country
– makes UGA/GT game even more important
– Imagine having the opportunity to see GT/Aub, GT/FL, GT/Bama, GT/TENN, GT/LSU in Atlanta every few years as teams rotate in? Much better that GT/NCSt, GT/Miami, GT/NC, GT/BC.

I think GT could compete – and would add to the great college football environement this city enjoys.

The state of Georgia has some great schools that we should be proud of – and I wish GT the best except for when they play UGA – then I can’t stand the Bugs!

retired

June 1st, 2011
10:43 am

Move us back to the top of the heap Atlanta has the National Ultimate frisbee Championship team!

Matt Ryan

June 1st, 2011
10:46 am

Top sports in the World

1. Futbol (Soccer)
2. Football
3. Baseball
4. Basketball
5. Cricket
6. Ping Pong

1231223: Hockey

Steve-o

June 1st, 2011
10:47 am

It DOES matter that Atlanta lost the Thrashers. Having 4 teams is a prestige thing for most cities, but of course in Atlanta there are a lot of people who say good riddance just because they don’t follow hockey. Most of the cities that have all 4 major fanchises are elite cities… then again, I guess it’s fitting that we don’t have 4 teams since ATL is a second-tier city that likes to think of itself as “world class” (as the mayor just referred to ATL in a news interview). Atlanta has has more in common with St. Louis and Tampa-St. Pete than Chicago or Boston.

Matt Ryan

June 1st, 2011
10:49 am

Top sports in the World (correction)

1. Futbol (Soccer)
2. Football
3. Baseball
4. Basketball
..
1231221. Cricket
1231222. Pong
1231223. Hockey

and the winner is ...

June 1st, 2011
10:50 am

If a place on the map cannot allow children to “go outside and play on the frozen pond,” it does not need a hockey team.

Steven

June 1st, 2011
10:51 am

For all of you that think Atlanta is still a great sports town – even the Braves couldn’t sell out PLAYOFF games. Atlanta, unfortunately, is now a bastion of metrosexual fair-weather fans. RIP Thrashers.

Horsehockey

June 1st, 2011
10:51 am

Vs two big pro sports contracts: The NHL and Pro Bull Riding. Says all you need to know about hockey’s stature as a major sport.

mervdaman

June 1st, 2011
10:59 am

So people in Atlanta are not into hockey. It’s not the NHL’s fault that they don’t know a good thing when they don’t see it. Typical American attitude! If you’re not the biggest and best in everything than it’s second rate. ATL thinks that a move to Winnipeg doesn’t make sense. Yah right ATL, hockey in Winnipeg doesn’t make sense. Hockey in Phoenix and Miami doesn’t make sense. And all the comments from people that say they don’t care or watch hockey just proves that Atlanta shouldn’t have a hockey team.

ChippersLoveChild

June 1st, 2011
11:00 am

To the people that say this city is perceived as the “Braves, Falcons, and college football” outside of the market, you are wrong…. the only thing Atlanta is known for is the Braves. Believe it or not outside of the south most people do not care about college football, so they don’t associate Atlanta with college football because it isn’t on their radar. The Falcons are improving, so with time they too might be part of what Atlanta is known for, but they haven’t done it long enough. Atlanta is only known for the Braves as far as sports go… and yes, this city is AAA for sports, but not because of the Thrashers leaving, but because I can buy a ticket to a playoff game for face value the day of the event and because opposing fans outnumber home fans at certain games.

Too tough

June 1st, 2011
11:02 am

This is the SOUTH…hockey just aint what we like to go and see….FOOTBALL #1 Baseball #2….(if the Braves dont do something ASAP to address such a feeble hitting team…Im done with them till next yr. too!)

Matt Ryan

June 1st, 2011
11:03 am

College Football is big in the South and the MIDWEST

BigMomma

June 1st, 2011
11:05 am

Hockey fans will say yes, non-hockey fans will say no. I wasn’t a hockey fan until 4 years ago when I went to my first game. Ever since then I was an avid fan. Hockey…GOOD hockey….well-marketed hockey will work in Atlanta given all of the Northern transplants and the youth hockey movement underway in the ‘burbs. It just wasn’t given a chance.

As to the “hockey is broadcast on Versus” argument…who just bought Versus and negotiated that hefty, long-term hockey tv contract? Yup, NBC. I think that TV marketing may change a little bit for them to have paid so much for the rights. It would’ve been nice to have the 8th largest market. Interesting how the sale happened AFTER the contract was signed…

ChippersLoveChild

June 1st, 2011
11:05 am

Matt Ryan,

“Football” is not the number two sport in the world. Sorry.

Billsen

June 1st, 2011
11:06 am

So… next year when the NFL and the NBA will likely not be happening, then you’ll miss having the Thrashers.

I LOVED that team. Hockey is simply the most exciting sport there is – especially at the NHL level. Those who never bothered to check it out, but seem to have the time to post comment denigrating it, I hope that you’re happy. Go back to that snooze-fest call golf. Go back to that yawner called NASCAR.

When you’re ready to man up – check out an NHL game.

Matt Ryan

June 1st, 2011
11:06 am

ChippersLoveChild ,

Is it Cricket?

Tommy

June 1st, 2011
11:08 am

Looking back, it’s clear the Thrashers were cursed from the start. The arena was about 30 minutes from the bulk of the fan base, the owners didn’t care, the GM made the guys running the Pittsburgh Pirates look good, and the team’s first signature player killed a teammate in a car wreck. let’s be honest–despite some bright moments this team was really, really epically bad. You have to TRY to miss the NHL playoffs 10 out of 11 years.

With all of that going on, it’s a wonder they lasted 11 seasons. Sure, those who can’t think of anything but college football for more than 5 seconds may not care, but the NHL can work in a southern town–look at Tampa. They succeed because they put a good team on the rink.

I believe Atlanta will get a major-league hockey team again. Not necessarily an NHL team–I honestly believe that league is doomed–but at some point, 10-15 years from now, someone will try again. If they import an established team from another city, have a committed owner, a good GM, and for crying out loud build an arena in the northern suburbs, they’ll be fine.

juice sourcer

June 1st, 2011
11:09 am

Atlanta behind Detroit…that’s about as low as you can go! Loserville USA and yes…triple A. How is that posible for an Olympic City?

Matt Ryan

June 1st, 2011
11:11 am

i know cricket has a BIG following in India, Paskistan, etc

Simple Jack

June 1st, 2011
11:12 am

Get a clue. Second time ATL crashed and burned on hockey. Is not going to happen—ever.

Hockey = Worst. Sport. Ever.

ATL still ranks as a major sporting town. Braves have won it all before (and been consistent winner in recent past). Football has been to the big show and could be going back REALLY soon. Basketball is two players (maybe one if Teague steps up) away from the next level—and they are not “bad” now…

GT Dude

June 1st, 2011
11:16 am

Last time I looked, the USA was a free market country (or at least until Obama gets his way) and the Atlanta market has simply not supported professional hockey. It is basic economics, there are not enough hockey fans in the metropolitian area willing to buy tickets to the games, buy the merchandize, or even watch the telecasts. Quit blaming anyone, the sports fans in Atlanta have spoken twice, no hockey

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
11:17 am

Chris — Double A, actually. Still hoping to work my way up to The Show one day.

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
11:21 am

Mid Town Joe — Trust me, I know. Wifey is from Pittsburgh.

Rick

June 1st, 2011
11:22 am

ChippersLoveChild:
“Believe it or not outside of the south most people do not care about college football”

May want to recheck your stats, not to mention look at the ratings, and finally look at the $ networks are throwing at conferences from around the country.

Dr. Phil

June 1st, 2011
11:22 am

In many ways, Ted Turner was not a nice man, but I really wish he would come back. I am coming to the gradual realization that the Braves are a mediocre baseball team at best.

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
11:23 am

Time — Tear Atlanta down? Is that what you got out of this blog?

Bruce Mac

June 1st, 2011
11:24 am

Yea, like NHL is a major sport. NASCAR, PGA, and College football are major sports and Atlanta area has all of them Arguing that hockey is major sport in the South is more than rediculous. Get real with your articles.

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
11:24 am

Sleeze — Sorry, no. I’m staying. So I guess you’ll have to move.

w.k. kortas

June 1st, 2011
11:25 am

Essentially, SEC/ACC football is a major league; the players aren’t paid (well, not openly, anyway), but it terms of TV ratings and fan interest, it’s clearly a major player, so I think you have to factor that into the equation, whereas in a lot of markets (Boston and New York, for example) BCS football is a non-factor, so the SEC/ACC really constitutes a major-league sport here. If the NHL ever comes back to Atlanta, it would be a niche sport, but niche sport in a 4.5 million population market; if the city had a deep-pocketed owner with a passion for the game, such as the folks with True North or Terry Pegula in Buffalo, hockey would work. If you have a dysfunctional ownership group that offers you an orphan hockey team that would be a tenant in its own building…well, that’s the kind of disaster that leads to relocation.

Horsehockey

June 1st, 2011
11:25 am

“As to the “hockey is broadcast on Versus” argument…who just bought Versus and negotiated that hefty, long-term hockey tv contract? Yup, NBC.”

Look, I don’t hate hockey and I’m certainly not happy the team left, but just checked the Vs TV ratings. Last available ratings were from 2008, so they may be a bit outdated, but it was < 250,000 viewers a game. Wonder how that compares to an average nationally televised NFL, MLB, or NBA game? Hint: in the millions, not the thousands.

As for the gomers saying they're glad the team left, or that they hate hockey, I'm guessing its mostly wounded pride. It's like not being invited to a party and saying, "I didn't want to go to that damned party anyway."

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
11:26 am

Pure Evil — We’re sending Vivlamore to Winnipeg for a desk guy and three dozen Tim Horton’s doughnuts.

Yurtle_the_turtle

June 1st, 2011
11:26 am

I still think Winnipeg sucks and the commisioner is an idiot. He stole a very good franchise and put it in a back-water town because his friend wanted to. He also had strong anti-Atlanta Spirit Group (could you blame him for feeling like that?) and thus he couldn’t wait one more year to pressure the idiots at ASG to sell to a decent Atlanta owner. Atlanta has more money than Winnipeg could ever dream. We could have kept the franchise here if the NHL wanted to. I can’t wait until year 3 at Loseipeg and see the numbers of “fans” drop to 9, 000 a night.

stevie zero

June 1st, 2011
11:27 am

jeff, pardon the digression, but will you be blogging from the ted tonight? and if so , how many cocktails will you need to sit through another 3-2 loss? yeeesh

Douglas

June 1st, 2011
11:27 am

I would prefer to see more Steeplechase events where you can wine and dine, catch some sun, and look at the beautiful women from Atlanta.

Bruce Mac

June 1st, 2011
11:29 am

Hockey is not a major sport in the South. The entire article is dumb.

Whopper Dawg

June 1st, 2011
11:30 am

When you put a NE/Canadian regional sport in a southern town, you had better be at least competitive. The reason the Thrashers didn’t work was not Atlanta, but how they performed.

Put a winner in here, and they will come.

Mitchell

June 1st, 2011
11:30 am

Now that the Thrashers are gone we can focus on the second biggest embarrassment to this city, the Braves.

Frank Wren, please fire Larry Parrish, then Fredi Gonzalez and then yourself.

Thanks.

Bluelander

June 1st, 2011
11:33 am

No, we are not a AAA town town at all. Jeff, you are right. We got hosed. Yesterday’s events have more to say about the NHL than Atlanta. Hockey is a great sport, especially live. High Def TV has made it more palatable to watch on TV, but it suffers when compared to the other 3 as a lot of its appeal is lost in the translation to TV. I would not go so far as to call it a nitch sport because the league has successfully penetrated markets in California and the South, but it is a distant 4th as a major sport and will remain there in my opinion. There are probably 7 or 8 franchises now that are in big trouble financially. It will be very interesting to see what happens in places like Phoenix, Miami and Long Island in the next couple of years. Things are not trending well for the league. I read yesterday that the Washington Capitals lost a ton of money this past season. That is unbelievable. They have the most exiting player in the game, a solid team and played to packed houses every night. That speaks volumes about the NHL. Without big money from TV, the league will always remain unstable and each summer they will always have a couple of franchises on the bubble, so to speak.

Chris

June 1st, 2011
11:35 am

Jeff:

If you are a AA writer does that make John Kincade an A ball radio host? He was full of misinformation about the Thrashers for the last several years. Of course in this town all the radio hosts are A ball, except 790 which is a softball league team.

FalconRob

June 1st, 2011
11:37 am

If a sport has important playoff and finals games on the Versus network, then I find it hard to take it seriously as a “Big Four” sport.

Brock

June 1st, 2011
11:38 am

I’ll miss the Thrasher girls in between periods. That’s about it. Ooh, I did like the fire breathing Thrasher at the top of the arena.

drajax

June 1st, 2011
11:39 am

This is a good sports town but the product the absentee/committee owners have put out has been boring and bad. A.S. was simply snake bit by bad advice, lack of money, and poor luck. Liberty Media choses to compete for a wild card rather than first. We need sportsmen as owners not committees or corporations. When the owners appear to take an interest because they are fans rather than its an investment the product will improve and fans will come. The city’s media should also bear some of the blame. In the last several years the Thrasher’s were never a topic on sports talk radio except when they were moving or Kovalchuk was leaving. Radio is important because it can create a buzz and for the Thrashers no one over the airwaves gave the team any time. Any publicity would have helped but instead we get the same tired content. They will say listeners didn’t want to hear about hockey. Maybe; but no one over the radio was interested in the game enough to sell it as the most exciting arena sport out there.
Atlanta has lost a major team but for all the reasons above no one cares. But next fall when Phillips is closed for 41 nights and all those businesses that relied on fans to come eat, sleep, dine and drink lay off employees, the city will realize that an important piece of the economic engine that is downtown is gone.
A sad state of affairs.

BehindEnemyLines

June 1st, 2011
11:42 am

The question depends upon your choice of (unspoken) phrase. If it’s about pro sports specifically, then yes . If it includes college sports then no. If you’re leaving the interpretation to the reader, then I’d say yes.

bart

June 1st, 2011
11:46 am

When speaking of relevance, there’s pro football, college football then pro baseball. All the rest are but window dressing. Any city with the two major pro sports has all it needs. (my apologies to all those employed by the Thrashers who are now out of a job).

krux

June 1st, 2011
11:46 am

Atlanta is not a minor league city. Its more of a college football sports city. The facts are that you dont and havent supported the Hawks at the level of most other NBA teams. You have not supported the Braves in a way equal to what they have provided you on the field. Football always does well in most places. Atlanta IS NOT a good pro sports market. You have a very good NBA team and you dont sell out. You dont sell out play off games for the Braves.

Having said that, its tough in an area like Atlanta and Phx to have established the deep rooted fans. It will be another generation before that happens. So many people that live in our areas are from somewhere else. The move from a place and then complain that we are not like the place they just came from. It will be awhile before our kids over take that group of residents.

Beleafer

June 1st, 2011
11:48 am

No, Atlanta is not a “Triple A” sports town. The fact is, the NHL needs to get it through their thick heads that they are not meant to compete for entertainment dollars in markets dominated so heavily by college and pro football, basketball or baseball. You can’t push a string, and hopefully Bettman figures this out sooner than later. The reason that the 8th largest media market in the U.S. just lost its NHL franchise to a city of 750,000 and a province with a total population of just over a million simply comes down to passion for the game. Sports fans in Atlanta repeatedly demonstrated that they had no such passion – P.S. nobody is surprised by this. Kids in Canada and some Northern States (Chicago, Boston, Detroit) are raised to understand and appreciate the game from an early age. There is no grass-roots hockey movement in Phoenix, Atlanta and Nashville for obvious climatic reasons. – they don’t get snow and ice for months on end. How could fans there be expected to pay to see a game they have never played as a kid and can’t easily relate to or understand. Fans in Winnipeg, have a deep connection to pro hockey and rue the day they lost their team sixteen years ago. Save for a few ardent supporters, nobody in the southern markets cares about how their team might be doing, if they are aware they have one at all. NHL fans know that with the exception of a statistical outlier (Dallas) or the mainly-snowbird-supported teams of Tampa Bay and Florida, hockey doesn’t work in southern markets, and so be it.The NHL needs to give up on the pipe dream of Southern expansion and locate teams where they have a fighting chance. The league will be stronger for it.

Stuart

June 1st, 2011
11:49 am

Jeff: THE ATL is definitely a minor league sports town–ATL has the dubious distinction of being the only town to lose TWO hockey franchises, and won a total of 0 playoff GAMES in 11 years yet Don Waddell–who didn’t understand the importance of defense in hockey–managed to hang on for 11 yrs.! In Detroit or Montreal, he wouldn’t have been hired let alone lasted 4 years with that anemic record. The Hawks are going nowhere past the 2nd round and are saddled with the Johnson contract, and even the Braves whiffed on Uggla when they could have gone after Lee and/or Adrian Gonzalez. The Braves may be the gold standard, but they still only won 1 title and lost 4 with the best starting pitching in MLB history and some great bats (Chipper, Justice, Pendleton, et al). In fact, they lost 2 WS when they were the superior team (’92 Blue Jays; ‘96 Yankees). 4 Teams, 1 Title, countless chokes, bad management, and poor attendance all all add up to mediocrity.

Mitchell

June 1st, 2011
11:49 am

Look, we lost the Civil War; they burned down our city; we have no real culture or history.

We’re a bunch of phoneys. Even most peoples accents here are affected.

We’re just one cliche after another.

We’re losers. Ain’t nothin’ can be done ’bout it.

Seriously, one championship in 45 years and Seattle gets the title of most miserable sports town?

We can’t even win that! I blame Bobby Cox.

P. Bull Terrier

June 1st, 2011
11:52 am

Moving the Thrashers to Canada hurts the NHL more than it hurts Atlanta. The NHL has mismanaged itself into a position where it is arguable that it is no longer one of the four major sports in the United States. The various pro soccer leagues are more popular internationally than the NHL and there are more amateur soccer players than hockey players in the U.S. NASCAR makes more money than the NHL and is probably more popular over a wider market across the country. It is arguable that both soccer and NASCAR should rank ahead of the NHL for the fourth spot on the list of major sports. My best guess is that the major sports, ranked in order of revenue and popularity in the U.S. is: football, baseball, basketball, NASCAR, soccer, hockey.

If you get bored Jeff, it would be interesting to see your list updated with the addition of pro soccer teams and NASCAR races in each city. I can’t keep track of whether or not Atlanta has a pro soccer team at the moment, but at least we still have a NASCAR race.

puppydawg

June 1st, 2011
11:53 am

Won’t miss the Thrashers one bit. Let’s drop on down to Double-A and get rid of the Hawks & Dream too.

George

June 1st, 2011
11:55 am

So what if there is not enough interest in a particular market for hockey? Sports fans are a function of local culture. Hockey is popular where winters are long and cold enough to freeze local ponds. What else is there to do? Every kid has skates. Can a stick and puck be far behind?

In warmer climates, playing on grass is more popular and so it should be.

Hockey in warm climates will be successful only in cities where there is a critical mass of ex-pats nostalgic for the sports of their youth.

Atlanta doesn’t need hockey. Just be great at that which you enjoy!

A Canadian perspective.

PureEvil

June 1st, 2011
11:58 am

Atlanta has had a bunch of losing teams so the perception is the fans don’t support the teams. In other cities the same thing happens it’s just not focused on as much as it is in Atlanta. New York Yankees had a hard time drawing a crowd in the 80’s. The Mets can’t draw a crowd right now.
The braves have one of the largest stadiums in baseball which is why they rarely sell out. But at the end of the year they typically are in the top half of all teams in attendance. Atlanta fans will support an organization that proves to us that they are as committed to the team as we are. Arthur Blank and Ted Turner fired fans up by spending money on players and hiring the right FO people to make the organization a winner. Since AOL and now Liberty have taken over the Braves the fans still support because they still win but, how many more people do you think would go to games if we had an owner who was front and center wanting to win just as badly as the fans and willing to spend money to do it. I know fans don’t come to see the owner but they’ll feel confident that if things aren’t going the right way at least we have an owner who isn’t afraid to do what’s needed to resolve the issue. Unfortunately the Hawks and Thrashers have never in their existence had an owner who LOVED either one of them enough to do whatever it took to win. Ted Turner loved baseball and just owned the Hawks and Thrashers. The ASG showed from the beginning that they were clueless numbtard douchebags that couldn’t and wouldn’t be able to succeed. They were why the Thrashers failed and will be the reason the Hawks fail unless they find someone who wants to buy them and give the team what it needs a owner who is a fan first.

GTT

June 1st, 2011
12:02 pm

Why doesn’t Cleveland have an NHL team?

and?

June 1st, 2011
12:05 pm

how quick can we “lose’ the hawks now… not fast enough……… fact is. hockey is not a universal sport and only appeals to certain folks.. now, Atlanta could get behind a hockey team if they were winners or at least had a regular chance at winning…….. FTR Atlanta’s image is not tarnished, aftewrall they survived the 60s-70s-80s of the losingnest pro teams around

Joseph

June 1st, 2011
12:09 pm

It always was a 2nd tier sports city. I believe a top tear city (or franchise, even) needs to support their team even when they suck The Mets, Cubs and Dodgers all have better attendance than the Braves this year, and they all suck (the first two have sucked for several years no less). Even the beloved [sic] dawgs had lots of empty seats last fall when they were struggling.

Nonfan

June 1st, 2011
12:12 pm

Really – how many people still care about the Thrashers? They were and are a bad team run by a totally inept bunch. I had to laugh when Mike Gerron (excuse any spelling error)got all choked up during his TV interview. They put a lousy product on the ice for 11 years and they expected people to continue to shell out hard earned money to watch ineptitude. In all these years they never got rid of that doofus, Don Waddell. They can take the team to Winnipeg – a jerk water town that has already lost one NHL team – and good riddance. I wouldn’t care if they won the Stanley Cup next year. I just feel bad for those folks who will be losing their jobs because of the ASG screwups.

John Galt

June 1st, 2011
12:14 pm

The NHL would have to be a major league for this to harm our standing.

Will

June 1st, 2011
12:14 pm

Those who argue that losing a NHL Franchise is no big deal do not understand the economics of professional sports.

Put aside for a moment the literal loss of the franchise. Atlanta, which loves to bill itself as a cosmopolitan, international city, could not find anyone willing to buy the franchise. I know that the former ownership and the NHL tried to paint this as a long-time exhausting effort when in fact the search for ownership could not have begun in earnest until six months ago when the ownership litigation (brought on with nobody to blame other than the ownership) was settled. Still, in six months, no one stepped forward.

Attendance remains a puzzle if you believe that Atlanta is full of transplanted citizens from the north. This is even more puzzling if you ever attended a Thrashers game when they played teams from New York, Philly, Chicago, etc. where thousands of their fans, now residing in Atlanta, turned the Arena into a neutral site at best. These transplanted northerners apparently never bought into the Thrashers as they apparently did not come back unless their former home town team was playing.

LMAO

June 1st, 2011
12:15 pm

There is a reason ESPN regularly refers to Atlanta as the worst sports town in America. Atlanta simply isn’t “world class” and people laugh when locals try to claim they are. The US has NY, LA, Chicago, SF and Dallas is slowly rising into that level of “World Class.” This town is the South’s Detroit.

DawginLex

June 1st, 2011
12:16 pm

Atlanta is a college football town that happens to have three pro franchises.

AngryFalcon

June 1st, 2011
12:16 pm

We have 3 sports teams. 100% of those teams made it to the play-offs. We have potential in all 3 teams. Just win and Atlanta will be viewed as a great sports town. We DO show up when we are winning. Quit mentioning the Braves teams of 15 years ago. Falcons games were all rockin last year. Hawks games were exciting when the team showed up to play.

We will never get Hockey again and MLS is looking unlikely with HB87 passing.

w.k. kortas

June 1st, 2011
12:17 pm

GTT– the answers to that are Columbus, Buffalo, and Pittsburgh. Doesn’t leave much of a market for Cleveland (who lost the Barons in the late 70’s.)

TorontoGuy

June 1st, 2011
12:20 pm

The Bills play games in Toronto and it is just a matter of time before Toronto has it’s own NFL team. The problem is we have a CFL team, the Argos, and it would hurt the CFL if the Toronto team were to fold. Also, the NFL makes much of their revenue on TV coverage and it wouldn’t sit well with the US networks to have a team outside of the US. I notice you didn’t count soccer in your list.

Bourne

June 1st, 2011
12:25 pm

The NHL now ranks behind MLS.

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
12:25 pm

Stevie Zero — Yes, I will be blogging from Braves tonight. Cocktails: no. Coffee: yes.

Stuart

June 1st, 2011
12:25 pm

Simple Jack:

I agree with your comments about hockey and the Hawks, with 1 caveat. Regarding hockey, that sport won’t come back here in my lifetime and I’m in my mid-30’s. That ship has sailed. As for the Hawks, they ARE 2 players away–unfortunately, those 2 players are Jordan and Shaq circa 1995! :>)

As for all of the comments that Georgia is a great college sports town and that makes a great sports town, I just have to laugh–the beloved Dawgs haven’t won a Nat’l Championship since 1980, over 30 years ago, and they are basically a mid-level SEC team behind the likes of Alabama, FLA and LSU, and MAYBE…MAYBE..on par with the next grouping of Auburn and TN, though those 2 schools have won titles more recently (and hey, I like UGA and am an unbiased BIG TEN guy). It just kills me with laughter that GA folks LOVE to tout UGA when so many true college powers (USC, Texas, Nebraska, OSU, and the aforementioned Big 3 of the SEC) have all won much much more. Any way you slice it, other than Seattle (the Sonics in ‘79 and some good Mariners teams in the ’90’s) and SD (no titles), the ATL is THE worst pro sports town–1966 is a long, long time ago, so the ATL has had lots of teams and years to bank more than 1 title, and that title should have been coupled with at least 1 more–this may be sacrilege, but Cox blew ‘91 and ‘96, and any true and knowledgeable sports fan knows that. Liebrandt v. Puckett was bad, but Game 4 of the ‘96 WS will live in ATL sports infamy along with Pearl Harbor (a nod to Roosevelt). Up 2-1 and 6-0 with Bielecki cruising, he changed course. That was mistake #1. Then, he inexplicably put Wohlers in to pitch the 8th when he had pitched the 9th all season long. Wohlers, attempting to preserve himself for 2 not 1 innings, hung the Leyritz slider and the rest is history. Tied 2-2, Smoltz couldn’t get the shell shocked ATL crowd into Game 5 despite a very good pitching performance. These are facts–that 1 extra title would have sealed the Braves legacy. That’s how close the margin of error is, and Cox blew it. Yes, he was solid, and for 162 games and the concept of steadiness, he was “Schottenheimer-esque”. But when the pressure tightened and the games mattered most, Cox made crucial and legacy mistakes.

Dan

June 1st, 2011
12:25 pm

The NHL had poor ratings partially because ESPN treated the league terribly. The ratings are better now on Versus than they ever were on ESPN, despite the jokes that nobody can find Versus.

Yes, I think this drops Atlanta to a AAA city, not because of the ordinary people in Atlanta, but because of the people with money in Atlanta. The NHL tried to stay here, but Atlanta Spirit ruined the Thrashers and ruined any chance they had of survival. They created this mess and made the Thrashers something nobody wanted to buy. Then nobody else stepped up, and the result is Winnipeg.

Could the NHL have worked in Atlanta? Maybe, but now we will never know, and the reason why is Atlanta Spirit. It’s not the NHL’s fault, it’s not the Atlanta fans’ fault. It’s Atlanta Spirit’s fault, and theirs alone.

Jeff Randall

June 1st, 2011
12:27 pm

Atlanta had a hockey team????

Edawg

June 1st, 2011
12:28 pm

Atlanta has serious traffic/public transportation/stadium locations issues that affect attendance tremendously, especially weeknight games.

Anybody who refuses to admit this is a problem has their head in the sand. Are there other issues affecting attendance? Yes…but this is the big one.

honest question

June 1st, 2011
12:29 pm

Has anyone ever known a normal person named Stuart?

kreedham

June 1st, 2011
12:34 pm

Seems to me that someone (Arthur Blank, Coke, somebody) could have made a deal to buy the Thrashers without going all in. Say a purchase price of $120 million to be paid over 4 years. 1st installment gets you 26% of the team, 2nd installment 25% and majority ownership with the option of minority owners (Glavine, etc) to buy in on 3rd and 4th installments or majority owner taking part of that!

Maybe we could make that deal with the NHL so save Glendale from ponying up every year and the NHL from owning a team….Let’s bring the Coyotes to Atlanta!…and the NHL would have to waive the relocation fee for the local owner doing them a favor and taking the team off their hands.

PureEvil

June 1st, 2011
12:36 pm

The top team in MLB attendance is Philly for 2011. Back in 2001 when the Phillies were bad they ranked 24th 2002 they ranked 24th 2003 they ranked 14th then they started to compete and attendance went up. When they start losing again you’ll see the attendance drop. Teams win people come. Teams lose people stay home. The Thrashers lost people stayed home.

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
12:36 pm

GTT — They used to do: The Cleveland Barons.

The ATL...

June 1st, 2011
12:38 pm

definitely dropped with the move of the Thrashers. I’m going to hate not living in an NHL town. I’m planning trips to Nashville already….

Horsehockey

June 1st, 2011
12:39 pm

Edawg makes a good point. Atlanta’s transportion problems cannot be underestimated in hurting attendance in all sports. For folks OTP, going to weeknight games is next to an impossiblity. The lack of a decent transportation system is what ultimately WILL relegate Atlanta to AAA status (if it hasn’t already done so). Adding a gazillion lanes to 85 and 5 or 6 miles to MARTA isn’t going to fix it either. Unfortunately, I doubt if the taxpayers or bass-ackwards politicians of this town have the vision to do anything about it.

Fortunately MLB, NFL, and NBA teams don’t survive on attendance alone as the NHL pretty much does.

Yurtle_the_turtle

June 1st, 2011
12:42 pm

Listen gang, if you did not like hockey, that is fine and you need not respond to this blog. From a business perspective, even if you didn’t like hockey you should be angry that a major sporting team left for a crappy town like Losipeg. There are folks who enjoyed the sport and would have gone to more games and generated income for downtown Atlanta (jerk of a mayor) had the ownership group actually put effort into the club. It was badly managed. ASG is a group of idiots who failed, plain and simple.

Gatorman

June 1st, 2011
12:44 pm

Atlanta is not defined by you or any other sports writers. I remember when the Braves drew well over 3 million fans and the national media called them the worst sports city in America. Atlanta is an icon city in the south and many parts of the country aren’t happy with that; too bad! The Hawks are an example of bad decision making by putting the stadium in south Atlanta, figuring only that part of the city would support the team. You put the stadium where the majority of the paying customers are, and many of those never wanted to go south Atlanta. A stadium should then and now be in the mid-town area, and it doomed the hockey team and may doom the basketball team for the same reason. I know this is not politically correct to say such a thing, but business is never politically correct.

reebok

June 1st, 2011
12:48 pm

i predict atlanta will have a re-lo’d hockey team here within 5 years. i’d like to see us get an MLS team…could really get behind that.

Jeff Schultz

June 1st, 2011
12:48 pm

PureEvil — that comment didn’t slip through the family values filter.

JR

June 1st, 2011
12:51 pm

Could it be our demographic in Atlanta? Atlanta Spirit sold us down the river. They only wanted the Hawks to begin with. Waddell and company poorly managed the team.. The best talent in the NHL passed through Atlanta on the way to gigs at top teams and Stanley cup glory. Heatley, Kovalchuk, Hossa, Tkachuk, need I say more!

PureEvil

June 1st, 2011
12:57 pm

i predict atlanta will have a re-lo’d hockey team here within 5 years

What could they be called?

The Atlanta 3rdtimers

The Atlanta Relocationers

The Atlanta Movers

The Atlanta Rebels

oh the possibilities!!

Sorry Jeff

wiseoldawg

June 1st, 2011
12:58 pm

Go Thrashers!! And take the Hawks with you!!

Bye, bye Thrashers

June 1st, 2011
12:59 pm

PMC

June 1st, 2011
1:01 pm

No one was going to swoop in and buy the team when the spirit would own the building and the hawks.

Certainly not Arthur Blank. Why would he want 2 bad stadium deals to contend with?

PapaSid

June 1st, 2011
1:02 pm

1. It’s a dollar issue – my available entertainment dollars. They are not unlimited. Braves (often), college football (often), Falcons (sometime) pretty much wipe me out. Hockey just doesn’t make the cut. 2. I wonder if you would try to check and see what percentage of the people upset about this are transplants from cities with a long hockey history? My suspicion is that this is a factor. Why don’t you try and prove me wrong?

PureEvil

June 1st, 2011
1:02 pm

And take the Hawks with you!!

Sorry you’ll have to wait untill 2028 for that!

BravesFan79

June 1st, 2011
1:07 pm

This column was awful.. what a dumb question.

BamaBob

June 1st, 2011
1:08 pm

The MLS argument is interesting. That league has evolved from a niche one to a player with its slow, yet steady growth. Teams in major areas are drawing extremely well and with the global appeal of the game could challenge the NHL in a decade or so as the “fourth major”. Especially if the NHL doesn’t contract as it needs to.

The WNBA is laughable. It exists only because David Stern says so. The TV ratings are so low sometimes they’re literally not measurable.

Cornbread

June 1st, 2011
1:17 pm

Jeff you could have saved some time with your list by just linking here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._and_Canadian_cities_by_professional_sports_teams

Notice the NHL left a major Top 10 North American market for #73. That says more about the NHL than it does Atlanta. Really, and I’ve been a fan and played hockey nearly all my life. The only American cities on that list not in the Top 50 – which includes MLS and CFL – are Buffalo at #54 and Green Bay at #146. The NHL relocating a team to Winnipeg would be like the NFL relocating Houston to Knoxville, TN (oh wait, how close is #40 Nashville?) or the MLB moving Toronto Blue Jays to Columbia, SC.

The NHL now has 5 teams outside the Top 50 markets in North America. Four of those cities are in Canada and the other at #54 is close enough. They are the only “Major League” to have teams outside the Top 50 with the exception of Green Bay which is the true outlier.

The NHL is not “Major League”. As Joe Friday has said, it’s a “Mickey Mouse League”. So, as much as this truly does suck for both Atlanta and hockey, Atlanta has not dropped to the AAA, the NHL has.

Zing

June 1st, 2011
1:30 pm

Screw the NHL. I’d much rather have an MLS team.

Let NONE in

June 1st, 2011
1:32 pm

the poor and unwashed OTP…

Roberta

June 1st, 2011
1:34 pm

ATL: It doesn’t really matter what Atlanta’s population is. It didn’t support the team and Winnipeg likely will

Brock

June 1st, 2011
1:34 pm

Evil- how bout the Atlanta Nomads or the Atlanta Gypsy’s.

Time

June 1st, 2011
1:36 pm

Yes Schultz, that’s what I got out of this column. That’s all you lot do (you and that other clown Bradley) is tear down sports in this city. Nothing is ever good enough. No player is ever good enough. No coach is ever good enough. All the time wanting to get someone traded or fired or preach about how Atlanta is now a AAA town or isn’t a good sports town.

Atlanta is a great sports city. And all you outdoors challenged people from up north should be thankful there are places like Atlanta. Where we don’t waste our money going to see bad pro sports. We just go out and play them. Your rosters are full of players from “crappy” sports towns.

The NHL is a second rate league. It’s not even 4th on the list of major sports as I’m pretty sure that both NASCAR and the PGA Tour (when Tiger plays) draw alot more viewers across the country.

So Schultz, why don’t you take the time to write a column about just how second rate the NHL instead of looking to downgrade this great city. As far as I’m concerned, it’s a thousand times worse of a black eye on the NHL than it is for Atlanta now that the Thrashers are gone.

Zing

June 1st, 2011
1:39 pm

Incidentally, I was sorry to see the Thrashers go, including how they went. But if someone tries to get another pro sports team to come here, I’d prefer an MLS team over the NHL. (Not that the NHL is coming back anytime soon–or ever).

jim

June 1st, 2011
1:42 pm

I am sorry the Thrashers are gone. Hockey is an exciting sport and Atlanta is a great city. The problem is not the fan base or generating interest. The fans I saw at games were engaged and knowledgeable and generally courteous (with the occasional dash of bloodlust). This whole issue is about poor ownership and high cost for the fan. Take a family of 4 to a Thrashers game: cost over $200 for the cheap seats, eating, parking, drinking, souviners. People don’t want to spend that kind of money to watch a team that loses. Second, ownership certainly marketed the team, but the best marketing in sports is winning. This team was a perennial loser and still drew over 13k per game in this last year. Did the Hawks ever do that when losing? They’re still here. The owners of this team couldn’t care less and took the team as a business loss for tax reasons. Fans who enjoy the sport and pay to watch it feel it as a loss. Those on this blog getting bent out of shape about being a 3 tier city, it is a nonsensical idea & the author is a dunce for suggesting it.

Cornbread

June 1st, 2011
1:43 pm

i predict atlanta will have a re-lo’d hockey team here within 5 years

And out of the ashes of the Flames and Thrashers arise the immortal firebirds, the…

Atlanta Phoenix!

OK,

Atlanta Firebirds!

Even more fitting if that relocated team should come from AZ. Alas, it’s all just a myth…

Jackets1

June 1st, 2011
1:49 pm

Losing the Thrashers doesnt make Atlanta a AAA sports town anymore than when the Arena football, women’s soccer, or WNBA teams closed up shop. In Canada, the NHL means something, but in most of the southeast and southwest, it is followed only by transplants (carpetbaggers). We could add a MLS team and it would probably be better supported. When Atlanta youth grow up playing hockey on the region’s frozen ponds, the NHL will survie here and i don’t see that happening anytime soon. I’m one of those people that gave it a shot and attended games the first five years and even have the misfortune of working downtown, but it just didnt hold my attention (winning or losing). Plus I still have no idea where the sport is located on tv. Truth be told, i’d rather attend a GaSt football game at the dome than Thrashers next door. Sorry Blue Land, you won’t be missed by many in Atlanta.

Rod Paradise

June 1st, 2011
1:53 pm

I have lived in GA all of my life and up until now, have never even heard of the Atlanta Flames. Granted it was when I was very young, but still. Thus, it goes to show you how much people in this area just do not care about hockey. I believe like sports that they grew up playing as a kid. Not many frozen ponds in this part of the world. Also there have been some people here with great insight into the NHL, and based on that information it sounds like the NHL is not doing well. Thus the franchise moving to Winnipeg sounds like a fairly reasonable transaction. Just my $.02

KE

June 1st, 2011
1:55 pm

Do the math! Atlanta Fan priorities are (or something close)
1.College Football (Georgia, Tech, Auburn, FSU, Clemson-all with major fan bases in Atlanta)
2. Falcons
3. Braves
4.College basketball’
5.Hawks
6. Then maybe the NHL!
Add in the economy and there just isn’t enough money, time and interest for fans to support everything. A sport that is not native to the population and with a limited amount of Northern transplants who happen to be Hockey fans–The sport does not have a chance.! I don’t place as much blame on ownership as the sports writers do. NHL would not draw well here if we were contenders for the Stanley Cup every year! Let’s move on!

BooBoo

June 1st, 2011
1:56 pm

Don’t cry for me Atlanterina.

Where’s Glen Ford when you need him?

Whatever happened to the Atlanta Knights? I bought sweatshirts with their logo on it at the K-Mart, after they won the Triple A championship, and then the aliens took them to Area 51.

Look what Calgary did with the Flames. Winnypig can do the same with the “Thrashers” (bet that name changes) Face it. Atlanta is a puppy mill for the NHL.

dawgfan123

June 1st, 2011
2:09 pm

NYC doesn’t have pro football!! They play in NJ!!

TruthSeeker

June 1st, 2011
2:11 pm

The Braves, Hawks, and Falcons have all gotten great support from Atlanta at various points in their history. Even people outside the city still talk about how electric Atlanta was when the Braves came out of nowhere during the summer of ‘91. The Braves were consistently in the top two in the league in attendance throughout the ’90s. It was only after several disappointing playoff performances that fans seemed to become jaded and attendance dropped off.

I think a similar thing happened with the Hawks. They were hugely popular for a stretch in the ’80s when they had ‘Nique, but it became obvious after a while that they were never going to win a championship. There hasn’t been real buzz around the Hawks in a very long time.

Someone (either Schultz or Bradley) posted that the Falcons had 38 straight sellouts before Vick went to prison. I must have forgotten about that because it blew my mind.

Obviously, Atlanta has shown it’s capable of getting behind all of these teams. But they need something to be excited about. The Braves in the ’90s were exciting. Michael Vick was exciting. But, honestly, if you look at the Atlanta sports landscape now, there’s not a whole lot to pull the casual fan in. The Braves are decent but about as thrilling as watching paint dry. The Hawks lack a superstar and are wildly inconsistent. The Falcons are on the verge of being elite, but the playoff game against the Packers showed they still have a ways to go.

FalconFan

June 1st, 2011
2:17 pm

The answer to your question is in rewording your question – Atlanta is a major sports town and does not like (or support for long) AAA (ie minor league) teams or sports. Atlanta Force, Flames, Attack, Knights, Chiefs, Glory, Beat, Dream, Thrashers – there is a graveyard of failed sports teams that played minor league sports or leagues and after an initial curiosity were sent on their way to a minor league town where they belong. The NHL is minor league – guys hitting a ball with metal sticks and guys driving cars around in circles ad nauseum draw better than this sport. That’s not sour apples, its the truth.

Remarkable

June 1st, 2011
2:17 pm

Jeff, thanks for reading the blogs. It does make reading them more interesting knowing you read them too and make comments.

Najeh Davenpoop

June 1st, 2011
2:19 pm

Were we in the Triple A of sports towns in 1996 when we had the Olympics and the defending World Series champions but no hockey team?

BarneyBones

June 1st, 2011
2:27 pm

For sale: Two authentic Thrasher sweaters, newly classified as collectibles, seldom worn due to fear of being viewed as a loser (or worse – yankee). Maybe those fools that live in some god forsaken frozen city like Winnipeg might want them……..to keep warm with over their 11.5 months of winter.

Hillbilly D

June 1st, 2011
2:27 pm

I don’t think so. If the Thrashers, or the Flames for that matter, had had competent ownership, they’d still be here.

Remarkable

June 1st, 2011
2:30 pm

Jeff, NEW Question: Should the name stay with the original city or with the team. Examples: Utah Jazz?, Cleveland Browns, etc…

404

June 1st, 2011
2:31 pm

Atlanta is a quality Sports town.

It’s the media coverage from the “Sports” section of the AJC thats the REAL disgrace.

povox

June 1st, 2011
2:32 pm

How ’bout we trade the Hawks to Tampa for the Lightning, St. Louis for the Blues or Pittsburgh for the Penguins?

doc

June 1st, 2011
2:36 pm

jeff, some might say atlanta became a minor league national and certainly southern sports town when it lost one of its two major nascar races. heh heh ;-)

Astonished

June 1st, 2011
2:44 pm

One of the most apparently detached owners in sports, Jeremy Jacobs of the Boston Bruins, was quoted today in the Boston Globe. He bought the team in 1975 and only recently has become more demonstrative of his passion for the team at the suggestion of team president and former Bruin Cam Neely.

“When you own a franchise in a city like Boston, these great, classic properties, it’s not another asset,’’ said Jacobs. “It’s a civic asset that you’re holding there. . . . You just don’t treat it the same way you would other property, so to speak. You should go in there with that recognition. I didn’t fully appreciate that until after I’d been there for several years. Then, it became more and more apparent that you were dealing with the emotions of a community and with the pride and the culture, more so than with anything else you would do.’’

It’s sad sad sad that the Atlanta Dispirit Group did not understand that the Thrashers, young as they are at a mere 11, became part of the emotions and fabric of the community. Having been a critic of Jacobs in the past, I hope what he’s saying is true. And that more owners would look at teams as not just another business to suck money from, but as a form of public trust.

James Adams

June 1st, 2011
2:59 pm

The NHL is no longer a national product. Solely regional. No loss here.

JoeEh

June 1st, 2011
3:00 pm

Remarkable : You could have our Manitoba moose minor league farm team. They are farming for Vancouver Canucks and if I remember correctly they are going for the cup tonight.

Let NONE in

June 1st, 2011
3:06 pm

HOCKEY IN Atlanta is officially done. No more of that or the Hawks.

Let NONE in

June 1st, 2011
3:12 pm

What happened to C-Viv? Some of bloggers were blamiing him for this. LOL>

Todd Go

June 1st, 2011
3:16 pm

Even WITH the Thrashers, Atlanta can’t be considered a first-class Sports town. Empty seats dominate most of our stadiums during regular seasons, and failure to produce in the playoffs is our legacy. Yes, College Football has tremendous regional appeal here (if that counts), but I would argue that on the local level (Dawgs and Jackets) it rarely lives up to the hype. Bottom line, the Thrashers are gone because of too much apathy on every level.

Mash

June 1st, 2011
3:16 pm

Without the Thashers, Atlanta may have actually moved up a notch.

Icepack

June 1st, 2011
3:21 pm

Hockey? Do all those folks in Roswell and Alpharetta need somewhere to go? The NHL is on its last legs as a major sport anyway. We’d trade the whole league for a good hitting outfielder for our lame-ass baseball team.

Let NONE in

June 1st, 2011
3:29 pm

Mash: Good one. Addition by subtraction of the worst team in the league. I like it.

Dr. Warren

June 1st, 2011
3:35 pm

Damn, Atlanta got big, didn’t it? In population, we’re bigger than Boston, too.

LAC

June 1st, 2011
3:39 pm

Bottom of the barrel, Losersville USA, cannot win any BIG game. I hope like HELL the hawks move too, Seattle needs a team back as well and I would be thrilled beyond words for THEM to leave, Atlanta DOES NOT NEED pro basketball, Worst sport ever, nascar a VERY close second.

Glad I am moving to Kansas City, This town is so bad in SO many ways it is not funny !

Even if you hate hockey, this is not good for ATL

June 1st, 2011
3:39 pm

Many Atlantans will not miss the Thrashers….many Atlantans would not miss the Hawks if they left….both are/were important to a city that makes its living on conventions and major sporting events…..the Metro Chamber of Commerce coined the phrase “Atlanta – the Sports Capital of the World” – this video covers damages to Atlanta’s reputation and civic pride resulting from the loss of a major league team:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldsg14vsGNc&feature=player_embedded

Would should have protected this asset. Sports Capital of the World – what a joke!

Puck Like A Porn Star

June 1st, 2011
3:42 pm

Where the hell is Vivlamore???

LAC

June 1st, 2011
3:42 pm

Oh forgot, Send dan uggla to Winnipeg too, HE $UCKS !!!!!

Atlanta IS a good hockey market, with the RIGHT commited owner, Losing Thrashers, makes this town a BIG NOTHING for me, so I am moving my business HQ, to KC, 18 will lose jobs because of asg and gary BUTTMAN !

wolfman

June 1st, 2011
3:58 pm

What is hockey?

Hillbilly D

June 1st, 2011
3:59 pm

Losing Thrashers, makes this town a BIG NOTHING for me, so I am moving my business HQ, to KC,

So since Atlanta is losing its NHL team, you’re moving your business to a city without an NHL team?

Redneck Spokesman

June 1st, 2011
4:05 pm

That there hockey is just too damn complicated. Blue line, red line, huh? But we do understand the high sticking, roughing, we like that.

dre

June 1st, 2011
4:07 pm

Atlanta will always be AAA as far as sports because Atlanta sports attendees just want to be seen. In no other city will you find so many idiots talking on their cellphones at games than here in Atlanta. It’s like we’ve just discovered cellphones!!!

Redneck Spokesman

June 1st, 2011
4:11 pm

they said them cell phones cause cancer and we could be those idiots that man was talking about cause we like to talk trash….white trash

dre

June 1st, 2011
4:17 pm

Redneck – LOL, you got me there

The real Hawks are in Chicago

June 1st, 2011
4:26 pm

Really, some of these comments are off the wall. I understand to a degree the frustration for the hockey fans. I would venture, that many here paint the true picture of winter sports in Atlanta. Non-existent. Your 95% numbers, your Dawgs, trying to say the NHL is lower caliber for losing Atlanta (been there done that and produced a Stanley Cup Champion after moving), and all the other excuses, are the reason the team moved. Was ASG bad ownership? Of course. Where were other prospective owners? Why not an offer? Because of the lease back provision?

Elroy is right. We’ll keep our hockey, 22,500 a night and 2 million person Stanley Cup Parade of a year ago. Great memories. Kind of like watching Bobby Hull, Stan Mikita and the like in the mid 60’s when there were only 6 teams. Gosh, that sport must suck if its only grown 5 times its size.

Football starts soon!

Really?

June 1st, 2011
4:31 pm

So sad to see people dumping on the game of hockey. It is the fastest, toughest, most skilled game out there. Take anything that you like about any other sport and hockey has it, in spades.

Could it be as simple as southerners not understanding the rules of the game and hence, writing it off? That would be sad, but understandable.

It always amazes me that college athletics are so popular in the USA and that hockey is not more fully understood and appreciated. The vast majority of college players will not even get a sniff at the pros whereas the NHL is stocked with the most skilled athletes on the planet. Despite this, you’ll get 50,000 people out to watch a game played largely by (pardon the phrase) nobodys, and the city loses a pro sports franchise, again.

It’s mind-boggling, really.

Big Daddy (formerly waffleboy)

June 1st, 2011
4:32 pm

@The real Hawks are in Chicago- From 2003-2007, your Hawks drew right at 13,000. The Thrashers never had a three season run that low. The fan are here. The ownership admitted they didn’t want the team and tried to dump them. And yes, the NHL is hurt by this deal. What they have in Winnipeg is there and will never grow. Atlanta was a growth market. The league failed Atlanta, not the other way around.

thrashers rally

June 1st, 2011
4:34 pm

at the thrashers rally, even the thrashers mascot didn’t show up. Instead, the atlanta hawks mascot was there for some reason. did the thrashers mascot have a previous commitment?

Jacket21

June 1st, 2011
4:35 pm

Yawn. When does college football start up? Those puppies up in Athens need their high hopes dashed again. Has anyone here actually seen a Thrasher? Its the size of a Parakeet. The name is as bad as the idea of having a hockey team located here. This is 90+degree Atlanta, if you’re fancy is having some sport with a a goal at each end of the field, at least a MLS team makes sense versus a team that plays on ICE? Really?

shlomo

June 1st, 2011
4:40 pm

atlanta need not apologize for what happened to the thrashers. Ownership put a lousy product on the ice and fans voted with their wallets and stayed home. There is no shame in that. There should be no expectation of attendance without the appropriate commitment from ownership. They didn’t deserve our support.

chief pitchanono

June 1st, 2011
4:43 pm

NO, i think the number you put up last week says it all. If they had put a good product on the ice they would have been fine. They did not, and this is what happens. Its true, because it was hockey and its not a hugely popular sport in the south, they probably were on a shorter chain than the other pro sports, but still they had plenty of time get a competitive team going and they didn’t get it done. The owners are the only losers here.

Jacket21

June 1st, 2011
4:45 pm

“Really” – Its about the game, the team, the atmosphere, players that grew up in our home towns and with traditions so ingrained in the essence of our being. Hockey here is a novelty, certainly not worth the high ticket prices, played by rental players that grew up in eastern europe, russia, and that frozen country north of us, and our dollars go into the pockets of owners from anywhere but here that will leverage a higher return eventually one way or another by moving to another city.

Let NONE in

June 1st, 2011
4:46 pm

Jacket21: Those pupps in Athens going to whip your arse again this year. I think you queens won a couple of games back about 20 years ago by playing ineligible players…it was so long I can’t remember how you all cheated.

Let NONE in

June 1st, 2011
4:48 pm

I have a very important announcement to make: FISH FRY…<>

Wandering Georgian

June 1st, 2011
5:04 pm

This is not to knock hockey, which is as good a sport as any. But in terms of the American sports landscape, I don’t think it’s any more important than soccer (another sport I love). Moreover, in cities with a large Latino population, soccer’s probably a more important sport to have than hockey, so I’d argue that it’s a bigger deal for Phoenix NOT to have an MLS team than it is for them to have a hockey team.

But hockey and soccer are a distant fourth and fifth, respectively, on the American sports landscape. Heck, probably fifth and sixth behind college football, really. Lack of either sport doesn’t make a city “minor league.” Unless the New York and Philly markets are minor league for not having a powerhouse college football team.

Horsehockey

June 1st, 2011
5:04 pm

Just received my new Sports Illustrated in the mail. Big full page ad for the Hawks. I am not making this up. Could it be that ASG is actually investing in their other sports property.

AJC on radio

June 1st, 2011
5:12 pm

some guy from AJC is SLAGGING the former Thrashers owners on radio right now in Canada

http://player.rogersradio.ca/cjcl/on_air

bee233

June 1st, 2011
5:14 pm

Right Jeff, unlike Charlotte, Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, New Orleans, Nashville, Raleigh, Houston, Oklahoma, Phoenix, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc….

All the Crap naysayers read this

June 1st, 2011
5:19 pm

…but our city will die
…but we had our chance
…but we don’t grow the game
…but Mr. Bettman doesn’t like us
…but they need a new TV contract
…but we don’t have an owner
…but the arena is too small
…but there is no corporate support
…but there is only 700,000
…but Hamilton would be better
…but we can’t afford those prices
…but we won’t reach 13000
…but the BOG won’t approve
…but the dollar will collapse
…but nobody wants to come here

Seems like we are spanking a lot of those buts

PureEvil

June 1st, 2011
5:30 pm

Breaking News

Newly formed ownership group in Atlanta to get MLS soccer franchise!!! Reported name of the team will be

The Atlanta Lawn ferries

Atlanta87

June 1st, 2011
5:51 pm

WHO CARES!?!?!?!?!

Train Wreck Bystander

June 1st, 2011
5:57 pm

I’d rather lose the NHL than lose one of the other leagues. I’d even go so far as to say that a Sprint Cup race is more important than the NHL.

TheAntiMe

June 1st, 2011
6:03 pm

Actually, the NHL just became Triple-A without Atlanta and are heading toward being the CFL with Phoenix likely being relocated this time next year. The NHL is headed down the tubes.

Brendan

June 1st, 2011
6:04 pm

Jeff Schultz, you’re darned right Atlanta just became a AAA sports town. It’s inconceivable that the Atlanta Spirit, LLC, whisked this team away, preventing local, interested buyers, from any access to the revenues from Philips Arena. Had the Hawks, Thrashers, and Philips Arena been packaged together, I’m sure a local buyer would have emerged. Instead, the Spirit rightly sized up the situation, that Commissioner Bettman would take the $60 million relocation fee, to help prop up the struggling Phoenix Coyotes organization.

I guess, in the end, the Spirit Group laughed last. They didn’t much care for hockey fans, and the feeling was mutual. They just didn’t understand the dynamics of running an NHL franchise. Or they didn’t care. Or both. Bygones. Atlanta just became much LESS of a city, without pro hockey at the NHL level.

Jeff, Atlantans can think of themselves and their city on a part with New York if they want to, but we just took a backwards step in that comparison.

Ellis

June 1st, 2011
6:04 pm

We were screwed once the greedy coterie of selfish, egotistical and completely fan oblivious ownership, the “Atlanta Dispirit”, contrived to manipulate, along w/ “Bag Man and Bank Bettmyass Bettman,” their support base, all the while flickin’ fingers and busting gut laughing til they can find their next target to f@#k. Maybe they should have included Donald “True Joke” Frump in their heist plans. Then they could screw ALL OF USA at once! FILTHY MAGGOTS!!!

DawgDad

June 1st, 2011
6:13 pm

No, we are not AAA. Shedding an ASG-owned franchise is a positive first step toward an ultimate healing. One down, one to go.

MLS Soccer??? Dixie Speedway will likely outdraw them.

Brendan

June 1st, 2011
6:14 pm

Cornbread, let’s just hope Waddell doesn’t weasel his way into the Gwinnett Gladiators and ruin them, too.

sidslid

June 1st, 2011
6:29 pm

And Jacksonville has an NFL team, why?

Kevin

June 1st, 2011
6:51 pm

Funny Don Waddell No go to Winnipeg why would he been fired soon there…so that save the moron goin n bein fired too also why hell the atlanta sprit get keep logo of team they abuse it anyway bye gettin Don teflon waddell too.Also where hell was the media coverge of The Thrashers when at home Not any time in 11years u ever saw Local News doin a live shot at hockey games just the Hawks is all…Maybe Kakemm reed fuss over that after all where was Mr Mayor when all this happen..Just this from Office who cares was his reply folks if hawks go and moved he be out fast as mayo on a chicken save team.As i said AJC lousy coverge of Team too same be said U note they came around when we had about Movin out started…Fine Belkin n ASG u keep logo n all rights keep this fact i want all the fans who claim they care to wear all Thrashers uniforms logo shirts at Open of NBA season here just show Belkin what is n stuff no hawks shirts no caps just Thrashers jersey too n signs to…..That will show them too make best Booooo them every home game next season….Braves Fans show u displeased wear unform jersey of thrashers to bring signs wave at cameras maybe we see it…..

Kevin

June 1st, 2011
6:56 pm

Hey we get a MLS team here they be own bye The ASG group by belkin n friends and in 6 years Move to winnipeg there also….If the Phoenix coyotes moved here please no let ASG own it….

Brian

June 1st, 2011
7:09 pm

The only 2 you can call sports would be hockey and football. Baseball is not a sport nor is basketball they are games like golf or something like that. So atlanta is no longer even a factor in being called a sports town.

Danny Richardson

June 1st, 2011
7:47 pm

There just isn’t a market in the Southeastern U.S. for Hockey. It’s sad for all of the fans and to the people behind the scenes who will lose their jobs as a result of this move. To keep things in perspective as far as the Atlanta sports market–there are “hometown” players on all of the 3 remaining professional sports francises. Were there any Georgia boys on the Thrashers squad? Probably not is my guess since most NHL players are Canadian or Eastern European. Atlanta is good for what it is which is professional & collegiate football, hoops, and baseball. Good Riddence Thrashers, a.k.a. Jets.

Buddy Grizzard

June 1st, 2011
7:53 pm

It says less about Atlanta as a sports town and more about ASG’s failure to sell the NHL in a non-traditional market. Not to discount the curse of Danny Heatly, but the ASG’s ownership of two of the four major pro sports franchises in Atlanta has contributed to alot of futility. Hopefully the ASG can get its ish together only having to run one franchise.

[...] • Is Atlanta a Triple-A sports town without the Thrashers? [AJC] [...]

SF Ryan

June 1st, 2011
8:26 pm

The answer to your question in the title of your blog is a resounding “YES”. Sports fans in Atlanta are college football fans first, and only if these pro teams are doing alright in the standings, NFL, MLB, and NBA fans dead last after watching highlights and replays of UGA football games.

Mr Bill

June 1st, 2011
10:16 pm

With an arena that will hold 18,000 for Hockey all we need to do is start over again with new owners willing to pay for an expansion team here and the name is already ours so we can use the Thrashers. This time will have people who know what they are doing. Hey it can’t hurt.

Matt "CHOKE" Ryan

June 1st, 2011
10:53 pm

With CHOKE at qb what do you people expect :)

rooster

June 1st, 2011
10:53 pm

@dawgfan123 – Well, at least you can SEE New York from the Meadowlands. Foxboro, one the other hand, is closer to Providence than to Boston. The old Boston Patriots had to be re-branded as the New England Patriots to get more people to identify with them (this would never be necessary for the Red Sox or Celtics, of course). Same reason there are NFL franchises called Tennessee, Carolina, Arizona, and Minnesota; MLB clubs called Colorado, Arizona, Florida, Texas, and Minnesota; and NBA franchises called Indiana, Minnesota, Utah, and Golden State.

Amature Boxing on ICE

June 2nd, 2011
1:10 am

HFIN

June 2nd, 2011
1:15 am

Go BRAVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

scottbravesfan

June 2nd, 2011
2:02 am

Jeff,

I think you need to calm down just a little bit. It’s not like Atlanta lost the Braves or the Falcons. If they ever lose one of those two teams, then yeah they would drop down but the major leagues in America are NFL, MLB, and NBA. With the growing Hispanic population in the U.S. I would not be surprised if in 20 years MLS leaps over the NHL in terms of popularity. All that is holding that league back is the salary cap situation.

And if Atlanta wants to get better attendance for weeknight games do something about the freaking traffic and let MARTA’s trains actually go to where people live.

BravesWin!

June 2nd, 2011
9:22 am

I remember going to see the Thrashers a few times during the playoff year…we were in first place and playing pretty well with a couple of exciting names on the roster…and the stands were still half empty. Hockey is a great sport (especially in person), but this is and always will be the city of college football (it’s no accident that the college football HOF is coming here), Falcons and Braves…and I am ok with that…and hey, if ASG sells the Hawks (or at least signs Dwight Howard), you can add them to the list. I will miss the Thrashers, but I alway thought that they would be much more fun to follow if they put 11 guys on the ice….and moved the game from the ice to a 100 yard field…and used an oddly shaped ball rather than a puck…and were the Falcons…

Mark in ATL

June 2nd, 2011
10:10 am

I don’t think most of us care about the NHL….the vast (99%+) didn’t grow up playing hockey. The vast majority of us (I would guess 90%+) couldn’t stay upright on a pair of skates if our life depended on it. We played baseball, football, basketball growing up. I’m 40…most of my fathers generation in the south were college sports fans growing up…there was no pro sports at the time. My generation is the first in the south to have pro sports the entire time I was growing up. However when we were kids we went to the things that our parents were passionate about…college sports. It’s going to still take another generation for this change to happen completely and I wonder if it will ever happen. We are college sports crazy in the south. Fans will drive an hour up 316 than around the corner to a game. Just who we are.

ATL Observer

June 2nd, 2011
11:25 am

@Mark in ATL, valid point, problem is: ownership didn’t nothing to rectify that situation. Part of the plan should have been for Thrashers’ ownership to take an active role in advocating rink construction across the state. That was never done. Dallas did it (and tell me that Dallas is a cold weather, non-football town) and the results speak for themselves: their team stayed. Tampa Bay has weathered some storms and their franchise is stable.

Making a pro sports team, but esp. hockey, takes WORK beyond just selling the tickets and fielding the team!

re: the AAA question, maybe it’s something more like “not quite AAA, not quite top of the line.” Atlanta occupies a weird middle space, it’s not really like most cities in the U.S.

ATL Observer

June 2nd, 2011
11:25 am

Obviously, I meant to say “did nothing” not “didn’t nothing!” :-p

ATLProSportsFan

June 2nd, 2011
11:42 am

Saying Atlanta is a better College Sports town rather than a ProSports town just make Atlanta look like a provincial minor league type of city on the world stage.

Dat just ain’t raight . . .

Go Falcons , Go Braves, Go Hawks(minus ASG)

Who cares about the football feeder teams of Dawgs, Tigers and YellowJacket bugs. Oh, my!!

not hocket

June 2nd, 2011
11:48 am

altlanta never has been and never will be a hockey town. It will not work in a city that is football oriented with a bunch of transplants living in suburbs. Quit wasting money getting these hockey franchises here run by morons.

RocketRichard

June 2nd, 2011
12:37 pm

Atlanta is a great sports town. What people dont realize about sports is that some of it is just pure plain luck. I would say that 98% of it is skill, but there is also the luck factor that factors in to the equation. Some things can be corrected and other things cannot be corrected. Ok in looking at the NBA finals and the current matchup between Dirk vs. LaBron AND D-Wade. Some folks think the Heat are guaranteed a title but they are not. If the Mavs play anywere close to how they played against the Lakers in the earlier round when they shot 70% from the field, and 90% from 3-point land, there is no defense that would be able to stop it. The Mavericks bench scored over 80 points on one game outscoring the Lakers entire team 89-82. Ive never seen that happen in professional basketball in any single game. Also in that game Jason Terry shot 9-10 beyond the 3-point line and Peja Stojakovich was 6-6 behind the circle. those two combined for 15-16 at the 3-point line. THAT IS SHOOTING LIGHTS OUT. If the Mavs can do that for four straight games against the Heat, the Heat will cool down and get eliminated. I just dont know if the Mavs can dial it in and focus on scoring the basketball at will like they did in the Laker series. Also, the Mavs cant allow the Heat to go up 2-0 or else the series will be over. How about Shaquille O’Neal announcing his retirement after game 1 of the finals so that SHAQS CAREER WILL OVERSHADOW THE FINALS. Shaq is such a selfish dog that he couldnt wait two more weeks after the finals to announce his retirement. He had to announce it now so that he would grab the spotlight and take it away from the Mavs and Heat. I’m glad shaq will be gone from the game because his IQ has always been about a -197.

Rick

June 2nd, 2011
12:51 pm

Rick from the outpost (Winnipeg) here. Your State population is about 10,000,000…10 times the province of Manitoba. A funny thing happened on the way to an NHL franchise. NHL players born in Georgia = 3. NHL players born in Manitoba = 359. It’s a religion up here in the Great White North. At best, it’s (was) a fad down there in Hotlanta. We used to have a junior hockey team here called the Winnipeg Braves…long before you got your MLB team from MIlwaukee. How ironic…The Winnipeg Braves. Instead of the old Winnipeg Jets whiteouts, we could start something called the Tomahawk Chop. Wudaya think?

LordStanley

June 2nd, 2011
1:38 pm

Even if Atlanta has dropped to the triple A of sports, I want to post this blog to show everyone the titles that the Atlanta sports franchises COULD HAVE and SHOULD have won. It wont make anyone feel any better, but it will just show WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN had these teams not blown it:
1980-Atlanta Falcons-BEST TEAM IN THE NFL ACCORDING TO RANDY WHITE
1988-Atlanta Hawks–POTENTIAL CHAMPIONS OF THE WORLD (lost game 7 by 1)
1991-Atlanta Braves–potential world champions (lost to minnesota)
1996-Atlanta Braves–back-to-back world champions (led the yanks 2-0)
1998-Atlanta Falcons-Beat Minnesota in NFC Title game
2010-Atlanta Braves–potential World champions (lost to SF in playoff)
2008-Atlanta Thrashers-lost in playoffs after deep run
2011-Atlanta Hawks–came within 2 wins of Eastern Conference Finals

All of the above atlanta teams SHOULD HAVE WON WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS. They choked in the playoffs and lost to inferior teams. Had they all won, people would be feeling different about these teams and the city that they live in.

Anonymous

June 2nd, 2011
2:30 pm

LordStanley, check your facts. The Thrashers made the playoffs in 2006, not 2008, and got swept in the first round. Hardly a “deep” run.

Besides, the fan base was tiny. Even perennial losers can draw fans in the NHL- something that can be said for no other sport, ESPECIALLY not ones played in Atlanta where even the best teams get no support because Mark Ingram isn’t coaching and Dale Earnhardt, Jr. isn’t driving. The Flames were a good team, and better for the move- When the new Winnipeg team brings home a Cup I’ll call it justice. No city should ever lose two NHL teams- but there should never have been a second franchise in Atlanta.

ATL Observer

June 2nd, 2011
2:30 pm

I can kinda agree with hotnocket. Over 96% of Winnipeg’s “metro” population is contained within the city proper, not so for Atlanta (F*#@* everybody lives in Gwinnett!). Until the transit gets up to code here and the state actually copes with the idea of a real CITY being a good thing, it’s always gonna lag here.

Anonymous

June 2nd, 2011
2:31 pm

Scratch that- Mark Ingram isn’t running the ball, not coaching.

LordStanley

June 2nd, 2011
3:07 pm

Anonymous: YOU ARE WRONG, ONCE AGAIN. Ok, I got my year wrong about the Thrashers and their deep run, but there was one year that the Thrashers were in the playoffs that they came one series short of the conference finals. Whatever year that was, the Thrashers DOMINATED the best teams in the league. That alone tells me that they were capable of winning a stanley cup that year. That was the only point I was trying to prove. Also, if it was the year that Heatley and Kovulchuk were both on the squad, then that was a potential stanley cup championship year. I am right on the money as I always am.

The Truth

June 2nd, 2011
4:30 pm

WOW Lord Stanley

You memory is a bit off

The Atlanta Thrashers 2006–07 season began with the highest expectations in franchise history, even with the offseason loss of their second leading scorer, Marc Savard to the Boston Bruins. Veteran center, Steve Rucchin, Niko Kapanen and Jon Sim were acquired in hopes help fill the Savard loss. With NHL superstars Marian Hossa and Ilya Kovalchuk and a healthy goaltender, Kari Lehtonen, the Thrashers clinched the first playoff berth and won the Southeast Division, claiming the #3 seed and home-ice advantage in the first round of the playoffs. However, they were eliminated from the playoffs on April 18, being swept by the New York Rangers in four straight games in the Conference Quarterfinals.

Go Jets Go!!!

June 2nd, 2011
8:33 pm

I’m sorry but despite its huge population, Atlanta is just not a sports town, unless you are talkin’ NASCAR or the Dawgs. Just look at the facts, Over the past decade, despite population growth, the Thrashers have been in the bottom three for attendance. That is with ticket prices in the bottom half of the league. The Hawks have been the WORST supported franchise in the NBA over the past decade and that is with prices 20% below the league average. Even the braves, who have won 4 pennants and a wild card in the last decade are a middle of the pack team in terms of attendance, and that is despite the second cheapest tickets in the league. Face it, Atlanta doesn’t give its sports teams a fair chance!!!

You can make fun of winnipeg as much as you want, but, they will have sold out ALL of the available season tickets come Saturday for the next 4 years (I might add those tickets are the 5th highest cost in the league). Not bad for a town with a couple of doughnut shops Eh???

GO JETS GO!!!

(Maybe you can get the Coyotes when they leave next year)

LordStanley

June 3rd, 2011
1:26 pm

THE THRASHERS COULD HAVE HAD A SIMILAR HISTORY TO THAT OF THE NEW YORK ISLANDERS. Maybe I got a little carried away and the disappointment of the Thrashers leaving town still lingers, but I knew that the Trashers had two hall-of-fame calibre SUPERSTARS in Danny Heatley and Illya Kovulchuk. I understand they played together during Kovulchuks rookie season and then Heatley was traded for Hossa. My point I was trying to make was if we could have kept Marc Savard and acquired Hossa, without giving up Heatley and if Heatley could have stayed in atlanta coupled with acquiring Kovulchuk, then you would have had Savard, Kovulchuk, Heatley and Hossea and I believe with the aggregation of those talented hockey players coupled with the supporting cast, THE THRASHERS WOULD HAVE HAD THE POTENTIAL TO WIN 4 STANLEY CUPS WITH THAT AGGREGATION OF TALENT. THAT WAS MY ONLY POINT THAT I WAS TRYING TO MAKE BUT I TOOK A ROUNDABOUT WAY OF GETTING TO IT.

rc35

June 4th, 2011
10:22 am

After all the time the Thrashers spent in town, the only one I could name was Danny Heatley–and that was because of the driving tragedy, not really hockey. On the other hand, I still remember Ray Comeau and Tom Lysiak from the old Atlanta Flames, not to mention their unforgettable coach, “Boom-Boom Geoffrion.”. Those guys went out of their way to make an impact on the community. I always felt like the Thrashers just sort of skated through town as if they were changing planes at Hartsfield.

Blue Flame

June 4th, 2011
11:22 am

To stay on the topic at hand…
Yes, Atlanta is a second rate sports town, and it hurts me to say so, since I grew up in Georgia, have lived here most of my life, and have supported Atlanta teams for decades. I was a big Thrashers fan, and seeing them leave town has made me realize that there is no more room for excuses.

I mean no disrespect to anyone, and I hope no one is offended by my comments. But to categorize local sports fan is not that difficult. The majority of them are from other places and remain loyal to other teams in other cities. I wish they would embrace Atanta’s teams as well, but most of them choose not to. As for the homegrown fans, for whatever reasons (regional pride, longing for the good old days), they prefer amateur sports, especially amateur football, to professional sports. Most of them don’t associate themselves with the city of Atlanta until it is convenient (Olympics, Super Bowl). The fact is, as has been stated earlier by others, the one team in Atlanta that is embraced by fans and the media, and also has a real national identity is the Braves. And it is likely to remain that way, at least until the Falcons win a Super Bowl.

As a mature sports fan, I suggest that one should enjoy each game for what it is, without worrying about the long term ramifications. Enjoy the ride and when the train reaches the station, get off.
I, for one, will miss the Thrashers. And as far as Atlanta being a second rate sports town, well that’s okay too.

D-Man

June 4th, 2011
12:25 pm

Braves haven’t done much in over a decade. Falcons fans still routinely walk out at half-time. Hawks will always be an also-ran at best. Regardless of what ‘ur pappy told ya, NASCAR is NOT a sport. Soccer? Did someone actually say Soccer? This isn’t the rest of the world, it’s the US, so Soccer is not a major league sport here. College football…my favorite. Most of the fans didn’t even graduate high school, much less go to the school for the team they seem so rabidly to root for. To answer the question, was Atlanta ever a contender for a sports town? Obviously not…

Smart Goat

June 4th, 2011
1:28 pm

Season tickets in Winnipeg went on sale to the general public today at noon. Sold out in 13 minutes. Your Thrashers are in very good hands, Atlanta!!!! Woot!! Woot!!!

anonuser

June 4th, 2011
6:31 pm

I was born in San Diego, California and I grew up in Deep South Texas, never more than 30 miles frm the Mexican border. I have no northern ties. I love hockey. Just sayin.

yearofthedawg

June 5th, 2011
2:26 pm

I’ll believe hockey is a major sport when the NHL finals are on TV in prime time on a real network. Don’t get me wrong, I like hockey. But the interest in many markets is tepid at best, so losing a bad NHL franchise doesn’t demote the city to AAA.

dd

June 5th, 2011
6:41 pm

how many seats does phillips arena have since they do concerts and circus since most hockey places have maybe 15000 seats?? Also why isn’t the mayor, governor or Waddell taking Nhl to court for overridding their own bylaws. I thought the team should be here another year if you go by the NHL RULES.

the gooch

June 6th, 2011
10:53 am

here come the rednecks. “Thrashers we hatem yuk yuk yuk.”

LordStanley

June 7th, 2011
1:09 pm

I hate the fact that the Thrashers are gone, but I will maintain as long as I live that had not been for an incredible ATLANTA CURSE coupled with an incredible amount of BAD LUCK, the Atlanta Thrashers, in my opinion, would have won at least FOUR STANLEY CUPS. I am sure and positive that would have happened had Danny Heatley and his friend not gotten into their car accident killing Snyder, then the fans of Atlanta wouldnt have run Heatley out of town because Heatley would have stayed if he werent being bashed incessently 24/7/365. Had the car accident never occurred, then as Illya Kovulchuk developed into a SUPERSTAR maybe after his second season, you would have seen potentially the SECOND HIGHEST SCORING LINE OF KOVULCHUK–HEATLEY, SECOND ONLY TO Jari KURRI AND WAYNE GRETSGY. Future Hall of famers Heatley and Kovulchuk would have teamed up to give us a scoring line that strikes and scores as fast as lightning. That would have been something else to behold and Im sure the Thrashers would have won the cups to prove just how special it was. Oh well, all we can do now is dream about it–WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN!

J

June 7th, 2011
4:21 pm

wow, these arguments i’m reading on here are piss poor … it shows that this town is full of complete idiots when it comes to analyzing sports & the economic impact created by sports teams. Did any of you fools even think how many transplants are here from the North who love hockey? Yeah, they may not be Thrashers fans and they won’t show up for the Thrashers rally but they throw good money at the team. Also, think about big sporting events here that attract people to come down for the games. That also has an impact on local businesses. To sit here and say the South doesn’t care about hockey b/c we are all NASCAR/College Football fans is ignorant and stupid. Goes to show you haven’t been to a game to experience it yourself. People talk about the Hawks not getting past the second round but yet 5 years ago, people were complaining the Hawks sucked and could never win games. They get to the playoffs (which is rare for any Atlanta now, other than the Dream) and you people still bitch. Same with the Braves … Braves were always in the hunt but people still weren’t attending the playoff games. This city makes me sick sometimes. Stop bitching and learn your facts. Those UGA fans who know nothing other than UGA football and comment as so, can suck this left one.

J

June 7th, 2011
4:30 pm

Fyi – i’m an Atlanta native & i’ve about had it with you ignorant UGA football fans. Curbside diploma??? It amazes me that 75% of the people that respond to any blog have UGA or dawg somewhere in their name. Do you have jobs??? You’re about as smart as my left nut, and that’s saying a lot.

For you UGA Grads, that comment doesn’t pertain to you ;)

J

June 7th, 2011
4:30 pm

And you winnipeg pricks, while i salute you on getting our talented young roster, stay the “F” off our blogs.

LordStanley

June 8th, 2011
12:15 pm

The question was asked, “What will you remember about the Trashers?” My answer to that is that the Thrashers were lucky enough to have two of potentially the greatest talented players in NFL history! Illya Kovulchuk and Danny Heatley. Had those two played together for at least a decade, the Thrashers would have EASILY WON MULTIPLE STANLEY CUPS! That is what I will miss about the Thrashers.