SEC media days: Hey, who let the BCS in here?

This is Bill Hancock of the BCS. He told us a few jokes.

This is Bill Hancock of the BCS. He told us a few jokes.

HOOVER, Ala. — Let me start by saying that I really like Bill Hancock. He has worked for the USOC for several past Olympics (summer and winter) that I’ve covered and he’s one of the few individuals a media person can always count on to get information and help cut through international red tape on issues.

But Hancock now is a likable guy with a thankless job: He is the executive director of the BCS.

Nothing stirs the masses like a power point. (Yawn.)

Nothing stirs the masses like a power point. (Yawn.)

I believe his second choice for employment was environmental spokesperson for BP.

Hancock opened SEC media days with a 15-minute power point presentation. He started with an unintended joke: “I’m going to tell you how [the BCS] works and why it works.”

He went on to talk about how college football “never has been more popular.” And, “Since the BCS was created, attendance and TV ratings have soared.” And (this might be my favorite): “We have the best sport, hands down. Why monkey with that?”

See, here’s the problem: Logic screams that college football has grown in spite of the BCS, not because of it.

The growth of college football can be traced to an increased presence on television, more dollars flowing into the sport than ever before and more higher profile coaches elevating programs to the stature of small nations or major corporations.

The fact college football has a flawed postseason system has nothing to do with its boom.

So I asked Hancock: What tells him that the BCS is directly responsible for college football’s growth?

His answer: “That’s a good question. That’s one of the things I thought about during my run this morning. I don’t think there’s a lot of intuitive evidence, hard evidence [that the two are related]. But attendance did begin to rise when the BCS was formed. Could it have been a coincidence? It could have. But we know the game has become much more of a national game because of the BCS. It’s not fair for us to take all of the credit for everything or get all of the blame for everything. But I don’t think it was just a coincidence.”

I’ll give him credit for a creative, albeit vague, answer.

But for what it’s worth, after his power point and a brief Q-and-A, I’m not sure that he convinced anybody in the room.

Previous SEC/Georgia posts

We’re LIVE at SEC media days (with no shortage of storylines)

NCAA reportedly investigating Florida (but temper excitement)

Can Dogs end Alabama-Florida monopoly in SEC title game?

Listen up, Ole Miss: I’ve got Colonel Reb’s replacement

Follow me on Twitter @JeffSchultzAJC and Facebook.com/JeffSchultzAJC

110 comments Add your comment

HOUDAWG

July 21st, 2010
5:47 pm

Incredible that Hancock tried to take credit (on BCS behalf) for the popularity explosion of college football. As so many others have stated here ……. IT’S TV ……. ratings and $$$$ ! No rocket science here ……..

And the commish comment regarding Kiffin ……. just priceless ! Don’t ya know he’s glad to get that punk out of the SEC ……

Chris

July 21st, 2010
5:49 pm

Jeff…that is why I wanted the Big 12 to implode and the Super Conferences to be formed. I think it would have forced College Football to bring in a playoff.

BravesFan79

July 21st, 2010
5:52 pm

Whats the point of having the “best regular season in sports”, when it only leads to the Worst postseason in sports!? The stupidity of the BCS is equal to baseball canceling the World Series so that teams like the Nationals and Cubs could play a “exhibition” game after the season.

[...] ♦ SEC media days: Hey, who let the BCS in here? [...]

Mike Smith

July 21st, 2010
6:11 pm

Excellent article, Jeff. I’m glad you asked that question about the BCS. The BCS had a goal that college football has outgrown. That goal is put the top 2 teams together. Too many years under the old poll system, there would be a clearly perceived top 2 that couldn’t play each other.

Well, that clearly is not the case anymore. Maybe it never was. Conferences are not equal in strength nor are schedules even among teams in the same conference. Oddly enough, I think the BCS exposed this more by getting the top 2 together. We can now see overrated teams playing in weaker conferences on weaker schedules get exposed.

The reason a playoff is needed is well, who do you replace the overrated media hype teams with? You have too many to choose from. The BCS exposed the flaw in everyone’s thinking and ironically showed how it is inadequate at the same time.

[...] ♦ SEC media days: Hey, who let the BCS in here? [...]

[...] ♦ Bill Hancock, executive director of the BCS, did a power point presentation, attempting to sell the world on why the BCS is such a great thing. Half the people in the room didn’t believe him. The other half were asleep. Here’s the link to the story. [...]

Tech Fan Since 1950

July 22nd, 2010
10:29 am

It comes down to this comparison: March Madness (playoff) vs January Foolishness!

[...] ♦ SEC media days: Hey, who let the BCS in here? [...]

[...] ♦ SEC media days: Hey, who let the BCS in here? [...]