Thrashers make changes, but did they go far enough? (UPDATED)

Hiring John Anderson was one of Don Waddell's many miscalculations. (Jessica McGowan/AJC)

Hiring John Anderson was one of Don Waddell's many miscalculations. (Jessica McGowan/AJC)

(Updated below with Rick Dudley quotes)

The man who has been in charge of hockey in Atlanta from day one (and failed) now has an even better title with less responsibility.

His close friend is now the general manager.

Together, they will try to set direction and hire a new coach.

What’s wrong with this picture?

Change is good. Change is needed. Change is the only thing that gives the Thrashers a chance for success and hockey an extended lifeline in Atlanta.

But did the Atlanta Spirit go far enough? Or did ownership just make the easiest, most convenient and least expensive fixes it could make, hoping that this all works out?

Let me start with this: Rick Dudley has a pretty solid reputation as a personnel guy. He acquired several of the players in Tampa Bay that ultimately led to the Lightning winning the Stanley Cup (though he wanted to trade Vincent Lecavalier, which ultimately led to him resigning before the title season). He did good work in Ottawa and Chicago.

But fixing everything here will be a chore. Under Waddell, there has been no consistency in objective or design. The pieces seldom fit. It’s not that every draft and every trade failed. There just seldom seemed to be a plan about what kind of team he was trying to put together. If there was a plan, it wasn’t working.

Worst of all, nobody seemed to care.

Great sports teams have a level of accountability – from owner to general manager, GM to coach, coach to player. This franchise lacks it. It was illustrated again this week when Waddell, in summing up the Thrashers’ ninth playoff-less season in 10 years and scrambling for something positive to say, uttered: “I think we did make some strides this year. I know we’ve heard that before, but we did finish above .500, which is something we haven’t been able to do.”

He should know better. The Thrashers’ record of 35-34-13 ranked 23rd in the NHL and, in reality, was anything but above .500. That third category in the NHL standings is a loss category, for overtimes and shootouts. If the Thrashers were above .500, then 23 of 30 teams were above .500.

Is that the standard now?

There are several problems here, problems bigger than the names on the door. Here are three:

♦ Player development is a problem because of the Thrashers’ dysfunctional relationship with their minor-league affiliate, the Chicago Wolves (AHL). The Thrashers don’t operate the Wolves. Their owner, Don Levin, is  more concerned about winning games than helping develop players the right way for Atlanta.

♦ Coach John Anderson had to go. He’s a nice guy but he was hired on the cheap. It was obvious at the time, even if ownership and blind Thrashers’ loyalists refused to acknowledge it. He’s not an NHL coach and proved it. There have long been rumors about the Club Med atmosphere around the team under Anderson. Bob Hartley never should have been fired. The problem wasn’t Hartley, it was the players in the locker room. Dudley/Waddell need an experienced coach, a proven winner, with an edge. The team lacks discipline and structure.

♦ I want to see ownership make a true commitment. If it takes money to turn the Thrashers into a winner – be it with a coaching hiring, a free agent signing or improving scouting and player development – let’s see it. There’s a reason the good teams are always good and the Thrashers are always the Thrashers.

Give Dudley credit: at least he understands the issues. When asked about the team’s attendance problems and rumors of a franchise move, he said, “In Chicago that first year, I think I could shake hands with everybody in the crowd. Now you can’t get in. You can’t sell tickets to a bad product.”

Regarding the team’s on-ice fortunes this year and next, he said: “We thought we should make the playoffs this year so obviously we think we should make the playoffs next year. I think we’re at a point now where we can evolve into something pretty good.”

He also believes the team needs to acquire a top-6 forward to make up for the loss of Ilya Kovalchuk.

If the Thrashers ultimately move, it won’t be because the sport failed, it will be because the franchise failed. There’s no reason for that to happen. There’s no reason stars like Kovalchuk or Marian Hossa should want to leave. There’s no reason a team should be turned into a cartoon by bringing in a relic like Chris Chelios.

Change is needed. We’ll see if this was enough.

160 comments Add your comment

LAC

April 15th, 2010
6:37 am

One last thing… did you hear what Mr.POTTY MOUTH levenson said about waddell, made me throw up ! He needs to go to a mental hospital as well !

Jeff, any Hope to get a NEW Hockey beat writer who is NOT a tool of asg ?

This vilimore, whatever, is TERRIBLE and his coverage this season, as well as NOT addressing the fans demands, has been disgusting. Did you see his interview on the NJ TV side last week, he was SICK, studdering, could not answer direct questions and on and on.

Old Stan made him look like a complete FOOL. Please get a REAL hockey guy here and get rid of this moron, he is THE Worst in The NHL !

Jeff Schultz

April 15th, 2010
9:24 am

Brendan — I’m not aware of Dudley being pushed out of Chicago, though I’m sure his friendship with Don had a lot to do with him coming to Atlanta.

Jeff Schultz

April 15th, 2010
9:27 am

LAC — I haven’t read Levenson’s quotes, but I’ll check them out. … And I think you’re being too hard on Chris.

I. McNugget

April 15th, 2010
10:03 am

John Anderson is a good coach, Atlanta will never know it until he’s hired by a team that will give him players to work with. A coach is only as good as his players. It’s cheaper to fire a coach than all the players! As far as Chicago is concerned, they have very good players there, they constantly are in the playoffs and win championships. Atlanta just chooses to not use them. Yes the team needs to do better scouting and signing but don’t blame it on Chicago. look at the Mighty Ducks, they don’t have an AHL team and they’re ok. Other NHL teams have weak AHL teams, why are they in the playoffs??? Wake up Atlanta!!!

Scottish Ale

April 15th, 2010
5:30 pm

Jeff,
I thought what you wrote about the Thrashers player development situation is spot on. I’ve been saying for years that the Thrashers don’t do enough to attract un-tapped regional fan interest. I really believe if the Thrashers were to move AHL squad to Birminham, Ala., they would be marketing to a regional fanbase that might actually begin following the Thrashers (after college football obviously). Bham has 18,500 seat BJCC and a large metro area with hockey history. It couldn’t hurt, could it?

Brendan

April 15th, 2010
11:42 pm

Jeff, I definitely agree with you there, that Waddell’s friendship and long history of working with Dudley, brought Rick Dudley here. But, I had heard that the whole Stan Bowman and Scotty Bowman thing left Assistant Blackhawks GM Rick Dudley out of the picture for possible GM successorship in Chicago. Whereas, the Associate GM position in Atlanta, working with his friend Don Waddell, could lead to Dudley becoming the GM. Which now has happened.

[...] have been fired as coach of the Atlanta Thrashers.  Jeff Schultz, another columnist for the AJC, maintains that the players in the locker room tuned him out and were responsible for the slow start ……to which I wholeheartedly agree.  Do I see Hartley return behind Atlanta’s bench?  I [...]

[...] Contratación de John Anderson fue uno de los errores de cálculo muchas Don Waddell. (Jessica McGowan / AJC) (Actualizado a continuación con Rick cita Dudley) El hombre que ha estado a cargo del hockey en Atlanta desde el primer día (y no) tiene ahora un título mejor incluso con menos responsabilidad. Su mejor amigo, es ahora el gerente general . Juntos, tratarán de establecer la dirección y contratar a un nuevo entrenador. ¿Qué hay de malo en esta imagen? El cambio es bueno. El cambio es necesario. El cambio es lo único que da la Thrashers una oportunidad para el éxito y el hockey sobre una línea de vida extendida en Atlanta. ¿Pero el Espíritu Atlanta va lo suficientemente lejos? ¿O es que la propiedad sólo hacer más fácil, más conveniente y menos costosa fija que podría hacer, con la esperanza de que todo esto funciona? Permítanme empezar con esto: Rick Dudley tiene una sólida reputación como un tipo muy personal. Adquirió varios de los jugadores de Tampa Bay que en última instancia condujo a los Rayos de ganar la Copa Stanley (si quisiera comercio Vincent Lecavalier, que al final llevó a … URL del artículo original http://blogs.ajc.com/jeff-schultz-blog/2010/04/14/thrashers-make-changes-but-did-they-go-far-enough/... [...]

[...] Embauchent John Anderson a été l'une des erreurs de calcul de nombreux Don Waddell. (Jessica McGowan / AJC) (mise à jour ci-dessous avec des citations Dudley Rick) L'homme qui a été en charge du hockey à Atlanta d'un jour (ou négatif), dispose désormais d'un meilleur titre, même avec moins de responsabilités. Son ami est maintenant le directeur général . Ensemble, ils vont essayer de régler la direction et d'embaucher un nouvel entraîneur. Quel est le problème avec cette photo? Le changement est bon. Le changement est nécessaire. Le changement est la seule chose qui donne les Thrashers d'une chance de succès et de hockey sur une ligne de vie prolongée à Atlanta. Mais est-ce l'Esprit Atlanta va pas assez loin? Ou bien la propriété juste faire le plus facile, plus pratique et moins chère fixe qu'elle pourrait apporter, en espérant que tout cela fonctionne à? Permettez-moi de commencer par ceci: Rick Dudley a une solide réputation jolie comme un gars du personnel. Il a acquis plusieurs des acteurs de Tampa Bay qui a finalement conduit à la foudre remporter la Coupe Stanley (s'il voulait le commerce Vincent Lecavalier, qui a finalement abouti à … URL article original: http://blogs.ajc.com/jeff-schultz-blog/2010/04/14/thrashers-make-changes-but-did-they-go-far-enough/... [...]

[...] Jeff Schultz chimes in  Schultz has a few concerns, even with the shuffling of names & positions. [...]