Georgia Tech wins, but this was nothing to celebrate

nesbittTD

Josh Nesbitt had an early 4-yard touchdown run to get Georgia Tech going. Nesbitt ran for two scores and threw for two more, but it turned out to not be such an easy night.

NASHVILLE — When a team has won five straight, launched itself into the BCS bowl picture and generally has left the impression it will skate through the “Nerders Row” portion of its schedule — Virginia, Vanderbilt, Wake Forest, Duke — it doesn’t expect to have games like this.

Georgia Tech defeated Vanderbilt on Saturday night 56-31.  Looks one-sided. It wasn’t. Nor should it have been this sloppy or this difficult.

Expectations on North Avenue suddenly are meteoric. Maybe the altitude got to be too much.

It’s all still sitting there for the Yellow Jackets, everything they could possibly  have wanted when this season began. A double-digit win total. An ACC championship. A BCS bowl game. A top-10 ranking. A second season under Paul Johnson to reaffirm that the first season under Paul Johnson wasn’t nearly a fluke.

But this game was a not-so-subtle reminder that there’s still the possibility of the bottom falling out. Vanderbilt entered this game with a 2-6 record. Its only victories had come over Western Carolina and Rice — and they don’t really count.

But where was this game at halftime? Tied at 28-28. When the Commodores drove to a field goal on their first possession of the second half, they led 31-28.

How bad should the Jackets feel about that? Bad enough to inch toward the balcony and maybe seek therapy.

In Vandy’s six previous losses, the Commodores totaled 9, 3, 7, 13 (that against Army, and only because of a field goal in overtime), 10 and 10. One of those 10’s came against the Bulldogs. So you need not wonder why Tech defensive coordinator Dave Wommack is as unpopular on The Flats as Willie Martinez is in Athens.

If the Jackets don’t want to concern themselves with impressing poll voters, that’s one thing. But they can’t give up an 80-yard kickoff return or a 62-yard touchdown run, as they did Saturday night, and expect to skate again. They can’t assume any of their remaining opponents will implode the way Vandy did.

Because there’s only one Vandy.

Jonathan Dwyer gave Tech a 35-31 lead late in the third quarter with a 3-yard touchdown run. Then Vanderbilt turned back into Vanderbilt.

On the ensuing possession, running back Jamie Graham fumbled on the Commodores’ 19-yard line. (It was one of three Vandy fumbles.) Two plays later, Dwyer was in the end zone again from 3 yards out and suddenly it was 42-31 after two touchdowns in a span of 40 seconds.

Early in the fourth quarter, quarterback Josh Nesbitt connected with Embry Peeples for an 87-yard score, and the game looked like a rout. But for most of the night, it wasn’t.

It would be overstating things to suggest this was an “escape.” It was more like a reminder.

After a string of impressive conference victories over Florida State, Virginia Tech and Virginia — two of those coming on the road — expectations surrounding this program skyrocketed. The Jackets had the look of  a team that was together and focused, that was following their coach, that seemingly would not be derailed in this home stretch.

Even coach Paul Johnson, while stating he believed Vanderbilt was better than its record indicated, did not anticipate any sort of a letdown. When asked earlier in the week about playing a non-conference game against a lesser opponent, he said: “I think our football team, to be a special one, has to go out and want to win every game. … I’m not worried about [a letdown]. I hope our guys are mature enough to realize that Vanderbilt is a good football team. We’re playing against the SEC. We’re not supposed to be able to compete. It’s a chance for our guys to match up with [an SEC team] again.”

Except that when you think, hear and see Vanderbilt, you don’t think, hear or see SEC. You see a small stadium that’s one-third empty on a campus where football doesn’t matter

It matters again at Tech. When you stumble, everybody notices.

469 comments Add your comment

Kurdt Kobain

October 31st, 2009
11:31 pm

This is the most doomy, pessimistic article I have ever read about a 25 point win. Yes, the first half sucked. Yes, the 2nd half was a rout as it should have been. Wouldn’t call this game a “stumble”.

jabster

October 31st, 2009
11:34 pm

The D needs to quit taking half the ballgame off and play the whole ballgame. Whatever CPJ told them at halftime, they need to take that to heart as soon as toe meets leather for the rest of the season.

stiggywiggy

October 31st, 2009
11:35 pm

Good insightful column. Maybe I should un-cancel my subscription to the AJC, which I canceled after your Limbaugh column (which somehow disappeared).

Tech’s defense sucks, but these days their offense appears unstoppable. What was Mark Bradley smoking last August?

Starring Ted Knight as Judge Smales

October 31st, 2009
11:37 pm

Agree with you Jeff. There was NO EXCUSE for that 1st half effort. Tech should have played the WHOLE GAME the way they played in the 2nd half. It is disappointing to see the defense get torched in the first half on several occasions. However, I am thankful that adjustments are made in the second half, but I would like to see a complete effort in BOTH halves. These efforts give CPJ ammunition to keep the team grounded, but 28 POINTS TO VANDY IN THE FIRST HALF. Totally UNACCEPTABLE, but will take the win.

jacketbacker

October 31st, 2009
11:37 pm

Defense has to play better but the O was fantastic!!…..Bottom line, its a win on the road and we move on……We just scored 56 points on a SEC team that gave up only 14 to USC the week before….Gooooo Jackets!!!!!!

calvin

October 31st, 2009
11:37 pm

Poor Jeff Schultz. His favourite team in Georgia lost
today, so he had to lash out at somebody.

GTJay

October 31st, 2009
11:38 pm

I agree with Kurdt–way to look at the glass as half-empty, Jeff. I certainly wouldn’t call 56 points and 600 total yards (and another domination in time of possession) a “stumble”.

Brock

October 31st, 2009
11:38 pm

Jeff-it wasn’t one sided? Did you see the second half? Have you seen total yards by Tech?(600) Did you see time of posession?

GT Mom

October 31st, 2009
11:38 pm

I think GT is the “Rodney Dangerfield” of college football. Doesn’t seem to matter what they do – they get no respect. I have to watch most games with the sound muted because I can’t stand the one-sided commentators. Only Raycom seems to do a good job of having balanced commentators. But I love watching ‘em – it’s always exciting!

durden

October 31st, 2009
11:39 pm

A tipped pass that just happened to land in a Vandy receiver’s hands and a failed pooch kick returned for a TD by one of the best kick returners in the nation are what kept them in the game. Nesbitt has started to figure out the passing game. It looked as though PJ wanted to give him a chance to practice it even when the score was close, and while it cost them some 3-and-Outs early, it paid off in the end. Thats the kind of confidence he has in this team’s ability to score and hold when it matters.
Yes, the D relies on the O to eat up time, but they seem up to the task. This is a aggressive, ball hungry D that gets itself in trouble sometimes, but they have enough playmakers to win.
If GT’s “sloppy” and “difficult” wins are by 25 points, and they learn this much about themselves in the process, maybe they ARE that good.

TML

October 31st, 2009
11:40 pm

This game was a stumble…for the defense. We cannot play this way and expect to go 11-1. Dook may always be Dook, but they beat Virginia today and have a head of steam right now. And we have to go to Wallace Wade. Not to mention that we still have Wake – who gave Miami all they could handle today – in-between.

Don’t get me wrong. I said we’d go 11-1 5-6 weeks ago and I still believe that we will. But this wasn’t how to get to 8-1. CPJ will say the same. But we ARE there. And with the wailin’ and nashin’ of teeth going on in Athens AND THE AJC NEWSROOM right now, I’ll most definitely take it! :) I just hope the defense gets back to its Virginia-like play…rapidly.

Go Jackets!

Go get “Toe Meets Leather” – Scott Sisson’s game-winning FG against then-#1 Virginia in 1990 – at http://www.stinGTees.com RIGHT NOW!!!

Jackette

October 31st, 2009
11:40 pm

Yes the D needs work and have played better but Dwyer was outstanding as well as Nesbitt and Roddy Jones. One thing that Tech hasn’t had is a week off and they are beginning to look like they need it but it was a good wake up call to prepare for Wake who almost beat Miami. Need the 12th man at home again to support the Jackets and do not know if anyone is noticing but Duke is not the some old Duke. They are currently in 2nd place in Coastal and Jackets could use some support in Durham because if you want this championship, your going to have to fight for it fans included.

GT For You And Me

October 31st, 2009
11:42 pm

Jeff: we all knew this was going to be a let down game… GT made the adjustments at half time. As we all knew they would. That’s the game they needed for a let down…To remind them of what they have to lose with a possible loss to an inferior team. They realized that in the second half. We won,that is the bottom line!

Not Disappointed

October 31st, 2009
11:42 pm

Jeff, sounds like tuff love. I do agree. Sorry I didn’t get to see the first half.

Paul Johnson will get the team focused. He knows how to adjust. Good article Jeff.

Ramblin Wreck!

Andrew

October 31st, 2009
11:43 pm

I’ll take a D that takes the 1st half off and then shuts it down in the 2nd with an offense that drops 600 yards on a SEC team any day of the week. Was it pretty? No. Is it a 25 point victory? Yes. I can only hope hope the Mutts let Logan play the rest of their games.

Mike Lum

October 31st, 2009
11:44 pm

Tech fans can’t think these next three games will be a cakewalk. Like Paul Johnson says, they haven’t won nothing yet. The Vandy win could’ve been more impressive, but it’s hard to get up for every game. Next week Wake will be tough enough. Let’s take them one at a time. Wins don’t have to be impressive, but every big play the defense gives up makes it harder on the offense.

stiggywiggy

October 31st, 2009
11:44 pm

Just a few words to preclude the onslaught of inevitable comments from wound-licking, previously black-hatted dawgies: No need to tell us how bad your SEC representative, Vandy, sucks, and how our win was insignificant. We remember how you celebrated your own win which you pulled out in the 4th quarter in Nashville. And you obviously can’t compare our performance against Mississippi Stae with that of the TRUE SEC “cream-of-the-crop” teams, LSU and Florida. I guess you’ll have to resort to the old default position of muttering crap about nerds and slide rules. Enjoy your slide into Baylorville, dawgies. Wonder how many discared red and black flags are now floating in the Saint John’s River.

Jackets Keep Rollin'

October 31st, 2009
11:47 pm

Jeffy Downer, if the “dawgs” beat anyone 56-31, ran for over 400 yds and passed for another 200 you would declare them BCS champs. When the dawgs beat Vandy it counts as an SEC win…If you keep talking smack about the SEC, make sure you give TECH kudos for beating a team from the so called best conf.

Not a pretty win, but I’ll take it. Defense stepped up 2nd half. They scored off a fluke pass deflection and ran back a kick — whatever.

Has ANYONE score anything near 56 points on them this year?

Mike Lum

October 31st, 2009
11:48 pm

Hey reality check, that was no rout. Don’t know what game you watched. Tech scored 21 points off four Vandy fumbles. Without those, it’s a 4 point game (if my Tech calculus/math is right).

TechFan

October 31st, 2009
11:48 pm

Truthful Jeff. If our D could have played a complete game, I think Tech would have met the expectations people had going into this game.

We need more consistency out of our D and special teams before we start thinking about a top 10 ranking.

Go Jackets!

Kurdt Kobain

October 31st, 2009
11:48 pm

There’s no such thing as an impressive win over Vandy. GT could have won by a hundred and people would have said “Its just Vandy.”

So I’ll the 25 point win and move on. Maybe its not something to celebrate, but its certainly no reason to doubt this team.

Sandyspringsjacket

October 31st, 2009
11:49 pm

Defense is unimportant, the objective is to out score the other guy and squeeze the life out of them like a python with our offense. We just keep doing that we will be OK. I can not wait to squeeze the life out of the barkless leg humpers. Championships are great, but beating the douch bag dawgs is still the greatest of all to a true GT fan!

stiggywiggy

October 31st, 2009
11:49 pm

The funny thing is, even though Jeff Schulz is correct that the defense sucked, it was a rout, nevertheless. If the score and total yards and time of possession, don’t scream ROUT, I don’t know what does.

third quarter fan

October 31st, 2009
11:49 pm

Never was worried.

Starring Paul Johnson as Sheriff Buford Pusser

October 31st, 2009
11:50 pm

When we finally muster a defense that will play strongly the entire 60 minutes, the rest of the nation will be sucking hind tit.

go tech

October 31st, 2009
11:50 pm

Here’s the points Vandy’s vaunted SEC opponents scored against them:
Ole Miss 23
LSU 23
UGA 34
MSU 15
USC 14

And little GT from the ACC?

56 points!! That’s 56 points!

I’d say that’s a pretty good showing vs. the mighty SEC.

This column was written at halftime...

October 31st, 2009
11:50 pm

Jeff, had already made up his mind how this blog was going to be written at halftime, no matter to outcome of the game. Tech made the defensive adjustments and the offense rolled to a 25 piont win…

Kudzu

October 31st, 2009
11:51 pm

Shut Up! Idiot…

Cuz

October 31st, 2009
11:51 pm

Is there any reason to read this column? I just scrolled past.

Joe

October 31st, 2009
11:52 pm

Bottom line…good teams find a way to win. Tech won that is all that counts. Yes the defense was victimized by the option read from the quarterback. Its the same offense that Miss State runs and that gave us fits for a while too…..

Oh and a little reminder the Gators squeaked by last week only to stomp the Dogs these week.

I have pity for the team Tech plays a full 4 quarters against because it will get ugly for the other team. Go Jackets!!!

stiggywiggy

October 31st, 2009
11:54 pm

Give it up, people. It’s a hopeless cause. Trying to convince an SEC elitist-shill that his conference is not the equivalent of Mount Olympus is like trying to convince an aging, declining starlet that no one still looks at her body the way they used to.

Vonn

October 31st, 2009
11:55 pm

I’m just glad I had my big umbrella with me.

Jackets Keep Rollin'

October 31st, 2009
11:55 pm

Hey Mike Lum, did you know fumbles are part the of the game known as “American Football.” And points scored off fumbles actually count towards the final score, and outcome, of the game. Isn’t that a crazy fact. Yes, you should read up on the rules some time.

No extra points for black helmets though.

Jeff Schultz

October 31st, 2009
11:56 pm

Some of you folks are funny, to think I have some pro-Georgia agenda. You should talk to some readers on that campus, who think I’m pro-Tech.

Ross

October 31st, 2009
11:56 pm

Jesus Jeff, you need chill out. Playing at night up there can be an adventure. They annihilated them. Tech is apparently in very good shape physically because they are still jumping around and fresh at the end of every game (other than Miami). “Tech squeaks by Vandy with 7 TDs”. Whew!

-drl

Eddie Elisma

October 31st, 2009
11:56 pm

That D. Thomas has some ups. Almost as much as me, E^2!

CW

October 31st, 2009
11:57 pm

I swear, some of the fans on this blog need to grow up. Schultz didn’t insult your mothers, he said that Tech’s defense didn’t play very well and I happen to agree. The numbers don’t lie! Tech gave up a kick return for a TD and made Vandy’s offense look like a juggernaut on three first half drives.

The offense played great, but the next two weeks are going to be tough. When the D plays so poorly, it ultimately puts pressure on Nesbitt, Dwyer and company to score virtually every drive. So far, they’ve been up to the task, but we’ve got to stop giving up cheap touchdowns.

Kurdt Kobain

October 31st, 2009
11:57 pm

I don’t think you’re pro-GT. I just think you’re overreacting a bit to a shoddy first half, and not giving enough credit for a stellar second half.

Kurdt Kobain

October 31st, 2009
11:57 pm

pro-UGA that is. or pro-GT for that matter.

Ross

October 31st, 2009
11:58 pm

Someone on Bradley’s side suggested the Dogs would come out in the 3rd qtr with silver helmets and red pants. By the time we get them, their wardrobe will be exhausted. They players will complain because they’re all wearing the same dress. Tech will stick with white and gold I imagine.

-drl

Cuz

October 31st, 2009
11:59 pm

Before you Tech fans listen to a lot of krap about it was just Vandy, hear me out. Before today, Vandy had the fifth best defense in the SEC. Yeah they played Army, lost. And some directional school. But they only allowed 1.85 offensive touchdowns per game including the game with UGA. Do not listen to the krap that columnists and a few Dawg fans, okay many, will tell you. You have a dam good team. Keep rolling except for Thanksgiving weekend.

I keep up with SEC stats to see if Willie should be fired at the end of the year. He is toast according to my stats.

truth

November 1st, 2009
12:00 am

shultz off the mark here

Jeff Schultz

November 1st, 2009
12:00 am

“This column was written at halftime…” Hey, I wish. I could’ve taken the second half off.

FYI, 2 second half fumbles in a span of three minutes (late in third, early in fourth) led to 2 Tech touchdowns.

BG

November 1st, 2009
12:00 am

Jeff, you have watched GT games this year, right? Please tell me how this victory was any different from their other ones. Tech pounds away in the first half, without seeming to make a dent. And then the other team just falls flat and Tech runs all over them. Tech WEARS YOU DOWN. This was a good win against Vandy.

Sarge1

November 1st, 2009
12:00 am

Damn, Jeff, I thought Tech won. So now they can’t give up long scoring plays? They can’t get into a “shootout” which BTW they won? What was your point in all ther criticism? It certainly doesn’t dampen miy enjoyment of a nice win for Tech. Jeff, go soak your head in a pooch puddle and kiss CMR’s a** for all those Bulldog fans who, BTW, suffered through a beating administered by Florida.

What?

November 1st, 2009
12:01 am

A win is a win is a win! Was ugly for a while but when Florida or USC puts up 50+ “Oh the best team in the country..” no matter the opponet. At the end of the day it is a win..that is the objective, to win!

Cuz

November 1st, 2009
12:02 am

Dang skippy you are pro-Tech Jeff. You bald headed weasel. From one weasel to another, you smell worse, you Tech lover.

Jeff Schultz

November 1st, 2009
12:02 am

Ross–Pretty funny stuff on Georgia’s unis and helmets.

Kurdt Kobain

November 1st, 2009
12:02 am

When did forcing fumbles become a negative thing? As I recall, the Vandy players didn’t just drop the ball.

Procrastinator

November 1st, 2009
12:02 am

Jeff, maybe you should get a bullet proof vest, these people want to shoot the messenger!

stiggywiggy

November 1st, 2009
12:02 am

Jeff, I’ll defend you here. You have no Georgia agenda and no Tech agenda. You have a “bad-boy” journalism agenda. You can turn a sports phrase like Leonard of Leonard’s Loser’s, but in order to cultivate the “edgy” image you’re trying to achieve, you must stir stuff up. And what better way to stir, than with sarcastic anti-homer invective? Yeah, yeah. You’re “irascible.” A regular Lewis Grizzard with irony. We get it already.

Jackets Keep Rollin'

November 1st, 2009
12:03 am

Jeff, you know good and well if Vandy wins you would be touting this as an SEC team beating an ACC team. I can see the awful article already.

Because TECH put 56 on Vandy (and I know they are an SEC team, because Georgia sure does count their win over Vandy as and SEC win), you are downplaying the dores.

Another sad, bitter article from a sad, bitter man. Go put your black helmet on buddy.

Cuz

November 1st, 2009
12:04 am

Sarge, it was not suffering. It was full torture. Me and my Dawgs want a rest at Gitmo.

Ross

November 1st, 2009
12:04 am

Jeff – someone should get them matching handbags.

-drl

Cuttysark

November 1st, 2009
12:04 am

Yes the defense and kicking game gave up a couple of touchdowns, but the offense rolled for almost 600 yards and put up 56 points on an SEC defense that was giving up 17 points per game. I’ll take the 25 point win and move on to play Wake next week.

Go to http://isportsweb.com for a review of the game on Sunday afternoon. Go Jackets!

Jeff Schultz

November 1st, 2009
12:04 am

BG — Defense has been a problem all season, you’re right. But this was Vandy. VANDY. Did you see their point totals before this game? Plus, Jackets had played so well in last 3 games — and yes, even better defensively.

Eric L Jones

November 1st, 2009
12:05 am

Is it funny to anyone else that Jeff Schultz is so insecure that he reads (and comments on) comments to his column?

Dude, decaf. Get some.

Hey

November 1st, 2009
12:05 am

Rush Limbaugh is a moron.

Andy Johnson

November 1st, 2009
12:05 am

I’m a graduate of GT and a GT football fan for 45 years. But I shut the TV off at halftime. This was the most embarrassing defensive GT team I have ever seen take the field. They looked like highschoolers out there. And the special teams? How is it that we seem to give up a kickoff runback every game, yet we have gone without one now for 140 games……probably a world’s record. And the kicking team? Half the high schools in Georgia have a kicker who can kick it farther. Dave Wommack has got to show me a lot more to stay at GT. It’s good that the offense can outscore opponents, because that is the only way we can win!

whats up with that?

November 1st, 2009
12:05 am

now that it is all over but the crying do you think Mr. College Football and the rest of the AJC sportswriters ocan take a look at GT’s Johnathon Dwyer as a Heisman candidate? 180 yds rushing tonight against Vandy, but nooooooooo all Barnhart can talk about is Spiller of Clemson..how bout getting your head out of Georgia’s behind and give Dwyer some favor..The ESPN announcers of the game said they felt GT was the best one loss team in the country, funny that national media starting to see it but not Mr. College Football blind as a goat in a hailstorm..any support from local media would be appreciated even though the nation will make up their minds without it

Jeff Schultz

November 1st, 2009
12:06 am

Procrastinator — No kidding. But seriously, I have no problem with some people having different opinions. Just keep it clean, and understand that I really don’t have a dog in this hunt. (And no, I don’t mean dog as in Georgia.)

TechMD

November 1st, 2009
12:07 am

The offense looks great, as usual but the defense took a big step backward in the first half. We’re not too bad on the fundamentals, tackling etc but we seem out of position at times. I’m not sure whether that is play calling or player responsibilities but we need the defense to perform better than that with consistency. I’m confident Johnson will get it fixed but I hope it’s this year and not next year.

Jeff Schultz

November 1st, 2009
12:08 am

Eric L — Insecure? I’m supposed to read comments and respond. It’s called interaction. It’s encouraged by both my bosses and my readers. But if you prefer, I’ll just ignore you from now on.

T.M. MCFARLAND

November 1st, 2009
12:08 am

This is about what I expected from this idiot–his beloved Dawgs stink it up in J’ville so naturally stupid has to take a shot at GT to massage the gator bites–Tech had a rough-confused !st half–made adjustments at the half–allowed only 3 more points while pulling away for a blowout–stupid can’t see the forest for the trees–well, get ready GT will be in the Orange bowl with 1 loss while the Doggies could very well be at home with 7 losses (Tech, Auburn, and Ken.+ the 4 they already EARNED! GO JACKETS!!

Procrastinator

November 1st, 2009
12:08 am

Andy, I’ll be willing to bet that Paul Johnson won’t have a problem getting rid of Wommack if he feels he can get someone better.

Ross

November 1st, 2009
12:08 am

Here’s an interesting stat – by taking three knees at the end, the Fearsome Bugs ended up with only 597 yards on offense.

Jeff Schultz

November 1st, 2009
12:08 am

And by the way, decaf is a waste of time. I generally go straight from high-octane coffee to scotch.

Jon

November 1st, 2009
12:09 am

I agree that Tech’s D gave up some big plays in the 1st half. Lets not forget that Tech lost 3 guys on the D line to the NFL…and we were pretty good on D last yr. Besides, speaking of the game against Vandy tonight, Tech only give up 3 points in the 2nd half!

Procrastinator

November 1st, 2009
12:10 am

Eric, You are a dumbass! Jeff’s interaction is what makes him special. For God’s sake Tech was lousy!!!!!!!

stiggywiggy

November 1st, 2009
12:11 am

Really, Eric L. Think of it as a town hall meeting. We are expressing our grievances at Scultz for his column and he’s willing to take the heat. At least his damn column wasn’t 1990 pages.

Jon

November 1st, 2009
12:12 am

Vandy didn’t play like Vandy in the first half…but they did in the second half. Either way, Tech has not accomplished anything until now. D is inconsistent but has potential. Kickoff coverage is horrendous.

BG

November 1st, 2009
12:12 am

I’m sorry, but a 25-point win is never “lousy”.

BartBuzz

November 1st, 2009
12:13 am

I have three words for Jeff Schultz. YOUR ARTICLE SUCKS! Tech won the 2nd half 28-3. I would say that Coach Johnson made his adjustments at half time. I didn’t like the first half either but I felt the same when Tech beat FSU. They won the 2nd half of that game 21-9.

So, give it a rest on the talk of Tech stumbling.. Focus your frustrations on UGA. They got an old-fashioned thumping today.

stiggywiggy

November 1st, 2009
12:13 am

Can’t we all get along? Two truths can be justaposed here: (1). Our defense sucked, yet (2). we still kicked the asses of a team in the allegedly mighty SEC, in a manner that no actual member of said allegedly mighty conference, was able to do.

Ross

November 1st, 2009
12:13 am

Hey how is that kid Etheridge who had a neck injury in the Auburn-Miss game?

TechMD

November 1st, 2009
12:14 am

I think Jeff’s point is that we need a more consistent D if we want to win the ACC championship and win a BCS bowl.

SickandTired

November 1st, 2009
12:14 am

Jeff I enjoy your writing but please, for your own well being, please, please, please don’t cover a Georgia game. It will put you into deep depression to see a school that uses state money put a product on the field like they do.

stiggywiggy

November 1st, 2009
12:14 am

Yeah, I know: juXtaposed. My typing sucks as bad as our linebackers.

Procrastinator

November 1st, 2009
12:14 am

BG, when it should have been a 56 point win 25 is lousy and I can assure you I have been a Tech fan long before you were a gleam in your fathers eyes!

Ross

November 1st, 2009
12:15 am

Oh don’t look now, but Tennessee is a damn good team. Suddenly the new SEC is looking like the old SEC. Tech is now 3-0 agin’em this year.

Kurdt Kobain

November 1st, 2009
12:16 am

Tech’s D played lousy for a half. The D played great in the 2nd half, and the offense was great all game long. One bad half by one side of the ball doesn’t make the entire performance “lousy”.

I get that we need to improve our consistency on defense, but this wasn’t a faceplant, or a stumble, or anything.

Another G(T)uy

November 1st, 2009
12:17 am

Yeah, the defense was porous. We’ve had plenty of defensive problems this year, but had tightened things down of late. However, I knew, since we were playing Vandy, that it would be a let-down game. Fortunately, it wasn’t such of a let-down that we lost. I think PJ will use this as a wake-up call for the WF and Duke games.

BG

November 1st, 2009
12:18 am

Procrastinator, you’ve got to be kidding me. How bad is your memory, old man? Do you recall the Chan Gailey era? How can you complain about this win? I’ll take this victory and I’m happy to have it. Good job, Jackets!

Cuz

November 1st, 2009
12:18 am

Jeff, Vandy allowed an average of 2.14857 offensive touchdowns per game prior to playing Tech. Tech scored 8. Am I missing something or would you like me to e-mail you my spreadsheet?

stiggywiggy

November 1st, 2009
12:19 am

The dawgie contingent seems awfully silent tonight. I was hoping to get their thoughts on retiring the color black. After the Alabama game last year and tonight’s “black hat” debacle, I’m beginning to think that 50% of their school colors are bad luck. Maybe instead of red & back, they might want to consider changing over to red and very red.

Blue Pants

November 1st, 2009
12:19 am

Tech exceeded expectations won by 25 in which I was laying (-13.5). The so called experts were calling for a closer game, let down and/or trap game. The bottom line was an easy victory on the road against an SEC opponent. I like to see teams deal with adversity. To me that’s the problem with the Choklahoma Sooners, they hardly ever face it outside of playing Texas. That’s why they haven’t made it over the hump.

jimbob

November 1st, 2009
12:21 am

Tech’s defense and special teams are pretty weak, but WOW is this offense good, and fun to watch. Not a ‘let down’ at all. Like a great boxer that throws a lot of body shots, tech hogs the ball and wears out the opponent. By 4th quarter, tech is moving the ball at will while the opponent is sucking wind.

And to think that this is only the 2nd year of the CPJ era. In year 2, Tech is playing at a level that some of us figured would take more like 4 years to get to. It shows what a real coach can accomplish.

BartBuzz

November 1st, 2009
12:21 am

One more observation. I think the Vandy defense was ranked 34th nationally. 597 yards ain’t too shabby.

Cuz

November 1st, 2009
12:22 am

stiggy, I loved the black helmets. I hated the way the red helmets looked with the black jerseys. I guess we could retire the color black. Kinda like Tech did the last time we slapped them silly when they were wearing it.

MWC

November 1st, 2009
12:23 am

EEER..8 AND 1…hmm…sour grapes…nuff said…get use to it.

stiggywiggy

November 1st, 2009
12:25 am

Good idea, Cuz. Past glories are fine antidotes to current failures. Dust off your old “Munson’s Greatest Hits” cassette and listen to him scream Lindsay Scott’s name over and over. That might help.

Supersize that order, mutt

November 1st, 2009
12:25 am

cuz, hopefully Tech has scrapped the blue crap after the LSU debacle last year. I agree with you, I think GA should scrap black too.

mtraininjax

November 1st, 2009
12:26 am

Shultz, like your columns, we read the whole column before we pass judgement, you can watch the whole game before you act like you are a head coach with a winning record.

Unless you are Mark Richt.

Larry Munson

November 1st, 2009
12:26 am

I see Papa John’s pizzas falling out of the sky.

Supersize that order, mutt

November 1st, 2009
12:27 am

You know, I don’t imagine what CPJ says to the team is much different than what Jeff wrote in his column. None of us should EVER be satisfied with mediocrity, even it is only for one half. I imagine CPJ thinks it was a pretty lousy win too. And that’s what I love about the man. He’s never totally satisfied, and with that kind of attitude, that means there is always a desire and an attempt to improve.

Not Disappointed

November 1st, 2009
12:28 am

Jeff, are you still at the stadium or do you have 4G wireless such as: “Clear Atlant Sprint, Att” I’m just wondering.

Jeff, I like article. Tell it like it is, but we won. A win is a good thing still.

Nite all!

TechMD

November 1st, 2009
12:29 am

No doubt about it, the offense ROCKS!

Rodney Dangerfield

November 1st, 2009
12:31 am

No respect I tell ya!

I watched a piss poor Iowa team do everything they could to lose a game today to an Indiana team that got beat by 40 by a low level ACC team that lost to freakin’ William and Mary called Virginia. Yet ESPN says they are the comback kids, lets slap everyone on the back and have a fun time. But then GA Tech O basically dominates Vandy for an entire game and “the worst SEC team hung with the best ACC team for a half, just sayin” from Pat Forde at ESPN.

Obviously he did not watch the game and see how GT’s O basically did what ever they wanted and Vandy get some lucky big plays. Tech dominated this game. I wasn’t even worried when Tech was down 31-28, because I knew Vandy could not keep running back kickoffs, getting freakish tipped passes, and long runs all night long.

Now even the hometown paper calls it nothing to celebrate. WOW.

On a side note maybe ESPN can spend more time mancrushing Tim Tebow since USC and their freshman STUD QB got freakin’ smoked by Oregon.

And I bet ESPN will do a big expose on how Notre Dame beat the crappiest team in college football and annoint them a BCS contender.

Kurdt Kobain

November 1st, 2009
12:34 am

Anyone see Manu Ginobli kill a bat on Sportscenter? PETA’s gonna be all over him now.

Procrastinator

November 1st, 2009
12:37 am

BG, I was around for Bobby Dodd. Yea a real old man and yes I remember Chan Gailey. My wife still remembers the fit I threw when Tech hired him.

Rodney Dangerfield

November 1st, 2009
12:37 am

One more thing… I gotta give props to the announcers during the Tech-Vandy game on ESPN 360. At least they “felt” like Tech was the best one loss team. I would say they are one of the top two with Oregon, but lets see how this season pans out.

PS. It is so awesome at work, the dawg fans don’t even talk about their team anymore. It is like if you don’t talk about it, it will go away! When Tech beats UGA this year all hell is gonna break lose in Athens, doom and gloom and honestly Tech should beat them next year baring injuries or early departures to NFL.

GTRich

November 1st, 2009
12:37 am

Jeff is right, our defense is bad, our kicking team is awful, our kicker is even worse than awful, thank God for our offense which manages to score more points than what our defense gives up. Regardless we should find a replacement for DW. Nesbit played a great game and deserves a Heisman mention.

Cuz

November 1st, 2009
12:37 am

This dawg only bites when he is provoked. I am a fan of Georgia Tech. I have always been one since I was a kid. As a kid I also was a fan of UGA. Both were Georgia schools. I attended and graduated UGA. That does not, nor has not, eliminated my being a fan of Georgia Tech. Why is that so hard to understand?

Tech beat the number five defense in the SEC. That defense had given up an average 2.14857 offensive touchdowns per game. Tech got 8. If that is not dominance then send me a chick in black leather and latex so I can understand what is domination. I have been really naughty.

45ACP

November 1st, 2009
12:38 am

Congrats on the win Jackets.

Hey

November 1st, 2009
12:38 am

The 2nd half counts just as much as the first half.

Look at the Defense in the 2nd half vs. the 1st half.

Dr. Samuel Loomis

November 1st, 2009
12:44 am

I prayed that Jeff Schultz would burn in Hell, but in my heart, I knew that Hell would not have him.

GT FAN UP NORTH

November 1st, 2009
12:45 am

As bad as the defense plays at times- I don’t care if they give up 50 a game as long as we have 51 on our side-If Josh can continue to progress and pass like he did tonight- I don’t see the Jackets losing another game this season. The Jackets have made people stay for mistakes which we saw tonight. It will be interesting to see what time next weeks time will be- Go Jackets- good win- I was hoping the WF would beat Miami today as that would have given us a game cushion but win out and don’t worry about I guess-THWG!!!

45ACP

November 1st, 2009
12:45 am

What we have here is a failure to communicate.

There are Dawg fans that really do pull for the Jackets.
Believe it or not.

Cuz

November 1st, 2009
12:46 am

I believe. I believe.

So did you get tired of suicide watch over on our side?

TechMD

November 1st, 2009
12:48 am

lol Cuz. And I agree with a lot of the other posts. Iowa is soooo overrated and lots of teams have a bad half here and there with nothing but kudos after they pull it out. Double standard all the way but I also agree with Johnson’s view that you can, and should, always improve.

Flowery Branch Yellow Jacket

November 1st, 2009
12:48 am

Good observations Jeff. Our defense looked bad in the first half, and our kicking team looked bad ALL NIGHT! The “high school” offense contnues to roll, but Georgia Tech will not gain national respect until we show that we can consistently stop “lesser” teams … even if they are from a “superior” conference. Personally, after watching Wake Forest and seeing the stats from the Duke game today, I’m more than a little concerned. Certainly the Jackets are CAPABLE of beating these two teams, but mistakes such as we saw tonight show that we are also capable of LOSING to them. The QB’s from both Wake and Duke are excellent passers, and our defense has not shown themselves consistently adept at stopping the pass. (Kind of reminds me of the Falcons!)

In any event, it was a good win tonight … just as the other eight have been. I’m hoping we’ll pick up three more before the regular season ends … and two more after that! Go Jackets!

Cuz

November 1st, 2009
12:52 am

MD, I think Tech is one of the best teams in the country. I just want them to have a better defense when they face Bama, Florida or the dang Horny Frogs.

You dang skippy I will pull for GT over Bama or Flo-rid-a in a BCS title game. I got state pride.

45ACP

November 1st, 2009
12:52 am

Oh, it’s so depressing. I’m afraid there will be blood everywhere.

GT Alum

November 1st, 2009
12:53 am

It may have been ugly at times defensively, but its a W so lets take it and move on… Jackets O is unstoppable- no one can argue that Vandy’s D was pretty good coming into the game. The D was embarrassed in the first half and Womack’s head is going to be on a silver platter at the end of the year. But at least they woke up in the 2nd.

Go Jackets!! I’d rather be talking about an ugly win than whining about a lopsided loss like our friends from Athens.

Paul Johnson is your Daddy

November 1st, 2009
12:57 am

PJ aka EF Hutton continues his dominance over Bobby Johnson and the SEC. Wommack needs to step up, though, or he’ll be looking for another job next year.

SEC fans would consider this a good SEC road win(since they’re all so tough), but now that we won it will be “so what, you only beat Vandy.” Gotta love the double standard…

Cuz

November 1st, 2009
12:58 am

Both W’s, Willie and Wommack, will be doing ReMax commercials at the end of the year. No extended contracts on their lawn services.

45ACP

November 1st, 2009
12:58 am

Don’t say MD. It reminds me of MD 20-20.
I had therapy for that.

Tampa Wreck

November 1st, 2009
12:59 am

Sorry, but Wommack has to go. Even with our “simplified” defense, we continue to be out of position. Our contain guys don’t contain, and the tackling by the secondary is flat out atrocious. It’s a good thing we can score 50, because were gonna need it against wake, the dukies, and the dawgs. Hell, it may take 70 to beat Duke the way our defense plays.

I guess the good news is this continues to give CPJ something to yell about. Maybe we can reinvent the defense again for Wake.

Paul Johnson is your Daddy

November 1st, 2009
1:01 am

Wommack’s D is pathetic. Just wanted to comment in order to pile on. He’s got to go.

Jeff Schultz

November 1st, 2009
1:02 am

Thanks F.B. Yellow Jacket. The offense was great tonight but, agree, a stronger statement could’ve been made tonight. I’m sure CPJ knows that, and he wasn’t happy with the D or the ST breakdowns. .. But rest of season is still there for taking for Tech.

45ACP

November 1st, 2009
1:02 am

They can ride around in the balloon and reminisce.

Jeff Schultz

November 1st, 2009
1:03 am

Loomis — Is there a Marriott there? I usually stay in Marriotts.

Jeff Schultz

November 1st, 2009
1:04 am

GTRich — Agree on Nesbitt. He was great tonight. I don’t know if he deserves to win the Heisman or not but he certainly deserves to be in the conversation. He’s at the center of one of the most productive offenses in the nation. That should count for something.

Cuz

November 1st, 2009
1:04 am

PJID, read my earlier posts. Vandy had a surprisingly strong D in the SEC before this game. Use the 2.14857 offensive touchdowns allowed by Vandy in conversations with Dawg fans or SEC fans in general. Tech scored 8. UGA scored 4. I don’t make up the stats, I just post em. It is what it is. And of course, it all depends on what the meaning of is, is.

Jeff Schultz

November 1st, 2009
1:07 am

Not Disappointed — Actually, I’m sitting down at the Airport Marriott (free wifi) having a a chicken quesadilla at this very minute!

Cuz

November 1st, 2009
1:08 am

Jeff, I cut my hair real close, put on some black rimmed glasses, trimmed my goatee and sat in my yard with a computer. I was trying to be you for Halloween. Kids ran away screaming. Mothers called me names I cannot repeat. Do you get that often?

DCJacket

November 1st, 2009
1:09 am

Enter your comments here

Jeff Schultz

November 1st, 2009
1:09 am

Cuz — no issues with Tech’s offense. It’s great.

DCJacket

November 1st, 2009
1:12 am

Ignore the bees behind the curtain Jeff. I loved the High octane > scotch comment BTW. I think you hit the nail on the head in that this game served a reminder that there is room for improvement. I’ll take the W and move-on regardless. CPJ for COA!! THWG!

45ACP

November 1st, 2009
1:16 am

It looks like the second time around scheming for the TO is not working.

Cuz

November 1st, 2009
1:16 am

I agree. CPJ for Coach of Alabama. We play them less than Tech.

45ACP

November 1st, 2009
1:17 am

Jeff, Cuz and Jacket nation have a great night.

stew

November 1st, 2009
1:18 am

Unis was a star for Ringling Brothers. He did the 1 finger hand stand on a ball!

G Man

November 1st, 2009
1:19 am

the Obvious : our offense (GT’s)is great, maybe the best in the nation when you consider the stats. Our defense and special teams, however, are another story. Clearly, we don’t have enough talent and depth at this point in time, and I’m sure more players are on their way. The subtle : Tech plays in control, unlike the thugs with the black “G” on their black helmet. In the 80’s and 90’s the U could get away with that type of play, because they were so much better athletically than their competition. While UGA (and the recruiting services) say UGA has better talent than GT, it’s not showing on the field. Why is that? Let’s just assume the UGA kids are in fact very talented; why do they get embarrassed by UT (who is not as talented) and UF (who admittedly is much more talented , although Georgia’s classes have also consistently ranked in the top 5 with UF’s every year). UGA will have more talent that any team they play the rest of the year, including Tech, yes Tech (though that gap is closing). So in theory they should win the next 4, rather easily in fact. And maybe they will. Any one want to bet on that? And what gives with all of the thuggish play on UGA’s part? That stuff will get you beat. FSU was taking all kinds of cheap shot at the Tech players at the end of that game in Tallahassee, and the Tech players just tossed the ball back to the ref and went back to the huddle. That’s the kind of focus the Dogs need. Too bad you don’t usually find that this time of year, at least whey you are so sorely lacking.

Cuz

November 1st, 2009
1:20 am

I would say goodnight but I am too tired. So g-nite.

Where is that Scotch that Jeff hid?

hey jeff but for the sec refs

November 1st, 2009
1:24 am

fla lsu and bama could each have a loss.

the no 4 sec usce, won a close game against an acc also ran in ncstate. a game where usce did not score a td on o. a game that saw an sec official blow a flagrant mugging foul late in the game and take the momemtum away from a driving ncstate team.

my point is…. as others have stated….. the sec is all hype. yet you douse water on the jackets 25 point win? bama an fla an lsu are winning close games at home against bottom tier opponents an you dis a gt win going away?

is it any wonder that the 3 conferences that get the most tv coverage also rank 1, 2 and 3 in attendance.

when you listen to espn abc etc it is plain that they are pulling for one of two scenerious in the nc title game.

opt 1….. a replay of the sec title game.

opt 2….. the sec champ against the cinderella hawkeyes. a team with no o and a good d. a team that has played nobody. a team that has come into the spotlight because of the come behind wins. say wha?

mabye gt would get more respect if they kept coming from behind? what say you?

45ACP

November 1st, 2009
1:25 am

I will leave everyone with this thought. Would CPJ want to retire at Tech?
Just asking.

hey jeff but for the sec refs

November 1st, 2009
1:27 am

btw the sec is no 1 in attendance

the big 10 is no 2 in attendance

and the big 12 is no 3 in attendance.

seems to me that those 3 conferences also get the most ink or air time also. i do not think that is a coincidence.

Reality

November 1st, 2009
1:33 am

I would much rather that Tech get a wake up call now than to lose to Wake or Duke. However, I also wish that the voters would finally give Tech some respect. ESPN called Tech the best one loss team in the nation and yet we are not in the top 10????

Rick H

November 1st, 2009
1:47 am

Does anybody remember margin of victory after the season is wrapped up? Does anybody think Florida will give back their national championship trophy if they win it because they only beat Arkansas by 3 and were in a game with Miss State for more than a little while? The week to week melodrama doesn’t really matter in the loong run but I guess people have to have something to talk about.

Besides, I thought the BCS eliminated margin of victory from consideration to keep teams from running up scores, so a win is a win and a loss is a loss.

blackprix

November 1st, 2009
1:49 am

Come on GT fans … you know darn well if GT wants to play with the elite in the nation … WE NEED A GOOD DEFENSE!! A defense that comes to play the whole game, that outplays lesser foes, that stands toe-to-toe with their equals.

I’m not a Wommack fan, and I believe he is the issue with how we play. You’re the teacher and you teach a subject. If you are not good at what you teach, it shows up in your students tests. Being a DC is no different.

You can’t be a Top 10 team and just show up. Glad we won, but I agree with the article – got to do better and coaching needs to make that happen.

GT121

November 1st, 2009
1:54 am

Shultz is a LEGEND in his own mind ,but hey he is funny even if my 8 year old son knows more about football than him..he does reply to the bloggers and thats alot more than that liberal nitwit C Tucker ever does…but hey..TECH WINS AGAIN….and tonite thats ALLLLLL that matters..GOOO JACKETS!!!

macrotech

November 1st, 2009
2:10 am

Glad to have the win…another sec team bites Tech’s dust!!! However, this Jeckle and Hyde defense of ours is going to be the death of me!!! It’s a good thing that our offense is scoring so much….WE’RE 8-1!!! GO TECH!!!

Stone Cold Schultz

November 1st, 2009
2:19 am

Well, just when you think Schultz has jumped on the GT Bandwagon, he falls off again whining about a 56-pt, 600 yd OFFENSIVE BONANZA!! A WIN is a WIN, and when a game is so taken over and controlled as GT did in the 2nd half of this one, IT’S A BEAUTIFUL THING!

Dry your tears Schultzie…It’s gonna be OK. We’re talking talent on The Flats and CPJ knows how to develop and use them. Talent goes to Athens and DIES A SLOW & PAINFUL DEATH…

Anyone trying to decide whether to commit to UGAG or GT has a pretty EASY DECISION to make now: Join a program that hit the bottom with Coach Chandler Gailey and is headed up in a parabolic RISE with CPJ…Or join a program in Athens that has quite obviously PEAKED and has FALLEN OFF A CLIFF with Blind Willie and The Emperor With No Clothes – The Once Mighty Coach Richt. The rapid pace at which these two programs have diverged is almost beyond belief!

So cheer up Schultz…GT Football’s got your back. The Lost & Clueless in Athens who can’t even decide what freakin color their uniforms are going to be on any given Saturday have somehow lurched uncontrollably into the most appropriate one —– BLACK! CMR says it’s OK for everyone in a UGAG uniform or in the stands or coaching with their eyes closed on the sideline to WEAR BLACK…Because there’s gonna be some changes soon for the Butt-Sniffers and some coaching careers will be BURIED, along with any hopes for Bowl Eligibility this year…

Imagine that…GT in a BCS Bowl and UGAG not even able to qualify for an Invite! There’s PLENTY TO CELEBRATE Mr. Schultz. Have some faith in CPJ…He’ll know if and when any changes need to be made too, but he won’t hesitate at the expense of the entire football program.

It’s going to be a BEAUTIFUL JANUARY this year, with tens of thousands of UGAG fans forced to stay at home and watch THE BEST FOOTBALL PROGRAM IN THE STATE perform for a national audience. RECRUITS: Listen up…COMMIT TO GT NOW while you still can…Pretty soon they’re going to be TURNING AWAY talented recruits, and you don’t want to find yourself in that position where you might have to settle for playing at a .500 school down the road a ways from ATL…

Bark Madley down on the Dawgs today and Schultz taking it out on GT…Are they starting to leave Pink Slips in the lockers down at the AJC Sports Room on the weekends now or something?!?! Somebody needs a Happy Pill…

[...] Josh Nesbitt touchdowns but the Jackets struggled more than expected. See the example post:  Georgia Tech wins, but this was null to fete | Jeff Schultz Posted in Uncategorized | Tags: became-the, blue-on-saturday, jackets, josh, [...]

GT Joe

November 1st, 2009
2:43 am

Wow, nothing to celebrate? That is a dumb statement and one of the many reason why I don’t and will not ever again subscribe to the Atlanta Journal Communist. Dwyer had a career day and the offense and the offense racked up just below 600 yards of total offense. Not to mention the defense only gave up three points in the second half. I think scoring 56 points against a team that only gave up an average of 17 for the rest of the season is definitely a reason to celebrate.

LSU 98

November 1st, 2009
3:31 am

two weeks ago after uga beat “vandy” all of you gt fans were saying it was just “vandy”. So now you want a little respect for beating what is probably the number 10 or 11 team in the SEC. what would you say if it were uga beating say nc state, duke or virginia which are the 10-12 teams in the acc. of course right now it looks like 6-12 may all have the same records. is it weak or is it equal strength?? i for one say weak. maybe lsu and gt get a rematch?

[...] See more here: Georgia Tech wins, but this was nothing to celebrate | Jeff Schultz [...]

the real OLD GOLD

November 1st, 2009
4:22 am

I was there in Nashville people.. and I agree with Jeff. The first half of this one we gave up 28 points to the team that could barely put up double digits on Army. They only managed 10 on Willie Martinez….

I was sick at my stomach. We shouldn’t have to put up nearly 60 to beat Vandy. I’m way more worried about the next 3 games now. We have to get better.

That being said.. the Offense was awesome, other than the supposed fumble. We also had a couple of questionable turnover calls that (vandy fumbles), one in particular that should have gone our way, so this was a great win all in all. Besides my 2am tire blowout at the Georgia line out of Chattanooga what a great trip. The trees were awesome up i-24.

Drew

November 1st, 2009
4:26 am

If the football gods had any common sense, they’d match up Tech with the University of Houston in a BCS bowl game.

You’d have the best running team in the country (Tech) vs. a team that can’t stop the run to save its life (UH), and the best passing team in the country, with the best QB in the country (UH) vs. a team that can’t stop the pass to save its life (Tech).

If I had to predict, I’d say 77-70 Tech.

Steven

November 1st, 2009
5:06 am

Jeff, no offense, terrible article. What if the score had been 23-3? That was the score after halftime. We had a terrible first half. Our coach came in to halftime and made an adjustment (unlike the guy in Athens). And we destroyed them in the 2nd half. Look at the stats. Almost double the time of posession. 56 points and 597 total yards. How can we not celebrate this? Most yards for the Jackets under Paul Johnson. Please.

JacketFan

November 1st, 2009
5:56 am

Jeff,

You don’t think Bobby Johnson’s past experiences against Paul Johnson teams had anything to do with Vandy’s effort yesterday?

ChuckE

November 1st, 2009
5:59 am

1st half had me chewing my nails, too. But even more than that, looking ahead is giving me cause to fret a bit as well. Neither Duke nor Wake are going to be pushovers, and as clueless as the Dawgs look now, anything can – and usually does – happen on Thanksgiving weekend.

I say enjoy this win, but get hard at work for next week. Rinse and repeat for the next three.

Go Jackets!

Bandwagon

November 1st, 2009
6:05 am

Another team schooled by Paul (high school offense) Johnson.

truth

November 1st, 2009
6:48 am

bring on Texas and GT wins 31-27

Alan

November 1st, 2009
6:49 am

Stiggywiggy:

I think the more appropriate color for UGAY would be PINK

81GTgrad

November 1st, 2009
7:07 am

Jeff – I have to agree completely with your comments. Vandy has a BAD offense. They could only muster one touchdown in 4 quarters against ARMY! We have struggled on defense and special teams all year. Our saving grace….CPJ’s halftime adjustments. With the exception of the Clemson game, we have proven to be one of the top 2nd half teams in the country.

Ben

November 1st, 2009
7:08 am

Folks, you have to admit that Vandy scored too many points for Tech to be considered a great team. The defense is not fast enough, and the kickoff team is poor. The offense might not click in one of these last three games, and can we count on the defense to save us? Remember that Wake lost by one to a team that defeated a (admittedly tired) Tech soundly. Tech can still lose any of the last three, and I don’t know it they would beat Clemson. We can only take it one game at a time and hope that Nesbitt always has at least a very good day. That’s hard to count on over three more games, a title game, and bowl.

JustCHIPPIN

November 1st, 2009
7:09 am

Jeff, this is not a surprise …. football teams get up about 4 or 5 times a year and you have a desperate Vandy team looking for a win and a tech team playing out of conference after that gauntlet stretch of games they are probably tired and while the def is rough this was going to be one of those games. Hell Jeff they covered 2x the spread!!!!! This game is the classic Tech game they would lose under Gailey,,,,

snapshot

November 1st, 2009
7:28 am

Terrible article. Tech gave up points but I believe they beat Vandy by more points than say LSU or the mutts.

The Real YellowJacket

November 1st, 2009
7:45 am

See he has to say something, anything that’s negative. It means he’s a journalist.
Scores off of fumbles. Did the players just drop the ball or did we play great defense in the second half?
It was VANDY. Yeah they don’t play football there, right?
Ignore us. Wouldn’t that be what you do already?

jacket3

November 1st, 2009
7:48 am

Can anyone say GT is getting better every game? Sure the’re holes on D and special teams. At least CPJ is a master craftsman at his job. We could put 7 more points on the board at the end of the game too but GT’s brain trust decided 8 was enough.

Love to see GT trounce big bad USC like Oregon did last night. Wake and Puke have good QB’s. But I certainly do not think they can handle GT’s grinding offense for 60 minutes. I looks now “no one can”.

Time for more “Bell”.

Flowery Branch Yellow Jacket

November 1st, 2009
7:48 am

Drew … I agree, the Tech vs. Houston match-up would be entertaining, to say the least.

I’ve read many comments by people who are willing to throw Wommack under the bus, and who credit the defense’s 2nd half performance to the coaches’ half-time “adjustments”. However, the coaching staff said last night that they didn’t really MAKE any adjustments. They just “motivated” the guys to play better football. At this point, we’ve not heard CPJ make any disparaging remarks about the members of his staff … and that’s as it should be. Personnel decisions should be made privately after a time of quiet reflection and analysis. While I’m less than thrilled by our defensive performance at times, I know that injuries have contributed to their ineffectiveness. Rather than calling for someone’s head on a platter, I’m content to let CPJ make his own evaluation of the program. From what we’ve seen so far, I’m pretty sure that he will take the actions that he thinks are in the best interest of the team. In the meantime, let’s support the WHOLE team, including its coaching staff. No need to be like the Dawg family who wants to consume their own.

U-no

November 1st, 2009
7:56 am

Yep, the defense was asleep in the first half. Things looked much better in the second. Tech stumbled, but at least they won when they stumbled. I will take a stumbling win over a well executed loss any day of the week!

CornieBread

November 1st, 2009
7:57 am

Enter your comments here

gtne80

November 1st, 2009
7:59 am

How can anyone read this column and conclude that it is “gloomy” or otherwise biased? Mr. Shultz paints a very accurate picture of the game.

Any GT fan has to have a nervous feeling in the pit of their stomach about our defense going into the remaining three games. While we’ve seen this team will its way to wins against tougher opponents, the weakness is real and evident. I don’t know whether it’s the defensive scheme or a lack of talent, but something is not right.

Giving up the TD on a kickoff return was an arrow into the heart. We had just taken a 2 TD lead and looked to be ready to put the game away but that one play put life back into Vandy.

This should be a wakeup call. CPJ needs only to show the team that Wake came within a whisker of beating UM yesterday and that Duke beat UVa to remind the team that the conclusion of this season is far from being reached. And it should not be lost on this team that UGA DOMINATED Vandy from start to finish. A loss against any of these teams would put a different feeling on this season.

CornieBread

November 1st, 2009
8:00 am

THANK GOODNESS THE VANDY qb PULLED A HAMMY!!! The score probably would have been a lot closer and the way the game was going…who knows.

Gary

November 1st, 2009
8:05 am

The point with this team is the halftime adjustments. We know what the defense is. We’d all love it if they came out with more fire early, but with the adjustments these coaches continue to make at halftime, this team is always in it.

To get down on the team after that first half is ridiculous, because time after time, the coaches and players show that they can adjust and they’re a completely different team in the second half. And as long as they keep winning going away, the first halves don’t really matter that much.

collegeballfan

November 1st, 2009
8:06 am

As I said in your pre game post – “I am always concerned about a letdown taking place in the players between the ears. I am an old guy & have seen it happen many dozen times.”

But apparently I was wrong. The offense played exceptional. The defense & spec teams stunk. I do not see how one part of the team is ready to play & the other not ready. My conclusion. The GT defense just does not have many good players. GT will be damn lucky to beat both Wake & Duke. Not a prayer against UGA.

Paddy

November 1st, 2009
8:06 am

Eric L….you sort of missed the whole theme of what a blog is supposed to accomplish. Had you been drinking young man????? Shame on you!

BraveJacket

November 1st, 2009
8:07 am

At first, I thought this column was unnecessarily harsh, but upon further review, I can’t discount anything Schultz is saying. Its a good analysis and points out the things the Jackets need to fix to continue this run. Lets hope for more consistent D and more stops against Wake and Duke.

Hal

November 1st, 2009
8:11 am

I have seen great Tech teams and because of the defense and special teams this is not one of them.

GA Tech Insider

November 1st, 2009
8:17 am

Jeff,

If I recall correctly, there were several pundits out there reminding all of us that Vanderbilt played LSU and South Carolina, both Top 25 Teams, and both away games, very close. GA Tech played Vanderbilt on the road. LSU only scored 23 points on them, and gave up 9, and South Carolina scored 14, and gave up 10.

Take away the kickoff return, and then we see that GA Tech’s defense gave up a total of 24 points.This is less than stellar, and I’ll be the first to admit that GA Tech’s defense looked pedestrian the first half of the game, but they only gave up 3 points the entire second half, once they settled things down; more in line with both of the SEC ranked teams I just mentioned.

On the other hand, GA Tech’s offense scored more points against Vanderbilt’s well respected defense than any other team they faced this season, including both of those ranked teams I just mentioned. In fact, The Jacket’s offense scored 22 MORE points than any other offense the Commodores defense has played all season, and that was the Georgia Bulldogs a couple of weeks ago.

Why isn’t it a bigger deal when Florida barely escapes Arkansas, and gives up 20 points, just 4 more points that GA Tech would have given up to Vanderbilt with out the kickoff return, than when GA Tech was playing on the road while Florida was playing at home?

How about when Florida gave up 17 points to UGA and they only scored 10 at Oklahoma State, or 13 at LSU, or 19 at Tennessee? Isn’t ANY defense entitled to have an off day without the entire team being driven off the cliff on a bus?

Like I said, at least GA Tech’s defense woke up and played tough the second half of the game, only giving up 3 points after Vanderbilt’s opening drive, which was aided by a tipped ball I might add.

The bottom line? GA Tech won on the road against an SEC team which everyone had been saying had one of the better defenses out there because they played LSU and South Carolina tough on the road. GA Tech put up a ton more points on them than any other team than they have faced all season and they ended up winning the game handily.

The Jackets are now 8 – 1 (2 – 0 against the SEC); Jonathan Dwyer is just starting to heal and run like he did last season; Josh Nesbitt and GA Tech’s passing attack is starting to come around; the defense is staring to show signs of life; and Wake Forest is coming to Bobby Dodd Stadium next Saturday afternoon for the Jacket’s next step towards Tampa.

So far, so good if you ask me.

mowreck

November 1st, 2009
8:19 am

Definitely not satisfied with the D. I flicked between the commercials to the Miami/Wake game CPJ will tell the truth when he tells you Wake has a better team than their record. They game Miami all they wanted and would have won except for the punt fumble (with little over minute left). Very glad we have Wake at home.

Now Duke, I been worried about because of our pass defense … their QB completed 30 of 40 against some team earlier and doesn’t matter who the team was. We don’t get some kind of pass rush they will shred us to death.

As of the Vandy game, A WIN IS A WIN. GOOOOOO JACKETS!

not so fast

November 1st, 2009
8:19 am

# 9 LSU led Vandy 13-7 at halftime.
# 21 South Carolina and Vandy were tied 7-7 at halftime.Give Vandy a littke credit,
The Jackets are really a second half team anyway if you look at the games against FSU, Virginia Tech, and Virginia.
8-1 Paul Johnson usually makes good halftime adjustments.

mowreck

November 1st, 2009
8:22 am

Let me re-do the first paragraph (starting to type like Schultz).

Definitely not satisfied with the D. I flicked between the commercials to the Miami/Wake game. CPJ is telling the truth when he says that Wake has a better team than their record. The gave Miami all they wanted and would have won except for the punt fumble (with little over a minute left in). Very glad to have Wake at home.

not so fast

November 1st, 2009
8:25 am

Georgia Tech out-scored Vanderbilt 28-3 in the second half and won by 25.
The first half was painful for a Tech fan.
……..GO JACKETS!

Tampa Wreck

November 1st, 2009
8:26 am

collegeballfan,

“Not a prayer against UGA.”??? Give me a break. That’s just stupid. Have you seen UGA’s defense?? I’ll admit we may need to score 60 that afternoon, but “not a prayer???” that’s giving the dogs way too much credit, and being way to negative on this team..

One thing you can say about this team.. They don’t give up and they find ways to win. I’m not crazy enough to say the next three are in the bag. I think we should be solid favorites every remaining game, but we “could” lose any of them. But no way the dawgs are the better team this year.

bb

November 1st, 2009
8:28 am

Actually, last night’s game should be taken as a corner turned; as a good sign; as a sign that GT has really arrived. When was the last time you can remember GT playing a sub-par game (really a bad game) and still winning by 25 points? In the past (read Chan Gailey years or even O’Leary years), this is a game GT losses. This is the loss to an obviously less talented team that reminds us that GT has not turned the corner. This is UVA in 2001, this is WF in 2002, this is Duke in 2003, UNC in 2004, NC State and UVA again in 2005, UGA and WF in 2006.

CPJ and the Jackets have one last streak to break this year. Every year since 1990, 18 years, GT has lost to at least one unranked team. In years past, last night would have been that game.

How is the GT/Vandy game any different than Iowa/Indiana (Iowa trailed by 10 in the 4th qtr) or Penn State/Northwestern (Penn State and NW were tied in the 4th qtr)? Or Fla/Tenn or Fla/Ark or Fla/MissSt or Ala/Tenn or Ala/SC for that matter??? Great teams win even when they don’t play well.

not so fast TYPO

November 1st, 2009
8:28 am

Give Vandy a “LITTLE” credit.

yellowjacket82

November 1st, 2009
8:28 am

Outscoring Vandy 28-3 in the 2nd half and winning by 25? On the road? Why wouldn’t we celebrate? We could have hung 60 on them.

not so fast

November 1st, 2009
8:36 am

—bb is right.—We can CELEBRATE just as much as Bama celebrated their bogus 12-10 win over UT and FLA celebrated their bogus narrow win over Arkansas.

Booger

November 1st, 2009
8:38 am

But georgia played before a bigger crowd. And florida is ranked number one. And vandy, well they’re a crappy team. And even if tebow did surpass herchael it was in four years. And why did you even write an article about tech? This is the ajc and you’re supposed to just write about uga. But at least you made it so pessimistic that maybe we can still beat the nerds on the 28th (please lord).Sorry bout the great win nerds.

Navigator

November 1st, 2009
8:38 am

Before a hoard of UGA fans wake up from their another horrible Halloween, I’ll get to the obvious. Tech’s defense is weak in the middle, and forcing the safeties to come in close has killed their deep pass defense. All said, two weeks in a row the defense did some major corrections and played a better second half. Let’s not leave out the sorry play of the special teams, that refuses to stay in their lanes, and more than once over running the cut back and allowing the other team big plays. But, all said they beaten some good teams and are 8-1 with Wake coming in next, and folks the wins and losses overwhelm anybody that wants to show a bunch of losers statistics.

What's scary is...

November 1st, 2009
8:40 am

…we could have scored another TD on them in the end if we wanted to. IMHO, you couldn’t have asked for a better result leading up to our next couple of games. PJ will be busting @(#&s this week…stay grounded and humble…

BuzzMan

November 1st, 2009
8:41 am

I hope the players understand that they still have Wake and Duke left in the ACC, if they lose any of these games and Miami doesn’t lose anymore in the ACC, they win the ACC Division by head to head. If the DEFENSE doesn’t get reborn next week, we are in trouble.

Tate

November 1st, 2009
8:43 am

I believe the season average for Tech would be 49 points per game against the SEC. The BIG BAD SEC.

Mike

November 1st, 2009
8:44 am

Gee guys. It was a good win on the road. Johnson made defensive adjustments at the half and Vandy got three points in the second half. Take a look at seceral other games like Virginia. The same thing happened. It wasn’t that long ago, we didn’t know what a half time adjustment was. We have had a winner two years in a row and getting stronger. We are playing a lot of young guys and more on the way. Johnson took a team built for one office and made them play in another scheme. Sure, we need to fix the first half defence, but that is better than fixing the whole game.

Booger

November 1st, 2009
8:45 am

read what insider said. much better insight than the crap that was paid for by the subscribers and advertisers.

not so fast

November 1st, 2009
8:46 am

Bob Stoops or Frank Beamer would have added another TD to make the score
TECH 63 – VANDY 31.
But Paul Johnson has class.

greg

November 1st, 2009
8:50 am

Bottom Line: GT ain’t that good.

Booger

November 1st, 2009
8:52 am

november 28th. we see how bad the black helmet boys are.

not so fast jeff

November 1st, 2009
8:53 am

The spread was 12 and a half and TECH won by 25.
………..Why not CELEBRATE Jeff !

GR82BAG8R

November 1st, 2009
8:54 am

You Tech fans need to lighten up. You are only two years into a new coach’s run and you are complaining about everyone noticing shortfalls in your defense. The first half was appalling, considering what Vandy had done up to then. You made adjustments at halftime and blasted them off the field. Accept the criticism for what it’s worth. Schultz implied you aren’t impressing the pundits with your performance, but why do you care? Surely you don’t expect to play in the BCS NC game. Keep winning and you will be in a BCS game. Would you have been happy with that two years ago? Last year?

Coach Johnson will be able to recruit good players and fill the gaps. Until then, you are not quite ready for the upper echelons. Congratulations on another impressive win.

Booger

November 1st, 2009
8:55 am

enjoy your run gator. don’t think we have a dog in the fight. oh thats right we do. thanks!

dgroy

November 1st, 2009
8:55 am

Nesbitt, Dwyer, Jones et al are sure fun to watch running the ball; however, let’s give a little credit to the OLine. Weekend after weekend they do a great job blocking for these backs…..way to go guys.

JS Mirror

November 1st, 2009
8:56 am

Pretty good article my man! Have another scotch. Should have praised the offense a lot more because they were awesome. The defense and special teams have real issues. The Defensive Backs looked lost and one in particular is afraid to hit someone. He could have stopped the TD if he would have just hit the runner head on at the 2 yard line, but he tackled him to the side allowing him to score. Then on the Vandy break away run he caught him at the 10 yard line and just followed him into the endzone and didn’t even attempt to tackle him. Tech needs to shake of some positions.

[...] Jeff Schultz of the AJC thinks the Tech win was nothing to celebrate. [...]

Old Gold

November 1st, 2009
8:59 am

Jeff, no problem with your article at all. And for Tech fans who think Jeff is biased, that’s ridiculous – he calls ‘em like he seems ‘em. My favorite Schultz column is the one you wrote following the Jasper Sanks “fumble.” Tech fans, read that one if you want to see how a great writer can take out-of-line, whining fans to the woodshed.

I think we’ve got some issues with our defense – some of which can be corrected now, some that can be addressed only with time and recruiting, to strengthen depth and talent – but overall, we’re a good team that survived a bad first half. I’d much rather learn a tough lesson with a win that after suffering a loss.

white water

November 1st, 2009
8:59 am

I think that Jeff was being fair. Our D and special teams needs to improve if we are to run the table. Any team with a good passing QB or with a large, quick D line will us fits.

barbyk

November 1st, 2009
9:05 am

Was agonizing over the first half, and think the strength and maybe conditioning of the team pulled them out during second.

will expect that Mr Johnson might have several discussions this week. hopefully

fans should not expect this sloppy attitude from this team

Michael

November 1st, 2009
9:12 am

The Real Old Gold: “We shouldn’t have to put up nearly 60 to beat Vandy.”

We didn’t have to put up nearly 60. We only had to put up 32.

"I just want to celebrate"

November 1st, 2009
9:15 am

USC lost and Georgia Tech SHOULD move up to the top 10 in the BCS.

GameTime

November 1st, 2009
9:18 am

Great summary, Jeff and right on target. The defense is very inconsistent and is average at best. Thank goodness for such a strong offense or the defensive weaknesses would be exposed even more. And the kick coverage is absolutely awful. And those posting who say the defense is OK are drinking way too much of the cool aid. This is not the defense of a top 10 team and that will become obvious before the year is over. The offense can only do so much.

ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

November 1st, 2009
9:23 am

IMHO, before GT can ever challenge for the big prize they are going to have to have a serious upgrade on the D. The one thing I have faith in is that CPJ will get the defense fixed….whatever that takes he’ll get it done. 8 of the 12 commitments for next year are on the D side. We also lost true freshman DT JC Lanier before the season started. He would have been a solid contributor to the D though he was a freshman.

CPJ knows what it takes to win championships. BTW, hanging 56 points on the 23rd ranked scoring defense in the nation is pretty good.

j

November 1st, 2009
9:24 am

tech is fine. they play the whole game and are adept at adjusting after half-time.

They are winning and winning convincingly. They should be on t.v. every week. They have the most exciting offense and games.

Let’s get real did you expect to beat vandy by 40 points (you won by 25)?

Tech is a team that has big plays. tech scores so quickly on drives that the opponent will always have a chance to put points up on the board.

George P. Burdell

November 1st, 2009
9:24 am

Everybody calm down. Yes our defense has issues but you didn’t have to watch the Vandy game to realize that. I think a lot of it is we were due for a let down and we got that out of our system in the first half. Hell, Bradley has been pointing to this as a trap game/loss since the before the season started. The important thing is the defense came out and shut them down in the second half. Every team, including Florida and Bama, have struggled at times this year. I’ve said all along because of our defense we would probably lose a game we had no business losing. Just be thankful that hasn’t happened so far. Bottom line is under a Gailey led team, this one would have been a loss and we’d all be feeling pretty bad this morning with our record sitting at 6-3. I’ll take a 25 point win anytime over any opponent and not find a way to feel too terrible about it.

ST

November 1st, 2009
9:25 am

Sorry to burst your nerd bubble, but Vandy is the worst team in the SEC by far. Even Georgia put up almost 40 on them. I just can’t believe they were able to hang with Tech for almost four quarters!

Atlanta Jacket

November 1st, 2009
9:27 am

We won and that is all that matters. However, our defense does need help / work. We will bounce back next week. At least we held them to 3 in the second half. We still might be a year away (funny saying that at 8-1) – d is still young and we are missing some starters from last year (Jackson, Cooper & Hall was supposed to start). Just keep winning.

Note we did score more points on Vandy then any other SEC team.

GT Fan

November 1st, 2009
9:27 am

Good article Jeff. Great blog! Mostly good football “opinions”. It’s an exciting time to be a GT fan!

BankerDawg

November 1st, 2009
9:29 am

Jeff, I cannot believe this article. Seriously.

Thought I would read some blogs before I left Jacksonville to make the somber trip back to Atlanta and to read this really blows my mind.

Trust me when I tell you I would love to have to “suffer” through a 25 point victory on the road in the SEC to move to 8-1 on the year.

Nothing to celebrate?

Sports writers are so much a part of the problem in college football, because people read your stuff and start to believe you know what you are talking about…when you clearly do not.

How about an article talking about how difficult it probably was to step out of conference and play a night game on the road? How about mentioning that Tech played only one home game in October (I think) and did not lose one game? How about the whole “8-1″ thing?

There are plenty of things you could have chosen to celebrate, but you did not. Your choice, I guess.

Also, I don’t think you have an agenda, I just think you’re an idiot.

Anyway, congrats Tech on the win. Man, this is going to be a looooooong ride back up 75….

As always….GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DAWGS! SIC ‘EM!

"I just want to celebrate"

November 1st, 2009
9:29 am

(ajc)…….8-1 Jackets HAMMER Commodores !

Johnboy

November 1st, 2009
9:30 am

“Defense wins CHAMPIONSHIPS…” Coach Vice Lombardi

William Casey

November 1st, 2009
9:32 am

I choose to celebrate anytime that GT WINS. Jeff’s article was accurate except for the provocative title. The Jackets could have scored 70 last night against an SEC team last night except for the fumble inside the five and CPJ playing the second team O the final six minutes of the game (right thing to do.)

I’m worried about Wake and Duke because they have very good QB’s. I think that GT wins out, though.

Native Son

November 1st, 2009
9:33 am

Mr. Schultz:

All teams get hyped to play the top teams

All teams improve to some degree by midseason

Under Johnson, Tech has always been a better second half team
Take away the tipped pass, the blown coverage on the run from scrimmage, and the kick return(the lucky plays), this game is 56-10 and you would have nothing to gripe about.

The other team had a coach, who’d played Johnson 9 times already

You wish they were the “dawgs”

Apparently seeing, is not believing, at least for you

Fla., nor Ala. has looked good every game (if not for the refs, they should have had at least one loss, and possibly two)

Paul Johnson put the breaks on in the 4th qtr or you’re looking at 70-31

I will bend, to say the defense was shaky in the 1st half, but it’s the same D we’ve had all year.

Yes, the BCS is noticing Tech

Nesbitt should get a mention for the Heisman, he has more rushing TD’s than most RB’s in the country, doesn’t throw much, but they count for more when he does.

Kudos to you for inciting a blog riot

Peace, from the most Native Son

SLIM PICKENS

November 1st, 2009
9:35 am

…………….Josh Nesbitt for Heisman !

Born2Buzz

November 1st, 2009
9:35 am

Yea, our D, specifically our pass D played terrible, but really only for one half. Look, we are the #11 (maybe higher after this weekend) team in the country and we have suspect Special Teams and a suspect D. The O makes up for a lot. This tells me there is room for improvement and with Coach PJ in charge I’m confident there will be improvements. That means challenging for BCS titles are a possibility.

Jeff, I appreciate the fact that you read and respond to the comments. It is a blog afterall. Maybe you could teach Tony B how to do so. Nah, nevermind.

Overstated

November 1st, 2009
9:35 am

Yes, the kicking game stinks. But that’s stating the obvious. The D stunk up the first half with missed tackles and some bad schemes. But they shut them down after the break. Good teams do that. But the “…nothing to celebrate” headline is a cheap shot. To even imply that this wasn’t domination is silly, really. Here Jeff, let me help:

Team Stats
Georgia Tech Vanderbilt
First downs 28 15
Rushing 22 7
Passing 5 8
Penalty 1 0
3rd Down 71% 55%
Rushes-Yards 69-404 29-218
Passing Yards 193 179
Return Yards 113 203
Pass C-A-I 6-13-0 14-24-0
ToP 39:45 20:15

Florida can struggle to even win the game against Miss St (who Tech dominated) and all you hear is “Good teams find a way to win.” Yeah, they do.

Coach Martinez

November 1st, 2009
9:44 am

Is there anyway I could persuade #26 D. Reese to transfer to Ga., he would fit right in with our defense, oops, he just missed another tackle

Long-time Jacket

November 1st, 2009
9:45 am

Journalism in Georgia is a thing of the past. No wonder so many newspapers are bankrupt or close to it.

IT NEVER seems any newspaper in the entire state can stand Tech having some success…wonder why? Oh, is it because most of the “journalists” are UGA graduates. Let UGA win a game by a fluke and it becomes a great moment in history…shades of Lindsey Scott. Show a little class and be glad another of the State’s institutes of higher learning is having a good season.

Stop being so negative. It will shorten your life!

Crump

November 1st, 2009
9:47 am

Thanks, for a good post. We’ll take the win, and pin this up in the locker room. One great truth is that all fame is fleeting.

MalibuGT

November 1st, 2009
9:49 am

whoa….bankerdawg….that is the most insightful post i’ve ever seen from a dawg fan on a GT blog.

The SEC is the SEC and playing at night (halloween) on the road is a tough task. without any doubt, our defense and special teams are not “top ten caliber”. we must lean on CPJ and the offense to make things happen.

I’m going to enjoy this amazing season and not start stressing over “bad wins”. i’ll take them anyway we can get them.

The question for us is how much the defensive woes are fixed by changing the coach. I know that is the number one discussion point on the UGA blogs and seems to be a consensus conclusion. I’m not happy with GT’s defensive showing (can’t seem to keep it together for 4 quarters), but not settled in my mind on if new coordinator fixes all that…

Dr. Phil

November 1st, 2009
9:51 am

There is absolutely no doubt that Tech is on the way up and UGA is on the way down. When the fans run Richt out of town on a rail, I hope they have a spot for Adams too. Will Tech have bowl junkets for members of the legislature now that Adams will be spending the holidays at his villa in Italy?

MalibuGT

November 1st, 2009
9:53 am

and Jeff, I hope you’re sleeping (after that midnight chicken quesadilla!). anyone who reads your stuff regularly knows you aren’t biased towards UGA. I think your style emphasizes the negative, regardless of team, and that’s ok. Occasionally, its even funny ;-)

son_sir

November 1st, 2009
9:56 am

Anybody know if a time has been set for the Wake game ?

BankerDawg

November 1st, 2009
9:57 am

Jeff

Sorry about the “idiot” comment.

I’m in a bad mood.

Born2Buzz

November 1st, 2009
10:00 am

We also fumbled on the 5 yd line. 56 could easily have been 63.

Take the W and move on. It is obvious that GT will not get respect from the national press unless we run the table and finish 13-1.

It will be interesting to see what UF does against Vandy next week as a comparison.

Now, let’s focus on Wake. They almost beat Miami and can throw the ball.

Saint Simons

November 1st, 2009
10:01 am

UGA = THUG ball

old Tech fan in NC

November 1st, 2009
10:01 am

The Wake QB was hurt yesterday…could have made a diff against Mia…and hopefully he will be OK against Tech. Concussions are serious.

The Dook passing game is cause for concern for the Tech D.

I was not worried about the outcome against Vandy…even when they gained the lead.

" I just want to celebrate"

November 1st, 2009
10:03 am

Number 10 in the nation is not bad.

GA Tech Insider

November 1st, 2009
10:05 am

And might I add, not as a total excuse, GA Tech’s defense was playing hurt all night, yet again; or they were slowed by players just back from being out for various reasons, therefore slightly out of shape. This list isn’t insignificant:

Jerrad Tarrant – bad back

Sedric Griffin – played with hand in cast

Dominique Reese – bad shoulder

Steven Sylvester – not sure, but didn’t play

Robert Hall – still out, but may be able to return sometime this month

Cooper Taylor – out for the year

Kyle Jackson – out for the year

Julian Burnett – returned after being out two weeks with a knee injury

Jason Peters – returned after missing last week due to illness

After looking at this list, and remembering the Yellow Jackets have been playing non-stop since 2-a-days, let’s cut the guys on defense a little slack for slipping in the first half.

Several guys came in playing out of position for the injured players, like Mario Edwards and Corey Earls, and once things got settled down in the second half, the guys came through quite nicely.

Angus

November 1st, 2009
10:05 am

Just adding to the Tech fans’ angst……..

After the 17 or so columns the AJC put out on the GA-FL game last week (as if there was any chance it would actually be a contest) and none on the Tech game, I cannot believe this is what you all came up with.

Perception is everything in CFB – I’m sure this will only help to keep Tech the worst rated 1-loss team in the nation. Tomorrow (or today), Heather Dinich will have this as a lunchtime link and this will contribute to what the nation thinks of Tech.

Thanks a ton, Jeff.

Old Gold Britches

November 1st, 2009
10:06 am

You were too easy on the poor defensive coverage especially D Backs and Linebackers.

LAdawg

November 1st, 2009
10:07 am

What a JOKE! Wins against Vandy and MS State and you guys crow about victories against the SEC when you play in a league of nothing but Vandys’ and MS States’. Replace Florida, LSU, and Oklahoma State with the crap in the ACC and all of a sudden the DAWGS are a one loss team and in the BCS picture.

Old Gold Britches

November 1st, 2009
10:13 am

LA mutt idiot

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/polls/119

Strength of Schedule GEORGIA TECH # 13 the black non magic nadd lickers #48

Go back to your pizza delveries.

tech fan

November 1st, 2009
10:24 am

Georgia Tech defeated Vanderbilt on Saturday night 56-31. Looks one-sided. It wasn’t. Nor should it have been this sloppy or this difficult……….
……………………………………………………………………………..word !

LAdawg

November 1st, 2009
10:24 am

OGB, so GT and the BCS are JOKES, what’s your point? Be thankful you were playing Vandy and not the Gators yesterday. Georgia’s colors are Red and Black; Tech’s are YELLOW and white. I bet Tech will have a YELLOW out when the Dawgs come calling.

GTOldSchool21

November 1st, 2009
10:25 am

Jeff, while the game wasn’t pretty the result was a win and I think the 56 points overcame the sloppy defense and terrible kickoffs and kickoff coverage. Later in the game, we improved the kickoff coverage and actually forced a fumble. Last time I checked, college football is 4 quarters for a reason. Give Tech some credit for finding a way to win again…by 25 points. This game was a wake up call but at the same time, Alabama almost lost to Tennessee recently…and Tennessee is terrible this year and they crushed your Bulldogs. Please talk trash about the teams that lose….Iowa No. 4 almost lost to Indiana….now that was an escape….

Jeff Quit Hating.........

November 1st, 2009
10:29 am

Bulldogs……………..SUCK

Falcons………………..CHOKE

The Yellow Jackets are the CLASS & SAVIOR of the State!

Old Gold Britches

November 1st, 2009
10:30 am

LA mutt……..my pizza is late…………………I was actually pulling for your mutts yesterday. I actually thought they had a chance. I guess I had a weak moment there……………… Looking forward to seeing you on the Flats. It should be a good game….maybe 56 to 31!

Jeff Quit Hating.........

November 1st, 2009
10:33 am

Saint Simons

November 1st, 2009
10:01 am
UGA = THUG ball

You mean WORTHLESS THUG at QB!

GTRich

November 1st, 2009
10:34 am

What are we feeding the kickoff guy, a low cal, low protein diet?? His kickoffs are what – 30-35 yards long??. That’s giving the opponents a helluva start. Put this guy in the weight room. Plus the defense was asleep along with Wommack for the entire first 3 periods. Thank God our offense can score more than the defense gives up.
As usual the offense did some great. I like how Nesbitt mixed it up. Overall great job by the offense big guns. Next stop Wake Forest. If skinner is back watch out. I think they are a better team than Vandy.

Jeff Quit Hating.........

November 1st, 2009
10:35 am

It will hurt all the Dawg fans when the Falcons miss the playoffs, select Tim Tebow and bench Ryan. That would have to hurt :)

LAdawg

November 1st, 2009
10:36 am

OGB you are a good guy. Your pizza is about to come out of the oven. Really, do you think with our offensive problems (QB that is out of his league, no running game, and a line that cannot comprehend the concept of a snap count) that we will be able to score 56 on the second worst defense in the state?

eastofA1A

November 1st, 2009
10:36 am

Thanks, Jeff. I for one have not been more frustrated and yelled at the TV more during a game in a long time. Our secondary plays ridiculously soft (except for MB). Watching them take bad angles, lazy pursuit, and dive at people’s feet trying to tackle was driving me crazy. Good teams do NOT play like that, even if we’re tired, beat up, or know we’re going to score 56 points before the game starts. The defense needs to get serious and GET NASTY! Missing Cooper Taylor has turned out to be a much bigger loss than ever expected.Cooper knew how to tackle.

Steve

November 1st, 2009
10:36 am

Give me a break Jeff. We scored 56 on them. I seem to remember the gators and noles having games like this with teams like Vandy when they were rolling up the points in the 90’s. Then it was wow look at the offense. Do I want the D to play better? Yes. But we held them to 3 points in the second half. They made adjustments and stopped them. We scored 56 Jeff. That’s 8 td’s. So quit complaining.

big dog

November 1st, 2009
10:40 am

Did number 26 make a tackle the entire game vs Vandy?? Every big play that the Dores made-26 missed a tackle. I don’t know who is backing him up, but if I were the coach he would not see the light of day anytime soon. But then why lay all the blame on him, the entire defense stunk in the first half. No way is tech a top 5 team with this defense–and brother I love the Jackets!!

doc

November 1st, 2009
10:41 am

like banker dawgs assessment of the game. like the fact ufa didnt do it against little miss st there and the jackets did at miss st. like the fact tech did get very good results under similar circumstances at vandy as ufa had at miss st but sort of stumbled. hard to sneer at 600 yards, over 700 with returns thrown in. like the stat that vandy hasnt rolled over with anyone from the sec and did get pelted by tech.

got to give some cred to the guys from the flats but agree no celebration. johnson doesnt do that or encourage it because he wants guys to walk like they expected it all along. so yes, i wont celebrate a victory either against a team they made look like it was bottom of the southern conference much less a team that didnt get blown out by its sec counter parts. it is johnson’s job to keep the guys focused on each game at hand and make the necessary adjustments at half to get wins. he proves to do just that. i can celebrate that, big time.

Steve

November 1st, 2009
10:41 am

Oh and Jeff. The line was 12-13. We won by 26. We doubled the spread and you are complaining? Nuff said.

Dawgs lost by what? 25 when the line was fla by 16?

Go back to the Ga game last year also. Do you see the trend. Come out getting beat or barely ahead first half. Make adjustments at half time. Steam roll to an easy win in the second half. Too many of you media pundits think football is a one half game. We’ve had 3-4 games this year where we dominated the second half over good offensive teams. The same will likely play out again against ga this year.
Close in the first half. We blow them out in the second.

Brock

November 1st, 2009
10:42 am

LA Dawg. Sorry you have to come over to the Tech Blog to get your jollys. Did you bring your black helmutt? Silly boy

Steve

November 1st, 2009
10:43 am

Of course if vandy loses to fla 61-24 next week, everyone will say look how dominant the gators are. It’s a joke.

Jack G.

November 1st, 2009
10:47 am

Why are all you folks jumping on Jeff?

All Jeff did was state the obvious. The D stinks and if it dosent get better someone is going to stick it to us.

I personally think Duke is going to give our D a lesson in Passing. They do it well and we dont defense it very well.

In short, Duke scares me.

As for the Georgia game look out. This will be a battle of defensive Cordinators.—Who is the baddest.

Kane337

November 1st, 2009
10:47 am

It’s easy to criticize the jackets now since the expectations are so much greater but look at this team now and compare them to what they were just 2 years ago under Chan Gailey Night and Day.
Instead of battling for a .500 record and bowl eligibility this team is contending for the ACC championship and is a legitimate top 10 BCS team. Paul Johnson has done a tremendous job in just less than 2 years. Give the man some time to recruit and fix the defense and this team could be scary for many years to come.

JJ

November 1st, 2009
10:49 am

2nd half matters too
28-3 gt

Stinger

November 1st, 2009
10:51 am

Jeff, are you kidding? Nothing to celebrate??? Mighty LSU beat Vandy by 14 pts; Ole Miss beat them by 16 pts; and South Carolina beat them by 4 pts. The worst loss previously was to UGA 34-10. We scored by far more points on them than anyone has and beat them by more points 25, than anyone else has. This was the mighty SEC on the road that we clobbered. Yeah, our defense did not play that well, but a football game is 60 minutes and we absolutely destroyed them in the second half like we have done most of the year. I am very pleased with this stomping of a mighty SEC team.

truth

November 1st, 2009
10:52 am

Johnson is a man, richt and bobo are boys

GT

November 1st, 2009
10:55 am

The Tech team played with heart, a Gailey team would have lost that game. What team in the country has the kind of record Jeff is talking about. We have bigger fish to fry so the article was somewhat on the money, we have a very weak first half defense almost by design it looks like. I am just glad we are having the year that wins along are not enough, this is a special year and these article are welcomed in that light.

Glitchy

November 1st, 2009
10:58 am

Don’t know if you’re pro-Georgia or pro-Tech, but you sure are pro-Statist – maybe B4 you write about Limbaugh again, you ( and the rest of the media) will check your facts…..

" I just want to celebrate"

November 1st, 2009
10:58 am

ajc– TECH STEAMROLLS VANDY

GT4Eever

November 1st, 2009
10:59 am

Mike Lum

October 31st, 2009
11:48 pm
Hey reality check, that was no rout. Don’t know what game you watched. Tech scored 21 points off four Vandy fumbles. Without those, it’s a 4 point game (if my Tech calculus/math is right).

WTF…those plays happened. You can’t play what ifs. It’s part of the game. They all count!!!

GBG

November 1st, 2009
10:59 am

The Yellow Jackets (8-1) rolled up a season-high 597 yards total offense against a Vanderbilt defense that was ranked 34th nationally, giving up 320 yards per game. They wore Vanderbilt out, holding the ball for nearly 40 minutes and rolling up 404 yards rushing.

And you write this crap? What about the offense Jeff? Give me one big break.

Old Gold Britches

November 1st, 2009
11:01 am

LA mutt NO, but maybe 31

wordy

November 1st, 2009
11:13 am

“And by the way, decaf is a waste of time. I generally go straight from high-octane coffee to scotch”

that is great. thanks Jeff

By the way GT what is up with GT. Wins at VT and gets destroyed at UM??? GT will be humiliated in a BSC bowl game

Stinger

November 1st, 2009
11:15 am

LAdawg, I wish we could play LSwho, Floriduh, Bammer,Okie State(LOL),Ole Missy, South Caroliner, Rocky Top, etc. This leaque is a joke. Plain and simple, a joke. Sad for you we do have one more SEC game on our schedule, UGA. I’d like to see you play Virginia, Duke, and Wake this year and see if you could win any of the 3. I doubt it.

macrotech

November 1st, 2009
11:19 am

LAdawg, no offense intended, but the sec just isn’t anything special without UF, BAMA and LSU (lsu is still questionable this year). The BIGGEST problem with Tech’s offense is that we’re going to have a tough time getting people to play us…right now, we have a schedule that we must play; we’re 8-1 with it! If you think the mutts could beat UM, FSU, NC, BC, then you’re as delusional as they come! No offense plus no defense means no chance! We have half of the equation working REALLY well….the other half is in the works! Amazing offense plus good defense equals a NC in the next couple of years. We all know how tough this season has been for all the dawg fans…sorry…Tech is the sh**, now! You know it! And, it KILLS you!!! GO TECH!!!

Jonnyboy

November 1st, 2009
11:20 am

Jeff, I see you still have a column. Not surprised it’s the AJC. Did they tell you to stick to sports and sports only? That is something that even you can’t screw up.
Now don’t think I am being hard on you, that Bonehead guy Mr no nothing football is just as bad.

jojatek

November 1st, 2009
11:21 am

Schultzy, puhleeeeaaaaase!! Are you kidding me?!! Our boyz made the adjustments that were necessary on defense… they were opportunistic when it mattered most… and their offense rolled yet again… that is what great teams (and, dare I say it, great programs) do… CPJ is the real deal…

Let’s talk a little bit more about those black helmets in Jacksonville: What the hell was that all about?!!! I think Jerry Glanville was the guy who invented that concept… dress an underachieving, poorly coached football team in black in a desperate ’slight-of-hand’ attempt to keep the fans (and the critics) at bay. Unfortunately, the black helmets are here to stay with the Falcons (Glanville’s only tangible legacy in Atlanta if you set aside his decision to send Brett Favre packing…). Let’s hope Richt gets back to red helmets on Thanksgiving weekend… if we wanted to play Grambling, we would have put them on the schedule!!

… and for God’s sake, CMR, please stop talking about men wanting respect and women wanting love in your post-game press conference… we’re really starting to worry about you… ;)

Brock

November 1st, 2009
11:21 am

My apologies to LA Dawg. This is not a tech blog, but a blog about tech. However, I still feel sorry for you.

Tallahassee Jacket

November 1st, 2009
11:22 am

Jeff, those Vandy fumbles were forced by GT defense. I don’t recall any missed center/qb exchanges, bad handoffs, etc. A rout is a rout.

Gen Neyland

November 1st, 2009
11:23 am

JS’s blog is accurate. To the GT fanbase, congrats on beating two of the SEC’s bottom feeders of 2009. You should start low and work your way up the ladder of SEC programs cause we all saw what happened when you started near the top last bowl season. And my goodness, Vandy hung with ya’ll way too long. I still see a GT defense that is hot/cold.

buzzwax

November 1st, 2009
11:23 am

Paul Johnson 56 Steve Spurrier 14

Johnboy

November 1st, 2009
11:25 am

Beez R beeutiful BUT DEFENSE wins championships! We’ll get there. I see a couple of ESL kickers on the horizon so that we aren’t always short field challenged. recruiting is gonna be like christmas in a toy store for CPJ. Who wouldn’t wanna come to ATL and play for a winner?

buzzwax

November 1st, 2009
11:25 am

Vandy and Miss St. are only in the SEC when they play SEC opponents……

Giff Smith for DC!

GTFan1

November 1st, 2009
11:26 am

What time do you guys think the Wake game will be? 3:30?

79

November 1st, 2009
11:27 am

I wonder if there isn’t a girl on Tech’s women’s soccer team who could get the kick-off past the other team’s 15 yd line…..

ACC puts up more points on Vandy than any sec team

November 1st, 2009
11:29 am

Jeff,
Such doom and gloom. Tech just put up more points on Vandy than any other sec team has. It’s hard to get up to play them, even for the sub-par ACC.
The only reason ugag put up their 30 something is they are trying to salvage their season.

Stumpknocker

November 1st, 2009
11:29 am

Shove it up your exaust pipe Shultz. Had this been a Dawg win, it would have been a hard – faught victory over a tough SEC opponent……….and BTW (LA DAWG), you can shove-it too!!!!!!!!

willie

November 1st, 2009
11:35 am

Hysterical article….we won by nearly 4 TD’s. Great stuff, Jeff.

Johnboy

November 1st, 2009
11:40 am

LA DAWG California deserves you… BTW your mop up QB did a lovely forward lateral to Brandon Spikes or was that supposed to be a forward pass?

Johnboy

November 1st, 2009
11:41 am

or was that lower alabama ?

Full Metal Jacket

November 1st, 2009
11:42 am

Just spent an hour this morning watching Sportscenter for their coverage of the GT game. Iowa got at least 10 min worth of love for a horrible game. TCU got plenty of coverage “still trying to figure out how they are even ranked… they dont play anyone worth a crap.” Oregon got spotlight props for the good win over a horribly overrated USC.

GT……buried in the 1 min “and in other football news section” showing one pass TD.
Of course UGA got a few good mins for their thumping by Florida. By the way UGA… the helmets are lame….seriously…when your uniform makes better press than your play on the field, its time to reevaluate your program….

Napa Jacket

November 1st, 2009
11:42 am

Schultz, you get it and you have gotten it all year. Tech can be good but we are not yet to a point where we can not be on point and still be good. I think you have a grounded approach to describing the state of our team. We are a heartbeat away from being one of the elite teams in the country but we are a hiccup away from dropping back into the masses. The best thing about our team is that the players and the fans have bought into the system and Coach Johnson has our respect and attention. My unqualified opinion is that if PJ can rally the troops as he has in less than 2 years (since the departure of Gailey) then he has the chance to do some very special things down at the flats…as long as he avoids the hiccups.

Keep up the good work.

JimC

November 1st, 2009
11:47 am

That was an embarrassment. If Vanderbilt hadn’t made so many mistakes in the 2nd half, Tech would have lost the game. I usually feel great on Sunday after a win, but not this time.

If we play like we did Saturday in Nashville, we’ll lose the last three games AND lose the devision championship.

Why can’t we play with any consistency?

Dumb

November 1st, 2009
11:47 am

Fla won the NC in 2006. That year they beat Vandy 25-19.

In 1996, when they had that powerful Danny Weurfel offense look how bad they beat Vandy. Give me a break JEFF

Florida Gators (12-1-0)
Date AP Rank Opponent Result
Aug. 31 #4 SW Louisiana (0-0-0) 55-21
Sept. 7 #4 Georgia Southern (1-0-0) 62-14
Sept. 21 #4 at #2 Tennessee (2-0-0) 35-29
Sept. 28 #1 Kentucky (1-2-0) 65-0
Oct. 5 #1 at Arkansas (1-2-0) 42-7
Oct. 12 #1 #12 LSU (4-0-0) 56-13
Oct. 19 #1 #16 Auburn (5-1-0) 51-10
Nov. 2 #1 Georgia (3-4-0) 47-7
Nov. 9 #1 at Vanderbilt (2-6-0) 28-21
Nov. 16 #1 South Carolina (5-4-0) 52-25
Nov. 30 #1 at #2 Florida St. (10-0-0) 21-24
Dec. 7 #4 vs. #15 Alabama (9-2-0)* 45-30
Jan. 2 #3 vs. #1 Florida St. (11-0-0)† 52-20

GR82BAG8R

November 1st, 2009
11:51 am

Gen Neyland, let’s see how the Vols perform against Vandy. Then you can try and defend how long Vandy hung with the Vols – - or perhaps how they hung one on the Vols.

BTW, one of those SEC bottom feeders gave Florida fits. So either Florida is close to being a bottom feeder, or MSU isn’t.

daegcatcher

November 1st, 2009
11:53 am

Jeff – you must have confused the Georgia performance with Georgia Tech. Don’t you get the script by now – lay back in the first half to make the other side relaxed and over confideent and then sting like a bee in the second half and really cream their butt in the final quarter – works every time! Poor dawgs – they looked pathetic and really will get an ass whuping when they play Ga. Tech. Bring lots of hydrocortisone for the bee stings!

JimC

November 1st, 2009
11:54 am

A bit off-blog, but it was quite enjoyable watching the Dawgies go down in flames yesterday. They’ve evolved into a very entertaining team as we try to guess how many bonehead penalties they’ll have each week and how many of their illiterate thug players are arrested.

It’s hard to have any team speed when half their players are wearing those heavy ankle monitors.

willie

November 1st, 2009
11:55 am

I must be missing something. GT had 25 more points, 200 more yards of offense and and a 40 to 20 minute time of possession lead. Vandy had the 2 fluke plays late in the first half to make it look closer than it was. There was never a doubt in my mind as I watched that GT was going to win this game. Good teams win games like this and they did….easily.

dawgcatcher

November 1st, 2009
11:56 am

Oh and when are the dawgs going to get a real quaterback like Nesbitt. Cox looks so pathetic and overwhelmed each time they lose.

JimC

November 1st, 2009
11:56 am

Hydrocortisone for bee stings. Ha ha, that’s pretty funny!

canes2222

November 1st, 2009
12:00 pm

very impressive. I said after the lose to us that if GT defense plays good, they will be the team to beat in the ACC. Right now GT deserves mid-top ten, maybe top 5 consideration. Great game!!

bamayellowjacket

November 1st, 2009
12:01 pm

Jeff
Did you write the title for this blog? Otherwise,some good observations. The defense still needs work, but the offense, OH MY!
Any ol’ way, a win is a win. and I “celebrate” them all.

Gen Neyland

November 1st, 2009
12:03 pm

GR82BAG8R : Until the game is played, one never knows what may happen. The point today is that GT-Vandy was played so now we can be critical of what was seen. Anyway, congrats to your guys…

AMG

November 1st, 2009
12:05 pm

I remember when people said this offense would never work against the FBS teams. When was that, last week, last month. Does LSU think they could stop us this year? I want a rematch, Tech may not have much of a defense,but boy will they run you over. Please send the second best SEC team to play Tech. We will destroy Alabama, Florida or LSU. Not one of them is a true power house team this year and the SEC is completely overrated.

Jackette

November 1st, 2009
12:05 pm

Would someone take a look at last nights game on ESPN360 at the 3:27:55 mark, take a look at Jonathan Dwyers photo? Who is that? It isn’t Dwyer so just wondering whose photo they have up with Dwyer’s name under it?

Patrick

November 1st, 2009
12:05 pm

Great win, GT!! The offense is a lot of fun to watch. One thing I noticed was the OLs do a lot of cut-blocking. Why does #71 dive at the ankles of the opposing lineman on every single snap? Anyway, good luck the rest of the season although you won’t need much luck to whip the pathetic UGA mongrels.

AMG

November 1st, 2009
12:08 pm

Thank God for Oregon, I know Tech fans want to be ranked ahead of them, but I hate hearing how great USC is, when it was obvious they were not all that. way to go DUCKS! USC should be ranked 15th or higher if anyone votes for the truth and not for some west coast bias.

Jackette

November 1st, 2009
12:08 pm

GT plays 3 SEC teams this year, 2 on the road whether any of them are ranked or not. The schedule is set, if all were in the top 25 and UGA usually is, we still have to play them. Not GT’s fault they are not having good years. You want to cry over someone’s schedule..take a look at who Fl and Bama play outside the conference…both play FIU, then here’s the rest..Charleston Southern, Troy, N. Texas and Chattanooga..

bamayellowjacket

November 1st, 2009
12:09 pm

BTW, this blog is still on daylight savings time.

W&Ws

November 1st, 2009
12:09 pm

Sorry, Jeff. It really does look like you made up your mind how to write your column at the half. Tech got 28 first downs and just one penalty. That tells me something about the overall progress of the team, O and D.

GR82BAG8R

November 1st, 2009
12:11 pm

Gen Neyland, agreed. However, the same “an any given day” applies. As much as we all like to think our teams are much better than other teams, upsets do occur. The overall stats of last night’s Tech game show domination. What impresses more about Tech is how they make adjustments at halftime. They don’t have the talent, yet they find ways to engineer victories.

Congratulations on your victory over South Carolina. I have to say, though, those black jerseys look odd. Have you been taking fashion lessions from Georgia?

Retards

November 1st, 2009
12:11 pm

Hey neyland you idiot–gt beat miss st by more than fla and lsu. we put up 56 on vandy. let’s see what fla does next week you moron. my guess is fla 41 vandy 20

" I just want to celebrate" what Tony Barnhart said

November 1st, 2009
12:13 pm

Mr. College Football predicted Georgia Tech would win by 25 points against Vandy and they did so.

" I just want to celebrate" something GT

November 1st, 2009
12:18 pm

Can we re-name the Cynthia McKinney Parkway after Josh Nesbitt.

ga is worst team in the sec

November 1st, 2009
12:20 pm

per the espn analysis crew. lmao.

i find it sad (not really) that the only adjustment that coach richt knows how to make is an adjustment in the dawgs uniform. by the time they play us i fully expect richt to have them playing in pink panties.

as far as those that disparage our d… give me a freakin break already. some points…

-we lost a ton of talent from last year on d so we knew we would be in a learning curve.
-obviously coach w and j both knew we needed more talent on the d at the begining of the year. look no further than our current recruits. almost all of them are d players.
- tenuta the coach that never met a game day adjustment that he liked aint looking all that stellar at nd. even though nd is a senior ladden team of 4 and 5 star players.
-insider had it right. we have a ton of injuries on d and we are still performning well enough to win and win big.
-we have no senior leaders on d.
-of 31 points, 3 came after the half. great adjustments on both special teams and on the d as a whole.
-the d really only gave up 17 points when you consider the run back and the hail mary tipped pass that vandy was gifted.
-anybody else notice that we ’shut’ down the ko returns after the half? shut them down. shut down a guy who tied will gaults return record.

i am way happy with coach w. those of you who whine an cry about him need to look at the facts before you prejudge the guy.

if he isnt doing his job than cpj will toss him out on his can (unlike chan) after the season is over.

something that coach richt has never had to do in his entire head coaching career.

Give me a break

November 1st, 2009
12:23 pm

We win by 25, which is double the friggin spread and this crap is written???
We put up 600 yards of offense against what was the 34th best defense, that plays in the mighty SEC and we get this?

What a load of crap. Football is TWO halves JEFF. Not one. If the Yankees were tied with the nationals 3-3 in the 5th and went on to win 10-4, would you say oh my they have issues? If Duke was tied with Coastal Car in bball at the half and went on to win 88-60, would you say oh my issues?? Of course not. Yet you write this garbage. What should have been written if you were truly a good sports writer would be something like—
Tech pulls away from Vandy as expected. Game was close early but gt’s dominant running AND passing pulled them away from a slow start. That is FAIR and ACCURATE. Not the crap you wrote. You really are a joke at analyzing. You sound like a liberal politician trying to justify pelosi and obama’s grand trillion dollar soon to be 4 trillion health care bs. Pathetic man.

Tech82

November 1st, 2009
12:25 pm

Mike Lum writes: “Tech scored 21 points off four Vandy fumbles. Without those, it’s a 4 point game (if my Tech calculus/math is right).”

Using the logic of that brilliant commentary, I could say, “Without the tipped pass, 62 yard run and kickoff return, it would have been 56-10.” What a ridiculous statement. You don’t get to analyze a game by removing the plays that didn’t go your way. If you could, then UGA would actually have a winning record right now.

GT65

November 1st, 2009
12:28 pm

600 yards of total offense and an 8-1 record are certainly reasons to celebrate. Win –I don’t get this article

coach smith

November 1st, 2009
12:31 pm

Tech’s mouth runners better hope they can score 50+ points on UGA becuase it is going to take that many to beat the Dawgs

Tech cannot stop the pass, UGA will throw the ball all over the yard

Todd

November 1st, 2009
12:32 pm

If 600 yards of offense and 56 points against a top defense in the sec isn’t something to celebrate, then I don’t know what is.
As others have written, we made adjustments at the half. Football is 2 halves you know. This article makes no sense.

coach smith

November 1st, 2009
12:32 pm

Tech fans who are being hard on JEFF,

remember when you were making fun of UGA for beating VANDY “only” 34-10?

Todd

November 1st, 2009
12:34 pm

coach smith
lol. yeah that joe cox and logan gray is real scary. you are too funny man. ga will likely be close in the first half, like they were against fla, but we pull away easily like we’ve done 5 times this year.

we beat the crap out of your sorry team 51-30

Booger

November 1st, 2009
12:35 pm

I feel sorry for CMR having to suffer through the alumni who force his hand on filling skill positions.

GTville

November 1st, 2009
12:36 pm

Jeff: I could not agree more. While offence was as usual spectacular, we can’t fumble on the 5 yard line, give up kick return TDs, and our D has a hard time stopping the shorter passes. Still deserve to be in the top 10 and if a few teams can lose, I think a title shot ahead of undefeated Boise State will be justified.

Duke, Wake and UGA will be able to hit open receivers and score a lot of points. My prediction is the Clemson FSU winner will take on GT in the Championship game….most likely FSU and they will head to the Orange Bowl at 7-5.

coach smith

November 1st, 2009
12:36 pm

Todd

give me a break! You want a pat on the back for beating another 2-7 team?

Tech’s wins
JAX st (get real)
Clemson 5-4
UNC 5-3
VaTech 5-3 your biggest win is over a 3 loss team
Miss St 3-6
Virginia 3-6
Vandy 2-7
Flat St 3-5 or 4-5

Tech’s wins are over teams combined 26/27 and 35

Give me a break and play somebody

coach smith

November 1st, 2009
12:39 pm

Todd

That “joe Cox” still passed for 2 TDs against Florida’s defense

don’t think you can hang your hat on what UGA did against Florida beacuse it doesn’t translate to Tech

Tech’s defense is not in the same breath as UTs, USCAR, Florida, AzSt, LSU or most of the teams that UGA has played

G Man

November 1st, 2009
12:39 pm

Jeff, kudos to you for writing an article that creates controversy (and draws comments), even if it’s wrong. You always celebrate wins, no matter the score, margin of victory or the “luck” of the play or plays that made the difference. Granted, you dont celebrate long, because there just isn’t time – another game looms next week. The most bothersome thing to me about the Tech season is exactly what this article demonstrates – media bias. Tech gets almost no converage on the national halftime shows. Why is this? We lose to LSU last year; so what? LSU outplayed Tech. We lose to UM this year, for the same reason. Hey, it happens. Anybody can lose one game. You write a negative commentary, after Tech wins by 25. OK, the hell with it. All we can do is keep playing, keep winning (hopefully) and eventually we will get some positive press. (I prefer Mark B. anyway; he’s more of a straight shooter and never mixes politics with sports).

Booger

November 1st, 2009
12:41 pm

i love when doggs have nothing to crow about.

V8 Cat

November 1st, 2009
12:41 pm

Jeff,
I am a huge Tech fan (season ticket holder/contributor) and have been for decades.Some of our fans just cannot “stand the truth” which is what I think you gave them. The defense and special teams play are ultimately going to bite us if they don’t improve. It is absolutely amazing we can over-come these problems which is primarily because we have one of the top head coaches in the nation. Yes we lost some very good defensive players from last years team, and we have had some injuries this year, but we gave-up a ton of points to UGA in last years game.

Go Jackets!
Make sure you heap some more misery on the dogs this year.

coach smith

November 1st, 2009
12:42 pm

Booger

yeah but it is not too often is it?

enjoy it while you can

Booger

November 1st, 2009
12:42 pm

i love reading crap posted by fans who look for the perfect game and can’t find it anywhere.

Booger

November 1st, 2009
12:44 pm

live in the now bubba dogg. what are u doing for us now? thats why you hate CMR.

Easy Charlie

November 1st, 2009
12:47 pm

O was NOT fantastic. Forget that. Hello, Tech was playing a 2-6 team called Vandy. Big Orange fans call Vandy “Possum.” Why? Because they get run over on the road and die at home. Tech needs to step way way up. BCS team? Nah. Hey guys — worry about Weak Forest and Dook. One of these ACC “weak sisters” will beatcha.

W&Ws

November 1st, 2009
12:52 pm

“Celebration” also means the fan has a team they enjoy rooting for, win or lose. Most of the pain in the Dawg camp is over this issue.

Texas Wreck

November 1st, 2009
12:55 pm

What game did you watch??? Tech won the game LARGE. Turnovers count. 8 touchdowns was a season’s worth of points under Gailey. And the tv announcers (SEC Shills!!) had the nerve to say the Tech offense is not built to come from behind. Obviously they know nothing about which they speak. This offense makes very big plays both on the ground and in the air. Vandy is not a great team but they played hard and lost again. A football game is 60 minutes long and it ends after the 4th quarter. Cutting performance into segments means nothing: The final score counts….
Give it a rest.

Todd

November 1st, 2009
12:55 pm

smith
you are on here evey week saying the same thing with this and other aliases. you’re a pathetic loser just like your ga team. enjoy every loss as i will laugh at every one of them. looks like 6-6 and you talk trash about a 8-1 team. ps you haven’t beaten a RANKED team this year. GT has! Get it? of course not. you are a loser. adios perdedor.

Todd

November 1st, 2009
12:56 pm

easy charlie = coach smith and im sure more will pop up throughout the day. what a waste of a life this sicko has.

BravesFan79

November 1st, 2009
1:07 pm

Didnt Vandy also challenge florida for a half? This article is overly pesimistic. Everyone knows our defense is weak this year compared to last year. Wait till we get some of these top recruits in here, GT’s defense will be dominant again!

One tin soldier rides away

November 1st, 2009
1:16 pm

Not long til the til the rubber meats the road at Grunt Field Dudd Stadium. Dogs will roll on this one. Keep it up Jackets, great team play.

One tin soldier rides away

November 1st, 2009
1:17 pm

So Tech ran it up in the 4th quarter. What is different about that.

One tin soldier rides away

November 1st, 2009
1:17 pm

So Tech ran it up in the 4th quarter. What is different about that.

One tin soldier rides away

November 1st, 2009
1:19 pm

Texas Wreck, what do the announcers have to do with Tech running up the score in the 4th quarter? Same old same old from the ACC crybabies.

Native Son

November 1st, 2009
1:25 pm

Has anyone seen Jeffrey?

Milt 1951

November 1st, 2009
1:28 pm

Just as was wriiten a few weeks ago, Tech now has the coach that Georgia used to have. Georgia will be back but right now I would not trade coaches. I still remember Chan Gailey.

Tech Geezer

November 1st, 2009
1:29 pm

The best defense is a good offense. For Tech, it may be the only defense. It is a good thing Tech’s offense is a truly great offense.

Booger

November 1st, 2009
1:31 pm

bubba doggs. CPJ has the formula. Its called time of possession. And get a big strong qb (a tim tebow knockoff) and a big strong back or two or three and a big strong receiver and if you keep the ball away from the opposition, good chance you will make the spread or better.
now tell us what CMR has to match up.

GTMike

November 1st, 2009
1:31 pm

For a win that was apparently so unimpressive, the ESPN commentators were sure impressed…

Dunno if anyone else caught this, but during SCar./UT game on ESPN they cut to an update on our game in the 4th qtr. right after we had just scored on the long pass. While they were showing it one of the commentators remarked “I can’t believe that these guys aren’t in the top 10″

Starring Paul Johnson as Sheriff Buford Pusser

November 1st, 2009
1:33 pm

stiggywiggy: “At least his damn column wasn’t 1990 pages.”

Stiggy,
I enjoy a good read. I’d like to see him write a few long columns in the future. One that is 2010 or 2011 pages and one that is 2012 or 2013 pages.

Rick

November 1st, 2009
1:37 pm

Jeff,

Do they actually pay you for your “insight” on college football? The way this crazy year is going, any win is a good win (see Iowa). And you do know that Tech rolled up 600 yards of offense on a team from the SEC – where we always here from UGA fans and AJC writers that every game is tough? Better luck on your next article.

Buzzfan

November 1st, 2009
1:38 pm

An ESPN radio guy here in LA saiBd the 2 offenses he lks best are Oregon & GT.

Starring Paul Johnson as Sheriff Buford Pusser

November 1st, 2009
1:41 pm

I watched the game on CSS. It was billed as an SEC football game. Yet the commentators constantly complemented Tech on it’s offensive prowess.
They fairly much knew that it was going to be a beat-down.

P.S. There’s a tin soldier that needs to ride away.

acc still athletically challenged conference

November 1st, 2009
1:42 pm

maybe tech would fare better against florida, alabama and Lsu, not! lmao, the Acc is a joke with one team in the top 20, you’ll always be second rate buggies!!!!!

trainbuilding U.

November 1st, 2009
1:45 pm

nice win nerdos, you have officially beat nobody ranked in the top 20 , lmao

trainbuilding U.

November 1st, 2009
1:49 pm

well va. tech was, lmao

Buzzfan

November 1st, 2009
1:50 pm

sorry for the typos-using my daughter’s laptop

Buzzfan

November 1st, 2009
1:54 pm

The SEC TV guys said they thought Tech was the best 1 loss team in the country. I was surprised because they were SEC
homers for most of the game.

StingDoc

November 1st, 2009
2:01 pm

To: “acc still athletically challenged conference ”

Uh – where did the dawgs go to get their head coach? Isn’t FSU in the ACC?

GT 4-1 against the SEC the past 2 years.

Texas Wreck

November 1st, 2009
2:13 pm

One Tin Soldier Rides Away: You are an idiot. I said the SEC announces made the ridiculous statement that the Tech offense is not capable of coming from behind. It has everything to do with the fact that these announces do not know what they are talking about. They had not seen Tech play nor done their homework. Tech’s offense makes big plays or long drives- they do both. Unlike you, I did not think the UGA helmets looked good; in fact, they looked a lot like Grambling, except Grambling usually has a good team.

Wreckmaniac

November 1st, 2009
2:20 pm

Team success can’t be based on the attitude that no matter what the defense dosen’t do, the offense will take care of it. Wrong. This defense dosen’t seem to be able to learn and continues to let marginal
opponents score big. A strong defense is the surest route to football
success and can carry a marginal offense a long way. The converse is not true. After QB, running back and wide receiver, you put your best atheletes on defense. Coach Spurrier seems to be learning this lesson.

Wreckmaniac

November 1st, 2009
2:23 pm

Lets hope we run up the score when we play the mutts

Wreckmaniac

November 1st, 2009
2:33 pm

If I were a dawg fan and thought my team could beat anybody I would keep my mouth shut about it. Even if the dawgs beat Tech, based on what has happened so far, anyone who predicts it now looks like an idiot.
UGA is down to its last gasp for the year. A win over Tech is the only thing left. Whoever gets to play them over the next 2-3 games is getting
a gift.

Wreckmaniac

November 1st, 2009
2:34 pm

My worry is that Tech will consider UGA as another Vanderbilt and think its going to be cakewalk which it will not be.

browndog

November 1st, 2009
2:35 pm

I am a UGA fan and see no way UGA can possibly keep GT from 400 to 500 yards in offense when the teams get together. Your program is on the rise and its appears that UGA is heading in the other direction. Good luck to you for the restof the year and may your team get the respect it deserves.

Texas Wreck

November 1st, 2009
2:36 pm

The Tech fans complaining about our defense seem to have forgotten the beating we took against Utah a few years ago in a “bowl game” where Tenuto was our DC. Every team has bad days, and our D has had a lot of them, so we depend on offense to win now. U of H gives up over 40 points a game, but scores over 50=winning record.

Mark Richt

November 1st, 2009
2:42 pm

Good teams win in the second half, but wouldn’t expect an AJC reporter to know that. I saw on some post that Yech outscored Vandy 23-3 in the second half. Sounds like what good teams are expected to do? But hey let’s hope they stumble over turkey after Thanksgiving.

B'Ham Jacket

November 1st, 2009
2:44 pm

It doesn’t take long when you see GT play that the weakest link is our DEFENSE. Hopefully, Coach Johnson will take care of this before the WF
game. WF and Duke and GA will burn us with their passing games! Why can we not defend the pass????? Especially since we know that is what they do???
And no that was not Dwyer’s picture shown on CSS broadcat last night. No idea who that was.

Wreckmaniac

November 1st, 2009
2:45 pm

I still can’t understand has Miss State lost to LSU. The same LSU that looked like the Steelers in the Peach Bowl is not in the class of Miss State. Is that another ” good teams find a way to win” story ?

Dawg Fan 74

November 1st, 2009
2:47 pm

No need to worry, the Dawgs will destroy GT.
That should knock them out of the top 20!
GT would have only 1 or 2 wins if they still played in the SEC.

Justin

November 1st, 2009
2:50 pm

Jeff, please stop with this garbage. 1) It’s hard to get too excited about playing Vandy. 2) We have so many injuries on our defense it’s ridiculous and Vandy ran an unconvential offense with some guys that are pretty fast. 3) We put up 56 freakin’ points.

I’m still excited and can’t wait for the UGA game and (hopefully) the ACC Championship game. Tech is the best we’ve been in about a decade or so and we still get terrible articles.

Mutts R Stupid

November 1st, 2009
2:50 pm

For a guy who writes for a third rate shrinking newspaper, little jeffy sure is critical. How about something useful from the Urinal? Maybe all the sports writers at the Urinal could suit up and trot over to the Tech practice field to give the defense a little practice tackling semi-live bodies? When the writers recover, sometime next year, they can resume hyping the mutts and bashing tech again.

Booger

November 1st, 2009
2:53 pm

so bubba doggs – give us the nov 28 game plan? got a new qb yet?

Booger

November 1st, 2009
2:58 pm

and the sec – you have florida and alabama, and what??

Booger

November 1st, 2009
2:59 pm

yes, dog squeeze.

Bryan

November 1st, 2009
3:03 pm

No move up in the coaches poll. They put penn st ahead of us. What a joke. Guess when Iowa gets creamed at oh st and psu loses to mich st or ohio st, they will drop them and put osu with 2 bad losses ahead of us.

Bryan

November 1st, 2009
3:05 pm

Dawg fan
I know you are craving attention. But at least write something logical. We have two wins against the sec you idiot and we don’t even play in your conf. When we beat you, we will have the same amount of wins as your crap team does now. That is funny!

Paul

November 1st, 2009
3:09 pm

When you stumble, everybody notices… except for people watching Iowa and calling them to “Comeback Kids!” Please!!

Shuttle

November 1st, 2009
3:13 pm

I wonder what will happen when….
Oregon loses again.
Lsu beats Bama.
Lsu loses to Ark or Miss
Fla loses to Bama
Iowa loses to Oh st
Cincy loses to Pitt or WV
Texas loses to A&M
TCU loses to wyoming or utah

It will get interesting when all this happens and GT wins out.
But we all know what will happen. They will say the sec is so good that a one loss team deserves to go nevermind the fact GT will have gone 3-0 against that very same sec.
And texas or some other team will get the nod and they will put GT at 3 or 4 saying they just aren’t good enough to be at the top. This is why a playoff has to happen. Each year CF crowns a champion, it is ridden with fraud. The bcs is a joke. Every team sport in the world crowns their champion by playing in a playoff AFTER the reg season. But not Div 1 football. Even 1aa has a playoff. Yeah those 1aa schools are so different where they can have a playoff and the teams they play against can’t. This sport is a joke.

Howabout a win

November 1st, 2009
3:14 pm

Well Jeff – at least GT didn’t dance and jump up and down on Vandy’s V like GA did. And Georgia’s win wasn’t really all that impressive against Vandy either – In fact (if you can recall) going into the 4th quarter Georgia only held a 20-10 lead.

erik

November 1st, 2009
3:15 pm

Hahahah, this is an awful read. Look at Iowa they have stumbled a ton over the past 5 weeks and they are still a top 8 team. Im so tired of the media tring to find something wrong with GT. The offense is top 10 in the nation and hard to stop. The defense is awful but are O scores enough points to win.

Newnan Jacket

November 1st, 2009
3:19 pm

How cynical! Did Georgia Tech just hang more on Vanderbilt than anyone had in the past 8+ years? Yeah, defense and special teams let us down on occasion last night, but thats no reason for this kind of column. I think you had something written at halftime, then toward the end of the 3rd quarter saw that you’d have to come up with something that fit the end of the game. Instead of rewriting the whole thing, you kept the first half and came up with something else by games end. No biggie, did it many times in high school myself.

Back to Tech: I always keep an eye on where I was to guage how far I’ve come. Not since the halcyon days of Hamilton whould we have won last nights game. After the first half I thought we might fold. Look at the reasons: No bye week yet; the first three games were within two+ weeks!; so many possibilities for let-downs against GOOD defenses. But then, I’m still not used to the character of this team.

That, my friend, is reason to celebrate: the character of this team is changing and I am oh, so thankful. There are just too many dark days of mediocrity behind us to be anything but thankful for the possibilities ahead of us.

juvenal

November 1st, 2009
3:19 pm

i’m celebrating-we win by 28(how many teams beat vandy that many?) not playing our a game & some people call that a stumble? 9 wins his first year, maybe that many next week, i bet michigan fans wish rr was that good with another coaches recruits; me, i’m just wondering what kind of d we’ll have with his kind of kid..& with full scholarship limit of 85, our last coach skimped on d recruits…

Chaps

November 1st, 2009
3:22 pm

Rodney Dangerfield-

Mistake to say that Tech’s hometown newspaper calls it nothing to celebrate. The AJC is definitely not Tech’s hometown newspaper. Tech’s hometown newspaper is the Technique.

juvenal

November 1st, 2009
3:24 pm

hey daugs-wud u trade coachs?we wud not!

gtechsta

November 1st, 2009
3:25 pm

I’ll take a 25, almost 600 yards of offense “nothing to celebrate” all season long. Schultz, are you that desperate for readership? Good grief.

SeminoleDale

November 1st, 2009
3:26 pm

Why would anybody respect Tech, what have they done lately on the national scene? NOTHING!

What ever it takes

November 1st, 2009
3:27 pm

Jeff – I think you just showed your true hand when you stated that GT’s win wasn’t really a big deal. You sound like so many UGA fans. But since you may have a very short memory (like most dawg fans) let me remind you that the GA game just 2 weeks ago with Vandy was still close going into the 4th quarter at 20-10. South Carolina just barely escaped with a winn (the same team that really should have beat GA had it not been for a TD called back due to a fantom foul – the type that UGA fans seem to forget when they complain about officials – and a dropped TD pass). Even LSU only managed 23 points against Vandy, and LSU was ranked in the top 7 at that time – that game was still with in a TD with 7 minutes still left in it.
So – I say all this, Jeff, just to point out that your beloved red and black was really showing when you wrote this article.
But one thing is clear – GT showed much more class than UGA can ever manage.

GTman

November 1st, 2009
3:30 pm

Dawg Fan 74 – we are 5-1 (soon to be 6-1) in our games vs the SEC the past two years. We beat Auburn twice with Reggie Ball and they are too scared to play us again. The SEC is a two team league – UF and AL and you are a joke.

Jeff, why do you choose to focus on the first half instead of the second half or the whole game? We totally dominated Vandy in the second half. Even their field goal was set up by a lucky deflected pass reception and they had a KO return for a TD in the first half.

What you fail to understand or appreciate is what has set GT apart from every other team this year – second half adjustments. I have not seen a team as good as GT this year in making adjustments and imposing their will on the opponent in the second half. CPJ is truly a genius when evaluating the game and making adjustments.

The other thing you fail to mention is that this team is just flat out FUN to watch play. Their execution gets better every week on offense (did you see the passing game??!) and the defense gets the stops and the turnovers necessary to control the game.

Go Jackets and keep it up!

What ever it takes

November 1st, 2009
3:32 pm

To SeminoleDale – you ask “Why would anybody respect Tech” – well you must be living at the homeless shelter again – or you aren’t taking your meds again – if memory serves me right I think Tech made a trip for a night game in Tallahassee and won – so I’m assuming FSU didn’t respect Tech?? 49-44 my friend.

Ray

November 1st, 2009
3:38 pm

Here’s what I think. The defense shows up when it has to. When they see the offense is going to trounce, they play to laid back. Then after the tongue lashing after halftime, they get it in gear. It’s happened almost every game this season. This is a prolific offense. Dwyer, Allen, Nesbitt and Thomas are studs. They would be all over sports center if they played on an sec team or tex, oh st, usc etc. They will all be back next year and they will be even better. Next year this offense is going to be just like Nebraska in 95. We are going to score 50-60 a game. By the end of the season, after we crush some big 10 school and are riding a 11 game winning streak, that will be when the idiot media finally talk about us. next year we will be pre season top 3 and in great shape to win a Nat Champ. You don’t need a bama type defense when you have this kind of offense. why is it no one says anything about bama’s offense as being a reason they can’t do this and that??? the best defense is a good offense. Over the past 20 years I have seen amazing offenses win Nat Champs from Fla, to Neb to Usc to Texas. Sorry but rarely do defenses win Nat Champs. It’s usually the offense. And if they ever do get a playoff, watch out. Cause you could see this type of offense win 2-3 Nat Champs over a 5 year period. Because it’s unstoppable when it’s run right. And right now it’s almost perfection.

GTman

November 1st, 2009
3:39 pm

Jeff,

I think I will start calling you Sergeant. After reading this article, it is clear that YOU “KNOW NOTHING”. The clip below reminds me of you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34ag4nkSh7Q&feature=related

So, here’s to a better article next time Sarge!

THWG!

Ray

November 1st, 2009
3:44 pm

And the time of possession. This is a huge asset for gt. Holding the ball for 70% of the game. I wish we had bama this season instead of 2013. We would beat them 45-20

Stone Cold Schultz

November 1st, 2009
3:46 pm

I think too many people are selling Vandy short. Of course they have a crappy W-L record…But they remind me of so many teams, even GT a few years back — They don’t have a lot of depth, but they come in hungry and hang tough for a half or 3/4, then fatigue sets in and games become runaways. They were STILL in the UGAG game well into the 3rd qtr if you recall…

As for WAKE next weekend…GET YOUR TICKETS NOW if you haven’t already. Let’s ROCK BDS!! Yesterdays’ Miami come from behind win with a min to go is what you call A SOUL STEALER…Kind of like when Tech ripped out VT’s heart and they fell apart…Like when Tech ripped out Virginia’s heart and they fell apart…Like when FLA ripped out UGAG’s heart and they fell ap…What a minute. That one doesn’t count. UGAG fell apart after the LSU game — That was their SOUL STEALER. It also gives a false sense of healing if you can blame the loss on the refs instead of taking the game back from the opponent while there’s still time on the clock…Obviously WAKE couldn’t do that by trying a 60 yarder at the end.

I hope I’m not wrong here, but I think WAKE is going to show up an utterly defeated team with NOTHING left to play for…Even spoiling GT’s BCS Bowl Dreams means little to a team that just had its SOUL stolen…GT will win this one by 40 points.

No matter what the ignorant say, we are fortunate to be watching an UNSTOPPABLE OFFENSE run by a soon-to-be NATIONAL CHAMPION COACH starring FUTURE NFL PLAYERS! The top prize may not be this year, but it’s coming. 3 yards and a cloud of dust…Don’t think so. As long as there’s no more stupid 3-3-5 Defense Experiments (the U of M game) or other radical changes, Tech runs the table.

IT’S A GRRREAT TIME TO BE A YELLOW JACKET FAN……SO GET YOUR TICKETS AND LET’S SELL OUT BDS FOR THE WAKE GAME…YES, THE WAKE GAME!!

Flowery Branch Yellow Jacket

November 1st, 2009
3:56 pm

I’ve read and heard complaints about our latest ranking, but I really don’t think we need to be too concerned about it. First, there are seven teams ahead of us who have not yet lost a single game. Regardless of their conference or their mythical “strength of schedule”, a perfect record should count for something. Suffice it to say that several of those teams will be playing each other within the next few weeks, so at least a few will drop from the ranks of the unbeaten.

There are also three 1-loss teams ahead of us … and all three have lost their only game to one of the seven teams mentioned above. Our single loss, on the other hand, came to the U … which is obviously not undefeated. While I personally think the Jackets are playing as well as virtually anyone in the country, you could make a case that our current ranking is “reasonable”. We just need to take one game at a time … win the rest of them … and let the polls take care of themselves. I believe that, if we win our last five games, we will finish the season somewhere between # 3 and # 5. If we build on that foundation, then next year we should start higher and stay higher throughout the season.

Go Jackets!

BehindEnemyLines

November 1st, 2009
3:57 pm

Anybody who watched that game last night & isn’t concerned about our defense, its preparation, its ability, and most of all its willingness to go hard enough to be championship caliber is in serious denial.

Duke won’t hand a game back to us that way, neither will Wake if their QB regains his senses. And the game against UGAg might have to be cancelled because the stadium scoreboards won’t go to 100.

I seriously doubt that CPJ is planning to tell the defense what a good job they did last night and its a sad indictment of how far a lot of the Tech nation has to go to get their minds right that anyone is trying to defend the first 35 minutes or so of last night. This is a team capable of more than we’ve seen in almost 20 years but last night was not a performance that wins the next 3 games, much less 5 more in a row, and we shouldn’t be willing to settle for anything less than all 5 of them.

Ray

November 1st, 2009
4:03 pm

I find this very telling of GT football and the ignorance of the media types like Jeff S.

Since the Miami loss Gt has won 6 in a row. I may be off a point or two, but I am pretty sure GT has covered the spread and in most cases doubled or tripled it in every game since the loss.

UNC the line I think was 7 and we won by 17
Miss st the line was 5 1/2 and we won by 11
FSU was fav by 5 and we won by 5
VT was fav by 3 and we won by 5
We were favored by 6 over Va and won by 25
We were favored by 12-13 over Vandy and won by 25

So if you took Gt every game since Miami, you won the bet. That is amazing in itself. Something that JS should write about but he and this crap paper’s columnists are too lazy to do any research.
Next week we will likely be favored by 12 over Wake. We will win this by 30.
How long before the media wakes up to the fact this is a top 5 team and is the most underrated team in football? We are on a march for a nat champ. If not this season, next year. GT reminds me of neb in the mid 90’s the way we are running all over teams.

CGATECHfan

November 1st, 2009
4:10 pm

It’s articles like this one that makes me wish Furman Bisher were still writing sports columns. It’s also one of the many reasons I don’t even think of buying the ajc anymore.

Yes, Tech’s defense stunk up the first half of play, but they adjusted in the second half and allowed for only 3 more Vandy points. That’s a reason to celebrate.

Here’s a few more reasons to celebrate this win:

Our offense scored 56 points against Vandy and won the game.

Tech’s win over Vandy now gives them a record of 8-1.

Tech win over Vandy allowed them to retain their #11 ranking in the USA Today Coaches’ Poll.

Tech still has a chance to be in the ACC Championship game and play in a BCS Bowl.

Sure it was “just” a win over Vandy. But it’s a win and that’s what ultimately counts in the end. Tech needs to just keep on winning and control the aspects of the game they can control. They can’t control what happens to teams ranked above them. They can’t control media perception and the obvious bias toward teams in other conferences. They just have to keep on winning. Three more wins to an 11-1 record. Now THAT’s something to celebrate!

Ray

November 1st, 2009
4:11 pm

Behind. Huh? Football is TWO, that’s 2 halves. Not one. We gave up 3 points in the second half, and that was only on a fluke play. Quit making it sound like the D was bad all game. What’s the difference between playing great the first and 2nd qtrs and not so good the 3rd and 4th? I would rather play good the last 2. Funny how no one said anything about the def in the VT game, but that’s what happened. Great 1st and 2nd qtr. Not so good 3rd and 4th. The bottom line is until someone stops us offensively, we will win no matter what the def does because we control the ball. And the fact the def stepped up in the second half, well I am not worried about it.

Drexel Gal

November 1st, 2009
4:13 pm

Beware of CLEMSON! Beware of CLEMSON! The Jackets will most likely win the Coastal Division, but they will also most likely play CLEMSON in the ACC championship. Clemson is getting hot at the right time, and its intertia will carry it into the ACC title game. Georgia Tech may be looking at another trip to the Gator Bowl, or worse, a trip to the Chick-Fil-A, which they have NEVER WON, even when it was called the “Peach Bowl”.

Beware of CLEMSON!

Greg

November 1st, 2009
4:13 pm

Here’s a reason to celebrate. We have twice as many wins as UGAg. LOL. And 2 of our wins have come against the mighty unstoppable SEC

nole93

November 1st, 2009
4:19 pm

10th in the latest polls. Tech must not have looked too bad!!

Greg

November 1st, 2009
4:19 pm

Drexal
We will run all over clemson. They won’t be a problem. and learn your bowls. the chik fila takes the acc #2 team, therefore it’s BETTER than the gator.

You’re obviously the same ugag loser posting idiotic stuff on here with your cute ever changing aliases.

RamblingWreckFan

November 1st, 2009
4:22 pm

Let’s hope for a Big East team in a BCS bowl game. If we get someone like a Florida or Alabama, with our defense we will get slaughtered. Thank goodness we have played the two weakest teams in the SEC.

Matt

November 1st, 2009
4:22 pm

3 sec teams ranked now. Hmm just like the ACC.

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
4:24 pm

Tech’s kickoff coverage in the first half reminded me to go down and check to see if the garage doors were left open.

Unofficially, Scott Blair recorded his 7th tackle (2 assisted) and recovered his 1st fumble of the year. That’s high-risk special teams coverage, but thanks, Scott. You play all-out.

Matt

November 1st, 2009
4:26 pm

USC drops just 8 spots after getting blown out? They have 2 losses, with one being to a horrible wash team. And they are still ranked top 12? They should be 20-25. The polls are a joke.

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
4:28 pm

Flowery Branch Jacket – Thanks. That’s exactly what I wanted to say, and you saved me the typing!

Ray

November 1st, 2009
4:28 pm

RamblingWreckFan
Same ugag loser thinking he’s so funny masquerading as a gt fan.
I would love to take on Fla and Bama. They would not stop us. Our off is better than their def. We could beat them both.

tell like it is

November 1st, 2009
4:29 pm

Being a Gt fan is like rideing a Moped,there fun to ride, but you don’t want anybody see you ride one.

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
4:29 pm

“Beware of Clemson” won’t be a problem if we lose to Wake or Duke. FOCUS!!!

Ray

November 1st, 2009
4:31 pm

RamblingWreckFan
Oh and the easiest way to know you are not a gt guy other than your obvious bs ignorant post? It’s not ramblinG
It’s RAMBLIN you DOLT.

Ray

November 1st, 2009
4:34 pm

tell it

Did you even graduate high school? My gosh are you ignorant. Nice spelling and grammar. Being a UGAg is perfect for you.

Matt

November 1st, 2009
4:34 pm

Let’s be real if Tech plays defense like they did last night they will never be a powerhouse program. Hello Paul Johnson i know you love offensive football but we can’t be a BCS title team giving up 30 plus points to a team like Vandy!

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
4:36 pm

Georgia Tech, Penn State, USC. That’s interesting. Iowa is still a sham, though. They are hanging by threads, AND they’ve already beat Penn State. That Iowa-Indiana game looked like ACC-Lite.

NO RESPECT TECH

November 1st, 2009
4:37 pm

GT is really no respect Tech because the ACC is so bad. And the SEC teams you guys beat your chest about beating would be like the best team in the SEC playing Duke and Maryland or Virginia or Wake Forrest. GT is the best team in the ACC. In other wordsn nothing to brag about.

You got luck that Vandy’s 1st team quarterback got hurt in the first few minutes of the game and Vandy had two critical fumbles. Vandy scored 23 on Army and 31 on the best team in the ACC with their second team QB. Each week that goes by proves being the Champion of the ACC is being the Champion of nothing. Tech will lose to either Duke or Wake Forrest, then UGA (yes even the DAWGs as bad as they are will finally put one decent game together) and then Clemson for the ACC Championship game. That’ll be a good representation of where no respect Tech really is. You guys have been really lucky this year but luck can’t last forever.

See you on the flats in November. We got nothing to play for but beating you this year, just like it has always been for you guys. Your are still Tech, a bunch of nerdy losers that have a decent season once every ten years.

You won’t win the ACC and you won’t win 10 games and you won’t beat UGA and you won’t finish in the top 10. Suck on that.

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
4:41 pm

Those Vandy fumbles were *very* forced.

RamblingWreckFan

November 1st, 2009
4:46 pm

Ray, YOU’RE The DOLT. From the Georgia Tech website. Ramblin became the catch phrase in the 60’s IDIOT.

Since that time, the Rambling Wreck car has joined a much older tradition-the Yellow Jacket-as the official school mascot.The current Wreck is the latest in a line of distinctive white and gold cars on campus. While there was no official Rambling Wreck before 1961, several fraternities took turns driving various such vehicles.

The first reference to a Rambling Wreck vehicle on campus was applied to a 1914 Ford owned by Floyd Field, Dean of Men. The Technique student newspaper was the first published reference to the car as the “Rambling Wreck” in 1927. The paper spoke out against Field when he considered trading the car that year, but he disposed of it anyway.

old chestnut dept.

November 1st, 2009
4:47 pm

My new favorite stupid quote: “the woeful ACC.”

Flowery Branch Yellow Jacket

November 1st, 2009
4:48 pm

Wow No Respect … your momma didn’t teach you much about manners, did she? Take a chill pill, find a girlfriend, and get a life!

Horn

November 1st, 2009
4:48 pm

SEC has 3 ranked teams just like the ACC. So simple math even a Uga fan can understand
Sec 3
Acc 3
3=3.

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
4:49 pm

Coach Johnshon isn’t afraid to play true freshmen. Izaan Cross had some big plays at DE. CPJ also isn’t afraid to change things up when mistakes are being made. Anybody see #26 (Reese) in the 2nd half? That’s because he wasn’t in there. He had more whiffs than Jeff Francoeur. He’ll be better next game.

Statue for CPJ

November 1st, 2009
4:50 pm

@Drexel Gal, the peach bowl (I still call it that) is better than the gator bowl. The Gator gets #3 in the ACC while the peach gets #2 and I like Dome better than Jax.

ralph

November 1st, 2009
4:53 pm

AJC lameculas UGA J-School rejects suck

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
4:54 pm

coach smith – Well, whatever. UGA beat Vandy by 24, and Tech beat them by 25. We all know the Tech-Georgia game will be competitive.

SECFan

November 1st, 2009
4:55 pm

Matt, Yes (3) SEC ranked Teams. #1, #3 and #9
ACC #11, #17 and #24.

Big Difference

SECFan

November 1st, 2009
4:56 pm

Horn, See my comments to Matt on rankings.

Stinger

November 1st, 2009
5:02 pm

Coach Smith, UGA wins??? Help me out here. They are so far and few between!!!!!!!!!! Ha!Ha! Ha! 41-17 and 56-31. Bring on Bama and Florida.

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
5:02 pm

coach smith – for your analysis, try this: subtract one loss from and add a win to Clemson, Vandy, FSU, Virginia, Clemson, MSU and UNC because those teams lost to Ga. Tech. Their records would be more respectable if they’d played somebody like Charleston Southern.

Delobert’s Law – “It never pays to beat a top 10 team. Beat them, and theyre not top ten anymore.”

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
5:04 pm

Old Broken Fingers don’t type too good sometimes.

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
5:05 pm

Rename the Cynthia McKinney Parkway the Jeff Shultz parkway, and it would be an improvement.

Yellow Fuzz

November 1st, 2009
5:07 pm

This just in. New AP Poll

1 Florida (38) 8-0 1448
2 Texas (13) 8-0 1408
3 Alabama (8) 8-0 1390
4 Cincinnati 8-0 1212
5 Boise State 8-0 1211
6 TCU 8-0 1147
7 Oregon 7-1 1130
8 Iowa 9-0 1127
9 LSU 7-1 1036
10 Georgia Tech 8-1 949

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
5:10 pm

SEC Fan – Yes, but #1 hasn’t played #3, and #3 hasn’t played #9 yet. Refer to Delbert’s Law. Anyway, Iowa had better not sneak up there, or the BCS will be seriously compromised.

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
5:14 pm

Hmmm, the SEC is right up there with the Cincy’s and Boise States.

Just kidding, no need to flame. The top tier of the SEC is *very* good.

reebok

November 1st, 2009
5:22 pm

I see the Tech-Wake game is set for 3:30. Does anybody know whether Wake’s QB did in fact suffer a concussion? Any word on his availability yet?

Joe Schmoe

November 1st, 2009
5:23 pm

Just got back from Vandy. What a game last night, and a tale of two halves. I think the D stayed on the bus for the first half, but in the second half played like they wanted to murder somone. There was some big hits that caused oooos and ahhhs from GT and Vandy fans alike. Must of been the chewing at half time by CPJ. Although this wasn’t the best game, I dont see it as Jeff does. It is soemthing to be proud about. We have a coaching staff that isnt going to put up with taking a game off (#26 Reese) and will put some one that hasnt played alot (#33Edwards) and make them successful. It could have been better, but we will take what we can get.

Stone Cold Schultz

November 1st, 2009
5:39 pm

BehindEnemyLines: “Denial”…Are you serious? Last night “not a performance that wins the next 3 games”?!?! What you smokin?

Name which team in the next 3 (Wake, Duke, UGAG) beats Tech when the offense produces 56 points and 600yds…There’s NOT AN FBS TEAM that would’ve beaten Tech last night when scoring 56 pts and rolling up 600 yds….PERIOD.

Stop joining Schultz’s Pity Party and CELEBRATE an awesome road win with an offensive performance that won’t soon be forgotten…Long passes, TDs, Dwyer runs, TDs, Nesbitt runs, TDs…WOW! Anyone referring to last night’s TROUNCING of Vandy as a “stumble” is looney tunes!

Rufus

November 1st, 2009
5:46 pm

PJ better use the game as a wake-up call because if you watched the Wake-Miami game, Wake won’t roll over and play dead. They ran up and down the field on the U, and, except for a few well-placed passes and catches, would’ve/should’ve won the game. We can’t expect to give up 31 points and win against Wake.

alabama and florida, thats it, lmao

November 1st, 2009
5:52 pm

how quickly that tech idiot forgot the louisiana state bengal tigers, you remember them don’t you little buggie, nice conference nerdo , we’ll see ya in Atlanta after thanksgiving even if the bug nation gives the dawgs no shot at winning……..its setting up beautiful with all the smack talk from the trainbuilders, llmmaaoo

CASEY

November 1st, 2009
5:56 pm

Hey Jeff even the best teams have games like that. Look at Iowa this weekend against Indiana and Florida against Miss St last weekend. Its just football. Teams have ups and downs. The point is they got it together and won. A win is a win and that is all that matters. No team is perfect every weekend and no team will ever play a perfect game. Just get the win thats all that matters.

Matt

November 1st, 2009
5:58 pm

And guess where 1 3 and 9 will be when they play each other or when they all beat each other which is very possible. Try 5 10 and 20. Not much of a difference eh?

Sunshine

November 1st, 2009
5:59 pm

alabama and florida, thats it, lmao

November 1st, 2009
5:52 pm
how quickly that tech idiot forgot the louisiana state bengal tigers, you remember them don’t you little buggie, nice conference nerdo , we’ll see ya in Atlanta after thanksgiving even if the bug nation gives the dawgs no shot at winning……..its setting up beautiful with all the smack talk from the trainbuilders, llmmaaoo

Hmmm, a dog fan talking smack while being 4-4 and in the dweller. You might wanna worry about your next opponet doggie, and not Tech’s success.

Sunshine

November 1st, 2009
6:01 pm

Matt

November 1st, 2009
5:58 pm
And guess where 1 3 and 9 will be when they play each other or when they all beat each other which is very possible. Try 5 10 and 20. Not much of a difference eh?

You cant beat a flawed system, but you just got to go out and win.

Matt

November 1st, 2009
6:02 pm

Yes Delbert. 1/4 of alabama and uf’s schedule is a joke. fiu troy charl southern n texas chattanooga

Sure is easy to have 8-0 records when 1/4 of your games are pansies. Other sec fans from other teams should laugh at this too. Some are just idiots.

Booger

November 1st, 2009
6:06 pm

still waitin to hear your game plan doggs. and who you starting qb will be. time of possession boys.. time of possession.

SECFAN

November 1st, 2009
6:08 pm

Matt,

Because of their strength of schedule, don’t expect #1, #3 nor #9 to fall to far. Not far enough that you would EVER see GA. Tech in the BCS Championship for sure.

Matt

November 1st, 2009
6:08 pm

It’s funny to read some of the bs on here. They say vandy and miss st are crap. Well fla struggled to beat miss st. Lsu did too. Fla has already played 2 cupcakes. They also played miss st who these ignorant types call sec crap. miss st beat ky last night so i guess that makes ky crap. and fla has vandy next week. so 5 of fla’s 9 games so far are against crap. then throw in ark who a crap ga team beat and you got 6 teams. make is 7 when you realize tenn was playing like big crap when fla played them in week 3. and now since ga is crap, that’s only one team that fla has played, lsu that isn’t crap. but wait. miss st nearly beat them, only losing by 4. miss st had 4 turnovers in that game. lsu had 0. so imo lsu is crap too. so there you have it. fla has played nothing but crap this year. bama too. so you are undefeated playing crap. makes sense.

Booger

November 1st, 2009
6:09 pm

love it when the doggs are mad at their coaches

Matt

November 1st, 2009
6:11 pm

sec fan
are you really this ignorant?
sagarin’s sos shows gt’s sos at 12. here’s where your sec teams and their “tough” sos are now.

fla 27
bama 36
lsu 39
so don;’t give me this sos crap. oh yeah vt is 7 and miami is 11. nice try sherlock.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt09.htm

Booger

November 1st, 2009
6:12 pm

doggs, percy harvin is on fox, gb vs minn, right now. he kicked your butts too if you wanta watch him some more.

Alabama Jack

November 1st, 2009
6:19 pm

Don’t sweat it, Tech fans. I got a good deal yesterday on some used black helmets we can wear for the rest of the season. They haven’t even been sweated in. We will have to affix a T after the G, but hey, the price was right. I got them for tebow, I mean, two bucks. Anyway, their magic will surely propel us over the rest of the schedule.

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
6:41 pm

CASEY – I’ve been on a rant on this for some time, so I apologize in advance. *Don’t use Iowa as an example of an undefeated team, that somebody could “upset! * They play like tissue paper.

CASEY

November 1st, 2009
6:45 pm

Delbert D yeah I don’t think Iowa is that good either, but the polls do. It is what it is.

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
6:46 pm

Alabama Jack – I don’t think those helmets fit properly, so you might try Bethune-Cookman (Martinez’s old job). Did you see Joe Cox’s face near the end of the game? It looked like his head had been in some kind of multi-axis vise.

techredneck

November 1st, 2009
6:48 pm

Very informative article. I love tech but as far back as I can remember they have always neglected their defense. If they would improve it they would be hard to handle. I’ve watched college ball for over 55 years and let me caution our fans. I know its fun to boast and brag but beware these successful seasons never last. Just look at that bunch over in Athens. They’ve had sucess for awhile, but now they’re on hard times. Remember that old saying, “what goes around, comes around”

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
6:57 pm

CASEY – I think that there is a Big-10 fudge factor in the rankings. That is one weak conference. Boston College beat Central Michigan (good MAC team) 31-10 yesterday. CMU beat Michigan State earlier in the year. Iowa didn’t beat IU Saturday, they were handed the game (again).

I don’t think that Tech will play in the NCS game this year (and don’t really care). What I’d like to see, and no offense to SEC fans, is the perfect storm of Bama, Florida and Texas losing, and have TCU and Cincinnati in the top 2 spots. Maybe then these “powerful forces” that “can’t be overcome” can be flushed aside and the BCS crock will crack into shards of clay.

CASEY

November 1st, 2009
7:06 pm

Yeah I agree, Bama, Texas, and Florida lose which i think is going to happen but I still think the BCS wil put one of them in the Champ game which would not be fair because the SEC is over rated. And I know Iowa will lose one prob Ohio St.

techredneck

November 1st, 2009
7:15 pm

Hey,” tell it like it is”‘ Better watch your spelling. Theres some sharp UGA genus name of slobberknocker who loves to show his genus by correcting spelling. You used “their”.In that case it should have been “they’re”. Of course you being a UGA follower, no one expects you to know how to spell any way. Also being a Ga. fan, is different. You want everybody to know who you are. Your teeth are rotten, you dip and spit, you have fart contest every time you and your freinds watch a game. You drive a big loud worn out pickup with “DAWGS” on the back window, and those little red dawg flags blowing in the wind. I hear Chan Galey is unemployed. Call him.

Keep it Real!

November 1st, 2009
7:20 pm

What type of article is this? When Florida and Alabama struggle with a terrible Arkansas team, a weak Miss St team and you make the excuses that the SEC teams are tough to play. Well GT played and SEC team on the road and won going away. Give GT credit for blowing out Vandy!

UGA did not blow-ut Vandy and they played at home!

A road win in the SEC is a great win if continue to the overrated SEC football conference! GT has 2 road wins against SEC teams! What does that mean to you?

UGA fans GT is really going to stomp you this year!

Patrick

November 1st, 2009
7:25 pm

Hey, GT is on the rise now but let’s not forget the fifty one to seven stomping just a few short years ago. How did that stomping feel? It could have been a lot worse if Richt hadn’t put in the 3rd string in the 4th quarter. The game should have ended with sixty five to zilch.

Patrick

November 1st, 2009
7:29 pm

Yellow Fuzz, please cite one team(above #8) that GT could beat.

Hondo

November 1st, 2009
7:46 pm

Jeff,
I would back off a bit on the Wacky Weed before you wright your comments.. So a couple of “Hail Mary” plays kept Vandy in the first half. Then as all great coaches and teams do Tech makes the necessary adjustments in the second half and the rest is histoty.

steve

November 1st, 2009
7:48 pm

About last nights game: I was out taking my little boy trick or treating and listening to the tech game on the radio. I could not believe how bad our defense was playing against a very weak Vandy offense. I am thankful we have a great offense like we have or we would be in bad trouble. After i got back home at halftime and saw the highlights I couldn’t believe the holes in the line that Norman had to run through and that other back ran through. Untouched. This has got to stop! I am happy for the win and happy that our offense once again had a great performance. Tech can beat you so many ways on offense. I just don’t think anybody can stop that. Our defense had better have their game faces on next Saturday against a very dangerous Wake Forest team who is gonna be pretty upset after losing to Miami in the last minute of that game. Skinner is a dangerous QB who can eat us up. I think we’ll win because Wake won’t be able to stop that offense and we will generate some long drives that eat up the clock. Go jackets!

SECFAN

November 1st, 2009
8:11 pm

Matt, Maybe you should look at the UP TO DATE SOS, not the beginning of the year. Here they are prior to yesterday’s games.

Strength of Schedule Ratings as of games of October 24, 2009

1 Washington 4.73142 2 Virginia Tech 4.90691 3 Arkansas 5.09605 4 Louisville 5.19466 5 Kentucky 5.19594 6 UCLA 5.22109 7 Colorado 5.24283 8 Minnesota 5.25194 9 Clemson 5.26808 10 Tennessee 5.31639 11 Mississippi St. 5.32217 12 Washington State 5.33707 13 Florida State 5.35129 14 Georgia 5.37034 15 Arizona 5.37385 16 Notre Dame 5.37553 17 Wisconsin 5.37755 18 Michigan State 5.40296 19 San Jose State 5.40622 20 Oklahoma 5.41379 21 Iowa 5.43911 22 Purdue 5.47392 23 Oregon 5.47672 24 Colorado State 5.47897 25 Miami (FL) 5.48026 26 Oregon State 5.50656 27 Nebraska 5.56681 28 Miami (OH) 5.56879 29 UTEP 5.63449 30 LSU 5.63913 31 Ohio State 5.65949 32 USC 5.71104 33 Michigan 5.76149 34 Illinois 5.77555 35 Alabama 5.79802 36 Texas 5.80458 37 Florida International 5.82116 38 Syracuse 5.82329 39 Virginia 5.85870 40 Arkansas State 5.85984 41 Iowa State 5.87937 42 Connecticut 5.88446 43 SMU 5.88515 44 Missouri 5.88890 45 Bowling Green 5.89225 46 Auburn 5.89275 47 Baylor 5.89516 48 Florida Atlantic 5.90289 49 Florida 5.91753 50 Rice 5.91838 51 Georgia Tech 5.93545

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
8:13 pm

techredneck – You probably unknowingly called slobberknocker “genus” instead of “genius”. I have to agree, slobberknocker is not only a separate species, but a seperate genus as well.

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
8:15 pm

And dammit, I misspelled “separate”. I am, however a vertebrate.

SECFAN

November 1st, 2009
8:40 pm

Delbert D.

November 1st, 2009
8:47 pm

SECFAN – “seperate” …Not a word. Not even in the ACC, where Duke, UNC and Thomas Jefferson’s own university hold sway.

Max Arnold

November 1st, 2009
9:02 pm

This article, if you can call it that, is the reason the AJC has dropping circulation. I have dropped the delivery and only buy one on occasion to get coupons or sepecial items. There is nothing good about the article, usless you are trying to please the Dogs. They got a better write up after giving Flordia a lot of help in pentalies.
I agree with the first comment, Kurtdt Kobain, just reread his. Max

Napa Jacket

November 1st, 2009
9:31 pm

No Respect Tech,
Thanks for the note. We’ll just meet on those flats and see how bad we’ll suck on your spew. UGA is one good player away from being Ole Miss in the SEC and your boy Richt is, according to those who knew him well at FSU, falling right into patterns that made those FSU fans so happy to see him go. We’ll suck on the upcoming results in our match on the flats. Why don’t you suck on many, many more years with MR and the tan-o-meter coaching your beloved dogs.

3opt

November 1st, 2009
9:39 pm

This win, statistically and on the scoreboard, reminds me of the wins made by Johnson’s absolutely dominant GSU teams. The defense will improve, but CPJ’s best defense has always been his superb, soul-crushing offense.

BB's

November 1st, 2009
10:00 pm

Teams that Tech could be in the top 10. Florida, Alabama, Texas, Iowa, Boise St., Cincinnati, Oregon St., LSU, TCU. And just to let you know that I am intelligent, and that I’m not smoking funny weed I will also list the teams that could beat Tech in the top 10. Florida, Alabama, Texas, Iowa, Boise St., Cincinnati, Oregon St., LSU, TCU. That’s why we need a playoff. The only sport in America without one! And to think. University presidents have PhD’s, and yet collectively they think the BCS is a good system.

GTRich

November 2nd, 2009
8:17 am

Question for SECfan and other dawgs – Since UF beat the dawgs 41-17 at home and if Tech were to beat the same dawgs on Nov 28 say by a score of 42-17, would you then concede that Tech is equal or better than Tebo’s team???

GTRich

November 2nd, 2009
8:24 am

Now dawgs, you have all gone silent. Don’t be shy, answer my question. If Tech beats UGA on November 28th by a score of 42-17 or better, would you concede that Tech is equal or better than UF??? No excuses about different day, different place either.

GTcoaches

November 2nd, 2009
8:56 am

Dave Wommack take Note – comments from power ranking:
Why The Ranking Should Be Higher: 404 rushing yards and six touchdowns against a strong Vanderbilt defense is nice, and no one’s going to stop this running game the rest of the year, but …
Why The Ranking Should Be Lower: … Vanderbilt can’t score, and it got 28 first-half points. Yes, the Tech defense put the clamps down in the second half, but the D really isn’t that good.
Wommack, you have 5 more games to show that you can coach defense. If you can’t do better than the first 9 games then Donald Trump has a message.for you.

ILovetheJackets77

November 2nd, 2009
9:36 am

Well, once again the Yellow Jackets get no love from anyone….not even a writer in there own home newspaper…it doesn’t suprise me. GT beat Vandy but the same amount of points as Teblow beat them sorry Dawgs by. Yes our D was terrible in the first half but listen to this they only managed a field goal in the second half. 600 yds total offense and 56 points that seems pretty impressive to me. How many points did UGA beat Vandy by? Not that damn many! Josh Nesbitt throws 2 tds and 200 yds. That’s impressive. JD ran for 186 and 3tds and Roddy ran for 80 and a td. So, Florida gets “style”points for beating the basement in the SEC in there own backyard by 25…what do we do beat the basement of the SEC on the road by 25 and rack up 600 total yards. Give me a break! When will people stand up say this is a good football team. To all the UGA fans out there what will you say when we muster as many wins in the SEC as you do this season? I am sick of ESPN and every other “authority” on college football calling GT and riding the jocks of our opposing teams and saying that our O is a fluke…a fluke? We are doing it week after week with ease. Did you parents ever tell you “if you don’t have anything nice to say, just shut your pie holes. When were are 11-1 and ACC Champs then maybe someone will give us a ‘lil respect… GO JACKETS!!!

Q-tip

November 2nd, 2009
10:03 am

In four SEC games so far, the most Vandy has scored is 10. Tech’s defense is absolutely pathetic and will be exploited against a real team if they ever play one.

GTRich

November 2nd, 2009
10:25 am

Q-Tip, is UGA a real team??? I know they play in the “best” conference SEC.. I’d assume from your comments that they will exploit and beat Tech when they meet. Right?

ILovetheJackets77

November 2nd, 2009
11:13 am

They couldn’t beat us with KnowShow Moreno and Matthew Stafford…how can they expect to beat us with Cox and no running game? Oh and that’s right a suspect D. 10 points is what they scored but whats the most scored on them? 56 was the most on Vanderbilt since Kentucky score 56 a few years ago.

nessel

November 11th, 2009
4:48 pm

The ACC is the laughing stock of college football. They currently have 5 teams playing below .500 ball. By season’s end half the conference will be below .500. PATHETIC!!!

Louis Skolnick

November 15th, 2009
3:49 pm

you’re a dispshick nessel