Braves making the right call in keeping Hudson (updated)

Tim Hudson allowed only a run on seven hits in his final 2009 start against Washington. (Curtis Compton/ccompton@ajc.com)

Tim Hudson allowed only a run on seven hits in his final 2009 start against Washington. (Curtis Compton/ccompton@ajc.com)

(THIS IS UPDATED FROM AN EARLIER BLOG WITH HUDSON NOW CLOSE TO SIGNING)

The Braves’ offseason is about to start the best way possible: with pitcher Tim Hudson signed to a new contract.

Our David O’Brien is reporting that Hudson is close to signing a three-year contract extension worth approximately $9 million per season. Assuming that deal is finalized, consider this a good omen for the winter. A year ago, general manager Frank Wren whiffed in several of his early free agents pursuits, and negotiations played out in a public forum. This deal, he’s closing early.

Yes, the  Braves need a bat. That’s no secret. But the offseason roster makeover had to start with Hudson. He made a successful comeback from elbow surgery and gives the Braves one of baseball’s strongest starting rotations, with probably Tommy Hanson, Jair Jurrjens and two of the following: Javier Vazquez, Kenshin Kawakami and/or Derek Lowe. (Vazquez is entering the final year of his contract, making him a valuable trade asset, but he was the team’s best starter from start to finish last season and Wren would prefer to avoid dealing him.)

I swapped emails with Wren late Tuesday night. After reading David’s story over the weekend about negotiations beginning this week with Hudson’s agent, I was hoping to get a general feel for talks. Now, I certainly never expected Wren to respond, “Funny you should ask. We just offered $X.X million per year and they countered at $X.X million. I’ve sent you both proposals in an attachment.”

So when Wren gave me no numbers, I wasn’t disappointed.

But if there was any lingering doubt that the Braves wanted Hudson in their starting rotation next season, Wren obliterated it with this email: “As you know, we don’t comment on negotiations, but I will say that Tim progressed as we thought he would coming off the surgery and we expect him to be even better next year with additional time off from this season to get stronger.”

Let me translate: signing Hudson was priority one.

Re-signing him is the right decision. As much as keeping him means a significant financial commitment, it gives the Braves the best possible starting rotation.

The obvious cynical comeback to that is: “Oh not, not another old pitcher coming off surgery.” But Hudson is less of a risk than either Tom Glavine or John Smoltz were. He’s not nearly as old (34) and the Braves already have had a chance to see him pitch post surgery (seven starts, 2-1, 3.61., 30 strikeouts and 13 walks in 42.1 innings).

If Wren gets Hudson signed, the focus the rest of the offseason switches to trading an arm for a bat (or two).

But Hudson had to be the first domino to fall — and it’s about to.

63 comments Add your comment

Don

October 30th, 2009
10:05 am

It is absolutely amazing that the Braves plan, worry, fret over possible ways to improve the team and budget problems – possible trades, possible free agent signings, having enough salary budget etc. – and yet IGNORE the thing that would help the team the most – and would be the most simple of things to do – and would’nt cost next to nothing – FIRE BOBBY COX.

Don

October 30th, 2009
10:11 am

Why waste all the effort trying to improve the team – when we still have Bobby Cox as manager. Frank Wren has had an almost impossible job to try to build a winner – when his hands have been tied by having to keep Bobby Cox. In 09 and again for 2010 our pitching can be good endough to win – but we have had Cox as manager, making this almost impossible. Sad thing is that in 2011 when Cox is gone, we may no longer have the pitching good enough. The only possible explanation for keeping Cox would seem to be that he was given a guarantee to being able to stay as long as he wants. Having to watch Cox’s lack of management, to say nothing of his blunders – game after game is a sad, sad situation.

HARRY

October 30th, 2009
12:16 pm

JJ,KK,Vaz,Huddy,Hanson and Lowe in the bullpen as the closer and can come out as a starter late in the season. You don’t just give a winner away.

Bob Horner

October 30th, 2009
3:14 pm

Hudson is a solid pitcher, but he’s only won 14 games for us ONCE since he’s been here. If we sign him at the expense of Javy Vazquez, it’s going to be a huge mistake. He’s a solid, serviceable #3, but certainly no stud. He’s not really even in the same league with Vasquez at this point in his career

ozzie

October 31st, 2009
11:43 am

I agree Horner. They signed Hudson b/c he is better than KK and Lowe. One of them will go to make room for Hudson.

Vaz is not going anywhere. If anything they may extend him or 2-3 years after they dump Lowe or KK.

I will be the contrarian and say KK gets the boot. I don’t think Wren has given up on Lowe.

I also think they will try to trade for Adrian Gonzales before they make an offer to LaRoche.

If they think Holliday and Bay will be massively over priced they could make a run at Adrian and then trade for someone like Josh Willingham for LF.

Gonzo & Willingham will hit a combined 55+ HRs for $10mm/season. You can’t beat that.

I would prefer Holliday in LF and LaRoche at 1B but Liberty would need to get involved and boost payroll – even if its Lowe who is dumped and not KK.

Sonny Clusters

November 1st, 2009
5:39 pm

GoodTraction, they’s the imposter saying we was going to stop posting.

HAL

November 1st, 2009
6:39 pm

people make me laugh with there boobby bashing the latest round being fighting phils sucking braves blasphemy lol when boobys given players like loaf to manage what do you want him to do add water and produce out of a guy who should have retired 5 years ago a hustling player/ ohh and the same could be said for chipper on a lesser level lol

Don

November 2nd, 2009
9:26 am

The sad and unbelievable thing is that the best, most signigicant, and most simple way to improve the team is being ignored. To do the most to improve the team, the Braves do not need to make a trade, or sign a free agent, or spend big bucks; they just need to get rid of the biggest cause of their problems — fire Bobby Cox.

Don

November 2nd, 2009
10:59 am

Want Wren to make the Braves better – Then untie his hands and let him fire Bobby Cox.

abudefdef

November 3rd, 2009
7:18 am

Sam, what was the Braves’ record againt the Phillies this year? And we’ll be better next year ;)

Wren is in a tough spot, if he trades KK, then the Japanese player inroads are shot, if he trades Vazquez, then he gets rid of one of the best pitchers from this season, which leaves Lowe, and the big contract. hopefully the Braves can find someone willing to swap hitting salary for pitching salary…

abudefdef

November 3rd, 2009
7:21 am

Stop bashing Bobby Cox…the Braves will improve by subtraction once Greg Norton is gone. Shoot, that’s probably worth five or six more wins!

Don

November 3rd, 2009
10:38 am

Compared to Bobby Cox, Norton is an All Star.

shelbydawkins

November 4th, 2009
11:04 am

I wonder if the Braves will keep garrett anderson