
This was the scene after a win over Boston in the first round last year in Philips Arena. But three playoff wins won't satisfy Josh Smith -- or the masses -- this time around. (AJC photo.)
The last time the Hawks won a playoff series was 10 years ago. We could not have known then that it was a signal for impending doom.
A first-round win over Detroit was followed by four straight losses to New York, which was followed by management’s decision to go in a new direction, which was followed by presumed dementia by general manager Pete Babcock, because that’s the only possible explanation for his next decision — trading Steve Smith for Isaiah Rider and a giant flushing sound to be named later.
Welcome to recovery.
The Hawks open the playoffs Sunday night against Miami. They are the better team. They have the home-court advantage. They should win. If they don’t, it certainly doesn’t mean the franchise will circle the drain for the next several years. But what will the last six months have meant?
Loading ...
For a guy whose maturity has sometimes come into question, Smith shows remarkable perspective.
The Hawks won 47 games this season, their most since 1998. They held onto the No. 4 seed in the Eastern Conference for the last three months of the season, illustrating an improving and maturing roster and possibly an improving and maturing coach, Mike Woodson.
But this isn’t a year ago. When an eighth seed takes the league’s best team to seven games in a playoff series before losing, as the Hawks did with Boston, satisfaction comes easy. Expectations are higher now.
Win this series, and the regular season is validated.
Lose this series, and feel free to flush.
This is when Joe Johnson needs to show he can make a difference in the postseason. This is when Mike Bibby needs to make his case for being re-signed.
This certainly is when Woodson needs to show that improving win totals in each of the past four seasons is not an aberration, because the man was given only a two-year contract this season, an indication his future may be on the line.
There’s a significant difference in ripple effects between the Hawks winning four games and losing four games — way beyond this postseason. Winning reaffirms that the plan doesn’t have to change. Losing mandates change.
“I feel like a lot of people didn’t even expect us to make the playoffs this year, so in that sense it was a really good season,” Al Horford said. “But at the end of the day, a team gets judged by their playoff performance. This is when great teams are made.”
Miami is not a great team. But it has the only player in the series (Dwyane Wade) who can take over a game. It has the only x-factor. If you’re wondering why some are struggling to pick a winner in this series, there it is.
Well, that and the Hawks’ relative lack of a postseason resume.
“Probably some people won’t believe we can win in the playoffs until we actually do,” Smith said.
“I don’t want to be one of those players who, seven or eight years down the line, is someone who still hasn’t made it past the first round. I don’t want to have to live with that.”
There’s an easy solution.
Jeff Schultz can be reached via email (jschultz@ajc.com), Facebook, Tweeter (SchultzAJC) or carrier pigeon (make a right off 400).
53 comments Add your comment
tale of woe
April 20th, 2009
4:51 pm
I rarely read the comments, but some of you guys have way too much time on your hands. Jeff, don’t let a few rotten tomatoes get you down. I think the Hawks have done good this year and I think Woodson is getting better as a coach. I still think he isn’t very creative and doesn’t know what he wants to do most of the time. I always look at the plays after a timeout and 8/10 times we turn the ball over or make a stupid play. To me, that is coaching…
Anyway, I am hoping we win this series quickly as I think the Cavs will be waiting for us after their 4 game series with the Pistons.
I am curious – Truth-serum , do you have a job? If so, what do you do? You have way too much time and think way too much into some of these things. Are you lonely?
truth-serum
April 20th, 2009
9:16 pm
tale of woe
April 20th, 2009
4:51 pm
I appreciate the honor of you singling me out. I’m flattered. I don’t know you, or care to. Thanks have a nice day.
Schultz, why are you trying to make an issue of judgment about Woodson’s Job? The city is behind Woodson and his crews just like the bubbas are behind you and your crew.
Sund came out in an article published by the AJC last week and praise and congratulated Woodson. Charles Barkley and TNT’s Crew praised the work of Woodson. It clear to see that he has done an outstanding job and will be back next year no matter what your mouth says.
Woodson is a winner and we are lucky to have him!!!
Just like the many guys on here that see you for who and what you are, guys that matter like Sund and Barkley see Woodson for who and what he is.
You are narrow, divisive and unfair. You may not like it but that’s my impression of you and no matter how many bubbas you send after me I’ve read enough of your writings to know what you are about.
Mike Woodson isn’t talking to you because he too, can see through you. Of all those coaches you named that are speaking to you how many are Black? How can you suddenly be ignorant of why Woody isn’t speaking to you? When you read the other sports writers post they have hundreds of different responses because they are fair journalist. You are a race baiter. Should you receive mercy when you showed none? Let’s ask Michael Vick did you show him any mercy…
Woodson will be back next year regardless of what the Hawks do in the playoffs. Win lose or draw in any round and the Hawks will still be playing at or equal to their talent level. Woodson does a Great Job.
home and family
July 11th, 2010
2:38 am
Hi dude , Why dont u put facebook badge on your blog? Because I want to follow your facebook. Thank you Regards Admin