Mitch McConnell: “King” Obama out to grab yer guns!

mitch-mcconnell-ap-7-3-12

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who faces re-election in 2014, is doing his part to model the new spirit of moderation and bipartisan compromise that the GOP hopes to demonstrate to voters in the days ahead.

Here’s how he begins a new email message sent out to supporters:

Dear Patriot,

You and I are literally surrounded.

The gun-grabbers in the Senate are about to launch an all-out-assault on the Second Amendment. On your rights.

On your freedom.

Just the other night, President Obama urged them to act. And then he went one step further, spelling out the 23 different Executive Orders he will take to get your guns.

My friend, our freedom is under direct assault.

From those who want take your guns. From those who want to shred our Constitution, and as our good friend Rand Paul from Kentucky says, from those who want to be King.

Let me tell you, Mitch McConnell is ready to lead the fight to protect your rights.

Will you stand with Mitch today? …

Below I’ve included the full list of 23 executive actions issued by the gun-grabbing “King Obama” regarding firearms. I confess to being curious: When McConnell describes these actions as steps that “(Obama) will take to get your guns,” which specific actions does he mean?

Is it the effort to keep identify people who are too crazy to buy guns? Is it the “national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign”? Or the order to trace all weapons recovered in the commission of a crime? The initiative to train first-responders on how to respond to a school shooting?

Every American voter ought to read McConnell’s letter (full text here), read the list of executive actions issued by Obama, and then decide for himself or herself which party represents the sane, rational way forward for the people of this nation.

1.) Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system.

2.) Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system.

3.) Improve incentives for states to share information with the background check system.

4.) Direct the Attorney General to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.

5.) Propose rulemaking to give law enforcement the ability to run a full background check on an individual before returning a seized gun.

6.) Publish a letter from ATF to federally licensed gun dealers providing guidance on how to run background checks for private sellers.

7.) Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign.

8.) Review safety standards for gun locks and gun safes (Consumer Product Safety Commission).

9.) Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations.

10.) Release a DOJ report analyzing information on lost and stolen guns and make it widely available to law enforcement.

11.) Nominate an ATF director.

12.) Provide law enforcement, first responders, and school officials with proper training for active shooter situations.

13.) Maximize enforcement efforts to prevent gun violence and prosecute gun crime.

14.) Issue a Presidential Memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence.

15.) Direct the Attorney General to issue a report on the availability and most effective use of new gun safety technologies and challenge the private sector to develop innovative technologies.

16.) Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes.

17.) Release a letter to health care providers clarifying that no federal law prohibits them from reporting threats of violence to law enforcement authorities.

18.) Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers.

19.) Develop model emergency response plans for schools, houses of worship and institutions of higher education.

20.) Release a letter to state health officials clarifying the scope of mental health services that Medicaid plans must cover.

21.) Finalize regulations clarifying essential health benefits and parity requirements within ACA exchanges.

22.) Commit to finalizing mental health parity regulations.

23.) Launch a national dialogue led by Secretaries Sebelius and Duncan on mental health.

– Jay Bookman

1,214 comments Add your comment

Gale

January 23rd, 2013
9:28 am

Fred, and Marty, transgender children articles. I could not locate the one I was specifically thinking of.
http://www.npr.org/2011/12/26/144156917/transgender-kids

Gale

January 23rd, 2013
9:28 am

Fred, and Marty, transgender children articles. and this one.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90234780

Redcoat

January 23rd, 2013
9:31 am

So many sources of info that is published that is found not accurate, reputations will decline of those supposedly that could be trusted…..the real truth will be shocking. When this game has reached a point that it can no longer be believed on a national level, people will revert to trusting only the local folks because people can personally verify what they experience and see for themselves…..and correct it.

RB from Gwinnett

January 23rd, 2013
9:45 am

“You can call names all you like, but you won’t change that scientific fact.”

That NOT a scientific fact, Stands, that’s an opinion and nothing more. And there is no scienitist on the planet whose opinion trumps the opinion of our Creator. If you want to take a chance that our Creators opinion is that He doesn’t care about His children until they reach that 3rd trimester, well, I guess that’s going to be something you get to answer for on your day. Good luck with it.

stands for decibels

January 23rd, 2013
9:56 am

And there is no scienitist on the planet whose opinion trumps the opinion of our Creator.

Your notion of a Sky Friend doesn’t set policy.

/back upstairs.

Greg Charles

January 23rd, 2013
10:05 am

McConnell is just worried he’ll qualify as too crazy to own a gun.

Adam

January 23rd, 2013
10:40 am

RB: If you want to take a chance that our Creators opinion is that He doesn’t care about His children until they reach that 3rd trimester

RB lives in fear. This explains a lot.

middle of the road

January 23rd, 2013
12:24 pm

“Mick, if you were walking down the street and saw a 200 lb. man beating a 5 year old to death, what would you do? Would you say that’s his choice and keep walking?
If the answer is “no” then you understand how I feel about that fetus. I will not be the one who does nothing while evil flourishes.”

RB, we understand that is your OPINION. I could have the opinion that anyone who shoots a burglar in his own house, or a soldier that shoots the enemy that is firing at them is guilty of MURDER, and should be tried and executed. Does that mean that my OPINION should become law? Only if enough people shared that opinion and got their legislators to vote for it. Does it give me the right to go and enforce my OPINION and shoot those returning soldiers, since they are murderers? I believe I could easily justify my OPINION by the teachings of Jesus Christ (if a man slaps you on the one cheek…).

I could be like you and say that all those who kill criminals in their house are EVIL – all soldiers who kill are EVIL. Your opinion doesn’t give you the right to control our lives. If you think abortion is wrong, don’t have an abortion. If a woman chooses to have an abortion, that is between her and God.

Joe Hussein Mama

January 23rd, 2013
12:27 pm

Towncrier — “Let me be blunt: why don’t you stick to being a cheerleader for Obama and most things liberal and leave more difficult things like interpreting texts to those obviously more qualified than you?”

I’ll be blunt, too. You could stand to take your own advice.

“I haven’t a JD but I have advanced degrees and considerable experience at interpreting historical texts.”

Guess what? I’ve got advanced degrees as well and have *taught* this subject at the college level. However, that didn’t seem to send you scurrying to take a seat and pipe down, as you’re asking Jay to do.

“Having studied the issue extensively, I don’t think there can be much doubt that the founders intended meaning of the 2nd Amendment was to ensure that retained the right to 1) individually bear arms (which, for the most case was an assumed unenumerated right though it was nonetheless codified in a number of state constitutions around 1789) so to, if necessary, form militias to 2) defend against threats to life and liberty, both foreign and domestic.”

Having studied the issue more than you and having taught it as well, there’s quite a bit of doubt regarding what you say, and considerable evidence that you’re completely wrong.

“It was clearly understood in the 18th century to be an INDIVIDUAL right.”

Only when affirmatively and clearly stated to be so, as it was in at least three states’ Constitutions or declarations of rights. it was *not* understood to be an individual right in states where it was not as explicitly stated.

“Ironically, Scalia and the majority violate their own interpretive principles”

A point I made to you just last week.

“Please, Jay, stick to simpler political issue-of-the-day columns: it suits you better. Or put in the work to really understand the history behind and around the Constitution.”

Physician, heal thyself. And let me know when you actually manage to secure a teaching position that covers this material, as I’d like to audit the class.

Abe Froman

January 23rd, 2013
12:58 pm

Given that this is a letter designed to raise funds, don’t you think it would be a little over the top as far as claims go? The Democrats use the same tactic saying that if the Republicans were back in office, they would immediately start polluting the air, taking away social security and medicare, start more wars, and put blacks back into slavery. Without sensationalism, how do you get people fired up to send money to an old white millionaire to run for re-election?

mae brown

January 23rd, 2013
3:17 pm

I’ve seen this movie…the plot is dull and it flopped first time on the circuit…or maybe this is the sequel.The Cast is nontalented,one note and the background sets have been used on every movie made about politicians…Mitch McConnell is miscast as leading man and no having leading ladies leaves one to wonder if Mitch is light in his loafers?Wing nut,oops,wingman Ryan has the looks but whines his lines…all of them…so never know how strongly he feels about anything…As usual Cantor provides comic relief…and I need relief after this turkey…Pepto ,please……

Dixie Normous

January 23rd, 2013
3:59 pm

11.) Nominate an ATF director.

He has to order himself to do that?

Mark T

January 25th, 2013
11:08 pm

You really are an idiot Bookman…Dianna Fienstein’s bill includes 150 different guns they want banned, I own some of those guns so yes, they are trying to “come get our guns”

Jay

January 26th, 2013
7:58 am

Mark T, you should get your facts right before throwing words like “idiot” into the conversation. Feinstein’s bill bans the production of new weapons, but makes no attempt whatsoever to confiscate or outlaw existing firearms.