
Mitt Romney tried to explain his loss Wednesday to disappointed financial backers by telling them that he would have gotten away with it without that durned 47 percent:
“The Obama campaign was following the old playbook of giving a lot of stuff to groups that they hoped they could get to vote for them and be motivated to go out to the polls, specifically the African American community, the Hispanic community and young people. In each case they were very generous in what they gave to those groups.”
“With regards to African American voters, ‘Obamacare’ was a huge plus — and was highly motivational to African American voters. You can imagine for somebody making $25—, or $30—, or $35,000 a year, being told you’re now going to get free healthcare — particularly if you don’t have it, getting free healthcare worth, what, $10,000 a family, in perpetuity, I mean this is huge. Likewise with Hispanic voters, free healthcare was a big plus….”
“With regards to Hispanic voters, the amnesty for the children of illegals — the so-called Dream Act kids — was a huge plus for that voting group. On the negative side, of course, they always characterized us as being anti-immigrant, being tough on illegal immigration, and so forth, so that was very effective with that group.”
So let me get this straight: When Romney, in the first debate, promised a tax cut to the middle class, he wasn’t promising them a gift? When he wooed his backers on Wall Street by telling them that he would repeal Dodd Frank, abolish the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau and lower corporate taxes, that wasn’t promising a gift?
When he went to Viriginia to promise to build even more nuclear-powered submarines that just happened to be built right there in Virginia, that wasn’t a gift? When he went to coal country to promise to weaken environmental regulations that protect the air we breathe, that wasn’t a gift? When he traveled to Florida to promise to replace $716 billion in Medicare funding allegedly cut by the Obama administration, that wasn’t a gift?
Or is it only a “gift” when offered to poor African Americans or Hispanic Americans?
All in all, it is quite something to see complaints about pandering from a man who wafted in the political breeze with all the gravity of a dandelion seed.
It’s true that Romney’s political career has now ended, and that his sole remaining function is to sit on the stage during the inaugural ceremonies, his presence required as official recognition of his own defeat. But the mindset that he revealed in that infamous “47 percent” tape, the mindset that he confirms in his latest remarks, continues to be a serious problem for the party he represented.
And once again, Bobby Jindal of all people gets it. Asked about Romney’s remarks in a press conference, Jindal became “visibly agitated,” Politico reports.
“No, I think that’s absolutely wrong. Two points on that: One, we have got to stop dividing the American voters. We need to go after 100 percent of the votes, not 53 percent. We need to go after every single vote.
“And, secondly, we need to continue to show how our policies help every voter out there achieve the American Dream, which is to be in the middle class, which is to be able to give their children an opportunity to be able to get a great education. … So, I absolutely reject that notion, that description. I think that’s absolutely wrong.”
He reiterated the points for emphasis.
“I don’t think that represents where we are as a party and where we’re going as a party,” he said. “That has got to be one of the most fundamental takeaways from this election: If we’re going to continue to be a competitive party and win elections on the national stage and continue to fight for our conservative principles, we need two messages to get out loudly and clearly: One, we are fighting for 100 percent of the votes, and secondly, our policies benefit every American who wants to pursue the American dream. Period. No exceptions.”
– Jay Bookman
382 comments Add your comment
Brosephus™
November 15th, 2012
7:53 am
To paraphrase Rush, “I’m glad he failed!!”
Fly-On-The-Wall
November 15th, 2012
7:56 am
I’m guessing Mitt didn’t learn from what the election showed. As a side note, how many ‘gifts’ would he have given if elected? Sauce & Goose come to mind.
Fly-On-The-Wall
November 15th, 2012
7:56 am
Woo Hoo! I’m # 2!!
Paul
November 15th, 2012
7:59 am
I read the newspaper article first, then this.
It removed any thoughts I’d been entertaining that if Mitt had won, maybe he’d have done okay.
As Gov Jindal put it, Mitt still doesn’t get it. Talk about a compartmented mind.
Fly-On-The-Wall
November 15th, 2012
7:59 am
So far Jinal seems to be the only Republican who is saying publicly that he gets it. He knows what the American people said in this election.
Jack
November 15th, 2012
8:00 am
I’m a proud Obama voter still waiting for my gift. I feel entitled to all that the constitution promises.
ByteMe - Got ilk?
November 15th, 2012
8:01 am
And Obama’s actually talking to this guy about what he can do in the context of the next Obama administration? Seriously? Mr. I’m Not So Christian When I’m Talking To Other People With Money?
Let him go play with his car elevator and leave the important stuff to people who think big.
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
8:03 am
Oh, do stick around, Mitt. Tell us more!
ByteMe - Got ilk?
November 15th, 2012
8:03 am
So far Jinal seems to be the only Republican who is saying publicly that he gets it.
I’m not quite convinced of it. He’s not saying that Republicans want to have policies that are terrible for anyone who isn’t already rich or white or able to go to another country to get an abortion. He’s saying that their messages suck. That’s not quite “getting it”.
Ronnie Raygun
November 15th, 2012
8:03 am
Let’s not forget that Mooch Romney also wanted to eliminate capital gains taxes so that he wouldn’t have to pay a dime in taxes and could live off of those of us that work for a living.
clem
November 15th, 2012
8:03 am
after delivering good concession speech, he reverts to evil mitt. how about releasing your tax returns now to show us how to reform taxes.
Thomas Heyward Jr
November 15th, 2012
8:03 am
I read somewhere where Romney gets some sort of Federal Pension and bonus for running two consequetive Presidential campaigns…AND free Obamacare……for life.
.
And he’s going to take it.
.
wtf
Jackie
November 15th, 2012
8:04 am
I wonder if Mr. Romney has any friends outside his immediate family?
Stevie Ray..Clowns to the left and Jokers to the right..here I am...
November 15th, 2012
8:04 am
BRO
Rush? You? Really?
You gotta admit, BO is certainly giving away a bunch of free stuff…no denying that..
ByteMe - Got ilk?
November 15th, 2012
8:04 am
I read somewhere where Romney gets some sort of Federal Pension and bonus for running two consequetive Presidential campaigns…AND free Obamacare……for life.
Yeah, sure, because everything you read on the Internet is true.
Brosephus™
November 15th, 2012
8:05 am
Seems as if Mr. Romney’s a perfect example of the skyboxification (I love that term) of America. I don’t understand how any sane person could have ever thought that he would be capable of leading this country. He may be the best thing ever when it comes to running a company. He lacks the understanding necessary to run a country. This latest statement shows he was absolutly honest when he made that 47% comment, and I am glad he lost the election.
East Lake Ira
November 15th, 2012
8:05 am
I was promised flying cars by now dammit.
ByteMe - Got ilk?
November 15th, 2012
8:05 am
You gotta admit, BO is certainly giving away a bunch of free stuff…no denying that..
Still waitin’ for mah phone!
Corbin Sharpe. I think, therefore I am...I think
November 15th, 2012
8:05 am
Got dead threaded below, so here’s the rerun…
Good morning all y’all…
I’m in a little late this morning…have a phone interview with Social Security this morning so I took the day off….tomorrow too…
I was going through my normal morning cheezburger sites and saw this one…remind you of anybody?
http://cheezburger.com/6761679360
ByteMe - Got ilk?
November 15th, 2012
8:06 am
I was promised flying cars by now dammit.
Meet George Jetson….
His Boy Elroy….
Corbin Sharpe. I think, therefore I am...I think
November 15th, 2012
8:07 am
Mitt Romney certainly does show disdain for the “47%” doesn’t he? Well, he shows disdain for pretty much everyone who isn’t like him. I hope Ann keeps her promise and keeps him out of the political life.
Butch Cassidy (I)
November 15th, 2012
8:08 am
And yet people thought Romney was “out of touch”. I wonder why?
Jm
November 15th, 2012
8:08 am
Sorry
Everything Mitt said is pretty much true
Everyone loves free stuff until they have to pay
Julia
November 15th, 2012
8:08 am
or maybe Romney lost not because of PBO giving away lots of free stuff, but simply because Romney himself is a giant douche?
curious
November 15th, 2012
8:09 am
The Kelleys of Tampa, FL and Petraeus/Allen friends represent the “Real” moochers in this country.
Heard a report on NPR that they haven’t made a payment on their $1.5 million home since 2009.
Are they “Takers” or what?
TaxPayer
November 15th, 2012
8:09 am
And Mitt continues to be a loser.
ByteMe - Got ilk?
November 15th, 2012
8:09 am
Everything Mitt said is pretty much true
Only in Republican Moocher World, where the “gifts” are tax breaks for not breaking a sweat.
Cosby
November 15th, 2012
8:09 am
When people find they can elect people who will provide for them and they do not have to work for it, then they will all live in servitude. You mention “Free” for several item but nothing is free, somehow, somewhere, it has to be paid for. So when we all decide to sit on the front porch and do nothing, then waht….again, how stupid is the USA.
ByteMe - Got ilk?
November 15th, 2012
8:10 am
or maybe Romney lost not because of PBO giving away lots of free stuff, but simply because Romney himself is a giant douche?
Maybe, but what woman would want to use him for that purpose?
SBinf
November 15th, 2012
8:10 am
Well Mitt is definitely derailing any chance of a cabinet appointment.
Smells like sour grapes to me.
Corbin Sharpe. I think, therefore I am...I think
November 15th, 2012
8:10 am
How a di9abetic feels…
http://cheezburger.com/6759723520
(I should know)
Ronnie Raygun
November 15th, 2012
8:11 am
Mooch Romney loves his free stuff too. He just thinks it’s even sweeter when he steals it from workers pension funds.
Corbin Sharpe. I think, therefore I am...I think
November 15th, 2012
8:11 am
number nine, number nine, number nine…
Butch Cassidy (I)
November 15th, 2012
8:11 am
In all honesty, I do have to give Mitt credit where credit is due. Ever since the primaries, when my frineds and I wager 10k or more, we refer to it as “I’ll bet you a Romney”.
DannyX
November 15th, 2012
8:11 am
“Everyone loves free stuff until they have to pay”
You mean like trillion dollar wars? Medicare Part D? Tax cuts?
Corbin Sharpe. I think, therefore I am...I think
November 15th, 2012
8:12 am
“Everyone loves free stuff until they have to pay”
Mario
November 15th, 2012
8:12 am
Good article, very much on point….
Brosephus™
November 15th, 2012
8:12 am
You gotta admit, BO is certainly giving away a bunch of free stuff…no denying that..
Stevie Ray
The Rush comment was HUMOR!!!! Geez dude… Do you actually think I listen to that garbage??
As to giving gifts, every single damned politician that runs for office promises something to whatever group they want to get votes from. What free stuff has Obama given away that no other president has given away before him?
ObamaPhone
November 15th, 2012
8:13 am
Truth Hurts, I guess. but it’s true. The only thing he left off was the Detroit bailout. Bought all those votes too AND with YOUR money. Get as many people on the government dime as possible and make them forget that it is possible to make a better life without them.
Banderson
November 15th, 2012
8:14 am
Romney was going to give “gifts” to the Koch brothers, Adleson and others, so it’s logical that he’d think that’s how the game works.
Whatever
November 15th, 2012
8:14 am
I wish we could setup a system where nobody was promised anything. Then step by step identify our greatest needs and fund those first until we were out of money. Then spend nothing else.
I don’t care what your pet program is if there is no money to fund it. Balance the budget!
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
8:15 am
about this (Which, I admit, I’m hearing for the first time just now)
“With regards to African American voters, ‘Obamacare’ was a huge plus — and was highly motivational to African American voters. You can imagine for somebody making $25—, or $30—, or $35,000 a year, being told you’re now going to get free healthcare — particularly if you don’t have it, getting free healthcare worth, what, $10,000 a family, in perpetuity
If you’re wondering where you’ve heard this kind of claptrap before…
http://mediamatters.org/video/2009/07/22/limbaugh-obamas-entire-economic-program-is-repa/152339
Mitt Romney = Rush Limbaugh on a better diet.
ITS ALL BUSH"S FAULT
November 15th, 2012
8:15 am
Robme is a punk and you CONS are losers…
Peter
November 15th, 2012
8:15 am
The Republican’s can’t get over the fact they have become Dinosaurs and want to continue to separate the American public.
Their love of country is ONLY after their love of themselves, and their judgmental ideology.
Watch now how they will refuse to work with the president, at the expense of the nation.
Butch Cassidy (I)
November 15th, 2012
8:16 am
Jm – “Everyone loves free stuff until they have to pay”
Everyone loves roads, clean air, in tact bridges, drinkable water, police, firemen, and a strong military until they have to pay. In other words, Romney supporters.
Donna Becker
November 15th, 2012
8:16 am
as long as the GOP is glued to Faux news and as long as Rush and O Reilly and Hannity continue to be the voice of the Right this attitude and message will continue to be delivered. I, as a Dem. Lib… hope they keep it up. 4 more years for us..Go HILLARY!!
Will the "REAL" Mitt Romney sit down and shut up?
November 15th, 2012
8:16 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxch-yi14BE
willydoit?
November 15th, 2012
8:16 am
So the bottom line is, the candidate that “gives” the most…wins!
Romney’s gifts just weren’t as good as Obama’s gifts.
Stevie Ray..Clowns to the left and Jokers to the right..here I am...
November 15th, 2012
8:17 am
I see where welfare spending since 2008 has increased 32% on the federal level which accounts for some $180 billion per year…some is of course due to unemployment but we are not even counting the not so insignificant amounts to be spend on HC..anyone who believes we will, despite the rhetoric to the contrary, no incurr hugh amounts of addtional costs are living in the the neighborhood of denial..
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
8:18 am
Balance the budget!
Sure thing. Soon as we’re at 4% unemployment, we can focus on that.
Until then, it’s economically suicidal to be adopting major spending cuts.
southpaw
November 15th, 2012
8:18 am
“Mitt Romney, exit stage right. A little quicker, please …”
You heard it here first. He’ll exit quicker than Al Gore.
Ronnie Raygun
November 15th, 2012
8:18 am
Best quote of the day:
“Conservatism isn’t really about the things it claims to be about. It isn’t really about free markets and moral values; it’s about authority — the authority of bosses over workers, of men over women, of whites over Those People.” Paul Krugman
indigo
November 15th, 2012
8:18 am
Mitt’s comments sound like a combination of out of touch rich man and convoluted Mormon thinking.
Jindal’s comments show he’s first out of the gate in applying Romney flip-flop and 180’s tactics for political gain.
American Republican politics – the gift(curse?) that just keeps on giving.
SBinf
November 15th, 2012
8:19 am
And rather ironic, coming from a guy who has avoided paying income taxes the last ten years using a complicated ruse to defer charitable giving.
gasux
November 15th, 2012
8:20 am
Just shows you how small of a man Romney is. Truly classless. The American voters got it right.
Whatever
November 15th, 2012
8:20 am
Stands,
You might want to plan for it now. Go ahead and discuss the programs we really need and those that can be trimmed. Waiting to some future pie in the sky day won’t cut it.
I’d like a little leadership on the issue today.
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
8:20 am
The GOP talking points get sadder and sillier every year. I’m glad they’ve latched onto “Democrats want free stuff” this time; it’s so easily batted back and mocked.
Thing is, the GOP really doesn’t have anywhere to go with their rhetoric, so long as Obama and the Dems manage to govern with merely mediocre competence. Unless they wish to attack from the left, but I don’t see that happening in earnest (Romney hinted at it, a bit, in the debates) until at least another election cycle.
willydoit?
November 15th, 2012
8:21 am
“Truth Hurts, I guess. but it’s true. The only thing he left off was the Detroit bailout.”
I wonder if they will come in and bail out Hostess now? With only 18,000 employees, does that qualify them to be too big to fail???
MaJo
November 15th, 2012
8:21 am
Jay, I agree with most of what you said, but how is cutting taxes, so people can keep more of what they earned, a gift? You can’t give a gift to someone when they already own it. And I’m not arguing whether cutting taxes is right or wrong.
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
8:21 am
You might want to plan for it now. Go ahead and discuss the programs we really need and those that can be trimmed.
that is the sort of thing that should be studied by a few hundred bean counters working quietly in the background. Not front and center today.
Mr. Snarky
November 15th, 2012
8:22 am
Keep it up repubs! You’re headed for defeat in 2016 with talk like this.
Jm
November 15th, 2012
8:22 am
Patronage is as old as politics
Julia
November 15th, 2012
8:23 am
or maybe Romney lost not because of PBO giving away lots of free stuff, but simply because Romney himself is a giant douche?
Maybe, but what woman would want to use him for that purpose?
You have a point there. how about Mitt lost because he is a giant hose bag and everyone knows it?
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
8:23 am
…of course since Mitt decided not to do what ever Presidential candidate since 1984 (I think) has done, and release his tax records going back more than a year, we have no idea what kind of “stuff” he’s received, not really.
Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)
November 15th, 2012
8:23 am
“I don’t think that represents where we are as a party..”
Um, yes it does, Bobby.
H.E. Pennypacker
November 15th, 2012
8:23 am
Or when Romney promised to shield those over 55 from exposure to his Medicare axe, that was a promise of free stuff to his base, senior citizens, and a play for the state of Florida.
Zinc
November 15th, 2012
8:24 am
As a rich, financial guy, I am sure Mr. Romney has NEVER received a gift from the government. No tax cuts, no extra deductions, no loopholes for his business. Nope…none. All the gifts are for the youth and minorities in this country
Ronald Reagan Parkway
November 15th, 2012
8:24 am
The Obama campaign was following the old playbook of giving a lot of stuff to groups that they hoped they could get to vote for them and be motivated to go out to the polls, specifically the African American community, the Hispanic community and young people. In each case they were very generous in what they gave to those groups.”
_______
Romney lost in Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and several other states with “very low” African American and Hispanic populations. One thing is sure; Mitt Romney and the Republicans are on the WRONG side of history!!
Whatever
November 15th, 2012
8:24 am
Stands,
I’d settle for the bean counters if I knew someone cared about what they said. Nobody is taking it seriously. Even if it is just the bean counters they have no authority and neither side listens to them.
The CBO numbers get stated if they agree with the point one side wants to make. They are discounted if that side doesn’t like the numbers.
Bean counters don’t make decisions. Our elected leaders do. I’d like them to start leading.
Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)
November 15th, 2012
8:24 am
Sounds like Bobby might be better off switching parties. It’s never too late. The power-wielding part of the Democrat Party is the moderate part.
southpaw
November 15th, 2012
8:25 am
Ronnie Raygun @8:18
Paul Krugman on conservatism? Seriously?!
OK. Let’s hear his fellow economist, Walt Williams, on liberalism. “History is not going to be kind to liberals. With their mindless programs, they’ve managed to do to Black Americans what slavery, Reconstruction, and rank racism found impossible: destroy their family and work ethic.”
http://www.boycottliberalism.com/Walter-Williams-Quotes.htm
Keep Up the Good Fight!
November 15th, 2012
8:26 am
Hard to believe that Bobby Jindal is the one crying from the inside of the GOP “I see stupid people” and all the others can do is blame their failures on how they were outsmarted by the “most incompetent president evah”.
Ronnie Raygun
November 15th, 2012
8:27 am
MaJo: the tax cut is the gift. If someone offered to let you welsh on a debt, wouldn’t you consider that a gift?
Common Sense isn't very Common
November 15th, 2012
8:27 am
Mitt can now follow his money to the Cayman Islands.
Bye Bye Mittster the shytester
Stevie Ray..Clowns to the left and Jokers to the right..here I am...
November 15th, 2012
8:28 am
BRO
Of course they all buy votes…not suggesting that is not the case…and the DEMS give the obligatory increases in welfare and the GOP push more goodies for the upper class..the opinions on who is responsible for increases and whether these inflation adjusted numbers are accurate and that 2009 is included in BO’s watch or hangover from Bush watch is subject to dispute..
Geez, you sure got upset about me sarcastically suggesting you listened to Rush…on a serious note, maybe we both should listen to him on occasion..just to be able to suggest we are more balanced…why don’t you go first?
Recon 0311 2533
November 15th, 2012
8:28 am
As we observe the riots in Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece due to austerity brought on by socialism and buying votes we see America’s future under Democrats. Obama clearly has no concern for our economic future in fact he seems to want that kind of future for our country.
TaxPayer
November 15th, 2012
8:28 am
Even Mitt’s “charitable giving” was nothing more than a con game designed to funnel money back in his pockets by cheating both the IRS and the Mormon Church. Mitt the tax cheat is a sore loser.
Atlanta Mom
November 15th, 2012
8:28 am
Mr. Romney believes that people who make $25,000 a year should spend $10,000 of it on health care. And he wonders why people support health care reform.
Granny Godzilla - Union Thugette
November 15th, 2012
8:29 am
Saw this yesterday and chuckled quietly to my self….
Loved the Kos headline on it
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/14/1161742/-Romney-rides-off-into-the-sunset-as-big-a-dick-as-always
(if this gets through the censors)
willie lynch
November 15th, 2012
8:29 am
It appears Romney is still listening to Limbaugh and FOX. I am still surprised by how many still don’t get the idea that 100% of the votes are up for grabs. The rush to now garner the Latino support is telling in it’s lack of thought and vision. Why do you think Black people have supported the democrats for all these years?
Is the offer on the table to Latino’s going to be much different from what you could offer other groups of color? Is there a specific thing that makes Latino’s more amenable to switching there vote after one election?
Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)
November 15th, 2012
8:32 am
austerity brought on by socialism
The dumb, oh, it burns.
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
8:32 am
Bean counters don’t make decisions. Our elected leaders do. I’d like them to start leading.
Leadership would mean stating quite clearly, that we will begin paring back spending once unemployment is down to what’s considered near-full-pool, i.e., 4%. I’ve no problem whatsoever with the President stating that. I wish he would! And if pressed for specifics, he could speak of hypothetical cost-benefit analyses, wherein we could (for example) determine the impact of allowing privately funded enterprises to handle more of some publicly funded operations.
I know that wouldn’t satisfy the deficit hawks, but to put it nicely, f-ck those guys.
DannyX
November 15th, 2012
8:32 am
Ronald Reagan would have made a great modern Democrat, he gave out lots of free stuff.
He expanded Medicare.
He was responsible for a large part of the Earned Income Tax Credit that Republicans hate with a passion.
He gave amnesty to millions of illegal aliens who are now voting for Democrats as are their children and grandchildren.
He triple the debt by giving away free stuff.
Saint Ronnie has been downgraded to Ronald McFreestuff.
bookman parrot
November 15th, 2012
8:33 am
what a ton of drivel from so many …. nothing here to see.
Lord Help Us
November 15th, 2012
8:33 am
Proceed Governor…
Granny Godzilla - Union Thugette
November 15th, 2012
8:34 am
Recon 0311 2533
November 15th, 2012
8:28 am
As we observe the riots in Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece due to austerity brought on by socialism
.
.
.
Balderdash
History Revised
Piffle
Can you say Angela Merkel and David Cameron response to recession?
Oh wait…
You’re still listening to the media that lied to you.
Stevie Ray..Clowns to the left and Jokers to the right..here I am...
November 15th, 2012
8:34 am
Finn McCool (The System isn’t Broken; It’s Fixed)
November 15th, 2012
8:24 am
I think it’d be bad idea for Jindal to change parties…a return to the middle is what the GOP needs…in this respect Jindal differentiates himself favorably in GOP…at least what the GOP needs to become..
Isabella
November 15th, 2012
8:34 am
Mittens doesn’t get it! Plus, the Republican Party has lost their way! He blamed everything and everyone except himself. President Obama doesn’t win elections by giving gifts; he wins election because he has something intangible yet of intrinsic value to give to the American people… honesty, integrity and character. He also means what he says! Many in the pub party just don’t get it! Plus, you don’t win elections by lying to the people, discounting women, children, old people, minorities, health care and dogs. Contrary to Wall Street, this country isn’t just …all about the almighty dollar! Also, the 47 percent do matter.
Butch Cassidy (I)
November 15th, 2012
8:35 am
Recon -”As we observe the riots in Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece due to austerity brought on by socialism and buying votes we see America’s future under Democrats.”
What time does your flight leave?
Recon 0311 2533
November 15th, 2012
8:36 am
“The dumb, oh, it burns.”
Then get your head out from where the sun doesn’t shine and wash your face. Maybe the burning will stop and you’ll see things more clearly.
Lord Help Us
November 15th, 2012
8:36 am
‘You’re still listening to the media that lied to you.’
We are no longer dealing with willful ignorance…IMO, this has progressed to delusional psychosis…
BuckeyeInGa
November 15th, 2012
8:36 am
Wow, Romney still can’t comprehend that he lost the election.
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
8:37 am
GG @ 8.29, I gotta say, the Orange Satan pegged him perfectly:
Phew! He no longer has to pretend that his 47 percent remarks were “just completely wrong.”
He can go back to his belief that 47 percent of Americans are leeches on society. And bragging to his country club friends about all the NASCAR team owners he knows, as if anyone gives a sh-t.
Stevie Ray..Clowns to the left and Jokers to the right..here I am...
November 15th, 2012
8:37 am
DannyX
November 15th, 2012
8:32 am
You are spot on…don’t discount the amount of welfare spending under Nixon either..
Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)
November 15th, 2012
8:37 am
Stevie, I don’t think the GOP can sustain a move to the middle/moderate. But yesterday’s rejection of Price was a good sign.
I just don’t see the moderates in the party with enough power and charisma to get the wingnuts to sit still.
Ronnie Raygun
November 15th, 2012
8:38 am
southpaw:
You want to compare Krugman to an Ayn Rand worshiper? Williams has a Nobel prize in economics? Must have missed that in his bio.
But I did see this nugget of “wisdom”:
“He has said of Ayn Rand’s 1967 work Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal that it is “one of the best defenses and explanations of capitalism one is likely to read.”"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_E._Williams
Anyone who take Rand’s fiction seriously has mental problems.
RB from Gwinnett
November 15th, 2012
8:38 am
439K new jobless claims…. Ouch.
I guess you libs are going to call that INCREASE more good news like you did the week before the election too, right?
Jay, find that cheap substitute for Xolair yet? Or perhaps would you care to admit you were wrong?
willydoit?
November 15th, 2012
8:42 am
“this country isn’t just …all about the almighty dollar!”
None of the things you care so deeply about would happen without “the almighty dollar.”
Money….we all need it! Don’t believe me? Just ask your union leadership how important the boss’ money is!
Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)
November 15th, 2012
8:42 am
Recon, social programs didn’t lead to austerity measures. The financial meltdown – caused in part by greed and corruption in the financial systems – is what led to austerity measures.
It’s the “shock doctrine” again – use every crises as an excuse to dismantle the social programs we the people use.
Brosephus™
November 15th, 2012
8:42 am
Stevie Ray
I’d say when comparing the growth in welfare vs the accumulation of wealth amongst the top 10% or even 1%, one could surmise that the welfare group is losing. I think one of the reasons why we’re becoming more “dependent” on welfare is due to wage stagnation over the past 40 years. If the bottom 90% saw wage growth anywhere near the rate of the income and wealth growth of the top 1%, we wouldn’t need half the welfare spending we currently have.
The way I see it, it’s all interlaced, and you can’t solve one problem without addressing others. If we increase jobs here with decent wages, you decrease the number of people who need welfare to make ends meet. Increasing jobs also increases revenue to the government for budgeting and other programs. What’s required to get the whole ball started would be for the top 1% to slightly decrease their ingestion of wealth/income and push it back into the economy to spike demand. I just don’t see that happening though.
As to listening to Limbaugh, I would much rather clean my ears with sandpaper-wrapped rusty barbed wire attached to a jackhammer.
WAW
November 15th, 2012
8:43 am
The American People (for whom NO Republican speaks, acts or a crap about) elected a Democrat not a Plutocrat RINO. Most Republican voters neither understand nor care that their “Moral Issues” do not matter at all to the party blowing smoke (I shan’t say where).
Lord Help Us
November 15th, 2012
8:43 am
‘439K new jobless claims…. Ouch’
And the fact that you leave out the part about the affect from Sandy tells everyone all they need to know about your psychosis…
Barack's the best
November 15th, 2012
8:44 am
Good riddance, Mittens. Hopefully you’ll get lost in one of your bajillion elevator-equipped garages and we’ll never hear from you again.
DannyX
November 15th, 2012
8:44 am
“None of the things you care so deeply about would happen without “the almighty dollar.””
Wasn’t it Jesus who said “Blessed is the almighty Dollar”?
BenDaho
November 15th, 2012
8:45 am
clem
November 15th, 2012
8:03 am
after delivering good concession speech, he reverts to evil mitt. how about releasing your tax returns now to show us how to reform taxes.
Right after Obama releases his college transcripts.
Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)
November 15th, 2012
8:45 am
Robert Reich has the plan:
A 2% surtax on the wealth of the richest one-half of 1 percent would bring in another $750 billion over the decade. A one-half of 1 percent tax on financial transactions would bring in an additional $250 billion. Add this up and we get $2 trillion over ten years. Raise the capital gains rate to match the rate on ordinary income and cap the mortgage interest deduction at $12,000 a year, and that’s another $1 trillion over ten years. So now we’re up to $3 trillion in additional revenue. Eliminate special tax preferences for oil and gas, price supports for big agriculture, tax breaks and research subsidies for Big Pharma, unnecessary weapons systems for military contractors, and indirect subsidies to the biggest banks on Wall Street. End the Bush tax cuts on incomes between $250,000 and $1 million, and — bingo: $4 trillion over 10 years.
And we haven’t had to raise taxes on America’s beleaguered middle class, cut Social Security or Medicare and Medicaid, reduce spending on education or infrastructure, or cut programs for the poor.
http://www.alternet.org/economy/what-president-should-propose-grand-bargain-reduce-deficit
willie lynch
November 15th, 2012
8:47 am
Once the right has purged themselves of the divisive end of their party, the Coulter, Hannity, Limbaugh, Ingraham, Liz Cheney, Sarah Palin, well I guess I should just say the FOX crowd, they will be in a better position to start building a more diverse coalition.
As long as these people are seen as spokesmen for the party they are doomed to failure as Romney’s continuing misread of events would indicate.
Bernadette
November 15th, 2012
8:48 am
Mr. Romney can’t seriously believe what he says. It’s so bigoted and untrue. Someone needs to gag him and give him some prozac/lithium. Quickly.
TaxPayer
November 15th, 2012
8:48 am
439K new jobless claims…. Ouch.
President Obama can now give in to the Republican demands to cut unemployment insurance in order to help reduce the deficit.
willydoit?
November 15th, 2012
8:49 am
“Wasn’t it Jesus who said “Blessed is the almighty Dollar”?”
JAY!!!!
Tell DannyX that we republicans are the only ones that can use “Jesus quotes”!!
KChi
November 15th, 2012
8:50 am
Hello Bobby
My American Dream is not to be in the middle class. My dream is an American without a class system.
Thank you.
Verbal Kint
November 15th, 2012
8:51 am
“Romney lost in Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and several other states with “very low” African American and Hispanic populations.”
News to me. Oh well. Carry on.
Joe Hussein Mama
November 15th, 2012
8:52 am
“I woulda won except for all the people who voted against me”
– M. Romney and all political losers everywhere, throughout all of space and time
Gale
November 15th, 2012
8:52 am
I wonder how many of those jobless claims are where Sandy messed with their workplaces.
Georgia
November 15th, 2012
8:55 am
I think Romney “Jeff Gordoned” the GOP. Wow. Jay misses the point. It’s not that building more submarines with screen doors is a gift to the screen door builders, and thus Romney is a hypocrite. No. It’s that he was talking from an Ivory Tower down to and about the voters who cringe everytime he opens his perfectly white mouth. “Those groups….someone making 25…30…35K…..African…..Hispanic……10k worth of free healthcare…….” Patronization is in the GOP’s dna which means it really is a class-gap thing. It’s elitists vs those groups of swarthy unwashed tired and poor masses of grubby hands and mealy mouths…….
If, in defeat, Romney and his pretty wife can only continue their train of thought they left off at debate 3, then this is a symptom of a far, far greater societal ill than just gaffe-gate. It means that the rich have become so out of touch with the electorate that an unbridgeable gap has evolved.( a gap so wide that not even an ironing board/dining table can bridge it). Jindal can point out that the candidate has no clothes, (no tatoos either), all he wants. He’s just a voice in the wilderness of our societies’ infrastructural divide which has become as concretely reinforced as girders on the bridge to nowhere, man.
Paul
November 15th, 2012
8:55 am
Recon 0311
“As we observe the riots in Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece due to austerity brought on by socialism and buying votes we see America’s future under Democrats”
You really ought to read Jay’s comments before you post. That way, you’ll at least sound a little bit thoughtful.
” When Romney, in the first debate, promised a tax cut to the middle class, he wasn’t promising them a gift? When he wooed his backers on Wall Street by telling them that he would repeal Dodd Frank, abolish the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau and lower corporate taxes, that wasn’t promising a gift?
When he went to Viriginia to promise to build even more nuclear-powered submarines that just happened to be built right there in Virginia, that wasn’t a gift? When he went to coal country to promise to weaken environmental regulations that protect the air we breathe, that wasn’t a gift? When he traveled to Florida to promise to replace $716 billion in Medicare funding allegedly cut by the Obama administration, that wasn’t a gift?”
DownInAlbany
November 15th, 2012
8:56 am
Why is anything about Romney (yes, I supported and voted for him) considered “news?” He has been proven to be irrelevant. Oh yeah, anything to deflect from our president’s failure to lead on the economy, unemployment, Libya, 4 years of $1 trillion deficits, etc. He’s meeting with BonJovi while the nation remains in a mess. All the while blaming Bush. Focus on Romney so the light stays off of Obama. Different day, same old tired deflect, deflect, deflect.
Lord Help Us
November 15th, 2012
8:56 am
It’s worse than I thought…our esteemed GA Rep, Chip Rogers is pushing the ‘crazy’ beyond the bounds of mere human comprehension…the man is a God-like visionary…
‘President Obama is using a Cold War-era mind-control technique known as “Delphi” to coerce Americans into accepting his plan for a United Nations-run communist dictatorship in which suburbanites will be forcibly relocated to cities.’
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/11/georgia-senate-gets-52-minute-briefing-united-nations-takeover
Not even Jindal is gonna bother trying to talk this dude down…
David
November 15th, 2012
8:56 am
Romney’s gift comments just show what he really thinks about the aveage American wage earner. If your not wealthy then apparently you don’t deserve health care.
The worrysome thing is that he does not even realize how jaded his privaleged childhood and life style have made him, and apparently is not alone.
Stonethrower
November 15th, 2012
8:57 am
It’s the GOP base vs minorities. Yep, that’s the winning formula Mitt.
Joe Hussein Mama
November 15th, 2012
8:57 am
RB — “Jay, find that cheap substitute for Xolair yet? Or perhaps would you care to admit you were wrong?”
Where are my freight-haulage data, RB?
Paul
November 15th, 2012
8:57 am
Finn, I’m going to lift your 8:45 and post it elsewhere, if that’s okay with you.
Even if it’s not, I’ll do it anyway!
RB from Gwinnett
November 15th, 2012
8:57 am
Bro, “I think one of the reasons why we’re becoming more “dependent” on welfare is due to wage stagnation over the past 40 years.”
I think it’s due more to 2 factors.
1, the economy has become more global in nature as it’s become easier to ship goods made all over the world to your local store for very little added cost. It’s allowed people in 3rd world places happy to make things for a buck a day to do exactly that. Hard to pay Joe six pack $20/hr for the same work Jing six pack will do for $1/hr.
2. We have a class of people who have figured out its easier to work the benefits system than to actually work and we’ve given them a system that allows it. We have some 10+MM Mexicans here doing jobs these very same people refuse to do even though they are the only jobs they’re qualified to do. They will never escape poverty by working the welfare systems. Never. It takes work and they’re unwilling to do the work.
Stevie Ray..Clowns to the left and Jokers to the right..here I am...
November 15th, 2012
8:59 am
BRO
I don’t disagree with a word you said…but if the topic is Romney’s comment, there is no small grain of truth..however, it’s not like it is news…
Romney’s only a victim of himself…he could have won…but…
Regarding Rush, try listening to Big Ed someday…he is clearly the Rush of the left…that Lawrence O’donnell’s bs is only exceeded by John Gibson..
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
8:59 am
Paul, Finn…y’all realize that the CPC had a perfectly reasonable plan to reduce the deficit in an orderly fashion already, right?
http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/the-peoples-budget/
Banderson
November 15th, 2012
9:01 am
So, now the GOP says socialism caused the economic problems in Greece, Ireland, Iceland, Portugal and Spain. I guess the they couldn’t figure out how to blame Jimmy Carter, Chris Dodd and Barney Frank.
jimmymac
November 15th, 2012
9:02 am
For a very long time I’ve considered Jindal a muppet of the GOP , with a clonelike adherence to the W model from neighboring Texas…….but after all that grovelling around the country the past couple of years dumbing himself down to promote their agenda they (the GOP) have shown him very little respect. He’s supposed to be a smart guy, and he sounds like one here. Anybody remember the Reagan democrats? Make way for the Obama republicans.
Paul
November 15th, 2012
9:03 am
DownInAlbany
What about Pres Obama’s actions regarding Libya do you regard as a failure of leadership? You wanted him to what, land ground troops to overthrow Gaddafi?
A Simple Man
November 15th, 2012
9:04 am
Can’t talk about successes. Can’t keep beating on Bush. Might as spend the next four years talking about Romney.
Tom Middleton
November 15th, 2012
9:04 am
If we’re going to be about freedom, Jay, then we have to be about those individuals and, yes, parties that will help us to be just that.
And if we can’t be free without good health, an education, control over our bodies and families, and, of course, jobs and the right to climb the ladder of achievement, no matter what the color of our skin, then we can’t be free, period.
And who is it offering us these viable necessities we need to make it happen, I mean, besides that absolutely insulting “ go borrow money from your parents”? We elected him, sir, and thank holy God we did. With us and him and Him, we can ALL get there from here!
RB from Gwinnett
November 15th, 2012
9:04 am
I’m aware the jobless numbers are affected by Sandy. I just wanted to know if ya’ll would call this increase a good thing too like you did the one before the election.
Joe Hussein Mama
November 15th, 2012
9:04 am
Banderson — “So, now the GOP says socialism caused the economic problems in Greece, Ireland, Iceland, Portugal and Spain. I guess the they couldn’t figure out how to blame Jimmy Carter, Chris Dodd and Barney Frank.”
I guess it finally sunk in that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae couldn’t have caused the crash, either, sinec neither FHLMC nor FNMA did business in any of the *other* countries where the RE market collapsed.
Paul
November 15th, 2012
9:05 am
stands
Thanks for reposting that. I’m gonna steal your post, too!
See, I’m just one of those lazy libs who wants other people to work for me so I can take what they produce and use it.
Wait… doesn’t that mean I’m a con mindlessly repeating what I hear from Rush, Hannity, Boortz and other assorted… what’s the word? Oh yeah…. ‘ilk’?
Doggone/GA
November 15th, 2012
9:05 am
“My dream is an American without a class system.”
There’s no such thing as a “classless” society. That’s a pipe dream.
East Cobb RINO, Inc (LLC)
November 15th, 2012
9:06 am
At least now we know the real Mitt.
Welcome to the Occupation
November 15th, 2012
9:06 am
So let me get this straight: When Romney, in the first debate, promised a tax cut to the middle class, he wasn’t promising them a gift?
For people who despise taxation as such, viewing it as theft, it follows very logically. Nice trick, huh?
But we shouldn’t laugh and gloat too much — the liberal disease — but rather should see Mitt Romney’s stunning arrogance and contempt for democratic rights as perfectly typical of the ruling elite in this country, one that ultimately includes both parties. These people will eventually stop at nothing to ram cuts down the people’s throats without the slightest regard for those people’s wishes or needs.
These people are absolutely ruthless – and without the slightest trace of shame.
Joe Hussein Mama
November 15th, 2012
9:08 am
I read this Breitbart post a few days ago, and I’ve been trying to figure out what the conservative angle is in sharing this with the world. I could see why a liberal site might release this, but I’m still scratching my head over why a *conservative* site would.
Anyone want to take a stab at explaining the conservative ‘why’ ot this?
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/10/Romney-Got-Smaller-Percentage-Of-Mormon-Vote-Than-George-W-Bush
Pandora
November 15th, 2012
9:08 am
This article was well written. In the end…OBAMA 2012!!!!
I’m so happy he won. May God Bless him, his familly, Biden, his family and President Obamas’ administration.
OBAMA 2012!!!
Michael
November 15th, 2012
9:08 am
Romney is right. He would have been wise enough as President to only give gifts to the rich. Bye Mitt.
clem
November 15th, 2012
9:09 am
don’t remember conservs clamoring for scooter or cheney’s scalp when the outed a cia agent
RB from Gwinnett
November 15th, 2012
9:09 am
Lets just be honest. ALL of our elections have become little more than a vote buying scheme by BOTH parties. They’re all trotting out laundry lists of “stuff” they’re promising to give each and every voting block in exchange for their vote. Very little of it has anything to do with the betterment of this nation.
DannyX
November 15th, 2012
9:10 am
“I’m aware the jobless numbers are affected by Sandy.”
RB, are you sure you didn’t see the headline then rush over here to deliver your “good” news?
After all, you are the one that saw a billboard and used it to declare the real estate market sound a few years back.
Tall
November 15th, 2012
9:12 am
…”To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize. ” -Voltaire, philosopher (1694-1778
Mary Elizabeth
November 15th, 2012
9:12 am
If there is a “real” Mitt Romney, then these remarks reflect who he is and how he sees. He is not in Obama’s league. Romney sees humanity with a hierarchial vision; Obama sees with an egalitarian vision. Many of our top CEOs see with the same hierarchial vision as does Romney.
That is why it will be destructive to America’s egalitarian vision if these same corporate CEOs are given the power to control our public schools, just as some of these CEOs attempted to control their employees’ votes. Vision is fundamental to what America becomes. Romney’s vision of humanity is essentially a petty, small-minded, limited vision, not an expansive, inclusive one. Thank God he was not elected to be America’s President, with the power to represent and to mold our nation to his vision. This election was pivotal. Providence, imo, took a hand in shaping our destiny.
Maria S
November 15th, 2012
9:13 am
I’m totally in favor of splitting up this country into Red states and Blue states. The Red states don’t take in enough revenue to support their own spending anyway so GOOD RIDDANCE!
East Cobb RINO, Inc (LLC)
November 15th, 2012
9:15 am
Louisiana Governor office is term limited and Jindal cannot run after his term is done. Otherwise I bet he would not survive a primary challenge from one of the wing nuts after these statements. Therein lies the problem with the GOP. Now they will label Jindal & Christie RINOs and purge them for the sake of purity.
W Rychart
November 15th, 2012
9:15 am
There is no question that Romney is spot on. Future elections will be a bidding war between the two parties for the Hispanic vote. The truth hurts doesn’t it?
Paul
November 15th, 2012
9:16 am
Morning, Joe Hussein Mama
“Anyone want to take a stab at explaining the conservative ‘why’ ot this?”
Maybe because conservative power brokers want to add LDS to their list of suspect people because they aren’t really as conservative as they were made out to be?
You’d have thought that race a couple years back in Arizona, where the LDS guy went down to a flaming defeat in a predominately LDS district (polls showed a majority of LDS thought that extreme conservatism did not reflect practicing their religious values) would have given them a clue.
Then again, there’s always Harry Reid if they’re that clueless.
Michael Dice
November 15th, 2012
9:16 am
Mitt never talks about the ‘gifts’ his own church bestowed on the American people when he hid all his money behind their robes in the 1990’s.
JKL2
November 15th, 2012
9:17 am
kchi- My American Dream is not to be in the middle class. My dream is an American without a class system. Thank you.
All we have to do is get rid of those evil rich people. That will fix everything. The problem with your Demwit utopia is someone still has t clean the toilet.
Liberalism: Not going to be happy until everyone is as miserable as we are!
Lord Help Us
November 15th, 2012
9:17 am
‘The truth hurts doesn’t it?’
Not for people that live in reality…
Franklin Levin
November 15th, 2012
9:18 am
It is so wonderful that this creep is not going to be president. He lives in a dream world and it is best that he stay there. What a whiner. He lost because not enough American were fooled.
Paul
November 15th, 2012
9:18 am
clem
“don’t remember conservs clamoring for scooter or cheney’s scalp when the outed a cia agent”
Maybe because neither scooter or cheney outed a cia agent?
Maybe because it was Richard Armitage who identified what was known at the time – that a person was a CIA employee?
willie lynch
November 15th, 2012
9:18 am
DownInAlbany
November 15th, 2012
8:56 am
President Obama meeting with Bon Jovi? Are you serious (rhetorical)? You supported Romney? Sorry to hear that. Had your party not spent the last four years doing what you continue to do now you might have supported the winner.
Get you head out of your…the sand and come to grips with the fact that people saw the Bush debacle as a legitimate claim for the president to make. They understood the expenditure was necessary to correct prior poor judgment and as our economy continues to improve the Euro zone has slipped back into a recession. A recession that’s fueling riots in Spain and rising right wing violence in Greece. Mind you these countries have instituted the policies championed by those on the right in this country.
Get your head where you can breathe. You might want to start by getting out of Albany.
RB from Gwinnett
November 15th, 2012
9:19 am
“just as some of these CEOs attempted to control their employees’ votes”
I think some of these CEO’s letters to their employees crossed the line, but some of these employees need to understand the realities of the decisions being made and their affect on their employer. I really don’t think most employees are spending any time thinking about where their employer is going to get that $2,000 per employee cash from, but it has to come from somewhere. As you’ve seen since the election, some are getting the message “it’s coming from the paycheck you used to get”. More to come, just wait for it.
Paul
November 15th, 2012
9:19 am
Michael Dice
Did you shop a pre-Thanksgiving sale on tinfoil hats?!!?
Granny Godzilla - Union Thugette
November 15th, 2012
9:20 am
“The truth hurts doesn’t it?”
Not nearly as bad as the long term effects of truthiness.
Those nearly killed our nation.
JohnnyReb
November 15th, 2012
9:21 am
I see that even though Obama won, many here still are detached from reality.
There was no voter mandate.
Obama won a little over 50% of the popular vote and carried 26 states plus DC.
Yes, he had a big Electoral College number – see popular vote.
The second dillusion is that simply by Obama winning the Right is going to roll over. Not going to happen.
As to Romney’s remarks, I don’t understand why they were necessary even if true. The black vote was Obama’s regardless and would not have changed without Obamacare. See Colin Powell and Oprah Winfrey.
As to Hispanics, they are respected in the white community over blacks not because of color but work ethic. It is disappointing they choose the nanny state over Liberty. As to work ethic – see Obama and golf.
RB from Gwinnett
November 15th, 2012
9:22 am
DannyX, what do you think the AJC’s advertisers would think about the “click counts” on this site being artificially inflated by AJC employees spending their days hitting the site and posting under different name on their blogs? Do you think they’d care at all? Put that on your billboard, Danny, and see if it tells you anything.
Lord Help Us
November 15th, 2012
9:23 am
‘The black vote was Obama’s regardless and would not have changed without Obamacare. See Colin Powell and Oprah Winfrey.’
Dude, you have issues…
Joe Hussein Mama
November 15th, 2012
9:24 am
W. Rychart — “There is no question that Romney is spot on. Future elections will be a bidding war between the two parties for the Hispanic vote.”
No, there’s a huge question about it. How many Hispanic people have you discussed the topic with?
“The truth hurts doesn’t it?”
Not at all. Then again, I don’t think the truth is at all what you seem to think it is.
That said, go ahead and keep going with that line of argument. It will serve the opposition well in 2014 and 2016.
AJ
November 15th, 2012
9:24 am
Quite honestly, this man brings out the worst in me. I find myself hoping he will have a nervous meltdown one of these days
Paul
November 15th, 2012
9:25 am
JohnnyReb
“There was no voter mandate.”
How do you define ‘voter mandate”?
Are you making the case that more people did not agree with Pres Obama’s ideas than with Gov Romney’s ideas?
Or are you saying the results don’t count because it wasn’t a wide enough margin? So how wide is ‘enough?’
Joe Hussein Mama
November 15th, 2012
9:26 am
Paul — “Maybe because conservative power brokers want to add LDS to their list of suspect people because they aren’t really as conservative as they were made out to be?”
Hmm. That’s a rather novel take, and one I hadn’t considered. Have you heard it articulated anywhere else?
My wife and I will have to discuss this; as I’ve mentioned before, her family left the LDS when she was a kid.
GT
November 15th, 2012
9:27 am
The Republican Party may understand the need to represent 100% of America, but what they fail to understand is they need to be part of America first. We don’t need an outsider explaining to us our problems. When your support is so cloistered in on part of the country or in one category you are separationists. Jump in get wet or maybe you are afraid you might turn a little left if you get too involved.
willie lynch
November 15th, 2012
9:28 am
W Rychart
November 15th, 2012
9:15 am
“There is no question that Romney is spot on. Future elections will be a bidding war between the two parties for the Hispanic vote.”
That’s ridiculous! The Democrats don’t have to bid for something they already have. The fact that Republicans can only see the Latino vote as all it needs to tip the scales will be seen as disingenuous to that community as it is to everyone else who’s looking at it.
Concentrating solely on the Latino vote is a shortsighted strategy. Jeez, I hope the Republicans get smarter than that. These are minor league ideas on a major league playing field.
GT
November 15th, 2012
9:28 am
Real capitalism is grass rooted like a virus looking for a mutation to enter the body. If the system had been allowed to run its natural course there would have been no need for a car industry bail out. What O had to do is reset the natural process of a hungry industry looking to compete. This was a gift, but not as Romney sees it. Obama saved the working class from the leaches Romney and his type back with bank bailouts that artificially create an economy on the backs of a middle class like a drug dealer.
Tim
November 15th, 2012
9:28 am
See, that’s the trouble with you liberals, Bookman. You think that it’s a “gift” that Romney pledged a tax cut for the middle class. How is it a gift when you already own the money? You’re so programmed to believe the government has a right to everyone’s wallets that you think at tax CUT is a GIFT. This is exactly the ruin of our country–viewpoints like yours. Awaiting the revolution…..
Joe Hussein Mama
November 15th, 2012
9:28 am
Paul — “Maybe because neither scooter or cheney outed a cia agent?”
“Maybe because it was Richard Armitage who identified what was known at the time – that a person was a CIA employee?”
Under the CIA’s rules and regs, Plame was *still* technically considered an agent, even though she hadn’t recently been on an op or been working under cover.
At the time she was outed, the CIA considered Plame *both* an employee and an agent.
Joe Hussein Mama
November 15th, 2012
9:30 am
Committee meeting. Back later today.
Thomas Heyward Jr
November 15th, 2012
9:31 am
In bashing Romney’s class-wafare,
Jay Bookman has proved to be……………………..
a good Chuck Schumer tool.
.
lol
GT
November 15th, 2012
9:31 am
The Obama “gift” to the car industry was part of what saved this country from going into a depression. Bush’s bail out of the banking industry saved the rich not this country, and left a weak interpretation of free enterprise. Wall Street reminds me of these antiquated law firms where a young energetic mind is put into the labor pool while a decaying feeble mind of seniority is giving the corner office and supported by the pool. Failure is part of the formula of success but the easy credit of Wall Street allowed for a soft car industry, easy sells, and no accountability, allowed no room for failure. The work force didn’t receive this windfall of entitlement; it was the rich, the investors, and the Ivy League executive with the silver spoon path to the top.
Dirty Dawg
November 15th, 2012
9:31 am
Jay, you nailed it. This is indeed the ‘mindset’ of everyone that identifies themselves as Republican. The ‘makers and takers’…the ‘47%’…the ‘job creators and the moochers’. And whenever I get pushback from my Republican ‘friends’ about this they, with fire in their eyes, give me the whole spiel…then when I point out that we – them and me – are included in the ‘taker’ total according to Mitt because we’re on Medicare and receive Social Security, I get ‘I paid, and am still paying, for those’…exactly my point I say but it just doesn’t matter to them. If it serves to criticize and denigrate Obama, Democrats, Liberals, whatever, they go with it, no matter the truth. I guess the reason I stop short of pointing out to them that the only reason for their hatred thats left is their bigotry, is that I want us to remain ‘friends’…but for the life of me I’m beginning to wonder why.
woodsrocks
November 15th, 2012
9:33 am
What a freakin’ jerk!!!!!
Paul
November 15th, 2012
9:33 am
JHM
Just occurred to me as I read the piece you linked to and I thought about how the extreme cons always seem to want to have a suspect group to blame their ills on.
straitroad
November 15th, 2012
9:33 am
Brosephus,
“As to giving gifts, every single damned politician that runs for office promises something to whatever group they want to get votes from. What free stuff has Obama given away that no other president has given away before him?”
This is not true. Typically in each election the Republican candidate promises more opportunity and freedom while the democrat candidate promises to seize from one group and give to another. The latter was amplified in this election which probably means good news for you and others on this board. While it’s tempting to take what’s given, in the long run it’s not good for the country or the person on the take. No self-respecting person can feel good about oneself living a life in this manner.
Lynnie Gal
November 15th, 2012
9:34 am
–Ronnie Raygun bears repeating: Let’s not forget that Mooch Romney also wanted to eliminate capital gains taxes so that he wouldn’t have to pay a dime in taxes and could live off of those of us that work for a living.
–My special gift from Obama is Romney’s defeat.
Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)
November 15th, 2012
9:34 am
Awaiting the revolution….
Better stock up on canned goods – it’s gonna be a mighty long wait.
Paul
November 15th, 2012
9:35 am
JHM
Which is why I said based on what we knew at the time. I believe the CIA never verified her status and gave a record of their reasoning until after the special investigation was concluded.
Lord Help Us
November 15th, 2012
9:35 am
‘I guess the reason I stop short of pointing out to them that the only reason for their hatred thats left is their bigotry, is that I want us to remain ‘friends’…’
Dawg, I have struggled similarly, but, I get bogged down with the bigotry angle when I consider how much these same people HATED Bill Clinton. The hate is similar…the reasons for it seem to be malleable…
Paul
November 15th, 2012
9:36 am
JHM
But the larger issue is still the number of people on the Left who think it was Cheney or Libby who ‘outed’ Plame.
gm
November 15th, 2012
9:36 am
Wow this is the right and there idiots, what about all the people who voted for Obama in Ohio, Mich, who have jobs do they want free stuff two?
How about all people in Paul Ryan District who voted for Obama do they want free stuff? The rest of the country saw what a fake Romney was, only the confederates of the south who receives more assistant from the gov because the south leads in poverty voted for these idiot.
How about all the whites in Iowa, VT, Main, RI, Wi, who voted for Obama? this is why the Rep and the conservatives southern white male are on the decline and no one takes them serious anymore.
Moderate Line
November 15th, 2012
9:39 am
Obama’s campaign strategy was to trash Romney which is exactly the same campaign strategy used against Kerry in 2004. It work for Bush and it worked for Obama. I am sure in the future it will be used again. However, I believe it is time to stop trashing Romney and move on. He was no bigger a liar or a flip flopper than Obama as proven by politifact. Nor was he anymore hypocritical than Obama. They were pretty much equal or different by a few degrees. The reason he lossed are many. My main issue with Romney was we have been cutting taxes since 2000 and our economy has not been the better for it so I don’t believe it is going to work now.
I can point to hypocrisy on both sides. It is a rather easy thing to do. However, I believe Romney lost because he really did not provide much of an alternative. The race was close because the economy is doing rather mediocre.
clem
November 15th, 2012
9:41 am
part of the reason is they have theirs and do not want other to get it…..but what i don’t understand is why most of these middle americans dont rebel against corporate captains. greed at top at all time high. and they think their ship don’t stink
East Cobb RINO, Inc (LLC)
November 15th, 2012
9:41 am
There was no voter mandate.
Please pass that along to Congressional Republicans.
entitled baby
November 15th, 2012
9:42 am
Wah wah wah
SwamiDave
November 15th, 2012
9:42 am
Many of the things Romney promised would have been gifts. Unless tax cuts reduce taxes below the taxes owed, they are never “gifts”. Allowing people to keep what is theirs already is not a gift.
Promising transfer payments and benefits funded by others is a gift. It would be a gift from the earner if given freely – it is likewise when funded by confiscated earnings.
Liberalism – Charity with Other People’s Money!
-SD
Tealiban Party
November 15th, 2012
9:44 am
It’s here! It’s here! UPS just dropped off my Obama gift!!! I love it! Thank you so much President Obama.
Ronald Reagan
November 15th, 2012
9:44 am
We need another President like George W. that can actually run a country! An eight year training program just don’t get it!
Remember Benghazi! Remember Benghazi! Remember Benghazi! Liberals are good at reciting “one liners!”
DannyX
November 15th, 2012
9:44 am
“How about all people in Paul Ryan District who voted for Obama do they want free stuff?”
I wonder if Paul Ryan voted for Obama? After all, Ryan scored a lot of free stuff for his district using Obama stimulus funds.
Paul
November 15th, 2012
9:45 am
clem
“.but what i don’t understand is why most of these middle americans dont rebel against corporate captains. ”
That is a mystery. As Bill Kristol of the National Review said the other day, letting the top-tier rates expire will not have any negative economic consequences and it’s a mystery why Republicans want to fall on their swords over tax cuts for millionaires so they can keep more of their toys, especially as half of them voted for Obama and half live in Hollywood.
I think we’ve witnessed some pretty effective brainwashing on rank-and-file Republicans.
Either that, or they’re preparing for new careers as water carriers.
Doggone/GA
November 15th, 2012
9:45 am
“Dawg, I have struggled similarly, but, I get bogged down with the bigotry angle”
Bigotry is not only race related. Bigots come in all stripes and colors and have many targets. Party affiliation economic status, education…all can trigger bigotry. And in the case of Clinton, they all did.
Tap Out
November 15th, 2012
9:46 am
We didn’t buy what Mitt was selling during the campaign….ain’t about to start now.
gm
November 15th, 2012
9:47 am
When will the right face the truth, young voters dont listen to scum bags like Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Neal B. this works with confederate voters in the south who still live in the 20th century who pretends they hate gov but receive all the gov benefits pell grants, ssi, va checks, medicaid. .
Stand in line Romney with McCain, Rush, Hannity and the rest of the southern conservatives white males who Obama has defeated, the 21st century is hear and there is nothing you can do about it.
Lord Help Us
November 15th, 2012
9:47 am
The ‘free stuff’ excuse is a hoot coming from the red states that are net ‘takers’ of federal monies.
The delusional psychosis of the conned apparently inhibits the acknowledgement of this reality…
Dan Edwards
November 15th, 2012
9:48 am
Romney lost because he reminds working Americans of the boss they hate. Someone more concerned about short term profits or “flips” that they cut everything that provides a stable long term ecosystem.
Even beggars are American; one’s self worth should not be based on how much money they make or IQ. It should be based on the blood, sweat, and tears of the humble and the self sacrifice to raise others up.
I didn’t see sacrifice or sweat with Romney, I saw someone who was just a better poker player.
Government needs to understand about the ecology of being American. You open up free trade with countries that do not have the same standard of living as America does and you only end up lowering your own standard of living to support theirs. And what do you get for it? A .10 cent cheaper bauble or shiny piece of plastic crap.
Logic_101
November 15th, 2012
9:49 am
It is clear that Romney is incapable of realizing that he lose on the merits, or lack of merits in his candidacy. A challenger should get at least a 20% boost from a bad economy, That together with his base, should have produced a victory of the order of 55% of the electorate. Instead, the man who spit on military families and veterans during his 47% speech to rich selfish people and his acceptance speech at the Republicans convention never could connect with Americans. In his world his cowardice, typified by his draft dodging during a war he supported, but echoed in his business dealings that went afoul of the law, seem to be due to someone else. His mocking of the idea that we are all in this together, his delusion that there is such a thing as a self made man, forced him to seem aloof from an electorate that knew better. Detached from reality, this failure as a candidate seeks to find some straw to hold on to to protect the myth that he believes about himself. There in lies the weakness of Mitt Romney. It is the weakness and depression his wife alluded to when she said she only feared what would happen if he did not get his way. It is the fear that comes from admitting defeat, my lot is worse than I think it should be, it must be the fault of someone else. In this case, women, minorities and the people that actually built this country, that actually defended this country, voted for a man who is this country, compassionate, intelligent, multicultural , industrious America. In the end, Joe the Plumber or Mitt Romney view Americans as takers. In th real world,the rest of us know who the takers are.
USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)
November 15th, 2012
9:49 am
“Yes, he had a big Electoral College number – see popular vote.”
it’s only a landslide when a republican wins 300+ electoral college votes
right?
williebkind
November 15th, 2012
9:49 am
I see in the AJC the news media is giving Obama a year to make things better. So please dont die before 2014 or you will miss out on the good times. Why are you talking about Romney? Have you heard about the cover up by the president where four Americans were murdered?
Will CNN/AJC find new meanings to words to excuse Obama for lying to America?
Jefferson
November 15th, 2012
9:49 am
Ever wonder why he lost ?? Not me….
East Cobb RINO, Inc (LLC)
November 15th, 2012
9:50 am
Mrs RINO got some free stuff from vendors at a convention this week. They must want something in return. Free market capitalism at its’ best.
clem
November 15th, 2012
9:51 am
paul, true armitage first. but i seriously doubt novak would have done his little hit job without corroboration by rove. we know scooter and cheney were working on discrediting joe wilson for telling the truth. to borrow lindsey’s expression “they were up to their eyeballs in it”. i don’t recall if novak called them before story but they sure scrambled after story and scooter fell on his sword.
and georgie said he was gone get to the bottom of it, but didn’t. and he did not pardon scooter.
add this to the fact that cheney leaned on cia and most likely influenced wmd critical thinking. how many lives lost there.
did you call for mcnamara or westmorelands scalp when they covered up viet nam….
i want the truth to come out; but for mccain & graham (two peas in pod & liars to boot about iraq
Aquagirl
November 15th, 2012
9:52 am
Allowing people to keep what is theirs already is not a gift.
The government provides services, if people are using those and not paying, they’re getting a gift.
Now I realize it’s fashionable among conservatives to assume a literate populace, roads, social order, power grids, etc. are simply naturally occurring features. If these people want government to “get out of the way” Somalia is ready when they are. I’ll help them pack their gold-plated luggage.
Lord Help Us
November 15th, 2012
9:52 am
‘Will CNN/AJC find new meanings to words to excuse Obama for lying to America?’
When ‘lying to America’ consists of calling an attack on our consulate as ‘triggered by a spontaneous protest’ vs ‘a terrorist attack,’ you REALLY do not have much…
Mary Elizabeth
November 15th, 2012
9:52 am
Paul Krugman, today:
“Some of us see an increasingly, radically unequal America, with rising inequality actually reinforced by public policy, with tax rates on the rich lower than they have been in many decades and the overall redistributive effect of government down substantially since the 1970s. But the right sees an entitlement epidemic, in which the big problem is that too many people are getting free stuff.
It’s important to understand the roots of this stuff. It began as a deliberate appeal to racism, with explicit condemnation of Those People as welfare moochers. . . .
And I don’t think the Republican party as currently constituted can change this: after 45 years of the Southern strategy, this stuff is what defines the party’s soul.”
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/15/the-moocher-majority/
Ol' Bob
November 15th, 2012
9:53 am
If Romney is to be believed (always a dicey proposition) then he and his team should really be in the running for the 2012 Joseph Goebbels Memorial Believe Your Own Propaganda At All Costs Award. If they didn’t see this loss coming, when most polls in the last SIX MONTHS of the campaign showed him trailing, sometimes by a little, sometimes by a lot, but nearly ALWAYS trailing, then they suffered one of the biggest reality disconnects ever. Honest, guys – you need to watch more than Fox to get a feel for what’s going on in “the real world”, wherever that may be. Well, what the heck could we expect from a candidate who couldn’t even remember his real name..?
lovelyliz
November 15th, 2012
9:53 am
Where was this version of Gov Jindal pre-November 6, 2012?
Jackie
November 15th, 2012
9:53 am
We should look carefully at the “hearings” chaired by Rep Issa(R-CA) and his outing of a CIA agent, an active CIA operation and possibly the death of some of those who supported the operation in Libya.
Welcome to the Occupation
November 15th, 2012
9:55 am
Tim: “How is it a gift when you already own the money?”
The old assumption that all taxation is theft (see my post above).
You’re hopelessly ensnared in capitalist ideology, Tim, if you think that taxation as such is theft.
If taxation per se is theft, then so is private property per se.
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
9:56 am
I’ve been trying to figure out what the conservative angle is in sharing this with the world. I could see why a liberal site might release this, but I’m still scratching my head over why a *conservative* site would.
I read some of the comments and I’m still a bit puzzled. Perhaps the simplest answer is also the least interesting one–this online contributor found this factoid interesting and wanted to generate some discussion?
Jay
November 15th, 2012
9:56 am
“Allowing people to keep what is theirs already is not a gift.
The dollars “returned” to taxpayers via a tax cut do not and never did belong to that taxpayer. They are dollars that are being borrowed instead from China and elsewhere. Every dollar in tax cuts is another dollar added onto the national debt. It is a “freebie” handed out to today’s taxpayer and voter that will have to be repaid by that voter’s children and grandchildren.
USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)
November 15th, 2012
9:57 am
“Ever wonder why he lost ?? Not me….”
nope.
the only thing I wonder is how he did as well as he did
April Carter
November 15th, 2012
9:57 am
Everyone just dying to be offended? How many left wing commentators said the exact same thing. Aren’t weak minded Republicans trying to find ways to cater to these groups as well. Just a simple analysis ( perhaps even a compliment in effectiveness on Obama campaign) is all this was. Worse swipe was that this would cost a lot ( something the media never comments on when the goodies are being promised).
Relax. The empty suit won. What do any of you care what Romney does or say anymore? Enjoy the inevitable success coming our way.
Jerry Eads
November 15th, 2012
9:58 am
I’m not surprised at Romney, and while some of Jindal’s policies on education (my interest) aren’t very smart, glad to see at least one Republican tries to think about everyone. Maybe he even realizes “trickle-down” economics don’t – the data are excruciatingly clear if any Republicans would look at such – and have never done anything except widen the income gap. (But I’ll not hold my breath.)
Paul
November 15th, 2012
9:58 am
clem
‘did you call for mcnamara or westmorelands scalp when they covered up viet nam….”
Yep.
And Johnson over the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
And I’ve been quite critical of much of the senior military leadership during that era.
” and he did not pardon scooter.”
Have to give Pres Bush credit for that.
Lord Help Us
November 15th, 2012
10:00 am
Ahhhh, memories…
Remember when the Bush Admin, Fox and the usual bullspitters adopted the mantra re: the surplus: ‘The gov’t is taking too much of your money and we intend to give it back.’
During record surpluses…crickets…
USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)
November 15th, 2012
10:01 am
“Have to give Pres Bush credit for that.”
and he hired Ben Bernanke. the only 2 things I agreed with in 8 years.
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
10:01 am
wow…
Maybe because conservative power brokers want to add LDS to their list of suspect people because they aren’t really as conservative as they were made out to be?
I’m so old I can remember when I was the guy who was willing to occasionally assume the absolute worst of America’s conservatives, and Paul was the guy occasionally reining me in.
Lord Help Us
November 15th, 2012
10:02 am
‘During record surpluses…crickets…’
Oops, meant during record DEFICITS…Mas Cafe, Ahora!
Ronald Reagan Parkway
November 15th, 2012
10:02 am
my November 15th, 2012
8:24 am
correction:
“Romney lost in Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and several other states with “very low” African American and Hispanic populations.”
Correction: Obama lost in Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and several other states with “very low” African American and Hispanic populations.”
Obama won in:
Oregon Population Race White Race Black Race Hispanic
3,871,859 88.6% 2.0% 12.0%
Nevada 2,723,322 77.7% 8.6% 27.1%
Iowa 3,062,309 93.0% 3.1% 5.2%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/19000.html
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
10:02 am
the only 2 things I agreed with in 8 years.
You forgot off-road diesel pollution regs! and the no-call list!
(and Poland!)
alex
November 15th, 2012
10:03 am
Yes the president offered “gifts”, Yes Romney offered “gifts”, it’s called pork in D.C. and they all do it , end of story.. For the repubs to improve, self evaluation must occur, end of story…
Yesterday someone wanted a good reference regarding the players of the mortgage debacle, on further thought.. I think that “reckless Endangerment ” is an excellent overview of the platers in this story from Fannie Mae to AIG, to the Texans west of Dallas to the Senator from conneticut. They are all there.
midtownguy
November 15th, 2012
10:03 am
The only “gift” I want from the Democrats is a marriage license for me and my partner of twenty years. But I fully expect to pay for it.
Walt Price
November 15th, 2012
10:06 am
The loser is not Mitt, but the American People. We will have 4 more years of the same failed Obama’s policies, with no growth and more taxes. Mitt was right about the 47% of people who are just getting something from the government without caring to pay taxes. It may be shocking for the liberals, but it is true.
gm
November 15th, 2012
10:07 am
Hey Mitt and low informed idiots at fox and viewers
Obama won VT, Iowa, RI, WI,NH Main, these places have a low population of less then 2% of minorties , when will you idiots start blaming Romney job performance in Mass where his state was 47 out 50 in job creation, the people in Mass despise him.
How about Mich were he was born, did not vote for him, only the southern confederates can defend a man who home town and where he worked knew he was a fraud, talking about backwoods southern conservatives, wow
Tired of Stupid
November 15th, 2012
10:07 am
“You can imagine for somebody making $25—, or $30—, or $35,000 a year, being told you’re now going to get free healthcare — particularly if you don’t have it, getting free healthcare worth, what, $10,000 a family, in perpetuity”
Does anyone but me read this with incredulity? 10K for a family earning 25-35K is roughly 30% of what they earn … how else are they going to get health care, they certainly can’t pay for it.
At a macro level there are 3 basic options:
1. We as a country fund it paying for it through our taxes.
2. Its funded by hospital emergency room care, where we who can afford health care pay for it in increased health care costs. Or
3. They die.
People are going to get health care, either we pay upfront and manage it with some economies of scale and resulting efficiencies – or we pay at the back end in our increasing health care costs. But nobody should fool themselves into thinking we won’t be paying for the health care of those that can’t afford it.
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
10:07 am
it’s called pork in D.C.
Coming soon to Rock Creek Park?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/wild-pigs-may-become-washingtons-next-big-pest/2012/11/12/03175e2e-130d-11e2-a16b-2c110031514a_story.html
(sorry, but that still kinda wigs me out.)
clem
November 15th, 2012
10:08 am
paul, good for you on standing up to the bs of some of our leaders. at least we can agree on that.
i think obama crazy to pursue afghan war, any idiot would know it is not conventionally winable. of course if there were a draft, i seriously doubt we would have been there in 2008.
every life lost there is total bs.
Paul
November 15th, 2012
10:08 am
Yeah, stands, those were the good old days, weren’t they?
But I do wonder – maybe we haven’t changed all that much and it’s the conservative movement that’s gone warp speed to the right.
Remember when I was the token neocon around here? (grin) Then again, that was before we had the EOI club.
Tom Zarek
November 15th, 2012
10:08 am
Asians voted about 75% for Obama. 4.9% of Asians are on welfare, compared to 5.2% of whites. So how do the Mitts of the world explain that?
USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)
November 15th, 2012
10:08 am
“You forgot off-road diesel pollution regs! and the no-call list!”
the no-call list was him? I thought that was Clinton
Georgia on my mind...
November 15th, 2012
10:08 am
In case some of you do not know the definition of “DEFEAT”….it is defined below and you will have to deal with it for 4 more years…
NOUN:
The act of defeating or state of being defeated.
“Failure to win”.
A coming to naught; frustration: the defeat of a lifelong dream.
Law The act of making null and void.
You for real
November 15th, 2012
10:09 am
A lot of talk about Romney and his money. Hope you all do not believe Obama’s pockets are not full. Obama could care less about what happens to any of the middle class people of this country. He got his and that is all that matters. We (the working) will all be stuck paying for this guys mess forever.
We do not pick a president anymore we are herded like sheep following what the news and news shows feed us. Shame!
F. Sinkwich
November 15th, 2012
10:09 am
Anybody see the Ramirez cartoon in the dead tree version of the AJC this morning? Absolutely hilarious (as usual) and appropriate to this topic:
http://www.investors.com/editorial-cartoons/michael-ramirez/633207-barack-obama-election-2012-free-stuff
Parenthetically, Luckovich has gotta hate having the Ramirez cartoon so often on the editorial page these days. When contrasted to Ramirez, Luckovich’s crude, third-grade artwork and his dullard editorial wit is exposed for all to see.
midtownguy
November 15th, 2012
10:10 am
How does that “not paying taxes” thing work? When I check out at Walmart do I just tell them I’m part of the 47% that doesn’t pay and they take the tax off my bill?
williebkind
November 15th, 2012
10:11 am
Obama the best president the far left news media can get elected. Now prepare for hard times.
MANGLER
November 15th, 2012
10:11 am
I remember when you simply didn’t discuss sex, politics, and religion in mixed company. The drivel (from all sides) online doesn’t bother me too much, given the ambiguity of the posters, as we all act like kids on here. However, now people around here seem perfectly at ease yelling in restaurants, watering holes, grocery stores, and around the water cooler about these issues and why they seem to have the answer to the worlds ills, and they sure as hell know who’s to blame for everything too. I know you all seem to feel pretty comfy in your local bubbles, but just for a second, pretend that the person or family next to you somewhere A) doesn’t exactly agree with you and B) didn’t work to spend their money to be there just to hear your loud mouth opinions blathering away and C) may be the type looking to quarrel with the first person who steps on their eggshell. The behavior in public lately has been annoying to say the least, and verging on degenerate and irate. But given how our “leaders” have acted over the past few years, it really shouldn’t surprise me.
USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)
November 15th, 2012
10:11 am
okay, F Sink … I’ll play …
give me one quote where Obama promises “free stuff”
much like the oft-quoted “messiah” complex, this is a myth perpetuated by the right.
fedup
November 15th, 2012
10:12 am
Lee Atwater types all over again. The rich always hates the poor and wants the status quo.
USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)
November 15th, 2012
10:12 am
“Obama the best president the far left news media can get elected”
OR … Mitt was the best candidate that not even FOX news could elevate above his mediocrity
alex
November 15th, 2012
10:12 am
Obama to GM, “here’s a gift.” Obama to the GM bond holders, sorry sucker, you pay for it>>”
Administration to AIG,”here’s a gift”,Administration to taxpayers: “pay it”.
They ALL do it, end of story…” I’m shocked, shocked to find gambling going on……………….
USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)
November 15th, 2012
10:13 am
“When I check out at Walmart do I just tell them I’m part of the 47% that doesn’t pay and they take the tax off my bill?”
… and the gas you put in your car and the taxes you pay on your house, etc …
Paul
November 15th, 2012
10:14 am
clem
My take is Pres Obama is on a fast track to get us out of Afghanistan. Yes, his advisors had a blow-out argument and Obama went with a limited troop increase, which is over.
I saw things going downhill when the conventional Army (pre-Petraeus influence) took over from the CIA. I always thought a more realistic approach was go in, kill and depose the Taliban (we did), kill and disrupt most of AQ (we did) then tell the warlords “we’re leaving. Sort it out. But if you arrange power-sharing deals with Taliban or AQ and let them reconstitute, we come back and kill them and then we kill you.”
Sometimes I do get this Genghis Khan streak I have to guard against.
Off to the gym – later.
The President of the U.S.A.
November 15th, 2012
10:15 am
+++++++++++++#######
+++++++++++############
++++++++++###############
+++++++++#####++++++++++###
++++++++###++++++++++++++###
++++++++##++++++++++++++++###
+++++++##+++++++++++++++++####
+++++++#+++++++++++++++++++###
++++++##+++++++++++++++++++####
++++++#+++++++++++++++++##++###
+++++##++++++++++++++############
+++++##++++++++++#+++##+####+####
+++++##++++++#####+++#++#####+####
+++++##+++++##+###+++#+++****++####
+++++##+++++++#++#+++#++++++++++###
+++++##+++++++++++++++#+++++++##+#
+++++#+++++++++++++++++#++++++##+#
++++++#+++++++++++++++#++++++####
++++++##+++++++++++++####++++####
+++++++#++++++++++##+###++++++####
++++##+#+++++++++++++++++++++##+#
++++##++++++++++++++++##++++++####
+++++#++++++++++++++######++++##
+++++#+#+#+++++++++##+++#+++++##
++++++#++#++++++++##+++###++++##
+++++++#++++++++++++++++++++#####
+++++++++#+++++++++++++#++++#####
+++++++++++#+++++++++++++++########
++++++++++++#+++++++++++++#########
+++++++++++++#++++++++++###########
++++++++++++++##++++++########+####
+++++++++++++#++###########++###”
nelson
November 15th, 2012
10:15 am
Actually, Mitt would exit more quickly, however Prez O has asked him to join the prez so that Mitts ideas for the economy can be addressed more fully.
All 50 states have filed petitions for seccession,the only political area content to stay within the union is Austin, Tex. Would I be remiss to say that there is discontent among the citizenery?
Alluding to giveouts only to AfroAmericans is “playing the race card”. Mitt addressed the NAACP in Atlanta to a smattering of boos, when they had invited him to speak. Now, is that rude, I ask you? Give it to me straight.
Aquagirl
November 15th, 2012
10:16 am
Asians voted about 75% for Obama. 4.9% of Asians are on welfare, compared to 5.2% of whites
Tom has uncovered the Yellow Peril Plot where they all aspire to collect welfare and talk on Obamaphones all day.
alex
November 15th, 2012
10:16 am
@stands, Yea, but mabye we can all join for some BBQ
As for Atwater, the guy is dead , give it a break, If there WAS a price to pay-he did with glioblastoma…..Give it up, he’s long gone, tried to make amends …give it up all you perfect people, sheesh
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
10:17 am
Remember when I was the token neocon around here? (grin)
I know Paul’s left, but for the noobs here–Paul and I used to actually *argue.*
USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)
November 15th, 2012
10:17 am
“Tom has uncovered the Yellow Peril Plot ”
USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)
November 15th, 2012
10:17 am
“Paul and I used to actually *argue.*”
Peadawg
November 15th, 2012
10:19 am
Romney, please go away.
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
10:19 am
the no-call list was him? I thought that was Clinton
UnU, the no-call list was signed into law by GW Bush in 2003.
If you’re trying to attribute it to an earlier president, you actually have to go back to GHW Bush’s efforts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_Consumer_Protection_Act_of_1991
Krystal'sBalls
November 15th, 2012
10:19 am
I am afraid that the U.S. for a long time to come (like forever) will not ne able to get past its scapegoating of people of color. It doesn’t matter that there are people out there who are decent and do not allow it to permeate their own lives. As long as it is allowed to remain a part of the larger discourse, the problem will remain.
As for Romney, I think he has a wonderful opportunity to show us ALL just HOW passionate he is about and how much he really “loves this country”. Show us how willing you are to contribute your ideas from the sidelines in service to the country if the President reaches out, which he undoubtedly will given his history for doing such things. Show us your true patriotism, or whether or not you were just seeking the TITLE.
saywhat?
November 15th, 2012
10:25 am
Paul @ 10:14. That is what I think should have happened as well.
Georgia on my mind...
November 15th, 2012
10:25 am
As for Romney, I think he has a wonderful opportunity to show us ALL just HOW passionate he is about and how much he really “loves this country”.
______
After Romney made the comments about African Americans and Hispanics, do you think that he is concerned about ALL Americans? In his heart, his intentions were not geared towards people of color nor is the Republican Party!!
DougW659
November 15th, 2012
10:25 am
Bobby Jindal’s analysis seems far to logical for him to be part of the Republican party. he isn’t denigrating those unfortunate enough to be born poor, he isn’t mentioning that the rights of the upper class are ‘God Given’, he isn’t quoting Ayn Rand. Is he considering changing to the Democratic party?
John E
November 15th, 2012
10:28 am
Enter your comments here
Tundra Dude
November 15th, 2012
10:29 am
Recon:
“As we observe the riots in Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece due to austerity brought on by socialism
Camelfeathers!
On a Socialism Scale, all these countries rank near the bottom.
In the middle are Germany, France, Austria, Holland.
By far, the most generous Socialistas are the Scandinavians.
The problems in these sub-prime countries are not caused by “Socialism Run Amuk”,
but by “Banksters Gone Wild”.
tip: stop watchin’ that Faux Nuze
alittlecommonsense
November 15th, 2012
10:30 am
“So let me get this straight: When Romney, in the first debate, promised a tax cut to the middle class, he wasn’t promising them a gift? When he wooed his backers on Wall Street by telling them that he would repeal Dodd Frank, abolish the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau and lower corporate taxes, that wasn’t promising a gift?”
No – Giving something to someone is a gift. Taking less from them is not. Liberals seem to have trouble with that concept.
AmericaShrugged
November 15th, 2012
10:30 am
Jay spins and his minions agree. Obama gave, Romney just promised, big difference. Otherwise, Gitmo would be closed, unemployment would never have gone above 8%, only 5,000 additional troops would have been deployed to Afghanistan, and taxes on the rich would have already reverted to pre-Bush rates. That’s stuff Obama promised in ‘08, none of which he delivered.
And after Obamacare the biggest gifts were the 2% SS reduction and the GM bailout, neither of which were mentioned. Obama spent almost his entire first term buying votes for his re-election. Great stregy, ti worked. But at what cost to America?
Thomas Heyward Jr
November 15th, 2012
10:31 am
The President of the U.S.A.
November 15th, 2012
10:15 am
—————————
.
Schumer Tool.
as well as all deomcrats.
.
lol
ITS ALL BUSHS FAULT
November 15th, 2012
10:33 am
This country needs a GOP enima
zeke
November 15th, 2012
10:33 am
Sorry, but Mitt is correct! When you have a large segment of the population that is given money, free housing, free phones, free cable, free internet, food stamps, aid for having illegitimate children, and, on and on, do you think they will vote for the moron promising them more and more, or, for the person trying to save the country and economy and telling them they will be required to work, look for jobs, and get less redistribution money from the taxpayers!
That was the point of the 47% comment! That is a fact today in the USA! We are almost at the point of being a welfare country! And, not that people who really need help should get it, but, the millions who are scamming the system need to be stopped! How can someone on welfare, food stamps and such afford big screen television and high definition service, new BMWs, smart phones, $200 or $300 sneakers??? That is what is wrong! And democrats do not want that to change, because, just like the plan to make illegals citizens, THEY HAVE TO DO IT TO GET THE VOTES AND TO KEEP THE ALMIGHTY POWER OVER THE REST OF US!
frank burns
November 15th, 2012
10:33 am
During the campaign Romney was against the Dream Act before he was for it, and now I guess he’s against it again. He hasn’t gotten the idea that truth counts. Must come from being a Mormon missionary.
The President of the U.S.A.
November 15th, 2012
10:33 am
Thomas Heyward Jr
November 15th, 2012
10:31 am
____
I bet it burns you up inside every time you have to look at his face and know that he is sitting up in Washington and you have the call him President of the U.S.A.
Thomas Heyward Jr
November 15th, 2012
10:33 am
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
10:17 am
Remember when I was the token neocon around here? (grin)
I know Paul’s left, but for the noobs here–Paul and I used to actually *argue.*
——————————————–
.
Progs don’t “argue”.
They whine.
If you live in Washington…….they whine as they divide the loot.
ITS ALL BUSHS FAULT
November 15th, 2012
10:34 am
CONS YOU LOST TWICE GET OVER YOURSELVES
Jesse
November 15th, 2012
10:34 am
Jay, giving benefits to a low income worker gets their vote, no question. It is a gift because they keep doing what they are doing and get more. Offering a coal miner the opportunity to mine or a boat builder the opportunity to build a boat is WORK. he offered JOBS, the opportunity to possibly achieve more through effort not hand outs. If the difference is not clear to you a person who made the art of language and literature their carer that concerns me. Further to the point if you are suggesting that adding up the votes of submarine builders, bankers, and coal miners out counts the sum of low income American families? its a good thing you went into literature because math is not your strong suite. In my opinion (and I’m willing to admit that what it is) Republicans were not trying to win by targeting Bankers who wanted Dod Frank repealed they were trying to keep and create jobs for more HARD working (key words here) Americans.
zeke
November 15th, 2012
10:34 am
Hey Frank! You think Obama the socialist is truthful? You must have failed kindergarten!
Thomas Heyward Jr
November 15th, 2012
10:35 am
Mary Elizabeth
November 15th, 2012
9:52 am
Paul Krugman, today:
“Some of us see an increasingly, radically unequal America, with rising inequality actually reinforced by public policy, with tax rates on the rich lower than they have been in many decades and the overall redistributive effect of government down substantially since the 1970s. But the right sees an entitlement epidemic, in which the big problem is that too many people are getting free stuff.
———————————————————–
.
Schumer tool………………….with passion.
DownInAlbany
November 15th, 2012
10:35 am
willie lynch
November 15th, 2012
9:18 am
DownInAlbany
November 15th, 2012
8:56 am
What does continuing to bash Romney accomplish? He is a footnote to the 2012 election. I can’t see him running for public office again.
Granny Godzilla - Union Thugette
November 15th, 2012
10:35 am
Since the ridiculous petitions to secede will never have enough signatures to amount to anything…
If you are one of those who feels like that, take the only route
dictated by personal responsibility.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2004/08/how_to_renounce_your_citizenship.html
And I bet a pitcher of martinis that not a one of them have the stones to do it.
Wimps.
spiker
November 15th, 2012
10:36 am
It’s long past time to strap Mr. Romney to the roof and drive him off to obscurity.
DannyX
November 15th, 2012
10:36 am
I wish Romney would have won. I was looking forward to my free Etch-a-Sketch.
ITS ALL BUSHS FAULT
November 15th, 2012
10:36 am
Even if the states succeed CONS would still lose….lol
Fly-On-The-Wall
November 15th, 2012
10:36 am
Mitt is nothing more than a salesman which means he’ll say anything to get the sale. A majority of the country wasn’t ready to buy from him. That’s about as simple as we can say it.
Thomas Heyward Jr
November 15th, 2012
10:36 am
USinUK – not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)
November 15th, 2012
10:13 am
“When I check out at Walmart do I just tell them I’m part of the 47% that doesn’t pay and they take the tax off my bill?”
… and the gas you put in your car and the taxes you pay on your house, etc …
—————————————————————————————————————————————–
.
Schumer TOOLED.
.
lol
0311/8541/5811/1811/1801
November 15th, 2012
10:36 am
“Surprise! Jobless Claims Up 78,000 Week After Election; PA, OH Worst Hit”
You reap what you sow !
Stevie Ray
November 15th, 2012
10:37 am
Finn McCool (The System isn’t Broken; It’s Fixed)
November 15th, 2012
8:45 am
Of course Reich has “the plan”…has anyone taken time to compare those benefits (of basically increasing the proportion of taxes paid for corporations and “rich” folks…) versus estimated costs? I submit that those (i agree, screw the defense contractor and reduce DoD by at least 25%) most affected will simply find new means to avoid having to pay for the 30% overage of current spending. He also assumes (as far as I can tell) that the government spending will be flat…is that accurate? To me, it’s simply a simple yet standard approach for DEMS…no country has ever gotten out of such a mess without middle class contributions..Also, I doubt that any jobs would result…likely the opposite..
I came across Stiglitz…one of the 5 most respected economists going..note Krugman is way down the list…who I came across on POTUS…I like his message and will be reading his book the Cost of Inequality soon…
http://ideas.repec.org/top/top.person.all.html
Interesting take on capital gains as well..creative…he suggests eliminating favored treatments on those gains that create nothing..such as land investments..
FlaminioX
November 15th, 2012
10:37 am
Romney lost because he offered jobs to a country that doesn’t want to work!
Tundra Dude
November 15th, 2012
10:37 am
Midtown:
The only “gift” I want from the Democrats is a marriage license for me and my partner of twenty years. But I fully expect to pay for it.
Wish ya luck….
but I’m reminded of something my sis swears a prof once stated:
Marriage *causes* mental illness.
barking frog
November 15th, 2012
10:37 am
Romney is leading the charge over the cliff for the Republican Party.
ITS ALL BUSHS FAULT
November 15th, 2012
10:37 am
seceed the gop
TaxPayer
November 15th, 2012
10:37 am
Mitt Romney, Karl Rove, et al, have found a new scam–promising billionaires lower taxes in exchange for their monetary support. Cons conning cons.
Erwin's cat
November 15th, 2012
10:37 am
you guys sound like Vilma….you won but are still complaining about the other guy’s behavior…get over yourselves and move on…
ITS ALL BUSHS FAULT
November 15th, 2012
10:38 am
GOP DENIAL PRICELESS
Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes
November 15th, 2012
10:39 am
….you won but are still complaining about the other guy’s behavior…
Pats by 3.
0311/8541/5811/1811/1801
November 15th, 2012
10:39 am
WASHINGTON (CBSDC/AP) – “As President Barack Obama is set to begin his second term, new statistics on America’s poverty rate indicate that nearly 50 million Americans, more than 16 percent of the population, are struggling to survive.”
That’s with just four years of Obama. Get ready people ………. you get what you wish for !
Ronald Reagan Parkway
November 15th, 2012
10:39 am
Granny Godzilla – Union Thugette
November 15th, 2012
10:35 am
If they made every person that signed the petition include a photo, address and phone number, they would not have signed. They all are cowards. If the President comes back and says, that they can personally secede and make arrangements for them to leave the country, they would not want to go.
HDB
November 15th, 2012
10:39 am
I’d say that Obama gave the nation the best gift of all: keeping Romney’s stupid self OUT of the White House!! That’s a gift I’ll GLADLY take!!
Tom in Atlanta
November 15th, 2012
10:40 am
The only hope for this country is to require citizens to be productive – find or create a job and pay taxes, instead of not working, being unable to pay taxes, and thus draining money and resources. Every person that gets off of government assitance, and begins paying into the system instead of taking from the system, helps us meet our current and future obligations. And that is the big difference between the two types of “gifts” described. “Lowering Corporate taxes” is an incentive given to businesses, i.e.employers, entities that give people a paycheck, and thus the ability to pay taxes. Grants to build Nuclear Subs, or ping pong tables for that matter – create jobs.
Giving Healthcare to all is a noble pursuit, but not a practical one. And if Obamacare gives me and others free healthcare, who is paying for it? The people who work and pay taxes pay for those that don’t work and don’t pay taxes. You can call it racism, or paint it as uncaring, or get mad because someone has more than you have – but the bottomline is this country needs more jobs and more taxpayers – not higher taxes.
If you’ve ever worked in sales – how are salesmen compensated? Usually by incentive – the more they sell, the more they earn. If they don’t sell – they don’t earn. It’s powerful motivation. Now imagine you are in sales, and your employer tells you that the more you sell, the more you PAY. That is precisely the type of logic that is prevalent under the current administration and its constituents. And why it will never work.
Create jobs – using incentives to do so, and you get more people more money and the government a larger base of taxpayers to fund their obligations. The color of the person’s skin, or his own individual wealth, should not enter into one’s decison about whose plan is most apt to get this accomplished. But it seemingly is the primary criteria used by a large number of voters.
Fly-On-The-Wall
November 15th, 2012
10:41 am
Even Kyle told everyone on his blog to stop the secession stuff. It is childish and he’s right.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
November 15th, 2012
10:41 am
Can someone help me….. I think I took a wrong turn. We appear to be deep into Angrywhitemenare stillstupidstan.
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
10:41 am
you guys sound like Vilma
Flintstone?
Stevie Ray
November 15th, 2012
10:41 am
GRANNY
Damn, is the pitcher of martini’s for a single “consumer”?
barking frog
November 15th, 2012
10:42 am
When longtime wealthy politicians cannot win an election running against a
foreign born anti-colonialist community organizer they should shut up and
listen to what the people are telling them.
Bloomberg/Trump2016
Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes
November 15th, 2012
10:43 am
Create jobs – using incentives to do so, and you get more people more money and the government a larger base of taxpayers to fund their obligations.
Eff your effin’ “jobs”.
Jobs are all we’ve had for a generation.
Start talking about creating careers and then I’ll begin to take you seriously
Stevie Ray
November 15th, 2012
10:43 am
I heard from some late night comedian that the 25,000 votes for Texas to succeed were all from out of state..
DannyX
November 15th, 2012
10:43 am
“you won…”
Wooo-hooo! SPIKE!!! Naa-naa na naa-naa naa!! Lol at the LOSERS. Better luck next time.
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
10:44 am
Giving Healthcare to all is a noble pursuit, but not a practical one. And if Obamacare gives me and others free healthcare
Free healthcare?
Educating yourself about a topic might be a good thing before posting.
alex
November 15th, 2012
10:46 am
Equating Schumer with ANYONE is a hideous example of human behavior and will NOT be tolerated on this blog,……
King Bee
November 15th, 2012
10:46 am
As a proud liberal/socialist I just want to give mitt a giant, “Thank you!”.
YOU were our secret weapon, Mitt! Your mouth…your deeds…they won us the election, they have given us the Supreme Court. You have pushed the United States to the left…hard! And maybe for a generation or more, gods willing!
Seriously…thank you, thank you, thank you!
PLEASE!!! Keep telling anyone who will listen your thoughts and philosophies.
But would you please not roof-rack the dog anymore???
Thanks!
Welcome to the Occupation
November 15th, 2012
10:47 am
AmericaShrugged: Obama gave, Romney just promised, big difference … ma spent almost his entire first term buying votes for his re-election. Great stregy, ti worked. But at what cost to America?”
I actually don’t disagree with that in its general thrust. But the question remains: How does your position claim when you recognize that MItt Romney will be just as cynical, just as mercenary, just as corrupt in seeking clients for to spread around favors to, as Obama could ever be?
(Hint: the disease is BI-PARTISAN.)
Mary Elizabeth
November 15th, 2012
10:47 am
Thomas Heyward, Jr., 10:35 am
You left out the essential paragraph of Krugman’s thought. Let me post it for you:
“And I don’t think the Republican party as currently constituted can change this: after 45 years of the Southern strategy, this stuff is what defines the party’s soul.”
Welcome to the Occupation
November 15th, 2012
10:47 am
AmericaShrugged: Obama gave, Romney just promised, big difference … ma spent almost his entire first term buying votes for his re-election. Great stregy, ti worked. But at what cost to America?”
I actually don’t disagree with that in its general thrust. But the question remains: How does your position claim when you recognize that MItt Romney will be just as cynical, just as mercenary, just as corrupt in seeking clients for to spread around favors to, as Obama could ever be?
(Hint: the disease is BI-PARTISAN.)
Keep Up the Good Fight!
November 15th, 2012
10:47 am
Why Mitt already told you that you had free healthcare by just going to the emergency room…. do you people never listen to those you nominate?
janet
November 15th, 2012
10:47 am
Wife Ann said she was worried about Mitt’s mental health if he was elected. I think she should be worried about his mental health period. He isn’t coping well with defeat so he blames it on everyone else. Sir, get thee to a clinic but first have a big glass of milk. You will feel better.
alex
November 15th, 2012
10:47 am
You are on I-285, there are no turns, Back to Atlanta Public Schools for you…
mase
November 15th, 2012
10:48 am
Its funny how everyone is saying the Republicans should listen to what the American people said in the election…what if the American people were wrong?
barking frog
November 15th, 2012
10:49 am
O.K. romneycons please reveal the romneyplan that offered jobs.
Erwin's cat
November 15th, 2012
10:50 am
O.K. romneycons please reveal the romneyplan that offered jobs.
it really doesn’t matter now does it?
DannyX
November 15th, 2012
10:51 am
“I heard from some late night comedian that the 25,000 votes for Texas to succeed were all from out of state..”
Thats pretty funny Stevie Ray, but I don’t want Texas to go.
Texas is very rapidly trending blue. Can you imagine the nightmare Republicans will face when looking at the electoral college map with Texas colored blue?
alex
November 15th, 2012
10:52 am
If California secedes will we still have to bail them out…..?Anyway, I hope that Waycross secedes…
DebbieDoRight - Math has a very strong anti-conservative bias
November 15th, 2012
10:52 am
That Mitt Romney — One Class Act!
stands for decibels
November 15th, 2012
10:53 am
SEE-sesshun SHEETZ! yee-hawww!
Butch Cassidy (I)
November 15th, 2012
10:53 am
On the bright side, with his election loss, Romney now qualifies as a Fox News spokesman. He’s free to appear on FNC anytime he wants and give his insights on how the guy that beat him really doesn’t know what he’s doing.
Redcoat
November 15th, 2012
10:55 am
Where are the rich Dem./Lib. job creators? are they creating jobs? where are these jobs? what kind of jobs are they? are they sitting on their money, and if so, why? What are they waiting on?
I know no one can directly answer these questions…..wish someone could
ahnald
November 15th, 2012
10:57 am
The 47% starts this country on a downward spiral, hands out, ready for big government to help them…Obozo wants you dependent on him, that is why he won….with ObozoCare looming, do you think companies are going to hire people and try and grow, NO WAY, Obozo is anti business, I want to grow my business and prosper but his policies and climate he has created scare me to death
Real Scootter
November 15th, 2012
10:58 am
Can anyone tell me where to go to signup for my free stuff? Please
DebbieDoRight - Math has a very strong anti-conservative bias
November 15th, 2012
10:59 am
He isn’t coping well with defeat so he blames it on everyone else.
Thats the “spoiled -given everything i’ve ever wanted-never had to do hard labor a day in my life- i DESERVE this- rich boy” attitude.
Cat: it really doesn’t matter now does it?
Obviously, to his voters, it NEVER mattered.
ahnald
November 15th, 2012
11:00 am
You do not use government spending to work your way out the financial ditch we are in, that is very basic….you create jobs, businesses do that, not the government
Krystal'sBalls
November 15th, 2012
11:01 am
Some of you people kill me with your stereotypes. You sit on your highhorses and look down at other people as leeches because they may be getting some government benefit. Meanwhile this SAME individual handed you your coffee through the Dunkin’ Donuts drivethrough this morning, or bagged your groceries at Publix or Kroger this morning, or even just walked into the restroom to clean up the piss that your trifling asses dump all over the floor around the urinals or scrub your feces from around the toilet because YOU were too damned nasty to clean up after YOURSELVES. You have ZERO perspective, yet you think you are the salt of the earth. To go along with that, many of you pretenders out here are really no further beyond those you ridicule and could find yourselves in the same situation in an instant. You’re just angry becaue SOMEONE ELSE tells you you should be. Pitiful.
King Bee
November 15th, 2012
11:02 am
“The 47% starts this country on a downward spiral, hands out, ready for big government to help them…”
If it’s for the 47%…The Grand Old Tea Partier’s say…It’s Bad, it’s Socialism!
If it’s a government handout/bailout/tax-break/welfare for them…it’s American as Apple Pie!
Sheila
November 15th, 2012
11:06 am
Romney was so arrogant he kept saying “When I’m President”, since he seemed to claim moral superiority, perhaps he should have read the verse that says,”pride goeth before a fall”. As for gifts, he was protecting the rich from higher taxes. Even Buffet says it’s not fair that his secretary pays higher taxes than he does.
mase
November 15th, 2012
11:07 am
Krystals..that post is not stereotyping people at all.
Rich
November 15th, 2012
11:07 am
Wonder what would happen with Fortune 500 companies if they hired law professors instead of qualified MBA’s to run their operations. Only in government can the less qualified person be chosen for the job.
deegee
November 15th, 2012
11:08 am
And the most disturbing thing is that he was talking to a bunch of financial backers. He was trying to keep them on board so that they would feel confident about spending more of their money on republican causes. What a stupid SOB Mitt the Twit turned out to be.
DannyX
November 15th, 2012
11:08 am
“You do not use government spending to work your way out the financial ditch we are in, that is very basic….you create jobs, businesses do that, not the government”
ahnald is right. To create jobs you hand out massive tax cuts then start trillion dollar wars, and of course start socialist Medicare Part D drug programs. Spend and untax! Businesses do that, not governments. Or something like that.
All hail the job creators!!!!!!
frank burns
November 15th, 2012
11:09 am
Well Zeke, first of all there is no truth in him being a socialist. So you are barking up the wrong tree there.
Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes
November 15th, 2012
11:10 am
perhaps he should have read the verse that says,”pride goeth before a fall”.
Perhaps you should reread Proverbs 16:18
Pride goeth before destruction,
and a haughty spirit before a fall.
ahnald
November 15th, 2012
11:11 am
Krystal…I have worked those kind of jobs you mention…what is your point ?…earned me $ to go to college and beyond…and then on MY OWN, NO HELP from THE GOVT, started a business and have done well..The President has no idea or plan on how to move this economy forward, NONE….Obozocare is a joke
DannyX
November 15th, 2012
11:12 am
“Wonder what would happen with Fortune 500 companies if they hired law professors instead of qualified MBA’s to run their operations. Only in government can the less qualified person be chosen for the job.”
Exactly Rich, what this country needs is a businessman like George W Bush with his MBA from that Ivy League university to lead us to economic utopia!
southpaw
November 15th, 2012
11:13 am
Ronnie Raygun @8:38
After seeing some of the recent Nobel Prize winners, I’m less impressed with that distinction than I used to be. Compare Paul Krugman to Walt Williams? No, not necessarily. I just figure that Walt Williams can describe liberalism at least as well as Paul Krugman can describe conservatism.
“Worship” Ayn Rand? Believe it or not, you can get some ideas from other people without “worshipping” them. Williams “worships” Rand about as much as Krugman “worships” the government.
Regnad Kcin
November 15th, 2012
11:15 am
“You do not use government spending to work your way out the financial ditch we are in, that is very basic….you create jobs, businesses do that, not the government”
Then why are “job creators” continually whining about what the government does? Just create the dam jobs!
Oh, I see – you can’t do that without your government handouts…uh huh…
Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes
November 15th, 2012
11:16 am
…and then on MY OWN, NO HELP from THE GOVT, started a business and have done well..
You built your own roads, bridges and tunnels?
You built your own sewer system, water treatment facilities, and solid waste disposal system?
You have your own fire department and police force?
WOW! You are one bad stud.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TIZb8d87AI
catlady
November 15th, 2012
11:17 am
Jackie@8:04–But it is such a BIG family!
Well, he has plenty he can do. He can put several tens of thousands out of work, for example. He can offshore a whole boatload of money, for example. He can get his wife a new Caddy, for example.
He will NEVER be a senior statesman. Just an old, washed-up, political has-been who wasn’t liked by much of anybody.
Jason
November 15th, 2012
11:18 am
C’mon, Jay:
Allowing people to keep more of their income is not a gift. No tax cut of any kind could ever be called a gift. I didn’t take the time to scroll through all 325 comments, but I sure hope I am not the only one making this point.
Also, these are comments he made to the biggest donors in his campaign: do we really need to pick nits over how he characterizes his loss to them? Obviously he is going to try to cover his flank. Romney loss, and he probably deserved to, but he is an imminently decent, well-meaning human being who went into politics for pure reason. I keep telling my GOP friends and family who think the world is ending the same thing about Obama. Just because the other guy has an (R) or a (D) behind their name doesn’t mean they’re evil.
P.S. To all the right-leaning commentators and politicos: there is no connection between Patraeus and Bangahzi. Stop burning credibility and save it for the fights that matter. That is all.
Skip
November 15th, 2012
11:19 am
ahnaid, you got running water? Need I go on?
AmericaShrugged
November 15th, 2012
11:19 am
Welcome – I agree with you. What was Bush doing creating the almost worthless but expensive Medicare (D)? It was a handout to buy re-election votes.
I’m socially liberal and fiscally conservative and what bothers me most is the tax handouts they both made.
Early on Bush was asked what happened to the surplus he inherited. He said we had a recession, we were attacked, and we’re at war. All true but he left out that in the face of all that he pushed through the largest tax cut in history, primarily for the rich.
Obama, faced with a big recession, gave a 2% reduction in SS, a vital system already facing financial problems. Has anyone noticed what the SS numbers were for 2011? As recently as 2008 SS was predicted to run a surplus through 2015. However, due to the recession, vastly increased numbers of unemployed and disability beneficiaries, and the 2% cut SS ran over $700B shortage in 2011!
Meanwhile the Reps won’t increase taxes on the rich and the Dems won’t cut entitlements.
Take whatever money you have left and buy weapons and canned goods because this isn’t going to work!
independent thinker
November 15th, 2012
11:27 am
Here’s how Mr. LOSER gets free stuff rom the government and makes millions on it without any disclosure in his presidential mandatory disclosures:
“”"”"”"”"”As Palast reported, a trust in Ann Romney’s name listed “more than $1 million” invested with Elliott Management, run by hedge fund guru and GOP mega-donor Paul Singer. (That’s the minimum amount of disclosure required by law, so it could have been much more than $1 million.) Singer subsequently snapped up large amounts of stock in Delphi at pennies on the dollar, and then, along with other hedge funds, demanded that the government assume pension responsibilities and bail the company out—or they would shut it down, thus crushing General Motors as well.
The government acceded, Delphi became lucrative again and then went public, and Elliott Management and its investors—including Romney—reaped enormous rewards.
Under any rational interpretation of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, these are holdings that a presidential candidate would need to disclose, because they can be affected by government action. The Romney campaign doesn’t argue that they are not, but rather that, since Ann Romney’s trust is “blind,” there is no disclosure requirement.
Today’s letter points out, however, that Ann Romney’s trust is blind in name only. Romney himself has said that “the blind trust is an age-old ruse, if you will. Which is to say you can always tell a blind trust what it can and cannot do.” Moreover, this is not a federally recognized blind trust of the sort Romney would be forced to create if he won the White House. If it was, he would have never been able to reap his windfall from Delphi, the letter points out.”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”
http://www.thenation.com/blog/170967/did-mitt-romney-break-law-failing-disclose-delphi-investments#
LIAR, LOSER, CHEAT, HYPOCRITE, DRAFT DODGER, INCOMPETENT CAMPAIGN MANAGER-
I hope the those rich SOBs who got fleeced by Romney and Rove use those words and sue his behind for a refund. Even his father would hate this Loser.
Krystal'sBalls
November 15th, 2012
11:31 am
mase
November 15th, 2012
11:07 am
Please tell me where I am stereotyping anyone? Nobody stated that everyone working in any of those capacities is receiving public assistance, only that the SALARY RANGE commanded by each of those POSITIONS make someone more likely to have to rely on some sort of public assistance. But then again your mind is small which is why you have really nothing of substance to say in response, only some dumb little one liner to try and detract from the point. I give PEOPLE the dignity their work (whatever type as long as legitimate) deserves.
DownInAlbany
November 15th, 2012
11:36 am
I don’t think anyone has explained why anything to do with Mitt Romney is “news.” Why even mention his name? We get it…all things democratic = good; all things republican = BAD! Dang, is it going to be 4 years of “blame Romney?” Anything to deflect from Obama’s failed 1st presidency, I guess. O gets a pass from you people on everything. (and, I’m the one with my head up my ___! OoooKkkkk)
Jeb Bush 2012
November 15th, 2012
11:38 am
Many negro and hispanics voted for obummer because he gave them free stuff – just like Mitt said! Mitt would have worked with our Tea Party Patriots to DEMAND additonal tax cuts for the Job Creator class. Even most negroes and hispanics agree that they are part of the problem, the “entitled” 47 percent that pay NO TAXES!
In 2016, a Jeb Bush, Lez Cheney ticket will win. Then we can begin to end demorat socialist programs like Socialism Security, Mediscam, and so called unemployment “benefits”! In the meantime, we in the GOP need to educate voters better. Women need to understand that pregnancy from rape is a gift of life, as Rep Mourdock explained. That their so called rapist is blessing them with the seed of life! hispanics should leave (self deport) because America is for Americans (not kenyans either)! Our GOP ideas are great! Newt Gingrich’s Junior Janitor brigade for example was an excellent idea, lets get these little hoodlums of the streets where as he said ” they sell crack and pimp their sisters”, and get them to “clean our schools and houses”!
Go GOP!
Krystal'sBalls
November 15th, 2012
11:39 am
ahnald
November 15th, 2012
11:11 am
And guess WHAT there skip?? YOU were one of the very people held in CONTEMPT by the person you are TODAY. Of course your perspective is gone because you have obviously forgotten where you came from!! I too have worked “those” jobs. I however have NEVER and WILL never forget where I have come.
Hilarious how you sit TODAY and gloat on how YOU “worked hard” because you were able to ultimately accumulate a little “something”, yet the people currently in the situation YOU were in at one time don’t get the same consideration. Indicative of the type of person you are.
PewtieNewtie
November 15th, 2012
11:55 am
Mitt Douchebag…
FlaminioX
November 15th, 2012
11:55 am
Romney lost because he offered jobs to a country that doesn’t want to work and has become Obama-dependent!
Bob
November 15th, 2012
11:57 am
So let me get this straight: When Romney, in the first debate, promised a tax cut to the middle class, he wasn’t promising them a gift?
A TAX BREAK IS NOT A GIFT BECAUSE THE MONEY WAS NEVER THE GOVERNMENTS TO BEGIN WITH. GOVERNMENT CREATES NOTHING, IT ONLY TAKES AND DISTRIBUTES. YOU LIBS ARE SO F*****G DENSE.
Joe Hussein Mama
November 15th, 2012
12:00 pm
Paul — “Which is why I said based on what we knew at the time. I believe the CIA never verified her status and gave a record of their reasoning until after the special investigation was concluded.”
The CIA wouldn’t *do* that before the investigation was over anyway.
They’re not in the habit of divulging classified info — or the fact that something *is* classified — unless there’s a pretty strong reason to do so.
“But the larger issue is still the number of people on the Left who think it was Cheney or Libby who ‘outed’ Plame.”
FWIW, there’s circumstantial evidence that implicates Cheney, and I personally feel that Rove and Libby conspired to protect him. That said, I recognize that I have no hard evidence to support my supposition.
Joe Hussein Mama
November 15th, 2012
12:07 pm
Bob — “A TAX BREAK IS NOT A GIFT BECAUSE THE MONEY WAS NEVER THE GOVERNMENTS TO BEGIN WITH. GOVERNMENT CREATES NOTHING, IT ONLY TAKES AND DISTRIBUTES. YOU LIBS ARE SO F*****G DENSE.”
Bob, I just LOVE the early start you’re getting on the 2016 campaign.
You go with that line, k? I’m sure it’ll work wonders for y’all next go-round.
(giggling)
mase
November 15th, 2012
12:32 pm
Krystals…you stereotyped those folks who you accused were stereotyping people on public assistance, “as people who “were too damned nasty to clean up after YOURSELVES. You have ZERO perspective, yet you think you are the salt of the earth. To go along with that, many of you pretenders out here are really no further beyond those you ridicule and could find yourselves in the same situation in an instant. You’re just angry becaue SOMEONE ELSE tells you you should be. “
Jason
November 15th, 2012
12:54 pm
Joe Hussein Mama-
I raised the same point without profanity, and it’s a good one: tax cuts are not a gift. I usually think Jay is at least a thoughtful commentator, even though I disagree with most of his politics. But in this case when he equates entitlements to tax cuts he is trying to score cheap rhetorical points at the expense of intellectual honesty. And I’d ask all of you on this blog so anxious to castigate Romney to ask yourselves an honest question: do you pay income taxes or federal taxes of any kind? If the answer is no, then try to imagine that you do, and every month when you get get your paycheck – the one you split three or four or – as in my case – five ways to support a family. How would you feel about someone equating a tax cut with an entitlement? A tax cut is simply putting some of what those people earn back in their paychecks.
I’d go so far as to call the comparison offensive,
TiredOfIt
November 15th, 2012
1:00 pm
America wasn’t ready for a king and queen. Maybe Willard can put on a uniform and party with Jill and Scott Kelley. Better yet pay off their bills.
Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes
November 15th, 2012
1:08 pm
…do you pay income taxes or federal taxes of any kind?
Do yourself a favor and google federal excise tax.
clem
November 15th, 2012
1:20 pm
some moron cried about jobless claims….does sandy ring a bell?
deegee
November 15th, 2012
1:49 pm
This morning I was listening to a serious discussion on CNBC over how to resolve the impasse over the country’s finances. A number of serious recommendations were made concerning tax cuts and tax revenues. Then some CEO of some big corporation says that the best way to resolve the problem is to expand the economy. So they asked him point blank how that can be accomplished. His answer, “Instill some confidence within corporate America.” Isn’t that just grand? Send out the unicorns and shower gold dust among the land. Let’s face it, the days of blowing big economic bubbles are over. You can’t lower interest rates any lower than they are. We can’t export our way out of this. Asia is slowing down. What do they pay these big shot CEOs to do all day?
Jason
November 15th, 2012
1:51 pm
Kamchak – T from the Steppes:
I didn’t mean for that to sound condescending – I’m simply arguing that if you see a third of your paycheck go to the federal government every month, you should be offended at the suggestion that a tax cut is a “gift” on par with a federal entitlement.
And even though your condescension was entirely intended, I’ll tell you that I don’t need to do myself any favors by googling federal excise taxes. They aren’t relevant to the point I was making.
Jason
November 15th, 2012
1:58 pm
Kamchak -
One more point on excise taxes: so I assume you would be in favor of eliminating all payroll taxes in favor of a flat tax on all goods and services? You won’t find many people who voted for Romney who would oppose that idea. You do realize that most Republicans would prefer that ALL taxes be excise taxes.
Don’t kid yourself that people who buy gas and cigarettes and alcohol are paying taxes on par with people who fork over a third or more of their paycheck to Uncle Sam. Mainly because people who pay income taxes are also subject to excise taxes.
Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes
November 15th, 2012
2:07 pm
Don’t kid yourself that people who buy gas and cigarettes and alcohol are paying taxes on par with people who fork over a third or more of their paycheck to Uncle Sam.
Now you’re moving the goalposts.
I never asserted anything of the sort.
You said, “do you pay income taxes or federal taxes of any kind?”
Last time I checked federal excise taxes were a form of “federal taxes of any kind”.
I may have been born at night, but it wasn’t last night, sport.
pete
November 15th, 2012
2:18 pm
The media is getting closer to the truth about Benghazi. This administration can only play keep away for so long. This whole Paula Broadway story is a smoke screen to keep folks away from the REAL story here. Thank God we have a FEW REAL journalists out there covering it.
So, while the Obama media is out celebrating the re-election of the messiah, lets take a brief look at what is going on in the real world;
Thousands STILL homeless in New York and New Jersey.
More lay offs announced.
400,000+ jobless, which shot up after the election…I wonder why?
Rockets launched in Gaza while troops build up on border..
Recession imminent.
You MAY want to report on what is really going on instead of gloating the re-election of Obama.
Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes
November 15th, 2012
2:22 pm
This whole Paula Broadway story is a smoke screen to keep folks away from the REAL story here.
They say the neon lights shine bright on Broadway….
Jason
November 15th, 2012
2:29 pm
“I never asserted anything of the sort.”
You sure implied it. It should have been obvious that I was referring to federal payroll taxes. My point was that it is specious to compare payroll taxes – which are taken out of earnings – and entitlements. By responding to my argument by saying “excise taxes,” it would be reasonable to assume that you were arguing that by virtue of paying excise taxes, people who do not pay payroll taxes can relate to the experience of having a third of their paycheck go directly to Uncle Sam (in the immortal words of Chris Rock, “you don’t PAY taxes – they TAKE them; that’s a JACK”). Otherwise, why say it? And you didn’t just say it, you condescendingly told me to “do myself a favor and google excise taxes,” as if it completely invalidated my point.
Admittedly, I probably didn’t do myself any favors with the way I worded my question about whether any of the people on this blog paid taxes. I didn’t mean for that to sound so smug, but looking back at it it does come across that way.
Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes
November 15th, 2012
2:34 pm
It should have been obvious that I was referring to federal payroll taxes.
Again — “or federal taxes of any kind”
You can’t even own your words without caveats.
Geez….
Jason
November 15th, 2012
2:38 pm
Pete-
Dude. Benghazi was a terrible and unfortunate event, and probably could have been handled better, first by the State Department and, yes, the President. But there’s nothing there. There is much better fodder for criticism of the Obama Administration, and the GOP is wasting capital on Patraeus. If I hear one more person say “what did they know, and when did they know it?” my head will explode. The Patraeus story has nothing – NOTHING – to do with Benghazi. I can assure you that no one was more irritated with the timing of the Patraeus resignation than Obama, because now you’ve got the media hyperventilating over a scandal that now involves sex – hence the MSM’s participation.
Guess what? The Congress has subpoena power. GP is gonna testify whether he’s still the head of the CIA or not. He waited until after the election to resign out of loyalty to his Commander in Chief. To use an old Clinton expression, “there’s no THERE there.”
Tony Drake
November 15th, 2012
2:49 pm
Mr. Bookman,
you said, “So let me get this straight: When Romney, in the first debate, promised a tax cut to the middle class, he wasn’t promising them a gift? ”
No, it’s not a gift to give me back the money i earned.
Jason
November 15th, 2012
2:50 pm
Kamchak-
This conversation is starting to resemble arguments with my wife. I was making an argument. As most most people do when they make arguments, I used a series of sentences to make that argument, all of which supported it in one way or another. I used the words “federal taxes of any kind” (which I really only said to make clear I was including social security) when I should have said “federal payroll taxes.” But it did not effect my major premise at all. In response you said “excise taxes,” which was a response to a minor premise contained in the argument that had no effect on the point I was making. And you’re acting like you won the argument. I don’t even know if we disagree, frankly, because you have yet to respond to my ACTUAL point. I have no idea whether you agree with it or not.
This, in a nutshell, is why we’re all f*cked.
Which is more or less how things play out at home for me. To wit,
Me: I cleaned the house in thirty minutes, I got the kids dressed and to school, I picked them up, made them dinner and put them to bed. I think I have earned the right to watch the game with some friends.
Her: It took you 35 minutes to clean the house.
Me: (sigh)
Brandt Hardin
November 15th, 2012
2:51 pm
After the election, Romney should know better than anyone that money just can’t buy everything. Despite all odds, our President prevailed. He still has an uphill battle fighting a Red House which has blocked his every move in an attempt to squash his goals of bringing the Middle Class equal pay, women’s rights, gay rights and affordable healthcare. The Bush Administration drove our economy into a swift nose dive and Obama is still the patsy. Watch conservative hands paint him in Blackface with a visual commentary of how Barack has been bamboozled at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2012/10/bamboozling-obama.html
Jay
November 15th, 2012
2:52 pm
“No, it’s not a gift to give me back the money i earned.”
No, Tony, it’s not the money you earned. The money you earned has already been spent by your government. Any tax cut sending money back your way would be financed with money that is borrowed from the Chinese and others, money that your children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren will be forced to repay on your behalf.
Jason
November 15th, 2012
4:03 pm
“No, Tony, it’s not the money you earned. The money you earned has already been spent by your government. Any tax cut sending money back your way would be financed with money that is borrowed from the Chinese and others, money that your children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren will be forced to repay on your behalf.”
Jay- I usually think you’re pretty level-headed and rational, even when I disagree with you. But this statement is indefensible. It contradicts private legal principals of contract, public legal principals of government debt and taxation and private property ownership. The government can’t spend our money; it can only spend its own. The government’s revenue is derived from private property (in this case wages). The United States Government is a distinct legal entity, and it is a participant in the private market. It has it’s own legal obligations and debt, and they are separate and distinct from ours. The best way – the only way – to describe the government’s relationship to our wages is that the government has borrowed massive amounts of money to pay its obligations. Its collateral for that that loan is its accounts receivable – aka, tax revenues.
Taking your statement to its logical conclusion, there would be no private property ownership as long as there is a budget deficit. Hopefully this is a case of a late-afternoon blood-sugar crash.
Jay
November 15th, 2012
4:06 pm
“The United States Government is a distinct legal entity, and it is a participant in the private market. It has it’s own legal obligations and debt, and they are separate and distinct from ours.”
Jason, as a matter of law, as a matter of The U.S. Constitution, as a matter of financial reality, that is simply not true. Do the words “We the People …” ring a bell?
Jason
November 15th, 2012
4:32 pm
You’re making my point. “We the people…” is the opening line in the The Constitution. The Constitution is the legal contract between the United States government and its citizens. All of the government’s authority is derived from the Constitution, and that authority is limited by the Constitution. The United States government is a distinct legal entity that can borrow money, enter contracts, spend money. It cannot spend my money, and I cannot spend its money. I cannot be sued for the debt of the United States government.
I’m general counsel for a private defense contractor, so this is not just an academic exercise for me. I can assure you that I see contracts which are executed in the name of the United States federal government every day. In every single respect, the United States government is an entity distinct from its citizens. The best analogy – in a private context – might be that United States is corporation and the citizens are shareholders.
I’m not saying that the fact that the government is borrowing money from China to pay its bills cannot have an adverse effect on the citizenry. For example, the credit rating of the US Government affects how much it costs to borrow money privately. But it is inaccurate to say that the government has already spent our wages. It has a lien on our wages as they are earned, but just like a bank has to foreclose on a house to be able to possess it, the government has to take the step of taxing our wages before it can spend them. Not that that even slows it down…
rc
November 15th, 2012
5:14 pm
Yea don’t tell the truth or face facts. Just make it up and demonize Romney That plays to your base
ld
November 15th, 2012
6:42 pm
DAMN. I missed out. The only gifts I got from any political campaign this year have been an in-box full of irritating e-mails.
Tom in Atlanta
November 15th, 2012
7:00 pm
Hey it’s Judge Judy – but if you take the time to watch it – it is very revealing about the mentatility of some of those accepting entitlements – they just don’t get it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFke1xOaTEA
This is what is wrong with our country – Money for nothing – but instead of addressing the problem – all you’ll hear is howls of racism.
One of the Three Nephites
November 15th, 2012
7:06 pm
The great deceiver Mitt Romney has habitually lied to the American public. He also lied when he went to see Billy Graham just a few weeks before the election to get his endorsement of the Mormon Church.
Do you think he told Billy Graham about the secret Mormon Temple Ceremonies that involves secret temple oaths, laws of sacrifice and consecration involving Mormon theocracy, strict obedience and sworn secrecy of all the Temple rituals? And all this while dressed in white robes, white hats, green aprons and chanting with raised hands at temple altars.
Romney, the compulsive liar and deceiver told him nothing about this.
Do you think Billy Graham would have endorsed Romney and his Mormon church if he was aware of these clandestine Temple rituals?
Look for yourself. For the very first time in 170 years, the Mormon Temple Ceremonies have been filmed by secret undercover video, in the Salt Lake Temple Temple in Utah, this year.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6udew9axmdM&feature=plcp
One of the Three Nephites
November 15th, 2012
7:15 pm
Romney’s gift to America would have been a White House administration governed slowly but surely by his religious paymasters in Salt Lake City. You don’t believe this?
Take a good long look at this entire Mormon Temple Ceremony filmed, for the very first time, in secret by undercover video in a Mormon Temple in Utah, this year:
Yes, Romney and the Mormon crazies were getting ready to descend on Washington big time!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VrsFEiTpsQ&feature=plcp
Vast Right Wing Conspiracy (aka "Knuckle-Dragger")
November 15th, 2012
7:44 pm
The Republicans have two ways to get the 47% – push to give away more than the supreme leader, or wait until the whole thing crashes and burns, and hope folks come to their senses.
Mr Common Sense
November 15th, 2012
7:58 pm
Sorry, pal, but tax cuts aren’t gifts. It’s your money to begin with. Obama did win with gifts and I find it refreshing that Romney is being forthright about the reasons he lost this election!
Mary Elizabeth
November 16th, 2012
12:00 am
Jason, you do not make your income in a vacuum. You make your income in a complex social interweaving that is America. You pay taxes to keep America viable so that you can continue to earn an income within America’s social structure.
George Washington, who was more prominent than any other American in founding our nation, first, as Commander-in-Chief of our military and, then, as America’s first President who laid the foundation for the survival of our nation, understood well the need for taxes to create a viable nation. It was not by happenstance that Washington was called ” The Father of Our Nation,” in his time.
From “Washington: A Life,” by Ron Chernow, p. 369
“The war continued to serve as Washington’s political schoolroom. Once again a harrowing winter forced him to think analytically about the nation’s ills. On both the civilian and military side of the conflict, he condemned slipshod, amateurish methods. America needed professional soldiers instead of men on short enlistments, just as it needed congressmen who stayed in office long enough to gain experience. Most of all Americans had to conquer their excessive attachment to state sovereignty. . . . Washington viewed the restoration of American credit as the country’s foremost political need, and he supported loans and heavy taxation to attain it. While fighting Great Britain, he pondered the source of its military power and found the answer in public credit, which gave the enemy inexhaustible resources. ‘In modern wars,’ he told Joseph Reed, ‘the longest purse must chiefly determine the event,’ and he feared that England, with a well-funded debt, would triumph over America with its chaotic finances and depleted coffers. . . .One virtue of a war that dragged on for so many years was that it gave the patriots a long gestation period in which to work out the rudiments of a federal government, financial mechanisms, diplomatic alliances, and other elements of a modern nation-state.”
And, from pages 424 – 425: “Washington also received a valuable education in finance from Robert Morris, who had raised money for the Continental cause on his own credit. Because the states had refused to collect their quota of taxes, Morris couldn’t service the sizable debt raised to finance the war. He warned that creditors ‘who trusted us in the hour of distress are defrauded’ and that it was pure ‘madness’ to ‘expect that foreigners will trust a government which has no credit with its own citizens.’ To end Congress’s servile reliance on the states for money, Morris proposed that it have the right to collect customs duties, and the fight for this ‘impost’ – the first form of federal taxation – became a rallying cry for proponents of an energetic central government.”
(It should be noted that the newly forming nation had so little money that it often could not pay the soldiers of the Revolutionary War who suffered great hardship including starvation, disease and death because of that fact, especially during the long, cold winters at Valley Forge. Washington, on several occasions, went to Robert Morris to ask for money to care for the needs of the soldiers of the Revolutionary War. Washington, who stayed with his men throughout their most dismal winters and rallied their resolve through his strength of will and who fought gallantly with his men in battle, often leading the way, lost money personally through his dedicated service to our nation and his efforts made our nation viable. You and I – and all of us today – are the beneficiaries of George Washington’s commitment and vision for this nation.)
Mary Elizabeth
November 16th, 2012
12:13 am
Mr. Common Sense, 7:58 pm
Gov. Romney has shown himself to be a poor loser who lacks both grace and insight.
Jason
November 16th, 2012
12:32 pm
Mary-
That was artful, rational, and even beautiful prose. But what’s it got to do with the price of tea in China?
I think President Washington would agree whole-heartedly that a tax cut is not the same as a hand-out. Which, as I have to keep repeating, is the ONLY point I was making by commenting on this column. And incidentally, Mr. Washington would spit out his wooden teeth if you told him the percentage of our paychecks that gets withheld for taxes. Then he would go sit on his back verandah and smoke some of the fashionable new cash-crop he – and many other founding fathers – grew in abundance. Not tobacco.
satch7
November 16th, 2012
5:17 pm
jason i’m tired of cats like you crying the goppers lost and going to keep losing until they realize rush,annn sean fox lies, are killing them.also the arrogance by the everyday working stiff con is old too. my vote was a vote against all of the above
Mitt Romney, exit stage right. A little quicker, please
November 19th, 2012
8:03 pm
[...] [...]