Gallup: Romney busts out a six-point lead

Obama supporters buoyed by last night’s debate performance just got a glass of cold water in the face in the form of the latest Gallup numbers among likely voters:

Romney: 51 percent
Obama: 45 percent

That’s a considerably better number for Romney than reported by the Rasmussen tracking poll, which puts the race at Romney 49, Obama 48, well within the margin of error. Other national polls also report a tight race, with advantages for either candidate of two or three points at best.

Obama continues to hold an advantage in state-by-state polling, giving him a lead in the all-important electoral college. That explains in part why Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight continues to give him a 64.8 percent change of winning re-election. However, that advantage continues to erode as well.

The effects, if any, of last night’s showing haven’t manifested themselves yet, and won’t until the end of the week at the earliest. The final debate is Monday.

But with Election Day only three weeks from yesterday, it is anybody’s race.

– Jay Bookman

721 comments Add your comment

Georgia

October 17th, 2012
1:53 pm

Ouch. I guess Romney did win. It was the moderator!!!!!

CJ

October 17th, 2012
1:53 pm

If debates matter, and it appears that they do, Gallup will have different results in a few days. Romney won’t like them.

Mighty Righty

October 17th, 2012
1:54 pm

Democrats are in full panic mode as the below article proves.

Despite numerous media outlets attempting to downplay the issue, Twitter exploded last night following the debate with new threats from Obama supporters to assassinate Mitt Romney if he defeats Obama in the presidential race.

As we reported yesterday, in addition to threats by Obama supporters to riot if Romney wins, innumerable Twitter users are also making direct death threats against Romney.

The primary reason given for Obama supporters wanting to see Romney dead is the fear that he will take away food stamps.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
1:54 pm

The polls will correct right before the election for credibility just like 08.

The last two debates will move them to our President.

HDB

October 17th, 2012
1:57 pm

The state-by-state polls are the critical measure; the national polls are an overall snapshot!! Check the polls in PA, IA, WI, OH, and MI…and let’s see where the electorate really lies…….

getalife

October 17th, 2012
1:57 pm

Our President will win the last debate.

Our President will strike the terrorists in Libya.

Our President will lower unemployment in the October job report.

Our President will get patriotism after the obl movie.

Our President will win reelection.

I have no doubt.

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
1:58 pm

CJ

October 17th, 2012
1:59 pm

I have to share this quote from Erick Erickson’s post about the debate last night. Sadly, it really illustrates the depravity of many on the right–

“Several times, on the stage, Mitt Romney commanded and the President followed. Romney led the President and I think it showed to undecided voters. Romney, at one point, commanded the President shut up and sit down and the President did so like a dog told to sit. It was masterful.

To their disgrace, CNN actually hired this guys and continues to keep him on the payroll and put him on the air.

Tommy Maddox

October 17th, 2012
1:59 pm

“Our President” is fading into the past.

Granny Godzilla - Union Thugette

October 17th, 2012
2:02 pm

Mighty Righty

October 17th, 2012
1:54 pm
Democrats are in full panic mode as the below article proves.

Despite numerous media outlets attempting to downplay the issue, Twitter exploded last night following the debate with new threats from Obama supporters to assassinate Mitt Romney if he defeats Obama in the presidential race.

As we reported yesterday, in addition to threats by Obama supporters to riot if Romney wins, innumerable Twitter users are also making direct death threats against Romney.

The primary reason given for Obama supporters wanting to see Romney dead is the fear that he will take away food stamps.

.
.
.
.
Please expound.

Give us some examples.

Give us some quantities.

Compare and contrast to type and quantity that have threatened President Obama.

Oh and….Gabby Giffords.

CJ

October 17th, 2012
2:04 pm

Granny,

Please don’t feed the trolls.

Don't Tread

October 17th, 2012
2:05 pm

I’ve already registered my displeasure with the communist-in-charge at the registrar’s office. Seems there were some other people there who were eager to do the same.

Not many Democrats on the ballot…Mostly Republicans vs. Libertarians.

mm

October 17th, 2012
2:05 pm

Let’s see what they look like by the end of the week. I had a right leaning female coworker tell me this mornng that she saw Romney as an arrogant, entitled bully. She is now voting for Obama.

USA Patriot

October 17th, 2012
2:07 pm

JB – Did you happen to see the focus groups follow up after the debate? Even the group on MSNBC was more than majority for Romney. Loved the guy on the Fox focus group that voted for BHO and said BHO has bull****ing the country for the last 4 years. Seems to me the “undecided” voters are the folks that voted for BHO last time around and it isn’t looking pretty for him this time around.

Sean

October 17th, 2012
2:07 pm

Rommey wasnt doing well before the debates because many Republicans were not behind him. Now they are because his performance.

Obama did well last night, but the damage from the first is still in effect.

jd

October 17th, 2012
2:09 pm

Erick and the Wingnuts need to make up their minds — they criticize Biden for being Rude and disrespect Obama for being polite… Kind a like Romney — one day he’s to the right, and the next day he isn’t… They are making zig-zag zell look like a straight arrow!

getalife

October 17th, 2012
2:11 pm

“Binders for women is going nuts online” fox news.

hsn

October 17th, 2012
2:11 pm

Gall-up ?
Naaaaah !

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
2:11 pm

jd, you are living in fantasy land. Obama wasn’t criticized by the right after the first debate, however, the lunatic left were frothing they were so mad. I thought Chris Matthews would have a stroke.

g

October 17th, 2012
2:11 pm

pre-debate, and just part of a daily tracker. If in fact you count that people don’t comprehend rude and arrogant behaviour, I suspect we will be seeing a shift again soon, unless they oversample in the south, which when the finding are broken out by geography show the PTOUS still leading in all other geographic areas of the country.

indigo

October 17th, 2012
2:12 pm

I think the folks in chage of the media want to decide who the next president will be. The lust for power is almost as strong as the lust for money.

Coming out with polls several times a day and talking them into the ground is a giveaway as to motive.

USMC

October 17th, 2012
2:14 pm

The Damage was done in the first Debate.

While Obama did well to win STYLE points and save a little face, he cannot escape his FAILED record while in office.

Last night CNN showed polling results after the Debate of all of the sub-categories:
1) Who do you trust will do a better job on the econmy
2) ……………………………………………………….Taxes
3)…………………………………………………………Healthcare
4)…………………………………………………………Immigration
5)…………………………………………………………Yada yada yad

And Mitt Romney was DOUBLE digits ahead in every category which John King kept pointing out.

So while Obama saved some FACE….. He’s lost the RACE!

Obama = NO SUBSTANCE

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
2:14 pm

indigo, agreed. Polls and debates are for the weak kneed. I doubt than any informed person, left, middle or right, is truly undecided.

MANGLER

October 17th, 2012
2:16 pm

Well we now know what the women without uteruses and white men with large trust funds think.

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
2:18 pm

Perhaps Obama would like to add “free Obamaphones” to his distinguished list of accomplishments. If he’s too busy then he could possibly persuade this person to speak for him:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio&feature=player_embedded

Granny Godzilla - Union Thugette

October 17th, 2012
2:18 pm

Romney Busts out!! OH NOES!!

Quick get him a binder!

USMC

October 17th, 2012
2:18 pm

And while Candy Crowley unprofessionally came to Obama’s rescue, she actually did Romney a huge favor.

The next debate is on Foreign Policy and between now and then the BENGHAZI issue will grow and grow and be tee’d up for Romney at the next debate. It plays right into Romney’s Dog Dish. :-)

Also, the controversy at the end of the debate last night created more focus for the issue and Obama has no where to hide. He either LIED or is INEPT…. or both.

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
2:18 pm

Note: Gallup’s tracking poll is a 7-day poll. It’ll take about 3 days before we see a clear trend. We’ll see it in other polls first. Expect the big media companies to have at least one by tomorrow.

Here’s the other thing: the pollsters are consistently saying that the bulk of the undecideds are mostly Republican voters, which is why the numbers broke so strongly for Romney in the past week. The question is: if they’re truly “undecided” on Romney at this point, are they they motivated enough to be a truly “likely” voter?

reebok

October 17th, 2012
2:19 pm

Gallup result looks like an outlier…way skewed from anything we’ve seen lately…and I’d feel the same way if it waas showing a big lead for Obama.

Georgia

October 17th, 2012
2:20 pm

Those who saw the debate on television thought Obama won. Those who watched the debate on their Etch-a-Sketch thought Romney won.

that could explain the new poll

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
2:21 pm

Hmmmm, many of the libs are bashing Gallup. Maybe Holder will threaten to sue again.

jd

October 17th, 2012
2:21 pm

“Keep Obama” — no on on the right criticized Obama after the first debate — Another lie to add to the woodpile…

Check Redstate post at 12:40 am in Oct 4– you will find criticism there…

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
2:22 pm

Check Redstate post at

And you’re sure that doesn’t qualify as “no one”, right? :lol:

stands for decibels

October 17th, 2012
2:22 pm

That explains in part why Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight continues to give him a 64.8 percent change of winning re-election. However, that advantage continues to erode as well.

well not really–it bottomed out on the 12th, but it’s risen a bit since then. (Granted, it was last updated last night, maybe the next update will show a downturn.) Dead cat bounce? Maybe, but it’s still a projected win.

Let’s not forget what Romney has to do in the swing states to pull it off. Won’t be easy for him even if the polling stays put.

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
2:23 pm

jd, lighten up, Francis. Some may have criticized Obama after the first debate, but most were simply thrilled at Romney’s performance. Counter that against the rage of the libs. They were vocally livid with Obama.

Mighty Righty

October 17th, 2012
2:23 pm

Granny

The language is too filthy to be printed here but below is the link where you can find the info including there ID’s id you are really interested. I would like to point out that Gabby Giffords was shot by a liberal left wing nut. Since the truth of this has been in the media multiple times I am surprised you didn’t know that.

http://www.infowars.com/threats-to-assassinate-romney-explode-after-debate/

USMC

October 17th, 2012
2:24 pm

stands for decibels

October 17th, 2012
2:24 pm

Also (I know I’ve pointed this out before) while I respect the Gallup organization, I can believe Nate’s claims of a +2.5% pro-GOP house effect, given that Gallup’s approval numbers are consistently below those of other pollsters. Not by a lot, but it’s noticeable.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/22/calculating-house-effects-of-polling-firms/

Goldie

October 17th, 2012
2:26 pm

Still about 3 weeks to go until Nov. 6th and we’ll see how those numbers in the Electoral College work out then!

Obama/Biden 2012! :)

Mighty Righty

October 17th, 2012
2:28 pm

Here is another of those “skewed” right wing polls.

The University of Colorado (CU) prediction renowned for perfect accuracy will predict a popular-vote win for Mitt Romney later this month, Campus Reform has learned.

The poll has accurately predicted every presidential election since it was developed in 1980. It is unique in that it employs factors outside of state economic indicators to predict the next president.

CU Political Science Professor Dr. Michael Berry, who spoke with Campus Reform at length on Tuesday, said there is at least 77 percent chance that Romney will win the popular vote.

Professor Michael Berry from the University of Colorado told Campus Reform in an exclusive interview that there is a 77 percent chance Romney will win the popular vote.
“Our model indicates that Governor Romney has a 77 percent likelihood of winning the popular vote,” said Berry.

Mitt Romney: The Great Deformer

October 17th, 2012
2:30 pm

Is Romney really a job creator? Ronald Reagan’s budget director, David Stockman, takes a scalpel to the claims.

Bain Capital is a product of the Great Deformation. It has garnered fabulous winnings through leveraged speculation in financial markets that have been perverted and deformed by decades of money printing and Wall Street coddling by the Fed. So Bain’s billions of profits were not rewards for capitalist creation; they were mainly windfalls collected from gambling in markets that were rigged to rise.
Nevertheless, Mitt Romney claims that his essential qualification to be president is grounded in his 15 years as head of Bain Capital, from 1984 through early 1999. According to the campaign’s narrative, it was then that he became immersed in the toils of business enterprise, learning along the way the true secrets of how to grow the economy and create jobs. The fact that Bain’s returns reputedly averaged more than 50 percent annually during this period is purportedly proof of the case—real-world validation that Romney not only was a striking business success but also has been uniquely trained and seasoned for the task of restarting the nation’s sputtering engines of capitalism.
Except Mitt Romney was not a businessman; he was a master financial speculator who bought, sold, flipped, and stripped businesses. He did not build enterprises the old-fashioned way—out of inspiration, perspiration, and a long slog in the free market fostering a new product, service, or process of production. Instead, he spent his 15 years raising debt in prodigious amounts on Wall Street so that Bain could purchase the pots and pans and castoffs of corporate America, leverage them to the hilt, gussy them up as reborn “roll-ups,” and then deliver them back to Wall Street for resale—the faster the better.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/10/14/david-stockman-mitt-romney-and-the-bain-drain.html

Matti

October 17th, 2012
2:31 pm

What helped Rmoney turn the corner? Was it his keenly insightful answer to the assault ban question? (Tell young people they should be married before having a baby, because married people never shoot anybody.) Or was it the “Hot Chicks Dig Ryan” buttons they’re handing out to young women at gotta-have-a-ticket campaign rallies on college campuses? Hmm…

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
2:32 pm

Nate Silver’s post at 1 AM this morning indicated that viewers of the debate gave the edge to Obama.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/17/instant-reaction-polls-show-narrow-obama-advantage-in-second-debate/#more-36216

And in his analysis posted this afternoon, he offers a good discussion on how poll *trends* and *clusters* of poll results are more revealing than any single poll can possibly be. If you’re interested in how polls are read and interpreted (and what kinds of flaws sometimes creep in), this afternoon’s post is a good one to read, IMO.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/17/oct-16-can-polls-exaggerate-bounces/#more-36238

Georgia

October 17th, 2012
2:32 pm

We finally get a real time poll result and the demographic experts on this board are predicting the results of future polls.

Surely they all watched the debate on their Etch-a-Sketch. Romney leads. Period. I also thought it was a win for Obama, but apparently the voters dont agree.

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
2:34 pm

I also thought it was a win for Obama, but apparently the voters dont agree.

Well, no, the voters agree. Where did you get the idea they don’t? From the gallup poll that’s a 7-day average that was last taken BEFORE the debate? Or do you have other numbers?

Mighty Righty

October 17th, 2012
2:34 pm

The best description I have seen regarding undecided voters and how they might vote was this example. Say you and your wife have been married for three and a half years and you ask her if she will stay married to you and she says, I don’t know, I am undecided. Think about it.

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
2:34 pm

getalife:

“Our President will strike the terrorists in Libya.”

There are no terrorists in Libya. Jay said so.

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
2:34 pm

Well, no, the votersdon’t agree

I’m sure it was the keyboard’s fault.

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
2:35 pm

Well, no, the votersdon’t agree

Never mind. I had it right the first time! LOL.

USMC

October 17th, 2012
2:36 pm

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
2:36 pm

Georgia, polls are often touted by the base constituents. Do you anyone who was moved from their voting preference by either of the debates? I don’t. Those persons who were for Romney 2 weeks ago are still for him while those planning to vote for Obama are still planning on doing so.

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
2:36 pm

The best description I have seen regarding undecided voters and how they might vote was this example.

Well, you’re pushing the bar higher for “stupidest comment today” at least.

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
2:36 pm

“CNN’s Candy Crowley admits Mitt Romney ‘was right in the main’ when he called out President Obama’s claim that he immediately called the deadly attack on the Libyan consulate a terrorist act — though she first agreed with Obama and cut short Romney’s response.”

Georgia

October 17th, 2012
2:37 pm

It doesn’t matter. History will see a black president in america only seven score and four years after the civil war. That it’s only for one term seems appropriate. In a generation, a hispanic female will probably be president, and then shortly after that a Cheyenne Indian will be president, (but for only 48 moons).

So what?

Steve-USA

October 17th, 2012
2:37 pm

I will wait until Nov. 6, I expect that poll to be the most accurate.

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
2:37 pm

stands for dB’s – Dead cat bounce?

uh hmmm – did you open the box?

USMC

October 17th, 2012
2:37 pm

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
2:37 pm

MR: Democrats are in full panic mode as the below article proves.

Good. I hope all those panicky Democrats get out and vote and take others to the polls.

VOTE OR DIE.

We have to make the choice and we need to take action. If Mitt Abdominal Romney gets in; then Democrats are to blame for allowing another war hawking republican to get to the adult table.

southpaw

October 17th, 2012
2:38 pm

Georgia -
The antenna on my Etch-a-Sketch broke. Any idea where to find either a replacement antenna (for the Etch-a-Sketch; I’ve got one for the TV) or a replacement Etch-a-Sketch? I need the one with an antenna, not without.

DannyX

October 17th, 2012
2:38 pm

Look at the cross tabs of the Gallup poll and it is not nearly as good for Republicans as it seems.

East 52 48 O+4
Midwest 52 48 O+4
South 39 61 R+22
West 53 47 O+6

Boris Badnoff

October 17th, 2012
2:38 pm

Indeed, impartiality was epitomized in this debate. Mittens was told by The Moderator that he was not going to be permitted to use any words that start with L or T or end in a vowel or consonant. Our Beloved Messiah was told that he would not be permitted to refer to the Peloponnesian War or the Eta Carina nebula unless specifically mentioned in a Star Trek episode starring Whoppi Goldberg. The one question that most viewers had was who decided that the moderator for this debate was going to be Meatloaf?

stands for decibels

October 17th, 2012
2:39 pm

uh hmmm – did you open the box?

Don’t we all get sucked into a black hole if that happens? Or am I thinking of an episode of the Outer Limits?

bullwinkle

October 17th, 2012
2:39 pm

Romney’s a financial salesman/deal-maker and he’s in our living room closing this one. It’s gonna be an interesting next four years.

Steve-USA

October 17th, 2012
2:39 pm

Mighty Righty@2:26

One problem, the election is not based on popular vote.

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
2:40 pm

Look at the cross tabs of the Gallup poll

Nah, not even the pollsters care about a national poll at this point. It’s all down to state-by-state polls in about 8 states at this point. That’s where the real action is. Everything else is just noise put out by the machine.

gm

October 17th, 2012
2:40 pm

Ohio, Florida, Va only matters, these states have people who look what this President has done by saving this country from collaps, sorry Georgia conservatives hateful people, you will always be a none factor in everthing, and last in every thing, because your history of racist, bigtory over shadows anything you do.

willie lynch

October 17th, 2012
2:40 pm

What will Romney’s re-hash of the Bush policies get us the second time around?

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
2:41 pm

Anyone care to explain how one (namely Obama) can know the attack on the consulate was a terrorist act the day following but then contend for two weeks it was the result of a “spontaneous” reaction to a film? I am all ears.

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
2:41 pm

If Obama wins I predict he will nominate Crowley for the Supreme Court. Wasn’t she wearing a black robe last night?

I also nominate her for the “Dan Rather Integrity in Journalism” award.

Doggone/GA

October 17th, 2012
2:41 pm

“One problem, the election is not based on popular vote”

I would say that it is based on the popular vote…but it’s not reliant on it.

USMC

October 17th, 2012
2:43 pm

CBS POST-DEBATE POLL: ROMNEY WALLOPS OBAMA ON ECONOMY 65-34%
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/16/CBS-Debate-Poll-Romney-Wins-on-Economy

—Most damaging for Obama! He cannot shake his dismal record…

Mitt Romney= Captain of Industry

Obama= Inexperiencedn& Naive Marxist who has NEVER had to make a payroll… AND IT SHOWS. :-)

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
2:43 pm

What helped Rmoney turn the corner?

Probably because, like I said before, not everyone’s voice is heard during these “polls”.

the only one that counts is the one at the voting booth.

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
2:43 pm

USMC is in “poo-flinging monkey” mode today.

Steve-USA

October 17th, 2012
2:43 pm

Dog-

Correct. Your word was a better choice.

Mighty Righty

October 17th, 2012
2:44 pm

There will be a poll on November 6, 2012. It will be the final poll. There are plenty of polls that indicate a Romney victory and a few that think Obama will win. That could change tommorrow. Anyone who thinks this race is over one way or another should put away their bong pipes and quit sniffing glue and try to get a reality check.

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
2:44 pm

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
2:46 pm

Anyone care to explain how one (namely Obama) can know the attack on the consulate was a terrorist act the day following but then contend for two weeks it was the result of a “spontaneous” reaction to a film? I am all ears.

Tell your hypocritical, 9/11 NOT Bush’s fault, ears to get a hearing aide.

===================================

to Scout – What do YOU KNOW about integrity?

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
2:46 pm

Doggone/GA – good distinction. What’s it been, twice, that the popular vote leader didn’t win the presidency?

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
2:46 pm

“If Obama wins I predict he will nominate Crowley for the Supreme Court.”

I will stipulate that the RNC seems almost dumb when it comes to what it will allow in debates (like having people like Matthews moderate one of their primary debates. Inexplicable, really. They should make moderators sign legal contracts in order to moderate debates. Then they would be accountable.

gm

October 17th, 2012
2:46 pm

Does the Poll take in two account Obama has open up a 30 point lead among Latinos?, after showing how much he care about women rights, I am sure Obama will have more women on his side.

DannyX

October 17th, 2012
2:47 pm

” It’s all down to state-by-state polls in about 8 states at this point. ”

That is true, and is exactly why the geographical breakdown of the Gallup poll is so important. The good ol’ south makes it seem like Romney has a huge lead, (+22 in the south for Romney.) Break it down to individual states and Romney’s lead disappears.

USMC

October 17th, 2012
2:47 pm

The Demwits right about now are grabbing every Illegal Alien and Dead Body they can find to steal the election for Obama. :-)

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
2:47 pm

“Tell your hypocritical, 9/11 NOT Bush’s fault, ears to get a hearing aide.”

ROFL. I’ll take that as a no – you can’t explain it.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
2:47 pm

As noted, national is one thing, state by state is another, city and precinct another. It’s the lower levels where the candidates are focusing.

USMC

“The next debate is on Foreign Policy and between now and then the BENGHAZI issue will grow and grow and be tee’d up for Romney at the next debate. It plays right into Romney’s Dog Dish.”

Rather sad that of four years events, Benghazi is the best Republicans can come up with to make an issue of. Especially given Nordstrom’s testimony yesterday to Rep Issa that even if they’d gotten every bit of security assistance requested, it would not have prevented the outcome.

Scout

“There are no terrorists in Libya. Jay said so.”

There’s a three-letter word that describes that assertion. Your only way out is to plead ignorance. On that, we’d believe you.

Mick

October 17th, 2012
2:48 pm

usmc

Gomer the lesser mixing it up with all the wrong ingrediates equals one bad jarhead shake..it’s good for him though because it helps stave off all those paris island flashbacks where he excelled in pushing up the earth thus keeping us in a correct elliptical orbit around the sun…

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
2:49 pm

Anyone who thinks this race is over one way or another should put away their bong pipes and quit sniffing glue and try to get a reality check.

what’s a bong pipe?….maybe a hukka?

stands for decibels

October 17th, 2012
2:49 pm

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
2:50 pm

Mitt Romney= Captain of Industry Outsourcing………

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
2:52 pm

“Rather sad that of four years events, Benghazi is the best Republicans can come up with to make an issue of.”

Do you mind sharing your evidence that this is the only foreign policy “issue” Republicans have spoken out about?

Mighty Righty

October 17th, 2012
2:52 pm

What will Romney’s re-hash of the Bush policies get us the second time around?

The Bush policies gave us unemployment on average of less than 6%, gasoline prices of less than $2.00 a gallon and 5 million more people working than Obama’s policies have. In addition, the Bush policies resulted in millions fewer on food stamps and welefare. His policies also resulted in real family income of $4500 per family more, fewer jobs sent over seas, and 5 trillion dollars in less debt. Yea, I would love to return to the Bush policies and years. I bet Obama wished he could run on those numbers.

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
2:52 pm

Paul – what’s even sadder is that after 4 years the best “accomplishment” Obama can come up with is that Romney is rich.

USMC

October 17th, 2012
2:52 pm

“Rather sad that of four years events, Benghazi is the best Republicans can come up with to make an issue of. Especially given Nordstrom’s testimony yesterday to Rep Issa that even if they’d gotten every bit of security assistance requested, it would not have prevented the outcome.”

You can whine about it all you want Paul, but more intelligent people realize the significance of the Obama Administration’s LIE about Benghazi.

Obama doesn’t get Affirmative Action or some sort of Hall Pass when the AMBASSADOR is killed.
He blamed a YOUTUBE video. He either LIED or is INEPT… or both. No way around it.

stands for decibels

October 17th, 2012
2:52 pm

what’s a bong pipe?

It’s, like, those Scottish things, but trippier, mannnn…

Thomas Heyward Jr.

October 17th, 2012
2:53 pm

Imagine…………………………………………………Mitt Romney with THE Secret Kill list and the Indefinite Detention powers of the NDAA…
.
Thanks a pant-load………………………Obama-Bots.

USMC

October 17th, 2012
2:54 pm

“Gomer the lesser mixing it up with all the wrong ingrediates equals one bad jarhead shake..it’s good for him though because it helps stave off all those paris island flashbacks where he excelled in pushing up the earth thus keeping us in a correct elliptical orbit around the sun…”–Mickey Mouse

You know Mick, if you smoke too much of that stuff, it will stunt your growth. :-)

Paul

October 17th, 2012
2:55 pm

Towncrier

“Do you mind sharing your evidence that this is the only foreign policy “issue” Republicans have spoken out about?”

I never said it is the only foreign policy issue of which Republicans have spoken.

I was referring to USMC’s “The next debate is on Foreign Policy and between now and then the BENGHAZI issue will grow and grow and be tee’d up for Romney at the next debate.”

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
2:56 pm

“The last thing I’m likely to post for the benefit of our butthurt-over-Benghazi guys…”

Please do honor this promise (as your response was a link to a silly and meaningless post).

anon1

October 17th, 2012
2:56 pm

USMC is the classic blogger who watched the debates and saw what he saw through his “predisposed views” colored glasses.
If Romney would actually say what he would do to close loopholes for tax deductions for the middle class, I might listen to his plan. The “put it into a bucket” stuff that he threw out last night was just dumb. Middle class does not need to lose the mortgage deduction, education credits or charitable contribution deduction.

Ahem

October 17th, 2012
2:56 pm

Georgia

October 17th, 2012
2:20 pm
Those who saw the debate on television thought Obama won. Those who watched the debate on their Etch-a-Sketch thought Romney won.

that could explain the new poll

and a comment like the above defies explanation

Mick

October 17th, 2012
2:56 pm

mighty

You definitely know whats in the bong pipe cuz you are about the only one who wants a repeat of the bush economy that led to ? Yes, if it was so great why don’t your fellow conned rally around junior and prop him up as the gold standard? You know the answer – epic fail…

Paul

October 17th, 2012
2:57 pm

“what’s even sadder is that after 4 years the best “accomplishment” Obama can come up with is that Romney is rich.”

A fact for which Romney should be profoundly grateful to Democrats, who have pretty much continued the policies that allow the rich to shield much of their earnings from the tax rates assessed upon the middle class.

Doggone/GA

October 17th, 2012
2:57 pm

“What’s it been, twice, that the popular vote leader didn’t win the presidency?”

Two or three, I think…not many – however many it was

cloudodust

October 17th, 2012
2:58 pm

I’m beginning to believe that it’s the MSM who has an agenda and it’s just that BHo is the lackey elected to carry it out. All in to prop up the media’s puppet, President obama

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
2:58 pm

ROFL. I’ll take that as a no – you can’t explain it.

It’s been explained ad naseum, yet you still insist on hearing it. Listen if I put it on a CD so that you can play, will you be happy then?

Paul: Especially given Nordstrom’s testimony yesterday to Rep Issa that even if they’d gotten every bit of security assistance requested, it would not have prevented the outcome.

Hiya Paul!! True – but that doesn’t matter to some, they want any and everything to make Obama look bad. I think getalife or maybe josef, said recently that between the GOP and the BinLaden supporters, one can’t tell who wants Obama out more.

stands @ 2:49 – Why bother? They’re going to pretend NOT to believe you or the article, or the fact that snow is cold and rain is wet, or whatever they choose to ignore on a Wednesday; so you should just save your breath.

gtt

October 17th, 2012
2:58 pm

Swallow that cold water, it will help fight that indigestion.

Mick

October 17th, 2012
2:59 pm

usmc

Too late, I’m 6′2″ you really, really want obama to go down but the 47 percenters are not in a forgiving mood…

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
3:00 pm

One detail that was so-far overlooked last night is that Romney mentioned his plan for eliminating deductions only affected the top FIVE percent of wage-earners.

That’s a married couple making $154,643.

DL Rupper @gitmo62

October 17th, 2012
3:00 pm

Maybe if the President didn’t lie and have Moderator help he would be as impotant in debate #2 as he was in Debate #1. Oh, well in the real show down Nov 6 he will lose and that’s all that counts. Tyranny ended

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
3:00 pm

M. Righty — “In addition, the Bush policies resulted in millions fewer on food stamps and welefare.”

Incorrect. There were HUGE increases to both during the Bush Administration.

USMC

October 17th, 2012
3:02 pm

“I was referring to USMC’s “The next debate is on Foreign Policy and between now and then the BENGHAZI issue will grow and grow and be tee’d up for Romney at the next debate.””–PAUL

Paul misses the point AGAIN.
All of the networks: CNN, FOX, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, etc. etc. etc. are talking about the BENGHAZI comment from the debate; not only Republicans.

And now Candy Crowley’s HUGE blunder of coming to Obama’s aid in the debate is highlighting Benghazi…. And by the way, America still has not heard the truth on Benghazi from the Obama Administration. :-)

John Townsend

October 17th, 2012
3:03 pm

Regardless, Romney has already lost the election. There is literally no electoral path for him to reach 270 at this point – he would literally have to win 7 out of 8 swing states, and that just isn’t going to happen.

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
3:03 pm

Correct me if I’m wrong, but would not Obama be considered as falling within the top 1% of the country in terms of personal wealth?

Romney earned his wealth through 25 years in the private sector.

How did Obama earn his millions in net worth? The pay of Community Organizers, State office, one term in the US Senate and 4 years in the White House doesn’t reward someone a value of $12-15 million.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
3:04 pm

USMC

“You can whine about it all you want Paul, but more intelligent people realize the significance of the Obama Administration’s LIE about Benghazi.”

You sure have some… original ideas about the meanings of some words, there, USMC.

But let’s skip that and you can tell us what the lie was.

I’m sure with all your military experience you’ll be able to weave it into the framework of investigation, identification and weighing of factors, assigning relative weight, determining cause, recommending corrective action – you know, all that stuff that the military does in such situations.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
3:05 pm

“I was referring to USMC’s “The next debate is on Foreign Policy and between now and then the BENGHAZI issue will grow and grow and be tee’d up for Romney at the next debate.”

Fair enough. Benghazi would not be that much of an issue save for the undeniable fact that both Obama and his administration for two weeks after the event blamed it on the angry response to a anti-Muslim film while knowing (according to the POTUS last night) it was likely a terrorist attack. That engenders suspicion, don’t you know?

Another potentially big issue is Syria. I have now seen numerous reports that there is widespread resentment among the rebels that westerners (read the US) haven’t supported them in their war (as we did in Libya) and THAT is why there at this time so many terrorist groups there. The ME is becoming a veritable powder keg.

USMC

October 17th, 2012
3:06 pm

“Too late, I’m 6′2″ you really, really want obama to go down but the 47 percenters are not in a forgiving mood…”

That’s not what the polls are showing… :-)

Paul

October 17th, 2012
3:06 pm

anon1

“The “put it into a bucket” stuff that he threw out last night was just dumb. Middle class does not need to lose the mortgage deduction, education credits or charitable contribution deduction.”

I understood that to mean, rather than specifying what deductions a household can or cannot take, that he would set a limit, say $25,000, and say ‘pick whatever deductions for which you qualify, but the most you can deduct is $25,000.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
3:07 pm

“It’s been explained ad naseum, yet you still insist on hearing it.”

Please pardon my ignorance and link to where it has been so explained.

gadem

October 17th, 2012
3:07 pm

what is this Obama phone that Republicans keep talking about? Is it an iPhone 5 or something?

DannyX

October 17th, 2012
3:08 pm

Benghazi was teed up for Romney last night. Romney took a big swing at it and fell on his ass.

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
3:08 pm

Peadawg

October 17th, 2012
3:08 pm

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
3:09 pm

“stands @ 2:49 – Why bother? They’re going to pretend NOT to believe you or the article, or the fact that snow is cold and rain is wet, or whatever they choose to ignore on a Wednesday; so you should just save your breath.”

Umm…it wasn’t an “article”

ragnar danneskjold

October 17th, 2012
3:10 pm

Although I am a Rpmney-advocate, I do not pay much attention to the polls. They are useful only in warning a candidate that he is doing the wrong thing, or that he is doing the right thing ineffectively.

I suggest that Chauncey’s current poll distress is more reflective of questions about the Benfhazi “explanations” than anything specifically debate-related. If what appears to be true is the case, he is locked into a bad position.

southpaw

October 17th, 2012
3:10 pm

Doggone/Keep Obama
George W. Bush was the 4th President who lost the popular vote. The previous 3 were Benjamin Harrison in 1888, Rutherford B. Hayes in 1876, and John Quincy Adams in 1824. The popular vote winners were Al Gore, Samuel J. Tilden, Grover Cleveland, and Andrew Jackson, respectively.
http://americanhistory.about.com/od/uspresidents/f/pres_unpopular.htm

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please

October 17th, 2012
3:11 pm

Obama still well ahead in Electoral college and these polls dont reflect the beat down he put on Romney last night.

All is well. Its still a big uphill climb for Romney and Obama’s to lose.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
3:11 pm

Hi DDR!!!

“True – but that doesn’t matter to some, they want any and everything to make Obama look bad. ”

That’s what it all boils down to, isn’t it? As a result, they fixate on minor issues, ignore major issues, get all tied up with their outrage and generally provide fine entertainment.

USMC

““I was referring to USMC’s “The next debate is on Foreign Policy and between now and then the BENGHAZI issue will grow and grow and be tee’d up for Romney at the next debate.””–PAUL

Paul misses the point ”

Well, given you’ve pretty much indicated you don’t mean what you say in your first post, but have to have two or three or more posts to read the responses and modify your first post…..

still waiting on you to tell us all what the lie was and enlighten us with those military-learned assessment skills -

Matti

October 17th, 2012
3:11 pm

What is it about the arrogance inherent in the American people that we think we’re entitled to a full, undiluted intelligence briefing every morning with our grapefruit, toast, and coffee, and by golly, if we don’t have 100% of the FACTS about something that happens halfway around the world in a war-ravaged desert, where even Anderson Cooper is eskeered to tread, and where — unlike every corner of our nation — “security” cameras are not positioned every fifty feet watching every creature’s every move, that we will scream we’ve been LIED TO! “Ooooohhhh, Oooohhhhh, the indignity! The C-I-freaking-A did not tell me everything I didn’t even know I wanted to know, and them not knowing, or not wanting to reveal classified information that puts our people in danger is NO excuse! Oooooohhh, the LIES! Avenge me, Captain Magic Underpants!” :roll:

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please

October 17th, 2012
3:12 pm

92 killed at American embassies under Reagan.

33 killed at American embassies under Bush.

4 killed at American embassies under Obama.

President Obama is right. He has the BEST record of defending our embassies

USMC

October 17th, 2012
3:13 pm

Simple Truths

October 17th, 2012
3:13 pm

Wow! Jay is looking to the Rasmussen poll numbers for hope. And here I thought the Rasmussen numbers were always out of whack and favored Republicans.

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
3:14 pm

that we will scream we’ve been LIED TO!

Not “we”. Just the poo-flinging monkeys.

stands for decibels

October 17th, 2012
3:14 pm

Umm…it wasn’t an “article”

It was a comment, with a link to a MM piece that, among other things, documents what Fox and Fiends has been crying about of late.

but mostly it was to get across the point that, basically, wingers are angry that Obama didn’t say “mother may I,” or something along those lines.

weetamoe

October 17th, 2012
3:14 pm

Romney’s binders of women sounds kind of old-fashioned but the real point is that when Romney was MA governor more than half of his cabinet was women, many of them minorities and democrats, and several have praised him publicly for the working conditions under his tenure. Of course Bill Clinton has little black books instead of binders, and the Pimp with a Limp keeps Obama’s list on his Blackberry.
Best comment so far is the one about Candy leaping from the bench to tackle Mitt as he raced for a touchdown (all 347 pounds of her).

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
3:14 pm

“If what appears to be true is the case, he is locked into a bad position.”

And that is the thing I REALLY don’t get. Why say the attack was caused by a film when the prudent and honest thing to do is just say “We think it may have been a terrorist attack but we are still getting intelligence reports” (or some such thing)? Why do it?

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
3:15 pm

And here I thought the Rasmussen numbers were always out of whack and favored Republicans.

They are and they do. Which means that if you find a poll that’s a significant outlier, it’s worth trying to figure out why instead of putting your money on it and doubling down on the mistake.

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
3:16 pm

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please

And the first ambassador to be assassinated since 1979. Yep, the BEST record since…….Jimmy Carter.

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please

October 17th, 2012
3:17 pm

How did Obama earn his millions in net worth? The pay of Community Organizers, State office, one term in the US Senate and 4 years in the White House doesn’t reward someone a value of $12-15 million.

Obama doesn’t have that much money. In fact he and his wife just paid off their student loans a few years ago.

The money they do have they earned from a couple of best selling books for which they were compensated quite well.

He certainly didn’t earn it laying off American workers and shipping jobs to China ala Romney.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
3:17 pm

weetamoe, that was Romney 1.0.

This is Romney 6.44.1011.73.

He’s the AOL candidate! A total POS but millions of people like him anyway!

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
3:18 pm

And that is the thing I REALLY don’t get. Why say the attack was caused by a film when the prudent and honest thing to do is just say “We think it may have been a terrorist attack but we are still getting intelligence reports” (or some such thing)? Why do it?

Because there were numerous protests over the film in a number of other countries that day. So the analysts first call was that it was also related to the film and that’s what the politicians repeated… even if later it turned out to be wrong.

So here’s the counter question: should they have ignored the analysts like Cheney would have done?

tm

October 17th, 2012
3:19 pm

How can Obama only have 45%??? Romney has conceded 47% already.

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
3:20 pm

How can Obama only have 45%??? Romney has conceded 47% already.

the poll had a margin of error… and obviously so did Romney :lol:

Paul

October 17th, 2012
3:20 pm

Towncrier

“Fair enough.”

Uh-oh…. USMC’s gonna unload on you for missing the point, again…. ;-)

The point I was making was that Benghazi is the issue because it’s the last thing that happened. So it’s like Republicans say ‘There! Shiny object!!! Get it!!!!” when in reality they’ve just run past far shinier objects that would make their point on foreign policy weaknesses, much better.

What USMC and others don’t seem to grasp is, by their reckoning, Republicans are locked into discussing whatever the media determines is the story. They don’t demonstrate real leadership by saying ‘look, this was an unfortunate situation, but other issues are far weightier. Let’s take a minute and discuss some.”

What’s really ironic is given all the diatribes USMC and others on the Right have over the ‘liberal media’ that with his post of “All of the networks: CNN, FOX, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, etc. etc. etc. are talking about the BENGHAZI comment from the debate; not only Republicans” he demonstrates that Republicans get yanked and led by whatever the liberal media decides is the important issue to focus on.

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please

October 17th, 2012
3:20 pm

And the first ambassador to be assassinated since 1979. Yep, the BEST record since…….Jimmy Carter.

I agree. Obama has kept people safer at our Embassies overseas.

The numbers dont lie. Thanks for agreeing.

DannyX

October 17th, 2012
3:20 pm

“And the first ambassador to be assassinated since 1979. Yep, the BEST record since…….Jimmy Carter.”

If only Obama had been so lucky to have passenger jets slam into the Pentagon and World Trade Center killing 4,000 instead, Obama would be a shoe-in for re-election like Bush.

Rightwing Troll

October 17th, 2012
3:22 pm

“it’s worth trying to figure out why instead of putting your money on it and doubling down on the mistake.”

Wingnuts know a lot about that… 2004 proved that and now they wish to do it again…

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
3:22 pm

“It was a comment, with a link to a MM piece that, among other things, documents what Fox and Fiends has been crying about of late.”

The linked MM piece does next to nothing to substantiate its claim there there is “no contradiction” between calling the attack a terrorist act and “mentioning” the film. Obama and Rice did not merely “mention” the film – they made it the primary cause of the attack for 2 weeks.

“…but mostly it was to get across the point that, basically, wingers are angry that Obama didn’t say “mother may I,” or something along those lines.”

When you get a truly plausible explanation for the apparent lie, let us all know. Otherwise, the sand is over there…

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
3:22 pm

Spontaneous acts of terror
in response to movies are
going to be hard to control
due to you tube being
worldwide.
Drone Google.

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
3:23 pm

Cheesy @3:17

how many jobs did Romney ship to China, how many Americans did he lay-off and how many jobs did he save and or create?

you obviously know the answer or are you making baseless claims

ByteMe - Got ilk?

October 17th, 2012
3:23 pm

When you get a truly plausible explanation for the apparent lie, let us all know

actually, when the wingnuts come up with a truly plausible explanation for why the information was wrong, let us all know.

eddy

October 17th, 2012
3:25 pm

PS…Crowley had a copy of Obama’s Rose Garden transcript so that she could drop the supposed “zinger” that Obama had uttered the word “terror” on the day after the attack. Can you say “prearranged setup so that Obama could say that he did utter the word “terror”. Wonder how she knew she needed to be his teleprompter. Doesn’t really matter though…..the administration’s official position was for 15 days (go to the videotape to confirm) that the attack was caused by the film. Either they lied or are incompetent or perhaps both. Gotta love the Dems. Now let’s all say together now…”our green initiatives are a huge success” Oh I forgot, the battery maker just declared bankruptcy. Just another $250million of the taxpayers money down the drain. Obama doesn’t know how to pick a winner….only losers. November 7th will be such a great day!!!!

Paul

October 17th, 2012
3:25 pm

Cheesy Grits

“Obama doesn’t have that much money. In fact he and his wife just paid off their student loans a few years ago.”

We must come from different worlds. I’d kinda consider a net worth of nearly $12 million (2010) to be a bit more than ‘not that much money.”

Matti

October 17th, 2012
3:25 pm

I’m not sure why I would be convinced that the attacks and the protests were definitively mutually exclusive. Bottom line: millions of Middle-Easterners hate us, largely because of our long-standing policies of sticking our noses into their beeswax, and our boots on their sacred sands.

I think anyone who volunteers for the diplomatic corps and supporting functions knows the risks inherent to deploying to places like Benghazi. I don’t think any of them expect to be as safe as they would be in a suburban movie theater after standing in lines to pay absurd amounts of money for extremely violent “entertainment” and over-priced, trans-fat-laden heat-popped genetically-modified corn products and HFCS-based sodas to wash it all down with. Oh wait…. maybe they are safer over there. Never mind.

Ahem

October 17th, 2012
3:26 pm

DannyX

October 17th, 2012
3:08 pm
Benghazi was teed up for Romney last night. Romney took a big swing at it and fell on his ass. masterfully put Oblunda on record and Crowley helped Romney in a way that is being played out today as she backpeddles away from her flub.

The Benghazi issue will live on and grow right up until the next debate and that is when Romney shoves the umbrella up Oblunda’s donkey and opens it.

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
3:26 pm

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please – Wrong

Most sites estimate the Obamas are worth $11.7 million.

In 2007 thee Obamas were worth about $1.7 million. He has profited handsomely during the end of the Bush administration and his first term as POTUS. He’s quite a capitalist and now qualifies in the nation’s top 1% in wealth.

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please

October 17th, 2012
3:27 pm

We must come from different worlds. I’d kinda consider a net worth of nearly $12 million (2010) to be a bit more than ‘not that much money.”

I meant he doesn’t have 12 million. Not that it wasn’t that much money.

Reading comprehension is tough I know. Georgia schools and all.

He is worth around 6 million according to Forbes. Just paid of school loans. Still owes on his mortgage.

Like alot of Americans.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/erincarlyle/2012/05/16/obamas-worth-nearly-6-million-see-why-hes-down-since-last-year/

stands for decibels

October 17th, 2012
3:27 pm

the real point is that when Romney was MA governor more than half of his cabinet was women

Sadly, no.

http://blog.thephoenix.com/BLOGS/talkingpolitics/archive/2012/10/16/mind-the-binder.aspx

I will write more about this later, but for tonight let me just make a few quick additional points. First of all, according to MassGAP and MWPC, Romney did appoint 14 women out of his first 33 senior-level appointments, which is a reasonably impressive 42 percent. However, as I have reported before, those were almost all to head departments and agencies that he didn’t care about — and in some cases, that he quite specifically wanted to not really do anything. None of the senior positions Romney cared about — budget, business development, etc. — went to women.

Secondly, a UMass-Boston study found that the percentage of senior-level appointed positions held by women actually declined throughout the Romney administration, from 30.0% prior to his taking office, to 29.7% in July 2004, to 27.6% near the end of his term in November 2006. (It then began rapidly rising when Deval Patrick took office.)

Joseph

October 17th, 2012
3:27 pm

It’s over Jay… I know you fruits on the left in the media want this to be tight but it ain’t happening. The people have awaken and see what a failure he is…..

"Keep Obama in President"....

October 17th, 2012
3:28 pm

DannyX

9/11 didn’t happen in an election year but I think you knew that.

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please

October 17th, 2012
3:29 pm

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please – Wrong

Actually im right.

And you’re wrong.

Not a real shocker.

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
3:30 pm

Well that sucks! I was kinda hoping for Obama being re-elected. I figure it would be better to let him just go ahead and ruin things for another 4 years until the lesson becomes self evident to even the farthest left kooks that liberalism does not work. After 8 years of economic disaster and financial bankruptcy even they wouldn’t be able to keep playing the blame W card. Plus its always amusing to watch a complete incompetent at work- kinda like the keystone cops. Go Barry Go!

DannyX

October 17th, 2012
3:31 pm

“The Benghazi issue will live on and grow right up until the next debate and that is when Romney shoves the umbrella up Oblunda’s donkey and opens it.”

The Benghazi issue is for the most part a figment of your imagination. If Romney again tries to use it for political gain he will whiff again. So far he is 0-2 with two strikeouts.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
3:31 pm

“Because there were numerous protests over the film in a number of other countries that day. So the analysts first call was that it was also related to the film and that’s what the politicians repeated… even if later it turned out to be wrong.”

Not for two weeks. And not after you have said it was a terrorist act. Mob violence is NOT terrorism.

“So here’s the counter question: should they have ignored the analysts like Cheney would have done?”

As Cheney would have done? What exactly is your point here? I want to see these alleged intelligence reports (as probably do a whole lot of people).

jms

October 17th, 2012
3:31 pm

64.8%! I love the precision!

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
3:31 pm

How did Obama earn his millions in net worth?

From taking kickbacks from Haliburton when he awarded them a no-bid contract for Afghanistan/Iraq.

Oh wait! that was Cheney!!

My bad.

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
3:31 pm

All the alternative energy
companies who get loans
must agree to buy at least
1 million copies of Obama’s
book.-Kamchak Corollary

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
3:31 pm

Yep, Mitts love him some binders of wimmens.

This is all a precursor to selecting Newt “Serial Adulterer” Gingrich and Herman “Serial Groper” Cain as his front men to find qualified wimmens to be on the Rush Limbaugh show…

Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!

October 17th, 2012
3:33 pm

Joseph,
I’ve been wondering, with your penchant of calling those of us on the left “fruits”, do you cross dress? I’ve often heard that those who use those kinds of derogatory remarks are often what they call others. Is that true for you?

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please

October 17th, 2012
3:33 pm

the one thing you can gurantee.

The dumebr and lower the level of eduction.

The redder the state.

Obama still has a nice lead in electoral college.

If he wins Ohio its game set match.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/2012_elections_electoral_college_map_no_toss_ups.html

Look at this map.

All the red states. Very low education levels.

The blue states. High levels of College Graduates.

Coincidence. No.

You can see it played out on these pages most everyday.

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
3:33 pm

I want to see these alleged intelligence reports (as probably do a whole lot of people).

Get the proper security clearance AND maybe a job as counterintel in the C.I.A. then maybe we can talk…. :roll:

OBIWAN

October 17th, 2012
3:33 pm

I am so glad our wonderful president told us that we have gotten back all the TARP money he gave to the unions, oh wait I think we are 46 billion short, but don’t worry he said it, it must be true right? I can’t wait to buy my solar panels from Colorado, oooppps they went bankrupt on another 140 million of taxpayer money. But that’s OK, we can buy them from China since the president has a plan B, fund China to build them, thank God he is soooo smart, right, just look at his transcripts…. Oooppss can’t find them… no matter he would not lie to us just ask the Lybian ambassador… Right?

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
3:34 pm

“..actually, when the wingnuts come up with a truly plausible explanation for why the information was wrong, let us all know.”

I’ll take that as a round about way of conceding you have no plausible explanation. Next batter.

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
3:34 pm

Good one frog!

Matti

October 17th, 2012
3:35 pm

Thulsa Doom @ 3:30,

Well bless your heart. Ever put yourself in politics? Ever worked a school board, city council, county commission? Ever advocated in a state legislature for people who can’t advocate for themselves? Ever entered a bureaucracy and tried to streamline a process or make it more effective under the primary directive of “do more with less?” while trying to figure out the nine different sets of “rules” in play? I can see how desperately you want to make a difference and do good for your community and nation before it’s too late and your creaky old bones turn to dust. DON’T WAIT! Get involved now, and then tell us how easy it is, and why people who have actually tried while you cheer or boo from the sidelines have sadly failed to meet your high standards and expectations.

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please

October 17th, 2012
3:36 pm

Well that sucks! I was kinda hoping for Obama being re-elected. I figure it would be better to let him just go ahead and ruin things for another 4 years until the lesson becomes self evident to even the farthest left kooks that liberalism does not work. After 8 years of economic disaster and financial bankruptcy even they wouldn’t be able to keep playing the blame W card. Plus its always amusing to watch a complete incompetent at work- kinda like the keystone cops. Go Barry Go!

Thanks for getting on board Thulsa.

I knew you would come around.

And yes it will take more than 4 years to recover from the 8 year disaster that was Bush.

And no we aren’t going back to Bush 2.0 ( Romney )

Good for you. The fog has lifted.

Obama still has comfortable lead. If he wins Ohio Romney is toast.

No way he can win. Welcome to the winning side.

Ahem

October 17th, 2012
3:36 pm

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please

October 17th, 2012
3:20 pm
“And the first ambassador to be assassinated since 1979. Yep, the BEST record since…….Jimmy Carter.”

I agree. Obama has kept people safer at our Embassies overseas.

The numbers dont lie. Thanks for agreeing.

And now we visit Mr. Logic’s classroom:

Teacher: “Ummm, let’s count from 1979 until 2012 children. Yes, that would be over 30 years. Now, subtract the number of years Oblunda has been in office. That answer tells us the maximum amount of time that Oblunda has had anything to do with embassy security and that during his watch we have four dead.”

Little Johnny: “But teacher, I thought that the White House had nothing to do with embassy security, at least that is what they said. This problem is very confusing.”

Teacher: “Don’t fret Johnny, it will all make sense on November 6th.”

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
3:36 pm

“Most sites estimate the Obamas are worth $11.7 million…In 2007 thee Obamas were worth about $1.7 million.”

Well…I’ll be. Imagine that. He must have some really good offshore investments ;)

Recon 0311 2533

October 17th, 2012
3:37 pm

Regardless of who anybody wants to win it will be close right down to the wire. It will be a get out the vote contest. Be prepared to be up all night.

DannyX

October 17th, 2012
3:37 pm

“Yep, Mitts love him some binders of wimmens.”

Lol, Republicans around here will tell you Mitt knocked it out of the park with that blunder.

Political blinders for blunders.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
3:38 pm

Matti

“I’m not sure why I would be convinced that the attacks and the protests were definitively mutually exclusive.”

Excellent point. It’s usually a trap to respond to “here’s A and here’s B. Pick one” by picking one. It can be much more correct, as you pointed out to pick A AND B.

Cheesy Grits

“I’d kinda consider a net worth of nearly $12 million (2010) to be a bit more than ‘not that much money.”

I meant he doesn’t have 12 million. Not that it wasn’t that much money.

Reading comprehension is tough I know. Georgia schools and all.

He is worth around 6 million according to Forbes. Just paid of school loans. Still owes on his mortgage.”

Reading comprehension? How about writing clarity, as in ‘Obama doesn’t have that much money.”

Then specifying if you’re speaking of liquid assets, just assets, or net worth? So if a person has a net worth of $N million but only $10,000 in cash you’d say he ‘doesn’t have that much money?”

Then you cite $6 million to support your position, which, by the way, was headlined “Obama’s WORTH nearly $6 million.”

You should really quit when you’re not too far behind -

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
3:38 pm

Please
October 17th, 2012
3:33 pm

the one thing you can
gurantee.

The dumebr and lower the
level of eduction.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
3:39 pm

Obimeat, did you fall down and hit your head?

The only thugs who got TARP money were the banksters and the Titans of Negligence and Criminal Malfeasance on Wall Street…

Adam

October 17th, 2012
3:40 pm

Do I get to pull the “skewed” card?

getalife

October 17th, 2012
3:41 pm

How dare you play politics with a attack

You are terrorists sympathizers

OBIWAN

October 17th, 2012
3:42 pm

JamVet, do you believe that, or are you the water boy? Check your facts…

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
3:42 pm

“What USMC and others don’t seem to grasp is, by their reckoning, Republicans are locked into discussing whatever the media determines is the story.”

I disagree, Paul. I think people are upset by what appears to be a needless lie and what motivation could underlie such puzzling behavior.

USMC

October 17th, 2012
3:43 pm

“It’s over Jay… I know you fruits on the left in the media want this to be tight but it ain’t happening. The people have awaken and see what a failure he is…..”–Joseph

Don’t count Comrade Obama out just yet….. He still has the votes of all ILLEGAL ALIENS and DEAD PEOPLE!

It’s not over yet, but it sure isn’t the “Obama Landslide” that JAY BOOKMAN and other Leftwing Operatives were touting. :-)

stands for decibels

October 17th, 2012
3:43 pm

Be prepared to be up all night.

I’m prepared for that, but if they call Ohio for Obama five minutes after the polls close, like last time? I’m probably turning in early.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
3:43 pm

Go ahead obimeat, show me where unions got TARP money. (And put a bandage on that thick noggin of yours!)

Welcome to the Occupation

October 17th, 2012
3:44 pm

Divided nation.

The people are confused.

Marx. He’s more relevant today than perhaps he’s ever been.

josef

October 17th, 2012
3:45 pm

There’s an awful lot of whistling past the graveyard here. Anything can still happen. The Romany Lady still ain’t laying odds.

getalife
It seems like that attack on the school girl may have tipped the balance in Pakistan. Popular sentiment is outraged and the right wing and mainstream fundamentalists are scurrying now to make a public condemnation, but it could well be a day late and a dollar short.

kayaker 71

October 17th, 2012
3:47 pm

I’m not sure how your electoral college experts figure your boy is going to win, but here goes……

Presently, the race is as follows:

O 201
R 191
Undecided 146, to include NV, CO, IA, WI, MI, OH, PA, VA, NC, NH.

That means that Romney only needs 79 more votes to put him at 270. If you count Fl with 29, NC with 15, OH with 18, VA with 13 and NH with 4….. viola….. 270. And that’s saying that states like IA, CO and WI might be in play. So dream on libs…. this ain’t over yet, not by a long shot.

Wilbur

October 17th, 2012
3:48 pm

Obama did better than his first debate in which he pretty much played the role of President Prozac. A better debate performance will not solve his core problems.
1. His record is abysmal. People are hurting and his policies are the reason.
2 He no longer offers any hope of relieving the partisan wars in Washington, especially since he has been it’s strongest proponent. Obama is left running as a old style, hard core liberal…not that attractive.
3.Obama does not seem to actually like or care about people. Nearly four years in and Obama is still detached and aloof. Now it seems that he is not telling the truth either. We don’t like liars.
4. He spent hundreds of millions of dollars assaulting Mitt Romney. When people got to actually see him in the debate with less media filter and absent the lefty spin, they realized that they had been lied to by Obama and his allies and that Mitt is a reasonable guy with some good ideas.

Don’t get too hopeful about the next couple of weeks.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

October 17th, 2012
3:48 pm

I hope Obama loses the popular vote but wins the electoral college. That would be funny.

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
3:48 pm

I disagree, Paul. I think people are upset by what appears to be a needless lie and what motivation could underlie such puzzling behavior.

Unless you were privy to the intel, which 99% of the ones crying foul AREN’T, then how would you know what was puzzling and what wasn’t?

I think you’re just spouting off crap you heard Boottz say — I’ve yet to see you write down an original thought or opinion.
========================

Seen on a blog: If Romney wins, get ready for the Hunger Games in real time. We’ll have the 1% making the 99% fight to the death for food and medicine.

We can call it Romney/Ryan Games and get to watch our children kill each other for entertainment.

Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)

October 17th, 2012
3:49 pm

Well, I’m sick of seeing a big fat lard-azz librul Democrat picked to moderate every debate. If this Crowley woman had of give Romney a couple more hours he could of come up with good answers, instead of leading with his nose right into a Obama fist four or five times.

All I got to say is, if Romney wins the most votes but loses because of this Electoral Colledge thing, alot of us rednecks are going to be highly pizzed. I mean, it was OK when Bush won that way, but once is enough. It gets old real fast when you’re on the losing side of something like that.

And that poll on Nov. 6 better not be slanted toward the Democrats the way the other polls are. It won’t take much for a bunch of us Southreners to Succeed from this union.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
3:49 pm

“President Obama argued that Mitt Romney would oppose equal pay for women and block access to birth control, but Mr. Romney sought to defend his policies as better for women.”NYT.

The numbers change to our President.

He crushed mitt romney like Biden did to ryan.

The numbers will correct.

Vote.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
3:50 pm

Towncrier

” I think people are upset by what appears to be a needless lie and what motivation could underlie such puzzling behavior.”

My view is ‘lie’ is inaccurate. More like there was confusion, overlapping assessments, different timelines of information flowing upward, crossed messages and all that.

Hey USMC!

Got the post ready describing the lie?

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
3:50 pm

JamVet he didn’t say UNIONS he said UNICORNS!!

Get your story straight Jam! You LIBER-ALLLLL!!!

OBIWAN

October 17th, 2012
3:50 pm

I must apologize, 46 billion was wrong, union and banks combined adds up to more like 132 billion.

http://www.inquisitr.com/187614/132-9-billion-still-owed-to-tax-payers-from-bailout/

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
3:50 pm

People are hurting and the policies of the past five administrations are the reason.

But that just doesn’t sound as juicy does it, Wilbur?

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
3:51 pm

Jam – Go ahead obimeat, show me where unions got TARP money. (And put a bandage on that thick noggin of yours!)

maybe next time
http://www.forbes.com/sites/louiswoodhill/2012/08/15/general-motors-is-headed-for-bankruptcy-again/

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
3:51 pm

“Excellent point. It’s usually a trap to respond to “here’s A and here’s B. Pick one” by picking one. It can be much more correct, as you pointed out to pick A AND B.”

Except that, again, mob violence is NOT terrorism. Hence the statements from the Obama administration like these:

“We do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.”

– Susan Rice, on CBS’ “Face the Nation” Sept. 16th.

“Our belief based on the information we have is it was the video that caused the unrest in Cairo, and the video and the unrest in Cairo that helped – that precipitated some of the unrest in Benghazi and elsewhere. What other factors were involved is a matter of investigation.”

- Jay Carney on September 18th.

You cannot have it both ways. Obama last night wanted to claim he called the attack a terrorist act the day after. That is the problem.

Mary Elizabeth

October 17th, 2012
3:53 pm

In my opinion, Obama won the debate, handily, although I was annoyed that the moderator cut Obama short through time constraints that were not organic to the moment, when Obama was about to explain the reasons for the deficit increases during his administration – after Romney’s accusations of Obama’s administration’s policies, in this regard.

As one commentator astutely stated later, the deficit increased under Obama, not because of his extravagant spending policies, but because the Recession had created severe job losses that effected government income/revenue, in addition to essential spending necessary for stimulus funds that kept the U.S. from falling into a Depression. Moreover, had government jobs not sustained such large cuts (many of which were cut because of ideology, imo), the unemployment rate would have been even lower today than 7.8%.

As I have stated before, from Paul Krugman’s pen, if the Republicans had passed Obama’s Jobs’ Bill, the unemployment rate would now be under 7%. Whether you believe Krugman’s assessment or not, simply having passed the Jobs’ Bill would certainly have lowered the unemployment rate, and thus the deficit, because more income/revenue would have been forthcoming, in circulation, had more jobs been forthcoming. But, Republicans simply wanted Obama to fail. That is obvious and sinful, imo, in what their intent has done to the American people.

I am going to restate Krugman’s words from his 2/22/10 post. I hope many will read Krugman’s words and will allow them to penetrate as to WHY this nation has had a decade of grief, financially. Malicious intent that is unsavory MUST be exposed because that malicious intent has effected millions adversely, and people who are not aware of this will vote – again – for Republicans and will vote, unknowingly, for their devious financial agenda to privatize as much of public institutions as possible, instead of sustaining a balance between the public and the private sectors, working in harmony. Moreover, Republican “trickle down” policies have proven to have been ineffective over decades to most Americans, but these policies have benefitted the very wealthy. Republican out-of-balance, almost rabid, ideology has been a catastrophe for ordinary Americans. We MUST not return to policies that have hurt our nation economically, in the past, through electing Mitt Romney as President of the U.S. in November.

Excerpt from Paul Krugman’s 2/22/10 NY Times column, entitled “The Bankruptcy Boys.” (I believed Krugman’s courageous assertions, below, to be truth exposed in 2010 – even before he penned this column – and I still believe, today, that his perceptions and assertions were true.) Please read his below comments. You have been effected by what has occurred.

————————————————————————

Paul Krugman: “Voters may say that they oppose big government, but the programs that actually dominate federal spending — Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security — are very popular. So how can the public be persuaded to accept large spending cuts?

The conservative answer, which evolved in the late 1970s, would be dubbed ’starving the beast’ during the Reagan years.

The idea — propounded by many members of the conservative intelligentsia, from Alan Greenspan to Irving Kristol — was basically that sympathetic politicians should engage in a game of bait and switch. Rather than proposing unpopular spending cuts, Republicans would push through popular TAX CUTS, WITH THE DELIBERATE INTENTION OF WORSENING THE GOVERNMENT’S FISCAL POSITION. Spending cuts could then be sold as a necessity rather than a choice, the only way to eliminate an unsustainable budget deficit.”

(Caps are mine to highlight Krugman’s message.)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/22/opinion/22krugman.html?scp=1&sq=Paul%20Krugman,%20The%20Bankruptcy%20Boys,%202/22/10&st=Search&_r=0

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
3:53 pm

DDR, the kid is a train wreck. (He must be a Romney fan!)

getalife

October 17th, 2012
3:53 pm

Good to see our President more relaxed and on top of his game.

The economy is improving and unemployment is dropping.

The gop will not destroy our country for the next four years but they will keep trying.

The gop are another collapse waiting to happen.

I have no doubt.

Vote.

Keep Up the Good Fight!

October 17th, 2012
3:55 pm

So much concern by the “American people” over an alleged “lie” of the administration (still without real evidence) but no concern over the proven lies of Mitt and Ryan….. :roll:

OBIWAN

October 17th, 2012
3:55 pm

I think it is funny that when confronted with FACTS liberals suddenly try to deflect the reality of Obozo lies… very funny, but stupid!

getalife

October 17th, 2012
3:55 pm

crier is still supporting the terrorists.

It does not get any worse than that crier.

Unpatriotic and unAmerican.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

October 17th, 2012
3:56 pm

Most recently, we’ve learned that Arthur Allen, CEO of ASG Software Solutions, sent an email to workers with the following subject line: “Will the US Presidential election directly impact your future jobs at ASG? Please read below.”

alternet.org

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
3:56 pm

“And yes it will take more than 4 years to recover from the 8 year disaster that was Bush.”

Just like I told you. Pass the cheesy grits has already got his lame ass blame W excuse ready for the next 4 years- by his own admission.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
3:58 pm

“My view is ‘lie’ is inaccurate. More like there was confusion, overlapping assessments, different timelines of information flowing upward, crossed messages and all that.”

I might agree save for the almost weirdly persistent contention that it was a “spontaneous” reaction to a film. It happened on 9/11 and the Libyan government was from the outset saying it was a terrorist attack. So the PROPER thing to say would have been that it was still uncertain if it was this cause or that – not almost ruling out a terrorist attack. It is a lie.

Matti

October 17th, 2012
3:58 pm

Towncrier,

As DDR already pointed out, your squawking indicates that YOU are not personally privy to the intel on the Benghazi matter, and that you have a sense of entitlement to that information that reaches beyond your reality. On the other hand, it’s possible that you’re squawking about “lies” because you DO have clearance for the intel in question; in which case, you’re a traitor for discussing it on a blog with unknown civilians and/or enemy spies.

Which is it?

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
3:58 pm

If Obama thinks he inherited a mess in 2008…just wait and see the mess he’ll inherit in 2012.

I still think Mitt will win the popular and lose the electorial

kayaker 71

October 17th, 2012
4:01 pm

Erwins Cat, 3:51,

It looks like Bozo will get a chance to “save” Government Motors again. If it’s stock falls any further, we are looking at one of the biggest disasters that the auto industry has ever seen. Stock at 20 dollars and change. Government owns 500.000.000 shares. Needs to get to 53 to break even with the taxpayer. Market share is down, Chevy Volt a colossal failure….. Bozo sure don’t belong in the car business. Or in the Solar Energy business as well.

Mary Elizabeth

October 17th, 2012
4:01 pm

Btw, I predict an on-target, razor-sharp Obama to show up for Monday’s final debate with details and vision, at hand. I have never believed that Mitt Romney was in Obama’s league. Romney has tunnel vision only as a CEO, in my opinion. He misses so very much, as a result.

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
4:02 pm

what facts? I read your link — it referenced more links that were not germaine to the original post or concept — i guess the writer was hoping no one would link to it and figure that part out.

=========================

but no concern over the proven lies of Mitt and Ryan…..

Thats because they’re not really seeking “truth”. What they’re seeking is anything that can make Obama look bad.

========================

(He must be a Romney fan!)

More than likely — he ran away like a coward, from the “facts” when you asked for proof.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
4:02 pm

Obimeat, you idgit, that article said nothing about unions and TARP money.

OK, I’m off to the great state of Nebraska tomorrow afternoon to see the whole famdamly.

Gonna stop and see THE stadium in Lincoln, gonna have a Runza or two and might just get some fishing in.

So, as I will not be here to share in FNM, I’m gonna have my own today.

However, unlike on FNM and in the great American spirit of smacking down neocon nonsense I will continue to intersperse political observations/corrections with the good music…

Here is what I’ll play as soon as Mitt gives his concession speech…

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
4:02 pm

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
4:02 pm

Paul:

” ………………… the attack on our consulate in Benghazi was not an act of terror.” Jay Bookman

http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2012/10/17/on-benghazi-the-debate-and-acts-of-terror/ (First sentence in #1).

USMC

October 17th, 2012
4:03 pm

“Just like I told you. Pass the cheesy grits has already got his lame ass blame W excuse ready for the next 4 years- by his own admission.”–TD

Even Liberals, not counting the Wingnuts on Jay’s blog, are getting tired of the blame GEORGE BUSH “excuse”. Obama has NO plan and it’s obvious. Even Obama knows it. :-)

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
4:03 pm

“In my opinion, Obama won the debate, handily, although I was annoyed that the moderator cut Obama short through time constraints that were not organic to the moment, when Obama was about to explain the reasons for the deficit increases during his administration – after Romney’s accusations of Obama’s administration’s policies, in this regard.”

Yeah, ME, Crowley should have given Obama 10 more minutes to talk than Romney – rather than the 4 he got. That’s fair, right?

“I am going to restate Krugman’s words from his 2/22/10 post.”

Puuhhleeeeaaaasssse. Honestly. ME, you are the most closed-minded devotee of liberalism I have seen on this blog. You almost deify people like Klugman and Obama. It’s alright to have your views. But geeezzzz.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
4:04 pm

If you refuse to unite to show patriotism and play politics instead on the Libya attack you are a terrorist sympathizer.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
4:05 pm

I still think Mitt will win the popular and lose the electorial.

Now that would be hanging chad sweet.

From the Lap of Luxury

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muhFxXce6nA

Paul

October 17th, 2012
4:05 pm

Towncrier

I believe Matti’s point, and the point to which I was responding, was that there were people at the compound incensed by the video and there were people at the compound as part of a planned, coordinated attack. They can both occur at the same time (A and B).

OBIWAN

October 17th, 2012
4:05 pm

Hey all you Obozo lovers, can you tell me where the middle class got 18 tax cuts? He said it so it must be true right?

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
4:06 pm

“I have never believed that Mitt Romney was in Obama’s league.”

I suspect, in your mind, no one is (except possibly for Klugman).

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
4:08 pm

K71 — “I’m not sure how your electoral college experts figure your boy is going to win”

Because he’s been leading in the EV stakes for months and because he still leads.

“but here goes……

Presently, the race is as follows:

O 201
R 191
Undecided 146, to include NV, CO, IA, WI, MI, OH, PA, VA, NC, NH.”

Not sure where your figures are coming from. Have a look here:

http://www.electoral-vote.com/

Obama 277, Romney 239, with 22 ties (CO and VA).

How are those figures arrived at?

http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2012/Info/polling-faq.html

Long story short, they use state-level polls from six outfits, including Quinnipiac, Rasmussen and Gallup (even though Gallup doesn’t do a lot of state-only polls). The result is that much of the statistical noise and outliers (polls that are WAY out of line from what other polls are showing) get muted.

If you hover your mouse over a state, you will get a popup that shows the most recent poll results for that state.

“That means that Romney only needs 79 more votes to put him at 270. If you count Fl with 29, NC with 15, OH with 18, VA with 13 and NH with 4….. viola….. 270.”

What I’m seeing on E-V.com is that Romney still has a hard row to hoe, even with FL right now. Even if he takes all the states currently showing in his column AND the tossups, he’s still only at 261. He’d have to take at least one medium-sized state (like WI, putting him at 271) or *both* NV and IA (which would put him at 273) WITHOUT losing any of the states he’s currently holding. And that would be tough for him, because several of the states he’s recently picked up are pretty squishy and could flip back to Obama before the election.

“And that’s saying that states like IA, CO and WI might be in play. So dream on libs…. this ain’t over yet, not by a long shot.”

Obama’s still got the advantage. Obama’s got more ways to win than Romney does; the task before Romney is still pretty daunting.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
4:09 pm

Scout

What’s your point with the 4:02?

JamVet

Travel safe, friend -

kayaker 71

October 17th, 2012
4:10 pm

getalife, 4:04,

And what are we supposed to do, let them get away with all of their lies and subterfuge? Are we supposed to ignore the fact that a major failure in foreign policy was responsible for the death of four Americans which might have been prevented with the proper security? Are we supposed to ignore that Fast and Furious was responsible for one of the biggest cluster f*cks in the history of American politics? You can continue to ignore these things if you please but the American people will not and should not, election or no.

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
4:10 pm

Matti,

You should be a little more careful in your sweeping judgements about who and what people get involved in and how they get involved to help others. I’ve never gotten onto school boards(I have no kids), or advocated down at state govt as you have. But I’ve done and continue to do a lot of things that I choose not to brag about that you don’t know about. I’ve got a good number of medicaid custrs that I do plenty for – whether it be talking to someone on their behalf, giving them a ride to an appt when no one else will, or making calls on their behalf to social service agencies. I have some elderly people no one seems to care much about that I stop by to see for 15-30 minutes here and there when I’m nearby. Why? Just to give them someone to talk as several of them are poor, alone, and just plain lonely. May not seem like much to you but it means a hell of a lot to them. I do stuff that I don’t get paid for and which is time consuming but which I do just to help people. And if you knew the area of town where I have a lot of clients my name is a household name amongst the hearing impaired community. Why? Because I take the extra time and effort to get involved and help those people. So please tone down the tone about who helps and does volunteer work and such. I do plenty as I know you do. I just don’t see the need to ask for public props for the things I do. But the various people that I help out in many little ways? They know.

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
4:10 pm

Most recently, we’ve learned that Arthur Allen, CEO of ASG Software Solutions, sent an email to workers..

Petty bullying — the last refuge of the scared……………….

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
4:11 pm

ME – I have never believed that Mitt Romney was in Obama’s league.”

neither have I…Mitt’s in the big leagues

josef

October 17th, 2012
4:12 pm

GETALIFE

Politics and strange bedfellows…one of the reasons the Taliban in Pakistan cited for shooting the schoolgirl was that she saw Obama as her hero…how long before their fellow travelers start a more “moderate” fundamentalist style of attacks…

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
4:12 pm

EC

That is my prediction as well.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
4:13 pm

mitt is going to lose.

We will never have a President that goes crazy after a attack on our embassies.

mitt is not a leader.

Our President will get these terrorists while crazy mitt plays politics like a con hack.

Peadawg

October 17th, 2012
4:14 pm

“neither have I…Mitt’s in the big leagues”

Mitt being the Cleveland Browns while Obama being the Alabama Crimson Tide…Obama still wins.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
4:14 pm

Thanks, Paul.

Going home is always sweet medicine.

Gonna head past Crete, Nebraska…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUbi4QeeN_c

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
4:15 pm

The Quinnipiac polling is suspect (as has been repeatedly claimed):

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-sheffield/2012/09/26/quinnipiac-pollster-admits-probably-unlikely-electorate-will-feat

If so, your conclusions may well be invalid even at this moment.

kayaker 71

October 17th, 2012
4:16 pm

Joe, 4:06,

We haven’t given up the possible chance of taking PA or MI as well. Either one of these plus, VA, NC, OH, FL and NH would push Romney way over the top. You might think that is wishful thinking but this country is turning around and waking up. Any of the states that are “leaning” toward any candidate can go a different way than the polls predict. In the next two weeks, if Romney’s poll numbers continue to improve, this is a horse race.

ragnar danneskjold

October 17th, 2012
4:16 pm

Assuming a republican capture of senate and presidency, the recession will end in approx 6 months. Repeal of ObamaCare will eliminate an unbudgetable cost precluding employers from hiring, and elimination of Dodd-Frank will ease the looming regulatory constraint. Averting – permanently – the “largest tax increase in the history of the world” will provide a great stimulus for the private economy. Add to that policies friendly to energy development (esp coal, nuclear, shale, and oil) and all will hum again nicely, except for those who would constrain our lives.

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
4:16 pm

USMC,

I dunno. I don’t think they ever tire of the blame W card. As pass the cheesy grits pointed out he is already making excuses for the next 4 years of Obama failure.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
4:16 pm

josef.

It takes one person to spark change and it took one girl to change Pakistan.

I think our President will call her the hero.

Micheal Ray Richardson

October 17th, 2012
4:17 pm

Today’s odds: Obama -245; Romney +215.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
4:18 pm

“If so, your conclusions may well be invalid even at this moment.”

Sorry. My post @4:15 was directed at JHM.

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
4:20 pm

josef

October 17th, 2012
4:21 pm

getalife

If the Nobel Committee is worth a grain of salt, she had better be it for next year…

“and a child shall lead them”
–Isaiah, 11-6

kayaker 71

October 17th, 2012
4:21 pm

Those two economists at the Univ of Denver that have predicted correctly every national presidential election since 1980 predict that Romney will get 320 electoral votes to Bozo’s 218. They haven’t been wrong in 33 years.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
4:22 pm

W left behind the biggest cesspool in this republic since Herbert Hoover.

But apparently to Republican noses it was liquid myrrh…

When I was 15 and first heard this stuff, I knew it was true then. Still do…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tH1DGcD1sro

josef

October 17th, 2012
4:24 pm

ZamVet

“W left behind the biggest cesspool in this republic since Herbert Hoover.”

And neither one of them in the running with US Grant…

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
4:24 pm

Towncrier — “The Quinnipiac polling is suspect (as has been repeatedly claimed)”

I’ve asked you before to explain what the problem is, and the best explanation you’ve been able to summon is that there’s some demographic distribution problem with the polling because more Democrats were in the sample population than Republicans.

So, are you as concerned about the gender distribution of the sample population? How about the household income distribution of the sample population? The educational level of the sample population?

The fact of the matter is that a *properly randomized* sample population will yield polling results that are within a mathematically predictable distance from the actual, ‘true’ figure. That’s what the Margin of Error tells you — how close the survey results are to the *actual* figure.

All this brouhaha over the demographic distributions in the survey population is simply noise. Mr. Sheffield, the author of the piece you linked us to, is quite simply *presuming* that demographic distribution MUST have an effect on the poll results. FWIW, IMO it’s the latest conservative iteration of ‘if the poll results favor the Democrat then they’re obviously incorrect’ meme.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
4:28 pm

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
4:28 pm

K71 — “We haven’t given up the possible chance of taking PA or MI as well. Either one of these plus, VA, NC, OH, FL and NH would push Romney way over the top.”

If you say so. I prefer to be in the position of *already* being over the top and simply having to play defense, or, better yet, snaking some of Romney’s recently-won states back away from him.

“You might think that is wishful thinking but this country is turning around and waking up.”

FWIW, I don’t think that either of us are in a position to be able to speak for what the entire country thinks.

“Any of the states that are “leaning” toward any candidate can go a different way than the polls predict.”

Including the ones in Romney’s column right now. :D

“In the next two weeks, if Romney’s poll numbers continue to improve, this is a horse race”

I don’t think they will. The major polls won’t start showing results from last night’s debate until the weekend or even early next week (it takes a while to construct, conduct and crunch the numbers for a poll, so they lag a bit), and by then, the third and final debate will be upon us. IMO, Romney’s just about out of chances at this point.

DebbieDoRight - A Do Right Woman

October 17th, 2012
4:29 pm

Have a safe journey Jam! And don’t forget to melt some Conned’s brains in your off time!

Happy Trails!-

getalife

October 17th, 2012
4:30 pm

kay,

What are you supposed to do?

What did you do after 9/11?

Did you play politics and attack w?

Stupid question unless you are not American.

kayaker 71

October 17th, 2012
4:30 pm

Joe, 4:24,

Most of these polls have admittedly had as much as a 9-11% positive Democratic sample. Quinnipiac has admitted that their polls have been skewed because of this. Add to this the sampling of the exit polls taken in 2004 and 2008 that they say have some bearing on today’s polling. And with all of this, Most polls, except Gallup today, still have the race at dead even. This very well may make up the winning ticket for Romney, even in states that are undecided at present.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
4:31 pm

JamVet

If you’re going past Omaha at dinnertime, try
Dixie Quicks
157 West Broadway, Council Bluffs IA

their Texas Chili Pepper Steak is great.

Not far from there, breakfast at
Amato’s
6405 Center Street, Omaha NE

Ricotta-berry pancakes. Really good. With a side of homemade Italian sausage that’s a meal in and of itself.

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
4:33 pm

USMC

October 17th, 2012
4:34 pm

Jack In Cumming

October 17th, 2012
4:34 pm

AWWWWW YEAAAAHHHH!!!

I guess the MSNBC focus group and the Lundy focus group must not have watched the same debate. I mean since Obama won and they claim to support mitt after the debate.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
4:35 pm

“I’ve asked you before to explain what the problem is, and the best explanation you’ve been able to summon is that there’s some demographic distribution problem with the polling because more Democrats were in the sample population than Republicans.”

False. I have indicated other potential problems with polling created by rapidly evolving technology and calling lists used by polling organizations. This is but one problem.

“All this brouhaha over the demographic distributions in the survey population is simply noise.”

That is what you apparently wish to believe. Bad data leads to bad statistical conclusions.

“FWIW, IMO it’s the latest conservative iteration of ‘if the poll results favor the Democrat then they’re obviously incorrect’ meme.”

Well…you don’t see me posting poll results much – even when (lately) they have “favored” Romney. I think polls are becoming increasingly unreliable.

josef

October 17th, 2012
4:35 pm

ZamVet

If you happen to go through Salina…stop at Eat-Eat (no idea what the real name is, but you can see that neon message flashing for miles from all four compass points)…plain, old everyday truck stop fare, but GOOD…

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
4:36 pm

Beyond The Middle of the Road

October 17th, 2012
4:36 pm

Please, let’s not have another election end in the popular vote favoring one candidate and the Electoral College favoring the other candidate.

josef

October 17th, 2012
4:37 pm

Paul

October 17th, 2012
4:37 pm

Beyond

What?!!? And deprive the blog of about two years’ worth of meltdowns?

kayaker 71

October 17th, 2012
4:37 pm

USMC, 4:34,

It was good to see the steam spout out of those dumbo ears of his. The more he loses his “cool”, the more the arrogant narcissist comes forth. I don’t see how he has made through these first two debates without losing it more than he has.

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
4:38 pm

Mitt being the Cleveland Browns while Obama being the Alabama Crimson Tide…Obama still wins.

I’d take that bet…even the best college program can’t compete in the worst of the bigs…kids vs men

getalife

October 17th, 2012
4:39 pm

Yes, get back to just slinging drudgey poo instead of playing politics with the Libya attack.

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
4:39 pm

USMC

October 17th, 2012
4:40 pm

Postal Service Hits Borrowing Cap for First Time
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443675404578060850778951388.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection

Trickle Down Government Does NOT work.

Thatcher about socialists
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-cgsQXKUvA

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
4:42 pm

K71 — “Most of these polls have admittedly had as much as a 9-11% positive Democratic sample.”

Are you asserting that the pollsters *set out* to oversample Democrats?

And I ask the same questions of you as I asked Towncrier — what about gender? What about household income? What about education level? Those are all predictors of how someone might vote. Are you worried about how those distributions were represented in the survey sample, or is party affiliation the only thing that concerns you?

“Quinnipiac has admitted that their polls have been skewed because of this.”

I don’t think that’s quite right. I think that conservative pollsters *presume* that such a situation *automatically* means that the results are suspect; it doesn’t. If your selection protocol (the means by which you select the sample population from the universe of possible members) is properly constructed, then your results *will* be reflective of the larger population within a statistically determinable margin of error. Poll results at the *edges* of those margins of error are called ‘outliers,’ so you don’t want to repose too much trust in a single poll — it’s wiser to consider several polls, taken over a period of time. You can construct a scatterplot of those results, and then find a point or trendline that fits the center of mass. Doing that will give you a close approximation (sometimes VERY close) of where the entire universe (of potential members) would fall if you were to survey all of them.

“Add to this the sampling of the exit polls taken in 2004 and 2008 that they say have some bearing on today’s polling.”

Why do exit polls from 4 or 8 years ago have any bearing on today’s results? Statistically speaking, previous poll results don’t influence future poll results. If you think they do, then don’t go to Vegas. :)

“And with all of this, Most polls, except Gallup today, still have the race at dead even.”

Seriously, read Nate Silver’s Fivethirtyeight.com blog. He does an outstanding job of explaining polls and polling to the interested observer, and he does some great statistical analyses that help zero in on where the race is and where it’s going. Silver got his start as a baseball statistician, so you know he can’t be all bad. :D

“This very well may make up the winning ticket for Romney, even in states that are undecided at present.”

I’m not seeing it, but I’m sure we will both continue to follow it closely.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
4:42 pm

“Those two economists at the Univ of Denver that have predicted correctly every national presidential election since 1980 predict that Romney will get 320 electoral votes to Bozo’s 218. They haven’t been wrong in 33 years.”

They were just lucky 8 times in a row ;-)

USMC

October 17th, 2012
4:42 pm

“Please, let’s not have another election end in the popular vote favoring one candidate and the Electoral College favoring the other candidate.”–Beyond

I predict that won’t happen this year. Romney Wins!

Peadawg

October 17th, 2012
4:44 pm

“I’d take that bet…even the best college program can’t compete in the worst of the bigs…kids vs men”

Alabama’s different. The CFB rankings should be:

1. Alabama 1st String
2. Alabama 2nd String
3. Alabama 3rd String
4. Oregon
5. Florida

USMC

October 17th, 2012
4:44 pm

Congratulations to Comrade Obama and at least saving a little face last night! :-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cMlu7tUshg

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
4:44 pm

oh…and as far as polls go

Pats by 3 :)

Jay

October 17th, 2012
4:45 pm

“Those two economists at the Univ of Denver that have predicted correctly every national presidential election since 1980 predict that Romney will get 320 electoral votes to Bozo’s 218. They haven’t been wrong in 33 years.

Oh man. Really?

No. They have not “predicted correctly every national presidential election since 1980.” They also haven’t been doing this for 33 years. This is the first year in which the model has existed; the paper proposing it was only published in August.

What they did was review presidential elections since 1980 — a whopping sample of eight — and try to find solely economic statistics that might have influenced the outcome. It is laughable to see people try to cite that nonsense while those same people brush aside far more sophisticated, far more complex, far more subtle and yes, far more accurate computer models of the climate.

james

October 17th, 2012
4:46 pm

I have question-Why would any Jewish person in
America vote for Obama? I have Jewish friends in
the business world that dislike him and will vote
republican for the 1st time. Obama will not protect
Israel and they are very scared of
a 2nd term for this dude… New York/New Jersy may
be closer then usual this time around which know one
in the media seems to have any interest in and assumes
an easy win for the incubent….

Pizzaman

October 17th, 2012
4:46 pm

Time to fly the Flag upsidedown!

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
4:47 pm

Thanks, guys and gals.

Going home is almost a guaranteed way to gain a few pounds. I can smell the ribs and steaks and burgers now!

And seeing that football cathedral in Lincoln is one helluva powerful, even emotional experience for any Husker fan, near or far.

GO BIG RED!

(In the deed, the glory)

In honor of the five time champions, the song that they use to enter the stadium with on fall afternoons…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVPRLUNtY-k

Jay

October 17th, 2012
4:48 pm

“Assuming a republican capture of senate and presidency, the recession will end in approx 6 months

More utter nonsense. The recession was over in June 2009, and we have experienced 31 consecutive months of job growth.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
4:49 pm

“It is laughable to see people try to cite that nonsense while those same people brush aside far more sophisticated, far more complex, far more subtle and yes, far more accurate computer models of the climate.”

So, Jay, how do you integrate the fact that global warming has stopped over the past 16 years into your “theory”? Is that like “catastrophic evolution”?

Recon 0311 2533

October 17th, 2012
4:49 pm

If Gallup is accurate with the 6pt. Romney bump those bumps according to professional pollsters typically start showing up in battleground states about 5 days later than the national polling. If that’s the case and with Romney ahead in Florida, Virginia, New Hampshire and only a point behind Obama in Ohio it’s possible he could win all of those states and if so it would be lights out for Obama. The race is too close to call.

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
4:50 pm

Towncrier — “False. I have indicated other potential problems with polling created by rapidly evolving technology and calling lists used by polling organizations. This is but one problem.”

You’ve cited that as a *potential* problem, but I don’t believe you’ve actually substantiated any real-world instances of that issue with respect to any of the major polling outfits.

“All this brouhaha over the demographic distributions in the survey population is simply noise.”

“That is what you apparently wish to believe. Bad data leads to bad statistical conclusions.”

Perhaps you will oblige me by presenting some hard evidence of a major pollster actually using “bad data,” then?

“Well…you don’t see me posting poll results much – even when (lately) they have “favored” Romney. I think polls are becoming increasingly unreliable.”

I’ve said this before, and I’m not sure you’ve ever seen me mention it, so I’ll say it again. I don’t *personally* repose any trust in a political poll with a Margin of Error greater than +/-3.0%. If the MOE is +/-3.1%, I’m not interested. That’s why I prefer poll aggregators like Nate Silver and Electoral-Vote.com; even though the polls they use often have MOEs somewhat in excess of 3.0, the fact that they aggregate and track over time means that outlier effects are muted and that statistical noise gets muted, too. Over time, you can see a trendline start to form, and if you put that trendline up against a trendline for a pollster who’s got *better* MOEs, you can see that they track fairly closely with each other. In short, aggregating the run-of-the-mill polls will give you a close approximation of *more accurate* poll results.

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
4:50 pm

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
4:50 pm

Alabama’s different. The CFB rankings should be:

it doesn’t matter, it still no contest for a pro team…even if Saban is coaching them up

Seriously, the difference between “leagues” is enormous there are 704 starting positions in the NFL…24-25 or 3% of those are rookies, not to mention they are top rookies nationwide not just Bama

Orange12

October 17th, 2012
4:51 pm

“More utter nonsense. The recession was over in June 2009, and we have experienced 31 consecutive months of job growth.”

Do you actually mean job growth where you are making good money or do you mean flipping burgers type job growth?

getalife

October 17th, 2012
4:52 pm

I have not seen the picture of mitt when he whined “wha”t do Candy but this is the moment after she said our President did call it a terror attack.

http://cdn.crooksandliars.com/files/movieimages/2012/10/25796.jpg?key=1350444509

josef

October 17th, 2012
4:53 pm

JAMES

I’m not any Jewish person, but I am A Jewish person…why would I vote for Obama? My pocketbook is doing okay, me and Unmentionable have a shot at having our 35+ year relationship legitimized, there’s hope for fullfilling the American dream for millions of brought here illegally as children, and the Israeli policy in place since 1947 is unchanged….

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
4:53 pm

K71 — “Those two economists at the Univ of Denver that have predicted correctly every national presidential election since 1980 predict that Romney will get 320 electoral votes to Bozo’s 218. They haven’t been wrong in 33 years.”

I say again, DON’T go to Vegas! :D

Hey, I’ve drawn eight straight winning hands at this Blackjack table. That means my next hand is GUARANTEED to be a winner!

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
4:54 pm

…the fact that global warming has stopped over the past 16 years…

Oh my goodness. Open wide, insert both feet.

Man, when I was 20 years old, this chick was one lethal-ass singing heat wave…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR2iHsiwS8g

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
4:55 pm

Jay -…far more sophisticated, far more complex, far more subtle and yes, far more accurate computer models of the climate.

Burt Rutan is laughable?….. “far more accurate computer models of the climate”…now that’s laughable

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
4:55 pm

EC

You are 100% correct. No college team would beat an NFL 2nd string.

From Jr College to Division 1 there are probably 700 or 800 college teams. Number is just a guess but it is a lot

There NFL as on 32 teams, which consist of the very best of all of those colleges, with a few exceptions.

No contest even if they played 100 games

Jay

October 17th, 2012
4:55 pm

“So, Jay, how do you integrate the fact that global warming has stopped over the past 16 years into your “theory”? Is that like “catastrophic evolution”?

Global warming hasn’t stopped, Crier. That is, unless you take the word of a London tabloid over the decades of research conducted by the planet’s top climatologists.

Matti

October 17th, 2012
4:56 pm

Thulsa Doom,

I’m glad to know you get involved, and didn’t mean to imply that you don’t. My point was simply that making a difference via government office is HARD. You can’t even get elected w/o owing people, often people you don’t want to owe. Like teachers who enter the profession all full of ideals and plans to make a difference, elected officials become jaded by the process and how little they are able to accomplish vs. what they wanted to accomplish. (Much easier to make yourself rich than fix problems for the people…)

I’m an awesome quarterback (and wide receiver, too!) from the comfort of my sofa. That was my point.

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
4:56 pm

Jam

I have been laying down some killer Skynyrd cuts for you…….

Hope you have been jamming

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
4:57 pm

getalife- The polls will correct right before the election for credibility just like 08

That’s why Romney is now in the lead. Thye could only deflect for obama so long without losing all credibility.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
4:57 pm

“More utter nonsense. The recession was over in June 2009, and we have experienced 31 consecutive months of job growth.”

Facts don’t matter but they could make a come back one.

Keep trying.

Jay

October 17th, 2012
4:59 pm

Burt Rutan is an aerospace engineer. He knows how to make spaceships. That’s like claiming that cobbler would make a great runner because after all, he knows how to make shoes.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
5:00 pm

“Perhaps you will oblige me by presenting some hard evidence of a major pollster actually using “bad data,” then?”

Sure…they are confessing to it left and right, their livelihood be damned. I think one interesting thing to look at will be the final polls or those just before the election. It will be interesting to see if Quinnipiac (for instance) over samples Democrats then. If they do – and they are really wrong – then there will be your evidence.

Cosby

October 17th, 2012
5:00 pm

This country needs big change to bring back hope. Lets hope that not only the white house changes but congress does so as well. Otherwise, this country will be heading off a cliff that is only a breth away..for those who like things free..someone has to pay for them and the bill is quickly coming due!

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
5:01 pm

…or do you mean flipping burgers type job growth?

The minimum wage jobs that pay less now in 1968 dollars than they did in 1968, O12?

We should all be so proud of our corporate overlords, huh?

BOTH, oh hell to the yeah.

Cranking that 4:50 right now.

That debut LP was one of the greatest ever…

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:01 pm

jk,

mitt is in the lead because of the first debate.

After the last two debates you will see them move to our President.

16 is right around the corner.

If you cons start acting like Americans and unite with our President to get the terrorists, you might have a chance. Good luck picking a candidate that will not freak out after the 3 am call.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:03 pm

“or those who like things free..”

They want jobs con.

AmericaShrugged

October 17th, 2012
5:03 pm

If the polls are right and the election were held today we’d have a President elected by the electoral college that got less votes than Romney. And you thought letting one person (the SCOTUS in a 5-4 vote) determine the law of the land was bad. What’s this? Minority rules.

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
5:05 pm

Towncrier — “Sure…they are confessing to it left and right, their livelihood be damned.”

Once again, “hard evidence,” please. And what are these ‘confessions’ to which you refer?

“I think one interesting thing to look at will be the final polls or those just before the election. It will be interesting to see if Quinnipiac (for instance) over samples Democrats then.”

Same question I asked K71 — are you asserting that pollsters are *deliberately setting out* to oversample one or more demographic groups?

“If they do – and they are really wrong – then there will be your evidence.”

Logical fallacy. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc.

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
5:05 pm

Jay – Burt Rutan is an aerospace engineer. He knows how to make spaceships. That’s like claiming that cobbler would make a great runner because after all, he knows how to make shoes.

He is a master of data analysis (more so than any climatologist I would bet) and that’s what he did…looked at their data and came to an entirely different opinion…comparing making shoes to the first independent successful commercial space flight…that’s very laughable…

those accurate models you reference can’t even predict the past…again, laughable

josef

October 17th, 2012
5:07 pm

Coito, ergo sum.

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
5:07 pm

Jam

You might know this, but the picture that is on the cover of “Pronounced ………………….” was taken in downtown Jonesboro. I hear they used to jam over on Lake Spivey in the early 70s.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AM95u8Xpjyk

Ben Shockley

October 17th, 2012
5:07 pm

PREDICTION: getalife will disappear on Nov 7

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
5:08 pm

getalife- It takes one person to spark change and it took one girl to change Pakistan. I think our President will call her the hero.

Can we bring her over to replace dumb a$$? I’m sure she would make a better president (even with brain damage).

Ben Shockley

October 17th, 2012
5:08 pm

Adam has already disappeared.

The writing is on the wall/

Ben Shockley

October 17th, 2012
5:09 pm

“Can we bring her over to replace dumb a$$? I’m sure she would make a better president (even with brain damage).”

why not? We already have established precedent with a Muslim president.

Roswell mom

October 17th, 2012
5:09 pm

Romney’s economic policies = GW Bush’s economic policies. He may win, but you’d better hope you can get your money to the Caymans in a hurry. His claims of being able to balance the budget will not be achievable – at least if he’s telling the truth about wanting to increase military spending, not raise taxes and keep Medicare intact. Of course, quickly balancing the budget isn’t a real issue, since inflation remains low and there’s no crowding out of private borrowing. Where the real damage will be done is when he pays back his sponsors by getting rid of regulations on business that protect investors, employees and consumers. Romney will have the full blown depression that GWB started. If that sounds good to you, vote for him.

DannyX

October 17th, 2012
5:10 pm

“If the polls are right and the election were held today we’d have a President elected by the electoral college that got less votes than Romney.”

Let’s hope that happens!

Anyone want to bet on the where the Real Clear Politics average will be at in one week? Right now Romney is up by .4%

RCP averages have been very accurate.

I predict an Obama bump of 2%. Anyone?

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:10 pm

ben,

I will be lurking.

jk,

I think she will stay in England.

josef

October 17th, 2012
5:10 pm

JKL

That brain damage snipe speaks to something in your character I find imminently offensive…you’ve got a nasty streak a mile wide…

adam smith's invisible hand

October 17th, 2012
5:10 pm

If Romney wins, the middle class will be lost for generations.

Jay

October 17th, 2012
5:11 pm

He is a master of data analysis (more so than any climatologist I would bet)

Right. And on what basis would you make that bet? Because he tells you something that you find convenient to believe? He has no ability to analyze data on the climate because he knows little about the climate and has no training in how it works.

I would no more let Rutan tell me about climate change than I would jump in a space vehicle designed by a climatologist. Expertise in one field does NOT translate to expertise in another, no matter how devoutly you wish to believe it.

Ben Shockley

October 17th, 2012
5:11 pm

“Of course, quickly balancing the budget isn’t a real issue, ”

I bet you were one of the people whose house was foreclosed, weren’t you?

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
5:11 pm

cat, though the North Koreans love you Republicans (they ain’t completely alone!), don’t be a flat earther.

I’ve got bad news for you deniest (is that a word?) cons – cigarettes DO kill people, gravity is more than a “theory”, Darwin is 150 years on and you still haven’t come up with dick to explain him away and Rick Perry and Towncrier are dead wrong – the earth is not cooling.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R82OM5tzcrk

Stew Day

October 17th, 2012
5:12 pm

HIstorically if a challenger is tied or ahead going into the stretch you can expect independents to break 2-1 even 3-1 for the challenger. Obama can not defend his record of complete incompetence.

Ben Shockley

October 17th, 2012
5:13 pm

“He has no ability to analyze data on the climate because he knows little about the climate and has no training in how it works.”

I could say the same about you and economics.

In fact, I have said it.

Old Goober

October 17th, 2012
5:13 pm

You are 100% correct. No college team would beat an NFL 2nd string.

Not many of you are old enough to remember when there was an annual game featuring college all-stars and an NFL team. It was semi-competitive for a few years, but after a while the odds got so stacked in favor of the NFL team that the entire system was abandoned. Now the season-opening game features a pair of NFL teams playing one another in Canton, Ohio.

Mighty Righty

October 17th, 2012
5:14 pm

Mick

You have a poor memory. Bush was re elected something that Obamanazi won’t. Obama prays to Allah every night to return the economy to the level Bush enjoyed at the end of his term. In fact just last week Obamanazi was bragging that unemployment had improved to 7.8% falsely claiming that was the rate four years ago. It wasn’t. In October of 2008 unemployment was 5.7%. That was before the Bamster started bad mouthing the economy, which he kept up for most if not all of his first year. Still does! Guess what? The president’s attitude does effect consumer confidence. In fact two years of his negative attitude gave the Republicans control of the House and got rid of Obamanazi’s filibuster proof majority in the Senate. You Democrats have got to get over Bush. He is not running plus his record even at the end was better than Obamanazi’s. Obamanazi did reduce the rate of layoffs at a cost of 5 trillon dollars. It would have been cheaper to have just bought all of his jobless estates in the Bahamas and retired them on 100,000 a year for life.

josef

October 17th, 2012
5:15 pm

getalife

Interesting thing about Malala, some of the older kids at school have been preparing get well cards for her…it was not an assignment, but THEIR automatic reaction…

Jay

October 17th, 2012
5:15 pm

from the scientists at NOAA, in a press release issued today:

“Some skeptics of global warming have been pointing to British data that a London newspaper claims shows no warming since 1997. But the United Kingdom meteorological office and Weaver said the claims are misleading.

“I don’t know what data they are looking at,” Weaver said. “2010 is the warmest year. 2005 is the second warmest year.”

According to NOAA, all of the top ten warmest years on record have occurred after 1997, when the skeptics claimed global warming stopped.

If you are citing a London tabloid as your evidence, weighed against the scientists at NOAA and elsewhere, well … that’s a really really really poor argument.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:16 pm

The cons are angry because they know they are going to lose.

Brain damage sux because you have a permanent headache that never goes away.

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
5:16 pm

Expertise in one field does NOT translate to expertise in another, no matter how devoutly you wish to believe it.

data analysis is data analysis…..that’s where the expertise is…because it doesn’t fit your narrative, it must be wrong and Rutan is a huckster…Right even though he is one of the most accomplished engineer/scientists in modern history

I’ll take his opinion over yours and even mine in a skinny minute…

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
5:17 pm

“Global warming hasn’t stopped, Crier. That is, unless you take the word of a London tabloid over the decades of research conducted by the planet’s top climatologists.”

It has plateaued and we will see where it goes from here. I think it has mostly to do with the size of the “trend” (in years) you are plotting, Jay (please pay particular note to the 2nd millennium temperatures):

=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record_of_the_past_1000_years

josef

October 17th, 2012
5:17 pm

RIGHTY

You are aware that if indeed he is praying to All-h, he’s praying to the same G-d as Jews and Christians, aren’t you…or for that matter, according to the Sufi, the Un-versal G-d of all humanity…

philosopher

October 17th, 2012
5:17 pm

I can see no reason for anyone to WANT Willard Mitt Romney to be president. From economics to health to freedom to human rights to foreign policy, no one, and that includes Romney, actually knows what he stands for. He has blatantly and without shame, flipflopped on every possible issue. If you are voting for him because all you desperately want is a Republican, ANY Republican …or a white person, ANY white person in office, that I get.

TaxPayer

October 17th, 2012
5:17 pm

I did some checking into some of Rutan’s claims. Once he was challenged, he started back pedaling fast enough to put a bike in flight without the use of wings.

Jay

October 17th, 2012
5:17 pm

“I could say the same about you and economics.

In fact, I have said it.”

In that specific case, Ben, I don’t have to be better informed on economics than economists. I just have to be better informed than YOU.

Which is quite easily done, as demonstrated repeatedly.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
5:18 pm

Righty, get some help.

Soon.

You and your imaginary Nazis are gonna blow a gasket…

td

October 17th, 2012
5:19 pm

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:01 pm

No my delusional friend. The first debate was the excuse the polling agencies and the LMS made to stop using the bogus methodology and to start to portray a more accurate look at the election before election day. The LMS has been holding the water for Obama for his entire term in office and now that it appears he is going to lose they have to put on the perception that they are fait and balanced so that they can go after Romney when he is President and not have the American people totally turn them off and they lose their jobs.

TaxPayer

October 17th, 2012
5:19 pm

Rutan very quickly backed off of any claim that he was anything more than an aeronautical engineer as well. He is supposed to be implementing changes to his presentation based on numerous errors that he has acknowledged once they were pointed out to him.

Georgia

October 17th, 2012
5:20 pm

Romney could win, and four years from now, the economy will do exactly the same thing it would do if Obama had won. Globilization is unchartered territory and you may as well try to predict where lighting will strike four years from now.

Why doesn’t anyone understand that blogs and websights and their accompanying opinions exist only to sell “How to make money at home” or “Get my free book” spam? Nobody knows what to do to create growth. Not in this globalization.

Unchartered territory. Expect the unexpected. I think we are on the verge of a new golden age of growth and prosperity. The only thing that can stop this growth would be if all 7 billion people on the planet created their own websites trying to sell each other “How to make money at home” spam.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
5:20 pm

“Rutan will also not interview with Scientific American, as he claimed that the magazine has “…improperly covered man-made global warming. They drink Kool-Aid instead of doing research. They parrot stuff from the IPCC and Al Gore.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burt_Rutan#cite_note-Cohen-2010-47

(New Scientist, January 30, 2010, Issue 2745, pg.26. )

Translation: “I’m unwilling to be interviewed by experts in the field who would challenge me. Plus I have no confidence I can make a convincing case to people who have the credentials to know what I’m talking about, so I’ll just call them all Kool-Aid drinkers and hide.”

That’s about all I need to hear about Rutan as an expert source -

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:20 pm

josef,

Yes, it sparked reaction across the world especially with children.

Mighty Righty

October 17th, 2012
5:20 pm

Jay, we all know why you leftists abandoned the term “global warming” in favor of “climate change” so don’t start that balogny.

Obama's wealth puts him in the top 1% so why the hate towards Romney?

October 17th, 2012
5:23 pm

FWIW, reports say that 90 year old George McGovern is non-responsive in hospice care. I really didn’t care for his political platform, but he was one helluva gentleman and American.

My how politics have changed. Candidates now beat their chests if they served in the military. McGovern never played that card and he was a WWII hero. I remember reading where he flew in bombers and earned the distinguished flying cross (or whatever they call it).

Too bad politicians on both sides aren’t more of a true servant like McGovern.

josef

October 17th, 2012
5:24 pm

GEORGIA

There’s a good deal of sense in what you said. I’m not so sure about the Golden Age thingie, though.

Jay

October 17th, 2012
5:25 pm

“I’ll take his opinion over yours and even mine in a skinny minute…

yeah, maybe so. But that’s not the question, now is it?

The question is whether to take his opinion over that of equally bright people who have studied the field for decades and know what the hell they’re talking about. And on that question, no, I will NOT take an amateur dabbler’s opinion over that of experts in the field. Especially not when the fate of the planet rides on it.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
5:25 pm

Jay, we all know why you leftists abandoned the term “global warming” in favor of “climate change” so don’t start that balogny (sic).

Righty, at least get within six years of the current conversation, OK?

From a 2006 article in National Geographic:

Scientists often use the term “climate change” instead of global warming. This is because as the Earth’s average temperature climbs, winds and ocean currents move heat around the globe in ways that can cool some areas, warm others, and change the amount of rain and snow falling. As a result, the climate changes differently in different areas.

http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/gw-overview/

Obamabarrassment

October 17th, 2012
5:26 pm

Our President will win the last debate.

Our President will strike the terrorists in Libya.

Our President will lower unemployment in the October job report.

Our President will get patriotism after the obl movie.

Our President will win reelection.

I have no doubt.

Just like the old communistas were taught songs to sing about the revolution. Just like bad Christians whose religion is songs (or Muslims, whose religion is blowing things up) and nothing else. –getalife, he speaks so well for modern liberals…so well he probably isn’t even aware how prescient he is.

’nuff said.

Oh and getalife,

I look forward, I really look forward to voting and helping, with the intelligence of the nation and with the citizens of Georgia, to correcting the mistake that was electing Obama/Biden (grumpy/dopey) and bringing your whole doubts to full fruition in three weeks.

But hey, you’ll still have a great song to sing, if you want to keep humming the tune. ……” I have no doubt…..” do do doooo…..

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:26 pm

Economists predict 12 million jobs created the next four years if the gop does not screw it up.

td,

They had mccain up by 10 then corrected right before the election.

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
5:26 pm

M. Righty — “Jay, we all know why you leftists abandoned the term “global warming” in favor of “climate change”

Right, because “climate change” is more descriptive of what the climate models actually predict.

Obamabarrassment

October 17th, 2012
5:27 pm

Oh and getalife,

No doubt the prez will “strike” the terrorists in Libya—if he thinks it will help him on November 6.

Right now, he’s got to be strategizing with David Axelrod about which attack date would bring the most electoral votes to his losing cause.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
5:28 pm

“Same question I asked K71 — are you asserting that pollsters are *deliberately setting out* to oversample one or more demographic groups?”

I would assert it as a clear possibility. They are paid by media organizations and a number of those organizations are indisputably biased. It wouldn’t be the first time people have done wrong things for money. Yet, strangely, most of the more “respectable” pollsters seem somehow to get close to accurate with their final polls. FWIW, IMO viewing polls as “snapshots” creates a lot of plausible deniability. I’m sorry, but the fact is that lots of people “cheat” in competitions. And they cheat in politics as well – as much as they can get away with.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:28 pm

embarrassment,

I will look at the cons in line in the eyes and start chanting four more years.

pogo

October 17th, 2012
5:29 pm

Jay I guess Candy lived up to her liberal cred’s last night as you knew she would. With her liberal bias in full display what she did do was expose why Americans don’t trust you or her or any other member of the “mainstream media”. The game was rigged against Romney from the start by Candy and company but Romney stood up to it with dignity and with intelligence. As for the imposter in chief, he just continued to do the only thing he knows to do which is to try to destroy his opponent not on substance but on ill defined accusations and innuendo. Obama has no record of success to run on. No, Obama didn’t win last night. He continues to lose and in three short weeks we will see
by how much. Obama did not have a plan, he did not have an excuse or even acknowledge that he had made any mistakes during his tenure. Besides liberals, your brethren out there are threatening to assassinate Romney if he is elected. Twitter is afire with these liberal morons whose main beef is that their food stamps will be gone if he is elected. I predict that if Romney wins there will be riots in the big cities and apparently the feds are afraid of this as well. If Obama wins, then life will go on. That tells you exactly about the kinds of people that support Obama and that support Romney. You liberals should be proud. Jay your own inability to criticize Obama places you squarely in the camp
of the typical Obama supporter.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:30 pm

“No doubt the prez will “strike” the terrorists in Libya—if he thinks it will help him on November 6″

Are you a terrorist sympathizer?

Sounds like it.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:31 pm

pogo,

Your whining just gets better and better.

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
5:32 pm

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
5:33 pm

Paul:

“Scout

What’s your point with the 4:02?”

Just exposing Jay for his absurd definition of terrorism, since according to his definition the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center was terrorism but the attack on the Pentagon the same morning wasn’t since it was a “military target”.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
5:35 pm

Granted, National Geographic is no Heartland Institute!

But they do have a sort of so-so scientific track record over the past 124 years!

LOL at global coolers…

Randy Meisner from Scottsbluff….

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RI73sJRPZBc

Obamabarrassment

October 17th, 2012
5:35 pm

JamVet,

You and Mr. Bookman pretend that the conversation has changed –for legitimate reasons.

Now the ubiquitous claim is that “climate change” must be stopped. And hurrah, the liberals were toasting it’s demise upon the nomination of our current embarrassing president.

But if climate change is happening and it must be prevented, please answer the one simple question:

When has the planet’s climate ever NOT changed?

Go ahead, and if you want to duck behind some “more learned” “scientists” go ahead. Find some silly scientist that can answer this one and maybe we’ll start listening to you “warming” alarmists.

What you prove in your fecklessness to answer is that you yourselves know little or nothing about science, much less warming, change or how to make arguments concerning them.

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
5:35 pm

To quote him again:

“The premise of the entire debate is false, because the attack on our consulate in Benghazi was not an act of terror. An act of terror, by definition, targets the civilian population and attempts to inflict terror on that population. This was a military operation/assassination, targeted not at civilians but at the top American presence in Libya and, indirectly, at the armed guards who protected that presence. It was an attack on the United States and its interests.

Calling it an act of terror confuses the issue.”

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
5:35 pm

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
5:35 pm

“Just exposing Jay for his absurd definition of terrorism, since according to his definition the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center was terrorism but the attack on the Pentagon the same morning wasn’t since it was a “military target”.

Well…that was an “exceptional” instance of terrorism ;-)

Fred ™

October 17th, 2012
5:35 pm

TBS: When they transfered that album to disk they cut off two songs……

Mighty Righty

October 17th, 2012
5:35 pm

josef

Thank you for your advice. While there may not be a difference to whom Muslims pray when compared with Jews and Christians, there is one huge difference in their beliefs. That difference was recently manifested in Libya at our counselate.

td

October 17th, 2012
5:37 pm

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:26 pm

td,

They had mccain up by 10 then corrected right before the election.

Final Gallop poll in 2008:

Obama 55%
MaCain 44%

Final Results:

Obama 53%
McCain 46%

Gallops final poll gave the Dems a 2 point advantage as compared to the final outcome.

Try again

Obamabarrassment

October 17th, 2012
5:37 pm

Are you a terrorist sympathizer?

Sounds like it.

No, I’m all for the Obama foreign policy to begin to working against the terrorists for the first time. If it happens for the maximum political effect, so much the better for lil’ Barry.

josef

October 17th, 2012
5:38 pm

Obamabarrassment

I’d say he’s waiting until the Prime Minister designee gets his new government lined up…

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please

October 17th, 2012
5:38 pm

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/17/14514354-man-arrested-in-alleged-plot-to-attack-federal-reserve-in-nyc?lite

Since you get full blame for any Terrorist acts that are successful you must get full credit as well for those that are not.

Anything else would be hypocrisy.

Thank you for keeping me safe President Obama.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:39 pm

Climate change is a job creator to try to stop it.

Stop fighting against jobs cons.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
5:40 pm

“When has the planet’s climate ever NOT changed?”

Never. It it CANNOT be conclusively proved that just because the earth has been undergoing a warming trend that such a thing never happened before or that it is now BECAUSE of CO2 emissions. The question is the sky really falling?

Paul

October 17th, 2012
5:40 pm

Scout

It seems to me you’re misreading Jay’s introductory comments.

Pass the Cheesy Grits Please

October 17th, 2012
5:40 pm

No, I’m all for the Obama foreign policy to begin to working against the terrorists for the first time.

Seemed to work against Osama bin Laden.

You know… the guy who masterminded 9/11

Compare that to what the Republicans did. They ran around Iraq looking for boogeymen and got alot of people killed.

Pretty easy to see who won that one.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:40 pm

“Since you get full blame for any Terrorist acts that are successful you must get full credit as well for those that are not.

Anything else would be hypocrisy.

Thank you for keeping me safe President Obama.”

Good point.

Thank you President Obama.

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
5:41 pm

Towncrier:

They will go to any lengths to not call it what it is.

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
5:42 pm

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
5:43 pm

Why are terrorists attacking
the US ? What have we done? We extend a helping
hand and someone bites it.
We defended against Iraq
twice after their scurrilous
attacks. When Afghanistan
resisted our peaceful tour
into their country we once
again began defending with
vigor. If they would accept
democratic republicanism
we would empty our treasury to help them.
Mystifying ingratitude to
attack their liberators.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
5:43 pm

“They will go to any lengths to not call it what it is.”

It is a creative dodge, you must admit.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:43 pm

td,

Look a month before the election and try reading what I said.

embarrassment,

aq is crushed, obl and daffy are dead, the ME are free.

You don’t know what you are talking about.

Which side are you on?

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
5:44 pm

josef- That brain damage snipe speaks to something in your character I find imminently offensive

It sometimeshappens when you get shot in the head. I’m just saying that even if she doesn’t fully recover, I would still take her over obama.

I wonder if she plays golf? I will bet she has a better arm too.

josef

October 17th, 2012
5:44 pm

RIGHTY

It was also manifested when tens of thousands of ordinary Libyans took to the streets to send us the message that they were sorry and grieved their loss of their friend and to let us know that those were NOT good Muslims. The numbers protesting the shooting of Malala are much larger than those numbers of the bad Muslims…

Folks keep yapping about where are the “good” Muslims? Why don’t they speak out? Well, they are and it’s time we do the “good Christian, good Jewish” thing and give them the support (and prayers) they need to challenge those who would seek to pervert their faith…

Paul

October 17th, 2012
5:45 pm

Towncrier

” It it CANNOT be conclusively proved that just because the earth has been undergoing a warming trend that such a thing never happened before or that it is now BECAUSE of CO2 emissions. ”

Is it your contention no amount of CO2 will have a deleterious effect on climate?

indigo

October 17th, 2012
5:45 pm

There are many qualities needed to be a good American President. Being a reasonably good debater is just one of them, and of realtively little importance. And yet, the media seems to be doing everything in it’s power to brainwash us into thinking that the next president should be whoever wins these debates.

I wonder why this is?

Fred ™

October 17th, 2012
5:45 pm

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
5:46 pm

getalife- the ME are free.

ROFL! Basking in the glow of sharia law…

You must REALLY hate women.

TaxPayer

October 17th, 2012
5:46 pm

My bologna has a first name, it’s Mighty…

Jay

October 17th, 2012
5:46 pm

I’ll temporarily set aside my ban on responding to the silliness of 0311 to set this straight:

Under other circumstances, I would have no problem distinguishing between what was a clear act of terrorism in Manhattan and an attack on a military target such as the Pentagon, which depending on circumstances might NOT be terrorism.

In this particular case, however, that attack on the Pentagon was undertaken by the hijacking of a civilian airliner with 59 people on board and forcing it to crash into the military target, an act that without a doubt constitutes terrorism.

However, I fully understand that with that particular rabbit hole filled and capped, another will open any minute now ….

td

October 17th, 2012
5:46 pm

Enter your comments here

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
5:47 pm

““They will go to any lengths to not call it what it is.”

BTW, Scout, I challenged Jay’s “definition” of terrorism here:

http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2012/10/17/state-chartered-school-proponents-show-a-lot-of-brass/#comment-1115357

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:47 pm

josef,

Well said.

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
5:47 pm

td

Are you saying that the pollsters who predicted a margin less than what it ended up being, were giving a “cushion” or pad for the Republicans?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national.html

If you are going to tell it, tell it all brother. Tell it all

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
5:48 pm

iHowever, I fully understand that with that particular rabbit hole filled and capped, another will open any minute now ….

And water is wet.

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
5:49 pm

Jay

If you miss the rabbit hole, step into one and break your ankle………….. You only have Jay to blame

:-)

josef

October 17th, 2012
5:49 pm

JKL

If you weren’t such a narrow minded snippy fool, and you really DID care about Malala and what she stands for, you’d be following her story and know that the prognosis is for a full recovery. You are just a disrespectful. You are not a good person, imeoiauo… good people don’t use a tragedy such as this involving a child to make light of…

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
5:49 pm

Enter your comments anywhere else but here

TaxPayer

October 17th, 2012
5:50 pm

Shell also appears to be grateful for the lack of arctic sea ice. I’m sure they wish there were even less of it year round. Meanwhile, back on planet earth, Republicans have long since acknowledged their absolute ignorance in any field of science given their support of people like Broun that claim the earth is only 9000 years old.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
5:50 pm

“Is it your contention no amount of CO2 will have a deleterious effect on climate?”

No. But I couldn’t say for sure. And I certainly don’t know how much CO2 might have a deleterious effect if it did – not without isolating all of the factors.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:50 pm

“You must REALLY hate women.”

“Binder full of women” is exploding on the Internet.

mitt has a women voter problem.

Thomas

October 17th, 2012
5:51 pm

If Romney wins it is Bush’s fault.

Georgia

October 17th, 2012
5:51 pm

Global warming? Climate change? The issue is Planet Formation. If you talk about planet formation, then you are talking about star formation, which necessarily creates planets. If you’re talking about star formation, then you’re talking about galaxy formation, which necessarily creates stars. If you’re talking about galaxy formation, then you are talking about black hole formation, which necessarily creates galaxies and about which we will never figure out.

So anyone who claims to know whether mankind is responsible for global cooling or global warming has a lot of imaginary data to present.

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
5:51 pm

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
5:52 pm

But if climate change is happening and it must be prevented, please answer the one simple question:

IF it is happening???????????????

Where do you get your information? The Korean Central news Agency?

But just for grins, I’ll answer it, it is irrelevant.

Either that or you need to share your groundbreaking news to the climatological experts out there, who apparently have not even considered that question!!

Wake up and join the Age of Enlightenment

Obama's wealth puts him in the top 1% so why the hate towards Romney?

October 17th, 2012
5:52 pm

Things that make you go hmmmmm

Study: Black Americans Feel Less Empowered Under Obama Than They Once Did

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2012/10/17/study-black-americans-feel-less-empowered-under-obama-than-they-once-did

td

October 17th, 2012
5:53 pm

getalife

October 17th, 2012
5:43 pm

td,

Look a month before the election and try reading what I said.

embarrassment,

aq is crushed, obl and daffy are dead, the ME are free.

You don’t know what you are talking about.

Which side are you on?

Gallup (Traditional)* 10/16 – 10/18 2590 LV 2.0 49 46 Obama +3
Gallup (Expanded)* 10/16 – 10/18 2277 LV 2.0 51 44 Obama +7

The data does not lie my delusional friend.

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
5:53 pm

getalife- Climate change is a job creator to try to stop it. Stop fighting against jobs cons

Thank you Al Gore! Your carbon offsets have saved the planet!

Everyone is better off since I bought a piece of paper giving me rights to some third world country’s air….

pogo

October 17th, 2012
5:53 pm

And Jay, even Candy admitted (after the debate of course) that Romney was right on Obama’s statements about the Benghazi attacks. But you can’t bring yourself to admit anything, absolutely anything, that Obama has done wrong can you? Are you so scared of your editors that you can’t say what you plainly see before you? America is finally catching on to the liberal bias in the the old, established and outdated liberal media sources and we don’t believe anything they say anymore. The NYT’s and the Washington Post are basically irrelavent now as we all know they are in the tank for the liberal cause and that makes them as useless as a tabloid. So are CNN, NBC and CBS. They don’t investigate and report on the weaknesses of politicians. They only do these things on the politicans that don’t agree with their liberal ideology. The sad truth is that once you can’t trust the media because they have not done the job they are paid to do because of their political bias the American people have no recourse but to not trust anything you say. Drudge is becoming more and more successful everyday because of this. And what Drudge draws from are the articles and the things that you won’t see in the liberal press . That is what your bias has done to the industry you work in and you have done none of us (including yourself) any favours. We now have to depend upon an internet clearing house of information from all sources to form our opinions. Some of it is trash and some of it is real but, we all know that was is coming from the old media sources is liberally biased trash.

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
5:53 pm

Matti,

Ok. I hear what you’re saying. And I do believe you have some very good and valid points. And yes it is difficult to affect the change that you speak of- particularly when you’re dealing with govts and bureaucracys which are cumbersome, resistant to change, often lacking accountability, and just a pain to deal with and effect change. We all know this. And the irony is that many of the liberals on here clamor that the solution to various problems and to these inept and slow moving bureaucracies is more of it. Regardless though kudos to you for your efforts to effect the change you believe in.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
5:53 pm

Okay…I’m out. Goodnight all.

Normal Free, Human Rights Thug...and liking it!

October 17th, 2012
5:55 pm

JKL,
Just when I thought you could get no lower, you went and broke the record…

td

October 17th, 2012
5:55 pm

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
5:56 pm

STUDY: Blacks Feel ‘Less Empowered’ Under Obama…

Things that make you go hmmmm.

drudgey spam

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
5:56 pm

“It is laughable to see people try to cite that nonsense while those same people brush aside far more sophisticated, far more complex, far more subtle and yes, far more accurate computer models of the climate.”

Now that is funny. Let me know when these computer models can accurately predict the weather one month from now- forget about 50 years. And let me know if you really think the many variables in all these models are going to be exactly as the scientists predict them to be 50 years from now. And last let me know just how good scientists are at predicting the sun’s weather patterns since it is after all the single biggest determinant of weather here on Earth.

Thomas

October 17th, 2012
5:58 pm

Under other circumstances, I would have no problem distinguishing between what was a clear act of terrorism in Manhattan and an attack on a military target such as the Pentagon, which depending on circumstances might NOT be terrorism

Jay- it is a distinction without a difference. The smartest liberal around demonstrated that by firing up the base with the term- that evolved to legal significance- a “hate crime”. A foreign ambassador died and the extremes immediately looked for an answer that kept their saint’s hands clean- it was the video. If the WH did not want to jump to a conclusion then, pray tell, why did they in fact rush to judgement?

Anyway- love the drama masking the dishonesty from both sides. What emotional compensation do you folks who blindly protect either side receive?

Paul

October 17th, 2012
5:58 pm

Towncrier

Thanks for the honest response. Let’s look at it a bit more indepth.

” But I couldn’t say for sure.”

Why not? Just do a bit of reading on greenhouse gasses. See what they do with thermal radiation. Just ask yourself ‘if a little absorbs a little radiation, what happens if we have a lot of greenhouse gasses?”

“And I certainly don’t know how much CO2 might have a deleterious effect if it did – not without isolating all of the factors.”

Again, do a bit of research. Seems to me you’re dismissing all the research that indicates that since the Industrial Revolution we’ve added to the naturally-occurring amount enough to measurably affect the system. Which means more thermal radiation is trapped. Which means there is a point at which we can measure the effects of that trapped radiation.

I think some people make this way more complicated than it is, so they can plead it’s too complicated, therefore has too many variables, therefore has too many potential holes, therefore it’s unreliable, therefore it’s false.

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
6:00 pm

Towncrier — “I would assert it as a clear possibility. They are paid by media organizations and a number of those organizations are indisputably biased. It wouldn’t be the first time people have done wrong things for money.”

Okay. I *don’t* believe it’s going on (certainly not in any sort of organized way), but since you’re apparently saying that you *believe* it to be true, we can leave it at that. Still, if you come up with some evidence of it actually happening, I’d appreciate a heads-up on it.

“Yet, strangely, most of the more “respectable” pollsters seem somehow to get close to accurate with their final polls.”

Maybe because their polling methods *really do* work and the bias here resides in the *observer* — you.

“FWIW, IMO viewing polls as “snapshots” creates a lot of plausible deniability.”

Why wouldn’t you view them that way? Clearly, a poll taken in August wouldn’t be reliable today. Again, as I said, tracking poll results over time (especially a lot of them) via scatterplot can really help in narrowing down where the *actual* figure resides.

“I’m sorry, but the fact is that lots of people “cheat” in competitions. And they cheat in politics as well – as much as they can get away with.”

I recognize that, but to be honest, if you’re concerned about cheating for political purposes, you should be more worried about Rasmussen. His outfit actually worked for President Bush (the younger).

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
6:00 pm

Climate change is part of
God’s plan to keep his
covenant to not again
destroy the human race
by rain. Thus he put a
rainbow in the sky. The
arc of the covenant.
Our fault this time.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
6:00 pm

td, I’m working on my 1,000 word concession speech. (grin)

Hope you are too!

For my…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tq39zIWJaeU

Jay

October 17th, 2012
6:01 pm

“And Jay, even Candy admitted (after the debate of course) that Romney was right on Obama’s statements about the Benghazi attacks.

No, Pogo, she said it DURING the debate. To Romney:

“It did as well take — it did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea there being a riot out there about this tape to come out. You are correct about that.”

And as I acknowledged this morning, the Republicans have a point, because Obama’s reference to “acts of terror” the next day was brief and indirect. The real issue, however, is the ridiculously enormous gravity that Republicans attempt to give this question, as if were actually important in ways that none of them, when challenged, are actually able to articulate.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
6:01 pm

JKL2 5:53

You’re confusing climate change with carbon credits.

indigo

October 17th, 2012
6:02 pm

josef – 5:17

The Jewish God will someday send the Messiah.

The Christian God has already sent the Messiah, Jesus.

The God of Islam sent his prophet,Muhammed.

They are NOT the same God.

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
6:02 pm

getalife- Economists predict 12 million jobs created the next four years if the gop does not screw it up

Thank you Republican Congress! Imagine what we could do if the Democrats decide to deal in reality for a change.

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
6:04 pm

td

Why are you citing the RCP average when it fits your narrative (last time McCain led), but use a single poll (Gallup) when it fits your narrative?

That is called disingenuous to say the least but carry on…..

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
6:05 pm

I started listening to the wind and the rain
You strained your ears but could hear nothing
One night I thought I heard them whisper my name
And I went running

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWH_nvLK7jc&feature=watch-vrec

indigo

October 17th, 2012
6:06 pm

Erwin’s Cat

Is your expertise in climatology greater than all the world’s leading experts?

If not, why do you persist in thinking you know more than they do?

josef

October 17th, 2012
6:06 pm

JAY
@ 6:01

It’s what’s passing for foreign policy policy in their books…point out what may well be fumbles of the current administration without having any clear and coherent alternative to offer…

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
6:06 pm

Keep Up the Good Fight!

October 17th, 2012
6:06 pm

Thank you Republican Congress! Imagine what we could do if the Democrats decide to deal in reality for a change.

Oh do tell us what bills and acts that the Republican Congress did specifically to create 12 million jobs, with links and evidence…. And evidence of their passage into law or actual action not some bills that never made it further.

yep

October 17th, 2012
6:07 pm

josef

October 17th, 2012
6:08 pm

indigo

Yes, it is the same G-d, the G-d of Abraham…all three of the great monotheistic faiths are the children of Abraham…

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
6:08 pm

josef- If you weren’t such a narrow minded snippy fool, and you really DID care about Malala and what she stands for

1. I personally could care less.

2. obama and all his friends are on the side of the guys who shot her.

Jay

October 17th, 2012
6:08 pm

““I would assert it as a clear possibility. They are paid by media organizations and a number of those organizations are indisputably biased. It wouldn’t be the first time people have done wrong things for money.”

Yes.

The pollsters are lying. The climatologists are lying. The clerks in Hawaii’s Department of Vital Records are lying. The statisticians at the Bureau of Labor Statistics are lying. The people who said there were no WMD are lying.

Lies. All lies. All part of the great liberal media conspiracy to tell you things that you do not choose to believe. Honestly, 20 years ago I never would have believed that such a mass self-hypnosis was possible. And now I have witnessed it in action.

td

October 17th, 2012
6:08 pm

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
6:00 pm

td, I’m working on my 1,000 word concession speech. (grin)

Hope you are too!

For my…

A very good friend of mined use to play with 38 Special. I got to meet them a couple years ago when my friends local band opened for them.

Jay

October 17th, 2012
6:10 pm

“obama and all his friends are on the side of the guys who shot her.”

JKL, that is just truly sick.

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
6:11 pm

Well thank you General Bookman for finally getting it straight !!!

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
6:11 pm

JKL — “2. obama and all his friends are on the side of the guys who shot her.”

Dude. You are *deeply* effed up IMO. Get professional help. :(

Stevie Ray..Clowns to the left and Jokers to the right..here I am...

October 17th, 2012
6:12 pm

Indigo,

Can you elaborate more on the whole messiah/god thingy you posted?

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
6:12 pm

normal- Just when I thought you could get no lower, you went and broke the record…

Which one is that?

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
6:12 pm

td, one of the more underrated southern bands.

And let’s face it, everyone needs a 20th century fox!

I got to meet these guys a couple of months back.

HUGE fun…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wawp5NNKOi0

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
6:13 pm

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
6:14 pm

“1. I personally could care less.”

You couldn’t or could?

:-)

TaxPayer

October 17th, 2012
6:15 pm

Republicans politicians make it very clear that they are doing the bidding of the likes of Exxon, the Koch crooks, Massey, et al, with their appointments to the science and technology committees. They put dumbasses like Broun and Akin on the committees for a reason and it has nothing whatsover to do with their expertise in any field of science.

josef

October 17th, 2012
6:15 pm

BIG DADDY
@ 6:08

Okay…if you say so… :-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiiE-h9ZYag

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
6:16 pm

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
6:16 pm

-Blacks Feel ‘Less Empowered’ Under Obama…

I thought hand outs were supposed to empower people?

Vote obama: I got fish. Who wants one?

Paul

October 17th, 2012
6:16 pm

indigo

The Jewish God will someday send the Messiah.

The Christian God has already sent the Messiah, Jesus.

The God of Islam sent his prophet,Muhammed.

They are NOT the same God.”

That is correct, ’cause most orthodox Christians say G-d sent Himself, as they’re the same. Unlike the other two religion’s view of G-d/.

:-)

Stevie Ray..Clowns to the left and Jokers to the right..here I am...

October 17th, 2012
6:16 pm

JAY

I think you are mixed up on the conspiracy’s format…Fox New, MSNBC and the like play subliminal music with hidden messages claiming the other side is the root of all evil..the masses breath it in and both parties end up with mantra that their guy is never wrong…

With 80 some odd polls out there, who the heck knows what’s right.

What is your prognostication relative to voter turnout?

TaxPayer

October 17th, 2012
6:17 pm

jkl continues to demonstrate that new lows do indeed exist and he’s determined, by God, to find them.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
6:17 pm

2, being a dick in public, only gets you so far in life!

(Jesus may love you, but the rest of us think you’re an assh*le.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mww_nDz-bz0

josef

October 17th, 2012
6:17 pm

JKL

And you’re a dip sh*t…that is if Imam Torquemada Big Daddy will let me say that…

getalife

October 17th, 2012
6:17 pm

td,

“In the new poll, taken Friday through Sunday, McCain leads Obama by 54%-44% among those seen as most likely to vote. The survey of 1,022 adults, including 959 registered voters, has a margin of error of +/— 3 points for both samples” USA Today.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
6:17 pm

josef

“It’s what’s passing for foreign policy policy in their books…point out what may well be fumbles of the current administration without having any clear and coherent alternative to offer…”

At least they’re consistent with foreign policy and domestic policy -

Keep Up the Good Fight!

October 17th, 2012
6:18 pm

Now that is funny. Let me know when these computer models can accurately predict the weather a random individual’s death one month from now- forget about 50 years. And let me know if you really think the many variables in all these models are going to be exactly as the scientists predict them to be 50 years from now. And last let me know just how good scientists are at predicting the sun’s weather health advances and medical science death patterns…….

I guess the insurance companies will close their doors tomorrow since it is obvious they have no evidence or proof that what they predict works.

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
6:18 pm

Towncrier @ 5:47

Thank you. Jay finally decided he couldn’t live with his ridiculous definition.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
6:18 pm

jk,

A new low for you.

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
6:19 pm

Paul- You’re confusing climate change with carbon credits

Thanks! I guess I’ve been confused about pollution and greenhouse gases effecting our temperature. Good to know it has no effect

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
6:19 pm

josef @ 6:17

He did and well said

:-)

Jay

October 17th, 2012
6:19 pm

I love that scene, Josef. The first time I saw that scene my jaw dropped. Burl Ives is just so good, and the lines themselves … right to the heart of it.

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
6:19 pm

Paul:

FYI, Bookman finally decided the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon was an act of terrorism.

It’s a start !

Stevie Ray..Clowns to the left and Jokers to the right..here I am...

October 17th, 2012
6:20 pm

JAMVET,

What ever happened to ARS? I remember in the 70’s as a kid listening to Doraville…while one of those giant Marathon gas containers exploded…Doraville sure no longer meets ARS description…

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
6:20 pm

jay- JKL, that is just truly sick

Don’t blame me. I’ve voted against obama on three different levels.

Madmax

October 17th, 2012
6:23 pm

Jay

October 17th, 2012
6:01 pm
The real issue is the president, that on the anniversary of 9/11 had not attended his security briefings and that after an attack on the US, he took it as trivial and continued on with his fund raising activities. That shows where the presidents priorities lie. God forbid he stand up Oprah and his rich friends because he has a job to do!

And if our intelligence is so bad in the area, why does the WH dismiss the idea that Iran is not close to making and deploying a bomb? Are we to believe that our intelligence is as bad as Biden the Goofy explained or are we to believe Biden the Forceful that Iran has no capability because our intelligence toldd us? Hard to know what to believe.

josef

October 17th, 2012
6:24 pm

JAY

Williams said that that scene was the best delivery ever done of any of his material…exactly what he had in mind…

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
6:24 pm

josef

October 17th, 2012
6:25 pm

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
6:26 pm

What ever happened to ARS?

Geez….

Let me google that for you.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
6:26 pm

JKL2

“Thanks! I guess I’ve been confused about pollution and greenhouse gases effecting our temperature. Good to know it has no effect”

You’re batting 1000. Congratulations.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
6:27 pm

SR, they are still jamming, even if half of the original band has gone to the great gig in the sky!

I saw them in Duluth this summer and they tore the place down.

My home town for the past 33 years…

And you’re right a whole bunch of redneck auto repair joints replaced by Korean restaurants!

Even still, it’s funky but it’s pretty

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7VVZQ_BYFE

Stevie Ray..Clowns to the left and Jokers to the right..here I am...

October 17th, 2012
6:27 pm

Josef,

At first I thought you were refering to Gilbert O’Sullivan’s song of the same name…Love that movie as well…Cool Hand Luke one of my absolute favs..

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
6:31 pm

kamchak- Translation: Don’t do as I do, do as I say do

Is the young woman a “married” lesbian or did I miss the part about about her working on a sex change?

Paul

October 17th, 2012
6:31 pm

Scout

“Bookman finally decided the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon was an act of terrorism.”

Finally?!!?

When has he ever held otherwise?

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
6:31 pm

Mend a country,
mend a city.
US foreign policy.

Stevie Ray..Clowns to the left and Jokers to the right..here I am...

October 17th, 2012
6:32 pm

JAMVET,

On another musical note, Led Zeppelins O2 reunion concert movie is playing at a handful of theatres and is available on DVD Friday…

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
6:32 pm

josef

October 17th, 2012
6:32 pm

STEVIE

I’m a HUGE Paul Newman fan myself, both as an actor and a mensh…and, man, could he interpret Williams!

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
6:33 pm

jamvet- 2, being a dick in public, only gets you so far in life!

Burn any good books lately?

indigo

October 17th, 2012
6:34 pm

Stevie Ray – 6:12

The same God cannot someday send the Messiah, have already sent the Messiah and send The Prophet instead of a Messiah.That would make no logical sense. So, obviously, they are NOT the same God.

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
6:36 pm

indigo – Is your expertise in climatology greater than all the world’s leading experts?

If not, why do you persist in thinking you know more than they do?

I didn’t but I know a guy who knows more about data analysis than most climatologist, if not all…my guy made a working spaceship (which required enormous amounts of modeling and data analysis), Jay’s guys made “models” that can’t even predict the past, who are you gonna believe

Paul

October 17th, 2012
6:36 pm

indigo

“That would make no logical sense. So, obviously, they are NOT the same God.”

Care to explain the Trinity, then?

Paul

October 17th, 2012
6:37 pm

“Jay’s guys made “models” that can’t even predict the past, who are you gonna believe”

Not somebody who talks about predicting the past.

Unless it’s Dr. Who.

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
6:38 pm

JOSEF
I’m a HUGE Paul Newman fan myself, both as an actor and a mensh…and, man, could he interpret Williams!

He was a heck of a racer too :wink:

josef

October 17th, 2012
6:40 pm

indigo

Read Maimonides (and Avorroes) on that….

“The same God cannot someday send the Messiah, have already sent the Messiah and send The Prophet instead of a Messiah.That would make no logical sense. So, obviously, they are NOT the same God.”

The same G-d has sent the Messiah (to the Christians) and Mohammad (to the Muslims)…meanwhile, the Jews wait…

josef

October 17th, 2012
6:41 pm

CAT

And made a damned good salad dressing…a true Renaissance man, he!

TaxPayer

October 17th, 2012
6:41 pm

“Jay’s guys made “models” that can’t even predict the past, who are you gonna believe”

Bullsh*t

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
6:42 pm

E. Cat — “He was a heck of a racer too”

Jerry was a racecar driver.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Was_a_Racecar_Driver

Tundra Dude

October 17th, 2012
6:46 pm

Rasmussen tracking poll, which puts the race at Romney 49, Obama 48, well within the margin of error

The D’s are shocked up here. BO is down to a one point lead, according to Marquette U poll of 870 likely voters. No R has won Wicy since Ronoldo.
Romney might be the Son of Ronoldo!!

Paul

October 17th, 2012
6:48 pm

Erwin’s cat 6:36

I’d posted this on a few occasions when this topic arose. Given the guy’s not a climate scientist it should fit in with your model of someone who analyzes data and has a professional reputation in his field. It was a gamechanger in my thinking. Never had anybody refute his analysis. One started, but it became obvious he hadn’t watched the presentation when he began his dismissal. Don’t let the title, “Microwaves, Icebergs and Climate Change’ be off-putting. It does tie together. Plus, the first half does set a serious groundwork for he second half.

And I’m sure Dr. Long would be more than happy to be interviewed by Scientific American, or any other such organization.

http://byutv.org/watch/a83c1385-eaf6-4f20-9c5a-b7460700a0da

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
6:48 pm

Jay -The question is whether to take his opinion over that of equally bright people who have studied the field for decades and know what the hell they’re talking about. And on that question, no, I will NOT take an amateur dabbler’s opinion over that of experts in the field. Especially not when the fate of the planet rides on it.
Those experts have presented fraudulent data analysis….Those experts have no accountability for being wrong except maybe losing govt funding where as if Burt’s analysis were wrong people might die….have you at least read his analysis? Are you familiar with his other accomplishments besides the dorky spaceship?…seriously try to discredit Burt is a losing argument and hardly credible
Calling Burt an amateur is like calling Ben Shockley bipartisan

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
6:49 pm

You’re batting 1000. Congratulations.

Too funny.

2, get out of the gutter, man.

You wouldn’t know a good book if it fell in your lap, as you apparently have read one since you had to in high school!

BOTH, super sweet ARS at 6:32.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FhLRSCRilU

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
6:50 pm

Paul,
No I haven’t…thanks
I will look into it

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
6:50 pm

Paul:

He “massaged” it to make it fit.

By the way, he still says the murder of our ambassador was NOT an act of terror.

” ……………. because the attack on our consulate in Benghazi was not an act of terror.”

ODD OWL

October 17th, 2012
6:52 pm

When Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda attacked America on 9/11, no one blamed the Bush/Cheney Regime, even though Bush/Cheney took their eyes off of Al-Qaeda and focused like a lazer beam on Saddam Hussain and Iraq… So why do the Romney/Ryan Republicans attempt to blame President Obama and the Democrats for the Benghazi terrorist attack ??? It seem as though Mittens, Tagg the birther and probably the whole Romney family are bias, prejudice and bigoted… Romney was also ignorant of the fact that President Obama called the benghazi terrorist attack an act of terror the day after the attack in a Rose Garden news conference… Candy Crawley verified that the president did called it a terrorist act and exposed Romney to be either ignorant, a liar or both…

They BOTH suck

October 17th, 2012
6:55 pm

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
6:55 pm

Paul,
just saw the reference to Dr Who…too funny

BYU TV…I have actually done a lot of research there during grad school…great facilities

Paul

October 17th, 2012
6:55 pm

Scout

Jay’s right.

Those rabbit holes magically multiply…..

YouLibs

October 17th, 2012
6:56 pm

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
6:57 pm

jamvet- You wouldn’t know a good book if it fell in your lap, as you apparently have read one since you had to in high school

At least I don’t promote censorship.

You’re lying about the rest. Nothing new there…

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
6:58 pm

TaxPayer – Bullsh*t

Gazuntite! :wink:

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
6:58 pm

Paul:

Tell that to the families of those murdered in Benghazi.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
6:59 pm

Erwin’s Cat

I don’t know about the facilities. I did come across the site while I was doing some inquiry into an area. Seems they host experts from various disciplines to come and provide about a 45-minute lecture. No credit, students just encouraged to attend to broaden their thinking. From some of the topics it seems the university goes out of its way to challenge students’ thinking.

Watched another a few months back. Sen Harry Reid. Interesting life story. At the end of his life he went into why he thought it more consistent with the principles Christ taught to be a Democrat than a Republican. I laughed, thinking of the discussion that must have prompted!

TaxPayer

October 17th, 2012
7:02 pm

Those experts have presented fraudulent data analysis

Back up your claim with a little of that stuff known as facts. Further, Burt acknowledges himself that he dabbles with aspects of climate science as a hobby. He has never published a paper in the field or even submitted a paper for peer review. Here is a good exchange between Burt and Brian Angliss, another engineer, on Burt’s work. It’s quite interesting.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
7:06 pm

2, you just promote the banning of labor unions, keeping people from voting, the corporate takeover of we the people’s government and other fascist philosophies.

Your hero candidate:

Corporations are people, my friend.

A real American hero:

The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism — ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. ~Franklin D. Roosevelt, April 29, 1938. Message to congress.

Now get out of the gutter, oh nasty one…

TM

October 17th, 2012
7:06 pm

“The real issue, however, is the ridiculously enormous gravity that Republicans attempt to give this question, as if were actually important in ways that none of them, when challenged, are actually able to articulate.” I guess you think its nonsense when the President appears to misleading or not telling the truth. Of course we know Bush lied and was skewered by you and your paper. But when Obama goes on for two weeks lying to us its just something to ignore because it was of no consequence,

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
7:10 pm

TaxPayer – I read some of that the other day and yes Burt acknowledges his short comings and some errors
In truth, I am not a Denier…more like a skeptic and question the motivation of the Al Gore crowd…I don’t believe for a minute we are at a tipping point, and believe man may have made some contributions but a “crisis” is going to require more convincing data than the flawed models being bantered around as “accurate”

Jm

October 17th, 2012
7:12 pm

Yep, it’s a tight race

Paul

October 17th, 2012
7:12 pm

TM

What was the lie?

Before you answer that, could you also please define ‘lie’?

josef

October 17th, 2012
7:14 pm

PAUL

Lie is what you do to get laid…

TaxPayer

October 17th, 2012
7:15 pm

Erwin,

You should read the entire exchange. I just gets better and better.

ODD OWL

October 17th, 2012
7:17 pm

Mittens Romney was a bully in high school and he was a bully as a private equity, vulture capitalist, cutthroat corporate boss… Now we see that Romney is also a bully Presidential candidate… Romney disrespected president Obama, he disrespected the office of the President and he also disrepected Candy Crawley and all women with his Rico Suave’, sexist, male chauvinist pig, Mexican machismo attitude… Mittens actually believe that Women belong in the kitchen, submissive, barefoot, pregnant and cooking him some tacos… I cannot understand why any Woman would support and vote for the bully, Mittens Romney…

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
7:17 pm

TaxPayer – I will, what I read was a very good exchange

TaxPayer

October 17th, 2012
7:17 pm

Lie is what you do to get laid…

And all this time I thought it was a combination of the number of drinks one had and who was still left at the bar at closing. Not that I ever participated in such activities…

josef

October 17th, 2012
7:20 pm

Paul

October 17th, 2012
7:22 pm

josef

Now I can finally tell them apart. Thanks!

TM

October 17th, 2012
7:22 pm

“To lie is to deliver a false statement to another person which the speaking person knows is not the whole truth, intentionally.” Kinda like last night when he claimed he labeled it a terrorist attack the day following the murders.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
7:24 pm

ODD OWL

Kinda loses some of the punchiness of righteous indignation about disrespect when you use phrases like “Mittens” and “Mexican…. attitude.”

Paul

October 17th, 2012
7:26 pm

TM

Has any president, acting in his presidential role, not lied?

Is a president lying ever justified?

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
7:27 pm

Kinda like last night when he claimed he labeled it a terrorist attack the day following the murders the smoking gun is the mushroom cloud.

Doggone/GA

October 17th, 2012
7:28 pm

“That would make no logical sense. So, obviously, they are NOT the same God.”

But you are making the assumption that the judgement of other men about the status of those three men matches God’s intentions in sending them.

josef

October 17th, 2012
7:29 pm

PAUL

Actually, I should have given proper credit…Mrs. Lura Barnette…she taught my mom, my dad, and all my brothers and sisters, me and several of my nieces and nephews English…an amazing woman she, and quite the character, she’d say anything to get us to understand and that was her example

Another when she was trying to get us to understand Tom Swiftleys, “The man sat on the buzz saw, said Tom disastrously…”

Back in the late 20s she was being told she had to resign because she was pregnant. She became the first woman in Mississippi to successfully challenge the requirement of teachers. Her defense: “For the love of G-d, I teach biology!”

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
7:30 pm

Smoking mushroom with
a gun might put you on a
cloud. -Thomas Jeffersin

TM

October 17th, 2012
7:31 pm

Paul- when is it okay for the President to not be truthful?

josef

October 17th, 2012
7:33 pm

Paul

October 17th, 2012
7:35 pm

josef

As you’ve likely gathered, I do love those plays on words. And the double meaning in your ‘lie’ post.

Who says the impact of a teacher can’t span generations?

Paul

October 17th, 2012
7:36 pm

Oh, come on, TM, you come to a forum like this and duck such a simple question?

Pres Roosevelt. WWII. With regularity.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
7:37 pm

“The pollsters are lying. The climatologists are lying. The clerks in Hawaii’s Department of Vital Records are lying. The statisticians at the Bureau of Labor Statistics are lying. The people who said there were no WMD are lying.”

Let me break it down for you, Jay:

A) Human beings lie for various reasons.
B) Pollsters, climatologists, clerks, statisticians and everyone else (including Obama, Romney, you and me) are human beings.
C) Pollsters, climatologists, clerks, statisticians and everyone else (including Obama, Romney, you and me) can and do lie.

None of this is true, of course, if you believe in the liberal doctrine (Rousseauian) that man is naturally good (and rarely does wrong – just look at the almost non-existent murder rate in that bastion of liberalism, Chicago).

“Lies. All lies. All part of the great liberal media conspiracy to tell you things that you do not choose to believe. Honestly, 20 years ago I never would have believed that such a mass self-hypnosis was possible. And now I have witnessed it in action.”

Of course the mainstream media is not liberally biased. It never has been. That is a….LIE. People like David Chalian don’t jokes to co-workers about Romney not caring if blacks drown because he is biased – anymore than men who make crude sexual jokes about females at work are harassing. People like Arthur Brisbane don’t cop to this bias because it is true. No, it is all part of an elaborate satire upon those who believe otherwise. Matthews doesn’t feel a tingle down his leg only for Obama – no, he felt that for GWB as well. Dan Rather isn’t biased because he pushed to air a damaging report on GWB that was not properly vetted. No, he just made an “honest” mistake. Things like the Journolist don’t exist because of bias. No, they were just “playin”. Gabrielle Giffords’ tragic shooting was linked to the Tea Party not because of bias – no, because they were (in Jay Carney’s words) acting on the best available information. The Duke La Crosse team was accused left and right of rape by the media not because it is biased – no, they were again acting on the best available information. It is all a fiction, this idea that the mainstream media is liberally biased.

Thanks for the clarification, Jay. Sure is nice to have an unbiased and clear-sighted person such as yourself set things straight for the rest of us ignorami. Let me get back to my rabbit hole.

ODD OWL

October 17th, 2012
7:38 pm

I call Romney mittens because he’s soft… I call Romney Mexican because thats his heritage… Romney definitely need an attitude adjustment… The President begin that process last night… In the next debate, the Commander of the Predator Drone will reduce Mittens to the level of a sniveling, groveling, prostrated chicken hawk…

Paul

October 17th, 2012
7:38 pm

TM

But more apropos to your original point: you are stating as fact that the president knew the information he presented was false and he did so with the direct intent to deceive.

Evidence?

Or just ’cause you don’t like the guy?

TM

October 17th, 2012
7:39 pm

Paul maybe I am slow what was his justification for lying that you agreed with?

Paul

October 17th, 2012
7:40 pm

ODD OWL

” I call Romney Mexican because thats his heritage…”

I believe you’re confusing ‘heritage’ with ‘place of birth.’

It’d be like calling Sen McCain Panamanian.

Dharma Bum

October 17th, 2012
7:40 pm

Polls don’t mean anything… they meant nothing when Obama was up and they still mean nothing when Romney is up.

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
7:42 pm

Pollsters, climatologists, clerks, statisticians and everyone else (including Obama, Romney, you and me) can and do lie.

Birthers and jobbers and skewers and ringers — OH MY!

Paul

October 17th, 2012
7:42 pm

TM

I’ve yet to be convinced he was lying.

I am so far of the opinion he was getting multiple, conflicting reports from various agencies and there was a good deal of ineptness displayed.

But not willful, intentional deception.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
7:43 pm

Just a bit of advance notice – it’s been a long day and I’ll be punching out soon -

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
7:44 pm

Polls serve as guidelines to
the path a candidate should
follow to gain support.

josef

October 17th, 2012
7:45 pm

PAUL

That woman was truly a role model for generations…a true Southern Lady of Culture and Breeding, she could and did teach the entire curriculum. She also was keenly aware of her position in society. When the state was doing the two-step with token integration back in the early 60s, the school board was going to send two white teachers to the black school and two black teachers to the white school. She volunteered to go to the black school. The local klukkers burned a cross on her front lawn. She went out and regal noblesse oblige roasted hot dogs and marshmallows…it was THAT that was the talk of the town!

She was also a classically trained pianist and organist. She was giving a concert one evening and her bra was causing her difficulty, she stood up, reached underneath her dress and unhooked the pesky garmet, pulled it through the front of her dress, slapped it across the bench, sat down and continued the concert!

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
7:47 pm

JOSEF
She was also a classically trained pianist and organist. She was giving a concert one evening and her bra was causing her difficulty, she stood up, reached underneath her dress and unhooked the pesky garmet, pulled it through the front of her dress, slapped it across the bench, sat down and continued the concert!

That is a hoot and a half

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
7:47 pm

Keep Up the Good Fight!

October 17th, 2012
7:48 pm

Pollsters, climatologists, clerks, statisticians and everyone else (including Obama, Romney, you and me) can and do lie.

well if he is telling the truth…then that is a lie….and if its a lie then…

Oh my….. a logic loop.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
7:48 pm

josef

You are truly blessed to have had so many colorful characters enter your life!

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
7:51 pm

Why is it wrong to lie when
needed? A novel is a lie.
Jesus told parables which
were not true. Opinions are
not truths.

josef

October 17th, 2012
7:52 pm

CAT
Everybody in my hometown has a favorite Mrs. Barnette story, some from personal witness, and others as part of the local lore…

PAUL
Well, I’ll have to agree to that…it’s probably why I’m such a happy person, eh?

Jay

October 17th, 2012
7:53 pm

“You are truly blessed to have had so many colorful characters enter your life!”

Somehow, I have this image of those folks sitting around, telling their friends, “Did I ever tell you about my friend Josef?”

josef

October 17th, 2012
7:54 pm

FROG

You sound like Granddaddy: “write it down, Jody. If you put it on paper, you’re an author. If you just say it, you’re a liar.” :-)

josef

October 17th, 2012
7:54 pm

IMAM

Me and Owen don’t have no friends! :-)

ODD OWL

October 17th, 2012
7:57 pm

Non rich White Americans are presented with a clear choice in the upcoming Presidential elections… Do you want a President or do you want a greedy, selfish, conceited, condescending, bullying corporate Boss ???

getalife

October 17th, 2012
7:59 pm

Cuba is allowing their people to travel now so where are my dang cigars.

The media knew our President called it a terror attack all along but failed to report it.

Our President said it several times.

Paul

October 17th, 2012
8:00 pm

“Somehow, I have this image of those folks sitting around, telling their friends, “Did I ever tell you about my friend Josef?””

I can’t think of a better post upon which to call it a day.

Pleasant evening, all -

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
8:01 pm

Campaign 2012.
Much ado about nothing.

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
8:02 pm

I’ll take the greedy, selfish, conceited, condescending, bully corporate Boss guy ODD OWL

does that mean I’m white and rich?

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
8:03 pm

josef

October 17th, 2012
8:04 pm

getalife

I was reading about that Cuba one earlier…interesting…did you happen to catch the program on one of the learning channels about Cuba’s ecological unspoiled natural environment position for studies? The “time warp” it’s been trapped in has meant that the lack of development has had the side effect of making them now a center for study of such…

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
8:04 pm

I foresee former josef
students saying let me
tell you about this wonderful
teacher I had….

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
8:04 pm

get – I’ve always wanted to vacation in Cuba…the Europeans i know give it high marks

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
8:06 pm

I’ll take the greedy, selfish, conceited, condescending, bully corporate Boss guy ODD OWL

With that choice, I think you’re gonna be on the receiving end of any “take[ing]“.

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
8:06 pm

The Cubans can become
wealthy by selling the
vintage autos they have.

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
8:06 pm

josef – they are quite resourceful..almost McGieverish…due to decades of limited resources (no pun intended)

getalife

October 17th, 2012
8:07 pm

“Binders full of women” was a self inflicted wound.

He tends to say dumb stuff like w but he can sell bs..

josef

October 17th, 2012
8:07 pm

Awww…y’all are just being nice…but, I will say this about my teachers…I had some magnificent ones who taught me a lot more than the curriculum objectives and for that I am eternally grateful…

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
8:09 pm

Kam – how can you resist a description like that…that Boss guy sounds awesome (the again, I like A-hole personalities).it’s.too bad Clinton can’t run again :wink:

getalife

October 17th, 2012
8:10 pm

josef,

cat is probably right about taking a vacation there.

My people had big plans in Cuba then Castro won.

It was going to be bigger than Vegas.

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
8:12 pm

Z

October 17th, 2012
8:12 pm

Mitt Romney lost last night because he is a bully and a liar, he is condescending to Women, he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, especially about Foreign Policy which is scary and he was disrespectful to the President of the United States. Does he even know what his own policies are?
The Right Wing Republicans don’t care if Romney lies or cheats. According to Grover Norquist, Rightwing Republican(we won’t raise taxes EVER, guy) all they only want is someone to sign all those Radical Right Wing policies into law. Bill’s like destroying Medicare with Voucher care or coupon care, Medicaid, Social Security, Planned Parenthood, the Affordable Care Act(Obamacare), Pell Grants, deregulate the banks again, give Corporations even more tax breaks than they already get, taking food stamps away from already hungry children and oh so many other programs that help the Middle Class and Poor. Who needs enemies when we have Republicans like Romney/Ryan running for public office.

josef

October 17th, 2012
8:13 pm

Those cars are a treasure trove…also the Old City…I had the chance to go to Cuba a couple of years ago with a group from the Temple, but I was already obligated to summer school. The folks who went said it was truly amazing…

Ahem

October 17th, 2012
8:13 pm

John Townsend

October 17th, 2012
3:03 pm
Regardless, Romney has already lost the election. There is literally no electoral path for him to reach 270 at this point – he would literally have to win 7 out of 8 swing states, and that just isn’t going to happen.

“Thank goodness, John has awakened from his coma. It will take him a few days to catch up on current affairs and then he will retract his silly comment”, said Dr. Reali T. Check.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
8:14 pm

“Somehow, I have this image of those folks sitting around, telling their friends, “Did I ever tell you about my friend Josef?”

Well, someone at least has a smidgin of Biblical knowledge (even if it is second hand). Good line ;-)

Joe Hussein Mama

October 17th, 2012
8:14 pm

Towncrier — “A) Human beings lie for various reasons.
B) Pollsters, climatologists, clerks, statisticians and everyone else (including Obama, Romney, you and me) are human beings.
C) Pollsters, climatologists, clerks, statisticians and everyone else (including Obama, Romney, you and me) can and do lie.”

Logical fallacies: Association Fallacy/Fallacy of Composition, Hasty Generalization, Fallacy of Necessity, Jaynes’ Projection Fallacy.

“None of this is true, of course, if you believe in the liberal doctrine (Rousseauian) that man is naturally good (and rarely does wrong – just look at the almost non-existent murder rate in that bastion of liberalism, Chicago).”

Your error is that you’re apparently presuming that because human beings *can* lie, that lying on the part of others *must* be the root cause of the issues you appear to be noting. However, it’s a far simpler explanation to simply ascribe the error to you personally, rather than to some unrevealed and undemonstrated conspiracy.

“Of course the mainstream media is not liberally biased. It never has been. That is a….LIE.”

No, that’s a negative assertion. The fact that you don’t personally agree with it doesn’t make it a lie. Even if the negative assertion was not true, that doesn’t categorically make the assertion a ‘lie,’ as lying requires *knowing and intentional* untruth. You’ve not even come close to demonstrating that.

“People like David Chalian don’t jokes to co-workers about Romney not caring if blacks drown because he is biased – anymore than men who make crude sexual jokes about females at work are harassing. People like Arthur Brisbane don’t cop to this bias because it is true. No, it is all part of an elaborate satire upon those who believe otherwise.”

Your strawman is aflame, sir. You posit a binary condition and fail to recognize other possible sets of causes or circumstances that could be at issue.

“Matthews doesn’t feel a tingle down his leg only for Obama – no, he felt that for GWB as well. Dan Rather isn’t biased because he pushed to air a damaging report on GWB that was not properly vetted. No, he just made an “honest” mistake. Things like the Journolist don’t exist because of bias. No, they were just “playin”.

Demonstrating errors of judgment on the part of one or many individuals does not demonstrate a broad-based conspiracy of some sort. Or do you also credit the Clintonian assertion regarding the existence of a supposed “vast right-wing conspiracy?”

“Gabrielle Giffords’ tragic shooting was linked to the Tea Party not because of bias – no, because they were (in Jay Carney’s words) acting on the best available information. The Duke La Crosse team was accused left and right of rape by the media not because it is biased – no, they were again acting on the best available information. It is all a fiction, this idea that the mainstream media is liberally biased.”

I don’t think that anyone here would argue that *no* bias exists *anywhere* in the mass media, but that’s not the argument you’re railing against. You’re apparently claiming that the things you’re objecting to MUST OF NECESSITY be attributable to a vast conspiracy or some sort. Frankly, I don’t give your claim any more credence than I gave the Clintons’ claim 20 years ago.

“Thanks for the clarification, Jay. Sure is nice to have an unbiased and clear-sighted person such as yourself set things straight for the rest of us ignorami. Let me get back to my rabbit hole.”

I think that you should consider your own biases as well as those of others. From my perspective, you have some rather hefty ones of your own.

Now, I’m out for now, and I hope that you’ll have a pleasant evening. If you choose to reply to me, I’ll respond to you tomorrow.

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
8:14 pm

frog
those cuban classic cars are not what they look like…most have been fitted with parts from various cars and the drivetrain is usuallyadapted military stuff anything and everything…anything to keep it going because new ones aren’t coming…almost every car is a 1-off custom in a very unique way

getalife

October 17th, 2012
8:15 pm

They should have lifted the embargo by now so I can get some Cuban cigars.

Perhaps in our President’s second term.

Ahem

October 17th, 2012
8:16 pm

Dharma Bum

October 17th, 2012
7:40 pm
Polls don’t mean anything… they meant nothing when Obama was up and they still mean nothing when Romney is up.

You betcha

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
8:20 pm

Erwin’s cat
Probably true but the look
has been retained and that
still sells.

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
8:22 pm

get…I get Cuban cigars on most overseas adventures…it’s about the only time I smoke cigars…i never bring any home with me

josef

October 17th, 2012
8:23 pm

FROG

That was always my song for my junior high track coach, history and science teacher (NO, not THAT coach :-) ) His recognition of who and what I was without ever mentioning it and his quiet support of me as I was learning how to come to terms with “all that” is something I will forever be grateful for.

Erwin's cat

October 17th, 2012
8:24 pm

frog
they could sell for their uniqueness, but other than that….it wouldn’t be like finding a numbers matching hemi cuda in grandpa’s basement

Vast Right Wing Conspiracy (aka "Knuckle-Dragger")

October 17th, 2012
8:27 pm

What we will see is the magnificent president kardashian close this gap, starting in three to five days, and reaching a crescendo (even if he were caught on video murdering somebody) a day before the election. You can bet your house on it.

deegee

October 17th, 2012
8:29 pm

Are these the same polls that were so over sampled and under represented a couple of weeks ago that they weren’t even credible?

Ahem

October 17th, 2012
8:31 pm

Yes, which makes the reality even worse for Oblunda / Plugs 2012.

ODD OWL

October 17th, 2012
8:34 pm

Mittens Romney said that he had a binder of Women when he was Gov. of Mass… Are a binder of Women similar to a stable of Women ???

NoBodyYouKnow

October 17th, 2012
8:35 pm

Romney has a file on Candy Crowley. Thats the one that has all the big fat know it alls.

josef

October 17th, 2012
8:45 pm

NoBody
@ 8:35

Cheap, tacky, and trashy.

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
8:46 pm

Next debate should be a
cage match. No ref.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
8:47 pm

Bind her but don’t gag her Romney.

What a hoot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_Tdwub0Ncs

Old Goober

October 17th, 2012
8:49 pm

Well, I’ll be settin’ there with old Ace and our big bag of fried pork skins and a case of PBR. One of two things will happen before the night is over. Either I’ll be up early to tell everybody WE’RE BACK or I’ll be in hiding from the blast from #1 Foxy Lady and what she likes to tell us Republicans the day after a election.

I expect somebody’s lying like a cheap rug in these polls. I know I lie big-time every time I get a call from a pollster. I tell ‘em I’m a Communist that plans to vote for the Socialist Muslim Kenyan early and often. We’ll see pretty soon if there are other voters like me out there.

Romney-Ryan 2012. Let’s put the White back in the White House.

barking frog

October 17th, 2012
8:52 pm

Old Goober
Romney-Ryan 2012. Let’s
put the White back in the
White House.
………..
You’re already halfway there.

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
8:58 pm

Technically, three-quarters there, frog.

(I’m down with the brother’s white Kansas half!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77Q7j6s_OKg&feature=watch-vrec

NoBodiesbetterhalf

October 17th, 2012
8:59 pm

O’bama has a wonderfull record (1.) 23 million unemployed ( 2.) 47 million on food stamps(3). 5.5 million homes in foreclosure ( 4.) $4500 drop in household income.( 5)5.5 Trillion in new debt. (6) $716 billion in medicare cuts. (7)2.6 trillion for O,bamacare “would not cost us another penny”.(8)1.9 trillion in new taxes in HIS new budget, 100% increase in gas prices. Bush caused all this, give him another 4 years. “GOD help us”. I’m gonna vote for him because he’s a “brother”. I’m gonna vote for him because he’s so nice looking, I’m gonna vote for him because he has the most beautiful wife and kids, I’m gonna vote for him because he can make a great speech. Never mind all those statistics. They’re all lies anyway.

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
9:03 pm

Went to the gym after my last appt and while I’m on the treadmill there on the tvs several people are watching the latest Nancy Grace missing or dead white girl syndrome case. Does this sensationalized bullshyte ever end? Then I just walk in a few minutes ago and the girlfriend is watching the same BS on my tv. Geez.

NoBodyyouknow

October 17th, 2012
9:03 pm

Josef, you must be fat too?

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
9:06 pm

“They should have lifted the embargo by now so I can get some Cuban cigars.”

Well it looks like on top of being a true believer in the liberal cause getalife is a cigar lover. T’aint nuttin wrong with that.

JKL2

October 17th, 2012
9:07 pm

jamvet- 2, you just promote the banning of labor unions, keeping people from voting, the corporate takeover of we the people’s government and other fascist philosophies

0-4. Is that better than the 0-10-1 rant you went on about what I believe in last time?

Stay hot all knowing one…

Keep Up the Good Fight!

October 17th, 2012
9:14 pm

The quality of the trolls’ postings just seems to be diminishing as we draw nearer to the election and it’s clearer that Romney will not win the election.

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
9:22 pm

Went to the gym after working 96 hours straight, I walked 50 miles in the snow barefoot, uphill both ways only to hear Fox’s Doocy droning on and on about how the moderator can’t be a ref, but must be “fair.” Does this sensationalized bullshyte ever end? Then I just walked in on my girlfriend, Candace Swanepoel, watching the same BS on my tv. Geez.

Furia

October 17th, 2012
9:24 pm

Don’t believe all of the polls! Romney will in a landlslide!

Josef

October 17th, 2012
9:24 pm

Nobody

Well, must admit that I’m not what I was in my prime! But, back when it mattered? Never got any complaints…

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
9:25 pm

So Jay posts an article admitting that Romney is up 51-45 in the latest gallup and then you got folks saying its becoming more and more clear that Romney can’t win. Delusional.

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
9:27 pm

“Logical fallacies: Association Fallacy/Fallacy of Composition, Hasty Generalization, Fallacy of Necessity, Jaynes’ Projection Fallacy.”

Wrong. The argument I postulated is perfectly valid.

“Your error is that you’re apparently presuming that because human beings *can* lie, that lying on the part of others *must* be the root cause of the issues you appear to be noting. However, it’s a far simpler explanation to simply ascribe the error to you personally, rather than to some unrevealed and undemonstrated conspiracy.”

You seem not to be able to read between the lines very well. Jay was NOT saying that I believe all that he ascribed to me – he was dramatically overstating the case to make a point. I was doing the same. I do NOT think that all journalists in the mainstream media are liberally biased. Jake Tapper and Mike Wallace, for instance, seem to be pretty objective IMO.

“No, that’s a negative assertion. The fact that you don’t personally agree with it doesn’t make it a lie. Even if the negative assertion was not true, that doesn’t categorically make the assertion a ‘lie,’ as lying requires *knowing and intentional* untruth. You’ve not even come close to demonstrating that.”

Again, neither Jay’s nor my post was meant to be a strictly logical argument. I have said this again and again, you seem unable to detect sarcasm or satire (irony in general) very well.

“Your strawman is aflame, sir. You posit a binary condition and fail to recognize other possible sets of causes or circumstances that could be at issue….Demonstrating errors of judgment on the part of one or many individuals does not demonstrate a broad-based conspiracy of some sort. Or do you also credit the Clintonian assertion regarding the existence of a supposed “vast right-wing conspiracy?”

I was offering evidence of bias off the top of my head. You can “parse” this evidence as much as you want, but that does not mean it is not valid.

“I don’t think that anyone here would argue that *no* bias exists *anywhere* in the mass media, but that’s not the argument you’re railing against. You’re apparently claiming that the things you’re objecting to MUST OF NECESSITY be attributable to a vast conspiracy or some sort. Frankly, I don’t give your claim any more credence than I gave the Clintons’ claim 20 years ago.”

Why don’t you take your argument up with someone like Arthur Brisbane (the outgoing New York Times managing editor) – I suspect he can speak to the kind of bias of which I am speaking a bit more authoritatively than you:

“When The Times covers a national presidential campaign, I have found that the lead editors and reporters are disciplined about enforcing fairness and balance, and usually succeed in doing so…Across the paper’s many departments, though, so many share a kind of political and cultural progressivism — for lack of a better term — that this worldview virtually bleeds through the fabric of The Times.”

I am arguing that there is a liberal Weltanschauung that leads many mainstream “journalists” to skew things to more accord with that perspective. It is not so much a conspiracy (but I think the Journolist suggests that it can rise to that level) as a desire to see one’s view win the day.

“I think that you should consider your own biases as well as those of others. From my perspective, you have some rather hefty ones of your own.”

Of course I have biases. Everyone here knows my biases and views. But I am not paid to publish articles I claim are “objective”. And I think, from reading your comments the past few months, that you do not really understand human nature very well. Unless someone is REALLY committed to doing what is right, they will invariably and consistently have few qualms about doing clearly wrong things.

“Now, I’m out for now, and I hope that you’ll have a pleasant evening. If you choose to reply to me, I’ll respond to you tomorrow.”

Okay, my friend. I hope your evening is a good one.

Furia

October 17th, 2012
9:28 pm

Romney in a landslide. Won’t even be close.

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
9:29 pm

Why do birds suddenly appear
Every time Doomy is near,
Just like Kam, they long to be
Close to Doom…

The obsession continues.

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
9:34 pm

Oh! I almost forgot!

I did this all while wearing only a pair of speedos and a wife-beater.

Recon 0311 2533

October 17th, 2012
9:34 pm

Jay is conceding the very real possibility of an Obama defeat. You libs should heed his indirect advise and condition yourselves for that possibility. The acceptance of your possible loss could be more easily emotionally accepted on this potentially fateful Wednesday morning in early November.

DownInAlbany

October 17th, 2012
9:36 pm

Obama’s post-debate pitch aims to make campaign all about Romney

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/17/obama-post-debate-pitch-aims-to-make-campaign-all-about-romney/#ixzz29btdY06g

If this is all that O has (and, regardless of opinions to the contrary, he REALLY cannot run on his record), Romney may very will win. Let the Faux News jokes begin, but, you know it’s true.

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
9:38 pm

“Again, neither Jay’s nor my post was meant to be a strictly logical argument. I have said this again and again, you seem unable to detect sarcasm or satire (irony in general) very well.”

Towncrier,

Let me suggest that you use the kamchak disclaimer when you say something that’s meant to be satire, sarcastic, or when you’re being facetious or just plain kidding. Since they often lack the ability to discern these forms of humor its best to put the disclaimer in there to let them know not to take a particular statement seriously.

Furia

October 17th, 2012
9:40 pm

Lefties in a panic. Party is over. Drink up Moderates! Romney in a landslide!!!!

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
9:40 pm

The only white man in a 100% black neighborhood is on a roll tonight with his retreads.

DownInAlbany

October 17th, 2012
9:43 pm

NoBodiesbetterhalf

October 17th, 2012
8:59 pm

O’bama has a wonderfull record (1.) 23 million unemployed ( 2.) 47 million on food stamps(3). 5.5 million homes in foreclosure ( 4.) $4500 drop in household income.( 5)5.5 Trillion in new debt. (6) $716 billion in medicare cuts. (7)2.6 trillion for O,bamacare “would not cost us another penny”.(8)1.9 trillion in new taxes in HIS new budget, 100% increase in gas prices. Bush caused all this, give him another 4 years. “GOD help us”. I’m gonna vote for him because he’s a “brother”. I’m gonna vote for him because he’s so nice looking, I’m gonna vote for him because he has the most beautiful wife and kids, I’m gonna vote for him because he can make a great speech. Never mind all those statistics. They’re all lies anyway.

This, sir, sums it up unlike anything I’ve ever read or heard.

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
9:43 pm

Recon 0311 2533

October 17th, 2012
9:34 pm
Jay is conceding the very real possibility of an Obama defeat.

But but but at least one of them is saying that its becoming even more obvious that Romney is going to lose. The new 51-45 numbers that Jay posted somehow or another validates his argument- in liberal fantasyland it does anyway.

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
9:47 pm

“Romney busts out a six point lead”- the real world according to Jay

“Its becoming more and more clear Romney is going to lose”- kook liberal fantasyland.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
9:50 pm

I think you cons already accept the fact that our President will win another term.

Our country can’t take another gop disaster now so you might have a chance when our country is in better shape.

It is a huge risk to give power to the gop because of their horrible record on governing.

Furia

October 17th, 2012
9:51 pm

And yet another…..Romney in a Landslide!!!!

Divide and Conquer

October 17th, 2012
9:51 pm

Oh goodie. If Romney wins, the righties will think they have some sort of “mandate”. *Sigh*

Furia

October 17th, 2012
9:54 pm

Romney will right this ship! No thanks to Bush and Obama! Moderates rule.

Recon 0311 2533

October 17th, 2012
9:54 pm

Doomy,

The libs as you well know live in a LaLa land conditioned by the propaganda they soak up daily. The irony is that many are intelligent potentially free thinking people who’re just addicted to meaningless political causes. Of course the majority are just extremely stupid people who”re easily led by the nose.

TaxPayer

October 17th, 2012
9:55 pm

Mark T

October 17th, 2012
9:55 pm

Pass the cheesy grits

Nope, youre wrong

Three things are apparent from President Obama’s annual financial disclosure statement, released today:

He is a wealthy man, with assets of as much as $10 million.

He has a hefty stake in JPMorgan Chase, the megabank that just made a bad $2 billion bet. Obama has an account worth between $500,000 and $1 million.

Despite the nation’s $15.6 trillion debt, he is a believer in government paper. More than half of his assets are in Treasury bills and notes.

The disclosure statement lists assets and liabilities in dollar ranges, so pinpointing the president’s net worth is difficult. His assets appear to tally between $2.6 million and $9.9 million. He holds a mortgage on his Chicago home of $500,000 to $1 million.

As was clear from Obama’s income tax filing, much of his income continues to roll in from book royalties. The disclosure form lists $100,000 to $1 million in royalties from Dreams From My Father, $100,000 to $1 million from Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters, and $50,000 to $100,000 from The Audacity of Hope.

TaxPayer

October 17th, 2012
9:57 pm

This, sir, sums it up unlike anything I’ve ever read or heard.

That’s what lies do–read like nothing you’ve ever read before.

NoBodyyouknow

October 17th, 2012
9:57 pm

DowninAlbany. THANKS, The truth always hurts the DEMS.

independent thinker

October 17th, 2012
9:58 pm

Romney told a whopper last night about his investments being in a blind trust and that he was not one of the pioneers of outsourcing. Going after Obama for what investments are in his pension was totally lame like a 2 year old caught with their hand in a cookie jar. But the sheep will believe anything.

“”"”"”"”"”"”"”"But is the Governor really to blame? After all, he hasn’t run Bain Capital for years. The answer depends on which Romney you believe, Mitt Beta or Version 2.0.??At last night’s town hall debate, President Obama was quick to bring up the Governor’s overseas investments and his former firm’s outsourcing trigger finger. According to the New York Times fact-checker, the Big O wasn’t lying. Romney does indeed have millions invested in various funds managed by Bain Capitol. Eight of those millions funded the equity firm’s purchase of 51% of Sensata’s shares. Now Bain is using its majority shareholder power to cut production costs by shipping Sensata’s manufacturing to China.But Mittens has continuously denied having any agency over how Bain spends his invested dollars since they’re all managed by a blind trust. “”"”"”"”"”"”"
http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2012/10/romney_contradicts_romney_on_blind_trusts.p

“”"”"”"”"”"”Never mind that Mitt Romney has an estimated net worth as high as $250 million, or that some of it has been invested in offshore accounts of a sort never held by any previous presidential contender. He assures us that his assets are held in a “blind trust” over which he exerts no control.

But just how blind are such trusts, anyway? In Romney’s case, apparently not quite blinkered enough to keep his trustee—who is also his personal lawyer and longtime friend Bradford Malt—from investing more than $10 million of Romney’s money in an investment fund managed by Romney’s son Tagg.

In 1994, when he was running for the Senate against Ted Kennedy, Romney attacked Kennedy for disclaiming any responsibility for his investments, declaring at one point: “The blind trust is an age-old ruse.” He takes a different tack today, but even his own spokeswoman, Andrea Saul, has acknowledged that if he’s elected, he’ll move his wealth into a new, stricter blind trust, governed by federal rules.”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/purdum/2012/07/mitt-romney-age-old-ruse-blind-trust

Nothing like having a president who is a pathological liar and who will continue profiting off of outsourcing.

Furia

October 17th, 2012
9:58 pm

Romney will unite Dems and Repubs. Thank goodness there is an adult in the room.

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
10:00 pm

Splinters from pressure treated wood hurt.

The truth?

Nah — not so much.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :razz: :razz: :razz: :razz: :eek: :eek: :eek:

JamVet

October 17th, 2012
10:00 pm

Del, didn’t you go away once?

(We’re hard to quit, ain’t we?)

LOL.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFCbgW8VqiA&feature=related

Furia

October 17th, 2012
10:02 pm

LAAAAAANDSLIDDDDDEEEE FOR THE ROMNEY…FINALLY THERE WILL BE SOMEONE WHO WILL UNITE INSTEAD OF DIVIDE. YOU SHOULD ALL BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES.

Boy oh boy

October 17th, 2012
10:02 pm

Recon 0311

Nice statement. I bet your God would be proud of you at this moment.

Aser706

October 17th, 2012
10:05 pm

Getalife:

Dem control is to blame for all of govt failures and corruption for the last 20 years.

Recon 0311 2533

October 17th, 2012
10:05 pm

JamVet, Never quit never say die. Pain is only weakness leaving the body. Actually, I wish I could still believe that because I managed to somehow wrench my back out over this past weekend and now talk about pain.

DownInAlbany

October 17th, 2012
10:06 pm

TaxPayer

Which ones would you claim to be lies? I’d like to hear your factchecks on the paragraph.

In my opinion, this is an exact representation that we’ve suffered through for the last 4 years. Prove him wrong…

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
10:08 pm

Furia

October 17th, 2012
10:11 pm

Furia

October 17th, 2012
10:12 pm

Romney is the MAN.

kimo sabi mo

October 17th, 2012
10:13 pm

OMG = “Obama Must Go”

Jm

October 17th, 2012
10:15 pm

Obama is the political version of Fahreed Zakaria

A faux intellectual with a great education pedigree, but just thinks he’s smarter than he is

And is arrogant and obnoxious

Drive by

OedipusTax

October 17th, 2012
10:17 pm

Obama promised in February of 2009 that if he did not halve the deficit that he would serve “a one term proposition.” 5.7 trillion dollars later, he has no ideas other than to spend more money, claim “fairness” much like a spoiled child, and spend our childrens’ money until they have no future. Worst President in the history of the United States. Makes Carter look like Abraham Lincoln.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
10:20 pm

Just use one name jm.

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
10:21 pm

Obama promised in February of 2009 that if he did not halve the deficit that he would serve “a one term proposition.”

When you have to lie to make a point, you really have no point.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
10:24 pm

“It’s hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.” Thomas Sowell

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
10:26 pm

“I loves me my life-sized Ayn Rand blow-up doll. I only wish that I had a lifetime supply.”
– Thomas Sowell

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
10:26 pm

Jm @ 10:15

“I think this man (Obama) really does believe he can change the world, and people like that are infinitely more dangerous than mere crooked politicians.” Thomas Sowell

getalife

October 17th, 2012
10:26 pm

There is a good reporter on CNN in Libya. She said eyewitnesses said they heard the group coming and chanting then attacked for over an hour and left. aq did not claim responsibility so that leaves me to believe it was an armed militia upset about the movie. Our President covered all bases in his transcripts.

Midori

October 17th, 2012
10:27 pm

I see the resident cons are still in panic mode.

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
10:27 pm

Oh no ! Kammie has been reading my posts !

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
10:28 pm

Scout,

True. But libs will never understand that.

yuzeyurbrane

October 17th, 2012
10:28 pm

Gallup may be right at the point in time they took the poll. But I am skeptical it will stay unchanged. This has always pointed to being a very close election, as we will all see on Election Day. In the meantime, a rigorous honest debate is what democracy is all about.

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
10:30 pm

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
10:30 pm

Scout,

Careful there. He may develop an unhealthy obsession with you and back it up will kamspam fictitious quotes. Oops. Its happened already. You’ve been pelted with kamspam!

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
10:31 pm

Hiya, Midori! :wink:

getalife

October 17th, 2012
10:31 pm

Hi Midori :)

We got del back.

Same ole same ole.

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
10:34 pm

Thulsa:

Jay even came out of his hole after me today after I really nailed him on one.

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
10:37 pm

I missed most of the day. What did you nail him on?

getalife

October 17th, 2012
10:41 pm

“CAIRO — Libyan authorities have singled out Ahmed Abu Khattala, a leader of the Benghazi-based Islamist group Ansar al-Sharia, as a commander in the attack that killed the American ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, last month, Libyans involved in the investigation said on Wednesday. ”

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/18/world/africa/us-singles-out-libyan-islamist-as-a-commander-in-consulate-attack-libyans-say.html?_r=2&

I was right again.

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
10:43 pm

“I see the resident cons are still in panic mode.”- liberal fantasyland

Yes. Of course. We always start panicking when Romney surges to a 6 pt lead in the Gallup poll for the first time.

Get Real

October 17th, 2012
10:46 pm

At least the race has gotten quite exciting over the last 4 weeks…..may be a long night on Nov 6th

LeRoi2

October 17th, 2012
10:47 pm

It’s the economy, and we are not stupid. Romney will win by 5% or more. Our 4 year national nightmare is coming to an end.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
10:48 pm

You got demolished in the last two debates and our economy is back on track.

Of course you are worried.

Get Real

October 17th, 2012
10:52 pm

Get-a-Brain……at least try and act like you have a partially functional brain….demolished in the last 2 debates….geez, what an infant

getalife

October 17th, 2012
10:53 pm

get real,

You write like a brat.

Grow up son.

Midori

October 17th, 2012
10:54 pm

Hi Kammie :)

Hi Getalife :)

Getalife: we knew he was full of it and would be back. this page is like a moth to a flame to him :)

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 17th, 2012
10:54 pm

Thulsa:

Here is his direct quote from a previous thread …………. unbelieveable :

“The premise of the entire debate is false, because the attack on our consulate in Benghazi was not an act of terror.”

He “crawfished” so bad it would have been funny except for the fact that four Americans were murdered by TERRORISTS !

Have fun with the few remaining libs. Have to get up early.

TAPS !

getalife

October 17th, 2012
10:58 pm

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
10:59 pm

Scout,

Yeah. I saw that. Unbelievable. The lengths they will go to to try and cover up this president’s incompetence. Been awhile since I’ve see him try and parse words and play the lib semantics tap dance that bad to spin a story.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
11:00 pm

It was not aq so the gop are wrong again.

Get Real

October 17th, 2012
11:00 pm

Get-a-brain…….mind boggling comments from the 24 x 7 blogger of another universe…..truly sad

getalife

October 17th, 2012
11:05 pm

get real,

Just the truth son.

Too bad you can’t handle it.

Aser706

October 17th, 2012
11:06 pm

Getalife:

Dominated in not getting it done, yes. Dominated in ignoring a housing bubble for the sake of votes, yes. Dominated in not making the call on any issue that they must own, yes. Dominated the lazy vote, yes.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
11:10 pm

acer,

Get what done?

Towncrier

October 17th, 2012
11:12 pm

“Let me suggest that you use the kamchak disclaimer when you say something that’s meant to be satire, sarcastic, or when you’re being facetious or just plain kidding. Since they often lack the ability to discern these forms of humor its best to put the disclaimer in there to let them know not to take a particular statement seriously.”

TD, that to me is like lighting an applause sign for an audience in a TV show. If people can’t discern satire, sarcasm, general levity and so on then I am afraid they shouldn’t be making arguments on a political blog – because they are doing nothing more than providing fuel for the satirist’s fire (I have played that role a few times and may again soon). They certainly aren’t making strong arguments.

yuzeyurbrane

October 17th, 2012
11:13 pm

Jay–are you sure you got Gallup numbers right? I clicked your link to Gallup and it clearly says 50 to 46 for Romney among likely voters. Your error makes a difference between a clear breakout for Romney something still within the margin of error.

Aser706

October 17th, 2012
11:19 pm

Getalife:

The past 4years.

Furia

October 17th, 2012
11:23 pm

Furia

October 17th, 2012
11:25 pm

Viva Romney!!

Thulsa Doom

October 17th, 2012
11:26 pm

“If people can’t discern satire, sarcasm, general levity and so on then I am afraid they shouldn’t be making arguments on a political blog”

Towncrier,

True. But if that became a prerequisite for making arguments on a political blog then our liberal audience would up and disappear.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
11:27 pm

acer,

Check your 401 k and thank the President.

getalife

October 17th, 2012
11:33 pm

There is nothing more laughable than a con pretending to be intelligent and intellectually honest.

Alan

October 17th, 2012
11:36 pm

President Romney. Get used to it.

Aser706

October 18th, 2012
12:27 am

Getalife:

Your argument is weak and now understandable. You are simply annoying.

getalife

October 18th, 2012
12:29 am

mitt will be gone soon.

Ken

October 18th, 2012
12:49 am

President Romney and VP Ryan. Get used to it.

Joey

October 18th, 2012
1:36 am

Obama is a used car salesman hack who has hoodwinked half of America into believing he cares about you.

So, was it 20 million dollars spent on personal Obama vacations in the last 4 years? Maybe it’s not Romney who is the evil top hat Monopoly guy after all?

Obama=disgusting elitist who couldn’t manage a magazine stand

Joey

October 18th, 2012
1:40 am

If all these death threats were made against Obamy by Conservatives, Eric Holder would sue everyone, and Al Sharpton and Spike Lee would be leading 24/7 marches in the streets.

But, threaten a GOP Presidential Candidate with death? No problem, it’s cool.

Bring your cameras to the polling stations to take pix of the New Black Panthers with clubs in their hands …..again.

Joey

October 18th, 2012
1:41 am

A common field mouse would make a better President than the Liberal Messiah we have now.

Joe The Plumber Too

October 18th, 2012
3:08 am

Joey, I saw a story about former Navy Seals getting together to go to polls where the punk boy black panthers might gather. I can see those sissy panthers running down the sidewalk when confronted by real men. Should be interesting, although I’m sure pansy punk eric holder will be foaming at the mouth to charge the Seals with hate crimes before he like barry and me-shell have to pack up and get out.

Jack

October 18th, 2012
5:36 am

Unlike Obama, read the entire health care program the Congress passed and see if you still want to be a small business owner.

Moon Mullins

October 18th, 2012
6:15 am

The Great American I. Q. Test is just around the corner. It has only one question: Will the American people vote for a candidate shrouded in mystery and secrecy who has, with his own voice and words and without any coersion or duress, stated to a group of his wealthy supporters that he was writing off 47% of the American people — that they didn’t matter?

This election could be the only time in my 71 years where the working class voted against their own self-interest — for a candidate who refuses to open up regarding his personal wealth, where he got the money to start Bain, how long he ran Bain, how much money he made while running Bain, why he has his money stashed in secret Swiss bank accounts and in Post Office Box banks in the Cayman Islands, how he’s going to accomplish what he says he going to do and why he keeps changing his mind about the key issues of the election?

And, lastly: Why did his wife say in an interview with a Nevada TV station on 9/28/12: “I think my biggest concern obviously would be for his (Mitt’s) mental well being.”

I think this election comes down to a message worn on a T-shirt by a man attending a Romney rally. The message on the T-shirt was: “Put the white back in the White House.”

And, so it goes. . . .

Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!

October 18th, 2012
6:19 am

Good mornin’ all y’all…This is my kind of debate…

http://cheezburger.com/43345665

Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!

October 18th, 2012
6:24 am

GT

October 18th, 2012
6:41 am

This seems so much like the Bush campaign. The Supreme Court will be deciding a lot in the next four years.

Same 'ol, Same 'ol from the Dems -- do as I say, not as I do...

October 18th, 2012
6:54 am

At the second presidential debate on Tuesday night, a camera caught first lady Michelle Obama clapping after moderator Candy Crowley told Republican presidential candidate Gov. Mitt Romney that President Obama called the Benghazi attack an “act of terror” soon after the attack on the U.S. consulate.

According to the rules both campaigns agreed to, or the memorandum of understanding (MOA), there is to be no clapping from members of the debate audience.

The rule: Article 9, Section A, Subsection 7: “All members of the debate audience will be instructed by the moderator before the debate goes on the air and by the moderator after the debate goes on the air not to applaud, speak, or otherwise participate in the debate by any means other than by silent observation, except as provided by the agreed upon rules of the October 16 town hall debate.”

AU Liberal in ATL

October 18th, 2012
6:57 am

USMC is giving the USMC a very bad name. You really should either shut up or at least change that tag.

Jay

October 18th, 2012
7:03 am

“a camera caught first lady Michelle Obama clapping after moderator Candy Crowley told Republican presidential candidate Gov. Mitt Romney that President Obama called the Benghazi attack an “act of terror”

Ooooh! CLAPGATE!

Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!

October 18th, 2012
7:07 am

Ooooh! CLAPGATE!

Heh, In my day that was Olongapo City, Philippines

TaxPayer

October 18th, 2012
7:17 am

Clapgate! Jay’s trying to give the cons something of interest to talk about.

TaxPayer

October 18th, 2012
7:27 am


DownInAlbany

October 17th, 2012
10:06 pm
TaxPayer
Which ones would you claim to be lies? I’d like to hear your factchecks on the paragraph.

In my opinion, this is an exact representation that we’ve suffered through for the last 4 years. Prove him wrong…

Down,

I agree with the last two sentences per your 9:43 post,

“They’re all lies anyway.

This, sir, sums it up unlike anything I’ve ever read or heard.”

Why should I wish to prove that wrong when it is obviously correct.

Georgia

October 18th, 2012
7:37 am

I applaud clapgate. I am a little concerned about how Jay spent all day yesterday spinning semantical nuances over the word terrorism. Acts of War vs Terrorism. Pearl Harbor vs 911. Conspiracy to commit murder vs mob riot’s collateral damage. It is disconcerting that Obama claimed he called it terrorism when he knew that everyone’s eyes were wide open and it was easily checked. So, when he rehearsed with his handlers that very point, and they read the transcripts and realized that Obama used the word terrorism in a generic context, it exposes the very conversation they had about whether they could claim that Obama called it terrorism. “Do you think it’s such a close call that no one will notice until it’s too late and by then it’ll blow over and become just more forgetable noise?” “It’s close enough, we’ll be okay.” Didn’t Obama realize that Romney would be pouring over that same transcript? Obama didn’t even have to go there. He brought it up. Instead of saying “We got Bin Laden”, he goes after the still uncertain timeline about what the state dept knew and when they knew it.

It’s just upsetting, especially when it forced Jay to thrash around over the very same semantic ground. Are we all con men? Do we have to spin every single phrase? and where are all these full figured women coming from? They are ruining it for me. I want barbie dolls. sorry.

Doggone/GA

October 18th, 2012
7:39 am

“Ooooh! CLAPGATE!”

Well, I guess they’ll just have to destroy all the tapes from that debate and insist that Obama and Romney do it all over again. And they can tie the audience members hands to their chairs so they can’t possibly break such an important rule again.

TaxPayer

October 18th, 2012
7:43 am

Clapgate! Cons will insist on reviewing all the hidden camera footage.

stands for decibels

October 18th, 2012
7:49 am

Ooooh! CLAPGATE!

Can it be the next “BUTTHURT OVER BENGHAZI BECAUSE IT’S ALL ABOUT ME ME ME AND MY FEE-FEES?”-GATE?

stay tuned.

Thomas

October 18th, 2012
7:52 am

Ooooh! CLAPGATE!

versus picking on this comment:

“There is nothing more laughable than a con pretending to be intelligent and intellectually honest”

Really Bookie- now you may need to read the above comment from one of your 10 avid followers a few times to note that it makes no sense.

stands for decibels

October 18th, 2012
7:52 am

USMC is giving the USMC a very bad name.

the Corps survived Gomer Pyle. They’ll survive Gomer’s Piles.

They’ll adapt; they’ll overcome

TiredOfIt

October 18th, 2012
7:53 am

Romney: “I will create jobs as President, although government doesn’t create jobs”

Keep Up the Good Fight!

October 18th, 2012
7:54 am

Scandal of the day…. Clapgate! Stay tuned for the new shiny made up atrocity that means that the President should [chose one]

A. be impeached
B. be imprisoned
C. be deported to Kenya or
D. not be elected.

And watch Faux daily for more pout, more rage……

Keep Up the Good Fight!

October 18th, 2012
7:57 am

Hmmm…. words parsed “generic” context… “acts of terror”, words not parsed so much for true meaning “didn’t build that”.

Whereever are we going to put all the feinting couches needed for our cons.

stands for decibels

October 18th, 2012
7:57 am

Taxpayer-subsidized concussion-factory SHEETZ.

Paul

October 18th, 2012
7:57 am

“Clapgate! Jay’s trying to give the cons something of interest to talk about.”

They do like to focus on the momentous issues of the day, don’t they?

Jo

October 18th, 2012
8:06 am

Take a breath! The Gallup poll was taken before the second presidential debate. Secondly, Gallup, like Rasmussen, is very Republican slanted and third I think everyone knows or should know by now that polling organizations are retained ensure that TV ad buys are strong. It’s kind of part of their mandate. It’s in their interest to ensure there’s a close race in order that more TV ads are purchased. In fact, there was a complaint made in 2008 that TV ad buys were down. It’s no surprise that polling organizations made sure there’d be a turnaround and more of a tight race this time around.

Nobody should vote based on polls to begin with and neither candidate is telling the American people their plans for the future. I’m leaning Obama simply because the Republicans have a history of leaving one half of the American population out in the cold. If you’re not a Christian white man, there’s only a token place for you in their party. Don’t they realize that leaving women behind is a huge impediment to the growth of the economy? One half of the population is women and women are a vital part of the economy growing. Relegating them to a somewhat inferior place in the economy is foolish and short-sighted not to mention all the social issues talked about by the Republicans which would turn back the status of women to the Mad Men days of the early 60’s!

TiredOfIt

October 18th, 2012
8:14 am

Heber C. Kimball said, “I think no more of taking another wife than I do of buying a cow”. I wonder if Willard agrees?

stands for decibels

October 18th, 2012
8:14 am

just one thing:

Gallup [...] is very Republican slanted

jo, I take issue with this assessment. Yes, Gallup has a documented “house effect” that tends to favor republican candidates by a consistent degree but that is not quite the same as being “slanted”, *if* by slanted you mean they are deliberately holding their finger on the scale to help one side.

I do not have reason to believe that they are doing that.

Gallup’s issues have been their polling methodology, most notably their over-reliance (in the past, they have taken some steps to rectify this) on landlines, which have skewed things a bit.

But I think Gallup is a valuable resource, and if they do a national poll that has Romney up beyond the MoE, it IS significant, as a snapshot in time. It’s a piece of a greater story, inasmuch as there is no question Romney has closed the gap that had opened after a crappy-for-him Republican convention and a great-for-Obama Democratic convention.

But it’s also clear that the gap closing happened in the wake of a very good debate performance–if correlation equals causation, then it is reasonable to imagine that a strong performance by Obama this week, will at minimum stem the losses and at best (for Obama) get his probabilities for a win trending upward again.

headin’ upstairs.

GT

October 18th, 2012
8:15 am

The south is like a party guest that won’t go home. I think of the months right after the elections either way, the blockade being formed by the Republican congress, the nightmare of the herb doctors from the Tea Party, holding the country hostage, until we all wear garlic bags around our necks to cure this economy.

Maybe this is the best thing for the country. Get this thing over with, go directly into bankruptcy, nuke ourselves, and then let the grass roots come up. There will be no debate when the depression gets here of what could have happened, these times will look like dizzy allusions as we stand in bread lines. These avoidable wars we fought, health insurance, transportation all gone. This commonality of failure helped that last generation, my parents, become the greatest we have ever seen, greed and smoke and mirrors, lack of honesty will drown this generation. It is the only way hard headed uneducated people will see what their condition and view of the world cost us. Even Newt may lose a few pounds in this desert. Bring it on Mr. Hoover the sooner we get a feel of real the sooner the world will hold fact as a community again instead of an outline for spin doctors and herbal health.

TiredOfIt

October 18th, 2012
8:24 am

Another George (Vacation) Bush:
During Mr. Romney’s four-year term as governor of Massachusetts, he cumulatively spent more than a year — part or all of 417 days — out of the state, according to a review of his schedule and other records.

TiredOfIt

October 18th, 2012
8:50 am

GT

October 18th, 2012
8:58 am

The best question of the debate in my opinion was the lady who asked how Romney differed from Bush. They have a lot of the same advisories and philosophies, a very good question. Romney compares himself against Obama, as if he is utopia. If life were so easy. The truth is a lot of people don’t blame Bush for this recession and don’t think Obama saved us from depression. I am not sure there is enough left to fake another four years of artificial growth we saw in 8 years of Bush, after Clinton balanced the budget. Easy credit for the private sector ain’t going to happen, and if it does the banks are not going to be bailed out. In the end of four years we will be right back at the threshold of a depression one more time, with willing Democrats to run and take the blame for a four year banquet under Romney. Romney made his money during these heady unreal days of easy credit that gave false numbers of prosperity and put us here. There is nothing that is going to be easy about the next four years. I almost want to see Romney pull all these levers and find they are as impotent for him as the man he has be critiquing for several years and now he will have to take four years to learn which one don’t work. In the meanwhile he will set back equality in America a decade. Romney, if elected will be the most unpopular president in the history of this country, but he for once won’t be able to pass this off to the next administration, this stuff turns too fast now day, you can’t control your bathroom breaks to fit your schedules.

Joe Hussein Mama

October 18th, 2012
9:31 am

Towncrier — “Wrong. The argument I postulated is perfectly valid.”

Wrong. The argument you presented (one does not *postulate* an argument) is full of leaps of reasoning and logical fallacies.

“You seem not to be able to read between the lines very well.”

Besides that fact that you don’t seem to be able to do it yourself, you also seem quite hidebound in your reasoning; asserting that there can’t be shades of gray here. There’s either 100% right or 100% wrong in your scenario, AFAICS. What ‘lines’ are there to look between in that? Binary choices like the one you’ve presented don’t *admit* to having lines, Towncrier.

“Jay was NOT saying that I believe all that he ascribed to me – he was dramatically overstating the case to make a point. I was doing the same. I do NOT think that all journalists in the mainstream media are liberally biased. Jake Tapper and Mike Wallace, for instance, seem to be pretty objective IMO.”

Do you see objectivity as something that’s common only to conservative journalists? Or do you believe that objectivity and bias can coexist in a single person, if that person recognizes their own biases?

“Again, neither Jay’s nor my post was meant to be a strictly logical argument. I have said this again and again, you seem unable to detect sarcasm or satire (irony in general) very well.”

As I’ve told you before, there’s nothing so magical or unique about your writing that it will communicate your thoughts, intent or argument with 100% clarity 100% of the time. And given that I’ve taught the subject at the college level, I repose more trust in my own English usage abilities than I do in yours. That said, it’s good that you acknowledge that your post didn’t contain a “strictly logical” argument, particularly given all the logical fallacies it contains.

“I was offering evidence of bias off the top of my head. You can “parse” this evidence as much as you want, but that does not mean it is not valid.”

Kettle logic. Russell’s Teapot. Your lack of evidentiary support is sufficient to make it invalid. It’s not incumbent upon me or anyone else to disprove or invalidate an argument that you haven’t proven or validated.

“Why don’t you take your argument up with someone like Arthur Brisbane (the outgoing New York Times managing editor) – I suspect he can speak to the kind of bias of which I am speaking a bit more authoritatively than you.”

Logical Fallacy: Appeal to Authority.

“When The Times covers a national presidential campaign, I have found that the lead editors and reporters are disciplined about enforcing fairness and balance, and usually succeed in doing so…Across the paper’s many departments, though, so many share a kind of political and cultural progressivism — for lack of a better term — that this worldview virtually bleeds through the fabric of The Times.”

In his opinion. I’m certainly accepting of the fact that *your opinion* holds that to be true just as Brisbane’s does, but you seem quite cavalier about leaving that part out — leading me to the conclusion that you’re trying to claim something to be factual when it’s not. IIRC, we’ve had this discussion before.

“I am arguing that there is a liberal Weltanschauung that leads many mainstream “journalists” to skew things to more accord with that perspective. It is not so much a conspiracy (but I think the Journolist suggests that it can rise to that level) as a desire to see one’s view win the day.”

You’ve also argued that political pollsters *never* oversample Republicans, but that’s not true. I was looking at this poll last evening and *just happened to notice* that it . . . yes, indeed . . . OVERSAMPLES REPUBLICANS. Yet you and scads of other conservatives will rail for days about the “biased” and “skewed” polls that “never oversample Republicans,” yet here we have one — and I wasn’t even looking for it. I believe that you and your political allies have simply (once again) *asserted* something without proof and counted on sheer ignorance and laziness to carry the day for you. I think you didn’t bother to look, I think Republican campaigners didn’t bother to look, I think that conservative posters here didn’t bother to look and I think that all of you are counting on no one else bothering to look, either.

Well, just as you’re claiming the existence of this pervasive liberal mindset that can’t help but percolate into the news and mass media in general, you’ve also claimed that pollsters are ’skewing Democratic because they never oversample Republicans.’

Well guess what? They *do* oversample Republicans. So your claim of a week ago is wrong, and I bet if I looked closer, I’d find it to be wrong a LOT. So I think your claim of seeping liberal bias is wrong, too, and I challenge you to provide evidentiary support for your two claims.

Poll discussion: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/09/obama-up-by-3-in-colorado.html

Survey instrument: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/ColoradoPostDebatePoll.pdf

“Of course I have biases. Everyone here knows my biases and views. But I am not paid to publish articles I claim are “objective”.

You’re not *paid* to post anything here. :roll:

“And I think, from reading your comments the past few months, that you do not really understand human nature very well.”

I think, from reading *your* comments over the last few months, that you expect your views to be accepted as factual and that you don’t feel that you have to support them in any evidentiary fashion. I also think that you make a great many leaps of logic that are ideologically-based. And, FWIW, I don’t recognize you as much of an expert on “human nature” despite your high-sounding proclamations about how you think it works. Anyone can make guesses, and you’re no better than me in that respect.

“Unless someone is REALLY committed to doing what is right, they will invariably and consistently have few qualms about doing clearly wrong things.”

Rejected. We spoke of this about a week or so ago when discussing religious and philosophical motivations in a societal context. You clearly couldn’t believe that an atheist could behave or conduct themselves in an altruistic manner, and that position is shining thru brightly here. Just because *you* can’t conceive of someone behaving in a certain way does not in any way demonstrate that such behavior is impossible or categorically nonexistent. That’s lazy logic, and I had thought you better than that.

“Okay, my friend. I hope your evening is a good one.”

And yours as well.

Furia

October 18th, 2012
9:33 am

Romney now up 6 points in Gallup…can you all say LAND SLIDE?

Joe Hussein Mama

October 18th, 2012
9:36 am

Towncrier — “TD, that to me is like lighting an applause sign for an audience in a TV show. If people can’t discern satire, sarcasm, general levity and so on then I am afraid they shouldn’t be making arguments on a political blog – because they are doing nothing more than providing fuel for the satirist’s fire (I have played that role a few times and may again soon). They certainly aren’t making strong arguments.”

And had you tried making that argument in one of the college classes I taught, your final grade would not have been one you would have wanted to share with your parents.

Joe Hussein Mama

October 18th, 2012
9:37 am

Furia — “Romney now up 6 points in Gallup…can you all say LAND SLIDE?”

I love how cons thought all the polls were “skewed” and raged about it for the last month.

Now they seem to think the polls all come straight from heaven.

(laughing, pointing) :D

Mark T

October 18th, 2012
9:39 am

http://www.mrctv.org/videos/obama-2009-if-economy-isnt-fixed-3-years-there-will-be-1-term-proposition

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 17th, 2012
10:21 pm
Obama promised in February of 2009 that if he did not halve the deficit that he would serve “a one term proposition.”

When you have to lie to make a point, you really have no point.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Mark T

October 18th, 2012
9:48 am

TaxPayer

October 18th, 2012
7:17 am
Clapgate! Jay’s trying to give the cons something of interest to talk about

OOOH Bindergate!…If Libs had half an education they would know he was referring to binders of applications and resumes from women…but hey, I guess we cant hold you to that high a standard

GT

October 18th, 2012
9:56 am

no but I can say depression!

Junior Samples

October 18th, 2012
10:13 am

I don’t know if there are enough deceased voters to give Obama the win. I’m sure Obama with his Chicago thug background will give it a heck of a try.

D

October 18th, 2012
10:41 am

@GT
“The best question of the debate in my opinion was the lady who asked how Romney differed from Bush”

I thought so, too. Biggest thing that bugged me about President Bush was his lack of bipartisanship. Seems to me that the very thing that chaps people the most is when their values are not being fairly represented. Bush and Obama are very much alike in that regard.

GT

October 18th, 2012
10:44 am

My Uncle Shelby, from Texas, was a Democrat all his life, but since he has been dead 10 years, he has been voting Republican.

GT

October 18th, 2012
10:58 am

Bush’s unilateral personality not only makes domestic relationships impossible, it bleeds into his foreign relations too. No one liked Bush, couldn’t even get a majority of this own country to vote for him, he was like the mean old man that came out and screamed at kids in my old neighborhood. Then the kids grew up and he wants them to forget all that. Every answer for Romney is to go to war. He doesn’t say it like that but the responses he suggest and his observations of no apologies necessary funnel into no other options but war.

Furia

October 18th, 2012
11:20 am

Romney will fix the mess Bush and Obama has left us….Go Moderates!!!

Bill Orvis White

October 18th, 2012
11:47 am

Why in the Lord’s name are you foolish liberals so surprised? Your president LIED TO YOU and those who never wanted “him” installed into the job in the first place. WHY ARE YOU SURPRISED THAT “HE’S” GOING TO LOSE? WHAT AM I MISSING HERE? The dolt first said that we have 57 states. Then “he” said “he’d” bring unemployment under 5 percent? WRONG! That is a difference of 9 million out of work. WE HAVE 23 MILLION OUT OF WORK. $20T in ObamaDebt, a stupid illegal health care bill smacked upon us and $716 billion robbed from Medicare TO PAY FOR THE STUPID BOONDOGGLE! THIS IS THE BIGGEST FAILED “ADMINISTRATION” AND WE THE PEOPLE ARE TIRED OF IT AND ARE NOW FIRING THIS IDIOT AND REPLACING “HIM” WITH A MATURE COMMON SENSE ADMINISTRATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am no joke about this. I am serious! This “man” needs quickly leave the Oval Office ASAP!!!!!!!
Amen,
Bill

Democrats Are Devils

October 18th, 2012
5:16 pm

scratch that, its a 7-point lead, bitches !!! :cool: :mrgreen:

Furia

October 18th, 2012
9:27 pm

Gallup…Romney 52 percent Obama 45 percent! Pulling away baby!!!!!

Furia

October 18th, 2012
9:28 pm

Romney will fix this mess that Bush and Obama have left us!!!!!!!!! Moderates win the day.

HamiltonAZ

October 19th, 2012
12:20 am

Give me a leader who can deliver a speech like the Prime Minister of Australia. Remarkable.
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/transcript-of-julia-gillards-speech-20121010-27c36.html