Encouraging economic data, from sources public and private

Last week, a better-than-expected jobs report inspired scoffing among those to whom good economic news is bad political news, including suggestions that the government numbers had somehow been cooked as part of a political conspiracy.

That doesn’t seem to have been the case, as economic data continue to surprise on the upside, from government as well as private economic sources, and across economic sectors:

from Bloomberg:

The economy is improving more than professional forecasters anticipated, particularly in data on employment and housing, according to the Bloomberg Economic Surprise Index, which compares 38 indicators with analysts’ predictions. The index, based on gauges compiled by private businesses and trade groups in addition to government, confirms U.S. growth is generating jobs in the face of a global slowdown and looming federal spending cuts and tax increases known as the fiscal cliff.

“The economy is improving, and the labor market is getting better,” said Robert Brusca, president of Fact & Opinion Economics and a former New York Fed economist. “These numbers are what they are, they’re not being slanted. On a scale of one to 10, the economy is at a fairly firm six and may be heading higher….”

From Reuters, on consumer sentiment:

The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan’s preliminary October reading on the overall index on consumer sentiment came in at 83.1, up from 78.3 the month before, and the highest since September 2007, the survey showed on Friday.

The new buoyancy among consumers comes shortly after the U.S. unemployment rate tumbled to its lowest in nearly four years in September as more people returned to the workforce and found jobs than economists had predicted.

“We are getting some quite interesting signals from consumer sentiment and employment data – both (the) unemployment rate and initial claims – that there has been some quite significant improvement in the economy,” said David Sloan, an economist at 4Cast in New York.

From the Census Bureau on retail sales:

WASHINGTON — Retail sales rose a larger-than-expected 1.1% in September as consumers shook off fears of looming economic problems and continued to boost their spending after pulling back earlier this year.

The new data Monday came as the Commerce Department revised August’s increase in retail sales to 1.2% from the earlier estimate of 0.9%. That meant the rise in August was the largest monthly gain since October 2010.

Economists had expected a 0.8% increase in September, according to a survey by Bloomberg. Retail sales last month were up 5.4% from a year earlier. Sales for the three-month period ending in September were up 4.8% from the same quarter in 2011.

From Business Insider, on housing:

Despite some nagging doubts that have remained over the U.S. housing market, consensus is that housing has turned the corner and is recovering.

In his latest note titled The Housing Recovery Is For Real, Deutsche Bank’s Joseph LaVorgna writes that the “residential housing market is in the very early stages of a durable recovery.”

LaVorgna says this recovery in housing is important because housing is what led the U.S. economy into a recession, and is part of the reason the recovery has been so slow. Moreover, as “a leading indicator of underlying domestic demand,” any improvement in housing suggests that underlying domestic demand should improve as well. From Lavorgna:

‘…. At minimum, the strength in residential construction suggests it is unlikely that underlying domestic demand will weaken further. This provides us with some comfort that the recent sub-par performance in the economy is not long lasting and that over time, domestic demand will strengthen, perhaps as concern over Europe fades a bit and the “fiscal cliff” is adequately dealt with.’ “


From Fitch Ratings, on housing construction:

Fitch Ratings raised its projection for single-family starts and new-home sales this year, but warned housing growth could be somewhat less robust in 2013.

The ratings company expects single-family housing starts to improve about 19% in 2012, with new-home sales and existing-home sales increasing 19.5% and 8.5%, respectively.

Fitch, last month, forecast a 12% rise in single-family housing starts, 10.5% growth in new-home sales and a 5.6% bump in existing-home sales.

Fitch said the year-over-year gains for single-family starts and new-home sales earlier this year have sustained momentum. Meanwhile, seasonally adjusted statistics for single-family starts, new homes and existing-home sales have also been advancing most months.

From Ward’s Automotive Group, the auto industry newsletter, reporting a surge in fourth-quarter auto production in North America:

Hot on the heels of an estimated 20,300-unit September production shortfall, North American car and truck assembly plants are embarking on an even more robust fourth-quarter program than the one put in place a month ago.

Although Ford has not yet revealed what revisions it has in store for October-December, the rest of the industry already has boosted production plans by some 53,900 units for the period.

The bulk of the increase is set to occur this month with 61,700 units added to the October slate, some of which likely were deferred from September and some pulled forward from December’s plan, now 16,400 units lower than it was a month ago.

But, even assuming the entire September and December downward volume adjustments are included in this month’s higher schedule, that still means an additional 16,700 vehicles in the October boost, on top of which some 8,600 units have been added to the November plan.

The largest Q4 increase comes from General Motors, up 18,500 units, mostly cars, including gains of 26,000 in October and 3,000 in November, followed by a 10,500-unit cut in its December slate…

Incorporating the revised outlook, North American plants now are in line to build some 15,692,200 cars and trucks this year, up 16.5% from 2011’s 13,471,500 completions.

NAProdSchedule1210

– Jay Bookman

508 comments Add your comment

USMC

October 16th, 2012
7:50 am

“…You don’t want that black man in your whitehouse.”–AU Liberal in ATL

Well, it seems the desperation from the Left is reaching new levels.

And who said the Debates would have minimal effect on the election.

Even the gullible Liberals didn’t like what they say during the first Debate.

Obama must be in bigger trouble than we think. :-)

TiredOfIt

October 16th, 2012
8:01 am

What was the Ryan photo-opt of washing clean pans all about?

kayaker 71

October 16th, 2012
8:02 am

stands, 7:42,

I never thought that I would be stepping up to defend Hillary. However, she has the balls to accept responsibility for this Libya fiasco while her boss tosses her under the bus to protect his election chances. She did, in at least two speeches prior to admitting fault, profess that some ridiculous video was the cause of this cluster, thinking that she, Rice, Carney and others could spin this in their own way. Even her own State Dept insiders wouldn’t fall on their sword for her or for Bozo. However, for whatever reason, she has stepped up and taken the blame. Her political future is certainly in doubt because of this and well should be. She and her security staff screwed up…. big time. So, spin this any way you please. The end result will no doubt not change.

stands for decibels

October 16th, 2012
8:05 am

5 unmet promises of President Obama…

What USMC fails to mention is that he wouldn’t support Obama on fullfilling *any* of those promises mentioned in the Politico piece.

anyway, spendy SHEETZ, headin’ upstairs for a bit.

stands for decibels

October 16th, 2012
8:09 am

oh, one other thing:

However, she has the balls to accept responsibility for this Libya fiasco

She’s doing the job she’s supposed to do as a loyal team member. And by the way, merely using the term “balls”, as you and others *constantly* do in place of the word “courage”–mostly to belittle our President, I think, rather than to praise his Secretary of State–indicates that you’re stuck in a rather stupid last-century gender paradigm that seems pretty out of touch.

and what happened in Libya? it’s only a “fiasco” because our corporate media have determined that it needs to be called that. Under an Godly War Preznit like Bush, they’d be telling us how we have to pull together in a time of need.

The corporate media can’t allow Obama to get too uppity. Bad for their bottom line.

Stevie Ray..Clowns to the left and Jokers to the right..here I am...

October 16th, 2012
12:02 pm

TAXPAYER

Increase in spending first year in office: Bush 33%; Obama 27%

Increase Bush second term: 20%
Estimated increase in Obama’s second term: 7%

What I don’t know if how much of this reduction is a result of decreased war spending in Iraq and Afghanistan..

Tom(Independent Viet Vet-USAF)

October 16th, 2012
12:31 pm

Stevie Ray – Correct me if I am wrong, I did not know Bush was in the race. I sure hear you libs calling his name every day. I will bet you that if Romney wins(?), he will not blame Obama for the past four years, like you libs choose to do daily!

TW

October 16th, 2012
12:44 pm

If Obama and Romney were to swap skin color at lunch, tomorrow’s media coverage of the debate would be about Cool Hand Luke and Don King.