Gallup: Debate loss erases Obama’s lead entirely

How badly did President Obama lose the first presidential debate?

Gallup says 72 percent of those who watched the debate believed that Romney had won; just 20 percent sided with Obama. In fact, “Romney’s 52-point win is the largest Gallup has measured. The prior largest margin was 42 points for Bill Clinton over George H.W. Bush in the 1992 town hall debate.”

But here’s the most important thing:

t8ahhh-ho0sosuaddjw0ya

In its three days of polling prior to the debate, Gallup found Obama with a consistent four-to-six point lead. In the three after the debate, Gallup found them even. Historically, debates aren’t supposed to shift the polls to such a degree, but historically, that was a whupping the likes of which we hadn’t seen before.

– Jay Bookman

223 comments Add your comment

facts will prevail...

October 8th, 2012
7:36 am

Hopefully President Obama will be back on top after the next debate. It is hard to have a debate when your opponent changes his stance in the middle of the game. Mitt Romney, how can you trust him if he does not trust his own words??

theintelligentdesigner

October 8th, 2012
7:36 am

Morning inn Georgia. I thought this might well interest
you:http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_spectator/2012/10/is_the_republican_party_racist_how_the_racial_attitudes_of_southern_voters_bolster_its_chances_.html
Dunno why it isn’t highlighted..

Rightwing Troll

October 8th, 2012
7:36 am

Considering the (alleged) “a$$ whippin” Obama took, it’s amazing that’s all the boost Money Boo Boo got.

Maybe it has something to do with all the lies Money Boo Boo told… confidence and demeanor carried the night, but the next morning belonged to the internets and google…

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
7:38 am

Mitt and Ryan seem to have both found their winning strategy–more bigger lies.

theintelligentdesigner

October 8th, 2012
7:38 am

Well, it’s a link that doesn’t work to a Slate article by Ron Rosenbaum about the Ole South and it’s fine ladies and gentlemen. How Romney is guaranteed 100 electoral votes.

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
7:38 am

meh – 538 says it wasn’t as great for Romney as everyone thinks:

Mitt Romney remains in a considerably stronger polling position than he was before last Wednesday’s debate in Denver. But the polls released on Sunday did not tell quite as optimistic a story for him as those in the debate’s immediate aftermath.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

Mormon Missionaries Taught NOT to Tell The Truth

October 8th, 2012
7:39 am

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
7:40 am

So, does Mitt’s snakeoil cure the gout too.

theintelligentdesigner

October 8th, 2012
7:41 am

Do the conservatives believe these polls?

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
7:42 am

“Do the conservatives believe these polls?”

:lol:

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
7:48 am

Well, it’s Gallup, the place with the 2.5% GOP house effect.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/22/calculating-house-effects-of-polling-firms/

Let’s not get too carried away here.

(mind you, I check Gallup all the time, because I think it’s a useful resource for trendlines, but they consistently understate Obama’s approvals and suchlike compared to most every other pollster.)

DownInAlbany

October 8th, 2012
7:49 am

Maybe it has something to do with all the lies Money Boo Boo told…

What lies, exactly, are you referring to? It’s pretty easy to sit back and call someone a liar…without evidence…

Granny Godzilla - Union Thugette

October 8th, 2012
7:49 am

but but but …skewed polls……

Ken

October 8th, 2012
7:50 am

Here is another reason why he is going down in the polls. We cannot trust fuzzy numbers.

Jack Welch, the former CEO of General Electric (the former parent company of NBC News), set off a firestorm by insinuating that the administration manipulated the jobs numbers because they were so incredible.

Doggone/GA

October 8th, 2012
7:52 am

“Here is another reason why he is going down in the polls. We cannot trust fuzzy numbers”

That is SO last week. You need to make a greater effort to keep up

weetamoe

October 8th, 2012
7:53 am

At his celebrity-rich fundraiser in CA last night Obama said *everyone here is incredible professionals.*

Mike

October 8th, 2012
7:53 am

Romney is the snake oil salesman selling sunshine & rainbows but once you buy the product you find out its the same old thing as Dumbya….a empty suit trying to make inept conservative philosophy work…it never has and never does…..and all but the 1% suffer for it.

barking frog

October 8th, 2012
7:54 am

The power of TeeVee. No
wonder the candidates
spend so much money
there.

Jay

October 8th, 2012
7:54 am

As Dorothy would say:

Birthers, skewers and jobbers, oh my.

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
7:56 am

“What lies, exactly, are you referring to? It’s pretty easy to sit back and call someone a liar…without evidence…”

you want evidence?? here you go: Mitt Romney’s debate performance consisted of 27 myths within 38 minutes talk time.

http://tucsoncitizen.com/hispanic-politico/2012/10/05/mitt-romneys-debate-performance-consisted-of-27-myths-within-38-minutes-talk-time/

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
7:58 am

538 says it wasn’t as great for Romney as everyone thinks

That’s not quite my take-away from Nate these past few days. his latest post (from last night) goes into a fair amount of detail as to why he thinks his own model has been a bit slow to pick up on Romney’s polling.

Of course that’s why I like Nate; he’s the only polling analyst I know who will take pains to let people know what numbers HE’s posting, that you shouldn’t take too seriously.

There’s no doubt that Mitt’s helped himself of late. I don’t think it’s anywhere near enough to turn Ohio his way this month, and without Ohio he’s basically screwed, but [insert wussy qualifier here.]

barking frog

October 8th, 2012
7:58 am

If Mitt doesn’t win the
Presidency maybe he’ll
get an Emmy for best
actor in a special event.

DownInAlbany

October 8th, 2012
7:59 am

Defend and deflect, defend and deflect. And, thanks, Jay for setting the tone with your juvenile name calling…that’s about the best you people have, isn’t it?

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
7:59 am

Jack Welch, the former CEO of General Electric (the former parent company of NBC News), set off a firestorm

He DID? why I had no idea! please tell us more, Johnny Zeitgeist!

Road Scholar

October 8th, 2012
8:00 am

And Jack Welch “welched” on his comments later! He tried to distance himself from them. See a pattern?

DowninAlbany: Here is a source:

Romney Told 27 Myths in 38 Minutes
By Igor Volsky, ThinkProgress
04 October 12

Mike

October 8th, 2012
8:01 am

The only way he got a “bounce” was to deny the crazy GOP platform that he was running on.

Two Parties, One Con (Welcome)

October 8th, 2012
8:01 am

Anybody doubting the importance of modern mass communications and the way the common man and woman take their cues about what to believe should look at this swing. It’s phenomenal.

But in all fairness to the mass man of our modern societies, who isn’t so much able to think as to move in response to various stimuli, the performance of Barack Obama was so pathetic that a person could be fully justified in being completely won over by the sheer bravado and chutzpah of Mitt Romney’s intellectual corruption. There was a boldness to it, a breathtaking barefacedness, that quite frankly even a radical like me could appreciate.

Maybe Mitt Romney really is the better of these two sorry excuses for candidates for the job.

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
8:03 am

Hey, serious question for the media savvy here:

Anyone know why Team Obama has adverts on my TeeVee? I saw a few whilst watching the Division Series this weekend, and I thought, “well that’s kind of weird/a waste of money, targeting Georgians.”

Is it some decoy fake-out designed to get Mitt to waste more of his resources here? Or am I just not understanding how these ad buys go down, that if you pay for an ad package on certain cable/satellite channels (I was watching TBS/TNT on DirectTV) you wind up hitting everyone?

Road Scholar

October 8th, 2012
8:04 am

USinUK: Damn you’re good! Hope you have a great day! I have to go to a meeting…. keep all in line!

Two Parties, One Con (Welcome)

October 8th, 2012
8:04 am

Jay by the way did you see this devastating critique of the president’s performance by Bob Herbert, formerly of the NY Times?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-herbert/no-more-excuses_b_1941156.html?utm_hp_ref=tw%20

It’s time to stop making excuses for Barack Obama. With so much at stake in this election, his performance at the debate on Wednesday night was indefensible.

Ever since he was elected, there have been reasons offered, either publicly or privately, for why Obama has been unable to fully engage some of the nation’s most important challenges. Despite the rampant increase in poverty in the worst downturn since the Depression, Obama supporters whispered that he couldn’t do more for the poor and couldn’t speak out more forcefully on their behalf because that would not be politically advantageous. So nearly all of his economic initiatives had to be couched in language that referred to the middle class, even though the poor were being hurt far worse. LBJ could launch a war on poverty but not Barack Obama.

Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!

October 8th, 2012
8:04 am

Two parties,

Mitt Romney did well and looked well because lairs always do well while attacking. I don’t believe that will happen again…just sayin’

Road Scholar

October 8th, 2012
8:05 am

stands: Not all people in Georgia are Georgians! Plus this tv market covers more than Georgia!

killerj

October 8th, 2012
8:07 am

Anybody want a beer? go tea party.

Jhunt163

October 8th, 2012
8:08 am

Funny how anyone who questions an uptick of 6% in two months on the BLS report is suddenly a birther. Did you notice the unemployment rate on u6? Did you also notice the dramatic increase in Government employment? I am not stating there was any funny business on the side of the labor department, but anyone who puts stock in arbitrary household survey numbers needs to know about a bridge I have to sell.

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
8:09 am

Two Parties @ 8.04, I love Bob Herbert, but if you want a truly devastating critique, accept no substitutes:

Obama may have done more to depress voter turnout than all the i.d. laws combined. No, it probably didn’t change a lot of minds on who we support. But it sure as [all get-out] wasn’t inspiring. We like our candidates to be willing to show off their moves. Someone needs to get all Mickey Goldmill on Obama’s ass. Romney repeatedly called President Obama a liar without being called on it. That’s demoralizing [stuff], right there. Dude, you have facts on your side. Use them with clarity and conciseness. Fight, mother[fornicator]. Get off the ropes and get your footing and punch back. Or the country’s going down for the count.

Tundra Dude

October 8th, 2012
8:09 am

Well, it’s a link that doesn’t work to a Slate article by Ron Rosenbaum

sure it does
http://slate.me/UxO6gI

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
8:11 am

Plus this tv market covers more than Georgia!

Yeah, it gets Ala-frickin’-bama and Tenne-frickin’-see…

sorry, I don’t get this ad buy. I enjoyed seeing the ad, mind you–I like how he went all Rove and attacked Romney for his debate performance; somewhere, Karl is tipping his Klan hood and saying “nicely done!”

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
8:11 am

Republicans are burned out on reality teevee shows. Mitt and Ryan’s star roles in new series about two liars on a journey along their yellowbrick road is the latest buzz.

Jay

October 8th, 2012
8:11 am

” I am not stating there was any funny business on the side of the labor department,”

Then what ARE you stating?

indigo

October 8th, 2012
8:12 am

And yet, winning these “debates” is about as good an indicator of real competence as doing well on all these standardized tests our school children have to cram for.

We are really becoming an “all style, no substance” Nation.

Jhunt163

October 8th, 2012
8:14 am

Yeah, ok Jay your are right the unemployment rate is 7.8% and things are really looking up. Wonder what things will be like next month when it doesn’t include a household survey that was the largest number in 19 years.

barking frog

October 8th, 2012
8:14 am

Look at the content of
Romney’s debate remarks
and then this poll and you
see the reason for the
axiom ‘ never underestimate
the stupidity of the public’.

Tundra Dude

October 8th, 2012
8:19 am

ken:
Here is another reason why he is going down in the polls. We cannot trust fuzzy numbers.
Jack Welch, the former CEO of General Electric…..

Oh, right, Jack Welsh, the “Master Chef”

GE’s Jack Welch Knows About Cooking the Books
http://bit.ly/QXPHJy

Robert

October 8th, 2012
8:22 am

This debate had no winners. “Polls” are for people looking for excuses and Romney found one. This debate reminded me of 2 little children. One child (President Obama)follows directions and is respectful towards other people. The other child (Romney) is spoiled and will do anything to get attention no matter how they get it. As voters and parents how do we handle this situation? Do we praise and reward the child who follows directions and is respectful towards other people. Or do we punish the child who will do anything to get attention no matter how they get it.

I hope and pray most voters act like responsible parents and recognize the strengths and weaknesses of both children.

Brosephus™

October 8th, 2012
8:22 am

Then what ARE you stating?

He’s screaming, “I’M A JOBBER. HEAR ME ROAR!!!”

RB from Gwinnett

October 8th, 2012
8:23 am

This is fun watching you liberals heads spin trying to excuse the embarrassment Obama dealt you at the debate. Somebody call a waaaaambulance!

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
8:26 am

“He’s screaming, “I’M A JOBBER. HEAR ME ROAR!!!””

roar???

not so much

Classic Conservative

October 8th, 2012
8:26 am

Not usually subscribing to conspiracy theories, this one sounds interesting, even if not entirely plausible.
We know that incumbent presidents usually lose the first debate and we know that this incumbent held a pretty good lead in the polls before the first debate. We suspect that the media (especially the 24hr news stations) love a narrative that will keep viewership high. What if the president’s team decided to let up a little on the first debate so the media could have their underdog story and then the president with great showings in subsequent debates gave them the come-back story to maximize their viewership throughout the cycle? Then we realize they overdid it – lost too badly and now have more ground to make up than they intended.
What the hey? It’s a Monday.

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
8:27 am

Cons are clearly not embarrassed by Mitt’s presentation of more bigger lies and his subsequent “win” based on his willingness to say anything that gets him a vote. Lyin’ Ryan is certainly the perfect running mate for the Mitt.

Two Parties, One Con (Welcome)

October 8th, 2012
8:27 am

JKL2

October 8th, 2012
8:30 am

Libs doing everything possible to avoid talking about obama’s record. When you can’t compete in the arena of ideas, go for the character assassination. What lies is Mitt Robme going to tell today?

Vote obama: You were dumb enough to fall for it last time!

eddy

October 8th, 2012
8:30 am

The November surprise is on its way….but, but, but…how can Romney lie so much while Obama and his minions are the most truthful administration ever….when you lie, you must lie again to cover up the original lie and then again. “I say, my administration will be the most transparent of any administration ever.” “Remember, I said transparent not truthful.”

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
8:33 am

Two words to describe Romney’s performance in the debates:

Gish Gallop

The Gish Gallop, named after creationist Duane Gish, is the debating technique of drowning the opponent in such a torrent of half-truths, lies, and straw-man arguments that the opponent cannot possibly answer every falsehood in real time.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
8:34 am

“Libs doing everything possible to avoid talking about obama’s record. ”

the hell we are …

economic growth over the last 2 years
positive job growth over the last 2 years
killed OBL
… and have you seen the DOW lately???

am I better off than I was 4 years ago? oh, HELL YES.

Brosephus™

October 8th, 2012
8:35 am

Funny that these hardcore conservatives are here defending the ultimate RINO. I guess the hatred for all things Obama will cause the most conservative conservative back a RINO. Boy, when that Etch-A-Sketch got shook, I didn’t think it would shake a significant part of the population too.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Classic Conservative

October 8th, 2012
8:36 am

There’s a nice alliteration to it. Can I use it as a verb? For example, Romney gish-galloped all over the President in the first debate.

Whirled Peas

October 8th, 2012
8:36 am

At last the American people have gotten a good look at the empty chair. A look that not even the main stream biased press could defend against.

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
8:37 am

” Boy, when that Etch-A-Sketch got shook, I didn’t think it would shake a significant part of the population too”

when the spinless wonder is all they’ve got, they’ll prop him up as much as possible.

they called Kerry a flip-flopper, but he had NOTHING on Mittens.

Macon Voter

October 8th, 2012
8:39 am

When obama was 6 points ahead “WE WINNING!” Now that he’s behind. “Oh, these polls are just too fuzzy.” Save time. Pack now.

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
8:39 am

Thanks for the link, Two Parties. That concluding graf needs repeatin’:

Even as trickle-down economics has failed disastrously over the past 30-plus years, it has simultaneously become part of the fabric of elite thinking, making it virtually impossible to stand outside of it, and call out its deceptions in clear, unambiguous terms. Hence, anyone who does call out its deceptions in ordinary, non-professorial language, is by definition an outsider, a Rosa Parks, someone unserious whom none of us need pay attention to.

And yet, almost 60 years later, we all know that Rosa Parks was right.

Fred ™

October 8th, 2012
8:40 am

What lies, exactly, are you referring to? It’s pretty easy to sit back and call someone a liar…without evidence…

Wow. Really? The lies have been well documented. If you have your head so far up your rear end so as not to hear the truth how can we help you? But then you are probably a talk radio listener so separating fact from fiction isn’t your strong suit.

Mick

October 8th, 2012
8:40 am

Well. I just think that obama got caught up in the fickle finger of fate; just waiting for the sequel and no drama obama to get it right. Especially after biden takes ryan to the woodshed…

Antoinette

October 8th, 2012
8:41 am

Mitt Romney did very well in the debate with President Obama. You could see how insulated the President has become and how shocked he was that his opponent was not this right-wing, woman-hating, millionaire-serving, snake oil salesman that he and his party were trying to pretend he was. Repeating something over and over again doesn’t make it true. If you keeping screaming liar, liar…you must also have the facts to back it up. In this case, it was clear that Obama had nothing more than taunts and rederick.

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
8:41 am

At last the American people have gotten a good look at the empty chair.

By all means, hang your hat on THAT talking point. It’s a wiener!

kayaker 71

October 8th, 2012
8:41 am

The U6 numbers on unemployment are almost as bad as Georgia football. Can’t see how anyone could ignore the truth about unemployment. Seems like we have an actual figure closer to 14.7% and have had for some time now….. can you say 43 mos? We add only 114K jobs in Sept yet have a drop to 7.8% in the jobless. And you expect any thinking American to buy this?

Obama - Hugo -- same direction for each country??

October 8th, 2012
8:41 am

In landmark election, Venezuelan voters see two futures

By Andrew Rosati, Contributor
posted October 7, 2012 at 5:14 pm EDT

Caracas, Venezuela
Venezuelans are casting ballots today in one of the most important elections of their lifetimes.

With their votes today, they will either keep their current president Hugo Chavez in power or elect the opposition candidate Henrique Capriles into office. Mr. Chavez has promised to forge forward with his “socialist revolution,” while Mr.Capriles has cast himself as a moderate who will maintain social safety nets for the poor but put Venezuela’s economy on more stable footing.

Surveys have varied wildly on who is poised to win today, but supporters of each side are convinced that they have the edge – and that their choice is the only viable option for Venezuela.

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
8:43 am

“The U6 numbers on unemployment are almost as bad as Georgia football.”

I love how the right discovers U6 when the other team is in office …

barking frog

October 8th, 2012
8:43 am

Antoinette
You had me until i got
to the last word…

Keep Up the Good Fight!

October 8th, 2012
8:44 am

It appears that defeating Obama at any cost is what is most important to the conned. They’ll ignore Mitt’s flips, flops and lies and even claim him when he shows his RINO stripes.

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
8:44 am

Especially after biden takes ryan to the woodshed…

er… don’t be real surprised if Biden does a repeat of 2008, where he plays nice the whole way through.

Mind you, I’d love for Team Obama to let him get those big ol’ choppers into Ryan’s neck (figuratively speaking) but Biden will do as he’s told.

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
8:45 am

Mitt just did not denigrate the Republicans in that 47% eloquently enough on hidden camera. Everything’s all right now though because he was more eloquent once he knew he was being recorded before his voting audience. :lol:

DownInAlbany

October 8th, 2012
8:49 am

Did you people make it to Caracas this weekend to cast your vote for Hugo? From the results, it looks like maybe you did.

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
8:49 am

And you expect any thinking American to buy this?

Meanwhile, back on the ranch, the conned yearn for a return to trickle down and skittle-producing Laffer Curves and the next exciting episode of Ryan’s Yellowbrick Roadmap.

Fred ™

October 8th, 2012
8:49 am

Wow seems to be a record number of sock puppets for so early in the morning. I thought Kylewas coming back today……..

Jm

October 8th, 2012
8:50 am

Obama will regain a lead until the next debate

Obama is running some pretty misleading ads down in FL now

Taking 3 word snippets from statements or reports to say Romney is a bad guy

It’s “taking things out of context” taken to the extreme

Anonymous

October 8th, 2012
8:50 am

Let me make this quite clear in six words…I DON’T WANT ROMNEY AS PRESIDENT!!! As a person with a disability, Romney getting in as President is scary. He’ll run this country into the ground. In fact if he becomes President, I’m moving to Canada and staying there until his 4-8 years are up or someone impeachs that good for nothing liar, bully and racist!

Classic Conservative

October 8th, 2012
8:51 am

Why do we as a society, attach to candidates possessing a boringness, solemnity, pomposity, complacency, smugness, and self-righteousness, all of which are hallmarks of the Victorian character when, in our own lives, we tend toward the flightful, spirited, “oops, did I just do that? ha. ha.” character? We take risks, (maxing a credit card, plucking a grape from the produce bin) say, “oh, well” then travel on.
But then so many attach to politicians like Gingrey, Price, Romney, Ryan. Why?

TBone

October 8th, 2012
8:52 am

Some of the American people have woken up and smell the cat food, others will never wake up. Your messiah has no clothes on and it’s very alarming. Vote for the MORMON, they’re good folks.

Brosephus™

October 8th, 2012
8:52 am

Two Parties @ 8:27

Appreciate that link. I called a poster out for supporting a candiate that made lying part of his platform, and as par for the course, the poster shifted goalposts. Your link puts that lie out in black-and-white for anybody with a pulse to see.

“I will not reduce the taxes paid by high-income Americans,” Romney said in the debate. But even as he spoke, his website still touted his plan to cut marginal rates by 20 per cent – a monumental amount of savings for those at the top, which would necessarily have to end up hurting those who make less, be they poor or middle class.

Romney’s big lie about his tax-cut plan is actually composed of several different lies, all tied together. But the central lie was outed by MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, a former Senate budget staffer, who knows this territory the way that seasoned professionals do.

Yet, the point he made should be obvious to anyone: when you propose a tax-cut, the size of the tax-cut is the size of the tax-cut. In his exact words, “The tax cut is measured by how much revenue you will cut from tax collection. That’s what – that’s how the tax cut is described.”

When you propose ways to off-set the cut, seeking to minimise or eliminate its impact on the budget, those are ways of paying for the tax-cut, which O’Donnell notes, are “a whole separate section of the legislation”.They do not magically turn the tax cut into not a tax cut. They are policies, not pixie dust.

I tried telling the poster that dropping rates 20% IS a tax cut, regardless to what you do to pay for them. As I said earlier, I am amazed at how much of our population got shook. We live in an Etch-A-Sketch nation.

indigo

October 8th, 2012
8:53 am

down – 8:49

And just who is this “you people” you keep refering to?

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
8:54 am

if he becomes President, I’m moving to Canada and staying there until his 4-8 years are up

curiously, I hear there’s an airline that’s running an ad campaign appealing to just those sentiments (in a non-partisan fashion, of course).

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/lifestyle/2012/10/jetblue-will-fly-upset-voters-out-of-the-country/

kayaker 71

October 8th, 2012
8:54 am

Rasmussen has Romney 49%…. Bozo 47%. Seems that Romney, according to Rasmussen, has gained some ground in Florida, VA and Ohio. This isn’t over, liberals, even with your early voting edge and Bozo trying to suppress the military vote by not allowing them to extend their time to vote in Ohio. This clown will do anything to win.

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
8:54 am

” In fact if he becomes President, I’m moving to Canada and staying there until his 4-8 years are up”

ohfercryingoutloud … seriously???

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 8th, 2012
8:55 am

It’s “taking things out of context” taken to the extreme

“You didn’t build that”

Brosephus™

October 8th, 2012
8:55 am

Taking 3 word snippets from statements or reports to say Romney is a bad guy

Well, one doesn’t have to shorten it to 3 words to make it effective.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPgfzknYd20

Steve

October 8th, 2012
8:55 am

Paul Krugman:

“The U.S. economy is still far short of where it should be, and the job market has a long way to go before it makes up the ground lost in the Great Recession. But the employment data do suggest an economy that is slowly healing, an economy in which declining consumer debt burdens and a housing revival have finally put us on the road back to full employment.
And that’s the truth that the right can’t handle. The furor over Friday’s report revealed a political movement that is rooting for American failure, so obsessed with taking down Mr. Obama that good news for the nation’s long-suffering workers drives its members into a blind rage. It also revealed a movement that lives in an intellectual bubble, dealing with uncomfortable reality — whether that reality involves polls or economic data — not just by denying the facts, but by spinning wild conspiracy theories.

It is, quite simply, frightening to think that a movement this deranged wields so much political power.”

DownInAlbany

October 8th, 2012
8:55 am

Apparently, Joe Biden is taking 6 days off, at a critcal time in the campaign. Is it to prepare for the debate on Thursday or simply to keep him out of the public eye for as long as possible? I’m thinking the latter. Unfortunately for the Dems, it eliminates at least one of their excuses for his performance come Friday morning.

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
8:55 am

Mitt eloquently re-stated his position to you people in his constituency in the first debate with his rendition of “there’s a sucker born every minute.” Good show, Mitt.

Brosephus™

October 8th, 2012
8:56 am

Bozo trying to suppress the military vote by not allowing them to extend their time to vote in Ohio.

Do you have a quota for lies, or do you just wing it day by day?

Jm

October 8th, 2012
8:58 am

“As a person with a disability, Romney getting in as President is scary”

Yeah, there are a lot of people using disability as unemployment insurance since Obama made it easy to get disability benefits

If you can work but are falsely claiming disability, you probably do have cause for concern

It seems you can use a computer well enough to type, I wonder why you’re on disability…..

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
8:58 am

That kayaker. Always clowning around and still expecting to be taken seriously. This just in from kayakerland: Mitt wins debate against Ronald McDonald. Mitt said “tastes great” while Ronald argued for “less filling” and the crowd in kayakerland roared. Good for him.

Paul

October 8th, 2012
8:59 am

So Americans consider the positions of the predebate Romney and they aren’t buying it. Romney goes into the debate and edges closer to sounding like Pres Obama and Americans think it sounds pretty good. Got it.

Article in the paper over the weekend dealt with Republicans rallying around Romney. Reporter pointed out all his past positions – prolife, healthcare, etc – that he’s changed and asked if that bothered them. Theme was “but he sounds good. He talks about God and Liberty and Patriotism and no Big Government so that other stuff doesn’t matter.”

He does know his audience, doesn’t he? Just like on this blog last week – how many Republicans did we see taking issue with the latest Romney Transformation?

Fred ™

October 8th, 2012
8:59 am

TBone

October 8th, 2012
8:52 am

Some of the American people have woken up and smell the cat food, others will never wake up. Your messiah has no clothes on and it’s very alarming. Vote for the MORMON, they’re good folks.
+++++++++++++++

We know what Sean Hannity has to say, thanks for repeating him, but have YOU any original thoughts to convey?

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
8:59 am

“It’s “taking things out of context” taken to the extreme

“You didn’t build that””

you know, I wsa going to post that, but I could just hear their defense … “that was DIFFRUNT!!”

RB from Gwinnett

October 8th, 2012
8:59 am

Kayaker71, they aren’t counting on thinking Americans to buy it, they’re counting on liberals.

Granny Godzilla - Union Thugette

October 8th, 2012
9:01 am

K 71

Do you read anything besides the Back of the box of Lucky Charms?

“Bozo trying to suppress the military vote by not allowing them to extend their time to vote in Ohio.”

And yellow stars and pink hearts and green shamrocks……

mm

October 8th, 2012
9:02 am

When is the so called liberal media going to quit covering for Romney and call him out for his 27 lies in 38 minutes?

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
9:02 am

“thinking Americans”

:lol:

and yet, what’s the #1 criticism by GOPpers??? that we’re all educated elitists …

I wish they’d make up their mind

Goldie

October 8th, 2012
9:02 am

Ouch — Dems gotta show up in Nov.! :)

Two Parties, One Con (Welcome)

October 8th, 2012
9:02 am

So, Jay, I know you focus is on national and local issues, but any chance you have a take you’d care to share on the re-election of that big bugaboo of the American liberal establishment, the big awful socialist ‘dictator’ Chavez?

I’d be curious on your take.

Jm

October 8th, 2012
9:02 am

Kam

That’s four words :)

Actually, played in context it still sounds bad, so beat that drum all you want, it doesn’t help

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
9:03 am

It seems you can use a computer well enough to type, I wonder why you’re on disability…..

jm at his finest. loser.

kayaker 71

October 8th, 2012
9:04 am

Brocephus, 8:56,

Tell me why anyone, especially a sitting president, would file a lawsuit to keep military from voting. Now that’s not just in any state….. it’s Ohio. And that’s the only one. He didn’t do it in CA or NY….. just Ohio where those 18 electoral votes are critical to a second term. Now, seriously, Brocephus….. you rant on and on about suppression of those poor unfortunates that just can’t possibly have a picture ID because they are minorities and then you ignore an egregious insult to our military, especially those overseas. Hypocrisy…… it is alive and well.

Go Greyhound

October 8th, 2012
9:05 am

Anonymous @ 8:50 am
In fact if he becomes President, I’m moving to Canada

Start packing and let us know where we can send your prepaid Greyhound ticket. Remember, if you talk the talk you better be ready to walk the walk!!!!

Tundra Dude

October 8th, 2012
9:05 am

to Kayak:
There is no Rasmussen poll, it’s a pay-to-poll agency , Pulse Opinion Research.
It’s no secret, you call mainly landline phones, you’ll reach disproportionately old flatulating conservatives.

http://bit.ly/QEMrSO

Rasmussen Polling Methodology Leaves A Lot To Be Desired

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 8th, 2012
9:05 am

USinUK

I just checked in over at drudgey and saw this:

Ruth Davidson, the Scottish Conservative leader, is to highlight official figures showing that only 283,080 households north of the border – 12 per cent of the total – pay more in tax than they receive in public services.

[...]

She will blame Alex Salmond, the SNP First Minister, and his Labour predecessors for nurturing a “corrosive sense of entitlement” among voters that has prevented her party making a comeback in Scotland.

Do y’all have Whole Foods over there in the UK?

Are there huge __________ ladies with grocery carts filled with steaks and lobster paying for it with food stamps and their __________ kids all wearing the latest Air Jordans talking on their iphones?

Are they then followed out to their Bentleys with the 30′ spinners?

Fred ™

October 8th, 2012
9:05 am

Two Parties, One Con (Welcome)

October 8th, 2012
9:02 am

So, Jay, I know you focus is on national and local issues, but any chance you have a take you’d care to share on the re-election of that big bugaboo of the American liberal establishment, the big awful socialist ‘dictator’ Chavez?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Is THAT the new talk radio tack? Focus on Chavez? Gearing up for another unfunded republican war? We gonna invade South America this time?

Jm

October 8th, 2012
9:06 am

Taxpayer

The Internet and computer make it possible for most everyone to work if they have the willpower

For Pete’s sake, if Stephen Hawking can work, so can most Americans

I’m not advocating ending disability, but we shouldn’t be handing it out like lollipops either

Doggone/GA

October 8th, 2012
9:07 am

“So, Jay, I know you focus is on national and local issues, but any chance you have a take you’d care to share”

blogspot.com is ready when you are

Brosephus™

October 8th, 2012
9:07 am

Paul: He does know his audience, doesn’t he? Just like on this blog last week – how many Republicans did we see taking issue with the latest Romney Transformation?

He’s playing them like a fiddle and they’re too obsessed with defeating Obama to see they’re getting played for fools.

Jm

October 8th, 2012
9:07 am

Anonymous

Enjoy Canada. Nice place, but you won’t be missed.

Butch Cassidy (I)

October 8th, 2012
9:08 am

K71 – “The U6 numbers on unemployment are almost as bad as Georgia football.”

The U-6 has been around for as long as the BLS has been tracking labor statistics. I’m just curious as to why no one EVER quoted the U-6 prior to 2009?

Fred ™

October 8th, 2012
9:09 am

kayaker 71

October 8th, 2012
9:04 am

Brocephus, 8:56,

Tell me why anyone, especially a sitting president, would file a lawsuit to keep military from voting. Now that’s not just in any state….. it’s Ohio. And that’s the only one. He didn’t do it in CA or NY….. just Ohio where those 18 electoral votes are critical to a second term. Now, seriously, Brocephus….. you rant on and on about suppression of those poor unfortunates that just can’t possibly have a picture ID because they are minorities and then you ignore an egregious insult to our military, especially those overseas. Hypocrisy…… it is alive and well.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Wow Pinnochio, your nose must have grown three feet this morning. have you NO shame?

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 8th, 2012
9:09 am

Enjoy Canada Taiwan. Nice place, but you won’t be missed.

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
9:09 am

RW-(the original)

October 8th, 2012
9:09 am

Anyone know why Team Obama has adverts on my TeeVee? I saw a few whilst watching the Division Series this weekend, and I thought, “well that’s kind of weird/a waste of money, targeting Georgians.”

stands for…,

What you’re seeing are the national slots during those broadcasts. When ad time is allocated on a national broadcast network some of it is local, but other slots are national.

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
9:10 am

That kayaker. Always clowning around

As someone who will let loose an occasional “Mittens” himself, I do find it rather charming to see that Kayaker seems to believe that if he *ever* fails to refer to the President as “Bozo,” Tinkerbell dies, or something.

Mr. Lost without a telepromter or talking points

October 8th, 2012
9:10 am

So, libs — Why didn’t Obama challenge Romney DURING the debate????

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
9:10 am

When ad time is allocated on a national broadcast network some of it is local, but other slots are national.

That’s kinda what I figured, but wasn’t sure, thanks.

Two Parties, One Con (Welcome)

October 8th, 2012
9:12 am

Fred: “Is THAT the new talk radio tack? Focus on Chavez? Gearing up for another unfunded republican war? We gonna invade South America this time?”

No, this is something you’ll probably hear next to nothing about as there is almost total agreement on Chavez between the two parties and throughout the entire media establishment: they universally despise him. So, as with other issues the parties are in lockstep agreement on, you won’t hear too much other than some sniffs and snide dismissals about the ‘takers’ and deluded masses of Venezuela not knowing any better. Funny how the US mainstream press will deride the “47% takers” remarks of Mitt Romney and then turn around and suggest the same basic thing when it sees results elsewhere that it doesn’t like.

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 8th, 2012
9:13 am

“When teleprompters are outlawed, only outlaws will have teleprompters.”
– Thomas Jefferson

Paul

October 8th, 2012
9:14 am

kayaker 71

“Bozo trying to suppress the military vote by not allowing them to extend their time to vote in Ohio.”

I’m beginning to doubt you were ever in the military, let alone the rank you claim. else you’d know the Ohio case was not about the traditional absentee voter policies or about, residency vs location regarding voting. You would know it was about early voting and you’d know a federal judge issued an injunction denying modifying the early voting rules to give special privileges to military members.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/military.asp

Brosephus™

October 8th, 2012
9:14 am

Tell me why anyone, especially a sitting president, would file a lawsuit to keep military from voting.

As soon as a sitting president does that, I’ll answer that question. When you have to lie to protect legislation, maybe the legislation is effed up from the beginning. Nobody tried to keep the military from voting. That law in Ohio cut back the number of days EVERYONE ELSE got to vote. We still believe in Equal Protection here in the US, and that includes Macon too.

Now, seriously, Brocephus….. you rant on and on about suppression of those poor unfortunates that just can’t possibly have a picture ID because they are minorities and then you ignore an egregious insult to our military, especially those overseas.

As a 2nd Generation Black male who’s voicing concerns over voter rights, you’re damned right I will protect the rights of ALL Americans to vote. As somebody in their 70’s you know how many Americans lost their lives trying to get equal access to the ballot box. Either you’re playing stupid about our past or you were one of those who fought against that equal access. Based on your bigoted and somewhat racists bullsh*t you post here, I’d go with the latter, but that’s water off a duck’s back now.

That law wasn’t no insult to the military and you damn well know it. That law was an insult to the everyday man and woman of Ohio who lost 3 days access to the ballot box. When you have to lie to make your point, you don’t really have a point to make. Trying to use the military as an accessory in that lie would disgrace almost anybody, but since we’re talking about you kayaker, I doubt you feel anything bad at all for pushing that lie.

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
9:14 am

I’m not advocating ending disability, but we shouldn’t be handing it out like lollipops either

Meanwhile, jm, you toss out the bull like the free lollipops without even giving your own words a second thought.

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 8th, 2012
9:15 am

HUGO ‘WINS’…
Supporters party…
Divided nation…
Tanks in streets…

drudgey spam

Jm

October 8th, 2012
9:15 am

Obama is an empty suit

You saw the real Obama during the debate

And he sux

lynnie gal

October 8th, 2012
9:15 am

Intelligent Designer–Slate link works. Thanks for sharing.

A few polls after a poor debate performance by Obama does not an election make.

kayaker 71

October 8th, 2012
9:15 am

Butch, 9:08,

“Prior to 2009?”……. Seems like the numbers were somewhat better then. Except for a brief time in 1980 due to Carter’s bungling of the economy, the numbers have been well below 8%. We have been closer, if you take the highs and lows, to a traditional 5%, through Reagan, Ford, Bush 1, Clinton and Bush 2. And, in recent political history, we have never had unemployment at so high a percentage that lasted so long.

RW-(the original)

October 8th, 2012
9:16 am

And to be a tad more clear you’ll mainly only see those national slots on a TBS/TNT type of national broadcast. It’s far too expensive to do that on an NBC/ABC type so if you see them there it’ll probably be very late in the race or someone has gone daft and run local spots for no apparent reason.

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 8th, 2012
9:16 am

Biden Takes 6 Days Off Campaign Trail to Prep for Debate…

drudgey spam

Jm

October 8th, 2012
9:17 am

Chavez to go big on socialism

Been working swell so far (/sarc)

He says Obama would vote for him. On that point he’s correct.

Brosephus™

October 8th, 2012
9:17 am

kayaker

One last point to show you don’t have a clue as to what you’re talking about, how did that Ohio law affect military votes overseas? Given that overseas voters usually vote by absentee ballot, how did that law affect them when the law gave military three extra days of IN PERSON voting? Talk about peddling stupidity down Main Street…. :roll:

Fred ™

October 8th, 2012
9:18 am

No, this is something you’ll probably hear next to nothing about as there is almost total agreement on Chavez between the two parties and throughout the entire media establishment: they universally despise him.

There ya go sport. So why do YOU insist on talking about a non issue, that asshat Chavez? just engaging in your talk radio/FOX news practice of slinging poo against a wall to see what sticks?

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
9:18 am

I posted this earlier…

Karl is tipping his Klan hood and saying “nicely done!”

and ya know, that’s a really stupid thing to post even in jest. My apologies.

Jm

October 8th, 2012
9:18 am

Let’s see Obama do a live press conference with reporters asking questions.

Oh wait he doesn’t do those anymore.

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
9:19 am

Why didn’t Obama challenge Romney DURING the debate????

Why should President Obama be confronted with a scenario where he must remind his opponent repeatedly that he should not be telling lies in order to “win” the moment. President Obama has enough of that crap to contend with when dealing with Iran’s leaders, etc. Mitt should be honest. He should set a good example for his children and for his constituency.

Mick

October 8th, 2012
9:20 am

jm

So what was romney? Santa claus? Promised anything an everything just to muddle up the picture. His plan has been analyzed and the numbers just don’t add up but…just trust us and when we get in we’ll let you know. I don’t think so…

Jm

October 8th, 2012
9:21 am

Let’s see Obama speak extemporaneously

Oh wait, he doesn’t do that. Well, anyway.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

October 8th, 2012
9:22 am

The Romney debate lies:

9) “The president’s put it in place as much public debt — almost as much debt held by the public as all prior presidents combined.” This is not even close to being true. When Obama took office, the national debt stood at $10.626 trillion. Now the national debt is over $16 trillion. That $5.374 trillion increase is nowhere near as much debt as all the other presidents combined.

ThinkProgress

stands for decibels

October 8th, 2012
9:22 am

It’s far too expensive to do that on an NBC/ABC type so if you see them there it’ll probably be very late in the race or someone has gone daft and run local spots for no apparent reason.

Yep.

Now, if you could explain why Henry Repeating Arms keeps running all those ads on MSNBC, I’m going to have to elevate you to Most High Pundit Poobah status.

(mind you, I love the ads, myself…)

JamVet

October 8th, 2012
9:23 am

Hello!

The popular vote is like the Time of Possession stat in football.

Which is to say, a heckuva lot less relevant than the actual score. As in the actual score of the Electoral College.

Where the incumbent’s lead has not evaporated.

But this “tightening of the race” is all good for those easily amused by the corproate media who need such distractions!

Ben Shockley

October 8th, 2012
9:23 am

I’m buying as much stock in Tide as I can afford. Liberals have been wetting their beds all over America since that debate shellacking.

hiram

October 8th, 2012
9:23 am

The “undecided” electorate is like the huge flocks of black birds that simultaneously change direction in flight every few seconds. Lacking the ability to process conventional information, the upcoming debate performances will determine the direction they zig or zag next, and no one can accurately predict that.

Paul

October 8th, 2012
9:24 am

I know this is likely a losing effort for those who need it the most, but here’s an article about how the unemployment numbers are calculated, why it can seemingly conflict with the jobs numbers and all about what a great, grand conspiracy it is to benefit the incumbent (okay, so that last bit was sarcasm).

http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/10/05/4314835/how-the-government-compiles-the.html#

I’m guessing there’s a group on our blog who won’t read it. Care to guess which group that is?

Woodstock Mike

October 8th, 2012
9:26 am

It’s so hilarious reading these comments!! I like when the liberals say “Romney is a liar!”. LOL

And I assume you think Obama has never told a lie right? So funny…

RB from Gwinnett

October 8th, 2012
9:26 am

From: robert brown
To: Robert Brown
Sent: Mon, October 8, 2012 9:20:53 AM
Subject:

Here’s some good data showing the growing rolls of the disability crowd. The welfare crowd knows this is the golden ticket. Get on the list, stay on the list. Get the cash and a parking space up front everywhere you go. All it takes is 1 doctor to sign the papers and I’d bet if you look at the doctor who signed the papers in evey geographical area, you’ll find they’re all taking the same path of least resistance. You’ll notice this trend actually started when Clinton’s welfare reform went into effect and has steadily risen since then. http://news.investors.com/business/042012-608418-ssdi-disability-rolls-skyrocket-under-obama.htm?p=full

As with everything else, liberals refuse to separate the people in true need of disability protection from those scamming the system. They don’t seem to notice the food stamp crowd is obese and put 2 and 2 together. Here’s a tip, libs, there is no such thing as “big boned”. They’re FAT. And they aren’t getting that way because they don’t have enough to eat. The debate over the science on that issue ended a long time ago.

Paul

October 8th, 2012
9:26 am

Ben Shockley

No matter what reincarnation you choose, you’ve never seemed to grasp the concept of discussing the topic before making your bid for attention, have you?

Obama is over

October 8th, 2012
9:27 am

Pretty sad that the new Axelrod talking points are to call the opposition liars rather than present a positive platform for the next four years- really classy. And exactly which Romney are you accusing of lying- the caraciture created by the Obama team for the past year or the Romney Obama confronted on the debate? Obama has started to believe his own BS. You can quote unnamed liberal economists all day long, but that will not be an excuse for Obama’s mediocre record.

Woodstock Mike

October 8th, 2012
9:27 am

“When Obama took office, the national debt stood at $10.626 trillion. Now the national debt is over $16 trillion. That $5.374 trillion increase is nowhere near as much debt as all the other presidents combined.”

This guy was actually defending Obama with the commments above. Talk about being an absolute moron!! Defending Obama for not adding as much debt as all presidents combined, that’s great!!

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

October 8th, 2012
9:28 am

The Romney debate lies:

11) “What we do have right now is a setting where I’d like to bring money from overseas back to this country.” Romney’s plan to shift the country to a territorial tax system would allow corporations to do business and make profits overseas without ever being taxed on it in the United States. This encourages American companies to invest abroad and could cost the country up to 800,000 jobs.

ThinkProgress

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
9:28 am

Republicans know that honesty does not sell snake oil.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

October 8th, 2012
9:29 am

Woodstock Mike, try to learn how to read quotation marks in a sentence. It really helps reading comprehension.

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 8th, 2012
9:29 am

Oops, looks like someone made a mistake with their copy/pasting, eh Robert Brown?

Citizen of the World

October 8th, 2012
9:32 am

Last week, according to the Republicans, polls were not to be believed — obviously skewed! Watch them latch on to this poll like a drowning man on a floatation device.

Old Goober

October 8th, 2012
9:32 am

Tell me why anyone, especially a sitting president, would file a lawsuit to keep military from voting. Now that’s not just in any state….. it’s Ohio. And that’s the only one.

“Keep military from voting” kayaker? Why don’t you tell the whole truth? The GOP in Ohio passed a law allowing extended voting for the military, which they believe favors them. The law denies the same extended voting to all others. After all, that might bring in some Democratic votes.

I won’t call you a liar—just a half-truther. But you’re as shameless as Romney in your equivocating.

DownInAlbany

October 8th, 2012
9:33 am

Obama is now soliciting campaign contributions from overseas, a clear violation of law!

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

October 8th, 2012
9:33 am

The Romney debate lies:

19) “And, unfortunately, when — when — when you look at Obamacare, the Congressional Budget Office has said it will cost $2,500 a year more than traditional insurance. So it’s adding to cost.” Obamacare will actually provide millions of families with tax credits to make health care more affordable.

TaxPayer

October 8th, 2012
9:34 am

I knew a Robert Brown at the company where I worked many years ago. I think he lived in Gwinnett. Did you get a little carried away with your post, rb.

Jefferson

October 8th, 2012
9:35 am

Seems to me Romney lost if he is going to change all of his positions, which he did.

Paul

October 8th, 2012
9:35 am

DownInAlbany

“Obama is now soliciting campaign contributions from overseas, a clear violation of law!”

Welcome to the blog. But, if you don’t want to get lumped in with all those who, as Granny Godzilla put it, get their information from the back of Lucky Charms boxes, you’ll find it advantageous to provide a bit more background and a link to show where you got your information. If it’s a place you can’t link, like Rush’s radio show, it’s okay to just say so.

bob

October 8th, 2012
9:36 am

I think Romney should hammer Obama over his lies about the embassy killings. Many here want to say Romney lied but are you really stupid enough to believe the 9/11 bombings were over a video ? CNN reported what really happened 3 days after it happened but Obama was telling the UN and everyone else it was over a video. You will never hear Romney telling his supporters they are successful only do to blind luck. On the other hand, Obama tells that to his supporters and they agree with him.

kayaker 71

October 8th, 2012
9:36 am

Finn, 9:33,

I like this one better ……… “This Health Care Plan will only cost the American taxpayer 940B dollars”.

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 8th, 2012
9:36 am

Jay:

It’s not just “but historically, that was a whupping the likes of which we hadn’t seen before.”

What it really shows is Obama is TOTALLY unqualified to be President of the United States.

Butch Cassidy (I)

October 8th, 2012
9:36 am

K71 – “Seems like the numbers were somewhat better then.”

I see, the U-6 only matters when you disagree with the stats. Gotcha.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

October 8th, 2012
9:37 am

The Romney debate lies:

This one’s a doozy:

22) “I like the way we did it [health care] in Massachusetts…What were some differences? We didn’t raise taxes.” Romney raised fees, but he can claim that he didn’t increase taxes because the federal government funded almost half of his reforms.

ThinkProgress

0311/8541/5811/1811/1801

October 8th, 2012
9:37 am

By the way ………. I can’t believe you posted something from “Drudgey”.

Kammie will be all upset !

RB from Gwinnett

October 8th, 2012
9:37 am

Darn that “select all”!! Oh we’ll!!

Fred ™

October 8th, 2012
9:38 am

DownInAlbany

October 8th, 2012
9:33 am

Obama is now soliciting campaign contributions from overseas, a clear violation of law!
++++++++++++++++++++

I’m sure you just *forgot* to post us a link to this little gem. But you’ll correct that immediately, right?

getalife

October 8th, 2012
9:38 am

It is a conspiracy.

DownInAlbany

October 8th, 2012
9:38 am

Ok, Paul…I’m not very techo-savvy….http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/08/claim-obama-campaign-illegally-solicited-foreign-donors-via-social-media-website/

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 8th, 2012
9:38 am

Obama is now soliciting campaign contributions from overseas, a clear violation of law!

Not even on drudgey.

bob

October 8th, 2012
9:39 am

Paul, I have read this thread many times and do not see this documentation. In fact, many here are saying Romney lied in the debate yet I see no supporting links.

skipper

October 8th, 2012
9:40 am

I am an independant.period. However, I did debate in high school (along with football) and the pundits can go back and forth all they want. That was a double-barrel high-brass butt’-whoopin’ Romney dished out…….period.

Tinkerella

October 8th, 2012
9:41 am

Well, if the Mittster wins, perhaps he can get Paul Broun with some of his illustrious pearls of wisdom to help out with things. He can rewrite history (or just ignore parts of it).

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
9:42 am

“Do y’all have Whole Foods over there in the UK?

Are there huge __________ ladies with grocery carts filled with steaks and lobster paying for it with food stamps and their __________ kids all wearing the latest Air Jordans talking on their iphones?

Are they then followed out to their Bentleys with the 30′ spinners?”

actually, this is where my colleagues think that I’m the hanging judge – because the welfare system here makes the one in the US look positively Scrooge-like.

Tundra Dude

October 8th, 2012
9:43 am

anony mouse wrote, in part:
I DON’T WANT ROMNEY AS PRESIDENT!!! As a person with a disability, (snipped)
I’m moving to Canada…..

No you’re not…..moving to Canada….
Even young, healthy, educated/skilled workers have difficulty trying to emigrate there.
Good luck finding any country willing to take you, unless you have a big $ta$h in the bank.

Finn McCool (The System isn't Broken; It's Fixed)

October 8th, 2012
9:43 am

And something Obama said that should worry us:

“Lehrer: Do you see a major difference between the two of you on Social Security?

Obama: You know, I suspect that, on Social Security, we’ve got a somewhat similar position. Social Security is structurally sound. It’s going to have to be tweaked the way it was by Ronald Reagan and Speaker — Democratic Speaker Tip O’Neill.”

Ladies and gentleman, that was the sound of your president offering to screw you on your retirement. This revealing exchange was followed by some politically strategic talk by both candidates about how current retirees shouldn’t be worried, because, as we all know, their votes are needed in the short term. But the rest of us? Be very, very worried.

http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/what-you-need-know-about-obama-and-social-security-sell-out

Talking Points

October 8th, 2012
9:44 am

Question for all of the Repubs on the blog…Why do ALL Republicans feel like they must out talk or get the last word in even when they know that they are wrong?

Example.

Weatherman:
The weather calls for a 100% chance of rain today.

Republican:
That can not be true. When Ronald Reagan was President, it never rained on Mondays.

Weatherman:
How can you say that when it has been raining all morning and there is a flash flood warning?

Republican:
That can not be true. When Ronald Reagan was President, it never rained on Mondays.

The Thin Guy

October 8th, 2012
9:44 am

If we are cursed with another 4 years of Dumb and Dumber zerØcare will make its transition from a nightmare to the straw that broke the camel’s back. It will totally destroy the American economy and our healthcare system. Look at the articles about the doctor shortage in Georgia. What do you think is going to happen in 2014? In 2014 everyone will be required to have healthcare insurance but it will be as useless as teats on a nun. All the good doctors will go to a cash only business and refuse all forms of insurance. So you will have to pay for insurance which you can use only to see a government doctor. Unless you are rich you will be forced to sit in a waiting room with thousands of other peons waiting to see your doctor who flunked out of taxidermy school in Bangthedesk. Don’t know if Mittens can prevail in the next debates but if he fails we are doomed to the Third World.

Jack

October 8th, 2012
9:45 am

Whole lotta liberal frustration goin’ on here. Hope fist fights don’t break out.

Brosephus™

October 8th, 2012
9:45 am

In fact, many here are saying Romney lied in the debate yet I see no supporting links.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPgfzknYd20

Fred ™

October 8th, 2012
9:45 am

bob

October 8th, 2012
9:39 am

Paul, I have read this thread many times and do not see this documentation. In fact, many here are saying Romney lied in the debate yet I see no supporting links.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Actually there have been several. Brocephus posted a great video of Romney “debating himself.” It shows a clip of Romeny saying one thing in the debate followed by his “original” position from earlier speeches. It’s quite funny. If you google Romney debate lies you’ll find many links. I got this one from googling debate lies……

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/06/1140747/-Four-of-Romney-s-big-debate-lies-in-one-nbsp-video

Goldie

October 8th, 2012
9:45 am

“President Obama has enough of that crap to contend with when dealing with Iran’s leaders, etc. Mitt should be honest.”

thanks Taxpayer — Our President came with the facts on his side and decided to not wrassle Mitt in that mud pit of lies and distortions that he kept slingin’ around! :)

Mighty Righty

October 8th, 2012
9:45 am

Below is “PROOF” the lies being told about the butt whipping Onama took last week are being told by Obama, not Romney.

Princeton Economist: Obama Campaign Is Misrepresenting My Study on Romney’s Tax Plan
8:45 AM, Oct 8, 2012 • By JOHN MCCORMACK

Last night, the Obama campaign blasted out another email claiming that Mitt Romney’s tax plan would either require raising taxes on the middle class or blowing a hole in the deficit. “Even the studies that Romney has cited to claim his plan adds up still show he would need to raise middle-class taxes,” said the Obama campaign press release. “In fact, Harvard economist Martin Feldstein and Princeton economist Harvey Rosen both concede that paying for Romney’s tax cuts would require large tax increases on families making between $100,000 and $200,000.”

But that’s not true. Princeton professor Harvey Rosen tells THE WEEKLY STANDARD in an email that the Obama campaign is misrepresenting his paper on Romney’s tax plan:

“I can’t tell exactly how the Obama campaign reached that characterization of my work. It might be that they assume that Governor Romney wants to keep the taxes from the Affordable Care Act in place, despite the fact that the Governor has called for its complete repeal. The main conclusion of my study is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 about the same. That is, an increase in the tax burden on lower and middle income individuals is not required in order to make the overall plan revenue neutral.”

Fred ™

October 8th, 2012
9:46 am

Well looky there Brocephus, great mind not only think alike but think on the same time stamp lol.

getalife

October 8th, 2012
9:46 am

Our President had to make an ad on mitt going crazy after the Libya attack because that dang liberal media refuses to talk about it.

The media is doing a great job for romney and the gop.

Fred ™

October 8th, 2012
9:48 am

Our President came with the facts on his side and decided to not wrassle Mitt in that mud pit of lies and distortions that he kept slingin’ around!

I wouldn’t say TAHT Goldie. Looked to be like they were trading lie for lie that night lol.

getalife

October 8th, 2012
9:51 am

Yeah our President ran away from his tax plan and told nothing but lies too Fred.

What ever, it worked for romney.

Paul

October 8th, 2012
9:53 am

DownInAlbany

Thanks.

I’m heading out for a bit, but two things: first, the link goes to a site that reprints what it finds elsewhere. Second, the source if “The Government Accountability Institute.” NOT the Government Accountability Office, an official agency of the US government. Any time an organization tries to make itself sound like an official government agency, one’s antenna should go up. And okay, third: briefly skimming, the assertion that “they solicit for donations and lots of people who visited the website were from overseas” is pretty darn weak. Maybe my understanding is off, but the idea of restricting what country of residence has access to a website like that just doesn’t happen – unless you’re in China or N Korea, maybe.

bob

Many here refer to any stretching, shading, changing of a fact as a ‘lie.’

Just something some of us don’t take all that seriously. Unless it’s particularly egregious.

Romney’s got an advantage, here. His positions have been so general and many identify Ryan’s proposals as Romney’s positions, that he can say “what? Me?!!?”

out for a bit.

Paul

October 8th, 2012
9:55 am

bob

make ” changing of a fact ” read “changing of a position”

Donovan

October 8th, 2012
9:59 am

I must give credit to Bookman’s sense of fair play and realization of it is what it is. Yes, Mr. Bookman, your candidate got thoroughly whipped in his debate with the next POTUS.

Conversely, I must shake my head with disbelief and disgust to the denial and immaturity of your myrmidons. NOW IT’S LIES, huh? Before it was the Denver altitude, then a conspiracy of hiding cheat sheets, and then it was an imposter showing up. Unbelievable! You all sound like idiots.

Here’s a clue that you all need to understand as best as you can…Mitt Romney showed America just who he is, where he comes from, and America loves him for what he stands for, in spite of what you all have tried to paint him as. No smoke-and-mirrors. No shinannigans. No record of failures.

Mitt Romney knows and the American people know that Obama cannot run on his record. Obama and his political advisors concluded after the midterms that the president would lose in 2012 if the election was a referendum on the economy. The election had to be a “choice” election between Obama and a “worse” Republican alternative in order for Obama to win, and he had to start beating up on his potential Republican opponent right away. You know it and we know it. NOW HE IS A LIAR. Ok, right!

Must I remind you deniers the immortal words of your community organizer…”One nice thing about the situation I find myself in is that I will be held accountable. You know, I’ve got 4 years…If I don’t have this done in 3 years, then there’s going to be a one-term proposition”.

No amount of name calling, character assassination, or idiotic debasement will change the fact that America will not support a president with no credentials and failed economic policies. And we won’t even go into the incompetent foreign polices and cover-ups. That will be forth coming with the next debate.

Since some of you hard core disbelievers know the colors of Luck Charms better than most, I would suggest that you remain eating children’s cereal and let the children take your place when it’s time to vote on Nov. 6.

getalife

October 8th, 2012
10:02 am

Looks like the Americans that have not made up their minds yet will wait until the election to decide so the polls right before the election will show who will win.

Rightwing Troll

October 8th, 2012
10:02 am

“I wouldn’t say TAHT Goldie. Looked to be like they were trading lie for lie that night lol.”

Mittens was the one who was more poised, confident, and comfortable in his lies, and it showed.

DownInAlbany

October 8th, 2012
10:02 am

All of this is support of a prez that supported a trillion dollar stimulus for millions of shovel-ready jobs only to chuckle later about there is no such thing as shovel-ready jobs. Or who continues to lie about how Stevens was killed and the lack of security and his refusal to provide additional security.

Two Parties, One Con (Welcome)

October 8th, 2012
10:02 am

Donovan: “NOW IT’S LIES, huh? ”

No one who witnessed the cascade of lies that was Romney’s debate performance ever doubted that.

So, try again.

Mitt Romney is a perfect representative for the Republican position — as I think his base has now finally accepted — as he is a veritable geyser of lies.

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 8th, 2012
10:04 am

JamVet

October 8th, 2012
10:04 am

Last week, according to the Republicans, polls were not to be believed — obviously skewed! Watch them latch on to this poll like a drowning man on a floatation device.

Yep, the pro-war, pro-plutocracy, corporate-owned, conservative media is in the tank for the GOP. Again…

BWAHAHAHA!!

Mick

October 8th, 2012
10:05 am

donovan

So you love mitt and think he has the answers to all that ails us? Go ahead and believe in him when you know damn well that his numbers just don’t add up. After the conclusion of the last republican president, I’ll take steady growth and the stock marker rising, that’s the real indicator of yours or mines wealth, we are all tied to it one way or another and I’ll stick with the current president. Romney’s debate performance is so overhyped, what did he have to lose? He was losing very badly before the debate and there are two more…

USinUK - not very ladylike (and former Girl Scout)

October 8th, 2012
10:06 am

“failed economic policies”

GDP – in growth
Jobs – in growth
equities – soaring

this is “fail”???

only in GOP land, where up is down

Mick

October 8th, 2012
10:07 am

kam

PILLOWS!

Kamchak ~ Thug from the Steppes

October 8th, 2012
10:09 am

Mick

DUVET COVERS!

TBone

October 8th, 2012
10:13 am

@ Fred Well now we know who listens to Hannipie cause I sure as hell don’t. Hey face it dude, you backed the wrong horse.

Moderate Line

October 8th, 2012
10:15 am

I always tell my kids never leave an answer blank. Obama left the answer blank and Romney won by default.

Brosephus™

October 8th, 2012
10:16 am

Fred @ 9:46

You’re starting to rub off on me. Only time will tell if that’s a good thing for me or not.

:razz:

Two Parties, One Con (Welcome)

October 8th, 2012
10:18 am

Fred: “There ya go sport. So why do YOU insist on talking about a non issue, that asshat Chavez? just engaging in your talk radio/FOX news practice of slinging poo against a wall to see what sticks?”

Why do you think?

Because I’m in opposition to the dank and musty consensus between the two parties as much as I am against the rank and foul lies of the FOX news right, which now makes up the core of the hard-right Republican party.

Mighty Righty

October 8th, 2012
10:22 am

I am sure all have noticed how the Obama administration chooses to re-name problems rather than solve the problems. The examples are numerous. When their reign began they wanted all terrorist attacks to be renamed as “over seas incidents” there by reducing terrorism on their watch. Apparently they think if they don’t call an attack on us by terrorists terrorism then its not. They also refuse to use the word Muslim when refering to our enemies expecting us to believe we are under assault by Methodists or fundamental christians what ever that is or anything but Muslims. The most egregious recent example is the terrorist attack by Muslims on our consulate in Libya that resulted in the murder of four of our citizens including our ambassador. The Obama administration flat out lied calling it a “demonstration.” (We now know our inept administration was hiding its own stupidity because it had been previously warned of the attack and the Libyan ambassador had ask for additional security prior to the attack which had been denied by our state department.) I suppose by the administration’s definition of the “terrorist attack” our soldiers in Afghanistan are not engaged in combat but are merely controlling “demonstrations.” I would suppose that had this administration reigned on 9/11 when the twin towers and the pentagon were attacked by Muslims, Obama would have called it an “arial demonstration’. The terrorist attack at Fort Hood resulting the multiple deaths of our soldiers has from day one been referred by this administration as a “work place incident” even to the point that our soldiers have been refused Purple Heart commendations. Amazing. So the very people that can’t even tell ther truth about our most serious threats to our security try to paint Mitt Romney as a liar! Don’t make me laugh. The Obama administration doesn’t know what the meaning of the word “truth” is.

Two Parties, One Con (Welcome)

October 8th, 2012
10:24 am

Fred:

Or, to put it slightly differently, I’ll bet you are in perfect lockstep with the mainstream liberal consensus of the major editorial boards like the New York Times who think it’s just terrible that the poor Venezuelan people didn’t know any better and re-elected the big mean socialist Hugo Chavez.

Am I right, Fred?

Mr Right

October 8th, 2012
10:25 am

Only a fool would want four more years like the last four years!

Johnjay

October 8th, 2012
10:25 am

It is difficult to criticize Romney on his positions, as he’s had every possible position on every issue at one time or another. He’s even had multiple positions on the same issue within a 24 hour period. In fact, the only thing consistent about Romney has been that he’s a slippery little devil who’ll say anything to get elected. I realize that there are people who hate Obama – a subset of which hate him because of his political positions – but, he does have a record that’s out there for all to see, so he can’t just flip-flop like a dying fish on every issue. Maybe you don’t like that unemployment has consistently gone down under Obama (we were losing 800,000 jobs a month at the end of Bush2’s reign), and maybe you don’t like that the Dow Jones Industrial Avg. has gone up over 60% under Obama (it lost 25% under our last Rep. pres.). I can see that there are anti-success people out there who want to go back to Rove’s ideas and will vote for his current puppet, Mitt. As for the rest of us, we’ll vote for Obama.

Two Parties, One Con (Welcome)

October 8th, 2012
10:27 am

Obama – Hugo — same direction for each country??

Uh maybe, maybe not. But whatever works with the rubes.

Joseph

October 8th, 2012
10:36 am

Wow Jay you sure didn’t want to talk about this long…. After the debate whoppin I guess you can get your excuse’s ready for Biden now because its a given Ryan is gonna ‘put him in chains’.

Kimmer

October 8th, 2012
10:37 am

Technically they aren’t lies until Romney actually takes office and doesn’t do what he says he will. Say like Obama who promised to cut the deficit in half and actually doubled it. Made a big deal about having the healthcare debate on C-Span and told McCain, “The campaign is over John” when he called him on it. Well, here are a few more for your reading pleasure.

“Now, what I’ve done throughout this campaign is to propose a net spending cut.”

“If we see money being misspent, we’re going to put a stop to it, and we will call it out and we will publicize it.“

“I want to go line by line through every item in the Federal budget and eliminate programs that don’t work, and make sure that those that do work work better and cheaper.”

“Instead of allowing lobbyists to slip big corporate tax breaks into bills during the dead of night, we will make sure every single tax break and earmark is available to every American online.”

“We can no longer accept a process that doles out earmarks based on a member of Congress’s seniority, rather than the merit of the project.”

“If your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: not one single dime.”

“Barack Obama and Joe Biden believe the United States has to be frank with the Chinese about such failings and will press them to respect human rights.”

“Lobbyists won’t work in my White House!“

“I’ll make oil companies like Exxon pay a tax on their windfall profits, and we’ll use the money to help families pay for their skyrocketing energy costs and other bills.”

. “Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.” .

A special one on the 100th day, “The first thing I’d do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That’s the first thing I’d do.

Mighty Righty

October 8th, 2012
10:42 am

Funny how the “most intelligent, most articulate, greatest president in american history” couldn’t come up with a cogent, truthful answer in opposition to Mitt Romney’s asertions during the debate. This was particularly strange because the subject was Obamanomics of which one would think the president would at least have a working knowledge. Prior to the debate we thought Obama’s 57 state gaffe was just a slip of the tongue. Perhaps not! Without a speech writer and without a teleprompter the president was less than oridinary. Obama should do better next time as he will not be cornered by having to hide his Marxist beliefs.

JamVet

October 8th, 2012
10:48 am

Only a fool would want four more years like the last four years!

BRING BACK GEORGE & DICK!

BRING BACK GEORGE & DICK!

BRING BACK GEORGE & DICK!

Moderate Line

October 8th, 2012
10:49 am

Brosephus™
October 8th, 2012
9:45 am

In fact, many here are saying Romney lied in the debate yet I see no supporting links.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPgfzknYd20
+++++
Both lied. To complain you lost because one side lied is comical when both sides hapitually lie. Also, poltifact has identified 119 statements by Obama which are mostly false or worse. Romney is no better with 79 such statements. Neither side is paragon ov virtue when it comes to truth.
Romney
Poltifact ruled 3 statements by Obama and 5 by Romney as false or mostly false. If you include half-trues as lies then it was 6-6.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/oct/03/fact-checking-denver-presidential-debate/

Moderate Line

October 8th, 2012
10:51 am

Brosephus™
October 8th, 2012
9:45 am

In fact, many here are saying Romney lied in the debate yet I see no supporting links.
++++++
Poltifact ruled 3 statements by Obama and 5 by Romney as false or mostly false. If you include half-trues as lies then it was 6-6.

I forgot to say this is from the debate.

Moderate Line

October 8th, 2012
11:03 am

Brosephus™
October 8th, 2012
8:55 am

Taking 3 word snippets from statements or reports to say Romney is a bad guy

Well, one doesn’t have to shorten it to 3 words to make it effective.
===
Again, Politfact has identified has identified 119 mostly false or worse statements by Obama. In the debate BOTH candidates made false statements.

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/barack-obama/

Southern Pride

October 8th, 2012
11:28 am

Two Parties, One Con (Welcome)

October 8th, 2012
11:33 am

Mighty Righty: “Funny how the “most intelligent, most articulate, greatest president in american history”

I’ve never considered him to be the “most articulate” or “most intelligent” president. But then again, I’m not a liberal.

JKL2

October 8th, 2012
11:55 am

Anonymous- In fact if he becomes President, I’m moving to Canada and staying there until his 4-8 years are up or someone impeachs that good for nothing liar, bully and racist!

Please beat the rush and go now. Just make sure you go thru the proper channels be cause Canada is drowning under the wait of illegal aliens (Americans).

JKL2

October 8th, 2012
11:57 am

jamvet- BRING BACK GEORGE & DICK!

Burn any good books lately?

Tom Middleton

October 8th, 2012
1:13 pm

But it’s how Romney wins debates that should matter the most, Jay. In short, he lies. He creates his own facts while simultaneously claiming that it’s his opponent doing this, not him, and it’s very effective, especially when he then adds something like “you’re not entitled to your own facts.”

But like in the Republican primary, his opponents get so bewildered at trying to win a debate in the severely dishonest but newly minted Mitt-wondrous land of Oz, that they end up losing, also like happened with our president.

There is a way to win, of course; and in my opinion, President Clinton had the best advice when he said on debating Mitt Romney to “just go at him” with the real truth and not let up till you’ve won.

That’s a big chore, of course, for Romney’s lies are both legendary and legion, and even his staff has to run around trying to correct things he says. But like I’ve mentioned before, we all can help; and making it clear what a liar Mitt is may be the very best way of all!

TBone

October 8th, 2012
1:41 pm

@ Tom Middleton I am sure glad that you straightened us out about who was telling the unadulterated truth the other night and who was the BIG FAT LIAR, LIAR PANTS ON FIRE! Thank you so much.