John Edwards, not guilty and also not innocent
John Edwards is guilty of many things — stupidity, venality, arrogance and a callous cruelty among others — but a jury of his peers has found him not guilty of Count Three in the six-count federal indictment against him.
The jury deadlocked on the remaining five charges, and the judge in the case has declared a mistrial on those counts.
For the time being, at least, the verdict means that Edwards has won his gamble not to admit guilt and to fight the charges against him, which focus on alleged abuse of campaign finance laws. I can’t claim to have followed the case closely enough to have an opinion on the legal outcome, in part because as indicated above, I had already reached a conclusion about the man himself, and it wasn’t good. It was enough to know that the country had dodged a bullet in not elevating him to the vice presidency or higher, and that his reputation was forever ruined.
As Roy Barnes, a former Edwards supporter, put it recently, “There are some people who ought to be taken out from a courthouse, tied to an oak tree and just whipped. I think he fits into that category.”
I’m sure Barnes was speaking figuratively when he said that. At least I think he was.
Maybe.
– Jay Bookman
Tell us what you think about the site
Customer Care »
Vacation stops, manage subscriptions and more
AJC Services
Sections
Other Editions
Visitor Agreement | Privacy Statement
© 2013 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
698 comments Add your comment
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
10:49 pm
“Once again, he can post all night and unlike his question or suggestion earlier, NO one has attempted to silence him.”
Well, no one can actually. But you can make ceaseless demeaning comments that have little or nothing to do with the debate all in childish effort to shut others up. It’s all schoolyard stuff.
bman
May 31st, 2012
10:50 pm
I wonder what Mister Bookman thinks when he peeks in on sutff like this….
They BOTH suck
May 31st, 2012
10:50 pm
Because alcohol can be sold to anyone that is 21 yrs or older, everyone at least that age will become alcoholics………… may not be likely, but it could happen
Thulsa Doom
May 31st, 2012
10:50 pm
They both suck,
I’m not convinced either but towncrier has a logical point based on observations of other cultures, of quickly changing situational morality in various cultures, and of what is and was considered abnormal or normal over time. And btw there as I stated pedophilia is today accepted at least to some degree in some cultures as I mentioned. In Afghanistan pedophilia is rampant among the taliban.
Fair's fair
May 31st, 2012
10:51 pm
Porsche dirossy
Also hot
Bummer
Thulsa Doom
May 31st, 2012
10:51 pm
bman,
He thinks what a bunch of blowhards.
They BOTH suck
May 31st, 2012
10:53 pm
TC
Quit playing the victim,,,,,,
School yard is going from Gay marriage to polygamy to pedophilia as if somehow it is in the same ball park.
Only in warped minds like yours is it in the same ball park
Pray for your own soul tonight……….. A Christian testament is not what you have displayed on this blog?
So keep up the BS…… As I said earlier, it has been fun
barking frog
May 31st, 2012
10:53 pm
fairs fair
do you give IQ tests before
sex?
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
10:53 pm
“I’m not convinced either but towncrier has a logical point based on observations of other cultures, of quickly changing situational morality in various cultures, and of what is and was considered abnormal or normal over time.”
How do you see this TD and hardly none of the liberals don’t? Again, I think it is because they recognize the logical implication of what I have argued and they don’t want to admit them because it undermines their position.
Josef
May 31st, 2012
10:55 pm
Both
I never have been able to relate to Celsius….how much is 15 c in fahrenheit?
They BOTH suck
May 31st, 2012
10:55 pm
TD
Of course the discussion is coming from numerous people and all over the board, but in one post he went made sure that we are talking US….. when it seems to fit his weak agenda he wants to bring in other cultures……..
Let him yap……….. and play his victim card as well as his get out of Leviticus free card (thanks Jay for that one)
Fair's fair
May 31st, 2012
10:56 pm
Gay marriage is legal in Canada
Conscientious objectors are streaming over
They BOTH suck
May 31st, 2012
10:56 pm
josef
59 I think
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
10:56 pm
“Pray for your own soul tonight……….. A Christian testament is not what you have displayed on this blog?”
Take it up with the Apostle Paul, TBS:
21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.
24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised.
- Romans 1
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
bman
May 31st, 2012
10:57 pm
I’m all for gay power & everything, but is it ok if we talk about women, too? I have a LOT of questions regarding Asian women.
Fair's fair
May 31st, 2012
10:57 pm
Frog
Yes actually
Want to know my funniest test?
They BOTH suck
May 31st, 2012
10:57 pm
TD and bman
I think you are right……
He knows his asylum is running wild
They BOTH suck
May 31st, 2012
11:00 pm
TC
Post all the verses you like. I am not a Christian…..
So you take it up with the your God…. Hopefully he forgives your bigotry…….
Josef
May 31st, 2012
11:00 pm
Some of the most conservative folks are proponents of gay marriage…Cheney comes to mind…it’s not a conservative-liberal thing
j$
May 31st, 2012
11:01 pm
…for the reminder that liberals are hooligans.
Fair's fair
May 31st, 2012
11:01 pm
Josef
Cheney is a liberal
Fair's fair
May 31st, 2012
11:02 pm
“deficits don’t matter”
Who said dat?
They BOTH suck
May 31st, 2012
11:02 pm
josef
Correct and some “liberals” only play lip service and really could careless if gays achieved the right
barking frog
May 31st, 2012
11:02 pm
fairs fair
text away.
They BOTH suck
May 31st, 2012
11:03 pm
TC
Romans is Paul, correct?
What did you Jesus say about gays?
Guess he was too busy hanging out with 12 dudes to make too many comments on the issue
Josef
May 31st, 2012
11:04 pm
Bman
You got a point there…don’t know much about Asians, though. But that shouldn’t keep me from talking about what the are, should I?
Fair's fair
May 31st, 2012
11:06 pm
Frog
I usually end up in a conversation somewhere along the way about family history
I tell them I’m a third this, a third that, and a third the other
A real knee slapper
But math-tards need not apply
It does the job well
Failure rate is high
Larry summers says women aren’t good at math
I might be inclined to agree
j$
May 31st, 2012
11:06 pm
Josef, bless you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5xux2Mp77Y
Thulsa Doom
May 31st, 2012
11:07 pm
They both suck,
I’m not saying that I fully agree with towncrier. Because I don’t think that just because we allow gay marriage that all of a sudden pedophiles are going to be marrying very young men.
What I am saying is that the more I think about it he has a valid point based just on what’s happened here. Looking at history just here in the U.S. regarding both gay marriage and abortion. Abortion was legalized in 73. How many people in the 40s or even the early 50s- scarcely 20 odd years earlier really thought that what in their view was murder would ever really be legal. Think about that for a bit. Same with gays. Did gays 30-40-50 years ago even fathom the idea that they would be able to marry? Societal attitudes and situational morality can change quickly. That’s all I’m saying.
And what we may think is completely abnormal or morally wrong may very well be different 30-40-50 years from now. Its not that far of a stretch given societal attitudes on gays and on abortion just 30-50 years ago before legalization of both.
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
11:08 pm
“So you take it up with the your God…. Hopefully he forgives your bigotry…”
Christian or no, if He exists, He is your God as well. I hope he does forgive all of my sins, but arguing that homosexuality is wrong would not be one in His book. I have simply tried to show that the widespread acceptance of homosexuality to the point that gay marriage is now in view at a federal level has no clear moral or logical basis – it’s just okay because we say it is okay. I say it is not because the Bible says it is not – if it said otherwise, so would I. I am not smart or wise enough to know what behavior is truly good or bad for us – not by a long shot. If were an atheist, I could see little logical ground for endorsing any moral code. Logically, in a godless world, there is no difference between helping an old lady across the street or axe-murdering her. In 100 years or so, when all that knew her have turned to dust or if they human life is somehow destroyed, it makes no difference. Only emotionally does it matter to us in the here and now.
Josef
May 31st, 2012
11:09 pm
What does the Imam think….look at that posts count..what do you think he thinks? Just don’t call nobody a Delusional Lickspittle..
Ted
May 31st, 2012
11:11 pm
A quick salute to the coward Mike Luckovich who will not satirize any powerful democrat including John Edwards. Luckovich may not be funny, but he is predictable.
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
11:11 pm
“I’m not saying that I fully agree with towncrier. Because I don’t think that just because we allow gay marriage that all of a sudden pedophiles are going to be marrying very young men.”
Neither did I say that, TD. I posted that as a real logical possibility (not “all of a sudden”), given gay marriage and polygamy being ruled constitutional. How could anyone argue otherwise (since existing laws permit the marriage of 13 year olds under certain conditions)?
Fair's fair
May 31st, 2012
11:12 pm
I’m glad for every Tina fey there are probably six Rosie odonnells
At least I hope so…..
This is America….. Fat everybody
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
11:13 pm
“And what we may think is completely abnormal or morally wrong may very well be different 30-40-50 years from now. Its not that far of a stretch given societal attitudes on gays and on abortion just 30-50 years ago before legalization of both.”
Thank you, TD. Why can’t they see this? It baffles me – truly.
They BOTH suck
May 31st, 2012
11:15 pm
TD
I appreciate you attempting to bail him out, but I’m going to pass.
The man showed his true colors on this issue. He has every right to those colors, but he raised his flag very high without a doubt and so did others who had other opinions, including myself.
All that backpedaling and dancing around while pushing others to back up info while he dodged his own assertions, was a true testament to what he thought.
This isn’t the 1st time I have either read or been in discussion with him on this issue.
Saying he is against homosexuality because of x,y,z is one thing. Bringing on that SLIPPERY SLOPE of polygamy and pedophile and if I’m not mistaken saying “same category” is pure ignorance. His opinion and his ignorance on the issue
And I’m the one that is childish? It makes him feel better if he can bring in the others so he can somehow group all these people into one category. That is surely an assumption on my part but “same category” are his words not mine. That is how I came to my assumption, strictly based on his words
They BOTH suck
May 31st, 2012
11:16 pm
josef
If he gets paid by the post, he is making a Kings ransom while Wingfield is making minimum wage
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
11:16 pm
“What did you Jesus say about gays? Guess he was too busy hanging out with 12 dudes to make too many comments on the issue…”
I’m sorry…are you suggesting he was gay? Knowing he was going to die and therefore not get married and that sex outside of marriage was sinful, was he supposed to “hang out” with women and be tempted to sin? Not to mention of course that, men and women didn’t “hang out” with each other in that culture – but you knew that, right?
Josef
May 31st, 2012
11:19 pm
J$
Thanks…
They BOTH suck
May 31st, 2012
11:20 pm
For the 33rd time…… Good night all………… you as well TC
I will catch up on anything left outstanding tomorrow
Everyone have a great night and an even better Friday
peace
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
11:21 pm
“Saying he is against homosexuality because of x,y,z is one thing. Bringing on that SLIPPERY SLOPE of polygamy and pedophile and if I’m not mistaken saying “same category” is pure ignorance. His opinion and his ignorance on the issue.”
It’s called a reductio ad absurdum argument. It is a valid form of argument, whether or not you think I executed it well or fairly.
They BOTH suck
May 31st, 2012
11:22 pm
TC
Don’t get up tight about Jesus..
What did he say about gays? Not Paul who was at one time Saul the killer of Christians…………
I know a little………
Thulsa Doom
May 31st, 2012
11:22 pm
Towncrier,
” I posted that as a real logical possibility (not “all of a sudden”), given gay marriage and polygamy being ruled constitutional.”
Then I misunderstood you.
“How could anyone argue otherwise (since existing laws permit the marriage of 13 year olds under certain conditions)?”
Speaking of all this things sure have changed just in the past 50 -100 years regarding marriage with children. My girlfriend’s aunt Lois married her husband when she was 14 and he was 20. It wasn’t child molesting back then. 60 years later they are still married. The other 2 sisters were also in their teens when they married and the men were about 5-7 years older. B was 15 and married a 22 year old man. The third was an old lady. She got married when she was over the hill at 17. Today those men would probably be put in jail but back then things was different. Specially out here in the pastureland up near Athens.
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
11:23 pm
“Don’t get up tight about Jesus..”
He is either a liar, a lunatic or actually who he said he was (Lord).
Josef
May 31st, 2012
11:23 pm
Crier
It’s not my religion, but didn’t he hang out with Mary Magdalene?
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
11:27 pm
“It’s not my religion, but didn’t he hang out with Mary Magdalene?”
Women were around Jesus and his disciples from time to time (in appropriate settings) – the Bible says they helped support His ministry. But there is no evidence he hung out with them, say, at night or not in a public place or where there were lots of people.
Fair's fair
May 31st, 2012
11:29 pm
Allah is my god.
American laws infringe on my religious freedom.
Bad America.
Thulsa Doom
May 31st, 2012
11:29 pm
They both suck,
Towncrier is a big boy with a reasoned argument. He don’t need no bailing out by me or anyone else.
My initial response on his first post was that he had jumped on the crazy train. But I judged too quickly( knee jerk response) and the more I thought about it and about societal changes and attitudes in our very lifetime the more I realized the man has a very valid, logical point whether you or I agree or disagree with him. That’s all.
barking frog
May 31st, 2012
11:29 pm
TC
no footwashing or perfume
application?
Fair's fair
May 31st, 2012
11:30 pm
Every Muslim worth their salt has at least 3 wives.
America blows
Fair's fair
May 31st, 2012
11:31 pm
Bye frog
Allah is calling me to bed
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
11:33 pm
“no footwashing or perfume application?”
That was in the presence of men at a meal and the woman in question kind of imposed herself on the gathering. I wouldn’t characterize that as “hanging out”. No temptation to sexual sin was even remotely possible in those scenarios.
barking frog
May 31st, 2012
11:35 pm
fairs fair
may tina be in your dreams.
Thulsa Doom
May 31st, 2012
11:36 pm
they both suck, towncrier, otros,
Its been an interesting conversation but Doomy is running on fumes so I’m out.
Fair’s fair,
Don’t know if you’re a lib or a con but it don’t much matter- the one liners are great. Keep em coming.
Josef
May 31st, 2012
11:37 pm
Well, I guess that pretty much makes it clear that Crier thinks women need to know their place.
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
11:38 pm
“Its been an interesting conversation but Doomy is running on fumes so I’m out.”
I am out too, TD. Goodnight, josef! I have nothing against you as a person, I hope you know.
barking frog
May 31st, 2012
11:40 pm
TC
Jesus avoided temptation
from women to avoid the
commandment to Noah
to be fruitful and multiply
and replenish the earth
or just avoid sin.
bman
May 31st, 2012
11:42 pm
I’ve slept with married women. Quite a few. I’ve never felt bad.
Sorry. I had to get that off of my chest. God made me this way…..
Towncrier
May 31st, 2012
11:45 pm
“Jesus avoided temptation from women to avoid the commandment to Noah
to be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth or just avoid sin.”
His purpose was not to have a family, but to die for everyone at a relatively young age (33). It would have been irresponsible I suppose to start a family and then leave it without his support (my thought – not taken from the Bible). And and Paul indicates in one of his letters, His interests would have been divided as a married person. Besides, He said that people are not given in marriage in heaven but are like the angels.
barking frog
May 31st, 2012
11:52 pm
Jesus fulfilled the moses
commandments, it seems
he would have fulfilled the
one to noah and he left
his young church to peter
more important than a
family.
G Mare 71(PLEASE VOTE NO ON TSPLOST)
June 1st, 2012
12:35 am
Wow, just WOW! The wing nuts really do come out at night. Have to say, I am surprised that you ate still here Josef. But then somebody has to at least try to refute their craziness. And I am out for tonight. Yah, I know y’all will miss me.
Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!
June 1st, 2012
6:43 am
Well, all y’all…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSYbZTsY-00
Bud Wiser
June 1st, 2012
6:45 am
John Edwards – typical liberal plantation master scum.
Granny Godzilla - Union Thugette
June 1st, 2012
7:05 am
“typical liberal plantation master scum”
Some of us prefer ham and eggs to bile and bulldookey for breakfast.
stands for decibels
June 1st, 2012
7:10 am
He is either a liar, a lunatic or actually who he said he was (Lord).
yeah, Scout likes to post that assertion a lot as well. Looks like we have C. S. Lewis to thank for that one.
see also:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_perry/trilemma.html
The argument which McDowell calls the “trilemma” is popular among amateur apologists for Christianity. It was first popularized by C.S. Lewis, and has become even more common since McDowell reworked it. It is logically weak, but it is rhetorically powerful–as its popularity and recurrence attest–and so worth considering in more detail than it might otherwise merit.
[...]
it is not the case that there are three and only three precisely-defined choices to be made here, but rather a vast continuum of possibilities. We don’t know with any level of confidence precisely what Jesus as a historical figure claimed for himself, and in any event if whatever he claimed was false there are a great diversity of possibilities, which include liar and lunatic (which McDowell has not successfully ruled out) but which also include many other options which do allow Jesus to be considered a sage or moral teacher and no more.
The trilemma argument does not support any particular opinion one way or another concerning Jesus. If one already believes that Jesus was the Christ of the Christian faith and hence Lord, then naturally one is disinclined to believe that he was anything else, and may favor the idea that other options are untenable. This argument, however, provides no logical support for one who doesn’t already believe to choose the “Lord” option out of all the others.
Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!
June 1st, 2012
7:14 am
Good morning Granny G.
I asked the question last night why couldn’t a conservative State like North Carolina, full of conservative jurors convict a “typical liberal plantation master scum” (modifying here)?
The answer is that even in North Carolina you are innocent until PROVEN guilty….so the “pond scum” is innocent. Gotta love our system of law. America! I love it!
Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!
June 1st, 2012
7:22 am
Coming soon to your area…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T88fbHOmvRk&feature=related
Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!
June 1st, 2012
7:26 am
Starting my Friday, just in time…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxpcZrQQM-4
Granny Godzilla - Union Thugette
June 1st, 2012
7:27 am
Mornin Normal!
Innocent till proven guilty…..
An interesting concept that should be applied to voters rights as well.
Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!
June 1st, 2012
7:31 am
Granny G…
You’re preachin’ to the choir here!
TaxPayer
June 1st, 2012
7:36 am
Well, there are the innocent and then there are the forgiven.
Bud Wiser
June 1st, 2012
7:38 am
So, Granny Couch Cow, which part of my statement do you think you have the intelligence to show as inaccurate?
More evidence that the Obama economic ‘recovery’ is working; according to a recently released study, there are 126,000 fewer millionaires in the US since just last year.
Where did they go?
Bahamas? Curacao? Switzerland? Monaco?
Or where they just perhaps taxed out of the ranks, or businesses ruined and closed by the continual piling on of regulations from the govt, decreasing jobs, because they were not paying enough of their ‘fair share’ to subsidize the growing ranks of freeloaders?
Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!
June 1st, 2012
7:40 am
Bud!
Two words…De. Caf….
TiredOfIt
June 1st, 2012
7:41 am
“His purpose was not to have a family, but to die for everyone at a relatively young age (33)”
Is it really that big a deal when you know you won’t be dead for long?
barking frog
June 1st, 2012
7:41 am
Bud
they are now billionaires.
Granny Godzilla - Union Thugette
June 1st, 2012
7:49 am
Budwiser
Cow Couch? More bile?
You poor sad fellow.
TaxPayer
June 1st, 2012
7:49 am
I also heard that part of our loss of millionaires was due to those that took it with them.
Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!
June 1st, 2012
7:50 am
Scout seems to forget that Jesus was not made “Divine” until the Council of Nicaea voted on it, around 400 years after his death as a political move to entrench the Catholic power base of Constantine. The Christian cult is most superbly “The Greatest Story Ever Sold”.
…and ask any Rabbi, if Jesus was 33, then he was most definitely married. It was law unless you were Essene, but the Bible does not mention that. Like I said…”The Greatest Story Ever Sold”.
barking frog
June 1st, 2012
7:51 am
Taxpayer
job creators in hell?
RB from Gwinnett
June 1st, 2012
7:54 am
John Edwards is as “not guilty” as OJ Simpson.
“why couldn’t a conservative State like North Carolina, full of conservative jurors convict a “typical liberal plantation master scum” (modifying here)?”
I wasn’t aware NC voted 100% R in the last or any election, Normal. Do you have anything that might remotely support that? I realize that might be a bit of projection, but you do have to have 100% to convict somebody. Just 1 idiot juror could easily have prevented the conviction as was done in the Nichols case. It’ll be interesting to hear what the guilty/not guilty balance from the jurors.
And for the record, NC voted for Obama.
Jm
June 1st, 2012
7:59 am
Now I know why cons hate planned parenthood
They run more ads down here in FL, and they’re as honest as the swift boat guys
And they get taxpayer money, running ads against the republican nominee
Brosephus™
June 1st, 2012
8:02 am
More evidence that the Obama economic ‘recovery’ is working; according to a recently released study, there are 126,000 fewer millionaires in the US since just last year.
Ya know, if your “millions” are in the stock market and not liquid, you can lose that money and no longer be counted as a millionaire while still living in the US. Look at ol’ Zuck… He’s lost 25% of his value in Facebook since it IPO’d. If he was a borderline millionaire when shares first started trading, he wouldn’t be one now.
Limiting the choices to things that you “think” are the only possibilities is the first sign of a weak argument.
Jm
June 1st, 2012
8:04 am
“more ads” than mcdonalds
Adam
June 1st, 2012
8:05 am
New data out shows CONSERVATIVE media bias, not liberal:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/05/the-charts-that-should-accompany-all-discussions-of-media-bias/257961/
At no time in the past year has coverage of President Obama been as positive as that of Governor Romney. Indeed, at no time in the past year has it been on-balance positive at all.
RB from Gwinnett
June 1st, 2012
8:06 am
Jm, Planned Genocide makes Darfur and Syria look like a hazing prank. 300,000 dead every year, year after year.
Adam
June 1st, 2012
8:07 am
Cue the bellyaching that stems from “You’re wrong because… BECAUSE SHUT UP, THAT’S WHY” (or the slightly milder “pfft, the analysis is liberal bias, because I dont’ like the results, therefore I’m still right that there’s liberal bias not conservative bias”)
Normal Free...Pro Human Rights Thug...And liking it!
June 1st, 2012
8:07 am
RB,
Shorts too tight this morning? And…according to our law system, O.J. was innocent.
stands for decibels
June 1st, 2012
8:10 am
How many people in the 40s or even the early 50s- scarcely 20 odd years earlier really thought that what in their view was murder would ever really be legal.
anyone who was paying even the slightest heed to public policy debates at the time.
RB from Gwinnett
June 1st, 2012
8:10 am
Adam, “At no time in the past year has coverage of President Obama been as positive as that of Governor Romney. Indeed, at no time in the past year has it been on-balance positive at all.”
What positive news about Obama do they have to report on?
stands for decibels
June 1st, 2012
8:10 am
anyhow, I see there’s job SHEETs upstairs.
Brosephus™
June 1st, 2012
8:11 am
Sheetz!!!!
Brosephus™
June 1st, 2012
8:12 am
What positive news about Obama do they have to report on?
I thought the Right “whine” was that the media fawns over Obama and whitewashes everything…
barking frog
June 1st, 2012
8:12 am
Normal
OJ was criminally not
guilty as charged, civilly
responsible for the
deaths of nicole and
goldman under our
system.
Adam
June 1st, 2012
8:19 am
I thought the Right “whine” was that the media fawns over Obama and whitewashes everything…
EXACTLY.
RB, you completely fell into my trap. Thanks for that. You have admitted that the media is not in the tank for Obama. Congratulations on becoming a liberal, by the way, since anyone who disagrees with major talking points is no longer a conservative, doncha know?
Doggone/GA
June 1st, 2012
8:20 am
“And…according to our law system, O.J. was innocent.”
Not quite. He was found not guilty. He was not found to be innocent. I don’t think our courts ever declare someone innocent.
Department Of Justice Tells Florida To Stop Purging Voter Rolls
June 1st, 2012
8:22 am
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/31/florida-voter-purge_n_1561137.html
Jack
June 1st, 2012
8:33 am
Edwards was making a baby with his bar pick-up while his wife was dying of cancer. That’s about as low as a man can get. And this low-life could have been a heart beat from the presidency.
skipper
June 1st, 2012
2:56 pm
Hey Jack,
See Kennedy, FDR, Clinton, etc. they all did it……..they just musta had on the ole raincoat………………and they WERE the prez at the time! Amazing what that ole booger will do……………………