Solution for Israel: ‘Take out’ Obama?

“Damn” is about all you can say about something like this.

“Damn fool” would be the longer version.

Andrew Adler, owner/publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times, wrote a column earlier this month musing about the options available to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. As Adler saw it, Netanyahu has three choices:

One, launch a pre-emptive strike against Hamas and Hezbollah.

Two, launch an attack against Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Three, I’ll let you read for yourself:

obamahit

Adler now says he didn’t really mean it, and is sorry.

Damn fool.

– Jay Bookman

459 comments Add your comment

Doggone/GA

January 21st, 2012
9:58 am

“Looks like Jay has deleted my post”

Well, I read it…so it WAS there.

Doggone/GA

January 21st, 2012
9:59 am

Bro! Love it!

Road Scholar

January 21st, 2012
9:59 am

JKL2: You may want to add a verb to your last paragraph. Eliminating armed force jobs insinuates Peace is breaking out! If not aren’t we in a position to insist our allies belly up to the bar on most of these “police actions”? And you do not respect your leadership?

Don’t get me wrong, I respect you and yours for serving our country. But with an attitude like yours, I’d be looking to send you off if not out of the military, to a job/location out of the mainstream. What is your rank?

Common: Ouch!

JamVet

January 21st, 2012
10:02 am

Don’t they have any decent blogs in Illinois? (grin)

From that Haaretz article…

Like most of you, I have never met Andrew B. Adler, owner and publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times, but I think we can all agree that the man is spectacularly stupid. In his contorted apologies he has described himself, after all, as “an idiot.”

The three or four infantile paragraphs of vile text that Adler published in his obscure Atlanta newspaper last week, in which he suggested that Israel consider assassinating President Obama, almost slipped under the radar, but was picked up yesterday by Gawker.com, and is now going viral. “A fool may throw a stone into a well which even a hundred wise men cannot pull out”, the saying goes, and it will indeed take a long time and a great effort to undo the damage that Adler has wrought, in one fell swoop, in defaming Israel by implying that it might, in anyone’s wildest dreams, consider such a kooky conspiracy; in staining American Jews by appearing to supposedly represent their twisted way of thinking; and even by undermining the institution of Jewish journalism by exposing that it harbors such birdbrained bozos in its midst.

Selah.

Common Sense isn't very Common

January 21st, 2012
10:02 am

JKL -

you do realize Clinton isn’t running for President, don’t you?

Jay

January 21st, 2012
10:03 am

Grahame, your post is still there.

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
10:04 am

kamchak- Translation: I voted for a loser four times in a row.

To quote Satchel from “Get Bucky” “What happens when all the stupid people vote? The Democrat wins”

Everyone I voted for in 2010 won. Hopefully the trend will continue.

You do realize obama comes from Chicago don’t you? Besides being the home of the most corrupt politicians in the country, it’s also 98% Democrat. It’s hard to believe a black man, sponsored by crooks, for the extremely dominant party in Chicago could ever get elected…

Common Sense isn't very Common

January 21st, 2012
10:06 am

Newt and Mitt are supposed to be at the same restaurant in SC at 10:45.

CNN is covering live. I got 5 on the heavy weight. :-)

Soothsayer

January 21st, 2012
10:08 am

robert @ 9:07: Great post!

That’s exactly what I’ve been saying for months on this blog, much to consternation of some here.

What we have here is the “Israel tail wagging the United States dog.” AIPAC has far too much leverage over our elected officials and will launch concerted attacks on any Representative or Senator who doesn’t fall in line.

We are on the verge of World War III and Israel would gladly take us into it. Wake up, people.

Doggone/GA

January 21st, 2012
10:10 am

“It’s hard to believe a black man, sponsored by crooks, for the extremely dominant party in Chicago could ever get elected”

Why is that hard to believe?

Brosephus

January 21st, 2012
10:10 am

And the story has already vanished from even the AJC.

Before making such a statement, I would refresh the AJC homepage. Looking at the “Latest Headlines” section, this is what I saw just now:

Latest Headlines »
87-year-old Gwinnett man missing
Last Henry County bank closes
Burglar’s steal son’s combat medals
Ivy Prep rejected again
Cops: Man stole $50K in jewelry
Cop: Evidence against me made up
Killer hanged self with sweatshirt
Publisher suggests ‘hit’ on Obama
Hawks fall in Philadelphia
Girl killed by pellet gun

Doesn’t seem like it’s vanished from the AJC to me.

TaxPayer

January 21st, 2012
10:12 am

Newt and Mitt are supposed to be at the same restaurant in SC at 10:45.

Mitt can afford to buy everyone’s breakfast with his pocket change while Newt can barely scrape together enough trinkets from Tiffanys to share with the crowd. It’ll be a close one.

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
10:13 am

taxpayer- debt that Republicans refuse to accept

ROFLMAO! The party of “I never met a spend increase I didn’t like” complainig the other party doesn’t want to take responsibility for debt. (ever heard of the Tea Party?). If you hated Bush spending, you should want to assassinate obama yourself.

So this is all about JKL2 losing his taxpayer-funded job

I’m good with the job. Unfortunately I hitched my wagon to the pension years ago and it’s looking like I’ll never receive a dime(peso) of it. I gave up on Social Security, but was at least hoping to get my pension.

Thanks for your support of us servicemen.

md

January 21st, 2012
10:13 am

Don’t condone what was said, but can certainly understand the discussion. I’d guess our spook community has the same discussion about foreign leaders quite often.

Don’t we (Obama) have a hit order out on several Al-queda leaders? One was even a US citizen……oh the non-outrage……..

And no, I’m not defending our enemies…..just pointing out a matter of perspective. Even US law says citizens should have a right to trial……..

Jay

January 21st, 2012
10:14 am

Why wouldn’t you get your pension, JKL?

Or are you just being a drama queen there.

Michael

January 21st, 2012
10:15 am

311/1811 You are a scary dude, to children. Paranoi run in your family?

Brosephus

January 21st, 2012
10:18 am

md

I do believe there was sizeable outrage over the targeting of US Citizens.

You do realize obama comes from Chicago don’t you? Besides being the home of the most corrupt politicians in the country, it’s also 98% Democrat. It’s hard to believe a black man, sponsored by crooks, for the extremely dominant party in Chicago could ever get elected…

Seems like that GOP Minority Outreach program’s a complete bust… Can’t blame people for voting for the opposition when you don’t do jack sh*t to persuade them to join forces with you instead.

Doggone/GA

January 21st, 2012
10:18 am

“You are a scary dude”

Not so much scarY as scareD

TaxPayer

January 21st, 2012
10:20 am

JKL2,

If you lose a government pension, it will be as a result of the Republican’s efforts. They’re the only ones pushing that sort of Draconian cut in government in case you have not noticed. And as for the debt, yes, the Republicans refuse to acknowledge that the bulk of it is their own creation and that tax hikes — not tax cuts — are needed to pay for it.

Mick

January 21st, 2012
10:22 am

**Unfortunately I hitched my wagon to the pension years ago and it’s looking like I’ll never receive a dime(peso) of it. I gave up on Social Security, but was at least hoping to get my pension.**

He probably won’t get his his pension because he keeps voting republican and doesn’t realize that if they had their way, we would become a nation of paupers. It’s OK though because he should be able to pull himself up by his bootstraps well into his 50’s, 60’s, and 70’s

md

January 21st, 2012
10:22 am

For a wee bit of perspective from others outside our shores (or some inside our shores):

It was first reported in January of last year that the Obama administration had compiled a hit list of American citizens whom the President had ordered assassinated without any due process, and one of those Americans was Anwar al-Awlaki. No effort was made to indict him for any crimes (despite a report last October that the Obama administration was “considering” indicting him). Despite substantial doubt among Yemen experts about whether he even had any operational role in Al Qaeda, no evidence (as opposed to unverified government accusations) was presented of his guilt. When Awlaki’s father sought a court order barring Obama from killing his son, the DOJ argued, among other things, that such decisions were “state secrets” and thus beyond the scrutiny of the courts. He was simply ordered killed by the President: his judge, jury and executioner. When Awlaki’s inclusion on President Obama’s hit list was confirmed, The New York Times noted that “it is extremely rare, if not unprecedented, for an American to be approved for targeted killing.”

Road Scholar

January 21st, 2012
10:25 am

JKL2: Losing your pension? If the Dems never found spending increases they didn’t like, it must be your repub brothers who are going to cut your benefits?

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
10:25 am

road scholar- And you do not respect your leadership?

Very respectful of my leadership. Love working for all of them. Unfortunately, obama doesn’t know the first thing about leadership. Glad I don’t have to work with him.

I’m an SFC. Trust me, I’ll lead the way in getting rid of fraud waste and abuse. Unfortunately we are subject to the whims of politicians who often don’t have our best interest at heart. With our current OP Tempo, the military needs to remain “fat” for awhile to give our troops time to recover. Making cuts at this time is a bad thing.

Mick

January 21st, 2012
10:26 am

jamvet

I missed the music last night and was surprised that it was pre-empted by this sordid garbage. Such is life, I just don’t have any music in me right now…

JamVet

January 21st, 2012
10:32 am

The dueling condidate twits are going to have a Ham House hambush?

How ironically appropriate.

And how about this? The Nutter playing UP his Spiro-like prickish persona?

“He’s likeable. I would never beat Obama in a personality contest.”

No, and you’d also likely never beat Pol Pot, Idi Amin or Saddam Hussein, either…

Mick

January 21st, 2012
10:32 am

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
10:32 am

common sense- you do realize Clinton isn’t running for President, don’t you?

You’re criticizing Gengrich and projecting a trait onto him that was possessed by your Patron Saint William Jefferson Clinton. How could it be bad for Newt when it was glorified by the left in Clinton? “leave his private life alone” “he can compartmentalize” “JFC screwed around and nobody complained about him”

MoveOn.org was founded upon Clinton’s infidelity.

Grahame

January 21st, 2012
10:33 am

Oops, sorry Jay. I accused you of deleting my post from last night and I just saw it! I doubt you care or will even read this, but sorry ol’ bud.

Mick

January 21st, 2012
10:34 am

Clinton’s infidelity was being outed by the republican hypocrites, a veritable cornucopia of wife cheaters…

Doggone/GA

January 21st, 2012
10:35 am

“How could it be bad for Newt when it was glorified by the left in Clinton?”

Clinton set himself up as a pargon of family virtue? Really? That’s news to me, and I suspect it would be new to him too.

JamVet

January 21st, 2012
10:35 am

Making cuts at this time is a bad thing.

Th exact same mantra we’ve heard for thirty years.

An inviolable cornerstone of the Party of Permanent War.

And the only famous military quote I can think of to describe this collective paranoia is “Nuts”.

Peter

January 21st, 2012
10:36 am

Wow the Jewish community is more about me than anything else.

I guess being special, means you can run your mouth, and act as you want.

Jack

January 21st, 2012
10:37 am

Bookman loves to stir the pot with extremists. A more interesting story would be about the mess out at the airport.

Doggone/GA

January 21st, 2012
10:37 am

“Mr Gingrich said that media attacks made it ‘harder to govern this country, harder to attract decent people to run for public office’ ”

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2089219/South-Carolina-Republican-debate-Newt-Gingrich-denies-asking-Marianne-open-marriage.html#ixzz1k6jLFPhW

So Gingrich counts himself as “decent people”

Doggone/GA

January 21st, 2012
10:38 am

“A more interesting story would be about the mess out at the airport.”

blogspot.com is ready whenever you are

Take America Back

January 21st, 2012
10:39 am

Is Obama back from Disney World yet? I hear Mickey Mouse is hiring seasonal workers. Anyway I wonder about something. If an Israeli wrote about assassinating Bush circa 2006, would Jay be writing about it in similar fashion? Oh wait, a film about Bush’s assassination was the hit of the party at the Toronto Film Festival! In any event, Israelis should be ashamed. America elects presidents, and the president is America’s representative. An assault or evil wish on our president is an assault and threat on us all (bet you liberals never said that about Bush or Reagan).

Anyway moving on to more pressing matters:

How about Newt’s beatdown of John King on DNCNN at the beginning of the debates, eh? Priceless. ‘Bout time someone said what we’re all thinking: main stream media shrills for Obama.

From the AP: “President Obama blames the press for creating the image that he’s aloof and disconnected from the rest of Washington, insisting in a new interview that he’s just more interested in spending time with his family than in exchanging pleasantries with strangers.”

Really? He’s blaming the [liberal] press for who he is? Laughable. Four more years!

“Michelle Obama celebrated her 48th birthday Tuesday night with her husband and friends at a D.C. steakhouse where the menu features a $28 hamburger named ‘The Obama.’”

Amazing how we don’t ever see pictures of these events where all the millionaires hang out with the Obamas, eh?

“General Motors Chairman and CEO Dan Akerson agreed Wednesday to testify next week before a House panel investigating the government’s handling of an investigation into fire risks in the Chevrolet Volt.”

Well, you can’t expect one of Obama’s “green” creations to have a problem, right? So what if your power bill goes through the roof charging it every night because Obama killed coal. It’s all about the “green” man.

And for the finale and circling back to the liberal media, NPR’s Nina Totenberg on Friday claimed that there were more people on food stamps under W. Bush than there are under Obama today (no, she really said that even as we’ve been pummeled with data stating otherwise). But that’s not the best of it. The best part is she said “facts don’t matter” to Gingrich. You seriously cannot make this stuff up. If ever there were a textbook example of liberals relying on emotions over fact, this is it:

“NINA TOTENBERG, NPR: You know, Newt knows how to play this game. And as Charles said, he is in his own backyard, right next to Georgia, and he is incredibly glib. It doesn’t matter that, you know, that there were more people on food stamps under George W. Bush. It doesn’t matter that his suggestion is that minorities are the ones who get food stamps, that far more white people get food stamps. It doesn’t matter that working people get food stamps in order to feed their families. Facts don’t matter to him and it makes for great, it makes for great talk.”

Just the facts, Ma’am. Imagine all the scams and shenanigans here:

“USDA data released this week shows that the number of Americans receiving food aid from the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) hit another all-time high in August. 45.8 million people — almost 15% of the country — were enrolled in the program, which replaced Food Stamps in 2008. This is only a slight increase from July, when 45.3 million Americans were receiving SNAP help — but a massive 31% jump since June 2009, when the National Bureau of Economic Research declared the most recent recession over.”

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/us-food-stamp-usage-hits-new-record

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
10:39 am

doggone- “It’s hard to believe a black man, sponsored by crooks, for the extremely dominant party in Chicago could ever get elected” Why is that hard to believe?

It was said I voted for losers. I knew that before I cast my vote. Doesn’t mean I didn’t vote for the better candidate. I just didn’t vote based on skin color, class envy, or the promise of greater welfare.

Kamchak

January 21st, 2012
10:40 am

You do realize obama comes from Chicago don’t you?

So?

JamVet

January 21st, 2012
10:41 am

Mick, we had it rockin’ as usual last night on the other concurrent thread.

I had no idea this one was even up until this morning.

Nice bluesy Zep for a soggy Saturday AM…

To me, this one just drips with that signature sensuous sound of theirs…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bkjv9SscotY&feature=related

Doggone/GA

January 21st, 2012
10:42 am

“I just didn’t vote based on skin color, class envy, or the promise of greater welfare”

Nope, you just phrased it to be read AS IF you were bigotted against him BECAUSE OF his being a “black man.” And you didn’t actually answer the question: WHY would it be hard to believe he “could ever get elected”?

Soothsayer

January 21st, 2012
10:42 am

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
10:43 am

Jay- Why wouldn’t you get your pension, JKL?

I’ll be elligible for my pension. I just have serious doubts that 1: the government will be able to pay it and 2: it will be only worth about $2 since our current administration is monitizing our debt and trying their best to turn our dollar into a peso.

I’ll offer former Soviet Union public officials up as exhibit 1.

Mick

January 21st, 2012
10:45 am

jamvet

Oh yeah, that is a great zep tune, great bluesy feel….here’s a cool rain song-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPjDMZiuhbQ

TaxPayer

January 21st, 2012
10:46 am

I’m still trying to stop laughing about a Republican, in this case, Newt, coming down on Mitt for paying a lower tax rate. Is Newt jealous. Or just plain envious.

JamVet

January 21st, 2012
10:49 am

This Ragin’ Cajun cracks me up sometimes.

The guy certainly has the neo-cons nailed…

Memo to Republican Establishment:

Let me break it to you gently — you’ve got a first-class disaster on your hands. I know you boys thought this thing would work out and you would be able to whip the Republicans in line to fall in behind Mitt (I assume you are all males but if there is a female in the establishment, I apologize.) Not going too good, is it fellows?

It’s been a terrible time to be a Republican. There have been many moments during this process that have caused me great joy. Certainly the events of Thursday, ending with the CNN debate, and even the Fox debate Monday night, have helped ease the pain of my beloved Tigers’ and Saints’ recent defeats.

I mean, most people thought it was kind of a watermark when your Tea Party gang booed the golden rule. You know, I’ve spent some time in Philly and they have always thought they were pretty radical because they actually booed Santa Claus and Willie Mays. Philly, I’ve got news for you — you ain’t got nothing on South Carolina Republicans. They just aren’t buying any of that do-unto-others garbage.

I actually thought my favorite moment of this delightful process was when one of your eight front-runners, Herm Cain, (as Sarah Palin calls him) actually ran an ad with his campaign manager endorsing him. (Rove, why didn’t you think of that in 2000? Imagine the headline: “Rove endorses Bush.”)

The climax of that delicious ad is when he actually takes a drag on a cigarette. But my favorite thing about Herm’s campaign manager is that he is the only person in the history of the world that was actually barred from political consulting. Let me tell you, I’ve been in this business for quite a while and I’ve never known of anyone other than Mark Block to be suspended from practicing this profession.

PS — As my former boss once said, I feel your pain. That’s why I didn’t mention Rick Perry.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/21/opinion/carville-republican-disaster/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

md

January 21st, 2012
10:50 am

“I’m still trying to stop laughing about a Republican, in this case, Newt, coming down on Mitt for paying a lower tax rate. Is Newt jealous. Or just plain envious.”

Actually have to agree……..all those guys standing up there harping about Mitt’s taxes made the party look foolish considering they run on a platform of free enterprise.

They sounded like they came out of the OWS camps to attend the debate.

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
10:56 am

taxpayer- If you lose a government pension, it will be as a result of the Republican’s efforts.

I’ll offer up there should be a big difference between my pension and that of a government official. Remember when govenment officials used to be civil servants? Now most are the highest overpaid positions out there. I would do my job for less, but compared to what I have had to sacrifice next to some sitting behind a desk pretending to be important, I feel I kind of deserve it. It you want to cut some payroll, most officers are grossly overpaid and I won’t even go into contractors.

Until the government unions get under control, nothing will change.

Brosephus

January 21st, 2012
10:59 am

md

There’s one thing that people do not consider when discussing the targeting of Americans, and that is the oaths that are taken by the president, the military, and government law enforcement officials that would be responsible for taking such actions.

Presidential Oath of Office:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Military Oath of Office:
“I, *****, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

Fed Oath of Office:
”I, *****, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that <b.I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

Seems that law dictates that, if a citizen is deemed an enemy of the Constitution, it is the duty of the president, military, and government as a whole to defend the Constitution in spite of the fact that they are doing such against a citizen.

md

January 21st, 2012
11:00 am

“I would do my job for less, but compared to what I have had to sacrifice next to some sitting behind a desk pretending to be important, I feel I kind of deserve it.”

I would concur……seems there should be a “life on the line” component in the equation………

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:00 am

Did anyone notice IL passed up CA as the most fiscally unstable state? For those of you not keeping up with current events, ALL of the people ruining IL are the President’s good buddies. But I’m sure sharing the same philosophies will work out differently for our country since obama is the smartest man in the world.

md

January 21st, 2012
11:02 am

soco……don’t you think that same type oath is taken by other leaders around the world??

My point……I find it a bit hypocritical to wag our finger at others for discussing what we do ourselves.

Common Sense isn't very Common

January 21st, 2012
11:02 am

All of the people ruining IL are the President’s good buddies?

That’s one hell of a Christmas card list.

:-)

Kamchak

January 21st, 2012
11:03 am

Did anyone notice IL passed up CA as the most fiscally unstable state?

No, but I have noticed that all during this thread you have been the biggerst whiny baby about how bad your life is.

Just sayin’.

Kamchak

January 21st, 2012
11:03 am

“biggest” not “biggerst”

Brosephus

January 21st, 2012
11:04 am

Until the government unions get under control, nothing will change.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Please don’t tell me you’re afraid of the dark too…

md

January 21st, 2012
11:06 am

And soco……doesn’t that Constitution say something about “due process” too……….

Brosephus

January 21st, 2012
11:06 am

biggerst

Is that like a big assed bratwurst or something? :)

md

Point taken. I’d also add that there’s a split within this country over whether we should do such things or not. I don’t find it hypocritical when it’s not something that’s agreed upon with unanimous consent from all citizens and parties involved.

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:07 am

Jamvet- Making cuts at this time is a bad thing. The exact same mantra we’ve heard for thirty years

Do you realize we had more troops in Desert Storm than we have in the total military now? There are tons of ways to save money in the miltary budget, but downsizing personnel at this time would be bad. Soldier’s need some time to spend with their families and let some wounds heal. I’d think that would be something you could relate to.

Common Sense isn't very Common

January 21st, 2012
11:07 am

Bro – you know in your heart that it’s the Gov’t union thugs that has caused all the problems.

OMG :-)

Hyperbole much?

Kamchak

January 21st, 2012
11:08 am

“Plop plop, fizz fizz, oh what a relief it is.”
– Thomas Jefferson

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:11 am

doggone- WHY would it be hard to believe he “could ever get elected”?

Get some coffee because your obviously still asleep. It’s a facetious statement.

JamVet

January 21st, 2012
11:11 am

Bro, speaking of labor unions, it looks like the quasi-fascists in Wisconsin are going to learn in humiliating fashion the results of trying to be dictatorial dickheads.

Thanks to the OWS folks, revolution and patriotic civil disobedience is in the air.

And watching a bunch of these neo-con union busters get kicked to the private sector curb via recalls will be enormously entertaining. As will be the subsequent teeth gnashing of the parasites who’ve personally profited enormously from the work of said labor unions…

Brosephus

January 21st, 2012
11:12 am

md

That it does, and it appears there would be conflict between the two if defending the Constitution required taking action without due process. I’m gonna wager that most legal experts would lean more towards defending the Constitution in that instance, but I won’t say that’s a definite answer.

getalife

January 21st, 2012
11:12 am

We got some real Obama envy on this blog.

He did not write this article cons.

Why are you ignoring it?

TaxPayer

January 21st, 2012
11:14 am

JKL2,

I’d say the issue of benefits is a bit more involved than you have indicated based on this overview. Anyway, whatever the benefits, how do you think they should be paid for? More tax cuts? Certainly not tax hikes!! How un-Republican! How about we just take the payroll taxes that the working class have paid and give those to the military retirees instead. Or we could eliminate Medicaid and unemployment benefits, etc., and tell those people that it is just the price they have to pay you for your willingness to protect them from harm…

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:14 am

Brosephus- Seems that law dictates that, if a citizen is deemed an enemy of the Constitution, it is the duty of the president, military, and government as a whole to defend the Constitution in spite of the fact that they are doing such against a citizen.

Are you advocating the assassination of the president then? We all know he hates the Constitution.

Brosephus

January 21st, 2012
11:15 am

NoCom

Trying to label government unions as some kind of threat is like claiming you have an attack dog in your home because your significant other has a teacup poodle. :)

AmVet

I’ve been watching that situation unfold, and I’m surprised at the silence surrounding the entire fiasco. It will be interesting to see things play out. I think it’s just good to see democratic processes working as they should.

getalife

January 21st, 2012
11:15 am

“Are you advocating the assassination of the president then?”

Are you jk?

Brosephus

January 21st, 2012
11:17 am

Are you advocating the assassination of the president then? We all know he hates the Constitution.

WE don’t know that. Some people, you included, may think that, but there’s not a single person who could prove that beyond a reasonable doubt at this time.

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:17 am

common sense- That’s one hell of a Christmas card list.

You do realize the President sends out thousands of cards don’t you? I’m the only one in my family not on the Presidental mailing list.

JamVet

January 21st, 2012
11:17 am

“…but downsizing personnel at this time would be bad.”

For whom?

The republic?

For our gargantuan deficit?

For our national security?

Please.

The ONLY reason that it would suck for those guys is that in this post-apocalyptic, corporate destroyed capitalism, there are very few good jobs for anybody. Even veterans.

So let’s cut to the chase, for the chickenhawks who run the Republican Party there will NEVER, EVER, EVER be a good time to do it.

To them, these men and women are not much more than political tools to be used as canon fodder whenever they get that frequent vicarious bloodlusting itch. Or is it a rash?

And they can all kiss my ___….

Support the troops.

stands for decibels

January 21st, 2012
11:18 am

“Guys who support domestic terrorism against the United States probably shouldn’t qualify for government pensions.”

–Thomas Jefferson

Common Sense isn't very Common

January 21st, 2012
11:19 am

Bro – No I know all you gov’t types are just pu$$ycats :-)

JKL is just this with a bad attitude

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDiLOMP9MNE

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:19 am

kamchak- No, but I have noticed that all during this thread you have been the biggerst whiny baby about how bad your life is

The difference between me and you Democrats is I might complain but I don’t have my hand out.

Vote for obama. Free money for everyone!

Common Sense isn't very Common

January 21st, 2012
11:21 am

You do realize the President sends out thousands of cards don’t you? I’m the only one in my family not on the Presidental mailing list.

———————————————————-

I’m depressed now since I didn’t get mine this year. :-(

Paulo977

January 21st, 2012
11:22 am

Brosephus
Doesn’t seem like it’s vanished from the AJC to me.

____________________
But then this is the real home of the real KKK isn’t it?
How about GA Judge Michael’s question about Obama’s eligibility for office?

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:25 am

Jamvet- speaking of labor unions, it looks like the quasi-fascists in Wisconsin are going to learn in humiliating fashion the results of trying to be dictatorial dickheads

Is that why Scott Walker has raised more money in the last 6 month than any governor in history? All this recall BS is going to do is wast about $10 million WI taxpayer dollars. WI is kicking a$$ since he took over. Fell free to compare it to it’s southern brother IL if you want.

Brosephus

January 21st, 2012
11:25 am

NoCom

That’s why I laugh when people go all bat shiite crazy about government unions. The larger unions are Fed Unions, and by law, they can not strike. They can’t bargain over pay or benefits either. If people really knew the limited power of fed unions, they’d piss their pants from laughing everytime some rightie brings up the evil government unions. Amoebas have more spine that fed unions. :lol:

stands for decibels

January 21st, 2012
11:25 am

Common Sense isn't very Common

January 21st, 2012
11:26 am

‘Who can rid me of this troublesome Judge Michael Malihi ‘

-Anyone with brains

getalife

January 21st, 2012
11:26 am

I doubt jk works for the government .

I doubt jk has a job.

Big Sis should keep a eye on that con.

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:27 am

jamvet- Thanks to the OWS folks, revolution and patriotic civil disobedience is in the air.

I ordered a new shirt last week. “Occupy Patrol Base: At least our movements have a purpose.”

Common Sense isn't very Common

January 21st, 2012
11:29 am

Bro – I know. My father was ‘civil service’ and really understood and explained what that meant.

Brosephus

January 21st, 2012
11:30 am

Paulo

I’m quite interested in seeing how that case plays out in court.

stands for decibels

January 21st, 2012
11:31 am

If you guys think Jay’s got it in for Newt, ya might oughta have a look at Rude Pundit’s latest…

[W]hen Gingrich went all angry chimp on CNN’s John King at last night’s GOP South Carolina debate over a question about Marianne Gingrich’s interview with ABC, it wasn’t only unexpected. It’s what he does. He’s always the victim. When he said, “I am tired of the elite media protecting Barack Obama by attacking Republicans,” you could have put Bill Clinton in there.

Oh, wait. Here’s Gingrich in June 1996 in the Washington Times: “[T]here is no president in modern times more systematically protected by the elite media.” (Indeed, one could go through much of the way Gingrich has attacked Obama and find almost verbatim antecedents in his attacks on Clinton, Gore, and Kerry.)

In December 1994, Gingrich was congratulating the House Republicans for their victory in the midterms. After talking about his family, he said, “I want to ask all of you to join me in — (pauses) — I’m trying to think. It’s a little difficult to say. In thanking the person who has endured more from the media and more from the process than anybody should have to for me to be here, my wife Marianne.” Callista Bisek, who was a House staffer, was probably there for that rally. Maybe she was a little uncomfortable as Gingrich introduced his wife since the Speaker had been f###ing Callista for a year already.

No, there’s no issue about a sociopathic character flaw here that might be of interest to the voters.

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:32 am

taxpayer- How about we just take the payroll taxes that the working class have paid and give those to the military retirees instead. Or we could eliminate Medicaid and unemployment benefits, etc., and tell those people that it is just the price they have to pay you for your willingness to protect them from harm…

It seems you’re implying Soldier’s don’t work. We actually are the working class. Since we are paid by the government, everything we receive WAS taken away from a working person.

Don’t worry about Medicare because your wonderful Obamacare is going to get rid of that on it’s own.

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:35 am

Brosephus- Some people, you included, may think that, but there’s not a single person who could prove that beyond a reasonable doubt at this time.

Another 2 second google answer…

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/obama-constitution/2008/10/27/id/326165

Common Sense isn't very Common

January 21st, 2012
11:35 am

JKL – Don’t worry about Medicare because your wonderful Obamacare is going to get rid of that on it’s own.

——

So I guess you are conceding that Pres. Obama is going to win, eh?

Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)

January 21st, 2012
11:37 am

Well, I guess today all those fine folk in South Carolina are trying not to scrape their knuckles as they walk to the polls.

I sure hope they have decent weather. Unlike us. Heck, we’re in the middle of a thunderstorm up here at Simpsons Trailer Park. In the middle of January. This is crazy.

My guess is, old Newt might of picked up a few votes from the men in SC over that report of him wanting a open marriage. Which is no marriage at all. I guess us people will watch the returns at Billy Bob’s and brag a little about how this country is getting back to the Conservative way of doing things. And in the end I’m afraid it’ll go the Way of McCain and we’ll have four more years of the Socialist Illegal Kenyan. But at least we’ll of got our licks in. Then I start thinking of No. 1 Foxy Lady getting on here and telling us all to . . . well, you know.

Oh well, it’s a gloomy day, might as well think gloomy thoughts. Have a good Saturday everybody.

Kamchak

January 21st, 2012
11:38 am

Newsmax?

There’s your sign.

HAHAHAHAHA!

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:38 am

jamvet- For whom? The republic? For our gargantuan deficit? For our national security? Please

It’s all rainbows and unicorns here in obamaland. We are so well respected around the world, I don’t know why we don’t just get rid of the military now…

md

January 21st, 2012
11:38 am

“If people really knew the limited power of fed unions, they’d piss their pants from laughing everytime some rightie brings up the evil government unions.”

Just a point of clarification, but “gov’t unions” isn’t restricted to the fed……if the State unions had the same restrictions, there would probably be less discussion on the matter…….

getalife

January 21st, 2012
11:38 am

My advice to cons is you can’t beat him so join him.

And when some loud mouthed punk calls for our President’s assassination, stand up for your country cons.

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:41 am

common sense- I’m depressed now since I didn’t get mine this year.

My Dad, brother and sister did. And their all registered Republicans. I guess your not that good a democrat after all.

Keep Up the Good Fight!

January 21st, 2012
11:44 am

“It’s fun to stay at the YMCA” — Thomas Jefferson

JamVet

January 21st, 2012
11:48 am

Purpose? From what I can see the purpose of the GOP is to create slogans. And the more they are tailored for simpletons, the higher their “purpose”.

As for other nations and their “respect’” for us?

What a bunch of crap. You spendaholic neo-cons absolutely detest foreigners, but you want their respect???

Hysterical…

getalife

January 21st, 2012
11:49 am

“Recon 0311 2533

January 20th, 2012
9:06 pm

I’m not a supporter of the policies of our president but as Americans we decide through the election process. A threat against our president is a threat against America and that is unacceptable regardless of ideological beliefs.”

That is what I am talking about cons.

It is not a partisan issue jk.

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:50 am

common sense- So I guess you are conceding that Pres. Obama is going to win, eh?

To rehash things I’ve already typed today, let alone multiple times in the past:

Yes, I think obama will get re-elected, because when too many stupid people vote, the Democrat wins.

Obama is going to be re-elected based on 1: class envy 2: skin color 3: the promise of bigger handouts. His target audience is people who don’t pay income tax and unions.

He could care less about anyone earning a paycheck. Something our founding fathers specifically warned against.

TaxPayer

January 21st, 2012
11:53 am


JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:32 am
taxpayer- …

It seems you’re implying Soldier’s don’t work. We actually are the working class. Since we are paid by the government, everything we receive WAS taken away from a working person.

Don’t worry about Medicare because your wonderful Obamacare is going to get rid of that on it’s own.

JKL2,

That is your handle parked next to that implication so it would be you making said implication. Kindly park your Limbaugh Lingo at the door and pick it up when you exit. As for my question of how to pay your benefits, I see you failed to reply. Care to try again. How about since the DoD gets 700 billion annually and your benefits are only 100 billion, you convince your superiors to get by on a mere 600 billion per year. Perhaps a small cut in active deployed troops and even a little cut in some futuristic aircraft or something similar will do the trick. That way, the people whom you claim to be fighting to protect might still be alive when you come back stateside to check up on ‘em. It’s a win-win.

JKL2

January 21st, 2012
11:53 am

getalife- And when some loud mouthed punk calls for our President’s assassination, stand up for your country cons

I don’t want to see him assassinated because then we would be stuck with blathering idiot Biden in charge (and people complained about Sarah Palin–ROFL) It’s a shame the Demwits thru Hillary under the bus because I think even her would be doing a much better job now.