Newt stumbles, Obama surges and Ron Paul exposed
8:59 am December 27, 2011, by Jay
A handful of political developments to get us started in the last week of 2011:
Newt Gingrich — at this point a longtime resident of Virginia, not Georgia — has failed to qualify for the Republican ballot in his home state, which holds its primary on March 6. That’s important in purely practical terms, because Virginia is a big state with a lot of delegates, and because Gingrich was expected to do well there. Instead, only Mitt Romney and Ron Paul will appear on the ballot there, because they were the only ones to collect enough valid signatures.
The failure is also important as a symbol of the former speaker’s lack of discipline and competent leadership. He likes to talks a big game — he and his advisers have likened the ballot failure to the attack on Pearl Harbor — but grand rhetoric is no substitute for execution.
Gallup has confirmed what earlier polls have reported as well — President Obama is having a good holiday season. His job-approval rating of 47 percent is now higher than his disapproval rating of 45 percent. The test will come in trying to sustain that kind of support. Congress, in contrast, will end the year with an approval rating of 11 percent, which is really mind-boggling if you think about it. And what’s truly dismaying about that number is that it is so well-deserved.
With the Iowa caucuses exactly one week away, Ron Paul continues to do well in the polls. But with success comes greater scrutiny, and in Paul’s case it has focused on the contents of an “investment newsletter” that Paul produced and profited from back in the ’80s and ’90s. The publication — titled the “Ron Paul Investment Newsletter” or the “Ron Paul Survival Newsletter” — contains a series of racially biased attacks, whacked-out conspiracy theories and anti-gay rhetoric.
The newsletters were long been known, but have become more relevant as Paul attempts to break out of his cult-figure niche into the mainstream. Paul himself claims that he didn’t write the pieces published under his name, which a., I find difficult to believe and b., doesn’t matter even if it’s true. If you allow such pieces to be published under your name, for your own personal profit, they become your responsibility.
– Jay Bookman
819 comments Add your comment
Newt stumbles, Obama surges and Ron Paul exposed – Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog) | PAULitics.US – Wake Up America
December 27th, 2011
9:05 am
[...] Newt stumbles, Obama surges and Ron Paul exposed – Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog) Posted in Ron Paul | Tags: atlanta-journal-, ballot, collect-enough, constitution, journal, obama, ron paul, the-ballot, the-former /* [...]
philosopher
December 27th, 2011
9:09 am
first
Midori
December 27th, 2011
9:09 am
hope you had a very merry Christmas, Jay
***Don't Mess With Texas***
December 27th, 2011
9:10 am
Didn’t Ron Paul and Rick Perry lobby to have Texas secede from the United States? Can we sell Texas to Mexico for $1?
bman
December 27th, 2011
9:10 am
“President Obama is having a good holiday season. His job-approval rating of 47 percent is now higher than his disapproval rating of 45 percent. The test will come in trying to sustain that kind of support.”
From CNBC 8:12 AM: Between 100 and 120 Sears and Kmart stores will be closed, Sears Holdings said Tuesday, after terrible holiday sales during what is the most crucial time of the year for retailers.
Much more of this and the 47% will be back down. It will probably be back down anyway as gallup tends to +- 2 each day.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
9:11 am
Ron Paul exposed?
EEEK!
Road Scholar
December 27th, 2011
9:11 am
And I thought Newt was in the party of personal responsibility! Let the whining continue!
As for Paul, the Washington Post has an interesting article about the lack of legislation he has sponsored and/or had passed based on his time in office.
philosopher
December 27th, 2011
9:12 am
I don’t think I have ever seen such a circus in my entire life.I am not a Republican, never have been, but I am emabrrassed for the party…as well as disgusted and a little unnerved by it. I prefer a worthy opponent as I believe most people do.
philosopher
December 27th, 2011
9:12 am
embarrassed
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
9:12 am
bman
been to sears or kmart lately?
their management ran them into the ground.
Lord Help Us
December 27th, 2011
9:13 am
I finally found an article the other day that profiled a number of Iowans that have flipped their support from Trump to Bachmann to Perry to Cain to Gingrich (with some now grudgingly moving to the Romney camp).
The rationalizations go full circle and, ironically, could result in most of them supporting President Obama if he decided to seek the GOP nomination…
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
9:13 am
Newt Gingrich — at this point a longtime resident of Virginia, not Georgia — has failed to qualify for the Republican ballot in his home state, which holds its primary on March 6.
I realize that a candidate must needs delegate details to staff, but it says a lot that he can’t hire competent people to plan and execute a winning strategy.
How is he gonna accomplish that should he succeed to the Oval Office?
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
9:17 am
I understand Newt Submitted 11,000 signatures and they couldn’t verify 10,000 of them.
What the hell is that all about?
Southpaw
December 27th, 2011
9:19 am
If all you’ve got to banish the idea of voting Paul is a few newsletters from the 80’s that were taken out of context for the purpose of dramatizing the issue I feel so sad for your uninformed opinion. It’s always the whiteys so quick to finger point racism.
Austin NAACP President Nelson Linder, who has known Ron Paul for 20 years, unequivocally dismissed charges that the Congressman was a racist in light of recent smear attempts, and said the reason for him being attacked was that he was a threat to the establishment
Want to know what black people really think of Ron Paul?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JA2ehvB-_Ac
Beware those who immediately default to racist slander when confronted with something they oppose, they are the most racist of all.
bman
December 27th, 2011
9:19 am
Granny .. .. No, I haven’t. In fact, I didn’t even know Kmart was still around. It seems as if I do remember reading something about management at Sears as well as competition.
It doesn’t really matter how they got into the shape they are currently in. It’s about jobs…
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
9:20 am
Don’t you all know that Obama is personally responsible for Sears/Kmart not reaching it’s numbers? If ya’ll watched Fox News 24/7 like me you would be in the know.
josef
December 27th, 2011
9:21 am
josef
December 26th, 2011
11:21 am
Memo is out. Ron Paul is the new attack flavor. Use the day off to get ready.
Told you.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
9:21 am
bman
actually it’s about both.
SwamiDave
December 27th, 2011
9:22 am
And every day more data keeps coming out about how majorities of Americans are tired of wasteful spending and recognize that government is not the answer. PrezBO’s bump is in large measure the success of the recent “payroll tax lie” where he & Democrats (with the help of willing accomplices in the media) shilled the lie that Democrats extending the tax break for TWO MONTHS was doing more for Americans than the already-waiting ONE YEAR bill that PrezBO claimed to want.
Sorry Jay, but you were as much a dishonest shill & liar as PrezBO for parroting the scam.
We’ll see if he continues to win by lying and complete avoidance of his own record. We’ll see if those who happen to share his political views continue to void themselves of integrity by toting water for this administration & perpetuate its lies to the American people.
-SD
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
9:22 am
In fact, I didn’t even know Kmart was still around
In fact, I don’t drive with my eyes open so I would never notice that big red K-Mart sign. I thought it was a Denny’s.
AgentS
December 27th, 2011
9:22 am
I think it’s fairly obvious to anyone now that Gingrich was never serious about running for president. For him and Cain, this was a publicity tour so he can sell books and speeches.
It comes down to Paul and Romney and anyone else left standing after Super Tuesday.
Paul’s friends and supporters make Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers sound like normal people.
Romney can’t tell the truth about anything or hold a position longer than 12 seconds.
Wow Republicans of 2011-2012, if you are not interested in running, just say so- Obama can take on the Green party and Constitution Party instead.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
9:23 am
Southpaw
He printed those statements under his name.
He ran away from an interview regarding them.
If it walks like a duck…..
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
9:24 am
It doesn’t really matter how they got into the shape they are currently in.
If anyone is interested in learning how not to do something, then yeah, it really does matter.
Lord Help Us
December 27th, 2011
9:25 am
bman, you may also want to look up how many Walmarts and Costco’s have opened over the past few years…
bman
December 27th, 2011
9:27 am
lol Finn … i just did a search for the closest Kmart in my area. Mableton, Ga. – - I live at the Marietta Square. Not too many people see those big red Kmart signs
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
9:27 am
We need Newt’s sharp tongue to stay in the race to belittle whichever front runners emerge. Newt is actually working for the Democrats – just watch.
Congress and My Tax Dollars
December 27th, 2011
9:31 am
With millionaire status now the norm, the rarefied air in the Capitol these days is $100 million. That lofty level appears to have been surpassed by at least 10 members, led by Representative Darrell Issa, a California Republican and former auto alarm magnate who is worth somewhere between $195 million and $700 million. (Because federal law requires lawmakers to disclose their assets only in broad dollar ranges, more precise estimates are impossible.)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45793299/ns/politics-the_new_york_times/
More of my tax dollars being exploited!
steve tuggle
December 27th, 2011
9:33 am
Everyone knows Ron Paul is not a racist. Just do a little research for yourself and you will find out why his support is growing. Ron Paul 2012
josef
December 27th, 2011
9:34 am
The truly scary thing about Paul. beyond his race-baiting, is his appeal to the younger voters. It’s midnight, do you know where your kids are? If this is the direction we’re headed in the future, we’ve got some serious problems that need addressing now…
scott
December 27th, 2011
9:34 am
Amazing. you site these polls only when convenient. When obama’s levels drop, you simply find a different poll that says something else. When it rises, you say “See….He IS doing a good job.” Now that you are citing these polls again, how about you start bringing up the polls that say that more than half of America wants Obamacare to go away?
TaxPayer
December 27th, 2011
9:34 am
It’s gotta be tough being a Republican right about now. What with so many presidential candidates to choose from and every one of them just as good as the other. Thanks for the holiday present, Republicans.
P.S. Please keep Ron unexposed though. That may be more than any of deserves.
Lord Help Us
December 27th, 2011
9:35 am
‘Everyone knows Ron Paul is not a racist.’
He’s not a racist, he just says a lot of racist things…
This another one of those ‘common knowledge’ positions?
Jay
December 27th, 2011
9:35 am
At best, Steve Tuggle, Ron Paul was willing to profit by playing to the racist sentiments of others.
At best.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
9:35 am
Everyone knows Ron Paul is not a racist.
Where did you get that special dispensation that allows you to speak for “everyone”?
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
9:36 am
Ron Pauls Actual Words….
“I think this fence business is designed and may well be used against us and keep us in. In economic turmoil, the people want to leave with their capital. And there’s capital controls and there’s people control. So, every time you think of fence keeping all those bad people out, think about those fences maybe being used against us, keeping us in.”
Sept 2011
Jesse
December 27th, 2011
9:36 am
Granny, go look up the full, unedited interview, and you’ll find no ducking and running. Just a clever bit of editing to make it appear so.
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 27th, 2011
9:37 am
let me translate the virginia thing for you – “holy crap, these rubes are
takin me serious. That’ll ruin the scam.I better screw this up, and fast”
plus, Virginia was getting sick, so Newt asked for a divorce, and then
Virginia wasn’t going to sign anything…
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
9:37 am
With the Iowa caucuses exactly one week away, Ron Paul continues to do well in the polls.
Sort of related to that–I found this On the Media piece from last weekend to be enlightening:
http://www.onthemedia.org/2011/dec/23/problem-likely-voters/
Essentially, the filtering done by mainstream pollsters to make sure there are “likely voters” represented is somewhat problematic, and the question “Are you likely to vote?” is one that people tend lie about with some regularity.
Which would indicate that the dynamics of Iowa polling for Ron Paul might be rather severe, but who knows.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
9:38 am
jesse
which interview.
the one he ran from?
please let us know which you are talking about…linkee?
Evan Rogers
December 27th, 2011
9:39 am
Ron Paul wasn’t exposed at all. This issue has been in the media for 20 years now. Everyone who supports Ron Paul already knows about this and has realized that, EVEN IF HE WERE a racist, he would never allow a racist law to be passed at the federal level because his love of the Constitution is greater than any supposed hatred of his fellow man.
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
9:39 am
Amazing. you site these polls only when convenient. When obama’s levels drop, you simply find a different poll that says something else.
Not intended as a factual statement.
Tomas
December 27th, 2011
9:40 am
To granny Godzilla,
Sad to see you believe that video that CNN put out. The unedited video shows the interview simply ending on its own. Paul did not end the interview or storm out. The main stream media will lie and cheat to get its way. Don’t fall victim to them.
http://www.dailypaul.com/196334/cnn-released-unedited-interview-ron-paul-did-not-storm-out-it-was-a-creative-editing-hit-job
There’s a link to the video…if you choose truth, that is!
Talking Head
December 27th, 2011
9:40 am
“At best, Steve Tuggle, Ron Paul was willing to profit by playing to the racist sentiments of others.”
That is basically the livelihood of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
9:41 am
because his love of the Constitution is greater than any supposed hatred of his fellow man
is this another one of those strange reasons that we should not allow gay people to marry?
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
9:42 am
The main stream media will lie and cheat to get its way.
Aannnnnnnnnnnnnndd I quit reading.
mm
December 27th, 2011
9:43 am
“a few newsletters from the 80’s that were taken out of context ”
Yep, with the incompetent right, it’s always the media’s fault.
“PrezBO’s bump is in large measure the success of the recent “payroll tax lie” where he & Democrats (with the help of willing accomplices in the media) shilled the lie that Democrats extending the tax break for TWO MONTHS was doing more for Americans than the already-waiting ONE YEAR bill that PrezBO claimed to want.”
That was an idiotic post.
Stonethrower
December 27th, 2011
9:44 am
President Reagan was not a racist either but he used some of the “us against them” ideas to his advantage to get the southern vote just like Ron Paul did. So what if he rejects the color vote. It’s not like they are going to vote for him anyway.
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
9:44 am
@Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
9:23 am
@Granny Godzilla who wrote;
“He ran away from an interview regarding them.”
Did you see the unedited interview? He answered Borger numerous times about the subject, yet she continued to badger him, to the point where he said enough. That’s the facts and the complete interview is on youtube. Just more selecftive “reporting”, by “news people” who have a vested interest in not seeing Dr. Paul elected.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
9:46 am
Tomas
Watched your link.
Yes the inteview was over when Paul was faced with questions he did not want to answer.
He could not face the tough questions and started unwiring himself…
Looks like a swift egress to me.
Not real brave.
#1 Foxy Lady
December 27th, 2011
9:49 am
someone better get to work on that ron paul is not a racist home-made sign.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
9:50 am
Mike Parent
Perception.
I see a guy afraid to answer and ripping off his mic and getting outa’ dodge.
Badgering racists is a good thing.
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
9:50 am
how about you start bringing up the polls that say that more than half of America wants Obamacare to go away?
Got a link for this? That might help. But I bet not.
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
9:50 am
How is he gonna accomplish that should he succeed to the Oval Office?
Frankly, that’s about as legitimate a worry as oh, say, whether your flying unicorn’s landing gear can handle the Hartsfield-Jackson runway surface.
Paul Tripp
December 27th, 2011
9:51 am
Yes, the guy who would end our wars in the Middle East faster than President Obama and stop killing tens of thousands of Arabs a year, who would pardon hundreds of thousands of predominantly minority inmates in prison for federal drug crimes (15% of drug users are black, but over 60% of those in jail for drug use are black, and the majority of the remainder are hispanic or native – the drug war is the most severe instance of institutionalized racism around today), is just so racist. I mean, everyone knows that racists support reforming our criminal justice system to make it more fair to minorities and oppose killing brown skinned people around the world.
Everything in the newsletters was written in the period after the end of Paul’s 1988 campaign for President and before his return to Congress in the mid 1990s, while he was running his private medical practice. He wasn’t active in politics and wasn’t paying attention to his newsletter because, at the time, he wasn’t considering continuing his political career and didn’t care. Lapse of judgment? Sure, and you can stack that up against Romney’s inability to hold the same position for any length of time or Gingrich’s record of ethics violations during his time in office or Obama having been elected to save the middle class from the rich, only to redistribute wealth back upwards with bailouts, stimulus packages, and increased government subsidies, but if you want to smear him for racism, maybe you should look at the other candidates’ records of supporting unjust wars against Muslims, destroying our civil liberties, and supporting the policy of arresting disproportionately high numbers of minorities in the war on drugs.
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
9:53 am
Groups battle sex trafficking in Atlanta
I see a lot of traffic on my way to work and home but I never seem to run into this sex traffic. What side of town is that traffic on?
bman
December 27th, 2011
9:53 am
Finn …. scroll
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/obama_and_democrats_health_care_plan-1130.html#polls
M
December 27th, 2011
9:53 am
Ron Paul wants environmental issues to be solved with property rights. That little bit of insanity alone should keep him from being president, even if he wasn’t a blatant bigot.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
9:54 am
Lapse of Judgement?
now that’s something of an understatement.
David
December 27th, 2011
9:57 am
The only people exposed are the Mainstream Media, who have been exposed as shills for the welfare/warfare state. How can you mention newsletters written by a ghost writer and not mention that the head of the Austin NAACP came out in support of Ron Paul, or that he has the highest support among non-whites in the GOP, or that he would end the racist Drug War? Of course, it is the same reason you shills question his foreign policy views as “isolationist” but fail to mention that his support among active duty military smashes EVERY other candidate including Obama.
Go screw yourselves.
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
9:57 am
ahem.
“As you may know, a bill that makes major changes to the country’s health care system became law in 2010. Based on what you have read or heard about that legislation, do you generally favor or generally oppose it?” If oppose: “Do you oppose that legislation because you think its approach toward health care is too liberal, or because you think it is not liberal enough?”
38% say they favor it.
37% oppose because it’s “too liberal.”
14% oppose because it’s “not liberal enough.”
(Funny how conservatives forget about that last part.)
atYou
December 27th, 2011
9:57 am
http://www.counterfeitcandidate.com
AmVet
December 27th, 2011
9:57 am
Newt is a hoot.
What kind of Tweedledum Party amateur can’t even run his campaign to the point where he gets on the ballot for the primaries in all fifty states???
Hello?? Were they too busy shopping at Tiffany & Co to notice the requirements?
And you rubes actually think this fraud is one of the great intellectual giants of your movement?
Somewhere Ralph Nader, Ross Perot, John Anderson and every other third party candidate are all laughing their arses off…
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
9:58 am
“Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began. … What if the checks had never arrived? No doubt the blacks would have fully privatized the welfare state through continued looting. But they were paid off and the violence subsided.”
– Ron Paul
Describing 1992 Los Angeles Riots
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
9:58 am
David
writes the radical libertarian epistle succintly:
Go screw yourselves.
The 1%....
December 27th, 2011
9:59 am
Pelosi Spends Christmas at Posh Hawaiian Hotel
Published : Tuesday, 27 Dec 2011, 7:10 AM MST
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was not dreaming of a white Christmas.
For the third year in a row, the California Democrat shacked up in a sun-drenched, beachside hotel at Historic Ka’upulehu in Kona on the island of Hawaii, the Hawaii Reporter reported this week. For the past two years, Pelosi reserved a posh suite that fetches $10,000 a night.
The Four Seasons Resort Hualalai offers visitors beachfront dining, fashion boutiques and Jack Nicklaus signature golf, the paper reported. In years past, the paper reported, local taxpayers coughed up $34,000 for police detail to escort Pelosi around the island.
President Obama and his family are also spending the holidays at the tropical paradise during a 17-day vacation in Kailua, Oahu.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
9:59 am
Frankly, that’s about as legitimate a worry as oh, say, whether your flying unicorn’s landing gear can handle the Hartsfield-Jackson runway surface.
Gawd, I hope so.
Jay
December 27th, 2011
9:59 am
So the story line is that Ron Paul shouldn’t be held responsible for statements that were printed under his own byline, under his own picture, in a publication that he owned?
Really guys? That’s the best you can do?
More importantly, is this how Dr. Paul carries out the “personal responsibility” he regularly advocates, by trying to blame others for his own egregious statements?
josef
December 27th, 2011
10:01 am
Sooth
Given his opinions on the State of Israel (and Jews in general, especially the international zionist hoodlum bankers), I’d've thought he was your man… just a musing from the Rothschild place…
Armindo
December 27th, 2011
10:02 am
Its kind of funny how this blog has the most misleading title i have read yet. You start off with “Ron Paul exposed” and then continue to talk about racial remarks made in a newsletter from the 80’s which has already been disproved that it did not come from Paul, but instead one of the workers at the newsletters.
Nice try.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
10:02 am
Where did this Ron Paul RULZ contingent come from?
Is this blog posted on the gooey Drudgey goodness?
M
December 27th, 2011
10:04 am
If you’re poor, or if you can’t get a job…you’re lazy and it’s your own stinkin’ fault. If you can’t get on the ballot in your own state or if you experience political backlash over racist statements you made in a newsletter than made you a ton of money, it is everyone else’s fault but your own, and somebody else better fix the system fast before you get angry.
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
10:04 am
But they were paid off and the violence subsided.
Wait a minute–is this about the LA riots, or Teh Glorious Eye-Rack SURGE?
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
10:04 am
Jay, you are worried about racist statements from Paul while our president spent Christmas in another country?
Oh ma Gawd!
mm
December 27th, 2011
10:05 am
Every week our righty friends come on this blog to defend the next imbecile candidate from their party.
SwamiDave
December 27th, 2011
10:06 am
What part was “idiotic”?
The part about the fact that the House had already passed a 1 year extension. The part about the Senate saying they had “wanted a 1 year extension”, but could only pass a 2 month extension, adjourning for the year demanding passage of their bill, refusing to confer. The part of PrezBO blaming Republicans who’d already passed an extension they claimed to want.
Or the part of shills like Jay and fellow media liberals who parroted this sham that they knew was a lie.
The idiotic part is really that so many Americans have fell for the lies of dependency and redistribution which empowers proponents of the failed philosophy to hold power.
-SD
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
10:06 am
Where did this Ron Paul RULZ contingent come from?
You’ve got about a million or so dorks who compulsively google their Lord and Savior’s name every half hour or so, would be my guess.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
10:07 am
Who was the one big Paul supporter we had and is he all the new ron supporters today?
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
10:07 am
Every week our righty friends come on this blog to defend the next imbecile candidate from their party.
They provide free amusement for us liberals. Better than TV.
guest38282
December 27th, 2011
10:08 am
I am confused…is an 11% unemployment rate reason to celebrate?
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
10:08 am
Liberals – lay off Ron Paul.
The longer he rides in the clown car the better. I wish Herb Cain were still around just for the jokes. I really miss him.
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
10:08 am
Everybody lies except SwamiDave. He’s a righteous dude dontcha know?
M
December 27th, 2011
10:08 am
SwamiDave,
Google “Keystone Pipeline.”
Butch Cassidy
December 27th, 2011
10:09 am
The 1% – “For the third year in a row, the California Democrat shacked up in a sun-drenched, beachside hotel at Historic Ka’upulehu in Kona on the island of Hawaii, the Hawaii Reporter reported this week. For the past two years, Pelosi reserved a posh suite that fetches $10,000 a night.”
To qoute from the Republican handbook (which by the way is supported an a regular basis by many on this site). Stop with the wealth envy, pull yourself up by your bootstraps, stop hating successful people and go open a business, stop punishing success, stop hating people who made “good choices”, stop with the class warfare, don’t blame others for your “bad choices”, take responsibility, work harder, get a job, etc, etc, etc………
TimeForRealChange
December 27th, 2011
10:11 am
Of course Obama is getting a surge. He changed the definition of poverty and got the newspapers to go along with it, and they all only report statistics that make things look good. If the truth were being told… Well if the press told the truth Obama would never have been elected, but if they were telling the truth about the economy right now, then Obama’s numbers would be far worse. Even so they are pretty bad for the man so many called the messiah.
Talking Head
December 27th, 2011
10:12 am
I don’t think Paul does a very good job articulating his points, but I support him. I just find it hilarious that the liberal media, democrats, and administration have nothing to defend themsleves against Paul except a newsletter that was printed 20 something years ago with supposedly racist comments.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
10:13 am
Even so they are pretty bad for the man so many called the messiah.
Most of the “so many” being on the far right.
M
December 27th, 2011
10:13 am
TimeForRealChange,
Is it scary living inside your head? Sounds like it.
Butch Cassidy
December 27th, 2011
10:14 am
TimeForRealChange – “Even so they are pretty bad for the man so many called the messiah.”
Thanks for bringing that up.And I agree, you definitely need to tell those idiots on the right to stop calling him that.
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
10:14 am
Oh dear, while Kyle’s away, I’m here to play.
But I am so concerned about President Obama. He’s plunging right into those big waves in Hawaii and having to do it for a whole week. Besides, having to put up with a snooty, ritzy hotel for a long week and mind the kiddies and Michele and all that. And Nancy Pelosi next door! Poor guy!!
Anyway, I’m sure someone will dust the Oval Office while he’s gone. He doesn’t use it much but somebody’s got to do it.
Yes, Virgina, there is a Santa Claus and he carries the Prez to Hawaii every Christmas. So I want to thank Santa and the taxpayers for their good work. Yep, Hawaii is a fine place for the president. Just think, it won’t be long before he can stay there year ’round. Let the good times roll!
Doggone/GA
December 27th, 2011
10:15 am
“Most of the “so many” being on the far right”
Most? I would have said all.
Grover Norquist was touched by Sandusky
December 27th, 2011
10:16 am
Newt not getting on the Virginia Ballot was in his book. In chapter 3 titled, “How to properly court a woman when you are still married”
tony
December 27th, 2011
10:16 am
Talking Head, have you read the newsletters? They are not SUPPOSEDLY racist, they ARE racist and ant-semitic and homophobic. Paul is not a person who should be President.
Ron Paul on Secession
December 27th, 2011
10:17 am
If he is elected President, will the U.S. reman in tact….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03Q4s-LeBgs
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
10:17 am
Most? I would have said all.
There is linkable evidence that there are few on the left that went hyperbolic.
Normal
December 27th, 2011
10:18 am
Dusty,
Hittin’ the ‘nog this mornin’?
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
10:18 am
Paul could solve this problem easily IF he wanted to.
Take Responsibilty and Publically Apologize.
Butch Cassidy
December 27th, 2011
10:18 am
tony – “Paul is not a person who should be President.”
Only if your a minority, gay or a healthy 30 year old male without health insurance.
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
10:18 am
from the Washington Post today:
Of the 620 measures that Paul has sponsored, just four have made it to a vote on the House floor. Only one has been signed into law.
House colleagues say the genial Paul has often shown little interest in the laborious one-on-one lobbying required to build a coalition behind his ideas. This year, for instance, Paul has sponsored 47 bills, including measures to withdraw from the United Nations, repeal the federal law banning guns in school zones and let private groups coin their own money.
None has moved, and 32 have failed to attract a single co-sponsor.
Yeah, sounds like a winner to me.
Butch Cassidy
December 27th, 2011
10:20 am
Finn McCool – “Yeah, sounds like a winner to me.”
What did you expect, they’re running out of candidates.
Normal
December 27th, 2011
10:20 am
I’m liking the Christmas spirit the GOP is showin’…They are givin’ the President another four years out of the goodness of their hearts. Either that or they are just plain incompetent…you decide.
Steve - USA
December 27th, 2011
10:20 am
Not really a ringing endorsement when less than half the country thinks your doing a good job.
Of course if you consider how everyone else is doing you only have to be on an ant hill to be King of the Hill.
Talking Head
December 27th, 2011
10:21 am
“Paul is not a person who should be President.”
Purely based off his supposedly racist comments 20 years ago? That’s all you got? So when Obama said that those two white police officers who arrested the black professor at Harvard were acting ’stupidly’ without knowing any of the facts, was that racists? If so, should he still be President?
I could care less if Obama was racist, I disagree with his policies and that is why I think he should no longer be the President.
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
10:22 am
Ron Paul wrote: “Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for that pro-communist philanderer, Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressmen (sic). What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it: We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day.”
What a turd-fondler.
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
10:22 am
repeal the federal law banning guns in school zones
seriously?
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
10:22 am
yeah – Ron Paul voted AGAINST his own misnamed “audit the Fed” bill – (the Fed had been audited by Deloitte for decades). I suspect that was his only legislation that ever passed since it was in Dodd-Frank.
AmVet
December 27th, 2011
10:23 am
…have nothing to defend themsleves (sic) against Paul except a newsletter that was printed 20 something years ago with supposedly racist comments.
Preposterous.
Read his website. (like you’ve ever done that before!)
There is a plethora of damning “positions” I could list.
Even so, I find Dr. Paul very interesting, as his membership in the hyper-dysfunctional GOP is, in many ways, absurd
BTW, “supposedly racist”?? Exactly what would have have to write to meet your criteria?
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
10:25 am
His first bill was introduced just 11 days after he arrived on Capitol Hill in 1976. It would have repealed the law that had created the Occupational Safety and Health Administration six years earlier. It didn’t get out of committee.
OSHA protects workers. That’s a very bad thing isn’t it?
bman
December 27th, 2011
10:26 am
it’s odd — more than odd how many people like Ron Paul. Even some democrats like him.
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
10:26 am
No, actually, Ron paul’s only passing bill was this:
The passage of H.R. 2121, in fall 2009, unfolded without drama. It allowed for the sale of a customhouse in Galveston, Tex. The House debate took two minutes, and the vote took eight seconds. The ayes had it.
Powerful legislation that.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
10:26 am
OSHA protects workers. That’s a very bad thing isn’t it?
Yep, so-shool-izm.
Paul
December 27th, 2011
10:26 am
Lots of posts about Ron Paul. It may be an interesting topic to some, but he’s not a serious contender to see it through to the nomination.
Gingrich thought he was, Just like he thought he never had a chance (else why was his organization so lacking?) and was shocked when he rose, ever so briefly, to the top. He’s the story – bombast and bluster giving him a boost, only to be sunk by the reality of his own ego.
Yup, it’s Romney vs Obama. I hope we get away from the nomination pandering and on to a clear, honest, ‘this is what I really think’ discussion of the issues in the campaign.
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
10:27 am
“Paul is not a person who should be President.”
Purely based off his supposedly racist comments 20 years ago?”
Yep. See the problem is not who made the statements, Paul or one of his staff, but the fact that the statements were published in the first place.
Why do you insist that it shouldn’t matter because it was 20 years ago? Is there a statute of limitations on racism?
Did Ron Paul grow wiser and more mature in the last 50 years? (Talk about a late bloomer.)
Voice of Reason
December 27th, 2011
10:28 am
The title of this comment is “The Jay Bookman Comment”. Now if I say racist things on here, in your name, should it haunt you for the rest of your career? Is it really so hard to believe that a doctor (who had the only OB/GYN practice in his entire county) could be too busy to read every article in a newsletter written in his name? Do you read every single comment on every article you write? Should he be judged by the newsletters or by everything he’s ever written or said, and every vote he’s ever taken? He’s still at the top of the polls and climbing. The people will not fall for this nonsense.
carlosgvv
December 27th, 2011
10:28 am
Newt’s failures go beyond a lack of discipline and competent leadership. Comparing his problems in Virginia to Pearl Harbor also show he has a complete lack of class. As for Ron Paul, his newsletter showing racism, whacked-out conspiracy theories and anti-gay rhetoric will mean little or nothing to those who just MUST have a lighter shade of pale in the White House.
M
December 27th, 2011
10:28 am
If you don’t like things like a long life expectancy, vote RON PAUL!
Because living longer is socialist.
Talking Head
December 27th, 2011
10:29 am
“Lots of posts about Ron Paul. It may be an interesting topic to some, but he’s not a serious contender to see it through to the nomination.”
Sadly, that is the truth.
mm
December 27th, 2011
10:29 am
Swami,
“What part was “idiotic”?”
And you call yourself “Swami”?
The House bill was loaded with poison, like the Keystone Pipleline and cuts to unemployment from 99 to 50 weeks. And the best part? The Repugs in the Senate blocked it from a vote.
Then Boner asked Reid, Obama, and McConnell to work out a short term bill. They did, then the boner didn’t want to allow a vote until his grapes were in a vice. Educate yourself instead of spouting the pathetic “canned” talking points your fed each and every day by the right.
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
10:29 am
In 2006, Paul authored a resolution congratulating NASA on a shuttle flight
Ron Paul is DA MAN! What would we do without that piece of legislation!
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
10:29 am
repeal the federal law banning guns in school zones
seriously?
—————–
Yeah, let’s arm the little kiddies with Uzis. oh, wait, those are made in Israel . . . .
jconservative
December 27th, 2011
10:30 am
Folks it is not the liberal media that will keep Ron Paul off of the Republican ballot. It will be the Republicans who control the purse strings for the Party.
You can read about it in all the Republican leaning newspapers and magazines.
When Paul stuck his tail between his legs and ran off from the CNN interview he killed any chance he had of making the Republican ballot. People do not vote for cowards and he did a cowardly thing by running from tough questions.
bman
December 27th, 2011
10:31 am
Paul .. .. I agree. I think it’s Obama vs Romney, too. Then again, just 2 weeks ago, I thought Gingrich would get the nomination. Despite what people say, Gingrich does do good in debates. It’s just that he is disliked by, it seems, everyone lol
AmVet
December 27th, 2011
10:32 am
Morning, Paul. Hope Santa came by your place.
Yup, it’s Romney vs Obama.
Amazing, huh? Barry gets what appears to be yet another cupcake competitor.
First the RINO McCain and now the RINO Mittens.
Wow. Talk about one helluva messed up organization…
Talking Head
December 27th, 2011
10:32 am
“Why do you insist that it shouldn’t matter because it was 20 years ago? Is there a statute of limitations on racism?”
It doesn’t appear to be a repeating part of his life. Now Obama sat in Rev Wrights church for 20 years. That is a pattern I would take into consideration.
Oh yeah, remember Sen Rober Byrd of West Virginia. Yeah he was in the KKK and help leadership positions in the klan. That didn’t stop democrats from electing him for decades so…whatever.
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
10:33 am
Well good morning, Normal. You lIving it up over the holidays but back at work again? That sounds like a good Republican. Back at WORK!! Now now!
You should be home knitting like Granny and burning the air ways with hot propaganda. You know. Kinda like Bookman.
Nothing like a heated liberal full of hot air.. They can spend all day over a few words. Better than working, I’d say.
But somebody surely is busy checking old records. It’s a shame they can’t find a single thing on those lively Democrats. Aint it a shame!
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
10:33 am
I will vote for Ron Paul in our open primary in Georgia. The GOP needs a little shake up. Romney is the same old empty headed Republican with no ideas.
I would never vote for Ron Paul in the general, of course. His view of economics is naive – his economic team would focus on inflation in a giant contraction. They have been wrong on inflation since early 2009.
Jm
December 27th, 2011
10:33 am
Romney 2012
Game on. Set…..
Paul
December 27th, 2011
10:33 am
Morning, AmVet
Found a bit of interesting family history over the holiday. Had a great-grandfather who owned an oil pumping operation in Pennsylvania. Was bought out by Rockefeller and returned to Sweden. Those who didn’t sell out – Rockefeller drove the crude prices way, way down and bankrupted the holdouts. Rather like the way Mongols spread west – cooperate, you’ll live. Resist, you die.
Anyhow, the off-topic point of this is, when I heard the tale I thought of so many of our free-market, get government out of business, kill regulations blogging buddies. See, if they’d have had their way, Rockefeller could’ve had a total monopoly of crude pumping, refining, distribution and sales here in the US of A. Then we could have gas at, oh, $8 a gallon and Rockefeller would be the top .0001 percent of the 1 per centers.
But our blogging buddies’ dream didn’t come true and the evil government actually got in Rockefeller’s way.
No wonder they’re in such ill sorts all the time.
M
December 27th, 2011
10:34 am
Talking Head, the key word in the last paragraph of your 10:32 isn’t “democrats;” rather, it’s a pair of words in the first sentence. They’re capitalized.
Andrew
December 27th, 2011
10:35 am
The statements in the newsletters were not racist. They were criticisms of black violence (the L.A. riots) gangs, carjackers and the system of institutional social dependency even though blacks of been given every luxury to succeed. It is an indictment of double racial standards in America.
A society where 85% are born to one parent or murder being the leading cause of death amongst black men 18 to 35. Since the 1960’s blacks have seen their society fall apart. You would think with all the so called government help it would be different. Black society has be afforded ever luxury. Maybe we should take some away and force it to stand on its own two legs. Let us not forget the double standards whites live with in dealing and talking about blacks. BLACK SOCIETY HAS BECOME EXTREMELY VIOLENT SINCE THE 1960’s. This is because of the “war on drugs” and who wants to end that.
Really criticizing the Bloods and Crips who made a fad of carjacking whites in the early 1990’s.
I lived in the ghetto and I never sees all you white people critical of Ron Paul there. except maybe to recruit from us fleet footed blacks. It is a sad day when THE RACE BAITERS like al sharpton and other dare call Ron Paul a racist. I also never knew being of MLK was racist. Besides he was of repeating what FBI surveillance found.
This is from his so-called racist newsletter or which there are a number similar. they were really cherry picked by race baiters:
” Last year hundreds of Americans died
‘liberating ‘ Kuwait, and now we are getting more information about what they died for Foreign embassies in Kuwait are crowded with slaves–yes, slaves–who used wartime confusion to escape from their rich Kuwaiti masters.
The British government documented more than 1,000 cases of Filipino, Bangladeshis, and West Africans held in bondage by the ruling Kuwaiti tribe.
“Note the irony of Black Americans risking their live to return Kuwaiti slave owners to power.
Shame on you people.
josef
December 27th, 2011
10:36 am
PAUL
@ 10:26
Pretty much agreed on that…
********
Hey, if it says BY Ron Paul, and Ron Paul doesn’t counter it immediately and have it removed, then by d*mn, it IS by Ron Paul…
whiskey4Paul
December 27th, 2011
10:37 am
Wow.. Just more media hypocrisy here. Educate yourselves on the history of our Nation, educate yourself on the history of Central Banking in Europe.
Then, when your eyes are finally open, you will see Ron Paul’s newsletter for what it truly is. A piece of paper written over 20 years ago.
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
10:38 am
How does the “less government” and “less regulation” thing work with voter ID laws? Isn’t that kinda against the point?
Maybe it’s all about less regulation on me and more regulation on everybody not like me.
Mary Elizabeth
December 27th, 2011
10:38 am
The free market, racism, and the direction our young want to take the future, as indicated by their support of Ron Paul.
Learning from the past – to redirect the future, for the better. Doing my small part (sharing my past memories – from firsthand experiences – which go back decades).
From “MaryElizabethSings,” Dec. 23rd:
—————————————————————
“One example of how the free market failed to promote an egalitarian spirit among all people occurred during the Civil Rights Movement during the 1960s in Atlanta. Businessman Lester Maddox, who later became Georgia’s governor, refused to allow African-Americans to enter his privately-owned restaurant for a meal. Maddox even brandished a handgun at the door of his restaurant to make certain that all understood his position. The U. S. government, through a three-judge circuit court in Atlanta, had to intervene and declare that Maddox was wrong because all citizens, being equal under the U. S. Constitution and the laws of our government, had equal right of access to his restaurant (as well as to all businesses which were patroned by the general public, which the U. S. Supreme Court later reconfirmed).
In my opinion, a more spiritually-evolved business owner would not have taken Maddox’s position, whatever current norms were being lived out in his time and place.The U. S. Constitution – stretching its power and wisdom from the minds and spirits of our founders over the centuries – was the only force through which Lester Maddox was made to practice egalitarian principles toward African-Americans in his business operations. America’s Founding Fathers had insured that that justice would happen when those in the private market place, such as Maddox, refused to practice simple humanity toward all others. That example was government operating at its spiritual best by insuring equal justice for all.
Post Script: Unable to win his case, Lester Maddox became a martyr to segregationist advocates by selling the restaurant to employees rather than agreeing to serve black customers. He was later elected Governor of Georgia.”
————————————————-
“Capitalism and Egalitarianism” from “Mary Elizabeth Sings”:
http://maryelizabethsings.wordpress.com/2011/12/08/egalitarianism-and-capitalism/
Adam
December 27th, 2011
10:39 am
I am glad Ron Paul is being exposed, finally, to more people for who he is. Sure, he has a lot of core support, but the whack-a-doodle libertarians will buy anything in the name of “more freedom,” even if it means that your only help in a time of hurricane disaster is your neighbors (the same neighbors who ALSO got wiped out by the storm), the return of “whites only” signs under the misguided (and that’s putting it mildly) idea that the free market will take care of that on its own, and letting people die because they can’t afford or won’t buy health insurance that is ridiculously expensive – all because the charities that the whack-a-doodle libertarians think will take over will not be able to in practical terms.
Ron Paul on Secession
December 27th, 2011
10:40 am
blogger says..
It doesn’t apply to be a repeating part of his life. Now Obama sat in Rev Wrights church for 20 years. That is a pattern I would take into consideration.
Did Obama own the church? Did Obama distance himself from Rev Wright?
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
10:40 am
Uh oh, CARLOS is now saying Gingrich has no CLASS!! What???
Come to think of it, Gingrich has had many a class in several universities since he completed his PhD and doesn’t mind showing you his grades. Now that’s class in the finest scholarly tradition.
What twinkle-toes would hide his grades if he made good ones? Huh huh huh???
Nawww, Gingrich has got class an liberals got crass for poor propaganda on the cheap.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
10:41 am
And btw, “whack-a-doodle libertarian” applies mostly to the crazy and most vocal of libertarians, who really believe all the above stuff. If you are a libertarian that does NOT believe the free market solves all ills and charities and neighbors will save us all, then I’m not talking about you.
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
10:41 am
Gee, what a surprise, leaders in the white house and congress are wasting our tax dollars again and a supporter of small government is found to have ugly skeletons in the closet. No matter what emotional position the vocal majority of BO supporters possess, nothing has changed in the way DC does business. BO promised the moon and has delivered a predictable zero…a healthcare bill without transparency and suspicious public support, takes credit for anything postive that happens during on his watch while laying blame for anything to the contrary.
Then we have a challenger who many (idiots) will attack for being in a cult, a history of flip flopping, and comes from big, and being successful….I recall we elected Clinton despite his history of womanizing…I’ve lost track of exactly what qualities we are looking for….lessor of two evils I guess and whoever can raise the most money.
It’s all the same…
Adam
December 27th, 2011
10:42 am
It doesn’t apply to be a repeating part of his life. Now Obama sat in Rev Wrights church for 20 years. That is a pattern I would take into consideration.
What is the pattern to which you are referring? A total of maybe 2 sermons over 20 years?
Paul
December 27th, 2011
10:43 am
morning, josef!
“Hey, if it says BY Ron Paul,”
I do believe the newsletter had a typo.
I meant to say “Bye Ron Paul”
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
10:44 am
Oppps, my comments regarding Romney should not be interpreted as support for him…he does certainly have history of flip-flopping, and represents business as usual…Two crappy options as usual…when will it end? Anyone….Beuhler…
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
10:45 am
Pattern??
Nope that was called a video loop.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
10:45 am
Stevie Ray: I recall we elected Clinton despite his history of womanizing
And this equates to changing your position on every single issue… how exactly?
I wonder when people will get over trying to run the sex lives of everyone running for office, everyone in the public eye like celebrities, and/or everyone they know like their neighbors?
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
10:47 am
In H.R. 1098, Paul proposes allowing private groups to coin their own money to circulate alongside dollars and cents.
whack a doodle doo to you too!
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
10:48 am
wow, i didn’t know all this about Ron Paul. He may be nuttier than Bachman.
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
10:49 am
Support for healthcare bill….
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
10:49 am
In 1992, Ron Paul wote the following in one of his newsletters:
“An ex-cop I know advises that if you have to use a gun on a youth, you should leave the scene immediately, disposing of the wiped off gun as soon as possible. Such a gun cannot, of course, be registered to you, but one bought privately (through the classifieds, for example).”
Do you really want this person to be president?
Gator Joe
December 27th, 2011
10:52 am
Jay:
No surprise Ron Paul is the darling of the Tea (We’re Not Racists, wink, wink) Party. His bigoted (I’m being kind using “bigoted”) views expressed 20 years ago notwithstanding, what has he ever done to improve the lives of minorities still suffering from the effects of decades of discrimination and racism?
Adam
December 27th, 2011
10:52 am
Do you really want this person to be president?
I want him to run as a third party candidate in order to kill any chance of a Republican getting in.
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
10:53 am
President Obamas relationship to Rev. Wright is NOT analogous to Ron Paul’s relationship to Ron Paul.
Dinkdunk
December 27th, 2011
10:53 am
Ez to figure- Obies on vacation (again) i approve of that ( even though it costs a bloody fortune).
A dad
December 27th, 2011
10:53 am
Actually, if certain foreign nations succeed in causing the dollar not to be the standard for purchasing oil, the Keystone pipeline could end up saving this country. Pick at the GOP candiates all you want, but if Obama is re-elected POTUS, his disastrous economic policies will continue. Look at Great Britain in the 70’s as an example of what Obamaeconomics will cause.
As for the core issue,so what if Paul is a bit racist. How many blacks will vote against Obama? Could a white candidate for mayor of Atlanta ever win? Despite this being the 21st century, sadly, racial tension remains a fact of life. We’ve really come far haven’t we….
josef
December 27th, 2011
10:53 am
Preacher Wright was and is one of the leading voices of liberation theology…read him…his comments that made the news are nothing new…
M
December 27th, 2011
10:54 am
Here’s another reason not to vote for him:
http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-205_162-20098876.html
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
10:56 am
a dad
” Look at Great Britain in the 70’s as an example of what Obamaeconomics will cause.”
Oh? Really?
Bet you got a doozy of an explanation why.
Can’t wait to read that.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
10:56 am
“Reverend Wright” is going on the upcoming bingo card web application….
lynnie gal
December 27th, 2011
10:59 am
The Republican establishment desperately wants Newt off as many ballots as possible to allow Romney to win the nomination. The reason is, they know he’s their best chance to beat Obama in November. They will go so far as to repress the votes of Republicans who don’t know better and try to vote Newt. Voter repression is a favorite tool of Republicans this cycle. All across the country, Republicans are invalidating student ID’s and making it difficult for minorities to get the photo ID they need to vote. As Republicans attempt to tighten voter requirements, they may be squeezing their own voters as well–something they may not have considered.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
10:59 am
Hey, without Rev Wright and Bill Ayers what would Sean Hannity talk about? His head is empty otherwise.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
11:00 am
Granny Godzilla-
Go to YouTube and search Ron Paul racist news letter and watch the wolf blitzed interview in 2008. Ron Paul has apologised and has disavowed those statements. In fact Ron Paul is the only candidate you will hear of refer to the war on drugs as the new form of slavery. Because the war on drugs specifically targets blacks!!! Ron Paul has been the biggest critic of the war on drugs. Also, if Ron Paul is such a racist then why does he have the most black support of any republican candidate??? How could you be black and hate yourself?? The reason he left that reporter during that interview is because he has been asked the question 1000 billion f ing times!!!!!! How many times does one person have to answer the same question??? He said that he didn’t write, doesn’t believe in it, apologies for his negligence in management of the newsletter, and disavows any racial or homophobic statements in the newsletters. Go on YouTube search Ron Paul racist newsletters. He has been on CNN, msnbc, and fox news multiple times to address this issue Years and years before that CNN interview. The 2008 interview with blitzer is the best. That’s why he walked out!!! Because it’s old news!!! He has already addressed it…
Lord Help Us
December 27th, 2011
11:01 am
a dad,
Can you please define, ‘Obamaeconomics?’
I have a gut feeling that you have no idea…
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
11:02 am
Oh my goodness, Mary Elizabeth SINGS!
Give that lady a fried chicken drum stick for bringing up Lester Maddox.
Mary E., that is not the plane from which you usually preach. Did you give up Jefferson for Maddox? Where oh where is the perfect man to be a politician?
AmVet
December 27th, 2011
11:02 am
Will Newt give up now that the Germans have bombed his Pearl Harbor?
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
11:03 am
Can you please define, ‘Obamaeconomics?’
I have a gut feeling that you have no idea…
I have a gut feeling the words “socialism”, “Marxism”, “communism”, and “fascism” will figure prominently in that definition.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
11:04 am
Pipelines already deliver Alberta’s tar oil here. Its refined in Illinois. Keystone XL is merely a more direct route to the Gulf.
That issue is way overdone.
Ben Doverhereitcomes
December 27th, 2011
11:05 am
Wow, even Bill Clinton says that obama is the worst president ever. Anyone who thinks differently has blinders on. The truth is that neither mitt nor newt can ever be president. If one of those idiots wins the nomination (which I doubt), all of us (RP supporters) take our votes and walk out the door. OOPS, aren’t those the same votes that the GOP needs to defeat obama? Meanwhile, we will continue to have the support of republicans, independents, libertarians, blue republicans, and democrats. We will be pulling votes from obama and the GOP candidate. We will split the vote of both parties and gather those votes in a third party candidacy for Ron Paul. The age of the people not having their voice is over. The age of corruption is coming to a close. The age of media control is coming to a close. The age of the people is here. Ron Paul 2012!
Oh and by the way, I find it pretty funny that the media is trying to dig up all of this old news in order to slander Dr. Paul. Do they really think that we are going to change our minds and give up our chance at true freedom? They pick on the little crap and ignore the 23 trillion that the Fed sent out the door in the span of three years. I don’t see many reporting on that. That ought to tell you whose side they’re on.
One more thing, if you haven’t noticed, the Ron Paul army owns the internet. We have his back just like he has ours.
Quit with the trivial B.S. and focus on real issues.
M
December 27th, 2011
11:08 am
Ben Doverhereitcomes,
OK, real issue. Environmental concerns CANNOT be addressed with property rights. Discuss.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
11:08 am
Ben – you “sound money” nutcases will never end the Fed. You can’t. Fed governors serve 14 year terms. One president can’t make a dent in it.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
11:08 am
We will split the vote of both parties and gather those votes in a third party candidacy for Ron Paul.
H. Ross Perot got almost 20% of the popular vote, but didn’t receive a single electoral vote.
Lord Help Us
December 27th, 2011
11:09 am
Too funny,
the a$$hat that spouts, ‘Quit with the trivial B.S. and focus on real issues,’ is the one that starts his post with the fictional, ‘Wow, even Bill Clinton says that obama is the worst president ever.’
Are you representative of most RP supporters?
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
11:11 am
Johnny BeGood
Two public apologies for that racist claptrap shouldn’t be too difficult
for a many who wants to be President.
You say “How many times does one person have to answer the same question???”
Are you new to this blog?
We answer some questions day after day after day…..
AmVet
December 27th, 2011
11:12 am
Wow, even Bill Clinton says that obama is the worst president ever.
Been reading Stormfront.org and thewhiterace.com again, Ben?
LOL…
Adam
December 27th, 2011
11:12 am
Wow, even Bill Clinton says that obama is the worst president ever.
I’m sure you have proof of that statement….
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
11:12 am
Not a real boottz redneck
A you repeal the federal reserve act… Case closed 14 yr terms mean nothing once you repeal the act. Sound money nutcase??? Does the constitution not say that “only congress shall issue currency and the only legal tender shall be GOLD and SILVER”… The federal reserve is not congress, nor is reserve currency backed by gold or silver. So therefore it is a unconstitutional act!! Goodbye
Adam
December 27th, 2011
11:13 am
I find it pretty funny that the media is trying to dig up all of this old news in order to slander Dr. Paul. Do they really think that we are going to change our minds and give up our chance at true freedom?
Welcome to the Whack-a-doodle Libertarian Club!
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
11:15 am
@Granny Godzilla ; No, that was plain old disrespectful badgering. Her question was answered!
Obama’s surging? That’s because he’s where he can’t do any harm, on the links. I wonder when he’s going to man up and fire his lying AG.
http://www.examiner.com/charleston-conservative-in-charleston-sc/ron-paul-calls-for-criminal-charges-against-eric-holder
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
11:16 am
Johnny-
Sure, Congress can repeal the Federal Reserve Act. But even the GOP won’t do that. And you don’t need a president to challenge the Act in front of the Supreme Court.
Gee – 98 years and no one has challenged the constitutionality of the Fed? Wonder why? And the dollar is backed by assets – go look at the Fed balance sheet. Its just not gold anymore.
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
11:16 am
Obama vowed to filibuster any bill containing Telecom immunity….got Telecom money, voted against filibuster by Dodd against immunity and supported the underlying bill…
Another diddy, Obama promised to end the influence of money in politics…yet all the ones who got us into the financial mess Rubin, Summers and Goldman Sachs in general, are now put in charge ofthe cleanup….Obama promised investigation of financial collapse, got money, changed his mind…
DBCOOPER
December 27th, 2011
11:17 am
Solyndra Employees Get More Taxpayer Money.
A private company employees are getting ‘taxpayer’ money for being layed off?
And Obama is surging?
God Help us!!
Adam
December 27th, 2011
11:17 am
Obama’s surging? That’s because he’s where he can’t do any harm, on the links
Which is exactly why the polls taken while he was in Washington doing his job reflect his job approval when he’s on vacation… or something.
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
11:17 am
My goodness, we have already moved to the THIRD PARTY here. Things are moving right along.
Bookman is really stirring the pot while on vacation. What next? Ron Paul’s third party? Perry’s Texas party? Biden’s Bigger Party? Pelosi’s Pretty Party?
Hawaii withdraws from the USA and makes Obama president?
MIght as well run wild with this crazy proposition day hallucinations.
A dad
December 27th, 2011
11:17 am
Granny – trying to explain anything to a “mind made up” liberal is an exercise in futility. Apparently, you are not a student of world economics, but here’s a short summary. The English socialist party was/is keynesian, as is Obama. When England’s debt/export-import imbalance grew so large, the ruling socialist imposed higher taxes, privatized a lot of industry and business, all of which put England into an economic dive. I’m sure with the internet and your keen grasp of the “facts” you can verify this with minimal effort. Funny thing though. What England experienced in the 70’s sure sounds a lot like Obama’s economic policies of the day. Don’t take my word for it. Do the actual research for yourself. And yes, there is talk about no longer using the dollar for the world resrve currency. in large part ebcause we spend far more than we take in. Do you realize that even if the gov’t took 100% of everyone’s income it still woldn’t be enough to make ends meet. Simple economics anyone should understand. Can’t keep spending more than you earn. And yes, it goes back before Obama, before Bush, before Reagan. Simply politicians seeking to please the masses and get re-elected. And passing the buck (pun intended) to the next generation. Don’t tell me you believe the social security funds are in a lock box drivel. SSI has been looted for years, the money borrowed back by the FF&C of the U.S. gov’t. But we are fast approaching the day when there will be no more money to borrow, and no other country will want U.S. currency.
Yes, I’m a lot sharper than I usually am, and I apologize. But I’m tired of hearing so much bs. Not that I support Gingrich, but I don’t give a rat’s patootie who filed for his first divorce. What about Obama sitting all those years listening to the “hate the white devil” sermons from the good Rev. Jeremiah. I can hear the uproar now if any GOP candidate sat through years of KKK lecturing, butthen again, the old double standard is de rigeur for libs, isn’t it. What we need is someone, and I don’t care whether D or R, who actually understnads the problem and the changes that need to me made before it is absolutely too late. A dad out.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
11:18 am
Obama vowed to filibuster…
Ah ah ah let me stop you right there and ask the open-ended: What are you talking about?
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 27th, 2011
11:19 am
Ok, its Romney then.
So the question is, who will occupy the passenger
seat in the clown car? RPaul, Newt, Sarah, CChristie? It will have to be
a base jumper, a snake-handler, ’cause the base ain’t coming out
for Mittens – quite the pickle for them.
A dad
December 27th, 2011
11:20 am
LHC:
I understand the economic theories of John Maynard Keynes, probably far better than you do. Andif you don’t believe Obama subscribes to Keynesian economics, future discourse with you is pointless.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
11:21 am
Granny – trying to explain anything to a “mind made up” liberal is an exercise in futility. Apparently, you are not a student of world economics, but here’s a short summary. The English socialist
Number of words to get to Kamchak called it! – 33
Adam
December 27th, 2011
11:22 am
A dad: Perhaps you’d like to explain – without moralistic overtones – why Keynes is so bad?
Adam
December 27th, 2011
11:24 am
A dad: Not that I support Gingrich, but I don’t give a rat’s patootie who filed for his first divorce. What about Obama sitting all those years listening to the “hate the white devil” sermons from the good Rev. Jeremiah
I submit to you that if you don’t care about one you should also not care about the other. Besides, you’re claiming that he gave lots of those sermons and there is no evidence to support that.
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
11:25 am
In 2010, BO appointed Geithner met with Goldman CEO Blankfein 38 times…3 more entries on his calendar that Harry Reid…13 more than Nancy Pelosi…
BO more loyal to Wall Street than us voters and taxpayers….no different from Bush…in fact, I can argue BO is everybit, if not more betrothen to private interests ….various industries, campaign bundlers and broken promises of no more business as usual in DC than most of the sitting presidents in past 30 years…
RB from Gwinnett
December 27th, 2011
11:26 am
Another installment in the Obama lovefest. Yawn…..
I guess Santa didn’t deliver on my request to bring Jay some journalistic integrity. Maybe next year….
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
11:27 am
Stevie Ray — The FCIC did investigate the financial crisis. Nailed it too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCIC
and Obama fined Goldman $550 million – so much for their puny little donations to his campaign.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
11:27 am
Mike Parent
Disrespectful badgering?
All us kenyan muslim facist anti americans have had a wee bit of badgering to put up with don’t ya think?
Man up.
A dad
Lighten up Francis.
Lotta words..no data.
I suppose it would do no good to point out that the statement
“trying to explain anything to a “mind made up” liberal is an exercise in futility.”
is a real blunder on your part when you have no data. just feelings.
and then you want me to dig up data to support your point?
hysterical, indeed.
geez the right has gotten so squishy.
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
11:28 am
Okay, so NG is OK and agrees with SC flying the Stars and Bars over their State house and the President was ok listening to the Rev Wright saying “God Damn America. ” ?
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
11:29 am
squishy, squishy, squishy
like wet socks
TaxPayer
December 27th, 2011
11:29 am
I love watching Republicans try to think of something supportive to say about their candidates.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
11:30 am
Granny Godzilla
Pure old fashioned demagoguery!!!
Lol What do you want the man to do???
He has already been disavowing them for 10 years!!!!! What more do want? The answer is nothing will satisfy you. Because its not this issue that has you up in arms. Your using this a political tool just as any pundit would do to empathize they’re political agenda. The fact is Ron Paul is not a racist!! There are 100’s maybe 1000’s (by now) of african americans making videos on YouTube supporting Ron Paul who see right through your liberal agenda. I’m calling you a Racsist granny Godzilla cause I know you support the war on drugs. The number one cause of minority incarceration and enslavement. Anyone who supports the war on drugs is a racist!!! Ron Paul has been fighting against judicial discrimination ever since he stepped foot in congress some 30 yrs ago. He has never been caught in a clip being racist, he never voted in a racist manner, and he has time after time stated that the government should stay out of marriage (gay or straight marriage). So because only paragraph worth of racial slurs can be found in the 10’s of 1000’s of newsletters that was published under Ron Paul’s name, you deem him a Racist?!?!? Wow… Granny Godzilla you are really brainwashed by the neo con and liberal media…
p.s. Ron Paul list his heros as Martin Luther king, Rosa Parks, and Ghandi…sounds like a real racist to me :/
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
11:30 am
ADAM,
Thanks for response…sometimes it’s true that your baby actually is ugly.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/22/moveon-obama-must-keep-hi_n_108514.html
Much has been written on this…OBAMAZOMBIES don’t seem to want to consider the fact that he is no different to any self-serving politician who will say anything to get elected…
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
11:31 am
Mike Parent — a just God would damn America for our treatment of Native Americans and slaves.
Most adults got over this though.
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
11:31 am
Granny, When did you ever see her ask the same answered question, over and over? I guess he husband had her other ear.
A dad
December 27th, 2011
11:31 am
Adam – the simplest answer is in the form of a question: name one country that espouses and abides by Keynesian economics that is successful, and explain why keynseian economics made it so. Answer: you can’t. I hope themoralistic overtones were truly lacking, and my reply was simply a statement of fact. Another example was the college professor who, to explain socialism, etc., told his students that he would take all the exam grades, add them together, then divide to get an average and tht would be the grade everyone in his class would get. Some students studied hard, others didn’t. The next next exam that came up, less student studied hard and the average grade was lower still. The final exam, no one really studied (why, what was the incentive) and the class failed. That’s pretty much the analysis of the “tax the rich” discussion going on, but that’s for another day.
The gov’t does not produce, it generates no revenue. It exists only by taking from its citizens and re-distributing that revenue, whether by tax credits, entitlement programs, etc. While some re-distribtuion (honestly not using in the way that word is being used currently) is necessary, far too many are dependent on the gov’t, and have/will be their entire lives. There are a lot of problems facing this country that require hard decisions, unpopular ones. And if they aren’t made, we’re going to end up hosed.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
11:32 am
Mike
Do you think God would damn or bless America for the Tuskeegee Experiment?
Be honest….
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
11:33 am
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
If there is a God, he already did by ‘giving” us GWB and BHO.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
11:33 am
Mike
Man up.
A dad
December 27th, 2011
11:34 am
Thought you’d miss the point Granny. I do have the data, but I wanted to hopefully make you curious enough to search this out for yourself. That was you couldn’t accuse me of misquoting, etc. But you want everyone to do everything for you so you can sit back and snipe. How typical. You had a chance to do something for yourself, without interference, and passed. Enjoy the new year.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
11:36 am
WWII spending was proof Keynes was right.
the biggest Keynesian failure was Bush without a doubt. Keynes would raise taxes during positive GDP years and spend more in negative years.
Paul
December 27th, 2011
11:36 am
Ben
“Wow, even Bill Clinton says that obama is the worst president ever.”
Do you have a reputable source for that or do you believe everything you read, no matter where you read it?
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
11:36 am
In 1992, Ron Paul wrote: “Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for that pro-communist philanderer, Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressmen (sic). What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it: We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day.”
In 2011, “A Dad” wrote: What about Obama sitting all those years listening to the “hate the white devil” sermons from the good Rev. Jeremiah
Yes, I can see why you support Ron Paul.
I hope your daughter grows up to marry a black man.
BADA BING
December 27th, 2011
11:37 am
Air Jordans for $180? That is a lot, but I understand that also includes your bail.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
11:38 am
but I wanted to hopefully make you curious enough to search this out for yourself. That was you couldn’t accuse me of misquoting, etc. But you want everyone to do everything for you so you can sit back and snipe. How typical. You had a chance to do something for yourself, without interference, and passed.
Oooooo, a test premised on a fiction and a passing grade with snark…… can someone please add spam to that plate and we’ll have lunch!
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
11:38 am
First I’d have to believe in God to answer that. BUT that “experiment” was beyond defensible or excusable, as were many other atrocities done here. Being a good American means admitting and learning from our mistakes,AND assuring they never happen again, JMO.
josef
December 27th, 2011
11:38 am
DUSTY
And a cheery hello to you…
“Give that lady a fried chicken drum stick for bringing up Lester Maddox”
That ought to get at least a five paragraph response! Nevermind he appointed more blacks to public office than anyone before (not sure about since) and, to me, the most important thing he ever did, he appointed a black to the draft board because to him the idea of drafting so many of Georgia’s black sons and sending them off to Vietnam when they had no voice on the board, “just ain’t right.” A complex fellow he…George Wallace was elected his last term with 95% of the black vote…
Of course, all that may have happened when some people were living safe and sound and insulated from all the injustices Up Nawth…you never know…
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
11:39 am
NOT NEAL BORTZ,
You think $550 million is a lot of money for Goldman for SEC immunity?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/22/moveon-obama-must-keep-hi_n_108514.html
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2010/07/goldmans-550-million-fine-slap-on-wrist/
$13 billion in profit in 2009 means 4.2 percent of single year profits for years of criminal activity that BO vowed to pursue…suggest you google the number of BO appointments who came from GS, went to BO or prior adminstrations policy decision making post, pushed more deregulating legislation (ie bank holding company) then returned to GS to profit off policies they championed while in DC..
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
11:39 am
a dad
Insult first? Data Later? And you expext to be taken seriously?
no data….just diatribe
squishy.
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
11:40 am
Granny, “man up” ?
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:40 am
What a great way to end the game last night.
Brees is the man.
Who dat going to win the Super Bowl.
Paul
December 27th, 2011
11:40 am
Well, I see that before I posted several people mocked/ridiculed/questioned Ben about his Clinton/Obama confrontation and offered him the chance to put up or shut up.
He chose the third option – he left.
This blog is a tough place for newbies who think they can operate like they do on Redstate or other blogs and post whatever fanciful notions cross their mind and other people will respond with “yeah, you tell them!!!”
Lord Help Us
December 27th, 2011
11:41 am
a dad,
So, apparently, ‘Obamaeconomics’ = keynesian
Okay, since Ronald Reagan, Bush !, Clinton, Bush II all subscribe to degrees of keynesian economics, as do the current crop of GOP candidates (sans RP), why do you call it Obamaeconomics?
Adam
December 27th, 2011
11:42 am
Mike Parent: Okay, so NG is OK and agrees with SC flying the Stars and Bars over their State house and the President was ok listening to the Rev Wright saying “God Damn America. ” ?
Once, to make a point, yes. I dare you to find more than one sermon in which he said this, and to read up on the context.
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
11:42 am
Get a life: If the Patriots kept pouring it on with the game settled, to get a record, everyone would be crying, “Bad Form”.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:43 am
Mike,
Sore lose much?
You must be a con.
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
11:44 am
Let’s see, Keynesian economic policy went into effect in the US as a response to the great depression and lasted up to the mid 70’s – a time during which the middle class in the US ballooned and the country emerged as a super power.
Yeah, I guess I’m a Keynesian.
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
11:44 am
Well, I better leave Bookman’s Propaganda Picnic and write some thank-you notes. MIckey Mouse will be president by the time I come back.
Do let me commend liberals for the vim & vigor of their persistent paranoid personalities. Amazing! Day & night at that!
Carry on, comrades. The day is young.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
11:44 am
A dad: Adam – the simplest answer is in the form of a question: name one country that espouses and abides by Keynesian economics that is successful, and explain why keynseian economics made it so. Answer: you can’t.
There is a logical fallacy that describes what you just did there with pinpoint accuracy:
(shifting the) Burden of proof (see – onus probandi) – “I need not prove my claim, you must prove it is false”
Onus probandi – from Latin “onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat” the burden of proof is on the person who makes the claim, not on the person who denies (or questions the claim). It is a particular case of the “argumentum ad ignorantiam” fallacy, here the burden is shifted on the person defending against the assertion.
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
11:44 am
Johnny b Good wrote: “He has already been disavowing them for 10 years!!!!!”
————
No, not really. When this issue first came up in 1996, he defended the writings in his newsletters. It was only later when the “paleo-libertarian” strategy collapsed that he began trying to distance himself from what he wrote back then.
What do I want? I want him to accept responsibility for the articles and to stop trying to blame “some dude” for them.
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
11:47 am
GRANNIE GODZILLA, ADAM, NOTNEALBORTZ,
Is there any end to your OBAMAZOMBIE positions? Suggested reading if you are interested in a balanced analysis of all the croyism and the fact that politicians and giant corporations remain above the law and that both parties are the same:
GLENN GREENWALD: With Libery and Justice for Some
Republic Lost: Lawrence Lessig
Throw Them all Out: Peter Schweizer
Your baby is no less ugly than any of the prior WH occupants…of course, we both know its highly unlikely any of you will research this to a degree that curbs your predictable and shallow barbs at anyone not of your opinion…
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:47 am
Dusty,
Leaving already?
I remember when you posted w did nothing wrong.
josef
December 27th, 2011
11:48 am
ADAM
I don’t presuppose to speak for the Christians, but in my faith G-damn is calling the L-rd’s N-me in vain and to do so from the pulpit is the height of apostasy, imo. He might as well have stolen, born false witness, coveted his neighbor’s ass or any of the other nine from the pulpit…sorry, but that rhetorical use is not forgiveable given the podium from which he spewed it…
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
11:49 am
Adam, yes he made his point. In any event he outraged some people. http://articles.cnn.com/2008-04-29/politics/obama.wright_1_wright-barack-obama-speech-on-race-relations?_s=PM:POLITICS
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
11:50 am
Hevy, Stevie, take a chill, dude. Shouting at the computer screen isn’t going to help your blood pressure any.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:50 am
SR,
Did you expect one man to change our corrupt government by himself?
No silly, he will need a mandate and a movement for that.
Are you joining the OWS or just running your mouth?
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
11:52 am
For all you genious economists citing Keynes…here’s something to consider:
The ultimate test case for the Keynesian model, of course, is the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which promised that 3.5 million private sector jobs would be created at a price of $787 billion. The President warned that if the stimulus were not signed into law, the country could face 8.8 percent unemployment.
One only needs the post-enactment facts in order to ascertain the success of the stimulus bill:
• 862,000 jobs created at an average cost of $282,000 per public sector job and $647,000 per private sector job
• Four of five jobs created are in the public sector
• Government spending is not correlated to areas of high unemployment, and
• The rate of unemployment has reached 9.3 percent after peaking at 10 percent.
Source is CATO
http://www.politicalforum.com/current-events/209267-obamanomics-101-failure-explained.html
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
11:52 am
getalife. No, I’m not a Pats fan, I was just stating a fact. Actually I was fine with them keeping the pedal to thew metal, but I wouldn’t have felt terrible if Brees got hurt doing it, either.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
11:53 am
When the newsletters first arose as an issue in 1996, Paul didn’t deny authorship. Instead, Paul personally repeated and defended some of the most incendiary racial claims in the newsletters.
In May 1996, Paul was confronted in an interview by the Dallas Morning News about a line that appeared in a 1992 newsletter, under the headline “Terrorist Update”: “If you have ever been robbed by a black teenaged male, you know how unbelievably fleet of foot they can be.” His response:
Dr. Paul denied suggestions that he was a racist and said he was not evoking stereotypes when he wrote the columns. He said they should be read and quoted in their entirety to avoid misrepresentation…
In the interview, he did not deny he made the statement about the swiftness of black men.
“If you try to catch someone that has stolen a purse from you, there is no chance to catch them,” Dr. Paul said.
Seems there are other statements by Paul defending his statements rather than denying authorship.
Now which Ron Paul is telling the truth?
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
11:53 am
Not a real boortz redneck
The federal reserve act needs be challenged!! The reason no one has challenged it is because it supports the status quo… Drr. Why would big government types give up a unlimited money supply??? Why get rid of a institution that can enable endless spending, endless warfare, endless welfare, and endless government. Lol I mean if I gave you a printing press and called the toilet paper you produced currency would you give that printing press up?? The fed gets to withhold alot of information because part of the fed is a Private Bank. Afterall, the federal reserve act was written by private bankers with only Banking interest and big business in mind. The federal reserve act is a direct violation of the constitution!!! Btw loved how you didn’t refute my constitution quote…;) because keynesians like you don’t support the constitution. Your big government types be it crony capitalist or socialist, who want to run the economy and run people’s personal lives.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
11:54 am
Stevie Ray – Senator Obama voted for telecomm immunity for their criminal compliance with Bush. I harbored no expectation that PBO would be a champion of the ACLU on the issue.
President Obama let me down on Medical MJ. That is the only time I muttered an obscenity toward him.
And Goldman committed no crime. Their “victims” are free to bring civil action anytime if they feel they were wronged. And Goldman has no consumer business. Their “victims” have legal counsel on the payroll.
josef
December 27th, 2011
11:54 am
getalife
Yeah, Dusty’s gone…come in, stir things up, and then leave…hrrrmph…
The Thin Guy
December 27th, 2011
11:55 am
Wonder if it ever occurs to Bookman that one of the reasons the approval rate for congress is so low is the Democrats control the senate? Delighted to know that Jug Ears and Hippo Hips are enjoying their taxpayer paid $ 4 mill plus vacation to Hawaii
http://news.investors.com/Article/595902/201112261944/kwanzaa-barack-obama-michelle-obama.htm
and keeping the Celebration of Kwanzaa alive. I went to a card store the other day and they were out of Kwanzaa Cards. Another example of blatant racism.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
11:55 am
Mike Parent
Did you miss the question or are you avoiding it?
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
11:32 am
Mike
Do you think God would damn or bless America for the Tuskeegee Experiment?
Be honest….
Adam
December 27th, 2011
11:56 am
Stevie Ray: Suggested reading if you are interested in a balanced analysis of all the croyism and the fact that politicians and giant corporations remain above the law and that both parties are the same:
Why do you think I disagree? Because I still want to vote?
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
11:57 am
getalife,
I really need to thank a few people for their delights at Christmas. But if you so desire I will tell you again: W did nothing wrong. After 9/11 he was the strength that held us together. That strength is missing now.
There! Now don’t fret I may return. Maybe. If I’m interested and all that….
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
11:57 am
I was away for awhile, saw this…
It doesn’t apply to be a repeating part of his life. Now Obama sat in Rev Wrights church for 20 years.
does any rational person posting here REALLY think that Obama’s was a “racist church?”
If so, please explain and show your work.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
11:57 am
“Jug Ears and Hippo Hips”
good lord alimighty.
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
11:57 am
CHILIDOG,
Thanks for calling me out as of course you are correct except I’m smiling as the blood in my body crashes recklessly into my arterial walls…I’m on a campaign to get all on both sides to agree that until we reform government, none of this matters….
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:58 am
Mike,
I enjoyed the game from beginning to end but the best part was Brees’s speech after the game. The first shot showed Brees doing the Tebow and gathering his thoughts. Then he gave a heart felt speech thanking his entire team to give them the credit. I thought this guy would be a great politician.
willie lynch
December 27th, 2011
11:59 am
It seems that every new republican front runner is being toppled with blinding speed. The only two candidates with enough “cheese” to pull off these kinds of stealthy maneuvers are Perry and Romney. And since the Perry campaign is dead that only leaves the one who would truly be challenged by these rivals.
I watched a season or two of Big Love on HBO, there’s some rough and tumble politicking going on with those Mormons.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
12:00 pm
“I’m on a campaign to get all on both sides to agree that until we reform government, none of this matters….”
So, you did join the OWS movement.
Good for you .
josef
December 27th, 2011
12:00 pm
GG
“Do you think God would damn or bless America for the Tuskeegee Experiment?”
I’ll take a shot at that. I don’t think G-d would blame America, but those individuals carrying out the act. I don’t think G-d really pays that much attention to the geo-political lines mankind has drawn across H-s creation to separate us one from the other…
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
12:00 pm
Chilidog
WRONG he never said those statements were his in 1996!!! He does however support the right of racist people to be racist. That’s free speech, that’s the first amendment. Every libertarian respects (although many condem) the views of racist people. That’s what he was defending in 1996 if you actually read instead of some New York times regurgitation, gotcha type reporting. Libertarians respect the free speech of racist people as long as they don’t use force.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
12:01 pm
“W did nothing wrong.”
Does anyone on this blog agree with this lie?
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
12:02 pm
I answered it as best I could, being an atheist. I wrote, “First I’d have to believe in God to answer that. BUT that “experiment” was beyond defensible or excusable, as were many other atrocities done here.”
So I would damn the people who instituted that “experiment.”, but I can’t speak for some invisible Deity.
I guess I can dislike my government while still loving my country.
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
12:02 pm
GETALIFE,
Best thing that could happen is that OWS and Tea Party colluded to press common ground….corrupt government is the only important issue that needs addressing. If BO couldn’t effect any remote changes, he shouldn’t have suggested “the days of lobbyist controlling the agenda in Washington are over…”
ADAM,
To answer your question…NO. But to be so partisan on most issues doesn’t move voters needs at all…
Doggone/GA
December 27th, 2011
12:02 pm
“That’s free speech, that’s the first amendment”
Sure it is. And it’s first amendment free speech to criticize him for those statement. The first amendment give “free speech” not immunity from the consequences of speaking your mind.
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
December 27th, 2011
12:04 pm
Well, howdy everybody and a Happy New Year to you. Now that the missus sister Maggie has been laid to rest in a double grave plot by 16 pallbearers I guess I can get back to blogging with you.
It looks like all the godly Republican canadates have done ruint their reputation and we got no more in the pipeline. So me and my buddy Jim Earl and my other buddy Joe Bill got together up at Billy Bob’s last night and went to work on helping the Republican Party out. And we come up with a idea: a rebranding strategery. See, we can use the same canadates and do what all the big corps. that have ruint theirselfs with lousy customer service do: rename theirselfs. See, if Bell Atlantic can show up as Verizon and looking closer to home if In the News can become Granny Godzilla and DB can become Stands for Decibels, then these canadates can take on new names and the voting public won’t be any wiser.
So Newt Gingrich can become Wham Bam Thank You Maam and Mitt Romney can get alot of Southren votes if he’ll just run as Bubba Christ. Who down here besides a few Atheists and Jews can vote against a Christ or a Bubba? We’re still working on a name for Ron Paul. Maybe Gramps McCool or something else that sounds cuddly. By the way, now that he’s being called a Rascist I like him alot better.
No charge for the advise and Jim Earl asked me to tell you hey. Anyhow, it’s beans & weenies time so have a good p.m. everybody.
josef
December 27th, 2011
12:04 pm
SFD
“…does any rational person posting here REALLY think that Obama’s was a “racist church?”
The Church of Christ? No. That congregation, yes. Read Preacher Wright’s writings going back for decades and judge from the corpus.
Tom(Independent)
December 27th, 2011
12:04 pm
Good news libs, Barrack Hussein Obama is surging in the polls. Four more years and we can go deeper in debt and put more people on welfare. If 95% of black people are voting for the black man, why doesn’t 95% of white people vote for the white man. What is wrong with that?
carlosgvv
December 27th, 2011
12:05 pm
Granny – 11:55
And yet, there’s no evidence that God ever did anything, one way or another, to America in connection with the Tuskeegee Experiment. In fact, there’s no evidence whatsover that God even exists. And yet, how many books written about God would fill how many bookshelves? The logical thing to do would be to put religon aside and wait patiently until irrefutable evidence comes in that God not only exists, but is the God you’re worshiping. Unfortunately, common sense and logic go out the window when irrational religion takes over the mind.
willie lynch
December 27th, 2011
12:05 pm
The Thin Guy
December 27th, 2011
11:55 am
How is Kwanzaa racist? All races can celebrate Kwanzaa. Is Hanukkah racist?
Doggone/GA
December 27th, 2011
12:05 pm
“That congregation, yes”
Including the white members?
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
12:06 pm
As they say in politics the only thing libertarians and liberals agree on is they hate Neo Cons. The only thing Liberals and Neocons agree on is they hate libertarians. And of course the only thing libertarians and NeoCons agree on is they hate liberals…. American politics jump in
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
12:07 pm
NOTNEALBORTZ<
Appreciate your response however, we know by virtue of the fine that GS admitted to disclosure issues and mislead buyers relative to mortgage related securities….admitting to civil fraud SEC charges..of course we will never know what other crimes they may have committed given the record setting cronyism that exists between GS and our corruptresentatives…
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
12:08 pm
“…does any rational person posting here REALLY think that Obama’s was a “racist church?”
Do you expect jews to like Nazi’s? What’s in the past is in the past?
getalife
December 27th, 2011
12:09 pm
I did not believe him when he said we invented aides until our government admitted injecting std’s in humans for “study”.
Paul
December 27th, 2011
12:10 pm
Hello Dusty
“W did nothing wrong. ”
I suppose that’s a matter of opinion. So you’re okay with his not vetoing spending bills and running up the debt?
You’re okay with his putting thru a number of megabillion dollar programs and not paying for them, just shifting the debt onto your kids and grandkids?
Is that what you consider ‘nothing wrong’ or would you like to revise your statement to something along the lines of “did nothing wrong except:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.(How do you make the symbol for ‘infinity’ on a keyboard?)
josef
December 27th, 2011
12:10 pm
Doggone
“Including the white members?”
Yes.
Stevie Ray
December 27th, 2011
12:12 pm
GETALIFE,
I didn’t formally join because their messaging is for crap but i understand they do deal in high quality weed….all joking aside, OWS and the teaparty both have good core issue relative to government reform….I’m more akin to OWS folks that teaparty who scares me with all their god and other unrelated rhetoric….for the record as it were…
Thanks for the fun….I feel my campaign was furthered today and that common ground exists…who is in favor of a second constitutional convention?
Later
Vinny
December 27th, 2011
12:12 pm
It’s a shame that we have a president that spent 20 years in a racist, hate-filled church being mentored by a racist marxist.
A dad
December 27th, 2011
12:13 pm
Adam – I did answer. I said there isn’t a keynesian country that succeeds.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
12:13 pm
What exactly has Obama done for his “black voters”? I know the right-wing wants to make everything a race issue but they don’t explain what he has done.
Bush sent everyone a $300 check. I don’t know what Obama has done. Making them buy health insurance does not count. (except Aetna and other insurers have nearly doubled in share price)
FED UP
December 27th, 2011
12:15 pm
I consider myself independant on politics. As disappointed as I was with Clinton (yes I voted for him) I think he did a good job at getting things done with a majority of Republicans he had to deal with. Mr Obama is a clean cut looking man with a very attractive family, and he is a smooth talker. Makes great speeches. I just wish I had written down everything he promised before he was elected. EXAMPLE: the debate on the healthcare bill will be on C-span so everyone can understand more about the bill! IT WAS NOT. The healthcare bill will not cost any additional money! We now know many hidden cost are gonna hit us right in the checkbook and the account is OVERDRAWN! And many more falsehoods. But both parties push the candidate that makes the best appearance and makes the best speeches. And we all fall for it. The only thing that smells worse than politics is a cesspool.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
12:15 pm
Chilidog
you embarrass yourself lmao
I am a African American!!!! Omg haha how could I be racist against myself?? Well according to that 1992 Ron Paul newsletter then he must be the classic flip flopper because he voted for the MLK holiday. Go look at the roll call vote, Ron Paul voted yes!!! So why would he write that then vote yes???? Omg you are a moron
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
12:15 pm
“Bubba Christ”
I like that. A sure winner here in the Deep South (as long he is white and fat)
getalife
December 27th, 2011
12:16 pm
SR,
I think it will take three or four more Presidents to fix a firmly embedded corrupt government and President Obama is just a start. It took a few decades to get to this point and change will not happen in two terms.
willie lynch
December 27th, 2011
12:16 pm
Tom(Independent)
December 27th, 2011
12:04 pm
I’m glad you proclaim yourself “Independent” because those views are far from the views of the collective.
Mark
December 27th, 2011
12:16 pm
A 2006 memo penned by Newt Gingrich praised the health reform law Mitt Romney piloted as governor of Massachusetts, and threatens to undercut the former House speaker’s criticism of that plan.
A memo (first unearthed Tuesday by the Wall Street Journal) distributed through Gingrich’s Center for Health Transformation credits Romney and his state’s health reform law as a positive development.
“The most exciting development of the past few weeks is what has been happening up in Massachusetts. The health bill that Governor Romney signed into law this month has tremendous potential to effect major change in the American health systemm,” Gingrich wrote. “We agree entirely with Governor Romney and Massachusetts legislators that our goal should be 100 percent insurance coverage for all Americans.”
That would seemingly temper Gingrich’s criticism of the Massachusetts plan as the “forerunner of Obamacare.”
Gingrich has similarly criticized the individual mandate contained both in Romney and President Obama’s health reforms, despite having supported a similar model for health reform in the 1990s. He’s since disavowed such a plan.
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
12:17 pm
Pretty good read and still relevant:
Today, the signature of modern American capitalism is neither benign competition, nor class struggle, nor an inclusive middle-class utopia. Instead, predation has become the dominant feature—a system wherein the rich have come to feast on decaying systems built for the middle class. The predatory class is not the whole of the wealthy; it may be opposed by many others of similar wealth. But it is the defining feature, the leading force. And its agents are in full control of the government under which we live.
http://motherjones.com/politics/2006/05/predator-state
Doggone/GA
December 27th, 2011
12:18 pm
Josef “Yes”
Baloney
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
12:19 pm
Where’s Harry Truman, now that we really need him!
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
12:20 pm
Fed up, I can tell from your post that you are well-informed and obviously very very fair and balanced. Obviously you have done your research and I am sure if you were tracking those promises you would be even more fair and balanced. I am sure you would never post a falsehood or blame Obama unfairly and unbalancedly. And I am sure YOUR cesspool does not stink.
I imagine the obvious snark in the above eludes you…but if you want to learn real infomation about promises kept, Politifact may be for you if you can turn off Faux.
Paul
December 27th, 2011
12:20 pm
Mark 12:16
Haven’t you been listening to Newt’s clarifications? He only said that stuff because they were trying to head off Hillary’s attempt to shove socialized medicine down our throats!!!!”
//sarc//
trevordc
December 27th, 2011
12:21 pm
The only thing being exposed here is how the AJC is still as liberal as usual. I hear everyday on the radio how ajc is going to be more down the middle….lol. You guys are the msnbc of print media. Just embrace it, i would respect you more if you did.
josef
December 27th, 2011
12:22 pm
Mike
@ 12:19
Amen!
Doggone…
Well, make a sandwich of it, it doesn’t change anything…
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
12:22 pm
Mike Parent
You have Harry Truman in every Neo Conservative that runs for office. If like Harry Truman look no further than Rick Santorum and Michelle Bachman. Neo Cons have long hailed Woodrow Wilson and Harry Truman as icons of neoconservatism.
josef
December 27th, 2011
12:24 pm
trvordc
The AJC has moved more to the middle…it still has a long way to go…
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
12:27 pm
Johnny begood wrote (12:00 pm): “”Chilidog
WRONG he never said those statements were his in 1996!!! “
—————-
He never said they weren’t. They were written in the first person in a newsletter under his name.
He is totally responsible for them.
too bad, so sad.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
12:27 pm
More good news for liberals from the Obama DOJ – they won’t pursue convictions regarding online poker intrastate.
I may register Georgia Poker.com today.
josef
December 27th, 2011
12:27 pm
johnny
For the love of G-d, man, what DO you know of Harry? Liberal, on a lot of issues, conservative on others, but it there ever were a President who represented us as a people as who we really are, it was he…never forget that he integrated the Armed Forces and gave us the Marshall Plan, called by Churchill, “the most unsordid act in history.”
Tom(Independent)
December 27th, 2011
12:29 pm
Willie lynch@12:15 – My views are not as far off as you would like to think. As a conservative I do think of my childrens and grandchildren lives not just for right now! I believe our number one concern should be our citizens jobs and economy not what happens in foreign countries. We are not the world’s policman anymore, or so I hope? They (foreign countries) must look out for themselves!
getalife
December 27th, 2011
12:29 pm
newt is a typical con that lies about everything but takes no blame for anything.
Ask him about leading on deregulations with gramm to watch his head explode.
There will be no change with willard or newt so there is only one choice left.
JOE Cool
December 27th, 2011
12:30 pm
Tom(Independent)
December 27th, 2011
12:04 pm
Poor Tom….so small minded.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
12:32 pm
Chilidog
What are you talking about??? He did say that he didn’t write them and that he didn’t support those views. However he did say he supports the free speech of racist people. Your trying to tie that into your arguement and you fail so hard at doing it.
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
12:32 pm
Johnny begood wrote: “He (Paul) does however support the right of racist people to be racist.”
————–
Apparently he did so by giving them a platform from which they could air their racist veiws.
How do libertarians feel about publishing racist comments in order to raise money from racists?
Is that OK, because the racists are responding to the man and not the message? (or is it the message and not the man?)
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
12:33 pm
getalife
Newt is far worse than Willard. He is vindictive, corrupt to the core, and friendless inside DC. He would surround himself with lackeys and reprobates. He truly is sleaze in its full representation.
Steve - USA
December 27th, 2011
12:33 pm
josef@12:24 The AJC has moved more to the middle…it still has a long way to go…
It had to, it’s circulation was dropping through the floor. The AJC’s old target audience couldn’t afford to buy a paper, they had to move toward the middle.
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
12:35 pm
Johnny begood wrote: “Every libertarian respects (although many condem) the views of racist people.”
———————————
Oh, really?
You do realize that you are not helping your cause with statements like this, don’t you?
Why should anyone have any respect for a viewpoint that is motivated by hatred?
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
12:35 pm
The AJC’s old target audience couldn’t afford to buy a paper, they had to move toward the middle.
Ahh the post of stupidity rather than perhaps acknowledging the march of technology.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
12:35 pm
“However he did say he supports the free speech of racist people.”
Ron Paul and I both support the free speech rights of racists.
He was stupid enough to hand them a megaphone with his name on it.
No Oval Office for him.
Doggone/GA
December 27th, 2011
12:37 pm
“Well, make a sandwich of it, it doesn’t change anything”
And what gives you special insight into the motives of those white racist members of a church with a black preacher leading it? I’d be VERY interested do know why they did that.
Richard
December 27th, 2011
12:38 pm
Ron Paul is a humanitarian in the sea of political lobbyist and corruption which undermine the American people. Look at not only his voting record while in Congress, but take a snapshot of his entire life. As young boy growing up on a farm, learning what hard work and savings really meant. Then a humanitarian choosing to not dodge the draft like Gingrich, but instead joining the Airforce to become a Flight Surgeon, and later a humanitarian becoming an OBGYN Doctor delivering babies.. multitudes of them. This man cares for life, as a humanitarian took his fight to congress and challenged the de-linking of the Gold standard, by history knowing that empires have consistently come to an end once the monetary policy of that empire was based on a fiat standard.. Paul, once again as a humanitarian sought to protect that very same thing which the Founders of this great nation sought also to protect, your life, your liberty, natural law rights which would ensure a freedom to obtain prosperity. Not only does Paul have a sound understanding of history, and where we have come from, he has endorsed the continued education in economic philosophy (Austrian Economics), he is very aware of the history of foreign nations (read: The Foreign Policy of Freedom) and again as a humanitarian seeks the protection of rights for all citizens of the whole world, which more so than any other candidate is known and supported by people around the world.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
12:38 pm
Not,
Yes newt would be a disaster and willard is the 1 % candidate.
Folks expecting change from those two is like dusty saying w did nothing wrong.
It is a lie and they know it..
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
12:38 pm
how true is this?
by failing to prosecute a single high-profile Wall Street actor today, the Obama Administration is failing to deter financial fraud tomorrow.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-connaughton/obama-wall-street-laws_b_1157915.html?ref=email_share
mm
December 27th, 2011
12:40 pm
I saw a very interesting bit of information on the news the other night. The registered voters in this country are:
42 million democrats
37 million independants
30 million republicans
I guess now maybe the cons will stop calling their views the “majority”.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
12:41 pm
Josef
Harry Truman supported military interventionism as much as the neo cons do. In fact if you look at Truman’s stances on the issues he is a poster child of neoconservatism. Bush’s foregin policy was Truman doctrine all over again. Google “Neo conservatism and Harry Truman”. Modern mainstream republicanism comes from the “the old left” which opposed the “new left” ushered in by Kennedy. The old left, left the democratic party in the late 60’s early 70’s and joined the republican party. They became known as the “neo conservatives” or the “new right”. They opposed the “old right” or paleoconservatives/libertarians. The neo cons hijacked the republican party and today all we have is two warring factions of the democratic party. The Old left vs the New Left…with the exception of Ron Paul who is a dying breed of paleoconservative.
Talking Head
December 27th, 2011
12:41 pm
Obama to ask for $1.2 trillion raise in debt limit. Would increase debt limit from current $15.194 trillion to $16.394 trillion.
“We now have over $9 trillion dollars of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child,” Obama said on July 3, 2008, at a campaign event in Fargo, N.D.
“That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic,” said candidate Obama.
MXJ
December 27th, 2011
12:44 pm
Ron Paul did not say those things.
watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKBlk1Vpeuw
RON PAUL 2012!!
-from a proud, 21 year old black male
Thomas
December 27th, 2011
12:44 pm
“they cling to guns or religion”
I can’t remember who said that or to whom it was said…..
I am not a Paul fan, but we all need to step out of our glass house occasionally so we, at least, appear more mature.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
12:44 pm
A dad: I said there isn’t a keynesian country that succeeds.
Then you do not believe in American Exceptionalism?
RB from Gwinnett
December 27th, 2011
12:45 pm
““Do you think God would damn or bless America for the Tuskeegee Experiment?”
I’ll play too. My answer is similar to Joseph’s. I believe he would damn the people responsible for the actions/decisions in the matter up to the point they confess their wrongs and ask him for forgiveness. I don’t believe he would damn the nation unless the nation were party to the acts and embraced them as being acceptable. We didn’t and still don’t.
I do, however, think he will remove favor from us when we continue to go down the road of societal acceptance of abortion, calling lifestyle choices normal, etc. And yes, I know I have a log in my own eye, but I know it’s a log, it’s my log, and not a nationally embraced log. The Bible gives many examples of nations God has withdrawn his favor from and it never turns out well for them.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
12:45 pm
Finn –
Mortgage origination fraud is nearly impossible to prove and rare.
Foreclosure fraud is a state issue governed by state law.
MBS fraud is one financial institution vs another. Civil action is appropriate there.
Take MF Global – they are bankrupt and a billion dollars of customer funds are missing. Was there fraud? They can’t find the audit trail. 98% no one will ever know or they broke no law.
Talking Head
December 27th, 2011
12:47 pm
“Then you do not believe in American Exceptionalism?”
Like, liberty, individualism, laissez-faire?
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
12:47 pm
Read Preacher Wright’s writings going back for decades
Could you point to anything in particular?
epr1
December 27th, 2011
12:48 pm
Ron Paul is the only politician alive with the courage to defend against racism. Look how fast the other Dems and Rebups demonize, sanction and bomb Muslims because it’s good for them politically. If it was good to do the same against Jews, we all know they would do the same. Only Ron Paul consistently says “no” to killing brown kids abroad for political power.
Paul
December 27th, 2011
12:48 pm
7 pages and it’s nearly all Ron Paul.
Tells you something about the new outlook on Newt,even in conland.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
12:49 pm
Chilidog
Because it is your first amendment right… Freedom sometimes is difficult, it’s not perfect. But its better than authoritarian rule. If the government tells a person they can’t be racist then what’s to stop the government from putting you in jail for being gay, liberal, or conservative. If a certain type of speech should be prohibited then why not all speech. Ron Paul is not racist and he has always voted for racial equally and has always presented in person racial and sexual equality. You think because of a few sentences that Ron didn’t even write that it refutes everything he has voted for and every speech he had ever made!!! Nice try.. You fail at logic and you fail at life
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
12:50 pm
Mortgage origination fraud is nearly impossible to prove and rare.
Rare? The recent Wells Fargo settlement suggests otherwise.
MBS fraud is one financial institution vs another. Civil action is appropriate there.
It may also constitute the basis for criminal action.
Midori
December 27th, 2011
12:51 pm
I get so effing sick of the “Rev. Wright” red, er, black herring.
The man spoke the truth. Period.
Deal with it.
RB from Gwinnett
December 27th, 2011
12:51 pm
““We now have over $9 trillion dollars of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child,” Obama said on July 3, 2008, at a campaign event in Fargo, N.D.
“That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic,” said candidate Obama.”
The problem is his plan to pay it back doesn’t include every man woman and child, it only includes the millionairs and billionairs and there isn’t enough money in all of them combined to pay it back.
And the spending continues as if that weren’t the case.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
12:52 pm
Granny Godzilla
Well Obama went to a white hating Church and won’t show his birth certificate. He refuses to show it and everytime he is asked he ignores it and gets angry. Under your logic Obama is a racist and is hiding the fact he was born outside the US. You want to engage in political quick talk… Engage!!!
Normal
December 27th, 2011
12:52 pm
josef
December 27th, 2011
11:48 am
Josef,
Just catchin’ up on my reading when I saw your above…I’ve been accused of using the “Lord’s” name in vain, as in G-Damn, first name last name, but it was never ibntentional. With me it as, when irked about bsome thing, like this. God! Damnit! Two one word sentences is all. I wonder if that will count against me?
—————————————————–
As for Harry…he did accept responsibility. “The buck stops here”. Gotta love it….
————
…and I hope you had a great Hanukkah!
josef
December 27th, 2011
12:52 pm
Doggone
I would also be interested in knowing why. I have always been intrigued by such.
Johnny
Military interventionism? Under treaty obligations, yes, and there reluctantly. The Truman Doctrine is and has been pretty much the American foreign policy stance. Now that the Cold War is no more in its old manifestation, it is not so much “at issue.” However, the idea of “containment” appears to have been adopted vis a vis Iran, a step back from the intereventionism of the Clinton-Bush years.
Midori
December 27th, 2011
12:55 pm
Well Obama went to a white hating Church and won’t show his birth certificate. He refuses to show it and everytime he is asked he ignores it and gets angry. Under your logic Obama is a racist and is hiding the fact he was born outside the US. You want to engage in political quick talk… Engage!!!
so much stupidity packed in so little space……….
Doggone/GA
December 27th, 2011
12:55 pm
“I would also be interested in knowing why. I have always been intrigued by such”
Did it ever occur to you that your assessment of their being there is WRONG?
Normal
December 27th, 2011
12:55 pm
As to the topic, the only thing I like about Ron Paul is his stance on the military. At least he as the “war is stupid” thing down pat.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
12:55 pm
won’t show his birth certificate
birthers
josef
December 27th, 2011
12:58 pm
SFD
Read them for yourself and draw your own conclusions. It would serve no useful purpose here for me to go cherry picking…
NORMAL
You’re not a preacher speaking from the pulpit, either.
midori
And he took the N-me of the L-rd G-d in vain from the pulpit. Deal with it.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
12:58 pm
Liberty, individualism, but also collective action, civil rights, societal agreement that the government should help the poor in some fashion instead of branding them failures, everyone playing by the same rules, etc.
Normal
December 27th, 2011
12:58 pm
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
12:55 pm
Yeah, some people just can’t keep up, ya know?
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
12:59 pm
Johnny begood wrote (12:15 pm)
” Well according to that 1992 Ron Paul newsletter then he must be the classic flip flopper because he voted for the MLK holiday. Go look at the roll call vote, Ron Paul voted yes!!! So why would he write that then vote yes???? Omg you are a moron”
—————–
Not quite, Johnny. When the bill first came up in 1979, Paul voted “Yes” to an amendment that would have changed the holiday from a Monday to a Sunday. That bill never became law. The holiday was established in 1983. Ron Paul voted AGAINST that bill, but it passed anyway (house Vote # 289, Aug, 2, 1983).
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h1983-289
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
12:59 pm
Josef does Isreal or Korea ring a bell… How bout that tad bit of interventionism under Truman’s watch??? That’s bush/Cheney all the way. Don’t take my word for it look at self proclaimed neo cons they love Truman he is a conservative Icon… The old left IS the New Right!!
Doggone/GA
December 27th, 2011
12:59 pm
“And he took the N-me of the L-rd G-d in vain from the pulpit”
In your opinion. I could be just as accurately described as a prayer asking for a specific result.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
1:01 pm
The Federal Reserve is also the largest taxpayer – $125 billion the last two years. Technically they are not taxes but that kind of change works anyway.
There are two new Fed nominations today, btw.
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
1:02 pm
Johnny begood (12:32 pm) wrote:
”What are you talking about??? He did say that he didn’t write them and that he didn’t support those views.”
====================
In 1996? Citation please.
wsjiii
December 27th, 2011
1:02 pm
Proof of Ron Paul’s racism:
http://www.5k.com/
Paul
December 27th, 2011
1:02 pm
Hi Midori!!!
“so much stupidity packed in so little space……….”
You talking about someone’s cranium?
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
1:03 pm
Normal, well I am sure trying to keep up with news that a long form is avaiable online for probably a year or more now together with the prior certificates from the State of Hawaii is just too difficult to keep up with over the holidays.
Then again, I heard my SO’s parents this weekend claim that there is so much we don’t know about Obama…….. So we know Fox is still putting out this garbage.
Banksters_Rule_the_World
December 27th, 2011
1:03 pm
Has any noticed how all the latest smear articles on Ron Paul are all headline, but little content. I’ve noticed the bold, inflammatory headlines, but when I got to read the article there is only a paragraphs or two of the same old regurgitated lines as all the others smear articals.
In the United States in the 1930 the socialist party never garnered more than a few percent of the vote, but it was the most influential political party in America because its policy were adopted by both the Democratic and the Republican Party
Milton Friedman.
Vote Ron Paul 2012!
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
1:03 pm
As to the topic, the only thing I like about Ron Paul is his stance on the military. At least he as the “war is stupid” thing down pat.
remember hearing from the DNC establishment that Joe Lieberman was “with us on everything but the war?” (which wasn’t really intended as a factual statement, but never mind that.)
Perhaps our standard line for Ron Paul is that he’s *against* us on everything but the war.
Talking Head
December 27th, 2011
1:04 pm
“Liberty, individualism, but also collective action, civil rights, societal agreement that the government should help the poor in some fashion instead of branding them failures, everyone playing by the same rules, etc.”
Why did you leave out laissez-faire? Regardless, you didn’t address you claim that American Exceptionalism was somehow a by product of keynesian economics. Which it clearly is not.
Normal
December 27th, 2011
1:04 pm
Josef,
Is it a sin to ask God to damn a person? Like Steppenwolf’s song, “God damn the pusher man….”
Not that it matters really, but I’m just asking.
This “taking the Lords name in vain” business is just religion. We would be better off without it. You really don’t need religion to worship God.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
1:04 pm
Chilidog
That’s because in 1983 the bill created a paid federal holiday!!!! He was voting against a payed federal holiday because it is a waste of tax payer dollars… You fail again
Jack
December 27th, 2011
1:06 pm
I hope Obama’s job-approval ratings soar to 100%. Then I’ll likely get my request for help on my utility bills and may get a new pair of the Jordan sneakers in the deal. Also, since he’s making my house payments, I can probably afford one of those new, hot-shot Ford Mustangs; convertable that is.
larry
December 27th, 2011
1:06 pm
it only includes the millionairs and billionairs and there isn’t enough money in all of them combined to pay it back.
6 of the Walton children has more money than the combined income of 93 million Americans.
I think there is enough. Now if the Repub party would quit protecting them. Bless their hearts.
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
1:07 pm
Johnny begood (12:49 pm) ”Because it is your first amendment right… “
It is my first amendment right to espouse racist views in a Ron Paul newsletter?
No, I don’t think it works that way. Thank you for playing.
Matti's After-Christmas Sale
December 27th, 2011
1:08 pm
You really don’t need religion to worship God.
AMEN!
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
1:08 pm
Johnny begood
A new Rock n Roll Moniker
yea yea yea
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
1:08 pm
Chilidog
In the 70’s he voted yes for a national holiday!! But voted no in 1983 when the bill wanted to make MLK a “paid federal holiday”… That’s just evidence he is principled about fiscal conservatism… In fact the majority of republicans voted no for that reason!! The “paid holiday” language..
Tom(Independent)
December 27th, 2011
1:10 pm
Joe Cool – Please tell me why am I small-minded?? Is it because I care about our citizens and have little or no concern for others in foreign lands. Economic times that we are in almost demand it in my opinion. For example – I am a former vet and I would water-board a suspected terriorist on national TV if it would save an American life!
USMC
December 27th, 2011
1:10 pm
I hope everyone had a Merry Christmas and/or Happy Chanukah!
More of Obama’s Wasteful SPENDING… Where does it stop???
Obama to ask for debt limit hike; wants $1.2 TRILLION more: Treasury official
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/27/us-usa-treasury-debt-idUSTRE7BQ0KU20111227
Unbelievable, Folks!… and no amount of “Revenue Increases”, Socialist code word for Higher taxes on successful Americans, will help our President’s out-of-control SPENDING.
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
1:11 pm
I applaud President Obama and the Democrats for the political victory they won last week. The impact was to weaken the influence of the most reactionary and clueless faction in Congress – the tea party Republicans – and strengthen the hand of both progressives and pragmatic conservatives. This can only be a good thing.
by: Eugene Robinson, Washington Post
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
1:11 pm
Normal
“You really don’t need religion to worship God.”
In fact in many cases it makes it harder.
I know loads of people who found Religion and far far fewer who found
God.
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
1:11 pm
Johnny begood (12:52 pm)
”Well Obama went to a white hating Church and won’t show his birth certificate. He refuses to show it and everytime he is asked he ignores it and gets angry.
==============
So you’re a birthertard as well as a Ronulan. Figures. Are you a 911 truther as well? Do you think the moon landings were faked? What about Chemtrails? Those are real right? Ron Paul had stuff about Black Helicopters in his newsletters as well. Do you believe that JFK was not shot by Oswald?
Midori
December 27th, 2011
1:12 pm
And he took the N-me of the L-rd G-d in vain from the pulpit. Deal with it.
big f*cking deal.
many have done much, much worse.
say raping their members children, for instance.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
1:12 pm
some folks weren’t paying attention during the debt ceiling debacle.
funny
josef
December 27th, 2011
1:13 pm
NORMAL
Is it a sin? In my belief and in my opinion, yes… and while I might agree with you that “This “taking the Lords name in vain” business is just religion.” We’re talking here of a man whose professed religion precludes such as a fundamental of the faith…
johnny
@ 12:59
There was no military intervention in Israel. In Korea, yes, and that as a treaty obligation…
Doggone
@ 12:59
You’ve punched the plumb silly button with that one!
ivykid
December 27th, 2011
1:13 pm
Anyone that is not happy with the current state of the American way of life can choose who the banks, Wall St., and the Mainstream are attacking. Someone who thinks that we can continue on our current path will chose Romney or Obama to continue our course. Obama will lose some favor as Kmart/Sears starts closing stores along with several others effected by poor sales.
Paul
December 27th, 2011
1:14 pm
Hello, USMC
“More of Obama’s Wasteful SPENDING… Where does it stop???
Obama to ask for debt limit hike; wants $1.2 TRILLION more: ”
Okay. So what $1.2 trillion in the budget would you cut NOW?
Midori
December 27th, 2011
1:14 pm
Hi Paul
Brian
December 27th, 2011
1:14 pm
Ron Paul has owned up to publishing the Newsletters. So what does that mean? He admits oversight. There were over 500 newsletters with fewer than a dozen with questionable content. Are we to believe that a bigot and racist wasn’t consistent enough to put this kind of content in all of his letters? In any of his books? In any of his interviews in 40 years in the public eye? The fact is this is just a smear campaign. Eric Dondero (Eric Rittberg) who was a congressional aide, was fired from Paul’s staff and has participated in these smear campaigns, and has vocally done so due to Paul’s non-support of the Iraq war. Dondero ran against Paul for his congressional seat in 08, and was trounced in the polls. Dondero writes for RedState, which is a very anti-Paul blog. As I said, it’s not consistent with the mans other writings, other speeches, and has never been seen or heard on tape or in person espousing racist views. Nelson Linder, the Houston NAACP president has come out in support of Paul as a personal friend. Just another attempt to distract from the real isues.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
1:14 pm
Chilidog
I dislike the language in those newsletter as well. We agree totally on that!!! I’m right there with you. But Ron Paul did not write them. Nor has he ever voted, supported, or spoke in public about those views…So you fail once again to prove Ron Paul racist. I guess if your misguided political philosophy leads you to adhere to free speech that is totally and utterly unfactual. Then I respect your right to believe in such nonsense. However, I’m still going to refute and debunk everything you say!!
I’m a African American for Ron Paul!!
Blacks Speak to Whitey
December 27th, 2011
1:15 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JA2ehvB-_Ac
Adam
December 27th, 2011
1:16 pm
Why did you leave out laissez-faire? Regardless, you didn’t address you claim that American Exceptionalism was somehow a by product of keynesian economics. Which it clearly is not.
I left out laissez-faire because that implies free for all free market rules, as in, no rules at all.
American Exceptionalism is because of the rise of the middle class, which is a result of Keynesian policies set forth in the 30s and 40s.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
1:18 pm
Chilidog writes:
”Well Obama went to a white hating Church and won’t show his birth certificate. He refuses to show it and everytime he is asked he ignores it and gets angry.
==============
So you’re a birthertard as well as a Ronulan. Figures. Are you a 911 truther as well? Do you think the moon landings were faked? What about Chemtrails? Those are real right? Ron Paul had stuff about Black Helicopters in his newsletters as well. Do you believe that JFK was not shot by Oswald?
No Chilidog I dont. I’m just pointing out under your logic I could say the same thing about Obama you do about Ron Paul…
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
1:18 pm
Johnny begood (1:04 pm)
That’s because in 1983 the bill created a paid federal holiday!!!! He was voting against a payed federal holiday because it is a waste of tax payer dollars… You fail again
No, you fail.
You lied about Paul’s vote.
It is clear that Paul was not “Flip Flopping” when he wrote in his 1993 newsletter: “Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for that pro-communist philanderer, Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressmen (sic). What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it: We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day.”
mgginva
December 27th, 2011
1:18 pm
Only a hack trying to flavor his “work” would claim Dr. Paul has been exposed. This material has been available forever and rehashed time after time after time.
The media is no longer independent. Congress made a huge mistake a decade ago in deciding to allow giant corporations to buy up the media outlets and turn them into conglomerates easily used as tools to manipulate the American people. This is the result. Dr. Paul threatens the powers that be to such an extent that they have tried to marginalize him and steer us away from the truth. If one looks at just who owns which media pieces it becomes strikingly easy to understand exactly who is trying to ruin Paul’s credibility. It worked very well in 2008 and up until now it has also been extremely effective.
If we, as the 99%, want to keep allowing the 1% to run the country and pocket every single financial gain that’s occurred in the last 30 years we need to do nothing other than sit back and believe what the media is telling us. Fox, ABC, The Washington Post, NY Times, Wall Street Journal, etc. are all bound together now by big business and no longer operate as watchdogs to protect us by telling the truth.
We are being sold down the river and we need to wake up and stand up and find new sources for our news. If you believe CNN operates in the interest of truth you’re living in the past. If we allow the status quo to continue we’ll be a nation of very rich and very poor people. To believe the rich don’t have an agenda is to be a further victim. Just watch and fact check the stories about Paul and you’ll realize why his supporters are so upset. Dr. Paul is under attack by a very very powerful group that like the way things are going and they want their candidates to win and they also believe we are too lazy or stupid to understand how they are duping us.
josef
December 27th, 2011
1:21 pm
midori
Keep defending him for that all you want. It puts you in the same category as those who defend the child molesting rapists defending their own Men of G-d…
and, bottom line, this is what has given organized religion a bad name…self-aggrandizing pompous asses using the pulpit for personal glorification…all faiths, all creeds, all colors…
Matty G
December 27th, 2011
1:23 pm
Ron Paul exposed? Digging up 20y/o newsletters that were disavowed years and years ago while he was busy running a medical practice? That’s really the best anyone can do? All of this was investigated when Dr. Paul returned to the house–using newt’s own dollars–and there was not enough evidence to convince voters in Texas. How come NAACP presidents support Ron Paul (look up Nelson Linder).
How about Obama? He was long-affiliated with a preacher that is very racist in his own right. He directly contributed money to this church/minister. He helped fund and put his ACORN cronies in power. These are the same folks that perpetuated the housing crisis and used every avenue to make a quick buck to kill the housing market. How about that OBAMA himself promised to end these wars and LIED to the people to get elected?
How about Mitt “no backbone” Romney? Read any press from MA from when he was gov. It is all very critical and shows that he has no real opinions. He caters to the audience at hand. His health care system is a failure in MA – nobody likes it!
Newt “dirty as can be” Gingrich? He will sell out his own dying wife for a shot at a better woman. He sells his soul to the highest bidder. He was fined by Congress $300k for ethical misconduct. Wow – highest ever for the dirtiest gov’t entity. That says a lot. Is there $1 in it? Newt is for it…unless he can get $2 to be against it.
Paul
December 27th, 2011
1:25 pm
USMC
How ’bout half?
Only $600 billion?
Cutting half the waste is better than nothing!
Have at it!
Talking Head
December 27th, 2011
1:25 pm
“I left out laissez-faire because that implies free for all free market rules, as in, no rules at all.”
Wrong. It implies that trade can be done without restrictive taxes and regulations from state intervention.
Laissez-Faire is American Exceptionalism. It’s one of the key factors that made the experiment of America work.
And according to you, America was not exceptional until the 1930’s. Pathetic.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
1:25 pm
Ron Paul will never support a single piece of bank regulation.
Its hilarious that someone named ‘Banksters Rule the World’ is a Ron Paul supporter.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
1:25 pm
How about Obama? He was long-affiliated with a preacher that is very racist in his own right.
Ok, this was OBVIOUSLY on the conservative talk radio this morning.
THINK FOR YOURSELVES. There is NO CORRELATION between the two.
Doggone/GA
December 27th, 2011
1:25 pm
“In my belief and in my opinion, yes”
And while your belief may matter to YOU, it’s GOD’s opinion of what was said that REALLY matters.
Doggone/GA
December 27th, 2011
1:27 pm
“You’ve punched the plumb silly button with that one!”
And why is it any “sillier” than saying that racist white folks chose to attend a church with a black preacher?
josef
December 27th, 2011
1:28 pm
Doggone
Agreed…now take a swig of that drink yourself…it’ll help wash down the baloney sandwich!
Adam
December 27th, 2011
1:29 pm
Talking Head: Wrong. It implies that trade can be done without restrictive taxes and regulations from state intervention.
So laissez-faire is less taxes and regulation? That’s a good enough reason to leave it out. America certainly isn’t exceptional because we lowered taxes on business and let them do whatever they want without regulation.
And what’s pathetic is attempting to call me pathetic because I think the rise of the middle class is exceptional. Does that mean you disagree? Or are you trying to construct a straw man of an argument where you put words in my mouth?
USMC
December 27th, 2011
1:31 pm
“Okay. So what $1.2 trillion in the budget would you cut NOW?”–Paul
EVERYTHING should be on the table… Yes, military and all.
I would favor cutting most if not all foreign aid, for starters. Then I would favor an ACROSS the top cut of 10%-25%… Get er done!
Adam
December 27th, 2011
1:32 pm
USMC: EVERYTHING should be on the table… Yes, military and all.
I would favor cutting most if not all foreign aid, for starters. Then I would favor an ACROSS the top cut of 10%-25%… Get er done!
Well, aside from the foreign aid I agree with you.
Why Ron Paul Can NEVER be President(funny stuff)
December 27th, 2011
1:32 pm
If you can relate to this man, you are also delusional….
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/0a03ebddbb/ron-paul-a-bad-lip-reading-soundbite
…..mentally challenged…..
josef
December 27th, 2011
1:33 pm
Doggone
There you go knee jerking again…I said, first, “congregation.” And I said I wonder about that, too. It intrigues me and I never said nary a word about “white” parishoners choosing to go to a church with a black preacher.
And, interesting that no one has asked my opinions of his earlier writings and why I read them…I read them and drew my own conclusions…quite frankly I found a lot of his commentary on reconcilliation of the “white” relgion with the “black” experience to be valid and thought provoking…
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
1:35 pm
I would water-board a suspected terriorist on national TV if it would save an American life!
There’s your sign.
Oy!
getalife
December 27th, 2011
1:36 pm
The Falcon players response to the Saints running up the score last night is maning up.
They blamed themselves for not making the plays.
We could use more of that in politics.
Quagmire
December 27th, 2011
1:36 pm
What’s up Jay? Hopefully you and your family had a great Christmas. I wish Health and Wealth to you and your family. Health is your weath………..I see you got things started today on the blogs. Keep up the good work and I will continue to read, learn, and be entertained.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
1:36 pm
$1.2 trillion minus foreign aid ($40 billion) – you’re down to $1.16 trillion.
Defense
Medi(care/caid)
Social Security
That is where the money is.
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
1:36 pm
Ok, this was OBVIOUSLY on the conservative talk radio this morning.
It’s the default response any time any GOPer is accused of racial insensitivity. “yeah well … Your boy sat in them pews listening to HATEY HATEFUL HATIFICATION for TWENTY YEARS!!!”
It’s generally uttered by people whose knowledge of Trinity UCC wouldn’t fill a thimble.
Mike Parent
December 27th, 2011
1:37 pm
Normal …How about his view on ending the “War on Drugs”, aka the war on minorities and the under 30 crowd. (75% of all drug arrests are of people under 30 and minorites are appx.7 times more likely to be arrested for drugs than whites)
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
1:37 pm
for any Ron Paul supporters here, can you defend Ronnie’s sponsoring of this bill:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.539:
———-
The Supreme Court of the United States and each Federal court–
(1) shall not adjudicate–
(A) any claim involving the laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unit of local government relating to the free exercise or establishment of religion;
(B) any claim based upon the right of privacy, including any such claim related to any issue of sexual practices, orientation, or reproduction; or
(C) any claim based upon equal protection of the laws to the extent such claim is based upon the right to marry without regard to sex or sexual orientation; and
(2) shall not rely on any judicial decision involving any issue referred to in paragraph (1).
—————-
In other words, Ronnie’s trying to nullfy the 14th amendment.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
1:38 pm
Chilidog
You win at epic failing. I didn’t lie Ron Paul voted yes in the 1970’s for a “national holiday” he voted no in 1983 against a “federal paid holiday”. The issue in 83 wasn’t racism is was the “paid federal holiday”. In fact almost ALL REPUBLICANS voted no on that bill. Thats not racism that is fical conservatism. Can you not read or understand bills?? Your problem isn’t philosophy it is deductive and reasoning skills. You have a serious problem Chilidog. Again Ron Paul didn’t write that 1992 newsletter. He has publicly spoke against racism and has voted for racial equality everytime in congress. So why would he secretly write like 4 or five slurs over the period of 20+ years, yet not endorse those views when voting or speaking??? Because he didnt say that not did he write that. Case closed you been refuted once more. Now your trying to make up a racist situation to support your tin foil wearing conspiracy theory that Ron Paul is racist. It’s not working…
TaxPayer
December 27th, 2011
1:39 pm
Republicans are running out of time. They’re gonna have ta pick their favorite. Will it be the Newt or Mitt or Perry or Ron or Michelle. So many excellent choices. How will you Republicans evah decide. If only y’all could get another Bush in the race. That would decide it for ya.
josef
December 27th, 2011
1:40 pm
Chilidog
“Ronnie’s trying to nullfy the 14th amendment”
That pesky little amendment do tend to get in the way when pursuing an agenda…left or right!
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
1:41 pm
“In other words, Ronnie’s trying to nullfy the 14th amendment.”
Republicans hate the Constitution.
I can name ten amendments they want to get rid of.
A dad
December 27th, 2011
1:42 pm
Adam – are you seriously espousing that America is a keynesian economics country all those years. Boy, you must not have taken any economics classes in college.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
1:42 pm
Not A Neal Boortz Redneck: And they want to line-item veto the religion part of the first amendment.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
1:43 pm
Chilidog
The link you gave was broken what was the bill he voted No on???
getalife
December 27th, 2011
1:43 pm
“Ben Nelson retiring from Senate”Politico
Good news.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
1:43 pm
Boy, you must not have taken any economics classes in college.
You phrase that as if it’s a bad thing.
Talking Head
December 27th, 2011
1:44 pm
Adam,
I think your views are pathetic because you support an economic theory that results in theocracy. America is exceptional because of the freedom we enjoy, including how our market was conceptualized and the steps taken to prevent a theocracy.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
1:44 pm
A dad: Are YOU suggesting that every country that exists today does not have some form of Keynesian economics in it? I’m not saying it’s absolute Keynes everywhere, but I AM saying that the Keynes parts of stimulating the economy either work great, or do not make things worse. Austerity, on the other hand, makes things worse very quickly. So if you don’t like Keynesian economics so much, you must find something more to your liking. What is that something?
Ludwig von Mises
December 27th, 2011
1:45 pm
Photographic proof that Ron Paul is a racist!!!
The presstitute shills and the Neocons are going to pull out all of the stops against RP. And they will come down on him with both feet. I don’t think I’ve ever seen the establishment MSM so scared in my lifetime; It’s because they have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo.
By the way, if you want to see some great pictures of Ron Paul acting like a racist, then check out the following link:
http://www.5k.com/
Please spread these photos around!
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
1:45 pm
Adam — I wish I had a dime every time a wingnut said “there is no separation of church and state in the Constitution”.
Like the Bible – they wave it around and won’t read it.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
1:46 pm
Talking Head: I am sure you have some kind of evidence supporting that Keynesian economics results in theocracy. Otherwise, I don’t buy it. I am against theocracy but I see no evidence that Keynesian economics is about anything but economics. There’s no religion involved.
td
December 27th, 2011
1:47 pm
Folks, there is a plan sitting on the table right now in the Senate. I think it is called the penny plan and I do not remember the sponsors. The plan says stop all automatic increases in budgets and the cut 1 penny (1%) per year for the next 6 years to all government programs. This will balance the budget and begin the process of paying off the debt. If the congress would adopt this plan then after the 6 years I think most conservatives would consider tax increases if it was to go directly to pay off the debt.
If Federal agencies can not find 6% of waste, fraud, abuse and duplicate efforts then we are lost as a nation with no hope.
josef
December 27th, 2011
1:47 pm
K’chak
“Boy, you must not have taken any economics classes in college”
“You phrase that as if it’s a bad thing.”
And a polite golf clap…
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
1:49 pm
Bill Text
111th Congress (2009-2010)
H.R.539.IH
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.539:
Paul
December 27th, 2011
1:49 pm
USMC
The difficulty with across the board cuts is that it says “Every program is equally important and no program has any more waste than any other program.”
For that reason, I’m not in favor of across the board cuts.
I’m more for eliminating entire programs.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
1:49 pm
America is exceptional because of our “freedom”?
Crazy talk – we are not the freest country by any stretch.
I would say we are exceptional in one thing – exploiting resource for financial gain. No one touches us in that regard.
Talking Head
December 27th, 2011
1:49 pm
“Talking Head: I am sure you have some kind of evidence supporting that Keynesian economics results in theocracy. Otherwise, I don’t buy it. I am against theocracy but I see no evidence that Keynesian economics is about anything but economics. There’s no religion involved.”
Sorry Adam, I meant aristocracy. I am in another blog commenting on religion and government.
TaxPayer
December 27th, 2011
1:50 pm
Has Fox “news” had any positive comment about either the Newt or Ron. Who is Fox “news” supporting these days anyway. Perry perhaps. I think he made a C in Economics which is probably better than most Republicans.
td
December 27th, 2011
1:50 pm
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
1:45 pm
The only separation in the Constitution is a limit on the Government. Our government is prohibited in establishing a national church and they are not suppose to interfere in religion. There is absolutely no restrictions on what states can and can not do in regards to religion. There is only the (made up) total separation that the courts have since imposed.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
1:51 pm
Talking Head: ok, what makes Keynesian economics lead to aristocracy? As far as I can tell, what does that is continually shifting the burden of taxes and resource exploitation on those who are least affluent.
Paul
December 27th, 2011
1:52 pm
I find rather amusing all the talk about Rev Wright being a racist.
The guy retired to a gated community that’s about 97% white.
Johnny begood
December 27th, 2011
1:52 pm
Chilidog
What is wrong with We The People act??? Hr 539… I support limiting federal courts to interfere with states rights. Ok here we go. This arguement goes all the way back to Jefferson and Madison. The constitution never gave the authority of the supreme court or the federal courts the power of judicial review. It was simply a power the court gave itself. Since then the supreme court and federal courts have overwhelmingly have ruled in favor of the federal government. The courts have expanded the commerce clause to the extent it has no defined limits anymore. Ron Paul’s we the people act simply repeals some of this judicial overreach.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
1:52 pm
Ron Paul wants to go back to the fifties.
We will move forward into 2012 and the only things stopping economic growth are the EU and the gop.
Paul
December 27th, 2011
1:53 pm
TaxPayer
I think Shepard Smith on their evening news show is a closet Democrat, what with what he’s said on-air about Obamacare and the Republican candidates -
Adam
December 27th, 2011
1:54 pm
td: There is absolutely no restrictions on what states can and can not do in regards to religion. There is only the (made up) total separation that the courts have since imposed.
No, the first amendment is federal, which supercedes state law. It’s in the U.S. Constitution, meaning it is held higher than the laws of states attempting to impose religious favoritism in any way.
josef
December 27th, 2011
1:54 pm
PAUL
EOI!
But yeah….he had to do that cause the Jews wouldn’t let him in to see Obama…oops, he corrected that, just the zionist ones!
Adam
December 27th, 2011
1:55 pm
What is wrong with We The People act???
It attempts to give states the right to ignore federal laws. And that is wrong.
tireofit
December 27th, 2011
1:55 pm
What is it with republicans and someone is always out to get them?
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
1:56 pm
td
wrong again
The 14th Amendment incorporates all amendments into state law. Until the 1860’s states were permitted to establish a religion or force residents to pray. No longer.
do a search on the 14th and incorporation – it is judicial history
josef
December 27th, 2011
1:57 pm
PAUL
“I think Shepard Smith on their evening news show is a closet Democrat,”
I think he’s an open one…and he didn’t mind biting the hands that feed him with his two-finger snap on gay rights either…but, then, the boy IS from Mississippi!
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
1:57 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_%28Bill_of_Rights%29
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
1:58 pm
The plan says stop all automatic increases in budgets and the cut 1 penny (1%) per year for the next 6 years to all government programs. This will balance the budget and begin the process of paying off the debt.
it would also throw the economy into a ditch and impoverish millions but hey, like Stalin said, ya can’t make an omlette without breaking a few eggs, am I right?
Adam
December 27th, 2011
1:58 pm
Best New Graphic in the world today: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2011/10/horse_race_politics_an_animation_of_the_2012_republican_campaign.html
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
1:59 pm
Johnny begood (1:52 pm) ”Chilidog
What is wrong with We The People act??? Hr 539… “
=====================
Because it’s in violation of the 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution. You would think that someone like Paul, who wraps himself up in the Constitution more than he wears clean underwear, would know that.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
2:00 pm
Those darned activist judges in the 1890s!
Applying the Constitution to the states – the gall. (conservative mockery)
Talking Head
December 27th, 2011
2:03 pm
“Talking Head: ok, what makes Keynesian economics lead to aristocracy?”
Keynes was a lifelong member of the British aristocracy. He hailed the system of aristocratic rule as sound, so long as governing personnel were chosen from the existing organic elite.
TaxPayer
December 27th, 2011
2:03 pm
Maybe Shep is the Fox “news” token Democrat now that they don’t have Colmes.
td
December 27th, 2011
2:04 pm
Adam
December 27th, 2011
1:54 pm
You seem to forget about that little 10th admendment?
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”
Are you trying to tell me that the Federal government can make up any law and it trumps state laws? This is not what this part of the Constitution states. If the power of such a laws is not explicitly written into the Constitution as a power of the Federal government then the states have jurisdiction to create the law. As an example: Marriage and divorce law is not Federal it belongs to the states. Why do you suppose this is the case? How about murder that happens in the states?
This is a big difference between conservatives and liberals. Most Conservatives think the Federal government has gone to far in making laws and liberals believe they have not gone far enough.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
2:06 pm
Maybe Shep is the Fox “news” token Democrat now that they don’t have Colmes.
Fox needs him in the same way that the Globetrotters need the Washington Generals.
Just sayin’.
josef
December 27th, 2011
2:06 pm
Boortz Redneck
“Those darned activist judges in the 1890s!
Applying the Constitution to the states – the gall”
Yeah, just where would state’s rights have been without Plessy v Ferguson or Williams v Mississippi!
Herman's Cane
December 27th, 2011
2:06 pm
Anybody pegging this economy on Obama was pegging Bush’s disasters on Clinton.
In other words, they will accept no blame, only dole it out. And then unabashedly demand our support.
Ain’t gonna happen.
td
December 27th, 2011
2:07 pm
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
1:58 pm
Would it really throw the economy in a ditch? What proof do you have to support your theory? Are you trying to tell us that there is not 6% of waste, fraud and abuse in the budgets of all the agencies? If you are saying that then we are a lost nation.
Lord Help Us
December 27th, 2011
2:10 pm
‘Keynes was a lifelong member of the British aristocracy. He hailed the system of aristocratic rule as sound, so long as governing personnel were chosen from the existing organic elite.’
Bullchips…
td
December 27th, 2011
2:11 pm
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
1:59 pm
Johnny begood (1:52 pm) ”Chilidog
What is wrong with We The People act??? Hr 539… “
=====================
Because it’s in violation of the 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution. You would think that someone like Paul, who wraps himself up in the Constitution more than he wears clean underwear, would know that.
How is it a violation?
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
2:12 pm
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
1:49 pm
“America is exceptional because of our “freedom”?
Crazy talk – we are not the freest country by any stretch.”
Boortz Redneck,
Doesn’t sound like you’ve done very much traveling sir. When you travel in many nation’s around the world its not at all unusual to come to police or military checkpoints and have to provide ID and reasons for your travel before then being allowed to proceed. In the U.S. you can get in your car today and travel across state lines and drive from here to Maine or to Washington state and not be stopped by anyone asking why you are going to Maine or Wash. state. I haven’t been to Europe in quite awhile but as I understand it if you are on trains in Western Europe police can go through the cars checking passports.
If you don’t think that we are as free or more free than the vast majority of nations on earth then you clearly haven’t been anywhere.
Oh, one other thing redneck. In terms of freedom of speech we can say whatever the hell we want which you cannot do in nation’s like Britain or Germany. Crazy people here can deny that the holocaust existed and just be looked upon as the nuts that they are. Do the same in Germany and you can go to jail.
F. Sinkwich
December 27th, 2011
2:12 pm
Ron Paul supporters are in general as looney as the lib ilks posting here.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:13 pm
td: What I am saying is that the first amendment is in the constitution. Because of that, the Tenth amendment only applies to the part where it says “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States,” or did YOU forget about THAT little part of the 10th amendment?
td
December 27th, 2011
2:15 pm
TaxPayer
December 27th, 2011
2:03 pm
Maybe Shep is the Fox “news” token Democrat now that they don’t have Colmes
Hannity is the only true conservative on Fox the rest of them are right leaning moderates (where the majority of the country is).
Oops, Wrong Planet
December 27th, 2011
2:15 pm
I looks like Newt got his VA petition signatures the same way he got his Twitter followers.
josef
December 27th, 2011
2:15 pm
Thulsa
Yeah, and try posting your opinion on a Canadian, or British blog and see how long it takes to get censored…
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
2:15 pm
I left ilk and cookies for Santa on Saturday night.
josef
December 27th, 2011
2:16 pm
The ilk man cometh!
getalife
December 27th, 2011
2:16 pm
filky,
cons are sane?
When did that happen?
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
2:17 pm
Are you trying to tell me that the Federal government can make up any law and it trumps state laws?
I’ll tell you that any day of the week and twice on Sunday, yep.
Would it really throw the economy in a ditch? What proof do you have to support your theory? Are you trying to tell us that there is not 6% of waste, fraud and abuse in the budgets of all the agencies?
1) Yes. 2) Austerity measures at a time of high unemployment always bite you in the ass. see also this. 3) There might be, in theory; however, there’s no way to magically make any bureaucracy, public or private, somehow put itself on a diet and flush out 6% of supposed fraud/waste/abuse without discarding many babies with the bathwater.
If you are saying that then we are a lost nation.
No, it simply means that the trumped-up “deficit crisis” is not what we should be focusing on until we get this country working again.
Lord Help Us
December 27th, 2011
2:17 pm
Is it ilk season again already?
Them’s good eatin’…what’s the limit?
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
2:18 pm
“it would also throw the economy into a ditch and impoverish millions but hey, like Stalin said, ya can’t make an omlette without breaking a few eggs, am I right?”
It would throw the economy into a ditch? Is that a factual statement or just your opinion? Because the Austrian school of econonics would certainly disagree with you.
Quoting Stalin? Nice! He of the 227 order.
josef
December 27th, 2011
2:19 pm
td
Hannity is not a “true conservative.” He’s bat shyt crazy…imo
Grey83
December 27th, 2011
2:21 pm
At our request, William Bernstein, an investment manager at Efficient Portfolio Advisors in Eastford, Conn., reviewed Rep. Paul’s portfolio as set out in the annual disclosure statement. Mr. Bernstein says he has never seen such an extreme bet on economic catastrophe. ”This portfolio is a half-step away from a cellar-full of canned goods and nine-millimeter rounds,” he says.
There are many possible doomsday scenarios for the U.S. economy and financial markets, explains Mr. Bernstein, and Rep. Paul’s portfolio protects against only one of them: unexpected inflation accompanied by a collapse in the value of the dollar. If deflation (to name one other possibility) occurs instead, “this portfolio is at great risk” because of its lack of bonds and high exposure to gold.
When William Jennings Bryan gave his cross of gold speech, he was complaining that imposing the gold standard led to massive defaltion, wiping out farmers and putting working people out of jobs. This is Paul’s promise.
Investing in economic collapse.
From the WSJ: Investor George Soros’s family fund bought about $2 billion of European bonds formerly owned by MF Global Holdings Ltd., the very debt that helped force the securities firm to file for bankruptcy protection Oct. 31, according to people close to the matter.
When world famous speculator George Soros made one billion dollars back in 1992 he bet that the British Pound would plummet. He knew that Britain would be forced to pull out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism, a system of fixed exchange rates that existed in Europe at the time. Pressures had been mounting in the British economy and it was forced to de-peg its currency from the other European currencies and allow it to float freely in order to avoid skyrocketing interest rates and an economic crash.
Soros shorted the Pound and cleaned up to the tune of ONE BILLION DOLLARS!
A similar thing is about to happen with the euro, only much, much, bigger!
And George Soros has positioned hisself to gain.
td
December 27th, 2011
2:21 pm
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:13 pm
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”
This says “Congress”, the Federal government, “shall make no law”. Where does it restrict the states from making any law? Again, the 10th amendment leaves these matters to the states. You are making the argument for me. It is in plain (easy to read) language. Do you believe the second Amendment means that only the military can own guns?
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 27th, 2011
2:21 pm
What the hell is a ‘true’ conservative?
The only conservative running for Pres. is Obama
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
2:22 pm
Quoting Stalin? Nice!
Obviously when you sarcastically quote a tyrant, that makes you JUST LIKE THE TYRANT.
(and I doubt Stalin actually said that, it’s just fun to imagine he did.)
Normal
December 27th, 2011
2:26 pm
Common Sense isn’t very Common
December 27th, 2011
2:21 pm
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:26 pm
td: I think you’re ignoring significant parts of the Constitution to try to make the case that states can ignore federal law. Like this, for instance:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.
td
December 27th, 2011
2:27 pm
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
2:17 pm
Are you trying to tell me that the Federal government can make up any law and it trumps state laws?
I’ll tell you that any day of the week and twice on Sunday, yep
I think you my friend are wrong. I think the decision in the upcoming Obamacare case before the USSC will prove this out. I would also ask if this is true then why did the USSC state clearly that the states had the rights to put voter id provisions into its laws? Why do the states have the rights to decide who can marry whom? Why are there different divorce statues in states? Why do some states have the death penalty an some do not?
A dad
December 27th, 2011
2:27 pm
Adam – keynesian economics espouses the gov’t stepping in in times of economic downturn and reviving the economy via spending. Keynesian economics is a spend now, don’t worry about the future model. Even Keynes recognized that those in the gov’t generally either lacked the economic expertise or else it would just take toolong for the gov’t to act to make any real difference. keynes was all about spending. Re-distribution of wealth from the rich to the poor would essentially equate to the poor spending, vice saving. In other words, Keynes makes no provision for the future, whichin turns makes everyone, expecially those poor “poor” who spend everything, even more dependent upon the gov’t in later years. Vicious cycle, yes?
What system do I advocate. Free enterprise. Supply and demand. Survival of the fittest. I make no apologies for anyone too lazy to go out and make a living. However, some have become generationally institutionalized by gov’t policies. So what happens to them? I’d go with my suggested welfare reform of years ago. Doesn’t make sense for someone getting $400 a month in benefits to be kicked out and have to work a full-time, min wage job and bring in $275 (all figures for exmaples only). So, force them to get a job and bring in the 275, then supplement their income with the 125 needed to bring them to the 400. That was they don’t suffer anything economically and you can now support 3 for the price of 1. Look at all the opportunities in this country to succeed if one works hard enough. But that’s been bred/dribven out of so many, who simply expect to be handed whatever they want. Free enterprise Adam. Over time, it tends to balance itself out.
A dad
December 27th, 2011
2:27 pm
Adam – keynesian economics espouses the gov’t stepping in in times of economic downturn and reviving the economy via spending. Keynesian economics is a spend now, don’t worry about the future model. Even Keynes recognized that those in the gov’t generally either lacked the economic expertise or else it would just take toolong for the gov’t to act to make any real difference. keynes was all about spending. Re-distribution of wealth from the rich to the poor would essentially equate to the poor spending, vice saving. In other words, Keynes makes no provision for the future, whichin turns makes everyone, expecially those poor “poor” who spend everything, even more dependent upon the gov’t in later years. Vicious cycle, yes?
What system do I advocate. Free enterprise. Supply and demand. Survival of the fittest. I make no apologies for anyone too lazy to go out and make a living. However, some have become generationally institutionalized by gov’t policies. So what happens to them? I’d go with my suggested welfare reform of years ago. Doesn’t make sense for someone getting $400 a month in benefits to be kicked out and have to work a full-time, min wage job and bring in $275 (all figures for exmaples only). So, force them to get a job and bring in the 275, then supplement their income with the 125 needed to bring them to the 400. That was they don’t suffer anything economically and you can now support 3 for the price of 1. Look at all the opportunities in this country to succeed if one works hard enough. But that’s been bred/dribven out of so many, who simply expect to be handed whatever they want. Free enterprise Adam. Over time, it tends to balance itself out.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:29 pm
td: Why do the states have the rights to decide who can marry whom? Why are there different divorce statues in states? Why do some states have the death penalty an some do not?
How about because there aren’t any federal laws to the contrary?
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
2:30 pm
“2) Austerity measures at a time of high unemployment always bite you in the ass”
Yes and no. First of all we’re not talking about “austerity” cuts such as what’s going on in Greece. We’re talking about modest overall cuts. Nor are we talking about extraordinary monetary policy such as what Volcker did to fight inflation and bring down interest rates.
Cutting govt waste and infefficiency helps rid the economy of long term malinvestments which actually hinder growth. We may have some very short term pain for the fall out but the ensuing recovery would be broad and quick.
Or we could continue to follow the failed Keynesian approach proffered by Obama which is simply making things worse and impeding a long term recovery. Keynesian economics and stimulus does not work. Japan tried stimulus 10 times during its lost decade and to no avail. It simply prolonged the recession and stymied recovery.
There’s no need to debate Keynesian vs the Chicago school of economics. All you have to do is look at the great Depression and lately look at Japan’s lost decade and failed stimulus. Learn your economic history staring you right in the face and you will know that stimulus simply makes things worse and that the biggest inhibitor to long term growth is the growing debt problem.
Biff Clinton
December 27th, 2011
2:30 pm
Obama is a pathetic excuse for a President and our nations first affirmative action disaster
RON PAUL 2012
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
2:31 pm
td -
the old 10th Amendment argument?
“ This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding. ”
The Supremacy Clause makes the 10th Amendment pretty toothless. But its nice that its there – I have no issue with it.
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
2:31 pm
td (2:11 pm): How is (the We The People Act) a violation (of the 14th Amendment)?
——————
Read the Section 1 of the Amendment for yourself
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The part in bold applies the privileges or immunities of the U.S. Constitution and all its amendments to the states. The “We The People Act” attempts to remove that application.
td
December 27th, 2011
2:33 pm
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:26 pm
You are correct as long as the federal laws do not super cede the restrictions or explicit duties placed on the congress through the Constitution.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:33 pm
A dad: You do realize that with free enterprise and survival of the fittest the banks would have done what they did in the past ten years much, MUCH sooner, and caused a collapse of the entire economic system, and still run away with most of the spoils, yes?
There would be no need of any Keynes measures you describe (which, btw, is NOT all there is to it) if there were enforced regulations on the banks and lenders so they could not get away with what they got away with.
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
2:33 pm
the 14th amendment also basically nullifies the 10th amendment by applying the rights guaranteed by the Constitution to the states as well as the federal government.
Erwin's cat
December 27th, 2011
2:34 pm
Wow….can ya get more dramatic over a 1% cut/yr for 6 yrs?….throw the economy in a ditch!….really???…the butterfly effects of economy?
Finn McCool (Run Newt, run! You da man!)
December 27th, 2011
2:35 pm
Free enterprise Adam. Over time, it tends to balance itself out.
Like self-regulating banks, right? And the idea that companies will always act in the best interest of consumers and citizens?
td
December 27th, 2011
2:35 pm
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
2:31 pm
Obamacare decision will see just how far the made up “Supremacy clause” will be allowed to go.
What is the purpose for state government is the Federal government has ALL the power?
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
2:37 pm
td @ 2.27, the answer to all of your questions is because the Feddle Gubmint hasn’t cared enough to overrule the states on these issues.
and I seriously doubt that any decision the SCOTUS will make on the ACA’s insurance mandate will have anything to do with state’s rights.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:38 pm
td: “made up” Supremacy Clause? I’d love to see you try to argue with the founding fathers on that one.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:38 pm
and I seriously doubt that any decision the SCOTUS will make on the ACA’s insurance mandate will have anything to do with state’s rights.
^ THIS
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
2:39 pm
….throw the economy in a ditch!….really???
Only delusional people believe that throwing the federal government into reverse and chugging backwards, somehow, would not have disastrous effects on this nation’s well being.
Alas, those delusional folks include all too many Congrefscritters.
Chilidog
December 27th, 2011
2:40 pm
td (2:21 pm)
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”
This says “Congress”, the Federal government, “shall make no law”. Where does it restrict the states from making any law?
================
Read the 14th amendment again.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The states are bound to the Bill of Rights, just like the Federal Government is.
phy
December 27th, 2011
2:40 pm
Mr. Bookman says Ron Paul exposed. All he has been exposed for is failure to edit and read every line of his newsletter that has thousands of pages where less than 1/100,000 has racially insensitive remarks.With 8 different authors at the time and Paul’s involvement with his medical practice,I can see how this happened. If you go on youtube and listen to every speech he has ever made you will see he clearly is no racist. He is just the opposite.
td
December 27th, 2011
2:41 pm
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:29 pm
td: Why do the states have the rights to decide who can marry whom? Why are there different divorce statues in states? Why do some states have the death penalty an some do not?
How about because there aren’t any federal laws to the contrary?
Could that be because the Constitution restrict the Federal government from making such laws? Are you really trying to tell us that the far left and the Gay community does not want the Federal government to make a law that would all marriage in all 50 states? Are you trying to tell us that the Libs do not want a Federal law banning all death penalties?
Corey
December 27th, 2011
2:42 pm
Spk, Aqua, Granny G, Am Vet, Adam and like minded, I have to whisper this. The Republicans who comment here daily have become deranged since Mr. Obama took office. That explains their feeble musings devoid of logic. Is there a twelve step program for ODS (Obama Derangement Syndrome) that they can attend? They are in need of serious intervention. I’m afraid they will commit mass suicide if he is reelected?
Erwin's cat
December 27th, 2011
2:43 pm
“Only delusional people believe that throwing the federal government into reverse and chugging backwards”
————————————–
No only delusional people equate taking ones foot off of the accelerator to throwing it into reverse
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:44 pm
Could that be because the Constitution restrict the Federal government from making such laws?
No.
THBAEOSATSQ
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
2:45 pm
td
Actually, the Supremacy Clause is one of the legal justifications for federal health insurance regulation. No one thinks it can win the case alone though.
States have lots to deal with as it is.
Look at the takings clause of the Constitution. Its very controversial but it took 200 years to get to Kelo. There is plenty of state law written on eminent domain.
Kelo was rightly decided in my opinion. But conservatives hate it.
I also think Citizens United was rightly decided. And liberals hate it.
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 27th, 2011
2:45 pm
Corey –
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:46 pm
Are you really trying to tell us that the far left and the Gay community does not want the Federal government to make a law that would all marriage in all 50 states? Are you trying to tell us that the Libs do not want a Federal law banning all death penalties?
There is not enough majority support for either. As soon as there is, those laws will be brought up, pass, and be the law of the land.
It’s really that simple.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:47 pm
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck: What is your reasoning behind saying Citizens United was rightly decided?
td
December 27th, 2011
2:48 pm
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
2:37 pm
td @ 2.27, the answer to all of your questions is because the Feddle Gubmint hasn’t cared enough to overrule the states on these issues.
and I seriously doubt that any decision the SCOTUS will make on the ACA’s insurance mandate will have anything to do with state’s rights.
So if the SCOTUS decides that the Federal government can not mandate to the people that they must purchase a good or service then that would also apply to the state governments? What about care insurance? Would this do away with Romney care in Mass> because they mandate the anyone living in the state must purchase health care insurance from a private vendor?
AmVet
December 27th, 2011
2:52 pm
I’m afraid they will commit mass suicide if he is reelected?
One can only hope. (grin)
BHO has had a very mixed record to date and IMHO is certainly beatable next November.
But with this absurd slate??? The neo-cons stand the exact same chance that that laughable cast of clowns in 2008 did. Which is to say, slim and none.
And to demonstrate just how ludicrous that hemorrhaging farce of a “conservative” party is, look at Huntsman.
Smart, reasonable, moderate and with a great resume.
In other words, someone who appeals to about 2% of the GOP’s “base”…
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
2:53 pm
So if the SCOTUS decides that the Federal government can not mandate to the people that they must purchase a good or service then that would also apply to the state governments?
I honestly haven’t a clue–if I had to bet, though, I’d say that any ruling that would strike down the mandatory purchase requirements of the ACA would be written narrowly enough not to affect any existing state law.
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
2:53 pm
What the following really comes down to is something that we all know as a basic law of common sense. Govt spending is largely an inefficient allocation of resources. And until you reduce the level of govt interference,inefficiencies, and distortions and malinvestments in the economy you are not going to allow the economy to self correct, for the means of production to adjust, and for consumer preferences to realign. Read below and the understanding becomes more clear.
In America’s Great Depression, Rothbard (2000) wrote, “there is one thing the government can do positively [during a depression], however: it can drastically lower its relative role in the economy, slashing its own expenditures and taxes” (p. 22). The Japanese government raised its consumption tax from 3 percent to 5 percent in 1997. There were income tax cuts in 1994, and in 1998, the top income tax rate was decreased from 65 percent to 50 percent and the corporate rate from 46 percent to 40 percent. Despite some tax cuts, Japan has maintained a high level of government spending. Government-services spending increased 9 percent from 1995 through 1999 (EIU 2001).
Tax decreases cannot have their full beneficial effects if they are not matched by corresponding decreases in government spending. If more money is left in the hands of private citizens, some of it will be saved, helping to justify the lengthened structure of production, whereas all government spending is consumption.8 The increase in the consumption tax and the failure to reduce government spending along with the other tax cuts delay recovery from recession. Government spending seeks to maintain the existing production structure, against the demands of consumers, instead of permitting its liquidation and reconstruction (Herbener 1999).
The repeated fiscal stimulus packages with public-works spending, the large amount of savings controlled by the postal savings system and allocated through FILP, and the efforts to prevent bank and business failures all have prevented the market process of recovery from working.
td
December 27th, 2011
2:53 pm
Adam
December 27th, 2011
2:46 pm
Are you really trying to tell us that the far left and the Gay community does not want the Federal government to make a law that would all marriage in all 50 states? Are you trying to tell us that the Libs do not want a Federal law banning all death penalties?
There is not enough majority support for either. As soon as there is, those laws will be brought up, pass, and be the law of the land.
It’s really that simple.
So what you are trying to tell us then is that the states can do whatever they want to do until the Federal government can muster a majority and decide what the supreme law of the land is going to be on any subject?
AmVet
December 27th, 2011
2:54 pm
Oh noes. Out of control slanties!
Steve - USA
December 27th, 2011
2:55 pm
Finn McCool,
Maybe it’s time citizen’s start acting in the best interest of themselves. Hopefully people are starting to realize that 15 MPG Truck, 4,000 Sq. Ft. House and Massive Credit Card Debt was not exactly a great idea.
One of the biggest omissions of responsibility in this recession is the role individuals played in their own demise. Of course you don’t get to many votes by telling people to be more responsible with their money.
JMHO
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
2:56 pm
What the economy really needs in order to turn around.
In Austrian theory, the recession is necessary, and once it sets in and bad investments are liquidated, the economy will self-correct. After 10 years, there are still no signs of economic correction. Austrian theory recognizes that time is required for economic self-correction but that the correction can only occur if the market process is allowed to work. Rothbard (2000) summarized the Austrian policy position this way:
If government wishes to alleviate, rather than aggravate, a depression, its only course is laissez-faire—to leave the economy alone. Only if there is no interference, direct or threatened, with prices, wage rates, and business liquidation will the necessary adjustment proceed with smooth dispatch. Any propping up of shaky positions postpones liquidation and aggravates unsound conditions. (p. 185)
As described above, Japan’s government has done everything but leave the economy alone and allow self-correction.
http://mises.org/daily/1099
A dad
December 27th, 2011
2:56 pm
And Adam, who was it that allowed the banks to do what they did? Why our elected officials. The same ones that Keynes would permit to “stimulate” and direct the economy. Can we say Fannie and Freddie boys and girls. Or the fact that Barney F’s boyfriend was at the helm? Free enterprise. Apple. Microsoft. Facebook.
Thulsa – well said. Granny, getting some references now? T – would you please sned some on GB in the 70’s Granny’s way? She wants everything opn a silver platter.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
2:58 pm
Adam -
I am a First Amendment absolutist.
Citizens United suppresses Free Speech – even if that speech is bought and paid by loathsome characters.
Those liberals at the ACLU sided with the conservatives by the way. I should send them another donation come to think of it.
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
3:01 pm
No only delusional people equate taking ones foot off of the accelerator to throwing it into reverse
No. Your analogy would make some sense if we were discussing a plan to control the growth of the federal government; if we were to simply allow it to grow in real dollars spent at the same rate as (say) the population were to grow, then that would be coasting.
Forcing every agency to actually cut back 1% each year may not sound like a lot, but there’s no way you could do that and not throw a lot of perfectly decent people out of work (not just on the federal payroll, but in those businesses that depend upon their work with the federal government), and to make it even sh-ttier for all of those people, they’d likely have little or no public resources to fall back on, since those were being cut back as well.
In a time of strong economic growth and near-full employment, maybe it would make some sense to wage war on waste/fraud/abuse and force all agencies to make some cuts, figuring that the private sector would be strong enough to absorb most of those who were tossed out of work.
With a genuine, ongoing unemployment crisis (as opposed to an utterly manufactured debt crisis), I will continue to argue that austerity is the dumbest move we could make.
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
3:03 pm
Steve-USA,
True enough. You don’t get too many votes telling people that its partially their fault. Nor do you get to many votes by telling people the truth- that the best option to recover from economic recession is to do nothing. There are just too many dumb people out there that thing govt is supposed to fix everything. All they know is to look to govt. How and where we ever went wrong in going to this mentality is probably where we began to decline as a nation.
The only doing to be done should be to lessen the govts role in the economy rather than increase it. But again. That’s a hard thing to try and tell people that have an ingrained mentality that govt has to “do something”, particularly when the only thing the govt should do is get out of the way and reduce its involvement in the economy.
Finn McCool
December 27th, 2011
3:06 pm
Here’s a good read on Greece by Michael Lewis. I had no idea just how FUBAR Greece was/is. Mind boggling.
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/10/michael-lewis-greece-201010
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
3:07 pm
“I will continue to argue that austerity is the dumbest move we could make.”
Those who continue to refuse to learn from economic history will be condemned to repeat it. As we are doing now here in the U.S.
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
3:08 pm
“I had no idea just how FUBAR Greece was/is.”
Why would anyone expect anything different from a welfare state where there is a heavy dose of govt interference in the economy?
Adam
December 27th, 2011
3:09 pm
td: So what you are trying to tell us then is that the states can do whatever they want to do until the Federal government can muster a majority and decide what the supreme law of the land is going to be on any subject?
Yes.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
3:09 pm
A dad: And Adam, who was it that allowed the banks to do what they did? Why our elected officials
Yes, they repealed key provisions in place to help prevent that sort of thing, when REPUBLICANS were in charge. Barney Frank never had as much influence as a Republican majority.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
3:10 pm
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck: Well my view is that corporations should not be allowed to make unlimited donations if individuals are not allowed to do the same.
Steve - USA
December 27th, 2011
3:10 pm
Thulsa Doom@3:03
I hear what you are saying. It’s easier to be patient when you are on the boat than it is when you are in the water trying to hang on for dear life. You can hardly blame people for wanting to at least think something is being done to throw them a life preserver, even if the people on the boat don’t believe in the life preserver.
Mark Zandi is a childhood friend of mine, I don’t speak to him that often but when this all hit the fan he said on TV it would take 10 years to get out of this mess totally. Next chance I get I will ask him if someone told him no play down the “10 years” remark.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
3:10 pm
Austrian theory failed in the Long Depression in the United States.
didn’t know about the Long Depression?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Depression
Erwin's cat
December 27th, 2011
3:11 pm
Stands for dB – In a time of strong economic growth and near-full employment, maybe it would make some sense to wage war on waste/fraud/abuse and force all agencies to make some cuts, figuring that the private sector would be strong enough to absorb most of those who were tossed out of work.
In those conditions no austerity would be needed because the revenue stream would be very very strong
I’d like to see some data where 1% cuts would be seriously impacting employment in both the public and private sectors..or either for that matter…I don’t see it
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
3:11 pm
A dad,
I’m just trying to get them to understand that we are repeating the exact same mistakes that Japan went through. And getting the exact same results that Japan got in its lost decade. You would think people would learn and educate themselves on economic history. But something tells me that the mentality that govt must “do something” is just too firmly entrenched in their mindsets. No matter how much economic evidence you present they may never learn the straightforward truth that govt is not the solution. Govt is the problem.
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
3:11 pm
I can’t afford to make idle people merry. I help to support the establishments I have mentioned-they cost enough; and those who are badly off must go there. If they would rather die, they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population.
(Dickens, 1843)
Welcome to the Occupation
December 27th, 2011
3:12 pm
What’s up, bloggers. Merry Christmas.
Smash — plutocratic — rule.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
3:13 pm
silver platter?
what a hoot.
A dad
December 27th, 2011
3:17 pm
Thulsa – and let’s not forget my earlier example of (not so) Great (any more) Britain. And I think that Russia is in that group as well. My biggest fear,however, is that by continuing to borrow and borrow and borrow, Obama is going to cause the U.S. dollar to no longer be held the int’l reserve currency. The U.S. Dollar ain’t what it used to be, evidenced in no small part by it no longer being accepted in some foreigh countries. Heck, there’s a bank in Mexico, Mexico of all places, that no longer accepts deposits in U.S. dinero. Pretty soon my monopoly money will be worth more than the U.S. dollar, and all the dollar will be good for is, well, let’s just say the makers of Charmin might see their stocks drop….
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
3:17 pm
Erwin’s @ 3.11–As things stand, monthly employment numbers that have included encouraging trends for private employees, have been battered by state cutbacks throwing thousands out of work.
If we were to make an across the board 1% cut to federal spending–and yes, this dirty effing hippie peacenik is including Defense in this–yeah. I think that would render us pretty much FUBAR, economically.
Of course I can’t prove that it would happen, any more than the guys who continually assert that government “just has to get out of the way” would make a thousand flowers bloom.
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
3:18 pm
Obama is going to cause the U.S. dollar to no longer be held the int’l reserve currency.
snort. yeah, all by his lonesome! Backwards, in high heels!
A dad
December 27th, 2011
3:18 pm
Granny, in not being willing to do any independent research for yourself, well, hoot isn’t the word I’d choose.
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
3:19 pm
A little reality check for the ZOMG WE R IN A DEBT CRISIS! crowd.
http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds/government-bonds/us/
A dad
December 27th, 2011
3:21 pm
SFD – his adminsitration’s policy is just to keep printing more money. And borrowing it. So while he inherited issues, his course of action is making this all the worse. Didn’t get your insult. My retort is never wrestle with a pig. You get dirty and the pig likes it.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
3:21 pm
Granny, in not being willing to do any independent research for yourself…
Translation: I couldn’t back up what I posted earlier so I’ll play the “independent research” card.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
3:21 pm
Obama is borrowing to pay for Bush’s $1.3 trillion annual deficit x 3 years (now)
I know – quit blaming Bush! But its not like its irrelevant.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
3:22 pm
Actually, no one is “printing money” in the Obama administration.
We borrow money.
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
3:25 pm
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
3:10 pm
Austrian theory failed in the Long Depression in the United States.
didn’t know about the Long Depression?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Depression
Boortz redneck,
Something tells me that you don’t understand what you are posting. Much of that wiki article confirms Friedman and others. And if you will go back and re-read the article you will understand that after the panic of 1873 hit it was govt monetarist policies which worsened things, along with govt protectionist policies, etc. Once again govt made things worse. And also please understand the difference between monetarists and the Milton Freedman school of economics.
Thank you for making my point for me although something tells me it was clearly not your intention.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
3:27 pm
Jeez….. we are still on the “I made a point without providing actual evidence and you are too lazy and want it all on a platter if you don’t research my point”?
It does seem as if the righties are doomed to constantly repeating this kind of silliness……….. just doomed or then they go to “just kidding, it was a joke” silliness
Lord Help Us
December 27th, 2011
3:27 pm
‘his adminsitration’s policy is just to keep printing more money. And borrowing it.’
a dad…well, I am looking for the viable GOP candidate that will not print money or borrow. Can’t find him/her. Guess you are sol for at least another 4 years…
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
3:28 pm
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
3:22 pm
Actually, no one is “printing money” in the Obama administration.
We borrow money.
Wrong again. Doomy out. Be back later to splain to you yet again the errors of your ways.
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
3:29 pm
SFD – his adminsitration’s policy is just to keep printing more money.
Well, it’s kind of hard to read past something that is so blatantly false on its face.
If this all-powerful Administration were really only to “just keep printing more money,” that’d mean we wouldn’t be taxing anyone at all.
Obviously, we are taking in revenue. Just as obviously, the moment we began printing currency, there were people saying it was worthless, as some do today.
If it’s so worthless, why does the world continue to invest in ten year t bills that return a measly 2 percent?
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
3:30 pm
A dad
and I should be surprised by your unhappiness in having me deny doing your bidding?
still a hoot -
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
3:31 pm
Keeps
They never cease to amaze me.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
3:31 pm
Thulsa
Your reading comprehension is lacking.
“In 1874, a year after the 1873 crash, the United States Congress passed legislation called the Inflation Bill of 1874 designed to confront the issue of falling prices by injecting fresh greenbacks into the money supply.[36] Under pressure from business interests, President Grant vetoed the measure”
Grant went all Austrian and the Depression cranked on for six more years.
Nowhere does the article vindicate Austrians. In fact, Rothbard ties himself into knots in the article trying to save the little fairy dust of Austriansism.
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
3:32 pm
We borrow money.
…for next to nothing. Because, you see, we are the wealthiest, most powerful nation ever on earth, still, by a decent margin. And yet some seem to think we should curl up into a fetal position and give up on this whole “more perfect union” business.
anyway, I’m done floggin’ this dead horse. If ain’t nobody buyin’, I’m movin’ on until Jay’s got something new for us.
Erwin's cat
December 27th, 2011
3:34 pm
stands for dB,
what if the 1% cuts have no impact on employment…up or down, would you go for it then?
BigD
December 27th, 2011
3:37 pm
Obama’s numbers go up exponentially with the relative amount of morons created.
This is just sad,sad brain washing of the easily swayed.
bill arp
December 27th, 2011
3:38 pm
I’m starting to see a pattern on this blog, and in the media in general. As soon as any of the GOP candidates start to make a name for him/herself, the attacks come out of left field. Wonder why this never happened with B Obama? Oh, that’s right, he’s perfect. Forgot about that!
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
3:39 pm
This is just sad,sad brain washing of the easily swayed.
“Easily swayed”?
Kind of like, “the smoking gun is the mushroom cloud”?
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
3:39 pm
This is just sad,sad brain washing of the easily swayed.
And yet the “easily swayed” Obama supporters are not at all “swayed” by the genius of the Republican contenders….collectively, individually or served with a side of spam.
TaxPayer
December 27th, 2011
3:40 pm
If it’s so worthless, why does the world continue to invest in ten year t bills that return a measly 2 percent?
Because it is the least most worthless and gold is the most bubbly.
Lord Help Us
December 27th, 2011
3:41 pm
BigDB, well, in Jan/Feb 2009 Obama was around 60-65% job approval. By your definition there must be fewer morons now than 3 years ago…
BigD
December 27th, 2011
3:41 pm
You past the litmus test….yep MORONS.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
3:42 pm
I’m starting to see a pattern on this blog, and in the media in general.
I’m starting to see a pattern also.
Someone “new” comes along and immediately blames the media
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
3:44 pm
Do sock puppets need voter ID?
Bruno
December 27th, 2011
3:44 pm
I’m starting to see a pattern on this blog, and in the media in general. As soon as any of the GOP candidates start to make a name for him/herself, the attacks come out of left field.
bill–Just ignore the fact that 90% of the press votes Democrat. It couldn’t possible influence their reporting in the least. Just ask them, and they’ll tell you so.
BigD
December 27th, 2011
3:46 pm
It’s the fact that he has ANYone to support him after this abysmal performance of laziness.
Take off the rose colored blinders and you will see a perfect example of “peter principle”.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
3:48 pm
or Bill
you might consider that the 90% of the press that old what’s his name
claims vote democratic are just wiser than the two of you.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 27th, 2011
3:49 pm
Republicans live in a fact-free vacuum.
Its why Creationism is such a conservative rallying theme. They have to push their myths to keep the past alive.
Its also why the best capitalists are liberal. Reading a balance sheet is fact based.
carlosgvv
December 27th, 2011
3:53 pm
With all of these charges and counter-charges flying here for and against Obama, a fundamental fact about politics needs to be remembered – No Government is popular in economic hard times. Obama does not like these economic tough times any more than any of you but, obviously, there’s no quick and easy way out. And, I hope those here don’t honestly think Romney, Gingrich, Paul, Bachmann or Perry could do any better in restoring us to 4 or 5% unemployment.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
3:54 pm
Granny, here is the photo ID for the sockpuppets
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
3:56 pm
Keep
OMG…Voter ID Fraud! Shari’s dead!
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
3:59 pm
just have time for a drive-by, and since Erwin’s posed a reasonable question–
what if the 1% cuts have no impact on employment…up or down, would you go for it then?
You mean if I magically knew that 1% cuts would have *no* impact on employment? where “no impact” would mean that we’d merely add enough jobs per month to maintain the current percentages of unemployed?
hmm. Since I don’t consider the current state of affairs to be acceptable I guess the answer is no. I don’t think a 1% cut in spending would be worth maintaining an unacceptable level of unemployment.
But I think maybe I’m missing the spirit of your question. Obviously, if cutting back on spending were to have *positive* results for our economy I would embrace such measures. I do not believe that would be the result of 1% cuts each year.
Please understand–I don’t especially enjoy having the federal government being as powerful as it is; I don’t especially hate it, either. I’m pretty much neutral, and tend to look at how the rest of the world operates and what it provides to its citizenry through public and privately funded initiatives, and adjust my expectations accordingly—keeping in mind that (to repeat myself) we are the richest, most powerful nation ever on earth.
later, kids.
stands for decibels
December 27th, 2011
4:04 pm
oh, and Erwin, if we were at “full” employment, meaning 3-4% unemployment? then yeah, I’d think cutting back 1% per year would be fine, if it meant no overall job losses. repeating myself, I don’t see how that happens, it think it will trigger a spike in joblessness, but at “full” employment, we could pretty easily absorb those jobless folks, and not trigger a recession.
really gone now.
Adam
December 27th, 2011
4:07 pm
Just ignore the fact that 90% of the press votes Democrat. It couldn’t possible influence their reporting in the least.
Proof, please
A dad
December 27th, 2011
4:10 pm
granny and kamchak – your juvenile efforts are laughable. Like I said earlier, if I gave y’all the evidence you’d accuse me of picking and choosing, selective quotation, fudging facts and statements, etc., ergo, verifying the facts for yourself so you can’t accuse me of bias. Thulsa gave y’all a good example about Japan, which is similar. Wouldn’t take a lot of effort to verify, but as I can see, y’all are afraid you might find something which would contradict your espoused positions, which of course would be intolerable for you. I pity you. granny, if nothing else, you could do the research and maybe find something to contradict my assertions, but you can’t even go along that tack but instead take theinfantile “Can’t make me do this neiner neiner neiner.” You madame, are a true Southerner in all aspects of the word. Kamchak, whatever. Gee, having read Bookie’s blog for sometime and seeing how everyone attacks one another, I played by those rules and look what happened. Typical double standard.
SFD, we used to be the most powerful nation. That’s one of the problems. We’re not anymore but you refuse to realize/accept that. Anyway, everyone have a great election. I’m moving my assets offshore, and when the current administration crashes the economy, I’ll think of you (NOT!) while I’m whiling away the hours in leisure on a beach somewhere while you’re standing in a gov’t bread line.
TaxPayer
December 27th, 2011
4:12 pm
oh, and Erwin, if we were at “full” employment, meaning 3-4% unemployment?
Oh Noes! That can’t be so. We gots to get to 2.8% in order to make Paul Ryan’s yellowbrick roadmap work. Just ask the folks over at the Heritage Club.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
4:15 pm
a dad
our juvenile attempts?
you couldn’t back up a car let alone an argument.
mr. silly pants
(Oh and this true southerner was born and raised in walking distance to
the friendly confines….)
you are just hootier and hootier.
suggestion. flip names again and start over.
too funny
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
4:16 pm
he’s gonna move his assets
i quiver
TaxPayer
December 27th, 2011
4:16 pm
You past the litmus test….yep MORONS.
Some folks need to be careful with that there finger pointing thingie. They might put their eye out.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
4:17 pm
granny and kamchak – your juvenile efforts are laughable.
That’s not the way it works here, sport.
You make a claim, you back it up.
Otherwise you’re subject to scorn and derisive laughter
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 27th, 2011
4:19 pm
Not a NBR -”Its also why the best capitalists are liberal.
Reading a balance sheet is fact based.”
and why US co. balance sheets perform better in Democratic admins.
(except for co’s that profit off the misery of others, now that’s the con
wheelhouse, right there)
josef
December 27th, 2011
4:20 pm
The lowest national unemployment rate on record in the United States is 2.5%, posted in May and June of 1953.
So, even in the best of times there’s that many either between jobs, goldbricking, or what have you. Shouldn’t that be taken into consideration when evaluating the “real” number of unemployed?
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
4:21 pm
I saw the chippendales move their assets about 10 years ago….
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
4:22 pm
Keep
Is it time for a group scoff?
A dad
December 27th, 2011
4:22 pm
Ohh Kamchak…. you’re such a bad@sssss. I’m so afraid. Noob.
Granny, you’re just nor worth it.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
4:23 pm
I saw the chippendales move their assets about 10 years ago….
Male strippers going Galt.
GT
December 27th, 2011
4:23 pm
I think it has been this way for a long time. There is some lag time in polling and reality. I cannot remember a stretch in American politics that has produced this kind of results. I think the speaker of the house have been thugs for a while, but none dared run for the presidential office because their character was such as Newt’s. There is no shame anymore, reality shows or whatever make all this possible. You can have absolutely no talent and be famous and make a lot of money.
td
December 27th, 2011
4:24 pm
Adam
December 27th, 2011
3:10 pm
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck: Well my view is that corporations should not be allowed to make unlimited donations if individuals are not allowed to do the same
They are not allowed too make unlimited donations to an individual candidate. They are treated the same as an individual or a union or an organization when it come to donating to PACS and can make unlimited donations.
A dad
December 27th, 2011
4:25 pm
But you know what’s really pathetic? I’ve been egging y’all on repeatedly and neither of you had the slightest clue. Just geting you both to respond like I was to you. I’ve been LMAO for several hours at how obtuse y’all are
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
4:28 pm
a dad
i imagine what you consider worthwhile would give me a chuckle.
you remain a hoot.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
4:30 pm
he can spell obtuse!
josef
December 27th, 2011
4:30 pm
A dad
“You madame, are a true Southerner in all aspects of the word.”
Would that mean she’s polite, courteous, well-mannered, respectful of family and tradition, consistently writes the most impressive books in the English language, generates the widest range of music, cooks a range of world recognized cuisines, enjoys relaxing and passing the time with friends and neighbors…among other things…oh, yeah, and knows what a Sweet Potato Queen is!!
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
4:31 pm
But you know what’s really pathetic?
Don’t care.
Your emotions are not my responsibility.
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
4:33 pm
josef
the veritable iron hand in velvet glove…..and a cubs sweatshirt.
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
4:34 pm
OK, everybody who has already posted 25 times in the last hour, PLEASE take a break. I have an important announcement. YES!
While writing at my desk this afternoon, I looked out into the back yard and there was a……COYOTE!! Yes, it was. Plumy tail, sharp nose and all. And I live within 285, not the wild wild west but here he was scouting out the back yard! Unfortunately I had neither slingshot nor shotgun to defend the premises. So he wandered off! Ahhhh safe at last! (But not the feral cats who stop by some times. I fear for them.)
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
4:36 pm
oooooo a group scoff! So much better than a group hug especially with those Cain people….it just feels sooooo wrong.
TaxPayer
December 27th, 2011
4:37 pm
the veritable iron hand in velvet glove
For those times when a rolling pin simply will not do!
josef
December 27th, 2011
4:38 pm
DUSTY
So, they’re here! We’ve had them back home for a while…they’re not bad neighbors.
GG
He must be one of those people up in Madison County…bless his heart!
Logical Dude
December 27th, 2011
4:39 pm
Dusty:
(But not the feral cats who stop by some times.)
Yes, the coyote knows where to find some food. usually just one coyote isn’t as effective as a pack, but still, it’s right to worry.
A dad
December 27th, 2011
4:40 pm
Josef – deep fried and smothered is a range of world recognized cuisine? You need to get out more mate.
Kamchak – go back to watching the chippendales. I’m sure that’s where you’d rather be.
Granny glad I gave you a hoot or four. That’s what I’m here for.
Folks, it’s been entertaining, but has gotten really old. More fun if people know when they’re being made fun of in jest. Have at it another day.
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
4:40 pm
Ohhh JOSEF, didn’t know we had met. I love your definition of a true Southern lady. Could we meet for tea? My white gloves are clean and ready to go. You may call me Talulla if you wish.
Honey, you are the sweetest thing!!
Granny Godzilla
December 27th, 2011
4:41 pm
a dad
we know that’s what you are here for.
it’s obvious.
Jackie Goldberg
December 27th, 2011
4:42 pm
This former (D)emocrat is bailing on the fraud known as Obama. What a ride he took us on. What fools does he think we are.
I’m voting for the Peace candidate, Ron Paul. And I’m converting fellow Democrats daily.
Ron Paul=Real Change
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
4:42 pm
Ah yes, the “declare victory while backing out the door” ploy.
Sounds familiar.
sjosephm
December 27th, 2011
4:47 pm
Granny Godzilla,
You realize all you’re doing is parroting the media when you accuse Paul of “running” from an interview and “printing” the newsletters? You clearly haven’t done any research of your own or would know that CNN editied that video of Paul to make it appear like he left the interview in a huff. Everyone except the ignorant, completely gullible, and those that are looking for something negative about Paul to believe in, know that Paul has never espoused any of these remarks in the 6 sentences of the thousands of newsletters. It’s sad, but not surprising at all, to see this laughable smear campaign working on people.
josef
December 27th, 2011
4:47 pm
A dad
Say what? Obviously you’ve never been to N’awlins, Charleston, Savannah, San Antonio…
Strange…everytime I’m abroad and they hear my accent, they want me to cook for them…an after dinner conversation about Welty, Williams, Faulkner, Wright and Grisham, some blues, jazz, gospel, R&B, country and western on the squawk box, and when I was younger, well that slow, Southern style…
josef
December 27th, 2011
4:50 pm
DUSTY
Why, ma’am, it’d be my honor and pleasure. Perhaps later we could stroll down by the levee and count the stars in your eyes under the moonlight?
Logical Dude
December 27th, 2011
4:50 pm
A dad: More fun if people know when they’re being made fun of in jest.
So, you actually are a troll?
JAY BOOKMAN
December 27th, 2011
4:51 pm
I am Jay Bookman, and I thinks blacks and jews are disgusting vile leeches. Both Granny Godzilla and I believe that homos should be shot.
I am making these statements in my name and therefore this must mean I have written them, and any attempt to disavow them by me in the future is meaningless because as long as they are written in my name, these statements will tarnish me forever just like Ron Paul. I don’t need any facts.
I’d also like to say that I hate arabs and think we should bomb them all and keep them detained. Praise Obama for continuing my glorious liberal crusade!!
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
4:52 pm
umm… sjosephm…. I am sure that given your “in the know” status and that you represent “everyone except the ignorantc, completely gullible and those looking for something negative” that you can address intelligently with supporting links the prior statements of Ron Paul regarding his racist newsletters and address the inconsistencies…..right?
Here you go…… we’ll expect a cogent response. http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/12/27/395391/fact-check-ron-paul-personally-defended-racist-newsletters
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
4:54 pm
Well, good gracious, I don’t even know what “a dad” is here for. OH, the mysteries of life! And Madame La Rosa de Teacup is not available. What to do?
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
4:54 pm
Fake Jay…. when you get the AJC to publish your “statements” as one of Jay’s articles, come back and tell us. You do understand the distinction right?
Jackie Goldberg
December 27th, 2011
4:57 pm
Here is the UnCut Cnn interview with Gloria Borger (who’s husband works as a lobbyist for the MIC) and Ron Paul.
Why didn’t they show the whole thing?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLonnC_ZWQ0
Logical Dude
December 27th, 2011
5:00 pm
Jackie: Why didn’t they show the whole thing?
Well, you know they must have had to edit it for time. Yeah, edit for time! That’s the ticket!
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
5:03 pm
Oh Josef, my heart is aflutter (but let’s skip the levee as I don’t swim). I have almost crushed my fan in pure delight! Grandma Sophie is delighted too. She always accompanies me when meeting a gentleman. As soon as she gets her teeth in, we will be along.
A dad
December 27th, 2011
5:03 pm
Josef – will respond to you since you’re responding in kind. Yes, I’ve been to Naw’lens, Savannah and San Antonio (although I characterize the latter as Western, not Southern, as would the folks I knew in San Antonio). I’ve also lived in Seattle, NYC, SF, Miami and Pittsburgh as well as England, Iceland, Germany, Japan, and a very brief sojurn in Taiwan, so I’d like to think I have a fairly wide background of experience on which to base my comments and baits.
My “dig” was just another attempt to bait certain folks who, as I see after that post, can’t hep themselves but to keep on posting and posting, I guess to try and get the last word. Not my proudest day, but having read this blog for a while, it’s what I’ve come (sadly) to expect from folks on this and Wingfield’s blog so I decided for the first time to engage in same and see where it led. Needless to say I wasn’t (but really was) disappointed. Lots of bs and nonsense back and forth. Simply stated, just tired of seeing a lot of regurgitating news stories, etc., and was hoping to get people to start looking around for themselves. The fact that didn’t happen proves my point (at least in my mind), i.e., we are hosed as a country.
Logical, have seen you on this blog before, so don’t tell me you haven’t seen the sort of idiotic back and forth I was dictating. No, am not a troll. More like an uruk-hai….
Tomorrow’s another day. Maybe Obama will gain another percentage point of approval (for now) so Bookie can write how November will be a landslide. Now play nice everyone….
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
5:06 pm
What? We have a fake Jay Bookman here? Isn’t one more than enough? Mercy, please!
Logical Dude
December 27th, 2011
5:06 pm
A dad: Logical, have seen you on this blog before, so don’t tell me you haven’t seen the sort of idiotic back and forth I was dictating.
Oh, I have seen plenty of it. It was more of a comment on someone coming on the blog and trying to stir things up rather than actually engage in useful discussion.
Uruk-hai may be a better fit for you, yes.
josef
December 27th, 2011
5:09 pm
Tallula aka Dusty
Why, of course Miz Sophie should accompany us. I wouldn’t think of our first meeting going unchaperoned. Will she be making her etoufee? Ask her which wine I should bring.
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
5:13 pm
Hey, I got some Sunset HAIKU perfume for Christmas. Is that the same as Uruk-hai?
I like mine and it is one sweet smell!.
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
December 27th, 2011
5:13 pm
Well, another day, another dollar. I’ll just jump in here and say us Republicans can’t see a way out of this mess without making about 40% of the people in this country dirt-poor. That’s the way us Middle Class people and the 1% can stay that way. Let these leeches get out on the street & beg for a living. I say we put the old geezers back to work and put Those People and the Welfare Moms in poor houses. I know we borrowed and spent the geezers SS money, but it’s gone now and we can’t get it back. So we need to Welch on our debt and cut the heck out of the budget. The commies got the bomb so they need to be paid. All the geezers got is maybe a wheelchair and a cane. We can take those away from them soon enough.
Have a good night everybody.
josef
December 27th, 2011
5:16 pm
a dad
My San Antonio folks would disagree…strongly! Though they will tell you they are Texians first. I will avoid my own curriculum vitae of places been and things I’ve done…modesty being a Southern virtue (heh, heh, even I wouldn’t go that far!). But I’ve been to and spent time in all those places you mention save Taiwan and Japan, plus a few others. Which is to say, you don’t want to go uppity with me!
AmVet
December 27th, 2011
5:16 pm
I don’t think Ron Paul is particularly bigoted or racist.
Gawd knows he doesn’t hold a candle to the current governor of Georgia…
A dad
December 27th, 2011
5:17 pm
Logical – my efforts were my attempt to demonstrate how ludicrous discussion has gotten. A lot of what is on these blogs is nothing more than stirring things up. I for one began reading these blogs, naively perhaps, in the hope of being expoused to deffernt point of view, pointed to articles and links, etc. dealing with honest facts and not just regurgitated hype, but have for the most part been disappointed. The good hthing is, from now on, I won’t stoop anymore. I’ll do my best to include citations, back up statements etc. with real facts, and try to encourage what I began reading blogs for. Honest discourse is best. It’s how we learn, grow, survive. Perhaps I have raised myself above uruk-hai. Later LD..
Logical Dude
December 27th, 2011
5:21 pm
A dad, yep, it’s good to get a feel for the blog. Most of us who are middle of the road find it amusing how each side can be so blinded by their side that they can’t see the middle, or see the middle as “not as extreme, but still out there” compared to whichever side they are on.
josef
December 27th, 2011
5:21 pm
ZamVet
Oy! We’ve now reached the point of who’s the “less” racist and bigoted…
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
5:23 pm
Ah Josef, kind gentleman,
Miz Sophie sends her sincerest apology but she has no etoufee at the moment. Only hog jowl which would hardly suffice the taste of a culinary genius such as yourself..
We do hope you will not be offended in any way at our inability to please. Would you mind bringing that vino of the Gods, Manischevitz (the big bottle)?. That too makes my heart aflutter!
AmVet
December 27th, 2011
5:24 pm
Of course, josef.
Unless you really do contend that none of us are.
Or is it only Abraham Lincoln who matters? (grin)
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 27th, 2011
5:25 pm
The rest that are running make Paul and Romney almost normal
Steve - USA
December 27th, 2011
5:25 pm
A dad,
You were right the first time. They don’t want discourse, they want to tell their little jokes and then pat themselves on the back. I suspect some of them work for the same man.
I will make this request one more time. Jay – please post a list of posters by name along with their IP address and how many times they have posted in the last 100 days.
josef
December 27th, 2011
5:29 pm
DUSTY
Speaking of hawg jowl…got yours yet for Sunday? Neighborhood Publix has finally caught on. Got a half a bag of black eyed peas left over from Rosh Hoshana. There were some nice looking mustard greens at the store. Gotta get the stuff together to make the crepes…no Mansischewitz! Either a Bikaver or our traditional Chateau Cadillac…a jug of Pissonya for New Year’s Eve….
Jay
December 27th, 2011
5:30 pm
Steve, I will never post IP addresses of posters here.
And with rare exceptions, no regular poster here posts under any name except his or her own. Even the rare exceptions do it only to assume some other persona, as in Redneck Convert. Sorry to disappoint.
Bryan Black
December 27th, 2011
5:30 pm
Ron Paul is not coming to Mainstream. Americans are running to Ron Paul! He is the only candidate with principle and a sound economic plan. The Federal Government is now ‘To Big to Fail’ and Americans need to take it down. Return the power back to the states. Get the power away from the crony capitalist in Washington. Support our troops. Bring them home! Vote Ron Paul!
granny godzilla
December 27th, 2011
5:31 pm
a dad
oh you weren’t completely unable to back up your data…you was just funnin’ me?
well, now we know you can’t back up your diatribes or successfully deliver a punch line.
it’s never too late for vo-tech.
all snarc aside, i’ll pay special attention to your efforts to provide data.
A dad
December 27th, 2011
5:32 pm
Josef – shame on you, sir. Don’t you know you should offer the lady a nice jug of MD 20/20. Or the way you two are flirting back and forth, perhaps a bottle of Boone’s Farm Strawberry Hill might even be in order. Then again, you don’t want to spoil her right off the bat.
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
5:33 pm
Oh bother, that phony REDNECK who doesn’t know a trailer from a box car. I hope a coyote shows up in his backyard (and bites him. Then the coyote would need “shots”.)
And there’s AMVET still protesting over at Bong Doys & Tacos on Buford Highway. AmVet is hard to please and tells the biggest lies ever heard at the VA hospital. The governor of Georgia can’t tell a lie as big as AmVet. He wouldn’t even try. Too honest.
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
December 27th, 2011
5:33 pm
Jay – please post a list of posters by name along with their IP address and how many times they have posted in the last 100 days.
Whoa! Hold on there! I don’t want a bunch of riff-raff looking up my address here at Simpsons Trailer Park. Especially the radical libruls. Most of us here got standards. We don’t let insurance or used car salesmen in and it’s for danged sure we don’t want a bunch of wild-eyed hippies showing up here.
josef
December 27th, 2011
5:34 pm
Steve
Has it dawned on you yet what “An Atlanta blog with a little bit of opinion about a whole lot of things” means? It’s the cyber front porch…come on in and sit a spell, take a load off…pick a fight..make a joke…discuss the great issues of the day…don’t be a tight a33…
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
5:36 pm
A DAD
Sir, you are no gentleman… even if you still have all your teeth. There’s no doubt about it!
josef
December 27th, 2011
5:40 pm
Dad
Just so I’m on board correctly…are you new herebouts?
I assure you, you don’t wamt me and Dusty to take the gloves off with each other! We’re much nicer when we’re flirting…
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 27th, 2011
5:41 pm
You don’t have to be a gentleman to be a dad
AmVet
December 27th, 2011
5:41 pm
“An Atlanta blog with a little bit of opinion about a whole lot of things”.
The depth and variety of discourse here is what separates it from the others. At least in my very limited experience checking out he other AJC blogs.
And why Jay gets more posts from more people than all of them combined. (I suppose.)
Even the miscreants from Tucker’s old forum and Wingfield’s drop in here from time to time with some nugget of wisdom.
Who, like a bad case of blogging herpes, go away, but then come back…
A dad
December 27th, 2011
5:42 pm
M’lady Dusty – who accuses me of having all mah teeth…. Them’s fightin words round these parts. I just knows how to pleze wommin is all.
Now if I were to bring the wine, perhaps a nice 86′ Chateau Mouton Rothschild would be in order. Or perhaps a 79′ Chateau Y’quem or 85′ Petrus is more to your liking.
josef
December 27th, 2011
5:43 pm
AmVet
Where IS who? I’m feeling so neglected.
sovereign
December 27th, 2011
5:44 pm
All you need to know about Ron Paul’s racist newsletters: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KBaMYP6DaI
A dad
December 27th, 2011
5:45 pm
Josef. Oh. I thought youse and Dusty was into each other. Guess now I’m the one being funned and all….
And yes, I’m fairly new to blogging.
Common Sense – all too true. The world wouldbe a much better place if it weren’t though.
josef
December 27th, 2011
5:46 pm
A Dad
Not so sure about that Rothschild…here on the Rothschild plantation it’s sort of, well, unassuming…
And DUSTY
Those are his teeth, he paid good money for them!
squidsarepretty
December 27th, 2011
5:47 pm
“The newsletters were long been known, but have become more relevant as Paul attempts to break out of his cult-figure niche into the mainstream. Paul himself claims that he didn’t write the pieces published under his name, which a., I find difficult to believe and b., doesn’t matter even if it’s true. If you allow such pieces to be published under your name, for your own personal profit, they become your responsibility.”
Translation: As Ron Paul becomes less ignorable because of his rising poll figures, we have to try to bring him down with smear tactics. We, the corporate-owned media, are rarely concerned with “expos[ing]” real racism. Rather than discuss his beliefs on how the war on drugs affects minorities, we will focus on a newsletter that expresses views about MLK and MLK Day that directly contradict Ron Paul’s voting record.
ArtusRegister
December 27th, 2011
5:49 pm
It’s difficult to determine which it more sad and vomit-inducing: the morons why write this lie-filled trash and insist upon the relevance of ancient, settled “news,” or the sheeple who can’t wait to digest it, expel it and share it, fresh with their own stench of blatant dishonesty.
The “interview” was over—as is clear to anyone who watched the whole thing (as opposed to the original, heavily edited version)—when the “interviewer” asked the same damn question five or six times hoping for a different answer than she had been given over and over. She was clearly not interested in continuing the conversation, but rather badgering the candidate. How many times do you people think a person should have to answer a question?
This angry black man has it right: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1uc7×4a8SM&feature=related
josef
December 27th, 2011
5:49 pm
A DAD
Well, welcome aboard and don’t make yourself scarce. We’re an ornery lot, but all in all, a pretty open minded and democratic (lower case D!!!) bunch…after a while, you’ll catch some of our back and forth picks and digs which, like any “family” go back a long, long way. Honestly, though, welcome. We always need some fresh meat!
A dad
December 27th, 2011
5:51 pm
Josef – I shall endeavor to be prime rib then. Still, I’d like a better come back than “hoot.” I mean really now, who says hoot in this day and age.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
5:51 pm
…we have to try to bring him down with smear tactics. We, the corporate-owned media…
Yep, a familiar tactic. A “new” poster, the same tired ol’ “blame the media” card.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
5:52 pm
So for some this would be their first foray into the political blogging….
A dad
December 27th, 2011
5:53 pm
And by way of admission and as a show of good faith, yes, I did pay for my teeth. Had them knocked out playing HS football many moons ago. Trainer shot my lips and gums up with lidocaine and the coach sent me back in the game, blood and all.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
5:55 pm
Yes Fake Jay, we all realized that you are moronic enough to claim you are someone else, to miss the differences in your claim and to be clueless that Jay’s posts have a different color to them so that they can be distinguished from the fakes like you.
But on the moron scale, your posts did achieve an almost perfect 10.
josef
December 27th, 2011
5:58 pm
DAD
One word of advice…the smiley emoticom gets you off the hook a lot of the time…and it drives @@ mad! Prime rib? Nyanh…give me some alligator tail!
good fight
Yeah, I’m going to have to back off and be nice until he gets more accustomed…
redneckbluedog
December 27th, 2011
5:59 pm
steve tuggle
December 27th, 2011
9:33 am
———————————–
Steve Tuggle…!?!? I used to know a boy up in Tennessee named Steve Tuggle…He was on pills real bad…Didn’t know how to vote, either….Of course, nobody up in Tennessee knows how to vote, pills or no pills….
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
5:59 pm
A DAD
Sir, I do not encourage one who is not a gentleman to throw rose petals into the wind.
Any further supplications will cause a glove to be throw into the fight. Button your boisterous lip, sir! With kindest and compassionate regard, au revoir!
josef
December 27th, 2011
6:01 pm
josef Your comment is awaiting moderation.
December 27th, 2011
5:58 pm
DAD
One word of advice…the smiley emoticom gets you off the hook a lot of the time…and it drives @@ mad! Prime rib? Nyanh…give me some alligator t*il!
good fight
Yeah, I’m going to have to back off and be nice until he gets more accustomed…
****
Was that it?
Imam Torquemada…was gibt’s hier….
josef
December 27th, 2011
6:03 pm
OKAY, IMAM
Release me and let me go…
DAD
Another word of advice…we have this Blue Nosed B*tch moderator who gets in a dither for unknown reasons…so when you get thrown in moderation, don’t take it TOO personally….
Got one there now myself….
redneckbluedog
December 27th, 2011
6:03 pm
TOP ISSUES FOR 2012:
1. Obama will win in a landslide…Trump or no Trump…The economy should improve…
2. American Healthcare Act….I would rather deal with the blowback of approval rather than a rejection…
3. MOST IMPORTANTLY…Why do banks and oil companies HATE regulations? Do they not offer products that people want? Is this all that is left for business strategies? As a small businessman, I enjoy obeying the law and see opportunities in every regulation…Regulations drive innovation…
josef
December 27th, 2011
6:06 pm
redneckbluedog
What you got against Tennessee?
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
6:06 pm
Josef,
I don’t really care for hog jowl. Blackeyed peas are OK but nothing more. Guess I am going to have bad luck all year,
I am going to make split pea soup with the left over Christmas ham hock. That’s a favorite around here. Never had it at home but learned to like it later.
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
6:07 pm
Well, I leave the blog for a few hours and Dusty and josef are nigh on to gettin’ married. Raving lunatics are swarming over the blog spouting semi-literate hogwash. (You might try that spellcheck once in a while.) And, Redneck Convert’s warning people to stay clear of his trailer. Don’t he’s gonna let you have it with his AK-47 that he only uses for hunting. Can you believe it!?
A dad
December 27th, 2011
6:10 pm
You know what really amazes me sometimes? it’s how far afield discussion gets from the topic of the blog. I mean, WTFO?
Dusty dearest, I neither throw rose petals nor pearls before swine. Besides, I know you’re related to Granny G and that your family tree don’t fork. A reservoir to you as well….
josef
December 27th, 2011
6:12 pm
DUSTY
You know me, arch traditionalist, so I do eat the hawg jowl. Much the same with black eyed peas. I have them at Rosh Hoshana and New Year’s day…greens? You betcha…
Remind me this spring and I’ll give you my Mama’s recipe for polk salad quiche…
Jackie Goldbert
December 27th, 2011
6:14 pm
redneckbluedog said:”2. American Healthcare Act….I would rather deal with the blowback of approval rather than a rejection…”
It wasn’t a “healthcare” act, it was a right wing health insurance ripoff and enslavement act. Obama was so good at his grinning and bs that he managed to get a bunch of “democrats” to support a right wing giveaway to insurance companies. Then, this “constitutional scholar” told us it was like auto insurance.
Proving that most people will believe anything.
Of course, little Obama sycophants will be shocked and dumbfounded when a republican administration uses the commerce clause to require you to purchase something their lobbyists cook up.
Frankly, Americans deserve to be ordered around.
josef
December 27th, 2011
6:15 pm
DAD
This is the South, Son. An unforked family tree is a sign you’re ancestrally Uppity!
But as far as going afield….that’s one of the joys of this blog…no telling what you might find out…
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
6:16 pm
Jay, I done figured it out! What’s happening is that — due to cutbacks — they’re giving the inmates at the state’s asylums laptops and encouraging them to blog on your blog!
Think of how much they’re saving on Thorzine and some of these other expensive drugs. EXPRESS YOURSELF! Dump it all out over there at Bookman’s blog. What better therapy is there?
Oh, occasionally, there’s an escapee who blogs after hours but mainly they cut ‘em all off before dinner time. I just can’t wait to see who shows up tomorrow!
Amfortas
December 27th, 2011
6:16 pm
I know Jackie, it was so right-wing that the republicans opposed it.
Amfortas
December 27th, 2011
6:18 pm
Someone has a different opinion than Soothsayer, they must be insane!
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
6:19 pm
And yet Fake Jay, given a chance in 1996 to deny he wrote those newsletters or approved newsletters sent out under his name at his direction, he failed to do so and merely said that he was quoted out of context. In other words, in 1996, he effectivly said the words were his or reflected his beliefs.
Don’t get me wrong, I think you have proven your inability to tell the truth about anything….. but you are welcome to continue down the path of ignorant support. You have yet to address the 1996 issues for your racist.
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
6:20 pm
Opinions welcome. Semi-legible thought droppings are not.
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
6:21 pm
Little Davy Crybaby: “I know you’re here — I can hear you breathing.” You better run off and hide now while you still can!
Dusty
December 27th, 2011
6:22 pm
Well, I clutch my pearls over A DAD and his swine. Ah, nevermind, a football player and we all know what happens with those head bumps and cracks. We must be kind.
But, dinner calls. That is, the Christmas turkey has yet to see his last days. The dressing is getting a bit sluggish but the gravy brings it about. So , later, alligator. Stay out of the swamp.
josef
December 27th, 2011
6:30 pm
DUSTY
Bon appétit ma ‘tite chère amie! Vais-je vous voir demain?
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
6:30 pm
No, Jay’s blog has turned from being some kind of real discussion of the issues into an ersatz mental health exhibit. Where one’s psychoses are on display for the entire World to view. Delusions, mania, grandeur, infallibility, you name it!
If you’re nutty, it’s Jay’s blog for you! No extreme is too extreme! I’m never gettin’ out, but I sure can post on this here blog.
Jay
December 27th, 2011
6:36 pm
I see the Paulites have given me a teaching opportunity here. See, when you discover that people are posting bogus stuff under your name, you intervene and stop them.
You don’t allow them to continue publishing vile things under your name, on a publication that you own, year after year after year, because otherwise ….
josef
December 27th, 2011
6:37 pm
IMAM
Thanks! Wonder what it was?
DAD
My 6:01 has been released…
josef
December 27th, 2011
6:40 pm
FAKE JAY
Otherwise you get fatwahed!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDT7GP9l1-I&feature=related
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
6:42 pm
By the way, none of my earlier statements pertain to any of the “regulars” on this blog. Please don’t take offense. I think all of you know who I mean.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
6:47 pm
I bet Fake Jay still does not comprehend the nuances
josef
December 27th, 2011
6:49 pm
good fight
Nuances? Is that when you take your clothes off to conjure the spirit world?
Tom Middleton
December 27th, 2011
6:51 pm
When we have a political party that works for the wealthy few alone, Jay, yet can’t get elected without a majority vote, there’s going to be a lot of deceit built into their political rhetoric, and it just goes with the territory.
And given the fact that all three of the opposition candidates you mentioned, including Mitt Rhomney, are verifiably notorious for not telling us the consistent truth about anything, then we know why President Obama is rising in the polls.
The more we can see what the Republican candidates are really all about as they try to tear down this president, the more we can see he’s the realist in the race.
We had eight full years of stick-to-principles Republican politics that collapsed our economy and put us into this mess. And with no admission of responsibility or guilt in anything they did, or heart-felt willingness to help us get ourselves out, I think it’s safe to say that they won’t be telling us the real truth anytime soon, and may not even know what it is anymore!
BADA BING
December 27th, 2011
6:54 pm
CNN Headline
Gun sales set record in December, which broke the previous record just set in November.
I guess we will have plenty of shovel-ready jobs in the New Year!
josef
December 27th, 2011
6:57 pm
BADA
Now thass jus’ baaad…!!!
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
6:58 pm
josef, I really try to avoid imagining any of the posters unclothed (well at least the males
) …. but to be clear… “nuances” are not “nude arses”
BADA BING
December 27th, 2011
6:59 pm
Shoe fans……bought a $79 pair of Sketchers online for $29. No bail needed, no shooting, no broken glass, no fighting.
BADA BING
December 27th, 2011
7:01 pm
Politicians’ and Congress’ approval ratings going down, and gun sales going up. Any correlation? Discuss in small groups.
josef
December 27th, 2011
7:05 pm
good fight
Not so sure about the female ones…DDR excluded…
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
7:20 pm
You think you got it bad! Sheesh!
0311/1811
December 27th, 2011
7:21 pm
Headline: “No troop parade imminent as Iraq war ends”
WASHINGTON — “Americans probably won’t be seeing a huge ticker-tape parade anytime soon for troops returning from Iraq, and it’s not clear if veterans of the nine-year campaign will ever enjoy the grand, flag-waving, red-white-and-blue homecoming that the nation’s fighting men and women received after World War II and the Gulf War.
With tens of thousands of U.S. troops still fighting a bloody war in Afghanistan, anything that looks like a big victory celebration could be seen as unseemly and premature, some say.”
As a Vietnam Veteran I am not surprised. I mean, we didn’t celebrate “Victory in Europe Day” because at that time we thought we had a couple of more years to fight Japan ………… right?
Pathetic !
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
7:22 pm
If it ain’t right, you got to return it for a refund!
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
7:24 pm
josef, you are suggesting that the righty females posting here do not look like the female talking heads on Fox? As for the center and left females, I am certain they all bear a striking resemblence to, oh say, one of the hosts of the Today show right?
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
7:24 pm
Well, this explains everything!
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
7:25 pm
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
6:58 pm
“josef, I really try to avoid imagining any of the posters unclothed (well at least the males”
That’s pretty funny coming from the poster obsessed with fantasizing about me in speedos.
TaxPayer
December 27th, 2011
7:25 pm
Bada Bing,
It’s all done with the backhoes nowadays.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
7:26 pm
Okay, for Scout’s sake, how about we save a little cash. We can combine the Gay Pride Parade with one for “Mission Accomplished”
BADA BING
December 27th, 2011
7:28 pm
taxpayer…..What kind of hos? Careful!!
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
7:31 pm
thelma, as much as you want to imagine someone fantasizing about you in speedos, laughter and derision should not be confused with your fantasizing wishes, speedo boy (ala George “the water is cold” Kanstanza). But if you wish fantasies, perhaps you can send your photo in for the parade. Be warned in advance, even they have standards.
josef
December 27th, 2011
7:32 pm
good fight
With the exception of DDR I think most of them all look more like Moms Mabley.or Aunt Esther!
Well, why not? The repeal of DADT is one of the few unquestioned victories to come out of this mess…
Thulsa…
Somehow I just don’t see you as my Romany Prince… he’d be a hard act for anybody to follow, though…
TaxPayer
December 27th, 2011
7:33 pm
taxpayer…..What kind of hos? Careful!!
Depends on the occassion. This time of year usually calls for the HoHoHoes.
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
7:37 pm
We seem to have forgotten the essential elements of the Reagan Administration’s success: a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States’ global responsibilities.
Of course, the United States must be prudent in how it exercises its power. But we cannot safely avoid the responsibilities of global leadership or the costs that are associated with its exercise. America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire. The history of this century should have taught us to embrace the cause of American leadership.
Our aim is to remind Americans of these lessons and to draw their consequences for today. Here are four consequences:
• we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global
responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future;
• we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values;
• we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad;
• we need to accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.
Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next.
Elliott Abrams Gary Bauer William J. Bennett Jeb Bush
Dick Cheney Eliot A. Cohen Midge Decter Paula Dobriansky Steve Forbes
Aaron Friedberg Francis Fukuyama Frank Gaffney Fred C. Ikle
Donald Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad I. Lewis Libby Norman Podhoretz
Dan Quayle Peter W. Rodman Stephen P. Rosen Henry S. Rowen
Donald Rumsfeld Vin Weber George Weigel Paul Wolfowitz
Project for a New American Century mission statement 1997. It all seemed so acheivable back then. Before we were poor.
josef
December 27th, 2011
7:47 pm
Somebody say something provocative.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
7:48 pm
Somebody say something provocative.
Abortion.
josef
December 27th, 2011
7:51 pm
K’chak
Okay. Breeders is messy!
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
December 27th, 2011
7:53 pm
Project for a New American Century mission statement 1997. It all seemed so acheivable back then. Before we were poor.
Well, I don’t want to get picky here, but wasn’t just about all them signers a draft-dodger, except for Rumsfeld?
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
7:57 pm
Breeders is messy!
That’s what yor mama said!
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
7:58 pm
Former “Saturday Night Live” actress Victoria Jackson, working on confidential information she as a web talk show host has special clearance to obtain, has claimed that the United States is being overtaken by radical Muslims bent on bringing the nation under Sharia law.
“I just went to a briefing in Washington DC, across the street from the Capitol, at the Longworth building at 8:30 am two days ago and it changed my life,” Jackson said last week on her web show, “Politichicks.” “For six hours, I saw pictures and names and dates and facts and Islamic law books and Korans, Surahs for six hours and they proved to me… that the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated our highest positions in government and this is serious.”
Sooth will soon be sending another welcome new blogger package to Victoria!
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
December 27th, 2011
7:58 pm
Funeral for N. Korean ‘dear leader’ set for Wednesday. CNN.com
I sure wish the Rev. Rex Humbard was still alive. He’d do a bang-up job sending that little guy with a bad haircut to his Eternal Reward, just like he did for Elvis.
0311/1811
December 27th, 2011
7:59 pm
From the “state of the flakes” …………….
Headline NBC: “Adult Film Condom Proposal Qualifies for June Ballot”
“A proposal that would require adult film actors to use condoms has qualified for the June ballot after proponents gathered enough signatures to put the issue before Los Angeles voters.
The Adult Film Workplace Condom Initiative would condition adult film permits on the production company’s agreement to use condoms on the film set. Under the proposal, fees may be charged to “provide for inspectors to ensure compliance with conditions on film permits.”
http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/politics/Adult-Film-Porn-Sets-Condom-Ballot-Measure-136259473.html?dr
Now “that’s” a government job for you ………… “Porn Movie Condom Inspector” !
I wonder what the educational and experience requirements would be?
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
8:00 pm
Breeders is messy!
That club is not exclusive to breeders.
josef
December 27th, 2011
8:04 pm
good fight
She oughta know…bred nine!
Provocative…? Muslim abortionists?
Mama Says
December 27th, 2011
8:06 pm
Lets cover some things here folks.
In this day and age we all demand plan talk from our elected officials. Why then do we blast them when they do ? While we insist on skirting the issues.
First thing- Paul’s affiliation with “racist view points”. In any honest Evaluation of race relations today we need to admit the feelings on both sides of the equation. Blacks were and in some cases still are victims of racist treatment and bias and as a result are correct to be leery of the white race in general. The white race however is not dominated by a racist agenda and those of us who really try to be cognizant of our actions are becoming increasingly tired of the race card. The very allegation disarms everyone of the facts and prevents the white person from being treated fairly, in that circumstance. If truth and fairness are really our goal we should remember that that is the goal and not relegate individuals into an unfair fictional truth. The fact that racial politics is one way to gain advantage over another is contributing to and influencing the common people. Today you can be 100 percent sure that someone you know will experience the negative side effects of that game. Whites increasingly look at the cry of racism as an excuse and blacks hear the cry and almost automatically side with the person that they look like, regardless of truth.
To argue or even believe that there could be a race war is but one more example of the heightened sensitivity to race in this country. It is not an indictment of racism itself. I am sure that blacks see the potential just as well as whites, albeit from a different perspective but then again the same conclusion. We live in a country in which 53 percent of white voters voted for a black man yet we are constantly reminded of what the whites have done throughout history. While it doesn’t compare to the harsh reality of slavery the analogy is comparable to a married couple dealing with adultery. The wrongful partner understands their sin but the marriage will not work if the victim continually reminds him of his ills and misdeeds. Resentment will eventually take over and he will get tired of being called an unfaithful partner who despite his attempts to right the wrong is continually accused.
I am not a Paul supporter but calling it as u see it does not make you a racist. No more than calling a thief a thief means you steal.
Our responsibility is to take the issue as it is and fix it. We fix it by talking honestly about it not by acting like it isn’t there. We could start that conversation by being adult enough to actually say the “n” word in that conversation and talking about its meaning, origin and it’ use in the BLACK community as well as in the white. We could teach that it is demeaning to anyone who is called that by ANYONE who calls it. Let’s be honest about race, it will not be pleasant for either side but let’s do it. Then we can condemn the circuitous way we avoid the problem by blaming others for what they say, not what they do. Let’s live in the real world, where a white man is just as likely to be harmed in the projects as a black man is in the gated community. A world where we have been taught our place, rich or poor black or white.
Then we can place our votes based on 20 year old news letters.
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
December 27th, 2011
8:08 pm
I wonder what the educational and experience requirements would be?
Don’t matter. I expect that guy that uses the cucumber in the demo for school kids is a lock for that job.
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
8:08 pm
Scout: I don’t think they make condoms that big! Some of those guys have to keep it on a reel!
josef
December 27th, 2011
8:10 pm
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
8:00 pm
Breeders is messy!
“That club is not exclusive to breeders”
*****
Well, true, if you’re doing it right!
****
Scout
Actually saw a show one night interviewing a woman whose job was condom inspector…on the assembly line!
josef
December 27th, 2011
8:12 pm
MAMA
So…racism is black-white, eh? Okay, whatever….
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
8:13 pm
Not that I actually watched no porno films or nothing! Heck, anytime I feel the need to feel inferior, I always like to watch a good porno film!
josef
December 27th, 2011
8:16 pm
Sooth
An old queen friend, “what you gonna do with it? Paint a face on it and kiss it good night? Throw it over your shoulder and burp it?”
Mama Says
December 27th, 2011
8:18 pm
Josef,
Instead of putting words in my mouth try dealing with the facts. If you are black you just exhibited your racist point of view by saying racisim can just be one way. If you are white I am sure you feel comfortable walking through the projects tonite in Atlanta, by yourself.
0311/1811
December 27th, 2011
8:19 pm
josef:
Google “deoderant inspector” !
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
8:19 pm
Ahh, the white victim card….. played frequently here. I think there is a swimming pool in PA for the victims.
While it doesn’t compare to the harsh reality of slavery the analogy is comparable to a married couple dealing with adultery. The wrongful partner understands their sin but the marriage will not work if the victim continually reminds him of his ills and misdeeds
Especially if that poor partner (strange you assume its a Him) who strayed continues their ills and misdeeds or it the impact of those ills and misdeeds remain….
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
8:20 pm
“Honey! did you see the size of that thing?”
“Yeah, I got eyes don’t I?”
“That kinda looks like mine, don’t ya think?”
(Yeah, in your dreams!)
“Sure, darling!”
0311/1811
December 27th, 2011
8:21 pm
DETROIT — “Heading down a path that could lead to the state of Michigan taking over the running of Detroit, Gov. Rick Snyder on Tuesday appointed a team to review the city’s finances.”
A once great American city.
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
8:22 pm
Scout: median home price in Detroit, $6,000.00.
0311/1811
December 27th, 2011
8:23 pm
“Al-Qaeda in Iraq says it was behind Baghdad blasts ………….. ”
No ……………………… you’re kidding.
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
8:23 pm
It’s all them damned unions and community organizers!
0311/1811
December 27th, 2011
8:23 pm
Sooth:
Yep.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
8:24 pm
Especially if that poor partner (strange you assume its a Him) who strayed continues their ills and misdeeds or it the impact of those ills and misdeeds remain….
It will always be a matter of trust.
josef
December 27th, 2011
8:24 pm
MAMA
What I am saying is what I say anytime the subject of racism comes up, so long as we remain mired in the black-white paradigm, all we’re doing is spinning our wheels and getting no where. I am saying that black and white alike can be and are just as racist against brown, red and yellow…we need to break free of that. Would it make you feel more at ease did I say white-black instead of black-white?
Would I feel comfortable walking through the projects. Not really. Nor would I not be looking over my shoulder here in Buckhead…
I am just saying to broaden your perspective on racism and try and see it as something other than black-white/white-black…
gm
December 27th, 2011
8:25 pm
Hey Mitt, when are you going to release your tax returns? so the middle class can see the millions you are still making off their backs, and when are you going to tell America about the compainies you ran out of business and thousands you have laid off.
Wow, a man thats worth over 240 million really cares about some of the Georgians living in trailers in rual areas”””’
Thank President Obama for bringing our troops home for holidays and fighting for middle class””
Mama Says
December 27th, 2011
8:26 pm
Good fight are really so blind that u cannot see you just placed me in a general category because I am white I therefore can never be done wrong. In other words the facts that I struggle to pay my bills, grew up on the wrong side of the tracks in a rat infested cinder block house with little heat and no air conditioning was a benefit of my white race.
Got it now I by virtue of your general beliefs concerning one race would never be prejudged because of my race would I
Real Scootter
December 27th, 2011
8:27 pm
well,my poker game got cancelled tonight so I thought I might drop in to see what was going on here and see that I can play the race card game instead.
gm
December 27th, 2011
8:28 pm
Thanks President Obama for bringing our troops home for holidays and fighting for middle class””
Sean
December 27th, 2011
8:29 pm
How many of you Ron Paul bashers have even read his newsletters in question? Those statements are skewed…if you actually read what the newsletters say you’ll see that there are NO racist statements.
His statement on being able to recognize terrorists by their skin was actually him lamenting the fact that most people think that this is true. The MSM showed only the second half of a sentence! This is mass manipulation at it’s best
Mama Says
December 27th, 2011
8:29 pm
Sorry Josef,
U got me with the look beyond black and white logic when dealing with race. Isn’t that the very definition of racisim ?
By the way you condemned me for my post, I asked us to do exactly what you just asked for–to fix the problem
josef
December 27th, 2011
8:33 pm
Scooter
Hey, white boy! Good to see ya!
******
New reality show coming…Cajun Pawn Stars… yow!
josef
December 27th, 2011
8:35 pm
MAMA
How did I condemn you? All I wanted to know was why you’re locking it into black-white/white-black. Those among us who are neither have heard enough, already. Give somebody else the stage.
Rick
December 27th, 2011
8:35 pm
Newt is a college professor, or at least he was, right? Learning to follow instructions is a BIG part of the college learning experience, as well as learning how to “suck up” the punishment, when you have blown it. Suck it up, Newt! Man up to your mistake (miscalculations in Virginia) If you can’t do that, at least STOP the whining. You are 68, but from what we can see, you haven’t grow up yet. It is not too late, but you really have to want to change. REALLY want it?!!! Enough to change?
josef
December 27th, 2011
8:36 pm
Scout
THAT google was worth it! Thanks…
Mama Says
December 27th, 2011
8:37 pm
In many peoples eyes the only way to fix the race issue is for ALL whites to admit they are racist, apologize for their god given natural sin and give as much away as possible. While blacks, Hispanics and any other race which has been victimized by the like minded white people take that acknowledgement and revel in the fact that they were right, all whites are given a script when they are born and we all collaborate on the one goal we have in life, screwing all the brown skinned people.
Sorry, I didn’t get my manifesto when I was born, so I will never take your blame. I will be more than happy to help fix the issue if you can get off your high horse and stop acting completely innocent and pure of the blight brought upon all of us, known as eyesight and prejudice
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
8:37 pm
Mama Says, not sure what you are trying to say. Perhaps you could be clearer. I frankly don’t care who you are or where you grew up. You can keep playing the white victim card all you want. If you grew up on the “wrong side of the tracks”, then you were the victim of poverty NOT race most likely. They are and remain to different problems which have some significant overlap but you are not a WHITE VICTIM of Racism, you are a victim of poverty who happens to be white. Can there be white victims of racism, yep! Can there be other races who are victims of racism, yep! Has racism ended? No it still exists and not just in a small minority, there are remanents of slavery and racism impacts that remain today.
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
December 27th, 2011
8:40 pm
well,my poker game got cancelled tonight so I thought I might drop in to see what was going on here and see that I can play the race card game instead.
Well, get with the program then. We’re way past the race card and on You-Know-Whats and condoms! I keep telling Jim Earl and Joe Bill this is a weird blog.
Recon 0311 2533
December 27th, 2011
8:44 pm
Latest Gallup polls have Obama desurging. Approve 46% Disapprove 48%. Oh well Jay’s trying but reality keeps getting in his way.
josef
December 27th, 2011
8:45 pm
good fight
And you’re falling into the same trap, with all due respect. Move beyond it and try to see that racism is there in all of us and if blacks and whites would shut up and listen to the browns, reds, and yellows they might, just might, be able to understand that…
And MAMA
I’m the first to jump when I hear Redneck, Cracker, Trailer Trash and what have you and piss my liberal peers off a’plenty when I do…
Mama Says
December 27th, 2011
8:49 pm
Good fight,
Why can’t anything be what it simply is ?
Jay posted on Paul’s news letters and the fact that racisim is alleaged .
The fact is that Paul simply speaking on the subject, like me tonite, is being condemned as racist because of what he said. Not the facts.
You want to cloud the issue with poverty issues and the like.
The fact is any leader of the civil rights movement will tell you that racisim is the cause of the gap in monetary equality and that a disproportionate amount of poor are black. That is why it matters where I grew up and why what I grew up with.
independent thinker
December 27th, 2011
8:49 pm
Soothsayer needs to stop drinking the Kool Aide and worshipping at the revisionist history of the almighty Saint Ronnie. Our attacks under Clinton and Bush II by terrorists can be traced to two disasters under the invincible chickenhawk president (made movies and never saw combat in WW II) also known as Saint Ronnie;
1. Merely blowing up Ghadaffis tent after Libya downed a Pan Am 747 killing hundreds of Americans.
2, Turning tail and fleeing Lebannon after over 150 marines were killed by Hezbollah and
3. Condemning Israel for blowing up our ally, Sadaam Hussein’s nuclear reactor.
So this is how a president shows military strength?
Oh i forgot he invaded Grenada – a country small enough to be overrun by a few troops of boy scouts with BB guns.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
8:53 pm
Soothsayer needs to stop drinking the Kool Aide…
What a dreadful and misused cliche.
You can only “drink the kool-aid” once.
Geez….
Mama Says
December 27th, 2011
8:55 pm
The fact that I asked for dialogue and have instantly been acussed of using the white victim card is what it is. A failure to address the real issue and a means by which those who are comfortable in their world of blame can snuggle up with each other and condem us all
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
8:55 pm
[T]he global systemic crisis [i]s a phenomenon characterizing the end of the world as we know it since 1945, marking the collapse of the American pillar on which this world order has rested for nearly seven decades. Since 2006, we had identified the period 2011-2013 as that during which the “Dollar Wall” on which the power of the United States sits would fall apart. Summer 2011, with the cut in the United States’ credit rating by S & P, marked an historic turning point and confirmed that the “impossible” (27) was indeed in the process of coming true.
[T]he 2012 election year, which opens against the backdrop of economic and social depression, complete paralysis of the federal system (29), strong rejection of the traditional two-party system and a growing questioning of the relevance of the Constitution, inaugurates a crucial period in the history of the United States. Over the next four years, the country will be subjected to political, economic, financial and social upheaval such as it has not known since the end of the Civil War which, by an accident of history, started exactly 150 years ago in 1861. During this period, the US will be simultaneously insolvent and ungovernable, turning that which was the “flagship” of the world in recent decades into a “drunken boat”.
The unstoppable US economic spiral : recession/depression/inflation
In fact, the United States ends 2011 in a state of weakness unmatched since the Civil War. They practice no significant leadership at international level. The confrontation between geopolitical blocs is sharpening and they find themselves confronted by almost all the world’s major players: China, Russia, Brazil (and in general almost all of South America) and now Euroland (30). Meanwhile, they cannot control unemployment where the true rate stagnates at around 20% against the backdrop of an unabated and unprecedented reduction in the labour force (which has now fallen to its 2001 level (31)).
Real estate, the foundation of US household wealth along with the stock market, continues to see prices drop year after year despite desperate attempts by the Fed (32) to facilitate lending to the economy through its zero interest rate policy. The stock market has resumed its downward path artificially interrupted by two Quantitative Easings in 2009 and 2010. US banks, whose balance sheets are much more heavily loaded with financial derivative products than their European counterparts (33), are dangerously approaching a new series of bankruptcies of which MF Global is a but a precursor, indicating the absence of procedural controls or alarms three years after the collapse of Wall Street in 2008 (34).
Poverty is gradually increasing in the country every day, where one in six Americans now depend on food stamps (35) and one in five children has experienced periods of living on the streets (36). Public services (education, social, police, highways…) have been significantly reduced across the country to avoid city, county, or state bankruptcies. The success with which the revolt of the middle class and the young (TP and OWS) has met is explained by these objective developments. And the coming years will see these trends get worse.
SMEs [Small- & medium-sized enterprises], households, local authorities (38), public services,… have no more “padding” to soften the blow of the recession into which the country has fallen again (39). We anticipated that 2012 would see a 30% drop in the Dollar against major world currencies. In this economy, which imports the bulk of its consumer goods, this will result in a corresponding decrease in US household purchasing power against a backdrop of double-digit inflation.
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article32204.html
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
8:58 pm
The fact is any leader of the civil rights movement will tell you that racisim is the cause of the gap in monetary equality and that a disproportionate amount of poor are black.
Well if it be fact, then I am sure you can prove all of the claims in your statement. As for Paul, well I am certain that talking about how fleet of foot “they” can be is not at all racist
or perhaps an “non-racist” assumption that 95% of the black males in DC are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.
josef
December 27th, 2011
9:01 pm
Mama.et al.
Okay, dialogue on racism…what are the top ten issues today in Indian country?
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
9:03 pm
The fact that I asked for dialogue and have instantly been acussed of using the white victim card is what it is.
And it ain’t what it ain’t.
And repetition is repetition.
And tautology is saying the same thing but just using different words.
ODD OWL
December 27th, 2011
9:05 pm
The Republicans should spare themselves further embarrassment on the campaign trail and a surefire landslide defeat in the Presidential election. The Republicans should give some serious thought to not running any candidate in the Presidential election in 2012. They should allow president Barack “The Hawk” Obama to run unopposed.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
9:06 pm
“–Roubini 2012 Outlook: Nouriel Roubini says 2012 is going to be a bumpy year. “At this point, a eurozone recession is certain. While its depth and length cannot be predicted, a continued credit crunch, sovereign-debt problems, lack of competitiveness, and fiscal austerity imply a serious downturn. The US — growing at a snail’s pace since 2010 — faces considerable downside risks from the eurozone crisis. It must also contend with significant fiscal drag, ongoing deleveraging in the household sector (amid weak job creation, stagnant incomes, and persistent downward pressure on real estate and financial wealth), rising inequality, and political gridlock… Restoring robust growth is difficult enough without the ever-present specter of deleveraging and a severe shortage of policy ammunition. But that is the challenge that a fragile and unbalanced global economy faces in 2012.”
The EU and the gop are in the way of growth but we will make it past the w collapse.
Real Scootter
December 27th, 2011
9:09 pm
Cajun porn stars! You got to be kiddin, oh you said pawn,my bad
Hey Redneck,please let me know when a trailer comes up for rent in the park there but I can provide only small arms fire!
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
9:10 pm
Take a good look at this chart. In fact, save it to your favorites or bookmark it. This is an exceptional chart. Let me explain what you are looking at. The blue line is commodities (gold, silver, oil, soybeans, wheat, pork bellies, you name it.) the red line is the dollar. Notice how the two lines are almost mirror images of each other. Now look over at the far right side of the chart and tell me what you see. If you had to guess, what do you think might happen to the red line and what might happen to blue line? In fact, it’s already happening. The dollar is going down and commodities are going up.
josef
December 27th, 2011
9:10 pm
getalife
Hello, friend of the Red Man! You’ve done more than anybody else on the blog to undo the damage done to the First Nations… I hear they’re considering naming a wing of the school for you!
Mama Says
December 27th, 2011
9:10 pm
Good fight did you just ask me to prove factual what the allegations are of the civil rights leaders ?
Shouldn’t they be the ones to support their assumptions ?
As for fleet of foot, are we going back to jimmy the Greek or a conceptualized anticipation of a group who would be the enemy in a race war. I mean by definition Paul is talking about blacks since he is white, right ? Or would you like him to describe his side ( given he is white) .
If the subject is a race war I would hope the whites would be evaluated by the blacks.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
9:14 pm
Shouldn’t they be the ones to support their assumptions ?
Shouldn’t you be the one to prove they actually held those assumptions first?
josef
December 27th, 2011
9:14 pm
Scooter
Cajun porn stars? Google is your friend…
Recon 0311 2533
December 27th, 2011
9:15 pm
We can lament America’s failings and prophesize her demise but the turn around and restoration lies in ridding this nation of the far-left. The left as only a small minority has none the less been succeeding in destroying this country from within. Purging the left from society will unfortunately require the destruction of the Democratic Party that is now wholly owned by left wing radicals. Hopefully, we will see the peaceful beginning of the lefts end in the 012 national elections.
josef
December 27th, 2011
9:17 pm
Like I said, as long as it’s still mired in that paradigm, all we’re doing is spinning our wheels…and the direction this dialogue has gone is evidence thereof…
getalife
December 27th, 2011
9:17 pm
josef,
They built that school with my donations.
At least it was fun
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
9:17 pm
josef, I would suspect much is life on the reservation for those that remain. Prejudice, poverty, lack of job opportunity, education and many of the problems associated with those issues.
josef
December 27th, 2011
9:18 pm
DEL
I’m far left. How do you propose to rid America of me?
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
9:18 pm
Del: you’re exactly right! We should round them up, gas them, and burn them in ovens!
Hey! What was that feller’s name what done that before?
getalife
December 27th, 2011
9:20 pm
All this doom and gloom of the demise of our great country is way premature.
The cons say they want to undo what the Obama administration did but that will bring us back to the collapse.
When will you cons leave la la land and live in the real world?
josef
December 27th, 2011
9:20 pm
An interesting read…
1- Fatherhood
2- Children of Alcoholics (COA)
3- Community Leadership
4- Domestic Violence
5- Drugs and Inhalants
6- Youth Suicide
7- Alcoholism
8- Parenting
9- Families
10- Intergenerational Trauma
http://www.whitebison.org/magazine/2005/volume6/no10.htm
Soothsayer
December 27th, 2011
9:23 pm
“All this doom and gloom of the demise of our great country is way premature.”
The rule of being a parasite is not killing the host. Unfortunately, Wall Street and the Corporatist/Fascist ruling elite have not learned this.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
9:23 pm
Mama, again you are not being very coherent in your rant so difficult to follow your logic.
Now you made a claim that The fact is any leader of the civil rights movement will tell you that racisim is the cause of the gap in monetary equality and that a disproportionate amount of poor are black. and then you whine about being asked to prove that a leader of the civit rights movement has made that statement. Two components of your statement of “fact”…… 1. racism is THE cause of the gap in monetary [in]equaltiy. 2. a disproportionalt amount of the poor are black. As to item 1, I’ll settle for your proof that a leader of the civil rights movement actually “alleged” that racism is the cause.
Mama Says
December 27th, 2011
9:24 pm
Josef,
What was done to the native people is but the first act on a long list of injustice perpetrated by the U.S.
The problem one of reality. Historically around the world the weakest have lost. Be it on the playground or at war.
Once it is done there is little left to correct. Your people were wiped out, the blacks were brutalized, Irish were banished, Jews were targeted for extermination.
It has taken place inter race also. Light skinned blacks thought they were better than dark skinned, Cherokee was against Blackfoot.
White Germans were against white English. It is what it is.
The only way to overcome it is to teach that it is wrong. We teach by talking and saying what actually took place. Not by condemning the ancestors of those who perpetrated the deeds.
Not trying to argue just saying
Real Scootter
December 27th, 2011
9:25 pm
Dang josef,don’t make me go googling again. Whew
I learn more here than I want to learn.
josef
December 27th, 2011
9:26 pm
getalife
I know some would think I’m picking at you…but far from it. You’ve actually made the effort to know the people and to take your own just due (and I DO mean that) in bringing about that success you see every time you go there. And that it’s been fun is icing on the cake…
Recon 0311 2533
December 27th, 2011
9:27 pm
josef,
I’m not advocating getting rid of you or anyone else on a personal or collective basis, only your ideology that has been detrimental to this nation. You’re free to pursue life any way you wish you’re just not free to force your personal life beliefs on those who believe differently.
Nick UK expat in Singapore
December 27th, 2011
9:29 pm
The Day you get Ron Paul elected I will look at moving my production from Turkey to the US and emigrating myself. He has the potential to to be the greatest president of modern times. I have lived all over the world – South Africa with Mandela, Gorbachev in Russia, Thatcher in the UK, Reagan in the US, Clinton in the US (even!!). Ron Paul I hope will eclipse them all, he could be the great freedom fighter we havent had!
josef
December 27th, 2011
9:29 pm
MAMA
The Cherokee were against the Blackfoot? When, where?
That aside, you make a good point. That’s why I say, move beyond the black white/white black dichotomy…
Mama Says
December 27th, 2011
9:31 pm
Good fight,
If you cannot understand that I referenced a common allegation of the civil rights leaders as it lends itself to poverty you are living under a rock.
Turn on the Tv find Jessie or Al and wait 10 seconds they will tell you how and why blacks are poor and it will be linked to racisim—in their eyes, not mine. Your would therefore have to ask them to explain it and stop acting like I am the one who said it was fact. I referenced an allegation as it is made by black leaders, not me. How can I be expected to prove their fact ?
josef
December 27th, 2011
9:32 pm
DEL
“You’re free to pursue life any way you wish you’re just not free to force your personal life beliefs on those who believe differently”
Likewise, I’m sure.
NICK
Say what? I can see you’ve been around Earth, but what planet are you from? Ron Paul is a clear and present danger…
Mama Says
December 27th, 2011
9:35 pm
Josef,
How about Cherokee against Creek ? I don’t know. Point is it was Indian against indian
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
9:39 pm
Mama, again, if all I have to do is “wait 10 seconds”, you should have no problem in finding a “leader” making that claim. Now be a good little poster and prove your claimed “facts” or just admit you are making them up, which reflects more on you. Simple request.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
9:39 pm
If you cannot understand that I referenced a common allegation of the civil rights leaders as it lends itself to poverty you are living under a rock.
If those “allegations” are as ubiquitous as you claim, then you should have no trouble providing quotes then, huh?
josef
December 27th, 2011
9:45 pm
Mama
I couldn’t resist! Cherokee and Creek? Which faction of which?
As I said, your point is valid…and once we move beyond black and white, we move into a whole new realm of sadly unexplored territory…let’s go there…
A dad
December 27th, 2011
10:02 pm
Dad’s baaaacccckkkkkkk. Mama, I got indoctrinated earlier about how some just keep egging you on. Yes, a lot of racism in the U.S is black/white, but there is more to it than just that.
JOsef – you’re librul? Had me fooled. You was asking some intelligent questions and acting all rational and such. Does this mean Dusty is conservative? (Dang, going ot have to buy new teeth and all).
Kamchak – yo just keep watching those chippendale dancers and leave the arguing to us.
Josef – I’ve eaten gator tail. And snake, insects, mudbugs, and even dog.
josef
December 27th, 2011
10:08 pm
Dad
Good to see you back! Yeah, I’m liberal and Dusty’s conservative…we does tangle from time to time…can get plumb nasty with each other.
I’ve eaten a lot of that, too…no dog that I know of…
womanforpaul
December 27th, 2011
10:13 pm
America Needs Ron Paul.
Ron Paul has had consistent policy positions from the start. The other candidates simply say what the voters want to hear. Ron Paul warned us about the housing bubble, the debt crisis, the collapse of the US dollar, the high employment and recessions; basically, the entire collapse of our economy. He is the only candidate who can get us out of our mess.
Ron Paul is a man who defends the constitution, civil liberties, peace and prosperity. Paul has the wisdom, foresight, honesty and integrity to be president.
Mitt Romney does not where he stands on any issue; Michelle Bachmann is just very angry; Rick Perry does not know very much; John Huntsman has worked for Democrats for many years; Rick Santorum is an extremist; and Newt Gingrich is philosophically unanchored, an unstable element, whom as Peggy Noonan, former Reagan speechwriter writes is a “human hand grenade who walks around with his hand on the pin, saying, Watch this!”.
America Needs Ron Paul.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
10:13 pm
Kamchak – yo just keep watching those chippendale dancers and leave the arguing to us.
You seem to be laboring under the misapprehension that I, 1) watch men dance 2) work for you, sport.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
10:15 pm
Arguing? Merely naysaying and posting “facts” that are made up is not a substitution for argument. I’m sorry, did you sign up for the 10 minute session or the 5 minute?
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
10:19 pm
Dad,
You and I have returned just in time to see the specter of liberal ignorance raises its ugly head once again.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
10:27 pm
“Congress Really Is As Bad As You Think, Scholars Say”
http://www.npr.org/2011/12/27/144319863/congress-really-is-as-bad-as-you-think-scholars-say
Yeah con ignorance has nothing to do with it doomy.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
10:30 pm
We had a visit from the ron paul media crew.
He is a kook and will be gone after this cycle.
The man wears a permanent tin foil hat.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
10:32 pm
Well I for one agree with Thelma….. the Spectre of his ignorance of liberals is confirmed whenever he raises his ugly head.
josef
December 27th, 2011
10:32 pm
Getalife
He’s bat shyt crazy…
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
10:34 pm
“Gallup has confirmed what earlier polls have reported as well — President Obama is having a good holiday season. His job-approval rating of 47 percent is now higher than his disapproval rating of 45 percent”
Speaking of approval ratings I do seem to remember Obama’s high approval ratings after UBL. A month later his approval ratings were back to their usual dismal numbers. I suspect folks are feeling charitable towards him round Christmas time. Lets see what his poll numbers look like say in mid February in the dead of winter. And as for Congress they’ve had low approval ratings for quite a while now.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
10:37 pm
josef,
He is but his fans will have bachmann to support after he is gone.
She will probably run a few more times.
Martin Williams
December 27th, 2011
10:37 pm
Jay, I had plenty of respect for Ron Paul until these articles came out. He is a closest racist and kept denying it. I also know that, we have plenty of Ron Pauls out their. He is the only politician that talks about spending in terms of defence spending and 98% of the politicians don’t even want to go there. Defence spending by United States is high time socialism truly mixed with capitalism. Ron Paul needs to accept the facts and apologize.
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
10:37 pm
keep up,
Stringing together one coherent, logical thought seems to be a herculean task for you. That’s no surprise of course but Doomy here to help. I got your back.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
10:43 pm
Stringing together one…
Too funny!
josef
December 27th, 2011
10:47 pm
Getalife
Bachman tickles me…Newt and Paul scare me, but for different reasons…Newt is an egomaniac, a Mussolini type. Paul? Well, I don’t want to go that far just now, but…
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
10:49 pm
Doomy ready for some bowling. Liberal pins line themselves up and I just knock em on down. I see I have at least 2 of my pins to play with.
td
December 27th, 2011
10:50 pm
getalife
December 27th, 2011
10:27 pm
You do realize there are two houses in Congress. One controlled by the Republicans and one by the Democrats. There has been 28 bills passed by the house that would help the economy that the Democrats (Harry Reid) will not even bring up for a vote. Meanwhile, the Senate has not even passed a budget in over 900 days.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
10:51 pm
Oh no….thelma has started referring to himself in the 3d person again….. seems those psychological issues have not been addressed over the holidays. Good news though. The start of the new year means more insurance coverage for addressing those low esteem issues of the impersonal self-referrence. If they are denying you coverage Thelmy, “One call, that’s all’…….
josef
December 27th, 2011
10:54 pm
Good fight
We are not amused!
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
10:56 pm
There has been 28 bills passed by the house that would help the economy that the Democrats (Harry Reid) will not even bring up for a vote
Nice talking point claim but again to become law a bill requires passage in both the Senate and the House and then the signature of the President. And just claiming a bill would “help” the economy does not make it so.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
11:00 pm
oh no…. the josef (and pocket friend?) is not amused. The horror…..the horror.
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
11:01 pm
keep up,
Oh lawdy. And now you’re a psychologist on top of an ambulance chaser. Who knew? You’re about as smart as Stalin was compassionate. But keep setting yourself up keep. I loves my bowling.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:04 pm
td,
Yes, I watched the gop “work” on C-Span.
The gop pass ideological bills that they know have no chance to pass the senate.
It is the worst I have seen .
td
December 27th, 2011
11:04 pm
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 27th, 2011
10:56 pm
And when the Senate brings a bill to the floor, they usually add amendments and send it to conference or back to the house. Why has this Senate not done this? Maybe it is because the Dems strategy is to get nothing accomplished so that they run against the so called “do nothing Republicans”?
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
11:06 pm
“Nice talking point claim but again to become law a bill requires passage in both the Senate and the House and then the signature of the President”-keep
Oh noes. Someone stating the obvious as if were a newly discovered truth. It just doesn’t get any funnier.
“And just claiming a bill would “help” the economy does not make it so.”-keep
Well of course ma’am. The stimulus bill proved that point. Keep sho does like pointing out the obvious. For his next point of enlightenment he will point out that the sun rises in the east. Sheesh!
td
December 27th, 2011
11:08 pm
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:04 pm
td,
Yes, I watched the gop “work” on C-Span.
The gop pass ideological bills that they know have no chance to pass the senate.
It is the worst I have seen .
Then why will not the Senate amend them and send them back to the House? I saw the same thing when the Dems controlled the House and the Republicans controlled the Senate and the Senate substituted an amendment and sent it back to them. What is the problem with the Senate?
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:12 pm
td,
They can’t amend ideology silly.
It gets rejected quicker than the President budget .
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
11:13 pm
What is the problem with the Senate?
Why do you consider it a “problem” when the Senate won’t touch crap?
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
11:13 pm
td,
Allow me to offer some sage advice on arguing with a liberal. Now of course I’m not saying this applies specifically to anyone that you are debating. I’m just sayin…
Never argue with an idiot. They’ll only drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:15 pm
“Why do you consider it a “problem” when the Senate won’t touch crap?”
Exactly.
doomy,
You are credible on being an idiot .
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
11:19 pm
You are credible on being an idiot .- getalife
getalife,
Directly calling someone an idiot is a red card. Careful ma’am.
However, I feel you lack the competence to realize your inherent folly or the error of your ways. Being the nice guy that I am I simply corrected your folly. Your welcome
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:23 pm
doomy,
Well, you are finally credible on something and thought you should be rewarded for that fact.
It is a first.
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
11:23 pm
“Why do you consider it a “problem” when the Senate won’t touch crap?”
Its always interesting to hear the libs criticize the Republican House for not passing “jobs bills” while completely ignoring the reckless behavior of the obstructionist senate. If only the libs could think logically and critically. If only…
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
11:25 pm
getalife,
I’m sorry I’ve ignored your posts to me the last several days. You’re generally just not worthy of a response and that’s why I’ve been ignoring your posts. However if you insist on being one of my bowling pins I will certainly accomodate you.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:26 pm
Lets take a look at the gop house “jobs bill”.
Nah, we know it is tax cuts and no regulations.
td
December 27th, 2011
11:26 pm
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
11:13 pm
Thank you for the advice. I have been around for a few years (on other blogs) and have argued with libs about different subjects. I refuse to stoop to the name calling level and if you happen to go to Gallaway’s blog you will see where I have been called every name in the book (It seems he does not have the same red card policy as Bookman). I will continue to make points of fact and hope that maybe they will get it one day and turn from the dark side of the force.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
11:27 pm
If only the libs could think logically and critically.
If only it was possible to “string[ing] together one.”
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:27 pm
doomy.
Gutter balls is name calling.
You are bowling the same as your credibility.
Zero.
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:30 pm
td,
Do you ever admit you are wrong after the facts prove you are wrong?
td
December 27th, 2011
11:30 pm
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:26 pm
Lets take a look at the gop house “jobs bill”.
Nah, we know it is tax cuts and no regulations
Yes, less regulation and less taxes equal are growing a prosperous economy. Where as the Democratic alternative (more regulation and higher taxes) gotten us in three years?
BTW: What about the brilliant policy of stopping the production of domestic energy? The Keystone pipeline will produce 200,000 shovel ready jobs but the Dems do not want it. Why?
td
December 27th, 2011
11:32 pm
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:30 pm
td,
Do you ever admit you are wrong after the facts prove you are wrong?
Where are any facts that have proven me wrong at?
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
11:32 pm
Yes, less regulation and less taxes equal are growing a prosperous economy.
There’s your sign. Oy!
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:33 pm
td,
So you are doomy.
I can tell by the con talking points.
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
11:34 pm
Where are any facts that have proven me wrong at?
You can start with this statement: The Keystone pipeline will produce 200,000 shovel ready jobs
td
December 27th, 2011
11:37 pm
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
11:34 pm
Well how many jobs will the Keystone pipeline produce?
td
December 27th, 2011
11:38 pm
getalife
December 27th, 2011
11:33 pm
And my conservative point of view is wrong how?
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
11:43 pm
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
11:32 pm
“Yes, less regulation and less taxes equal are growing a prosperous economy.”
Economics history FAIL! Somehow or another kamchak’s mind seems to have never learned the reasons why a nascent country, in a mere 130 years or so became one of the most powerful nations on earth. And his mind doesn’t seem to understand that this rise to global economic superpower took place with little regulation and with no permanent income tax until 1913. Let me repeat that so that it sinks in. Between 1776 and 1913 when the permanent income tax was instituted the United States became a dominant global power. And we did it precisely because of a limited central govt, a low tax burden, and a very light regulatory environment. You would think libs would pick up a history book and read some basic history. You would think…
Kamchak
December 27th, 2011
11:48 pm
Well how many jobs will the Keystone pipeline produce?
We’ve already been through this.
Geez….
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
11:49 pm
“The Keystone pipeline will produce 200,000 shovel ready jobs but the Dems do not want it. Why?”
I dunno td. Bookman presented a study done by some liberal perfessor sitting on his ass in an ivory tower somewhere in the east trying to say the keystone project would actually end up costing jobs. And you know the libs. They’ll always take the word of a left wing lib perfesser sitting in an ivory tower with an agenda over the people that actually will be doing the hiring and actually providing the jobs.
Jay
December 27th, 2011
11:53 pm
They’ll always take the word of a left wing lib perfesser sitting in an ivory tower with an agenda over the people that actually will be doing the hiring and actually providing the jobs.
Tell ya what, Thulsa. If the Keystone Pipeline people want to guarantee they’ll hire the hundreds of thousands of workers they claim their project will produce, and surrender any profits if they don’t, then I’ll believe them. Lacking that, I’d say they have quite a powerful incentive to exaggerate, wouldn’t you?
Thulsa Doom
December 27th, 2011
11:54 pm
“According to an independent assessment by Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations” Yep. A librul perfessor in a classroom setting knows better.
There’s your sign. Oy!
Kamchak
December 28th, 2011
12:05 am
You would think libs would pick up a history book and read some basic history.
Yep. An
librulidiot phlogiston economics perfessor in a classroom setting knows better.There’s your sign. Oy!
Thulsa Doom
December 28th, 2011
12:05 am
Jay,
Lets say they only produce 6500 direct jobs. Its 6500 jobs Jay. Why the potus has waged such an all out assault against the American economy is beyond me.
And what you conveniently seemed to have left out of your article is the various indirect jobs that will be created catering to the workers such as restaurant jobs amongst many other job categories. Funny how you guys left that out.
“If the Keystone Pipeline people want to guarantee they’ll hire the hundreds of thousands of workers they claim their project will produce”,
First of all I don’t remember Keystone saying that they themselves will hire 200,000 people so lets dispense with the dishonesty. They were stating that many other indirect jobs would be created as a result of the direct jobs. And even you must acknowledge that indirect jobs would certainly be created no matter what the number of actual jobs created.
“and surrender any profits if they don’t, then I’ll believe them.”
More wealth envy? Or just corporate hating? Why should they surrender any profits? Taxes will be paid on the profits they reap and substantial, badly needed taxes will be paid through the payroll of employees hired and of indirect jobs. One would think that libs would be in favor of this bonanza of tax revenue. One would think…
“Lacking that, I’d say they have quite a powerful incentive to exaggerate, wouldn’t you”
Suppose you’re right jay and that they are exaggerating. So? The point is that a substantial amount of direct and indirect jobs would be created along with badly needed energy and badly needed tax revenue. Unless of course you have a problem with America stepping a little bit closer to energy independence, jobs being provided, and of course hefty tax revenues to the treasury.
Thulsa Doom
December 28th, 2011
12:08 am
“phlogiston economics card” for the 4 millionth time. Sooo predictable!
There’s your sign. Oy!
getalife
December 28th, 2011
12:16 am
Why in the world do you want more welfare for big oil when they do not need it?
They can use trucks to transport the oil and don’t need a pipeline.
Lets help the American worker by providing long term jobs.
Thulsa Doom
December 28th, 2011
12:21 am
getalife
December 28th, 2011
12:16 am
“Why in the world do you want more welfare for big oil when they do not need it?”
getalife,
First of all they’re not asking for corporate welfare. They’re simply looking for permission for a go ahead on the project. There’s a difference ma’am. The oil company and its employees would be paying enormous amounts of taxes back into the system.
“They can use trucks to transport the oil and don’t need a pipeline.”- getalife
getalife,
This is truly one of the most ignorant statements you’ve ever made. The economies and cost savings of transporting oil via pipeline instead of by truck or enormous. And I believe this is crude oil not refined gas. Just what we don’t want is thousands of more heavily laden gas trucks going up and down the road. Sheesh.
With that doomy out.
getalife
December 28th, 2011
12:24 am
Just keep chanting drill baby drill doomy like last cycle.
The results will be the same.
Jackson Baer
December 28th, 2011
2:24 am
Ron Paul will win Iowa and then either take New Hampshire or come in a strong second… yet he’s not viable? It’s funny how the media is claiming a Paul victory in Iowa will discredit the state but not if anyone else wins. It doesn’t get much more hypocritical than that.
http://www.whatthehellbook.com/the-book/
Normal
December 28th, 2011
6:18 am
This is why you don’t need religion.
http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2011/12/28/pagan-students-and-public-schools/
USinUK
December 28th, 2011
6:21 am
Normal – 6:18 – oooooooo … starting the day with a grenade, I see!!
I hope you and all the little Normals had a FAB Christmas!! (did the Missus keep you off of ladders this year??)
Maker (non-gov't/union worker)
December 28th, 2011
6:55 am
Liberals are the worst. What happens when all the conservative makers who go to work everyday to support the liberal gov’t workers and welfare takers, listen to Jay’s and granny godzilla’s advice and become liberals who don’t work? Who will pay the taxes for the outrageous gov’t salaries then. Liberalism MUST fail because it is unsustainable. Someone must work, and I mean real jobs, not school teachers (entitled lazy trolls, most of them who live off taxes), firefighters, first responders, and other gov’t workers whos are NET tax takers NOT tax payers. All liberals are worthless. This country will thrive when everyone TAKES CARE OR THEIR OWN RESPONSIBILITIES and not before. As a conservative, liberals want me to pay all my bills and their bills also. Now who is correct and responsible- me or the liberal living off my work?
Willis
December 28th, 2011
7:04 am
If God acted like Ron Paul, God would be denying that he is responsible for the Bible.
AmVet
December 28th, 2011
7:09 am
Maker, I’m curious what it it exactly that YOU make.
Cars? Planes? Furniture?
Bueller?
Adam
December 28th, 2011
8:11 am
What happens when all the conservative makers who go to work everyday to support the liberal gov’t workers and welfare takers
I know Ayn Rand has some good quotes and all, but she is mostly full of crap.
And btw, welcome to the whack-a-doodle libertarian club!
Adam
December 28th, 2011
8:13 am
And also, as soon as you agree to put up your taxes instead of trying to cut them,. I’ll believe you’re a maker. Until then, you’re really just another taker, insisting everyone ELSE pay taxes, but not you.
A dad
December 28th, 2011
8:48 am
Man, can’t belive this blog kept going through most of the night. Don’t you people ever sleep. Morning Adam. Hopefully you’ll remember our discussion yesterday re keynesian economics, of which one of the basic tenets is to let people keep more money so they’ll spend, spend, spend. So, wouldn’t cutting taxes and allowing people who pay higher taxes to keep more of their money equate to allowing them to spend more?
Chilidog
December 28th, 2011
2:12 pm
So, are the Ronulans still defending the goofy little twerp?
Tom
December 28th, 2011
8:59 pm
Come on folks, Ron Paul is not presidential timber. But, when you stop to think of it, all the GOP candidates for president are either demented or out of touch.