
“You’ve always been crazy, this is just the first chance you’ve had to express yourself.”
– Louise to Thelma
——————————-
Even the folks on the Wall Street Journal editorial board understand that the House GOP is acting suicidal, noting that the squabble with Senate Republicans has turned into a “circular firing squad” and that “the political rout will only get worse” unless they concede the standoff with President Obama.
“At this stage, Republicans would do best to cut their losses and find a way to extend the payroll holiday quickly. Then go home and return in January with a united House-Senate strategy that forces Democrats to make specific policy choices that highlight the differences between the parties on spending, taxes and regulation. Wisconsin freshman Senator Ron Johnson has been floating a useful agenda for such a strategy. The alternative is more chaotic retreat and the return of all-Democratic rule.”
But Thelma and Louise, also known as John Boehner and Eric Cantor, show no signs of altering course, as the New York Times reports:
“Mr. Boehner of Ohio, the first-year speaker who has struggled throughout 2011 to corral his members, said House Republicans would not relent and accept a two-month extension of the tax cut that was approved by the Senate on Saturday as a way to buy time for a more permanent solution. He instead named members to a committee to negotiate a new agreement with the Senate, which adjourned Saturday….
Mr. Boehner called Mr. Obama to summon the Senate back to Washington to bargain with House Republicans despite the approach of the holidays. “I just think the American people expect us to do our work,” Mr. Boehner said.
But he was rebuffed by Mr. Obama, and by House and Senate Democrats, who said they would appoint no counterparts to Mr. Boehner’s newly named negotiators. And more Republican senators who voted for the Senate bill urged Mr. Boehner to get his lawmakers to do the same, saying the ugly fight was damaging both Republicans and the already badly battered Congress.
“It is harming the Republican Party,” Senator John McCain of Arizona said in an interview on CNN. “It is harming the view, if it’s possible anymore, of the American people about Congress. And we’ve got to get this thing resolved and with the realization that the payroll tax cut must remain in effect.”
Obama and the Democrats must think it’s Christmas or something.
– Jay Bookman
1,134 comments Add your comment
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
8:28 am
My professional opinion?
neener neener neener
too funny.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
8:28 am
“Even the folks on the Wall Street Journal editorial board understand that the House GOP is acting suicidal”
damn librul media
(thought I’d go ahead and get that out of the way)
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
8:28 am
Obama and the Democrats must think it’s Christmas or something.
Shouldn’t that be the Kenyan equivalent?
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
8:30 am
Keeps
Sikukuu njema ya Krismasi (”Merry Christmas” in Swahili)
or
Na azaliwe ndani yako (”May the Lord be born within you this Christmas
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
8:30 am
““It is harming the Republican Party,” Senator John McCain of Arizona”
and if anyone knows about harming the Republican Party, it’s John “oooo, I like the cute one from Alaska” McCain …
Midori
December 21st, 2011
8:31 am
my brother calls that the “ultimate chick movie”
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
8:31 am
Thanks Granny!
I have to agree with the NRA on this one: Happy Holidays!
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
8:33 am
It seems as if the Senate Republicans are distancing themselves from the Congressional RepubliCANTs.
And just where did the Nutster sit?
right what a bunch of retards
December 21st, 2011
8:34 am
Can you believe the selfish Americans on the right? 39 rep in the Sen voted for this bill and the Un Americans on the right are blaming Obama.
Thank you tea party for wining in 2010, you have shown what a bunch of selfish un Americans you are, to vote to halt millions Americans unemployment during the holidays, the material Obama has to run against you idiots its never ending.
AmVet - Pa rum pum pum pum, cons are dumb
December 21st, 2011
8:34 am
The Party of No no no no, no no no no no, no, no, no, no no no no no, no no no no strikes again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QQoDypBIhQ
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
8:36 am
Jay – I appreciate you coming here to put some new threads up even while on vacation.
Now if you could just keep the libruls in check
Happy holidays to you and yours.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
8:37 am
Actually its the Boehner and some of the Republicans…. Boehner is afraid that if he allows a vote, enough Republicans will vote for it that it will pass…..
More stupidity from a minority.
gm
December 21st, 2011
8:38 am
Thank you tea party idiots, for letting Obama rise in the polls with another selfish act, I hope your family are one of the millions of people who unemployement will run out while looking for work””””’
Michael
December 21st, 2011
8:39 am
They say you see the light just as you go off the cliff.
Cutty
December 21st, 2011
8:39 am
“Never interfere with an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself”- Napoleon Bonaparte
The only problem is that they’re dragging the rest of us down with them.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
8:42 am
Tuesday evening as the House debated whether “In God We Trust” should be the national motto. Of course, “In God We Trust” already is the national motto, guaranteed by an act of Congress in 1956. And “In God We Trust” had already been reaffirmed once before as the national motto, by another act of Congress in 2002. Still, on Tuesday, the House spent 35 minutes debating whether the motto should be re-reaffirmed.
More stupidity from republicans.
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
8:42 am
If only Obama were a member of a religion that did not observe Christmas. Then he could stay in DC and work and demand that others do the same instead of spending time observing a religious thing that some religious people might observe with family and such.
HoyaLawya
December 21st, 2011
8:43 am
If anyone needs a visual of Boehner and the TP caucus:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk7yqlTMvp8
Mick
December 21st, 2011
8:45 am
Country first? Never, for both sides it’s all about the political game. This time, the repubs are the clear losers. Want progress? Dems take back the house, hold the senate, and re-elect obama, then, put the pedal to the metal and consummate the marxist, socialist agenda…
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
8:47 am
The funny thing that I read about Boehner the other day was that since most of his siblings are blue collar they are being hit with the crap that the congress critters are sitting on.
Must make for a tense holiday. No wonder he wants to stay in D.C. to work this out.
SBinF
December 21st, 2011
8:47 am
Love it! The republicans welcomed the tea party with open arms. Even then, I said it was but a brief honeymoon. Republicans figured they could retake the house with the help of the tea party, then continue on business as usual. Boehner has no control over his caucus, and they are driving their car over a cliff. Check Obama’s poll numbers, they have been rising steadily over the summer and into the fall. Even Wingfield is trying to spin it, “there are no winners in this fight.” BS, the president is winning, and hopefully the American people will eventually win. Republicans have already said their biggest goal is removing Obama from office.
This may be the shortest “revolution” in some time. Obama’s election chances improve with each passing day of this malarkey, and I feel there will be quite a bit of pushback against the fanatical right wing as well. Are there any moderate republicans to fill the void in place of such lunacy??
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
8:47 am
“Of course, “In God We Trust” already is the national motto”
I thought it was E Pluribus Unim (or unum)
RB from Gwinnett
December 21st, 2011
8:48 am
So, the senate R’s don’t have the numbers to stop anything and can’t afford to vote “no” on an extension, so they vote for this completely idiotic 2 month deal, they all take their toys and go home as if they’ve actually accomplished something, and now the house looks bad??????? Only if you are acompletey hyper partisan left wing hack, Jay. Every rational and sane person sees this 2 month extension as the total lack of legislative competence it is.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
8:48 am
Common – 8:47 –
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
8:51 am
RB – are you a TPer by chance?
old cowboy
December 21st, 2011
8:52 am
BOOKMAN, YOU STILL HAVE YOU HEAD BURIED IN THE SAND. WHY DON’T YOU START GIVING ADVICE TO DEMOCRATS LIKE YOU DO REPUBLICANS WHEN YOU THINK THEY ARE WRONG INSTEAD OF BEING A ONE NOTE WHORE FOR THEM.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
8:53 am
oh, my … looks like cowboy’s batteries are shot in his hearing aids … no need to shout, dear … oops, sorry … NO NEED TO SHOUT, COWBOY …
Normal
December 21st, 2011
8:54 am
The GOP House of Representatives kind of reminds you of a self inflicted Spanish Inquisition, huh?
bucket
December 21st, 2011
8:54 am
I remember the good ole’ days before the lunatic fringes on both sides took over the Democrat and Republican parties. The House would pass a bill, then the Senate would pass a bill, and then they would have a conference committee to hammer out the details until they could produce a result that could pass both houses. Then they sent the bill to the POTUS to sign. It is still hilarious to hear the Dems complain about being powerless when for 2 years they were in control of 3 branches and for the last year they have been in control of 2 branches. Neither side looks good in this debacle. To be sure the President will come out smelling like a rose because everyone loves a good victim. IMO they should bring back President Clinton and tell all the “leaders” in Washington, DC to take a long vacation. (Hawaii anyone?)
Three jack
December 21st, 2011
8:55 am
The house GOPers did the right thing. The senate version of extending SS tax cut was not a clean extension. In fact, they made dramatic changes that would have prevented most if not all businesses from being able to update their payroll software in time to process checks — http://images.politico.com/global/2011/12/nprc_letter_re_hr_3630.pdf
Shame on senate republicans including both Georgia senators for approving the bill without understanding real problems included in it. Boehner does a horrible job of explaining why the house is against it, but at least they did the right thing by voting to take the legislation to conference in order to straighten out provisions that cannot be implement in time.
Time to vote out Saxby and Johnny!
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
8:55 am
Normal – oh, you HAD to say that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ixgc_FGam3s
Mick
December 21st, 2011
8:56 am
rb
Merry Xmas & happy new year….this could be a very long new year stretching into four more….
Normal
December 21st, 2011
8:56 am
I guess that Eric (The Red) Cantor must have pictures of Bohner and McConnel in the shower together…
Maker (non-gov't/union worker)
December 21st, 2011
8:56 am
So, liberal politicians supported by liberal media, sceam, “We have a deal”, and leave town. Republicans are in Washington to work on the Senate and House bills in conference. Other than the mouth breathing media and societies takers (all gov’t employees, teachers included, and other Dummycrats), who is upset at the House? Not I. I know Pres Obama and Jay and media tells us it is the Republicans fault, but the thinkers in this country don’t listen to liberal media and believe it. Just watch. See you on Nov 2012!
Watch and learn ...
December 21st, 2011
8:56 am
When the republicans get swept out of office in 2012, remember that this vote was the beginning of the end for them.
God is good all the time! Merry Christmas!
Aquagirl
December 21st, 2011
8:57 am
No wonder he wants to stay in D.C. to work this out.
I’m waiting for the cons to call Boehner out for his War On Christmas. Can you imagine if Obama suggested everyone work instead of celebrating the birthin’ of baby Jeebus? Oh, the humanity.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
8:57 am
Bucket
“when for 2 years they were in control of 3 branches and for the last year they have been in control of 2 branches”
and at that lie reading stops
Jim Robinson
December 21st, 2011
8:58 am
No content, Jay. Spending must be cut.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
8:59 am
Maker
“but the thinkers in this country don’t listen to liberal media and believe it.”
yep that damned liberal Wall Street Journal!
run by that damn liberal News Corp
owned by that damn liberal Rupert Murdoch
who also owns that damned liberal Fox News…
dman damn damnity damn
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
9:00 am
WHY DON’T YOU START GIVING ADVICE TO DEMOCRATS
Why I thought that was exactly what was going on at the annual holiday meeting of the liberal media coordination and planning conference at DNC headquarters and the luncheon at the White House. I hear the liberal media/DNC play book is almost finalized for next year. You didn’t think Jay was really on vacation did you? He is on the agenda as one of today’s speakers. “Sour Noting the Republicans: It’s not easy showing their repeated stupidity”. I am sure there are some graphs and more pictures of them going off the cliffs. Look at the powerpoint.
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
9:02 am
Ok for 2 years out of 8 years of the Bush admin. the dems were in control. That makes them %25 complicate to the debacle that was handed to Obama.
Wars on the Credit Card plus tax cuts didn’t work did they?
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:02 am
I wonder if Obama staying in Washington will stop the whole “But he only goes on vacation!” nonsense that the Bush-ites like to throw out because their guy got such a hard time for taking month-long vacations.
Nah.
I sure hope the Democrats run ads or hammer home talking points about how the President stayed in Washington even though the Republicans in the House went home!
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:03 am
“Why I thought that was exactly what was going on at the annual holiday meeting of the liberal media coordination and planning conference at DNC headquarters and the luncheon at the White House.”
don’t forget they need to update their e-mail database so that we all get our daily talking points
bucket
December 21st, 2011
9:03 am
@ Granny – what is the lie? Did the Democrats not have control of the White House, Senate, and House for 2 years? Does President Barack Obama not ring a bell for you? Does Senate Majority Leader Reid not ring a bell? How about Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi? Good Lord, that’s part of the problem in this dang country right now! We have way too many victims and no LEADERS!!! (And yes, I was referring to legislative functions. I know there is the executive, judicial, and legislative BRACNHES of government.)
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:04 am
As a side note, I hope the Democrats LET THEM let the tax cuts expire. At least the Senate Republicans are in a good position considering a lot of them voted for the brief extension.
ragnar danneskjold
December 21st, 2011
9:04 am
Yes indeed, one wonders why the republicans do not embrace this democrat effort to cut funding for the already gravely-underfunded social security fund. Why, unless the house republicans take a different course, the budget deficit will fall and the bureaucrats strangling the economy will be constrained. We cannot have such a stimulus for the economy!
bucket
December 21st, 2011
9:04 am
oops – branches
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
9:04 am
jay is giving subtle advice to the Democrats. That advice is:
Don’t act like RepubliCANTs.
Impotent Rage Against the Obama Machine
December 21st, 2011
9:04 am
well, the radio said that Nope & Derange ain’t really workin’ out fer us
i really need to get this hearin aid checked
Kramer
December 21st, 2011
9:05 am
The leadership that this Preseident is showing is so silent it has become sad. The moron is like a bad parent who scolds his children but, never leads by example. Keep writing this moronic dribble Book Man. You keep proving why the left is out of touch with reality and is poised to take another beat down in 2012. At least you have your leftist following of idiots who support you.
ragnar danneskjold
December 21st, 2011
9:05 am
Just because the proposed two-month payroll tax holiday would cause countless millions of wasteful reprogramming for every company paying workers does not mean the waste ought not be imposed on the economy.
roughrider
December 21st, 2011
9:05 am
Boehner and gang have stopped being legislators and have become obstructionists.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:06 am
“Did the Democrats not have control of the White House, Senate, and House for 2 years? ”
um … are you saying that the Senate and the House are two separate branches of government???
Doggone/GA
December 21st, 2011
9:06 am
“I thought it was E Pluribus Unim (or unum)”
Not anymore
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:06 am
damn, Doggone … I leave the country for a couple of years and the place falls apart without me …
Aquagirl
December 21st, 2011
9:07 am
The GOP House of Representatives kind of reminds you of a self inflicted Spanish Inquisition, huh?
Nobody expects a self-inflicted Spanish Inquisition!
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:07 am
Adam – 9:02 – Romney is taking hte credit for it …
FEEL the power of MITTENS!!!
ragnar danneskjold
December 21st, 2011
9:07 am
Just because the senate democrats have refused to pass a budget for three years is no justification for house failure to support the incompetence.
Mick
December 21st, 2011
9:07 am
Republican house of representatives, 2010-2011 – defines epic fail…
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
9:08 am
Why won’t the republicans let the Prez. spend christmas with his family? they are attacking the family values pres.
The shame.
Holiday showdown over payroll tax tests Obama, GOP – Newsday | Botswana – iWooho.com
December 21st, 2011
9:08 am
[...] slugging it out in Washington …Payroll tax cut impasse: Who is to blame?Washington Post (blog)House GOP has manuevered itself into a dead endAtlanta Journal Constitution (blog)White House scores with its #40dollars campaignCNN (blog)CBS [...]
ragnar danneskjold
December 21st, 2011
9:08 am
Dear USinUK @ 9:06, looks like the senate cannot pass a budget without your physical presence.
ragnar danneskjold
December 21st, 2011
9:09 am
Why cannot we all support the president in his wish to kick the can down the road a couple of months?
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:09 am
ragnar – FEEL THE POWER OF ME!!!
Jm
December 21st, 2011
9:10 am
Who cares.
I’m telescope hunting.
sheepdawg
December 21st, 2011
9:10 am
These babbling idiots are entertaining to watch, but this has gone too far…….I just hope the middle class sheep will remember this dysfunctional bunch of crybabies, led by the biggest crybaby, next election.
ragnar danneskjold
December 21st, 2011
9:10 am
We demand gridlock, something to paralyze the bureaucrats – that is the only cure for the private economy malaise.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
9:11 am
bucket
you really don’t know do you?
well I will help the less fortunate a wee bit
No the Democrats did not have control complete or otherwise over the 3 branches of government AT ANY TIME.
and you kinda got that whole 3 branches thing really confused. white house (executive is 1) house and senate equals congress( legislative is 2)…do you even know what the 3rd branch of government is?
and you should be ashamed and embarrased that you don’t know that.
Maker (non-gov't/union worker)
December 21st, 2011
9:11 am
Granny- Using Fox News as a source, I am aghast! Oh, Watch and Learn, look in a morror to watch and learn come Nov 2012. Liberals get DESTROYED! 2010 will look like a picnic to Democrats. Despite the bias toward Obama and Dems, you may be suprised to learn the country does not like to be in turmoil and the one leader who represents us all, is making the turmoil worse with class warfare and such. and Obamba is not trying to help or reach out, just make things worse, get as many unemployed and other dependents as possible on the gov’t as those are his voters. Embarassing, and who would have thought that Obama could be so unpopular after his crowning as King of America by all you liberals and fawning media. I personally can’t believe he has screwed up all his good will and likability to this point. Granny and others know it, Republican Pres in 2012, no matter who is nominee.
ragnar danneskjold
December 21st, 2011
9:12 am
Dear USinUK @ 9:09, that sounds like what my mommy called a “bad touch.” Have a great day!
jconservative
December 21st, 2011
9:13 am
This is about the 2012 election and the Republican members of the House are blowing it.
In the latest CNN/ORC poll Obama has at worst a 52% mark against every Republican in a head to head matchup.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:13 am
ragnar – 9:12 –
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:13 am
Kramer: The leadership that this Preseident is showing is so silent it has become sad. The moron is like a bad parent who scolds his children but, never leads by example
Ask Osama bin Laden about that.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:14 am
Aquagirl: Nobody expects a self-inflicted Spanish Inquisition!
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:14 am
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8358544.stm
and the hopes of a nation were dashed …
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
9:14 am
maker
not so clever new name
same wrong headedness.
oblama
December 21st, 2011
9:15 am
Oblama is the House of No…… no way but my way – lemmings going over the cliff to their doom. Even Bonnie Fwank author of this doom, is abandoning ship. In a real world Bonnie would be in the Big House (with his new roomie Bubba)- not on his way to the Pent House. Oblama should resign in disgrace and move to somewhere more to his liking – like France. As Clinton said – “Obama has replaced Jimmy Carter as the worst president in history.” We need a ticket of Ross Perot (term limits) and Ron Paul (common sense) to return to sanity. We don’t need “DemoCant’s or Rebublicant’s”. Corruption and stupidity needs to be voted OUT. I am going to vote AGAINST anyone that is an incumbent.
joe
December 21st, 2011
9:16 am
You have to admit it is a bit nuts to try to pass something that is only good for two months…plus, the treasury is already on board saying it would be impossible to enact. Why not table this until they can vote on an extension for one year? Oh wait, the Dems don’t like things that make sense…
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:17 am
Maker: Despite the bias toward Obama and Dems, you may be suprised to learn the country does not like to be in turmoil and the one leader who represents us all, is making the turmoil worse with class warfare and such
Oh you are so out of touch. YOU will be the one who is surprised, especially that “class warfare” is a phrase most Americans recognize to mean something different than what you THINK it is. Not to mention the terms socialist, communist, compromise, etc….
I have a Reagan plush doll for you to cry in the corner with come November.
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
9:17 am
Jm@December 21st, 2011
9:10 am
Any chance you are in D.C.
AmVet - Pa rum pum pum pum, cons are dumb
December 21st, 2011
9:17 am
2010 will look like a picnic to Democrats.
Yeah, because your beloved GOP is on such a roll, huh?
That is what? One election in a row that you haven’t gotten absolutely decimated, like those previous two in 2006 and 2008.
What a juggernaut of electoral victories, huh?
Better hope Mittens gets the nomination, and then doesn’t pick another Sarah BarraClueless. Because he is the GOP’s ONLY chance at not getting crushed again this time
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:17 am
“Bonnie Fwank”
you really do have to be some serious kind of lame … or maybe an 8-year-old on Cmas break … to write that kind of crap
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
9:18 am
The GOP won’t follow the advice of their own best and brightest…
They are doomed to fail.
That’s such a happy Christmas thought.
jconservative
December 21st, 2011
9:19 am
The political bottom line, 156 million people pay FICA and every one of them will see a tax increase of 2% Jan 1, 2012.
Prediction: the extension of the payroll tax will happen in January 2012, it will be for a full year and will be back dated to 1/1/2012.
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
9:20 am
We need a ticket of Ross Perot (term limits) and Ron Paul (common sense) to return to sanity.
—————————————————–
Don’t use my name and Ron Paul’s in the same sentence.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
9:21 am
you may be suprised to learn the country does not like to be in turmoil and the one leader who represents us all
Ahhh, now I see. SO this is that guy?
The Des Moines Register’s Jason Clayworth reports:
“I asked him if he’s elected, how does he plan to engage gay Americans. How are we to support him? And he told me to support Obama,” said Arnold. […]
“When you ask somebody a question and you expect them to support all Americans and have everyone’s general interest,” Arnold said. “It’s a little bit frustrating and disheartening when you’re told to support the other side. That he doesn’t need your support.”
AmVet - Pa rum pum pum pum, cons are dumb
December 21st, 2011
9:21 am
As Clinton said – “Obama has replaced Jimmy Carter as the worst president in history.”
In which of your parallel realities did that happen, meat?
Your Boy Emperor was, hands down, the worst ever.
And you know it.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:22 am
jconservative: Prediction: the extension of the payroll tax will happen in January 2012, it will be for a full year and will be back dated to 1/1/2012.
How would the backdating affect checks?
stands for decibels
December 21st, 2011
9:22 am
and you kinda got that whole 3 branches thing really confused. white house (executive is 1) house and senate equals congress( legislative is 2)…do you even know what the 3rd branch of government is?
Teach, I know, I know, call on me! The third branch is the Judicial branch. And it’s controlled by four right wing terrorists and some wishy-washy guy who votes with them most of the time, except when he’s feeling kinda pissy.
AmVet - Pa rum pum pum pum, cons are dumb
December 21st, 2011
9:23 am
Re, Bonnie Fwank.
Hateful homophobia from the children who are no longer allowed to use the f and q words in public…
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
9:23 am
Perry must be the TP favorite. Double dipping into the Texas treasury while proclaiming his hatred of bureaucrats.
LOL what a piece of work. Nutster/Perry 2012
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:23 am
Keep up – dang … but it is nice to hear a politican be brutally honest …
which is why I always ask – why-oh-why are there gay republicans??? your party doesn’t like you, doesn’t want you and sure as hell doesn’t support your rights …
Tommy Maddox
December 21st, 2011
9:23 am
A two month extension for the payroll cut? What does that do? It continues the narrative forward to give Obama something to talk about other than his record during an election year. Bravo House!
How’s about the Democratic Senate giving us their first budget in three years? That would be a niche CHANGE that I might believe in.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:24 am
First Bon Jovi is declared dead over the internet (false) and then Thatcher is declared dead over text (false). I feel like spreading an email rumor that Obama has died just to watch all the racists rejoice with glee in public and out themselves.
NAGA
December 21st, 2011
9:24 am
Yes we should be thankful for the dems and their wonderful plan
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/two-month-payroll-tax-holiday-passed-by-senate-pushed-by-president-cannot-be-implemented-properly-experts-say/
bucket
December 21st, 2011
9:25 am
I reposted what I sent at 9:03 since some on here don’t want a serious discussion and would rather mock people who don’t drink their Democrat/Republican kool-aid:
@ Granny – what is the lie? Did the Democrats not have control of the White House, Senate, and House for 2 years? Does President Barack Obama not ring a bell for you? Does Senate Majority Leader Reid not ring a bell? How about Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi? Good Lord, that’s part of the problem in this dang country right now! We have way too many victims and no LEADERS!!! (And yes, I was referring to legislative functions. I know there is the executive, judicial, and legislative BRACNHES (branches) of government.)
I know I won’t be missed, but I am out of here.
Tommy Maddox
December 21st, 2011
9:25 am
Yep.
RB from Gwinnett
December 21st, 2011
9:26 am
“@ Granny – what is the lie? Did the Democrats not have control of the White House, Senate, and House for 2 years?”
Don’t waste your time. You’re expecting rational debate from Granny and you’re no more likely to get it than countless other posters who’ve tried for years. Don’t bother.
Watch and learn ...
December 21st, 2011
9:26 am
“As Clinton said – “Obama has replaced Jimmy Carter as the worst president in history.””
If you are so sure that your republicants are going to be in power come Nov. 2012, WHY TELL LIES? Because republicants thrive on lies and false innuendos to keep their mindless followers on course.
Clinton was just on the View two weeks ago PRAISING President Obama. Google it if you don’t believe me & even republican nut Elizabeth didn’t have much to say on that note.
Rightwing Troll
December 21st, 2011
9:26 am
“The political bottom line, 156 million people pay FICA and every one of them will see a tax increase of 2% Jan 1, 2012.”
And us Small Business Owners (”job creators”) pay 100% of that FICA for ourselves (and 50% of that FICA for our employees) and are not eligible for its benefits… There’s some good lovin for the “backbone” of our economy, meanwhile the folks who earn money by using our money (with no risk to themselves) are given huge tax breaks and golden parachutes whether they make money or not (with our money)…
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
9:27 am
Adam @ 9:22 am
It can be done by adding back the percent extra that was taken.
But for those proclaiming that it is a nightmare. It isn’t. The remittance to the gov. would be the problem. but since it is done quarterly not much of an issue.
josef
December 21st, 2011
9:27 am
Well, and a cheery good morning to all from your sorry-low-down-good-for-nothing blog relative gubment employee with a couple of weeks off at the taxpayers’ expense. Thank you very much, and Happy Birthday Baby Jesus! It’s still Christmas Break no matter what the heathens amongst us insist we call it…
Thelma and Louise? That’s about the size of it. Good one, Imam, even though I ought not to be speaking to you after you got me in trouble last night and left me to duel banjoes with the Strawman…
Granny
Question: if Mr. GG is a dude and you’re a dudette, are your offspring dudelings?
Normal…great story from the ggkid!
USinUK–if the Newt goes in, will the Brits offer some of us political refugee status?
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
9:28 am
Budgets are nearly worthless.
All tax receipts (income) and 90% of appropriations are set on auto-pilot. Sequestration will be far more important than a budget.
Normal
December 21st, 2011
9:28 am
Maker (non-gov’t/union worker)
December 21st, 2011
9:11 am
Just keep smoking that “wacky tobaccy”….
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:29 am
“would rather mock people who don’t drink their Democrat/Republican kool-aid:”
um, understanding what the 3 branches of government are has isn’t Dem/GOP kool-aid … it’s founding father kool-aid …
but I admire that you’re willing to boldly throw your ignorance out before the world … and continue to stand by it.
you just go.
Normal
December 21st, 2011
9:29 am
Grand morning to you, Josef.
Did I get my last answer right? Wounded Knee?
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:30 am
RB: You’re expecting rational debate from Granny and you’re no more likely to get it than countless other posters who’ve tried for years. Don’t bother.
Riiiiiiight. Because “Democrats had full control and could pass anything they wanted!” is rational discussion. Oh sure, THIS TIME you took out the hyperbole, but it’s basically the same thing. Having a majority in the Senate does not equal control, nor does having exactly 58 Democrats and two Independents that all voted together with the Republicans voting against EXACTLY ONCE (after watering down said bill enough to make it palatable to ConservaDems). If you really want RATIONAL discussion, you would discuss all the nuances. Instead, we get “Democrats had ‘control,’ therefore they are FULLY responsible for anything that passes or doesn’t pass.”
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:30 am
josef – 9:27 – everyone can come stay at our house …
godless heathen
December 21st, 2011
9:31 am
Ronald Reagan spent Christmas in the White House so that his Secret Service people and his staff could spend the holiday with their families.
SPC
December 21st, 2011
9:31 am
Stupidity on top of stupidity. Is it any wonder we’re in the mess we’re in?
Mighty Righty
December 21st, 2011
9:31 am
It aggravates me to have to agree with Jay, but this is one of the few times he has been correct. Hey Jay, how about a column on how the Taliban is not our enemy as the Obama administraton thinks?
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
9:33 am
josef…. will this make you feel better:
On December 6, President Obama issued a memorandum stating that he was “directing all agencies engaged abroad to ensure that U.S. diplomacy and foreign assistance promote and protect the human rights of LGBT persons,” an initiative that includes combating criminalization of LGBT status by foreign governments and enhancing efforts to protect LGBT asylum seekers.
WorldNetDaily’s Bob Unruh, who is apparently its correspondent from Bizarro World, offered this, um, unique interpretation of the memo in a December 7 article headlined “Obama offers plan for U.S. to be global LGBT sex cop: Wants to import homosexuals with special asylum privileges”
All part of the plan to make LGBT a majority in this country!
But just for USinUK, no log cabins!
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
9:33 am
Perhaps the house Republicans should publicly announce a change to the Senate bill to do nothing but increase the payroll tax holiday from 2 to 12 months since that is clearly the only issue they have with it. Go for it.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:33 am
Mighty Righty: Hey Jay, how about a column on how the Taliban is not our enemy as the Obama administraton thinks?
Ok, people often use this sarcastically, but I’m serious. I would like to see you write a column on this on your own blog or place of writing, because I have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about.
Rightwing Troll
December 21st, 2011
9:34 am
Irony – The Newtster on TV whining about what the Mitten’s superpac is doing to his campaign.
It’ll be soon. Newt can only contain himself for so long before his true inner Newt shows back up. He’s got some pretty good (sounding) ideas in that bulbous, narcissistic head of his, but a zebra can’t change his stripes, and Newt can’t not be Newt for long.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
9:34 am
George W. Bush and his Enron buddies were very cozy with the Taliban, Mighty Righty.
That Afghan pipeline was the Keystone XL of their day.
It's laughable
December 21st, 2011
9:34 am
that the GOP and Dems think that they can get things done without some compromise. I mean, 50% of the country is democratic and 50% is republican. it’s lunacy to think that one party can ram their agenda through without considering the wishes and needs of half the country. and it goes both ways
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:35 am
TaxPayer: Perhaps the house Republicans should publicly announce a change to the Senate bill to do nothing but increase the payroll tax holiday from 2 to 12 months since that is clearly the only issue they have with it. Go for it.
I know, that would call them out wouldn’t it? That’s NOT the issue they have. The issue they have is they don’t want to extend it at all, unless they can extract more from the Democrat side. Negotiations and all that.
sam
December 21st, 2011
9:35 am
boehner may be the worst speaker ever. good golfer, bad leader
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
9:36 am
How long before Newt calls Willard a “Mormon Fascist anti-American”?
Normal
December 21st, 2011
9:36 am
Josef, USinUK,
“USinUK–if the Newt goes in, will the Brits offer some of us political refugee status?”
In one year from February 2012, I can collect SS and retire. With my Military retirement and SS, I was thinking of moving to St. Croix. But If Newt does get in, I’ll help build the bridge to Britain…
AmVet - Pa rum pum pum pum, cons are dumb
December 21st, 2011
9:36 am
heathen, that is only because he couldn’t find his way out of the building. (grin)
josef, you neer-do-well, mooching off of the rest of us!
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
9:36 am
RB from Gwinnett
December 21st, 2011
9:26 am
“@ Granny – what is the lie? Did the Democrats not have control of the White House, Senate, and House for 2 years?”
Don’t waste your time. You’re expecting rational debate from Granny and you’re no more likely to get it than countless other posters who’ve tried for years. Don’t bother.
NOW NOW RB…
You know that rational debate one must have a rational premise.
And old what’s his name up there didn’t have one.
then again that may be one of the gozillion things you don’t know…
facts hurt
December 21st, 2011
9:36 am
Yeah! Obama and the Democrats win the political fights like children. But American’s continue to drift without a leader.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:36 am
Godless – 9:31 – okay, I’ll bite –
where’d you find that little nugget???
mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack the Liar Obama - BEND OVER, Here comes the CHANGE!
December 21st, 2011
9:37 am
Hawaii or DC? $4 MILLION tax payer dollars? One of them is out of touch, you decide. Here’s a hint, he has BIG EARS and will be ONE TERM. MERRY CHRISTmas!
willydoit?
December 21st, 2011
9:37 am
For once, I have to agree with the democrats!!
we can not afford a tax cut and we want to pay more..our fair share!
Wait a minute!
Now the democrats want to keep the tax cuts and don’t want to pay their fair share???
Politics is so confusing!!
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:37 am
Normal: But If Newt does get in, I’ll help build the bridge to Britain…
You’ll never get the funding
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:38 am
I like how people think leadership is “do everything my way or else.” No wonder you’re not in leadership positions yourselves….
yuzeyurbrane
December 21st, 2011
9:38 am
Even in Georgia, this suicidal behavior will be for naught unless middle class voters turn out next November and vote these scoundrels out of office. It will be good for the country and even good for the Republican Party to return to sanity.
Rightwing Troll
December 21st, 2011
9:38 am
Andy’s back!
stands for decibels
December 21st, 2011
9:39 am
Riiiiiiight. Because “Democrats had full control and could pass anything they wanted!” is rational discussion.
Yeah, I only occasionally bother to correct that one. An accurate statement would be to say that Democrats had theoretical control over two of three branches of government for about a year, until MA’s senate seat changed hands. That control depended on the tender mercies of a guy who had actively campaigned for John McCain, who had a serious grudge against the Democrats for denying him a primary win in 2006.
Without Joementum’s say so, nothing got done.
So yeah, that was the “total Democrat control” our conservative brethren love to bring up. Over and freaking over again.
facts hurt
December 21st, 2011
9:39 am
@Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
“George W. Bush and his Enron buddies were very cozy with the Taliban, Mighty Righty.”
You mean the Enron scandal that occurred under Bill Clinton’s administration? Check your facts you stupid tool.
godless heathen
December 21st, 2011
9:40 am
USinUK. Heard it on MSNBC, so it might not be true.
AmVet: Or maybe he forgot where home was.
stands for decibels
December 21st, 2011
9:41 am
anyway, gotta go run in this soup.
back later, maybe, kids. Be excellent to one another.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
9:41 am
Enron imploded in 2002 – that is the fact.
They were working on the Afghan pipeline with Dumbya and the Taliban in 1999.
SAm
December 21st, 2011
9:42 am
I thought “Greed is good!” was the national motto.
godless heathen
December 21st, 2011
9:42 am
Tax cut extension? We don’t need no tax cut extension. The Federal Government needs more revenue so it continue to do its good works.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:42 am
stands: The “didn’t pass a budget” canard is old too. As though keeping the previous budget isn’t EXACTLY part of what they want, a freezing of government spending at certain levels. Sure, it would be nice to pass a budget that reduced spending on some things, but can you guess what would happen to a budget that didn’t gut SS, Medicare, and give lots to DoD? It would be filibustered. No point in even bothering.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
9:43 am
Common 9:17
Nope. The internets. Looking for an 18 inch dobsonian. May have to wait another year before the wife green lights it.
BW
December 21st, 2011
9:43 am
I love how presidential leadership has now been defined as usurping Congress and ruling by fiat. The President should “lead” a Republican House and a filibuster-prone Senate to passing solutions for America. Sweet jeebus!
stands for decibels
December 21st, 2011
9:43 am
one other thing…
Hawaii or DC? $4 MILLION tax payer dollars?
refresh my memory, and I’ll take the answer off line… what’d it cost to fly Preznit Chimpy McWarHard-on & his crew to his fake ranch in Crawford all those times?
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
9:44 am
FACTS HURT
Guess you missed the time Bush said he didn’t know Kenny Boy Lay, but it was found he sent him a birtday or Christmas card when he was Governor and signed called him by his little nick name (you know you loved his nicknames)…
“Kenny Boy Lay”
Wasn’t that sweet of Dubya?
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
9:44 am
2001 -
“The Enron scandal, revealed in October 2001, eventually led to the bankruptcy of the Enron Corporation, an American energy company based in Houston, Texas, and the dissolution of Arthur Andersen, which was one of the five largest audit and accountancy partnerships in the world. In addition to being the largest bankruptcy reorganization in American history at that time, Enron was attributed as the biggest audit failure.[1]”
Wiki.
Kenny Boy was a big Bush donor.
Bill Orvis White
December 21st, 2011
9:44 am
Dear honorable Mr. Speaker and honorable Majority Leader Cantor:
Onward my Christian soldier, honorable Speaker Boehner. WE THE PEOPLE in the Tea Party were upset with you earlier this year, but it looks like you got your strength back. Stand up for your rightful principles and you know that with the help of the Lord Almighty, you will be set on the righteous path to saving this once-free nation.
To my Hebrew friend, Mr. Cantor who I had the pleasure of sitting near at a prayer breakfast several years ago: I know that you know that you are doing the right thing by cutting through the extreme liberal media filter to disseminate the truth. What is the truth? The truth is that the rightful GOP wishes to extend the payroll taxation levels for one year, but would like to create over 20,000 jobs in the process. This so-called “president” does not wish to create jobs. Instead, “he” wishes to expand the largess of government in the form of Social Insecurity, Mediraid, Mediscare and unemployment “benefits.” Please let the once-free nation and the world know that you are dedicated to creating real jobs, real growth, real prosperity, a culture of life and a return to the values that made this once-free nation great! We have a Marxist in the White House who will be easily defeated in less than one year by either the honorable Speaker Gingrich or the honorable Governor Romney. But, you know something, I cannot wait that long. I would like to start hiring workers now. Unfortunately, I will have to wait until January 2013.
Amen,
Merry Christmas,
Bill
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:45 am
Godless – considering Reagan took 112 vacation days at his Santa Barbara ranch, I find it highly unlikely that at least one of those vacations wasn’t during Cmas
and you seem to forget – Joe Scarborough is on msnbc -
sam
December 21st, 2011
9:46 am
Willard is in fact a mormom facist anti-american
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:46 am
Jm – are you far enough out of a city so that you don’t have a lot of light pollution?
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
9:46 am
facts…. lets not get to far off base from the original article, but figured I would give you just a little food for thought…. Good day
Lay, who President Bush affectionately referred to as “Kenny-boy” when the two forged an alliance in the 1990s to advance Bush’s political ambitions and Lay’s business prospects, contributed $122,500 to Bush’s gubernatorial campaigns in Texas. Lay would later explain to a PBS “Frontline” interviewer that, though he had worked closely with former Texas Governor Ann Richards, the Democrat incumbent who Bush challenged in 1994, he backed the Republican because “I was very close to George W.”
Needless to say, once Bush became governor, Lay got his phone calls returned. A report issued by Public Citizen in February, 2001, months before the Enron scandal broke, identified Lay as “a long-time Bush family friend and an architect of Bush’s policies on electricity deregulation, taxes and tort reform while Bush was Texas governor.”
No wonder Lay had Enron give $50,000 to pay for Bush’s second inaugural party in Austin in 1999 — a showcase event that was organized by Karl Rove and others to help the Texas governor step onto the national political stage.
After Bush gave Enron exactly what it wanted in 1999, by signing legislation that deregulated the state’s electrical markets, Lay knew he had found his candidate for president.
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
9:46 am
Jm – be careful throwing about words like 18 inch dobsonian. Calista may hear about you
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
9:48 am
Common – 9:46 – or Mrs. Dr. Dobson …
josef
December 21st, 2011
9:49 am
Normal
Yep. Wounded Knee.
USinUK
I’ll just get the Romany Lady to get me a caravan…but if we need a place to park it…
good fight
Looks good on the surface…til you take a look at what’s being sent to such havens of gay security as Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Uganda…like a lot of the rest of his stuff, all hat and no cattle…
And actually I feel fine..I’m in a good mood as per the better nature of my fellow human beings…
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
9:50 am
how about a column on how the Taliban is not our enemy as the Obama administraton thinks?
But they are not our enemy, are they!
kreedham
December 21st, 2011
9:50 am
You know you folks could get new Congressmen next year….if you have to vote for 1 party get someone to run against the incumbent. In Georgia there are none worth sending back. Gingrey, Price, Westmoreland, Lewis, Broun, Bishop….replace em all!
oldtimer
December 21st, 2011
9:51 am
Why not just extend for the year and be done. This is driving smalll firms mad…
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
9:52 am
Enron was also responsible for the rolling blackouts in California – they bribed energy producers to cut production at peak times and then sold energy at 500% mark-ups to desperate providers.
Bush could pick em!
Kamchak
December 21st, 2011
9:52 am
Did someone say caravan?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4XKHkzDggk
Obozonomics
December 21st, 2011
9:52 am
I think it is funny how you liberal losers always fail to mention that this bill has OVER 7 Billion is DEMOCRATIC earmarks, but that is par for the course for liberals….If they want to pass this bill why not do it like this;
“The payroll tax shall be extended for 1 year”
Then vote on it…but wait where is the pork?????
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
9:52 am
LOL. Hate to tell you this, Jay, but Kyle clearly got the better of you today:
“No one is completely in the right in the Washington-wide temper tantrum over extending the payroll-tax holiday. I don’t understand how Senate Republicans — who voted in large numbers for a two-month extension of the holiday — could have been so far out of step with House Republicans who insist on the year-long extension they’ve already passed.
That said, I have a hard time understanding the sudden conventional wisdom that public opinion about the situation will favor:
a) Senate Democrats, who want to enact a two-month extension offset by a tax on middle-class mortgagees and then spend even more time early next year arguing about the very same issue rather than moving on to other issues — rather than enacting a one-year extension offset by the exact same tax on middle-class mortgagees as well as a reduction in welfare and entitlement benefits for wealthy Americans and illegal immigrants, a pay freeze for federal workers, the auctioning of some wireless spectrum, and a few smaller items;
and/or
b) President Obama, who has repeatedly said he wants a full-year extension of the payroll-tax holiday but who, rather than castigating the Senate for passing only a two-month extension, instead is being nakedly partisan in castigating the House for sticking to its year-long extension.
Other than the length of the extension, there is very little substantive difference between the two bills except for the offsets, which is natural given that a year-long extension requires more offsets than a two-month extension. And there is very little in the House’s list of offsets that could be considered widely controversial.
And then there’s the fact that neutral experts say a two-month extension would be a nightmare for smaller firms to implement.”
Maybe you should have given a bit more thought to your piece.
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
9:56 am
JAY
I understand from an OLDCOWBOY’s post at 8:52 that you have love for sale….if so, I am feeling a bit frisky this morning…
Another thoughtful post from a less than thoughtful contestant…
RB from Gwinnett
December 21st, 2011
9:56 am
How about one of you lemming liberals explain to us why we should be happy about only getting a 2 month extension on this tax deal? Why 2 months anyway? Why not 1 or 4? And then we can have this same stupid conversation again in 2 months?
I’m sure that pile of crap sounds rational to you lemmings, but dang….
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:57 am
I think it is funny how you liberal losers always fail to mention that this bill has OVER 7 Billion is DEMOCRATIC earmarks
Care to name just 5? Should be easy, considering there are 7 BILLION.
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
9:58 am
As usual, there is of course three sides to the extension story….of which only two are offered.
ADAM,
I’m confused how you posit that a federal budget is not important…can you help a brother out? Seems reckless and political to me but I’m always interested in learning…
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
9:59 am
“And then we can have this same stupid conversation again in 2 months?”
Well, now that we are NOT talking about raising the debt ceiling, Obama apparently is okay with short term solutions. The hypocrisy is glaring.
Ol' Times
December 21st, 2011
9:59 am
Boehner has got his manhood in a vice with Grover Norquist and the oligarchs on the one side squeezing and the working class stiffs who are getting tired of being screwed on the other.
And, in a situation like this, there’s only two things Boehner can do: 1. blame the President, and 2. have a bottle of Merlot.
I’ve said all along that a year is a lifetime in presidential politics and, given their need to be partisan, provocative and over-the-top, the GOTP will alienate themselves from anyone with an IQ over 40.
harvey
December 21st, 2011
9:59 am
Republicans are trying to stem the bleeding in this country, and the borrowing. To defund social security by allowing the payroll tax extension is a short term solution to a long term problem. Like putting a bandaid on someone who is bleeding internally. We need people who will stand up for what is right and we need to understand money doesn’t grow on trees.
bookman parrott
December 21st, 2011
9:59 am
Democraps good, umgowwa; Repubs bad, umgowwa.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:59 am
RB: How about one of you lemming liberals explain to us why we should be happy about only getting a 2 month extension on this tax deal? Why 2 months anyway? Why not 1 or 4? And then we can have this same stupid conversation again in 2 months?
I’m NOT happy with that. But if it is 2 months vs 0 months, I’ll take 2 months. Because it damn sure isn’t 2 months vs 12, no matter how much your reps want you to think it is. This is all about taking a tax cut away from the President, and trying to use the propaganda machine to later say Obama is at fault because he can’t “lead.” It doesn’t work on most people. I’m sorry for the gullible ones.
godless heathen
December 21st, 2011
10:00 am
I don’t know USinUK. They didn’t say every Christmas, but IMHO, if he only stayed in DC for one Christmas so that his staff and security could be with their families, it was mighty damn considerate.
I’m not one that begrudges the POTUS his “vacation” time because he is never really on vacation. It’s a 24/7 job. I do think President Obama has a perception problem when he gives a speech about shared sacrifice and then the missus has to head out to Hawaii a couple of days before the President, greatly increasing the cost. Does it enter his head, “You know this won’t look good?” But I guess when you consider yourself one of the 4 best Presidents ever and all your dog washers assure you that reelection is a certainty, why care?
Peter
December 21st, 2011
10:00 am
Wow……… Bin Laden’s dead, Iraq War basically over, un-employment coming down, the economy is picking up speed, and now folks want to help the middle class for a change……..gosh what will happen next ?
PROSPERITY FOR ALL in the USA ?
Looks like the Right is coming un-glued, and Newt and Romney behaving in funny ways.
By November 2012 if all keeps up, Obama will win in a landslide victory !
John K
December 21st, 2011
10:00 am
Blame the American people. They’re the ones who elected these tea bag idiots.
harvey
December 21st, 2011
10:01 am
It will take businesses 4 months to gear up their payroll systems to figure out the 2 month extension effect. Hasn’t anyone in Congress ever run a business? This is totally irrational.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
10:01 am
Stevie Ray: ’m confused how you posit that a federal budget is not important…can you help a brother out? Seems reckless and political to me but I’m always interested in learning…
The budget is the last one that was passed with whatever auto-adjustments get made, until a new one is passed. So, for now, the last passed budget is the one we follow.
So, there isn’t “no budget.” There’s just no NEW budget.
wreckmaniac
December 21st, 2011
10:01 am
Can the president and the Supreme Court nullify the credentials of this congress ? We can impeach the president. Can the president and/or the court impeach Congress ? Why are we forced to pay for the continuation of this farce we call Congress ?
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
10:02 am
Funny how that original bill submitted to the senate by the house had a little more to it than a simple payroll tax cut. Perhaps the house should have actually given the senate a simple bill that did nothing more than extend the payroll tax cut for 12 months if that is truly what they claim to want.
Steve - USA
December 21st, 2011
10:02 am
Looks like Obama has lost one fan.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/21/matt-damon-slams-obama-democrats-one-term-balls_n_1162511.html
“I’ve talked to a lot of people who worked for Obama at the grassroots level. One of them said to me, ‘Never again. I will never be fooled again by a politician,’” Damon tells the magazine. “You know, a one-term president with some balls who actually got stuff done would have been, in the long run of the country, much better.”
Peter
December 21st, 2011
10:02 am
Ha ha ha bookman parrott …….. Sounds like Repubs dumb….. umgowwa.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
10:03 am
godless heathen: I do think President Obama has a perception problem when he gives a speech about shared sacrifice and then the missus has to head out to Hawaii a couple of days before the President, greatly increasing the cost. Does it enter his head, “You know this won’t look good?”
So in order to “look good” the President and his wife and children must all go on vacation at the same time, or not at all, all because the President has to stay in Washington to make a point?
Why begrudge the family a chance to have their vacation? Why make the ACTUAL children suffer because Congress are acting like children? Are you saying the first family should fly coach with no security?
josef
December 21st, 2011
10:04 am
K’chak
Thanks for that! Love that piece…
Peter
December 21st, 2011
10:04 am
Hey harvey……Republicans are trying to stem the bleeding in this country, and the borrowing ?
Really ? Did that start just the other day ? Or with Bush ?
Dekalb comments
December 21st, 2011
10:04 am
To those posters that think the President isn’t showing leadership here I call you out.
The president has articulated his view that a 12 month extension is needed to keep the fragile recovery alive. The Senate Democrats were successful in working with the Senate Republics to get a temporary extension. The calculus was the two parties are still too far apart to agree on a funding mechanism for a 12 month extension but that something needed to be done to prevent taxes from going up on the majority of Americans in less than 2 weeks.
McConnell allegedly had an agreement with Boehner on the proposal but now Boehner boy cannot control the renegades in his own party. This isn’t about the president behaving like a schoolboy. This is about Teabagger Republics acting like toddlers that haven’t had their afternoon naps. Grow up.
Dekalb comments
December 21st, 2011
10:04 am
To those posters that think the President isn’t showing leadership here I call you out.
The president has articulated his view that a 12 month extension is needed to keep the fragile recovery alive. The Senate Democrats were successful in working with the Senate Republics to get a temporary extension. The calculus was the two parties are still too far apart to agree on a funding mechanism for a 12 month extension but that something needed to be done to prevent taxes from going up on the majority of Americans in less than 2 weeks.
McConnell allegedly had an agreement with Boehner on the proposal but now Boehner boy cannot control the renegades in his own party. This isn’t about the president behaving like a schoolboy. This is about Teabagger Republics acting like toddlers that haven’t had their afternoon naps. Grow up.
Paul
December 21st, 2011
10:05 am
I read the first page of comments and did not see one articulate defense of House Republicans’ actions. Oh, I read a few whines and talking points, but nothing addressing the concerns of the Sen McCains of the Senate.
Did I miss anything on the following three pages?
Now for off-topic: Pres Clinton appeared on Bill O’Reily’s show last night (followed by Newt). BOR said his arrival was amazing – said it’s kind of conservative central around there, yet nearly everyone was line up to get a pic taken with Pres Clinton. I still think they guy would win a third term. Anyhow, the interview’s not all that long and it’s here:
http://video.foxnews.com/v/1338638373001
I did enjoy the body language when BOR asked Pres Clinton if he respected Gingrich as a man -
Obozonomics
December 21st, 2011
10:05 am
Adam;
http://patdollard.com/2010/12/senate-spending-bill-contains-thousands-of-earmarks/
You are correct, it is 6,000 earmarks total over 8 billion, feel free to check it out..
Darwin
December 21st, 2011
10:05 am
Ragnar – Actually, Social Security is not underfunded. It was over funded starting in the Reagan years. It’s merely been raided repeatedly since the Republicans like to give tax breaks to the wealthy without reigning in defense and entitlement spending. Social Security has a ton of IOUs. When the baby boomers start straining the system, tax hikes will then be needed to pay back the IOUs. Ragnar – please educate yourself before posting your inane blogs.
carlosgvv
December 21st, 2011
10:05 am
The proposition that the House is acting suicidal is problamatic at best. It all depends on what Republican voters do in 2012. If past history is any indication, large numbers of voters will still vote Republican no matter how crazed House Republicans become. Happy New Year!!!!!!
Late to the party
December 21st, 2011
10:05 am
Look who is really the party of NO
The House passed several bills aimed at helping get Americans back to work. This year (2011) the House has passed over 20 crucial pro-growth, pro-jobs bills, which have been left to languish in the Democrat lead Senate.
This week the House passed the following important bills that will help our nation’s workers and job creators by removing burdensome, job-killing regulations. The passage of these bills now brings the tally of House-passed bipartisan jobs bills sitting in the Senate up to 25.
Payroll Tax Politics Pose Risk for Congressional Republicans – BusinessWeek | Botswana – iWooho.com
December 21st, 2011
10:06 am
[...] the politicsDallas Morning News (subscription) (blog)Newsday -Washington Post (blog) -Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog)all 5,836 news articles » // © 2011 Botswana – [...]
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
10:06 am
yeah, Steve – he’s REALLY going to vote GOP …
you keep thinking that
Payroll Tax Politics Pose Risk for Congressional Republicans – BusinessWeek | Botswana – iWooho.com
December 21st, 2011
10:06 am
[...] the politicsDallas Morning News (subscription) (blog)Newsday -Washington Post (blog) -Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog)all 5,836 news articles » // © 2011 Botswana – iWooho.com [...]
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
10:06 am
“This is all about taking a tax cut away from the President, and trying to use the propaganda machine to later say Obama is at fault because he can’t “lead.”
Do you really consider a short-lived (even if year or two) decrease in the amount you and I pay into an essential fund that is nearly insolvent a “tax cut”? It’s a gimmick, pure and simple. A tax cut for you and I would be eliminating a bunch of loopholes for the few to allow for a reduction in the lower tax rates for most Americans.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
10:07 am
Did I miss anything on the following three pages?
Surely you jest.
Steve - USA
December 21st, 2011
10:07 am
Dekalb comments,
Why not just work on it and get the 12 month extension done? Why does everything have to be decided at a later date?
Payroll Tax Politics Pose Risk for Congressional Republicans – BusinessWeek | Botswana – iWooho.com
December 21st, 2011
10:07 am
[...] the politicsDallas Morning News (subscription) (blog)Newsday -Washington Post (blog) -Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog)all 5,836 news articles » // © 2011 Botswana – [...]
josef
December 21st, 2011
10:07 am
heathen, et al
Is there something wrong with going home for the holidays?
Butch Cassidy
December 21st, 2011
10:07 am
RB from Gwinnett – “Only if you are acompletey hyper partisan left wing hack, Jay.”
Really? So The Wall Street Journal and John McCain are now “hyper partisan left wing hacks” now? I hope the GOP doesn’t find out, that would just be awkward.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
10:08 am
Damon is just a slim talented version of Michael Moore.
Neither understands the real world cutthroat politics. And Moore is still flapping his gums on Glass Steagall – he knows nothing about Wall St.
Liz Warren does.
Donna
December 21st, 2011
10:08 am
I think the Democrats scheme to send up bills that are unworakble, is working. But the American people are the one who lose. All u lefties have already lost. The whining is insufferable.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
10:08 am
“You are correct, it is 6,000 earmarks total over 8 billion, feel free to check it out..”
you did note that R’s are the beneficiaries of these earmarks, as well, didn’t you???
or did you just gloss over that part …
Steve - USA
December 21st, 2011
10:08 am
UsinUk,
Quote where I said he would vote for the GOP. Damn you are stupid.
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
10:08 am
Given all of these Republican house imposed constraints what would a Republican approved budget look like. I’d love to see those numbers. But wait. Wasn’t that Ryan’s yellow brick road map. The one that cut medicare and social security and medicaid and food stamps, etc., while increasing the deficit even more so the wealthiest could get more bigger tax cuts. Why yes. Yes it was! If only we could have a 2.8% unemployment rate, that yellow brick road could lead to a pair of red slippers to boot.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
10:10 am
“I read the first page of comments and did not see one articulate defense of House Republicans’ actions.”
LOL. You are actually looking for an “articulate defense” of politicians “actions” (Republican OR Democratic – let’s not stupidly leave out the latter)? Do you still believe in Santa Claus?
Adam
December 21st, 2011
10:10 am
I think it is funny how you liberal losers always fail to mention that this bill has OVER 7 Billion is DEMOCRATIC earmarks
I didn’t realize by “this bill” you meant a bill that has absolutely nothing to do with the payroll tax bill. My mistake
Paul
December 21st, 2011
10:10 am
Keep
Yeah, well, I had to ask -
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
10:11 am
The only relevance the GOP holds for the average American is figuring out how to screw them next. I seriously cannot understand how anyone who makes $75k or below can support these jackholes.
Oh wait…they shine up shiny sparkling distractions like gay marriage, abortion, and other wedge issues to divert attention to their pandering policies to wealthy individuals and corporations. Which explains their affinity for glittering signs at their Orange Pekoe Brigade rallies.
If someone studied the mass of GOP supporters, I’m sure they would find at least 80% suffer from ADHD. The other 20% are just dim-witted.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
10:11 am
OH WOE!!!! Steve thinks I’m stupid!!!!
whatever shall I do???
wherever shall I go???
oi – numpty – you were the one gloating that Obama lost a “fan” — just pointing out that, in the scheme of the election, that means less than what you seem to think it means.
RB from Gwinnett
December 21st, 2011
10:12 am
“I’m NOT happy with that. But if it is 2 months vs 0 months,”
The R’s in the house are trying to give you 12 months. If you’re not happy with the 2 Harry and co. are offering, fuss at them.
Keep kicking the can down the road….
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
10:12 am
It seems like house republicans like to hold up ANY pro wage earner or UI benefits bills at Christmas.
Last year they held out for the extension of the Bush era tax cuts for the wealthy, this year who the hell knows what the congress critters want
Steve - USA
December 21st, 2011
10:13 am
Kyle has actually written a nice blog on the payroll tax that shows that neither the Rep’s, Dem’s or Obama has covered themselves with glory on the extension.
mm
December 21st, 2011
10:13 am
“Every rational and sane person sees this 2 month extension as the total lack of legislative competence it is.”
You rightwing morons always ignore the truth. Your a holes in the senate blocked your house bill. Then your a holes in the house blocked the senate bill. And you’re blaming the democrats? Americans will vote your party into the politcal wilderness over this one.
Doggone/GA
December 21st, 2011
10:14 am
“The R’s in the house are trying to give you 12 months”
So were the Senators…but you see, they couldn’t come to an agreement on that…yet…so they, GASP COMPROMISED on a 2 month extension to give them time to be home for the holidays and THEN have time for more negotiations.
But you already know that.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
10:14 am
jewcowboy -
GOP owns the Wahhabi Christians on abortion, gay hating, Zionism, and Creationism.
50% of the middle class is THAT STUPID.
Peter
December 21st, 2011
10:14 am
Which Bills Donna ?
Seems the Repubs in the Senate were Ok and voted so…..Please enlighten the readers to the bills they shouldn’t vote for ?
How do you feel about helping the un-employed this Christmas… Thank you.
honest_abe
December 21st, 2011
10:15 am
time for a speaker with some backbone. boehner has proven to be an abject failure. this is a battle the house republican just can’t win.
the funniest part of this entire ordeal is that most of these same repubs opposed the payroll holiday just a few weeks ago. now they want to make sure it’s extended for a full year. make up your mind already!
Obozonomics
December 21st, 2011
10:15 am
Adam,
The 1900 page “bill” to extend the tax cut is right there in that link, why is that so hard to comprehend? Yes the tax cut is entered into this bill, with ALL the 6,000 earmarks… So I ASSume you would pass this as is? Right?
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
10:16 am
Peter,
I find it difficult to opine that one man is responsible for end of Iraq war, killing of OBL, decrease (which may prove seasonal) in unemployment et al….Of course, I don’t believe the government has any material impact on economy that is not negative and cost inefficient…the war ended as scheduled and the search for OBL went on for 10 years…not like your man was on the ground or otherwise involved in all the years rebuilding intelligence network destroyed over the years…not sure who to blame for that..
ADAM,
I understand the push the ball forward tactic with budget but why exactly is creating a new budget something that went by the wayside? Using my budget from 3 years ago would be a devastatingly bad idea for my family…
The bill that’s all the rage relative to extension of payroll tax certainly has it’s share of earmarks…many of the most ridiculous are GOP driven….All this is simply partisan re-election posturing as usual from BOTH parties with no small amount driven by the long on wind, short on experience BO…the entire town reaks of egotistical and no backboned electorate who have no concern except where campaign funds will be found for re-election…
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
10:17 am
“Kyle has actually written a nice blog on the payroll tax that shows that neither the Rep’s, Dem’s or Obama has covered themselves with glory on the extension.”
But childishly likening politicians of the wrong color to Thelma and Louise is just so much more…melodramatic. Who cares if it skews reality?
Steve - USA
December 21st, 2011
10:18 am
UsinUk,
It was a joke, Do you really think Matt Damon is the straw that stirs the drink? You have no idea what I think it means.
How you arrived at me thinking he would vote for the GOP is only a fairy tale in your mind.
Miike
December 21st, 2011
10:18 am
Boenher and the House passed a FULL YEAR payroll taxcut – but OLD SOURPUSS REID would not even allow a vote on it.
The truth is that OLD SOURPUSS REID is the one playing politics – pushing thru a 2 month plan. It is UTTERLY ridiculous that reporters do not point out the fact that REID is the problem!
godless heathen
December 21st, 2011
10:19 am
Why begrudge the family a chance to have their vacation? Why make the ACTUAL children suffer because Congress are acting like children? Are you saying the first family should fly coach with no security?
Well Adam, did I say that? If I were saying that I would have said that. Begrudge Michelle and the tikes their vacation? Poor poor overworked Michelle. They could simply ride with Daddy when he went to Hawaii. He could leave three of his “Yes, you are the greatest.” parrots off the flight.
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
10:19 am
OBOZONOMICS,
Thanks for the post I was trying to find the text…wonder if BO will offer the 5 days of sunshine before he passes whatever final format of this bill that is created???
One thing positive about the earmarks in a general sense, they are the only aspect of most legislation underwhich we actually know where the money goes….
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 21st, 2011
10:20 am
“Maybe you should have given a bit more thought to your piece.”
Now Strawman,& Steve, this is not a Herman Cain/Newt thread.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
10:20 am
Usinuk 9:46
The FL swamp is super dark. Easy to get to. Humidity isn’t great but it’s still good.
Common. Good advice
AmVet - Pa rum pum pum pum, cons are dumb
December 21st, 2011
10:21 am
Is there something wrong with going home for the holidays?
According to Thomas Wolfe, it ain’t possible!
But then again…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffUY8T5xmtI
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
10:23 am
godless heathen,
“if he only stayed in DC for one Christmas so that his staff and security could be with their families, it was mighty damn considerate.”
Did you ask this of Bush, or should only Democrats do this?
Billings
December 21st, 2011
10:23 am
Democrats always look for the quick fix. The GOP aims for long-term solutions. Two months vs one year. The business community would benefit from the latter, which, by extension, would benefit the unemployed.
The standoff was sowing confusion among business executives, who were running out of time to adapt to any new payroll tax regimen. Even the Senate’s proposed two-month extension was creating headaches because it contained a two-tiered system geared to ensuring that higher-income earners paid a higher rate on some of their wages, according to a trade group.
“There’s not time enough to do that in an orderly fashion,” said Pete A. Isberg, president of the National Payroll Reporting Consortium trade group. “We’re two weeks away from 2012.” He wrote a letter to congressional leaders this week warning that the Senate bill “could create substantial problems, confusion and costs.”
Meanwhile, Medicare announced Tuesday that, as it has in the past when doctors’ reimbursements have been cut through congressional inaction, it would withhold physicians’ payments for two weeks in January to avoid passing on a 27 percent cut in Medicare fees. The hope is that the problem gets fixed by then.
http://www.connectmidmissouri.com/news/story.aspx?id=699631
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
10:24 am
GODLESS HEATHEN,
Why exactly does POTUS not pay for any part of his vacation? I can understand we should cover security but it’s not like he isn’t worth millions….at least the prior wingnut had his own place to stay in Crawford so $50k a night isn’t wasted…BO sure picks the most expensive places to vacation….
Quite a perk….ADAM…with no budget does that mean you man can spend 4million anytime he wants to vacation?
The single most important problem is campaign finance reform and ethics reform in Congress…without which we can expect no changes (other that natural market forces) in any of the other secondary issues currently in vogue.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
10:24 am
“…but you see, they couldn’t come to an agreement on that…yet…so they, GASP COMPROMISED on a 2 month extension to give them time to be home for the holidays and THEN have time for more negotiations.”
Yes..we need to give the politicians in DC at least a year to make a decision that would take business executives a couple of days to make. Sounds good.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
10:24 am
On Fox News last night, both the Weekly Standard’s Steve Hayes and conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer continued the hand-wringing, with Krauthammer saying that “the Republicans have been entirely outplayed.” “Ultimately, the Republicans will cave,” Krauthammer predicted
And thus all the whining by the righties today……..
willydoit?
December 21st, 2011
10:24 am
I am willing to pay more…tax away!!
Ask not what your country can do for you….
Paul
December 21st, 2011
10:24 am
I love the sight of leaderless wingnuts twisting in the wind. Unemployment declining, stock market up, second Great Depression averted, economy recovering, Iraq finished, Libya liberated without US boots on the ground, Bin Laden and his friends killed, lowest tax rates since 1955, millions more with health insurance, auto industry salvaged with net return to taxpayers, zero White House scandals – all Obama’s fault!
LeeH1
December 21st, 2011
10:25 am
I remember back when, during the Triassic-Bush Period, you didn’t need to pay for tax cuts, because the neo-cons said they paid for themselves.
Now their ideas of taxes have evolved, even if they don’t believe in evolution. While they don’t have to pay for tax cuts for the super-rich, they do have to pay for tax cuts to the middle class, or they can’t be made.
Did anyone mark in the rock strata when this curious evolution of tax ideas took place?
And remember: “When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will evolve!”
AmVet - Pa rum pum pum pum, cons are dumb
December 21st, 2011
10:26 am
The FL swamp is super dark. Easy to get to. Humidity isn’t great but it’s still good.
Jm. when I was stationed in Tampa, I dated a girl from Hollywood and my roomie, a girl from Ft. Lauderdale. (Don’t ask!)
So we’d pile into my Camaro and head down there pretty much every Friday night.
As we started getting close, I remember off in the distance to the left were all of the lights of the southern Florida cities, and to the right, pitch black darkness where the gators and snapping turtles ruled!
Steve - USA
December 21st, 2011
10:26 am
Not a fan of Obama but he has young children, the guy should be able to enjoy a Christmas vacation without taking a beating for it.
If he worked through Christmas people would say it is proof he is not a real Christian.
josef
December 21st, 2011
10:26 am
St Simons
When in doubt, use a string of polysyllabics and the past imperfect subjunctive…
ZamVet
You like that book?
MiltonMan
December 21st, 2011
10:26 am
You libs are much too easy. Funny how you clowns always bring up Enron/Ken Lay & how much they were in bed with the reps. Here is one for you – the clueless gaggle:
Clinton officials publicly helped Enron win the contract in India as well as in Indonesia. Enron had received U.S. government funds to build power plants in China, the Philippines and Turkey. Enron also won contracts in Pakistan and Russia while accompanying senior U.S. government officials on state trips. In June 1996, four days before India granted final approval to Enron’s project, Lay’s company gave $100,000 to the DNC. Source: Time Magazine
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
10:26 am
Jm – VERY cool!!! we live too close to London – way too much light pollution to see anything but the brightest stars … and airplanes …
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
10:27 am
I don’t like Hugo Chavez or his political ideals, but I do agree with him on the following quotes:
“Mr. Obama decided to attack us,” Chávez said. “Now you want to win votes by attacking Venezuela. Don’t be irresponsible. You are a clown, a clown. Leave us in peace … Go after your votes by fulfilling that which you promised your people.”
“Focus on governing your country, which you’ve turned into a disaster,”
…and I thought they were friends, aww.
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
10:27 am
JEWCOWBOY,
I left yesterdays afternoon post so didn’t get to giggle at your final response yesterday which I found hilarious…
Of course you are delusional on all of your other postions of course except to the extent they agree with mine (tee hee)…nice to have dialogue with those who don’t resort to shout-downs and name calling…
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
10:27 am
For Straw and the other distorters….. I am confident that if a bill is proposed that extends the payroll tax cuts for a year and imposing a small tax increase on the very wealthy, why the Dems would gladly sign on (oh wait they did, why was that not passed, oh right, the asshat Republicans)… and it could have all be done in less than 30 minutes. Pizza anyone?
TPiper
December 21st, 2011
10:28 am
Having read the comments I haven’t seen a single one that mentions what’s really going on.
The GOP controlled House has already voted on a bill with a 1 year extension BUT they threw their entire want list which includes Medicare cuts, an increase in Medicare premiums, further spending cuts, new unemployment rules, approval of the XL Pipeline, pay freezes and a hodge podge of other BS.
The House GOP knew this bill was over-reaching and has no chance of passage by the Senate or signing by the president.
The Senate GOP basically wanted the XL pipeline approval and blockage of any “millionaires tax” included for their agreement of a 1 year extension.
Since the GOP and DEMs can’t agree on the XL Pipeline and” millionaires tax” they compromised on a short term fix so the payroll tax wouldn’t kick in and they could have more time to negotiate their differences.
Essentially Both the GOP Senate and House want to use the Payroll Tax Cut as a hostage to get what they want but the Senate is a little more reasonable.
The GOP House is trying to spin this as if they want a full 1 year extension and the Senate just wants to “kick the can down the road” but they don’t tell you that all their other want list is the poison pill the DEMs and Senate don’t want to swallow.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
10:28 am
Stvie Ray
“Why exactly does POTUS not pay for any part of his vacation?”
Actually he does pay for his part of the vacation expenses.
Do some homework.
redneckbluedog
December 21st, 2011
10:28 am
The House’s actions, both yesterday and earlier in the summer, show a lack of vision and an extreme focus on small-minded, petty politics…
That’s not what made this country great..That’s not what help us defeat fascism, build the Pentagon, nor the TVA…The President, at least, has a big-picture, long-term vision for America…as does the Senate…the House, on the other hand, and the pinheads that support some of these jokers, just want to make the President look bad, even at the expense of the American people….I do not think this will serve them well in November…..
…..
Peter
December 21st, 2011
10:29 am
WOW…. such a statement…..Democrats always look for the quick fix. The GOP aims for long-term solutions.
Yup WAR, Inflation, help a few of the very Rich long term I guess ?
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
10:29 am
RE CLINTON,
I’ve been reading about him a lot lately….didn’t realize how sleazy he truly was..I have done a 180 on my feelings of him now that he seems more honest and bi-partisan in some of his assessments…
josef
December 21st, 2011
10:30 am
PAUL
Pretty good list there, but let’s not put Iraq finished in there…like I say, this one sounds an awful lot like Mission Accomplished to me…and the news coming out from there ain’t good….
godless heathen
December 21st, 2011
10:31 am
“jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
10:23 am
godless heathen,
“if he only stayed in DC for one Christmas so that his staff and security could be with their families, it was mighty damn considerate.”
Did you ask this of Bush, or should only Democrats do this?
——————————————————-
I didn’t ask it of anybody. I just pointed it out.
Jay
December 21st, 2011
10:31 am
Isn’t it something to see Americans take the side of a dictator such as Hugo Chavez against their own president?
Normal
December 21st, 2011
10:31 am
Why do the “People on the Right” on this blog, refuse to see that the Senate passed the 2 month extension with over 80% approving. That works out to about 38 Republican Senators voting yes. Why couldn’t the House just have gone along with ther brethren? Why do they insist in changing the game. Why now insist that they want a year extesion for the American people?
Why indeed. It’s because the House does not want any extension and is playing “high stakes poker” with the Middle Class. Bohner and Cantor are first class, gold plated hypocrites, being led by the nose, period.
Bill
December 21st, 2011
10:31 am
The House is the ONLY one doing its job….Bookman is for it…I am not…thanks Mr, Speaker, Ryan and Cantor….
Peter
December 21st, 2011
10:31 am
Yup Stevie Ray. things are getting better.. and the GOP is hating that !
MiltonMan
December 21st, 2011
10:32 am
Paul – “zero white house scandals”???
Yet another lib homer with his head in the sand.
I guess you never heard of Fast & Furious. Solyndra, etc.???
Bill
December 21st, 2011
10:32 am
Normal because the Senate is FULL of RINO’s and should be PURGED…start with Chambliss….
Steve - USA
December 21st, 2011
10:32 am
Jay@10:31
Let’s leave Sean Penn out of this.
Peter
December 21st, 2011
10:32 am
Isn’t it something to see Americans take the side of a dictator such as Hugo Chavez against their own president?
Yes truly the American Spirit in the Right !
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
10:34 am
GRANNY,
Thanks I wasn’t aware of that….makes me feel better about one small aspect of where our money is burned…my bad.
Jay
December 21st, 2011
10:34 am
I’m with you on Penn, Steve. He’s a great actor and well-intentioned probably, but he has played the fool on the political stage.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
10:35 am
Stevie Ray,
“Quite a perk….ADAM…with no budget does that mean you man can spend 4million anytime he wants to vacation?”
The Air Force pegs operating AF1 at $182k an hour. It is 2.5 hours from Washington to TX. Bush visited Crawford 77 times in his Presidency.
$182,000 x 5 x 77 = $70,070,000
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
10:36 am
“Isn’t it something to see Americans take the side of a dictator such as Hugo Chavez against their own president?”
Yes, Jay. Glad to see you can comment on that, but not when Obama is kissing his @$$. I guess it ISN’T something when the President of the US is bff with a dictator.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
10:36 am
Talking Heads: “country, which you’ve turned into a disaster,”
…and I thought they were friends, aww”
Guess you better take another look at all those right wing fantasy scenarios about the Kenyan being part of a world-wide plot of Marxist sympathizers eh?
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
10:37 am
yep – zero scandals.
Fox News can’t gin up a scandal by itself. No one gives a damn about the longstanding practice of gun walking.
mm
December 21st, 2011
10:37 am
“The truth is that OLD SOURPUSS REID is the one playing politics – pushing thru a 2 month plan. It is UTTERLY ridiculous that reporters do not point out the fact that REID is the problem!”
That bill contained lots of BS, such as the pipeline, cuts to unemployment, etc. If you can’t be honest with others, at least be honest with yourself.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
10:37 am
Stevie
They even pay for BO….
MiltonMan
Paul said no scandals and he’s right.
Now he never said there hadn’t been any ginned up phoney partisan
faux scandals. With the GOP in the opposition position those pop up every 15 minutes or so.
josef
December 21st, 2011
10:38 am
JAY
“Isn’t it something to see Americans take the side of a dictator such as Hugo Chavez against their own president?”
D*mn, Boy, I keep telling you…read the memos!
All right, Sean Penn…gets on my last gay nerve a lot of the time, but I’ll say this for him, he not only puts his money where his mouth is, he gets in there and does the hands on dirt work, too…gotta respect him for that…
nelsonh
December 21st, 2011
10:38 am
5 more days the new contender and President of theU.S.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
10:38 am
Time to disband the whig party again.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
10:38 am
“He’s a great actor and well-intentioned probably, but he has played the fool on the political stage.”
as opposed to Stephen Baldwin who is only 2 of those three …
AmVet - A Happy KwanzChristmakkuh to al!
December 21st, 2011
10:39 am
josef, I couldn’t get through it. As dry as saltines…
Head, may I presume you also enjoyed his “It doesn’t smell like sulfur anymore.” comments about GWB?
Oh, the risk of agreeing with foreign tyrants. Even when they compare themselves to JFK.
But to each his own…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyyRLv0mFa4&feature=related
WOODSTOCK MIKE
December 21st, 2011
10:39 am
Do liberals ever expect Democrats to do anything? Our president is a Democrat. All I read here is how the GOP didn’t do something. Are Democrats capable of doing anything?
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
10:39 am
PETER,
One month of favorable trend an economic turnaround do not make. His re-election depends on 3 things only: the economic trend leading up to November, the turnout of all those first-time voters in 2008, and which nitwit the GOP puts up against him….he can’t win on his record alone that’s for sure…the blame game is getting old and it’s time he take some responsibility and offer leadership to the issues we face….campaign finance reform and ethics reform of Congress is a good start…he could win on championing those causes alone and would be my vote…
Too bad his has broken his pledge to “end the days of lobbyists setting DC agenda” and casting rays of light on legislation before he signs it…of course, it takes 2 or 3 days of the 5 for anyone actually interested to read 1900 pages of crap so I don’t see why he doesn’t make good on that promise as well..
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
10:40 am
My favorite Faux scandal ….
Bryan Fischer: Obama wants to give America back to the Indians
What’s yours?
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
10:40 am
Grany G – 10:37 – well, there WAS the scandal of Obama’s gift to the Queen …
and don’t forget the Churchill bust scandal …
they were downright … scandalous! I tells ya!!
AU Liberal in ATL
December 21st, 2011
10:40 am
All this crap started when the R’s got in bed with the extreme right wing religious nuts. It continued in a big, big way when they jumped in the pool with the so called “Tea Party”. The whole point of all that was nothing more than to win elections. At this point they obviously don’t give a good god damn about the country. They’re getting exactly what they deserve. Merry Christmas, everyone….well, almost everyone.
WOODSTOCK MIKE
December 21st, 2011
10:41 am
And don’t tell me that on one side Republicans won’t follow John Boehner and on the other side Republicans get their way on any vote because they hold the majority. Either they are with Boehner or not, which is it?
Jay
December 21st, 2011
10:42 am
So which is it, Talking?
You initially said you agreed with Chavez’ complaints about Obama “attacking Venezuela”.
Now suddenly you claim that Obama is kissing his @ss and is bff with Chavez? Which is it?
The only thing constant between those two statements is a hatred of Obama and a willingness to believe anything and support anything, including an anti-American dictator like Chavez, that might validate your hatred.
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
10:42 am
JAY,
Can you think of any thesbians who haven’t fallen into Penn’s category of foolishness. I thought all he needed was “some tasty waves and a cool buzz…”
Is Alec Baldwin still a citizen of US or is he operating exclusively from France. I can’t keep up. Jon Voight is equally nauseous for GOP positioning..
WOODSTOCK MIKE
December 21st, 2011
10:43 am
“All this crap started when the R’s got in bed with the extreme right wing religious nuts.”
Oh yeah, those religious fanatics!! Wow, this guy who wrote this is a complete idiot. Do you consider Obama a religious fanatic?
Kamchak
December 21st, 2011
10:43 am
My favorite scandal?
The long form.
What’s in box 23, or was it 26?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
10:43 am
Stevie Ray,
“so didn’t get to giggle at your final response yesterday which I found hilarious…”
Please tell me you’ve turned that satellite radio to something more soothing like industrial death metal.
“you are delusional on all of your other postions of course except to the extent they agree with mine”
Well that is a given and, of course, reciprocal
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
10:43 am
Woodstock: Do liberals ever expect Democrats to do anything? Our president is a Democrat. All I read here is how the GOP didn’t do something. Are Democrats capable of doing anything?
http://kids.clerk.house.gov/grade-school/lesson.html?intID=17
Enough said but whine on.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
10:43 am
Granny — my fave fake scandal is the lone Black Panther holding a baton who never intimidated a person.
You can’t have voter intimidation without an intimidated voter! (none were ever found). Of course FAke News made it sound like thousands were beaten half to death.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
10:44 am
oh and the terrorist fist bump….that makes me chuckle still
WOODSTOCK MIKE
December 21st, 2011
10:44 am
It’s real simple, you can read these posts and get the picture, liberals are such an angry group of people, nothing is good enough, blame everyone else, they don’t do anything wrong ever!! It’s like a child…
Paul
December 21st, 2011
10:44 am
Google: “never-wrong pundit Allan Lichtman”
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
10:44 am
Hmmmm….Boner, Reid, Pelosi, McConnell…..should we really be shocked and awed with our bankrupt finances and lack of moral fibre?
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
10:45 am
And MiltonMan conveniently neglects to mention that Phil Gramm’s wife was on the Board of Directors of Enron back when Phil slipped that little midnight hour addendum into the must pass budget bill without any review or discussion. You know the one.
josef
December 21st, 2011
10:45 am
ZamVet
I waded through it twice the first time out of obligation and the second time for a lit course…I never could really get the point, though…
Normal
December 21st, 2011
10:45 am
Start breaking out your Short Timers calandar…the end is near…
http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/mexico-mayan-region-launches-1265989.html?cxntlid=thbz_hm
Jm
December 21st, 2011
10:46 am
Amvet
Yeah, I love the swamp down here. Super dark, quiet.
Usinuk yeah, ATL has the same problem as London (only probably only slightly less so). Atlanta is just drowning in light pollution. Someone call the EPA (kidding)
Maybe I’ll go for a smaller telescope. Can get a much cheaper 12 inch and start having fun now rather than wait another year
Ah the dilemmas
Nice Guy
December 21st, 2011
10:46 am
Jay – “Even the folks on the Wall Street Journal editorial board understand…”
The liberal holier-than-thou attitude is displayed right off the bat.
WOODSTOCK MIKE
December 21st, 2011
10:46 am
It’s interesting when liberals strongly support Obama but then I ask them why are you such a strong supporter? They then sit there in silence…
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
10:46 am
Woodstock Mike “It’s real simple, you can read these posts and get the picture, liberals are such an angry group of people, nothing is good enough, blame everyone else, they don’t do anything wrong ever”
Again, what’s a “liberal” exactly? Is that just assumed to mean someone who supports Barack Obama and/or criticizes House Republicans? Kind of narrow don’t you think?
How’s everyone doing this morning? Another day in the oligarchy!
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
10:46 am
“I love the sight of leaderless wingnuts twisting in the wind. Unemployment declining…”
Now THAT is some spin. Record levels and duration of unemployment and it dips around Christmas time and all is well!! Stay off the rum until Christmas, please.
“…stock market up…”
May I suggest you apply for position with a marketing firm? Or do you already work for one?
“…second Great Depression averted…”
Exactly what my crystal ball said too. Did you get it at Walmart?
“…economy recovering…”
Yes. There is complete agreement on this…you can read about it everywhere.
“…Iraq finished…”
This is a premature statement. We must wait until Iran takes control of it first.
“…Libya liberated without US boots on the ground…”
Now if Obama would only kill off the other hundreds or ruthless dictators in the world, perhaps starting in China.
“…Bin Laden and his friends killed…”
He had friends?
“…lowest tax rates since 1955…”
All thanks to our first mulatto president!!!
“…millions more with health insurance…”
How about all of the inmates who received food stamps? Don’t forget about them!
“…auto industry salvaged with net return to taxpayers…”
How about that Chevy Volt, huh?
“…zero White House scandals…”
You mean, none like those under the Clinton administration? Let’s hope that the Fast and Furious investigation is only what Obama and “friends” say it is: a racially motivated witch hunt!!!
Well said, Paul!!!
saywhat?
December 21st, 2011
10:46 am
WOODSTOCK MIKE
December 21st, 2011
10:39 am
“Do liberals ever expect Democrats to do anything? Our president is a Democrat. All I read here is how the GOP didn’t do something. Are Democrats capable of doing anything?”
I can’t speak for others, but I expected Democrats to pass some form of health care reform, and they did (although not in the form I would have preferred). I expected them to end DADT, and they did. I expected the President to get us out of Iraq, and he did, to get Osama Bin Laden, and he did, and to get us out of Afghanistan, which I still hope he will. I expect the Democrats to strengthen the economy, and they have, despite the total lack of cooperation, not to mention outright attempts at sabotage and hostage taking from the GOP.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
10:46 am
Don’t forget the $200 million dollar a day trip to India……
Why $4 million is a bargain!
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
10:47 am
JEWBOY,
The worst of the worst are John Gibson and Thom Hartmann. BIG Ed is the best for comedic relief…
On another note, can you guess how many times I’ve be referred to as GOYIM from parents of women I’ve dated?
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
10:47 am
The only thing constant between those two statements is a hatred of Obama
Ah yes! The tie that binds.
Kamchak
December 21st, 2011
10:48 am
It’s interesting when liberals strongly support Obama but then I ask them why are you such a strong supporter? They then sit there in silence…
Once again for those of you in the cheap seats — I SUPPORTED JUAN McSAME AND SNOWBILLY SNOOKI IN THE PREVIOUS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION!
AmVet - A Happy KwanzChristmakkuh to al!
December 21st, 2011
10:48 am
Thesbians?
Are those that what I think they are?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
10:48 am
“NORTH KOREA: Unemployed Twentysomething Gets Nuclear Weapons” ~ Andy Borowitz
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
10:48 am
Dems actually reversed the “Enron Loophole” in 2008 over Bush’s veto too.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
10:49 am
“oh and the terrorist fist bump….that makes me chuckle still”
ba-HA … I almost forgot about that …
and let’s not forget the WHITEY TAPE
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
10:49 am
AMVET,
How many of you are there on this forum? Please let me know which one is the real one…isn’t there any screening for names? Is using spin-off on existing name a sign that you’ve hit a nerve?
Bill Orvis White
December 21st, 2011
10:50 am
FACT: Corporations in the U.S. pay the highest taxe$ in the world. FACT: Corporations are job creators. FACT: Corporations are getting out of the U.S. ’cause this draconian government is choking them. FACT: The rightful Republicans would like to keep workers’ tax levels where they are. Letting those rates go back is 1)Not “Boehner’s” or the GOP’s tax increase – that is a massive liberal lie 2)Rates will only go back up because this president cannot work with anyone and creates roadblocks.This payroll tax thing is a blip on Obama’s sour economic radar. The fact is our economy would be soaring if a President Huckabee or McCain were at the wheel stimulating U.S. dollar$ by cutting taxe$ on corporations, cap gains and scrapping the confusing income tax.
FACT: Hussein Obama works far less than any of his predecessors. GW Bush’s meeting started promptly at 7 a.m. each morning. Hussein Obama’s short meetings start at 9 a.m. with everyone in inproper attire. There is no prayer. There is no dignity. GW Bush worked long 12 hour days filled with important meetings because he was the war president. Hussein Obama carouses in the Oval Office with foreigners and celebrities like Stevie Wonder. NOTHING GETS DONE IN THE WHITE HOUSE THESE DAYS.
Merry Christmas + Amen,
Bill
Jay
December 21st, 2011
10:50 am
Personally, I think most celebrities come off sounding naive when they dabble in politics, Stevie.
Sean Penn has simply done so on a much grander scale. His support for Chavez in particular is ludicrous.
On the other hand, as Josef points out, I think Penn does deserve points for sincerity and actually getting involved at ground level in Haiti and elsewhere. In places, he has made a real difference.
saywhat?
December 21st, 2011
10:50 am
WOODSTOCK MIKE
December 21st, 2011
10:44 am
“It’s real simple, you can read these posts and get the picture, liberals are such an angry group of people, nothing is good enough, blame everyone else, they don’t do anything wrong ever!! It’s like a child…”
This posted right after a long lists of posts laughing about faux scandals. Somebody is consumed with anger, but it ain’t us……
Typical BS
December 21st, 2011
10:50 am
Someone wants to sit down to talk about how to pay for a tax cut and not borrow more money? “Sorry, I’m on holiday, just pass it and we’ll see what’s in it later”
Fire the entire 435 in the House next fall, and 33/34 senators that are up for office as well. Can’t do any worse than what we have now. Even throw in a D rated president for good measure and maybe there is hope. Every day these clowns don’t do anything, we go another $4 billion in debt. Every day!
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
10:51 am
“Sean Penn has simply done so on a much grander scale. His support for Chavez in particular is ludicrous.”
haha … well said.
Bluecoat
December 21st, 2011
10:52 am
Go easy on Thelma she cries a lot (may be that time in her life)as for Louise she will follow Thelma.
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
10:53 am
Corporate taxes? LOL.
Ireland has a 12.5% corporate tax rate and they are losing corporations fast. Dell picked up and moved to Poland.
Our rate is 35% but no big company pays it.
reebok
December 21st, 2011
10:53 am
Boehner wants to work through the holidays? Why does he hate Christmas? And God? And America?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
10:53 am
Stevie Ray,
“The worst of the worst are John Gibson and Thom Hartmann. BIG Ed is the best for comedic relief…”
Never heard of them. But, a confession, I own 2 tv’s and they are in the guest bedrooms.
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 21st, 2011
10:54 am
Captions for the above photo –
-Friends don’t Let Friends Drive Republican
-The Bush Administration- A Metaphor
-Trickle Down
-ConWorld – The Ride
-Who Needs Road Taxes
Nice Guy
December 21st, 2011
10:54 am
Jay – “I think Penn does deserve points for sincerity and actually getting involved at ground level in Haiti and elsewhere. In places, he has made a real difference.”
I don’t think people discredit him for what he does. Its just how he goes about his business is what bothers me. You know, its the whole, ‘its not what you say but how you say’ thing.
Mick
December 21st, 2011
10:54 am
Sean penn and haiti – a match made in liberal heaven….anyone else going to haiti anytime soon?
Kamchak
December 21st, 2011
10:54 am
Every day these clowns don’t do anything, we go another $4 billion in debt. Every day!
Everyday.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
10:55 am
Woodstock Mike: “It’s interesting when liberals strongly support Obama but then I ask them why are you such a strong supporter? They then sit there in silence…”
Do you think I am a big supporter of Obama? That is in the mindless, knee-jerk sense?
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
10:55 am
Jay,
I should have clarified a little better, but knowing how you libs take a lot out of context I wanted to make sure the quotes were in full. I do agree with Chavez about Obama being a clown, and destroying our country. Oh, and they’ve been bff for a while now kissing each other exchanging a little light reading for one another…but you were silent on that.
The Truth
December 21st, 2011
10:56 am
Funny how so-called ‘fiscal conservatives’ always talk about ‘cutting spending’, but they never complained when their boy George W. lost 3 billion dollars in the Iraqi desert. Compare that to the flimsy 500 million that was lost by Solyndra that they keep yapping about…
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
10:56 am
FACT: Unless it starts with prayer, it’s not work. FACT: Bill does not know facts.
But thank Allah that Bush and staff wore “proper” attire when meeting at 7 AM to plan their lies for the day. All prayers ended with “Good Job Brownie” and “Mission Accomplished!”
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
10:57 am
Bill Orvis White,
FACT: Constantly using “Hussein Obama” rather than his given name is a sign of your xenophobia,
Bluecoat
December 21st, 2011
10:57 am
Yep, Bush was the worker bee,working for the queen bee corporations.
josef
December 21st, 2011
10:58 am
“All thanks to our first mulatto president!!!”
Who would that be? If you want to go throwing out the race classifications, he’s not a mulatto. Father–mulatto, Mother–white = Quadroon….
Mick
No, they’re not going and maybe they should…and gotta give his “Brownie” points in NOLA…
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
10:58 am
there was also….
The Missile Defense Agency logo looks Islamic!
and
The Nuclear Security Summit logo also looks Islamic
Jefferson
December 21st, 2011
10:58 am
It’s time the GOP thinks about someone other than themselves.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
11:00 am
SR, none of “me” are real. I’m just a figment of your blogging imagination
…liberals are such an angry group of people…
Says Ebeneezer Mike!
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:00 am
Meh
Eliminate Corp taxes and raise capital gains and dividends taxes
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
11:00 am
Iraq War debacle = 2000 Solyndras.
And Solyndra had a chance to make money – albeit a very small one.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
11:01 am
Talking – 10:55 – I’ll repeat what I said downstairs when ragnar brought up the same subject:
OHNOES!!!!! Hugo Chavez – a man who ended term limits so that he could be preskident for life and who pals around with a certain M Ahmadinajad – doesn’t like our president!!!
OH DEARYDEAR!!! whatever shall we do???
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
11:01 am
Granny Godzilla,
“The Missile Defense Agency logo looks Islamic! The Nuclear Security Summit logo also looks Islamic”
Well that fits since our President is quite obviously Islamic.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:04 am
Oh Lordy
Johnson running on Libertarian ticket
On the bright side, that probably keeps Ron Paul off it
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
11:04 am
GG and jewcowboy – and let’s not forget the Flight 93 memorial poutrage!!!
http://michellemalkin.com/2005/09/10/flight-93-memorial-seeing-is-believing/
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
11:05 am
jewcowboy
yep nothing says islamic like a great 3 point shot and a love of pie.
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
11:05 am
Jm@December 21st, 2011
11:00 am
I agree with those but you need to hold out for the 18 incher
It’ll make you more popular
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
11:05 am
JAY,
BTW, I just downloaded Glenn Greenwalds new book and appreciate your turning me on to him…will let you know what I think if you are interested…”With Liberty and Justice for Some”..
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
11:06 am
BAAAAAhahahahahahahahahaah
one of the best Onion headlines ever:
http://www.onionsportsnetwork.com/articles/jesus-christ-claims-tim-tebow-not-ready-to-be-nfl,21167/
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:07 am
Reuters analysis on their web page: $48 BILLION STOLEN FROM MEDICARE LAST YEAR
What a totally Fd up system
Stop paying your taxes people
You’re being robbed
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
11:07 am
wrong Jm
Libertarian Convention is in May next year. They choose then. Although I hope he stays in the GOP race in hopes of a brokered GOP catfight.
josef
December 21st, 2011
11:08 am
USinUK, Granny
Nyanh…best scandal was taking the wife for a night on the town, dinner and a show…just what kind of family values does that man have, anyway…wasn’t he supposed to be feeling patriotic with a harlot?
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
11:08 am
So all it takes is an extra $40 a month in paychecks (not for everybody) to give Obama a 50% approval rating?
That forgives everything, all of the damage this president has done to America.
The payoffs to his cronies, the trillions in debt, the dictatorial way he runs our country (openly admitting he will circumvent Congress to get his way), betrayal of our allies, the threats to our gun rights/free speech, Fast and Furious.
I didn’t think it was possible to top the stupidity of the 2008 election.
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 21st, 2011
11:08 am
whoa granny, Fox wants to give “Merka back to the Indians?
oh..Obama wants to give merka back to the Indians.
the drunk brother-in-law steals my ferrari, takes it out and wrecks it,
and wants me to buy it back from him?
No sir buddy. No sale. You broke it. You bought it.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
11:10 am
“Who would that be? If you want to go throwing out the race classifications, he’s not a mulatto. Father–mulatto, Mother–white = Quadroon….”
Mind citing evidence for his father being mulatto (since I have not seen that written anywhere)? Otherwise, thanks for agreeing with me that Obama is NOT black (like the media hypesters would have you believe).
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
11:10 am
josef and granny – then there’s always the “they’re comin’ fer our guns!!!” alarm
Not a Neal Boortz Redneck
December 21st, 2011
11:10 am
“Reuters analysis on their web page: $48 BILLION STOLEN FROM MEDICARE LAST YEAR”
That is why we need the IPB in Obamacare (Sarah’s death panels) – they could line item the scooters out in one cut.
Stevie Ray
December 21st, 2011
11:10 am
USNUK,
That’s funny I don’t care who you are…look at it this way, Pat Robertson is quite thrilled so shouldn’t we relish TT as well?:-)
I posted this Hitchens quote the other day but appropriate currently: “If you gave Rev Falwell an enema, you could bury his remains in a matchbox….” Of course you can fill in just about any political figure (or perhaps Stevie Ray).
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:11 am
Common
no doubt
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
11:14 am
of course there is the ever popular and yearly
war on Christmas
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:15 am
Elizabeth Warren has a super PAC called “rethink PAC”
Ironic. And she’s no more a saint than anyone else out there
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
11:15 am
Stevie –
I’ve heard a lot of Hitchens quotes lately, but not that one … (will be chuckling over that one for days)
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
11:16 am
Talking Head,
“the dictatorial way he runs our country (openly admitting he will circumvent Congress to get his way)”
Really?
“List of Signing Statements issued by George W. Bush”
http://www.coherentbabble.com/listGWBall.htm
josef
December 21st, 2011
11:16 am
strawman…
The classification for the Coastal Kenyan mixed bloods…as far as US racial categorization, according to the long form, father is not categorized by race…when that happens according to contemporary definitions in the US official documentation, the test is “appearance, what does s/he look like…”
St Simon’s
Drunken brother-in-law? Keerful, you’ll get the R card thrown at ya!
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:16 am
Obama has a super PAC: priorities USA action
Bashing Romney
Obama. Just another dirty hustler
getalife
December 21st, 2011
11:17 am
cons choose to live in la la land by clinging to all the gop lies hoping they are true. They know they are probably lies but they want to believe the lies to make them feel better about losing.
cons are America’s worst sore losers. They never get over it so they live in la la land.
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 21st, 2011
11:18 am
“$48 BILLION STOLEN FROM MEDICARE LAST YEAR”
4% of that by one guy, your governor, Rick Scott (R)
Yeah, hold the store owner responsible ’cause his store got robbed.
Now, THAT’S the Republican brain at work, in all its glorah (see picture)
RBO
December 21st, 2011
11:19 am
Ah, history repeats… Has anyone else observed the “our way or the highway” negotiating similarities between the current crop of Republican Tea Partiers and the recently-voted-out-of-office Blue Dogs of the Democrats…? And how nothing gets done for our Country because of their inability to compromise…? Believing that one’s specific solution to the country’s complex problems will be agreeable to all of the electorate is the absolute pinnacle of arrogance.
Kamchak
December 21st, 2011
11:20 am
Outdoor adventurers are represented by the BackPAC
Jay
December 21st, 2011
11:21 am
A book report over the holiday break would be grand, Stevie Ray.
Kamchak
December 21st, 2011
11:21 am
Singers from the 40s are represented by the RatPAC.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
11:21 am
jcb, to your point at 11:16, I think some of BHO’s popularity is that he is simply, not George Bush.
ANYONE who succeeded that godawful blithering, deadly idiot would have to be viewed somewhat favorably in comparison.
That BHO and the rest of us inherited the worst mess in modern history is both the good and bad news…
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
11:21 am
jewcowboy @ 11:16,
so I guess you are encapable of accepting that Obama has flaws and instead revert to what Bush did…sad
Mark T
December 21st, 2011
11:21 am
So they extend the cuts for 2 months, then what?
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
11:22 am
Jm: “Reuters analysis on their web page: $48 BILLION STOLEN FROM MEDICARE LAST YEAR
What a totally Fd up system
Stop paying your taxes people”
No! That’s the wrong way to go.
The thing to do is drastically RAISE taxes — across the board — and INCREASE benefits.
Only through the universalization of benefits and responsibilities can this wreck of a system be saved.
Brosephus
December 21st, 2011
11:24 am
It will take businesses 4 months to gear up their payroll systems to figure out the 2 month extension effect. Hasn’t anyone in Congress ever run a business? This is totally irrational.
Sounds like businesses need to get more efficient in their accounting depts.
USinner @ 11:06
Beware, lest you wish to have to Christian basher sticker placed on your shirt.
Kamchak
December 21st, 2011
11:25 am
The Inuit are supported by the IcePAC.
josef
December 21st, 2011
11:26 am
Strawman
Mwangi Peter Wanderi has written the most extensively on the cultural identity of the Waswahili…some of his work is available on internet…
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
11:26 am
“The classification for the Coastal Kenyan mixed bloods…as far as US racial categorization, according to the long form, father is not categorized by race…when that happens according to contemporary definitions in the US official documentation, the test is “appearance, what does s/he look like…”
That is quite a stretch and won’t do, unless you are hereby claiming that ALL Kenyans are of mixed blood (which I think would be dubious). Unless you can come up with something better, my point stands: Obama is mulatto. But even if you can somehow prove your claim, you are merely proving that he is even LESS black than I claim. As I’ve said before, it’s sad that his racial heritage – which should be a badge of honor in an historically racially divided nation – is forever obscured by the media.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
11:26 am
Brocephus – 11:24 – are you kidding??? that one has been placed on my shirt since I was in 7th grade and called an idolator for being Catholic.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:27 am
Kam
I like those PACs
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
11:27 am
“The thing to do is drastically RAISE taxes — across the board — and INCREASE benefits.”
“Only through the universalization of benefits and responsibilities can this wreck of a system be saved.”
Occupation,
I take it you are being facetious right? You can’t possibly be serious.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
11:28 am
“A book report over the holiday break would be grand, Stevie Ray.”
And will you promise us a “What I Did For Christmas” report in the new year, Jay?
getalife
December 21st, 2011
11:28 am
After the cons get destroyed this election, they will be marginilized as kooks where they belong and our country will come back.
We are in the last throes of the kooky con movement.
Hang in there Americans.
godless heathen
December 21st, 2011
11:28 am
Us beer swillers are supported by the SixPAC
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
11:29 am
Kam – “The Inuit are supported by the IcePAC.”
booooooooooooooo
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:30 am
Kam
What’s green bay’s PAC called?
Brosephus
December 21st, 2011
11:30 am
Outdoor adventurers are represented by the BackPAC
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
11:31 am
We weary travellers are supported by the OVER PAC (which has, as yet, been unsuccessful at removing the weight restrictions for checked luggage)
Bill Orvis White
December 21st, 2011
11:32 am
@jewcowboy
Hussein Obama is the “man’s” name. He’s also a failed Marxist community organizer and very failed state and U.S. senator. I know this bad movie better than anyone here on this lefty blog and I’m afraid to see its ending. Mark my words here on this date: this country WILL be in great peril if this once-free nation “re-elects” this failed “president.” I’m also hoping that your Mr. Hatfield over there in Waycross gets ‘Lil Hussein off of the Georgia primary ballot. It’s important that a candidate’s parents were both American born. I still think Mr. Trump was onto something about this “president’s” birthplace.
Merry Christmas and Amen,
Bill
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
11:32 am
Talking Head,
“so I guess you are encapable of accepting that Obama has flaws and instead revert to what Bush did”
Nope…I just have fun pointing out your poutrage. If you truly cared about a President circumventing Congress you wouldn’t be just concentrating your ire on Obama. Instead you like to make blanket statements calling Obama a dictator, yet ignoring past actions.
In the first 3 years, Bush had 85 signing statements. Obama has had 16.
Grover Norquist was touched by Sandusky
December 21st, 2011
11:33 am
GOP – Instead of blaming President Obama for the Sun rising in the morning and setting in the evening. You guys should listen to a Michael Jackson song, “I’m Starting with the Man in the Mirror, I’m asking him to change his ways”
My bad, that’s toooooo much like thinking!!!!!!!!!!!!
Newt’s Tiffany’s acct just went up by another $100K(he bought a promise ring)
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:34 am
Doom
He’s probably serious….. (head shaking)
Halftrack
December 21st, 2011
11:34 am
What does this tax extension ultimately do? It creates a bigger hole in Social Security funds. It is a stealth plan by Obummer to fundamentally change America. This does not create a job anywhere. Let’s wise up and smell the coffee.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
11:35 am
“this country WILL be in great peril if this once-free nation “re-elects” this failed “president.” ”
heehee
it looks like someone needs to “learn” how to “use” quotation marks “correctly”
josef
December 21st, 2011
11:35 am
Strawman
Coastal Kenyans (Waswahili) are quite distinct from those of the interior…the term mulatto for them goes back to the classifications of the British colonial period when they were afforded certain priviledges over the Negroes of the interior…
However, with the exception of the American Indians, one can “legally” call oneself whatever one chooses for classification…only Indians have to present documentation to be officially classified as Pesky Redskins and thus eligible for all the set asides, scholarships, affirmative action, etc, etc.
Kamchak
December 21st, 2011
11:35 am
What’s green bay’s PAC called?
PackPAC?
Or would that be TwoPAC? No that is representation for rappers.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
11:37 am
Bill Orvis White,
“Hussein Obama is the “man’s” name.”
Hussein is not his given name, it is his middle name. Do you call Clinton Jefferson rather than Bill? Again…your xenophobia is showing.
As for the rest of your screed…Season’s Greetings.
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
11:38 am
USinUK @December 21st, 2011
11:26 am
that one has been placed on my shirt since I was in 7th grade and called an idolator for being Catholic.
———————————————————————–
Then shouldn’t you be in the chosen land (Ireland) with the chosen people (we Irish)
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 21st, 2011
11:39 am
Sometimes Pres Obama must feel like Sheriff Bart in a mashup
of Blazing Saddles & Les Miserables..
Jefferson
December 21st, 2011
11:39 am
Bill Sissy White, the name caller gets called a sissy.
Kamchak
December 21st, 2011
11:39 am
Hussein is not his given name, it is his middle name.
I’m one of those middle name people.
Causes a lot of problems for children, it does.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
11:39 am
The newt was occupied in Iowa.
A heard a guy on CNN blast the cons for living in la la land.
Ron Paul is winning Iowa.
Good times.
Brosephus
December 21st, 2011
11:39 am
USinner
Well, when you start early, you finish strong!!!!
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:40 am
PDA lovers engage the SmackPAC
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
11:40 am
Jm,
Ya think he’s serious? That’s the scary part.
Kinda interesting that the do nothing Dem. led senate which has sat on countless house bills and which couldn’t even pass a budget for years is blaming the House. I think the House is right about one thing. That sorry do nothing Senate should keep their sorry, lazy, fat asses in Washington and work through Christmas. I’m thinking the senate is even worse than Obama.
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
11:41 am
jewcowboy,
Once again, you are encapable of accepting the fact that Obama has flaws. I know Bush had flaws, and thats why I didnt vote for him in 2004. You seem to harbor the idea that if you deflect the critizism from the current president to the former you have dignified him in some way.
You just said, “you truly cared about a President circumventing Congress you wouldn’t be just concentrating your ire on Obama. Instead you like to make blanket statements calling Obama a dictator, yet ignoring past actions.”
Why wouldn’t I be concentrating on Obama? Is he not the CURRENT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES? Has he not said on record that he would “like to work his way around Congress” on multiple occasions?
I am a firm believer in that history has a way of repeating itself and look to the past for answers, but I’m not blind to the current corruption of today.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
11:43 am
So calling someone by their middle name now constitutes xenophobia. Interesting leap of logic. A very long leap at that.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
11:43 am
I have already adjusted my income projections for 2012 to include a 6.2% FICA instead of 4.2%
But in all this, has everyone forgotten that UI is about to get cut dramatically ALSO? This is what the R’s REALLY want. People to get cut from the rolls, and not get back on once a deal is made after the fact.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
11:43 am
getalife,
“Ron Paul is winning Iowa.”
Perhaps Newt shouldn’t be telling 10% of the population to F-off.
http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.com/2011/12/20/gingrich-to-gay-iowan-vote-for-obama/
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
11:43 am
Common – if you’ve never heard of Dara O’Briain, look. him. up.
best comedian I’ve ever heard (and, yes, he’s Oirish)
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:44 am
BK and McD’s both fund the MacPAC
They are being sued though by UrbanGardenPAC (a front for Michelle)
josef
December 21st, 2011
11:44 am
jewcowboy
just doing my EOI duties here, but it is now his “given” name as opposed to his “surname.” Of course back when he was born, we still used the term “Christian” name!
getalife
December 21st, 2011
11:45 am
The fact (not for those living in la la land) is a two month extension is the only thing that would pass.
Ignore that fact all you want cons but it is the truth.
Kamchak
December 21st, 2011
11:46 am
USinUK
Is Dara O’Briain the guy you posted a youtube link of last year?
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:46 am
Doom
I think so
His previous name was Trotsky, after all
getalife
December 21st, 2011
11:48 am
jm and doomy,
Talk about the issues cons not other people.
Matti's Observant Eye
December 21st, 2011
11:48 am
Thulsa,
You don’t think we should blame the House for the fact that more tax money will be removed from my paycheck next month, even though my millionaire Congressman fought long, hard, & nasty to keep his own tax cut from expiring? Okay, I’ll try to see your logic here, but in order to see it, I’ll have to reconcile the GOP House hypocrisy. See, they promised only a year ago:
“We will end the practice of packaging unpopular bills with “must-pass” legislation to circumvent the will of the American people. Instead, we will advance major legislation one issue at a time.”
The reason the Senate didn’t hop all over the House bill was that they broke that promise when they held MY tax rate (but not theirs) hostage in order to insert a favor for their oil-industry buddies. This was also the reason the President gave for promising to veto it. So I ask you, Thulsa Doom: Should I believe the GOP when they make a pledge to me or not? How do YOU rationalize it when they break a promise to you?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
11:48 am
Thulsa Doom,
“So calling someone by their middle name now constitutes xenophobia. Interesting leap of logic”
Ok…then tell me. Why would one call a person by their middle name, if that person did not go by their middle, it took more effort to write and was less precise in terms of to whom one was referring?
Jefferson
December 21st, 2011
11:48 am
The GOP is being played and they are falling for it…
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
11:49 am
“But in all this, has everyone forgotten that UI is about to get cut dramatically ALSO? This is what the R’s REALLY want. People to get cut from the rolls, and not get back on once a deal is made after the fact.”
I know, right??? Three years is far too little time to find work. During the Depression, of course, everyone turned their noses up at jobs no one else would do because it was beneath them – just like now.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
11:49 am
Getalife
Let’s talk about your issues then
They are many
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 21st, 2011
11:51 am
The Republican House’s approval rating falls below the unempl rate
This is where the coast guards put out the flags heheheh
getalife
December 21st, 2011
11:51 am
jm,
I do have a issue with cons and I am writing a book called La La land.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
11:53 am
“During the Depression, of course, everyone turned their noses up at jobs no one else would do because it was beneath them – just like now.”
Got a link con?
josef
December 21st, 2011
11:53 am
jewcowboy
Well, Barak just don’t get it, Hillary being no Deborah…
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
11:53 am
“BK and McD’s both fund the MacPAC”
sounds like something Apple would fund …
but then it would wind up being called the iPAC
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
11:55 am
Kam – 11:46 – yep – this guy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0thRUS1wUw
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
11:57 am
Talking Head,
“you are encapable of accepting the fact that Obama has flaws. I know Bush had flaws, and thats why I didnt vote for him in 2004. You seem to harbor the idea that if you deflect the critizism from the current president to the former you have dignified him in some way.”
Actually, I’m just trying to figure out why you seem to think Obama is engaging in “dictatorial” ways. What has he done to back up your assertion of “the dictatorial way he runs our country (openly admitting he will circumvent Congress to get his way).”
The one way he can circumvent Congress is through the us of signing statements, yet he has used signing statements nearly 80% less than the previous administration. As far as Executive Orders, he has slightly less than the previous administration at the same time in their tenure. so by 2 measures this administration has circumventing Congress’s will less than the previous.
“I am a firm believer in that history has a way of repeating itself and look to the past for answers, but I’m not blind to the current corruption of today.”
So what is your basis for your comment?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
11:59 am
josef,
“Of course back when he was born, we still used the term “Christian” name!”
Even if he is a Muslim?
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
12:00 pm
Matti’s @11:48 am
But they promised him that they would love him forever,
Just like the Nutster promised in his wedding vows all 3 times LOL
Brosephus
December 21st, 2011
12:01 pm
Guess I’ll get me an on topic post…
Seems like the WSJ isn’t the only one wondering aloud about House Republicans..
I was reading some of the conservative columnists at the WaPo, and they’re feeling the same way…
Ed Rogers
I’m the Republican in The Insiders, so I’m not supposed to say “ditto Carter” to my Democratic counterpart.
I try to be a conscientious follower of the news, a clear conservative and mostly a Republican team player. But I’ve lost track of how the GOP defines success on the payroll tax issue. I’ve lost track of the true Republican position; I’ve even lost track of the good we can claim we have done. We seem to have put President Obama in a win-win position. How do we define success or victory now? I’m not asking this question to make a point; I’m asking because I don’t know the answer. [...]
The only people House Republicans have over a barrel are other Republicans. We are even about to make Obama a legitimate tax cutter…
or, there’s Jennifer Rubin’s view
The GOP, if it has not the wherewithal to oppose a payroll tax reduction (When will Congress ever have the nerve to increase it and stem further hemorrhaging of funds available for Social Security? Why not cut the entire tax, according to the Democrats’ logic?), then cut a deal and come back to finish the work in 2012. If the Democrats want another 10 months of payroll tax relief, then Republicans should get something for that (e.g. more cuts, a definitive decision on the pipeline). Just not now. In January.
Then there’s Daniel Horowitz over at RedState.com
This is why, for the last time, I call on House Republicans to pass a clean 12-month extension without any strings attached; no riders, reforms, offsets, and extraneous extensions attached. That will totally put the ball back in the Democrats’ court, forcing them to support or reject the only workable extension plan.
Seems like the House GOP has been snookered into stomping the flaming bag on their doorstep…
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:01 pm
Jeesum Crow…how many grammar and spelling mistake are in my 11.57 post.
That what you get for doing two thing at the same time.
Multi-tasking: Doing two or more tasks at the same time poorly.
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
12:02 pm
I suprised to see most of the liberal posters here are upset with the possibility of a 2% tax hike in your SS tax. I mean you support those who pass legislation that want tax hikes to pay for a egalitarian society. You support those with the mind set that the government ALLOWS you to keep a certain % of the governments money, and it is never YOUR money.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
12:02 pm
http://blogs.ajc.com/mike-luckovich/?cxntlid=sldr
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
12:03 pm
“when they held MY tax rate (but not theirs) hostage in order to insert a favor for their *oil-industry buddies*”- Matti
Matti,
You make it difficult to respond when you lose all credibility by launching into the hyper rhetoric with nonsense about their “rich oil buddies”.
As for dishonesty and broken promises I recommend you review Obama’s various broken promises. There are way to many to enumerate but here is a link for your review.
Being the fair and open minded person that you are I am certain you will take a half day or so to review his voluminous list of broken promises.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/12/obamas_trail_of_broken_promises.html
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
12:03 pm
“Got a link con?”
Not for third graders.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
12:04 pm
jewcowboy – he’s Muslim??
I thought he was muslin!
Brosephus
December 21st, 2011
12:04 pm
Talking Head
If that 2% tax hike keeps conservatives out of my wallet, then I’ll gladly pay it.
Common Sense
December 21st, 2011
12:04 pm
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
10:08 am
That article is from Dec. 15, 2010, NOT 2011. What earmarks are you saying is in the current non-negotiated bill we are all upset about? Sorry if this was discovered but I skipped several pages of comments, so I might be late to the table.
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
12:05 pm
Bro – did all the pols get the full TSA treatment when they returned home.
By that I mean the full on OVER the BARREL cavity search
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:06 pm
Strawman,
“During the Depression, of course, everyone turned their noses up at jobs no one else would do because it was beneath them – just like now.”
The Bureau of Labor Statistics puts 4 applicants for every job opening. In a healthy economy the ration is 1:1. People aren’t turning down jobs…there are not enough jobs to go around. Your statement is, well, malarkey.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
12:06 pm
“Ok…then tell me. Why would one call a person by their middle name, if that person did not go by their middle, it took more effort to write and was less precise in terms of to whom one was referring?”
Jewcowboy,
Perhaps he just likes the name. Personally I like it so much that I just may start calling Barry Hussein. I like the elegance of the name and the way it just rolls off the tongue. Hussein! Hussein! Hussein! What a mighty fine name indeed.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
12:07 pm
““Got a link con?”
Not for third graders.”
Just admit the lie con.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:08 pm
USinUK,
“I thought he was muslin!”
Better muslin than muesli.
josef
December 21st, 2011
12:08 pm
USinUK
Nyanh…his muslin comes in on his Mama’s side…
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
12:09 pm
“If that 2% tax hike keeps conservatives out of my wallet, then I’ll gladly pay it.”
Translation: I am a cult disciple of the Democratic party, what is thy bidding my master.
say it ain't so....
December 21st, 2011
12:09 pm
I’ll agree with you that the rejection of this bill is a republican blunder and p.r. disaster but Jay, did you read the entire wall street article or just picked what you wanted out of it. the entire article slams the tax extenstion as bad policy, called it a stupid bill btw. those clowns in wash d.c. have no clue on basic economic policies. the bill was a bad deal and companies like adp (which manage payrolls) said the bill stunk too….
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
12:09 pm
““Got a link con?”
Not for third graders.”
“Just admit the lie con.”
My only question is: how long have you been held back? Ten years? Twelve?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:09 pm
Thulsa Doom,
“Perhaps he just likes the name.”
I’ve no doubt.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
12:11 pm
There is a opportunity for you cons to disband the whig party again to start a new party that represents you instead of just the 1 %.
I doubt you will take this opportunity for change.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
12:11 pm
Conservativism is the checkmate on the little man of the intellectual/spiritual world.
Conservativism is the gnashed teeth and shaking fist of the little man doubling down on his own resentment.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
12:12 pm
straw,
Sore lose much?
Just admit you lied.
Man up son.
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
12:12 pm
JCB – not everyone is capable of doing heavy construction for minimum wage, just the Advil alone would eat up their wages.
The loss of middle class and manufacturing jobs is what has created this economic crisis. It goes back to NAFTA(Bush-Clinton) MFN for China (Clinton) and the at will offshoring of these jobs.
Bush did not and would not put and end to the uneven trade with China or end H1b visas (that were no longer needed) but instead gave a free pass to big business that have gutted the US economy while at the same time lowering their taxes.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
12:12 pm
“People aren’t turning down jobs…there are not enough jobs to go around. Your statement is, well, malarkey.”- jewcowboy
Hmmm. Kinda interesting that people that can’t even speak English and have virtually no education can make it 3,000 miles to here in Georgia from central America and find a job but regular Americans can’t. Somehow or another these uneducated, non English speaking people keep finding these elusive jobs at restaurants, poultry plants and carpet mills, meatpacking plants, construction related jobs, and crop harvesting.
Aint that just amazing that poor people with no education and no English speaking skills can find jobs that Americans can’t?
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
12:12 pm
Jewcowboy and TD
Good afternoon
I hope he likes the name because the probability that he will be saying it for the next 5 yrs is increasing as time goes by
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
12:13 pm
“…but Jay, did you read the entire wall street article or just picked what you wanted out of it?”
He’s referencing Thelma and Louise and you have to ask? Didn’t you learn in Rhetoric 101 that all sound and cogent arguments begin with a dubious allusion to a third rate movie? Come on! Of course he read the whole article!!!
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
12:14 pm
Aint that just amazing that poor people with no education and no English speaking skills can find jobs that Americans can’t?
don’t forget to mention the “for little to no pay” part
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
12:14 pm
TD
Are you saying that we went from 5.0 or so unemployment to what we have now just because people became lazy?
yes there are lazy people out there but not in the numbers you would like to believe
say it ain't so....
December 21st, 2011
12:15 pm
lol strawman, that’s funny
but my point was that companies like adp said the new extension would be too hard to empliment and possibly cause companies to violate tax laws…. the bill sucked….if they were going to pass a true extension, it should have been for a year with no strings attached to the tax holiday….
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
12:16 pm
“Aint that just amazing that poor people with no education and no English speaking skills can find jobs that Americans can’t?”
Truly, it is a mystery. Until one considers things like attitude and desire and, of course, not having alternate sources of income (like three years of unemployment insurance).
Brosephus
December 21st, 2011
12:17 pm
NoCom
One can only hope.
I’m sure there’s probably some who shied away from TSA, especially after wanting to remove the name “officer” from their job title. Why America puts up with such jackassery, I’ll never understand.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
12:17 pm
The worst part of this, and the part that really steams me, is how these lazy, parasitic veterans, with no job skills are increasing the unemployment rate…
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
12:18 pm
I may be wrong but 99 weeks of UI isn’t 3 years is it?
getalife
December 21st, 2011
12:18 pm
cons can’t even admit they lied when called out on their lies.
Challenge their every word because they do not live in the real world.
They have regressed to children putting their fat fingers in their ears and saying la la la la la la la to not hear the truth.
Sad and pathetic but true.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
12:18 pm
“…if they were going to pass a true extension, it should have been for a year with no strings attached to the tax holiday….”
You will get no argument from me. NO bills, in my opinion, should be created with “strings attached.” THAT is perhaps the principal issue with deadlock in Congress.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:19 pm
Thulsa Doom,
“Kinda interesting that people that can’t even speak English and have virtually no education can make it 3,000 miles to here in Georgia from central America and find a job but regular Americans can’t”
Kinda interesting…but false: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/07/06/world/americas/immigration.html?scp=2&sq=Mexico%20and%20border%20and%20immigration&st=cse
The other thing that is kinda interesting is that gas is is averaging $3.21 a gallon and most of the unemployed live in either suburban or urban areas not rural areas. Not a lot of agricultural work going on in Marietta or Riverdale.
The real question is what happened to all those jobs the Republicans promised in 2010? How many jobs bills have the Republicans passed?
godless heathen
December 21st, 2011
12:20 pm
jewcowboy: “People aren’t turning down jobs…there are not enough jobs to go around. Your statement is, well, malarkey.”
From our very own Jay Bookman, June 2011. “Thanks to the resulting labor shortage, Georgia farmers have been forced to leave millions of dollars’ worth of blueberries, onions, melons and other crops unharvested and rotting in the fields.”
A problem we didn’t have during the Great Depression.
Matti's Observant Eye
December 21st, 2011
12:20 pm
Thulsa,
It seems you’re either too embarrassed to answer my question, or you just don’t know the answer. No biggie.
I hold my Congressman accountable because (a) his job is to represent the people of this district directly, and (b) my responsibility as a citizen is to hold him accountable for every little thing he does in that capacity. I try to hold our Senators accountable, but they represent the entire state (in theory), and care even less about lil’ ol’ me than my Congressman. It’s the President’s job to sign or veto the bill, not determine the contents. I guess you missed class that week in fourth grade when the teacher explained how this works, huh? Bless your heart (like, if you had one.)
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:21 pm
They BOTh suck,
“I hope he likes the name because the probability that he will be saying it for the next 5 yrs is increasing as time goes by”
And the GOP is helping that come to fruition.
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
12:22 pm
“The real question is what happened to all those jobs the Republicans promised in 2010? How many jobs bills have the Republicans passed?”
Republicans have created or saved 5,345,911 jobs just by defeating the Dems in 2010 elections.
say it ain't so....
December 21st, 2011
12:22 pm
agreed strawman, strings attached bills do screw things up, so do politicans who legislate for their own personal benefit, both parties guilty……very guilty….
getalife
December 21st, 2011
12:23 pm
th,
How many jobs did w lose?
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
12:23 pm
“Republicans have created or saved 5,345,911 jobs just by defeating the Dems in 2010 elections.”
oh, my – we seem to have entered into the Unicorns-pooping-Skittles territory again …
larry
December 21st, 2011
12:23 pm
Kinda interesting that people that can’t even speak English and have virtually no education can make it 3,000 miles to here in Georgia from central America and find a job but regular Americans can’t”
Did you ever think that those are the type of people employers are looking for?
Had a person tell me that the local chicken hatchery would not hire him because he was over qualified.
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
12:24 pm
“How many jobs did w lose?”
Well he ‘lost’ his job and those in his administration…then adding that to Obama/Pelosi/Democrat math…your guess is as good as anyones, how about anywhere from 1 to infinity, your call.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
12:26 pm
th,
Deflect.
How many jobs have been recovered from w’s collapse?
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
12:26 pm
“The Bureau of Labor Statistics puts 4 applicants for every job opening. In a healthy economy the ration is 1:1. People aren’t turning down jobs…there are not enough jobs to go around. Your statement is, well, malarkey.”
Whoever said the economy is healthy? The point was a sarcastic one (in case you didn’t pick up on that) implying that a not miniscule portion of those on the unemployment rolls could find work if they were willing to do things they were “over qualified” to do. My parents grew up in the depression so people like them have better perspective on how things were like than you or me. The movie Cinderella Man captures the hunger people had to work back then. I don’t get that sense now.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:28 pm
Common Sense,isn’t very Common,
“not everyone is capable of doing heavy construction for minimum wage, just the Advil alone would eat up their wages.”
You mean we can’t put everyone in a field to pick soybeans and cotton for $8 an hour? Sometimes I think the GOP us to go back to a time when “There was a land of Cavaliers and Cotton Fields called The Old South…Here in this pretty world Gallantry took its last bow…Here was the last ever to be seen of Knights and their ladies fair, of Master and of Slave…”
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
12:29 pm
“How many jobs have been recovered from w’s collapse?”
Once again, using Obama/Pelosi/Democrat math anywhere between 1 and infinity, your call.
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
12:29 pm
What I want to know is why no one seems to be talking about how the FICA tax cut is simply defunding Social Security at a time when SS outlays exceed revenues for the first time in 2010, but appears to be in deficit for years to come.
“Social Security expenditures exceeded the program’s non-interest income in 2010 for the first time since 1983. The $49 billion deficit last year (excluding interest income) and $46 billion projected deficit in 2011 are in large part due to the weakened economy and to downward income adjustments that correct for excess payroll tax revenue credited to the trust funds in earlier years. This deficit is expected to shrink to about $20 billion for years 2012-2014 as the economy strengthens. After 2014, cash deficits are expected to grow rapidly as the number of beneficiaries continues to grow at a substantially faster rate than the number of covered workers. Through 2022, the annual cash deficits will be made up by redeeming trust fund assets from the General Fund of the Treasury. Because these redemptions will be less than interest earnings, trust fund balances will continue to grow. After 2022, trust fund assets will be redeemed in amounts that exceed interest earnings until trust fund reserves are exhausted in 2036, one year earlier than was projected last year. Thereafter, tax income would be sufficient to pay only about three-quarters of scheduled benefits through 2085.” [www.ssa.gov] Trustees Report
Solvency of SS was on everyone’s lips a few years ago, we knew it was headed into the toilet, but Obama’s bright idea is to reduce SS taxes (revenues)? Bright idea for him, because he’s trying to turn SS into yet another welfare entitlement by removing even the shroud it had helping it masquerade as something other than a Ponzi scheme. As it is, in 2010 there were 34.9M tax units (of 153.5M) with “Zero or Negative Sum of Income and Payroll Taxes” representing 22.8% of all tax units paying nothing in combined income and payroll taxes–they are free-riding on general revenue-funded America as well as SS.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
12:30 pm
You unemployed cons should back up your bs and go help the farmers instead of blaming the American people for your collapse.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:30 pm
AmVet,
“the part that really steams me, is how these lazy, parasitic veterans, with no job skills are increasing the unemployment rate…”
That and their socialized medical care.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
12:30 pm
jewcowboy – 12:28 – they’s the forman at Tara – they’ll tell us when it’s quittin’ time!!!!
(don’t be surprised when they don’t say “quittin time” … ever)
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
12:30 pm
“…agreed strawman, strings attached bills do screw things up, so do politicans who legislate for their own personal benefit, both parties guilty……very guilty….”
Are we…related? I mean, so like minded on this question..
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
12:31 pm
The totality of the conservative strategy : deal in vague insinuations to exploit the ignorance of low information voters.
The core of conservative ideology: cynicism an little-man-ism.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
12:32 pm
Kudos, Head.
Although I constantly see the handiwork here from those who own copies of the Republican Dictionary of Made Up Definitions, it is a rare that I see examples from the companion tome, the Republican Book of Fabricated Mathematics.
Perhaps some quotes from GOP Science in the Era of Global Cooling, are in order?
getalife
December 21st, 2011
12:32 pm
th,
At the rate the economy is slowly growing, how long until we recover all the jobs w lost?
A decade?
Try to grow up and answer these simple questions con.
I know you can’t.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:32 pm
USinUK,
“oh, my – we seem to have entered into the Unicorns-pooping-Skittles territory again …”
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
12:33 pm
jcb, you are not suggesting that the Economics 101 would suggest that unemployed people may not have the money to get to a job in a remote location and even if they did, it may not be a wise economic use of their money if they spend more than they would earn (not including opportunity costs)…… why you would think that even anyone who claimed to have even looked at a Economic syllabus would comprehend that simple reality….. I wonder if the hate and nonsense is somehow distorting rational thought for these wingnuts.
Why basic Economics 101 would say that if these jobs are not being filled, then them there job creators will raise the wage to attract workers absent other factors. Surely there must be someone on the right who can work out these basic Economic matters.
Matti's Observant Eye
December 21st, 2011
12:34 pm
The movie Cinderella Man captures the hunger people had to work back then. I don’t get that sense now.
That’s probably because directors and expensive camera & production crews aren’t venturing in great numbers to where the truly hungry, destitute people ARE, and creating slickly-edited pieces on poverty that will garner boatloads of advertising dollars. You’re right, though. There are some people doing extremely well in this economy, taking advantage of the bargains they can get on homes and other formerly-expensive retail items, making profits on the low, low labor costs they get overseas, as well as the special attention they get from their GOP Congressmen regarding their fair tax burden. For some Americans, LIFE IS GREAT!
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
12:34 pm
What I want to know is why no one seems to be talking about how the FICA tax cut is simply defunding Social Security at a time when SS outlays exceed revenues for the first time in 2010, but appears to be in deficit for years to come.
Because any good Republican knows that you have to cut taxes in order to increase tax revenues.
Butch Cassidy
December 21st, 2011
12:35 pm
So elected Republicans don’t even support other elected Republicans, but by electing a Republican, the country is going to be saved? Riiiiiiiight.
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
12:35 pm
And for all the lawbreakers out there (the small businesses that hire illegal immigrants( e-verify is the LAW)
Jm
December 21st, 2011
12:36 pm
Usinuk
. True
Getalife. Sounds like an autobiography
josef
December 21st, 2011
12:36 pm
jewcowboy
There was a land of Cavaliers and Cotton Fields called The Old South…Here in this pretty world Gallantry took its last bow…Here was the last ever to be seen of Knights and their ladies fair, of Master and of Slave…”
Who said that?
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
12:38 pm
jewcowboy,
Otay. I gotcha. So there is noooooo more illegal immigration. None at all. At least according to one article anyway. Better call the border patrol and tell them to stand down. No one is coming over. No one.
You are right in one sense though. A lot of illegals have indeed returned home due to anti-immigraion laws and the economic downturn.
The funny thing about the Obama economy if you are correct is that Obama succeeded grandly where W failed miserably. By making the U.S. economy so abysmal Obama has single handedly solved the immigration problem. Bravo Obama! Pigeon clap!
“The real question is what happened to all those jobs the Republicans promised in 2010? How many jobs bills have the Republicans passed?”- jewcowboy
jewcowboy,
Don’t worry. Doomy is here to help you out with the facts sir. Since 8/23/10 372 passed house bills have died in the Dem controlled senate. Depending on who you listen to 15 to 24 of those bills were jobs bills. Hard to pass a jobs bill when Harry Reid and the Dem led senate, which also hadn’t passed a budget in a couple of years, simply let them die.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:40 pm
Strawman,
“Whoever said the economy is healthy?”
Not I, since the ratio of applicants to jobs is 4:1, rather than 1:1.
“implying that a not miniscule portion of those on the unemployment rolls could find work if they were willing to do things they were “over qualified” to do”
I think you are overlooking the millions who are already doing that…and many cases cobbling together multiple jobs to make ends meet.
The bottom line is the monthly UI benefit is about $1000. Now I don’t know about you, but $1000 a month doesn’t really afford a luxurious or even comfortable existence considering the average 1 bedroom apt in Atlanta rents for $737.
“captures the hunger people had to work back then”
Heaven forbid we actually expect a better life than what those 80 years ago had to deal with.
HDB
December 21st, 2011
12:40 pm
Common Sense isn’t very Common
December 21st, 2011
12:18 pm
I may be wrong but 99 weeks of UI isn’t 3 years is it?
Nope…it’s 5 weeks short of 2 years!!!
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
12:40 pm
jewcowboy,
I almost forgot. Here’s the linkee to all those passed house bills including jobs bills that simply died in the senate. You can thank Harry Reid for joining Obama in an all out assault on the American economy.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/83057-290-bills
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
12:41 pm
Alright, deadbeats, back to work!!
For PlatinumBlack:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leWCaedO6Mg
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
12:42 pm
TD – and how many of those ‘jobs’ bills had 2000 pages of rides and earmarks on them?
And what about the promise from the Republicans for no riders on ‘important’ legislation?
Oh wait, I get it JOBS aren’t important to them.
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
12:42 pm
TD
You post link of the bills that “died” but no links to the bills that died to due to filibuster from the Republicans
Lets be “fair and balanced”……… right?
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
12:44 pm
“That’s probably because directors and expensive camera & production crews aren’t venturing in great numbers to where the truly hungry, destitute people ARE, and creating slickly-edited pieces on poverty that will garner boatloads of advertising dollars.”
Doh! Why didn’t I think of that? What was I thinking, anyway – that there a number of people (NOT all) milking the system rather than working hard to find work? Thanks for SO forcefully convincing me of my error. I am in your debt.
Matti's Observant Eye
December 21st, 2011
12:45 pm
Thulsa,
In that list of jobs bills that the house passed this year that died in the Senate, did you look to see how many of them violated the promises they made in their 2010 Pledge to America, specifically the one on page 33 about advancing legislation one issue at a time?
Or are you still hoping Americans will simply forget about this if you continue to ignore, deflect, and do the “lalalala I cant hear you!” schtick?
HDB
December 21st, 2011
12:46 pm
josef
December 21st, 2011
12:36 pm
Margaret Mitchell…..”Gone With the Wind”
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
12:47 pm
What I want to know is why no one seems to be talking about how the FICA tax cut is simply defunding Social Security at a time when SS outlays exceed revenues for the first time in 2010, but appears to be in deficit for years to come.
MPercy–I attempted to bring up the same point a few weeks ago and was met with total silence from the Lefties here. The best that I can figure is that the truth is now secondary to proving that the Republicans are evil incarnate.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
12:48 pm
“The bottom line is the monthly UI benefit is about $1000. Now I don’t know about you, but $1000 a month doesn’t really afford a luxurious or even comfortable existence considering the average 1 bedroom apt in Atlanta rents for $737.”
Of course that assumes everyone is on there own and not, say, living with their parents (did you know that the majority of “poor” people in America are young?)…
“Heaven forbid we actually expect a better life than what those 80 years ago had to deal with.”
There are expectations and then there is reality. I personally wish everyone a good life and have done a lot to help others in need.
josef
December 21st, 2011
12:48 pm
HDB
Nope.
Matti's Observant Eye
December 21st, 2011
12:49 pm
Strawman,
I wasn’t trying to give you a hard time. I thought Cinderalla Man was an awesome movie that powerfully portrayed the widespread hunger and destitution of that era. My point was simply that we don’t SEE the effects of today’s poverty the same way, because our 99 TV channels are piping in all manner of other things into our living rooms. You’re right that today’s poverty is different. Also, there are people who still manage to keep their homes and cars, but have little money left over for food or medicine. It’s not in our faces, but it’s there.
Peter
December 21st, 2011
12:50 pm
Great statement……. I didn’t think it was possible to top the stupidity of the 2008 election.
Yes you can……… Palin can run for President !
The GOP is so funny these days coming apart at the seams !
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:50 pm
Keep Up the Good Fight!,
“you are not suggesting that the Economics 101 would suggest that unemployed people may not have the money to get to a job in a remote location and even if they did, it may not be a wise economic use of their money if they spend more than they would earn”
I know…crazy thoughts.
$8 an hour x 8 hours – 20% taxes = $51.20
150 miles / 22mpg x $3.21 a gallon + $0.48 per mile wear and tear(AAA) = $26.68
Take home with no meals = $24.52 per day…for 8 hours of work and at least 2 hours of driving.
$24.52 x 30 days = $735.60
So to be away from home 10 hours a day and work in a field the average unemployed Atlantan would just be able to pay for their average apt.
Brilliant.
HDB
December 21st, 2011
12:50 pm
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
12:40 pm
Question: How many of those bills were “clean”…..or how many had somethiong “extra” attached to them that countered a regulation that Republicans didn’t like….like the Clean Air Act????
Really want to know………
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
12:52 pm
Bless your heart (like, if you had one.)- Matti
Matti,
I was wondering when I would get a “bless your heart” card. I think that’s the 4 millionth of those cards the libs have passed out. When you can’t win a debate just use the “bless your heart” card.
“If you have one”. Yep. I shore do. I just believe that the best way to help people as proven by economic history is for govt to get out of their way and let them pursue their own self-interests without the nanny state dictating everything. You believe in the welfare state taking care of people. The only thing the nanny state does is create more problems than it solves and reduce people to being wards of the state. And people like you call it “compassion”. Shame on you. And if you don’t believe the nanny state creates even more problems than perhaps you should read Patrick Moynihan’s book( a liberal NY senator)who stated back in the early 70s that the welfare state would end up destroying the black family. He was right and liberals like you just refuse to learn.
But go on with your idea that you have a heart because you believe in the nanny state. It obviously makes you feel better. And being a person of such great heart I’m also certain you have a heart for babies and are anti abortion right? I would hate to think you don’t have a heart for the most innocent among us.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
12:52 pm
I’ve seen the same error mentioned today at least twice…
“What I want to know is why no one seems to be talking about how the FICA tax cut is simply defunding Social Security at a time when SS outlays exceed revenues for the first time in 2010, but appears to be in deficit for years to come.
”
Simple answer is: it’s fully funded.
More here
Each of the plans under consideration is fully paid for, replacing revenue the Social Security Trust Fund would have lost from lower payroll tax receipts with money made up from either alternative revenue sources or spending cuts. The earlier payroll tax holiday, set to expire this month, was also fully-funded, and the program has thus far “been held harmless” from the holiday, as Reuters noted today.
it’s not the stupid that bothers me as much as the childish refuse to do their homework folks. they were not raised well.
Billings
December 21st, 2011
12:52 pm
In contrast to Bookman’s linked WSJ editorial .
If the pols want economic recovery, they should go long.
Want Growth? Try Stable Tax Policy
The payroll tax cut is one of 84 tax provisions expiring this year, 10 times as many as expired in 1999. .
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204791104577110152436029914.html?mod=opinion_newsreel
too little time
December 21st, 2011
12:52 pm
Really, I can understand the Republicans point of the whole 2 month extension being pointless. But if their purpose is to pass it for a whole year, 2 months ought to be fine. It would have been better to pass it now AND slam Harry Reid.
“We are going to pass this thing even though it is a cheap shot on parting Democrat Senators not to do their jobs and get a 12 month extension done.”
The reason for not passing it (i.e. only two months) is not satisfactory and makes Republicans look bad. So, was the Senate petty? Absolutely. Was the House even more petty? ABSOLUTELY.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
12:54 pm
jewcowboy – 12:50 – but you’re forgetting the rally cry of the right — compared to the poor of Mumbai, the poor here are living the high life!!! they have a refrigerator! dishwasher! indoor plumbing!!!
$24.52 x 30 days = $735.60
sweetjeebuseatingRamen, don’t you know that’s more than 5 years’ wages for people in Mumbai!!!
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:54 pm
josef,
“Who said that?”
I would say just about all of these folks: http://www.gop.gov/republicans/name?forward=media
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
12:55 pm
Bruno: Exactly. If George Bush in 2006 had promoted 2% reduction in SS taxes the world would have been ending according to the left. Obama promotes the idea today and it’s all wine & roses.
I also am amused that the various proposals to “pay” for the SS tax holiday are general revenue items. I seem to recall Jay and company arguing here vociferously that SS does not affect deficit at all. But if we’re going to pay for an SS tax holiday with general funds, seems to me that ain’t so, now, is it? Of course, it wasn’t so when they said it then either, since SS is now in deficit (outlays exceed annual revenues), the “trust fund” IOUs are starting to come due and must be paid out of general revenues–which mean more borrowing from China, et al. And SS outlays become a deficit driver, or rather did as of 2010 and will be until the system collapses in the not-too-distant future.
josef
December 21st, 2011
12:56 pm
jewcowboy
Seriously…who said it…?
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
12:57 pm
josef – seriously, it was the beginning of gone with the wind
Peter
December 21st, 2011
12:57 pm
HDB . please tell us of a “Single Bill” that is clean, and has zero attached to it.
That is the way of Washington, and the Pork problem.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
12:57 pm
M PERCY
Fully Funded.
No deficit to SS.
RPEATED FOR EMPHASIS
Fully Funded.
No deficit to SS.
AND AGAIN
Fully Funded.
No deficit to SS.
HOW ABOUT JUST ONE MORE
Fully Funded.
No deficit to SS.
(GOP requires that, ‘member?)
Peter
December 21st, 2011
12:58 pm
MPercy. did those wars Bush started effect SS ?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
12:59 pm
josef,
Ben Hecht.
josef
December 21st, 2011
12:59 pm
USinUK
Seriously, which GWTW…?
HDB
December 21st, 2011
12:59 pm
josef
December 21st, 2011
12:48 pm
That’s the opening line in “Gone With the Wind”; didn’t Margaret Mitchell write it??
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
12:59 pm
Common sense, Matti, HDB, and they BOTH suck- good to see ya again,
Most of those bills the house passed weren’t even brought up in the senate. How can they be seriously debated if the Senate won’t even bring them up or debate them. You all have a point about extra things being attached to some of the bills but even then that’s been standard on a lot of bills for a long time. Nothing new there. Seems to me that even if there is something attached to a bill that the senate should at least look at the bill rather than just squashing it without any debate whatsoever. How can one possibly take the Senate seriously if they won’t even bring up a bill for debate?
josef
December 21st, 2011
12:59 pm
jewcowboy
Close, but no banana…
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
12:59 pm
Boehner cuts off C-SPAN Cameras when Dems attempt to bring vote on payroll tax cut. Oh I am sure this lack of transparency is Obama’s fault and we will here the chorus of the right wingnuts decrying the lack of transparency. Wait for it……. Wait….
josef
December 21st, 2011
1:00 pm
HDB
Nope. She didn’t.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
1:00 pm
USinUK,
“they have a refrigerator! dishwasher! indoor plumbing!!!”
Lucky b@stards.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
1:01 pm
it’s the verbiage that plays at the very beginning of the movie, before you see Scarlett on the porch with the Tarlington twins
HDB
December 21st, 2011
1:01 pm
Peter
December 21st, 2011
12:57 pm
Bush’s Debt Ceiling increases were “clean”……
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
1:01 pm
So the House GOP wants to sit down and talk with Dems from both the House (who are willing) and the Senate (who are unwilling). Harry Reid won’t talk until a short term bill is passed. Hmmmm I recall a couple of years ago when Harry wouldn’t let anyone go home to push through a very important bill…oh yeah Obamacare. Harry Reid is a piece of garbage.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
1:01 pm
jewcowboy – 1:00 – seriously, they should stop complaining!
seriously
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
1:02 pm
How can one possibly take the Senate seriously if they won’t even bring up a bill for debate?
Nope…no noticeable irony in the fact that this absurdity is mentioned in a blog thread about the House not even bringing up a bill for debate or a vote that the Senate passed with 89 votes…… NO IRONY AT ALL.
Rant on!
Normal
December 21st, 2011
1:02 pm
Josef,
Uncle Remus?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
1:02 pm
josef,
Are you referring to Victor Fleming?
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
1:02 pm
TD
“How can one possibly take the Senate seriously if they won’t even bring up a bill for debate?”
There is merit to what you are saying; however you know very well that the House with their majority as sent bills knowing that the Senate would not bring them up…. heck even the Repubs in the Senate knew they were going nowhere.
It is a game on both sides……… The House as the ability to pass what they want knowing it will not fly in the Senate… then they can say… see “Reid is a do nothing”…..
HDB
December 21st, 2011
1:02 pm
‘Doom….back at’cha!!
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
1:03 pm
josef,
Or Sidney Howard?
Normal
December 21st, 2011
1:04 pm
Josef,
Christopher Plummer?
josef
December 21st, 2011
1:04 pm
USinUK
It does, that…but who wrote it?
jewcowboy
Not quite there yet…
Normal
You jus bein nasty now!
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
1:05 pm
TD
Granted this is a simplistic analogy but it is like a kid who is on restriction but still asks his parent to go to the movies. They say “no” and he throw a fit….. He already knew the answer, especially if his parents do always stick to their guns.
Yes that goes both ways and both Ds and Rs cry when it happens
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
1:05 pm
MPercy,
Your first error is that you’re making too much sense.
Secondly I don’t think the liberals on here give a damn about how debt we continously accumulate. Their morality does not allow them to care about the burdens being piled onto the small backs of our children and grandchildren.
A favorite mantra of the left when proposing legislation on something like gun control is that we must do it “for the children”. If there is anything at all that we should do “for the children” it would and should be to quit piling vast sums of debt onto their little backs. Strangely the liberals are silent on this issue. Except for ranting about W’s debt of course which is the first thing out of their mouths in a conversation about debt. Nevermind today’s debt cause its easier to just blame W.
josef
December 21st, 2011
1:05 pm
BTW there is a reason I’m asking…and it’s not just to get a new thread from the Imam…
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
1:06 pm
USinUK – you’ve got indoor plumbing
TMI
that’s right UK is socialist LMAO
Adam
December 21st, 2011
1:07 pm
Strawman: 99 weeks is 1.9 years, not 3. And as Jay pointed out earlier, 52 weeks is now close to a standard amount of time to look for work, by a much larger margin than before 2007. Ending the 99 week extension causes the benefits to only be disbursed for 26 weeks max. A case to end unemployment in this manner could be made if the economy was good enough to support millions of Americans getting jobs, but I can guarantee you there will be no massive spike in hiring because of the extension being dropped, as many cons imagine would happen, because of the stupid belief that people are just sitting on their butts NOT looking for work because they have their cushy unemployment check of $100.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
1:09 pm
godless heathen: Begrudge Michelle and the tikes their vacation? Poor poor overworked Michelle.
Yep, I have my answer. You DO begrudge them their vacation.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
1:10 pm
They BOTH suck,
BTW I don’t think Americans are lazy but I do think we have lost some of our work ethic and that just out of basic economics most people realize that its easier to draw $1000 a month unemployment than to work at McDonalds at $8 an hour/40 hours a week to make roughly the same as unemployment. Very few people would work a low wage job while looking for a better job if the money they draw from unemployment is close. Also, take a look at all the jobs that illegals have taken- restaurant, construction, the poultry, meat, and carpet plants. These are all jobs that Americans used to work. Why do we not work these jobs anymore?
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
1:11 pm
Granny Godzilla
Fully Funded with deficit spending on the general revenue side of the “lockbox”.
No deficit to SS.
SS is in deficit on it’s own accord. So says the SS board of trustees.
REPEATED FOR EMPHASIS
Granny Godzilla
Fully Funded with deficit spending on the general revenue side of the “lockbox”.
No deficit to SS.
SS is in deficit on it’s own accord. So says the SS board of trustees.
Granny Godzilla
Fully Funded with deficit spending on the general revenue side of the “lockbox”.
No deficit to SS.
SS is in deficit on it’s own accord. So says the SS board of trustees.
Granny Godzilla
Fully Funded with deficit spending on the general revenue side of the “lockbox”.
No deficit to SS.
SS is in deficit on it’s own accord. So says the SS board of trustees.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
1:11 pm
“that its easier to draw $1000 a month unemployment than to work at McDonalds at $8 an hour/40 hours a week”
sweet jeebus …
where on earth do you get your facts???
who do you think is getting $4k/month in unemployment???
seriously
who.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
1:12 pm
josef,
“Not quite there yet…”
Sorry, but the “The New Biographical Dictionary of Film” says Ben Hecht.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
1:12 pm
Speaking of unemployment,I assume the “non-homework doers” haven’t seen this study
Check out the last paragraph of page 1.
It’ll shock and awe your craven little hearts.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
1:12 pm
sorry – my misread – thought that said $1k/week not $1K/mo
that’s what I get for multitasking
josef
December 21st, 2011
1:13 pm
If anybody needs a vacation it is First Lady Michelle Obama…can you imagine how difficult it is to have to entertain all those jackasses, smile, and be nice? I wouldn’t last a day in her job. So far she’s been quite the gracious First Lady…I like her…
Adam
December 21st, 2011
1:13 pm
Stevie Ray: Why exactly does POTUS not pay for any part of his vacation?
With what? His government paid salary? And I’m curious, is it even POSSIBLE for him to offer up money to pay for it?
at least the prior wingnut had his own place to stay in Crawford so $50k a night isn’t wasted…
^ What the hell kind of nonsense tripe is this?
BO sure picks the most expensive places to vacation….
Yeah, like “home for the holidays.” Pretty expensive to do that. might as well not bother.
ADAM…with no budget does that mean you man can spend 4million anytime he wants to vacation?
Is this like the time he spent $200 million per day to be in Asia? Sorry, but I’ll not take your word on cost estimates for his vacation for two reasons 1) The track record isn’t that great and 2) He hasn’t even LEFT YET.
josef
December 21st, 2011
1:14 pm
jewcowboy
He was the chief writer of the filmscript, but those were not his words…
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
1:14 pm
“House not even bringing up a bill for debate or a vote that the Senate passed with 89 votes…… NO IRONY AT ALL. Rant on!”
Keep up,
If the senate really gave a damn have them stay and work through Christmas. Unfortunately they just don’t care and there is no point in the House bringing the bill up for debate if the Senate simply does not want to work for the American people.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
1:15 pm
MPercy
Really?
Provide Linkee….
Cause I read this at Fact Check
Reducing the Social Security payroll taxes paid by employees by 2 percentage points (to 4.2 percent) obviously brings in less money for Social Security. But the trust fund isn’t suffering as a result. The government must cover the shortfall with general fund money.
The Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees said in its 2011 report: “The loss of payroll tax revenue due to this one-year reduction will be made up by transfers from the General Fund of the Treasury to the OASI and DI Trust Funds and will thus have no financial impact on either program.”
Fully funded and approved by 39 senate republicans.
Common Sense isn't very Common
December 21st, 2011
1:15 pm
ok kids it is time for me to take Big Bird home for the holidays.
Play nice together and I will see you tomorrow.
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
1:15 pm
“that its easier to draw $1000 a month unemployment than to work at McDonalds at $8 an hour/40 hours a week”
is the unemployment monthly check seriously around $1000? if that’s true then I can’t believe anyone is working at mcdonalds
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
1:15 pm
Thulsa Doom,
“most people realize that its easier to draw $1000 a month unemployment than to work at McDonalds at $8 an hour/40 hours a week”
“Why do we not work these jobs anymore?”
Perhaps because there were only 62K opening and had more than a million applicants.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-28/mcdonald-s-hires-62-000-during-national-event-24-more-than-planned.html
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
1:15 pm
This is too funny. A showdown between Senate and House Republicans. Who would have ever thought that the Senate Republicans would be calling out the House Republiocans for not caring about the middle class worker.
Merry Christmas. HoHoHoes.
Erwin's cat
December 21st, 2011
1:15 pm
Adam – “NOT looking for work because they have their cushy unemployment check of $100″
————————-
more like $325/week…not that it makes a difference, but let’s try and be accurate…it only takes a little more time.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
1:17 pm
USinUK,
Reading comprehension is fundamental. The mistake and ensuing knee jerk reaction is ok. I expect it from liberals.
Traniqua
December 21st, 2011
1:17 pm
“…Senator John McCain of Arizona said in an interview on CNN. And we’ve got to get this thing resolved and with the realization that the payroll tax cut must remain in effect.”
You have to wonder if the ditsy old fool realizes that the ‘payroll tax cut’ is defunding the social security trust fund, which is already empty. What we really need is a payroll tax INCREASE and a moratorium on new federal spending – including no new wars – for several years.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
1:19 pm
Thelma, you can whine all you want about the Senate. The Senate Bill has sufficient votes in the House to obtain a MAJORITY Vote of the House Representatives. There is no Constitutional requirement that the Senate negotiate with a Boehner’s committee who do not want any bill passed to work out a bill that has the votes to pass the House.
So who is not working for the American people? Can you say Boehner and the Tea Party?
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
1:20 pm
more like $325/week
You sure that isn’t the max amount based on one’s past employment history and state of residence. I wouldn’t want you to present any inaccurate information after all.
HDB
December 21st, 2011
1:21 pm
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
1:05 pm
First, you ARE in error when yo state the liberals do NOT care about the debt…..many conservatives forget that the CLINTON Administration worked towards balancing the budget in his second term and had a plan to pay DOWN on the debt. That was sideetracked when the nation got BUSHwhacked! Remember what Bush said right after 9/11 when he stated that terrorism wasn’t going to take the nation off-stride: “Spend money!” That’s EXACTLY what he did….and NO ONE cried about his level of spending! When the nation went into economic freefall, the source of last resort in order to arrest the freefall was…and IS…the government!!
Logically, we all know that as a nation, we can’t continue in this methodology…but we also know that you INCREASE government spending in bad economic times….and CUT government spending in good economic times!! If you look at the nations that have contracted their government spending, their recovery has been made more difficult!!
You can’t blame Obama for the cards that Bush dealt him…..he just has to play the hand!!
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
1:21 pm
This is my impression of liberal pandering:
Obama and the Democrats hate old people! They cut $500 billion from Medicare to pay for Obamacare and cut the SS tax by 2%. Old people are going to die faster and will be forced to eat dog food.
That was fun.
godless heathen
December 21st, 2011
1:21 pm
Michelle can have a stay-cation any time she wants. She can pay for her own vacation anytime she wants. When she could save the taxpayers a few hundred thousand by spending one or two more days with that egotistical husband then ……… Wait nevermind.
Can’t say that I blame her. His head has gotten so big it probably takes up all the seats on AF1.
Erwin's cat
December 21st, 2011
1:22 pm
TaxPayer – Fair enough
http://chartingtheeconomy.com/?p=1399
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
1:23 pm
TaxPayer,
“You sure that isn’t the max amount based on one’s past employment history and state of residence.”
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/05/12/unemployment-benefits-best-worst-states/
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
1:25 pm
Erwin’s cat @ 1.33,
That is from 2009.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
1:26 pm
Tales of the Rich and Famous …. . and the melting Armani shoes :
“I am a fat cat, I’m not ashamed.” – Ken Langone, co-founder, Home Depot
cosby
December 21st, 2011
1:27 pm
Dems and the main street media win again. no word on why Harry passed a bill to be sent back to the house, knowing it would be rejected and then closed the Senate. Then the main street attack on the Tea Party…press, Obama, socialist, big Government lovers and be damn any freedom.. the price will be paid is going to be heavy and I blame folks like you JAY…let the war begin!!
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
1:27 pm
“Reading comprehension is fundamental. The mistake and ensuing knee jerk reaction is ok. I expect it from liberals.”
ahem, POT.
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
1:27 pm
They cut $500 billion from Medicare to pay for Obamacare…
If you cut money from a program that was never funded — I’m thinking Medicare Advantage — have you really cut anything at all or did you just right a wrong.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
1:27 pm
More Famous Last Words from the Land of the Melting Armani Shoes:
“If I hear a politician use the term ‘paying your fair share’ one more time, I’m going to vomit.” — Tom Golisano, founder, Paychex Inc.
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
1:28 pm
“MPercy. did those wars Bush started effect SS ?”
Not in the same sense that cutting the SS tax rate temporarily has. According to the SS Board of Trustees, SS took in $49 billion less in 2010 than it expended. The deficit was paid for by redeeming some of the IOUs, so there was no overall funding gap. But SS still took in less than it spent–it had to dip into its savings for the first time in 25 years. It will have to do so again this year, only with a larger deficit (about $150B, based on projected deficits of $46B plus the circa $100B I’ve seen mentioned as the cost of the year’s cut). This will be made up in part by funding SS $100B from general revenues (as GG has insisted it’s FULLY FUNDED), and the rest by cashing some more of those IOUs. Keep funding at 4.2% for a few more years and those IOUs will be used up even faster than there were expected to. At 6.2% rates, the IOUs were expected to last until 2036 (ten more years), so I have to assume they will run sooner than 2036. In fewer than 25 years we will see SS in a real problem. Keeping the 4.2% rate is just hastening the problem.
The wars didn’t defund SS in the same fashion. Instead, they were funded at least in part by SS surpluses, which were converted to Treasuries (IOUs) and the proceeeds then spent on the wars and other things. So the wars (and other things) owe SS money back (with interest).
P.S. The Iraq war was started with strong Democratic support. H.J.Res. 114 passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 296-133, and passed the Senate by a vote of 77-23. Eighty-two Democrats in the House (40% of their number) and 29 Democrats in the Senate (50% of their number) also supported the action.
The Afghanistan war was even more strongly supported by Democrats. House Joint Resolution 64 passed in the House 420-1-10, and the Senate version passed 98-0-2. I don’t have the break down those numbers, but it hardly seems necessary.
Erwin's cat
December 21st, 2011
1:28 pm
jc – it’s the best I could do on short notice and likely still comparable, at any rate it’s still better than making up or exaggerating the amount for dramatic effect
josef
December 21st, 2011
1:29 pm
Taxi
@ 1:20
From what I understand, that’s pretty much it…
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
1:30 pm
godless heathen,
“When she could save the taxpayers a few hundred thousand by spending one or two more days with that egotistical husband then”
Again, Bush took 77 trips to Crawford at a cost of $70M for AF1 alone, or $8.75M per year. Or is it only Democrats vacations that raise your ire?
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
1:31 pm
MPercy Really? Provide Linkee….
I did. I my first posting on the subject, but perhaps it got mangled. I’ve forgotten how or never knew how to make real links work here. Summary of the 2010 Board of Trustees report.
http://www.ssa.gov/oact/TRSUM/index.html
Social Security expenditures exceeded the program’s non-interest income in 2010 for the first time since 1983. The $49 billion deficit last year (excluding interest income) and $46 billion projected deficit in 2011 are in large part due to the weakened economy and to downward income adjustments that correct for excess payroll tax revenue credited to the trust funds in earlier years. This deficit is expected to shrink to about $20 billion for years 2012-2014 as the economy strengthens. After 2014, cash deficits are expected to grow rapidly as the number of beneficiaries continues to grow at a substantially faster rate than the number of covered workers. Through 2022, the annual cash deficits will be made up by redeeming trust fund assets from the General Fund of the Treasury. Because these redemptions will be less than interest earnings, trust fund balances will continue to grow. After 2022, trust fund assets will be redeemed in amounts that exceed interest earnings until trust fund reserves are exhausted in 2036, one year earlier than was projected last year. Thereafter, tax income would be sufficient to pay only about three-quarters of scheduled benefits through 2085.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
1:33 pm
M Percy
You’ll note my back up is 2011….
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
1:33 pm
More Famous Last Words from the Land of the Melting Armani Shoes:
“Acting like everyone who’s been successful is bad and because you’re rich you’re bad, I don’t understand it.” — Jamie Dimon, CEO, JP Morgan Chase
And all the wise gentlemen grunted among themselves in agreement.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
1:34 pm
Welcome: Grunted only? No hurumpfs?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
1:35 pm
Erwin’s cat,
From the link I posted it looks like the range is from $213(AZ) to $416(HI) per week. I can’t seem to find an average for 2011.
USinUK
December 21st, 2011
1:35 pm
Welcome – 1:33 – you forgot the last half of his quote, “cake, anyone?”
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
1:35 pm
But the trust fund isn’t suffering as a result. The government must cover the shortfall with general fund money.
Granny–Can you say “shell game”??
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
1:35 pm
“They cut $500 billion from Medicare to pay for Obamacare…
If you cut money from a program that was never funded — I’m thinking Medicare Advantage — have you really cut anything at all or did you just right a wrong.”
Medicare Advantage funding cuts only account for about 1/5 of the amount to be cut….Democrats hate seniors! They cut funding for SS! They want to punish those who are going to buy houses or refinance their houses to pay for it! Obama hates anyone who buys a house! AHHHHHHHH!
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
1:37 pm
More Famous Last Words from the Land of the Melting Armani Shoes:
“You’ll get more out of me if you treat me with respect.” — Leon Cooperman, chair, Omega Advisors
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
1:38 pm
HDB,
2 things. First of all it was Newt and the Republican house that forced Clinton into balancing the budgets.
Secondly the rest of your post as I predicted is nothing more than blame W. What exactly does Bush have to do with the FY10, 11, 12 budgets and the forecasted enormous deficits by the Obama administration through 2020?
Reagan didn’t spend his time worrying about the 7.5% unemployment and double digit inflation and interest rates and stagflation that Jimmy Carter left him. He just went to work and produced 16 million jobs and an mindblowing 7% economic growth rate 2 1/2 years into his presidency. Apparently Obama is going to spend all 4 or 8 years blaming his predecessor. What a pathetic POS loser.
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
1:39 pm
So if you got laid off from one of them $7.50 an hour jobbies in Florida, the most you could hope to get would be $88.50 per week. Also, isn’t there a limit on the number of weeks you get based on the number of years employed. Anyway, I don’t see what sort of point anyone would hope to make about people supposedly living the good life off of that pittance.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
1:39 pm
USinUK: “Welcome – 1:33 – you forgot the last half of his quote, “cake, anyone?”
I think what they’re saying these days is Let them eat APPS!!
josef
December 21st, 2011
1:40 pm
That crawl at the beginning of the film was Selznick…Mitchell was not at all happy about it, feeling it mispresented what the epic romance was all about…Hecht had a lot to say about the dickering with his script.
Ms Mitchell was particularly put off by the excising of her tertiary characters few of which made it to the big screen and, in cutting them out, she felt that the film missed in capturing the lives of the non aristocratic and the Big House without which the complexity of the socio-cultural world she sought to depict became nothing more than essentially a cardboard cut-out.
A lot of people who critique GWTW have only seen the film (or clips) and have never read the romance. And that is sad.
godless heathen
December 21st, 2011
1:41 pm
jewcowboy,
“Again, Bush took 77 trips to Crawford at a cost of $70M for AF1 alone, or $8.75M per year. Or is it only Democrats vacations that raise your ire?”
Trying that red herring again? I said earlier I have no objection to the President and family going on a vacation. Fine. And I can’t blame Michelle for not wanting to travel with the super ego. It’s just too bad they are not more sensitive to the perception that they are not concerned about how much money is spent for their pleasures, especially right after the President has given a speech about shared sacrifice.
Do you have a cite of an instance where Laura Bush flew to Hawaii alone when she could have waited another 2 days and traveled with the President?
And for how many years will you use the “but but but George Bush” excuse?
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
1:43 pm
Shell game…sure I can say it.
It remains fully funded.
A GOP requirement that was meant.
The whining is about lentgh of time not funding right?
Matti's Observant Eye
December 21st, 2011
1:43 pm
Whatevs. All I know is that my millionaire Congressman fought a relentless battle to keep his own tax cuts — and those of his billionaire sponsors — from expiring, but he’s holding MY measly little tax cut hostage for a variety of reasons, none of which has anything to do with what’s best for me.
You can “shame” me all you want, and pretend to know what I think of your idea of a “nanny state” but you can’t refute the FACTS: My GOP Congressman does not give a F**K about people like me who work for a living, pay our bills on time, and watch our net worth plummet while his skyrockets.
Please, cons, keep up the “lalala, well shame on you liberals” garbage. The FACTS speak for themselves, and the last effing straw is about to be laid on the proverbial camel’s back any day now. This won’t stand.
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
1:43 pm
“The government must cover the shortfall with general fund money.”
This being a first step toward removing even the thin veneer that SS is some sort of retirement plan–pay in to get out. Benefits track payments, i.e. if you pay in more then you get a higher benefit.
Fund it from general revenues and it’s just a welfare transfer payment decoupled entirely from contributions. Well, that’s already in effect, with EITC credits (paid for from general funds) more than offsetting income *and* payroll taxes for about 20% of tax units. And in 2011 (and 2012 maybe at least) you’ll have general revenue paying for another 16% of SS revenues.
While some are aware of the Ponzi scheme structure of SS and fully understand it is neither insurance, nor a retirement plan, nor even guaranteed, I would have to guess that the majority of the public will want to know why SS died or demand that the transfer payments continue even if they have to come from general revenues. Either way, the scam will come to an end and be revealed as a failure or morphed into a true welfare state behemoth.
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
1:43 pm
What exactly does Bush have to do with the FY10, 11, 12 budgets and the forecasted enormous deficits by the Obama administration through 2020?
Well, you see, there’s them bills from the past that still has to be paid. For example, there’s them wars that was kept off the books and then there’s them unfunded tax cuts and that Medicare Advantage thingie, amongst other things. I heard even TARP is gonna come back and bite us in the butts for twice what it was originally projected to cost us. And of course we had that Great Recession that took a major bite out of tax revenues while Obama and the Democrats were trying to ease the blow to millions of US citizens against the wishes of the Republicans.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
1:45 pm
“It’s just too bad they are not more sensitive to the perception ”
Well frankly godless heathen, i don’t think they really give a damn about those whoe perception is marked with hate.
Can’t say as I blame them.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
1:46 pm
made it all the way to ponzi scheme…..
I really prefer it when the stupid stuff is at the beginning, much less of a time waster.
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
1:47 pm
“Summary of the 2010 Board of Trustees report.”
Sorry. Make that 2011 Board of Trustees Report.
Each year the Trustees of the Social Security and Medicare trust funds report on the current and projected financial status of the two programs. This message summarizes our 2011 Annual Reports.
The financial conditions of the Social Security and Medicare programs remain challenging. Projected long-run program costs for both Medicare and Social Security are not sustainable under currently scheduled financing, and will require legislative modifications if disruptive consequences for beneficiaries and taxpayers are to be avoided.
The long-run financial challenges facing Social Security and Medicare should be addressed soon. If action is taken sooner rather than later, more options and more time will be available to phase in changes so that those affected have adequate time to prepare. Earlier action will also afford elected officials with a greater opportunity to minimize adverse impacts on vulnerable populations, including lower-income workers and those who are already substantially dependent on program benefits.
Both Social Security and Medicare, the two largest federal programs, face substantial cost growth in the upcoming decades due to factors that include population aging as well as the growth in expenditures per beneficiary. Through the mid-2030s, due to the large baby-boom generation entering retirement and lower-birth-rate generations entering employment, population aging is the largest single factor contributing to cost growth in the two programs. Thereafter, the continued rapid growth in health care cost per beneficiary becomes the larger factor.
Social Security
Social Security expenditures exceeded the program’s non-interest income in 2010 for the first time since 1983. The $49 billion deficit last year (excluding interest income) and $46 billion projected deficit in 2011 are in large part due to the weakened economy and to downward income adjustments that correct for excess payroll tax revenue credited to the trust funds in earlier years. This deficit is expected to shrink to about $20 billion for years 2012-2014 as the economy strengthens. After 2014, cash deficits are expected to grow rapidly as the number of beneficiaries continues to grow at a substantially faster rate than the number of covered workers. Through 2022, the annual cash deficits will be made up by redeeming trust fund assets from the General Fund of the Treasury. Because these redemptions will be less than interest earnings, trust fund balances will continue to grow. After 2022, trust fund assets will be redeemed in amounts that exceed interest earnings until trust fund reserves are exhausted in 2036, one year earlier than was projected last year. Thereafter, tax income would be sufficient to pay only about three-quarters of scheduled benefits through 2085.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
1:50 pm
so raise the cap for a few years….
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
1:52 pm
godless heathen,
“I said earlier I have no objection to the President and family going on a vacation.”
The content of your posts speak to the contrary.
“It’s just too bad they are not more sensitive to the perception that they are not concerned about how much money is spent for their pleasures”
Face it…with people like you, they are damned if they do, and damned if they don’t. They can do nothing right by you.
“And for how many years will you use the “but but but George Bush” excuse?”
I’m sorry. I missed the memo that the world started on 1.20.2009. Just what would you have me use to compare Presidential terms?
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
1:53 pm
Granny, the 2011 report is what I quoted (mistyped as 2010) and it does include the text you represented: “The loss of payroll tax revenue due to this one-year reduction will be made up by transfers from the General Fund of the Treasury to the OASI and DI Trust Funds and will thus have no financial impact on either program.”
Assuming this is actually done (can you say Doc-Fix?), then no additional damage will be done to SS *beyond* the predicted effects of continuing operational deficits. So in that case, my comment about accelerating the damage may be incorrect–assuming the funding is restored.
But the transfer will have an impact on general revenues. And that is to increase general deficits.
Also see my comments on transforming SS from a conceptually separate tax system into a welfare program funded by general revenues.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
1:53 pm
What’s everyone doing since it’s the end of the world next year?
I was thinking of getting a year long massage next year. With a cooler of beer next to me. Decadent you say?
Not if it’s the end of the world. I better notify Santa
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
1:53 pm
Medicare Advantage funding cuts only account for about 1/5 of the amount to be cut….Democrats hate seniors! They cut funding for SS! They want to punish those who are going to buy houses or refinance their houses to pay for it! Obama hates anyone who buys a house! AHHHHHHHH!
I’m sure you have a link to that.
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
1:54 pm
It remains fully funded.
Well, there you go, Granny. No need to scratch below the surface.
The whining is about lentgh of time not funding right?
All I can say, Granny, is that we’re fortunate that we have folks in this country with a little more intelligence and maturity than you and the rest of the Free Lunch crowd have.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
1:55 pm
“but we also know that you INCREASE government spending in bad economic times….and CUT government spending in good economic times!! If you look at the nations that have contracted their government spending, their recovery has been made more difficult!!”- HDB
HDB,
Economic history proves you wrong ma’am. Just ask the Japanese who tried massive stimulus and thus endured the “lost decade”. Or look at our own experience with the great depression. Even John Maynerd Keynes decried that the Fed made the depression worst.
Well, let’s look at the facts. Just the facts ma’am.
Governments have attempted massive Keynesian spending efforts like the one proposed by the Obama-Reid-Pelosi triumvirate time after time. Each time, they have failed to cure economic downturns or spark prosperity. In the Great Depression, for instance, Presidents Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt increased federal debt from 16% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 1929 to 44% in 1939. But that unprecedented increase in government spending failed to end the Depression, and only impeded the economy’s ability to correct itself naturally as it had during earlier depressions.
As another example, Japan redistributed enormous amounts of money during its “Lost Decade” toward the same type of infrastructure projects that our current “stimulus” package proposes. Yet, almost 20 years later, Japan remains mired in economic stagnation, and only crippling debt to show for it. And from 1965 to 1980, Americans will recall that the federal government engaged in massive spending and redistribution efforts beginning with President Johnson’s “Great Society.”
Those toxic efforts continued under Presidents Nixon, Ford and Carter, and Nixon himself foolishly said that “we’re all Keynesians now.” Unfortunately, these programs did nothing but increase poverty, waste billions, stall the stock market and create “stagflation” (the combination of inflation and economic stagnation that Keynesian theory considered impossible). From 1965 to 1980, the Dow Jones Industrial Average stalled between 800 and 900 over that long period.
In contrast, Ronald Reagan’s supply-side, market-based principles ended America’s worst recession since the Depression itself. In eight short years, the stock market jumped from 900 to almost 2500, inflation plummeted from 13.5% to 4.1%, unemployment fell from 7.1% to 5.5%, interest rates tumbled from over 20% to under 10%, per capita income jumped from $20,000 to $24,000 and consumer confidence skyrocketed from 74.4 to 116.
This also explains why the stock market crash under Reagan in 1987 did not destroy the healthy economy, whereas Hoover’s and Roosevelt’s government spending and protectionist programs turned the 1929 market crash into a decade-long depression.
Simply put, the laws of economics and real-world experience are clear: market-based, supply-side economic principles bring prosperity, whereas Keynesian government spending programs perpetuate stagnation and waste resources.
http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/freedomline/current/in_our_opinion/massive-government-spending-ineffective-stimulus-primer.html
HDB
December 21st, 2011
1:56 pm
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
1:38 pm
“What exactly does Bush have to do with the FY10, 11, 12 budgets and the forecasted enormous deficits by the Obama administration through 2020? ”
The FY10-12 budgets are a reflection of what the current economic atmosphere is and what the governmental obligations reflect. Since Obama was GIVEN a bad hand, he took what he had and made it work!! Obama arrested the freefall…and the economy IS turning around!!
Lest you forget, the best era of economic growth was the Clinton years!! Optimum tax rates were 39.5%. Greatest era of economic mobility was the Eisenhower years…..and the optimum tax rate was 90%!!
Also, lest you forget – Reagan RAISED taxes TWICE to spur economic growth! Reagan cut taxes….and the nation went into recession first!! (I LIVED through those years!)
…and if you think Reagan DIDN’T blame Carter….think again!!
Mr. Carter is acting as if he hasn’t been in charge for the past three and a half years; as if someone else was responsible for the largest deficit in American history.”
–Ronald Reagan, nationally televised campaign speech, October 24, 1980. (Federal deficits totaled $252 billion under Mr. Carter. By the end of Mr. Reagan’s presidency, federal deficits would total over 1.4 trillion.)
Myth: The recession of 1982 was Carter’s fault.
Fact: That recession occurred in the second year of Reagan’s term, following tax cuts and deregulation.
The recession of 1982 hit during Reagan’s second year in office. Double-digit inflation was well on its way to being defeated by this time, and Reagan’s tax cuts and deregulation policies were already in effect. Blaming Carter’s tax and regulation policies for this recession is therefore difficult.
As I’ve asked before…and have YET gotten a cogent response: Where was this level of concern pertaining to government spending whene the nation was BUSHwhacked???
Adam
December 21st, 2011
1:56 pm
I think it’s totally fair to compare Presidential vacation times on the whole, and length of time per vacation, and perhaps even location. The last one is way more subjective. Some may think Texas is a perfectly legitimate place for “home for the holidays” and yet think Hawaii is extravagant, even though it’s “home for the holidays.” Add to that the fact the President hasn’t left yet, but his family has (oh the humanity!) and the length of time Obama’s predecessor spent on vacation versus Obama’s time, and I think you get a pretty good look at how absurd it is to harp on Obama’s vacation time. The ONLY reason to do it is because you think there’s something wrong with vacation in general, or you really REALLY hated it when Bush was called out for the same thing, so you just HAVE to get back at the Democrat.
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
1:59 pm
you can’t refute the FACTS: My GOP Congressman does not give a F**K about people like me who work for a living, pay our bills on time, and watch our net worth plummet while his skyrockets.
Well… there is that.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
1:59 pm
Omg
The essay writing here is out of control
Doesn’t everyone know it’s 2011
No one reads anything longer than a tweet
Ask getalife
Adam
December 21st, 2011
2:00 pm
Thulsa: You make it really difficult to take you seriously when you quote articles from a clearly partisan source, full of “facts” that contradict every other economist who has had a say on the subject.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
2:01 pm
doomy gets long in the tooth.
“EPA issues strong limits on mercury emissions
By Neela Banerjee | 10:30 a.m.
The Obama administration’s tough new rule to limit emissions of mercury, arsenic and other toxic substances from sources such as power plants could prevent up to 11,000 premature deaths annually.” LAT
Pro life.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
2:01 pm
Bruno
I’ll weep into my pillow tonight because of your disdain.
Boo Hoo
Look it started already.
HDB
December 21st, 2011
2:03 pm
Doom……and if you really want to get the gist of the Reagan policies:
1) “At his seventh press conference, President Reagan…responds to a question about the 17% black unemployment rate by pointing out that ‘in this time of great unemployment,’ Sunday’s paper had ‘24 full pages of…employers looking for employees,’ though most of the jobs available–computer operator, for example, or cellular immunologist–require special training, for which his administration has cut funds by over 30%.”
–Paul Slansky, The Clothes have no Emperor
2) “The Agriculture Department [under Reagan proposes] cutting the size of school lunches…. In addition, condiments such as ketchup and pickle relish would be reclassified as vegetables.”
–Paul Slansky, The Clothes have no Emperor
3) “The epitaph of the Reagan presidency will be: ‘When Ronald Reagan became President, the United States was the largest creditor nation. When he left the presidency, we were the world’s largest debtor nation.’”
–Lester Thurow, MIT professor of economics
4) “[A] lapse into fiscal indiscipline on a scale never before experienced in peacetime.”
–David Stockman (Reagan’s budget director) describing the 1980’s, The Triumph of Politics: Why the Reagan Revolution Failed
5) “In the Reagan years, more federal debt was added than in the entire prior history of the United States.”
–Richard Darman (Reagan adviser), Who’s in Control? Polar Politics and the Sensible Center
6) “Reagan’s theory was really ‘trickle down’ economics borrowed from the Republican 1920s (Harding-Coolidge-Hoover) and renamed ’supply side.’ Cut tax rates for the wealthy; everyone else will benefit. As Reagan’s budget director David Stockman confided to me at the time, the supply-side rhetoric ‘was always a Trojan horse to bring down the top rate.’ Many middle-class and poor citizens figured it out, even if reporters did not.”
–William Greider, magazine article, “The Gipper’s Economy”
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
2:03 pm
Famous Quotes from the Land of the Soot-Stained Armani Suits
Just remember, if you thought royalty had died with two major revolutions in France and America and two catastrophic world wars, think again:
My taxes are “more than a medieval lord would have taken from a serf.” — Peter Schiff, CEO, Euro Pacific Capital
Jm
December 21st, 2011
2:04 pm
Granny
Don’t “go Boehner” on us
Reptiles don’t cry silly
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
2:05 pm
“…full of “facts” that contradict every other economist who has had a say on the subject.”
Really? EVERY other economist? You only wish you had that breadth of knowledge. How pompous.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
2:06 pm
Jm
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Tzzo1M73hYM/TMHDTwQu1vI/AAAAAAAABuE/2Wkf_p7xtQk/s1600/GodzillaFacePalm.jpg
Matti's Observant Eye
December 21st, 2011
2:06 pm
All I can say, Granny, is that we’re fortunate that we have folks in this country with a little more intelligence and maturity than you and the rest of the Free Lunch crowd have.
OH NO, HE DI’INT! Did he just play the “free lunch crowd” card? I’m betting Granny pays for her own lunch, as do I.
I’ll bet Granny also knows, as I do, that there’s no such thing as a “free lunch” even when you’re enjoying a lunch for which someone else pays the tab. The price for those kind “free” lunches is often much worse than paying for an over-priced entree, especially when the one paying is sitting there spinning lies and manipulations with a big fat grin on his face. Yep. I’ll bet Granny knows better, as do I.
USMC
December 21st, 2011
2:06 pm
IOWA: ROMNEY 25% PAUL 20% GINGRICH 17%
Jay’s WET DREAM! Oh wait, Huntsman didn’t place….
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
2:07 pm
Fiscal stimulus can raise output and incomes in the short run when the economy is operating below its potential. To have the greatest impact with the least long-run cost, the stimulus should be timely, temporary, and targeted. It should be timely so that its effects are felt while economic activity is still below potential; when the economy has recovered, stimulus becomes counterproductive. It should be temporary to avoid raising inflation and to minimize the adverse long-term effects of a larger budget deficit. And it should be well targeted to provide resources to people who most need them and will spend them: for fiscal stimulus to work, it is essential that the funds be spent, not saved.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
2:07 pm
Matti
I pay for the ingredients and make it as well….
My egg salad is to die for.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
2:08 pm
“granny Godzilla”
Reptiles have a very small cortex
Granny’s name makes sense
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
2:08 pm
“I heard even TARP is gonna come back and bite us in the butts for twice what it was originally projected to cost us.”
Well, yes and no. Probably not in the way you think it will.
Congress authorized Troubled Asset Relief Program in October 2008 with $700 billion to buy preferred stock through the Capital Purchase Program and toxic holdings such as troubled residential mortgage-backed securities.
Only about $245 billion was disbursed to banks. As of March 2011, $244 billion had been repaid (some $20B is outstanding, the difference will represent interest payments made). The outstanding bank monies will likely be paid back in full plus interest. The evil banksters (some of which didn’t want to money in the first place) have pretty much paid everything back.
There were a few other expenditures from TARP such as helping individual mortgages that will end up costing about $25B or thereabouts.
The problem though is Fannie, Freddie, and Government Motors. The cost of Fannie and Freddie could run to $300B.
IBD:
Although the bailout has extended to nearly a thousand institutions, just a few are primarily responsible for the continued deficit: Fannie and Freddie, of course, AIG, and the auto companies (GM, Chrysler, GMAC).
As for Fannie and Freddie, no solution seems imminent. They’re currently $134 billion in the red (counting their dividend payments) — more than the entire TARP. Congress and the administration are in the initial stages of discussing how the companies should be wound down and how much of the investment could be recouped.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
2:10 pm
Oh wait, Huntsman didn’t place….
pirate
December 20th, 2011
11:03 pm
Thank you, thank you Republicans for continuing to ignore the only candidate with actual presidential credentials……John Huntsman. He’s smart, he knows politics and foreign policy and he seems to be a pretty reasonable guy. All the ingredients you need to poll at about 2% in the wonderful Republican party. ‘preciate it!
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
2:10 pm
“Reptiles have a very small cortex”
I thought it was the MEDULLA OBLONGOTA. Or maybe its just having all them teeth and no toothbrush.
josef
December 21st, 2011
2:10 pm
BRUNO
You’re on record here as not having turned down a free lunch…
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
2:11 pm
Well, you see, there’s them bills from the past that still has to be paid. For example, there’s them wars that was kept off the books and then there’s them unfunded tax cuts and that Medicare Advantage thingie, amongst other things. I heard even TARP is gonna come back and bite us in the butts for twice what it was originally projected to cost us. And of course we had that Great Recession that took a major bite out of tax revenues while Obama and the Democrats were trying to ease the blow to millions of US citizens against the wishes of the Republicans.
Taxpayer,
In other words its all W’s fault. Why don’t you just say that to begin with?
1-Those wars that were kept off the deficit books still added to Bush’s overall debt numbers sir.Sheesh.
2-The W tax cuts Obama and a full Dem led Congress could have rescinded had they wanted to. They didn’t. But I suppose that’s still W’s fault anyway.
3- The Bush recession ended in June of 2009 and job losses had bottomed in Jan. 2009. So for 2 1/2 years almost we have been out of the W recession. This is the weakest recovery from a recession since the great depression. If you look at severe recessions sir, especially the steep ones, you will find that recoveries have always been exceptionally robust, particularly since there is nowhwere to go but up. This has not been the case under O. It just hasn’t and that is squarely on O. Not W.
4- That Medicare thingie? Please elaborate because it was Obama who cut 500 billion from Medicare- not W. Or could you be referring to the Part D drug plan which compared to the other health plans like Medicare and Medicaid is the only govt plan to not only come in on or under budget but to come in wayyy under budget. Just the facts ma’am.
5- You “heard” tarp is gonna come back and bite us? Link please.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
2:11 pm
Granny
Nice photo
I recommend a dermatologist
Matti's Observant Eye
December 21st, 2011
2:11 pm
Hey, know who gets the REAL FREE LUNCH? Congressmen. Yep. See, they do the INSIDER TRADING thing, which is illegal when one of us does it, but they shelved the bill that was introduced to hold them to the same standards that we must follow.
They get rich, keep their tax cuts, and enjoy the finest, gubmit-paid-private-doctor-of-their-choice health care for life! Heck, that’s better than free lunch!
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
2:12 pm
Jm
Except of course for the Godzilla Family….
It’s the radiation.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
2:12 pm
Strawman: Ok, show me some economists who agree with the stuff above who are not already listed as sources for it? Someone, preferably, who has written an article that explains why Keynesian economics doesn’t work in economic downturn without putting political spin on it. I am willing to read.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
2:12 pm
con heads are exploding again.
They flock here to attack the messenger or deflect blame to the other side.
Too funny
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
2:12 pm
Adam,
“I think it’s totally fair to compare Presidential vacation times on the whole, and length of time per vacation, and perhaps even location.”
Well, according to some on here President’s only began taking vacations starting in 2009.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
2:12 pm
Jm
you are just too cute by half!
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
2:12 pm
Taxpayer,
Never mind ma’am. MPercy did your homework for you. You are dismissed.
Matti's Observant Eye
December 21st, 2011
2:13 pm
josef,
I think his use of “lunch” in that assertion was a metaphor. Heh…
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
2:14 pm
“con heads are exploding again”
and again I say….this is just starting.
they are going to get a lot uglier right up to President Obama’s inauguration in 2012 and beyond.
i for one won’t be bullied by squishy GOP.
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
2:14 pm
“I heard even TARP is gonna come back and bite us in the butts for twice what it was originally projected to cost us.”
Well, yes and no. Probably not in the way you think it will.
Okay, MPercy. Twice as much may be an understatement.
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 21st, 2011
2:17 pm
The depths of con desperation – from the oh its all coming apart dept
The CNS news service is reporting today that the Capitol Xmas tree
does not have enough Jesus-themed ornaments on it, and this is
a socialist muslin conspiracy, & well, you know who is president & all..
gm
December 21st, 2011
2:17 pm
USMC
Hey, fake Marine, do mitt and newt care about a idiot jar head ? I wonder how many vets have either of those people have helped? Obama has done more for vets then any President in the last 20 years.
I guess a fake marine can not do research”””’
godless heathen
December 21st, 2011
2:17 pm
“Well, according to some on here President’s only began taking vacations starting in 2009.”
According to who? You all are sure having a grand time setting up your own straw men to knock down today. Whatever. When that’s all you got, it’s all you got.
See you later.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
2:17 pm
Granny
Radiation? Better see an oncologist too then
Jm
December 21st, 2011
2:20 pm
New Obama mercury rule to cost $9.8 BILLION per year
Just FYI
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
December 21st, 2011
2:20 pm
Well, what a bunch of morans! Now we’ll need to pay for them to fly back to Washington so they can get their tail out of the crack. I say don’t reelect nobody, unless he’s got a R after his name.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
2:22 pm
jm,
Life and Earth vs money.
Your 1 % willard will do the same.
Money is the devil’s candy.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
2:23 pm
“Thank you, thank you Republicans for continuing to ignore the only candidate with actual presidential credentials……John Huntsman. He’s smart, he knows politics and foreign policy and he seems to be a pretty reasonable guy.”
Actually, he is a bit more conservative than people think and I, as a conservative, would vote for him were he the nominee.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
2:24 pm
Granny my wife says I’m more than half cute
She is biased of course
Tommy Maddox
December 21st, 2011
2:26 pm
“Money is the devil’s candy.”
Have you gone back to trading beads and skins for fire water?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
2:26 pm
St Simons,
“The CNS news service is reporting today that the Capitol Xmas tree
does not have enough Jesus-themed ornaments on it, and this is
a socialist muslin conspiracy, & well, you know who is president & all”
Which is funny, b/c some are lambasting the Obama’s for the number of trees in the White House.
http://news.investors.com/Article/594258/201112120812/obama-white-house-christmas-trees.htm
I can’t keep track of these peoples’ issues anymore.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
2:26 pm
godless heathen,
“According to who?”
It’s called sarcasm.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
2:26 pm
“Since Obama was GIVEN a bad hand, he took what he had and made it work!! Obama arrested the freefall…and the economy IS turning around!!”- HDB
Reagan was given a worse hand with double digit inflation, interest rates, and 7.5% unemployment. 2 1/2 years in after a recession had to be triggered by Fed Chairman Volcker in order to bring down interest rates the economy was clicking at a 7% growth rate under Reagan. Why is it now not growing at a 7% clip under Obama? And Reagan had to endure a 2 year recession in order to make things ripe for economic growth again. The W recession ended 5-6 months into Obama’s presidency. What is your excuse?
The fact that you clearly do not understand that Fed chief Paul Volcker triggered a recession on purpose to bring down interest rates and inflation tells me right then and there that you simply do not have an understanding of economics. Reagan and his policies did not trigger the recession. Fed policy did and it did it on purpose to fight inflation. Good lord woman even liberal economists will tell you this as will Jay himself. Its not a debateable point. But somehow or another your mind is convinced that Reagan triggered the 81-82 recession. Go read up on that recession please. Educate yourself ma’am.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
2:27 pm
Getalife
Money creates the things that will clean up the environment
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 21st, 2011
2:29 pm
Oh, please, please let the Republicans fail to extend the payroll tax break
really, we can save that 1B war chest for 2016 & Medicare for All.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
2:30 pm
Strawman: Actually, he is a bit more conservative than people think and I, as a conservative, would vote for him were he the nominee.
Who would you NOT vote for if that person were the nominee?
Truth be told, I, as a supporter of Obama, would consider Huntsman if he were the nominee.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
2:30 pm
Redneck convert: “Well, what a bunch of morans! ”
Wasn’t Bugs part of that clan?
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
2:32 pm
Actually, he is a bit more conservative than people think and I, as a conservative, would vote for him were he the nominee.
Why should anyone care what a strawman does.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
2:33 pm
Welcome to the Occupation,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Kh7nLplWo
Grover Norquist was touched by Sandusky
December 21st, 2011
2:34 pm
GoP – now the flavor of the month is going away, newt aka boss hog. Ron Paul is up next. I actually agree with a lot of the views that Ron has. In 2008, he was considered crazy by the gop base, what changed. Oh, it was your options,(Cain Train or Newt aka boss hog, Michelle(never in the race), Mitt-he’s still deciding, Perry related to bush, now Ron Paul is back in. High insight, gop, you did this to yourselves. Tell me why none of the gop candidates has asked bush to endorse them??????????
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
2:35 pm
“Reagan’s theory was really ‘trickle down’ economics borrowed from the Republican 1920s (Harding-Coolidge-Hoover) and renamed ’supply side.’ Cut tax rates for the wealthy; everyone else will benefit.- HDB
HDB,
You need some help with your understanding of economics. When the supply siders cut top marginal tax rates what that did was free up money for the investing class to then invest in the economy- new business ventures. If top marginal rates are too high then the investor class will simply park their money in tax free munis, the bank, or send it offshore. The risk reward isn’t appropriate for them to engage in risk taking behavior. You mention that high top rates under Eisenhower and the fact tha the economy was still growing. Well of course ma’am. We were the lone standing manufacturing power after WW2 decimated Europe and Asia. Duh!
And contray to the spoonfeeding about trickle down economics let me educate you on how supply side really works. As you noted the people at the top have their marginal rates cut. They then take that money and invest in new businesses. Lets say a restaurant for example. It could be months or even a year or 2 before that new business makes money- if ever at all. In the meantime the people who are working for the business or who built the plant, factory, restaurant, etc all have to be paid. they are making money and reinvesting their wages into the economy. There is nothing trickle down about it ma’am. When you free up investing capital to engage in new business ventures the first people to profit are not the owners and investors who may or may not ever make a dime but the employees and contractors and suppliers who that business pays. Trickle down is just spoon fed bumper sticker garbage for people who have no understanding of economics.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
2:35 pm
Jm,
“New Obama mercury rule to cost $9.8 BILLION per year”
For clean air? Seems like a bargain. But just for the record, source please…
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
2:37 pm
full of “facts” that contradict every other economist who has had a say on the subject.- Adam
Really Adam? Facts that contracict “EVERY OTHER ECONOMIST WHO HAS A SAY ON THE SUBJECT” EVERY ONE OF EM Adam?
Please delete and try again Adama. Your nonsense is outta hand.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
2:37 pm
“To be clear. I believe in evolution and trust scientists on global warming. Call me crazy.” ~ Jon Huntsman
Ensuring he will never be the nominee in the modern Republican Party.
josef
December 21st, 2011
2:39 pm
gm
USMC is a lot of things, but fake he ain’t…’course he do server a lot of red herrings and folks do go jumpin’ for ‘em…
…and I have it on good authority that his neighborhood association made him put an Obama sticker on his welfare Cadillac…
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
2:39 pm
“ell me why none of the gop candidates has asked bush to endorse them?”
Bush does not exist. You are not allowed to reference him or his Presidency. They never existed. The world began on 1.20.2009.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
2:42 pm
AmVet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Kh7nLplWo
LOL
gm
December 21st, 2011
2:43 pm
Thulsa Doom
The rep party never like to tell the truth about their god Ronald Reagan: when he took office in 1980 the debt was 1 trillion after he left office it was 3 trillion, and there god had 10% unemployment in 1983.
Thanks Obama for doing a hell of a job with the worst crises since the depression, several states have unemployment of 5% or below all this within 3 years you are the man””””
Jm
December 21st, 2011
2:43 pm
Getalife
I am all for clean air and water
I accept the new regulations, though I find them exceptionally crude, wasteful, inefficient, and generally dumb
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
2:43 pm
“As I’ve asked before…and have YET gotten a cogent response: Where was this level of concern pertaining to government spending whene the nation was BUSHwhacked???”
HDB,
Perhaps you weren’t paying attention but many cons were dismayed over the level of debt being run up by W. He was a major disappointment in that regard and as a result the Rs got whacked in the 08 elections. You see we don’t have the cult of personality thing going where an R potus can do no wrong unlike the libs. As bad as W was he racked up approximately 5 trillion in debt in 8 years. O so far has racked up nearly 4.5 trillion in less than 3 years. Just going by the facts which number is worse ma’am?
Adam
December 21st, 2011
2:43 pm
Thulsa: Perhaps you should show me non-partisan economists who agree with your ridiculous nonsense. Show me non-partisan economists who say Keynesian economics doesn’t work during economic downturn, and that trickle down or supply side economics works (as you are clearly behind this failed idea too).
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
2:44 pm
Gingrich Plummets in Polls as Voters Start Remembering Who He Is – Dawning Awareness Threatens Campaign
http://www.borowitzreport.com/2011/12/21/gingrich-plummets-in-polls-as-voters-start-remembering-who-he-is/
“Newt Gingrich has got to do something fast to keep people from remembering who he is,” pollster Logsdon said. “He might try growing a moustache or wearing an eye patch, but that might be too little, too late.”
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
2:46 pm
Considering Jay’s image, I’ll post my running question to anyone who cares to respond.
I’ll never tire of asking this question:
Barring a huge upset, Republicans will take control of at least one house
of Congress next week. How worried should we be by that prospect?
Not very, say some pundits. After all, the last time Republicans
controlled Congress while a Democrat lived in the White House was the
period from the beginning of 1995 to the end of 2000. And people remember
that era as a good time, a time of rapid job creation and responsible
budgets. Can we hope for a similar experience now?
No, we can’t. This is going to be terrible. In fact, future historians
will probably look back at the 2010 election as a catastroph for
America, one that condemned the nation to years of political chaos and
economic weakness. – Paul Krugman
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
2:46 pm
Thulsa Doom,
“You see we don’t have the cult of personality thing going where an R potus can do no wrong unlike the libs.”
BWUAHHHAHAAAHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHHAAA! Oh my…I think I’ve piddled myself. Thanks for the afternoon laugh.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
2:47 pm
Jewcowboy 2:38
Source: the EPA
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
2:47 pm
“Thulsa: Perhaps you should show me non-partisan economists who agree with your ridiculous nonsense. Show me non-partisan economists who say Keynesian economics doesn’t work during economic downturn, and that trickle down or supply side economics works (as you are clearly behind this failed idea too).”
See 1981-1989
HDB
December 21st, 2011
2:48 pm
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
2:26 pm
Kinda off there, Doom…….
The double-digit inflation was already falling when Reagan took office!!
Inflation Rates:
1979 11.3%
1980 13.5
1981 10.3
1982 6.2
1983 3.2
Reagan came into office in January 1981, and within 108 days passed a budget that contained his famous supply-side tax cuts. Of course, a budget passed in 1981 would be enacted in 1982, so business owners had plenty of advance notice of their impending good fortune. It is true the tax cuts were supposed to be phased in over three years, 10 percent a year. But David Stockman had produced computer simulations “proving” that the tax cuts would result in 5 percent growth in 1982 alone. Optimism was so high that today Stockman derisively refers to the 5-percent growth calculation as the “Rosy Scenario.”
Furthermore, Reagan imposed a moratorium on all new federal regulation enforcement the moment he took office. In fact, the Reagan administration began slashing and burning existing federal regulation; it cut the Federal Register nearly in half by 1986.
Yet 1982 was the worst year since the Great Depression, with -2.2 percent growth. Why should that be? The private sector knew about the tax cuts well in advance. Many conservatives argue that impending changes in tax rates affect corporate behavior; for example, when the rich learned in 1986 that capital gains would be raised in 1987, they took all the appropriate counter-measures in 1986. Then why did this not occur in 1981, with news of massive tax cuts on the horizon?
Furthermore, by 1982 there had already been enormous cuts in the capital gains tax, the most sacred tax cut that conservatives hold dear. Between 1978 and 1982, the top rate on capital gains was cut from 39 to 20 percent. And the top rate on unearned income fell from 70 to 50 percent (mirroring a similar rate cut in earned income).
As for deregulation, that actually began under Carter, not Reagan. Carter deregulated airlines, trucking, railroads, oil and interest rates, and set up much of the deregulation machinery that Reagan would later use.
The supply-sider’s dream was largely realized by 1982 — and yet that year turned out to be the worst year since the Great Depression. So the question is: why is Carter still to blame for the that recession, when Reagan had a full year to install a radical supply-side agenda?
Remember: CARTER nominated Volcker to the Federal Reserve Board…….Paul Volcker tightened the money supply in 1979…..and the recovery began in 1981!! The Reagan recession hit in 1982……….
If Volcker triggered the recession in ‘82, the question you should ask is this: If there was a recovery beginning in 1981…..why trigger a recession ONE YEAR LATER unless it was a POLICY decision!!! Who sets the policy!!!???
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
2:48 pm
“Reagan: when he took office in 1980 the debt was 1 trillion after he left office it was 3 trillion, and there god had 10% unemployment in 1983.”- gm
gm,
So reagan racked up 3 trillion in debt in 8 years? Oh, and most of that was due to the military buildup which brought down the USSR for which we received a hefty peace dividend in the 90s and from then on.
But I digress. Reagan ran up 3 trillion in 8 years right? Soooo what about Obama running up nearly 4.5 trillion in less than 3 years? Cat got your tongue gm?
10% unemployment in 1983 under Reagan? Yes. As a result of the recession. But perhaps you need a lesson in economic history sir. From the bottom point of the recession until the end of his term Reagan created over 20 million new jobs and unemployment plummeted. Allow me to repeat it again so that your mind can fathom it. From the bottom of the recession to when he left office Reagan created 20 million new jobs. Educate yourself sir.
Scooter
December 21st, 2011
2:48 pm
Republicrats got played by the band-aid applicators when they tried to apply yet another band-aid… the real fix is always just around the corner. Hey maybe the democrat controlled senate will pass a budget next year.
Brosephus
December 21st, 2011
2:49 pm
When the supply siders cut top marginal tax rates what that did was free up money for the investing class to then invest in the economy- new business ventures. If top marginal rates are too high then the investor class will simply park their money in tax free munis, the bank, or send it offshore.
That’s why supply side and kenyesian economics standing alone isn’t worth a wooden nickel nowadays. Both of those schools of thought had a bit of relevancy when we were a single country economy. However, when applied to a global economy, neither one is sufficent to aid us. I wish people would get that through their skulls and actually pay attention to things that will aid the US and not the rest of the world for once.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
2:51 pm
Jewcowboy
$9.8 billion I’d bigger than the entire GDP of several small nations
I wouldn’t consider it a trivial price
And there are cheaper ways to achieve the same goals
Jm
December 21st, 2011
2:53 pm
Bro says 2 economic models suck
Then says we should do what helps the US
Ok. Based on what? The Brocephus econometric model? Because I haven’t seen that one proven out anywhere.
Mary Elizabeth
December 21st, 2011
2:53 pm
For any reader who may be interested, I have just added some thoughts on the thread of a day or two ago, entitled, “Gingrich’s anti-judicial tirade. . .”
Happy Holidays to all.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
2:54 pm
HDB,
I’ve no disagreement with your post @ 2:48. Volcker was nominated by Carter. He triggered a brutal recession which he had to do in order to bring down inflation to get the economy going again. It ended up costing Carter the presidency and triggered the 81-82 recession. We are not in disagreement on any of this.
My point is very simple. That as the recession bottomed that the Reagan recovery began and as a result of his economic policies the economy went on to produce astounding job growth and 20 million new jobs. His growth rate was 7% 2 1/2 years into his presidency. My question is that if the W recession ended 5-6 months into Obama’s presidency why then can’t he produce the same economic results as Reagan did? Its very simple- because his economic policies are bad for America. Plain and simple. Look at the weak economy 2 1/2 years into his presidency. Can’t blame this on W though I suspect you will try.
HDB
December 21st, 2011
2:57 pm
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
2:43 pm
The question you should ask is this: How much did it take to pull the nation out of the Bush recession?? If you look at the parallel between Reagan and Obama: Reagan QUADRUPLED the deficit in his FIRST YEAR to get out of the recession his policies induced…..Obama spent what he had to to get the nation out of recession from what his predecessor induced!!!
BTW….I’ve never said that Obama could do no wrong; in certain aspects, he hasn’t gone FAR ENOUGH!! He needs to CHALLENGE the Republicans….particularly in the health care arena because market forces do NOT work there!!
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
2:59 pm
“However, when applied to a global economy, neither one is sufficent to aid us”- Brocephus
How so? Why would macro policies not apply to us just because the economy is more intertwined with the global economy than in years past?And btw we have been trading with the rest of the world forever.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
3:03 pm
Talking Head: 1981-1989? Seriously? How about we get a little more up-to-date? Show me economists in the past 5 years who espouse this stuff. I even gave you a little bit of a freebie there, 2006 is the beginning of that timeline. Surely when the economy wasn’t in the crapper, there were non-partisan conservatives saying “Full speed ahead!” with the deregulation and Bush tax cuts!
Adam
December 21st, 2011
3:04 pm
Excuse me, non partisan ECONOMISTS, not conservatives
HDB
December 21st, 2011
3:05 pm
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
2:54 pm
The problem is that the ENTIRE financial market was on the verge of collapsing under Bush rather than the stock market crash….just one sector…. that happened later under Reagan. Different paradigm!
You STILL had multiple recessions during the Reagan/Bush41 years!!
You STILL have the wealthy paying less taxes than in previous years….but rather than to unleash economic power, they’re hoarding money…and the tax rates are the LOWEST they’ve ever been!!! Supply side isn’t working now………
gm
December 21st, 2011
3:07 pm
josef
More people are on welfare that look like you then me, 30% of people are on f/s in ks, co, mt, wv, ut, mn, now remind you that minorities only make up less then 2% in those state.
Cut off fake fox news and reseach””
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
3:07 pm
abolish the FED, repeal the 16th & 17th amendments
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
3:09 pm
“Reagan QUADRUPLED the deficit in his FIRST YEAR to get out of the recession his policies induced…..Obama spent what he had to to get the nation out of recession from what his predecessor induced!!!”
HDB,
Reagan spent a lot because he built up the military. Do you not acknowledge this? And also that it brought about the fall of communism worldwide? Or that we reaped a peace dividend in the 90s as a result of Reagan winning the cold war?
“Obama spent what he had to to get the nation out of recession from what his predecessor induced!!!”
Wrong! The W recession was over 5-6 months into Obama’s presidency. When was the stimulus passed? February 17 the law was passed and from there money was put out. If you think that a Feb. stimulus ended a recession that officially ended in June or July then you have absolutely zero concept of lag times between when economic policies are implemented and when they actually take effect. And you have quite a few economists and quite a bit of economic history- Japan and our own great depression where the evidence is that govt interference made things worse. We may well have been better off doing nothing as opposed to going another trillion in debt. Debt which has to be repaid eventually.
I laid out the evidence on Japan’s lost decade and our own great depression for govt interference prolonging those events. Apparently you did not read and learn from them.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
3:10 pm
Jm,
“Source: the EPA”
Thanks.
“$9.8 billion I’d bigger than the entire GDP of several small nations”
“The EPA has put the annual cost of meeting a 75 parts per billion standard at $9.8 billion. A 70 parts per billion ozone standard would cost $22 billion annually. But EPA notes that the costs of either could easily be offset or exceeded by reduced health care costs.”
And the health benefits,”2,300 fewer nonfatal heart attacks; 48,000 fewer respiratory problems, acute bronchitis and asthma attacks; 7,600 fewer respiratory related hospital visits, and 890,000 fewer days when people miss work or school.”
Brosephus
December 21st, 2011
3:10 pm
jm
There is no Brosephus model, so you won’t see it applied anywhere.
Doom
True, we have been trading with others for a long time. Our trade policies have been in place since we were the big dog in the small pen. Our policies and negotiation techniques have not changed with the times. We can’t keep doing the same thing over and over and keep expecting the same results.
For example, a tax rate cut from 70% to 35% would provide a good bit of money to circulate back into the economy. When we were investing at home FIRST before going abroad, that money helped the US quite a bit. Nowadays, you’re talking about 3% rate cuts that don’t amount to more than pennies because of loopholes and deductions. Then when that extra money gets circulated, it’s invested worldwide giving us a much smaller boost. If you put 100 gallons of water into a swimming pool, you’ll see the level rise. If you put 100 gallons into the ocean, you won’t see a thing.
My point in the economic spectrum is that we no longer feel or take pride in what WE do here at home. There’s no desire to invest at home or do for country now. We’ve become a bunch of selfish greedy a$$holes and we’re paying the price for it. Greed IS one of the seven deadly sins.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
3:16 pm
So, no economists in the past few years who really support the nonsense posted before? That trickle down works and Keynesian economics doesn’t?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
3:16 pm
Jm,
“$9.8 billion I’d bigger than the entire GDP of several small nations”
Yeah…Mauritius and Haiti.
gm
December 21st, 2011
3:17 pm
Thulsa Doom
Obama running up nearly 4.5 trillion in less than 3 years? Cat got your tongue gm?
I am proud that my President bailed out millions of my fellow Americans with the auto, housing, unemployement, this is what this country is about, these people lost their jobs under GW I guess he should have let them run in the soup line.
Lets not forgot about the 700 billion for two wars, that were not paid for, so are you saying Doom that those familes who pay taxes should not have been helped?
You failed to mention Reagan raised the debt celing 18 times and raised taxes 14, on the middle class and let wall street run wild.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
3:20 pm
So now it takes over 100 hours per month of work for the median worker to make median rent. For those keeping score, assuming that the worker works full time every single week, that is MORE THAN HALF of the median worker’s income. Gods help him/her if they’re part time.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
3:21 pm
The problem is that the ENTIRE financial market was on the verge of collapsing under Bush rather than the stock market crash….just one sector…. that happened later under Reagan. Different paradigm!- HDB
HDB,
Yet again your economics history has failed you. Do you not remember the enormous S&L debacle in the billions that began later in Reagan’s 2nd term.
“You STILL had multiple recessions during the Reagan/Bush41 years!!”HDB
Another economics history fail. We’ve had multiple recessions throughout our economic history under both Rs and Ds ma’am. You think recessions only happen under Rs? Now you are really sounding desperate.
“You STILL have the wealthy paying less taxes than in previous years….but rather than to unleash economic power, they’re hoarding money…and the tax rates are the LOWEST they’ve ever been!!! Supply side isn’t working now”
Some truth and some not. First of all they are paying less on a federal level. However when you add in the 2nd highest corporate tax rate in the world then that changes the whole picture ma’am. You’re also not adding in state and local tax burdens which may change the picture even more.
And if they’re hoarding money than so what. Its their money to hoard. And if they didn’t feel that the economy was being strangled to death by regulation or by an anti-business president then maybe they would start investing and hiring again. But they won’t because of the anti-business climate that O has fostered. You have no one to blame for this climate but the O man himself.
Oh and I better repair your statment that tax rates are “THE LOWEST THEY’VE EVER BEEN”. Perhaps since WW 2 or since the 20s or 30s. But how can they be “THE LOWEST THEY’VE EVER BEEN” if we didn’t even have a permanent federal income tax until 1913. Please explain this fallacy in logic???
Talking Head
December 21st, 2011
3:22 pm
“I am proud that my President bailed out millions of my fellow Americans with the auto, housing, unemployement, this is what this country is about, these people lost their jobs under GW I guess he should have let them run in the soup line.”
Not according to the OWS crowd, I thought they were upset because the Banks got bailed out and the people didn’t. So I guess you are validating that the OWS crowd and movement is a complete waste of time?
HDB
December 21st, 2011
3:22 pm
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
3:09 pm
1) Much of Reagan’s military budget was the carryover from Carter’s R&D budget!! Carter INCREASED the military’s R&D so that the weapons WOULD come online during the Reagan Years!! Alaso note that the Carter recession had ended in 1981…because the economy was RECOVERING….but Volcker triggered the ‘82 recession so that supply side would be invoked!! We’re still PAYING for that with endless budget deficits!!
2) Actually, the W recession didn’t end until September……and stimulus lag times can vary from one month to as long as 36 months……it’s contingent upon the industry and the effect!! As unemployment is a lagging indicator, so is the stimulus effect……..
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
3:22 pm
“Perhaps you should show me non-partisan economists who agree with your ridiculous nonsense.”
I’m afraid that your position is that any economists who agreed with his “ridiculous nonsense” will be deemed partisan by definition. Thus, your rejoinder requests something that is impossible in your worldview.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
3:23 pm
Talking Head: Not according to the OWS crowd, I thought they were upset because the Banks got bailed out and the people didn’t. So I guess you are validating that the OWS crowd and movement is a complete waste of time?
You’d be right if only for the tiny little fact that a couple million people being bailed out is still a small percentage of the amount that NEED bailing out, if your goal is to bail out everyone.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
3:26 pm
MPercy: I’m afraid that your position is that any economists who agreed with his “ridiculous nonsense” will be deemed partisan by definition. Thus, your rejoinder requests something that is impossible in your worldview.
So you’re not even going to try? My view on what is non-partisan is someone who isn’t inserting themselves into the political aims of one party or another when making their statements about what works and what doesn’t. They do exist. Show me some that think supply side works and Keynesian economics doesn’t.
Come on. You guys WANT to prove me wrong, right?
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
3:26 pm
Adam: here’s a list of some who likely don’t believe in overall benefits of Keynesian economic theory, but I suspect you will decry them all as partisan.
http://www.cato.org/special/stimulus09/alternate_version.html
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
3:27 pm
gm,
In other words its W’s fault. Is that all ya got sir?
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
3:27 pm
Oh I see, you mean non-partisan like Paul Krugman.
HDB
December 21st, 2011
3:29 pm
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
3:21 pm
I didn’t forget the S&L crisis; it was the precursor to what happened with the financial markets were deregulated…….
I know that recessions occur no matter who’s in office…..but it seems as though recessions under Republican administrations affect people that I know the harder……I know it did ME!!
If this is such an anti-business climate, then why are businesses more profitable….and the stock value increasing?? You forget that OFFSHORING was begun under Reagan/Bush……THAT’S why employment has been eroding…..the lower-skilled jobs that were the pathway for the lower classes to progress were taken away…..plus the importing of undocumented labor which was really unleashed under Reagan (note: Reagan’s “amnesty”)…….and VIOLA…..the start of the decline…..
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
3:31 pm
You know it’s time to go to TMZ when the thread descends into an argument about Reagan.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
3:37 pm
MPercy: That statement is very short, and very partisan in nature. It’s inserting itself into current policy and trying to make the case that the Republican view is the right one, AND the Democrat view is the wrong one. It also comes from a Libertarian website and appears to have been signed by universities, who are not people.
And no, I consider Krugman to be partisan as well.
What I am looking for is an economist somewhere who can show the historic reasons for why supply side WORKS, and Keynesian economics DOESN’T, based on actual data and explanation. Something that will take me a while to read.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
3:38 pm
“Alaso note that the Carter recession had ended in 1981…because the economy was RECOVERING….but Volcker triggered the ‘82 recession so that supply side would be invoked!! We’re still PAYING for that with endless budget deficits!!”
HDB,
Economic history. As for “we’re still paying for it with endless economic budget deficits”. that statement is just a bunch of baseless gobbldeegook. Clinton and the Republican house balanced the budget and we’ve had deficits ever since due to out of control spending- not Reaganomics. Or would you prefer going back to the Carter era of staglfation of the 70s. the problem is spending by govt- not supply side economics ma’am
Volcker’s Fed is widely credited with ending the United States’ stagflation crisis of the 1970s. Inflation, which peaked at 13.5% in 1981, was successfully lowered to 3.2% by 1983.[12]
Volcker raised the federal funds rate, which had averaged 11.2% in 1979, to a peak of 20% in June 1981. The prime rate rose to 21.5% in 1981 as well.
Volcker was committed to eradicating stagflation by giving the nation some bitter medicine: an intentional recession. In 1980, Volcker tightened the money supply, which stopped job growth in the economy. In response to hard times, businesses began cutting their prices, and workers their wage demands, to stay in business. Volcker argued that eventually this would wring inflationary expectations out of the system.
The recovery of 1981 was unintentional, and with inflation still high, Volcker tightened the money supply even more severely in 1982. This resulted in the worst recession since the Great Depression. Unemployment in the final quarter of 1982 soared to over 10 percent, and Volcker was accused of the “cold-blooded murder of millions of jobs.” Even high-ranking members of Reagan’s staff were vehemently opposed to his actions. Congress actually considered bringing the independent Fed under the government’s direct control, to avoid such economic pain in the future. Today, economists calculate that the cost of Volcker’s anti-inflation medicine was $1 trillion — an astounding sum.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
3:39 pm
“Who would you NOT vote for if that person were the nominee? Truth be told, I, as a supporter of Obama, would consider Huntsman if he were the nominee.”
If Obama were not a social liberal, I would likely vote for him over Paul. And still might anyway (since Paul is a Libertarian).
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
3:39 pm
Adam,
“Something that will take me a while to read.”
You can’t escape family…no matter how impressive the book looks.
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
3:40 pm
As I suspected Adam.
Brosephus
December 21st, 2011
3:45 pm
You know things are truly effed up in this country when you read something like this…
As owner of A-Z Outlet in Holland, Bryan Vandenbosch has purchased a lot of electronics, jewelry, and tools, but after almost 19 years in business, he bought something he never expected — a Purple Heart, a medal awarded to U.S. troops wounded in battle. This one was earned in Afghanistan in May 2010.
“[The Soldier had] been in here the week [before Thanksgiving],” says Vandenbosch. “He brought it in the following week, I purchased it from him, and put it on display.”
Vandenbosch says the active-duty Soldier, on leave from Afghanistan, was reluctant to sell the medal at first, but like a lot of people, he needed a little extra cash for the holiday season. So, the Soldier gave up one of his two Purple Hearts — something he almost gave his life to get.
http://www.military.com/news/article/soldier-pawns-purple-heart-for-christmas-cash.html?ESRC=topstories.RSS
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
3:45 pm
TD
“However when you add in the 2nd highest corporate tax rate in the world then that changes the whole picture ma’am. ”
Does that hold true from an effective rate stand point?
Really?
Adam
December 21st, 2011
3:45 pm
MPercy: If all you can do is offer up a short, signed statement then you haven’t shown what I am looking for, even if it was non-partisan.
Matti's Observant Eye
December 21st, 2011
3:45 pm
Strawman,
What have you got against being socially liberal? Is there something Un-American about minding our own business when it comes to what people do in the privacy of their own homes, and keeping the government OUT of decisions that should be private? Or is it equality under the law you have a problem with?
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
3:45 pm
…..but it seems as though recessions under Republican administrations affect people that I know the harder……I know it did ME!!- HDB
HDB that is your anecdotal opinion and is fostered by your bias. How else do you explain the staggering black unemployment rate under Obama which is substantially higher than it was under W? Yet to hear granny tell it everyone in her family has great jobs and is doing well under O. Sure. Uh huh.
“If this is such an anti-business climate, then why are businesses more profitable….and the stock value increasing??”- HDB
Simple. Companies are cutting fat and excess employees and becoming cash cows. They aren’t spending costly money on new plant, equipment, new hiring and training, new R&D which are all huge cash drainers. That is why profits are up so substantially. Growth costs a lot of cash flow.
“You forget that OFFSHORING was begun under Reagan/Bush……THAT’S why employment has been eroding…..the lower-skilled jobs that were the pathway for the lower classes to progress were taken away…..”- HDB
Offshoring has been going on forever. Its just catchy to use the phrase in the past decade or so. Its nothing new and textile workers who started losing their jobs 20-30 years ago will tell you so. And this happened under Clinton as well. The world is becoming more global.
“plus the importing of undocumented labor which was really unleashed under Reagan (note: Reagan’s “amnesty”)…….”-HDB
And which party is for the most party for illegal immigration and which party is for the most part against it? I think we both know the answer to that one.
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
3:49 pm
Yes, they have.
Obama’s end.
Meanwhile the President isn’t doing anything and his poll numbers are rising.
Sounds like two problems there, Jayman. 1) Obama’s and 2) the whole country.
Don’t think Republicans have much to worry about at all. Come a solid candidate in November, the media/Dems/liberal columnists won’t be able to get away with all this all-problems-in-DC-are-republican’s-fault nonsense.
Takes two to tango, no matter what the dippy Jay Bookman (heir of Cynthia Tucker’s “success”) has to say.
Go teach at UGA, Bookman. Show ‘em how a real mediocre non-race-baiting liberal hack gets his paycheck.
Merry Christmas.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
3:49 pm
They BOTH suck,
No. It doesn’t. But combining the 2 plus the bevy of state and local tax rates may mean that the overall tax burden is actually higher than its ever been or close to it. I’ld have to check and see since I’m not sure. But I did see a stat that combining federal, state, and local govt spending means that total govt is consuming something like 40-50% of every dollar spent in the U.S. I find that number hard to believe and honestly I can’t remember what the figure was but I would like to research it and know exactly how much of the economy total govt expenditures are eating into.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
3:50 pm
“Show me economists in the past 5 years who espouse this stuff.”
The main error is your thinking, Adam, is that somehow you suppose “economists” have greater powers of understanding the global economy than they actually do. They are akin to weathermen who can speak accurately to isolated events in narrow time frames, but cannot tell you with ANY certainty how things are going to be in one year. You place far too much faith in mankind’s intellect. We are all of us idiot savants.
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
3:51 pm
Thulsa @ 345,
Which party today is for suing the state’s efforts to enforce federal immigration laws?
Yes, that answers your question nicely about which party is “for illegal immigration”.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
3:53 pm
Adam,
I’ve seen this MPercy’s posts on here before. He’s probably the most knowledgeable person I’ve seen ever post on here in regards to understanding govt expenditures and taxation. I’m afraid you brought a boy scout knife to a gunfight.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
3:54 pm
Strawman: They are akin to weathermen who can speak accurately to isolated events in narrow time frames, but cannot tell you with ANY certainty how things are going to be in one year.
Except I’m not asking for predictions. I’m asking for an honest approach to the subject of supply side and Keynesian economics, with a conclusion that supply side works and Keynesian economics doesn’t, in an article written by an economist who has studied all this.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
3:54 pm
Come a solid candidate in November…
And who exactly/which flavor of the month would that be?
Solid (GOP) candidate is the oxymoron of the year.
LOL…
Adam
December 21st, 2011
3:56 pm
Thulsa: Then he won’t mind discussing it further. Simply throwing out a statement and going “You are going to claim this is partisan!” isn’t going to stop me from saying, yes, it IS partisan, and no, you haven’t proven your point.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
3:57 pm
I only have about 30 minutes before I have to go. It’d be nice to have a considered approach to this to read before I leave for the day.
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
3:59 pm
“The available empirical evidence does not support the idea that spending multipliers typically exceed one, and thus spending stimulus programs will likely raise GDP by less than the increase in government spending. Defense-spending multipliers exceeding one likely apply only at very high unemployment rates, and nondefense multipliers are probably smaller. However, there is empirical support for the proposition that tax rate reductions will increase real GDP.
Mr. Barro is a professor of economics at Harvard and a senior fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. Mr. Redlick is a recent Harvard graduate.
—————-
Nobel laureate Edward Prescott of Arizona State University’s W.P. Carey School of Business, argued that “no respectable macroeconomist” believes stimulus works.
————————
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/25/primer-on-the-great-debate/
Do you understand why well-known economists, including Nobel Prize winners, are on opposite sides of the debate about the stimulus package and what should be done about the recession? Not only Americans, but people everywhere are confused, largely because the economists who are writing and speaking about what should be done have such fundamental disagreements.
There are two main schools of thought. One group is under the broad umbrella of the Chicago or Austrian school economists who are heavily influenced by the teachings of F.A. Hayek (1899-1992) and Milton Friedman (1903-2007). The members of the other group are commonly known as Keynesians, who accept many of the teachings of John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) and his disciples
In theory, if the increased government spending is only utilized on projects where the benefits of the venture exceed the costs of the additional inflation and net tax burden, the Keynesians’ call for more spending could have merit. (In the 1930s, it was argued by many that even if the government only employed people to dig holes and then fill them in, the economy would be better off. Most modern Keynesians no longer advocate such wasted effort, which clearly did not work.)
The Keynesians have several problems translating their theory into practical policy, particularly in democratic countries. They need to determine the correct amount of additional spending (how much “stimulus”) and then have it spent in the early stages of the recession. Experience has shown that most additional government spending arrives in the later parts of the recession, or even after the recession is over.
This merely adds to the inflationary pressures, which are often building as economic activity picks up. Another problem is what the economists consider desired increases in spending – those areas which meet a reasonable cost benefitstandard. These are often quite different from those projects on which the politicians often want to spend money (rebuilding soccer fields and increasing wages for unionized workers – both of which are in the new stimulus bill).
Many economists who accept the basic Keynesian argument of the utilization of labor and capital resources, nevertheless, were against the stimulus bill just passed by the U.S. Congress, because much of the spending would be wasteful or even destructive, by reducing the incentives for productive economic activity.
——————————————-
Surely somewhere out there among the “well-known economists, including Nobel Prize winners, are on opposite sides of the debate about the stimulus package” will be someone Adam can accept as “non-partisan economist” who believes that “ridiculous nonsense”. But I repeat my opinion that Adam will simply label anyone who does not subscribe to his point of view is a partisan clinging to “ridiculous nonsense”.
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
4:01 pm
solid GOP candidate.
tee hee hee
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
4:02 pm
Fast and Furious,
yes. It do. I just find it fascinating that given the Dem’s well known support for illegal immigration that a liberal can actually find a way to blame reagan for illegal immigration. Its fascinating really.
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
4:06 pm
Thulsa: “I’ve seen this MPercy’s posts on here before. He’s probably the most knowledgeable person I’ve seen ever post on here in regards to understanding govt expenditures and taxation.”
Thanks, but no, I’m not. I’m just an engineer and can “run numbers” and bring that mindset with me.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
4:07 pm
“brosephus model”
Interrogate all Brazilian models.
That’s the bro model
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
4:08 pm
“blame reagan for illegal immigration.”
I blame Kevin Costner. If he hadn’t built it they wouldn’t have come.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
4:09 pm
“What have you got against being socially liberal? Is there something Un-American about minding our own business when it comes to what people do in the privacy of their own homes, and keeping the government OUT of decisions that should be private?”
I simply do not believe in legalized abortion (which I consider homicide) or gay marriage. These are not, in my view, “privacy” issues since they can affect society at large. And I am not going to get into a discussion of this at length here today.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
4:09 pm
Romney can fix America
Obama can’t
Adam
December 21st, 2011
4:10 pm
MPercy: Can’t say for sure whether the person is partisan or not, considering he is from the Cato Institute. But since the arguments being made are a reasonable approach, I see no reason to say anything particularly partisan about the article. I do not think this particular aspect is correct, though:
a bubble that developed because too much money was flowing into housing along with a loosening of credit standards.
I think that puts too much of the focus on the bubble cause being people who couldn’t pay, when that is actually a much smaller cause than some other causes. Since the article doesn’t deal with that aspect further, that’s all I will say about that.
The article doesn’t seem to come to a conclusion that Keynesian economics doesn’t work, just that it doesn’t cover all the bases. No school of economics does. I’m not sure the case was sufficiently made for the Keynesian solution being wrong in the case of stagflation, however.
Please do send more.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
4:11 pm
Adam,
Don’t say I didn’t warn you about arguing with MPercy. To add to his statement above I’ve already presented evidence as to what Keynesian or stimulus efforts did in Japan during the lost decade and during our own great depression. The evidence seems clear. Keynesian and govt interference not only did not help but actually prolonged those depressions. You would do better to simply read history as opposed to taking one point of view and doggedly sticking to it no matter what.
That liberals do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons history has to teach them- Thulsa Doom by way of Aldous Huxley
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
4:12 pm
TD
“I just find it fascinating that given the Dem’s well known support for illegal immigration that a liberal can actually find a way to blame reagan for illegal immigration”
Now, now ,now
Are you telling me that all the business owners and investors who have knowlingly utilized illegal labor all vote Dem?
You know that is a lie…. many are Repubs who utilized and have been and in many cases still utilize illegal labor………
Deal had to be drugged by his own party to sign the last immigration bill in the GA….. If you do not believe so….. Go look at his statements before he was elected and now….. There was a change. Those chicken farmers and plant owners in the Gainsville area were none to please with Daddy Deal……… You think they are all Dem and support Obama?
Really?
Bush had a Repub Congress for six years…. he did what?
Granted the Dems are no better… It is just that Repubs talk a better game, but in the end for the most part do nothing more….
Yes TD….. illegals still work and live in Arizonia……. and are getting hired by those same local Repub and Dem business owners
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
4:12 pm
Strawman,
“I simply do not believe in legalized abortion (which I consider homicide) or gay marriage.”
Believe in them or not, they do exist.
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
4:14 pm
Strawman
How does two people of the same sex impact society at large?
Does it make others gay or want to marry those of the same sex when they were straight before? Really?
Will it change how you believe?
Adam
December 21st, 2011
4:15 pm
Strawman: These are not, in my view, “privacy” issues since they can affect society at large
Abortion affects exactly one person and possibly that person’s family and partner(s) if they know about it. And only on the emotional level.
Gay marriage also only affects people on the emotional level.
Jackie
December 21st, 2011
4:15 pm
The so-called conservatives in the House and the Senate, long ago, painted themselves into a corner because they thought the electorate would believe the “bumper sticker pejoratives” about President Obama while hoping that most who disagreed with them would not understand basic economics concepts.
The sad thing is, the so-called conservatives continue to paint themselves into that proverbial corner.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
4:16 pm
“Except I’m not asking for predictions. I’m asking for an honest approach to the subject of supply side and Keynesian economics, with a conclusion that supply side works and Keynesian economics doesn’t, in an article written by an economist who has studied all this.”
No…you said before that “show me economists in the past 5 years who espouse this stuff.” It seems to me that you are selectively filtering out information. Do your own homework. I am not doing it for you.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
4:19 pm
Jackie,
“The sad thing is, the so-called conservatives continue to paint themselves into that proverbial corner.”
The sadder fact is their jacknob supporters keep buying those bumper stickers. Especially the shiny ones…they like those best.
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
4:20 pm
Strawman
meant to say how does two people of the same sex getting married……?
You know what I meant
How many people have “turned” gay in the countries that allow gay marriage? How has that impacted the family and what they teach in those countries?
It does make an impact on society…. right?
By the way I’m straight as an arrow, but love to belly laugh when people like you post the BS you post
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
4:22 pm
I do not think I can satisfy Adam’s request, as it is impossible. He labeled a short simple disagreement statement as partisan. His opinion appears to mirror the President’s
“There is no disagreement that we need action by our government, a recovery plan that will help to jumpstart the economy.” — PRESIDENT-ELECT BARACK OBAMA
“There is no disagreement” is an absolute statement. Logically, the existence of even a single point of contradictory evidence refutes the absolute. Some 350 economists made a simple statement in response:
“With all due respect Mr. President, that is not true.
“Notwithstanding reports that all economists are now Keynesians and that we all support a big increase in the burden of government, we do not believe that more government spending is a way to improve economic performance. More government spending by Hoover and Roosevelt did not pull the United States economy out of the Great Depression in the 1930s. More government spending did not solve Japan’s “lost decade” in the 1990s. As such, it is a triumph of hope over experience to believe that more government spending will help the U.S. today. To improve the economy, policy makers should focus on reforms that remove impediments to work, saving, investment and production. Lower tax rates and a reduction in the burden of government are the best ways of using fiscal policy to boost growth.
350 economists, reportedly including some Nobel Prize winners, signed this statement.
Clearly, at least some of them disagree with the President’s contention, refuting his absolute.
Clearly, at least some of them subscribe to the alternative premise: that tax cuts and smaller government would be better.
But they are all labeled partisan, apparently only because they signed onto this statement. Voicing their disagreement with the absolute used by the President is ipso facto proof of their partisanship. Thus their opinions are discounted immediately.
I am apparently supposed to find a well-known and respected Austrian/Chicago/Hayek/Friedman economist who will have never expressed disagreement with the political machine but who will have clearly articulated the premise so that Adam can peruse it at length.
I was initially just trying to contradict Adam’s absolute “You make it really difficult to take you seriously when you quote articles from a clearly partisan source, full of “facts” that contradict every other economist who has had a say on the subject.”
“Every other economist” is again an absolute, and the existence of even one should suffice to refute the absolute. But the qualifier was there “partisan”. Given the qualifier, I expected that no such refutation would be acceptable, as it would be dismissed as partisan.
This predication was borne out in the initial 350. Subsequent counter examples have been deemed not meaty enough.
Thus, I accept my failure to produce the contradictory evidence for Adam, which simply convinces me my point that there was never a way to do so was prescient.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
4:23 pm
“Abortion affects exactly one person and possibly that person’s family and partner(s) if they know about it. And only on the emotional level. Gay marriage also only affects people on the emotional level.”
Wow…you have this thing (like all things it would seem) figured out, don’t you? What an inanely simplistic view of things. You make bald, grandiose assertions that you can’t possible back up. Grow up. There are more things in heaven in earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
4:25 pm
Adam “I’m asking for an honest approach to the subject of supply side and Keynesian economics, with a conclusion that supply side works and Keynesian economics doesn’t, in an article written by an economist who has studied all this.”
What about “non-partisan”? I remain firm in my assertion that any such evidence would be rejected as partisan screed–you cannot be placated on the subject. The names of 300+ economists, any of whom you could look up yourself to access their scholarly writings, were dismissed by you as partisan because they took the time to disagree with the President in a simple statement.
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
4:25 pm
Strawman
“You make bald, grandiose assertions that you can’t possible back up. Grow up”
This from someone who posted about impacts to society…. yet can not back it up without anything except his own opinion and ideology………
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
josef
December 21st, 2011
4:26 pm
gm
December 21st, 2011
3:07 pm
josef
gm
“More people are on welfare that look like you then me, 30% of people are on f/s in ks, co, mt, wv, ut, mn, now remind you that minorities only make up less then 2% in those state.
Cut off fake fox news and reseach””
Whew! L-rdy! Just what DO I look like? How many minority labels would you like?
Adam
December 21st, 2011
4:27 pm
Strawman: So perhaps you would care to tell me who else is affected by an abortion besides who I said?
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
4:28 pm
“By the way I’m straight as an arrow, but love to belly laugh when people like you post the BS you post.”
Do you support MAMBLA, genius? Before you answer: you do realize that sort of thing was practiced in ancient Greece (often said to be the birthplace of democracy), don’t you?. Where do YOU draw the line? Just because I draw it in a different place doesn’t mean you wouldn’t, in other circumstances, turn out to be just the sort of bigot you imagine me to be.
josef
December 21st, 2011
4:29 pm
Strawman
No legalized abortion? Rape? Incest? The mother’s health?
And not to worry about not believing in gay marriage. It doesn’t believe in you either.
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
4:30 pm
Strawman
Still waiting for the impacts to society based on facts…
YOU made the statement……. waiting
No deflection about what I support or do not support….
back up your assertions
waiting
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
4:31 pm
They BOTh suck.
“How many people have “turned” gay in the countries that allow gay marriage?”
Well, I was straight. I had sex with women all the time. Sometimes 3 or 4 or night. Couldn’t get enough. Then in 2002, I visited the Netherlands. All of a sudden I decided to be gay. That gay lifestyle beckoned me, so I dropped the chicks and jumped on the…diverse culture.
Corey
December 21st, 2011
4:32 pm
Republicans in Congress have been caught in a pickle of their own making, and as usual Republican voters on here have no defense to offer. Like a broken record or a doll with the string recoiling back into it’s neck, they mouth the same limited phrases “Obama socialist’”, “Obama Marxist”, “Libs this and that” with an occasional Atlanta thug or Muslim thrown in for good measure.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
4:32 pm
MPercy: What about “non-partisan”? I remain firm in my assertion that any such evidence would be rejected as partisan screed
A historical approach which references the ways in which both have been tried, showing that most tries support a particular conclusion as to whether it “works” or not, without resorting to tying it to things like “the stimulus” or “Obamacare” or “Reaganomics” or other politically charged terms (unless referenced like “some called this ______”) would work. Simply making an assertion that “Keynesian economics didn’t solve this one specific example that I won’t talk about except to call it by a politically common name” is not helpful.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
4:32 pm
“Believe in them or not, they do exist.”
So did genocide in Nazi Germany. Your point is?
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
4:33 pm
Strawman
There you go jewcowboy is an example you can use to back up your assertion that you are running from…
hahahahahahaha
Adam
December 21st, 2011
4:35 pm
MPercy: The names of 300+ economists, any of whom you could look up yourself to access their scholarly writings,
This is on my list of things to do, but like you said: 300+ names. It’s gonna take a while to look up each, filter through to find relevant topic writings, etc. But the statement itself does nothing to indicate WHY they signed it. And it only refers to the stimulus, indicates stimulus bad, tax cuts good, and references a couple of events like everyone is supposed to know all about them.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
4:36 pm
For Republicans, who were damn near once all Democrats, abortion, race relations and gay rights, among other issues, have zero to do with “societal impacts” or justice or giving a rats ass about the “babies”.
For them it is the same thing it has always been about – telling people what to do with their bodies and their lives.
And up until those dirty liberals, progressives, moderates, etc, upset their apple cart during those horrible days in the 1960s and 1970s, the goons could get away with it.
No more.
And never again.
Selah.
Jackie
December 21st, 2011
4:36 pm
@jewcowboy
It is instructive how you reacted to my post. I would venture that you helped the so-called conservatives out by supplying the paint.
Adam
December 21st, 2011
4:36 pm
I have run out of time for today. I have saved this position in my browser, so barring any unforeseen computer failure, I’ll be back to all this.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
4:37 pm
Strawman,
“Do you support MAMBLA, genius?”
Who is MAMBLA?
Granny Godzilla
December 21st, 2011
4:38 pm
Did you see the photo of the returning sailor and her partner kissing?
I understand there were loud cheers and flag waving.
It’s fabulous.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
4:39 pm
“No legalized abortion? Rape? Incest? The mother’s health?”
No, J, the kind of abortion which attempts to avoid responsibility for the consequences of a choice made earlier. Euthanasia is really not that different and may one day be as acceptable as abortion is now.
josef
December 21st, 2011
4:39 pm
jewcowboy
MAMBLA are a tree-dwelling serpent in Africa known for their powerful venum, I think…I didn’t google it, though…
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
4:40 pm
Boehner and the House Republicans want to force Congress and the President to stay in DC and work right through Christmas instead of taking this most Christian of holidays off to be with family and demonstrate a true and meaningful support of “In God We Trust”. House Republicans must not be Christians. This is horrible.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
4:40 pm
Jackie,
” I would venture that you helped the so-called conservatives out by supplying the paint.”
The “conservatives” don’t like paint…they like glitter and poster board. At least their tea-drinkers do.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
4:40 pm
“Who is MAMBLA?”
Typo…NAMBLA. Not an everyday word for me.
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
4:41 pm
MAMBLA are a tree-dwelling serpent in Africa known for their powerful venum, I think…I didn’t google it, though…
I thought they were Australian.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
4:42 pm
You know that is a lie…. many are Repubs who utilized and have been and in many cases still utilize illegal labor………They BOTH suck
They BOTH suck,
What can I say? You got me there pardner. I wouldn’t quite imply that I lied though. Nevertheless you are certainly correct. Many Repubs want a stop to illegal immigration or at least to get it under control but the dirty truth is indeed that a lot of bidness men, many of them Republican, loves that cheap illegal labor. You’ll not get an argument from me on that. Personally I am pro immigration since I am fond of Hispanic culture. But I would just like for it to be done in an orderly, organized fashion with a guest worker program where immigrants are welcomed, where they pay a set tax or surcharge to cover their costs to our social svcs, judicial, and health care system. And that’s it. And possibly something to give preference to Americans first in hiring although I’m not really sure how to go about this. The people hurt the most by illegal are our non skilled laborers, principally African Americans. That is the only downside that I see.
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
4:42 pm
AmVet,
If you fart and giggle along with NYTimes and CNN–as Jayboy does (and are still singing those inane songs you write), then I forgive you for not saying that a solid candidate will emerge.
In December ‘07 Obama wasn’t solid either.
They BOTh suck
December 21st, 2011
4:44 pm
TD @ 4:42
On that we can agree…. no doubt
josef
December 21st, 2011
4:45 pm
Strawman
Then be more judicious in the blanket statements…
And putting gay marriage in the same paradigm with genocide in Nazi Germany is a bit disingenous since if you know the history of the time and place, you will find that your opinion would be more on “their” side of the question of homosexuality and the rights of those falling under the label…
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
4:45 pm
How about Henry Hazlitt’s ‘The Failure of the “New Economics”: An Analysis of the Keynesian Fallacies.’
Or Friedrich A. Hayek, “Reflections on the Pure Theory of
Money of Mr. J. M. Keynes,” Economica, August 1931,
Those predates the current situation by several decades though.
Perhaps this http://econjwatch.org/file_download/475/HorwitzJanuary2011.pdf
by Steven Horwitz, who is a Professor of Economics
at St. Lawrence University in Canton, NY.
Bill Orvis White
December 21st, 2011
4:46 pm
Oh, good Lord @Keep Up The Fight!
When a Socialist-Democrat goes on and on and on with “his” secular drivel, someone needs to shut the lights off for God’s sake! I’m starting to love Speaker Boehner all over again.
@jewcowboy
Your rhetoric is always flawed. The fact is that the Bush-era tax cut$ created jobs, expanded the private sector and put this once-free nation on a path to being the world’s leader once again. Unfortunately your friend Hussein Obama came in and expanded the Welfare State through out-of-control entitlement programs. I use the correct reference to this “president” because “he” is dedicated to anti-colonialist Kenyan-Moslem-Euro-Centric socialistic thinking which is by all facts, is UN-AMERICAN and IMPEACHABLE!
Removing this Marxist from Georgia’s primary ballot will be just the very first step in removing this disaster from the Oval Office.
MERRY CHRISTMAS
Amen,
Bill
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
4:46 pm
I thought it was the black mamba. Truly one of the most venomous and nastiest snakes in the world. Not sure that its a tree dweller though.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
4:46 pm
Strawman,
“So did genocide in Nazi Germany. Your point is?”
Uh…wow. Genocide as a response to gay marriage and abortion. I’ve lost my train of thought.
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
4:49 pm
NAMBLA: North American Marlon Brando Look-alike Association
josef
December 21st, 2011
4:49 pm
Taxi
Had to go google it…Africa but only the green ones live in trees, the black ones live on land… the things we learn just being snippy, eh?
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
4:50 pm
The animal is the black mamba.
But the black NAMBLA is probably worse.
Kamchak
December 21st, 2011
4:50 pm
So did genocide in Nazi Germany.
Godwin’s Law, proven yet again.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
4:50 pm
Strawman,
“Not an everyday word for me.”
And not for gay people either. It’s usually only used by homophobes trying to slander gay men by saying they are all pedophiles.
JohnnyReb
December 21st, 2011
4:51 pm
PolitiFact has awarded the Lie of the Year – take a look;many regulars who post here bought into the claim. The Left won the propoganda battle on this, on a lie.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2011/dec/20/lie-year-democrats-claims-republicans-voted-end-me/
Is there any possibility the rhetoric from the Left on the payroll tax might also be pants on fire?
josef
December 21st, 2011
4:52 pm
MPercy
Good one! Could you have been a con-ten-duh?
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 21st, 2011
4:52 pm
What’s dangerous is – after 8% approval, there’s not much lower you
can go, so the House tantrum-throwers really have nothing to lose.
It is established that Republics have favored letting the payroll tax
go back up, putting that burden squarely on the backs of
middle class and the working poor, while continuing to protect
the richest. The host is right – at this point there is nowhere left
to hide. This charade that “oh we wanna do something but we just
can’t” fools no one. The cons are lying, and they’re busted.
This is their last gambit, their last money-grab and laugh as they
run away, hoarding the proceeds – The death throes of supply-side
trickle-on economics. If they succeed, it won’t be for long. They don’t
think or plan long-term. When they fail, they will fade into history with
fascism, feudalism, and other terrible ideas. They just look buffoonish
now. Wait 5 years. You won’t recognize them.
Hold the wheel. Steady. We’re almost there. They will hang themselves
Medicare for All by 2016, and the rest will follow.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
4:52 pm
So enlighten me, F&F, who exactly is this solid candidate of yours?
I’ve lost track of how many clowns have all squeezed into that tiny car, but so far I believe you’re “team’ is zero for nine on the “solid candidate” front. (With apologies to Mitt “I was Obamacare before Obamacare was Cool” Romney.)
And I believe Joseph McCarthy is still dead.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
4:52 pm
Seasons Greetings Orvis. Enjoy your Risperdal-nog.
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
4:53 pm
A snake well deserving of its reputation.
The black mamba (Dendroaspis polylepis), also called the common black mamba or black-mouthed mamba,[4] is the longest venomous snake in Africa, averaging around 2.5 to 3.2 meters (8.2 to 10 ft) in length, and sometimes growing to lengths of 4.45 meters (14.6 ft).[5] Its name is derived from the black colouration inside the mouth rather than the actual colour of its scales which varies from dull yellowish-green to a gun-metal grey. It is the fastest snake in the world, capable of moving at 4.32 to 5.4 metres per second (16–20 km/h, 10–12 mph).[1] It is a notorious snake that’s feared throughout the world. It has a reputation for being very aggressive, explosive and highly venomous. Many snake experts have cited this species as both the world’s deadliest and most aggressive, noting a tendency to actively attack without provocation.[6][7] One expert even calls this species “death incarnate”.[8] They are among the world’s ten most venomous land snakes,[9] and when threatened or cornered they often become very explosive[7] and fiercely aggressive, which is why they are given mythical status and many myths, legends, and stories about this species abound.
josef
December 21st, 2011
4:53 pm
Are the green MAMBLAS homosexuals from Mars?
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
4:53 pm
“a bubble that developed because too much money was flowing into housing along with a loosening of credit standards.”
I think that puts too much of the focus on the bubble cause being people who couldn’t pay, when that is actually a much smaller cause than some other causes. Since the article doesn’t deal with that aspect further, that’s all I will say about that.
Geez Adam,
Look who’s partisan now.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
4:54 pm
Orvis White: Oh, good Lord @Keep Up The Fight!
Holy Mithras! Well thanks for the effort but I am not the Lord, a Lord or even a saint. Somehow thinking that God and Boehner are acting in conjunction in any way just seems completely daft.
Have you ever tried to look up the definition of FACT? It does not mean what you think it means.
Warm druid and other paganism to you
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
4:55 pm
johnnyreb,
I dunno about that being the lie of the year. Getalife insists that the repubs tried to end Medicare. And he aint ever wrong.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
4:55 pm
Romney’s new slogan: “You’re Out of Other Options”
josef
December 21st, 2011
4:56 pm
jewcowboy
So, temme, is membership in that organization required of the coaching staff of major universities?
Kamchak
December 21st, 2011
4:56 pm
Warm druid and other paganism to you
A Saturnalia miracle!
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
4:56 pm
“Warm druid”
You don’t want to step in that…trust me.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
4:58 pm
josef,
“So, temme, is membership in that organization required of the coaching staff of major universities?”
Just highly encouraged it seems.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
4:59 pm
Did somebody say Keynes?
Quick, who knows whether it rhymes with “canes” or “queens”?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
5:00 pm
I’m really sick of seeing that picture at the top when I refresh. Can we please replace it with this one: http://whysoblu.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/brad-pitt.jpg
Jm
December 21st, 2011
5:07 pm
Stop paying your taxes
Your government is robbing you blind
Peter
December 21st, 2011
5:07 pm
HDB.. Ops I forgot Bush raised the debt ceiling so many times, that we are broke.. cause why ?
“Deficits don’t matter ”
WOW the few times we had a bill with nothing attached…Yes ….Bush pushed us to broke.
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
5:07 pm
Adam: “But the statement itself does nothing to indicate WHY they signed it. And it only refers to the stimulus, indicates stimulus bad, tax cuts good, and references a couple of events like everyone is supposed to know all about them.”
Um, yes, it does. They signed it because they disagree with the President’s absolute assertion, and they stated their beliefs in a brief fashion as warranted. Presumably, as economists at universities, they have a corpus with which to create a vast bibliography of scholarly essays and textbooks that are all likely to be in sync with the brief statement. That is, there *are* economists who believe in that “ridiculous nonsense”.
Now, they didn’t say why they believe what they believe. But even as an non-economist, non-historian, I am familiar with all of the cited issues: “More government spending by Hoover and Roosevelt did not pull the United States economy out of the Great Depression in the 1930s. More government spending did not solve Japan’s “lost decade” in the 1990s.”
Anyway, I provided a few references you can check out at your leisure, even if I expect you to snub them as irrelevant, insufficient, or partisan. I warn you though, economists are a boring lot, and they tend to have to prove themselves with a lot of equations that are inscrutable as if to say “Economics is a real science, see, we have equations.”
Here’s another, although not an economist, but a financial journalist at Bloomberg (UK). I note that this is recent, and written on the UK’s actions, rather than Obama’s. So not “partisan” vis-a-vis US politics.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=email_en&sid=a5t.xQdllnbo
And just as the Keynesians were wrong three decades ago, they are wrong now.
The U.K. has been in Keynes overdrive for the past 18 months. The budget deficit is already more than 12 percent of gross domestic product, on a par with Greece. And while the Greeks are cutting spending, the British deficit is widening. Figures for January showed another fiscal blowout. At the same time, interest rates have been slashed to 0.5 percent. And the pound has slumped in value, which is supposed to boost demand for British goods, and help close the trade gap.
Just about everything possible has been done to encourage consumption. The results have been miserable.
n reality, Britain has the worst of all possible worlds: a stagnant economy, a crippling budget deficit and rising prices.
The Keynesian consensus is that things would have been far worse without the stimulus provided by government. And if the economy isn’t pumped up with inflated demand, it will collapse back into recession. If it’s not working, that just proves the stimulus should be even larger.
It is the argument quacks always push: If the medicine isn’t working, increase the dosage.
And yet, reality has to intrude into this debate at some point. The deficit can’t get much bigger, interest rates can’t be cut much lower, and sterling can’t lose much more value.
Stimulating the economy isn’t working.
In fact, it’s only making it worse. Consumers and businesses don’t want rising taxes. A falling currency pushes up the cost of everything the U.K. imports, stoking inflation. Savers get decimated, and yet the banks remain reluctant to lend because they rightly believe the economy is in the doldrums.
Recipe for Recovery
What’s needed is a total change of direction. Get the deficit under control. Raise interest rates to restore confidence in the pound, and reward saving. Cut taxes to stimulate enterprise and investment.
And yet the real lesson of the U.K. in 2010 will be of wider significance. A country can’t spend its way out of a recession. And it can’t fix what was at root a problem of too much debt by just borrowing more and more.
In the country of its birth, Keynesian economics is being tested. If the economy isn’t growing at a healthy clip again by the end of 2010, its failure will be obvious to everyone.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
5:07 pm
In December ‘07 Obama wasn’t solid either.
Just noticed this, but has someone been playing on the holodeck again without permission?
Peter
December 21st, 2011
5:08 pm
Jm
December 21st, 2011
5:07 pm
Stop paying your taxes
Your government is robbing you blind
You are sounding Un-American…. or as a large group of Millionaires do it !
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
5:08 pm
Kam & JCB:
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
5:10 pm
Jm: “Stop paying your taxes / Your government is robbing you blind”
Wrong conclusion. Dead wrong.
Instead, INCREASE taxes drastically. Increase buy-in by the WHOLE society. Get everyone involved.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
5:12 pm
Welcome to the Occupation,
“Get everyone involved.”
National lottery. Get all the stupid people to pay for everything.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
5:18 pm
Keep Up the Good Fight!,
It’s worse than stepping in ilk.
pogo
December 21st, 2011
5:19 pm
The tax extension amounts to absolutely nothing. It would add about $1,000 dollars per “WORKING” household per year. We all know that “working” households are becoming far and few between under Obama so most of his constituents wouldn’t be impacted by it anyway. When held in the context of the un-necessary spending the average American does in a year, this supposed “taxcut” is meaningless. Americans blow way more money per year than that eating the very “nutricious” food at Micky D’s or Pizza Hut, watching netflix and playing the lottery. This sideshow means nothing and it is sponsored by a bunch of lying ass politicians, including your boy Obama. But the liberals are portraying it as a make or break for the American people. Pathetic. Anyone that tries to make political fodder of this sharade (like Jay) should be ashamed.
stands for decibels
December 21st, 2011
5:21 pm
MAMBLA?
Kay-reist, the homophobes are stupid.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
5:23 pm
JCB…. but the doodle keeps sniffing at it.
And pogo blahs blahs but says nothing….. real economists understand the impact of this tax cut on the GDP and economic growth. But its good to see him hard at work inflating the Macy’s Parade Balloons so early for the parade.
Peter
December 21st, 2011
5:23 pm
Really……. Pogo Really ?
We all know that “working” households are becoming far and few between under Obama so most of his constituents wouldn’t be impacted by it anyway.
What the heck do you mean ?
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
5:24 pm
Studies continue to show the important economic impact immigrants have on the national economy as well as states, be it the millions in losses Alabama faces after passing a draconian immigration law to the number of jobs immigrants help create.
Now venture capitalists are arguing for immigration reform for the sake of the economy after a study showed that immigrants founded almost half of the U.S.’s top 50 start-up companies and are vital management or development employees at roughly 75 percent of the nation’s leading cutting-edge companies.
Republicans, tear down that fence!
stands for decibels
December 21st, 2011
5:25 pm
It would add about $1,000 dollars per “WORKING” household per year.
aaaand any rational person stops reading at the bunny ear quotes.
Anyway, don’t blow up the blog. later, kids.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
5:27 pm
Gay Republican group GOProud said today that “Speaker Gingrich said absolutely nothing wrong” when he told a gay voter he’d be better off supporting President Obama’s reelection. Both GOProud and the Log Cabin Republicans insist that the liberal press is misrepresenting Gingrich’s comments, but in doing so they’ve conceded that supporting LGBT equality is not among their top priorities
This is not going to add to USinUK’s comprehension of why Gay Republicans exist.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
5:27 pm
MPercy, what’s the date of the Bloomberg article you cite? If Brown was still PM, it must have been at least 2-3 years ago. Do you know how out of date that is by now?
The Cameron-Clegg regime has set Keynes on its head, and where is it now?
So where does that leave us in our little ‘controversy’?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
5:27 pm
pogo,
“Americans blow way more money per year than that eating the very “nutricious” food at Micky D’s or Pizza Hut, watching netflix and playing the lottery.”
The estimates I’ve seen work out to about $40 a month for someone making $50K. Because it is a relatively small amount, people will actually use it rather than save it. Meaning it will go directly in to the economy.
That $40 will pay for my Netflix and a nice bottle of wine. Meaning at 3 companies benefit…Netflix, the liquor store, the winery.
A small. but direct stimulus.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
5:28 pm
Bo goes shopping with our President:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/21/obama-seeks-companionship_n_1163492.html#s565263&title=Obama_and_Bo
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
5:31 pm
Keep Up the Good Fight!,
“This is not going to add to USinUK’s comprehension of why Gay Republicans exist”
I was talking to a co-worker about this earlier. We are both baffled. Even if you agree with Republican stances on almost every other thing, the GOP despises gay people and actively work to destroy their rights.
It’s like fundamentalist Christians supporting an Satanist for President because they agree with his fiscal policy.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
5:33 pm
getalife,
“From there Obama headed to Best Buy to shop for his daughters, Malia, 13, and Sasha, 10. He purchased two $50 iTunes gift cards and two games – the Sims 3: Pets and Just Dance 3 for the Wii.”
Kind of douchey to report that…
Republicans act like the house is on fire while holding a can of gasoline
December 21st, 2011
5:37 pm
PRAYER trumps EVIL!
getalife
December 21st, 2011
5:37 pm
jewcowboy,
Douchy?
A man Christmas shopping for his daughters and dog?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
5:39 pm
getalife,
“A man Christmas shopping for his daughters and dog?”
Reporting what he purchased for his kids…
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
5:39 pm
jcb, I agree. If I understand that they are stating that they “rise above” “single issue politics” it would seem that this is not just saying… well I like everything except his stance on X. This is not a single issue. Left unchecked the extremists would have gays killed or jailed for their activities. So it seems that it is akin to saying “I am jewish and I am for Hitler.”
getalife
December 21st, 2011
5:40 pm
“Reporting what he purchased for his kids…”
Yeah, the like to buy music and play W ii.
So?
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
5:41 pm
“PRAYER trumps EVIL!”
More is accomplished from one man bending to work than from a thousand men kneeling to pray.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
5:42 pm
getalife,
“So?”
Would you like your kids to open a web page and see what you just bought them for presents?
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
5:43 pm
Welcome to the Occupation @5:27 pm MPercy, what’s the date of the Bloomberg article you cite? If Brown was still PM, it must have been at least 2-3 years ago. Do you know how out of date that is by now?
Feb, 2010. It’s within the timeframe stipulated by Adam. It’s not by an anti-Obama partisan, as stipulated by Adam. It’s not a bumper-sticker blurb, as stipulated by Adam. Now here you come and inject yourself complaining about it being out of date?
josef
December 21st, 2011
5:44 pm
jewcowboy
Nu, so what’s with the blond blue-eyed shaygets at 5:00? We should stick to our own…you’re breaking your mother’s heart. Mavis Goldstein’s boy…I’ll introduce you…just try it to please your Mamele,
http://www.miami.com/party-with-the-sexy-jews-of-miami-this-xmas-eve-at-vlada-article
getalife
December 21st, 2011
5:46 pm
“Would you like your kids to open a web page and see what you just bought them for presents?”
They probably told him what they wanted.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
5:46 pm
MPercy,
“Now here you come and inject yourself complaining about it being out of date?”
Well I didn’t want to say anything, but I’ll inject myself too. The black background is very distracting with the gold and white typeface.
saywhat?
December 21st, 2011
5:49 pm
getalife- I think jewcowboy means douchy in that they have spoiled any surprise if the kids happen to read the report, assuming the gifts are for his kids, of course. (Not the at least 20 illegitimate kids he has in Kenya, from the fooling around he did while erasing all signs of his REAL birth certificate)
Republicans act like the house is on fire while holding a can of gasoline
December 21st, 2011
5:49 pm
Angry WHITE MEN thought they were SMARTER than the COOL CALM Black man!
Hahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
5:49 pm
getalife,
“They probably told him what they wanted.”
And I still think it’s still a bit douchy to report what he bought for presents. If you don’t then fine…don’t waste your time wrapping any presents.
jewcowboy
December 21st, 2011
5:50 pm
josef,
“Nu, so what’s with the blond blue-eyed shaygets at 5:00?”
Where were they in the movie?
getalife
December 21st, 2011
5:53 pm
It is great he can go out shopping instead of just telling Americans to go shopping.
Good advertising for Pet Smart and Best Buy with the President shopping there.
Anytime he can leave the bubble to see the real world with real people is a good thing.
Rockerbabe
December 21st, 2011
5:53 pm
If you want the funnies [the GOP] to stop, then don’t vote for the idiots. They get paid a lot of money to make our lives miserable and I think this time next year, we should all get together and vote them out of our misery. Bye, bye GOP – it was NOT nice knowing you!
MPercy
December 21st, 2011
5:54 pm
AS far as Cameron-Clegg, they say they want to reduce the debt, etc. but then they turn around and “invest” public money.
Cameron said he wanted to build a society in Britain “in which we do not just ask what are my entitlements, but what are my responsibilities, one where we don’t ask just what am I just owed, but more what can I give”.
But the coalition with Liberals has been tense and not much is actually getting done except spending money.
“What we’re trying to do is invest public money, taxpayers’ money, into companies which can create jobs that last,” Clegg told BBC Radio 4. “And for every pound that will be invested from the Regional Growth Fund, we estimate 6 pounds will be matched from the private sector. So you’re making the money go much further, and you’re creating, or safeguarding, close to 325,000 jobs, jobs which are built to last.”
Sounds Keynesian to me, with similar results?
“The U.K. economy has barely grown over the past year and unemployment climbed to a 17-year high in the three months through August, fueling concerns Britain may slide back into recession.” [Bloomberg]
Republicans act like the house is on fire while holding a can of gasoline
December 21st, 2011
5:54 pm
@jewcowboy ecember 21st, 2011 5:46 pm
@saywhat? December 21st, 2011 5:49 pm
************************************************************
Come on people! Stay focused.
This ain’t about Obama this is about the ANGRY WHITE MEN who thought they were smarter than Obama.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Republicans act like the house is on fire while holding a can of gasoline
December 21st, 2011
5:56 pm
REPUBLICANS YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW.
God don’t like UGLY!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
josef
December 21st, 2011
5:57 pm
jewcowboy
oops…I had forgotten BP was in it! I thought it was just wanting better eye candy!
Republicans act like the house is on fire while holding a can of gasoline
December 21st, 2011
5:57 pm
House GOP has manuevered itself into a dead end!
CRASH!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
5:59 pm
MPercy: “It’s not a bumper-sticker blurb, as stipulated by Adam. Now here you come and inject yourself complaining about it being out of date?”
You’re right, I did kind of butt into your discussion. I was just pointing out that the more recent economic history in the UK might not necessarily support anti-Keynesian claims. The Cameron -Clegg gravediggers of the Keynesian legacy haven’t exactly been proven geniuses so far.
Republicans act like the house is on fire while holding a can of gasoline
December 21st, 2011
6:02 pm
While the STOP OBAMA MENTALITY HAS TANKED….The Republicans’ approval rate has DECLINED!
We told you so………..:)
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
josef
December 21st, 2011
6:06 pm
I’m still trying to catch up…did somebody kvetch that Obama went shopping with the kids?
getalife
December 21st, 2011
6:09 pm
There is nothing more humbling than trying to get Bo from humping the other dog.
Republicans act like the house is on fire while holding a can of gasoline
December 21st, 2011
6:09 pm
The PULBIC has CAUGHT on!
ANGRY WHITE MEN who hate Obama more than they love America.
Finally………
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
6:11 pm
Keep—If you’re on board, I have a legal question. My co-worker claims that he has a buddy in VA who is incarcerated due to non-payment of child support. The buddy has been unemployed for a while and says that he is unable to pay. He states that in VA, you get locked up for a year and a day for non-payment, then you are set free for three months. If you are unable to catch up all moneys in arrears in that three month time, then you go back to jail for another year and a day. He says that there are guys in jail with him that have been on this merry-go-round for ten years now. To me, that sounds a lot like debtors prison. Any thoughts??
Jm
December 21st, 2011
6:14 pm
Trotsky
Then u will have to raise taxes on the middle and lower classes since they are the ones who don’t pay federal income taxes
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
6:16 pm
MPercy:
The issue of the stance taken by the current government in the UK towards the Keynesian post-WW II consensus is apparently more complex than it might appear at first sight. (This article here lays out some of the issues : http://www.psa.ac.uk/journals/pdf/5/2011/869_401.pdf).
So the efforts to build a more coherent Britain (a “one nation” Britain) have to be seen as part of an effort to drive a wedge between the Third Way of the New Labour without simply repeating the Thatcherite legacy, or so goes the argument anyway. So the anti-statism is perhaps not as pronounced as we would expect it to be here in the states — through Tea Party eyes — so there’s still “investment” of public monies into the society, it’s just that these investments try to steer away from the Keynesian “big state” projects of the post- WWII years. Hence the departure from Keynesianism.
Republicans act like the house is on fire while holding a can of gasoline
December 21st, 2011
6:21 pm
EXTREMISM HURT THE GOP!
We told you so!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
6:25 pm
Hahahahaha
Republican actor–Isn’t there anyone in real life you can go annoy and leave us bloggers alone??
Paul
December 21st, 2011
6:28 pm
Okay, 849 comments.
Did anyone ever post a cogent defense of House Republicans’ actions in this matter?
And did anyone think Reps Boehner and Cantor would read the tea leaves, or are they going to go down and take the ship with them?
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
6:35 pm
Jm: “Then u will have to raise taxes on the middle and lower classes since they are the ones who don’t pay federal income taxes”
Absolutely right. They talk about “soaking” the rich. Hell, soak the middle classes too, I say.
That is the only way to break the intolerable blackmail that keeps our current politics in a constant logjam. But I’ll tell you this much, the last people on earth you’ll hear this from are the Democrats. Which means they are co-guilty in the current deadlock that threatens us.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
6:37 pm
Paul,
They are cutting funding for SS trust fund after not paying for tax cuts for their donors.
The gop will cave because they want SS to fail.
The real question is where is the plan for recovering this lost SS revenue.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
6:37 pm
Bruno, far from my area of expertise. That said, child support requirements are pervasive in a variety of areas of law including a requirement to obtain a professional license. And there have been a great deal of efforts to effectively create debtor’s prisons by debt collecting lobbying groups and by a lot of slimey debt collector tricks (see, e.g. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/22/debtors-prison-legal-in-more-than-one-third-of-us-states_n_1107524.html ) There have been a lot of bad laws created to get “deadbeats” and there are abuses.
As you recapped his case, it does not sound right (in legal terms, it does not pass the smell test for “logic”). Information from this TX group ( http://www.fathers4kids.com/html/ChildSupport.htm?article_id=74 ) suggests that he may be overstating his “plight” and that he may have failed to notify the court when he became unemployed.
From a VA lawyers website: In the state of Virginia the amount of money a noncustodial parent is ordered to pay in child support is based on income. And once that amount is set – unless a modification is made – that amount must be paid on time.
It certainly does not sound correct that the payment arrearage would grow while in jail. I also suspect that, as often happens in so-called “legal horror” stories, many of the nuances of the facts and circumstances have been left out of the story.
This story did not come from some email did it?
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
6:42 pm
Paul, you keep asking but there is no manger here and no miracles. Certainly no wise man that have posted cogent responses in support of Boehner and his band of dunces.
Can we get some more gold and myrrh…. you can keep the frankincense.
Paul
December 21st, 2011
6:43 pm
getalife
I understood the 1.9% surcharge on millionaires was intended to back-fill SS. But you kmow the GOP – they’ll agonize and say ‘pay for it’ when it comes to middle-class relief, but don’t bat an eyelash when someone says ‘hey, let’s cut upper-income taxes some more!”
Pres Clinton was on Bill O Reilly last night. It was a real good interview. I don’t think he quite goes along with Gingrich’s and the GOP’s revisionist history of that time period.
The whole interview (not that long) is here:
http://video.foxnews.com/v/1338638373001
That Black Guy
December 21st, 2011
6:45 pm
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:35 am
TaxPayer: Perhaps the house Republicans should publicly announce a change to the Senate bill to do nothing but increase the payroll tax holiday from 2 to 12 months since that is clearly the only issue they have with it. Go for it.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but if the senate passes a bill and sends it to the house, the house has to vote on the bill as is. If the house makes ANY changes to said bill, then it must go back to the senate to be voted on again.
Am I wrong?
Paul
December 21st, 2011
6:45 pm
Keep
No gold. The R’s (Roman Republicans) made the nonjobcreator family of the House of David give it to the ruling class, job producer Pharisees -
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
6:46 pm
getalife: “The gop will cave because they want SS to fail. / The real question is where is the plan for recovering this lost SS revenue”
And our so-called media — including Bookman frankly — play along with this game by refusing to bring into full view what this phony debate is meant to conceal: namely the fact that we have a wealth class rolling in oceans of money yet we can’t bring ourselves to ask these people to contribute one single dime in addition to help save our measly little excuse for an existing social safety net. And THAT is the true crime. We’re given a choice between two flavors of blackmail: eat this poison pill now or cut the legs out from under that program over there which will then progressively lose its legitimacy (e.g. big three).
The only answer? I’ve said it here many times.
REVOLT.
Of the MASS type, I mean.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
6:47 pm
Paul,
They can stop with the taking in less than spending when they cut the funding.
We need a law to force them to payback the money and can’t touch it.
President Clinton has been making the rounds.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
6:48 pm
The current political and economic system (like two snakes intertwined) is beyond saving. There is no saving it now. It must be knocked down along with the corrupt media establishment that colludes with it and props it up.
C’mon folks, let’s know it down now. Won’t you join me?
josef
December 21st, 2011
6:49 pm
PAUL
Been here just about the whole day and nothing particularly cogent…tried to pick a fight with gm, no go, and even Strawman wasn’t particularly up for a feud. Kinda a let down for my first day off…maybe the night crew will have some issues…
Paul
December 21st, 2011
6:51 pm
Occupation
After the advert -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-GRyOqsi9M&feature=related
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
6:52 pm
Paul, ha! nice
0311/1811
December 21st, 2011
6:54 pm
WELL, I GUESS OLD MATT WON’T BE PLAYING OBAMA IN ANY FUTURE MOVIES ………………………………
Headline: “Matt Damon Rips President Obama”
“Matt Damon rips President Obama in Elle magazine, blasting his leadership qualities and saying he’d prefer “a one-term president with some balls who actually got stuff done.”
The actor, a longtime supporter of the Democratic Party and onetime Obama advocate, reveals frustration with the administration in his wide-ranging interview.
“I’ve talked to a lot of people who worked for Obama at the grassroots level,” says Damon. “One of them said to me, ‘Never again. I will never be fooled again by a politician.’”
Damon then gets even more direct with his own criticism.
“You know, a one-term president with some balls who actually got stuff done would have been, in the long run of this country, much better,” argues the We Bought a Zoo star.
He adds, “If the Democrats think that they didn’t have a mandate – people are literally without any focus or leadership, just wandering out into the streets to yell right now because they are so pissed off.”
“Imagine if they had a leader,” wonders Damon.”
Paul
December 21st, 2011
6:55 pm
josef
Join the club – us trying to get the apologists to defend the indefensible!
It’s why sound bites were invented. But try to get’em past that, it throws them off.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
6:59 pm
The only answer? I’ve said it here many times.
REVOLT.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what a people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress. Men may not get all they pay for in this world; but they must pay for all they get. If we ever get free from all the oppressions and wrongs heaped upon us, we must pay for their removal. We must do this by labor, by suffering, by sacrifice, and, if needs be, by our lives, and the lives of others. ~Frederick Douglass
That Black Guy
December 21st, 2011
6:59 pm
Adam
December 21st, 2011
9:37 am
Normal: But If Newt does get in, I’ll help build the bridge to Britain…
You’ll never get the funding
Just call it a “green project” and the money will come rolling in.
Jm
December 21st, 2011
7:01 pm
Scout
It’s scary to think there are people to the left of Obama like matt Damon
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
7:04 pm
AmVet: right on.
“Find out just what a people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both.”
Which is precisely why we live in the most important times probably since the 30s. There is nothing like a crisis to really push the envelope. Fear and confusion are always the smoke that can be easily exploited to ram through a total rewrite of the social contract (or better yet just rip the thing up).
The only salvation is a movement that directly challenges the accepted memes. Instead of we just can not raise taxes on the wealthy another cent, it’s not only can we but you’ll be lucky if we don’t have them raised to 100% by the time we’re done.
Imagine how different our current political debate would be if all the smears and blackmails met with an even bolder counter proposal.
josef
December 21st, 2011
7:05 pm
PAUL
Today’s been mostly sound bites and master’s theses…jewcowboy and strawman started off on a pretty good one, but strawman turned tail and ran after making a couple of truly assinine ones, ZamVet’s been in the spirit of the Season, I got called a Fox devotee and told in essence that I didn’t know anything about minorities not being one myself,
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
7:05 pm
Rush claims Newt is with Boehner on the payroll tax fight: http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201112210017
Sometimes I get the feeling Newt really does not want to be the lead candidate. He runs to increase his fees and presence but he is surprised to be leading and trying to undercut his lead somewhat. Given the number of Republicans who think Boehner has been bested and the Republicans have lost a lot of face with the payroll tax cut fight, it seems rather idiotic to tell Rushie that he’s on board with Boehner. Perhaps we’ll see some dazzling explanation of the latest dog whistle from Newt.
josef
December 21st, 2011
7:09 pm
ZamVet
Sssshhh…don’t go quoting Douglass…he’s a Confederate propagandist and not a “MAJOR historian…” Imam done fatwahed him…
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
7:10 pm
That Black Guy,
I was not speaking of formal procedure, I was speaking to the politics at play. Calling the bluff, if you will.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
7:10 pm
Famous Last Words from the Land of the Soot-charred Designer Suits”
“Acting like everyone who’s been successful is bad and because you’re rich you’re bad, I don’t understand it.” Jamie Dimon, CEO, JP Morgan Chase
You call that “successful”, Mr. Dimon? Speak for yourself pal.
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
7:11 pm
Egypt was good thing, right? After all, we got rid of a dictator and installed a democracy, right? These were all good things that we, the United States, had a part in, right?
Paul
December 21st, 2011
7:11 pm
josef
It never ceases to amaze me, how many assinine assumptions some people here make.
Y’know, I’ll bet the Fox producers would scratch their heads in puzzlement if it turned out you’re representative of the majority Fox viewing audience!
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
7:11 pm
It certainly does not sound correct that the payment arrearage would grow while in jail. I also suspect that, as often happens in so-called “legal horror” stories, many of the nuances of the facts and circumstances have been left out of the story.
That’s what I suspect as well. Sometimes my coworker’s stories tend to get a little stretched in the telling…….
Correct me if I’m wrong, but if the senate passes a bill and sends it to the house, the house has to vote on the bill as is. If the house makes ANY changes to said bill, then it must go back to the senate to be voted on again.
TBG (and Paul)–From what I’m understanding, the House was pretty much told “Sign this and don’t ask any questions”. I’m no political expert, but I believe that a certain amount of back and forth is normal before signing a bill, which is what the House Republicans are asking for. If that is the case, then that hardly seems worthy of all the theatrics Jay and the Dems are generating over this.
The question that comes to my mind is why are lawmakers once again scrambling to fix something at the last minute ala the budget talks/threatened government shutdown??
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
7:12 pm
Imagine how different our current political debate would be if all the smears and blackmails met with an even bolder counter proposal.
And why we need men of great moral courage to lead us and help us find ours.
The best we can do is do our best; and we go forward, in a fragmented resolve until new champions like Douglass appear and carry our banner.
…that all men are created equal…
josef
December 21st, 2011
7:12 pm
good fight
“Perhaps we’ll see some dazzling explanation of the latest dog whistle from Newt.”
We can always hope. This topic has already worn thin. Wonder what they been talkin’ ’bout down to the AJC editorial offices? I checked the NYT and there wasn’t much there either…the memos must be held up in the Holiday rush…
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
7:12 pm
Jm: “It’s scary to think there are people to the left of Obama like matt Damon”
That’s not left, that’s pragmatic. He spoke of getting stuff “done”. C’mon man, sheesh.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
7:13 pm
AmVet: “The best we can do is do our best; and we go forward, in a fragmented resolve until new champions like Douglass appear and carry our banner.”
They just don’t seem to be of the same mettle any more. Guess growing up sleeping on sawdust and eating animal feed does something for your toughness.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
7:14 pm
scout is loving a lib actor.
Politics gets stranger and stranger.
Paul
December 21st, 2011
7:16 pm
Bruno
“but I believe that a certain amount of back and forth is normal ”
It is. Goes into a reconciliation with teams from the House and Senate. Nothing out of the ordinary at all.
josef
December 21st, 2011
7:16 pm
PAUL
It never ceases to amaze/amuse me how well informed the liberals are of what’s going on on Fox and how well informed the conservatives are of what’s going on on MSNBC…the advertizers seem to know, though…funny just how many lib things you find on Fox and how many con things you find on MSNBC…
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
7:16 pm
Bruno, I believe you are wrong on the bill analysis. If the House and Senate pass different bills on a matter, then there is typically a conference between the two groups to resolve differences and revisions made and passed. Currently there is NO vote on the Senate Bill as approved by the Senate in the House. The House has not passed its own bill. Boehner cannot let that happen because the Senate Bill will pass as written with a majority in the House. He has blocked any vote and has effectively asserted that a majority of the majority party and NOT a majority of the House must approve to even get to a vote.
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
7:17 pm
At the time of Mubarak’s exit in Egypt, both the US and the UK, along with the other participating NATO countries, were busily engaged in a hot contest of regime change and the gradual private takeover of Libya’s economy. In order for NATO’s al-Qeada rebel army to succeed on the ground, and for NATO allies not to be seen breaking the UN’s Resolution 1973 guidelines by being caught directly supplying arms to their proxy army in Libya, they needed a solid ask-no-questions partner in the region for the duration of 2011. That partner came in the form of the new Egyptian military junta, who obediently smuggled arms and al-Qaeda fighters over their western border into eastern Libya to help overthrow the regime of the late Col. Muammar Gaddafi.
The Wall Street Journal reported on March 17, 2011:
“Egypt’s military has begun shipping arms over the border to Libyan rebels with Washington’s knowledge, U.S. and Libyan rebel officials said…
… The shipments-mostly small arms such as assault rifles and ammunition-appear to be the first confirmed case of an outside government arming the rebel fighters. Those fighters have been losing ground for days in the face of a steady westward advance by forces loyal to Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi.”
For this reason, and for the most part, our moral crusaders in the White House will keep their mouths shut if any reports of naked violence by the Egyptian police state are circulating around Washington DC.
The state-sponsored violence appears to be getting much worse.
josef
December 21st, 2011
7:17 pm
occupation
Say what? What DO you know about Douglass early life? Have you read him at all?
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
7:19 pm
jo, one of the reasons that I enjoy this forum is that people, much more educated than I (me? I always screw that up!), get to pontificate. Even be pedantic, if they choose. But I learn a great deal anyway. And some of it is actually not useless!
And for me, all joking aside, having read and then quoting Douglass is truly a great honor.
You’re right, bud, I am in the spirit of the season this year. I even wrapped a few prezzies this evening.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2ih86J3Czw
getalife
December 21st, 2011
7:21 pm
I watch CNN to see Erin wearing leather
Paul
December 21st, 2011
7:21 pm
josef
Mrs. Paul and I watched “The Conspirator” last night. Movie by Robert Redford about the attorney who defended the mother of one of the Lincoln assassination conspirators who was tried by a military tribunal.
You too, AmVet – that movie should have been required watching by the entire Congress before they voted on that bill to strip American citizens of their Constitutional rights if someone said “hey… that guy looks like a terrerist…..”
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
7:23 pm
“And putting gay marriage in the same paradigm with genocide in Nazi Germany is a bit disingenous since if you know the history of the time and place, you will find that your opinion would be more on “their” side of the question of homosexuality and the rights of those falling under the label…”
Back…work required my absence. I wasn’t putting anything in any category. I was responding to a post that said gay marriage and abortion was an established reality. My response was to show that such a claim proves nothing since hatred of Jews and genocide was an accepted reality as well. Just because an even entire nation condones or practices something does not make it right. In our country, slavery was an accepted reality. We each have to decide for ourselves what defines right and wrong.
jack bull
December 21st, 2011
7:24 pm
I can’t believe David Axelrod actually said, “the higher the monkey climbs the tree, the more he shows his butt”, about his own President…wow.
I can’t wait to watch Newt chase Hussein Obama all over the country trying to debate him. that’s going to be pure entertainment. and when Hussein finally does agree to debate for 3 hours at a time, with no moderators, man, that’s when it’s going to get really good.
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
7:26 pm
Is it just me, or does there seem to be a whiff of hypocrisy regarding taxes coming from the Lib side today?? Up until now, I thought Libs were squarely in favor of raising taxes to keep a strong government running. Now they’re apparently in favor of further damaging the SSI trust fund to buy a few votes. SSI is only paid for by people with a job, the ones NOT hurting in this economic downturn. I fail to see what pressing immediate need is being met that justifies creating an even larger mess in the future.
josef
December 21st, 2011
7:27 pm
ZamVet
Douglass was an interesting one alright…he didn’t fit anybody’s box and called it as he saw it…
PAUL
Mary Suratt? Did they bring out the “Catholic conspiracy?” There is an argument that had she not been a Catholic she would never have even been brought to trial, much less execution…
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
7:28 pm
Paul, that movie got a 5 star from me. I am no fan of military court shams and nonsense. This Manning sham is just shameful.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
7:28 pm
“Up until now, I thought Libs were squarely in favor of raising taxes to keep a strong government running. Now they’re apparently in favor of further damaging the SSI trust fund to buy a few votes. ”
Maintaining or winning power is what motivates both parties, I am afraid. The system is adversarial by nature.
Paul
December 21st, 2011
7:29 pm
getalife
And I watch Fox for Megyn and Martha and Courtney and Harris and Uma…..
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
7:29 pm
So the Speaker of the House was yapping about how Congress needed to be at work now fixing this payroll tax cut legislation yet the Speaker of the House was no where to be found on the floor of the house.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
7:30 pm
I can’t believe David Axelrod actually said, “the higher the monkey climbs the tree, the more he shows his butt”, about his own President…wow.
jack, your bull is off. Axelrod said it about Newt. But thanks for playing.
josef
December 21st, 2011
7:30 pm
Strawman
My point was that your anti gay tone put you more in the Nazi camp…
jack bull
December 21st, 2011
7:32 pm
no, he said it about Hussein, and i didn’t know i was playing anything??
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
7:32 pm
“Axelrod said it about Newt.”
And Mr. Axelrod once again proves his graciousness and civility. I wonder if he ever looks in the mirror.
TaxPayer
December 21st, 2011
7:34 pm
As I recall the bipartisan approved Senate version of the tax cut that the house has failed to subject to a straight up or down vote paid for the tax cut with an increased fee on fannie and freddie loans or something like that. The Dems in the Senate like to pay-n-go, unlike the house Republicans who adopted rules stating that tax cuts do no require any offsetting payments, unless it’s payroll tax cuts apparently.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
7:35 pm
Paul, it sounds like a good film. I know some, but not that much about her role in Lincoln’s murder.
We each have to decide for ourselves what defines right and wrong.
Strawman, nice.
I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong. ~Frederick Douglass
getalife
December 21st, 2011
7:36 pm
Paul,
Megyn would have made the perfect nazi propagandist.
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
7:37 pm
“My point was that your anti gay tone put you more in the Nazi camp…”
A nonsensical point made because you missed the point of my sarcasm in the first place. Mine was a logical rejoinder; yours was an ad-hominen deflection.
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
7:37 pm
Paul– “It is. Goes into a reconciliation with teams from the House and Senate. Nothing out of the ordinary at all.”
Keep– “Currently there is NO vote on the Senate Bill as approved by the Senate in the House. The House has not passed its own bill.”
From this CNN article:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/20/politics/congress-payroll-tax-cut/index.html
“Instead, the House approved a separate resolution supporting a yearlong extension of both the payroll tax cut and emergency federal unemployment benefits. House Republicans are also pushing for a new, two-year “doc fix,” or delay in significant scheduled pay cuts to Medicare physicians.”
Again, this doesn’t seem to be a big deviation from past political practice. Am I wrong?? Why is the demand for further negotiation all of a sudden equated to driving a car off a cliff (see above photo). Obviously time is short due to holidays, which returns me to my earlier question. Who is responsible for letting this all come down to the last minute with all the associated theatrics??
Paul
December 21st, 2011
7:40 pm
josef
They made brief mention of the Catholic angle – when people were repeating gossip they’d heard about her.
Not at all different that what we hear about other groups nowadays. Same tune, different lyrics.
josef
December 21st, 2011
7:41 pm
Strawman
If you say so….
ZamVet
Her role in the what?
Jm
December 21st, 2011
7:41 pm
Jamie Dimon is a very good, capable CEO and a good leader for his company
Not to mention the country
If you know anything about banking
josef
December 21st, 2011
7:44 pm
PAUL
One of the untold stories of the time and place was just how anti Semitic and anti Catholic the Union government and people were…reading the northern press from then is a truly chilling exercise in, well, as you say, same tune but different lyrics…
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
7:49 pm
Jamie Dimon is a very good, capable CEO and a good leader for his company
Worth $10,000+ dollars an hour? Absolutely not.
josef
December 21st, 2011
7:50 pm
good fight
Well, I’m worth $10,000 an hour…now if I can just find an employer to agree…
Strawman
December 21st, 2011
7:51 pm
Okay guys…Gn to you all.
AmVet - Don't obsess over my monikers!
December 21st, 2011
7:54 pm
The Lincoln assassination.
???
And knowing well your position on the matter, I have read some about his history and words regarding slavery, notwithstanding his title of the Great Emancipator. Damning evidence to be sure.
But he was a man of his time. As we all are. Perhaps he was more dynamic in a more dynamic time but nonetheless, it will be easy to judge you and me and the rest of us here, and our words, a hundred and fifty years from now, yes?
Jeez, and I never play Elvis…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ODrPL9-kEs&feature=related
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
7:57 pm
Gotta run for dinner with PB, but will look for some answers to my 7:37 in a little while.
Paul
December 21st, 2011
7:59 pm
josef
There were just a few lines on the Catholic angle. Came in when people were repeating fantastic gossip they’d heard. Not much different than what we hear nowadays about certain groups. Same tune, different lyrics.(I’d written that and had my post disappear when I goofed and closed the browser – then saw you’d written the same. Out of the mouths of two witnesses…)
AmVet
Keep’s right – it was one of those sleeper films with a powerful message. I don’t go to a whole lot of movies at ten dollars a pop when it’s not one I’ve heard a lot about. I do love Netflix – just pop it in the queue and if it’s a lousy movie, just shut it off and I haven’t lost anything.
Bruno
I do think you are reading the situation correctly. Funny about the cliff analogy – ‘cept the car’s already airborne and the Republican passengers just don’t know it. By that I mean there is plenty of blame to go around, but what will the mildly informed electorate remember? “Pres Obama and the Senate passed a bill to extend my tax cut and Republicans killed it and now my taxes went up and Republicans are now talking about another tax cut for millionaires.”
This is a lousy situation for Republilcans. They should adapt, pass it, spin it, then make their arguments over the next two months.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
8:01 pm
Bruno, let’s try it this way. 89 Senators passed a bill negotiated by both Dem and Rep leaders. The bill will be passed if put to a vote on the House Floor. Boehner has “appointed” Congressman who don’t want the tax cut at all. Now you can ignore that history if you want and act as if Boehner was not consulted and not aware of what the negotiations were and that this is merely a “conflict” between bill versions. I don’t believe it and I don’t believe 89 Senators believe it. As for the theatrics, I am confident that the Dems would be very willing to have a straight tax cut bill with a payment mechanism and leave the rest out. You and I will likely disagree on who created the “theatrics”.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
8:11 pm
The fact is it is the best they could get out of the senate but the gop pretend they will accomplish a year long extension . They know they can’t. They will cave.
Because in the real world., the gop fight for stealing more out of SS because they want to end it.
Now both parties are for stealing SS funds.
Not much to cheer about .
AmVet
December 21st, 2011
8:11 pm
Enter your comments here
AmVet
December 21st, 2011
8:14 pm
Hello? Is thing on?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1vJ4sXetw4
josef
December 21st, 2011
8:16 pm
ZamVet
Like so many of the Yankee Sharia school, you seem to think that any criticism of the man and especially the man in his time and place is heretical, so complete is the hagiology. The same can be said for the hagiology of Jefferson Davis. It’s intellectually and culturally dishonest. And, no, it won’t be easy to judge, but all we have is the words left behind and the results of one’s actions.
The reason I said her role in the what was to bring up the point that her “role” and her conviction was on the flimsiest of evidence and hearsay which would have been thrown out of any responsible civilian court and is, itself a classic example of “guilt by association” in a time of hysteria–in other words right where we are at the moment.
josef
December 21st, 2011
8:18 pm
PAUL
Bizarre…I got that post of yours…I took it as a response to my query…hmmmm….
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 21st, 2011
8:19 pm
And just what ARE the Republicans saying today,
since they won’t DO anything -
Congressscum fat pig Jim Sensenbrenner:(R) “She lectures us on eating right while she has a large posterior herself.”
Rusty Limbaugh, fat oxycontin pig (G) “dare I say this, it doesn’t look like Michelle Obama follows her own nutritionary, dietary advice…”
Really? Really?
Is that all they got left, just blind ignorant hate?
Is there any shame left in them? Is any con capable of shame anymore?
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
8:20 pm
The candidacy of Newt Gingrich presents a historic opportunity for a new, bigger form of failure that could clarify to most Americans just how broken the electoral system is. On the one hand, the widespread anti-Obama sentiment coupled with a crippled economy could be sufficient to elect any Republican opponent. On the other hand, despite a long list of Gingrich deficiencies proclaimed by many mute-Newt conservatives and Republicans, he just might grab the Republican nomination and beat Obama. Counter intuitively, President Gingrich could help revive American democracy. He is the failure we have been waiting for, just the right old, fat, loud mouth, hypocritical white guy.
He would be such an utter and complete disaster as President that, finally, a vast majority of Americans, especially those that still vote, would reach a heightened level of despair, anger and disgust that some form of rebellion akin to what created the nation in the first place could occur. Think of Gingrich as the Segway President: all hype and fakery with no possibility of success, being much, much worse that George W. Bush and Barrack Obama.
In other words, the US would finally reach a bottomed-out political state more analogous to the tyrannical regimes that have fallen to grassroots revolutions. The illusion of a functioning democracy would melt away and the nonsense of being the greatest democracy would become crystal clear. History suggests that things must get so bad and painful that no amount of rationalizations, propaganda, lies and distractions can keep sustaining a corrupt and delusional democracy.
Maybe Newt would make a good President after all.
AmVet
December 21st, 2011
8:23 pm
…you seem to think that any criticism of the man…
Yet, I just did that very thing. Strange, huh?
And I know a Sherry (a NY JAP who moved to LA) but not that much about Shariah…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjAP8YHx058
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
8:30 pm
Amvet: I don’t many Japanese girls named Sherry!
moonbat betty
December 21st, 2011
8:35 pm
Yeah, I love Bookman’s pic.
The defeatist, glass half empty, dems.
sad….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1B89Osfj8dg
josef
December 21st, 2011
8:35 pm
ZamVet
No, you did not…you continue to promote him as “great” and list him repeatedly as one of the greatest Presidents…your “criticisms” sound like my “defenses” of him, “he had a first rate sense of humor and self irony…”
He does not belong in the same pantheon with Washington, Jefferson, Madison…he belongs with Jackson, Grant and Teddy Roosevelt…
He was the elected president of the United States of America. A section of that country went into rebellion. He was bound to counter that rebellion. He did, successfully. That said, his job performance and is up to criticism…otherwise we wind up with the classic the ends justifies the means and that is what George Bush and Bush lite are predicating their trampling on the Constitution on…
independent thinker
December 21st, 2011
8:39 pm
Tell me on thing that Boehner and his Repub sheep have accomplished since they took over the house. With their buds in the Senate fillibustering everything they have brought the entire legislative process to a screeching halt-Now they are getting hung on their own pitard – can’t even pass a tax cut even when they bow down daily and kiss the ring of the author/lobbyist who monitors the no tax pledge.
If Newt gets the nomination, I am not sure if Obama has to campaign to get reelected.
0311/1811
December 21st, 2011
8:44 pm
Jm:
Matt Dillon only “thinks” he is to the left of Obama. God help us if he gets in for a second term. Then you will see the true Obama.
moonbat betty
December 21st, 2011
8:44 pm
bottom line is, every incumbent should be kicked out next year if they don’t get something, anything done.
josef
December 21st, 2011
8:45 pm
Independent
“If Newt gets the nomination, I am not sure if Obama has to campaign to get reelected.”
Put it to you this way, I’ve sworn I won’t vote for Obama, but if it’s Newt on the other side, I will probably swollow my words and pull the Obama lever…not FOR him mind you, but for the salvation of the Republic. Newt scares the sh*t out of me and I don’t scare easily…
josef
December 21st, 2011
8:48 pm
moonbat
I say six year terms, no immediate succession, at least one term out before reelection…then the lifetime appointments of judges could be reduced to a 25 year maximum…
getalife
December 21st, 2011
8:51 pm
Knowing that Americans elected the w disaster twice, anything can happen.
La'Quishraniqua
December 21st, 2011
8:52 pm
“Obama and the Democrats must think it’s Christmas or something.”
Christmas, no. Kwanzaa, more likely. The Dems’ usual demographic is no doubt bummed out over the possible loss of their 2% payroll tax cut. Anyone with a brain (mostly Repub) understands that all it does is defund the Social Security trust fund – it’s not free $ from heaven.
Recon 0311 2533
December 21st, 2011
8:55 pm
“Maybe Newt would make a good President after all.”
Well I see old Sooth is on the night beat again posting his left wing propaganda that even his fellow leftists on here don’t read. Although boring at least he’s consistent. Merry Christmas Sooth.
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
8:56 pm
[B]eginning right after 9/11 and throughout 2002, the Bush-Cheney administration had its mind firmly set to invade Iraq militar[il]y, and no fact, law or argument could deter it from doing so.
In that, it was following the blueprint that neocons and pro-Israel “Likudniks” under the leadership of Paul Wolfowitz (Bush’s future deputy secretary of defense) and Lewis “Scooter” Libby (Cheney’s future chief of staff) had drafted in 2000 under the auspices of “The Project for the New American Century”, in a report entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses, Strategy: Forces and Resources For a New Century”.
This was a neo-conservative imperial project that became officially the “Bush Doctrine”. Its goal was to project, as far as possible into the future, the “unipolar advantageous position” that the United States inherited after the break-up of the Soviet Union, in December 1991.
It was really a hubristic and bare-knuckle strategy of world hegemony, based upon unilateral interventionism—militarily, economically and politically—by the U.S. It was an “America First” doctrine, based not upon modern international law, but rather on a solipsistic approach to American interests and the elementary principle of brute force. In fact, it was a giant step backward that could have consequences for decades to come.
getalife
December 21st, 2011
8:57 pm
“Anyone with a brain (mostly Repub) understands that all it does is defund the Social Security trust fund – it’s not free $ from heaven.”
With both parties agreeing to do this , SS will not make it.
The writing is on the wall.
josef
December 21st, 2011
8:58 pm
Simons
I get tickled when the blubber b*tts snipe at the First Lady…she’s a big gal, no doubt, but it’s a healthy big and quite frankly an excellent role model for the big girls and healthy beauty…Twiggy, she ain’t…and neither are the overwelming majority of us.
AmVet
December 21st, 2011
8:59 pm
No, you did not…
Yes I did. What is this? A damning by faint praise twist?
you continue to promote him as “great” and list him repeatedly as one of the greatest Presidents…
Of course. As do most Americans. But that is not the primary reason for me. On balance, he was a great leader and his words and actions still deeply inspire the nation. And of paramount importance to me is the fact that NO OTHER US PRESIDENT has had to deal with what he had to deal with. Deal with that. There are no comparisons. None.
your “criticisms” sound like my “defenses” of him
Perhaps. But I don’t think so. Using the word “damning” is hardly light fare to me.
“he had a first rate sense of humor and self irony…”
And why I take comfort in your knowledge, if not your scorn! LOL.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Uaej22RAzw
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
9:02 pm
Why, Dull! How nice of you to drop by. I hadn’t realized previously that you’re clairvoyant in that you can ascertain whether or not other bloggers actually read another blogger’s posts. Amazing. Have you ever thought about investing in stocks?
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
9:02 pm
And I believe Joseph McCarthy is still dead.
AmVet,
Funny how the word obsess is in your own name. Don’t worry. I won’t lecture you.
Old Retired English Professor
December 21st, 2011
9:04 pm
Now they are getting hung on their own pitard
I’m calling a penalty, 15 yards and loss of down.
First of all, it’s petard. A petard was a Renaissance-era land mine. One doesn’t get “hung on” a land mine.
I ordinarily observe the entries here and stay quiet, except to step in when josef gets too far out of line. The boy needs correction. But my tolerance boiled over, so to speak, when I read this passage.
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
9:07 pm
By the way, Dull, you will notice that I am usually on this blog only in the evenings. That is because, unlike you, I actually work for a living and don’t take anything from the government.
Also, unlike you — and a majority of bloggers here — I like to read. I like to share those things that I find interesting with my fellow bloggers.
However, like you pointed out, most of them are so busy nipping at their fellow bloggers’ backsides that they don’t have time to read anything meaningful, lest the “lose their place.”
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
9:09 pm
La’Quish,
Great name and Merry Christmas.
Actually, the dem plan is free $ from heaven. That’s their platform, embodied in their newest plank, saying almost outright, “We will never again pass another budget!” A promise they seem destined to keep. Oh yeah, they say that and “Republicans have really done it this time.” (See today’s Bookman/Luckovich coordination.)
It’s no wonder Obama does so little as President. This is the no-brain, no-policy and no-strategy strategy. “yes we can, yes we can, yes we can!” No wonder that after three years liberals are chattering sagely about how we still really don’t know who Obama is.
But with 9% unemployment, college grads working at McDonalds, most people have a good idea.
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
9:13 pm
Professor,
While you’re here…. I was wondering about that. In the saying, is one made to sit on one’s own petard, or does one do it by chance?
Old Retired English Professor
December 21st, 2011
9:16 pm
While you’re here…. I was wondering about that. In the saying, is one made to sit on one’s own petard, or does one do it by chance?
Well, Fast, when Shakespeare used the phrase “hoist on his own petard,” he meant “launched skyward” or “blown upward.” Does that answer your question?
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
9:19 pm
Sooth:
was really a hubristic and bare-knuckle strategy of world hegemony, based upon unilateral interventionism—militarily, economically and politically—by the U.S. It was an “America First” doctrine, based not upon modern international law, but rather on a solipsistic approach to American interests and the elementary principle of brute force. In fact, it was a giant step backward that could have consequences for decades to come.
-isms, -tionisms, -mony’s, -istics, -sistic’s and modern international law…..
Wow, how in the world the world survive before you pedantic dullards came down from your spaceship?
Merry Christmas,
Live long and prosper….. from government largesse.
AmVet - A Happy KwanzChristmakkuh to al!
December 21st, 2011
9:20 pm
I won’t lecture you.
Good idea.
Kam, et al, what is this hubbub about a racial slur and QPR? (I’m one of a tiny few Yanks who even knows what that stands for!) I sure wish the Premier League was more readily available for us plebeians. (I’d trade it in for the NBA straight up.)
And Bobby Bowden throws Jo Pa under the bus?! Wild times on the ESPN crawler…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElnfqLEshEk
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
9:22 pm
Yes, both actually; one question I asked and one I didn’t.
So one is blown-up on one’s own mine, I see. It’s got nothing to do with another actor doing the hoisting.
Thanks & Merry Christmas
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
9:22 pm
Ummm, OREP, technicality I realize but a petard does not appear to be a land mine (at least as we consider them in modern warfare as something weight triggered), it was a small bomb used to blow up gates and walls. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petard
Now perhaps to the extent that a both could be used in connection with ancient warfare attacks using mining.
But I do not profess to be an expert of the history of warfare.
moonbat betty
December 21st, 2011
9:23 pm
merry christmas from moonbat betty and jimi:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juwuXNFoJVc
josef
December 21st, 2011
9:25 pm
OREP
Most generally, I bow to your expertise. I don’t always, but I do generally. I do bear in mind, though, that one never knows when and where you might pop in. Since I haven’t heard from you in a while, I’ve been a bit concerned, and especially after getting this iPad. If you haven’t gotten one, you might not want to. Its autocorrect would drive you mad!
getalife
December 21st, 2011
9:26 pm
OT The President will sign the defense bill, BUT he is issuing a signing statement re: the detention clause.
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
9:26 pm
I wasn’t aware that it was Shakespeare–that was the other question.
The Bard continues to amaze me, but as an engineer I have little intercourse with his writings, though I’d guess more than other engineers in my line of work.
So, another question, if you’ll indulge me.
Are students still studying his plays and sonnets in English programs in the modern college, or are we now more about, say, “symbols of homosexuality in modern literature.”
Just curious.
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
9:28 pm
Keep up,
Like the current administration, your mind is confounded with legalisms and devoid of wit.
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
9:29 pm
“But with 9% unemployment, college grads working at McDonalds, most people have a good idea.”
How many of you think that real unemployment over 20%, widespread misery, poverty, foreclosures, homelessness and despair is “bad?” That is, that something is “wrong” with these “problems?”
I’ve got news for you, friends, this is nirvana for capitalism. They’re exactly the circumstances on which capitalism thrives. Corporations could not be happier.
For, with a reserve global workforce exceeding 3,000,000,000 workers, capital can exploit labor in ways never before imagined. Of these 3,000,000,000 worldwide workers, more than half are unemployed. Unions, contracts, collective bargaining, etc. — gone with the wind.
You see, the period 1948 – 1968 was an aberration, not the norm. Those conditions will never return. In the developed World, you can reasonably expect misery, poverty, joblessness, homelessness, hopelessness, decline, etc. for the foreseeable future, if not forever.
Those who think things are “going to get better” are due for disappointment.
Who the President is, or who controls Congress doesn’t matter. They may offer lip service, but the inescapable reality is that global capital has an unbreakable upper hand over workers. Perhaps forever.
Old Retired English Professor
December 21st, 2011
9:31 pm
josef, I have no intention of acquiring an iPad. I’ve barely mastered the rudiments of a PC in the past ten years. However, I do log in from time to time to keep an eye on you. For such a brilliant fellow, you’re capable of some horrible grammatical and rhetorical blunders. And lest you think me presumptuous, I can assure you that I have shoes older than you. A happy holiday season to you.
Paul
December 21st, 2011
9:34 pm
“Kam, et al, what is this hubbub about a racial slur and QPR?”
I’m with you, Amvet. I’ve found on this blog if there’s some acronym or letter combination with which I’m not familiar, I probably don’t want to ask. Once it’s in the brain cells, it’s not getting out.
Paul
December 21st, 2011
9:35 pm
So much for QPR. Much better to stay with S-P-Q-R.
moonbat betty
December 21st, 2011
9:36 pm
Hiya, OREP,
I have a question for you:
Do you know the origin of the nasty four letter word “F*CK”?
and do you prefer to use it as a noun, verb or adjective?
Paul
December 21st, 2011
9:37 pm
Had to split that. The whole thing went in moderation. And no, there should not be hyphens. But the Philistine blog moderator never read Latin…..
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
9:39 pm
F&F, devastating attack….. devoid of wit….however shall I survive the news.
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
9:39 pm
Wow, how in the world the world survive before you pedantic dullards came down from your spaceship?”
“Like the current administration, your mind is confounded with legalisms and devoid of wit.”
Fast and furious: rather than posting a rational discourse on why you disagree with that others post, you — like a coward — resort to personal insults.
But, then, what else would I expect?
AmVet - A Happy KwanzChristmakkuh to al!
December 21st, 2011
9:40 pm
Niiice, betty. Really superb choice.
Good to see somebody/anybody? besides me with a little holiday cheer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8g1TtJqHY_s
Old Retired English Professor
December 21st, 2011
9:42 pm
Are students still studying his plays and sonnets in English programs in the modern college, or are we now more about, say, “symbols of homosexuality in modern literature.”
At some of the better colleges and universities, students continue to study Shakespeare’s plays and sonnets. However, I gave up on higher education in English when I learned that Longman’s, one of the anthologies in English literature, had decided to omit John Milton from its selections because Milton is “too difficult for the modern reader.” Imagine that! Entire generations will be deprived of Paradise Lost. Can it be long before Shakespeare is omitted because his writings are “too difficult for the modern reader”? Or else some modern-day Bowdler will translate classics into modern slang? Can you envision Hamlet strolling onto the stage and uttering, “Well, dude, I don’t know whether I should just off myself or keep on keeping on with this crap”? I also consigned true English higher education to obvlivion when I learned that large English departments were segmented into feminists and other strange interpretations of literature.
Surprise!!! NOT!!!
December 21st, 2011
9:43 pm
Former Troy Democratic City Clerk William McInerney, Democratic Councilman John Brown, and Democratic political operatives Anthony Renna and Anthony DeFiglio have entered guilty pleas in the case, in which numerous signatures were allegedly forged on absentee ballots in the 2009 Working Families Party primary, the political party that was associated with the now-defunct community group, ACORN.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/21/officials-plead-guilty-in-new-york-voter-fraud-case/#ixzz1hEAc4Fdy
josef
December 21st, 2011
9:44 pm
OREP
Believe me, I look back at some of my posts, and all I can do is cringe! Happy Baby Jesus’ Birthday to you and yours.
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
9:44 pm
Bah! Humbug! Materialist “buy-fest” devoid of any of the original “meaning” of the real reason for Christmas.
Obama's fortunes rise
December 21st, 2011
9:45 pm
From 1811/0311 –
“Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to lead, are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.”
Paul
December 21st, 2011
9:47 pm
OREP
, I gave up on higher education in English when I learned that Longman’s, one of the anthologies in English literature, had decided to omit John Milton from its selections because Milton is “too difficult for the modern reader.” ”
Well, you gotta remember what these people were watching during their formative years -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeZqW6eqK2M
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
9:48 pm
Sorry josef, was I sensationalizing a bit with Frederick Douglass’ early life conditions?
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
9:49 pm
Sooth,
Hah hah!
Well, I wasn’t going to engage in petards, if that’s what you mean. I just don’t have the cheek to tell a guy who really seems like an English professor that wikipedia (Wiki!, Wow! (sic)) says that a <petard is something just slightly different than what he said it was.
Geez! I don’t go yanking definitions from non-authoritative sources like that and approach someone with knowledge and say, “hey dude, you’re just, like.. wrong, ya know?”
Thus, it is the legalistic mind begotten, and thus decays the culture.
There, I argued with you. Happy now?
Come early and often for more.
AmVet - A Happy KwanzChristmakkuh to al!
December 21st, 2011
9:51 pm
…the Philistine blog moderator…
Awesome.
OREP and Paul,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVb-nbJh5W8&feature=related
The Emperor has no clothes
December 21st, 2011
9:52 pm
Matt Damon is expressing his disdain for Barack Obama’s presidency again, this time saying that the President doesn’t have any “balls.”
Once one of Obama’s biggest cheerleaders, Damon slammed the president in a new interview with Elle magazine.
“I’ve talked to a lot of people who worked for Obama at the grassroots level,” he said. “One of them said to me, ‘Never again. I will never be fooled again by a politician.’…
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
9:52 pm
“[W]here the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.”
You must be talking about Scoot and Dull who live on my taxpayer dollars with their “pensions” and freebie “healthcare for life” that I also pay for, right?
Heck, I could live fairly well on what Scoot spends on oxycodone!
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
9:53 pm
Paul,
There’s an interesting book written by a Chicago professor, entitled The Closing of the American Mind by Alan Bloom, I think, about his perception that universities in American were going the way that the good Professor here says they are.
I confess, that while I had exposure to Shakespeare in high school, I never had any in college that I recall, anyway. Milton, who?
Just kidding, but I never read him either in any school.
Paul
December 21st, 2011
9:54 pm
AmVet
LOL! Stein hasn’t changed much.
And neither has his audience!
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
9:55 pm
Fast and Furious: how much have you had to drink tonight? Your coherency — or lack there of — indicates that you are PUI, posting under the influence. I have never uttered a word about petard, nor do I really give a flying rat’s rump roast what the fock a petard is. Got it?
Paul
December 21st, 2011
9:56 pm
F&F
Old story to the old hands, but I had a job transfer while one of my sons was a senior in high school, so he remained with a good friend of mine. I received a letter from him, he was chatting away and closed with “must go, I have a test next period in English. It’s on As You Like It but I should do fine. I read it last summer for fun.”
I do occasionally wonder what gene pool he came from.
0311/1811
December 21st, 2011
9:57 pm
Hummmm ………….. just wait until the campaign commercials start showing the equine slaughter houses ……………………………. ;o
Headline: “How President Obama Made it Legal to Slaughter Horses …”
http://middletown-ct.patch.com/articles/how-president-obama-made-it-legal-to-slaughter-horses
Paul
December 21st, 2011
9:58 pm
Evening, Sooth
Frak. Not fock. Frak.
Unless you meant Fokker. But that just doesn’t fit.
AmVet - A Happy KwanzChristmakkuh to al!
December 21st, 2011
9:58 pm
And I would be remiss if I didn’t say Happy Kwanzaa to the lovely La’Quishraniqua @8:52…
http://afroanglicans.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/kwanzaa-main.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSynDh_K0EE
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
10:00 pm
Damon’s played charcters who ostensibly have balls. Hey, who are we to question him if he wants to go crowing to Elle Magazine about testes?
Because Matt Damon knows what socialism should really be like, he wants someone with balls to do it for him.
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
10:01 pm
Scout: when the slaughterhouses were shut down in the United States, they simply moved to Canada and Mexico. Non-story.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
10:02 pm
FF, well perhaps you just accept anything from anyone…. you might want to be careful when you read that email from Nigerian prince.
I did not realize that being “seeming” to be an English professor made anyone an expert on every historical fact or that meant that they were never wrong or even slightly off in their precision…. but if that is the best you go, go for it. Again, I am just DEVASTATED.
josef
December 21st, 2011
10:06 pm
Occupation
Yes. The only reason I mentioned it was that he himself made a point of the dichotomy between having been taught to read and write by his mistress and “treated as a human” and still be held in slavery. He understood the significance of paternalism as a far more effective method of control and foregoing of the slave revolt than the physical and material deprivation. He took that concept into freedom, criticizing the paternalism of the “liberators.”
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
10:07 pm
Methinks Fast and Furious is none other than Little Davy Crybaby under yet another assumed name.
The nonsensical answers and incoherent, delusional posts give him away.
Poor ol’ Little Davy Crybaby! This “liberal” blog is his singular outlet in life. It’s his “fix” he just cain’t get over there at Wingnut’s blog.
When you collapse in satiety, please close the door behind you.
House Republicans getting creamed in the payroll tax cut PR war | Hotspyer – Breaking News from around the web
December 21st, 2011
10:10 pm
[...] Atlanta Journal Constitution: House GOP has manuevered itself into a dead-end [...]
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
10:11 pm
Thank Allah, Scout has got his PETA membership up to date to save those horses…. We can all talk about it over the vegetarian meal Scout will be serving over the holiday. The outrage……… oh wait, this is not about outrage, Scout could care less about the horses….its obout ODS.
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
10:16 pm
Friends, I don’t mind telling you I’m in a shyte-kicking mood tonight. I get so sick of these bombastic, lying, heartless Fright-Wingers posting over here on Jay’s blog I could scream.
What I’m looking for is one of their “minions” or “ilk” to join me in a “blog to the death” match.
Please, someone, take me up on this offer!
josef
December 21st, 2011
10:18 pm
OREP
The translator in me gives you an A+ for the Hamlet!
moonbat betty
December 21st, 2011
10:19 pm
The OREP needs food.
omg
gross.
Paul
December 21st, 2011
10:19 pm
Sooth
I’d love to stay and watch, but I’m beat. Bunch more work to get out in the a.m. before heading to the family gathering spot for the birthday celebration. I’ll have to catch the replay in the morning.
And good luck to finding someone to take you up on it.
Pleasant evening, all -
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
10:20 pm
For PlatinumBlack:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBBo4s8W2tc
TLA!!
PlatinumBlack
December 21st, 2011
10:27 pm
For Bruno, heart breaker…
http://youtu.be/HH7WXlf9WLk
AmVet - A Happy KwanzChristmakkuh to al!
December 21st, 2011
10:29 pm
Kickin’ choice @10:20, B. So smooth, nothing else could ever touch Santana. I still remember how Abraxas just blew me away.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbhzqoYYROA
bman
December 21st, 2011
10:32 pm
1,000 msgs on this one? Some of you guys need to check your blood pressure…especially you old-timers. Don’t get so worked up
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
10:32 pm
The heart is a lonely hunter, PB:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xU6Tw9RtTk
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
10:35 pm
Some of you guys need to check your blood pressure…especially you old-timers. Don’t get so worked up
Obviously you’re not sitting next to PlatinumBlack…..
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
10:39 pm
Back at ya, Am:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwxzMPnT5qY
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
10:45 pm
For PB: Merry Christmas, Baby!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xxi6mq9S2U
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
10:46 pm
“I’ve got news for you, friends, this is nirvana for capitalism. They’re exactly the circumstances on which capitalism thrives. Corporations could not be happier.”
Sooth,
Come on now. If capitalism thrived on everyone being broke and destitute then who would they sell their products to? A broke and destitute populace hurts capitalists. A thriving populace with money to spend means the capitalists can sell more products to them. You’re letting your hate cloud your thinking.
Henry Ford said it best when he was paying his employees a decent wage. He wanted them to be able to afford the very car he was building and they couldn’t do so unless he paid them a decent wage.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
10:47 pm
Ok I’m with you josef.
Bring Back Cynthia
December 21st, 2011
10:47 pm
The AJC needs to bring back Cynthia – At least her blogs had some original, rational reasoning. “Dork/;-man is just a political hack being fed tidbits from the White House every morning.
Bruno
December 21st, 2011
10:49 pm
Come on now. If capitalism thrived on everyone being broke and destitute then who would they sell their products to?
Doom, sometimes you can only shake your head
Keep Up the Good Fight!
December 21st, 2011
10:50 pm
Well this is one change that we can thank Obama for finally making, even if it did not seem fast enough, it had a lot of political foolishness surrounding it.
Marissa Gaeta And Citlalic Snell, U.S. Naval Petty Officers, Share First Same-Sex Kiss At Ship’s Return
To bad there is not a Life magazine to publsh this for its cover.
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
10:51 pm
Thulsa: “Come on now. If capitalism thrived on everyone being broke and destitute then who would they sell their products to? A broke and destitute populace hurts capitalists”
Of course, But you realize that war was declared on the Fordist model of capitalism some 3 decades ago. What we see now — virtually untrammeled rein of the rentier, the absolute opposite of a free market — would have baffled and horrified Henry Ford and Adam Smith alike.
PlatinumBlack
December 21st, 2011
10:55 pm
For B.
http://youtu.be/I9zpnLBtwwg
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
10:55 pm
Thulsa: that’s good and reasoned argument (Refreshing on this blog). Unfortunately, the paradigm to which you refer no longer exists. Global capital is no longer restrained to one market. They market their products all over the World. While what Ford espoused was noble, it is long-gone.
What I described in my earlier post is evident in all “developed” countries in the World. Most especially in Europe. Their problems are the same as ours.
Your business, one of the FIRE (Finance, Insurance, Real Estate) group of businesses, is largely immune from these problems. Real Estate is not so lucky.
The inescapable fact remains, though, that in a World with 3 billion workers, all of whom are competing for a limited number of jobs, workers in the developed World are going to lose out. Which is exactly what we are witnessing
The thought that global capital has some sort of altruistic bent or that they care about the plight of workers is nonsense..
Fast and Furious Spending
December 21st, 2011
10:56 pm
Sooth:
“Nirvana for capitalism”.
One of the purely nuttiest things I’ve seen all year. That’s like saying a heavy object is nirvana for gravity, a loud kerplunk in water is nirvana for wave motion, or the OWS protesters are nirvana for indecision and fumbling over words.
I’m constantly amazed at the witless rhetoric of the left, but this is a new fumbling low, Sooth. You win.
If “global capital” wins, then, rama lama ding dong capitalism must beat “workers”, right? What is this, a cartoonish two-dimensional view of history–one Marx himself repudiated?
Trouble is, workers aspire to have money, and in this country, they very often find it. Poor get rich quite easily here, that is, unless a guy like Obama (and OK, Bush too) is around to protect the rich and bail them out.
So, let us know witless one. If capital is so bad, why is government controlling it and managing all of it for us, and running our lives (as you might imply corporations are doing) a good thing?
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
10:57 pm
“Of course, But you realize that war was declared on the Fordist model of capitalism some 3 decades ago. What we see now — virtually untrammeled rein of the rentier, the absolute opposite of a free market — would have baffled and horrified Henry Ford and Adam Smith alike.”
Excellent, lucid post! There is intelligent life on this blog after all!
Soothsayer
December 21st, 2011
10:58 pm
Fast & furious: go mix yourself another drink, OK?
Welcome to the Occupation
December 21st, 2011
10:59 pm
Newt Gingrich as the first proper casualty of the age of Citizens United?
I think these guys hire consultants who get drunk, sit around and write stupid ads
bman
December 21st, 2011
11:00 pm
Virginia: Romney vs. Obama
Quinnipiac Romney 44, Obama 42
Romney +2
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
11:00 pm
“Of these 3,000,000,000 worldwide workers, more than half are unemployed. Unions, contracts, collective bargaining, etc. — gone with the wind.”-sooth
Sooth, if there is a lot of unemployment it is because real capitalism isn’t flourishing in most places. Take a look at socialist states like france where unemployment is near 20% for people in their 20s. Then take a look at the prosperity and lower unemployment numbers of the nations closest to true capitalism like Hong Kong and the other Asian tiger economies. Old style Western European socialist states are mired in decline. The more laissez faire western pacific rim economies of Asia with the exception of Japan are on the rise and have been. Its no coincidence sooth.
0311/1811
December 21st, 2011
11:01 pm
How can Obama approve the slaughter of animals like this ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GAbc5uQXJo
Thulsa Doom
December 21st, 2011
11:03 pm
bman,
Once they start the actual head to head debates