The flat-out paranoia of the NRA and Wayne LaPierre

Wayne LaPierre, the executive vice president of the National Rifle Association, gave me a call at home the other day. In the taped message, my friend Wayne warned me that unless I and other patriotic Americans stepped forward to stop it, the dastardly United Nations, with Iran, China, North Korea and other evil countries behind it, would soon come into our country and into our very homes, strip the Second Amendment out of the Constitution and “take away every pistol, and rifle and shotgun” that we owned.

Riiiggghhht. I just have one question though:

How is the UN going to accomplish this? Are they going to import little bulbous-headed men from Mars toting rayguns to take away our weapons? If so, I’m clinging to my copy of Slim Whitman singing “Indian Love Call” and you can’t have it until you pry it from my cold, dead fingers. Nosireebob.

Look, I recognize that the boundary between serious and seriously crazy has shifted considerably in recent years. But doesn’t this kind of nonsense still qualify on the fully crazy side of the ledger?

The ostensible cause of LaPierre’s hysteria is something called the International Arms Trade Treaty. If ratified by the United Nations and then by the U.S. Senate, it would require countries exporting conventional arms to certify that the weapons aren’t being sent to a terrorist or organized crime group, such as Hezbollah, and that they aren’t being sent to a nation conducting genocide or to a nation under a U.N. arms embargo, such as Iran and North Korea.

It would have no effect whatsoever on domestic ownership, possession or purchase of firearms. Such a claim is politically, practically, legally and constitutionally absurd. So why is Wayne LaPierre calling me and others to pretend otherwise?

Money is part of the reason. The United States accounts for 40 percent of the world’s exports of conventional arms, and the U.S. arms industry is nervous about legislation that might curtail their right to sell arms to whomever they wish. Those manufacturers, not coincidentally, are also heavy donors to the NRA, which is trying to whip up hysteria on their behalf.

In addition, such hysteria is part of the NRA’s own strategy for raising money for its coffers. Once the LaPierre robo-rant about the UN finished, for example, an operator quickly came on line to ask me to donate money to the NRA. I politely declined.

Finally, it’s also a matter of increasingly delusional paranoia infecting the NRA. Prior to the ‘08 election, the gun group warned its members that Barack Obama had a secret 10-point plan to end gun ownership in this country.

Point One was a federal ban on the use of guns for home defense. Point Three was a ban on the sale, manufacture and possession of handguns. Point Four was the closure of 90 percent of American gunshops. Federal taxes on guns and ammunition were supposed to go up 500 percent, and the sale of ammunition for hunting rifles was supposed to be banned altogether.

As you may recall, that bit of hysteria touched off quite a spree of gun-buying after the election, boosting the profits of the NRA’s sponsors in the gun industry. In fact, as ammunition disappeared from store shelves, that itself was quickly cited as evidence that ammo confiscation was already underway. The NRA, in other words, played its own members for patsies.

Today, three years later, none of that has come to pass. Obama has made no effort whatsoever to alter the nation’s gun laws. So, given their hyperbolic claims, you might think that would make LaPierre and others a little embarrassed, right? It’s like when evangelist Harold Camping predicted that the world would end on May 21. When he woke up May 22, you just know he felt at least a wee bit sheepish about it, right?

Well, no. Camping did no such thing, because you see, Camping is crazy. Instead of apologizing, he announced that May 21 had merely been the day of spiritual judgment, and that God was really coming to destroy the universe on Oct. 21, 2011. And that’s exactly the course that LaPierre and the NRA are taking.

In a speech at a conservative conference in Florida this month, LaPierre explained that by taking no action to implement his alleged 10-point program, Obama had actually proved that the NRA had been right all along.

You see, “before the president was even sworn into office, they met and hatched a conspiracy of public deception to guarantee his re-election in 2012″ by just PRETENDING not to seize guns. The failure to act “is all part of a massive Obama conspiracy to deceive voters and hide his true intentions to destroy the Second Amendment.”

“We see the president’s strategy crystal clear. Get re-elected and, with no more elections to worry about, get busy dismantling and destroying our firearms freedom. Erase the Second Amendment from the Bill of Rights and exorcise it from the U.S. Constitution….

President Obama and his cohorts — yeah, they’re going to deny their conspiracy to fool gun owners. Some of the liberal media are probably already blogging about it. But we don’t care because as far as we’re concerned, that lying, conniving Obama crowd can kiss our Constitution!”

The fact that such people have considerable influence over our nation’s policies — for example, 45 senators have signed a letter condemning the arms trade treaty, including the two from Georgia — does not speak well of us.

– Jay Bookman

603 comments Add your comment

Jarhead1982

September 28th, 2011
7:43 pm

Actually Jay, your friends should be proud of the actions of the NRA! Your anti gun friends are the ones who taught them and all the pro gun activists how to play the propaganda and fund raising game, especially the one based on fear and lies. Kinda sucks when the ones who served such rotten cake for over 4 decades, cant stomach being served that same rotten desert. So if you truly are upset about all that stuff occurring, go look in the mirror, and yell at yourself!

Funny how there is an awful lot of government supplied data & facts for the pro-gun side as well.

Something else that is rather funny Jay, how many of those reloading components come from outsde the US?

Get back to us when you have a clue what the UN treaty would do to the supplies of such materials and the resulting increase in costs for reloading ammunition due only to legislative BS of that UN treaty in the OTHER COUNTRIES. By the way, what happened to the cost pf large capacity magazines and semi auto clones when the semi auto rifle ban was enacted in 1994?

Backhanded gun control by making items too expensive for the average joe to buy is a common tact taken by the anti gun crowd, and the UN treaty at the very least will do just that.

Of course, the organization that has a statue pf a gun with a bent barrel in front of it, has changed their ultimate goal of gun control right? No they haven’t, so why should we be stupid enough to believe any claim that total gun control is not their final goal and anything related to such legislation is just not another stepping stone towards that ultimate goal?

Get back to us when you have a substantiated reason to believe the UN, you know, like when hell freezes over!

On the otherhand, since we, the US are the major financier of the UN, you better hope a conservative doesn’t get in the whitehouse soon. It would be a terrible, terrible thing if we were to defund the UN and actually use that money to finance national health care, eliminating the cost from the citizens, making all US business immediatley competitive on the world market, and a nice stimulus package, all while making the political party who does that HEROES to the public. Funny thing how when cash starts flowing in a healthy economy, tax revenues increase, making up for the monies spent on the healthcare. Besides, most of the UN membership are not our friends!

God what a horrible thing it would be to see the UN crushed financially for their arrogance!

willfindyou

September 28th, 2011
8:06 pm

another Jew … of the Tikkun Olam, Reform variety. My ancestors saved your ancestors in Europe with guns and lost their lives doing so. I wish we could have a death penalty for bloggers like this one that attack freedom and disrespect our patriot dead. When obama declares martial law, maybe we can set up our own Christian courts and sentence him to immediate death.

Rick

September 29th, 2011
9:45 am

For the 1st. time… you’ve disappointed me Jay with you perception, analogy, and conclusion(s).
To short shift the intent… of the warning… from the NRA is to do all citizens a serious disfavor.
You need to more closely read the “proposal” in contrast to other “restrictions” the UN has crafted in the past. To date, everyone has primarily served as a springboard to ever greater “control, influence and yes restrictions”… of individual human rights, the free flow of capitalism, and independent action of primarily the US. It is a shame that damn near anyone can have a blog and purport just about anything. What ever happened to “the clearinghouse of truth” ethic ? Now UNSUBSCRIBED.