Anti-immigrant extremist appointed to powerful state board

Gov. Nathan Deal has appointed a bigoted, anti-immigrant extremist to an important state board. The appointment should be withdrawn immediately.

Phil Kent, named by Deal to the Immigration Enforcement Review Board on Friday, is a former journalist, an author, a national spokesman for American Immigration Control and executive director of the American Immigration Control Foundation. The AIC opposes not just illegal immigration but immigration generally.

“The name of the left’s game is to open the gates to massive Third World immigration and keep the immigrants as ignorant, impoverished and unassimilated as possible,” the AIC warns in a recent anonymous column published on its website. “That way they will be a reliable electorate for ‘progressive’ politics, or perhaps reliable cannon fodder for armed revolution.”

That’s right. It’s a leftist plot to smuggle in cannon fodder for an armed revolution.

Kent himself has written even more inflammatory material. For example, he seems peculiarly concerned about preserving what he calls the “whiteness” of America. In a column last year, he warned that 2010 could be the “tipping point” for America, the year in which minority babies outnumber white babies.

“If this trend is not reversed– and it could be if an immigration moratorium were imposed– what Vassar College author Hua Hsu labels America’s white “centrifugal core” will slowly disappear,” Kent wrote. “This leads to big questions: What will be the values and ideas of a multicultural America? What will it mean to be white after “whiteness” no longer defines the cultural mainstream?

“Television and movies will increasingly have diverse casts– with whites downgraded. New York radio personality Peter Rosenberg gushes that it is ‘now very cool and in to have multicultural friends.’ The advertising world will radically change. Brown Johnson, a Nickelodean executive speaking before the Association of Hispanic Advertising Agencies, touts TV characters who don’t conform to ‘the white, middle class mold.’ Hispanic marketer Rochelle Newman-Carrasco further notes ‘it has become harder for the blond-haired, blue-eyed commercial actor.’

“Many whites ‘will flee into whiteness.’ They will move to where other fair-skinned brethren are to retain their identity — nostalgically yearning for an American authenticity where everyone speaks English. Politically, the country will become more balkanized, with white leaders forming and breaking alliances with their black and Hispanic counterparts. (An example: Gwinnett County — outside of Atlanta, Ga. — will turn into an Hispanic/Muslim enclave if present trends continue. Whites there are already moving to ‘friendlier’ areas.)”

Note the concept that “American authenticity” exists only in areas where the “fair-skinned brethren are able to retain their identity.” In other columns, Kent demands a halt to all humanitarian refugee programs in this country, calls Barack Obama “a dangerous, anti-white multiculturalist” and tells us that Obama’s success in attracting support from younger white Americans is “testimony to the growing number of whites brainwashed by incessant diversity propaganda.”

Kent is a well-known figure in Georgia politics and has kept none of these sentiments secret. The columns cited above can be found at his website, www.philkent.com. Yet Deal appointed him as one of seven members to the Immigration Enforcement Review Board anyway.

That board, created by House Bill 87, the illegal-immigration bill passed earlier this year, has real powers and responsibilities. Any Georgia citizen can now file a complaint with the board alleging that a state or local agency — a sheriff or a social-service agency, for example — has failed to be sufficiently aggressive in enforcing the bill’s harsh provisions.

The review board has subpoena power to force testimony. It will sit, much like a court, in deciding such cases. If it rules against a public agency or employee, the “guilty” party will have 30 days to correct the problem or face sanctions. According to the law, “sanctions may include revocation of qualified local government status, loss of state appropriated funds, and a monetary fine of not less than $1,000 or more than $5,000.” The attorney general would be authorized to implement the sanctions.

Putting that kind of power in the hands of a bigot is grossly irresponsible.

– Jay Bookman

1,508 comments Add your comment

C_Bear

September 7th, 2011
11:31 pm

‘Terrorists’ on Capitol Hill have been whittling away at our rights, while gaining more and more power. It seems these ‘terrorists’ have finally crossed the line. I have become convinced of a program, which has the INTENT to eliminate the gene-pool of our founding fathers. This is unheard of in the history of mankind. Through massive immigration of non-whites into only White countries, they have sought to “deliberately inflict on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.” This qualifies as an attempted genocide. They call me a racist. What they really are is anti-white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Mitchell Young

September 8th, 2011
2:05 am

I fail to see why opposing high levels of legal immigration, running at near 1 million a year despite our high levels of unemployment, should be considered disqualifying. Immigration is a policy, any country should have the right to let in as few or many immigrants as it wants, and its citizens should be able to debate, without accusations of ‘extremism’ , that policy is all its aspects.

I fail to see why ‘preserving whiteness’ should be an evil thing. The country was founded by white people and has had historically an overwhelmingly white majority. It also became incredibly successful, unlike most countries to our south. Could that majority ‘whiteness’ be part of the success of the USA, seems to me like the prima facie evidence is “yes”.

Finally, on La Raza (yes, that means ‘Race’ , as in biological race –raza is in fact the word used for ‘breed’ in Spanish). I don’t believe they are for a ‘reconquista’, but neither are they a ‘Civil Rights’ organization. They are essentially a racial/ethnic lobby whose number one goal is and has been for decades increasing the numbers of Latinos in the country. Not surprising, when in a democracy numbers means power and people tend to vote in ethnic blocks.

Tigermike

September 8th, 2011
8:29 am

Adam, I applaud your pictorial response of your head in your hand in frustration. My thoughts exactly!

Why? « Illegal Immigration 305

September 8th, 2011
10:02 am

[...] that their immigrant ancestors brought to this country, yet the idea of illegal immigration is now frowned [...]

LawDawg

September 8th, 2011
10:57 am

“Television and movies will increasingly have diverse casts– with whites downgraded. New York radio personality Peter Rosenberg gushes that it is ‘now very cool and in to have multicultural friends”

The horror, the hooorrrrroooorrr

John

September 8th, 2011
6:32 pm

You’re right, Jay. Radical leftists would never get involved with revolution. Their history shows them to be the most gentle of little lambs.

Sam

September 8th, 2011
10:11 pm

What You People Don’t understand is that. The Imperal Wizard of the Clan has never has appointed Minorities to any Positions in Their Organization.

steve bosley

September 9th, 2011
10:12 am

After all,if you continue flooding all white countries and ONLY white countries with non-whites and demand the whites “assimilate” themselves out of existence so as not to be “racist”,you cannot claim that you`re not:

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

All the so-called “anti-racists” support the GLOBAL genocide of white children in the name of “anti-racism”.Ergo,

ANTI-RACIST IS A CODEWORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.