In politics as in sports, it’s dangerous to get cocky.
And Georgia Republicans have gotten cocky. They have come to feel invulnerable and complacent, convinced that their constituents’ intense dislike of Democratic policies at the national level has given them a free hand to do as they wish here in Georgia, without consequence or backlash.
Ethical missteps, bad judgment, failure to govern — they believe that none of it matters as long as those magic words “Barack Obama” retain the power to distract and anger Georgia voters.
Want proof? Let’s review events just from the first eight months of 2011.
The year kicked off with the revelation that House Speaker David Ralston had taken his family and staff on a $17,000, all-expense paid holiday trip to Europe, courtesy of lobbyists for a high-speed rail company. In our much-reviled Congress, such behavior would result in severe censure or even removal from office, but here in Georgia it barely raised an eyebrow. In fact, Ralston continues to argue that limits on lobbyist gifts to politicians are not necessary given the fine, upstanding character of those we elect to public office.
There were also no repercussions when the chairman of the Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee, Jack Murphy of Cumming, was sued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for being grossly negligent in his role as a director of a failed bank in Alpharetta. Murphy is now barred from involvement in any FDIC-insured institution, but inexplicably, he has been allowed by his fellow Republicans to retain his role overseeing the state’s banking industry.
Murphy’s counterpart in the state House, Banks and Banking Committee chair Greg Morris, was also fined $5,000 this year by the FDIC for violating regulations as a director of an Ailey bank. He too has been allowed to stay in his leadership role overseeing Georgia’s deeply troubled banking industry.
Not surprisingly, neither Morris nor Murphy has shown interest in investigating why Georgia continues to lead the nation in bank failures or whether the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance, charged with regulating state-chartered banks, failed in its duties. Given that 17 of the nation’s 68 bank failures in 2011 have occurred here in Georgia, costing the FDIC a total of $1.549 billion so far this year, their studied avoidance of the problem is appalling.
But again, they feel no public pressure to do better, so why should they?
Then there was the scandal in June, when the executive secretary of the state ethics commission was given her walking papers and her sole investigator stripped of her job. Those events occurred immediately after the two sought to subpoena records from the 2010 campaign of Gov. Nathan Deal. Again, there were no repercussions. Overall, GOP leaders have slashed the commission’s budget by 42 percent since 2008, even as they have burdened the agency with new record-keeping duties. They have also stripped the agency of rule-making powers available to almost every other agency in state government, all the while claiming to be horrified at alleged abuses of power in Washington.
I haven’t even mentioned the coup against Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle by his fellow Republicans in the state Senate, which basically left that body rudderless, or the embarrassing financial shenanigans of Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers and his business partner, U.S. Rep. Tom Graves, or the continuing efforts of GOP legislators to empower themselves at the expense of local government officials. And who knows what the rest of the year will bring?
Once politicians feel themselves unaccountable, there’s no telling what they might do.
– Jay Bookman
1,210 comments Add your comment
stands for decibels
August 23rd, 2011
7:35 am
Well, it could be worse, I suppose.
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
7:37 am
The GOP in general and the State GOP in particular are common thugs in white shirts. Party over People. The GOP is no better than a street gang or a cult. But Karma says they will get theirs in the end.
stands for decibels
August 23rd, 2011
7:37 am
Oh, and Jay, you just blindly hate Republicans, that’s the only reason you keep posting these hack columns. You’d never say anything mean or nasty about your Democrat buddies.
(thought I’d get that one out of the way.)
Mel Brooks
August 23rd, 2011
7:37 am
It could be raining.
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
7:38 am
Stands,
Saved that one. Going to read it all…thanks!
stands for decibels
August 23rd, 2011
7:39 am
The GOP is no better than a street gang or a cult.
All things considered, it’s relatively easy to overcome a street gang or cult.
A baked-into-the-system political machine, on the other hand…
Mary Elizabeth
August 23rd, 2011
7:43 am
“Ethical missteps, bad judgment, failure to govern — they believe that none of it matters as long as those magic words “Barack Obama” retain the power to distract and anger Georgia voters.”
——————————————————————————————-
Rightwing majority thought prevails only in the present in Georgia. The tipping point toward a more progressive Georgia will be sooner rather than later. The exact time of this change is unknowable, but it will occur. 47% of Georgians voted for Barack Obama for President of the U.S. in the national election of 2008. That’s 47%. “Pride before Fall.”
HadIt
August 23rd, 2011
7:47 am
Wait and see, before ten more comments are added some Fox News Tea Party brain-fried zombie will claim that, in fact, it was actually Barney Frank that did it.
Hootinanny Yum Yum
August 23rd, 2011
7:48 am
Maxine Waters. She’s in the news. Let’s discuss the progressives in CA. C’mon, Jay.
carlosgvv
August 23rd, 2011
7:53 am
“they believe that none of it matters as long as those magic words Barack Obama retain the power to anger and distract Georgia voters”
And, since the number of racist dumbed down Georgia voters seems to be steadly increasing, they are safe in this belief. It is all too clear that a large number of Georgians would vote for the Devil himself rather than Obama. Giving Georgia politicians a free hand to do anything the want is a sure way to watch them toss what few ethics they have out the window.
stands for decibels
August 23rd, 2011
7:54 am
She’s in the news.
Clearly expressing what a majority of Americans believe is not really all that newsworthy.
But, nice attempted deflection from the topic at hand, anyway.
stands for decibels
August 23rd, 2011
7:58 am
Sorry, I should’ve written “plurality” rather than “majority” @ 7.54.
Tommy Maddox
August 23rd, 2011
7:59 am
“Once politicians feel themselves unaccountable, there’s no telling what they might do.”
Now ain’t that rich?
jt
August 23rd, 2011
8:00 am
From Senator Toombs….a great Georgian——————-
“I tell you, upon the faith of a true man, that all further looking to the North for security for your constitutional rights in the Union ought to be instantly abandoned. It is fraught with nothing but ruin to yourselves and your posterity. Secession by the 4th day of March next should be thundered from the ballot-box by the unanimous voice of Georgia on the 2nd day of January next. Such voice will be your best guarantee for liberty, security, tranquility, and glory.”
Emmanuel Hall
August 23rd, 2011
8:07 am
The Rpublicans secret weapon here is Georgia and across the nation is their rehtoric of bigotry, racism and hate to their base of the silly, foolish and misinformed. And they know that the so-called mainstream media, with few exceptions will challenge them. But, the salvation is; that no lie will live forever and I believe the end to this right wing Republican non-sense is near.
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
8:07 am
And how did that little exercise work out for them, jt?
I think that’s merely further evidence of the dangers of getting cocky.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
8:08 am
Well….If common decency, moral character and integrity won’t straighten out the GOP cabal in Georgia then perhaps they need to be reminded that according to Gallop just last week President Obama has a 48% approval rating here in our home state.
Guy Incognito
August 23rd, 2011
8:09 am
Why do you libs stay here? Move. We’re sooooooooo backwards. The time is coming for 2 countries. Y’all do nothing but make fun of us Red-Staters anyway. Why burden yourselves with, “the number of racist dumbed down Georgia voters (sic, “that”) seems to be steadly increasing”?
Guy Incognito
August 23rd, 2011
8:10 am
Bring it on Jay
stands for decibels
August 23rd, 2011
8:10 am
I imagine it’d cost a few quid to exhume Toombs’ remains and put them in front of a firing squad, but I’d be in for a C-note if anyone would join me.
Bail Out - Too Big to Fail -- Republican Greed
August 23rd, 2011
8:10 am
The CEO of major bail-out recipient Citibank is replacing the current President of Standard & Poor.
The Republican Bail-Out has earned the distinction of being the largest Entitlement Program ever conceived by the U.S. Government.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Justice Department is investigating whether Standard & Poor improperly rated dozens of mortgage securities in the years leading up to the financial crisis in 2008.
The unethical business practices continue during the “George W. Bush Great Recession”.
Good Little Liberal
August 23rd, 2011
8:12 am
From downstairs:
I would have loved to see him gone if there was an option other than mobs with automatic weapons to replace him. What is it with you guys and this “change” thing. We got change. Now our economy has been in the toilet for years with no end in site. We got change in Egypt. Christians being slaughtered, military in charge and Israel’s only Middle Eastern Ally is now having border wars. World wide instability is not a goal that I think the US should be trying to achieve.
And for God’s sake, stop comparing these armed mob takeovers to the American Revolution. The Declaration of independence was written by the SECOND Continental congress. At the beginning of the revolution we had a smart and established government waiting to take control.
I have to go to work. I know that you disagree, but I think we have made a huge mistake,
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
8:13 am
Though it is utterly futile, this column should be read to every lockstep, corruption coddling, reactionary Republican in this state.
Though a helluva challenge, it appears that the Georgia GOP is just trying to outslime their party brethren in Washington.
Nathan Deal encourages the ‘troops”…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr5KyLzFdgI
Peadawg
August 23rd, 2011
8:17 am
“Once politicians feel themselves unaccountable, there’s no telling what they might do.” – I missed where Obama stopped blaming Bush for all of our problems.
On topic though, you’re pretty much spot on with everything you said. Not much to argue here.
willydoit?
August 23rd, 2011
8:19 am
Racism is pretty much dead in America. Now we have Republicism and Democratism. We are a divided country based upon two groups. No matter which party is power, we either hate or defend based upon who we voted for.
Freedom of the press used to mean reporters would go after both parties…no longer true. It all depends on what network or paper the reporter receives a paycheck from as to which party he/she will try to destroy.
Guy Incognito…you may be right…we may see a divided country again in our life time.
Stonethrower
August 23rd, 2011
8:20 am
They are invunerable. Like it or not, this is a red state and will remian that way. Especially if the current occupant of the White House remains for another term. Besides, what other options due the good people of Georgia have. Once in power you do what ever is necessary to remain in power. Suck in up Dems. You had your turn for years and you blew it.
carlosgvv
August 23rd, 2011
8:22 am
Guy Incognito
If I don’t like the political situation in Georgia, I will stay and try to improve it. Unlike you, I do not have a “cut and run” personality.
carlosgvv
August 23rd, 2011
8:24 am
jt
Gov. Perry loves you.
stands for decibels
August 23rd, 2011
8:25 am
Besides, what other options due [sic] the good [sic] people of Georgia have.
golly, I don’t know… maybe they could stop voting kneejerk reactionary a-holes into positions of power, as they’ve tended to do for a coupla centuries now?
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
8:26 am
Guy Incognito
August 23rd, 2011
8:09 am
Why do you libs stay here?
Somebody has to clean up the mess
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
8:27 am
OFF TOPIC, but check this out:
HEADLINE: White House to Scale Back Regulations on Businesses
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904279004576524870307612628.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Hey look, the President is LEADING. At least, according to the Republican definition of leading so far. Watch those leadership goalposts move. Just watch…
JohnnyReb
August 23rd, 2011
8:28 am
If anything unlawful has occurred, the attorney general should investigate. Until then, it’s little more than carpetbagger unhappiness.
As our beloved Lewis proclaimed, if you are not the lead dog the view never changes.
The Leg Lamp is a “major award”….
August 23rd, 2011
8:29 am
Ah yes, some real red meat to start your day from the party of “tolerance and inclusion”.
August 23, 2011
Maxine Waters: ‘The tea party can go straight to hell’
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/08/21/maxine-waters-the-tea-party-can-go-straight-to-hell/#ixzz1Vr2WksS9
stands for decibels
August 23rd, 2011
8:30 am
The time is coming for 2 countries.
Yours can be that glorified drilling platform if you like.
jt
August 23rd, 2011
8:31 am
carlosgvv -Perry never considered secession.Another invention of the MSM.
.
Governor Perry is a pandering Statist fool who is avalaible to the highest bidder.
Makes Obama look like a piker.
.
And no………..Perry would not like me.No Statists do …for I expose the lie that they are living…….and no one really enjoys that.
.
The Leg Lamp is a “major award”….
August 23rd, 2011
8:31 am
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
8:27 am
So after 2 and a half years he decides to leave. Yeah, that’s real leadership.
Matthew
August 23rd, 2011
8:32 am
Oh Jay, you poor poor pitiful wanker. Just because your boy Obama is tanking in the polls and continues to ruin any prospects for recovery.
dupe-ilicious
August 23rd, 2011
8:32 am
The two parties need us to continue this split and they are both feeding a hungry population (mentally-starved, critical-thinking-malnourished) the idea that you have to pick one side or the other. If Georgians and Americans continue buying into this “team sport” view of governance then we’ll all get what we deserve and it’s not going to be anything like a “reward”.
Which party will dominate and “lead” the continuing destruction of this state and nation?
If you call yourself a Democrat or a Republican then you are part of the problem.
saywhat?
August 23rd, 2011
8:32 am
With 5 kids, one of the things keeping me in Geirgia is the Hope scholarship. I fear the republicans will succeed in killing it, or at least crippling it to the point of irrelevance, before my younger children have any chance of benefitting from it.
@@
August 23rd, 2011
8:32 am
And Georgia Republicans have gotten cocky.
And the Tea Party is the direct result of Republican cockiness. They’ve come to ruffle their feathers.
Matthew
August 23rd, 2011
8:33 am
Adam – The moves only save 10 billion over 5 years. 2 billion per year – big whoop.
1811/0311
August 23rd, 2011
8:33 am
“And Georgia Republicans have gotten cocky. ”
And Georgia Democrats have gotten arrogant.
The Leg Lamp is a “major award”….
August 23rd, 2011
8:35 am
The Leg Lamp is a “major award”….
August 23rd, 2011
8:31 am
By the way, go back and read the first paragraph in the article:
“The Obama administration will release final plans Tuesday for ending or cutting back hundreds of regulations, an effort to reduce the burden on business and counter criticism that the White House is tone-deaf to business concerns.”
Obama made the move to “counter criticism” he was ignoring business concerns. Yeah, great “leadership”.
Talk about moving the goalposts……..
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
8:36 am
Politics as usual. It really doesn’t matter that its the State Republicans this time, if Democrats were in running the show in Georgia, they would no doubt have scandles of their own.
Each party can talk the talk, but hardly anyone can walk the walk.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
8:36 am
Jay
Your first three paragraphs – I was hoping it might bleed over to our next election in Texas.
Then I read your examples. Hoo-wheee…. this Texan has to say ‘no way we’re beating you at that.”
And that’s quite a mouthful.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
8:36 am
Peadawg: I missed where Obama stopped blaming Bush for all of our problems.
Then you haven’t been paying attention to his town halls.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
8:37 am
Public pressure? The Republicans/Tea Nuts seem to celebrate more when their Republican officials have criminal/ethical background problems and flaunt the hypocrisy as if it is a badge of courage. But they foam at the mouth if you mention Obama….
_________________
I sure hope Adam has taken some motion sickness meds because he is already seeing the rapid movement of the goalposts!
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
8:37 am
Granny: Somebody has to clean up the mess
Ugh. So the Democrats are janitors and the Republicans are the wealthy class? Sounds close to accurate, but wholly unfair.
Misty Fyed
August 23rd, 2011
8:38 am
And you kindly forgot to mention that our state has over 10% unemployment under this Republican administration with no signs of easing.
You are talking about a group who elected Nathan Deal as Governor. Few are more conservative than I am and this group embarrasses me.
Dave R. - 3k/4k/5k
August 23rd, 2011
8:38 am
And has been pointed out many times before, Georgia Republicans don’t hold a candle to Massachusetts Democrats in their cockiness.
The bottom-line is that BOTH parties do this, both parties misbehave when in power, yet in BOTH states (and many others), the voters continue to be too stupid to vote out their locals.
Noah Zark
August 23rd, 2011
8:38 am
Just as the national Republican party is beginning to crack under the weight of its own hubris and greed, so to will the state Republican party. I don’t know when or what will set off its failure, but overreaching and this feeling of invincibility will come to roost.
You have to figure that the old statement “nature abhors a vacuum” is true. So know that the R Party has pretty much abolished the Democratic party in Georgia, there is a vacuum of political intrigue. So they will begin to turn on themselves.
But remember, there is NO difference between political beings and corporations. Corporations and government feed on each other like incestuous jackals. And we all know what happens as a result of that,
Daedalus
August 23rd, 2011
8:39 am
Don’t forget the fundamentally misguided transportation sales tax bill.
That legislation gets the most important part of transportation planning and implementation wrong: it fails to address who will operate the myriad transit systems outside of Fulton and DeKalb. The current funding list continues the Balkanization of transit provides. That GRTA would run bus lines that compete with Cobb Transit, Gwinnett Transit and MARTA is fundamentally wrong-headed and counter-productive to creating a seamless, or at least, a less fractured system.
I did not expect the GOP controlled legislature to take on the real heavy lifting — creating one transit agency for the state. Since MARTA was created by constitutional amendment the current GOP leaders simply don’t have the skills, desire and ability to fix that, but they could have decide who will operate transit in the suburbs. GRTA, ARC and GDOT already have the legal authority to operate transit systems. The smart move would have been to fold Gwinnett and Cobb transit systems into a regional system. Maybe even starting some east-west routes (Marietta to Sandy Springs and then Lawrenceville anyone?).
Instead the transit funding will resurrect Clayton transit and provide funding to Cobb and Gwinnett systems so they will stay insulated, and GRTA will continue to run bus lines that compete with all three of them as well as MARTA. Had the legislature addressed the “governance” issue I would vote for the sale tax even if ALL the funding went to the suburbs — but as configured, I cannot vote for it regardless of how much provincial pork they load into it.
And for this nonsense the Georgia GOP wants to be congratulated?
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
8:40 am
Even a party of inclusion should not include fools and charlatans.
And yes, the Tea Party can go straight to hell.
All us socialist, communist, trailer park living, america-hating, business-hating, government teat sucking, caddy driving welfare kings and queens with I phones, food stamp getting, muslim, uppity,
half-rican, lonely, fat folks think so.
USinUK
August 23rd, 2011
8:40 am
“ack Murphy of Cumming, was sued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for being grossly negligent in his role as a director of a failed bank in Alpharetta. Murphy is now barred from involvement in any FDIC-insured institution, but inexplicably, he has been allowed by his fellow Republicans to retain his role overseeing the state’s banking industry.”
the thing I find amusing is that I remember – VERY VERY WELL – how the GOP howled and screamed about how “corrupt” Tom Murphy was … criminey, he was a cub scout compared to the so-called “state leadership”
Dave R. - 3k/4k/5k
August 23rd, 2011
8:40 am
Oh, and Sen. Jack Murphy is the epitome of the do-nothing political blowhard.
Just sayin!
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
8:41 am
Matthew: 2 million each year, oh no! Not that piddly little amount! I mean, cutting NPR funding was a GREAT IDEA and it would have cut ONE MILLION.
Arguments like that 1) fail to take into account that every little bit helps, and 2) Entirely miss the point by focused on how MUCH it saves rather than THIS IS A REPUBLICAN IDEA. Hello? Reduce “job-killing” regulations? ASK the businesses which regulations hurt their profits the most and then act on it? You guys aren’t paying attention, because Obama acted on that, took that idea and made it a reality. LEADERSHIP.
Now, since deregulation solves EVERYTHING (according to some wild-eyed nuts), should we not now see a steep rise in job creation?
deegee
August 23rd, 2011
8:42 am
Murphy, Deal, Rogers and Graves have one thing in common. They made illegal immigrants the focus of their campaigns. Georgians dislike illegal immigrants more than they dislike blatant, in your face corruption. Pathetic.
jm
August 23rd, 2011
8:42 am
You know. Republicans would like to be given the power to “fix” America at the national level. When these kind of shenanigans go on at the state level, it discredits and minimizes the moral authority of the national party.
There are plenty of very good Republicans out there. But the GA State Republicans sure do take some of the wind out of the party’s sails…..
Not exactly the model of good governance…
USinUK
August 23rd, 2011
8:42 am
go, granny, go!
Wes
August 23rd, 2011
8:42 am
Jay,
If the government is either corrupt or ineffective, should we limit them to the few things they do well or give them more authority over our lives?
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
8:43 am
Leg Lamp: Obama made the move to “counter criticism” he was ignoring business concerns.
Right and I’m sure that’s the only reason he would do that.
I guess that makes sense if you REALLY BELIEVE that regulations are just rules that popped out of nowhere and Obama just closed his eyes and threw darts at a list of them to see which ones to get rid of. You know, because not a single one of them should exist…..
Thomas
August 23rd, 2011
8:43 am
uh… ok
Against the democratic leadership who have been clean and transparent as usual?
Matti's Annoyance
August 23rd, 2011
8:44 am
Guy Incognito,
Why don’t YOU move to a place where everybody is exactly like you? I’m FROM here, and we’re NOT going away. We’re not going to sit down, shut up, or get over it either. Nor will we let the corruption go unnoticed as the people about whom Mr. Bookman writes are counting on. If you’re so threatened by the notion that somebody might someday challenge the parroted, bee-ess talking points that come out of your mouth — oh how embarrassing! — then YOU move. Bullies are just chicken sh** on the inside anyway, and everybody knows it.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
8:44 am
Georgians have been known not to be so stupid that they have not at times voted out local officials who have failed…. There have been some local republicans who have been voted out of office for those failures in leadership and other failures. Its a shame they don’t do it more often and raise the bar!
jm
August 23rd, 2011
8:46 am
No free lunches….
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-22/baby-boomers-selling-shares-may-depress-stocks-for-decades-fed-paper-says.html
Misty Fyed
August 23rd, 2011
8:46 am
It’s time for the tea party to clean house at the State level too. I know you libs think the tea party movement is part of the republican party but it’s not. It’s a condemnation of the republican party. It asks for common sense leadership. Look after the money like it was yours and be honest. Integrity above compromise. Why is that so much to ask?
jm
August 23rd, 2011
8:47 am
Granny G 8:40 – at least you know yourself well.
Self awareness is the first step to recovery.
(ir)Rational
August 23rd, 2011
8:47 am
Well, Wes, since most of the people here are ardent supporters of the Democrat ideal, they would argue that it is only the Republicans that are this corrupt. Therefore, we should give them more power, but only to the Democrats. Personally, I think we should limit them to the things they were created to do, let them get good at that, and have that as all they do. But I’m just a crazy person who believes that I know how to spend the money I work for and earn better than some idiot in the state capital or Washington.
Oh-well. Who is John Galt?
jm
August 23rd, 2011
8:48 am
The Tea Party is saving America from long term financial armaggeddon. Fact.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
8:48 am
Obama made the move to “counter criticism” he was ignoring business concerns.
Actually Obama made the move in January….when he ordered the review….
Terd Fergesun
August 23rd, 2011
8:48 am
Why is it with you liberals Book Man that when dems act this way they are being aggressive. When Conservatives act this way they are cocky? Man, you do tow the liberal line I will give you that much. Problem is is clouds your opinion and makes you no different then a Limbaugh or Hannity. Better take a valium after that comparison big boy. I know you need it.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
8:48 am
jt
“Perry never considered secession.Another invention of the MSM.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5xTxcFA398
It folllows Perry’ speaking style – same as with the Fed – more “who knows what Texans might do (and I’m their governor) rather than active voice “Texas will do (whatever).”
For a governor to speak in such terms – who knows what others might think. They might think the Texas governor speaks treason!
Obozononics
August 23rd, 2011
8:48 am
Cocky is way better than the childish finger waiving and tongue sticking out of Rahm Emanuel, don’t you think? Where were your “Cocky” statements when the democrats drew the lines 10 years ago, typical liberal hypocrisy. What about the Obozo statement to the GOP to “get in the back of the bus” I guess that would not be considered cocky if you are a dimwit liberal….
jm
August 23rd, 2011
8:48 am
Misty Fyed – good point
USinUK
August 23rd, 2011
8:49 am
“I know you libs think the tea party movement is part of the republican party but it’s not. It’s a condemnation of the republican party.”
I guess we should all just ignore the fact that they ARE Republicans
roughrider
August 23rd, 2011
8:49 am
” Georgia Republicans believe themselves invulnerable”
A good reason why Georgia is about 10 years behind the rest of the nation on most issues.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
8:49 am
jm
August 23rd, 2011
8:48 am
The Tea Party is saving America from long term financial armaggeddon. Fact.
When pigs fly over the debt limit poofing glitter and silver dollars
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
8:51 am
Obozo…. Ummm… got any proof that the President said the words “get in the back of the bus”. Do try looking up the actual words. Here’s a tip for you. It was a speech that included a reference to a car and never mentioned a bus.
carlosgvv
August 23rd, 2011
8:52 am
jt
Perry suggested at a news conference that Texans might, at some point, get so fed up that they would consider seceding from the Union. He carefully worded it to distance himself from these feelings, but, as Paul Simon said – “say now who do, who do you think you’re fooling”.
USinUK
August 23rd, 2011
8:52 am
“Where were your “Cocky” statements when the democrats drew the lines 10 years ago”
um, in 2001, when W was in office and the GOP had the house and senate?
Terd Fergesun
August 23rd, 2011
8:52 am
USinUK
August 23rd, 2011
8:49 am
“I know you libs think the tea party movement is part of the republican party but it’s not. It’s a condemnation of the republican party.”
I guess we should all just ignore the fact that they ARE Republicans
What you liberals ignore is that we in the Tea Party will vote out Republicans who are not fiscally responsible. You liberals will stand by a bad democrat and basically let them eat their young.
ProgressivePeach
August 23rd, 2011
8:53 am
Thanks to all the wingnut commenters for proving Jay’s point.
David
August 23rd, 2011
8:53 am
Georgia’s unemployment rate being over 10% confuses me. I mean the Republicans have been the majority for how long now? Where are the jobs? Where are they? It surely can’t be Obama’s fault. He isn’t running Georgia. Where, Republicans, are the jobs or at the very least a jobs bill? I am really curious.
Obozononics
August 23rd, 2011
8:55 am
Normal, you are so funny, you really think the democrats are different?
Misty Fyed
August 23rd, 2011
8:56 am
USinUK. That’s an odd statement. How would you possibly know that? The world isn’t divided into two groups; Republican and Democrat. There are those whose lives do not revolve around affiliation to a party. There are few “yellow dawg republicans”.
Of course, this is a concept you may have difficulty grasping.
Jethro
August 23rd, 2011
8:59 am
It’s one thing to have and share a political view. It is another thing entirely to accept egregious behavior from our politicians. The point isn’t that the GOP is bad. Democrats have engaged in the same behavior when they were in control.
No, it is about our tolerance of these behaviors. “Yeah, so what else is new?”, is the common refrain from the peanut gallery. Why do we put up with it? It isn’t a Democrat vs. GOP issue. It’s about people behaving badly and why we the citizenry tolerate. Jay makes a valid point: there are no repurcussions.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:00 am
jm: The Tea Party is saving America from long term financial armaggeddon. Fact.
No, that’s an opinion.
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
9:00 am
“The Tea Party is saving America from long term financial armaggeddon. Fact.”
The Tea Party doesn’t know it’s arse from a hole in the ground. Fact.
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
9:01 am
“What you liberals ignore is that we in the Tea Party will vote out Republicans who are not fiscally responsible. You liberals will stand by a bad democrat and basically let them eat their young.”
Really, Terd? So Tom Graves and Chip Rogers will be defeated in the GOP primaries? David Ralston won’t be speaker any longer? The Tea Party will demand the resignation of Jack Murphy as Banking Committee chair?
(ir)Rational
August 23rd, 2011
9:02 am
USinUK – So where were the comments about the Democrats being cocky in the State? I believe that is what this is about? Now, personally, I agree, Republicans are being cocky here. How they’ve redrawn the lines, it is almost like they are trying to protect their jobs (much like the Dems did 10 years ago), but I’m not sure they’re trying to protect them from the Democrats, it almost seems like they’re trying to protect themselves from other Republicans. This concerns me more than about anything, simply because that really does remove accountability from the job. I believe term limits for every elected office would solve this problem. Everything from school board members, to county sheriff, to state and US representatives should have term limits. Lets put an end to career politicians. Of course, then we would run the risk of much higher unemployment, because many of these people seem unemployable.
Oh-well. Who is John Galt?
Citizen of the World
August 23rd, 2011
9:02 am
Don’t you know, Jay? Personal responsibility, ethics and accountability are for the little people!
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
9:02 am
Ethics … we don’t need no sticking ethics…. we are GOP !
Gordon
August 23rd, 2011
9:03 am
Yes, its just a big cycle that we can’t get out of. In 2008, eager Democrats in Washington and elsewhere were going to change the world. After all, they won the election. Now Republicans are badly overplaying their hand at both the state and national level. No wonder big problems never get solved. In fact, they just get worse.
It’s just going to take a Depression to change our ways.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
9:04 am
Education is the difference…..the GOP is the party of lesser education.
(ir)Rational
August 23rd, 2011
9:04 am
Peter, expand that to “we are politicians” and you would be correct.
Oh-well. Who is John Galt?
jm
August 23rd, 2011
9:05 am
Jay
“So Tom Graves and Chip Rogers will be defeated in the GOP primaries? David Ralston won’t be speaker any longer? The Tea Party will demand the resignation of Jack Murphy as Banking Committee chair?”
One would hope.
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
9:05 am
I see, jm.
Hope and change, huh?
Partisay
August 23rd, 2011
9:06 am
Obozonics….you answer the question….do you really think republicans are different?
Libertarian
August 23rd, 2011
9:06 am
Maybe we should let democrats take over the state….you know, so the rest of the state can operate like Atlanta, Clayton, and Dekalb. They have great school systems and foreclosures are low! Oh, wait…
Misty Fyed
August 23rd, 2011
9:06 am
Jay…The tea party has how many seats in the Federal Gov’t? Not many. It’s effectiveness now is limited to how big of a thorn in the side they can be to the “established business as usual politicians”. If the movement survives, I’d be surprised if they will be very effective in penetrating the state politics. Not enough people pay that much attention, and they don’t have that good ole boy memebership card.
jm
August 23rd, 2011
9:07 am
Um. Which group finally brought an end to Congressional EARMARKS? Hmmm, let me think now.
For the daft, here’s the answer: the Tea Party.
Which group is trying to reign in our parabolic debt and deficit? Answer for the clueless: the Tea Party.
The Tea Party has some warts. But it should be embraced as a force for good in America.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
9:07 am
“The Tea Party is saving America from long term financial armaggeddon. Fact.”
Do they have a plan? Is it written? Is it something we can look at? Does it list specific programs? You know, all the stuff they demanded of Pres Obama to take what he said seriously.
Or is it all slogans and signs and sound bites?
I will give them credit for bringing unnecessary spending to the top of the discussion pile. But to say they are saving the US from financial armageddon is a stretch. Bringing attention to something is one thing, having a plan is quite something else.
WOODSTOCK MIKE
August 23rd, 2011
9:09 am
My neighbor is an extremely nice guy, father of 4, gets up every morning around 6am to get to work and gets home around 6, has a beautiful house, a very friendly guy, helps his neighbors out anytime they need it, has some fantastic children that are excelling in school and college….
Wait, this guy told me he’s a Republican, how can this be?? He must be an evil thug because he’s a Republican!!
You guys on here have truly gotten worse and worse to the point now it’s comical…
Judging another human being because they vote politically a certain way is just downright pathetic.
This blog is more of a joke these days than a forum for educated discussions.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
9:09 am
“You had your turn…”
And there in four little words, is the ultimate justification for this repugnant party-wide disease of criminals and corruption.
Even the mafia must be impressed with such loyalty…
“If anything unlawful has occurred…”
Wink, wink, nudge, nudge. (11th Commandment Republicode for See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.)
But for the ultimate in Republi-red herring breakfasts and the height of criminal coddling confusion, I give you:
“Oh Jay, you poor poor pitiful wanker. Just because your boy Obama is tanking in the polls and continues to ruin any prospects for recovery.”
Followed closely by that 2nd 8:33 and 2nd 8:38…
Pathetic…
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
9:09 am
Normal
“The Tea Party doesn’t know it’s arse from a hole in the ground. Fact.”
Kinda like this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Bfe6CgYbH8
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
9:10 am
HA HA HA.Funny stuff…… “you answer the question….do you really think republicans are different?”
The Republican’s came up with “Cost Plus Contracts”..Yes they are different !
Terd Fergesun
August 23rd, 2011
9:10 am
August 23rd, 2011
9:01 am
“What you liberals ignore is that we in the Tea Party will vote out Republicans who are not fiscally responsible. You liberals will stand by a bad democrat and basically let them eat their young.”
Really, Terd? So Tom Graves and Chip Rogers will be defeated in the GOP primaries? David Ralston won’t be speaker any longer? The Tea Party will demand the resignation of Jack Murphy as Banking Committee chair?
Really Jay, if we have a Tea Party candidate that makes sense to run against them then they will. If not, then they will have no chance to raise money from our side. Accountability of both sides is what we are about. Not the racist tea baggers that “journalist” like you paint us as. Your credibility is right their with a Rangle and Pelosi. You are battling a losing war that in 2012 your losses will be beyond comprehension and you will blame Bush, the Tea Party and white men for your losses. Never looking at your man in the WH or in the mirror.
WOODSTOCK MIKE
August 23rd, 2011
9:10 am
How about you take a look at which politicians in America are presently under investigation for ethics violations?
Guess what, you will find some Democrats, oooohhhhh, can you believe it, you guys are fools…
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
9:11 am
“I see, jm.
Hope and change, huh?”
Can’t wait to see THAT sign at a Tea Party rally!
Aquagirl
August 23rd, 2011
9:11 am
One would hope.
Oh, the teanuts are now the hopey-changey party? Or did I miss the Teanut demonstrations demanding Jack Murphy be removed from the Banking Committee?
Manchurian-Kenyan Candidate
August 23rd, 2011
9:12 am
Cocky? You want cocky??
Cocky was 10 years ago when the Dem controlled legislature drew that ridiculous doughnut shaped district to pack it with Democrats…..now THAT was cocky. This stuff by Repubs is typical “to the victor goes the spoils”
Remember….”Elections have consequences”…..now, I wonder who said that……hmmmm…..can’t quite put my finger on that one….
“Hope and Change is now……NOT MY FAULT!!”
Partisay
August 23rd, 2011
9:12 am
Libertarian….or they could be like the republicans in Cobb….and raise taxes……BWHAHAHAHAHAHAH
jm
August 23rd, 2011
9:13 am
Jay 9:05 – you got it
Current status quo on most fronts blows (national, state, etc)
Throw the bums out!
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:13 am
The Tea Party has NO SEATS anywhere. The Tea Party doesn’t exist as a party, only as a far right wing of the Republican Party. They are loud and obnoxious, but they are a minority of the party and do not have their OWN party. They are, as Michele Bachmann probably thinks, just infiltrating.
Misty Fyed
August 23rd, 2011
9:13 am
Debbie,
We are not powerless. We just have to break the addiction to limiting ourselves to only two schools of thought and replace the current “politicians” with real citizens who serve out of duty, not out of ambition.
Aquagirl
August 23rd, 2011
9:13 am
Ugh, attempting italics before coffee = fail.
Sally
August 23rd, 2011
9:13 am
I lean Republican, but have to say I agree with you. And the sad thing is, you have only covered the things that have happened so far this year. To say the Georgia Republican Party in power has been a disappointment is a wild understatement.
James
August 23rd, 2011
9:14 am
Hmm, Jay, never remember seeing you write something similar about the Ga. Dems over the past 150 years.
spaceman109
August 23rd, 2011
9:14 am
@ matthew
Matthew
August 23rd, 2011
8:32 am
Oh Jay, you poor poor pitiful wanker. Just because your boy Obama is tanking in the polls and continues to ruin any prospects for recovery.
i see you frantically waving your arms in the air to try and distract people from the screwup g.o.p. in this state.
Matthew
August 23rd, 2011
8:33 am
Adam – The moves only save 10 billion over 5 years. 2 billion per year – big whoop.
if a g.o.p. president hhad done the same thing, you would be wildly celebrating and calling those moves the start of something big.
you are truly a talented comic.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
9:14 am
Peter
“The Republican’s came up with “Cost Plus Contracts”..Yes they are different !”
So now the career federal acquisition employees are identified by one political party?
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
9:15 am
Gosh WOODSTOCK MIKE…. silly stuff ! you guys are fools…
By the way your neighbor who is Republican, sounds like a nice guy….now why wouldn’t he be ?
Partisay
August 23rd, 2011
9:15 am
“Judging another human being because they vote politically a certain way is just downright pathetic.”
Yeah….a republican would NEVER do that. Would they? Tell us woodstock mike…would they?
jm
August 23rd, 2011
9:16 am
Paul 9:07 oh I’ll grant there’s no detailed plan from TPers, they just intuitively and intelligently know more debt is bad and our fiscal trajectory is unsustainable. And they know more government is bad. Now, it takes leaders to translate that into a real plan. Of course, that will never come from the current administration.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
9:16 am
“The Tea Party is saving America from long term financial armaggeddon. Fact”
Bullshyt.
Fact. They will slink back into their oblivion when a Republican gets back in the White House.
carlosgvv
August 23rd, 2011
9:16 am
jm
Congressional members of The Tea Party were more than willing to let America go into default, which would have caused a major financial disaster. And yet, you say they should “be embraced as a force for good in America”. Whose good are you talking about? Russia’s, China’s, Al Quida’s?
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
9:17 am
Hey Paul……..to this comment…….So now the career federal acquisition employees are identified by one political party?
Perhaps you have not been paying attention…….that was directly from Dick Cheney’s office……. the concept of paying too much for lesser work….but hey why not bilk the US Treasury if you can……legal robbery.
tothepoint
August 23rd, 2011
9:18 am
Jay, the lack of education produces an ignorant voter. This has now led to the Repub’s endorsement/morphing into the Tea Party. Basically, poor critical thinking skills and no understanding of History is the fault of our collective leadership at the local level. Turn off the TV and start reading!
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
9:18 am
“Which group finally brought an end to Congressional EARMARKS?”
They did? Really? There are no more earmarks?
Gee, if I didn’t know better, I’d say that was a false blanket statement.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
9:18 am
“Um. Which group finally brought an end to Congressional EARMARKS? Hmmm, let me think now.”
That thinkin’ thing…..don’t hurt yourself…
“But buried deeply in these 359 pages of ugly surprises is a provision that would mean one community in America would do a lot better than all of the others. The legislation added an estimated $450 million for a particular bit of defense spending that the Department of Defense did not ask for and does not want.
The item is a down payment that would obligate the federal government to future payments that could well be three or four times the increased spending added to this particular piece of legislation, with a big portion of the funds flowing to two cities in Ohio—Cincinnati, where Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) grew up, and Dayton, the largest city in his congressional district.
The money will go to pay the costs to General Electric Co.’s General Electric Aviation unit and the British-owned Rolls Royce Group for their development of an engine for the new Joint Strike Fighter aircraft—money that looks, feels, and smells very much like an earmark.”
February 13, 2011 Center for American Progress
Even though Senate Republicans banned earmarks in November, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) promised yesterday afternoon that he will find a way to circumvent that ban in order get his pet project funded, even if it means voting against the short-term continuing resolution Congress is now considering to fund the government:
Graham said there are plans to put language in the continuing budget resolution for the current year authorizing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to spend some of its own money so the study is not delayed further.
It will not mention Charleston specifically or include a dollar amount but Graham says corps officials told him they could put in between $50,000 and $100,000.
“The state is ready to write the check for the rest tomorrow. We just need to get the corps authorization to spend the money,” he said, adding he will oppose any continuing budget without the provision.
3-15-11 Think Progress
jm
August 23rd, 2011
9:19 am
carlosgvv – I never said the Tea Party was flawless. But to blame the fire alarm for alerting you to a fire, even though it is noisy, annoying, and sometimes obnoxious, doesn’t mean you just go turn off the fire alarm.
Instead, you go put out the fire.
Mr. POTUS Punt hasn’t done anything of the sort.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
9:19 am
jm
As I said, I give them credit for bringing the issue to the forefront. But, as so often happens, pushing further and further turns non-TP support to alienation.
Did you see the WSJ editorial posted earlier on the differences in attitudes regarding the economy and government over the past few years? Those were some very good points to consider.
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
9:20 am
Bookman is of course, correct. But, the alternative is far worse – knee jerk, bleeding heart, arrogant, elitest, intolerant, nanny-state benevolent tyranny offered by the liberal democrats. I still hitch my wagon to republicans. Gingrey has done a great job for me personally, but I’d like to get rid of my state Senator, who is a turd no matter what way he turns. So, all you old democrats out there – still think getting rid of the Rebel Battle flag was a WISE maneuver for YOU or your voters? What a bunch of maroons.
Terd Fergesun
August 23rd, 2011
9:20 am
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:13 am
The Tea Party has NO SEATS anywhere. The Tea Party doesn’t exist as a party, only as a far right wing of the Republican Party. They are loud and obnoxious, but they are a minority of the party and do not have their OWN party. They are, as Michele Bachmann probably thinks, just infiltrating.
Adam, that kool-aid is going to taste real bitter in November 2012 for you. have the Suicide Hot Line Number handy, you will want the help. Obama, the gift that keeps giving to Republicans everyday.
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
9:20 am
Hmm, Jay, never remember seeing you write something similar about the Ga. Dems over the past 150 years.
Well, James, you misremember then. When the Dems held power here, I was a harsh critic of their actions on ethics and other issues. Speaker Murphy, for example, would not talk with me, and Roy Barnes and I had several memorable disputes on matters such as the Outer Perimeter and other things.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
9:21 am
jm
Didn’t finish. Regarding a plan, seems to me when one has a political movement, not just an individual, but a movement pouring money and resources into getting ‘their’ candidate elected, that they have a responsibility to do more than complain. Like say, specifically, how we fix things. Especially when they ridicule their opponents (like Pres Obama) for not living up to their standards.
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
9:22 am
daedalus – please explain how the previous 5 DECADES of Democratic controlled Georgia did so much better? BS, buddy.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
9:23 am
Hey WOODSTOCK MIKE……do you ever read Kyle Wingfield’s blog ?….he did a piece on the under age sex trade in the Atlanta Area….. seems the culprits have a distinct demographic.
Rich older Republican males….. he said it not me !
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:23 am
Terd: Adam, that kool-aid is going to taste real bitter in November 2012 for you.
I don’t drink kool-aid. But it seems to me you are drunk on the TEA.
spaceman109
August 23rd, 2011
9:23 am
hey turd….while i cannot prove it without access to insider information, i am absolutely convinced that the tea party is wholly owned and operated by karl rove’s group…..american crossroads.
Manchurian-Kenyan Candidate
August 23rd, 2011
9:24 am
Thought I repost my moderated comment since Jay has let me play again…thx Jay
Cocky? You want cocky??
Cocky was 10 years ago when the Dem controlled legislature drew that ridiculous doughnut shaped district to pack it with Democrats…..now THAT was cocky. This stuff by Repubs is typical “to the victor goes the spoils”
Remember….”Elections have consequences”…..now, I wonder who said that……hmmmm…..can’t quite put my finger on that one….
“Hope and Change is now……NOT MY FAULT!!”
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
9:24 am
So, all you old democrats out there – still think getting rid of the Rebel Battle flag was a WISE maneuver for YOU or your voters
Boy that’s telling us….why I remember Sonny promised to bring it back….how did that work out for you?
It was a smart move then and remains a smart move…and yet you continue to fall for the silliness of the Republicans that knew it was a smart move, but played you and then failed you…..
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
9:24 am
Peter
“Perhaps you have not been paying attention……”
You might want to be careful with tossing that about.
“.that was directly from Dick Cheney’s office”
To which office are you referring?
Don't Forget
August 23rd, 2011
9:24 am
The original tea part was a single act. It made a statement and then the participants melted back into society. The current “tea party” bears little resemblence to its namesake.
Jefferson
August 23rd, 2011
9:25 am
So where are the good GOP ? Why do they allow this?
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
9:25 am
Hey Paul….where do you think those contracts came from ?
Who’s office wrote those ?
Why would I be careful about stating a fact ?
jm
August 23rd, 2011
9:26 am
Everyone sitting in the I-285 parking lot is sure wishing that outer perimeter had been built…..
Paul 9:21 – of course one can’t just complain. But can Joe Plumber articulate, and write legislation saying how Medicare needs to be fixed and reformed? Of course not.
Paul Ryan put a plan forward and all he was given in return was a constant roasting. Don’t preach to me how there are no plans. Plans have been put forward but head in the sand liberals seem to think the party never ends and spend like drunken sailors on Obama supplied cocaine.
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
9:26 am
Paul – YOU REALIZE that Texas VOTES every year whether or NOT to remain in the union, no? Texas was previously an independent country, so secession there is not so far fetched.
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
9:28 am
Paddy O, the people now in charge of Georgia as Republicans are in effect the same people — in fact, given that Nathan Deal and Sonny Perdue were once Democrats, they are LITERALLY the same people in many cases — who ran Georgia prior to 2000.
Not much has changed except changing D to R and ending the power structure’s unhappy, temporary marriage of convenience with black Georgia Democrats that the previous system forced upon them.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:28 am
jm: Paul Ryan put a plan forward and all he was given in return was a constant roasting
1) Is Paul Ryan part of the Tea Party? It’s really hard to tell sometimes who is and who isn’t
2) So if a plan is presented, and rejected, stop trying?
USinUK
August 23rd, 2011
9:29 am
“still think getting rid of the Rebel Battle flag was a WISE maneuver for YOU or your voters”
doing the right thing does not always = doing the popular thing
changing the GA flag was then and is now still the right thing to do.
even Denmark Groover said so before he died.
philosopher
August 23rd, 2011
9:29 am
The Georgia state motto: “Don’t confuse me with the facts.” I simply cannot understand such an incredible allegiance to ignorance. I understand the good ol’ boy” politicians reliance on it…it keeps them in power and in control…I just don’t get WANTING to remain completely and totally clueless and uneducated.
Darwin
August 23rd, 2011
9:29 am
You get the type of government you vote for. Georgia and the rest of the deep south has become Texas. White voters care only about two things: Low taxes and keeping their guns. The Repubs understand this psyche only too well. As long as the “other” party stays inclusive to all races, the Repubs will continue to dominate. Does this sound racist? You be the judge.
jm
August 23rd, 2011
9:30 am
Plans:
1. Obama’s Deficit Commission plan (DOA after Obama himself ignored it)
2. Paul Ryan reform
3. Gang of Six plan (delayed but irrelevant after POTUS pulled the rug out from under them)
4. Obama’s informal deficit team prior to debt ceiling raise: result, pathetic immaterial changes and more punting
5. New 12 member deficit team; prognosis: not good
Why so much of this garbage? Because the POTUS doesn’t know how to lead on issues of huge importance. He’s just Bush 2.0: hand out more goodies (ARRA, Health “reform”) but don’t do anything to fix our financial situation.
Sean
August 23rd, 2011
9:30 am
Humm..
Yeah… but all these indiscretions are dont really effect people. Also they are Republicans.. so the only way they will be voted out are the following..
1) They would have to kill someone
2) They would have a baby out of wedlock
3) They would have to suggest a tax increase
4) Support a rail line
5) Be seen smiling in a picture with gay people.
6) Support someone to have an abortion
After that no one cares. The 1.4billion the FDIC had to bail out to GA banks.. well its all funny money.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
9:31 am
FINALLY!!
It only took several dozen deflections, non-apologies, misdirections and red herrings but FINALLY a Republican with the courage to admit the obvious and with a backbone to speak the truth about the abysmal failings of these imperious frauds..
Sally, you are a breath of fresh air upon a squalid sea of non-conservative b*llsh*t.
Thank you.
(Way to man up all you Republican men.)
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
9:31 am
carlos – you can argue a maybe point all day long. If they were so willing to allow default, they would have voted against the deal in masse, did not happen – so perhaps you have bought the propoganda. Why do you dems think that deficit spending is OK?
USinUK
August 23rd, 2011
9:32 am
Sean – said by a Democrat, but still applies: “the only way I can lose this election is if I’m caught with a dead girl or a live boy”
àrmy vet
August 23rd, 2011
9:32 am
Sad that republicans are above the law of doing the right thing.
(ir)Rational
August 23rd, 2011
9:32 am
Paddy – the imperial federal government has proven in the past, when challenged on Constitutional matters, like whether states had the right to govern themselves, that they will fight to preserve their ideal of one unified government that has control over everything you do. Of course, history has been rewritten in much of the country to change the issues of 150 years ago to something else, but that doesn’t change what was the root cause. Lincoln picked a fight, and nearly lost it several times, yet because he didn’t, the people that were defending their rights were the ones branded as traitors. Well, like they say, history is written by the victors.
Oh-well. Who is John Galt?
jm
August 23rd, 2011
9:32 am
Oh yes. Forgot. Coburn’s $9 Trillion in deficit cutting plan also came out.
The reason nothing gets done is Senate Dem roadblocking do-nothing cro-magnons (Reid among others). Oh, and a do nothing POTUS.
USinUK
August 23rd, 2011
9:33 am
“Why do you dems think that deficit spending is OK?”
ever heard of Ronnie Reagan??? Patron Saint of deficit spending.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
9:33 am
Hey Paul, Why don’t you tell us what happened at the Energy meetings when Enron and the cronies showed up to create the Energy policy for America ?
There was allot of transparency there wasn’t there ?
Jefferson
August 23rd, 2011
9:34 am
The current flag is the flag of the Confederacy…
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
9:34 am
“ever heard of Ronnie Reagan??? Patron Saint of deficit spending.”
So that would make Obama the All Mightly One of deficit spending
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
9:34 am
Jay – that is SOMEWHAT true. Many of the repubs were here prior to the flag change that removed the veil from yellow dog democrats’ eyes. Also, if you genuinely believe that statement, then your article is actually arguing that the repubs need to flush the old repub-dem guys down the toilet & elect genuine repubs, yes?
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
9:35 am
Peter
When you said cost-plus contracts came out of Dick Cheney’s office, I asked ‘which office’? He’s held several..
Your 9:25 attempt at diversion indicates you really haven’t a grasp of the fact.
Cost-plus contracts go back decade. They were widely used in WWI (and Dick Cheney was not SecDef then, as we didn’t have a Defense Department then). So it couldn’t have been that office. They have their place, as do firm-fixed price. Both have advantages and disadvantages.
You can read more about them in the Federal Acquisiton Regulation (FAR).
https://www.acquisition.gov/far/
You’ll have to go to earlier versions, or check other sources, if you want more historical background.
And you’ll find it didn’t originate in Dick Cheney’s office.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
9:36 am
Who is the Tea Party? The Daily Show explains!
carlosgvv
August 23rd, 2011
9:37 am
jm
Being more than willing to let America go into default is not “alerting you to a fire”. It is letting the building burn down.
jm
August 23rd, 2011
9:37 am
ok, gotta go now that I’ve refuted a few liberal lies
cheerio
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
9:37 am
Larry, if you want to debate the issues, please do so. But don’t make it personal.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:37 am
jm: That is a crap argument on leadership. Not only have you forgotten any of the other plans Obama offered that were accepted and helped (some of these in his “list of accomplishments”) you also assert he has done nothing to attempt to fix our financial situation.
On jobs, Obama has helped to increase job creation.
On finances, Obama has set up a Consumer Protection Agency (which Republicans are blocking LEADERSHIP of).
On business, Obama proposed WAAAAAAY back to eliminate useless regulation, and now is making good after the study was completed.
On foreign policy (ignoring for the moment the idea of “the ends justify the means”) Obama has employed a strategy called “leading from behind” by his OWN TEAM, and it worked way better than the Yosemite Sam tactic of Iraq and Afghanistan. In addition, he authorized the mission to kill Osama bin Laden, in a way that was suggested to him be advisers as the most definitive way to deal with the problem. Both were decisions that were decisive.
The list goes on, and to say he has NO leadership is just intellectually dishonest.
USinUK
August 23rd, 2011
9:37 am
Talking – not quite. heck, neither Obama OR Uncle Ronnie hold a candle to W (who also left his dad in the shade when it came to racking up debt)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_debt_by_U.S._presidential_terms
lovelyliz
August 23rd, 2011
9:38 am
It’s becasue the Republicans screw up/commit fraud with the correct version of Jesus in what should be their hearts so it’s all forgivable.
Tech '10
August 23rd, 2011
9:38 am
Dang and it’s only August… Looks like what is needed more is for voters to pay more attention to what their elected PUBLIC SERVANTS are up to… but that would be asking way to much, huh?
jm
August 23rd, 2011
9:38 am
carlosgvv – ah, so a minority of the Republican party is at fault for potentially letting the government default? right……
out
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
9:38 am
Paddy O, Perdue and Deal are as genuine as any other Republicans.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
9:39 am
“ok, gotta go now that I’ve refuted a few liberal lies”
Some people are such champions in their own minds.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
9:39 am
“If they were so willing to allow default, they would have voted against the deal in masse, did not happen –”
66….a mess or en masse?
Libertarian
August 23rd, 2011
9:39 am
“changing the GA flag was then and is now still the right thing to do”
Ah, yes….and they changed it from one confederate flag to another. People are just too ill-informed to realize that fact.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
9:39 am
So Paul what you are saying is the “Cost Plus Contracts ” for the Iraq War were not created in Dick Cheney’s office ?
Or are you saying that bilking the Treasury was a thing they did in the past, so Republican’s should feel badly about repeating it ?
USinUK
August 23rd, 2011
9:39 am
Bosch – 9:39 – well, someone has to love jm … it might as well be him.
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
9:40 am
USinUK,
The national debt has increased $4,247,000,000,000 in just 945 days. That’s the fastest increase under any president ever.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/08/obama-national-debt.html
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:40 am
(ir)Rational: that they will fight to preserve their ideal of one unified government that has control over everything you do.
Hyperbole much? Do tell me how you don’t benefit from a national currency, national military force, national commerce (think Amazon and any business that wants to export to other states), LOCAL and state police and LOCAL fire, etc etc.
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
9:41 am
USinUK – HOW? Because in your asinine idealist world you convinced YOURSELF (please tell us when your relatives responded to call by THEIR STATE to arms, and how many were killed in that effort!) that the symbol was a symbol for hate & oppression? Most white folk, yellow dog demos believed it was for heritage – once the moron Barnes spit in their face, they put their boot so far up his ass, he still walks funny a decade a later. YOU seem to like to win a pyrrhic victory while losing the war – that constitutes leadership in your liberal universe? (It would explain Obamas victory)
jm
August 23rd, 2011
9:41 am
Adam 9:37
Only a liberal could possibly think “leading from behind” is leadership. how funny
I was referring to the tough financial issues. Not the pass punt easy issues Obama has nominally taken on. Easy to hand out candy. Obama hasn’t served up any vegetables yet. And that’s what leadership is about.
Politi Cal
August 23rd, 2011
9:41 am
Georgia Democrats held Georgia in an iron grip for decades and decades. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, boy, how them Dems can yell!!
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:41 am
Libertarian: Ah, yes….and they changed it from one confederate flag to another. People are just too ill-informed to realize that fact.
It’s all optics
USinUK
August 23rd, 2011
9:42 am
Libertarian – this was the GA flag during the Civil War http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Georgia_non_official.svg
while the new one incorporates this flag into the design, I don’t think you can say that it’s the same flag any more than you can say that the Australian flag is the Union Jack.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
9:42 am
Surely, Jay, you’re not trying to imply that *only* Republicans have “Ethical missteps, bad judgment, failure to govern”? A host of recent counter-examples says otherwise.
However, I am with you on some of these. Elected officials should be expected to be held to high ethical standards. No elected or appointed official should be allowed to operate outside the law or beyond the ethical standards expected and appropriate structures and measures should be in place to allow the public to be made aware of breaches and penalties for (major, intentional) violations should include impeachment and removal from their position.
This has nothing to do with the party of the politicians.
glacialspeed
August 23rd, 2011
9:42 am
If the Republican Speaker is being bought off by advocates for high-speed rail, I actually don’t think that’s a bad thing. A little more of that kind of corruption and we might get somewhere on transit.
Don't Tread
August 23rd, 2011
9:42 am
Let’s rewind to 2009:
Democrats have gotten cocky. They have come to feel invulnerable and complacent, convinced that their constituents’ intense dislike of Republican policies at the national level has given them a free hand to do as they wish, without consequence or backlash.
Ethical missteps, bad judgment, failure to govern — they believe that none of it matters as long as those magic words “George W. Bush” retain the power to distract and anger voters.
Once politicians feel themselves unaccountable, there’s no telling what they might do.
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
9:42 am
Darwin – i realize you need to demonize your opponent, but this perception of your opponent that is SO far off the mark will allow you to continue to be marginalized. Democratic voters rejected Cathy Cos for fat boy Mark. I would have voted for Cathy, not fat boy.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
9:43 am
OK Politi Cal …. Please tell us all the good things that happened for Georgia while Sonny was in charge….Please hold off on the “Rain Prayer Meeting”….cause I don’t think the rain came because of that !
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:43 am
jm: Only a liberal could possibly think “leading from behind” is leadership. how funny
No, only a conservative can take words and twist them into something entirely different.
But do tell me, what does “leading from behind” mean? Seems to me you guys just use it as a phrase, focusing on the idea that any leadership that isn’t the General taking his sword and charging the enemy FIRST is bad leadership.
Winning shows strength. Winning without fighting shows true skill.
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
9:43 am
MPercy, I agree with you on that.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:44 am
jm: I was referring to the tough financial issues.
Such as?
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
9:44 am
jm 9:26
The only Republican plan I’m aware of was Sen Ryan’s, and he’s not a Tea Party elected official.
Tea Partiers backed and won election of a significant number of Congressmen. They’ve been at odds not just with Pres Obama, but with Spkr Boehner.
They’re good at saying ‘no.’ Not so good at giving specifics.
Kinda like Michelle Bachmann.
It just indicates to me they are not ready, have not matured enough, to take the reins of power in a true leadership role.
PaddyO
“Paul – YOU REALIZE that Texas VOTES every year whether or NOT to remain in the union, no? Texas was previously an independent country, so secession there is not so far fetched.”
I do? My fellow Texans do?
What ballot initiative was that I’ve been marking all these years?
And WHERE did you come by this fact?
Jefferson
August 23rd, 2011
9:45 am
Congress spend the money, they have to pass spending. If you have a problem with spending, congress is your target.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
9:46 am
Isn’t the difference really the GOP always seem to want to mix Religion and politics, along with “Moral Judgement ” ?
WOODSTOCK MIKE
August 23rd, 2011
9:46 am
“On jobs, Obama has helped to increase job creation.”
This comment above shows how dillusional people can really become when talking politics… If a Republican was in office Democrats would say the administration is doing horrible at creating jobs, but when you talk to a Democrat about Obama they say he’s doing very well at creating jobs, so funny…
Libertarian
August 23rd, 2011
9:47 am
USinUK
What I’m saying is the CURRENT Georgia flag looks almost exactly like the first national flag of the confederacy.
Aquagirl
August 23rd, 2011
9:48 am
White voters care only about two things: Low taxes and keeping their guns.
That’s exactly how 14 year old Grover Norquist came up with his pledge. Really. He wanted to know “‘He won’t raise my taxes and he won’t steal my guns. Got it” And this is the deep thinking behind the teanuts.
Jefferson
August 23rd, 2011
9:48 am
Amazing that the future can be predicted if different things happened, wow.
WOODSTOCK MIKE
August 23rd, 2011
9:48 am
“Isn’t the difference really the GOP always seem to want to mix Religion and politics, along with “Moral Judgement ” ?
Maybe Obama should stop saying, “God Bless America” after his speeches?? Democrats would be happier…
(ir)Rational
August 23rd, 2011
9:48 am
Adam – Did I say there weren’t benefits to government? I don’t remember saying that, and I went back and read what I did say, and couldn’t find it. Maybe you can translate what I said so that I can understand it? Wait, no I said it, so I should know what I meant. Maybe not though?
Anyway, having a military, currency, and the ability to buy things from other states, as well as local and state police and everything aren’t exactly what I was driving at. I’m talking about a government that has grown so “powerful” (in their own minds) that they decide they have the right to tell you what products and services you have to buy, what property you are allowed to own, what you are allowed to do on that property, ect. Where does it end? Are we going to wake up in a few years with the Congress passing a law that says what tv stations we’re allowed to watch, and how we’re allowed to dress when we leave the house? I’m simply stating that maybe, just maybe, the people in government should try reading the Constitution, and understanding it, and then following it without trying to stretch it until they are able (in their minds) to have it cover what they want it to cover.
Oh-well. Who is John Galt?
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
9:48 am
Adam, come on. We all know that General Lee took sword in hand and led the troops into battle at Gettysburg, just as General Eisenhower was the first ashore at D-Day.
tom
August 23rd, 2011
9:49 am
Yes I am moving to another state for many reasons. Of course I will not miss the incompetence of the City of Atlanta officials and the State guys and gals are worse. I blame the voters for being so tolerant of a bunch of losers. They deserve those that they elect.
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
9:49 am
US – you know that Bush 2 spent like a Democrat, just like Clinton voted to approved 2 items which were positively republican (NAFTA & MFN for CHINA). Bush 2’s TARP (which saved the business that the SEC of TREAS ran before taking over treasury), plus the poorly planned & ineffective STIMULUS, is what prompted the creation of the TEA party. NOT just Obama’s spending addiction. Those who like to demonize your opponent (intolerant liberal) should realize that inconvenient truth.
stands for decibels
August 23rd, 2011
9:49 am
Off topic, but if you’ve ever asked yourself, “hey, self–
“what kind of a jerk would be joyful at the prospect of stock prices being depressed for decades, potentially making life miserable for millions of Americans who scrimped and saved in order to supplement their retirement plans that had been whacked coming and going?
(where the “coming” would be due to defined benefits being pulled out from under them a coupla decades back, and the “going” would be from this “shared sacrifice” Super-Congress crap that will probably hinge upon Americans making do with less of a SS benefit than they’d planned in order to provide continued tax breaks to billionaires)–
“…to the point of posting a little smiley-face next to the link to that story?”
Ever ask yourself that? Well, you’ll find the answer @ 8.46.
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
9:50 am
MPercy: “Surely, Jay, you’re not trying to imply that *only* Republicans have “Ethical missteps, bad judgment, failure to govern”? A host of recent counter-examples says otherwise.”
The whole point is that the notion of bipartisanship is just a joke, a clever fiction that is used to manipulate the masses, who believe (especially the further South of the Mason Dixon line you go) that there’s a substantive difference between Democrat and Republican.
A nice little fable, that. And one that works like a charm. Never mind that we have a center right president of the other party who often out-Republicans the Republicans in his cutting zeal. The lock on power by the ruling class is made virtually air-tight through its control of the two major US parties of big business.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
9:50 am
“…genuine repubs…”
Must be the Georgia state version of the ten year too late, sudden realization by the party faithful that GWB (and gang) was no conservative and not a “genuine repub”, huh?…
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
9:50 am
Bosch, don’t make it personal.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
9:51 am
Wow the things Paul does not know about Texas. Hey sport, you should move there sometime to learn something…. oh wait.
When someone discovers that both Texas and California were part of Mexico in the past, there will be hell to pay. The evidence is in the basement of the Alamo.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
9:51 am
“Isn’t the difference really the GOP always seem to want to mix Religion and politics, along with “Moral Judgement ” ?”
Peter,
I was reflecting on something along those lines yesterday whilest stuck in ATL traffic admiring the regal beauty of the King and Queen buildings off 285.
It was along the lines of this. You hear quite often here on the blog (and forgive me, but this is off topic) that Islam isn’t really a religion it is more of a movement that involves politics, etc. And I was struck at how hypocritical that is when you have mostly GOP politicians (and political movements like the Tea Party) who want to integrate Christian ideals into existing policy and law.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
9:52 am
Peter
Your original post was “The Republican’s came up with “Cost Plus Contracts”.”
I asked “So now the career federal acquisition employees are identified by one political party?”
To which you responded “Perhaps you have not been paying attention…….that was directly from Dick Cheney’s office……. the concept of paying too much for lesser work…”
So of course I asked ‘which office?” and gave a brief history of cost-plus contract and directed you to the Federal Acquisition Regulations.
And now your grand response is about the Iraq War?
I’m going to a football game this weekend. I sure hope they don’t move the goalposts as much as you do.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:52 am
WOODSTOCK: Not so. During the first few years, Bush assisted in job creation himself. My overall opinion is that much of the deregulation and tax incentives over time, however, were squandered and not used for the purpose of job creation in the end, allowing for a net loss. Now we have a situation where the economy is struggling and people are fearful to create jobs, or leave their existing jobs. This has been mitigated slightly by policies that were as direct as possible, the stimulus and government jobs. Yet, private job increases have topped government job increases overall. Net loss of government jobs, net gain of private sector. Now, to be fair, when you start with job losses going into the basement, there’s nowhere to go but up.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
9:53 am
jm,
Since your back after a one-two minute leave, would you like to share all the “liberal lies” you exposed?
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:53 am
Jay: Adam, come on. We all know that General Lee took sword in hand and led the troops into battle at Gettysburg, just as General Eisenhower was the first ashore at D-Day.
AHAHAHA love it….
Honestly though, that kind of thing only works in movies.
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
9:53 am
Adam – on leadership – STIMULUS being aimed at shovel ready projects – which any local government official with 2 years of experience could tell you DO NOT EXIST – is that your notion of a well seasoned, expert decision on how to blow 750 billion? or, were you not addressing GOOD leadership?
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
9:54 am
jm
thank you for the wonderful compliment to President Obama on leading from behind!
Leading from behind
A growing number of companies are finding that listening to and empowering employees is a strategy for success
Dallas Business Journal – by Margaret Allen , Staff Writer
Date: Sunday, November 28, 2004, 11:00pm
I do think that like the unfortunate term “tea bagger”, most righties
are spouting the phrase “leading from behind” without understanding what it means.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
9:54 am
“Leading from behind”.
The newest entry in the ever-growing tome of Republican bumper sticker-speak and empty sloganeering…
(ir)Rational
August 23rd, 2011
9:54 am
USinUK – using the official flag of the Confederate States of America as the basis of your flag is what Libertarian was referring to. It is, in essence the same as what everyone was so upset about, but so many people ignorantly believe that the Confederate Battle Flag was the official flag.
Oh-well. Who is John Galt?
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:56 am
(ir)Rational: they decide they have the right to tell you what products and services you have to buy, what property you are allowed to own, what you are allowed to do on that property, ect.
Can you point to federal laws that focus on this? Because most of the laws I know of that reflect this kind of mentality are municipal.
JOE C00L
August 23rd, 2011
9:56 am
Morning ALL,
Not sure if im late on this one, but:
“NJ GOP lawmaker quit over wife’s racist email to Carl Lewis”
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — A freshman Republican lawmaker resigned because his wife sent “an offensive and racist” email to the Democratic state Senate campaign of nine-time Olympic gold medalist Carl Lewis, a GOP official acknowledged Monday.
Pat Delany stepped down from the state Assembly this month and said he wouldn’t seek a full term in November because of his wife’s missive to Lewis’ campaign, Burlington County Republican Chairman Bill Layton said. Delany originally cited an unspecified family issue as the reason for his abrupt resignation.
Delany and his wife, Jennifer Delany, are white. Lewis, a political novice who’s among the greatest athletes of all time, is black.
Jennifer Delany’s email to Lewis’ campaign said, in part, “Imagine having dark skin and name recognition and the nerve to think that equaled knowing something about politics.”
WOW…the nerve of that Carl Lewis….(sarcasm)
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
9:57 am
Jay @9:43 am MPercy, I agree with you on that.
Well, then why this article? It surely wasn’t written from the perspective I just espoused and with which you just agreed.
I appreciate that your covering local issues in this case, but your slant was “Republicans are bad, see how they’re being unethical!” rather than “Unethical politicians are bad, and some local politicians are being unethical.” The fact that they are Rs is immaterial, really, as I hope (naively perhaps) that you would be saying the same reasonable things if all of the above had Ds behind their names. I don’t recall that to be the case, though, but my attention wasn’t really focused on what you were writing about back in Roy Barnes or Zell Miller (and I didn’t live in Georgia before those guys) so *maybe* you were.
I’m sure if we wait awhile, we’ll have some state Ds do something stupid as above and we’ll get a chance to see how you handle that.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
9:57 am
“is that your notion of a well seasoned, expert decision on how to blow 750 billion?”
Paddy O, I guess the Irish don’t know that one-third of the stimulus was tax cuts.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
9:58 am
Paddy O: Adam – on leadership – STIMULUS being aimed at shovel ready projects – which any local government official with 2 years of experience could tell you DO NOT EXIST – is that your notion of a well seasoned, expert decision on how to blow 750 billion?
1) The amount spent on jobs was far less than 750 billion from the stimulus package
2) The stimulus isn’t the ONLY thing Obama has done to help job creation
3) I never said anything about “shovel ready”
Good little liberal
August 23rd, 2011
9:58 am
I find it interesting that after three years of horrible policies that have driven our economy into the ground, now the President is claiming to do what the Republicans have been say all along and liberals consider that leadership. They also say that it hasn’t been the president’s fault for the failing economy, so now that he is promising to do the opposite of what he has been doing, he is being cheered by the Democrats for making real efforts to fix the economy. So what has he been doing for three years that was supposed to be such great job creating policies?
It is staggering.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
10:00 am
Left wing management 9:50 am MPercy: “Surely, Jay, you’re not trying to imply that *only* Republicans have “Ethical missteps, bad judgment, failure to govern”? A host of recent counter-examples says otherwise.” The whole point is that the notion of bipartisanship is just a joke, a clever fiction that is used to manipulate the masses, who believe (especially the further South of the Mason Dixon line you go) that there’s a substantive difference between Democrat and Republican.
I’m not espousing any bipartisanship. I’ve been voting straight L for many years now, so my horse is not hitched to either Rs or Ds wagon. My point, which Jay agreed with, is that we all (in all parties) should expect all politicians (regardless of their party) to abide by high ethical standards.
That is, this issues is not both an R and D thing (bipartisan) it’s neither R nor D should be be given a pass.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
10:00 am
GLL: I find it interesting that after three years of horrible policies that have driven our economy into the ground
A positive GDP growth of 3.x% is “Driving our economy into the ground.” Got it.
lynnie gal
August 23rd, 2011
10:00 am
Republicans will stay in power in GA as long as education is in such sorry shape in this state. Why do you think Republicans have been trying for so long to cut funds for education? Ignorance guarantees their base will flourish. The irony is that these ignorant southern goobers are the very people hurt by Republican policies. Now, that’s rich.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:01 am
Peter
You should know fixed-price contracts (several variants) provide payment of costs to a certain limit plus a certain profit. Cost-plus (several variants) provide a certain payment regardless of fixed expenses.
Cost-plus are usually used in an emergency or war situation where the government is unable to specify the specifics of what it needs, the quantity or the time frame. If the government can’t do that, they have not fulfilled their legal responsibilities for fixed price. Then the gov’t goes to cost-plus, as lives are at stake.
As time goes by, officials may or may not decide to transition to a fixed price. But not always. Which is why the Obama Administration has continued to do business with the same contractors Democrats criticized the Bush Administration for using, and why the Obama Administration continues to issue cost-plus contracts.
Aquagirl
August 23rd, 2011
10:01 am
Pat Delany stepped down from the state Assembly this month and said he wouldn’t seek a full term in November because of his wife’s missive to Lewis’ campaign
That’s gotta make for some awkward moments at the dinner table.
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
10:02 am
(ir)Rational, you make a good point, if accidentally.
The current state flag DOES resemble the Confederate flag, and yet most people aren’t bothered by that fact yet were very upset at the previous flag. Why would that be?
The answer is that the previous flag, bearing the Cross of St. Andrew, had become a symbol not of the Confederacy but of segregation now, segregation forever. Racists had taken that symbol and made it their own, and those same racists incorporated it into the Georgia state flag for racist reasons.
It wasn’t the association with things that happened 150 years ago that doomed the previous flag. It was the association with racist causes within the memory of many people living today.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
10:02 am
Joe C00L, but, but ,but, but, but…….George Wallace was a Democrat and Honest Abe a Republican!
Isn’t that proof positive?
LOL…
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
10:02 am
woodstock mike – that is accurate. as the old song says, “most held signs saying yay for my side”. If either, and Mr. Bookman accurately presents himself as a biased Democratic (ala Cynthia “I haven’t been a journalist in a decade” Turner) masquerading as a journalist – which is too bad, because generally he is a good journalist. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. Obama did a far worse job in the gulf than Bush did in NO, but he got little flack from his US press corps. Obama is a neophyte uber liberal, who when an election comes up, veers to the middle. Vote for him again at your own risk. YOUR US dollar is at risk, and we will see the long term impact of openly gay service members – if I had an option, I would not enlist.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:03 am
Hey Paul….Sounds like you are OK with Bilking the US Treasury…….and football seems to be the reason I guess.
Makes sense..no wonder the Iraq War ran over the cost projected.
john
August 23rd, 2011
10:03 am
Weekly bashing of republicans by Jay Bookman and the AUC…..CHECK!!!
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
10:03 am
Adam,
“A positive GDP growth of 3.x% is “Driving our economy into the ground.” Got it.”
Where in the world are you getting the data saying that we have 3% GDP growth?
(ir)Rational
August 23rd, 2011
10:04 am
Adam – well, there is Obamacare for one (fairly certain that is a federal law), then there is the EPA bringing out regulations stating that I’m not allowed to build a house on my property, or you’re not allowed to build a plant on yours or whatever because there is some species of newt or mouse or something like that living there, that no one ever heard of before, and that no one would have cared about had they not decided that me building on MY property was bad. Or the cases you hear about where there is a puddle in your back yard, and your house or deck casts a shadow over it, and then you’re fined because you’re “disturbing a wetland” or you’re fined because you clear out a drainage ditch and it “destroys a wetland?” Those seem like overreaches by the federal government to me. But then again, I believe that no one knows how to spend my money better than I do (with the possible exception of my wife, she seems to do a good job).
Oh-well. Who is John Galt?
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:04 am
YUP..let’s make up a WAR and Bilk the Treasury…..sounds good doesn’t it !
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
10:05 am
Jay – that statement on Ike & Lee is profound hubris. Both are recognized as great Americans & generals – if you thought that ACTUALLY should have occurred, you are deftly exposing liberal “asinine idealism”.
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
10:06 am
I can remember when it was Democrats under another Tom Murphy that acted exactly the same way in Georgia. In fact, we now have a pretemd president in the white house who is aacting like a dictator making up his own laws. I’ll worry about Republicans when Jay worries about King Obama.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
10:06 am
Yeah, irrational, I’m sure that happens just ALL the time.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:06 am
Hey Paul…… in response to this……Federal bank regulators sued 17 former directors and officers of Silverton Bank on Monday, accusing the officials of gross negligence and corporate waste in the biggest bank failure in Georgia history.
So was the Silverton Bank run by Republican’s or Democrat’s ?
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:07 am
Keep Up
“The evidence is in the basement of the Alamo.”
I’ve been to the Alamo. Didn’t see a basement. But I did see these guys with tattoos on the back of their index fingers who prevent people from going to a certain part of the Alamo… and they spoke some strange language among themselves…. and they hardly ever blinked…….
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
10:07 am
Bashing – Republispeak for exposing criminal negligence and malfeasance.
Damn the facts! Full speed ahead! ~David Farragut VI (Ga – R)
(ir)Rational
August 23rd, 2011
10:08 am
Jay – I understood that before, but it was possibly a mistake that I made the point now. If people that look at the Confederate Battle Flag and think about the history of it, they can’t be selective in their history and should realize that it was hijacked and used as a symbol of repression, racism and segregation. I have no problems with it not being used now, but it amuses me when people are so excited that they were able to “remove” the Confederate flag from the state flag.
Oh-well. Who is John Galt?
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:08 am
Peter
You assume incorrectly.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
10:08 am
Bosch @9:51 am “Isn’t the difference really the GOP always seem to want to mix Religion and politics, along with “Moral Judgement ” ?”
Quite. And the primary reason I have not supported Republicans in some time. I want a small efficient government that does what is clearly Constitutional, is prudent and affordable. A certain level of taxes is necessary to attain this, but otherwise the goal should be maximizing individual liberty not government power. When an R supports a move to what I believe is a better, saner government fiscally speaking I start to get optimistic and then in the same he breath tells me how he’ll work to outlaw abortion and have gays put to death (*maybe* not literally), I just walk away shaking my head.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:10 am
Ok Paul…. then help me out please !
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:10 am
Peter
“let’s make up a WAR and Bilk the Treasury…..”
Same contract problems occurred in that not-made-up war, Afghanistan.
(ir)Rational
August 23rd, 2011
10:10 am
Bosch – whether it happens all the time or not (and there are constantly stories in the news about this endangered species or whatever causing people to not be able to use their land), the fact that it happens at all is egregious and should be cause for concern. I may sound like a conspiracy theorist when I say this, but I look at what the government has done and worry about what they might decide they are able to do next.
Oh-well. Who is John Galt?
JOE C00L
August 23rd, 2011
10:10 am
@ Amvet, but, but, but, but…MLK was a Republican..lol
@ AquaG…..the funniest part of the article was this “Delany said in a statement that he and his wife don’t share the same racial views. He said he was sorry”
WHAAAAAAT??? You dont, but you married a woman with racist views???
BUT, But, But……….LOL.
Sad part about that whole thing, is she really showed the true deep down sentiments of what the GOP base feel or think. Hell, ITS CARL Mutha F’n Lewis….what, this man isn’t “PATRIOT” enough?
SAD!
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
10:11 am
Bosch – I assumed it was only 25%, it is widely reported that the STIMULUS cost a trillion. However, you avoided the subject quite nicely. Thank you.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:11 am
Peter 10:06
“So was the Silverton Bank run by Republican’s or Democrat’s ?”
do you make rabbit holes for a living?
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:11 am
Well it seems guys went into battle with out the proper equipment…so what did that non bidding do to help them out ?
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
10:12 am
Paddy O: Obama did a far worse job in the gulf than Bush did in NO, but he got little flack from his US press corps.
Oh big mistake. You see, this is the very issue that got me into politics in the first place.
Put simply: You are wrong. Obama didn’t do WORSE in the gulf. First of all, the two events (Katrina and the oil leak) are not equivalent. Secondly, the executive branch, which takes orders from the President, was there ON THE SPOT like they were supposed to be, and did everything they could to save everyone possible from the initial explosion, and later the oil leak itself. The criticism started with “Obama should have been there sooner” then he came down and people said “Why isnt’ he dealing with other issues?” Then the criticism was we shouldn’t have allowed BP so much leeway in cleaning up their own mess, so then the Coast Guard took the lead and all the criticism was on them instead, and by close extension, the President. Then the criticism was on having a moratorium on new drilling until the cause of the accident could be determined. That was a decisive and prudent decision by the President, but was reviled by critics who were focused more on immediate oil drilling jobs than on the future safety of the entire Gulf region.
The fact is that Obama made very prudent and decisive decisions regarding that event, an it showed TREMENDOUS leadership at that time, even if local people, far too dependent on offshore drilling work, didn’t like the short term result. Obama was blamed for no reason.
Bush mishandled the Katrina mess through FEMA, another government agency that had been rolled up into DHS and determined by many on the right to be “useless.” His crony in charge at the time did a “heckuvajob” according to Bush, but left many in New Orleans stuck in the Superdome for days on end with no way out. Light assistance from outside groups arrived before FEMA did, and this was touted by Bush as a good handling of the situation. That is what he was criticized, rightly, for mishandling about the situation.
Do you want me to go on, or do you want to concede that you don’t know what you’re talking about there?
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
10:13 am
Adam – OBAMA’S stimulus, which he sponsored, DID say something about ‘SHOVEL READY”. The fact that he was ignorant of the profound LACK of that type of project indicates how much of a novice he was. THAT WAS BAD, HORRIFIC LEADERSHIP.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:13 am
Hey Paul..no answer to the original question, so you decide that Alice in Wonder land is a good escape ? ?
boots
August 23rd, 2011
10:14 am
Bookman acts as if any corruption or ethical lapses started 10 years ago when the Republicans took over control of the state after 140 years of Democratic rule. Neither group is innocent – even today. Yet Bookman writes as if it is one-sided corruption. Well, Jay, I have news for you – both sides are corrupt and look out for themselves. Your type of writing only compounds the problem. Speak the truth: both parties are selfish and are spending this country in to major trouble by buying power and votes. Meanwhile, we have “leaders” like Waters and Biden calling normal citizens who have the guts to stand up for this nation “terrorists,” “thugs,” and telling us we can “go straight to hell.” Now, there is some civil discourse for you. Meanwhile, Obama shoots out of a sand bunker while Rome burns…
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
10:15 am
MPercy: “I’m not espousing any bipartisanship. I’ve been voting straight L for many years now, so my horse is not hitched to either Rs or Ds wagon. My point, which Jay agreed with, is that we all (in all parties) should expect all politicians (regardless of their party) to abide by high ethical standards.”
Well I would not disagree with that. But I would point out that the standards of ethical conduct you’re referring to are of little value without economic justice, and there can be no economic justice when the political system is absolutely dominated by a ruling class that is waging war against the workers, the middle class, and those at the lower end of the economic scale. Why would Georgia Republicans worry about something as trifling as minor ethical matters when they’re on a mission to consolidate control on behalf of the moneyed interests for whom they are the agents?
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
10:15 am
“the fact that it happens at all is egregious and should be cause for concern”
I doubt the accuracy of it happening enough for such an outrage against the policy itself and to bring such condemnation against an entire Federal agency.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
10:16 am
“However, you avoided the subject quite nicely”
Like the way I brought it up to begin with?
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:16 am
Peter
As I wrote years ago, it’s not a Republican or Democratic issue. It’s more the nature of the federal bureaucracy.
As far as body armor and up-armored Humvees, you may be more on point to point fingers to career military officers, general officer level, as well as their career civilian equivalent, who put such items at a low priority and funded other programs instead.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:16 am
Paul…….Please tell us how Sonny the last governor doubled his personal wealth while governor, and the entire country was in recession.
Obama is a war monger
August 23rd, 2011
10:16 am
They are getting cocky because everyone is realizing they are right. Today is Obama the war monger’s (Lybia for example) worst approval index. See Below:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
10:17 am
(ir)Rational: Please cite sources that the EPA came down and fined people for those very things. If you can, please show that this is a political move, unethical move, or a move that is just imposing a regulation for no reason. Also, please point to more than a law that hasn’t been implemented yet when referring tot he federal government as overreaching into every aspect of your life and forcing you to buy services (plural) and products (plural).
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:18 am
Paul……..Baloney to your comment…the Cost Plus Contracts were written via Cheney’s office….. for the Iraq War.
Aquagirl
August 23rd, 2011
10:18 am
ITS CARL Mutha F’n Lewis….what, this man isn’t “PATRIOT” enough?
Apparently you have not heard Carl Lewis’ rendition of our national anthem. Talk about grounds for deportation…..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJLvCM4j2mg
FDawg
August 23rd, 2011
10:18 am
I get it Jay… All Republicans are bad and all Democrats are good. Guess you forgot about some of the shenanigans from when Barnes, Murphy and crew were in charge?
(ir)Rational
August 23rd, 2011
10:18 am
Bosch – to some of us, on time is too many, but this hasn’t just happened once. And I’m not condemning an entire Federal agency, I’m condemning the over reaches by the Federal government.
Oh-well. Who is John Galt?
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
10:19 am
Paddy O: OBAMA’S stimulus, which he sponsored, DID say something about ‘SHOVEL READY”.
Please cite the part of the bill that said this. Otherwise, you’re referring to something a politician said, and ignoring the fact that I was not focused on how the jobs were PRESENTED, but how they were IMPLEMENTED.
philosopher
August 23rd, 2011
10:19 am
@(ir)Rational: Absolutely…Why in the WORLD should the government (I don’t guess this creature is a group of duly elected Americans, but some aliens who took over control of America) has any right whatever to preserve and protect the earth and the environment for the present OR the future-if it means stepping on YOUR right to do whatever the hell you please with whatever the hell you want to do with it or wherever the hell you want to do it. After all, it’s YOURS. And even though destroying the environment in your personal property might affect lots of other creatures, or creeks, or people in the long-term, YOU are what matters, and nothing and no one else. Shame on that big bad government.
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
10:19 am
“Bush mishandled the Katrina mess through FEMA”
Wrong. Katrina was mishandled by the local New Orleans and State of Louisiana governments.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
10:19 am
Blind partisan cons will vote gop no matter what the gop does.
Sad but true.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
10:20 am
Bosch: And I was struck at how hypocritical that is when you have mostly GOP politicians (and political movements like the Tea Party) who want to integrate Christian ideals into existing policy and law.
I was an early TEA party activist, back when Bush was passing TARP and Obama was planning the stimulus and Obamacare was on the horizon (my first offical TEA party event was the April 15th, 2008 protest at the state capital, but my own blogging on these issues started before the meltdown and TARP). At the time, I did not notice any religious element to the TEA party. However, that has changed as the religious right, who may otherwise naturally align with a small-government movement began to promote their other agendas alongside or even above the TEA party’s basic small-government mantra. This hijacking saddens me and means they have lost my more fervent support, and forces me to me more careful in my support.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:21 am
Yes Bush totally miss handled Katrina, and then he showed how much he cared about the typical American by not even going to see the issues.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:22 am
Peter
“.no answer to the original question, so you decide that Alice in Wonder land is a good escape ? ?”
No, you just strike me as one of those bloggers who hates all things Republican and thinks Dick Cheney had unlimited power to wreak whatever havoc he wanted for financial gain for himself and his buddies.
There’s no rational discussion in such cases. Your skipping about from cost-plus to Iraq to Georgia banks to Enron is evidence you won’t stay on topic.
This reminds me of Bill O Reilly last night. He had on Ben Stein and Mike Farrell. O Reilly said how higher tax rates would kill the economy, both guests refuted with historical examples (their point was, their is no correlation between economic growth and marginal tax rates).
O Reilly just cut the discussion and said “I don’t believe it.” Stein said “fine, give me an example” and O’Reilly changed the subject again.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
10:22 am
irrational,
It’s still seems like selective poutrage on your part. If you are so disturbed by “one time too many” for one policy and not others, then that’s a poor reflection of your policy analysis.
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
10:23 am
“I get it Jay… All Republicans are bad and all Democrats are good. Guess you forgot about some of the shenanigans from when Barnes, Murphy and crew were in charge?
No, Fdawg, I haven’t forgotten. And as I pointed out earlier, I was pretty harsh on both Murphy and Barnes. However, Murphy has been dead for four or five years now, and neither of those men has held power for roughly a decade now. So I’m a little uncertain as to the point you’re trying to make.
The errors of Democrats 10 years ago justifies GOP misbehavior today?
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:24 am
Most folks have forgotten about the FEMA Trailers, how they were polluted to the point of getting folks sick, but hey nothing happened to the builders of course…..
Republican’s said putting folks in trailers where they could get cancer is OK !
Obama is hate
August 23rd, 2011
10:24 am
I lean Democrat, but have to say I agree with you. And the sad thing is, you have only covered the things that have happened so far this year. To say the Georgia Democrat Party in power has been a disappointment is a wild understatement.
DawgDad
August 23rd, 2011
10:24 am
Perhaps if the Democrats weren’t race-baiting socialists there would be more spirited two-party competition. Alas, the most important elections in Georgia are normally the primaries.
Seriously, voters in both parties need to be very careful who they support and elect. Elected office, and government in general, is a magnet for the self-serving.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
10:24 am
“I’ll worry about Republicans when…” hell freezes over.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
10:25 am
Make that “April 15th, 200*9*” not 2008.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:25 am
Morning, Bosch
SoCom isn’t here. Do you have the magic calendar handy? What am I supposed to be today? I feel conflicted……
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:25 am
Paul this comment……….. you just strike me as one of those bloggers who hates all things Republican and thinks Dick Cheney had unlimited power to wreak whatever havoc he wanted for financial gain for himself and his buddies.
No to the first……. and a definite YES to the second. Dick Cheney is the anti Christ.
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
10:26 am
American corporations are absolutely ROLLING in cash right now. It’s almost impossible to overestimate how cash-drunk they are right now.
Corporations are sitting on enough cash to put every single unemployed American back to work for years on end. Which means the following:
Our problem is not economic, it’s political and ideological.
The fact that not a single major politician in this country with a D or a R by their name is proposing a works program right now speaks volumes about the crisis of political imagination that we face.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
10:26 am
They are getting cocky because everyone is realizing they are right. Today is Obama the war monger’s (Lybia for example) worst approval index.
Logical fallacy – Obama has low approval ratings for something so that means the opposite must be true, and Republicans, who are CLEARLY the mirror image of Obama and the truth and the light, have approval numbers that match the disapproval of Obama.
I wonder what those Republican approval numbers actually are?
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
10:26 am
MPercy,
“This hijacking saddens me and means they have lost my more fervent support, and forces me to me more careful in my support”
I think it’s safe to say that most of us would have problems with some of handlings in the Federal government, and would like to see a more efficient system. To blame it on one person, administration, or party is complete ignorance or just plain bigotry in the sense that the person is unwilling to see fault in themselves or their own beliefs.
I often said that I would be a TP, but I feel that what I want the feds to cut spending on and what a majority of self identified TPs wanted would be totally different.
It’s really just the never ending idea of what you agree with, you want continued spending, and what you don’t, you want cut. Problem is, that issue will never be resolved (IMHO).
(ir)Rational
August 23rd, 2011
10:27 am
Adam – I realize that a column listing all of them might not be sufficient for you, but that’s all I’m giving you cause I don’t have the time to do more research. I have to be in a meeting in 5 minutes. http://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2006/08/30/property_rights_attack_continues
I listed a law that will force me (assuming I haven’t already provided for myself) to buy a product that I may or may not need. I believe in my original post, I was referring to the idea that if they can do it even this once, where does it stop? So, maybe you or Bosch or Jay or anyone can answer that question for me. Where does it stop? How do we make it stop?
Oh-well. Who is John Galt?
JOE C00L
August 23rd, 2011
10:28 am
DawgDad
August 23rd, 2011
10:24 am
“Perhaps if the Democrats weren’t race-baiting socialists”
DawgDad, review the Pat Delany story a page back.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
10:28 am
“Perhaps if the Democrats weren’t race-baiting socialists”
AAAAAANNNNNNNDDDDDD I stop reading…..
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
10:28 am
“Wrong. Katrina was mishandled by the local New Orleans and State of Louisiana governments.”
Wrong. Katrina was mishandled by the local New Orleans and State of Louisiana governments AND FEMA/Bush administration.
After being roundly criticized in a slew of media, congressional and government reports, the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s internal watchdog Friday returned its own verdict on the handling of Hurricane Katrina: The criticism against FEMA is largely deserved.
In a hefty 218-page report, the Department of Homeland Security’s inspector general writes that the federal government and FEMA received “widespread criticism for a slow and ineffective response to Hurricane Katrina.”
“Much of the criticism is warranted,” Inspector General Richard L. Skinner writes.
The report gives an account of FEMA’s recent history and response to Katrina, covering ground that has been well-plowed in recent months, although adding some details.
It describes manpower problems, a decline in planning for natural disasters as attention focused on possible terrorist scenarios, and confusion over the roles and responsibilities of officials in responding to disasters.
It culminates with 38 recommendations to FEMA’s director and to the agency’s parent organization, the Department of Homeland Security.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
10:28 am
Talking Head: Wrong. Katrina was mishandled by the local New Orleans and State of Louisiana governments.
While your statement is correct, it doesn’t negate that Bush ALSO mishandled the mess. I know a lot about this so if you are going to argue this one, you better be prepared to sit in the corner with your thumb in your mouth by the end of it.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:28 am
Peter 10:25
That’s progress, of a sort -
Life long democrat
August 23rd, 2011
10:29 am
I’m really dissapointed in the Democratic party right now. I will probably not vote this year at a minimum.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
10:30 am
“Do you have the magic calendar handy? What am I supposed to be today?”
Sure Paul, let me check.
[sound of Muzak playing in background as Bosch checks magic calendar….}
…
…
…
Oh, here it is….yes, today, Paul, you are supposed to be an ass hole.
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
10:30 am
Liberals have a short attention span when it comes to reality. Bwarney Fwank has been elected gazillions of times, Maxine Waters doesn’t show any sign of being defeated anytime soon, Hank Johnson’s districts as well as John Lewis seem pretty secure and Sanford Bishop will get elected if he is dying on his deathbed. Pretty secure? Yeah, most of them.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
10:31 am
JOE, as long as he is NEVER allowed to song the national anthem in public again!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMHJxSYhrS0
Gator Joe
August 23rd, 2011
10:31 am
Jay,
No surprise, their [GA Republican politicians] supporters are, Big Business, ignorant white bigots, educated white bigots, and the Fox- brainwashed, a large and dependable Republican voting block in GA.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:32 am
Adam
Is it as much fun when you give them fair warning?
And Peter, those FEMA trailers are still being recycled for sale. I don’t think the Obama administration is knowingly trying to make people ill. It’s just another one of those “the career bureaucrats go on their merry way regardless of the party affiliation of the current administration.”
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
10:33 am
Adam – your time line on the gulf spill is horrendously inaccurate. Also, i did not attempt to meet your liberal high threshold of equivalency – however, they are comparative. The drill platform, which was authorized for operation by the Obama admin, burned for at least 3 days with very, very, very little press coverage. Then, like the old Monty Python skit, it fell over and sank into the swamp. You notion of prudent is what? 3 months? In Katrina, the local & state government failed the first 48 hours (they & the inept citizens); after that frame, the federal government was slow. PLEASE, from the time the well sunk until it was capped – how many days was that “prudently” addressed?
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:33 am
Paul as an Independent…….I am open to god ideas from either side, and frankly, I have very little to choose from in either party currently.
I am not just about basing Republican’s, as the Democrat’s have allot of blame to bear as well.
I do think the country’s current financial disaster was created during the Bush Administration……lack of over sight, and a real lack of concern for the typical American.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:33 am
Bosch
“Oh, here it is….yes, today, Paul, you are supposed to be an ass hole.
”
HEY!! Wait a minnit!!! That’s not a political party!!
oh…. wait…..
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
10:34 am
Jay: “The errors of Democrats 10 years ago justifies GOP misbehavior today?”
No, they don’t. But after a century of Democratic control of the state, one is left to wonder just how in the world Republicans managed to gain control at all? I mean, the way you talk, if only Democrats were in charge again life would be all unicorns and puppies. The election of Rs at all signified that Ds were not living up to the expectations of the state’s population somehow. If Rs similarly lose that status, they will be shifted back to being the minority party. Somehow I doubt that either way it will have any real impact on actually making the state a better place (100 years of Democratic control and our schools were, what 49th?).
In any large enough body (e.s, statehouse) there will be some bad actors, no matter who is in control. We should focus on them and getting them out, regardless of party affiliation.
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
10:35 am
left wing – you have drank about a reservoir worth of liberal kool aid. Keep pushing that socialism angle, it is sure to eliminate ALL the wealthy at some point.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:35 am
Paul one can really still purchase the original cancer causing FEMA Trailers ?
I did not know that…..can you point me in the direction, so I can see that for myself ?
(ir)Rational
August 23rd, 2011
10:35 am
Bosch – My outrage isn’t selective, and it isn’t limited. I don’t agree with much of the legislation that is being produced here in Atlanta or in Washington. There is too much legislation taking away my rights as an individual and not enough protecting them.
Philosopher – Yeah, it is completely rational for the government to bow to the demands of a certain group of people and bar me from doing things on my property, then not justly compensate me for the loss of my land. If they want to say to me “there is a protected species that lives there, you can’t build on that land” fine, but only if they then compensate you for the land that they have basically taken from you. Guess I should just be happy to give it up for the “greater good” though.
Oh-well. Who is John Galt?
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
10:37 am
Adam,
I’m suprised that you know so much about the Katrina situation, agree with my statement about the local government mishandling the situation…yet in your original post, you place all of the blame solely on Bush. Why?
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
10:37 am
Paul,
You can not dismiss what the magic calendar says. It’s magic, and it’s what it said. So…
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
10:37 am
kayaker 71: “Liberals have a short attention span when it comes to reality. Bwarney Fwank has been elected gazillions of times, Maxine Waters doesn’t show any sign of being defeated anytime soon”
Implication being that corruption on the part of the political opponents of those you cite is a-okay?
By the way, what’s a “liberal” exactly? Just dying to know. Enlighten me, please!
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
10:38 am
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
8:40 am
Even a party of inclusion should not include fools and charlatans.
And yes, the Tea Party can go straight to hell.
All us socialist, communist, trailer park living, america-hating, business-hating, government teat sucking, caddy driving welfare kings and queens with I phones, food stamp getting, muslim, uppity,
half-rican, lonely, fat, RACE BAITING folks think so.
I knew I forgot some….
Please let me know if I left anything else out…..
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
10:38 am
(ir)Rational: I can wait for more cites. A SCOTUS ruling is definitely powerful evidence and I will read carefully and do more research on it.
However, your citing of Obama Cares and using the slippery slope argument is going overboard. If everything snowballed as you suggested every time something like this happened then we would be in a MUCH worse situation now and feel like we are in an Orwell novel.
But aside from the hyperbole, that law has been constitutionally challenged and the SCOTUS will hear it and we’ll see how they rule on that particular aspect of the law, the individual mandate. I can’t say I like the idea of being forced to buy insurance. I would much prefer to pay taxes to get health care for all, rather than subsidize private health insurance companies through the “not a tax” tax known as the individual mandate. Still, if I or others cannot afford it, there are avenues to take care of that. It’s a big mess and could be much simpler if we’d all agree that health care is something we all need and all should pay small amounts of taxes for.
That is all about the SPECIFIC issue. But you are asserting that this means the government WILL do it to anyone at any time. The fact is that no law exists in implementation right now that forces you to buy ANY goods or services, nor can a Congress that can’t agree to anything suddenly agree to force you to buy something else.
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
10:38 am
Adam – your were trying to push Obama’s leadership expertise up a hill – that was the subject, Mr. Blinders ON. The STIMULUS proved that neophyte elected leaders don’t know their ass from their elbow, and that applies to other areas of their agenda. You are rapidly losing credibility.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
10:39 am
“There is too much legislation taking away my rights as an individual and not enough protecting them.”
What rights have you had taken away irrational? I mean, recently.
“and bar me from doing things on my property”
There are lots of groups that do this, Homeowners Associations for one.
And what specifically have you been banned from doing on your own property? Curious minds would like to know.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:40 am
Peter 10:33
I was wondering if we’d agree on anything today!
There was a lot of mismanagement regarding contracting with the previous administration. Some of it nefarious, some not. But the sad reality is, there are only so many companies with the capability to perform, on a massive scale, the services or provide the goods our troops need. So we’re stuck with the devils we know.
Add to that Congress unwilling to fund enough people to do oversight, weak prosecution of those who impede investigations or retaliate against whistleblowers, and a host of other examples and you’ve got a recipe for big problems.
I just don’t think it would have been all that different (on a large scale, not the specific examples) if someone other then Cheney had been VP.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
10:40 am
Talking Head: You’ll have to reread. I didn’t say that ONLY Bush was responsible, I laid out the reasons he was rightly criticized, and then pointed out that situation and the oil leak are not equivalent.
JOE C00L
August 23rd, 2011
10:41 am
The Delaney Household:
Thanksgiving:
“Thank your mother for this cold azz Thanksgiving Dinner tonight”
Christmas:
“Thank your mother for the re-wrapped fruit cake kids”
lol
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
10:42 am
Paddy O: “left wing – you have drank about a reservoir worth of liberal kool aid. Keep pushing that socialism angle, it is sure to eliminate ALL the wealthy at some point.”
I don’t want to “eliminate the wealthy”. What I want is to return that wealth to those who actually produce it.
JOE C00L
August 23rd, 2011
10:43 am
“Please let me know if I left anything else out…..”
Hippies?
Gm
August 23rd, 2011
10:44 am
What do you expect from a bunch of hicks who run and vote against their interest, the sad thing is these idiots especially south Georgia were voting like this before Obama took office, rep dont care care about Georgia, as long as they keep voting the good old boys in the the same results will continue to happen.
I mean you have people living in trailors in some part of Ga ponding their chest pround to be a poor Rep, these idiots have no healthcare, unemployed,, while Sonny and Deal has raked them under the coals.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
10:44 am
Hippies….I forgot that one.
Thanks
Aquagirl
August 23rd, 2011
10:44 am
So, maybe you or Bosch or Jay or anyone can answer that question for me. Where does it stop? How do we make it stop?
(ir)Rational, MPercy has made the point that libertarian/tea party crowd allow people on board who trample the crap out of other people’s rights, as long as it’s not THEIR rights to line THEIR pocketbook, they show little concern.
Complaining you can’t dump toxic waste on your property while the Republicans regulate what a doctor can and can not say to a patient is massive hypocrisy.
Maybe we “make it stop” by dropping the pretense these groups are concerned about big gub’ment. They’re only concerned about big gub’mint when it reaches into their lives, and they’re all too happy using government to achieve their own wants.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
10:44 am
“And yes, the Tea Party can go straight to hell.”
I am pretty sure that is where they are heading.
The suddenly fiscal cons are trying to clean up their mess for not stopping w’s destruction of our country.
Of course, they will never admit this fact because there is no personal responsibility or accountability from our cons.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:46 am
Peter
I’ve a daughter lives in Louisiana. Been looking for a trailer. Found a few on some lots. Really decent prices. Did some checking, found out where they originated. Dealers said “this is where we got them but all that gas stuff was overblown and FEMA said these were safe.”
Can I point you to the dealer(s)? No. Is it anecdotal? Yes. But given how desperate she was to have a place of her own, had the money to make it happen, and how good the prices were, yet she walked away from the deal, I’ve no reason to doubt what she told me.
sam
August 23rd, 2011
10:46 am
as long as they have the right letter next to their name, it doesnt matter what they do. there’s always someone to blame for our troubles.
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
10:47 am
“In any large enough body (e.s, statehouse) there will be some bad actors, no matter who is in control. We should focus on them and getting them out, regardless of party affiliation.”
Again, MPercy, I agree. My point in the column was not simply that Republicans are doing these things, but that they are doing them without consequence. It’s the “without consequence” part that is truly troubling, because it will encourage more and more such behavior.
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
10:49 am
Left Wing Management,
Bookman’s point today seems to be that Repubs can do most anything they want because they feel secure in who voted for them. I am just pointing out that it works both ways. I just don’t see a white candidate defeating Waters, Johnson, Lewis or Bishop anytime soon. And each of these elected Congressmen/women seem to think that they are pretty secure in their position. Like Daniel Inouye in Hawaii….. he’s been re-elected every time to the Senate since WWII. Think that a Repub could win a mayorial slot in Chicago?
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
10:49 am
getalife,
what was the deficit for FY07? 160 billion
what was the deficit for FY11? 1.3 trillion
which party took over Congress in the 2006 elections? Democrats
which government body is responsible for spending? Congress
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:49 am
Bosch
“You can not dismiss what the magic calendar says. It’s magic, and it’s what it said. So…”
Sushhh! I’m halfway thru a case of these:
http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/yhst-97565121716471_2167_63986450
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
10:51 am
Paddy O: Adam – your time line on the gulf spill is horrendously inaccurate.
No, it isn’t. The Coast Guard went out there immediately to help.
Also, i did not attempt to meet your liberal high threshold of equivalency – however, they are comparative. The drill platform, which was authorized for operation by the Obama admin, burned for at least 3 days with very, very, very little press coverage.
Two inaccuracies. First, the two are not comparative. One is a completely man-made disaster, and the other was a natural disaster. One involved need of evacuation and assistance by the federal government that was woefully inadequate, and the other involved no need of evacuation and was addressed by the federal government as quickly as was possible at the time given the size and scope of the man-made disaster. Second, I knew about the oil rig blowing up less than 12 hours after it happened due to press coverage, local, national, and yes, Facebook.
You notion of prudent is what? 3 months? In Katrina, the local & state government failed the first 48 hours (they & the inept citizens); after that frame, the federal government was slow.
The only mishandling on the government’s part was to go with the Republican idea that the corporation that CAUSED the disaster should also ADDRESS it, without any oversight. They tried the same methods tried in the Gulf of Mexico decades earlier, when ANOTHER oil well that wasn’t drilling as deep blew up and all of those methods failed then too. The idea that the government, and Obama, was responsible for the actions of those in BP who allowed the rig to blow up, and THEN responsible for any cleanup efforts, is intellectually dishonest. The government did finally, in the end, step in and take the lead in approving any efforts to clean up the leak and cap it. Skimmers were out there pretty quickly making sure that as little oil as possible reached the shores of the Gulf. Underwater plumes that existed made this difficult, and those were caused by the initial BP initiative of spraying the ocean with chemical dispersant.
You like to lay blame at Obama’s feet for this one, but all you can do is say “he didn’t act fast enough” when you didn’t even know all the facts. You also seem to think it would have made a difference if he had done something even faster. I agree. He should have ended the deregulation on oil rigs in the Gulf before this happened. Failing that, he acted as quickly and as prudently as was possible. Now, the federal agency that issues permits has a better plan, and they can get a spill of that magnitude capped within 20 days. That is still not good enough, and more needs to be done, but now there is a REAL plan for this kind of thing instead of a carbon copy plan issued to each oil company by a contract company.
Seriously, do you want me to go on? Really? Bring it.
Good little liberal
August 23rd, 2011
10:51 am
Adam
“A positive GDP growth of 3.x% is “Driving our economy into the ground.” Got it.”
So please be clear: Do you think that this is an economy that Democrats should be proud to have engineered?
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
10:53 am
Paul,
Those things are really effective and smell nice too. I couldn’t exist without them.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:53 am
Paul…. I am happy your daughter walked on the Trailer deal….best for her and all in your family !
Somethings ” too good ” are exactly that !
dixiedemons
August 23rd, 2011
10:53 am
We know the state of Georgia is not loaded with intellectual heavyweights. These wannabe Boss Hogg
republicans are guided by low morals and misguided value systems. The only thing Georgia can attract is drug cartels and GOP politicians. Both seem to be cut from the same piece of wood. Who voluntarily deals with them besides other criminals ?
JOE C00L
August 23rd, 2011
10:54 am
“I just don’t see a white candidate defeating Waters, Johnson, Lewis or Bishop anytime soon.”
Do any “white” candidates even go to these districts, live in these districts, contribute to these districts?
Steve - B.
August 23rd, 2011
10:54 am
If the politicians have no accountability then the job of accountability the voters of Georgia.
Zedd
August 23rd, 2011
10:55 am
“And the Tea Party can go straight to hell!”….Rest assured if w get there first we’ll be sure to stoke the fires for you Liberal puke stains arrival as the main course. Nothing like a good BBQ! “We cooking PIG in the ground, got some beer on ice, and all my rowdy friends are coming over tonight”
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
10:55 am
kayaker 71: “Think that a Repub could win a mayorial slot in Chicago?”
One just did. Effectively.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
10:56 am
Hey Adam.. My feeling on the Gulf oil spill disaster is…..”They discussed this issue in the Energy for America Meetings”…and did zero about it.
They knew there was a chance this issue would arise……thus the strict laws in Europe.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
10:56 am
GLL: So please be clear
OK, here’s clear: You are wrong that the economy has been driven into the ground right now, regardless of who is to blame for it. It is growing positively. That’s pretty clear.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
10:57 am
Talking Head
2007?!!?
What was the final deficit number for the last year of the Bush budgets? 2008?
’bout the same a the FY11 number.
I read once if you shut off the engine on an aircraft carrier, it’ll take 5 miles to slow down and stop.
Pres Bush was the captain of the ship, he jumped ship and Pres Obama’s the new captain trying to restart the engines. But the ignition switch wasn’t properly maintained and the fuel’s contaminated, so he has a lot of repair work to do.
But he was able to steer the ship so it didn’t end up on the shoals.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
10:58 am
Peter: My feelings on the disaster are multi-faceted. It brings a whole host of issues being handled badly, on the local, state, and federal level, as well as illustrating that if you give companies an inch they WILL take a mile.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
10:58 am
added to the list so far today….
race baiters, hippies and “Liberal puke stains”
sim
August 23rd, 2011
10:58 am
Georgia is a poster child for failed Republican policies. Our bank failures lead the nation (as per the article), but we also have more people in prison per capita than any nation on earth. Filthy coal-burning plants, highest unemployment in the nation, among the lowest in education (as always)–the list goes on and on. Everything the Republicans touch goes not just wrong, but disastrously wrong. Yet, they continue to be elected. This leads me to conclude that Georgia votes Republican for other reasons.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
10:59 am
Bosch @10:26 am MPercy, “This hijacking saddens me and means they have lost my more fervent support, and forces me to me more careful in my support” I think it’s safe to say that most of us would have problems with some of handlings in the Federal government, and would like to see a more efficient system. To blame it on one person, administration, or party is complete ignorance or just plain bigotry in the sense that the person is unwilling to see fault in themselves or their own beliefs.
I bitched through Mr. Bush’s term (although didn’t have “blogs” through most of that) and kept right on bitching when Mr. Obama took office.
I think you’d be truly surprised as to what TEA party supporters like myself would cut (personally, I’ve been advocating a hard spending-level freeze combined with a 5% across-the-board cut for each and every federal agency, followed by 2% the next year, then 1% cuts until we reach a balanced budget). Only after a balanced budget is in hand can any program be allowed to even consider increasing spending. I firmly believe that we spend more than enough across the board and that government spending is nowhere near 100% efficient. Force some waste out of the system will be a start.
For military spending, let’s end the wars. We can start with ending WWII and Korea and work our way up from there. We are still occupying and providing military coverage for Western Europe, Japan, and South Korea! No wonder Western Europe can afford to be socialists, we’re paying for much of their defense.
I would also be willing to support a return to Clinton-era tax rates for everyone (circa FY2000) if we at the same time returned to Clinton-era spending levels (FY2000 spending was 18.2% GDP). In FY2011 we’ll spend $2T (adjusted dollars) more than Clinton spent in FY2000 ($3.818T vs $1.789T). That’s 25.3% of GDP.
Matti's Annoyance
August 23rd, 2011
10:59 am
Aquagirl:
“They’re only concerned about big gub’mint when it reaches into their lives, and they’re all too happy using government to achieve their own wants.”
Let’s be fair. The Pekoe Heads are willing to step in and handle matters when there’s no gub’mint officers around to do it. Remember the young woman carrying a sign outside the Rand Paul event — a sign that the Pekoe Heads didn’t like? Remember how the guy wearing a “Don’t Tread On Me” button pushed her to the ground to help another man step on her head? They proved they don’t need gub’mint to tread on another US citizen’s Constitutional rights. They’re more than willing to take personal responsibility for being community thugs and bullies.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
10:59 am
Paul: The Republican plan: Make a mess and let the Help clean it up.
Good little liberal
August 23rd, 2011
11:00 am
Adam
The world’s largest skimmers were offered by several different governments to help contain the oil spill, but the Obama administration took weeks to just return their emails offering the help. Instead, they required BP to “flock” the pollution, causing it to sink to the bottom of the ocean to keep the oil from washing ashore. After locals, (not environmental groups) had started to dive down and see ow the oil was coating the bottom, then the Obama administration began to require BP to use a flocking agent that was not toxic, but of course the actual oil was toxic as hell.
I personally traveled to Grand Isle to videotape the beaches and even with all the press credentials, I was chased by the National Guard like I was a terrorist, while they allowed TV Sat trucks to set at specific places on the beach and only allowed even the network shooters access to only small section of the beach where there was little pollution. Is that a government that you are proud of?
n
August 23rd, 2011
11:01 am
For decades Georgia has operated on the principle of freewheeling greed. Republicans and Democrats sought elected office only to find new and more efficient methods to bilk the taxpayers and line their pockets. Cronyism and self-dealing were standard operating procedure, and elected officials who didn’t play the game were considered hopelessly naive and stupid.
The Democrats were awful, the Republicans are equally awful, but so new to power and so heady with their own omnipotence and importance that they don’t even bother to cover their tracks.
If we operate like a banana republic, where insiders profiteer and neglect all other aspects of rational governing and the public’s business in favor of their own enrichment, we will slide into economic oblivion. It has already happened.
We need several high profile prosecutions to convince folks that running for office means something other than working day in and day out to line your pockets and those of your cronies.
Dirty Dawg
August 23rd, 2011
11:01 am
Hey, I got a question…since nothing that Republicans typically do seems to p-off their constituents enough to turn ‘em out of office around here (other than not being conservative enough) – I mean, when you’re red, you’re red, right? How about if we came up with one that, under whatever passes for ‘normal’ circumstances, would be considered as most heinous and worthy of, virtual, banishment to an entire political party for having done it – namely, overtly stealing an election, or elections as the case may be. Fact is there is evidence a-plenty that the ‘02 Governor’s and Senate races here were ‘manipulated’ by the ‘Diebold Diode’…the ‘00 Presidential race was ‘won’ by geedubyabush through voter suppression and out-right fraud in Florida – along with a right-wing ‘Supreme’ Court – and we now know that Ohio was also ’stolen’ through the use of Diebold machines in the ‘04 Prez race that gave us another four years of bush, and the man behind the cretin, cheney. What I’m asking is that if there were incontrovertible evidence that these things took place…if the people responsible were to admit to it (probably to save their hides from some other kind of crime or to sell books when the ‘hush money’ runs out)…what would the reaction be from the ‘Right’? Would you guys be ’shocked, shocked, to hear that election fraud was going on around here?’…Would you be sickened to know that your leaders had rigged our fundamental right to vote and be willing to do something about it? My bet is that you would simply say – to paraphrase Huey Long (yeah, I know a Democrat, but one that got his in the end, or head, I don’t recall which) – ‘Sure, they stole it but they stole it for us’?
Until the people that vote Republicans into office around here can, finally, be repulsed by the kind of crap that their party engages in (like intentionally tanking the economy to make sure Obama is beatable in ‘12), we’re doomed to have this bunch running the show for the foreseeable future.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
11:02 am
Jay, I’m supporting you here. I expect there to be consequence. But you saying that the lack of consequences is the focus of your article, rather than the fact they’re Rs is a bit a of a stretch, in my opinion.
What do you suggest we do to get some create some consequences (except waiting for the next ballot)?
P.S. I’ll look forward to your full coverage of the next Democrat’s foibles.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
11:02 am
Peter
Yeah, and given her current living arrangements, she’d trade just about anything to have a place of her own.
a reader
August 23rd, 2011
11:02 am
“But again, they feel no public pressure to do better, so why should they?”
well, yeah….
jm
August 23rd, 2011
11:03 am
Jay 10:23 – feel like you’re playing “whack a mole”? I know the feeling.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
11:03 am
“…got some beer on ice…”
No you won’t.
You’ll have cheap, undrinkable swill called Bud. And not just because Beelzebub is cheap, but because your manipulated rubes really do think it is the King of Beers.
Drink up, Johnny…
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
11:04 am
Bosch @10:30 am
I usually disagree with you, and don’t know Paul (haven’t been her eon Jay’s for awhile), but that was a good one. I liked the muzak especially.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
11:04 am
Adam
“Paul: The Republican plan: Make a mess and let the Help clean it up.”
Yeah, well, since Bosch told me what I’m supposed to be today, they can have my wipes when they pull them out of my…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3FnpaWQJO0
The Leg Lamp is a “major award”….
August 23rd, 2011
11:05 am
More accomplishments from the Obama administration:
POLL: OBAMA APPROVAL INDEX HITS LOWEST EVER…
New home sales on pace for worst year ever…
NATIONAL DEBT RISES BY $3 MILLION EACH MINUTE…
Obama sets record: $4,247,000,000,000 debt in just 945 days…
$500,000 federal stimulus grant created 1.72 jobs…
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
11:06 am
Left Wing Management,
Rham Emmanuel is a Republican?
Joe Cool,
Do any of these candidates live in these districts,etc.
Wouldn’t do them any good if they did. Some places are predestined. Hawaii has not had a Republican Congressman or Senator since Aug 21, 1959 when they became a state and it doesn’t look too promising for Repubs anytime in the future. Bookman’s premise today is that politicians who feel secure in their positions become “cocky” and feel like they can do most anything without consequence. Sort of like Charley Rangel. Oops, he’s a Democrat. Works both ways, Joe.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
11:06 am
GLL: While you are technically correct that there was a delay in accepting foreign aid, it wasn’t as bad as the talking point would portray: http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2010/jun/16/george-lemieux/white-house-refused-international-oil-spill-aid-fl/
This may not be the best link to show you what I mean, but my point is that foreign aid was accepted, even if bureaucratic mess made it have delays.
As to your freedom of the press thing, well I think that was wrong, but also not at all what I was talking about. That was not right, and not something that should be tolerated. It also was common. They didn’t want anyone getting close at all for any reason, least of all documenting the event. So yes, wrong there. But that does not negate that this situation is NOT Obama’s “fault,” and does not negate that the situation is not equivalent to Katrina.
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
11:07 am
Paul @10:57,
Dems were in controll of all spending from Jan 07-Jan11…all you have to do is look at a spending chart and you will see that spending exploded during these years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Total_Deficits_vs._National_Debt_Increases_2001-2010.png
Don't Tread
August 23rd, 2011
11:07 am
…evidence a-plenty that the ‘02 Governor’s and Senate races here were ‘manipulated’ by the ‘Diebold Diode’…
…Ohio was also ’stolen’ through the use of Diebold machines in the ‘04 Prez race…
…intentionally tanking the economy…
Got Links? This would make interesting reading.
Good little liberal
August 23rd, 2011
11:08 am
Adam
“It is growing positively”
Really? So the incredibly unstable stock market and sustained unemployment are good signs? Declining home sales is good news?
I would like to think that is was improving, but I’m just not seeing it.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
11:08 am
okay, got a boatload of work (trying to split time between here and work is why I was up at 0430 to work yesterday and I don’t want a repeat tomorrow).
Later -
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
11:08 am
Hey sim… You forgot to mention the last Republican Governor doubled his personal wealth while in office, and changed laws so he could pay less taxes personally.
You also failed to mention he got involved personally in DOT projects that were going on on the streets in front of his own personal property.
You also forgot to mention that the GA 400 toll was never taken down as promised…… gosh when there is no one to run the ethics department, then who cares ?
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
11:08 am
Dems were in controll of all spending from Jan 07-Jan11
There it goes again! NO THEY WEREN’T!
Zedd
August 23rd, 2011
11:09 am
AmVet….oh you know me eh? Not likely. My taste buds are a bit more sophisticated than drinking Butwiper beer, but to each his own. Personally I like Michelob Ultra. If you weren’t a Vet, I might be inclined to up the ante a little more. But as such, I’ll give you a pass. Don’t try to paint with such a broad brush, it makes it harder to stay within the lines.
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
11:10 am
“And what specifically have you been banned from doing on your own property? Curious minds would like to know”
Try asking what he thinks his NEIGHBOR should be allowed to do on THEIR own property.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
11:11 am
Talking Head
Pres Bush signed the budget, then almost a third of the fiscal year was gone before Pres Obama took office.
As Pres Truman said ‘The Buck Stops Here.”
And here was Bush’s desk when he signed it.
Out -
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
11:11 am
GLL: So the incredibly unstable stock market and sustained unemployment are good signs? Declining home sales is good news?
No, but those are also not reliable metrics that determine all economic growth.
For one thing, the UI number will go down rapidly once the Agree-To-Nothing Congress doesn’t extend UI. Will the economy immediately become even better because that number went down? no. Will the economy become immediately better if we have day-to-day increases in the Dow? no.
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
11:12 am
Always remember folks, there are two kind of Republicans…Millionaires (real Republicans) and Suckers (Tea Party).
killerj
August 23rd, 2011
11:12 am
WAAAAAAA!WAAAAAAA!WAAAAAAAAAA! Bookman,s view.Go Tea Party.
Zedd
August 23rd, 2011
11:13 am
“Always remember folks, there are two kind of Republicans…Millionaires (real Republicans) and Suckers (Tea Party).” Still beats a jack-ass any day of the week!
carlosgvv
August 23rd, 2011
11:13 am
sim
A majority of Georgia Republican voters are just dirt-road dumb and will vote for whoever is best at brainwashing and propaganda. We’re not in last place for nothing. We work at it!!!!
Gm
August 23rd, 2011
11:13 am
As long as we have poor whites thinking it is a badge of honor to support rep who care less about Georgia and continue to live in the 20th century this state will continue be the state that sleeps with their cousins around the world.
Good little liberal
August 23rd, 2011
11:13 am
Adam
I need to get back to work. It’s funny that we are discussing this because I am having a hard time with a client that is a small city government that is actually pretty well ran, but after dealing with private business all these years, it is like wading through knee deep mud to get things done. It’s great that they have a big budget, but I’m thinking that I will be making about 5 bucks an hour after spending all this time with meeting after meeting and all these proposals.
Have a good one.
Matti's Bowel Movement
August 23rd, 2011
11:14 am
Could some one direct me to the nearest place to get some of that Obama money?
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
11:16 am
Matti’s Bowel Movement
Are you calling yourself a turd?
carlosgvv
August 23rd, 2011
11:16 am
Granny
How about Fascist pig scum. Haven’t seen that one in a while.
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
11:17 am
Rasmussen is brutal to Bozo today. Only 19% strongly approve of him…… 45% strongly disapprove, a difference of -26. In Bush’s worst times, his strongly disapproval was only in the low 30s. Only 26% approve of the way he is handling our economy. Foreclosures at an all time high. Unemployment still more than 9%, more like 14 or 15% if you are realistic. Maybe he can find some kind of solution a Maaatha’s Vineyard.
WOODSTOCK MIKE
August 23rd, 2011
11:17 am
Wow, this blog really is turning ugly.
Gotta respect Democrats though, they’re like Chicago Cubs fans, no matter how bad their team is, no matter how terrible they are doing, in their eyes they are the best and they don’t make any mistakes.
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
11:18 am
Ha, ha…more GOP history lessons…
http://www.thenation.com/article/162875/rewrite-sugarcoat-ignore-8-ways-conservatives-misremember-american-history
WOODSTOCK MIKE
August 23rd, 2011
11:18 am
“A majority of Georgia Republican voters are just dirt-road dumb”
But I thought most poor people vote Democrat?? Something isn’t adding up, LOL!!
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
11:19 am
I see Normal enjoys a good fiction tale.
WOODSTOCK MIKE
August 23rd, 2011
11:20 am
Remember that girl when Obama was running for president??
She was asked why she voted for Obama and replied…
“Obama gonna pay my mortgage!!!”
That was classic!!
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
11:21 am
kayaker 71: “Rham Emmanuel is a Republican?”
Probably somewhere comfortably to the right of Richard Nixon or Dwight Eisenhower. As I said above, the two parties in America today are just two faces of the same coin of Big Business. Emmanuel is a classic example, the cynical mastermind behind Obama’s attempted triangulation who hated the idea of health care reform and loved cozying up to his buddies in banking and high finance. Big money is in his bones.
Dave R. - 3k/4k/5k
August 23rd, 2011
11:21 am
“Fact is there is evidence a-plenty that the ‘02 Governor’s and Senate races here were ‘manipulated’ by the ‘Diebold Diode’… – and we now know that Ohio was also ’stolen’ through the use of Diebold machines in the ‘04 Prez race that gave us another four years of bush, and the man behind the cretin, cheney.”
Actually, there is no credible evidence that any of these things occurred. Just conspiracy website after conspiracy website dedicated to absolute nonsense regarding Diebold machines.
Citizen of the World
August 23rd, 2011
11:21 am
The man who questions opinion is wise; the man who quarrels with fact is a fool — Frank A. Garbutt
Jay
August 23rd, 2011
11:24 am
Talking Heads, those charts tell you nothing directly about spending.
They tell you about the deficit and debt, but a huge chunk of the increased deficit can be blamed not on spending but on much lower revenues thanks to the recession.
For example, in fiscal 2009 and 2010, revenues were less than 16 percent of GDP, considerably below the historical range of 18-20 percent. And when you consider that GDP itself was down in those years, you get a picture of just how much revenue shortfall plays into the deficit problem.
Paulo977
August 23rd, 2011
11:24 am
carlosgvv
A tid-bit for your info
http://www.suntimes.com/opinions/letters/7036422-474/perry-wants-to-secede–and-be-president.htm
DawgDad
August 23rd, 2011
11:25 am
“Corporations are sitting on enough cash to put every single unemployed American back to work for years on end. Which means the following:
Our problem is not economic, it’s political and ideological. ”
Doing what exactly? Corporations wouldn’t be in business long if they spent or invested the cash unproductively. Sure, we could dream up any number of national infrastructure investment projects to be funded by Government as make-work projects, but Government is leveraged to the hilt and can’t afford them. You’re absolutely right, it’s ideological. Sure, government can confiscate cash and wealth or pass laws directing corporations (people) to use it in certain ways. Where do think that leads? If that’s where you want to take us (Marxist or Fascist State, moreso than we already are), I want no part of it.
Mary Elizabeth
August 23rd, 2011
11:28 am
- I am for a party that supports public education in Georgia because it knows that education will enlighten all of Georgia’s young. It, also, knows that placing a priority on education will elevate the citizens overall because the public’s values will change toward common good interests, and not simply self-interest.
- I am for a party that looks at the great need by so many Georgians for dental care in Woodstock, and asks how can this be in Georgia. That party would want medical attention for all of Georgia’s citizens through government to ensure that all have needed care, and not simply be given care haphazardly through churches, here and there. That party would believe in the value of government to serve the common good medically.
- I am for a party that can foresee a positive coalition of business interests and public government interests to serve both interests fairly and equitably, and it would not be a party that supports condemnation of all government.
- I am for a party that seeks a social safety net for its elderly, and formerly productive citizens, simply because it is the right thing to do, and not simply because its members know that they, too, will be elderly one day.
- In other words, I want a party that knows the value of service more than it values power. Call that party by any name you choose. “A rose by any other name is still a rose.”
- A party that supports those values will have less corruption within its membership than a party that has grown to value power and self-interests, above all. And, that is because the values of that party will emphasize looking outward to the common good, and not simply inward toward self-interests.
And maybe, just maybe, that party would also help our overall economy grow because it would not be programmed to cut, cut, cut, thus, programmed to pull inward economically more and more, instead of growing outward in ideas that foster growth and development.
Aquagirl
August 23rd, 2011
11:30 am
Actually, there is no credible evidence that any of these things occurred. Just conspiracy website after conspiracy website dedicated to absolute nonsense regarding Diebold machines.
When Dave R. is your voice of sanity, it’s time to worry.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
11:31 am
Sorry Mike… with the education here in Georgia…….the GOP is probably dumber.
But I thought most poor people vote Democrat?? Something isn’t adding up, LOL!!
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
11:32 am
Here’s another good “Tale”…
http://www.thenation.com/blog/162907/cognitive-dissonance-conservative-media-respond-libyas-liberation
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
11:32 am
Hey MIke…….Gotta respect Democrats though, they’re like Chicago Cubs fans, no matter how bad their team is, no matter how terrible they are doing, in their eyes they are the best and they don’t make any mistakes.
I imagine you didn’t like the Bush years then ?
Manchurian-Kenyan Candidate
August 23rd, 2011
11:32 am
Jay, funny how you charachterize misdeeds of Democrats from 10 years ago as “errors” and current Repub actions as “wrongs”……got bias??
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
11:34 am
Jay,
As ususal, you only present one side of the story which not only misleads those reading it, but convinces yourself of a false reality.
There’s no doubt federal spending has exploded in recent years. In fiscal 2007, the last year before things went haywire, the government took in $2.568 trillion in revenues and spent $2.728 trillion, for a deficit of $160 billion. In 2011, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates, the government will take in $2.230 trillion and spend $3.629 trillion, for a deficit of $1.399 trillion.
That’s an increase of $901 billion in spending and a decrease of $338 billion in revenue in a very short time.
Steve - B.
August 23rd, 2011
11:34 am
It never ceases to amaze me that Liberals try to pretend their is no Democrats in big business.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
11:35 am
“MPercy has made the point that libertarian/tea party crowd allow people on board who trample the crap out of other people’s rights, as long as it’s not THEIR rights to line THEIR pocketbook, they show little concern.”
Woah now, I said that some people are entering the TEA party movement who want to do that, which is detracting from that movements original ideals. Since there is no “party” really, there’s nothing stopping them from hijacking the movement. It’s not a matter of allowing them to trample anyone’s rights. And libertarians surely are not supportive of anyone trampling anyone’s rights.
Most importantly, personally, is I don’t recall ever advocating trampling anyone rights. So don’t try to pin that on me.
Finn McCool
August 23rd, 2011
11:36 am
The Associated Press is reporting that GOP legislators are opposing the extension of a payroll tax cut that will expire on Jan. 1. The clear, unavoidable message: Americans workers should pay more taxes, while the rich should pay less.
http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2011/08/22/republican_tax_increase/index.html
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
11:36 am
Mary Elizabeth,
Some has to pay for all of that.
RIGHTISWRONG
August 23rd, 2011
11:38 am
This is the same group of folk who elected a crook to be our Governor.
Social Issues trump common sense with these folks. The crazy thing is the vast majority of Tea Party folks are not rich, yet the people they elect pass legislation that only helps the rich. I know several Tea Partiers and they don’t have a pot to pee in, but they don’t want gays to get married, they don’t want Unemployment Benefits Secured (unless they lose their job which has happened, then they blame Obama), they don’t want affordable healthcare for all (even though they suffer the most), they don’t want ANY of Obama’s policies to pass even if those policies help them! Unbelievable! They don’t even want to go back to Reagan era taxes just because Obama has proposed it.
Not 2 smart if you ask me, and the rich just keep getting richer and paying 15% or less in taxes with the loopholes while you dummies pay your 25, 28, and 35%. Nothing that Obama has proposed (with the exception of Healthcare) has passed, because of the Tea Party. Obama has had to do what the Repubs want. Look at the result of continuing the Bush Tax cuts. They wont even let the POTUS pass an Infrastructure bill which most certainly would create jobs. Rick Perry is bragging about jobs that Obama and the Feds created. They are playing you guys like fiddles, lying and laughing all the way to the bank.
We are still under Repub Policies that are supposed to put money in the JOB CREATOR’S pockets and then they are supposed to HIRE you! Where are the jobs? I am glad I am a job creator and don’t have to wait for these lies to come to fruition. I DO thank you dummies for the tax breaks. Preciate you…..
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
11:40 am
Corruption uber alles in Georgia’s right wing incumbency protection racket…
Last Thursday, the House of Representatives approved new maps as part of the reapportionment and redistricting process. Unfortunately, the majority party chose to play partisan politics with this process rather than draw maps that are fair for all Georgians. The proposed maps attempt to purge white Democrats, from the House of Representatives and cynically re-segregate Georgia along political lines by creating an all-white Republican Party and an all-black Democratic Party. The maps also attempt to create a Republican super-majority in both the House and Senate. This means that the majority party would not need a single Democratic vote to pass Constitutional amendments that would impact the entire State. The map eliminates choices for Georgia voters and does harm to Georgia by silencing the viewpoints of millions of voters.
Steve - B.
August 23rd, 2011
11:42 am
When I lived in Florida I was lucky enough to live in a condo on the beach. People would cry and moan about how much the taxes were and how they were tired of all the people getting handouts. Then a big storm would come and wash away the beach. Then they bitched that the Government wasn’t acting fast enough to replendish (sp?) the beach at a cost of tens of millions of dollars that the condo didn’t pay a penny of.
Moral of story: I find most people are self-serving despite political affiliations.
carlosgvv
August 23rd, 2011
11:42 am
WOODSTOCK MIKE
The Georgia “poor” and the Georgia “dirt-road dumb” are mainly two seperate groups.
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
11:43 am
Off topic, except for the greed factor. Remember this from back in 2009. Martin could never have dreamed what a nightmare his heirs and successors would become.
Piteeful, just piteeful.
KING ‘MONUMENT TO GREED’
WASHINGTON — The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s family has charged the foundation building a monument to the civil-rights leader on the National Mall about $800,000 to use his words and image — and at least one scholar thinks that Dr. King would find such an arrangement offensive.
The memorial is being paid for almost entirely through a fund-raising campaign led by the Martin Luther King Jr. National Memorial Project Foundation.
“I don’t think the Jefferson family, the Lincoln family [or] any other group of family ancestors has been paid a licensing fee for a memorial in Washington,” said Cambridge University historian David Garrow, author of a Pulitzer Prize-winning biography of Dr. King. “. . . [He would've been] absolutely scandalized.”
Financial documents revealed that the foundation paid $761,160 in 2007 to Intellectual Properties Management Inc., an entity run by the King family. They also showed that a $71,700 “management” fee was paid to the family estate in 2003.
Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/item_4DTe3bj9QcHd7Y2Hpvmp1O#ixzz1Vro2m2Qk
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
11:43 am
GLL: I am happy we found something to agree on.
mm
August 23rd, 2011
11:44 am
I’m so glad I moved to FL. Oh, wait. Nevermind.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
11:44 am
At some point we need to ens the mess maker party like the whig party.
That time is now.
They are listening to you because they are scared of losing their jobs,
What do you want.
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
11:47 am
Uncle Jed,
One of the most corrupt and basically immoral families. MLKjr was an icon. His children nothing but basic opportunists milking the system for all they can.
carlosgvv
August 23rd, 2011
11:48 am
DawgDad – “Doing what exactly”
What they could and should do is stop piling more and more work on their employees and start hiring to make the workloads more equitible. Of course, they won’t do this since they know their current workers won’t dare quit no matter how much work they are given. They, the employees, will work as much unpaid overtime as necessary to keep their jobs and their bosses will pocket all that cash.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
11:48 am
kay,
So Tucker was right.
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
11:48 am
The Associated Press is reporting that GOP legislators are opposing the extension of a payroll tax cut that will expire on Jan. 1. The clear, unavoidable message: Americans workers should pay more taxes, while the rich should pay less.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The conundrum: Dems/Obama were all about revenue raising during the “default show”. Here,they say that leaving this money in the hands of workers is better for the economy. So, why not cut taxes as a way to generate economic activity? Sounds like class warfare trumping solutions.
I refuse to accept your premise about “the clear, unavoidable message”.
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
11:49 am
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
11:47 am
++++++++++++
If I agreed with you more, I would not know how to express it.
DawgDad
August 23rd, 2011
11:50 am
Mary Elizabeth: I’m still laughing. You’re mixing up politics and religion, and looking to the State for spiritual satisfaction is going to be very disappointing for you, regardless.
I don’t get your reference to Woodstock and dental care. Just because a bunch of people lined up for free care doesn’t mean they didn’t have the wherewithall to provide for themselves. It’s about choices, personal, individual choices. I can get a free bite to eat (a food sample) at the store almost any day. Doesn’t mean I need food stamps.
Spending, spending, spending (in lieu of cut, cut, cut) is NOT going to help our economy grow. If you think it is, just how do you explain $14 trillion in national debt, $4.6 trillion increase under Obama (most in history), and the current fastest pace ever of increase in the national debt? Logic and facts are not on your side. We’ve spent our way into an economic crisis.
And, please show me a party (Tea Party included) that does NOT support public education? Even the Tea Party people who advocate privatizing public education STILL SUPPORT public education, and under any circustances “education of the public”. Of course, our current President sends HIS kids to a private school.
Aquagirl
August 23rd, 2011
11:51 am
I don’t recall ever advocating trampling anyone rights. So don’t try to pin that on me.
Sorry MPercy, I wasn’t trying to pin that on you. Quite the opposite, you’re one of the few people I’ve heard identifying with the Tea Party who are actively concerned about government intrusion when it affects somebody else. There’s not much protest if it’s not THEIR gunz, THEIR money, or THEIR god-granted Medicare. They may agree on an intellectual level other violations are bad but rarely seem arsed enough to do anything about it.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
11:51 am
Funny how the cons attack the the MLK family for corruption but give their party a free pass.
Right kay?
You have no right to say anything about corruption.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
11:51 am
Georgia has the worst government that dirty money can buy.
And it has only gotten significantly more corrupt and more inept since the GOP takeover of the past decade or two.
Keep the heat on these charlatans and thieves and maybe one day, even the Party First cons will wake up to the diseased organization they unquestioningly enable.
But I doubt it…
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
11:53 am
getalife,
One of Tucker’s best threads. She had moments of brilliance.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
11:54 am
kay,
Now about gop corruption.
Be consistent or be a hypocrite.
Lets hear it.
jm
August 23rd, 2011
11:54 am
Jay 11:24 – don’t worry. Tax increase loving Democrats already have that covered starting at the end of next year. Oh, and for real historical data
http://www.usgovernmentrevenue.com/downchart_gr.php?year=1800_2015&view=1&expand=&units=p&log=linear&fy=fy12&chart=F0-fed&bar=0&stack=1&size=1280_885&title=&state=US&color=c&local=s&show=
Yeah, historically 18-20%. Only post 1950. And only if you believe in Unicorns, the Tooth Fairy, and Santa Clause. (note that most periods range from 16.5% to 19%, the rest are outliers.)
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
11:55 am
Irene expected to grow to a Cat 4. Strongest storm since Hugo to hit Charleston. Boats in piled in the streets. Batten down, Charleston… you are in for a blow.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
11:56 am
Jed: So, why not cut taxes as a way to generate economic activity? Sounds like class warfare trumping solutions.
That’s exactly what a temporary payroll tax cut is. It gives the workers extra money to put back into the economy, and only hits/helps those making less than 106k. Tax cuts that affect ONLY those who will immediately spend the money, rather than save it, are the ones that stimulate the economy and help create jobs. Cutting taxes on businesses, whether small or large, does not do that. Cutting taxes on a rich person’s personal salary does not do that.
Just to be clear: Class warfare is to create the assumption that the poor should pay MORE, and/or the rich and/or businesses should pay LESS, not the other way around.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
11:57 am
M Percy @ 10:59
I agree with what you posted here. It’s suprising if you don’t assume that “liberals” (whatever that means) think a certain way, you will find we actually have alot of common ground.
Anyway, the only thing I would add to that, is that, and correct me if I’m wrong, the only new spending we have since Clinton is the new Medicare entitlement plan passed under Bush and paying off the wars. We haven’t added any real new spending since then. The increase in spending has been due to paying on the debt interest.
Now, I’m no financial expert, nor do I even play on on TV, so I could be wayyyyy off base, but to me, if you want to gripe about an increase in federal spending, you have to one, be honest and real about what it actually is, and two, you have to honest and real about ways to deal with it (raise taxes).
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
11:57 am
jm: Yeah, historically 18-20%. Only post 1950. And only if you believe in Unicorns, the Tooth Fairy, and Santa Clause. (note that most periods range from 16.5% to 19%, the rest are outliers.)
So 14% isn’t a problem… why?
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
11:57 am
Jm,
The President’s report on regulations is in and he will cut them.
Payroll tax and other tax cuts will be ordered.
There goes your argument.
What else you got?
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
11:57 am
And MPercy,
Sorry for the delay, kids needed help — pshaw…kids….needing help….from a parent…..
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
11:58 am
Nothing from kay.
Figures.
Jefferson
August 23rd, 2011
11:58 am
I’d like to know how GA is going to pay back the near 700million they now owe the Feds for unemployment, What are they going to cut?
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
11:59 am
“It never ceases to amaze me that Liberals try to pretend their is no Democrats in big business”
It never ceases to amaze me that wingnuts make false assumptions based on non-evidence.
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
August 23rd, 2011
11:59 am
Well, all this jabbering about a few thousand bucks here and there and not a word about how the guy that wrote “You Ain’t Nothin’ But a Hound Dog” has up and died. A fine, romantic song like that, and the guy is gone. And all people can talk about is how the fine Republicans down at the statehouse are getting a teeny bit uppity.
That song’s been running thru my head all morning. If I was a young buck again, I’d sing it to the first good-looking woman I see and sweep her off of her feet.
But no, this bunch just got to yammer about unimportant stuff. Anyhow, it’s lunch time. And now that I see the folks down at the statehouse have cleared the way for White folks to take Fulton County back, the beanie-weenies are going to taste extra good today.
So let Bookman be cryin’ all the time. He’s nothin’ but a hound dog.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
11:59 am
I do appreciate conservatives FINALLY going “well this means we were right!” Instead of running from their positions because Obama supports and implements them. Maybe if that keeps up we might actually DO something to help our country instead of just voting no on everything.
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
12:00 pm
getalife,
No one has a lock on corruption. The GOP is just as complicit in corruption as the Democratic party. Always has been. We get nowhere with this he said, she said game we play every day. It really does nothing but satisfy our own egos and give us something to do. We still have basic differences that are important to air. But corruption?…… an age old consequence of having elected politicians, regardless of party.
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
12:00 pm
Uncle Jed: “So, why not cut taxes as a way to generate economic activity? Sounds like class warfare trumping solutions.”
Tax cuts do ZERO to stimulate jobs and only make the pile of cash the corporations are sitting on rise higher, blocking out the sun. Giving us an economic eclipse.
DawgDag: “Sure, government can confiscate cash and wealth or pass laws directing corporations (people) to use it in certain ways. Where do think that leads? If that’s where you want to take us (Marxist or Fascist State, moreso than we already are), I want no part of it.”
Sure you realize though that what you laid out there is diametrically opposed to what we have now, so if you’re concern is that we’ll succumb to a Marxist state, believe me you’ve got nothing to worry about at the moment.
On the other hand, your scenario is based on the false option that what we are in fact moving towards is not precisely some sort of dystopia — which may or may not be recognizably fascist or marxist, but at any rate is sure to be nasty and brutish — in which the capitalists continue their attack on all those who are not big earners and well connected, further immiserating the poor, and leading to even more profound social unrest. So your implied assumption that we have a choice – that the status quo is sustainable – is false.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
12:00 pm
Bosch: It never ceases to amaze me that wingnuts make false assumptions based on non-evidence.
I dunno Bosch, that ceased to amaze me a long time ago.
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
12:00 pm
“So 14% isn’t a problem… why?”
If you’re spending more than 14% than yes. But the 14% figure has more (almost all) to do with the poor economy than the marginal tax rate. It’s bad enough that we’re only getting 14%, but when you couple that with spending % well above the normal it creates massive amounts of debt.
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
12:01 pm
Kayaker — “And each of these elected Congressmen/women seem to think that they are pretty secure in their position. Like Daniel Inouye in Hawaii….. he’s been re-elected every time to the Senate since WWII.”
Well, actually since just before statehood, 1959 IIRC. And he’s a Senator, not a Congressman. The whole state votes for him.
Republicans can and do get elected to statewide offices out there, as well as Federal. Republican Charles Djou won the special election last year to fill a Congressional seat for a few months (he was unseated in the general election by a Democrat), and the recently-in-office Republican Governor, Linda Lingle, just finished her term last December (and was also replaced by a Democrat). Prior to her stint in the Governor’s mansion, Lingle was Mayor of Maui County (there’s not really much of a distinction between cities and counties in the Aloha State). So Republicans can and do get elected to significant office in Hawaii.
But don’t look up Frank Fasi, the longtime Mayor of Honolulu. His tale will just confuse you.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
12:01 pm
kay,
Deflection and no personal responsibility.
Figures.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
12:03 pm
Talking Head: So temporary increase on the wealthy, temporary decrease via payroll tax cut, including sensible waste cutting in the same deal, until we get our numbers back up to at least 16% revenue and more positive GDP growth, as well as taking a swipe at the spending percentage. Whaddya say?
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
12:03 pm
Kayaker — “Hawaii has not had a Republican Congressman or Senator since Aug 21, 1959 when they became a state and it doesn’t look too promising for Repubs anytime in the future.”
You are incorrect. A Hawaii GOP Congressman *just* left office. And so did the GOP Governor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Djou
Mary Elizabeth
August 23rd, 2011
12:05 pm
Kayaker 11:36
Mary Elizabeth,
Some has to pay for all of that.
———————————————————
Kayaker, thanks for your comment. Addressing finance, as you should have, allows me to emphasize the last paragraph in my last post. Please reread that paragraph, if you will. It recommends ideas that will foster growth and development, and that growth and development, economically, will bring additional revenues.
Growing economically, as we did in the Clinton years, and in most other Democratic administrations, has fostered revenue growth. That is how the common good programs that I mentioned are paid for, as well as through our taxes that serve the common good. (And by not making the poor decision of the Bush tax cuts that ended up creating an increased deficitt.)
We have been programmed to think that we cannot both serve the common good and also pay for it. That is erroneous thinking. However, we do now, unfortunately, have to work on cuts to all spending (not just on entitlements), as well as on raising taxes and other means of gathering revenue, because of the hugh deficit we have accrued.
It appears that accruing that huge deficit has backfired on the American people.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
12:05 pm
LUNCH
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
12:05 pm
Adam – your “bring it” reminds of Bushes “bring it on”. YOU are grossly in error, due to your liberal addiction, that is was the FEDERAL governments job to evacuate citizens from New Orleans. This is patently false. If a government was responsible, it was either NO or Louisiana. Not comparative? Your objection was “this disaster is NOT comparable to this other disaster”. Seems to fall in the same ballpark. I assume you are saying the fire boats were coast guard dispatched? OK. Again, since you are a self appointed “expert”; please provide the timeline from platform ignition, sinking, to the well being capped off.
I guess Obama appointed the wrong fool to run the permit office, eh? Or, the wrong guy was in charge of the Coast Guard?
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
12:05 pm
Adam,
What’s funny now to see on the blog are all the conservatives who claim to blame Bush just as much for the financial woes, but are still complacent to bash liberals with the same sweeping swoops. Twas not the case here pre-Obama.
mm
August 23rd, 2011
12:07 pm
“The conundrum: Dems/Obama were all about revenue raising during the “default show”. Here,they say that leaving this money in the hands of workers is better for the economy. So, why not cut taxes as a way to generate economic activity? Sounds like class warfare trumping solutions.
I refuse to accept your premise about “the clear, unavoidable message”.”
Yep, no matter how guilty they are and no matter how much proof you provide, they still defend themselves with BS.
Hey Einstein, this is why the GOP will get crushed next year.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
12:07 pm
“due to your liberal addiction”
Is a Hyperbole Sandwich an Irish food thing? Does that go well with Cornbeef and Cabbage and Soda Bread?
bookman parrot
August 23rd, 2011
12:08 pm
Jay,
You and your lib cohorts have finally convinced me, you are correct. I have seen the “error” of common sense and I now will support Obama in his quest to turn the U.S. into a 3rd world country. Your propaganda has succeeded.
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
12:08 pm
Joe Mama,
I lived in Kailua for about 25 yrs during Fasi’s many terms as mayor, testified before the Demoractic Legislature on several occasions and am very familiar with Hawaii politics. Linda Lingle was an exception to the rule. But Inouye, Patsy Mink, until recently Neil Abercrombie and Daniel Akaka…. all democrats and not expected to change anytime in the near future.
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
12:08 pm
That’s exactly what a temporary payroll tax cut is. It gives the workers extra money to put back into the economy, and only hits/helps those making less than 106k. Tax cuts that affect ONLY those who will immediately spend the money, rather than save it, are the ones that stimulate the economy and help create jobs.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I fully understand the concept of a payroll tax cut. I refuse to accept the premise that only folks earning less than $106k spend money. However, if more liquid assets in the economy create activity, a point on which we agree, then why not infuse the economy with more, and not less?
I would submit that lower taxes and regulatory certainty do more to help create jobs than $600 bucks in someone’s wallet or a nominal rollback in the payroll tax.
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
12:08 pm
Adam,
The only true way to increase revenues is for the economy to start growing again. Having better than sub 3% GDP growth for starters…
Finding America’s next big production is the ticket out of this mess
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
12:08 pm
If you want to address our corruption problem, unite with the rest of Americans and do it.
If not , give it a rest .
You sound like hypocrites.
Now is the time.
Put up or shut up.
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
12:10 pm
Kayaker –
” lived in Kailua for about 25 yrs during Fasi’s many terms as mayor, testified before the Demoractic Legislature on several occasions and am very familiar with Hawaii politics. Linda Lingle was an exception to the rule. But Inouye, Patsy Mink, until recently Neil Abercrombie and Daniel Akaka…. all democrats and not expected to change anytime in the near future.”
You must have missed out on Charles Djou, then. He didn’t serve long, but he *did* serve as a US Congressman from Hawaii just last year.
I lived Mililani side; Kailua side too wet fo’ me, brah!
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
12:12 pm
getalife,
You seem to be in somewhat of a twit. I have just admitted to you, as any thinking person would, that corruption and underhanded politics occurs equally in both parties. That is not deflection, that is reality. What do you want?
Steve - B.
August 23rd, 2011
12:12 pm
Since the F in FDIC stands for Federal maybe the Federal Government should investigate why Georgia banks have cost the FDIC so much.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
12:12 pm
“getalife you really are a bit of a retard, you know?”
The Magic Calendar was RIGHT!! See Paul? Never misunderestimate the power of the Magic Calendar……
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
12:13 pm
Part Two:
Just to be clear: Class warfare is to create the assumption that the poor should pay MORE, and/or the rich and/or businesses should pay LESS, not the other way around.
++++++++++++++++
I disagree with your definition particulary as it relates to politics. The way it gets played is that the poor hourly sob is getting screwed by the evil corporations and the fat cats (anyone earning more than the oppressed) aren’t paying their “fair” share, thus meaning the little guy is carrying the burden of supporting the society and government functions. That is simply poppycock.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
12:14 pm
“getalife you really are a bit of a retard, you know?”
I do know.
RB from Gwinnett
August 23rd, 2011
12:17 pm
“You seem to be in somewhat of a twit. I have just admitted to you, as any thinking person would, that corruption and underhanded politics occurs equally in both parties. That is not deflection, that is reality. What do you want?”
As ususal, getaclue wants everything to be done according to the getaclue filter of what’s right and wrong. Basically that means everybody on the right is corrupt and everybody on the left isn’t. Doesn’t matter the issue, the person, anything. A complete and total inability to THINK.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
12:18 pm
The blaming both parties is deflection for your personal responsibility to address it in your own party.
You give your party a free pass, march lock step with gop corruption and blame both parties.
You fight against it in your party and the dems will get scared like they always do and stop theirs.
Get started and stop calling me a retard.
Mr Right
August 23rd, 2011
12:18 pm
Jay, you would have a little more creditability if you held the Dems to the same standards that you do the Republicans! I’m sure you would say you do but if so then why is it ALWAYS the bad GOP that we hear about and NEVER the Dems! And don’t be coming around saying that the Dems don’t have any bad eggs in their basket, we know better.
jm
August 23rd, 2011
12:18 pm
I do know.
getalife, you crack me up sometimes.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
12:19 pm
Speaking of Daniel Inouye, that guy rocks. He is the epitome of class, bravery and brains.
A true American hero. A Democratic lion who spoke out loudly during that sordid Iran-Contra affair under Saint Ronnie and a champion of the little guy.
I’m a little surprised that he was never swiftboated…
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
12:21 pm
Talking Head: “The only true way to increase revenues is for the economy to start growing again. Having better than sub 3% GDP growth for starters…
Finding America’s next big production is the ticket out of this mess”
That’s crazy talk. That’s wild-eyed commie pinko talkin’ right there.
Guards! Guards! Have this person escorted to solitary for incitement!!
[sarc]
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
12:21 pm
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
12:00 pm
Uncle Jed: “So, why not cut taxes as a way to generate economic activity? Sounds like class warfare trumping solutions.”
Tax cuts do ZERO to stimulate jobs and only make the pile of cash the corporations are sitting on rise higher, blocking out the sun. Giving us an economic eclipse.
++++++++++++++++++
While that may make for good fiction reading at bedtime, down at the indoctrination camp, it is just not true. Ask around. If you know some small business owners (that covers some sizable entities), ask them if they are comfortable with hiring right now. Many, if not most, setting political party alliance aside, will tell you that regulatory and taxation uncertainty, combined with not knowing where the Obamacare juggernaut will end up, have them unwilling to hire. They can get by with part-time, temporary staffing for now, which is not helping the economy at the level we need.
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
12:22 pm
AmVet,
We used to call Inouye the One Armed Bandit. Member of the 442nd, Medal of Honor winner. Never said that he wasn’t straight up. Just said that being a Democrat, he has a perpetual pass to his elected position.
Is it 2012 yet?
August 23rd, 2011
12:22 pm
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
11:57 am
Jm,
The President’s report on regulations is in and he will cut them.
I wonder what he is doing with the over 300 new regulations he added just in July?
Just wonderong
.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
12:23 pm
Have you ever heard a con say they will fight against gop corruption?
Jefferson
August 23rd, 2011
12:23 pm
Boy those GOP cats running GA sure do instill a vision of a great future for the state, huh?
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
12:24 pm
“I wonder what he is doing with the over 300 new regulations he added just in July”
Ask Congress to repeal the bills they passed that intiated the need for the regulations?
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
12:25 pm
Have you heard of a gop candidate promising to fight against gop corruption?
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
12:25 pm
kayaker — Respectfully, one doesn’t “win” the Congressional Medal of Honor. It’s not a lottery or a bingo game.
My Drill Sergeant in boot camp imparted that nugget of knowledge to us while we were all in the front leaning rest position. According to DS Webb, that’s the best position for Privates to be in if you want them to effin’ learn something.
WOODSTOCK MIKE
August 23rd, 2011
12:25 pm
Housing sales for 2011 are the worst numbers that have ever been recorded in history. For minorities the new home start numbers are even worse. Democratic response….
“It’s George Bush’s fault”
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
12:26 pm
Well, the Righties are strutting around here like the cock of the walk. Don’t forget, if your guy is elected he’s going to have the same problems to face.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
12:26 pm
I rest my case.
Not bad for a retard huh Paul?
Billybob
August 23rd, 2011
12:27 pm
keep talking jay………and all your hit squad keep talking……….pretty soon with all the rhetoric coming from your side, these liberal talking boards will be the only place you have left to be heard…….i love libs and you are round-about proving why hussein is toast in 2012………coward
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
12:31 pm
2012,
If you are talking about the law the sc justice thomas is an activist against it, tht law will change when needed.
Any cons fighting against the sc activist corruption ?
Nope.
Any cons fighting against citizen united corruption?
Nope.
What say you Paul?
Aquagirl
August 23rd, 2011
12:31 pm
And don’t be coming around saying that the Dems don’t have any bad eggs in their basket, we know better.
You might have a point….if the Republicans didn’t pile their bad eggs on top of the basket.
Jack Murphy and Greg Morris hold their Banking Committee memberships because other Republicans put them there. It’s not some group of nutty gerrymandered voters that make them secure. It’s guys like Chip “you know I can’t pay it back” Rogers.
Republicans PROMOTE their bad eggs, and protect them even when the rest of the world can’t stand the stench.
SwedeAtlanta
August 23rd, 2011
12:33 pm
It doesn’t matter whether these are Democrats or Republics. The party in power at a local, state or national level is vulnerable to boastful and cocky behavior.
In Georgia, the Republics own the state and arguably all of the state’s many problems from high unemployment, transportation issues, ethics problems, failure of the educational system, etc. But no one wants to hold them accountable.
So I say to Georgians, you get the government you elect. When you roll the Real Deal scumbag into office with solid majorities in both the State House and Senate, you will get good ole boy politics at its best. ‘You scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours’. They are not interested in helping Georgians if it means taking money out of their own pockets.
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
12:34 pm
getalife,
Short scenario…. Used to live in Enterprise, AL who was represented in Congress by a GOP Congressman named Terry Everett. Before Everett was elected to the Congress, he worked for Southern Bank who happened to have a lot of farm loans on peanut quota property. When Everett learned of a foreclosure, he snapped up the property for his own use. Accumulated about 3500 acres of quota property. After elected to Congress, Everett was named, you guessed it, Chairman of the Agricultural Committee. When the peanut quota stink got too strong, even for elected politicians, Everett negotiated a 3.5 billion dollar settlement to those who owned peanut quota land. His take?…… nearly 9M. Yeah, getalife, there are corrupt GOP politicians that are in it for what they can get. OK, my man, it’s your turn.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
12:34 pm
Hey look getalife and Paul, we are now a “hit squad”. cool. :8:
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
12:35 pm
Dang, how can you be cool if you forgot how to do the emoticon with the sunglasses…
is it….
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
12:35 pm
Okay, yeah, hit squad….cool
ken
August 23rd, 2011
12:35 pm
Once politicians feel themselves unaccountable, there’s no telling what they might do.
Good statement Jay . A good description of Obama and his wrecking crew.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
12:38 pm
kay and Paul,
Like AmVet , I screamed about the culture of corruption in Washington during the w disaster.
I concluded that the cons will never fight against it, so I let it go.
So don’t give me that both party cop out.
When cons fight against corruption , there will be unity on this issue but until then it is nothing but deflection of blame that get nothing accomplished.
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
12:38 pm
Uncle Jed: “Ask around. If you know some small business owners (that covers some sizable entities), ask them if they are comfortable with hiring right now. Many, if not most, setting political party alliance aside, will tell you that regulatory and taxation uncertainty, combined with not knowing where the Obamacare juggernaut will end up, have them unwilling to hire. ”
I’m just not buying it. Regardless of what these people are saying, the fact is that there is one primary reason they are not expaning/hiring: lack of consumer demand which is directly tied to sagging wages vis-a-vis productivity, not to mention consumer debt. There’s a confidence problem alright: a crisis of CONSUMER confidence.
So, are you saying the skyrocketing gap between corporate management earnings and worker wages (counting benefits, which are under attack on all sides) doesn’t bother you:? Why is that?
Bruno
August 23rd, 2011
12:41 pm
In case any of you missed the headline, legendary Motown songwriter Nick Ashford passed away yesterday. His marriage to Valerie Simpson was one of the great love stories of our time. From accounts, she rescued him from homeless and drug addiction leading to nearly 48 years together.
In addition to writing songs that they recorded themselves, they wrote numerous hits for others, including “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough”, “Your Precious Love”, “Ain’t Nothing Like the Real Thing” for Marvin Gaye and Tammi Terrell, “”Reach Out and Touch” for Diana Ross and the Spupremes, and “I’m every Woman” for Chaka Khan. My favorite composition of theirs was this one that Marvin and Tammi recorded:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZNbfKibFLE
Thomas
August 23rd, 2011
12:44 pm
I’m just not buying it. Regardless of what these people are saying, the fact is that there is one primary reason they are not expaning/hiring: lack of consumer demand which is directly tied to sagging wages vis-a-vis productivity, not to mention consumer debt. There’s a confidence problem alright: a crisis of CONSUMER confidence.
So, are you saying the skyrocketing gap between corporate management earnings and worker wages (counting benefits, which are under attack on all sides) doesn’t bother you:? Why is that?
Absolutely not in the majority of business which is in fact small and mid size. Confidence as to buying and hiring are the main drivers.
b/t/w I have been a frequent blogger that if you weren’t the founder of the company you should have a ceiling on your comp if you are a public company. But the gap you speak of plays no part in the decision making of the small to mid size company.
DawgDad
August 23rd, 2011
12:45 pm
“Tax cuts do ZERO to stimulate jobs and only make the pile of cash the corporations are sitting on rise higher”
Wow. You leave me almost speechless. No point discussing economics with a brick.
Now, there is validity in what you say in terms of corporations with off-shore production. The trick these days is targeting tax policy to ensure ON-SHORE production and job growth, and not to just fuel more domestic consumer demand. Which is why the Bush and Obama tax rebate/reduction policies targeted at taxpayers in general did not work – they were focused on increasing consumer demand, which in the short run may have heated up the economy but did little to nothing to stimulate sustainable growth and had the negative effect of driving up the trade deficit. Government, if it does anything, needs to incentivize investment in American on-shore production and conversion of raw materials. Anything else is a waste of time and money.
mm
August 23rd, 2011
12:45 pm
“ask them if they are comfortable with hiring right now. Many, if not most, setting political party alliance aside, will tell you that regulatory and taxation uncertainty, combined with not knowing where the Obamacare juggernaut will end up, have them unwilling to hire.”
Total BS. They are not hiring because there is no DEMAND for their products or services. Why? Because most people don’t have money to spend on anything other than their bills.
The righties think they are the wizards of economics. They need to learn the ins and outs of Supply and Demand.
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
12:48 pm
60% of Congress Not Holding Town Halls
Submitted by
No Labels Blogger
on August 22, 2011
Is your representative holding a public town hall meeting this August recess? No Labels called every office, and only 40% are scheduling open town hall meetings. It’s a sad sign of the state of affairs when our elected officials don’t have time to meet with their constituents.
No Labels activists spoke to all 430 current members of the House of Representatives to find that only 175* of them scheduled meetings. The results of the phone survey also reveal that members of both parties share the blame, with 67% of Democrats and 50% of Republicans stating they had no town hall meetings scheduled for the recess period.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What’s up with that? I thought these were representatives. The better news for us here in Georgia is that our folks did quite a abit better than the national numbers:
Georgia has 13 congressional districts/representatives and of those 8 will have town halls. Of the 5 that won’t, 3 are democrats and 2 are republicans. That puts us at about 62% holding meetings.
mm
August 23rd, 2011
12:49 pm
It is obvious the righties have been brainwashed by their corporate owned GOP. For 10 years their low tax, trickle down, outsource our jobs economy has failed miserably.
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
12:50 pm
Rightie mantra: we focked it up. You can’t fix it Now we’re gonna get elected (again). Sounds logical to me.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
12:50 pm
Well said mm.
They have no credibility on the economy or corruption.
Dirty Dawg
August 23rd, 2011
12:50 pm
Dave R…Don’t Tread…do your own research if you truly want to know, but my question was ‘what if it were absolutely, incontrovertibly, participants’ admitting their guilt in the theft of any and all elections’…if that were so, what would your reaction be? I believe that it wouldn’t matter to you so long as Republicans were in power. You don’t really care about the ‘right to vote’, or ‘one-man-one-vote’, do you? So long as your side wins, that’s all that matters…and that’s the saddest part of it all. How can you compete with that? Hell you guys even got more guns and ammo than we do…was this a great country, or what?
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
12:51 pm
Supply and Demand
Supply side economics?
Somthing important is missing ain’t it.
Demand. Consumption.
It ain’t rocket science.
DawgDad
August 23rd, 2011
12:51 pm
So, mm, you want Government to point a gun at my head and create DEMAND?
tireofit
August 23rd, 2011
12:52 pm
WOODSTOCK MIKE
August 23rd, 2011
12:25 pm
Housing sales for 2011 are the worst numbers that have ever been recorded in history. For minorities the new home start numbers are even worse. Democratic response….
“It’s George Bush’s fault”
++++
Hard to argue with the truth!
mm
August 23rd, 2011
12:53 pm
It’s speaks volumes about the mentality of the wingnuts on this blob. Notice the blog names: BillyBob, Uncle Jed, etc.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
12:55 pm
It amazes me Americans do not want to hold them accountable for a better future for their children.
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
12:58 pm
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
12:38 pm
I’m just not buying it.
+++++++++++++++++++++
Is that because you’ve asked around and gotten conflicting information or is it because you have chosen to “just not buy it”?
So, are you saying the skyrocketing gap between corporate management earnings and worker wages (counting benefits, which are under attack on all sides) doesn’t bother you:? Why is that?
++++++++++++++++++++
I would prefer to examine individual sitautions to be sure I fully understood the dynamics in play rather than make knee-jerk assumptions typically based upon news tidbits that we all know are foisted in ways supportive of a viewpoint, in most cases. Notwithstanding, I have no real problem with “corporate management” earning at significantly higher levels of compensation. In my experience in such roles, there exists a much higher degree of job volatility; responsibilty; stress; and accountability. Those positions merit higher compensation packages.
mm
August 23rd, 2011
1:00 pm
DawgDad,
“So, mm, you want Government to point a gun at my head and create DEMAND?”
That is the most ignorant post I’ve seen lately, although it does mirror the way righties try to fight logic with stupidity.
First of all, do you actually think that YOU being a republican makes you a job creator? LOL
Demand occurs when consumers have money in their pockets. Not when millionaires have money in their pockets. There are approximately 200,000 millionaires in this country. The rest of our population is struggling to make ends meet. The millionaires are sitting on mountains of cash. The rest of the population has no cash.
@@
August 23rd, 2011
1:00 pm
Say it ain’t so, Joe!!!
Joe Biden: What we ended up doing is setting up a system whereby we did cut by $1.2 trillion upfront, the deficit over the next 10 years. And we set up a group of senators that have to come up with another $1.2 to $1.7 trillion in savings or automatically there will be cuts that go into effect in January to get those savings. So the savings will be accomplished. But as I was talking to some of your leaders, you share a similar concern here in China. You have no safety net. Your policy has been one which I fully understand — I’m not second-guessing — of one child per family. The result being that you’re in a position where one wage earner will be taking care of four retired people. Not sustainable.
So hopefully we can act in a way on a problem that’s much less severe than yours, and maybe we can learn together from how we can do that.
Read more: http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/texttrans/2011/08/20110821131809su0.2135279.html#ixzz1VsHAqLrw
Hard to comprehend was Joe’s sayin’. Is he advocating one child per family in the U.S. or is he saying we need more young people to sustain our entitlement programs?
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
1:01 pm
Anybody on the left talking about Maxine Waters husband getting government loans to bail out his failed bank? How about Nancy Pelosi’s husband making millions off of government business? How about Obama getting his home for half price from a known criminal? How about Dick Durbin geting a sweetheart deal from Countrywide? How about the Clintons receiving special and illegal treatment on the White Water scandal? Remember Herman Talmadge and his magic coat? How about president Clinton firing the white house travel staff, some who had worked there for thirty years, so he could hire a political contrbutor? (Then after unjustly firing them had the IRS investigate them in an attempt to find a reason for the firing) How about Obama just this past Friday violating federal law for political gain? How about Clinton firing 2000 federal prosecutors to stall the investigation and prosecution of Dan Rostenkowski? What about Hilliary getting a 5 million dollar advance for a book that everyone knew wouldn’t sell? I could go on and on. But what’s the point. You have to actually be insane to believe one party is more corrupt than the other.
mm
August 23rd, 2011
1:04 pm
I see Paul Ryan decided not to run for Prez. He’s got more sense than the rest of the GOP field combined. Now it’s on the next great white hope, Christie.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:05 pm
MR,
Thanks for proving my point.
I am shocked, shocked I say you deflected blame to the dems.
So, what do you propose to stop corruption?
key and Paul can chime in on this one too.
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
1:05 pm
@@
August 23rd, 2011
1:00 pm
I am confused about the “up front” quote since not a penney was cut at this time.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
1:08 pm
getalife – Bosch
[[Paul
August 23rd, 2011
12:08 pm
[[getalife
August 23rd, 2011
12:01 pm
kay,
Deflection and no personal responsibility.
Figures.
getalife you really are a bit of a retard, you know?]]
wasn’t me.
If we’ve a new blogger who picked the same moniker, I’ll let it pass. Otherwise, I’ll see if AJC’ll send him to Elba.
So, Paul at 12:08. You new here?
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
1:09 pm
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:05 pm
I am still waiting for some one to tell me what happened to the TARP funds and the Stimulous funds that were left over? Obama’s pocket?
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
1:09 pm
Thomas: “Absolutely not in the majority of business which is in fact small and mid size. Confidence as to buying and hiring are the main drivers.”
I think that’s what I said, no? I said the main driver is consumer confidence, i.e. aggregate demand. Consumers aren’t spending. Hence no need for companies – unless you’re multlinational and doing business in emerging markets – to hire/expand.
“But the gap you speak of plays no part in the decision making of the small to mid size company.”
The gap I’m speaking of — betw corporate earnings and worker wages – is an issue of social justice. But ultimately it has real economic consequences too. Impoverished populations don’t provide for lucrative markets.
DawgDag: We’re not all that far apart here, in one sense. The stop-gap stimulus programs of Bush/Obama were pitiful, just a pittance of what was needed. Don’t stick a few dollars in people’s pockets, give them a job, even if it’s relatively low-paying. But more than that what they need is serious forgiven debt. Get them out of their mortgages. As for the other part of your response — reversing off-shoring — for that we need a manufacturing policy. But we can’t have that without a political consensus with the will to challenge vested interests who are really just fine with the status quo.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
1:09 pm
Mighty Righty
You forgot about the “W”’s.
Don’t you care?
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
1:10 pm
@@
Seems to me VP Biden was using diplomatic-speak to take a swipe at the Chinese, telling them that for all their recent criticism of the US, they’re in a worse long-term situation.
@@
August 23rd, 2011
1:11 pm
New national debt data: It’s growing about $3 million a minute, even during his vacation
Numbers with that many digits are hard to grasp, even for a Harvard head. So, let’s put it another way:
One billion seconds ago Bill Clinton was nearing the end of his two terms and George W. Bush’s baseball collection was still on the shelves in the Austin governor’s office.
The nation’s debt increased $4.9 trillion under President Bush too, btw. But it took him 2,648 days to do it. Obama will surpass that sum during this term.
Obama is saying yes, we can get control of the national debt. But ominously every time he says that he adds that trillions of dollars in infrastructure repairs are badly needed across the country. And with interest rates so low, according to the thinking on Obama’s planet, now is an excellent time to borrow even more money.
So, it looks like not too long before Americans learn what comes after 1,000 trillions.
It’s quadrillion. But for Bernanke’s sake, please don’t tell anyone in Washington.
Cute!
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:12 pm
Paul,
My first thought was is that Paul calling me a retard?
I apologize for calling you out.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
1:14 pm
getalife
No need to apologize. You could only go with the data you had.
Big difference between you and other bloggers – you get new information, you change your mind. And you apologize, even when you weren’t solely responsible.
Thanks.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:14 pm
MR,
Have you researched your question or just blame the President in a knee jerk reaction?
The facts show where the money went but you will ignore it.
Midori
August 23rd, 2011
1:15 pm
Paul – for the record, I knew that wasn’t you who called Getalife a retard.
You have more class than that. And a better vocabulary.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:17 pm
Paul,
I should have known it was out of your character.
Lets see if a con will admit stealing your name and calling me a retard before Jay bans them.
Take some personal responsibility for this action con.
Who did it?
Man up and admit it.
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
1:18 pm
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
1:09 pm
In case you didn’t understand, my post was about Democrats. But feel free to point out any Bush corruption, if you know of any. I don’t so help me out. I really can’t think of any.
stands for decibels
August 23rd, 2011
1:20 pm
(Oft topic.)
A bit of history from Gallup, posted without comment.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/149114/Obama-Close-Race-Against-Romney-Perry-Bachmann-Paul.aspx
——
In August 1999, Texas Gov. George W. Bush led Vice President Al Gore by 55% to 41% in a Gallup trial heat poll. That race ended up in a virtual dead heat, with Gore ultimately winning slightly more of the national popular vote than Bush.
In August 1995, Kansas Sen. Bob Dole was slightly ahead of President Bill Clinton in a Gallup poll, 48% to 46%. On Election Day 1996, Clinton beat Dole by eight points.
In August 1983, President Ronald Reagan was ahead of Democrat Walter Mondale by only one point, 44% to 43%. Reagan went on to beat Mondale in a 59% to 41% landslide in the November 1984 election.
In August 1979, incumbent President Jimmy Carter was tied with former California Gov. Reagan — each getting 45% of the vote. Reagan ultimately defeated Carter by 10 points.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
1:20 pm
Midori
Thanks.
getalife
I’ve asked he be sent to Elba. I doubt he’ll man up. Courage and responsibility are unknown concepts.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:20 pm
MR,
Did you steal Paul’s name and call me a retard?
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
1:23 pm
Uncle Jed — “In my experience in such roles, there exists a much higher degree of job volatility; responsibilty; stress; and accountability. Those positions merit higher compensation packages.”
I fail to see how golden parachutes and sky-high compensation packages are justifiable in the cases of CEOs who have flown their companies into the ground or who needed government bailouts to stay in business.
I also don’t have a problem with reasonable compensation for corporate executives, but I don’t think that a very large proportion of those executives are reasonably compensated.
Schrodingers cat
August 23rd, 2011
1:25 pm
LWM – “But more than that what they need is serious forgiven debt.”
_______________________________________________________
That certainly teaches financial responsibility…so the more irresponsible the debt the bigger the reward?
I might go for better or longer terms but forgive the debt?…No!
You borrowed it, you pay it back…It’s just how I was raised
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
1:25 pm
Mighty Righty
So was mine…..too funny.
did it part your hair when it went over your head?
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:26 pm
RB,
Was it you?
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
1:26 pm
mm
August 23rd, 2011
12:45 pm
+++++++++++++
With how many business owners did you have the discussion I mentioned? You declare BS, but you may be basing your declaration on DA. (let’s just go with “didn’t ask”).
You see, there actually is some demand and subsequent hiring, albeit weak. My point, which I think you and others may have missed in haste, was that permanent/full-time (benefits) employment is just way down the crapper. Some companies are growing, but not hiring robustly. There are cases where owners and their families are working more hours to cover the need and as I said, they are relying on part-time and contract employees. These don’t have much, if any effect on the labor statistics.
Peter
August 23rd, 2011
1:27 pm
WOW ……. WOODSTOCK MIKE…….. Typically you have more then just the Blah Blah you posted today….must be a lazy day !
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:28 pm
kay, jed, jm?
Schrodingers cat
August 23rd, 2011
1:28 pm
Joe Mama – “I fail to see how golden parachutes and sky-high compensation packages are justifiable in the cases of CEOs who have flown their companies into the ground or who needed government bailouts to stay in business.”
__________________________________________
I’m sure those are the terms of the contract…is it smart…Don’t know, but they have a contract which should be honored…
stands for decibels
August 23rd, 2011
1:28 pm
That certainly teaches financial responsibility…so the more irresponsible the debt the bigger the reward?
That’s been the message we’ve been sending to the banksters for the past three years, yep.
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
1:29 pm
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:14 pm
I don’t have proof of Obama’s dishonesty or for that matter believe he embezzeled. That did get your attention though. But, there is in fact money unaccounted for and he is the man in charge and is therefore responsible.
Spade is a spade
August 23rd, 2011
1:30 pm
Good to see the Repubs are catching up to the Dems in shenanigans. A balanced ticket. Vote Libertarian, you wont’ find too many of them being greased by lobbyists as Dems/Repubs are.
Mr. Bookman, I must ask…how did you write about Dems for how they ran everything prior to the 2000s? Human rights abuses aside, didn’t they have a few ethical lapses while running this wonderful state for 140 years after they lost the war to keep humans in slavery?
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:30 pm
MR,
Did you steal Paul’s name?
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
1:31 pm
Schrodinger’s cat: “That certainly teaches financial responsibility…so the more irresponsible the debt the bigger the reward?
I might go for better or longer terms but forgive the debt?…No!
You borrowed it, you pay it back…It’s just how I was raised”
Responsibility only has a bite if you’re a regular citizen. After the tightened bankruptcy laws of several years back it’s now vastly easier for a corporation to dump its debt (send its debtors packing) and start over than it is for the average citizen.
But hey, that’s business as usual in the plutocracy.
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
1:32 pm
Poll: Americans blame Bush for bad economy by wide margin
By a wide margin, more Americans blame former President George W. Bush for the national economic outlook than they do President Barack Obama, according to a new poll.
Numbers out of Quinnipiac University Thursday morning [July 27, 2011] indicated that 54 percent of Americans say Bush is to blame for exploding the federal deficit and swelling unemployment, whereas just 27 percent believe it is President Obama’s fault.
Those figures are bad news for Republicans, who are hoping to hang the nation’s poor economic state around the president to defeat him in 2012.
By and large, Americans told Quinnipiac that they trust Obama on the economy more than congressional Republicans, despite a growing dissatisfaction. Fourty-five percent also said they trust the president to help the U.S. economy, versus 38 percent who believe Republicans could do a better job.
It’s amazing how the public “get’s it,” but the Righties on this blog crow and strut. I wouldn’t be measuring the White House for those drapes just yet.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
1:32 pm
Uncle Jed: I refuse to accept the premise that only folks earning less than $106k spend money.
Not what I said, and not what I meant to imply. However, you can certainly agree that MOST of the people who make less than that DO spend money, even if they’re not the only ones. And if you rely on actual data, the further up you go in income levels, the less money is spent and the more money is saved.
However, if more liquid assets in the economy create activity, a point on which we agree, then why not infuse the economy with more, and not less?
For the same reason you don’t flood any market with anything. It has to be done reasonably.
I would submit that lower taxes and regulatory certainty do more to help create jobs than $600 bucks in someone’s wallet or a nominal rollback in the payroll tax.
They don’t. The evidence on that has been clear for some time now.
The way it gets played is that the poor hourly sob is getting screwed by the evil corporations and the fat cats (anyone earning more than the oppressed) aren’t paying their “fair” share, thus meaning the little guy is carrying the burden of supporting the society and government functions. That is simply poppycock.
The fact that this particular argument doesn’t hold water does NOT mean that those who have more than they ever have, and are NOT in a bad position, should pay less to the government, or that because this argument is false, the opposite muist be true and it’s really the poor that’s not paying their fair share. Those two suggestions I just mentioned are ACTUAL class warfare.
If you know some small business owners (that covers some sizable entities), ask them if they are comfortable with hiring right now.
Non-sequiter. Taxes would have to be cut so low that they account for hiring at least one person, part time. No tax cuts have ever done that for a small business. Small business owners are not comfortable hiring for reasons other than taxes and regulation. Those two things have nothing to do with the hiring decisions of a small business.
Talking Head: The only true way to increase revenues is for the economy to start growing again. Having better than sub 3% GDP growth for starters…
I disagree. I think that will increase revenue, yes, but it’s not the only way to increase revenue, and does nothing for the short term.
@@
August 23rd, 2011
1:34 pm
Paul:
Seems to me VP Biden was using diplomatic-speak to take a swipe at the Chinese
You bustin’ at the “seems” with speculation.
For all his faults, I still like Joe. Not an elitist bone in his body.
=============================
I was visiting Michael Tomasky’s blog. Low and behold, self-proclaimed leftists were calling for Jon Huntsman to challenge Obama in the primaries. Why? Because he’s willing to compromise and embraces cap and trade.
I guess they’re willing to overlook this:
It’s not completely implausible, and it does provide the occasion to make a point that needs making from time to time in this poisonous political culture. I enjoy political combat as much as the next guy, but I really do wish that there were more than three or four Republican moderates out there. Huntsman is hardly even a moderate—his beliefs on taxation, for example, are a long way from progressive. As Utah governor, he replaced six state income-tax brackets ranging from 2.3 to 7 percent with one rate of 5 percent, meaning that he lowered taxes on higher-income Utahans and raised taxes on lower-income residents. And he has said he wants a federal flat tax, which would almost surely end up starving the government of even more money and would by its nature be regressive. A man who grew up in the comfort provided by his father’s successful vision for egg cartons isn’t suddenly going to turn into Bob Reich.
Remember: at the recent Fox News debate, when the candidates were asked to raise their hands if they would oppose a long-term budget deal that cut $10 for every single dollar it raised in revenue, Huntsman’s hand shot up just like Mitt Romney’s and Newt Gingrich’s did. There are some forms of standing out he is clearly not willing to do, and let’s keep focused on those, because liberals are too easily won over (as he surely knows) by Republicans who sound reasonable on cultural issues.
Huntsman was Ambassador to China, and yet, he still embraces cap & trade. It’s a lost cause.
Diplomacy AND compromise are highly overrated.
Huntsman to challenge Obama? I say go for it.
schnirt
Schrodingers cat
August 23rd, 2011
1:34 pm
“After the tightened bankruptcy laws of several years back it’s now vastly easier for a corporation to dump its debt (send its debtors packing) and start over than it is for the average citizen. ”
=======================================
The actions or inactions of others have no bearing on my personal accountability or integrity…I make that decision/choice..If I borrowed it and promised to pay it back…guess what?..I will
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
1:35 pm
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:20 pm
Didn’t steal his name but then can’t disagree with him/her either.
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
1:36 pm
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
1:23 pm
++++++++++++
Not attempting to parse words or divert in any way, as I feel I have addressed queries to my post, but I see a notable distinction between CEO’s and corporate managament. I would agree that some of the CEO packages clearly should raise eyebrows, but as another poster noted, there are usually contractual arrangements dealing with CEO compensation. Fair enough?
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:37 pm
Paul,
You are right.
The coward will not step up.
I am sure he or she will be outed soon so he or she should go ahead and admit it.
Apologize and not get banned.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:38 pm
MR,
I feel the same way about you.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
1:39 pm
@@
you write “Hard to comprehend was Joe’s sayin’. Is he advocating one child per family in the U.S. or is he saying we need more young people to sustain our entitlement programs?”
then when you get someone’s opinion on what VP Biden meant, your response is “You bustin’ at the “seems” with speculation.”
o-kaaaaay……….
@@
August 23rd, 2011
1:40 pm
Getalife:
Lets see if a con will admit stealing your name and calling me a retard before Jay bans them.
PoliFore never liked you. He’s no con…a namejacker?
Ooohhh yeah!
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
1:41 pm
By the way, dB, I love how that one suggestion — forgiving of debts — almost more than any other, gets howls of protest from the promoters of personal responsibility.
As thought the entire system as it now exists is not based on the systematic removal of “moral hazard” from the highest places and its transfer to the backs of ordinary taxpayers and consumers.
By the way, it occurs to me that the progressives / liberals are missing a huge avenue not turning this into a watchword: contra Citizens United! If corporations are people, then ALL people need the same access to bankruptcy that corporations do.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
1:41 pm
Jay @11:24 am
And this is proof, to a degree, that the tax code (i.e., the Obama née Bush tax cuts) are not *the* problem. Tax revenues in 2007 reached all-time highs in absolute dollars and were strong at 18.5% GDP, all this under virtually the identical tax code as we had in 2010 which led to 14.9% GDP (down about half-a-trillion dollars from 2007 in absolute terms).
Changing the tax code (increasing rates) doesn’t fix the economy or necessarily bring in more revenue (and almost certainly won’t bring in as much as promised by a static model). But fixing the economy will bring in more revenue.
Of course, there’s not enough revenue to be had to satisfy the gaping maw of Government at this point, it seems.
captguitarman
August 23rd, 2011
1:41 pm
Great column, Jay. There you have Georgia’s cards right there on the table. Read ‘em and weep, Georgia. This is similar to a post I made a few days ago, but worth repeating. During the King Roy years that featured a Dem controlled state house (terrified of the inevitable Pub onslaught they saw in their rear view mirrors) created the “elephant ears” district that neutralized the huge Pub presence in North Georgia, and a 300 mile long “snake” district in central Georgia that did the same thing. It was infuriating and as a cocky Dem legislator wagged, “Political down to your toenails.” I was naieve for me to think then that once the Pubs gained power, they would govern with a much more noble and high-minded purpose — with the intention of moving the entire state of Georgia and and the lives of all of its citizens, regardless of party affiliation, forward. Like I said, I was naieve. I guess it will take Reconstruction politics another several decades to finally dissipate here, as Georgia, once a leading New South falls further behind while better governed neighboring states move ahead. Obviously, the most important thing now is exacting revenge, Karma, pay backs. And reaping the spoils of victory as now “bullet proof” legislators and executive and administrative types demonstrate their now unlimited power to do whatever they want to do. The really sad thing is in these tough times, blowing the opportunity to establish a new and more modern and progressive political order for Georgia (and I don’t mean “progressive” in the sense that the liberals, who have wrongly highjacked that word, now apply it to themselves — so they don’t have to refer to themselves as liberals in public). Nope. What we have here is Georgia politics – down to its toe nails – in which the only change from the King Roy years has been to remove all Dem baseball caps, t-shirts, lapel pins, bumper stickers, etc. and replace them with Pub baseball caps, t-shirts, lapel pins, and bumper stickers. Other than that, it’s still ‘jes good ol’ boys and good ol’ gals doin’ bidness.
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
1:42 pm
S. Cat — “I’m sure those are the terms of the contract…is it smart…Don’t know, but they have a contract which should be honored…”
I daresay that many of our contributors here would have no problem disposing of a *union* contract. One wonders how an argument defending the inviolability of executive employment contracts could stand together with an argument demanding the severability of union employment contracts.
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
1:42 pm
“Don’t know, but they have a contract which should be honored…”
as go unions
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:42 pm
@@,
pf was banned.
I am guessing it was jm because he thought it was funny.
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
1:43 pm
Oops! “Don’t know, but they have a contract which should be honored…”
as DO unions
@@
August 23rd, 2011
1:43 pm
Paul:
I wasn’t looking for an opinion, just thinking out loud.
Don’t be so sensitive.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
1:43 pm
@@
“Huntsman was Ambassador to China, and yet, he still embraces cap & trade.”
I believe you may call it parsing, or minutiae, or hair-splitting, but ’still’ means now. Present tense.
He does not now support cap n trade.
Did (past tense). Not still (present tense). Will? (future tense) who knows?
“So cap-and-trade is not something that is viable today,” Huntsman told Fox News.”
http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/167925-huntsman-cap-and-trade-at-odds-with-todays-reality
Left wing management
August 23rd, 2011
1:44 pm
Schrodingers cat: “The actions or inactions of others have no bearing on my personal accountability or integrity…I make that decision/choice..If I borrowed it and promised to pay it back…guess what?..I will”
Then that’s to your credit. But your personal sense of responsibility is not really at issue. What I’m arguing is that the moral hazard of the system at large has in recent years been systematically transferred to the backs of the less privileged, less well-connected.
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
1:44 pm
Uncle Jed — “Not attempting to parse words or divert in any way, as I feel I have addressed queries to my post, but I see a notable distinction between CEO’s and corporate managament. I would agree that some of the CEO packages clearly should raise eyebrows, but as another poster noted, there are usually contractual arrangements dealing with CEO compensation. Fair enough?”
I appreciate your willingness to engage me on this topic in a polite and collegial way.
Perhaps you’d see my immediately previous post, addressed to S. Cat, please?
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:46 pm
@@,
I am sensitive.
Your thoughts on a con stealing Paul’s name and calling me a retard?
I thought you did not like that word yet you say nothing.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
1:46 pm
@@
“I wasn’t looking for an opinion, just thinking out loud.”
You post on a public blog but aren’t looking for anyone to respond?!!?
Have you tried Microsoft Word? Temp folders?
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
1:46 pm
As for CEO salaries and packages, the Nintendo 3DS undersold, and in order to compensate for the loss of revenue, the CEO took a 50% pay cut.
WHAAAAAAT? Yes, personal responsibility for your company. The CEO at Nintendo knows what it means. Apparently CEOs in this country don’t.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
1:48 pm
Left Wing Management
Now there’s an idea.
If corporations are people, the people are corporations.
The Family G, Inc.
I want tax breaks for when we build our new retirement home.
(Getting ready for the counties to fight over us!)
I want to depreciate my washer, dryer, cars, trucks, mowers, etc….all equipment required to run my corporation.
I want to deduct the salaries paid to the CFO and CEO (Me and Mr G)
I want to drop unlimited cash on candidates.
I only want to pay 15% tax on all our income.
I want to right off capital losses.
I want to deduct entertaining costs and travel costs and gift costs.
I wanna be a coporation!
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
1:48 pm
Will it pass, will it pass?
“Members of the Georgia House who are delinquent in paying ethics fines would be stripped of their committee assignments under a proposal by Republican leadership”
http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/lawmakers-who-dont-pay-1132959.html
John Galt
August 23rd, 2011
1:49 pm
The GOP’s behavior has been poor, and it needs to be cleaned up. The fact that it is no where near the ethics swamp of Tom Murphey’s and Terry Coleman’s legislatures is not an acceptable excuse for it.
However, despite the lapses that Jay loves to recall they ARE pretty much invincible, which speaks even more poorly of the dems than the GOP-
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
1:50 pm
Granny 1:48
I like it when I read original ideas.
Way to go!
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
1:50 pm
Latest Gallop Poll
Presidential Job ApprovalObama’s Weekly Job Approval at 40%, Lowest of Administration
Obama drops to 39% Aug. 11-13, lowest three-day average to date
August 15, 2011
President Obama’s job approval rating dropped to 40% during the week spanning Aug. 8-14, the lowest weekly average of his administration. Obama’s three-day average fell to a new low of 39% for Aug. 11-13, marking the first time this average has been below 40% since he took office.
Steve - B.
August 23rd, 2011
1:50 pm
Doggone/GA @ 1:48
There you go. The Republicans are pushing for accountability. I guess Jay scared them.
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
1:51 pm
“I like it when I read original ideas.
Way to go”
It caught my eye too!
Anne
August 23rd, 2011
1:51 pm
They are full of themselves, they promise you the moon to get elected. I for one will vote against every single one of them. Retired so I have all the time in the world to campaign against them.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
1:51 pm
Paul
I am an IDEA Granny to be sure…..
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
1:51 pm
“The Republicans are pushing for accountability”
Well…let’s say they’re suggesting it. It still remains to be seen if they’ll actually PASS the darn thing.
Mary Elizabeth
August 23rd, 2011
1:52 pm
Mighty Righty@ 1:01
Your mentioned 7 individuals, some of whom did nothing illegal. Be that as it may, no one is saying that there is not individual corruption in society-at-large, including within all political parties.
However, the below statement, from the article above, does not simply address individual corruption; it also poses a very relevant question that causes citizens to wonder about possible corruption of the banking industry, itself, in Georgia. That sweeping possibility is even more disturbing to consider, although no corruption in the public’s interest should be overlooked:
————————
“Not surprisingly, neither Morris nor Murphy has shown interest in investigating why Georgia continues to lead the nation in bank failures or whether the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance, charged with regulating state-chartered banks, failed in its duties. Given that 17 of the nation’s 68 bank failures in 2011 have occurred here in Georgia, costing the FDIC a total of $1.549 billion so far this year, their studied avoidance of the problem is appalling.”
Steve - B.
August 23rd, 2011
1:52 pm
Granny – I am sure you have plenty of deductions when you file your taxes.
Schrodingers cat
August 23rd, 2011
1:52 pm
LMW
contracts usually have limits and when those limits are reached, they can be renegotiated…What you had in the past doesn’t matter…If the firm/corp lowers compensation…the CEO’s and unions have the same choice…accept the new contract or look for work elsewhere….but to riot and carry on because the new package isn’t as good as the old one is stupid and nonproductive
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
1:53 pm
“but to riot and carry on because the new package isn’t as good as the old one is stupid and nonproductive”
when has that happened?
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:53 pm
@@,
Crickets…….
Very disappointed in you.
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
1:54 pm
“I am sure you have plenty of deductions when you file your taxes.”
Not a given. I don’t know about Granny, but the only one *I* get is my personal deduction. There are NO others that I can use.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
1:55 pm
Bosch 11:57 am: correct me if I’m wrong, the only new spending we have since Clinton is the new Medicare entitlement plan passed under Bush and paying off the wars. We haven’t added any real new spending since then. The increase in spending has been due to paying on the debt interest.
Well, there was $870B or so in stimulus funding, plus TARP. Medicare Doc fix got put off again, so that’s what $250B? Mr Obama and Democratic Congress didn’t expire the Bush tax cuts when they were set to expire (and you guys count foregoing revenue as an expenditure, right?). There’s also Mr. Obama’s making work pay tax credits, and the “temporary” suspension of part of SS taxes. Several programs have been expanded in scope and spending levels (e.g. new SNAP program, also SCHIP expanded to what 300% poverty line?). And we’ve not yet begun to pay for “Obamacare” as it is commonly called (although we have started collecting some of the taxes from it).
@@
August 23rd, 2011
1:55 pm
Getalife:
PoliFore returned last night. jm’s on today. I don’t think they’re the same person but what do I know?
Retard? jay’s team loves the word…who am I to deny them their pleasures?
Paul:
There’s one thing about my husband that I do not like. He’s always in debate mode. Only thing that’ll dissuade him is when I go into dessert mode.
I’m off to Azerbaijan. Iran’s issuing warnings.
Steve - B.
August 23rd, 2011
1:56 pm
Doggone/GA
No Charitable contributions? I am surprised by that.
mm
August 23rd, 2011
1:57 pm
@@,
New national debt data: It’s growing about $3 million a minute, even during Congress’ vacation
There, fixed your typo.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
1:59 pm
@@,
Again, very disappointed.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
1:59 pm
Bosch @11:57: “The increase in spending has been due to paying on the debt interest.”
Well that’s also a part of it, but we’ve been rolling over Treasuries into all-time low rates for new notes. I mean, part of what we’ve been doing is issuing low-rate T-bills to replace higher-rate T-bills that have been maturing, so interest rates on the debt are really at or close to all-time lows. However, since the debt itself is at all-time highs, the amount of interest being paid is a problem.
Seems to me that is prime indicator that the first rule of holes needs to be obeyed as the first step to solving the problem.
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
1:59 pm
LWM-I must be priviledged and well connected because no one has transferred anything to my back. How about your back? Has anyone transferred something to your back?
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
2:00 pm
Aquagirl @11:51 am: Thanks for clarifying.
@@
August 23rd, 2011
2:01 pm
Getalife:
Do you really want a woman fighting your battles for you?
Wouldn’t wanna ruin your stud status.
(ISH)
Schrodingers cat
August 23rd, 2011
2:02 pm
Just sayin’ Dog….maybe no rioting (stateside) but certainly a lot of carrying-on
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
2:02 pm
No @@,
I thought you would fight using that word because of your job.
I was wrong and disappointed in you.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:05 pm
Steve B
So damn what?
I should have all the same rights and priveleges as a corporation.
I call for a new ERAfPwaC….Equal Rights Amendment for People who are
Corporations!
I really could stand to depreciate the old hot tub….the pump is starting to sound like a Harley.
Midori
August 23rd, 2011
2:07 pm
my granddaughter just called me — they had an earthquake in DC
Schrodingers cat
August 23rd, 2011
2:08 pm
I should have all the same rights and priveleges (sic) as a corporation.
Why?
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
2:09 pm
S. Cat — “If the firm/corp lowers compensation…the CEO’s and unions have the same choice…accept the new contract or look for work elsewhere….”
Examples of CEOs being faced with that decision, please?
Examples of US CEOs pay being reduced, please?
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
2:09 pm
Midori,
5.8 in Virginia.
They thought it was bomb in DC.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:10 pm
pentagon being evacuated….
JOE C00L
August 23rd, 2011
2:10 pm
“Granny – I am sure you have plenty of deductions when you file your taxes.”
but, but, but, i thought liberals dont pay taxes….
silly me
Schrodingers cat
August 23rd, 2011
2:11 pm
Sorry Joe, I don’t have time to be your research assistant, but to think it hasn’t happened is foolhardy
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:12 pm
Mr. Cat
Why?
Cuz people are corporations and so I am a coporation.
Turn about is fair play.
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
2:13 pm
S. Cat — “Why?”
Because the Constitution protects *my* rights. The last time I checked, there was nothing in it about protecting the rights of corporations.
If there’s a cogent and Constitutionally-supported case to be made for the rights of corporations to supersede the rights of individuals, I haven’t heard it yet. And I remain skeptical that it exists.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
2:13 pm
Oooooooo a blog mystery AND an earthquake at the Pentagon. Fun day indeed!
Paul,
I totally thought it was you who called getalife a retard. The Magic Calendar never lies.
Not So Casual Observer
August 23rd, 2011
2:13 pm
Jay,
How about a Democrat Governor who gives an order to his administration that essentially enacts a piece of legislation that was twice defeated, and further, is opposed by a majority of the state’s people? Would this Governor then be a target of your same criticism aimed at Republicans?
Would this Governor then be cocky, complacent and have a sense of invulnerability?
Of course the “Governor” is, in reality, the President of the United States and the legislation is the “Dream Act” that ICE agents have now been ordered to follow though the legislation was defeated. That SNEAKY, cocky, invulerable and complacent Barrack Obama issued an executive order during the debt/deficit debate to order ICE agents to follow the Dream Act.
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
2:14 pm
Mary Elizabeth
August 23rd, 2011
1:52 pm
I don’t disagree, but would like to make a couple of points. One, the FDIC is also responsible for making sure banks are solvent a responsibility they take very seriously. Two, the FDIC costs are 100% paid by the member banks. When an FDIC insured bank fails it is substantially the FDIC’s fault and costs you and I nothing.
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
2:18 pm
Not So Casual Observer
August 23rd, 2011
2:13 pm
Your comment is spot on. The is president should be impeached. He won’t be of course, but he should be.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
2:18 pm
Midori,
Are your peeps ok?
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
2:18 pm
Left wing management @1:31 pm After the tightened bankruptcy laws of several years back it’s now vastly easier for a corporation to dump its debt (send its debtors packing) and start over than it is for the average citizen.
Of course, now we can count on the Administration to run in and bypass the bankruptcy process altogether. Give companies a bailout so they don’t have to go into bankruptcy (a la TARP). Or do a fake bankruptcy and reward supporters only (as the Obama administration did with GM, in shafting secured creditors and rewarding unions, not to mention letting new GM retain billions of old GM losses to offset future taxes–that doesn’t happen in bankruptcy court).
What was that about plutocracy?
URIF
August 23rd, 2011
2:20 pm
Liberals are so selective and emotional in their thinking. They have no problem with “unions are people”, “governments are people”, but when you correctly describe corporations as people you take away their strawman that is so desparately needed to have a villain to make their argument. Ultimately every corportation is made up of people who invest in them (governments, unions, other corportations, pension funds/401ks for unions and people, and individual people) and people who work for them.
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
2:20 pm
S. Cat — “Sorry Joe, I don’t have time to be your research assistant”
And I’m not so credulous as to repose trust in unsupported claims and flights of fancy. If you’re going to assert it, then either provide evidentiary support or else prepare yourself to be disbelieved.
Frankly, I think it’s pretty rude of you to assert something, fail to demonstrate or support your argument and then find fault with someone who calls you on it. You might not have time to be my research assistant, but I don’t have time to blindly buy into the skylarking of d00ds on teh intertubes.
“but to think it hasn’t happened is foolhardy”
And to assert that it *has* (without supporting evidence) is no less so.
Schrodingers cat
August 23rd, 2011
2:20 pm
GG…then incorporate
Ron Paul 2012
August 23rd, 2011
2:20 pm
Only republicans are corrupt. Democrats drink from the fountain of excellence.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
2:21 pm
MPercy,
Those two earlier posts to me — well, I’ll take your word for it. I was pissed about the tax cuts not expiring, but was even more pissed about why. The programs you mentioned that have expanded are to help those who need it, and I’ve made myself crystal clear that I don’t have a problem with our govt. helping out the bottom income earners, or helping those who need it get back on their feet.
(As far as what you said in regards to Treasuris and T-bills and all that, you were talking Greek to me — not a clue what that means
)
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
2:23 pm
“Liberals are ”
AAAAANNNNNNNDDDDDD I stop reading.
Can we play another game?
“Apples are”
“Giraffes are”
“Trees are”
“Kumquats are” (really, what are those?)
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:24 pm
mr cat
i am….
Not So Casual Observer
August 23rd, 2011
2:24 pm
To the People who wish to be corporations:
You can be Granny, Inc. if you so desire. About $250 and follow the step-by-step instructions at your Secretary of State web site. You can immediately deduct, or depreciate any assets you purchase as long as your corporation has a “profit motive” and there is a reasonable expectation of a profit.
If you deduct the salaries you pay Mr and Mrs. Granny then the corporation will have a deduction but the same will be reported on your personal return.
I would suggest anyone in a small busines that interacts with the public should be incorporated for liability reasons.
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
2:25 pm
URIF — “Liberals are so selective and emotional in their thinking. They have no problem with “unions are people”, “governments are people”
I have yet to see any liberal describe a union as collectively equalling a person, or a government as same. Unions and governments are *made up of* people, to be sure, but that’s hardly the same. Your misstatement and misreading may or may not be deliberate, but it *is* glaringly apparent.
“but when you correctly describe corporations as people”
Corporations aren’t people, no matter how much you might like for them to be.
“you take away their strawman that is so desparately needed to have a villain to make their argument.”
There’s no straw man there at all.
“Ultimately every corportation is made up of people who invest in them (governments, unions, other corportations, pension funds/401ks for unions and people, and individual people) and people who work for them.”
So? Unions, governments and corporations are *all* made up of people, but that doesn’t *make* them people, nor does it grant them the *rights* of people.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:25 pm
Mr. Cat and URIF
Would you support a campaign to make sure that people/corporations
all have exactly the same rights?
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
2:26 pm
I heard that GM was not going to be doing any waranty work or free recall repair on their cars sold before Obama bought them. Is this true?
jm
August 23rd, 2011
2:26 pm
A. Glad the VA earthquake didn’t hurt anyone
B. God trying to send DC a message? Or was it just the delayed physical manifestation of the S&P downgrade?
Paulo977
August 23rd, 2011
2:26 pm
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
1:48 pm
Will it pass, will it pass?
Now that would be something to write home about ,if it does!!!!
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
2:27 pm
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:24 pm
mr cat
i am….
Says Sam.
And he even likes Green Eggs and Ham!!
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
2:28 pm
News reports coming in that the earthquake in Virginia…is Bush’s fault.
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
2:28 pm
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:25 pm
I agree with you. People should be allowed the same write offs as corporations.
Schrodingers cat
August 23rd, 2011
2:28 pm
Joe – Whether you believe it or not has no influence whether it has or not….but
In most cases CEO’s are shown the door rather than a decrease in compensation or the terms are realigned with company profitability and stock options or some other metric.
Believe it or not..summarily dismiss it…..makes no difference to me
Pizzaman
August 23rd, 2011
2:28 pm
Jay,
Why are you or anybody surprised what the “Redneck Republicans” do? After all they are or are descendants of “Yellow Dog Democrats” and have the same prejudice: they hate Blacks. Why else would they be spening all their efforts and political capitol trying to make the first Black President a one term President? BTW: I’m a 68 yr old, white conservative Independant raised mostly in the South and can’t support Yellow Dogs or Rednecks.
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
2:28 pm
Dem Congresswoman Blames Black Unemployment On “Racism”
Wonder what “all other colors” unemployment could be blamed on? Maybe a lack of jobs?
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:29 pm
Sam I Am
Is a corporation too.
(wait, do cartoon people/cats count??)
Schrodingers cat
August 23rd, 2011
2:29 pm
GG – Would you support a campaign to make sure that people/corporations
all have exactly the same rights?
————————————
No…would you?
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
2:30 pm
Of course the dems are corrupt.
They have unlimited bribes now.
What are you going to do about it?
Nothing.
Who stole Paul’s name?
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
2:30 pm
Mrs. G.,
Hey! Why not!?!
jm
August 23rd, 2011
2:30 pm
“News reports coming in that the earthquake in Virginia…is Bush’s fault.”
Well, its certainly not Obama’s fault. He’s in Martha’s Vineyard.
Mary Elizabeth
August 23rd, 2011
2:31 pm
Mighty Righty 2:14
My questions (and concerns) are:
Why have politicians in Georgia who are in power to investigate bank activities in Georgia not done so?
Since Morris and Murphy have both had difficulty with the FDIC, why have their political peers allowed them to remain in positions of power in their respective banking committees?
Why is Murphy still allowed by his political peers a leadership role in overseeing the state’s banking industry?
And most importantly: What IS the connection between Georgia’s politicians and the banking industry in Georgia?
jm
August 23rd, 2011
2:31 pm
Everyone should be incorporated. So many tax advantages….
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
2:32 pm
But then, it could be the hat: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/08/23/dem_congresswoman_blames_black_unemployment_on_racism.html
“When you look at African American males, 40% of them are unemployed, those under 30 years of age. I understand exactly the entire nation must be involved in this recovery but the black community is experiencing a great recession. That’s what we’re experiencing,” Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-FL) told MSNBC.
“And all of the growth in the past 30 years, we see it slipping away. From home ownership, the middle class; it’s slipping away from our hands. And it has a lot to do with many issues. Racism, shipping jobs overseas, access — no access to technology. You know, the digital divide is there and many of the new jobs that’s what it requires. So, we have a problem.”
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:32 pm
Mr. Cat
Yes.
Why won’t you?
You are certainly worth it.
No paradox there.
GT
August 23rd, 2011
2:32 pm
Jay I would love to agree with you but Bush got might cocky. He tapped phones of American citizens and forgot to inform the judge. He went to war on excuses trumped up, lied to congress and the UN but lived to lie again. They were going to drag him to court for the waterboarding, or lying about that but Obama was the bigger man once again and let Bush continue to think he walked on water and was above the law, a little like that man named Nixon. J. Edgar Hoover had more respect for law and justice than Bush. When you have all the answers who needs justice. Turns out he was right.
jm
August 23rd, 2011
2:33 pm
5.9 Earthquake
Guess the Chinese have finally drilled through the middle of the Earth and reached DC, to raid the Fed bank vaults and get their $ back. Kudos to them.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
2:34 pm
Bosch: The problem is that programs that you *think* are supposed to help the less fortune (a) often fail to do any such thing or (b) do so in such a grossly inefficient manner that you hardly needed to bother. I believe in a moral responsibility to help others, however it’s not (to me) the government’s job to force that belief of mine on others, nor is it right (in my opinion) that the government decides how much I’m gonna “give” and who gets it.
Some more spending we’ve embarked on. How about paying $150M/year to Brazil so we don’t have to stop subsidizing American farmers (which subsidies were found to be in violation of international trade agreements)?
[Time magazine, Friday, Apr. 09, 2010]
What could be more outrageous than the hefty subsidies the U.S. government lavishes on rich American cotton farmers?
How about the hefty subsidies the U.S. government is about to start lavishing on rich Brazilian cotton farmers?
If that sounds implausible or insane, well, welcome to U.S. agricultural policy, where the implausible and the insane are the routine. Our perplexing $147.3 million–a-year handout to Brazilian agribusiness, part of a last-minute deal to head off an arcane trade dispute, barely even qualified as news; on Tuesday, April 6, it was buried in the 11th paragraph of this Reuters story. (The New York Times gave it 10th-paragraph play.) If you’re perplexed, here’s the short explanation: We’re shoveling our taxpayer dollars to Brazilian farmers to make sure we can keep shoveling our taxpayer dollars to American farmers — which is, after all, the overriding purpose of U.S. agricultural policy. Basically, we’re paying off foreigners to let us maintain our ludicrous status quo.
Cotton subsidies are a particularly egregious form of corporate welfare, funneling about $3 billion a year to fewer than 20,000 planters who tend to use inordinate amounts of water, energy and pesticides.
jm
August 23rd, 2011
2:35 pm
5.9 Earthquake
When you cram so many additional federal employees into a 10 mile by 10 mile area, what do you expect?
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
2:36 pm
jm,
Did you steal Paul’s name?
Obozononics
August 23rd, 2011
2:37 pm
Soothsayer;
Your comments are the proof that most Americans watch only the government new channels on TV, the truth is that Obozo has spent WAY more in 3 years than Bush did in 8. Funny how liberals never let facts get in the way of their opinions…
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
2:38 pm
OMG, MPercy’s killing me with these more than one inch posts.
Now, I’ve gotta get out my brain cell.
Thomas
August 23rd, 2011
2:38 pm
I wanna be a coporation!
GG- you can. Simply start doing a business and look to file a Schedule C which is included in your- yes your very own- Form 1040. You can then hire folks which will cause you to file numerous forms with the feds, states, and counties to ensure proper withholding across all fronts. You will need to make sure you have a license to do business in all areas you conduct business. You will need to make sure you are properly filing sales tax. You will need to make sure your employees have proper contracts and are properly provided healthcare and retirement plans. You will need to do all recordkeeping and make sure it is accurate to substantiate to any government authority. You will need to make sure you record and file Form 1099s-
I probably covered about 25% of the issues that must be addressed beyond actually “doing the business”
It really is that easy!!!
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
2:38 pm
“spent WAY more in 3 years than Bush did in 8.”
On saving the w global collapse.
Midori
August 23rd, 2011
2:38 pm
yes Bosch – she’s fine.
told her to stay out of the Metro, tho.
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
2:39 pm
The year kicked off with the revelation that House Speaker David Ralston had taken his family and staff on a $17,000, all-expense paid holiday trip to Europe, courtesy of lobbyists for a high-speed rail company. In our much-reviled Congress, such behavior would result in severe censure or even removal from office, but here in Georgia it barely raised an eyebrow- Jay
For the life of me I don’t understand how anyone- Dem or Repub, wouldn’t be supremely embarrassed over the sickening relationship between lobbyists and pols here in GA and this trip in particular. For this man to accept such largesse and think we don’t expect a quid pro quo in terms of his vote on the matter is beyond belief. And while the Dems may crow about this obvious example of a pure pig at the trough I seriously doubt the state Dems are any less pure of corruption than this clown. The whole problem is that just like our pols on the national level every voter in a district thinks the problem is pols in other districts, states, etc. and not their particular representative. Makes me wonder if the whole situation is just plain hopeless given the apathy of the American voter.
jm
August 23rd, 2011
2:39 pm
getalife 2:36 – no, why?
5.9 Earthquake
Maybe someone requested a Treasury bond payment in cash.
1811/0311
August 23rd, 2011
2:39 pm
Hummmm ……………….. Someone sending a message?
Headline: “Strong Quake Hits Capital Region,
Sends Shockwaves Up East Coast”
“URGENT: A strong magnitude 5.9 earthquake strikes Virginia, sending tremors up along the East Coast and causing the Capitol, the Pentagon and downtown D.C. to be evacuated.”
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
2:40 pm
Thomas,
Don’t get audited.
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
2:40 pm
Obama’s tee thrown off course by earthquake. President quoted as saying, “if not for that darned earthquake, it’d have been right down the middle.”
Schrodingers cat
August 23rd, 2011
2:40 pm
GG – for starters, I don’t want corps to be able to vote in federal elections, serve on a jury, or run for federal office…that said, I do own an LLC
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
2:41 pm
jm,
Because the guilty will not admit it.
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
2:42 pm
Mary Elizabeth
August 23rd, 2011
2:31 pm
You are making assumptions. First I doubt anyone thinks Morris and Murphy should personaly investgate banks anymore than we would think Obama should personaly investigate Fannie Mae. I don’t know how committee appointments work. Why is Charlie Rangel still on the congressional finance committee? Who said they didn’t investigate these banks? They may have had them closed! All we know is what Jay is telling us and he isn’t telling us much.
Southern Comfort
August 23rd, 2011
2:42 pm
Lemme guess what’s transpired today. We have 12 pages of both conservative bashing for their ethical lapses and conservative deflection that’s defacto defense of those actions by trying to switch to talking about liberal ethical lapses. They’re all full of sh*t if you ask me. I admire Jay for writing this column because, if you’re gonna campaign that you’re all wholesome and good, don’t f**k up and get caught doing things that don’t fit that mold. The things you do in the dark will always come to light.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:43 pm
Thomas
I repeat…already am. Or our small business is..
I want to incorporate ME….I want the same stuff the fortune 100 get.
(in my teeny tiny fair share of course)
jm
August 23rd, 2011
2:44 pm
I wonder what would happen if someone PIMCO size required delivery of payment in cash. I mean, the US Mint would be in a real pickle. Yes, I’d like $10 Billion in cash please Uncle Sam. $100’s would be fine. It would still be a freight train of cash.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:45 pm
GG – for starters, I don’t want corps to be able to vote in federal elections, serve on a jury, or run for federal office…that said, I do own an LLC
WHY?
Those corporations are people…they have rights.
And it’s not like corporations aren’t already involved in elections,
american jurisprudence or all that good stuff.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
2:45 pm
“The problem is that programs that you *think* are supposed to help the less fortune (a) often fail to do any such thing or (b) do so in such a grossly inefficient manner that you hardly needed to bother.”
MPercy,
I think as a society, we’ve come to the conclusion that we are going to subsidiz the lowest wage earners in this country.
But oddly enough, I’ve grown cynical enough to think that it isn’t for the reasons we all want to feel all warm and fuzzy about: helping them. It’s for profit. As I’ve written before, that money goes straight back into the economy — if I had to pull a number out my ass, I’d say almost 90% of it goes straight back into corporations (i.e. groceries, utilities).
And while 147 million seems like alot of money, believe me, that is a drop in the bucket for such a project. That’s like a light bulb to most of us.
Jack
August 23rd, 2011
2:45 pm
This dumb-downed, racist, redneck, old people person with a pre-conceived bias (according to Bookman) will vote for the Devil if he’s on the GOP ticket. Anything, anybody would be better than the suit that’s in the White House now.
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
2:46 pm
What could be more outrageous than the hefty subsidies the U.S. government lavishes on rich American cotton farmers?- MPercy
MPercy,
On top of that these subsidies as I understand it go to large corporate agri-farms run by goliaths like Archer-Daniels Midland. In a Stossel report the subsidies are abused for tax purposes by rock stars like Bon Jovi and Springsteen and in our farm subsidies program there are even corporate farms owned by Arab sheiks of all people being subsidized by U.S. tax payers. The whole process of farm subsidies and now subsidizing Brazilian farmers is nothing short of insanity. And the biggest suckers of all- us the American taxpayers.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
2:46 pm
Midori,
Good to hear that, and oh yes, I would hate to get trapped in those tunnels (with some of those people
)
jm
August 23rd, 2011
2:47 pm
Granny G 2:43 – ah. now you’re learning. To get that stuff, you have to be profitable, spend money, etc. etc. Ie, “corporate subsidies” as you guys refer to them aren’t always (or even generally) subsidies. Instead, they’re a reduction in taxes owed rather than a handout.
GG, unless you’re profitable, you’ll get nothing. Its not a handout. Good luck.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
2:48 pm
“as I understand it ”
Maybe you can call Chambliss, he would know all about how those work.
jt
August 23rd, 2011
2:49 pm
That earthquake in Washington is GOD speaking.
.
He sayeth….”Stop your warfare/welfare/police state NOW….Leave my people (Georgians) ALONE.
Elect Ron Paul or ELSE!”
.
I heard him clear as a bell.
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
2:50 pm
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:43 pm
I thought you once wrote that you had your own business. Regardless, you can become a subchapter S and take advatage of the benefits. All write offs whether S corp. or C corp. are functions of income. In other words, you can write off any cost of acquiring income but not transportation to or from work or cost of personal benefits.
jm
August 23rd, 2011
2:50 pm
5.9 Earthquake
Ok. Which idiot pushed the red button that controls underground missile testing?
Or was it all the founding father’s rolling over in their graves simultaneously due to so much debt?
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
2:50 pm
“This dumb-downed, racist, redneck, old people person with a pre-conceived bias (according to Bookman) will vote for the Devil if he’s on the GOP ticket.”
I would expect nothing different from this demographic.
Thomas
August 23rd, 2011
2:51 pm
want to incorporate ME….I want the same stuff the fortune 100 get
I place a megaphone to my mouth and scream “You can- it is called a schedule C filer” You yourself will have all the same rights, privileges, and burdens without incorporating.
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
2:53 pm
5.9 Earthquake
++++++++++
Was this de fault Obama threatened?
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:54 pm
MR
We have a wonderful accountant – no worries.
But the goal is to make Godzilla Family, Inc.
I want to depreciate, I want to take advantage of special tax rates.
I want to give gifts and deduct them!
I Corporation.
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
2:54 pm
As I’ve written before, that money goes straight back into the economy — if I had to pull a number out my ass, I’d say almost 90% of it goes straight back into corporations (i.e. groceries, utilities). -Bosch
I see your point but your point also applies to corporations who pay taxes twice on a dollar- the dollar they earn and then again when they pay their employees. That money going back to corporations undoubtedly is spent more efficiently then just giving it to someone to spend in the form of food stamps for example. Giving money to a corporation which is nothing more than a collection of people working to a common purpose can result in the creation of actual wealth, the new creation of jobs, etc. Just giving money to someone to spend does not have the same multiplier effect and does not create wealth or jobs in the same fashion that a dollar given to a corporation can.
And while 147 million seems like alot of money, believe me, that is a drop in the bucket for such a project. That’s like a light bulb to most of us.- Bosch
Bosch,
If you’re not ticked about this kind of govt nonsense then when will you ever be mad about pure govt waste and folly? When is enough enough? For God’s sake we are spending 1.6 trillion more than we are taking in per year precisely because of crap like this. And the bill is going to come due soon. The piper is going to eventually have to be paid. And you’re only response is that its just a drop in the bucket?
jt
August 23rd, 2011
2:55 pm
God also isn’t happy with the lefty progs.
.
They sold their anti-war creds for a cheap political D.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
2:56 pm
Thomas
I can depreciate my washer?
I’ll call my accouting firm – Dewey, Cheatun & Howe to verify…
But If I’m not incorporated am I still people?
jm
August 23rd, 2011
2:56 pm
5.9 Earthquake
Ok. I thought Obama was done giving out MME permits. Who gave T Boone a fracking permit for DC?
Of all the the government incompetence……
jm
August 23rd, 2011
2:58 pm
GG 2:54 – now you’re thinking. Hop to and good luck.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
2:59 pm
” That money going back to corporations undoubtedly is spent more efficiently then just giving it to someone to spend in the form of food stamps for example.”
A dollar is a dollar Doom, and while I got no gripes with what you wrote, to argue one is more valuable is quite disingenuous.
“If you’re not ticked about this kind of govt nonsense then when will you ever be mad about pure govt waste and folly?”
Waste and folly? Were you by chance a college thespian?
Who wrote I wasn’t ticked, it just doesn’t keep me up at night, just like people on food stamps doesn’t keep me up at night. Again, to argue that corporations spend money more efficiently when they are sitting on literal mountains of cash is well, nuts.
And kudos to you for fitting in “waste and folly” and “For God’s sake” all in one post. Really. Good job.
But sometimes I think you assume too much about what people think — it helps to just ask.
Elvis
August 23rd, 2011
3:00 pm
The earthquake was on a previously unknown fault in Virginia. It is to be named Bush’s Fault.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
3:01 pm
Ha ha! Good one Elvis, and Happy Birthday!
(And are you actually a vampire?)
jm
August 23rd, 2011
3:01 pm
“It is to be named Bush’s Fault.”
I thought there were already hundreds of those…..
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
3:02 pm
And that Beloit’s Mindset List gets more lame every year. It used to be good for a couple of good shocks, but now it’s just lame-o.
Dave R. - 3k/4k/5k
August 23rd, 2011
3:03 pm
God to D.C. – “I’m not very happy with you”. . . .
Peadawg
August 23rd, 2011
3:06 pm
“The earthquake was on a previously unknown fault in Virginia. It is to be named Bush’s Fault.”
That’s funny as hell. I don’t care who you are.
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
3:07 pm
left wing: you have deftly demonstrated both your socialistic tendencies and the general MO of liberals everywhere – asinine idealism. The guy who put the parts together did NOT create the wealth in a vacuum – due to the surplus of HIS kind of labor, his labor is NOT as value as much. However, the guy who DID design the car, and guy who paid for & constructed the factory, have a much scarser labor pool – so, they can demand higher wages. very simple economics which most pollyanna socialistic liberals have a very poor command of. Kapisch?
Elvis
August 23rd, 2011
3:08 pm
Thank ya. Thank ya very much!
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
3:10 pm
Yeah Paddy O, that whole “division of labor” concept is just so foreign to us liberals. It’s all rocket science.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
3:10 pm
Elvis,
Seriously. Are you a vampire? Inquiring minds want to know.
Southern Comfort
August 23rd, 2011
3:13 pm
I don’t think it’s just DC that G*d has a problem with.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
3:15 pm
the epicenter was 90 miles south of DC….
who’s God mad at in Fredricksburg?
Geico or Quantico?
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
3:15 pm
A dollar is a dollar Doom, and while I got no gripes with what you wrote, to argue one is more valuable is quite disingenuous.- Bosch
Bosch,
If you think that a dollar spent by a govt program whether it be on farm subsidies or food stamps is as efficiently spent or invested as a dollar invested by say Bill Gates or a small businessman expanding his business then I just don’t know what to say to you. I don’t want to be insulting but there is nothing that can be said to a person that actually has that mindset. Hopefully I am just misunderstanding you or you didn’t explain things well to me. Please tell me that you really don’t honestly believe that a dollar spent in a govt program or by govt period is as efficiently spent as a dollar spent by an entrepreneur or small businessman.
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
3:16 pm
5.9 earthquake…nah, Congress just had a simultaneous f^rt…
Thomas
August 23rd, 2011
3:18 pm
GG- ok I give as I missed the “we are just being silly part”
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
3:18 pm
Enter your comments here
out of the blue
August 23rd, 2011
3:19 pm
“anybody would be better than the suit that’s in the White House now.” Says you JACK, now who would that person be?
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
3:21 pm
Doom-
Please tell me that you really don’t honestly believe that a dollar spent in a govt program or by govt period is as efficiently spent as a dollar spent by an entrepreneur or small businessman.
Here in lies the divide. Efficiency is relative to people. The government giving money in the form of food stamps is efficient to the person who runs the grocery store. You make it seem as those there is no waste and fraud in business.
Southern Comfort
August 23rd, 2011
3:21 pm
For those of you who were begging for Obama to cut regulations, thanks for opening the friggin’ floodgates to hell. If you didn’t think we had enough problems already, then just wait for a while…
The White House report spans 800 pages and includes 100 reforms for the Transportation Department alone, including eliminating railroad industry regulations that could save $340 million, officials said.
The Defense Department has finalized plans to speed up payments to 60,000 contractors and the State Department is reforming visa rules to “promote economic growth and tourism,” Sunstein said.
“Every plan emphasizes that it is not a one-shot endeavor,” he said. “We have made an effort to create periodic reviews of rules and to change the culture and be open to public concerns.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-issues-new-rules-to-end-bureaucratic-red-tape/2011/08/23/gIQAfAy4YJ_story.html
The State Dept gives visas out like halloween candy already, and they wanna promote economic growth and tourism even more?? Some of y’all may wanna start your own OB/GYN related businesses. If you think birth tourism (one example) was already bad, your wishes just opened pandora’s box. You can count on government spending to increase because of that as well. With more people trying to enter the US, you will need more CBP officers to inspect the arriving foreigners. Sometimes, it’s just best to leave well enough alone.
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
3:22 pm
“No Charitable contributions? I am surprised by that”
I contribute, but right at the moment not enough to bother using the deductions
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
3:26 pm
“Now that would be something to write home about ,if it does!!!!”
Yep, it would be…but THEN the question would change to: will they ENFORCE it?
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
3:26 pm
It is Mother Nature fighting back.
The plot thickens.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
3:27 pm
Not So Casual Observer: That SNEAKY, cocky, invulerable and complacent Barrack Obama issued an executive order during the debt/deficit debate to order ICE agents to follow the Dream Act.
Too bad you weren’t praising him for the YEARS he spent enforcing immigration to the MAX. Now that he’s doing the opposite, you are playing right into his hands by having poutrage.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
3:27 pm
OMG, MPercy’s killing me with these more than one inch posts
Sorry! This should be a one-inch post, though!
JOE C00L
August 23rd, 2011
3:28 pm
FYI, people who say “Anybody But Obama” are FRINGE!
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
3:31 pm
~~~Afternoon Quiz~~~
Who put forth the following plan?
A) Bill Clinton
B) Timothy Geithner
C) Herman Cain
D) Senator Barrack Obama
E) Warren Buffet
F) none of the above
A 9% business flat tax
Gross income less all investments, all purchases from other businesses,
and all dividends paid to shareholders.
A 9% individual income flat tax
Gross income less charitable deductions
A 9% national sales tax
This significantly expands the tax base which helps everybody.
This plan has the following advantages:
It is fair, revenue neutral, transparent and efficient
Zero tax on capital gains and repatriated profits
Replaces the payroll tax
Will aid capital availability for small businesses
Saves taxpayers $430 billion in annual compliance costs
It eliminates the uncertainty holding this economy down
jm
August 23rd, 2011
3:34 pm
stock market is walking on a knife edge.
Not fun to be a Fed governor right now.
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
3:35 pm
“Here in lies the divide. Efficiency is relative to people. The government giving money in the form of food stamps is efficient to the person who runs the grocery store. You make it seem as those there is no waste and fraud in business.”
Some people are stupid,
The money going to someone on food stamps may be efficient to that particular person. But that recipient’s perception of whether or not that dollar is efficiently spent is irrelevant to the point at hand. As for waste and fraud in business of course there is waste and fraud. Who disputes that? The point is that if a business operates with a great amount of waste and fraud within it then sooner or later that business gets eliminated via the survival of the fittest in a capitalistic economy. And a business is accountable- to its owner or owners, its employees if the work evironment is abysmal, and most of all to its customers. Can you say the same for big govt? And how long would a private business stay in business if it ran its books like the federal govt? Does the federal govt have the same accountability that a business does? Nope. If it did then SS wouldn’t be broke, nor Medicare, nor the federal govt period with 14.5 trillion in debt and growing every damn day.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
3:36 pm
Southern Comfort @2:42 pm “if you’re gonna campaign that you’re all wholesome and good, don’t f**k up and get caught doing things that don’t fit that mold. The things you do in the dark will always come to light.”
On this we agree. I do enjoy seeing some gay-bashing Republican getting caught in a dalliance with his male masseuse, or seeing an anti-abortion Republican paying for one for his mistress, or getting his 3rd divorce. Or a Democrat getting caught cheating on his taxes or parking his boat in another state to avoid his own state’s onerous taxes or being found to be offshoring jobs in their company to avoid paying taxes.
Schadenfreude, I guess, since I can be sure to not have voted either of them into office.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
3:36 pm
Let me point out that if God were unhappy with President Obama the epicenter would have been Martha’s Vineyard.
I suspect it has something to to with the pro-forma session in the senate.
jm
August 23rd, 2011
3:36 pm
Uncle Jed – what about cap gains and dividends?
I don’t care who you are, its a good plan. Expand the base, lower the rate.
jm
August 23rd, 2011
3:38 pm
GG 3:36 – maybe God just wanted to screw up his golf game a little
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
3:40 pm
SoCo,
We’re talkin’ Visa Credid Cards, right?
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
3:41 pm
Thulsa Doom @2:46 pm What could be more outrageous than the hefty subsidies the U.S. government lavishes on rich American cotton farmers?- MPercy
Actually, that was Time Magazine, which I quoted and thought I attributed. My bad if I didn’t.
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
3:42 pm
Doom.
And a business is accountable- to its owner or owners, its employees if the work evironment is abysmal, and most of all to its customers. Can you say the same for big govt? And how long would a private business stay in business if it ran its books like the federal govt? Does the federal govt have the same accountability that a business does?
But the government isn’t a business so why are you comaparing it to one. How many businesses can print their own money. How many companies rely on their full faith and credit for transactions(Technically speaking, that is what the dollar is since we abandoned the gold standard).
There are business that work exactly like the government. HAve you taken a look at companies balance sheet. What do you think debt is. It works the same for government, except they can actually rely on their debt being purchased. The government is held accountable, have you not seen the past few elections. IS that not what you vote for, based off their record or their rhetoric?? You ask if they have the same accountability as business, I actually say they have more. You know everytime the government spends money thanks to the 24hr news cycle, how much money did the AJC spend yesterday??
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
3:43 pm
It was the regulation report.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
3:43 pm
Doom,
If you don’t mean to be insulting then don’t. As SPAS wrote, much of what you are arguing is relative, and apples to oranges comparisons. And the constant comparison of govts. to a business is a fool’s errand. They don’t work the same, nor should they — they are opposite ends of the economical spectrum.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
3:43 pm
jm
he could have done that with a fast green…..
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
3:44 pm
“And while 147 million seems like alot of money, believe me, that is a drop in the bucket for such a project.”
Bosch, you may have missed the point that that was $147M we’re paying *to Brazil* annually so that we can continue to pay $3B to American cotton farmers annually without Brazil complaining to WTO.
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
3:44 pm
I saw that Dem. Congresswoman in Florida complaining about the unemployment rate among young black men and blaming it on racism and the digital divide. Huh? Jeez louise you can get small laptop now for $199 and internet service either free now if you’re poor enough or for $15 if you get dial up. Or just go to McDonalds, starbucks, caribou,etc and get online for dang free. Good grief. Part of the problem is that people like this woman have a dang excuse for everything. There are poor people today who have more technology in their phone including web browsing or in their $200-$300 desktop or walmart laptop then the wealthiest people in the country had a mere 20 years ago. And yet they still make excuses.
md
August 23rd, 2011
3:46 pm
So, is the point supposed to be that our local misfits are worse or equal to their national brethren???
We had a meltdown on Wall St……..and no investigations worth speaking about. Is it a surprise that the same is done locally? By two very different sides of the aisle by the way.
I’d also hazard a guess that there is a purpose behind it……..scaring the bejesus out of an already panicked and lackluster industry probably wouldn’t be too prudent…….let’s hope the statute of limitations doesn’t expire before the economy turns around……………..
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
3:47 pm
MPercy,
No, I didn’t miss that (although that last explanation is better) — I don’t like agribusiness subsidies anymore than the next person — in their current context anyway, but unfortunately, no one ever calls me who writes the checks. I have plenty of things I’d like to see done. For starters if they are going to subsidize farmers, I’d like to see them subsidize local farmers so as to not have to get food from other countries.
But again, all that is part of the bigger picture of world trade.
Joe The Plumber too.
August 23rd, 2011
3:47 pm
thanks granny, at first I thought me-shell fell out of bed but then was reminded they were in kennedyville. just kidding
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
3:48 pm
“more technology in their phone”
Did you know there are apps that you can download to make your puppies not bark? I kid you not.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
3:48 pm
@@
“There’s one thing about my husband that I do not like. He’s always in debate mode. Only thing that’ll dissuade him is when I go into dessert mode.”
You’re so much fun when you get spun up!
“I’m off to Azerbaijan. Iran’s issuing warnings.”
Now that’s the @@ I so fondly remember.
Midori
“they had an earthquake in DC”
Boehner told the TP to stick it and said Republicans are now willing to compromise on revenue?
Bosch
“I totally thought it was you who called getalife a retard. The Magic Calendar never lies”
Well, there’s always the question of Bosch’s reading comprehension….
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
3:49 pm
Uncle Jed/jm-
I just want to make sure I understand this plan. Now the current top tax rent is 35.6%. That plan wants to lower it to 9%and replace all payroll taxes. So just to make sure I got this correct, you are replacing 35.6(personal) and 7.65(payroll) with a 9% tax. …and just to also make sure I have an understanding, you believe that by expanding the base, you will generate the loss revenue even though you are eliminating all those taxes. Just want you to consider that even with perfect employment, you still ran a deficit at the 35.6% top rate, so even if everyone was employed and contributed, you would pull in so little revenue that you would probably actually grow the deficit. …
Just to make sure I’m clear.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
3:50 pm
picture from DC eathquake…better get President Obama back to save the day….
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
3:50 pm
“Well, there’s always the question of Bosch’s reading comprehension….”
Yes, Paul, I’ll admit, language is not my strongest skill — I’m a spatial learner.
SOUTHERN ATL
August 23rd, 2011
3:51 pm
Excellent article and oh so true!!
Southern Comfort
August 23rd, 2011
3:52 pm
Normal
I wish it were. Let’s just say, I’ll have job security for as long as I choose to work.
MPercy
I’ve never understood the need to elevate politicians to the point where they’re some kind of super being. They are human just as you and I. I expect them to make mistakes. I expect them to make wrong choices. I would much rather them be honest and realistic about expectations as opposed to painting them into some image that they have no chance of upholding.
md
August 23rd, 2011
3:53 pm
“. And the constant comparison of govts. to a business is a fool’s errand. They don’t work the same, nor should they — they are opposite ends of the economical spectrum.”
Such a bogus talking point………the fundamentals of both relate to income and expenses…….regardless where that income may come from (such as printing money)……..at some point, if the expenses get too far out of control, the entity can no longer keep up with the expenses…..
Greece is a smaller example, while the USSR is the bigger example……..
So some of you just keep on believing there is a difference……………………
stands for decibels
August 23rd, 2011
3:53 pm
And yet they still make excuses.
And dag nab it, they won’t get off my lawn.
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
3:55 pm
Bosch,
I get what you’re saying about people’s perceptions about the efficiency of a dollar spent by govt vs business. But what does that person’s perception have to do with what we are talking about? Or the price of tea in China for that matter?
I am comparing business to govt because of the perception that you have that a dollar is a dollar no matter who spends it. I simply disagree because I feel a dollar spent by a private business is more efficient in wealth creation or job expansion than a dollar transfer via the federal govt such as food stamps. And btw I’ve no problem with people getting help from our safety net programs short term. I just don’t agree with food stamps as a way of life or as an efficient use of a dollar. Otherwise the Soviet Union where the govt controlled every ruble would have been a rousing success and nations like Hong Kong and Singapore where there is little govt interference wouldn’t be among the most prosperous economies in the world.
BTW I like that term economical spectrum- part of our ever evolving language.
Paddy O
August 23rd, 2011
3:55 pm
“failure to govern” – under whose litmus test? although Perdue is widely regarded as a do-nothing, he actually substantially impacted the future of this state – first by merging RDC’s, then signing HB 277 into existence. He also created the public defender system in the state – something bleeding heart democrats failed to do.
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
3:57 pm
md-
Such a bogus talking point………the fundamentals of both relate to income and expenses…….regardless where that income may come from
Not they aren’t. A business provides a good or service for a fee. their revenue is solely driven off that product and other non-product related revenue(interest).
The government doesn’t sell anything. Their source of revenue is pure existence. All money that flows in to them flows right back out in theory. The concept of expenses getting too high are muted by the fact that they print the currency. If the government wanted to print 14.6 trillion dollars and pay off the bond holders, they could, it would be stupid, but they could. What business you know of that prints it’s currency.
Lefty
August 23rd, 2011
3:57 pm
Even though Georgia is becoming more and more diversified, our voting laws are not changing as well. One way to have our diversified votes counted would be for the State to institute the percent of votes won to whomever, in other words, in a Presidential Election, instead of our Democratic votes going no where, the top contenders (Dem, Repub, & Libert., etc) would get the requisite number of electoral votes instead of winner gets all. That might shake up some of these Republicans around here, and at least our votes would finally count for something!
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
4:00 pm
“I simply disagree because I feel a dollar spent by a private business is more efficient in wealth creation or job expansion than a dollar transfer via the federal govt such as food stamps.”
So? I don’t care, disagree with me. Your opinion is no more valid than mine.
“I just don’t agree with food stamps as a way of life or as an efficient use of a dollar.”
Again, you are making something relative. Food stamps as a “way of life” is still just that. I do see it whoever gets it as an efficient use of a dollar. One, it goes right back into the economy, two, it helps people eat — therefore helping them not starve (costing more in medical costs) or steal (costs for incarceration).
“and nations like Hong Kong and Singapore where there is little govt interference wouldn’t be among the most prosperous economies in the world.”
Again, with the generalizations.
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
4:00 pm
Doom-
I simply disagree because I feel a dollar spent by a private business is more efficient in wealth creation or job expansion than a dollar transfer via the federal govt such as food stamps.
So what’s the difference between me spending 100 dollars cash in a grocery store and someone using 100 in food stamps. Which had a greater impact on wealth creation.
Food stamps had a limited shelf life by the way. Part of the welfare reform act signed by Clinton. Got lifted during the recession. Should actually go back at the end of this year.
md
August 23rd, 2011
4:01 pm
“The government doesn’t sell anything. Their source of revenue is pure existence. All money that flows in to them flows right back out in theory. The concept of expenses getting too high are muted by the fact that they print the currency. If the government wanted to print 14.6 trillion dollars and pay off the bond holders, they could, it would be stupid, but they could. What business you know of that prints it’s currency.”
It’s still fundamental accounting………….money in best be greater than money out……if not, then Houston, we got a problem…………………
Sure, they can print 14 trillion…….and when the dollar is worth nothing, so are all those dollars being generated by private businesses……..the ones that provide the income…………………….
jm
August 23rd, 2011
4:01 pm
Wall Street smokes too much crack
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
4:02 pm
And I’m pretty sure in Hong Kong, the government owns all the land and it is merely rented. I’m pretty sure that counts as government intervention.
And Singapore has a high government presence as well. It’s a reason it’s the cleanest place in the world. (just came from there)
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
4:03 pm
Granny Godzilla
Your post about original arguments reminded me I was saving this for you. Since we’re all over the topics now I’ll go ahead and post it (with a slight modification at the end). It was to Scout regarding one of his perennial questions. The exchange was fun.
Scout
I noticed in the past you posted the same question several times. If memory serves me correctly, you wanted to know who said, or the origin of, ‘from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs.”
I think you might’ve known the answer but were just encouraging people to do research. If you really were looking for the source material, you may want to read at the end of the Book of Acts, fourth chapter.
It concerns the early body of Christian believers. Jesus has gone and left the believers/church under the direction of Peter and the apostles. It says: “And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all.
34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
35 And laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.”
So all of them gave all they had acquired thru their abilities, then they received back according to their need.
Then it goes on to tell about a husband and wife who sold all they had, gave most to the church but held part of it back for themselves. Wasn’t a good outcome.
So there’s your answer to “who said, ‘from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs”?
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
4:03 pm
SoCo: I’m not saying I expect pols to be perfect beings. I’m saying that karma’s a bitch. I didn’t care too much about Clinton’s affair (although I wondered why there wasn’t any backlash by the feminists who should have been out screaming about how he harassed poor Monica, sicne his position of power made it impossible for her to rationally consent). Bill Clinton was known to be a womanizer, and had not campaigned on a promise to purge DC of oral pleasures.
But hearing a guy supporting the “Defense of Marriage Act” (an anti-gay motion) who’s on his 3rd wife having cheated on the first two sequentially? Who’s marriage is he defending? And making a tax cheat the head of the Treasury? C’mon who writes this stuff?
If you’re gonna stump and rant and exhort for your position, then it’s the least I can do to expect you to live up to that position, whatever it may be. Fail in that and you’re falling from a much higher pillar that you placed yourself on. It wouldn’t be scandalous if, say Barney Frank was caught in bed with a man, would it? He’s openly gay. But if Pat Robertson, say, was caught in flagrante delicto then that’d be noteworthy.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
4:04 pm
“And Singapore has a high government presence as well.”
And they beat kids who vandalize with big sticks. A policy we should look into here.
Dusty
August 23rd, 2011
4:04 pm
md,
“So, is the point supposed to be that our local misfits are worse or equal to their national brethren?”
—————-
Well, no, md. This blog is supposed to prove that all misfits are from the GOP whether in Georgia or Washington, DC.
Did you not get your blog brainwashing info today? GOP—bad! DEMs—saints!!
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
4:05 pm
Some people are stupid,
I think you completely missed my point which very simply is that a dollar spent by the private sector is more efficiently spent and has a better chance at wealth creation and job creation than a dollar spent by the federal govt- especially a dollar which is merely a transfer payment such as food stamps. That’s all and hence the comparison between business and the federal govt.
As for govt accountability I still have to disagree with you. The odds are usually stacked pretty well in favor of an incumbent. And secondly I don’t remember where I read it just a few days ago but the reality is that in the house because of the way districts are drawn there are really only 60-80 seats every election that are really in play. The rest are solidly repub or democrat and the same incumbent is usually in there for very lengthy time frames. How else can you explain complete morons like the McKinneys, Sheila Jackson-Lee, etc retaining seats for such lengthy time periods.
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
4:05 pm
md-
Isn’t printed money the same as money in though.
I’m pretty sure you have defeated your point.
Mary Elizabeth
August 23rd, 2011
4:05 pm
Mighty Righty 2:42
Here is what citizens do know (and have not assumed) from the article above:
(1) Why have politicians in Georgia who are in power to investigate bank activities in Georgia not done so?
” . . .neither Morris nor Murphy has shown interest in investigating why Georgia continues to lead the nation in bank failures or whether the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance, charged with regulating state-chartered banks, failed in its duties. . . their studied avoidance of the problem is appalling.”
That implies that – whether Morris and Murphy personally investigated bank failures or not – as leaders, they failed to delegate to others to investigate banks.
(2) Why are Murphy and Morris still allowed by their political peers a leadership role in overseeing the state’s banking industry?
“. . .he (Murphy) has been allowed by his fellow Republicans to retain his role overseeing the state’s banking industry.”
“He (Morris) too has been allowed to stay in his leadership role overseeing Georgia’s deeply troubled banking industry.”
The question remains: Why are Murphy and Morris allowed to stay in leadership positions when they have had personal difficulties in banking issues, and have also failed in their legislative job responsibilities to have had banks investigated?
(3) And most importantly: What IS the connection between Georgia’s politicians and the banking industry in Georgia?
Based on the above, I hope that the AJC will have reporters investigate this question. All may be as it should be between Georgia’s politicians and the banking industry in Georgia, but then, again, all may not be as it should be. The people deserve to know.
Based
I would say that based on the answers that we do know from the first two questions that that question deserves an investigation and not an assumption as you have offered that maybe banks were closed.
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
4:06 pm
jm
August 23rd, 2011
3:36 pm
Uncle Jed – what about cap gains and dividends?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Go back and you’ll see that cap gains are taxed at zero and dividends at 9%. Also no tax on repatriated funds brought back into our economy.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
4:07 pm
“I think you completely missed my point which very simply is that a dollar spent by the private sector is more efficiently spent and has a better chance at wealth creation and job creation than a dollar spent by the federal govt”
Again, Doom, so? That’s still just your opinion. I happen to think that it doesn’t.
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
4:09 pm
Paul
That’s why I play for the fishermans team….
Talking Head
August 23rd, 2011
4:09 pm
Bosch @ 4:07,
Are you a public employee?
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
4:09 pm
Bosch,
Well it appears I can disagree with you one minute and then maybe agree with you the next. Just imagine if we could cane pole a kid with just one lash for something like shoplifting. Problem solved I’ll bet. Flash mob problems- 10 cane pole lashes. That shyt would be solved in a NY minute.
BTW what was that puppy yapping app that you can download to quiet them down a bit. My girlfriend has the yappiest 2 lb chihuahua that I’ld like to shut the hell up. The only dog I’ve met in my entire life that I absolutely cannot stand. Little ba$tard will never quit yapping.
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
4:11 pm
S. Cat — “Joe – Whether you believe it or not has no influence whether it has or not…”
If you can’t demonstrate it, then I shan’t repose any reliance in it, nor in arguments that rely on the claim.
Uncle Jed
August 23rd, 2011
4:11 pm
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
3:49 pm
Uncle Jed/jm-
Just to make sure I’m clear.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Strap your knee down and read again. There would be taxes on B2B sales and a national sales tax, as examples of revenue you hastily overlooked. The savings to taxpayers in filing costs are another example, albeit not that much relatively speaking.
(I am off to an appointment)
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
4:11 pm
+323.
Grow economy grow.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
4:13 pm
Granny
You’re on a roll today -
williebkind
August 23rd, 2011
4:13 pm
You guys and gals must get paid to blog on here? The President issues orders to follow the dream act that is not the law of the land! So our leaders are just like illegal immigrants the law of the land means nothing. They are here for a higher purpose–right?
md
August 23rd, 2011
4:14 pm
“Isn’t printed money the same as money in though.
I’m pretty sure you have defeated your point.”
No………..because printing money devalues the dollar……….which in turn, would translate into higher prices for goods/services, which would lead to less income being generated…………….
At some point, printing money can and will lead to hyperinflation…..see Zimbabwe for example………..
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
4:17 pm
So what’s the difference between me spending 100 dollars cash in a grocery store and someone using 100 in food stamps. Which had a greater impact on wealth creation.- Some people are stupid.
Some people,
On a micro level there’s not much of a difference if any. On a macro level there is a significant difference in what 1 billion in govt wealth transfers in the form of food stamps can generate vs a billion dollars in tax breaks given to entrepreneurs or small business. The difference being that of that billion dollars given back a lot of it will end up being spent just like food stamps or $100 cash injected into the economy. The difference being though that a portion of that money may well be spent on investment in business such as hiring and job creation. The same cannot be said of that aggregate spent on food stamps.
And also on the micro level you would be surprised what $100 has done in the 3rd world in terms of microcredit to very poor people to start a very small business such as a fruit stand or to buy a sewing machine and start a small sewing operation. I’m a big fan of micro credit programs in 3rd world states like in Africa, India, etc.
Mack H. Jones
August 23rd, 2011
4:18 pm
Following the end of Reconstruction and continuing until passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act The Georgia Legislature was a one party (Democratic) and one race (white) club. The good old boys did what they pleased and their constituents (white voters) allowed them to do so as long as they kept Blacks in their subordinate place. After 1965, Blacks began to win office as Democrats and the Republicans adopted their southern strategy. It has now borne fruit. With culmination of the current redistricting process, the good old (white)boys will once again have monopoly power and can do whatever they wish. Their constituents (white voters) will indulge them as long as they pledge to keep Blacks, and especilly Obama, in their subordinate place. Guess that is what is called American exceptionalism.
carlosgvv
August 23rd, 2011
4:18 pm
Granny – “would you support a campaign to make sure that people/corporations all have exactly the same rights”
From the start of recorded History, 5500 years ago, till now, right now, those with wealth and power have done everything possible to increase that wealth and power at the expense of the poor and weak. So, corporations and their lackey politicians will not now, or ever, support such a (to them) foolish proposition. There are few things in this world you can count on, I mean REALLY count on, but, sadly, this is one of them.
williebkind
August 23rd, 2011
4:19 pm
I am going to play Obama! Ok here is my order! All transplants in Ga go home!
Dusty
August 23rd, 2011
4:19 pm
Ah Mary Elizabeth,
Do you not know that cabinet officials in our present administration “forgot” to pay their taxes and NOBODY investigated?
Or do you forget there are Democrats in Washington who do not have “perfect” records yet they are supposedly serving “we, the people”?
Your vision is so one party directed that you lose credibility. Saying it nicely still does not obscure the fact that you see only one side of the political picture as perfect and that is the Democratic side.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
4:19 pm
williebkind: He isn’t issuing orders to follow the Dream Act. But after years of enforcing immigration to the max with the Republican promise that they will pass the Dream Act if immigration enforcement is stepped up, the Republicans haven’t kept their end of the bargain. No sense in deporting every last illegal you can find if it’s costing so much money to do it! So only the criminal ones.
In other words, Obama has a PLAN on illegal immigration. Where’s the Republican PLAN? Huh? HUH?
jm
August 23rd, 2011
4:20 pm
carlosgvv – what about now?
md
August 23rd, 2011
4:20 pm
Mary……..so do also think the people should know the truth about Wall St? And why is it not being investigated?
I find it interesting how folks only call for the folks on the other “side” to be investigated………
Wrong is wrong………this is bs calling for targeted investigations…………….let’s do them all.
A bit like asking others to raise their taxes when one is not willing to do the same to their own………
Dusty
August 23rd, 2011
4:21 pm
Yep, Granny is on a roll today. A Tootsie Roll!
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
4:22 pm
md: A bit like asking others to raise their taxes when one is not willing to do the same to their own…
Oh, is that what Warren Buffet did? I must have missed that part. “Raise all the millionaire’s taxes, except mine.” What a socialist.
Southern Comfort
August 23rd, 2011
4:22 pm
MPercy
Can’t argue with you on that one. I’ve made it a point to remember the promises that pols make. I’m looking forward to thowing those promises back in their faces when they sign up for re-election.
How else can you explain complete morons like the McKinneys, Sheila Jackson-Lee, etc retaining seats for such lengthy time periods.
Morons to you might just be a godsend to the people they actually represent. It’s all in perception. If you have a problem with the way districts are drawn, GA’s a good example of why you need to voice your opinion on those type of things. The GOP pretty much ensured they’d maintain their majority in DC with the way the maps were drawn up here. Which moron did you cast your vote for who enabled it here in GA?
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
4:23 pm
Doom — “My girlfriend has the yappiest 2 lb chihuahua that I’ld like to shut the hell up. The only dog I’ve met in my entire life that I absolutely cannot stand. Little ba$tard will never quit yapping.”
Get a cat. A big one, like a Maine Coon; they weigh about 15-20#.
I bet that dog will STFU in a hurry.
williebkind
August 23rd, 2011
4:23 pm
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
4:19 pm
Obama has never had a plan just an action when no one is looking! Since Obamacare the conservatives have a right to change their direction on any program.
md
August 23rd, 2011
4:25 pm
“So what’s the difference between me spending 100 dollars cash in a grocery store and someone using 100 in food stamps. Which had a greater impact on wealth creation.”
For starters, the comparison is not equal……………there is a cost associated with getting that 100 dollars in food stamps to the individuals……….private industry must first generate it for it to be distributed……..at a cost.
As is the same for all gov’t…………….
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
4:26 pm
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
4:07 pm
“I think you completely missed my point which very simply is that a dollar spent by the private sector is more efficiently spent and has a better chance at wealth creation and job creation than a dollar spent by the federal govt”
Again, Doom, so? That’s still just your opinion. I happen to think that it doesn’t.- Bosch
Bosch,
Not my opinion. Economics 101 and a fact that few if any economists would argue. And the fact that an entire bureaucracy is needed just to make the transfer payment in the case of food stamps alone proves my point. Nevertheless we will just agree to respectfully disagree on this point.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
4:27 pm
Dogs are usually a good judge of character…..
Schrodingers cat
August 23rd, 2011
4:27 pm
Joe – Steve Jobs took a pay cut…as did many others
http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/2010-04-02-many-ceos-took-a-pay-cut-in-2009_N.htm
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
4:28 pm
williebkind: Obama has never had a plan just an action when no one is looking! Since Obamacare the conservatives have a right to change their direction on any program.
I should have known better than to talk to the wingnuttery….
When no one is looking? Then how do you know about it? And this nonsense of Republicans have the right to change their position on anything because Obama Cares? Ugh.
md
August 23rd, 2011
4:28 pm
“Oh, is that what Warren Buffet did? I must have missed that part. “Raise all the millionaire’s taxes, except mine.” What a socialist.”
No, Buffet is of the “I believe only if they have to too” crowd……..then he doesn’t believe so much.
Talk is cheap…………..actions speak louder than words…………….
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
4:28 pm
Paul
I’m on a roll most days…just not always here.
This sadly is a dead end subject…I don’t see real change in Georgia
until they elect Baby G Senator.
Senator Dr. Astronaut Baby G, MD. PhD. OD. DDS. OMG. LOL.
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
4:28 pm
Looks like it’s time to go home. See you all later.
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
4:30 pm
Doom-
Cause people are stupid. People get bough in by rhetoric and don’t actually think, Looks at this blog for example. the tax plan that one on the prior page made absolutely no sense mathmeatically, but yet it sounds good, and appeals to the people who don’t want to pay taxes.
Isn’t all money a transfer payment. I receive my income from someone who claimed it as an expense. Economic Money is circular, not a straight line.
Dusty
August 23rd, 2011
4:30 pm
Carlos,
Are you completely blind? There are so many institutions, foundations, buildings, universities and monuments in this world funded by rich people. And many of the rich got that way by contributing new inventions such as cars, planes, instruments, electronics, refrigeration, and almost every convenience we have in our lives. Some did not get rich but many did. Why? Because they made great contributions. That’s why. Alll were not perfect but neither are the less fortunate.
Get rid of your wealth envy ( best description available). And I might add, the rich also pay the larger part of our tax input. What else do you want them to do? Give their money to you?
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
4:31 pm
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
4:19 pm
In other words, Obama has a PLAN on illegal immigration. Where’s the Republican PLAN? Huh? HUH?le
The Obama plan is to violate the law. He only enforces laws he likes? He should enforce the immigration law or resign or be impeached. We are a nation of laws. The next president will be a Republican. Do you want him to decide which laws he likes and enforce only them?
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
4:31 pm
But before I go
Yes, md, actions speak louder than words. That’s why all taxes should be voluntary. Then Washington will get the message.
Send in a check any time, give me a break. That’s just more conservative talk for wanting others to pay, just not them. I pay my taxes, am happy to do so, and would pay more if it was in the tax code. But I won’t give more because I’m a greedy b@stard just like everyone else who doesn’t want to pay more. The difference? I’m not so greedy that I want my taxes to be LOWER.
md
August 23rd, 2011
4:32 pm
“Isn’t all money a transfer payment. I receive my income from someone who claimed it as an expense. Economic Money is circular, not a straight line.”
The difference being…..it all must be generated by the private sector……………….
Adam
August 23rd, 2011
4:32 pm
Now I’m out
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
4:34 pm
For starters, the comparison is not equal……………there is a cost associated with getting that 100 dollars in food stamps to the individuals……….private industry must first generate it for it to be distributed……..at a cost.
md,
Thank you for speaking logic and economics. But I feel that its like trying to prove to a flat earth society member that the earth really is round. You can cite all the evidence in the world and it will make no difference to someone who is convinced of what they want to believe. It reminds me of the old saying that Dave Ramsey likes to say that “those convinced against their will are convinced further still”. Some people have closed minds and cannot be reasoned with.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
4:34 pm
SoCo, re your 4:22 did you see this post earlier? It was from an email from my rep Elena Parent…
Last Thursday, the House of Representatives approved new maps as part of the reapportionment and redistricting process. Unfortunately, the majority party chose to play partisan politics with this process rather than draw maps that are fair for all Georgians. The proposed maps attempt to purge white Democrats, from the House of Representatives and cynically re-segregate Georgia along political lines by creating an all-white Republican Party and an all-black Democratic Party. The maps also attempt to create a Republican super-majority in both the House and Senate. This means that the majority party would not need a single Democratic vote to pass Constitutional amendments that would impact the entire State. The map eliminates choices for Georgia voters and does harm to Georgia by silencing the viewpoints of millions of voters.
Southern Comfort
August 23rd, 2011
4:37 pm
And also on the micro level you would be surprised what $100 has done in the 3rd world in terms of microcredit to very poor people to start a very small business such as a fruit stand or to buy a sewing machine and start a small sewing operation. I’m a big fan of micro credit programs in 3rd world states like in Africa, India, etc.
Doom
I’d have to say, in that example, $100 in food stamps spent here will help our economy much better than $100 invested in a 3rd world country. It might be the reverse for businesses, and they may be helped out much better with the investment. As far as the US economy though, $100 spent here goes towards our GDP whereas $100 spent in Africa doesn’t quite have the same instant impact.
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
4:39 pm
Some people are stupid,
In reading your views it seems to me that similar to a lot of Dems your view of the economy is that of a static view. The economy, income dynamics, monetary supply and theory, the economic pie, everything is dynamic and not static.
And as md has pointed out repeatedly, money and income must first be generated by the private economy before it can be siphoned off in an economically inefficient manner by the federal govt to be distributed in transfer payments. Why this escapes liberals is a fascinating question. Anyway, I gotta go. Nice talking to you.
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
4:39 pm
Doom-
Sorry just saw the post @ 4:17 and had to respond. that’s dependent on every dime in the tax break going back into the economy which doesn’t happen. If your point is that tax break to entrepeneaurs and small business are more stumulative to direct injection of money then this should be interesting. I am considered a small business owner. A tax break doesn’t generate excess demand, it actually just puts more money in my bank account. It’s no incentive to expand or hire new workers. I actually lose value long term if you consider the time value of money. You know what causes me to hire, demand. Using the grocery store example. You give me a tax break I make an extra 30K. Am I gonna by more groceries because I have an extra 30k. Probably not.(Assuming most small business file on their personal). You give a poor person 100 in food stamps, how much do they spend…100. Thats direct, thats an increase in demand id they were previously spending 20. They only true tax cut that has any direct effect is the capital gains. More capital equals less debt financing, which means better bottom lines which means dividends.. That’s true wealth growth.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
4:40 pm
Granny Godzilla
“I’m on a roll most days…just not always here.”
And when you’re not here?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqClWdOcWog&feature=related
Recon (2nd.and 3rd.)
August 23rd, 2011
4:41 pm
Gallup now has Obama down to 38% approval and either losing or in a statistical tie with the potential Republican challengers.
md
August 23rd, 2011
4:42 pm
Adam…….there are only two plans currently on offer by the 2 parties……leave them alone, or raise just the rich………..and the reason is “because they have it”.
If you don’t see a problem with that scenario, then I doubt you ever will.
As for the not acting on one’s own……..reality says the system will stay pretty much how it is…..progressive. And the %’s will more than likely stay that way for years to come with a 2 party system…………so if folks like Buffet truly believe they need to give more to help the gov’t, then they should do so.
It’s nothing short of an excuse waiting for somebody to tell them they have to…………………
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
4:42 pm
Brocephus,
I see you’re point if you’re looking at it from a what’s good for America perspective and not doling out money to foreign interests. I was merely using the micro credit as an example to just show how efficient $100 can be if its invested in a private economy enterprise.That’s all. Gotta go.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
4:42 pm
Hmmm…. Last election at this time, I believe Obama was losing to both Guilliani and Clinton and Clinton was losing to Guilliani. How did that work out?
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
4:44 pm
md
August 23rd, 2011
4:28 pm
Warren Buffet is a senile old man. He says he wants to pay more taxes about three or four times a year and every time he does he gets a lot of undeserved publicity and praise from people who don’t know any better. The fact is he can give all of his money, his houses, cars, gold, and stock to the government anytime he wants. But if he did that he couldn’t get his name in the paper and on television three times a year saying he thinks he should pay more in taxes. He has made his money! He did it by not paying taxes! Now that he is do damn rich and so old that he isn’t going to live much longer, it really doesn’t matter what he pays in income tax he will still be rich and old. His comments on taxing income are meaningless except to a very few unthinking peeople. He doesn’t talk about taxing what he already has does he? He talks about income tax. He has billions without income!
Granny Godzilla
August 23rd, 2011
4:44 pm
Paul
How did you guess?
Was it the schwanzstucker?
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
4:44 pm
Doom/MD-
there is a cost associated with getting that 100 dollars in food stamps to the individuals……….private industry must first generate it for it to be distributed……..at a cost.
I never said there wasn’t a cost associated with it. What does that have to do with anything?
So you make a point that makes no sense and leave.
Money is circular is the dynamic thinking, money ging in a straight line(transfer payment, is actually the static idea.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
4:45 pm
I guess taxing those that don’t have it works well in some minds
Thulsa Doom
August 23rd, 2011
4:47 pm
Some people are stupid,
I see several errors in your economics views but will get back to you later. Gotta go but I leave you guys with this
General Electric is planning to move its 115-year-old X-ray division from Waukesha , Wis. , to Beijing . In addition to moving the headquarters, the company will invest $2 billion in China and train more than 65 engineers and create six research centers. This is the same GE that made $5.1 billion in the United States last year, but paid no taxes-the same company that employs more people overseas than it does in the united States .
So let me get this straight. President Obama appointed GE Chairman Jeff Immelt to head his commission on job creation (job czar). Immelt is supposed to help create jobs.
I guess the President forgot to tell him in which country he was supposed to be creating those jobs.
If this doesn’t show you the total lack of leadership of this President, I don’t know what does.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
4:47 pm
Granny
That had to be it!
Dusty
August 23rd, 2011
4:48 pm
Keep, 4:42
As we have all noticed NOW, what you mentioned did not work out very well. Even Democrats are saying so.. You shoulda stuck with Hillary.
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
4:48 pm
All I can say is give a man a fish and you feed him for one day.
Teach him to be a hedge fund manager and he can bring down the entire economy!
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
4:50 pm
MD-
Sorry..
Is their not a cost for the private sector gnerating that 100 dollars.????
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
4:52 pm
Dusty, thanks but I’ll stuck with Obama over McCain anyday. Of course, the Republicans/Tea Nuts have been obstructing so that they can cause this country to fail. Thankfully things have been approving since we took the keys away. We’d like it to be faster. But thanks for trying
md
August 23rd, 2011
4:52 pm
“I never said there wasn’t a cost associated with it. What does that have to do with anything?”
Plenty………..it changes the equation. Instead of 100 to 100, it’s more like 200 to 100. If it costs to distribute, then use that money more efficiently and create more wealth………..instead of having 100 to create, you now have 200………………..
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
4:53 pm
“But if he did that he couldn’t get his name in the paper and on television three times a year..”
Of all the imbecilic BS regarding the Oracle of Omaha I’ve ever read, and trust me I’ve read a LOT of it, that has got to be near the very top.
The world’s financial markets follow his every move and he is one of the most respected men in all of capitalism. His record as an investor, family man, philanthropist , of community service and as ab American is impeccable.
Yet you buffoonish armchair psychologists know his deepest darkest motivations? He needs the publicity???!!!
Jesus on a stick…
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
4:53 pm
Well finally I can agree… Clearly, Doom does not know what shows leadership.
md
August 23rd, 2011
4:56 pm
“I guess taxing those that don’t have it works well in some minds”
I guess this is the week where the masses no longer believe in the Clinton rates…….
And you might want to check out the booty the census burea says the “poor” hold.
In a progressive tax structure, there is a difference in rates……………everybody should have to pay something to be a member of society………how much is a pack of cigs these days??
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
4:56 pm
FWIW, I never even made it past those first two childish sentences. I’m sure the rest of it was equally scintillating…
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
4:58 pm
Gee, md, how much is a pack of cigs….and how much of that price is tax?
md
August 23rd, 2011
4:58 pm
“Is their not a cost for the private sector gnerating that 100 dollars.????”
Yes….and it comes out of the private sector………….
All the costs come out of the private sector………..
Mary Elizabeth
August 23rd, 2011
4:58 pm
Dusty @ 4:19:
md @ 4:20:
You both have selected reading of what I have written all day and you both project onto me simply your own stereotypical perceptions of me. That only shows that you have a very limited understanding of who I am or what I am about, in any depth.
—————————————————
The issue of the day is today’s article and it is not about me nor about Wall Street. It was about corruption of politicians of power in Georgia. I centered, specifically. on the banking aspect in the article above. That is what your focus should have been on if you were thinking correctly. That you make it about me or about Wall Street to point out that I “take sides” shows your own personal biases regarding me.
You obviously did not read my words to Mighty Righty earlier today in which I said at 1:52 p.m. the following. You can see that I do not consider corruption in either political party to be ok:
—————————————————————————-
Mighty Righty @ 1:01
“Your mentioned 7 individuals, some of whom did nothing illegal. Be that as it may, no one is saying that there is not individual corruption in society-at-large, including within all political parties.
However, the below statement, from the article above, does not simply address individual corruption; it also poses a very relevant question that causes citizens to wonder about possible corruption of the banking industry, itself, in Georgia. That sweeping possibility is even more disturbing to consider, although no corruption in the public’s interest should be overlooked:
——————————————————————————————–
Dusty, you continue to talk about my “saying it nicely.” I simply write as I am. I would really appreciate it if you would get away from the personal, where I am concerned.
I make no denial that I am a Democrat. So is Hillary Clinton, and Barbra Streisand, and so was Adlai Stevenson, and FDR and Eleanor. But I am so much more than a Democrat. I do not think that all should be called equivalent if the truth is not equivalent, as I see truth.
You should have also read my post at 11:28 a.m. today to understand that my thinking is more than that of a simply “Democrat” label per se. See below:
———————————————————————
“11:28 am
- I am for a party that supports public education in Georgia because it knows that education will enlighten all of Georgia’s young. It, also, knows that placing a priority on education will elevate the citizens overall because the public’s values will change toward common good interests, and not simply self-interest.
- I am for a party that looks at the great need by so many Georgians for dental care in Woodstock, and asks how can this be in Georgia. That party would want medical attention for all of Georgia’s citizens through government to ensure that all have needed care, and not simply be given care haphazardly through churches, here and there. That party would believe in the value of government to serve the common good medically.
- I am for a party that can foresee a positive coalition of business interests and public government interests to serve both interests fairly and equitably, and it would not be a party that supports condemnation of all government.
- I am for a party that seeks a social safety net for its elderly, and formerly productive citizens, simply because it is the right thing to do, and not simply because its members know that they, too, will be elderly one day.
- In other words, I want a party that knows the value of service more than it values power. Call that party by any name you choose. “A rose by any other name is still a rose.”
- A party that supports those values will have less corruption within its membership than a party that has grown to value power and self-interests, above all. And, that is because the values of that party will emphasize looking outward to the common good, and not simply inward toward self-interests.
And maybe, just maybe, that party would also help our overall economy grow because it would not be programmed to cut, cut, cut, thus, programmed to pull inward economically more and more, instead of growing outward in ideas that foster growth and development.”
————————————————————————————————–
Dusty and md,
I would greatly appreciate if, in the future, you want to address me, that you would stay with the issues at hand, instead of making your remarks about me personally. Otherwise, please do not post to me. Thank you.
Some people are stupid
August 23rd, 2011
5:00 pm
MD-
Plenty………..it changes the equation. Instead of 100 to 100, it’s more like 200 to 100. If it costs to distribute, then use that money more efficiently and create more wealth………..instead of having 100 to create, you now have 200………………..
WHAT….I literally laughed out loud. Ok, lets take the $100 example. Just to make sure i understand, your premise is before the federal government can give it out, someone has to make it in the private sector…ok
1. To generate money in the private sector has a cost, just like to distribute it in the public sector has a cost. So what part are you arguing.
2. Circle economy- Money generated is derived from money spent. Each time you get less and less money. That’s usally how it works. When you get a paycheck, you are getting a protion of what was generated. You spend a portion, your portion gets smaller, and smaller.
3. Say I own a company, and I’m gonna invest $ 100 in buying equipment. I give it to XYZ equipment. They receive 100 in revenue. HOw is that any different than I gonna buy 100 in grocery using food stamps. , they get 100 in revenue.
Maybe we are just looking at it from 2 different ends. Im focus on the end result, are you at the beginning???
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
5:00 pm
Granny, the fisherman you mention would not, I believe, be advocating forcing your neighbors at the end of a figurative and literal gun to sell their things to divide them according to needs. Forced charity is false charity.
josef
August 23rd, 2011
5:01 pm
Georgia GOP? Jus’ plumb uppity…
The immigration fracas? Can’t wait for the ruling on the Alabama Bishops’ challenge that it prohibits the free exercise of the Christian religion…
Southern Comfort
August 23rd, 2011
5:01 pm
Doom
Gotcha!!
AmVet
Didn’t see that post, but I’ve been watching the whole process play out. I’m not impressed by either party throughout this whole process either. I see the human element at play though. The GOP has control over the process. To them, it’s simply, “to the victor goes the spoils”. I don’t doubt for one minute that the Democratic Party would do the same if they were in control. I haven’t seen enough with my own eyes to say that they’re trying to purge White Democrats from GA. However, if past actions are any indications, I’ve witnessed many rural White Democratic Party members switch party affiliation both in GA and AL. The seemingly disconnected patterns gives pause for concern, but I can’t decare it’s an outright party attempt to do so yet. I’m interested to see how things play out though.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
5:02 pm
Dusty
“As we have all noticed NOW, what you mentioned did not work out very well. ”
Until someone can persuade me otherwise, I’ll stay with the position this economic situation was not like any other we’ve had in cause, in scope (excepting the Great Depression) and in how it fundamentally affected so many aspect of our economy.
Going in, there are just a few classical theories. Both administrations took actions – bailout and stimulus – and while the bailout and stimulus stabilized things, neither brought the kind of recovery we expected (well, in most cases. Corporate profits, as we’ve discussed, are higher than they’ve been in decades). And while the job losses and unemployment rates went on for some time, they did stabilize, but recovery is elusive.
So I have to ask: what would the loyal opposition have done? From what I read here and see in the media the answer is “Nothing!!! Even the votes we gave for the bailout, if we had it to do over, we wouldn’t have voted for it!!!”
So Republicans offer nothing. And that’s not a formula for recovery and success.
md
August 23rd, 2011
5:02 pm
“Gee, md, how much is a pack of cigs….and how much of that price is tax?”
Missing the point………if one can afford to pay 5-10 bucks for cigs, one can afford to pay something for the privilege of living in this society………………
The argument about taxes is bogus when it come to sales taxes………we ALL pay those.
1811/0311
August 23rd, 2011
5:03 pm
Johnny Cashless From the Grave:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n8K5b3gFvI
Dusty
August 23rd, 2011
5:04 pm
Keep,
Do keep up. Your reference was the time when Democrats were deciding whom was to be on the presidential ticket. You voted against Hillary and that was the mistake I mentioned. Obama, ouch!!
You, of course, wanted to say something unpleasant about McCain. Figures. But, then again, you DID forget to say that Bush did it. Better watch it or you will be kicked out of the morning coffee klatch for dereliction of duty. .-
josef
August 23rd, 2011
5:05 pm
Mary Elizabeth
Why a party? Democrat or Republican, do you really, honestly believe that their politicians have anything beyond their own self-interest at heart and mind?
marko
August 23rd, 2011
5:06 pm
I often wonder why you never see I’m stupid and I vote bumper stickers.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
5:07 pm
“At some point, printing money can and will lead to hyperinflation…..see Zimbabwe for example”
I have in my possession several “dollar bills” from Zimbabwe, in the denomination of 100 Billion Dollars (Z). Due to hyperinflation, these were only valid currency in Zimbabwe for 6 months. I bought from a coin dealer for the novelty of them for $8 (US) each.
There’s the stories about Germans pushing wheelbarrowfuls (wheelbarrowsful?) of Deutchmarks post WWI to buy a loaf of bread…
Matti's Annoyance
August 23rd, 2011
5:07 pm
To truly appreciate Mary Elizabeth’s direct, yet ladylike response to the rudeness of others, picture Dixie Carter playing the part of Mary Elizabeth, ala Julia Sugarbaker.
Delightful!
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
5:07 pm
md…. did not miss the point. Sales tax is a tax….. there are many taxes paid by the poor that are regressive. Let’s see…take all the wealth from the bottom 50%, 1.4 trillion. That’s what? 2x the amount of the tax loophole for the private jet industry…. You want their refrigerators and microwaves too?
Our problems stem from a very simple problem….what we used to tax to the higher income/wealth individuals has been reduced to a level too low to sustain the spending left over from the Bush era much less what is need to invest in infrastructure and to allow this country ability to deal with economic disasters like that left by Bush.
md
August 23rd, 2011
5:08 pm
“The issue of the day is today’s article and it is not about me nor about Wall Street. It was about corruption of politicians of power in Georgia. I centered, specifically. on the banking aspect in the article above. That is what your focus should have been on if you were thinking correctly. That you make it about me or about Wall Street to point out that I “take sides” shows your own personal biases regarding me.”
Mary…….just because Jay posts on one aspect of corruption does not equate to everybody falling in line on the subject……………….I have no problem saying it is wrong, but also that it is wrong on the National level………How about you??
And if you are going to get your britches in a wad when one responds to your posts, I suggest you learn to ignore them or not post on a public forum……………….this isn’t private e-mail here.
Good luck………..
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
5:08 pm
MPercy
“Granny, the fisherman you mention would not, I believe, be advocating forcing your neighbors at the end of a figurative and literal gun to sell their things to divide them according to needs. Forced charity is false charity.”
As I was in the original discussion with Scout, I’ll interject.
That was not the point, at all. Scout wanted to know who said “from each according to their abilities, to each according to their need.’
The answer I gave was Luke’s record of the early Christian church in the Book of Acts. It wasn’t about gov’t vs charity, it wasn’t about volunteerism vs gov’t programs. The concept is straight out of the New Testament.
Any other ‘buts’ are just an effort to distract from the earliest Christian practice of their religion and how they viewed materialism and their faith.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
5:09 pm
Dusty…I guess your post made sense to you… bless your heart.
md
August 23rd, 2011
5:11 pm
“1. To generate money in the private sector has a cost, just like to distribute it in the public sector has a cost. So what part are you arguing.”
Once again, all costs come out of the private sector……..the costs will be greater when an entire bureaucracy must first be paid for………………..so you have extra costs associated with gov’t.
Think cost on top of cost……………..or 2x the cost.
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
5:16 pm
In 1887 Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the
University of Edinborough, had this to say about the fall of the
Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior:
“A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.
From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse over loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship.”
“The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations from the
beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:
From bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage.”
The Obituary follows:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Born 1776, Died 2012
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
5:16 pm
Adam @4:22 pm Oh, is that what Warren Buffet did? I must have missed that part. “Raise all the millionaire’s taxes, except mine.”
Actually, pretty much.
First of all, Mr Buffet doesn’t have a large income. His company pays him a salary of $100,000 each year, and he “earns” a few million dollars every year in interest and dividends. He does hold assets that represent unrealized capital gains in the several tens of billions (crica $40B or so, primarily shares of Berkshire-Hathaway). If BH were to go belly up tomorrow, his holdings become worthless. His wealth, however is immaterial; the income is what he pays taxes on, much of which is taxed at the lower capital gains rate rather than income tax rate. Quoting his tax rate, based on CG rates compared to his secretary’s, based on income tax rates (and not at his or her *effective* income tax rate, at that) is apples and oranges.
Mr Buffet takes full advantage of the tax system to minimize his taxes. He has accountants and tax lawyers. He has clearly structured his affairs to minimize his taxes, as, for example, when he established trusts for his children.
It is further worth noting that when Mr. Buffet and his friends Bill & Melinda Gates set out to figure out how to improve the world, they created the tax-exempt foundation and donated billions of dollars to the foundation, rather than simply letting the government have that money. We have to ask why? Didn’t they trust to government to do the “right thing” with that money?
Finally, note that both Gates and Buffet, when they donated to the Foundation, did so by giving away appreciated shares of their respective companies, thus garnering for themselves the largest tax break possible–not only did they not have to pay GC taxes on the gains (substantial they were, too), but they get to claim the *appreciated* value as a deductible charitable contribution. So, if WB had been granted one share of BH when it sold for $1000, he would owe income taxes on on the $1000. But if he held that share until BH sold for $200,000 per share, he would owe income taxes on the $1000, and CG taxes on the $199,000 difference. But by donating the share to the foundation, he still owes income taxes on the $1000, pays no CG taxes, and gets to claim $200,000 charitable donation (which can go a long way to offsetting any other income he has).
Mr Buffet has moved virtually all of his wealth into these sheltered trusts, and structured his affairs to produce a relative pittance in taxable income. So, yeah, I’d say that he’s said “Raise all the millionaire’s taxes, except mine–because I’ve already sheltered all mine.”
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
5:18 pm
Ever wonder why pilots make the big bucks? Watch this video. I’m telling you, my rear end would have chewed a hole in the seat! Screw up and it’s your ass!
md
August 23rd, 2011
5:18 pm
“Our problems stem from a very simple problem…”
No, our problems stem from quite a collection of problems………up and down the spectrum.
Dropouts cost this society $300 billion annually…………….I’d say that would equate to “part” of the problem.
marc
August 23rd, 2011
5:19 pm
of course they feel invulnerable….heck rednecks always feel good at home on the front porch…
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
5:19 pm
Mighty Righty
You may not want to forward that email….
The Fall of the Athenian Republic: Mostly False.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/athenian.asp
Martin Williams
August 23rd, 2011
5:20 pm
Jay, are you really surprise at politics in the State of Georgia? I am not, and you know why? this is one of the few States that elected a governor while he was under investigation. The GOP is truly right to take big time advantage on all principles of political issues as Georgians/Southern folks in general are very sutpid when it comes to politics. You see Tom Price left his practice in the medical field to become a politician….go figure…….easy money and the best best benefits in the world especially after retirement.
Thomas
August 23rd, 2011
5:21 pm
MPercy
Well done. No matter where you stand think before defending the indefensible. Buffet could have easily said sale my stock, I will pay tax. I will then take the after tax monies and lend versus contribute. The assets then would not have created a charitable contribution and they would have stayed in his taxable estate.
BS walks.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
5:21 pm
MPercy
“First of all, Mr Buffet doesn’t have a large income. His company pays him a salary of $100,000 each year, and he “earns” a few million dollars every year in interest and dividends.”
In what universe is an income of $3,100,000 a year not ‘large’?
A dad
August 23rd, 2011
5:21 pm
I don’t know what strikes me as sadder: the ridiculous, factually inaccurate rants vented herein, or those who acually seem to be arguing that their party is better than the other one. If y’all haven;t figured out that regardless of whether Dem or GOP, essentially all politicians are self-centered, elitist, two-faced SOB’s then you’re beyond hope. Funny how you can allege one thing against the other party, and someone will always come back and point out that folks in your party have done it too. Nuff said folks? Maybe it’s time for a real “tea party”….
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
5:22 pm
md…having the money to fix the education system and to provide teachers, and to provide usuable education to “dropouts” including addressing the reasons that cause “dropouts” is part of the the infrastructure of this country. But we can agree…taxes are needed to address these problematic areas that private enterprise cannot wihout government support
Dusty
August 23rd, 2011
5:22 pm
Paul,
You can preach on indicating that this economic situation could/would have happened to any president. You might be right. The GOP has brought up many suggestions but none can get through Congress. What seems to get action now is issued by the president in one way or another.
The trouble is, Paul, the president is not seen or felt to be a competent leader. For instance, FDR encountered terrible economic conditions yet the people felt he was leading them in the right direction and would pull them through. He managed! He inspired!
Obama seems to do almost everything wrong. To decrease debt, he spends vast amounts of money. To help unemployment, he pays people not to work (That is what it amounts to.) To change the healthcare system, he ignores doctors and the failure of a trial in Massachusetts. After promising to bring home troops as soon as possible, he does not and sends the airforce to Libya without even looking to the representatives of Americans. He takes lavish vacations while talking about conservation. He seems to try but lack of experience and poor results are evident. He inspires no confidence.
The only approval I see now for our president is by loyal politicians and mindset voters to whom results don’t seem to matter. They ignore the obvious.
1811/0311
August 23rd, 2011
5:23 pm
“The problems we face today exist because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.”
Author unknown.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
5:25 pm
“For starters, the comparison is not equal……………there is a cost associated with getting that 100 dollars in food stamps to the individuals”
Not to mention the fact in order to put $100 into the pocket of a SNAP participant, that $100 (assuming perfect transfer efficiency) had to be removed from the pocket of someone else. It is reasonable to assume that the original holder of the $100 may also have spent it, albeit most likely on “luxury items” like going out to eat and not on groceries.
But the transfer is not 100% efficient, e.g., we have to pay people who administer the program, and cover fraud in the program, and print the EBT cards the program uses, and mail the cards, and pay the stores so that they install the machines that accept the cards, etc. That means that we must first remove $100 + all the overhead from the first person’s pocket so that the second (more deserving!) person can spend it.
Unless the stimulative effect of the 2nd person spending the money on groceries is larger than the stimulative effect of the 1st person spending the money on say, a steak dinner at a restaurant, *and* that effect is larger by a factor that is greater than the overhead involved in the transfer payment channel, then those dollars have been spent less effectively (for the overall economy) by the 2nd person.
Mighty Righty
August 23rd, 2011
5:26 pm
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
5:07 pm
Zimbabwe is a great example of what happens to a rich capitalistic economy when it is taken over by a socialism government. They went from one of Afica’s richest countries to one of its poorest in a very short time. The government took the businesses from the evil rich and the land from the farmers and redistributed it equally. Now everyone is equally starving.
saywhat?
August 23rd, 2011
5:26 pm
md- the $100 generated by the private sector could not safely and reliably be generated without the presence of government. Unless that person built their own roads, hired their own security force, wrote and enforced their own laws etc, don’t spout b.s. about the private sector doing it all on their own. Government and the private sector are symbiotic. To see how well the private sector does without a goverment, move to Somalia and write back telling us how great it is. To see how well government does without a private sector, time travel back to the Soviet Union.
The economy doesn’t care where spent money comes from. If tax breaks don’t result in the saved money being spent, either at the retail level or in an actual business creating investment, the tax breaks are worthless to the economy. It doesn’t make sense to invest in a business however, unless there are consumers ready to support that business. Until money reaches the hands of people willing to spend almost all of of it instead of sit on it, the economy will continue to stagnate. Use tax policy to create a consumer class again, and the new businesses and jobs will follow soon after. Its like tilling and fertilizing the soil before you plant.
josef
August 23rd, 2011
5:26 pm
martin
Georgians and Southerners are stupid when it comes to politics? What planet do you live on…they play politics better than anybody else in the country and have since the Virginia House of Burgesses…we may not like the politics they play, but the bottom line is that even Tammany Hall and Daly came South to study how…
Matti's Annoyance
August 23rd, 2011
5:29 pm
A dad,
Can’t disagree with your 5:21. However, adding more parties to the mix doesn’t really solve the problem: Campaigns require money, and he who raises the most $$$ (usually) wins. With the Supremes now effectively nullifying our sad little $50 contributions by enabling foreign conglomerates carte blanche to spend whatever they want on advertising on a candidate’s behalf (under hidden identities, even), there is virtually NO chance that our elections will return to the issues or that those issues will address the needs of average American people. Until we put some sensible limits on campaigning, our “representatives” will continue to be owned by their biggest donors and corporate sponsors, and will continue to serve THOSE entities, not us.
Unfortunately, I don’t see that happening, and I have to (in this rare case) agree with Mighty Righty. What we grew up believing was the greatest nation in the history of the planet will ultimately be a blip in in a history text somewhere that describes the foolish, arrogant failure of a greed-fueled, ignorant populace. Wish I didn’t, but I do.
pogo
August 23rd, 2011
5:32 pm
What about the Morris Brown story. Millions in the form of taxpayer funding are gone into Cross’s and her cronies pockets and now MB is only going to have to pay 500K to get back in good standing? And nobody is going to jail for this? Yep, there is something bad wrong with this country. I have a black friend who was an allumni of that college and he sent them lots and lots of money after he graduated. He also sent his son there who was in the process of getting a degree when this whole corruption thing happened. My friends money was gone and his son’s education up to that point suddenly didn’t amount to anything. He was then faced with the reality that he would have to pay again for his son to go somewhere else and retake the same classes he had already paid for. Yes, he was real happy with them. He wanted Delores Cross’s scalp but of course nothing was done to her. She wasn’t even prosecuted. Why wasn’t she prosecuted and why is our government so willing to let them default on millions of dollars of debt?
Pertaining to the topic, ALL politicians feed at the trough of public money because to them it is endless. They get good and “fat” from it. My God, most of you are from Atlanta and what with its illustrious history of policital corruption (mostly from corrupt Democratic officials), you have to know this. If you think that the party you support doesn’t do this you are an utter and complete fool. Of course that last bit describes a good number of the blinded fools here. I am really surprised that Jay would even bring repbulican corruption up considering the corrupt Democratic leadership the City of Atlanta has had over the years.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
5:35 pm
Dusty
“The GOP has brought up many suggestions but none can get through Congress. What seems to get action now is issued by the president in one way or another.”
I’m going back two and a half years. The one thing Republican went along with – the actions to stabilize the financial markets – they’ve now repudiated that action.
I am not aware of any other idea Republicans have put forth and said “this is it. This is what we need to spur economic recovery and get people working again.’
I hear what you’re saying, but I think we’ve forgotten the reactions FDR got thru the Depression. He was inspiring, but the results weren’t there for years and years. In that case, FDR and Obama are actually pretty much alike. All that differed was the reaction of the populace.
I don’t think Obama has ever said he was spending vast sums to decrease the deficit. What he has said i that spending levels are too high to sustain, but this is an economic emergency. And according to the classical theories I mentioned earlier, they should have worked. But they haven’t. I think both Democrats and Republicans were surprised by the outcomes.
Healthcare – I still cannot comprehend why people think not getting dropped from insurance when you’re ill, having insurance companies arbitrarily deny procedures, and other situations listed before, are good things. Boggles my mind.
Iraq’s on schedule. Military commanders and some Iraquis are lobbying for a delay. Afghanistan – he never, ever said he’d begin a withdrawal as soon as he was elected. Quite the opposite, actually.
I do see your point about results. My original point was, Democrats AND Republicans put forth classic proposals from the beginning. When they didn’t work a expected, Republicans said “if I had it to do over I’d have voted to not do anything’ and then became the complainers with no solutions (other than sound bites) they said “Here! This is what definitely will work.’
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
5:36 pm
I think we’ve just about beaten the shyte out of that $100. What do you think?
josef
August 23rd, 2011
5:36 pm
MATTI
Not so sure about that “blip in history” bit…this empire will be right up there with the Mesoptamian, Egyptian, Persian, Greek, Roman, Russian, Hapsburg, French, British, Spanish, Moorish, Ottoman…etc, etc. in the history texts of the future…too great and impact over too long a time to fade into a blip…
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
5:37 pm
The only problem with percy’s ‘analysis” is that it has nothing to do with Buffett’s specific recommendations, because he neither knows nor provides them.
In point of fact they completely disregard and utterly misrepresent the very thrust of Buffett’s proposal – to “eliminate the extraordinary tax breaks”.
These bloggers have convinced themselves that he is senile and they are brilliant when it comes to matters of fiscal policy, tax ramifications and economic principles.
I suspect 99.99999999999999% of Americans would laugh at that…
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
5:38 pm
Republicans = white = producers = good
Democrats = color = parasites (also known as moochers) = bad
Who knew it was this simple?
md
August 23rd, 2011
5:39 pm
“money to fix the education system”
And that is also part of the problem……it isn’t just the system…………folks do choose to leave said system……….and they are also part of the problem.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
5:40 pm
“The answer I gave was Luke’s record of the early Christian church in the Book of Acts. It wasn’t about gov’t vs charity, it wasn’t about volunteerism vs gov’t programs. The concept is straight out of the New Testament.”
I was responding more to Granny’s “That’s why I play for the fisherman’s team.” comment, which I combined with Granny’s long history of advocating redistributive government practices, to arrive at the supposition, which could be erroneous, that Granny might be implying that she feels that redistributive government actions would be advocated by Him as charity. I disagree with that prospect, based on my own faith.
Nevermind that though. Am I to understand that you’re saying that Marx appropriated “from each…” from Acts (and thereby from Jesus?)
It seems to me that there’s a large difference between Jesus’ supplication to be charitable (even if it was to the point of giving everything to the cause) and Marx’s plan for enforcing “from each…” at the point of a gun (and which our Government has been doing in its forced charity activities).
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
August 23rd, 2011
5:43 pm
this empire will be right up there with the Mesoptamian, Egyptian, Persian, Greek, Roman, Russian, Hapsburg, French, British, Spanish, Moorish, Ottoman…etc, etc. in the history texts of the future…too great and impact over too long a time to fade into a blip…
And they’ll be writing about the greatest invention in the American Age, the American Redneck. They’ll write that he never had too much book learning but he determined the course of history. They’ll write about how the redneck elected George W. Bush rather than the wimpy Al Gore. They’ll write about how the redneck was the backbone of the Tea Party. About how we stood up and said no to just about everything. I could go on and on. Too bad none of you will be alive when all the history books praise us.
carlosgvv
August 23rd, 2011
5:44 pm
Dusty
The rich learn early on that if they will occasionaly do something good, the plain folk will gladly look the other way while they do many bad things. As for taxes, the rich have high-powered lawyers and accountants to exploit every loophole legislated for them by their lacky politicians. So. most of them wind up paying little or nothing. The rich are really leading you around by the nose, sport!!
Matti's Annoyance
August 23rd, 2011
5:44 pm
josef,
If we make it to our 300th birthday in the condition we can reasonably expect given our current rate of decline, then, yeah… maybe a big blip, but certainly not so very impressive as the Egyptian, Greek, Roman, or even British empires. Well, unless we ditch education and public health entirely, and funnel ALL our money into military might, and kill a *bleep*load more people. Killing people seems to make history-book content, but generally, I’m agin’ it.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
5:46 pm
“In what universe is an income of $3,100,000 a year not ‘large’?”
In a universe where athletes make $25M or more per year, where Oprah makes about $100M per year for talking about nothing on TV, when actors are paid $20M per movie (work a few weeks), where rap musicians (is that an oxymoron, maybe not) make millions. Or where hedge fund managers make $1B or more? (P.S. It’s that last one that ticks the left off, the former are all good people just getting by).
For Mr Buffet to generate billions of dollars of wealth for his shareholders, $3M or so is not outrageous, esp. as his *salary* is $100K. But you’re right, I meant “not large relative to his wealth.”
md
August 23rd, 2011
5:47 pm
“In point of fact they completely disregard and utterly misrepresent the very thrust of Buffett’s proposal – to “eliminate the extraordinary tax breaks”.
And what good is the talk in a 2 party system split by a huge ideological divide??
If it’s argued for the next ten years, did they help or hurt? That’s ten years of contributions they could have made…………..but didn’t.
Must not truly believe in their convictions enough to pull out the ole wallet……………
Southern Comfort
August 23rd, 2011
5:48 pm
Sooth @ 5:18
I saw planes do things during the hurricane summer of 2004 that makes that 747 look like a routine landing. I’ve long thought that pilots should be well compensated for the skills they have.
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
5:48 pm
Redneck, thanks for lettin’ us record this over at your trailer the other night! Thanks again for holding the camera for us. Too bad the “Missus” was over at the bake sale and missed the whole thing! By the way that’s me . . . well, I’ll just let you decide which one’s me!
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
5:48 pm
So Mpercy and Righty, time to put up.
What exactly do you fault with Buffett’s specific recommendations?
If you have no clue what they are, I can help you out with some…
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
5:49 pm
Soothsayer
“I think we’ve just about beaten the shyte out of that $100. What do you think?”
I think I’d give them a hundred bucks to stop….
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
5:51 pm
Mighty Righty @5:26 pm
Indeed. Partly why I bought the bills in the first place. Mugabe is just another in a long line of miserable dictators espousing popular socialism and failing.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
5:51 pm
Sooth and Paul, naw! I’m gonna egg them on to get to the egg on the face syndrome…
md
August 23rd, 2011
5:52 pm
Great Paul…….have jay send that $100 to my address…….and Ill go home now
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
5:53 pm
Reading con comments makes you crazy.
Scroll down.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
5:54 pm
MPercy
“I was responding more to Granny’s ”
Sorry for misattributing your post –
As to the other, no, I’m not saying Marx appropriated from the early Christian church. It’s a concept, been around in many societies for a lonnnnnng time. There are, as you noted big differences between the two. But in answer to the question ‘who said, from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs’ citing Luke in his description of the Christian church is a fair answer.
Maybe not the answer some were looking for or expecting, but a fair answer nonetheless.
And again, I was not quoting, and Luke was not citing, any quote of Jesus. Luke was merely reciting how the church, led by the Apostles, interpreted Jesus’s teachings and put them into practice.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
5:56 pm
MPercy
““In what universe is an income of $3,100,000 a year not ‘large’?”
In a universe where athletes make $25M or more per year, where Oprah makes about $100M per year …’
care to guess what percentage of US households those income levels represent?
(Hint: no one could construe it as ‘large’).
Mary Elizabeth
August 23rd, 2011
5:57 pm
josef @ 5:05
It’s not an either/or proposition. Most have elements of self-interests and interests of the public. It is a matter of degree in each area for each politician. Some start out serving the public as a goal and then grow toward sel -interest, and some even grow in stature toward statemanship with time. JFK’s “Profiles in Courage” comes to mind.
Then, I saw a public servant first hand in my father, who was Director of Vocational Schools in several counties in south Georgia in the late 1940s. He helped veterans secure vocational skills and work after WWII, and then he became a City Manager of a town where he was committed to serving the public’s interest. He told me that had he been corrupt he could have been wealthy. He was not a wealthy man, but he was an outstanding public servant. He got Georgia’s legislature in his day, to grant retirement for all city employees throughout Georgia. It was not retroactive to include himself. He spoke before a Congressional Committee in the U.S. Congress to have the schools built by the veterans in the Vocational School to be used for black schools in the 1940s instead of simply being built for instruction, and then torn down. His request was granted by that Congressional Committee..
He was named a Man of the Year in two south Georgia towns for his public service in the 1950s. So, yes, I believe that some politicians have the public’s interest at heart. I saw it firsthand in operation. BTW, he admired both John and Robert Kennedy and met Robert.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
5:57 pm
Oh no you dont md, I stopped first so Paul owes me the money (although to be fair I left to help my kids and the topic was boring me to death)
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
5:57 pm
MPercy
I just read the last line of your post. I think we can move on to other topics.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
5:57 pm
AmVet “In point of fact they completely disregard and utterly misrepresent the very thrust of Buffett’s proposal – to “eliminate the extraordinary tax breaks”.”
I’ll disagree. I was addressing specifically the comment earlier that Mr Buffet was safe in raising this issue, since it won’t affect him any. This does appear to me to be the case. He *has* sheltered the vast majority of his fortune in the Foundation and other trusts. He *has* structured his income to minimize taxes.
I respect Mr. Buffet for his shrewd business sense and his largess to the charities he supports, but this oft-repeated meme from him smacks of hypocrisy. Mr Buffet is essentially saying “Stop me before I kill again” but only *after* he has garnered immunity.
1811/0311
August 23rd, 2011
5:58 pm
mooch
[mooch]
verb (used with object)
1.
to borrow (a small item or amount) without intending to return or repay it.
2.
to get or take without paying or at another’s expense; sponge: He always mooches cigarettes.
3.
to beg.
4.
to steal.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
6:03 pm
Who did it?
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
6:06 pm
AmVet
Go for it!
I got a kick out of the retired American Express CEO Harvey Golub who said in the Wall Street Journal, well sure, I made a boatload in salary and earnings, but hey! I paid 80 to 90 percent of it to the government in taxes!!!”
All that dough and he got the worst accounting firm in America to do his taxes. What a bozo.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
6:07 pm
md
No problem…. I’ve got that Monopoly board around here somewhere…. y’all were saying how a hundred bucks wasn’t worth anything anyhow…..
Thomas
August 23rd, 2011
6:07 pm
In point of fact they completely disregard and utterly misrepresent the very thrust of Buffett’s proposal – to “eliminate the extraordinary tax breaks”.
Completely wrong. 100% of Americans should be tired of the costless exercise of getting in front of a panting media to simply say things and not do things. Buffet benefitted greatly from his Goldman Sachs preferred stock which was given to him on a silver platter by the Feds. He has hired high priced lawyers to concoct a scheme to save him billions in current income and estate tax.
Walk the walk or don’t talk the talk
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
6:07 pm
I was addressing specifically the comment earlier that Mr Buffet was safe in raising this issue, since it won’t affect him any. This does appear to me to be the case.
Not sure what off-base comment you are referring to, but it doesn’t matter.
Because you are dead wrong.
Why? You apparently don’t know any of the specific recommendations he has made. I have read several of them and those specific recommendations do in fact, very much affect him. And another 0.3% of Americans.
Would he truly make up some highly public cock and bull story that did NOT affect him and think other brilliant people couldn’t easily figure it out?
This groundless posturing based on ignorance of the facts in an effort by the Republicans to portray him as some nefarious, devious, transparent liar is patently absurd.
And I am fully prepared to show you where you are in error…
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
6:08 pm
R I P Nick Ashford!
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
6:10 pm
So Thomas, you want to play as well?
Great.
Which of Buffett’s recommendations are you opposed to?
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
6:11 pm
East Coast theme song…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20Feq_Nt3nM
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
6:11 pm
AmVet: “What exactly do you fault with Buffett’s specific recommendations?”
Mr. Buffet has been saying this sort of thing for 5 years or more. Most recently, I believe was his NY Times op-ed piece. I am unaware of an specific proposal he made therein other than raising rates on those with incomes more than $1M and raising rates on those with incomes more than $10 even more. He didn’t provide his target rates for those new brackets. he complained about several other things that rich people get away with, but didn’t propose any other changes.
Neither of those two proposals does much in terms of impacting Mr Buffet personally, which is the main gist of my comments. He would see some of his income subjected to the $1M rate (my understanding is that Mr Buffet’s normal income is less than $10M per year). He has already sheltered most of his $40B in assets from any further taxation (e.g. estate taxes). He’s pretty safe saying raise the rate on over $10M to 100%. It wouldn’t impact him at all! This sort of tax increase is easy to call for.
As to the “proposal” to increase the number of brackets to include a new bracket with a rate higher than the 35.6% for $1M-$10M and another for income over $10M. I see nothing wrong with that, really, at rates of say 38 and 40%, perhaps, although I think 35% of a man’s income ought to be more than enough of a “fair share”.
Anything else?
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
6:14 pm
Republican Theme song…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOErZuzZpS8
josef
August 23rd, 2011
6:14 pm
duk-sha-nee u-ni-lu-tsv-hi
One of the reasons I dislike your persona to the degree I do is that you take your sneers at the absolute backbone of who we are as a society thinking you’re ever so d*mned superior…well, you’re not…you’re a useless, arrogant little pissant without a scintilla of respect for the working shmo…you don’t a bit more know what a Redneck really is…you’re a one-diminsional, one-trick pony…you may have your fan club who think you’re just ever so clever and every so witty and I’m not here to judge them, but you’re a supercillious, bigoted little twit, imho…
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
6:14 pm
Yeah, cons know more about our economy than Buffett.
Not buying it.
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
August 23rd, 2011
6:16 pm
you may have your fan club who think you’re just ever so clever and every so witty and I’m not here to judge them, but you’re a supercillious, bigoted little twit, imho…
Oh, put a sock in it, josef. You ain’t the be all and end all of this blog.
josef
August 23rd, 2011
6:16 pm
MARY ELIZABETH
Thank you for your answer.
F. Sinkwich
August 23rd, 2011
6:16 pm
Oh, nooooooo!
“Only 38 percent of Americans say they approve of the way Barack Obama is handing his job as president, according to Gallup’s daily tracking poll released today (which averages the president’s approval over Gallup’s previous three days of polling). That is the lowest that Obama’s approval has been in the daily tracking poll since he was inaugurated in January 2009. 54 percent of Americans in Gallup’s daily tracking poll said they disapprove of the way Obama is handling his job as president.”
Who the hell comprises that 38%?
Oh yeah, AmVet, granny, usinuk, etc.
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
6:17 pm
The Obituary follows:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Born 1776, Died 2012
Only if the Tea Party wins…
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
6:17 pm
dang it, josef, why do you have to make it personal to the pissants? Attack the posts, not the pissants!
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
6:17 pm
Who the he’ll is Josef talking to?
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
6:18 pm
I am unaware of an specific proposal he made therein other than raising rates on those with incomes more than $1M and raising rates on those with incomes more than $10 even more.
And there sir is the fatal flaw in your position.
He has made other very specific proposals in addition to those. Which do affect him exactly as he has said.
Here are three of several items to read about vis a vis his plans – capital gains, carried interest and Erskine/Bowles.
If you have difficulty in finding/researching them let me know…
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
6:18 pm
Dang, left off the
… that’s what I get for letting the pissants rant
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
6:18 pm
Make that hell
josef
August 23rd, 2011
6:20 pm
Duk-sha-nee U-ni-lu-tsv-hi
“Oh, put a sock in it, josef. You ain’t the be all and end all of this blog.”
Never said I was and the only time I ever lower myself to respond to you is when you quote, address or allude to me….
And. gee, Mary Agnes…dropped the shtick for that one, didn’t you…? Now THAT was funny…
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
6:20 pm
Bosch,
Redneck Convert (R–and proud of it)
josef
August 23rd, 2011
6:21 pm
BOSCH
It wasn’t you…
So, SHUT UP…
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
6:22 pm
josef, don’t hold back! Tell RC what you really think of his persona!
You did something that always cracks me up, my friend. At the end of your screed, you wrote “imho”.
Humble???
NOT!
(Just razzin’ ya…)
josef
August 23rd, 2011
6:23 pm
BOSCH
Hell vs he’ll…are you ipading?
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
6:23 pm
Getalife
Oh okay – did somebody just jack Paul again?
josef
August 23rd, 2011
6:24 pm
ZamVet
Not ME who’s humble…just my l’il ole wuthless opinion…
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
6:24 pm
Bosch,
I think so.
Who do you think it is?
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
6:25 pm
josef: I don’t see where Redneck has even mentioned you in any of this posts today. I find it hard to comprehend why you attack him so viciously. If any of the rest of had a post like yours, we would have been banned.
I don’t know who this whole feud between you and Redneck started but it’s wearing a little thin. I don’t have any animosity towards you or Redneck, but I think you’re carrying this too far.
Joe Mama
August 23rd, 2011
6:26 pm
Okay, when the oldtimers start getting in each others’ faces, it’s time to go.
But here’s a laugh for all on my way out.
http://www.imagepoop.com/image/1666/Slow-Down-The-Cop-Hides-Behind-This-Sign.html
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
6:27 pm
Paul @5:56 pm
Everything’s relative. I expect that A-Rod thinks that the MLB league minimum ($414,500) is small, but you (I bet) & I think it’s quite a large sum for playing a game. And again, I should have said “not large relative to his overall wealth”.
As to the question. Well, the top 400 have average AGI of more than $270M, and there were 4.2M returns with income more than $200K. It’ll take me longer to get a number better bounded that “somewhere between 400 and 4.2 million”.
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
6:28 pm
Paul @5:54 pm
Clear enough. Thanks, sorry to have interjected, but I was thrown off my Granny’s comment.
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
6:29 pm
So we are supposed to ignore what the American electorate is saying? Only 19% strongly approve of Bozo. 45% strongly disapprove. Only 26% say that they are pleased with how Bozo is handling the economy. 66% say we are heading in the wrong direction. Think that there might be some reason for this?
josef
August 23rd, 2011
6:30 pm
SOOTH
The jackass quoted me at length…and you can think what you want to, makes me no nevermind…
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
6:31 pm
Bosch – getalife
Yup. The coward has returned.
We’ll see if the AJC bans him for a while.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
6:31 pm
The only poll that matters is the next election kay.
Normal
August 23rd, 2011
6:31 pm
Josef,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_As5XzdzWI4
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
6:32 pm
Paul,
I want to know who it is.
Coward for sure.
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
6:33 pm
“Think that there might be some reason for this?”
Could it be that George W. Bush left him a big fat mess to clean up and the Republicans have tied both hands behind his back?
By a wide margin, more Americans blame former President George W. Bush for the national economic outlook than they do President Barack Obama, according to a new poll.
Numbers out of Quinnipiac University Thursday morning indicated that 54 percent of Americans say Bush is to blame for exploding the federal deficit and swelling unemployment, whereas just 27 percent believe it is President Obama’s fault.
Those figures are bad news for Republicans, who are hoping to hang the nation’s poor economic state around the president to defeat him in 2012.
By and large, Americans told Quinnipiac that they trust Obama on the economy more than congressional Republicans, despite a growing dissatisfaction. Fourty-five percent also said they trust the president to help the U.S. economy, versus 38 percent who believe Republicans could do a better job.
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
6:34 pm
getalife,
I find it hard to believe that with your head in the sand that your prospective is improved.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
6:35 pm
kay,
Four more years.
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
6:35 pm
getalife
I dunno? @@ has been down on Paul lately but it’s not her style. We need the moderator…
josef,
It’s my new iPhone had it a few weeks and damn that auto correct! It has also caused some marital problems as I can now bring my blog addiction to the porch during happy hour. So now I can blog, play around on FB, play Angry Birds, all while listening to Pandora radio- plus I downloaded an app that keeps the pups from randomly barking. It’s done wonders for my ADD! (sarc)
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
6:35 pm
71, saw your reply about Inouye earlier. I did not infer you had no respect for him. We disagree on many things, but some of them and some Americans go way beyond any supposed divide!
Time for a little…
(listen)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlG6_Ai2dKo&playnext=1&list=PLB3387DC5347D464D
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
6:39 pm
“The jackass quoted me at length…and you can think what you want to, makes me no nevermind…”
josef: he quoted you. Big deal! He didn’t say anything derogatory about your post, in fact he went off on a tangent that was humorous and didn’t even pertain to your post.
josef: now I know that someone who’s posted on this blog as long as you have has a thicker skin than that. Give it up! Realize that you and Redneck are on the same and get this past you. And that applies to you, Redneck!
josef
August 23rd, 2011
6:39 pm
BOSCH
You can always tell when I go onto ipad at night! Love that sucker, but that auto correct is a pain in the arse…some of the things it has me saying! I think Jay must’ve been in on it’s design…
PAUL
Why you? Revenge for shutting down the blog…and, no I figured it wasn’t you…just the one word? Never!
Bosch
August 23rd, 2011
6:39 pm
Yeah I want to know who it is too I don’t like people messing with Paul. I mean it’s Paul for Gods sake!
TruthBe
August 23rd, 2011
6:43 pm
Nothing in Georgia politics compares to the total destruction and corruption that the Obama administration with the help of the democrats have inflicted on the entire Country.
Jay as usual you are nothing but a mouthpiece for the liberal preverted racist progressive democrat criminals. Why don’t write some articles about the democrats dishonesty and corruption? This economy is ALL Obama’s. And the democrat losers in office.
AmVet
August 23rd, 2011
6:43 pm
I have not kept up with any of this recent nonsense. Namejackings? Retards? Red cards?
Just a fact of life in this virtual insane asylum…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAD28X-JZmE
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
6:44 pm
Soothsayer,
Quinnipac University, Hamton, CT. Not your most conservative bastion. I am sure that
Rasmussen didn’t ask the same polling group if they liked where the country is headed. 66% say that they don’t like it. And if you can deny the 45% who strongly disapprove of Bozo’s track record, then you might join getalife with his head firmly planted in the sand. As Bozo’s numbers fall, it won’t matter if some think that Bush screwed the pooch. He isn’t president anymore, or haven’t you noticed. This is Bozo’s dog and pony show now and his incompetence just will not go away. Are you glad you voted for this clown? Your numbers are getting smaller and smaller every day.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
6:45 pm
It’s a reality show with many characters.
We have to vote off the guilty one.
josef
August 23rd, 2011
6:45 pm
SOOTH
Blessed are the peacemakers…but I’m a Dixie Chick…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-ounk0FNdY
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
6:45 pm
Dang it… liberal preverted racist progressive democrat criminals if there had been a “socialist anti-christian marxist” in there I would have covered the complete bingo card
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
6:45 pm
getalife
I’ve a feeling Jay will out him/her.
josef
“just the one word? Never!”
THBPPPTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!
How’s that for one word, hmmm?
oh wait… that makes it more than one word…. dang, I hate when I do that……..
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
6:46 pm
AmVet @6:18 pm:
I’ve seen where he complained about these things, sure, but specific proposals? What CG rate does he propose, what tax rate for $1M bracket and $10M bracket? Did he manage to separate carried interest in a normal partnership, e.g. founding a law firm, vs. the hedge fund structure or does he lump them all into the same pot?
I mean sure, he’s said to stop “coddling” the mega-rich. But I’ve not seen (and I have looked) any specific proposals. Complaining that carried interest is somehow unfair is not a proposal (although, again, it doesn’t impact Mr Buffet as far as I am aware, carried interest is not part of BH’s structure).
I’m seriously interested if there was a set of real proposals.
Also, it wasn’t a random off-topic comment. It’s referenced right there at the top of my first Buffett (I am shamed to realize just now I have misspelled his name throughout!) post.
Adam @4:22 pm Oh, is that what Warren Buffet did? I must have missed that part. “Raise all the millionaire’s taxes, except mine.”
MPERCY: Actually, pretty much.
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
6:47 pm
For josef & Redneck!
Bubba
August 23rd, 2011
6:48 pm
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. If they were wiser, these guys would handle reapportionment so as to deliberately leave a credible minority party in existence. By gerrymandering to give themselves a super majority, they sow the seeds of their own downfall in the future.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
6:49 pm
AmVet
Hopefully you’re done, so I thought I’d offer a bit of assistance to the others, all in one place.
Mr. Buffett also spoke on several talk shows regarding the advantage he enjoys regarding the payroll tax and how it hits middle America harder. He spoke and wrote, as you noted, of much more than income tax.
And here’s a nice little article that breaks it down, examines his claims for errors and concludes with “Overall, we rate Buffett’s statement True. ”
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/aug/18/warren-buffett/warren-buffett-says-super-rich-pay-lower-taxes-oth/
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
6:51 pm
But then again you could just . . .
Fred
August 23rd, 2011
6:53 pm
Keep: Check your email. He’s sending a check…………. the late night email worked……….
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
6:54 pm
AmVet
And someone always has to mess with the inmates….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38maVb_30ng
TruthBe
August 23rd, 2011
6:55 pm
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
6:45 pm
Dang it… liberal preverted racist progressive democrat criminals if there had been a “socialist anti-christian marxist” in there I would have covered the complete bingo card
No we would have to add poor dumb negro obama butt kisser in there so that you could be added keep.
Tommy Maddox
August 23rd, 2011
6:55 pm
OT – was Obama caught telling the truth today or was that a normal earthquake? Just wondering…
kayaker 71
August 23rd, 2011
6:56 pm
AmVet,
Nice tape. I agree. I had the privilege of meeting and talking with Inouye at a Democratic fundraiser in Honolulu. He served our country at a very difficult time for the issei Japanese, as did the whole 442nd Regimental Combat Team.
Fred
August 23rd, 2011
6:56 pm
Soothsayer: You best just leave that one alone bro. Red goes straight to Josef’s last nerve for whatever reason and ain’t nothing gonna change it. Best to just back away before you get caught in the crossfire lol. I don’t even TEASE Josef about it anymore. I’d rather kiss a french baptist than get in that “argument.”
Bruno
August 23rd, 2011
6:59 pm
Sooth–Didn’t know if you saw my Nick Ashford tribute earlier. His and Valerie’s best:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZNbfKibFLE
I think josef stated he really liked this one too^^^^
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
7:01 pm
“No we would have to add poor dumb negro obama butt kisser in there so that you could be added keep.”
Red card.
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
August 23rd, 2011
7:01 pm
Well, looks like Kyle Busch done stepped in a big pile of it. He got convicted of driving 128 mph on a two lane road and doing it by a school and a church and all kinds of stuff. And he passed three cop cars that were doing 65 mph and heading to lunch. The judge took away his liscence for 45 days and he got sentenced to community service at some driving school. I guess he can teach a bunch of teenagers how to get a car up to 128 mph. There ain’t no cure for stupid. Who does he think he is, @@?
http://www.ajc.com/sports/kyle-busch-pleads-guilty-1134296.html
Fred
August 23rd, 2011
7:03 pm
Josef: All good things come to he who waits. I scrolled back to see the “source’ of today’s irritation with RC and FINALLY I understand. It was in his 5:43.
Yup, you sure as hell saw the measure of THAT fool long before I did. F him. He’s probably from New York. All this time, I thought he was laughing with us. Turns out he was laughing at us.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
7:03 pm
TruthBe…. hmmm…. why sure that’s objective addition. how’s the tea bagging….. were you featured in the “Aryian Pissant suggested whine selection” column?
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
7:04 pm
“liberal preverted racist progressive democrat criminals if there had been a “socialist anti-christian marxist” in there I would have covered the complete bingo card
No we would have to add poor dumb negro obama butt kisser in there so that you could be added keep.”
Other than that you like him, though, don’t you?
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:04 pm
FRED
Tu es un homme très sage à faire ça, St. Jean!
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
7:05 pm
Well, this day has been a revelation to me. I never would’ve guessed you could say cock and negro on this blog! I hope this goes through.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
7:06 pm
Sooth,
Retard too.
TruthBe
August 23rd, 2011
7:07 pm
Soothsayer, No.
Tommy Maddox
August 23rd, 2011
7:07 pm
I’d be mad too if I had voted for that loser.
getalife
August 23rd, 2011
7:08 pm
tb,
Hate much?
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:08 pm
TruthBe…
“No we would have to add poor dumb negro obama butt kisser in there so that you could be added keep.”
Well, looks like the dogs have drug in another dead skunk…Cuzzin Claus says to tell you you don’t know Scheiss even when looking in the mirror…
Fred
August 23rd, 2011
7:08 pm
Not wise enough by half Josef, but I muddle along…………
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
7:09 pm
Sooth, the trick is to use them all in a cohesive post and still not appear foolish.
Fred
August 23rd, 2011
7:11 pm
Josef: Just saw your Ipad comment. Did you download the AJC app? My wife got me an Ipad for my birthday last October and I rarely use the damn thing. I dunno why, I reckon it’s a handy little feller, but I just haven’t warmed to it………….. A friend of mine does Nook and she said if I download the nook app on it I can read her books for free. I need to try that……..
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
7:12 pm
Redneck, that just proves that if you’re going to 128 mph you don’t want to pass three police cars.
Paul
August 23rd, 2011
7:12 pm
my brother just sent me this:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/heart-wrenching-image-dog-keeps-watch-over-fallen-seals-casket-during-funeral/
after watching that, I’m calling it a night.
Bruno
August 23rd, 2011
7:17 pm
All this time, I thought he was laughing with us. Turns out he was laughing at us.
LOL @ Fred. Per the speculation that RC is another blogger here, I’d be fairly stumped to guess who, only because there are only a handful of writers here with the “creativity” to pull off such a long-term parody. The longevity of the character would definitely narrow the field, though.
Kamchak
August 23rd, 2011
7:19 pm
Reading con comments makes you crazy.
Scroll down.
Wisdom. Of. The. Ages.
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:19 pm
FRED
I’m still getting used to it…looks like I’m gonna have to get Unmentionable his own…the d*mned thing is more addictive than nicotine, alcohol and chocolate in combination!
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
7:20 pm
Paul, thank’s for the link. What can you say? Dogs are awesome. They have adapted well to their roles of being human’s best friends.
out of the blue
August 23rd, 2011
7:22 pm
Since it seems everyone here tonight has an opinion concerning the feud between redneck and josef let me interdict.
Redneck is a person who does not take himself seriously, but, will play off of ones weaknesses.
Josef, is someone, who is highly intellegent, but, has a cross to bear. Whether it be his religion, sexual orientation, or whatever….And in my humble opinion anything one might say Joseph will turn on you like a timber rattler!
dcb
August 23rd, 2011
7:24 pm
Actually a GOP supporter speaking here – give Bookman credit for a well-written op-ed piece from his liberal point of view. And in fact, he has a couple of good points. My party is, I’m afraid, shooting themselves in the foot nationally insofar as presidential candidates and their partisan stances. Allowing party leaders to maintain leadership roles on committees in areas where they obviously have at the very least, given the image of improper activity, is just plain nuts. Guess that’s why I now answer “Independent” when asked my political persuasion.
Fred
August 23rd, 2011
7:27 pm
Bruno: I never once speculated he was another blogger. He is who he is and that’s the way he blogs. I always thought he was kind of “cute” until I read the post I referenced and saw what Josef saw long ago. The guy hates the south. It’s not “parody” he genuinely thinks he better than us who are born and raised in Dixie. In short, he IS the asshat that Josef has said for a while. I missed it. I don’t usually make such errors in judgement, but it happens sometimes. I now COMPLETELY understand Josef’s disdain for this asshat and support it wholeheartedly.
I like to kid around about Yankees, but there IS a grain of truth in what I say. Ya’ll ARE different from us. That’s not a bad thing. Different is good. Josef is “different” than me. I’m “different” than you. (Getalife is different from EVERYONE lol). Each adds his own spice to the stew. The problem comes when folks think they are BETTER than others for some reason. RC thinks that. Hell, I love to dog the French but just damn, they make some good grub. And the Baptists? ……………. and the Baptists………….. and the Baptists……….. well I can’t think of anything THEY add except as an example of what NOT to be, but I’m trying to think of something………….. anyways where was I?
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
7:29 pm
What this country needs is another President like good ol’ George W. Bush to get itself straightened out again! Oh! wait! We’ve got Rick Perry? Well, he and the Republicans ought to have this all sorted out in no time.
First, they’ll end the laissez-faire attitude towards Wall Street and uber-leveraged derivatives that have the potential to wreck the entire World’s economy.
Then, they’ll end the corporate tax loopholes that encourage entire industries to China and other offshore havens.
Next, they’ll wrap up the disastrous, costly, never-ending. pointless wars that are bleeding the Country white.
And, finally, they’ll end the abuses of the Constitution that allow warrantless spying on Americans, allowing the interception of virtually e-mail, telephone conversation, etc.
Nah! Nevah happen!
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:29 pm
out of the blue…
I don’t like mean, hateful, and spiteful bigotry. Period. I don’t like it when I see it in myself and I don’t like it when I see it in others…thass all…
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
7:34 pm
“I don’t like mean, hateful, and spiteful bigotry. Period. I don’t like it when I see it in myself and I don’t like it when I see it in others…thass all…”
But thass NOT all. You appear to be compelled to torture yourself by reading it. Like driving slowly past a bad wreck. If you do like a lot of us do and just scroll right on past, you’ll never know what he says…or care.
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:35 pm
I like the Baptists…but then I like everybody except…
Good Little Liberal
August 23rd, 2011
7:35 pm
State Department to give the new government in Libya 1.6 billion bucks. Or maybe just find a guy on the street with a machine gun and give it to him.
Kamchak
August 23rd, 2011
7:35 pm
The guy hates the south.
That’s a stretch.
…he genuinely thinks he better than us who are born and raised in Dixie.
That sense of superiority is not exclusive to only one region of this country.
I now COMPLETELY understand Josef’s disdain for this asshat and support it wholeheartedly.
Even if it is intended as an insult — an insult is like poison or strong drink. It can only affect you if you accept it.
Bruno
August 23rd, 2011
7:36 pm
I don’t like mean, hateful, and spiteful bigotry.
josef–Does that mean you’re taking back all those things you said about Yankees and Carpetbaggers??
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:37 pm
Doggone…
True, that…but, what can I say, I really AM interested in what other people think…
RW-(the original)
August 23rd, 2011
7:37 pm
Wouldn’t it be a kick if Helen Thomas was moonlighting as Redneck Convert?
Bruno
August 23rd, 2011
7:37 pm
Another Ashford and Simpson smash:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jz_D-greh8Q
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
7:38 pm
“The guy hates the south. It’s not “parody” he genuinely thinks he better than us who are born and raised in Dixie.”
I’m from the South and, in all literal honesty, I never thought that about Redneck. Maybe you guys see something I don’t. I think his persona is that of a common-man Southerner whose opinions, while prima-facie seem to support Right wing positions, the deeper meaning is completely different. And, I think therein lies the value in his posts.
I think anyone who takes offense about Redneck’s portrayal of Southerners is being too sensitive. You wouldn’t have enjoyed any of Lewis Grizzard’s books.
When all is said and done, you don’t have to read them. For me, after a tough day of work, the first thing I do is search for Redneck’s posts. I love them!
bxnyc
August 23rd, 2011
7:39 pm
Jay, never mind the rightwing frothing at the mouth, I take issue with your column header “Georiga republicans believe themselves invunerable. It should read, SOUTHERN REPUBLICANS. They have an indoctrinated following who will twist themselves to justify their ideology. You/we are never going to win them over, as long as the south is dominated and populated by resentful people, who dont give a dam#n about facts but just want the black man out of office. Stop trying to use logic with them they only know one thing, they cannot acknowledge someone they consider inferior occupying the WHITE(pun intended)house, commanding the military and making decisions that affects their lives as legitimate. The biggest problem I see is feckless media afraid to offend extremists and hungry for on air time. If they stood up and called out the right they would be villified and might lose their jobs because their corporate masters would demand they back down.
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:39 pm
BRUNO
Just remember that not everything I say about them is “mean, hateful, and spiteful.” I’ve had enough nice things to say about you, now haven’t I?
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
7:40 pm
“but, what can I say, I really AM interested in what other people think…”
That’s one way to characterize it, but your invariable reaction makes it difficult to believe it’s the REAL reason. The way you react is more like someone looking for an excuse to be insulting.
Bruno
August 23rd, 2011
7:40 pm
Doesn’t the RC character go back at least 5 years?? How many other people been hanging around that long?? Maybe RC = AmVet.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
7:40 pm
GLL: Your continued hatred of Obama is duly noted. Of course, no real issue here. Its all part of the plane loads of money that Bush sent to Iraq and was never seen again…
Bruno
August 23rd, 2011
7:41 pm
I’ve had enough nice things to say about you, now haven’t I?
Up until you put me in place the other day.
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:42 pm
SOOTH
Got every one of Grizzard’s books, some autographed…don’t even consider putting him in the same category…
Good Little Liberal
August 23rd, 2011
7:43 pm
Keep Up
Ah, the mind reader who can take a line about the State Department and see a personal hatred for another person.
What am I thinking right now?
MPercy
August 23rd, 2011
7:43 pm
Note to self re: Mr. Buffett’s income.
I have been careless in describing Mr. Buffett’s income. I have pointed out his salary is reported to be $100,000 and he has a few million in dividends and interest. This represents his “ordinary” income subject to income taxes. His capital gains, though are regularly sizable, giving him a large AGI but most of which is taxed at LT CG rates. I have not always included that explicitly, and may have given the impression that Mr. Buffett only pockets a few million dollars per year–I was only trying to note his income subject to income taxes. Sorry for any confusion.
Forbes:
Buffett told [interviewer Charlie] Rose his 2010 adjusted gross income was $62 million. He implied that most income came from long-term capital gains and qualifying dividends currently taxed up to 15%. Only a small portion of his gross income – a few million dollars for Buffett – is ordinary income, like wages and interest income, taxed at higher ordinary income tax rates currently up to 35%.
Buffett [said] that he uses the maximum 30% charitable contribution deduction each year – for appreciated property – and he has a $10 billion carryover of charitable contributions for subsequent use too.
Buffett’s 30% charity tax deduction offsets his entire ordinary income, and next it offsets his lower long-term capital gains income. Hence, he pays approximately 15% long term capital gains tax rates only, and – as he likes to say – it’s a lower tax rate than others in his office pay.
Buffett also avoids nasty alternative minimum taxes (AMT) of 28%. Charity is a powerful tax savings tool to avoid income, AMT and estate taxes.
Good Little Liberal
August 23rd, 2011
7:44 pm
Keep Up
Oh, and Your continued hatred of Bush is duly noted.
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
7:44 pm
Well, let me put to you another way. He never posts anything that would get him banned. So . . . you can either live with it or not read his posts. He has as much right to post here as anyone else. If you take offense at his posts, don’t read them.
Kamchak
August 23rd, 2011
7:45 pm
Got every one of Grizzard’s books, some autographed…
I’ve got every one of Grizzard’s books, ALL autographed.
…don’t even consider putting him in the same category…
I would.
Bruno
August 23rd, 2011
7:45 pm
Where’s Brosephus?? He would groove on this A & S number:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWSuRXQAil8
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:47 pm
Doggone
Some days, yes; some days, no…depends on who gives me something to react to, give me something positive, I’ll react positive; negative, and I react negatively…I admit that I’m a knee jerk reactionary…other people don’t…
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
7:47 pm
“Got every one of Grizzard’s books, some autographed…”
Well, by now you should know that “Chile Dogs Always Bark At Night!”
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
7:49 pm
Oops! That was Chili not Chile!
out of the blue
August 23rd, 2011
7:49 pm
out of the blue…
“I don’t like mean, hateful, and spiteful bigotry” Neither do I Josef!
But, you do sometimes show an intolerance for comments that don’t really mean a tinkers damn.
And, as anyone who has posted here for two years or so…you do not forgive or forget.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
August 23rd, 2011
7:49 pm
what am I thinking now?
Ummm.. since there is not much depth to work with, my guess would be…
this
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:49 pm
SOOTH
And I would say the same to you concerning my posts reacting to him…
K’chak
As you might would put it, whatever, sport….
AND
I don’t much care for TruthBe either, but I’m sure there are some who do…
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
7:50 pm
“ive me something positive, I’ll react positive; negative, and I react negatively…I admit that I’m a knee jerk reactionary”
Or, in other words, you are content to give someone whose opinions you don’t like the power to control you.
Fred
August 23rd, 2011
7:51 pm
Damn, good lively discussion going and I had to relate the day’s good tidings to my wife (she just HAD to read all the emails) and now I have to finish supper. I always miss the good stuff…………
Good Little Liberal
August 23rd, 2011
7:52 pm
Keep Up
\Carl Stallings incredible orchestration of the best animated cartoons of all time. Wow. Quite the compliment, but no.
Bruno
August 23rd, 2011
7:52 pm
I would.
Gotta go with jo on that one, Kam. Lame blog characters /= writing geniuses like Lewis Grizzard. Though I guess I’ll never get any credit for time served in josef’s eyes, I’ve spent most of my life in the South, more than 30 years now. As such, I’ve got a feeling for the real deal, and Grizzard was the real deal.
Fred
August 23rd, 2011
7:53 pm
Kam @ 7:35: Noted. Got no time for any more of a response, but that was a good post. 99% of yours are.
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:53 pm
out of the blue…
I’ll agree with that since you did say “sometimes!” Not, as someone else has posited, “invarably!”
Good Little Liberal
August 23rd, 2011
7:54 pm
josef
The lefties will always support bigotry and hate.
Always.
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:54 pm
Doggone
Haven’t given you that power yet!
Bruno
August 23rd, 2011
7:55 pm
Another hit for A & S :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueLlohJGTxk&feature=related
Southern Comfort
August 23rd, 2011
7:56 pm
RW @ 7:37
Thasss just wrong!!!!
Bruno
Nice groove @ 7:45. Hearing about Nick caught me way, way off guard. I didn’t even know he was sick. I’m waiting for TV One to do an episode of Unsung on that duo. They’ve had a major impact on R&B for a long time.
josef
August 23rd, 2011
7:56 pm
GLL
“The lefties will always support bigotry and hate. ”
No, lefties won’t “always,” and neither will “righties.”
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
7:56 pm
“I’ll agree with that since you did say “sometimes!” Not, as someone else has posited, “invarably!””
when was the last time you posted something complimentary to Redneck?
Bruno
August 23rd, 2011
7:56 pm
So who gets more blog glory, josef for being comment #1000 (bottom of the page), or me for being comment # 1001, top of the page??
@@
August 23rd, 2011
7:57 pm
Redneck:
Who does he think he is, @@?
I beg your pardon…I speed on backroads. Only thing in danger of losing their life is an armadillo or two.
Nasty little scavengers. They’re only valuable as roadkill. Some people put out birdfeeders, I put out armadillos. Birds love ‘em.
Doggone/GA
August 23rd, 2011
7:58 pm
“Haven’t given you that power yet!”
that’s fine. I wouldn’t want it even if you offered.
Soothsayer
August 23rd, 2011
7:59 pm
“Give me a beauty queen who understands the rules of the game. Give me a beauty queen like Kathy Sue Loudermilk, who won the coveted Miss Collard Festival Queen title seven years running back home, breaking Cordie Mae Poovy’s string of four in a row. That’s not the only string Kathy Sue broke. When the one that held up the top of her swimsuit snapped, that’s how she ousted Cordie Mae in the first place.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“For years, I thought drive-in theaters were for watching movies out-of-doors. Then I went to one with Kathy Sue Loudermilk, bless her heart. She was a lovely child and a legend before her sixteenth birthday. She was twenty-one, however, before she knew an automobile had a front seat.”
–Lewis Grizzard
Hey! 2 for 1! Don’t say you didn’t get your money’s worth!
josef
August 2