NOTE: This is the electronic version of today’s AJC column.
Whatever else it accomplishes, passage of House Bill 87 has brought a welcome clarity to the debate over illegal immigration in Georgia. It has cast sunlight where there used to be shadows and has forced hypocrisy out into the open.
For example, do illegal immigrants perform labor that most Georgians are unwilling or even unable to do? The once contentious question now has an answer: Yes, in many cases they do. Acres and acres of crops now rotting in the south Georgia sunshine offer mute testament to that fact that agricultural labor is hard, and that most people in Western industrialized countries don’t want to do it.
And have Georgia farmers become dependent on that illegal workforce, in many cases building their entire economic structure on the availability of cheap and undocumented labor?
Until recently, the state agriculture community had clung to the fiction that only a small and unknowable percentage of their labor was here illegally. However, as their workforce shrinks in the wake of HB 87, such denials have become impossible to sustain. The degree to which they have relied on illegal labor is now painfully clear, and will be reflected on many a bottom line.
In fact, farmers have until now enjoyed the best of both worlds. As long as lax enforcement of federal immigration law gave them access to a large, docile and for the most part invisible workforce, they could sit back and remain quiet in the politically charged debate over amnesty and other measures intended to rationalize immigration. (It didn’t hurt that keeping those workers illegal created an all-but-captive workforce that had few other options.)
Members of Georgia’s congressional delegation have long been complicit in that two-sided game. They have quietly blocked periodic attempts by the federal government to enforce immigration laws more stringently, while simultaneously railing against the presence of the very illegal immigrants they were helping to protect.
Passage of HB 87 has ended that sweet little arrangement. If the state’s agriculture industry wants continued access to that workforce, they need to become vocal advocates for some means of legalizing and protecting it. They need to publicly acknowledge that a population vilified by many as a drain on the state’s economy is in fact a necessity in much of rural Georgia, and they need to start electing public officials who are willing to make that argument in Washington and here in Atlanta.
If they have workers they want to keep, they need to fight for them. And that does not mean adopting the Utah approach of trying to “legalize” illegal immigrants at the state level, giving them permission to be in the state as long as they agree to remain in the fields picking crops and don’t have any higher ambitions. (HB 87 includes a provision calling for a study of that approach).
Such a program would be wildly unconstitutional. And perhaps just as important, we are long past the days when we condemn a population to servitude in manual labor, allowing them to do that but dream of nothing else.
By the way, everything that can be said about the political silence of Georgia agriculture industry regarding the fate of its workforce, and the price they’re paying for it, can also be said about other industries, especially restaurants, hotels and other service-related industries.
The answer to this dilemma will come not in piecemeal state legislation, but in a federal law that simultaneously tightens laws against hiring of illegal labor while offering those already here a path to citizenship. Anything else is fruitless.
– Jay Bookman
420 comments Add your comment
Joe The Plumber too.
July 5th, 2011
7:53 am
yawn
willydoit?
July 5th, 2011
7:53 am
The Georgia farmers survived after slavery was abolished and they will survive the illegals leaving. The passage of HB87 may not be the popular thing to do…but it was the right thing to do.
Vickie
July 5th, 2011
7:56 am
Jay, first let’s address your “byline” above. It is over the top egotistical if you think about it. The photo is a bit large…
Second, let’s address your misguided (to be kind) attitude that we need to legalize the millions of illegal, welfare class people having strings of children at our expense while they send money back into the Mexican (predominately) economy. How in God’s name can a nation with crumbling infrastructure and its military stretched to the breaking point continue to be Mexican’s catch basin for their ever increasing overpopulation of welfare class people draining us dry? Give the ones here amnesty, and they will be rioting and demanding what they want in another decade or less.
Mary Elizabeth
July 5th, 2011
7:57 am
A courageous and humane column. Well thought through proposals to uplift all.
bman
July 5th, 2011
8:01 am
it’s so odd that people think this way…
Thomas
July 5th, 2011
8:03 am
Turn the sun off for a day. Move Israel to Mexico. Mexico becomes a bastion of economic growth and the Mideast is left to itself.
It is hard to imagine leading a country (Mexico) with so many intelligent, hard workers, with so many natural resources, and one has to risk their life to leave the country. I suppose the real solution is to continue enabling this grotesque result and wrap it as “great humanity”.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
8:09 am
There are whole neighborhoods that are gone in my neck of the woods….taxpaying working folks who decided to move on…..
Not Blind
July 5th, 2011
8:10 am
You are not seeing the forest, you are seeing a few trees. At most the agriculture industry needs some thousands of part time workers [ the few trees]. The problem is that we have many millions of illegal aliens in the country [ the forest ].
Aquagirl
July 5th, 2011
8:11 am
address your misguided (to be kind) attitude that we need to legalize the millions of illegal, welfare class people having strings of children
Oh yeah, there’s no bigotry behind this illegal bashing. None at all.
jconservative
July 5th, 2011
8:21 am
The chances of a federal immigration bill appear to be less than slim.
There is no one on either side of the debate willing to compromise with the other side. So we will not have a bill than does anything to resolve what to do about 11 million plus illegals in the country.
So what will we do? Nothing. We will continue the same policy we have had for the last 25 years.
The only difference is the several; states are now passing laws trying to control the flow of illegals within their borders. So we have cases on the state laws heading for the Supreme Court.
Since Congress and the White House have refused to address the issue for the last 25 years we can now expect the Supreme Court to resolve the issue.
That is what happens. Congress refuses to legislate an issue, the issue gets to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court “legislates” the issue. We call it “legislating from the bench”. We call it “activist” judges. We have been doing this since 1803.
We say we do not like either “legislating from the bench” or “activist” judges. But we refuse to handle the issues in the legislature. So the Court steps into the vacuum and makes a decision.
The history of the Supreme Court is as much a history of a failed political system as it is a history of a court.
Darko
July 5th, 2011
8:22 am
willydoit?
“The Georgia farmers survived after slavery was abolished and they will survive the illegals leaving. The passage of HB87 may not be the popular thing to do…but it was the right thing to do.”
Well said. It may mean we’ll pay a little more for farm products. So be it, it is a price I’m willing to pay.
Real Scooter
July 5th, 2011
8:23 am
Oh yeah, there’s no bigotry behind this illegal bashing. None at all
Oh yeah,there’s no bigotry behind your post either. None at all
Joe The Plumber too.
July 5th, 2011
8:24 am
aquagirl as usual screams bigotry and racism. Illegal is illegal (except if you are a potential dimocrap voter). ICE had a chance to round up thousands of criminals at the Capitol and busted six, our broken government at work, what else is new. It is much easier to try to raise taxes on the small business owners in this country to provide more welfare and ebt payments than to address the problems confronting us and reguardless of bedwetters public statements, the ones with half a brain know that the illegal aliens are part of the problem.
Bud Wiser
July 5th, 2011
8:24 am
Bookman:……. we are long past the days when we condemn a population to servitude in manual labor,…..
Are you actually referring to ACORN in sort of a Freudian slip?
Or perhaps your indentured collection of minorities that continually blindly vote democrat because that is what they have always done?
Perhaps in actuality this is a back door ploy for amnesty?
Why be so sneaky Bookman?
Media stooges these days just come out and say what they really mean, becoming more frantic as they realize their day is coming to a close in 2012, and will say or do anything their DNC masters instruct them to do.
carlosgvv
July 5th, 2011
8:25 am
Jay, offering those already here a path to citizenship in effect condons their coming here and being here illegally. Telling millions of people who have seriously violated our laws we will let them become citizens makes a mockery of the law. A whole generation has grown up seeing law enforcement look the other way while these laws were being ignored. Some of these in this generation will be our future Presidents, Congressmen and women, judges, etc. Do you want these future lawmakers to think obeying laws is optional? Have you even thought about this?
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
8:27 am
willy: The Georgia farmers survived after slavery was abolished and they will survive the illegals leaving.
Yes they found the marvelous feudal system called “share cropping” — worked wonders!! They put former slaves on the land, said it was “their land” (with a few stipulations), made them pay for the seeds, the plow and the mule to farm the land, then took 98% of the profits! THAT’s American ingenuity (with a feudal twist).
Keep Up the Good Fight!
July 5th, 2011
8:27 am
The problem will continue to become even more painfully obvious….and its not Bookman’s ego or photo despite the convulted attack. The problem is that there is one side that will not consider reality, one side that will only rail to get rid of them all, one side that attacks “illegals” as if all Hispanics are Mexican or all “illegals” are hispanic, one side that will not allow any practical solutions that include ANY path to citizenship no matter how sensible, one side that plugs their ears and says “lalalalalalalala” when the facts and costs are discussed, one side that screams over and over “what part of illegal do you not understand”. Jay, your proposal makes every bit of sense. Even Bush recognized it.
Alas, the extreme wingnuts only want to scream and demand, they do not want solutions they want to get their way.
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
8:29 am
Are you actually referring to ACORN in sort of a Freudian slip?
Grow up…….Sheesh!
Thomas
July 5th, 2011
8:32 am
“Alas, the extreme wingnuts only want to scream and demand, they do not want solutions they want to get their way.”
What an assinine comment. We also need a solution for drunk driving I suppose?
The far right cling to religion for answers, the far left finds its religion in thinking pretty thoughts and using other peoples money and time to effectuate said pretty thoughts.
No screaming here my man- I just know we have 20+ % inner city unemployment of which opm and pretty thoughts are not going to cure. It is time for the mealy mouths to move on just like the neocons were forced to do.
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
8:32 am
aquagirl as usual screams bigotry and racism. Illegal is illegal (except if you are a potential dimocrap voter).
address your misguided (to be kind) attitude that we need to legalize the millions of illegal, welfare class people having strings of children
I will be soooo glad when school lets back in.
Joe The Plumber too.
July 5th, 2011
8:33 am
keep up the good lies, As a member of “one side” let me tell you that I do not think that all hispanics are mexican nor do I think all illegals are hispanic. I don’t care if they are blacker than night or white with blond hair and blue eyes. If they are here illegal, round them up, send them back or punish them and then send them back, I’m just sick of paying for them.
Joe The Plumber too.
July 5th, 2011
8:34 am
babyslug, school will be back in session next November when barry the boy blunder is told he has two months to pack his gladrags and get out. Graduation Day.
Jm
July 5th, 2011
8:37 am
On balance, the new law is a good thing.
Off topic- NPR report this morning on section 8 voucher changes. Specific story about a woman whose voucher wil. Go up from $1500 to $2000 per month. And shes been on section 8 for 4 years. My reaction: say what???!!!!
$2000 a month in Dallas (where the story was$ will buy the toniest kind of place in Atlanta, Dallas, or most other places.
So taxpayers are now supposed to put up our poor in the ritz Carlton??? WTF
Southern Comfort
July 5th, 2011
8:38 am
Man, for so many here to have the answer to our problem, nothing has been done since Reagan. I’m no longer amazed by the armchair quarterbacking. Just more examples of how disfunctional our society has become. I’m sure before too long, the name-calling and other childish crap will commence.
Y’all have fun with what y’all do best…
Tamika
July 5th, 2011
8:38 am
Jay, Screw the employers and give the illegals amnesty is not a basis for a solution to the immigration problem.
A guest worker program might be.
Federal leadership in the matter with both real enforcement of our laws might be.
The last time we did an amnesty, we just fueled the demand for another amnesty. What is the difference between amnesty and open borders? The liberals are fond of demanding a comprehensive solution.
It’s time we had one.
Ayn Rant
July 5th, 2011
8:39 am
Despite all the political rants about illegal immigrants, nothing but harassment will ever be done to stem the flow of determined newcomers or to recognize “undocumented” persons as citizens.
Americans are not ready for the sensible, time-proved solution to the immigrant problem: acceptance of all who are willing to work and to adapt to the rudiments of our culture.
So let’s just keep venting our prejudice and outrage until time and circumstances wear us down to accept the inevitable!
1811/1801 - 0311/0317
July 5th, 2011
8:39 am
Two points:
1) “For example, do illegal immigrants perform labor that most Georgians are unwilling …….. to do?
Yes and that’s pathetic because our forefathers (and my grandfather, father and myself) had no problems with it!
2) “……..we are long past the days when we condemn a population to servitude in manual labor, allowing them to do that but dream of nothing else.’
We would still be condemning a whole nationality/race to servitude in manual labor even if a few could “move up”.
And that is also pathetic.
3) I would rather seal our borders, and protect our sovereignty and security. Save the billions in tax money for illegal alien purposes (crime, law enforcemnt, medical, schooling, welfare, etc.) and pay HiGHER prices for that kind of labor intensive food.
1811/1801 - 0311/0317
July 5th, 2011
8:40 am
Excuse me: It’s early ………. three points ………….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zANvYB93u2g&feature=related
Rightwing Troll
July 5th, 2011
8:41 am
Joe tha Idiot:
Then what?
John Fault
July 5th, 2011
8:42 am
If the ag. industry can’t afford to pay market wages for labor, then they will fail. It’s called the free market. Love it and eat peaches imported from Chile. They are better anyway.
America doesn’t need non-strategic industries like ag anyway. The only reasons ag survives in the US anyway is corporate welfare and illegal labor.
The ag industry needs to quit mooching off the producers.
1811/1801 - 0311/0317
July 5th, 2011
8:42 am
willydoit @ 7:53
“The Georgia farmers survived after slavery was abolished and they will survive the illegals leaving.”
Excellent point ……………. there is always a better way.
Southern Comfort
July 5th, 2011
8:44 am
If they are here illegal, round them up, send them back or punish them and then send them back, I’m just sick of paying for them.
Joe, you’re gonna pay for them either way you look at it, so prepare to stay sick of a long time.
If you round them up to send them back, you have to pay for the round up, detention, court costs, and deportation costs. If you round them up, punish them, and then send them back, you have the additional costs of housing them in jail/prison for whatever time they’re sentenced. Either way, it will be an expensive undertaking. I don’t have faith in anything being done anytime in the near future with the whole Taxed Enough Already crowd yelling so loud that they’re drowning out the rest of the voices here in the US. Until sanity makes a return appearance to any and all dialogue here, we’re screwed.
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
8:44 am
keep up the good lies
babyslug
barry the boy blunder
Well that is just like that “other” party – they can’t contribute to a discussion with logic and facts, so they just start name calling and pointing fingers. I’m surprised none of them have started using the incredibly super intelligent playground comeback of “I know you are but what am I?”
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
July 5th, 2011
8:44 am
1. Ten million rednecks with pickup trucks.
2. Forty million illegals.
3. Load illegals in beds of pickup trucks.
4. Give rednecks guvmint gas money.
5. Drive to Mexican border.
6. Dump illegals across border =
7. Problem solved.
Joe The Plumber too.
July 5th, 2011
8:46 am
rightwing fool: then what??????????????? you need to hit the gym this morning maybe sweat a little of the tequila out.
Aquagirl
July 5th, 2011
8:46 am
aquagirl as usual screams bigotry and racism.
When I read bigoted, racist posts, yes. That’s a pretty normal reaction if you don’t like bigotry and racism.
If xenophobic rants don’t bother you, there’s probably a reason.
hsn
July 5th, 2011
8:48 am
“The answer to this dilemma will come not in piecemeal state legislation, but in a federal law that simultaneously tightens laws against hiring of illegal labor while offering those already here a path to citizenship. Anything else is fruitless.”
Jay,
This is the most sensible, constitutional, and least costly solution to this issue. However, EVERY SINGLE TIME Federal Congressional proposals along those lines are introduced, the cons and their “act first, think later” mob supporters start screaming “IT’S AMNESTY, IT’S AMNESTY,” and the bill is killed.
Has the problem gone away?
Clinton tried it, the cons killed it. Kennedy tried it, the cons killed it. McCain and Bush tried it, the cons killed it. Even Bush, saw through their ethnic-based antics and called them out on it. Gutierrez tried it, but the usual suspects killed it.
The cons are nothing but agents of fear and apostles of stagnation of progress in this country.
Joe The Plumber too.
July 5th, 2011
8:49 am
be careful babyslug, you forgot to play the race card, oh well, you must be new. granny, amvet, debbiedonothing, joesmama and the rest of the bedwetters will fill you in.
THE TRUTH
July 5th, 2011
8:49 am
Illegal is illegal is illegal.
Joe The Plumber too.
July 5th, 2011
8:52 am
aqua, sorry I’m not scared of people of any color, but as a taxpaying citizen, I don’t like being around some people, thieves, liars, criminals, welfare broodmares…….
stands for decibels
July 5th, 2011
8:53 am
The only reasons ag survives in the US anyway is corporate welfare and illegal labor.
You don’t think maybe there might be a teensy bit of national security consideration involved regarding that policy? I mean, a country like ours with all that arable land, that chooses not to bother to grow most of its own food… that doesn’t sound very smart to me.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
8:56 am
A solution is clearly needed. But, aside from the seeming inability of Congress to get anything meaningful done unless facing an apocalypse, what I don’t get is the fuzzy thinking politicians (and even their constituents) have concerning illegal immigration and other matters involving principle. I would like to ask them a simple question: if a few strangers broke into your house and took up residency there for some years (though they mowed the lawn for you and did some other household chores), would that be alright with you? Illegal immigration is wrong, period. Try illegally immigrating to China (or even Mexico for that matter) and see what happens to you. Similarly, does anyone go to sleep at night without first locking their doors? We need to seal the borders! How foolish is it to have porous borders in a post 9/11 era? What do they do when a deadly disease appears in the population? They quarantine!
Those points aside, I should think if anyone deserves preferential immigration status it would be the people in our two great neighboring countries – Canada and Mexico. They are our friends and neighbors. If they wish to come here to work, let’s accommodate that desire with a guest worker program. If they want to actually immigrate here, let’s move them to the top of the waiting list. But do it legally, for Pete’s sake. But we should not condone the illegal actions of immigrants already here by simply legalizing them. Amnesty was already granted once back in the 80s. What did that accomplish? It apparently told everyone in other countries that there is no penalty for violating the sovereignty of our great nation, because millions have illegally immigrated here since then. What should be done with these people is the great question. They need to pay a price for 1) breaking the laws of our land 2) stealing goods and services to which they are not entitled 3) using our country rather than trying to be a permanent part of it. What they have done is wrong and many people (like those running businesses) have looked the other way because they were personally benefitting from the cheap labor – the rest of us picking up the tab be damned.
Had Congress acted to create a guest worker program and given preferential immigration status to our neighbors back in the 80s, we wouldn’t be having this conversation now. But, if they had acted to solved our unhealthy dependency upon foreign oil back in the 70s after the first oil embargo, our economy would be in much better shape and there probably wouldn’t be such a problem with terrorism (which is being funded largely with oil money). Let’s get people in Congress who will come up with and implement wise, constructive and viable solutions to our great problems.
AmVet
July 5th, 2011
8:56 am
The answer to this dilemma will come not in piecemeal state legislation, but in a federal law that simultaneously tightens laws against hiring of illegal labor while offering those already here a path to citizenship. Anything else is fruitless.
Jay, that is sensible and pragmatic, and therefore futile.
The extremists are interested in neither. It’s not in their political DNA.
And why they still have illegal cr@p on their faces from 2007…
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
8:56 am
Taxed Enough Already crowd yelling so loud that they’re drowning out the rest of the voices here in the US
Hmmmm do you mean people like these:
and pay HiGHER prices for that kind of labor intensive food.
They scream about taxes for infrastructure and schools, but say, out the side of their mouths that they wouldn’t mind, not one bit, paying more for food. Yeah riggggghhhhhttttttt……..
Southern Comfort
July 5th, 2011
8:56 am
dB
Smart doesn’t always apply here!!
stands for decibels
July 5th, 2011
8:57 am
The cons are nothing but agents of fear and apostles of stagnation of progress in this country.
well, that’s kinda harsh, and I’m sure most conservatives don’t believe themselves to be that…
but their leading intellectual light did proudly and famously proclaim that he wished to “[stand] athwart history, yelling Stop, at a time when no one is inclined to do so, or to have much patience with those who so urge it.”
…which is pretty much the same thing as being pro-stagnation and anti-progress, really. It just sounds prettier.
reyes
July 5th, 2011
8:59 am
I’m kinda getting tired of people claiming their taxes pay for illegals!!!! Really people, how much in taxes do you pay, Ur puny individual contributions couldn’t feed ur own family for a week. Grow up, and if u dislike illegals that much, do not eat chicken or any farm related items at all until they leave, otherwise u are biting the hand that feeds, there is no food that we eat that does not pass through illegal alien labor, are youall hypocrites?
Adam
July 5th, 2011
9:01 am
Skipping this one.
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
9:02 am
be careful babyslug, you forgot to play the race card, oh well, you must be new. granny, amvet, debbiedonothing, joesmama and the rest of the bedwetters will fill you in.
To that statement ma’am I give you this answer. Enjoy.
Peadawg
July 5th, 2011
9:04 am
“And have Georgia farmers become dependent on that illegal workforce, in many cases building their entire economic structure on the availability of cheap and undocumented labor?”
They won’t get any sympathy from me. Didn’t they know slave labor has been outlawed for a while? Shame on the farmers.
Joe The Plumber too.
July 5th, 2011
9:04 am
fellow conservatives, I have to head out to make urkle a few more dollars to give away today, be nice to the bedwetters, the mail didn’t run yesterday so some of them didn’t recieve the welfare checks you and I provide.
THE TRUTH
July 5th, 2011
9:04 am
reyes are you afraid you’ll be sent home ?
RRCC
July 5th, 2011
9:05 am
MYTH: Immigrants take jobs from Americans.
FACT: Immigrants create new jobs, and complement the skills of the
U.S. native workforce.
MYTH: Immigrants drive down the wages of American workers.
FACT: Immigrants increase overall economic productivity and have no
significant effect on overall wages for American workers.
MYTH: Immigrants will cause massive, unnecessary population growth
in the United States.
FACT: As the baby boomer generation begins to retire and the U.S.
fertility rate declines, it will be necessary to replace our aging
workforce with immigrants to maintain economic growth.
MYTH: Undocumented immigrants do not pay taxes.
FACT: Undocumented immigrants pay billions of dollars in taxes
each year, often for services they will never receive.
MYTH: Immigrants come to the United States for welfare benefits.
FACT: The law forbids immigrants from using welfare services.
MYTH: The Government should just enforce the law to solve our
immigration problems.
FACT: Enforcement alone will not solve our immigration problems. The
cost would be prohibitive, it would have a detrimental effect on
the U.S. economy, and it would simply push certain immigrants
further into the underground economy.
MYTH: Immigrants are not assimilating.
FACT: Immigrants are assimilating at much the same rate as past
waves of immigrants.
MYTH: Immigrants are more likely to commit crimes than
U.S. natives.
FACT: Immigrants have a much lower incarceration rate than
U.S. natives.
MYTH: Workers that come to the United States as temporary workers
will stay in the country once their visas expire.
FACT: Historically, migrants from Mexico worked in the United
States for a few months or years, but then returned home.
Border enforcement has made that pattern much more
difficult.
BADA BING
July 5th, 2011
9:06 am
Why aren’t Mexicans protesting in Mexico City, instead of downtown ATL? They can take their country back from the corrupt politicians and drug lords. Why are Hispanics boycotting the All Star Game, while Hispanics are playing in it? Most are honest, hardworking people, why don’t they rebuild Mexico?
poison pen
July 5th, 2011
9:07 am
Bosch
” There are whole neighborhoods that are gone in my neck of the woods….taxpaying working folks who decided to move on…..”
Bosch, Homes in your neighborhood must be extremely dirt cheap if people working for slave labor can afford them and are now leaving, or else you are full of BS…
Peadawg
July 5th, 2011
9:09 am
“but in a federal law that simultaneously tightens laws against hiring of illegal labor while offering those already here amnesty”
Isn’t that what you meant Jay? And the answer to that is no. Thanks for playing.
Richard L
July 5th, 2011
9:10 am
One – the bill is the right thing to do. Anyone here illegally is a criminal, and should be prosecuted, and then deported. Two – businesses should not be punished for hiring an illegal. Its not their job to enforce a law, that is the federal governments (and its a damn shame the states are having to do the federals job). Anyone in the U.S. should be assumed to be here legally, by a private individual. Third – the vast majority of the illegals here are people we want to encourage to come to the U.S. – legally. We need to come up with a much easier way for people to get here legally. These people are incredibly hard working, quite religious, and even as illegals, a real benefit to this country. That doesn’t change the fact that they are criminals when here illegally, and should be deported. It does mean that we really, really need to work out a way to make it much easier for them to get here.
THE TRUTH
July 5th, 2011
9:11 am
RRCC
July 5th, 2011
9:05 am
You make claim to several unqualified items. Where’s the True facts ?
Kevin B
July 5th, 2011
9:11 am
This article is so typical in leaving out a very important point when the issue of illegal aliens performing low-wage, manual labor is discussed. It’s maddening as a reader with some level of intelligence to hear the popular media parrot one another over and over again. The work these illegal workers perform is always said to be undesirable to legal Americans. What should be said is that this work is undesirable to Americans at the low wages paid to perform the kind of work illegal aliens do. What you should be doing Jay, is to stop performing lazy journalism and investigate an industry like agriculture and why it is built upon low wage labor. Is it greed or is it that American agriculture cannot compete with imports if they were to pay higher wages? That’s the kind of in-depth reporting I must turn to other sources to get other than the AJC.
@RRCC July 5th, 2011 9:05 am
July 5th, 2011
9:12 am
Links to support your BS claims?
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
9:15 am
“is to stop performing lazy journalism”
and maybe YOU should learn the difference between an opinion blog and reporting. You want reporting? Go to the AJC reporting pages, NOT the opinion pages.
AmVet
July 5th, 2011
9:15 am
Quit being a racist and then you won’t have to worry about being properly labeled as such, roto rooter.
reyes
July 5th, 2011
9:16 am
THE TRuTH…
I will answer ur question if u answer mine: when was the last you ate chicken?
Call it like it is
July 5th, 2011
9:17 am
“Acres and acres of crops now rotting in the south Georgia”
Interesting just got back from Donalsonville, and did not see any of the acres and acres of rotting crops, unless of course by acres and acres you mean 2. My family has 300 acres, and we have no issues with the labor pool, also same for the farms next to ours. Plenty of “legal” workers wanting to do a fair days work for a fair days wage.
As is typical of the media, they will find the couple of farmers who have modern day slaves and use them as the poster child for how bad its going to be on our farmers.
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
9:18 am
“As is typical of the media, they will find the couple of farmers who have modern day slaves and use them as the poster child for how bad its going to be on our farmers”
“My family has 300 acres, and we have no issues with the labor pool, also same for the farms next to ours”
Aren’t you doing the same thing you accuse Jay of doing?
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
9:20 am
If they are here illegal, round them up, send them back…
And exactly how much are you willing to spend — on a per head basis — to accomplish this task of rounding ‘em up and shipping ‘em back?
THE TRUTH
July 5th, 2011
9:20 am
Kevin B
July 5th, 2011
9:11 am
You didn’t think Jay would write anything based on true unbiased facts, or no, you did not think Jay could or would investigate anything to find facts. Jay is a parrot as you said to a left leaning paper.
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
9:22 am
Two – businesses should not be punished for hiring an illegal. Its not their job to enforce a law, that is the federal governments (and its a damn shame the states are having to do the federals job). Anyone in the U.S. should be assumed to be here legally, by a private individual.
Oh please! Business is NEVER at fault right? I mean, if it weren’t for Business’ (esp. the ones here in America); we would’ve never heard of such things like salmonella poisoning and e coli.
Curtis Rivers
July 5th, 2011
9:24 am
Thank you, Jay. Those of us working for immigration reform have known the facts for over a decade: that these people are not a drain on our economy, but vital to it. Conservative lawmakers have allowed this issue to become what it is today, and have allowed nativist and hate organizations to shape the debate by using it to unify a base of easily-led people who know little of research, independent thought, and are often driven by emotion rather than by thoughtful logic. Now, we begin to pay the price along with the immigrants caught in this system. Immigration reform is vital to our economic recovery, and to our future, as well as being this generation’s human rights issue in the U.S. Thank you for an honest and straightforward article which shows the only logical and positive way out of the mess these lawmakers have created for political purposes, and at great cost to American citizens and immigrants.
poison pen
July 5th, 2011
9:24 am
Has anybody kept count as to how many times Jay & Tucker have written about ILLEGALS?
How about GLOBAL WARMING?
AmVet
July 5th, 2011
9:25 am
“You didn’t think
Jay“the truth” wouldwrite“refudiate” or countermand anything based on true unbiased facts…LOL, like that is possible…
reyes
July 5th, 2011
9:25 am
Call it like it is
Quit being self-righteous, only someone as ignorant as u would believe that there are no illegals in ur farm, I bet I can go in there and find at least five or six
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
9:25 am
MYTH: Immigrants drive down the wages of American workers.
FACT: Immigrants increase overall economic productivity and have no
significant effect on overall wages for American workers.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Moderate Line
July 5th, 2011
9:25 am
For example, do illegal immigrants perform labor that most Georgians are unwilling or even unable to do? The once contentious question now has an answer: Yes, in many cases they do.
++++
Over and over we have heard that if a Republicans state that people on unemployment have no incentive to seek work that the Republicans are also insinuating that the unemployed are unemployed because they are lazy.
But in an area where the unemployment is 12% according to the Georgia Deparment of Labor we have Jay insinuating thee unemployed in this area is unwilling to accomplish these jobs. Is Jay insinuating that these people are lazy and would rather collect unemployment than be gainfully unemployed.
You can’t have it both ways. Making one argument when you want unemployment insurance extended and another argument when promoting the interest of illegal immigrants.
http://www.dol.state.ga.us/pdf/pr/lf_altamaha.pdf
THE TRUTH
July 5th, 2011
9:26 am
reyes
July 5th, 2011
9:16 am
Your point makes no sense, first I nor anyone else with intelligence will stop eating just because you claim you and Julio are killing and cutting up the chickens we eat.
poison pen
July 5th, 2011
9:27 am
Curtis Rivers,
” Now, we begin to pay the price along with the immigrants caught in this system.”
I think you meant ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, please get your facts straight.
godless heathen
July 5th, 2011
9:27 am
“mute testament to that fact that agricultural labor is hard, and that most people in Western industrialized countries don’t want to do it.”
My job is hard and i don’t want to do it. But I do it instead of living off the labors of others.
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
9:28 am
Conservative lawmakers have allowed this issue to become what it is today, and have allowed nativist and hate organizations to shape the debate by using it to unify a base of easily-led people who know little of research, independent thought, and are often driven by emotion rather than by thoughtful logic.
Say it ain’t so!!!
AmVet
July 5th, 2011
9:28 am
“Two – businesses should not be
punishedheld accountable to the rule of law for hiring an illegal. Its not their job toenforceobey a law…”Moderate Line
July 5th, 2011
9:29 am
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
9:25 am
MYTH: Immigrants drive down the wages of American workers.
FACT: Immigrants increase overall economic productivity and have no
significant effect on overall wages for American workers.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
++++
Please provide references.
THE TRUTH
July 5th, 2011
9:30 am
Amvet (NOT) HOW MANY TIMES ARE YOU GOING TO GET IN ON SOMETHING YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ? Like telling the truth, we’ve exposed you over and over again.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
9:30 am
poison pen,
Well, the Rapture didn’t happen, so I’m guessing people left because they do not want to live in an “unfriendly to them” State.
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
9:31 am
“But I do it instead of living off the labors of others.”
But you DO live off the labor of others. The labor of those who harvest and process the food you eat, the home you live in, the cars you drive, the clothing you wear, the furniture you lounge and sleep in. The roads you drive one, the entertainment venues you frequent, the clean air you breathe.
No man is an island.
Georgia Law Exposes States Hypocrisy | New York State Immigrant Action Fund
July 5th, 2011
9:33 am
[...] Bookman, columnist for the Atlanta Journal Constitution says that Georgia’s new anti-immigrant law has exposed the hypocrisy in the state’s [...]
AmVet
July 5th, 2011
9:33 am
We?
Just how many gerbils do you keep in your pockets?
Or are they your imaginary friends.
And why do you hate the troops?
LOL…
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
9:33 am
But in an area where the unemployment is 12% according to the Georgia Deparment of Labor we have Jay insinuating thee unemployed in this area is unwilling to accomplish these jobs. Is Jay insinuating that these people are lazy and would rather collect unemployment than be gainfully unemployed.
If someone has a degree in Computer Engineering and is used to making $35/hour; why would they go out and apply for a job (in the hot sun) that pays them $10/hour? If they wanted to make that type of wage, they could apply for a job at WalMart as a greeter — at least it has air conditioning and benefits.
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
9:34 am
Forgot to add WalMart has A/C and a chance to advance. No advancement in picking tomatoes in the hot sun.
godless heathen
July 5th, 2011
9:35 am
Doggone,
Not for free.
SOUTHERN ATL
July 5th, 2011
9:36 am
Jay, this is one of the best articles that you have ever written!!! Nice work!!!
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
9:36 am
“Not for free”
Care to expand on that? It doesn’t seem to make any sense.
reyes
July 5th, 2011
9:37 am
The truth,
If u actually had intelligence u would understand that what I say is not a claim but a TRUTH! Really, why must u continually fool yourselves? I indeed work for a poultry plant, as a production supervisor, I have no decision on who gets hired, but the racist rednex in the office continue sending me illegals and giving unemployment verifications to the rednex that apply, clearly white trash knows white trash is just that
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
9:37 am
Please provide references.
I spent over thirty years in the new home construction biz. I have first hand experience with builders not accepting bids from sub-contractors and telling us, “If you won’t do the job for $x, then we can find Mexicans that will.”
Southern Comfort
July 5th, 2011
9:38 am
Doggone
I think he’s trying to say that he’s not freeloading off the work of others…
AmVet
July 5th, 2011
9:40 am
Neo-cons operate on little more than hurt feelings and hyper-emotionalism.
As a rule, they are not practical, pragmatic, informed or reasonable.
Want proof?
Ask any one of them here, how to *effectively* deal with this illegal immigrant problem.
The harebrained “‘answers” are generally hysterical, or not forthcoming…
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
9:40 am
“I think he’s trying to say that he’s not freeloading off the work of others”
and neither are those who work in our fields and factories, whether they are illegal or not.
THE TRUTH
July 5th, 2011
9:40 am
Amvet (not) when did I ever say or do ANYTHING related to hating the troops ?
You do a disservice to our troops with your false claims.
You make all these claims and call everyone names when they don’t have believe in your socialist ways, you provide no proof because you CAN NOT.
Southern Comfort
July 5th, 2011
9:42 am
and neither are those who work in our fields and factories, whether they are illegal or not.
You know that and I know that, but I don’t think it’s quite as common knowledge as we perceive.
godless heathen
July 5th, 2011
9:43 am
“Care to expand on that? It doesn’t seem to make any sense.”
Paying for goods and services a foreign concept to you?
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
9:44 am
“You know that and I know that, but I don’t think it’s quite as common knowledge as we perceive.”
AMEN to that!
THE TRUTH
July 5th, 2011
9:46 am
Everyone wait for it the Great Amvet (NOT) knows the answer to the illegal immigrant issue, no one but he can think like he does.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
9:47 am
jconservative:
“That is what happens. Congress refuses to legislate an issue, the issue gets to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court “legislates” the issue. We call it “legislating from the bench”. We call it “activist” judges. We have been doing this since 1803.”
Well said. As to the Supreme Court’s wisdom in legislating issues, let’s ask our African-American citizens how they feel about the court’s Plessy vs. Ferguson decision in 1896 that upheld the constitutionality of segregation. Think about how much pain and suffering they endured as a people because of this decision. Now think about how this same decision was “overturned” (actually completely reversed) with the Brown vs. Board of Education decision of 1954. The very fact that the court completely reversed itself proves just how fallible it can be. 58 years of intense suffering because an unelected group of nine judges were allowed to establish the law of the land!
This same court has equated the act of disrobing in public with free speech, an absolutely inane twisting of the language of the Constitution. Had any one of these Justices tried to argue in a Debate 101 class that the founding fathers meant getting naked by the word speech, they would have been laughed out of the classroom. And this also court concluded that, as a “right of privacy,” women can abort unborn children. If such a judgement is valid, then why are people prosecuted for murder who kill the same unborn children in the belly of a pregnant mother? That is a contradiction. Why is a mother able to legally kill her unborn child when another person may not? Jconservative’s point is a very good one: if we don’t insist Congress (who we have control over) establish the laws we live by, then the Supreme Court will.
I accept that the majority opinion should prevail in this nation. If that majority wants pornography and strip bars, so be it. Let them make laws to allow that. The same with abortion. But it is simply not right to allow the nine UNELECTED very fallible human beings to decide it for us.
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
9:48 am
“Paying for goods and services a foreign concept to you?”
Who do you know who DOESN’T pay for goods and services?
THE TRUTH
July 5th, 2011
9:48 am
reyes
July 5th, 2011
9:37 am
Think of all the rednecks when you are deported.
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
9:48 am
Looks like brother AmVet has a stalker.
wigglwagon
July 5th, 2011
9:48 am
“For example, do illegal immigrants perform labor that most Georgians are unwilling or even unable to do? The once contentious question now has an answer: Yes, in many cases they do.”
I guess that is right Jay. Antonio Vargas is living proof that Illegal aliens only do jobs real Americans won’t do. Surely, real Americans would not stoop low enough to work as a journalist. Most real Americans refuse to use deceit as a way of making a living.
In just how many cases do the illegal aliens “perform labor that most Georgians are unwilling or even unable to do?” Since less than 2% of the illegal aliens work in agriculture and even less work picking and packing, just how many cases would that be? An unlimited amount of guest workers are available through an in place federal guest worker program and farmers are too greedy to pay even those modest wages. After due consideration of that fact, do you think it might be possible that a few Georgians would actually do that picking and packing if we sit back and allow those ‘wages and benefits’ to be determined by supply and demand as are most wages in this country. It has always amazed me how many Americans think farm workers should be forced to work for low wages and no benefits. It kind of reminds me of how it was in 20’s when a bunch of broke consumers was a major factor in breaking the entire US economy.
Fletch
July 5th, 2011
9:50 am
Baby Suggs – “If someone has a degree in Computer Engineering and is used to making $35/hour; why would they go out and apply for a job (in the hot sun) that pays them $10/hour?”
If that was the only option other than starvation, than I would guess they wouldn’t be to picky. However, we have more than enough “safety nets” to ensure that no one will ever have to worry about harvesting in the hot sun to survive. Probably a good thing we didn’t have many “social” programs in the 1930’s. Kind of hard to imagine this country without Hoover Dam.
AmVet
July 5th, 2011
9:50 am
Troop hater, so cough up your “proof” that Jay’s piece is not based on true unbiased facts.
Any loudmouth can make childish claims. It takes an adult to back them up. Something you never, ever do. Do you even know how to spell research?
I believe it is safe to say that you have NEVER provided ANY facts in ANY of your screeds.
To wit, you are ZERO for seven today.
THE TRUTH – FACT-FREE STYLE.
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
9:55 am
“I accept that the majority opinion should prevail in this nation”
No it shouldn’t. Would you support majority rule if, for instance, the majority decided that all blue-eyed blond people should be forced to leave the country? Our laws and courts are there precisely to protect the minority from the “tyranny of the majority” – and before you say so, yes, vice versa as well.
landaddy001
July 5th, 2011
9:55 am
The sensible solution to this problem is the solution we should have been using all along, enforce the laws. Allowing business and politicians to break the laws for decades is wrong. Following the laws as written is the correct path. No amount of name calling will change that. Illegal aliens find themselves in a situation of their own choosing. It’s really sad that they also choose to put their kids into the same situation. How could anyone think that their kids would get a better life when their very present was an unlawful act? Their kids who are born here have a chance but what kind of parent intentionally will put their kid in legal limbo? How selfish and cruel! The people who over stayed their visa or crossed the border without permission, knew they were breaking the laws. Let them be punished for their actions as any other law breaker would be. Those of you who wish to call me a racist even though I have not mentioned any specific ethnic group may now do so.
Grant H.
July 5th, 2011
9:55 am
“And perhaps just as important, we are long past the days when we condemn a population to servitude in
manual labor</strike) government dependency, allowing them to do that but dream of nothing else."It is a swap off for the DNC. They choose dependency over manual labor.
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
9:59 am
It is a swap off for the DNC. They choose dependency over manual labor.
Not intended to be a factual statement.
THE TRUTH
July 5th, 2011
9:59 am
Amvet (Not), I am going to do us both a favor, I am not going to call you a liar, I will not even tell tou to provide one ounce of proof that I have EVER been anything other than supportive when it comes to our troops, I am not even going to say how you resort to name calling when you are being outed, heck, I am even going to get off line, after all it is time for my walk, just think I will be outside walking enjoying life and you will still be the same old miserable you.
godless heathen
July 5th, 2011
10:00 am
“Who do you know who DOESN’T pay for goods and services?”
You are kidding, right? I take it you don’t get out much. Let’s take a ride down the street on this fine sunny “work day” and I’ll show you plenty of folks that are not paying for goods and services received.
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
10:00 am
Carlosgvv — “Telling millions of people who have seriously violated our laws we will let them become citizens makes a mockery of the law.”
Um, no. It’s not a *serious violation* of our laws at all. The Federal government treats it as a document offense; about on a level with driving without your license and registration.
I’m sure some folks would *like* for it to be a horrendous felony, but the fact of the matter is that it simply isn’t.
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
10:03 am
Jm — “NPR report this morning on section 8 voucher changes. Specific story about a woman whose voucher wil. Go up from $1500 to $2000 per month. And shes been on section 8 for 4 years. My reaction: say what???!!!!
“$2000 a month in Dallas (where the story was$ will buy the toniest kind of place in Atlanta, Dallas, or most other places. So taxpayers are now supposed to put up our poor in the ritz Carlton??? WTF”
$2K may buy a tony place in Dallas, but not a $2K Section 8 voucher. You can’t just walk up to a ritzy condo with a Section 8 voucher and expect to be rented a unit *unless* that condo *accepts* Section 8 vouchers.
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:03 am
“I’ll show you plenty of folks that are not paying for goods and services received”
Not even the clothes they wear, the food they eat, and the homes they live in? Pity I can’t actually take you up on that bet. I could use the money.
Laurie
July 5th, 2011
10:04 am
Jay, I don’t think you understand the full intent of our government. While most Georgians today might be unwilling to work the jobs illegal immigrants have been doing, eventually they will not have a choice as unemployment continues to be high and entitlements such as unemployment insurance run out. This has been the plan all along. We need to make room for the new underclass being created by the mass redistribution of wealth upwards.
AmVet
July 5th, 2011
10:05 am
THE TRUTH
July 5th, 2011
9:59 am
“…one ounce of proof that I have EVER been anything other than supportive when it comes to our troops…”
THE TRUTH
July 5th, 2011
9:59 am
“Amvet (Not)…”
LIAR.
That was easy, huh, troop hater?
Are you one of those never served, never-will chickenhawks turned peacenik?
Southern Comfort
July 5th, 2011
10:06 am
As to the Supreme Court’s wisdom in legislating issues, let’s ask our African-American citizens how they feel about the court’s Plessy vs. Ferguson decision in 1896 that upheld the constitutionality of segregation. Think about how much pain and suffering they endured as a people because of this decision. Now think about how this same decision was “overturned” (actually completely reversed) with the Brown vs. Board of Education decision of 1954. The very fact that the court completely reversed itself proves just how fallible it can be. 58 years of intense suffering because an unelected group of nine judges were allowed to establish the law of the land!
Kinda off topic, but the suffering didn’t end at Brown VS BOE. The suffering merely switched forms. Plessy upheld “Separate but Equal”, but it wasn’t all suffering. Look at areas such as the Greenwood section of Topeka, KS. That area was called the “Black Wall Street” back in the early 1900’s. “Separate but Equal” did have a few pluses as Blacks had to pretty much replicate everything in society including lawyers, doctors, and bankers. Once it was done away with, much of the Black business community suffered due to lack of patrionage.
Grant H.
July 5th, 2011
10:06 am
)? WTH?
“And perhaps just as important, we are long past the days when we condemn a population to servitude in
manual laborgovernment dependency, allowing them to do that but dream of nothing else.”It is a swap off for the DNC. They choose dependency over manual labor.
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
10:06 am
Joe the Plumber – “joesmama and the rest of the bedwetters will fill you in.”
If you think I’ve ever played the race card or wet my bed, then man up and face me on the topic.
It’s the kind of drive-by whining you posted @ 8:49 that makes me not take you and your complaints seriously.
Jefferson
July 5th, 2011
10:06 am
People don’t realize how much help they get, but think they can do it all on their own.
AmVet
July 5th, 2011
10:08 am
Kam, it’s all good!
To quote the esteemed Hillbilly D, “I’ve flushed better than him.”
Keep Up the Good Fight!
July 5th, 2011
10:09 am
Let’s take a ride down the street on this fine sunny “work day” and I’ll show you plenty of folks that are not paying for goods and services received
godless…..here’s a suggestion. Use the video cam on your phone and video all these people you can identify from your ride. You can email it to Jay and if it is conclusive proof as you claim, I am sure Jay can post a link.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
10:10 am
“No it shouldn’t. Would you support majority rule if, for instance, the majority decided that all blue-eyed blond people should be forced to leave the country? Our laws and courts are there precisely to protect the minority from the “tyranny of the majority” – and before you say so, yes, vice versa as well.”
I don’t think you are reasoning this through correctly. If the majority decided that 1) all blue-eyed blond people (of which I am one) should leave the country and 2) elected a sufficient number of Representatives and Senators who 3) made that a Constitutional amendment, I guess I would have to leave (remember that Supreme Court justices can be impeached). Why would this not be true? The likelihood of it happening is very, very remote, but I think it is possible. But that is a different question from whether or not the majority is right. That is obviously not true. I was simply saying that if the majority wanted do legislatively authorize some of the actions the Supreme Court has on its own, then I would either have to accept that or migrate elsewhere.
godless heathen
July 5th, 2011
10:10 am
Doggone,
If one has no job and no desire to get one, how, pray tell, do they do they pay for clothing, housing, food. Sorry, I forgot drug dealing, pimping, whoring, lottery winnings, and inheritance.
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
10:13 am
Baby Suggs – “If someone has a degree in Computer Engineering and is used to making $35/hour; why would they go out and apply for a job (in the hot sun) that pays them $10/hour?”
It should be pointed out that harvesting jobs require folks to move around a lot, so commuting and lodging costs will take a big wet bite out of that paycheck. It’s not like you can just drive 20-30 minutes a day to get to the fields you have to work; you’re in one area for a week or two, then you move on to the next crop and the next area. Plus, harvesting is a very seasonal job — that’s why you move around a lot. You go wherever the ripe/mature crops are.
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:14 am
“I don’t think you are reasoning this through correctly. If the majority decided that 1) all blue-eyed blond people (of which I am one) should leave the country and 2) elected a sufficient number of Representatives and Senators who 3) made that a Constitutional amendment, I guess I would have to leave (remember that Supreme Court justices can be impeached).”
You left out the most important step. See if you can figure out what it is.
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:15 am
“If one has no job and no desire to get one, how, pray tell, do they do they pay for clothing, housing, food”
If they aren’t walkind about naked and sleeping on the bare sidewalk, they’re paying with SOMETHING. And if you REALLY think they are all prostitutes and drug dealers…here’s your chance to see the laws enforced by turning them all in. Start now.
Mickey
July 5th, 2011
10:17 am
You completely overlook the fact that we have legitimate temporary guest workers, and THAT is the program that should be expanded – not rewarding those who enter illegally with a pathway to citizenship.
There is no concrete reason to send another signal to the world that entering in violation of immigration law is a guarantee of citizenship one day. That was the absolute worst message we sent in 1986.
If it costs more for food because farmers pay more for labor, so be it. Regardless of any increase, it pales in comparison to the amount of welfare costs associated with amnesty for millions of unskilled workers whose needs are enormous. In reality, most of those farmers aren’t really farmers. They’re big business: corporate agricultural concerns.
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:19 am
” it pales in comparison to the amount of welfare costs associated with amnesty for millions of unskilled workers whose needs are enormous.”
Please find and post a link that shows how illegal immigrants can claim welfare. I’m sure they will be VERY interested to know.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
10:19 am
“Plessy upheld “Separate but Equal”, but it wasn’t all suffering.”
True enough, but I was thinking of the institutionalized racism that resulted from the decision, and the beatings, lynchings, degradation, humiliation that was almost condoned in its wake. The decision probably made racist whites feel like they had permission to do these kind of things. I have a number of black friends, most of whom grew up in the South – one even became a Black Panther in his youth. So I have acquired some second hand understanding of what was suffered.
poison pen
July 5th, 2011
10:21 am
Bosch
poison pen,
” Well, the Rapture didn’t happen, so I’m guessing people left because they do not want to live in an “unfriendly to them” State.”
Bosch, nice try at deflecting the question, but we both know it’s BS. Try being honest once in your life, people would respect you for it.
Southern Comfort
July 5th, 2011
10:23 am
SKH
Ok… Understand what you were saying much better.
LOL
July 5th, 2011
10:24 am
This whole immigration problem has me so angry with BOTH sides. Liberals want everybody to be granted citizenship, Conservatives want them all to go home and close the border. Once again we have situation that can be handled with COMMON SENSE. Their ar way too many illegals already here to send home, and we probably can’t get all of thme to go home. So we need a guest worker program with amnesty for those workers already here. We need to build the fence on the southern border, but we also need to make it simpler to get these temporary worker permits, we need to have fewer types of permits and some should have fees attached to get one, and all of the one’s issued to those already in this country should have a fine/fee attached. These permits should allow the Federal Govn’t and States to tax these individuals. Theese permits can range from 6 months to five years. Their should be no hinderence to these people becoming US citizens through the usual channels. In order to do all of this we would probably need to close the borders and all immmigration for 6 months to 1 year just to put everything in place, but that seems a small price to pay to come to the gretest contry in the history of the world. After we get these fixes in place if you are caught sneaking into this country you are IMMEDIATELY deported and you can’t come in leagally for 1 year. If you do it again, that’s it you are barred for life. PERIOD. If you don’t return to Mexico or renew your permit; after your permit expires you get the same penalties. This is simple people, the debt limit is simple, most of the problems in this country have common sense Constitutional solutions; what we don’t have is a leader or leaders to get them done.
deegee
July 5th, 2011
10:24 am
I find it interesting that we lament low wages paid to unskilled, semi-skilled immigrant workers at the same time that we bash unions for wanting too much in the way of wages and benefits. We lament the loss of manufacturing jobs in the US and blame unions for creating the offshore explosion after years of demanding a living wage. Then we state that American workers will work the unskilled, semi-skilled jobs that immigrants hold if the employers would just pay them a living wage. Isn’t that ironic?
Southern Comfort
July 5th, 2011
10:25 am
You completely overlook the fact that we have legitimate temporary guest workers, and THAT is the program that should be expanded
My question is the same as I ask to the round’em up and deport’em crowd… Who’s gonna pay for it?
Southern Comfort
July 5th, 2011
10:26 am
deegee
Laughable too!!
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:26 am
“Liberals want everybody to be granted citizenship”
when you start your rant with a lie, you lose a LOT of your audience.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
10:28 am
“You left out the most important step. See if you can figure out what it is.”
I no longer play guessing games as I have found they are counter productive and lead to foolish arguments rather than honest debate. If you have a valid point, make it – for my benefit and everyone else’s. I don’t HAVE to be right, you see. I say what I think is right and if someone knows better and tells me, than I am enriched.
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:29 am
“I no longer play guessing games ”
It isn’t a GUESSING game, it’s an opportunity to educate youself about the process of amending the constitution. You left out A HUGE STEP, and I invite you to complete your edcuation and look it up.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
10:33 am
” Would you support majority rule if, for instance, the majority decided that all blue-eyed blond people should be forced to leave the country?”
Well, I certainly would not, because I like living here and would refuse to leave.
LOL
July 5th, 2011
10:33 am
Doggone/GA – Sorry you thought it was a rant, If you would bother to read what I wrote I also mentioned that Conservatives want to send the all home. See that’s the problem; if someone dos;nt agree with your point of view it’s a rant or hatred, or hurting children, etc… I am getting so tired of all of this partisan crap.
Mr Right
July 5th, 2011
10:33 am
Not a easy answer to the problem but wouldn’t we all agree that first thing that needs to happen is securing our border ?
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:35 am
“I am getting so tired of all of this partisan crap.”
and as a liberal *I* am tired of being accuse of things that aren’t true. And so I stopped reading your rant after the lie about all liberals. If that LIE wasn’t PARTISAN, then nothing is.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
10:36 am
Paul, in case you drop by, did you have a happy birthday yesterday?
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:37 am
“but wouldn’t we all agree that first thing that needs to happen is securing our border ”
No. Because it can’t be done. We have thousands and thousands and thousands of miles of border, both land and sea border and it is impossible to secure ever inch of it all.
But if you think it can be done, then how much in increased taxes are you willing to pay for it? Beause to even TRY is going to cost a HUGE amount of money.
Mr Right
July 5th, 2011
10:37 am
Who’s gonna pay for it?
I guess the same people that will pay for our $14,000,000,000,000.00 debt!
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
10:37 am
Not a easy answer to the problem but wouldn’t we all agree that first thing that needs to happen is securing our border ?
The Great Wall of China was insufficient in securing a border.
What can?
Left wing management
July 5th, 2011
10:38 am
For example, do illegal immigrants perform labor that most Georgians are unwilling or even unable to do? The once contentious question now has an answer: Yes, in many cases they do.
Well it always had an answer, to anyone with eyes to see. It’s just that people in some quarters wanted — and will continue to want — to deny the fact or to pretend that it doesn’t matter. Lack of political courage allowed this canard to live.
LOL
July 5th, 2011
10:38 am
Mr Right – of course securing the border is the FIRST step, but try to sell that to a Liberal/Progressive. You can’t repair the damage from leak until you STOP the LEAK! But when we repair it we will hopefully make it better than it was/ is.
BADA BING
July 5th, 2011
10:38 am
Is the new immigration bill responsible for droughts, insects, floods? All of these are faced by the farmers, and result in a lost crop, just like the lack of pickers. It is a problem that can and will be overcome, you people just don’t know how inventive working people can be.
The Thin Guy
July 5th, 2011
10:39 am
Cut off welfare, food stamps, unemployment compensation, and other government handouts and you’ll see crops getting picked by Americans. It is racist to suggest that illegal aliens are better at stooping over and picking stuff than we native Americans. What we need is motivation. And as long as the government is taking care of us there is no motivation. Which would you rather do? Sit on your rear blogging in your air conditioned digs supported by you government check or go out and work for a living.
Mr Right
July 5th, 2011
10:40 am
Beause to even TRY is going to cost a HUGE amount of money.
Wow, so just give up?
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:40 am
“You can’t repair the damage from leak until you STOP the LEAK!”
Beavers do it all the time to their dams, which are NOT watertight…but they do work to repair major leaks. So answer this: HOW will be secure every inch of our borders, and how much are you willing to pay in extra taxes to do it?
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:40 am
“Wow, so just give up?”
How much are you willing for you taxes to be increased to pay for it?
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
10:42 am
Wow, so just give up?
No, just attack the problem from another angle.
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
10:42 am
:and as a liberal *I* am tired of being accuse of things that aren’t true. And so I stopped reading your rant after the lie about all liberals. If that LIE wasn’t PARTISAN, then nothing is.:
And as an EOI on this blog, I’m tired of all the short-tempered partisans who call every error, imprecise wording or mistake a LIE.
A lie is a statement deliberately made when the person making it KNOWS the statement to be untrue.
Until everyone on this blog develops ESP and KNOWS what everyone else knows before posting, or until facts are put in evidence that disputes the statement and the originator still sticks to their story, the word “lie” should be banned from everyone’s repertoire.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
10:42 am
“than we native Americans”
Oh Lord, I hope josef doesn’t see that.
Atlas Shrugging
July 5th, 2011
10:43 am
The thin guy….well said…there are maore parasites living off the tax payers than destroying crops.
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
10:43 am
LOL — “Liberals want everybody to be granted citizenship”
I’m a liberal and I don’t want that. I think there are a LOT of liberals who don’t want that.
poison pen
July 5th, 2011
10:44 am
Doggone/GA
” Please find and post a link that shows how illegal immigrants can claim welfare. I’m sure they will be VERY interested to know.”
Doggone, If you go to the GOA and check 11/19/1997 you will find a study that Illegals got 1.1 Billion in false aid. That was all kinds of aid, not just walfare.
The study was done in 3 or 4 states only.
The illegals have a child here and then use that SS# to scam the Govt. this is only one way.
Please check out the site, this was done 14 years ago and as you know we have had millions of illegals sneak over our borders since then, so I would think that the cost is a lot higher now.
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
10:44 am
And as an EOI on this blog…
Not intended to be a factual statement.
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:45 am
“The illegals have a child here and then use that SS# to scam the Govt. this is only one way”
If that child is born on US soil, then you are talking about a US Citizen.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
10:45 am
“the word “lie” should be banned from everyone’s repertoire”
Well Dave R., it is lying to say that all liberals believe or think something when nothing can be further from the truth. It is a dishonest statement, in other words, a lie.
“making it KNOWS the statement to be untrue”
So either the person who makes such blanket statements is either a) a dumb ass for making such false sweeping generalizations, or b) a liar because they KNOW such statments are not true, but do so anyway.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
10:46 am
what’s EOI, again?
poison pen
July 5th, 2011
10:47 am
Doggone/GA
“You can’t repair the damage from leak until you STOP the LEAK!”
” Beavers do it all the time to their dams, which are NOT watertight…but they do work to repair major leaks. So answer this: HOW will be secure every inch of our borders, and how much are you willing to pay in extra taxes to do it?”
What if we got that cheap illegal labor to do it. ( just a joke )
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:47 am
“what’s EOI, again”
Equal Opportunity Instigator
Mr Right
July 5th, 2011
10:47 am
No, just attack the problem from another angle.
Hmm, and what would that be?
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
10:47 am
Hi Bosch! Doggone, Dave, Kammy-Kam, Poison …
hope everyone had a lovely 4th!
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
10:48 am
If one has no job and no desire to get one, how, pray tell, do they do they pay for clothing, housing, food. Sorry, I forgot drug dealing, pimping, whoring, lottery winnings, and inheritance.
godless your mom called, she said it’s time to come upstairs for your nap. It seems you’ve been up too long sniffing paint fumes in the basement and now you’re turning cranky. Kids these days!
JoeMama: It should be pointed out that harvesting jobs require folks to move around a lot, so commuting and lodging costs will take a big wet bite out of that paycheck
No doubt. That $10/hour quickly turns into $4.50/hr.
Mickey: If it costs more for food because farmers pay more for labor, so be it.
And you’d be perfectly fine with that right? You wouldn’t start screeching about rising cost of food/gas/etc. you’d just grin and bear it, correct? Yeah righhhhhttttttt…………….
deegee: Then we state that American workers will work the unskilled, semi-skilled jobs that immigrants hold if the employers would just pay them a living wage. Isn’t that ironic?
Truly ironic.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
10:48 am
Doggone – (chuckling) – oh, yeah, that’s right …
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
10:48 am
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
10:43 am
LOL — “Liberals want everybody to be granted citizenship”
I’m a liberal and I don’t want that. I think there are a LOT of liberals who don’t want that.
Okay, so far there are three here (myself included in this) that don’t want that, and I know USinUK doesn’t either because she’s mentioned that, so that makes four.
We can make that easy and ask if there are any “liberals” here on the board that DO want that. What say ye libs?
AmVet
July 5th, 2011
10:48 am
Completely *sealing* our borders is as ludicrous as was Reagan’s Star Wars.
The smartest approach is what BHO did earlier this year, send more funds and National Guard and other manpower to the BIG problem areas like San Diego County…
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:49 am
“Hmm, and what would that be?”
Make the laws against HIRING illegal immigrants much tougher, and theN FUND ENFORCEMENT of those laws. Taking a big bite out of available jobs will take a big bite out of the reason for people to try to cross our borders illegally.
poison pen
July 5th, 2011
10:50 am
Bosch
“the word “lie” should be banned from everyone’s repertoire”
Well Dave R., it is lying to say that all liberals believe or think something when nothing can be further from the truth. It is a dishonest statement, in other words, a lie.
“making it KNOWS the statement to be untrue”
” So either the person who makes such blanket statements is either a) a dumb ass for making such false sweeping generalizations, or b) a liar because they KNOW such statments are not true, but do so anyway.”
Bosch, Does that apply to your 8:09 post also?????????????????.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
10:50 am
HI USinUK! [Waving] The Bosches did have a nice 4th — really low key, but nice — good BBQ and veggies from the garden. Tonight is fried okra and green tomato night! Yeee ha!!
Hope I didn’t just speak out of place for you.
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
10:50 am
LOL– “Mr Right – of course securing the border is the FIRST step, but try to sell that to a Liberal/Progressive. You can’t repair the damage from leak until you STOP the LEAK!”
I disagree. If we make it painful for businesses to hire illegals — knowingly or not — and give them the tools to instantly determine if a job applicant is legal or not — then we will remove all incentive and reason for them to COME here AND to BE here.
Throw a few business owners and big businessmen in jail for employing illegals and then there won’t be any jobs here for illegals any more. And they will stop coming then — and the ones who are here will self-deport.
When you want an elegant and simple solution, ask a liberal.
When you want a simple solution that makes some people feel good but won’t actually solve the problem, ask a conservative.
poison pen
July 5th, 2011
10:51 am
USinUK, Thank you, we did and I hope yours was good also.
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
10:51 am
Hmm, and what would that be?
Glad you asked.
But Americans also want to be assured that this is the last time a broad legalization option is offered to illegal immigrants. Democrats ought to make it clear that they’ll enforce the borders and crack down on employers who hire illegally, a cheaper and more effective strategy for addressing the problem than building fences. After a few CEOs have done the perp walk for illegal hiring, they’ll stop offering jobs to those without proper documents. And when word gets across the border that U.S. companies have stopped hiring, those laborers will stop coming. They come for jobs, after all, not jihad.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
10:51 am
No poison it doesn’t, because that wasn’t an absolute sweeping genrealization about a group of people or a false statement. There are two neighborhoods in my town where most of the inhabitants (I’d say about 90%) have up and left. If you don’t believe me, I simply do not care.
Keep Up the Good Fight!
July 5th, 2011
10:52 am
Instigator? I always assumed it was IDIOT
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:52 am
USinUK – my 4th was quiet, but the weekend before was busy. Went out “waterfalling” and I’m now up to 340!
redneckbluedog
July 5th, 2011
10:54 am
I hate it for the farmers, and the losses are real…BUT, the losses are small compared to the crime these illegal alien leeches cause as well as motor vehicle accidents and indigent medical costs…
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
10:55 am
“BUT, the losses are small compared to the crime these illegal alien leeches cause as well as motor vehicle accidents and indigent medical costs”
Care to try to provide some proof of that?
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
10:55 am
Poison – sadly, the Brits don’t recognize the 4th of July (I wonder why ???) – but everyone at work was very kind!
Bosch – ohsweetjeebus … fried okra … I’m drooling on my keyboard – my mom and I used to make that and eat it as fast as it came out of the pan! the family was always very confused on why a huge bag of raw okra resulted in a small bowl of fried okra
oh, and you were right on the £££ with how I feel about immigration – if I and my mister had to jump through hoops, then EVERYONE ELSE CAN, TOO, DAMMIT
Mr Right
July 5th, 2011
10:55 am
When you want an elegant and simple solution, ask a liberal.
Yea, like how to lower the debt by spending more money? Thanks for the laugh of the day!
josef
July 5th, 2011
10:55 am
First, the thread…well said, Jay.
As for the cost of HB87, we won’t know that insofar as the agricultural sector is concerned until the harvest is in and marketed. Right now that is an unknown factor, but it is raising the question in more real terms. We’ll see.
Second, those talking about the post Civil War and the institution of share cropping. No doubt that’s the “solution” those in power now are looking for, a modern day version thereof. And just for the record for those out to play the race card on that one, sharecropping threw millions of white landless and ruined peasants into the same camp. Then when it became clear that the landless could see common cause across race lines, we wound up with the big boys here and Up North alike seeing it in their best interests to do all within their power to pit black and white against each other. I can see something very similar in the works here.
BOSCH
I am here, didn’t scroll back too much on this one…who said what about native Americans?
SKH
July 5th, 2011
10:56 am
“It isn’t a GUESSING game, it’s an opportunity to educate youself about the process of amending the constitution. You left out A HUGE STEP, and I invite you to complete your edcuation and look it up.”
Are you referring to the need for states to ratify the amendment? Did you not comprehend the point I was making or are you being childishly condescending? Have amendments been made to the Constitution before? Yes. Hence they are possible. Given sufficient political support, I suppose almost any amendment could be passed. If we were living a hundred years ago and having a conversation, would either of us have imagined a Germany led by Hitler? But let’s bring it closer to home: how many Klansman in the South were ever prosecuted for lynching blacks? Not many. And just why is that? Hitler or the Klan could not have existed without the complicity (active or passive) of the majority. I think you don’t recognize what I believe to be a fact of history: human beings, either individually or corporately, are capable of truly unbelievably good or evil actions. I don’t believe there is any guarantee America will not fall prey to madness at some point.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
10:56 am
Doggone – woohoo!! more waterfalls! I need to check out the bloggy goodness when I get home
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
10:57 am
josef,
See Thin Guy’s 10:39.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
10:57 am
“If we make it painful for businesses to hire illegals — knowingly or not — and give them the tools to instantly determine if a job applicant is legal or not — then we will remove all incentive and reason for them to COME here AND to BE here.”
amen.
and amen.
and all god’s children said A-FREAKIN-MEN
Left wing management
July 5th, 2011
10:59 am
Did somebody say “liberal”?
Just what IS a liberal?
In 1986 Ronald Reagan signed a sweeping immigration reform bill which included enforcement measures but also opened the way for amnesty.
Now, tell me with a straight face that Ronald Reagan was a “liberal”.
Go on.
Anyone?
josef
July 5th, 2011
11:00 am
BOSCH
“Liberals want everybody to be granted citizenship”
Add me to the list of those liberals who don’t call for citizenship for everybody…
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
11:00 am
“Are you referring to the need for states to ratify the amendment?”
Yes. Because you “stopped” the process at being passed by Congress. Congress cannot amend the Constitution. They can pass the bill, but you wouldn’t have to leave until it is actually ratified per the Constitutional requirements for amendments.
And even then, it’s possible that the Supreme Court could invalidate such an amendment if it violated other provisions of the Constitution. Even atification is not a guarantee.
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
11:00 am
“Well Dave R., it is lying to say that all liberals believe or think something when nothing can be further from the truth. It is a dishonest statement, in other words, a lie. ”
No, Bosch, it could also be imprecise wording (something our host is prone to do from time to time as well).
Heck, the insertion of a single word in that earlier statement would have made it true.
Insert “politicians” after “liberal”.
But since it sounds so much more poutrageous when you can accuse someone of “lying” it works for all too many people on this blog.
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
11:01 am
Which would you rather do? Sit on your rear blogging in your air conditioned digs supported by you government check or go out and work for a living.
Most people on this blog are bloging from work. Duh.
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
11:01 am
“In 1986 Ronald Reagan signed a sweeping immigration reform bill which included enforcement measures but also opened the way for amnesty”
And the problem with that bill, which is quite likely a direct influence on our current problem, is that Congress never funded adequately the ENFORCEMENT measures included.
Moderate Line
July 5th, 2011
11:01 am
RRCC
July 5th, 2011
9:05 am
MYTH: Immigrants take jobs from Americans.
FACT: Immigrants create new jobs, and complement the skills of the
U.S. native workforce.
++++
For all those using the MYTH/FACT argument. Stating something you disagree with as MYTH and things you agree with as FACT does not make either one a MYTH or FACT. In order to proved your point you need to provide either logic or evidence to prove your point.
The only thing that I gather from this type of argument is what you personally believe to be true and what you personally believe is not true.
If I disagree with you before the argument I am not persuaded by such arguments.
If I agree with you I have no further evidence than what I already have.
This should be labeled in MY OPINIION not FACT or MYTH.
Here are the FACT/MYTH based on an NPR article.
FACT: Illegal immigration has both negative and positive impacts on different parts of the economy. As noted above, wages for low-skilled workers go down. But that means the rest of America benefits by paying lower prices for things like restaurant meals, agricultural produce and construction. Another negative impact is on government expenditures. Since undocumented workers generally don’t pay income taxes but do use schools and other government services, they are seen as a drain on government spending.
Do illegal immigrants affect wages?Yes and no.
First the no. The most respected recent studies show that most Americans would notice little difference in their paychecks if illegal immigrants suddenly disappeared from the United States. That’s because most Americans don’t directly compete with illegal immigrants for jobs.
Next the Yes. There is one group of Americans that would benefit from a dramatic cut in illegal immigration: high-school dropouts. Most economists agree that the wages of low-skill high-school dropouts are suppressed by somewhere between 3 percent and 8 percent because of competition from immigrants, both legal and illegal. Economists speculate that for the average high-school dropout, that would mean about a $25 a week raise if there were no job competition from immigrants.
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
11:01 am
Hi, USinUK.
My 4th was GREAT. Thanks for asking. Do you still celebrate over there?
Paul
July 5th, 2011
11:02 am
Cast a little light into the darkness and it isn’t always pretty. I think this bill you’ve passed in Georgia is a good example of unintended consequences, or, in politicalspeak, “oops…. we didn’t see that one coming….”
So now the business interests need to get behind a legalization bill to protect themselves. That may be the only way this gets done. It’ll be interesting to see what spin Republicans put on it so they can support it.
But in the meantime, people will moan about increasing produce prices and lots of Georgia farmers are going to have a tough time competing. So much for the free market line -
Paul
July 5th, 2011
11:03 am
Hey Bosch!
First post, first at the top.
heh heh heh….
Mr Right
July 5th, 2011
11:04 am
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
10:51 am
Pretty typical lib answer, it always the people that give the jobs fault!
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
11:05 am
Greetings and salutations USinUK
In light of Villa-boas’ positive role model campaign, it looks like Ashley Cole is doing the mea culpa thingie.
Now that I think of it, a lot of Blue Lions are gonna hafta do the mea culpa thingie.
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
11:06 am
Mr Right — “Yea, like how to lower the debt by spending more money? Thanks for the laugh of the day!
It is just like a conservative to make up bulldada and attribute said bulldada to his post-opponent. I said nothing about debt reduction or deficits; the topic here is illegal immigration and the remediation of same. If you are too stupid to recognize that illegal immigration and our national debt are two different topics, then I am afraid I cannot help you.
Did you have a substantive criticism of my policy recommendation regarding how to remediate our national illegal imigration policy, or would you prefer to continue sitting in the corner and eating your own boogers?
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
11:07 am
“it always the people that give the jobs fault!”
In the case of illegal immigration…yes, it is.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:08 am
Dave – had friends over for dinner on Saturday – made Mexican (which, to me, is to American cuisine as curries are to British cuisine)
but, as with Thanksgiving, trying to celebrate a holiday in a country that doesn’t recognize it is like dancing to your iPod in the middle of a train station – everyone knows you’re doing what’s appropriate for you, but you just don’t quite fit in.
zeke
July 5th, 2011
11:08 am
Illegals by definition are criminal law breakers! Regardless of the reason they are here they are illegal and criminal! Does not matter whether they are Mexican, Chinese, Russian, black, brown, white, yellow, THEY ARE ILLEGAL AND CRIMINAL!~ THEY HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, PERIOD!! As for farm labor, there is the TEMPORARY WORKERS VISA! They are legally allowed to be here, must comply with reporting laws, must leave when the visa expires, and, they can come back again, LEGALLY! The good intentioned amendment that state someone born here is a citizen has been misused grossly! i\It was to insure the children of slaves were no sent back to Africa, and, has been used by liberals to insure all those born here are automatically made citizens! THAT IS WRONG! If the parent(s) are illegal then the child should also be an illegal-non citizen! It should only be applied to a child whose parent(s) are LEGALLY IN THE USA!!!!
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
11:08 am
Yea, like how to lower the debt by spending more money?”
Care to quote ANY liberals on that? Or better yet, find quotes from each and EVERY ONE of us that supports that baloney. A lie is still a lie, no matter how many times you repeat it.
josef
July 5th, 2011
11:09 am
Thin guy…
O-si-yo, Duk-sha-ni u-ne -ga
All right, who ARE the native Americans and who ARE the illegal aliens?
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:10 am
“it looks like Ashley Cole is doing the mea culpa thingie.”
wouldn’t touch him with yours
s’all I’m sayin’
PAUL!!! I forgot to tell you, I wiki’d you after our meet-up … you are even cooler than I realized! and, you need to be the one who friends me on FB – there are too many Pauls to go through for me to get the right one
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
11:10 am
“THEY HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, PERIOD!! ”
actually, yes, they do. There’s nothing in the Constitution that limits it’s protection of inherent rights to ONLY legal citizens.
@@
July 5th, 2011
11:10 am
Unintended consequences are a by-product of life as we live it. The question remains…who’s gonna pay for them?
I pay for mine.
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
11:10 am
…it always the people that give the jobs fault!
Always?
No.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:11 am
Mr Right – are you telling me that the contractors who cruise by Home Depot to pick up day laborers think that those guys are LEGAL???
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
11:12 am
hi josef!
Then when it became clear that the landless could see common cause across race lines, we wound up with the big boys here and Up North alike seeing it in their best interests to do all within their power to pit black and white against each other. I can see something very similar in the works here.
If something works, you stick with it. While we’re busy arguing about racial matters, all of our jobs, black, brown, red, white and blue are being sent overseas at an alarming rate. The irony of course is that they are being given to just another type of “brown” person.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
11:12 am
Paul has a wiki page? Well, how cool is that, and he was born on the 4th of July! I’m all agog.
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
11:13 am
Bosch, you should have NEVER pointed out that quote to josef on native Americans.
Just sayin’!
Next, he’ll be going all “Andy Jackson this and Andy Jackson that” and the rest will be just ugly . . .
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
11:13 am
What has Cole done now??? I’ve been all about Wimbledon lately.
brad
July 5th, 2011
11:14 am
As Dan Ackroyd would say, Zeke, you ignorant slut…
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
11:14 am
Dave R.,
Hehehehehehe. Who says YOU are the only EOI — oh and as one, I certainly do reserve the right to call someone who makes a stupid false statement as liar — it’s how I roll.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:14 am
zeke – if you are in the US – whether you are a tourist or an illegal immigrant – you are still covered by the US Constitution – just as, if YOU were vacationing in Columbia, you would NOT
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
11:14 am
zeke — “Illegals by definition are criminal law breakers! Regardless of the reason they are here they are illegal and criminal!”
Sorry, no. ICE considers it a document offense, about on the same level as driving without license and registration.
I understand that you apparently think it is a horrible offense, but the fact is that that’s not how the law sees it.
“THEY HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, PERIOD!!”
Everybody’s got Constitutional rights, whether they are here legally or not. You are just plain wrong on that point.
“As for farm labor, there is the TEMPORARY WORKERS VISA! They are legally allowed to be here, must comply with reporting laws, must leave when the visa expires, and, they can come back again, LEGALLY!”
I don’t have problem with that. Perhaps there is a way to streamline that process so that farmers can get the seasonal labor they need without making things too difficult for them. Maybe a registry of foreign laborers could be kept — a list of available farm hands whose work permits could be quickly and easily activated. And if they abused or overstayed their permits (or if they commited a crime), then they could be cut off from further participation in the program and chucked out of the country.
“has been used by liberals to insure all those born here are automatically made citizens! THAT IS WRONG!”
Sorry, no. That’s jus solis and is a time-honored legal principle.
“If the parent(s) are illegal then the child should also be an illegal-non citizen! It should only be applied to a child whose parent(s) are LEGALLY IN THE USA!!!!”
Then get the law changed if that’s how you feel.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:14 am
Bosch – Wimbledon … gah … would rather watch paint dry
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
11:15 am
USinUK, I suppose that shooting off roman candles on the street corner would probably be overkill over there?
SKH
July 5th, 2011
11:15 am
“And even then, it’s possible that the Supreme Court could invalidate such an amendment if it violated other provisions of the Constitution. Even atification is not a guarantee.”
This is news to me; as far as I know they can only invalidate laws and not Constitutional amendments. Even if that were true (and I don’t have time to research it now), Supreme Court justices can impeached, so it’s certainly hypothetically possible that the Congress could impeach and remove an “intransigent” justice or two if it were bent on doing so.
Now that we have this cleared up, was there a point you wished to make besides the nitpicking?
Ross Perot
July 5th, 2011
11:15 am
Americans don’t want these jobs at these wages because they will have to pay taxes on them even if they get a refund at the end of the year. Ok, lets grant them amnesty. When they fulfill their dreams and get out of the pick fields and compete with the unemployed AMERICAN citizens for jobs guess what? We need more illegals to work at those wages picking the fields. Brilliant thinking from a liberal…
BADA BING
July 5th, 2011
11:15 am
A crop picker is a tool, used to do work. Some picking is ‘dumb work’, meaning no determination is needed to decide if it is ripe or not. A machine can do dumb work, cotton gins, balers, reapers, thrashers. If a need exists, some inventor will invent it. Not all crops need to picked by hand, technolgy will improve if there is a labor problem. It always has.
Paul
July 5th, 2011
11:16 am
USinUK
Will do – just check you mail’s spam folder, ’cause it’s coming from my gmail account.
All my mail’s going to be from Gmail, it seems. Couple days ago Windows Live Mail got buggy. I can receive and read email, but try to reply, forward, or create, and I get a popup that says “A problem occurred trying to open this message.” After spending many hours searching for a solution, it seems this is another problem Microsoft is clueless about –
Oh, and all that wiki stuff? I deny all knowledge….
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:16 am
Bosch – Paul is, indeed, the epitome of cool. we agreed that we wouldn’t reveal personal deets, but suffice it to say, he’s neat-o
not that we didn’t know that already
openmind
July 5th, 2011
11:17 am
I like hearing the ideas proposed – some actual thoughtful ideas to deal with a very real and pressing problem. It would be so refreshing to not hear the stupid insults and name calling because it doesn’t get us anywhere. And there is no way to blame this one on the Federal Government or Activist Judges or High Taxes. It’s bad legislation that can/must be fixed at the state level – and certainly the legislation is in reaction to problems WE CAUSED OURSELVES. But whine about what “the other side” is/isn’t doing, and by all means, keep bashing each other over the head. We fall further behind. The south never learns.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:17 am
Dave –
– they save their fireworks for 2 things: New Years and Guy Fawkes …
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
11:18 am
A crop picker is a tool…
There’s your sign.
Oi!
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
11:18 am
“Who says YOU are the only EOI ”
Never claimed to be, Bosch, as YOU well know.
But since lying is lower than whale manure in my book, I am cautionary when throwing down that particular accusation.
Would that others were as well.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:18 am
Paul – will do!
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
11:19 am
I would LOVE to be over there for Guy Fawkes!
Left wing management
July 5th, 2011
11:19 am
Doggone/GA: “And the problem with that bill, which is quite likely a direct influence on our current problem, is that Congress never funded adequately the ENFORCEMENT measures included.”
And yet, who seems to be finally engaging in some enforcement in this area now? In other words which president has overseen the most deportations in recent history?
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
11:19 am
“not that we didn’t know that already”
Fer rizzle. Yo.
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
11:21 am
“After spending many hours searching for a solution, it seems this is another problem Microsoft is clueless about”
Adding to the thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of other problems Microsoft is clueless about.
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
11:21 am
Bosch
It’s not about what Cole has done now, I think it’s the cumulative effect of all the incidences.
Moderate Line
July 5th, 2011
11:22 am
Moderate Line
July 5th, 2011
11:01 am
Moderate Line
http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2011/07/05/immigration-bill-clarifies-a-once-muddy-debate/?cp=4#comment-646732
Moderate Line
July 5th, 2011
11:22 am
Moderate Line
July 5th, 2011
11:01 am
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5312900
SKH
July 5th, 2011
11:23 am
“There’s nothing in the Constitution that limits it’s protection of inherent rights to ONLY legal citizens.”
According to the Supreme Court’s interpretation, which isn’t necessarily right (and please don’t try to argue it is). It just is currently the ways things are until a Constitutional amendment “clarifies” things for the very human justices.
Who gets hurt most by illegal immigration?
July 5th, 2011
11:24 am
Illegal Immigration: The Impact on Wages and Employment of Black Workers
http://www.cis.org/articles/2008/briggstestimony040408.html
April 4, 2008
Vernon M. Briggs, Jr.
Emeritus Professor of Labor Economics
Cornell University
Member, Center for Immigration Studies Board of Directors
Testimony Before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
Because most illegal immigrants overwhelmingly seek work in the low skilled labor market and because the black American labor force is so disproportionately concentrated in this same low wage sector, there is little doubt that there is significant overlap in competition for jobs in this sector of the labor market. Given the inordinately high unemployment rates for low skilled black workers (the highest for all racial and ethnic groups for whom data is collected), it is obvious that the major looser in this competition are low skilled black workers. This is not surprising, since if employers have an opportunity to hire illegal immigrant workers, they will always give them preference over legal workers of any race or ethnic background. This is because illegal immigrant workers view low skilled jobs in the American economy as being highly preferable to the job opportunities in their homelands that they have left. A job that pays the federal minimum wage of $7.15 an hour (some states and localities have even higher minimum wages) is often several times higher than the daily wage they could earn in their homelands, if they could get a job at all. Even the worst working conditions in the United States are typically better than what many have experienced before they came to this country.
Paul
July 5th, 2011
11:25 am
USinUK
Evidently, Facebook’s redone how they do Friends requests. I hit the hypertext but got no confirmation. If it doesn’t show. lemme know.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
11:26 am
“I like hearing the ideas proposed – some actual thoughtful ideas to deal with a very real and pressing problem. It would be so refreshing to not hear the stupid insults and name calling because it doesn’t get us anywhere. ”
Well said, openmind
Baby Suggs
July 5th, 2011
11:27 am
The good intentioned amendment that state someone born here is a citizen has been misused grossly! i\It was to insure the children of slaves were no sent back to Africa, and, has been used by liberals to insure all those born here are automatically made citizens!
Hmmmm there’s something just not right with that paragraph…..let me see if I can fix it…..
The good intentioned amendment that state(s) someone born here is a citizen is great and also the American way! Without immigration, America could not have grown in oppulence, abundance, and become the leader that it is now!
That’s the best I coud do……….
BADA BING
July 5th, 2011
11:27 am
Tho years away, Hydroponics is coming . People will literally be able to harvest crops in a temperature controlled, light controlled envirionment. A new wave of indoor farming is on the horizon, no soil will be required. It will not replace regular farming, but it can be used to grow food near or in populated areas, reducing transportation costs and near large labor pools.
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
11:28 am
“Sorry, no. That’s jus solis and is a time-honored legal principle”
It’s not just “time-honored” – it’s a Constitutional right:
14th Amendment to the United States Constitution: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
Yep
July 5th, 2011
11:30 am
While no solution appears clear in solving our illegal immigrant problem, if we had any thought of enforcing our laws we certainly could incent these illegals to self deport by:
1. Placing an ICE agent at every “choke point” for accessing our governmental services like; healthcare, welfare, schools, etc.
2. Denying any entitlement program to non-citizens or requesting their proof of citizenship to continue on a program. A good example would be; allowing for an illegal to receive treatment at a hospital, but if they could not pay for their care, they get a one-way ticket to their country of origin after returning to health, with threat of incarceration if they ever return..
3. Ending birthright citizenship unless 1 parent was a US citizen. This is even more forgiving that any other developed country, which will not allow citizenship without some serious time and monetary committments.
4. Allow workers to have a pass to work, but are taxed like citizens without any chance of receiving one iota of benefits from uncle sam, ever. The fees generated from the program would go to funding the creation of a secure border to stem the tide of subsequent “unlicensed” illegals.
5. Require illegals to provide a bond ($1,000) that guaranteed their behavior while in the US that could be forfeited in case of auto accidents, sickness, etc. to cover the taxpayer costs.
6. Require companies that hired illegals to pay an annual fee ($1,000) for bringing these workers into their company for cheaper labor. This would cover some of their drain on normal taxpayers.
7. Deny social security to any party that had no proof of either working in this country or at least 1 parent with citizenship.
These are just a few things that could be negotiated. The point is that we can no longer afford to carry the fixed costs of a non supporting illegal worker program, especially in this economy.
Can add more later, but we have to start somewhere…….
Dusty
July 5th, 2011
11:32 am
Well, there are two kinds of liberals; the real ones and the blogging ones.
Real liberals are people who truly believe that that every human being deserves compassionate consideration and works towards that with compassion for everyone..They believe more in personal efforts with limited but available government efforts.
Blogging liberals are those who think insulting anyone who does not agree with their “compassionate” ideas. should be insulted and called liars, bigots and stupid for not agreeing with their particular compassion. They accuse, correct, and twist all for the good of humanity. They envy the rich. Government & high taxation is their savior for the needy.
The REAL liberal and REAL conservative are very much alike. You can hardly tell the difference.
Blogging conservatives speak the truth as they see it. They object to lies, corrections, and insults. They are not without fault but stand firm on execution of laws, good limited government, low taxes and support of the military. Their goal is a strong country of independent people.
So there you are: real and blogging liberals & conservatives. It is a motley bunch but so typically American.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:32 am
Paul – no friendie request, yet
hacimo
July 5th, 2011
11:33 am
This is an improvement over the usual screams about “racism” and “xenophobia”, “right wing hate”, that one has come to expect from the pro-illegal-immigration crowd. Unfortunately, this piece still gets itself tangled in several pieces of leftist spin and fallacy. The most glaring is the notion that for some reason American workers will will no longer do hard field work and, absent illegal labor, agribusiness will collapse and our precious vegees will rot in the fields. Indeed, any economist will tell you to expect one or two seasons of reduced production after a sudden decline in the available pool of cheap labor. Indeed one may recall such a decline in cotton and tobacco production after the ending of slavery and after pearl harbor. Eventually the shortages will cause end consumer prices to increase and the profit margins for producers will increase. This will drive investment in labor saving machinery and production efficiency and will also allow increases in the wages, working conditions and the benefits, of agricultural workers. These effects have been empirically demonstrated time and again in other crops that were once dependent on massive supplies of cheap labor; corn, cotton, wheat, grapes, oranges, tree nuts, etc etc. When the salary is sufficient, I estimate about $22/hour in current dollars, legal american workers will be more than willing to harvest our delicate produce.
I don’t know if the editors of this newspaper are deliberately distorting these elementary facts for some sort of political agenda. I hate to think this but the obvious alternative is to believe that they are totally ignorant of economics 101.
Uncle Jed
July 5th, 2011
11:33 am
This issue pits my logical self against my emotional self, both slapped around a bit by my principled self. At the end of the process I find myself back at the same place. We are a country of laws, not men; and we must adhere to the Rule of Law versus the Rule of Men or we will have no basis or foundation upon which to stand over the long haul.
Without secure borders we lose our sovereignty and controlled governance over various aspects of an ordered society in which we can all live and be assured our individual rights will be protected. In failing to address the border security; North to South and ocean to ocean, we essential implement amnesty to law breakers; open borders; and an undermining of our ultimate freedom.
It is somewhat akin to the debt ceiling dilemna; that being to address but one aspect of the problem and suggesting solutions that would be possible only in a vacuum. Now, back to some thoughts reagrding the illegals.
1) A streamlined program must be divised whereby those non-citizens, not already here but desiring to become citizens can apply for citizenship and follow the procedures. Learn some U.S. history and learn some basic english and demonstrate enough assets to survive for at least twelve months upon lawful entry. Illegal entry across our borders will make one ineligible for future citizenship.
2) A program allowing migrant workers, not desiring permanent residence or citizenship, to apply for a “growing season” entry visa and be housed and overseen by the farms needing the labor. The farm would post a bond for each worker and be responsible for “delivering” the migrant worker back to the border prior to the expiration of the visa and thus have the bond released.
3) A program whereby every illegal immigrant currently serving time for a conviction, other than for the illegal entry alone, be immediately deported back to their home country. They could apply for citizenship through the regular procedures.
4) A program whereby all persons currently here via illegal entry must register with the government and provide a valid and verifiable address and then be issued a registration card which can be used for purposes of identification if confronted by law enforcement. This card would not allow for any benefits nor be used as a substitute for a drivers license or work permit, but would allow them to not be arrested for illegal enrty. They could not move without updating thier registration card.
5) Persons here illegally at the time of enactment must register and then may apply for either a permanent work permit or citizenship or both. The work permit would be issued relatively quickly; would generate a taxing mechanism other than just sales/payroll tax, but would not allow participation in social security or other social benefits afforded to legal citizens. The employer would be responsible for reporting if these people left their employment so they could then be re-classified and monitored through other means. Each illegal entrant worker would have a portion of their pay withheld and contributed to a state sanctioned and monitored private health insurance co-operative.
6) Driver’s Licenses would only be issued to those persons able to pass a test in english and demonstrate a functional level of spoken english.
7) No person born within the borders of the U.S. shall be deemed a citizen of the U.S. unless born to a citizen of the U.S.
Add or subtract as you felt led, although my intent is not to engage in an all day back and forth with anybody here. I actually need to get busy on a project, but wanted to take a few minutes to jot down some thoughts. I stipulate the above to be “top of the head” in general but rooted in many years of personal reflection. Peace be upon you!
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
11:33 am
“Without immigration, America could not have grown in oppulence, abundance, and become the leader that it is now!”
Hmmmm there’s something just not right with that sentence…..let me see if I can fix it…..
Without MANAGED, LEGAL, immigration, America could not have grown in opulence, abundance, and become the leader that it is now!
josef
July 5th, 2011
11:35 am
If it weren’t for jus solis a helluva lot of those yapping here and now wouldn’t be citizens…just remember that when Angelo, Haim, Natalya, Laszlo, Jerzy, Kristof and company were getting off those boats back at the turn of the last century to do the dirt work in the sweat shops, their little anchor babies (that’s great granny and grandpa) would not have passed the muster of those already here and established…same thing with Bridgette and Paddy back in the 1840s, Jean Claude and Antoinette back in the 1810s…
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:35 am
Dave – it is fun – every town has a big to-do on their local Green, with a huge bonfire and ceremonial burning of the Guy. and fireworks. and sausage rolls.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:37 am
Dave – “Without MANAGED, LEGAL, immigration, America could not have grown in opulence, abundance, and become the leader that it is now!”
meh – it wasn’t particularly “managed” in the 1800s and early 1900s – particularly along the borders … or do you think “dose Cajuns” went through Ellis Island in a neat and orderly fashion on a detour from Canada?
Kamchak
July 5th, 2011
11:37 am
Well, there are two kinds of liberals…
I always
thought the world was divided into only two kinds of people — those
who think the world is divided into only two kinds of people, and
those who don’t.
The late, great Molly Ivins
Gordon
July 5th, 2011
11:37 am
“The answer to this dilemma will come not in piecemeal state legislation, but in a federal law that simultaneously tightens laws against hiring of illegal labor while offering those already here a path to citizenship. Anything else is fruitless.”
Sounds great, but the devil is in the details. What sort of path do you propose? How does that path compare to the paths of those who have chosen to obey existing law? Does that path take into consideration the fact that laws have been broken? Finally, once we tighten the laws against hiring illegal immigrants and then the human interest stories emerge about how those laws are causing pain, inconvenience, and the like, will those laws be ignored like the current immigration laws? In a way, this is just like the debt ceiling – what will be different next time?
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
11:38 am
“The good intentioned amendment that state someone born here is a citizen has been misused grossly! i\It was to insure the children of slaves were no sent back to Africa, and, has been used by liberals to insure all those born here are automatically made citizens!”
Here’s the problem with that statement: it is an INTERPRETATION that is NOT actually embodied in the amendment itself. If the writers of Amendment intended for it to only apply to the children of slave, they SHOULD HAVE SAID SO. They did not, therefore it applies to all children born on US soil.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:38 am
Dave – my gramma went through Ellis Island, but my granpa crossed from Canada into NY without showing nary a paper – that was back in the 19-teens
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
11:38 am
OK, USinUK, I gotta ask.
What are sausage rolls and what significance do they have with Guy Fawkes? Are they just tradition as our hot dogs and hamburgers are for the 4th?
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:39 am
Kam – I like to think there are three kinds of people …
those who can count and those who can’t
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:39 am
Dave – what hot dogs are to the US, sausages are to the UK
mmmmmmm …. sausages …
SKH
July 5th, 2011
11:40 am
“Without immigration, America could not have grown in oppulence, abundance, and become the leader that it is now!”
I wasn’t aware that fetuses immigrate to other countries. I don’t understand the logic of awarding citizenship to people simply born here; it seems irrational to me. We don’t call a calf born on a pig farm a piglet and we don’t call a baby born on a tour of a Vanderbilt mansion rich, yet we call the offspring of illegal immigrants legal citizens. Is it me (doing his best Martin Short imitation)?
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
11:41 am
“What are sausage rolls ”
Dave R., is sadly a sheltered person.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
11:42 am
SKH,
Because all of those scenarios are the same and all
geez.
josef
July 5th, 2011
11:42 am
USinUK
Dose Cajuns immigrated during the Spanish period at the invitation of the Spanish authorities…it was the Haitians in 1810 that caused the first of our immigration crises…
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
11:42 am
USinUK, I certainly think we had a better handle on immigration before this influx. Heck, both sets of my grandparents were from the Canadian Maritime Provinces (New Brunswick and Newfoundland).
All came in legally and 3 of the 4 became citizens (one died before making the grade).
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
11:43 am
“I don’t understand the logic of awarding citizenship to people simply born here”
Then here’s your opportunity to start a movement to repeal that section of the 14th amendment, but until you are successful (but don’t hold your breath) it will still be the law of the land.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
11:43 am
Uncle Jed, a very thoughtful post! I will consider it in some detail when I have more time.
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
11:43 am
No, Bosch, just VERY particular about what I consume . . .
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
11:46 am
Dave R.,
How can you go wrong consuming a sausage roll? I mean, it’s a sausage and a roll — two of life’s finest pleasures. Just don’t get hung up too much on what is actually in the sausage and you’re fine!!
DebbieDoRight
July 5th, 2011
11:47 am
Sorry Dusty – I couldn’t resist:
Dusty: Blogging liberals are those who think insulting anyone who does not agree with their “compassionate” ideas. should be insulted and called liars, bigots and stupid for not agreeing with their particular compassion.
BushSheeeEt Dusty! Let’s try a quick look back at this subject alone. Start with the first post and go as far as the first page, who starts with the name calling and asinine comments? If you said the conserves you’d be correct.
(Conserves) They object to lies, corrections, and insults. They are not without fault but stand firm on execution of laws, good limited government, low taxes and support of the military. Their goal is a strong country of independent people.
Have you been smoking crack early in the morning?! Object to lies and insults, (the object to correction part was dead on), they object to the truth – it’s like kryptonite to them. Most conserves want big business to make this country into another feudal england — what they fail to understand is that big business only cares about profit. A Utopia for big business would be the pre-inspection, pre-pro labor serfdom . They would love for all of the “little” people to return to being uneducated tools that can be manipulated and used to make big business omnipotent.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:48 am
Dave – sausage rolls with HP sauce — proof of a benevolent god who loves us
josef – fine … last half of the 1700s, mister stickler-for-details
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
11:48 am
SKH
July 5th, 2011
11:43 am
Uncle Jed, a very thoughtful post! I will consider it in some detail when I have more time.
SKH, while you are contemplating, you might want ask Uncle Jed where he stole that post from.
Adam
July 5th, 2011
11:49 am
The Mother of All No Brainers
Even your conservative supporters think you are nuts, GOP “leaders.” Time to get with the program, or prepare to lose BIG in 2012.
DawgDad
July 5th, 2011
11:51 am
Couldn’t make it past paragraph two. Words rotting on the page.
If the Federal Government cannot manage immigration, work permits, and our borders, which they’ve proven they cannot, why in Heaven’s name would we allow them to manage our health care?
Doggone/GA
July 5th, 2011
11:52 am
” why in Heaven’s name would we allow them to manage our health care”
Rest easy, we haven’t asked them to
Uncle Jed
July 5th, 2011
11:52 am
SKH, while you are contemplating, you might want ask Uncle Jed where he stole that post from.
Well, Bosch, if you feel I stole my words from someone please enlighten me as to the author. I have no way no know if my thoughts align with another’s, but I can assure you those words were mine, typos and all, my friend. I am not insulted, nor do I seek an apology. Do as you are led.
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
11:53 am
Yep — “we certainly could incent these illegals to self deport by:”
Did you read my 10:50 post? I think that would be a lot simpler and less costly than all the items you’re proposing.
1. Placing an ICE agent at every “choke point” for accessing our governmental services like; healthcare, welfare, schools, etc.”
And do what? Say “papers, please” to everyone who tries to enter? This seems incredibly intrusive — especially for citizens, particularly burdensome — most children can’t substantiate their citizenship, and also quite costly.
“2. Denying any entitlement program to non-citizens or requesting their proof of citizenship to continue on a program. A good example would be; allowing for an illegal to receive treatment at a hospital, but if they could not pay for their care, they get a one-way ticket to their country of origin after returning to health, with threat of incarceration if they ever return..”
It is very difficult to affirmatively *prove* citizenship, so your proposal seems burdensome and predicated on a presumption of guilt.
@@
July 5th, 2011
11:53 am
For those that CLAIM to be waiting to hear solutions, this one was offered back in May 2011:
$500 fine for employing illegals first time, $1,000 second time, and so on until its simply not affordable to businesses to hire them. The proceeds of the fines more than pays for the new force of employment verifiers.
If a business says it has a hardship need for those employees cause American workers can’t be found then they can immediately file for those workers under a guest worker program. That way the worker is documented- we know who they are. The legal worker has to then pay a 10% surcharge on their earnings as a tax for the privilege of working here. This will help pay for the burden they put on our education system, social svcs system, criminal justice system, etc.–Thulsa Doom
There was another offered by a conservative blogger just recently…can’t remember who it was though.
A lot of thought has to go into a solution, not just feel-good emotion.
These are stimulants that may unnaturally make you feel good in the short term, but have long-term negative consequences for emotional health and general well-being..
josef
July 5th, 2011
11:54 am
DAVE
Immigration was not at all regulated back then…that’s why “they” were able to come in the millions…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_immigration_legislation
SKH
July 5th, 2011
11:54 am
“Then here’s your opportunity to start a movement to repeal that section of the 14th amendment, but until you are successful (but don’t hold your breath) it will still be the law of the land.”
Repeal? I believe all that is needed is a statute by Congress to clarify the amendment. Otherwise, you’re right, I won’t hold my breath – at least until a global economic depression effects some change in thinking.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
11:55 am
Adam,
Read that this morning, I liked this:
But we can have no confidence that the Republicans will seize this opportunity. That’s because the Republican Party may no longer be a normal party. Over the past few years, it has been infected by a faction that is more of a psychological protest than a practical, governing alternative.
The members of this movement do not accept the logic of compromise, no matter how sweet the terms. If you ask them to raise taxes by an inch in order to cut government by a foot, they will say no. If you ask them to raise taxes by an inch to cut government by a yard, they will still say no.
The members of this movement do not accept the legitimacy of scholars and intellectual authorities. A thousand impartial experts may tell them that a default on the debt would have calamitous effects, far worse than raising tax revenues a bit. But the members of this movement refuse to believe it.
The members of this movement have no sense of moral decency. A nation makes a sacred pledge to pay the money back when it borrows money. But the members of this movement talk blandly of default and are willing to stain their nation’s honor.
The members of this movement have no economic theory worthy of the name. Economists have identified many factors that contribute to economic growth, ranging from the productivity of the work force to the share of private savings that is available for private investment. Tax levels matter, but they are far from the only or even the most important factor.
But to members of this movement, tax levels are everything. Members of this tendency have taken a small piece of economic policy and turned it into a sacred fixation. They are willing to cut education and research to preserve tax expenditures. Manufacturing employment is cratering even as output rises, but members of this movement somehow believe such problems can be addressed so long as they continue to worship their idol.
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:56 am
“If the Federal Government cannot manage immigration, work permits, and our borders, which they’ve proven they cannot, why in Heaven’s name would we allow them to manage our health care?”
sweet jeebus – talk about one of these things is not like the other.
thank god we don’t let them manage the military’s health care … oh, wait …
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
11:56 am
“at least until a global economic depression effects some change in thinking”
Geez, SKH, were you visiting another planet in September ‘08?
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:57 am
“$500 fine for employing illegals first time, $1,000 second time”
meh – slap on the wrist.
here, employers are fined up to £10K PER ILLEGAL
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
11:58 am
Bosch – 11:56 –
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
11:58 am
Adam,
In other words, I like the way Brooks refers to the GOP as a “movement.”
Wayno
July 5th, 2011
12:00 pm
If GA Ag farmers would pay $20 an hour and allow workers to collectively bargain, hell, yes they’d have an All-American labor force that would do the job! These farmers brought all their troubles on themselves! $8 an hour and STFU attitudes by farmers need to change!
Paulo977
July 5th, 2011
12:00 pm
USinUK
“hope everyone had a lovely 4th!”
Oh yes from Dekalb .We had rain , thunder ..very welcome AND a power outage!!!
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
12:01 pm
USinUK,
OMG, maybe SKH is really Interplanet Janet!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDre36ZW14I
josef
July 5th, 2011
12:01 pm
USinUK
I wasn’t being particularly a stickler for details, but I was trying to point our (not particularly to you) that the matter of what to do with “those people” goes way back and has been political from the get-go in our national view. The 1810 one I mentioned was a stink and a half with all kinds of fall outs. Bottom line, the Anglais were at the time hellbent on anglicizing Louisiana when, wham, in one fell swoop the population of New Orleans doubled and they were French speakers…this following the Alien and Sedition Acts aimed at checking the fall out from the French Revolution…the Adams lot were skeered that “our America” was being “infected” with those dangerous thoughs…
APS
July 5th, 2011
12:02 pm
They would love for all of the “little” people to return to being uneducated tools that can be manipulated and used to make big business omnipotent.- Debbiedoright
The evidence suggests that its the Democrats who want all the people to be uneducated tools. If you don’t believe that than look at the APS news on the homepage of the AJC today. The big education teacher’s unions and the Democrats who run school boards in most of the big cities couldn’t give 2 flips about whether or not the kids are being educated. They care solely about their jobs, their pay, political power, and patronage. The idea that the Democrats actually care about educating kids is ludicrous when they vehemently oppose any efforts to actually educate the kids or when they oppose efforts to try any new ideas such as charter schools, vouchers, testing standards, etc.
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
12:02 pm
Bosch, I just didn’t know if the British had just come up with another quirky name for another meal.
You know, like “bangers and mash”?
Dusty
July 5th, 2011
12:02 pm
Children born in America of illegal parents have the “sins” of illegality placed upon their head. The children are legal and the parents are not. It is a sad dilemma created by the illegals themselves. Now they want someone else to correct the problem they created. How human and wishful!
But laws are made for the good of the country and its citizens, not for the advantage of a few. If we are a democratic republic, the majority rules by established law based on our constitution.. That has to be the role our country must play. Anarchy is not a goal we wish to achieve.
josef
July 5th, 2011
12:03 pm
DAVE
Ooops…make that “not at all WELL regulated!” Don’t want to be called a liar here!
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
12:03 pm
josef – I hear ya! folks seem to think the “porous border” is a new phenomenon
Paulo – lightening + thunder = free lightshow!
Paulo977
July 5th, 2011
12:04 pm
USinUK
“sweet jeebus – talk about one of these things is not like the other.”
HaaaaaaaaaHaaaaaa…now you understand WHY some important measures are being stalled here!!!!
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
July 5th, 2011
12:04 pm
Well, let’s cut the bull-hockey and get to the point. If these illegals became citizens and were going to vote Republican, most of us Conservatives would be fine with the path to citizenship. But we know good and well they’ll vote librul Democrat. Maybe because we insulted them a little and called them a few names and made sure they had a rough time. So I say deport them all right now! Case closed! If you find a illegal that’s a sure-fire Republican, come talk to me then.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
12:04 pm
“SKH, while you are contemplating, you might want ask Uncle Jed where he stole that post from.”
I doubt your accusation has any merit, but why don’t you enlighten me? I have an MA in English and taught writing in colleges for about 5 years, so I usually have a good nose for plagiarism. In order for you to make a truthful accusation like this, you must be familiar with the original material. Point me to it, please. But if your accusation is baseless, what do you deserve? What does a woman who accuses an innocent man of rape deserve? If you have made a false accusation, why do it? You don’t really score any points that way and you lose credibility here. One doesn’t HAVE to be right, you know (because, despite strong feelings to the contrary, we often are wrong – LOL).
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
12:05 pm
Dave – mmmmm … bangers and mash with onion gravy … nomnomnom …
don’t forget bubble and squeak! (leftover potatoes and brussel sprouts – you have it on Boxing Day)
Watermelon
July 5th, 2011
12:05 pm
I just paid $2.67 over the weekend for a big, juicy watermelon from walmark the other day. They had pleny of em and at cheap prices. So what was Jay sayin bout all the handpicked crops like watermelons rotting in the fields?
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
12:06 pm
Thinking that David Brooks is a conservative supporter is nuts.
josef
July 5th, 2011
12:06 pm
APS
You have no idea what you’re blabbering about…why? Teachers’ Unions? In Georgia? It’s pretty hard to exert the kind of power you allude to when they don’t exist….
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
12:06 pm
SKH,
Yeah, cause it’s so much more credible to compare my accusation of plagarism to a woman accusing a dude of raping her.
professional skeptic
July 5th, 2011
12:07 pm
Tamika
July 5th, 2011
8:38 am
The last time we did an amnesty, we just fueled the demand for another amnesty.
The same will hold true for hoarders of offshore profits, with regard to tax holidays.
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
12:07 pm
USinUK — “meh – slap on the wrist. here, employers are fined up to £10K PER ILLEGAL”
What’s the GBP – USD exchange rate lately? About a buck sixty? So that’d be $16,000 per violation?
That sounds about right. PER GUY PER DAY. Under that plan, employing a single illegal for 90 days would cost upwards of $1.4 million.
If being here illegally is such an OMIGODCALLOUTTHENATIONALGUARD moment, then surely the penalties associated with *employing* such threats to the good order of society should be harsh as well.
Paul
July 5th, 2011
12:07 pm
[[“If the Federal Government cannot manage immigration, work permits, and our borders, which they’ve proven they cannot, why in Heaven’s name would we allow them to manage our health care?”
sweet jeebus – talk about one of these things is not like the other.]]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ect-kgxBb4M
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
12:07 pm
Dave – David Brooks IS a conservative. no matter how you slice it.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
12:07 pm
“Thinking that David Brooks is a conservative supporter is nuts.”
Nope Dave R., it just goes to show how loopy and hard right the GOP has gone.
He’s yours — own him.
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
12:07 pm
“don’t forget bubble and squeak!”
With names like that Lord knows WHAT they could have done to “sausage rolls”.
Left wing management
July 5th, 2011
12:08 pm
USinUK: “Dave – David Brooks IS a conservative. no matter how you slice it.”
What’s a “conservative” ?
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
12:09 pm
David Brooks may be a liberal’s idea of a conservative, but he’s not conservative.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
12:10 pm
“Geez, SKH, were you visiting another planet in September ‘08?”
No, but neither have I seen any soup lines. Who is saying we are now in a depression? My parents grew up in the Great Depression and (being the very curious sort) I have interviewed many people of their generation about what it was really like. Again, have you a point to make?
Logical Dude
July 5th, 2011
12:10 pm
I just think wayyy too much:
Dusty: Children born in America of illegal parents have the “sins” of illegality placed upon their head. The children are legal and the parents are not. It is a sad dilemma created by the illegals themselves.
But why would anyone want their child born in a different country if they cannot be legal residents? Is it because their own country is SO bad, that just giving their child the opportunity to be an American Citizen is worth any punishment?
What would the solution be? Should we fix the other countries so it’s not worth coming to the United States to have a child?
Or, should we destroy the US economy so that we are worse than the other countries? That seems to be the thoughts of those who would allow the US to default on its debt.
So, I see the logic and reasoning of those who want the US to default on the debt. It’s to get rid of all those illegals!
Keep Up the Good Fight!
July 5th, 2011
12:10 pm
Personally, I go for bratwurst on a bun over hotdogs anyday! And in some states that is the standard!
And no insult directed at USinUK, but last time I was in London and Bournemouth, I found the “bangers” to be mild as a generic hotdog.
Oldtimer
July 5th, 2011
12:11 pm
Do not give able-bodied US citizens unemployment benefits during planting and harvest seasons. Provide them with job applications for vacant agricultural positions. Provide them with gas money or transportation to jobsites – even provide small per diem subsistence if necessary until first pay check. No one is too good for farm work. I did it. It is honest work.
Paul
July 5th, 2011
12:11 pm
Bosch
With a few hits from Brooks and Will, maybe a bit of ‘what have we done?” will hit the Republican Party.
Naw, they’ll just be branded as RINOs.
Ever studied the stages of moral development? How it starts out, at the very bottom level, with everything black/white, yes/no, within the lines/out of the lines? I think that stage has been relabeled “Republican thought, 2011.”
USinUK
July 5th, 2011
12:11 pm
dave – or maybe conservatives have skewed so ridiculously far to the right that anyone to the left of them looks like a socialist
Left wing management
July 5th, 2011
12:13 pm
Dave R.: “David Brooks may be a liberal’s idea of a conservative, but he’s not conservative.”
What I figured.
So, again, what’s a ‘conservative’?
Is Ronald Reagan a conservative? Sounds like he might have been an amnesty-loving, starry-eyed pinko to me.
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
12:13 pm
Dave — “With names like that Lord knows WHAT they could have done to “sausage rolls”.
It may be a haul for you, but on the Marietta Square, there is an Australian Bakery that serves sausage rolls (no idea if they are like the British version), but what my wife and I go there for are the MEAT PIES. They’re a bit like minced/ground meat Pop-Tarts,with a soft bread crust. Some have mushrooms, some have onions, some have a lot of black pepper, but they’re all quite tasty. And they make a pork pie that I understand is very much in the British style. When we go, we get a few extra beef pies and stick them in the freezer. Three minutes in the microwave and you have a hot, tasty lunch.
Well worth a stop IMO if you happen to be in the area.
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
12:14 pm
Somebody needs to give up their blog name after that 12:10 post . . .
Just sayin’ !
Dusty
July 5th, 2011
12:14 pm
DebbieDoRight 11:47
Don’t apologize! I love it when you comment on what I post. You always prove my point.. And you did it again. You are one of the most typical of liberal bloggers but more entertaining and straight from outer space. Always fun, dear one. Always.
Logical Dude
July 5th, 2011
12:15 pm
Meat pies
Bangers & Mash
Sausage Rolls
okay, now I”m hungry! lunch time!
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
12:15 pm
“dave – or maybe conservatives have skewed so ridiculously far to the right that anyone to the left of them looks like a socialist”
Possibly so, USinUK.
Joe The Plumber too.
July 5th, 2011
12:15 pm
amvet, my favorite dimwit, sorry to take so long to get back to you, I was out working to recharge the ebt cards for your offsprings offspring. Exactly, whom am I a racist about, black folks, nope, white people, nope, asians, don’t think so, hispanics, I think not as my oldest two sons are of hispanic decent. Someone needs to explain to you that dimocraps are not a race, they are just the biggest thorn in my bag of bigotry. Followed closely by illegal aliens of all colors. Perhaps if you looked up the meaning of certain words you wouldn’t come across most of the time as a complete fool.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
12:16 pm
“Yeah, cause it’s so much more credible to compare my accusation of plagarism to a woman accusing a dude of raping her.”
Sometimes exaggeration makes a point more strongly. The problem is accusing people falsely – try doing that in court about any criminal offense and see what happens if you get caught. Why is it okay in a blog but not in court? Is it okay for people to come over to your house and dump drinks and food on your furniture and carpet? No. But it is apparently okay for everyone to do that in a movie theatre. Why? The only explanation I can come up with is double standards.
I apologize if I offended you by possibly implying you were a rapist; I was not at all.
Jay
July 5th, 2011
12:16 pm
APS cheating sheets upstairs
Logical Dude
July 5th, 2011
12:17 pm
Dave R. Somebody needs to give up their blog name after that 12:10 post . . .
LOL. I did toss in the caveat that “I think wayyy too much”
Sometimes my mind goes into other places and makes odd connections.
It helps sometimes, but sometimes I get connections like my 12:10 post. Not that it’s true, but it sure is fun to run down some of the alleys my brain goes.
Dave R.
July 5th, 2011
12:18 pm
“Is Ronald Reagan a conservative?”
Largely, yes. But he was also a realist when it came to what could be passed by Congress. However, very few politicians retain their core principles once elected.
Paulo977
July 5th, 2011
12:20 pm
Logical Dude
July 5th, 2011
12:15 pm
Meat pies
Bangers & Mash
Sausage Rolls
And Yorkshire Pudding!!!
Adam
July 5th, 2011
12:20 pm
Bosch: Yeah I found the “movement” comment funny too.
Also, gotta love how quickly he is disowned. I mean, most conservatives do NOT support the medicare portion of the Ryan plan, but if you say anything bad about the plan you are EXCOMMUNICATED. This disowning of David Brooks is more of the same.
Tundra Dude
July 5th, 2011
12:21 pm
The answer to this dilemma will come not in piecemeal state legislation, but in a federal law that simultaneously tightens laws against hiring of illegal labor while offering those already here a path to citizenship. Anything else is fruitless.
I think you’re right on.
Problem is, as long as it’s “fruitful” for politicians to be perceived as being tough on Illegals, most proposed solutions will be fruitless, imo.
ps: It’s nonsense to suggest they go back and apply legally. A Tucson attorney sez they’re still processing applications from the 1990’s!
Left wing management
July 5th, 2011
12:22 pm
USin: “dave – or maybe conservatives have skewed so ridiculously far to the right that anyone to the left of them looks like a socialist”
Yep.
The irony here is that American conservativism, which is based on a certain principled moderation, in perceived opposition to the excesses of the French enlightenment, is now a movement of pure radicalism. Everything it has ever fought, it now embodies in even more radical form. Just take “judicial activism” as one example.
You know William F. Buckley tried to blackball the Koch brothers for a reason. But tragically he failed. Anybody on this board going under the rubric ‘conservative’ ever even heard of William F. Buckley?
Mr Right
July 5th, 2011
12:23 pm
Joe Mama—- If you are too stupid to recognize that illegal immigration and our national debt are two different topics, then I am afraid I cannot help you.
Yall libs are saying we can’t afford the money to secure our borders so it would there is some connection! Sorry if you are SOOOO— SMART that you can’t see it !
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
12:24 pm
LWM — “Anybody on this board going under the rubric ‘conservative’ ever even heard of William F. Buckley?”
Yes. I subscribed to his “National Review” many years ago.
Darwin
July 5th, 2011
12:26 pm
Excellent article Jay. You hit the nail on the head. Of course, you won’t change the right wing thought process here – which is denial. What is great is the higher food prices that will result. Then the righties will blame Obama.
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
12:26 pm
Mr Right — “Yall libs are saying we can’t afford the money to secure our borders so it would there is some connection!”
And yet I said *nothing* about it, yet you made it your primary criticism. Once again, you utterly fail to engage on what’s being discussed, and instead make crap up and pretend that someone else (in this case, me) actually said it.
Is it at all possible for you to be honest?
“Sorry if you are SOOOO— SMART that you can’t see it !”
Did you actually have any substantive criticism of the suggestion I posted, or are you just going to pitch a fit as usual?
Left wing management
July 5th, 2011
12:26 pm
Dave R.: “Largely, yes. But he was also a realist when it came to what could be passed by Congress.”
That’s a fair enough assessment of things.
However, very few politicians retain their core principles once elected.
Tell me about it, brother.
Hope and change, anyone?
Schrodinger's cat
July 5th, 2011
12:30 pm
who;s winning today?
DebbieDoRight
July 5th, 2011
12:33 pm
OMG, maybe SKH is really Interplanet Janet!!
ROTFLMAO!!!
Mr Right
July 5th, 2011
12:34 pm
Once again, you utterly fail to engage on what’s being discussed, and instead make crap up and pretend that someone else (in this case, me) actually said it.
Sorry Joe Mama, You know since I’m so stupid I do those things!
Joe Mama
July 5th, 2011
12:39 pm
Mr Right — “Sorry Joe Mama, You know since I’m so stupid I do those things!”
Well, that certainly would explain it.
Look, I had a suggestion that I thought would *eliminate* the reason for illegals to come here and which would encourage those illegals who were already here to split ASAP. Did you have a substantive criticism of that idea or not?
Did you even READ it?
SKH
July 5th, 2011
12:42 pm
“What’s a “conservative” ?”
That is a very good question. Terms really need to be defined if they are to have any real meaning. Though I would be considered one, I personally dislike the word, because some of the positions taken by “conservatives” have not been conservative at all. I’m thinking, for instance, of the overly pro-business positions of conservatives that have not (within reason) really conserved the environment (I’m not talking about saving a brown mouse, but polluting the environment and causing people to get cancer as a result). The fact is, liberals are not always wrong and conservatives are not always right (flip that around if you are a liberal).
Dusty
July 5th, 2011
12:44 pm
Logical Dude 12:10
You take taken an illogical route from illegal immigrants with legal children to somehow default on the US debt. That is twisted logic a snake couldn’t follow.
We can pretty much guess at why illegals come here. Mostly economic reasons. There is some reason to believe that they think their legal children will anchor them here. Not so.
There is little reason to believe that the economy of the USA depends on illegal labor. I do not believe that agriculture will stop and food plants close without them. That is pure conjecture expounded by activists and journalists needing bloggers.
NO, we do not “rebuild or remake” Mexico, Guatamala, etc. That is their job. We will only if they have weapons of mass destruction or practice genocide.
Now, what was it you wanted illegal immigrants to do? Uphold/lift the debt limit? I believe they could help by going to their legal country. They can work on Mexico or wherever. We, legal US citizens will work on the debt limit There’s no doubt about THAT..
. .
Dusty
July 5th, 2011
12:50 pm
Awwww LOgical dude has already said he isn’t logical. Off to the new “sheet”. About time…
Aquagirl
July 5th, 2011
12:52 pm
Obama is spineless and doesn’t love America!
BOB FROM ACCOUNT TEMPS
July 5th, 2011
12:55 pm
ayan rant – acceptance of all who are willing to work and to adapt to the rudiments of our culture. there in lies the rub. they do not want to be part of the american culture and demand extra rights to boot.
SwedeAtlanta
July 5th, 2011
12:59 pm
While progress continues in automating many of the tasks associated with agriculture including improving crop varieties to be more appropriate for machine harvesting, the reality is there will always be a certain amount of agricultural related work that will need to be done by hand.
For those that underestimate the impact a complete shutdown of illegal agricultural workers would have on supply and price, think again. It won’t be a “little more” for a pound of tomatoes, etc. it will be a significant rise.
Why? Because the vast majority of Americans have no interest in doing the back-breaking work.Many Americans are not physically capable of doing the work (given obesity rates) and would not do the work in the hot summer sun for 10 hours a day.
It would take a huge rise in wages to lure some Americans to man the fields. I for one wouldn’t do that back-breaking work for anything less than $18-20 an hour and then only if the job came with benefits.
The prescription would likely mean a doubling in the price of domestic agricultural products that are dependent on manual labor. That will either be highly inflationary or will drive domestic producers out of the market and more of our produce, etc. would come from other countries where we have less oversight on the use of pesticides, etc.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
1:04 pm
“what they [conservatives] fail to understand is that big business only cares about profit.”
I would be considered conservative by most anyone, but I don’t fail to realize that. The apostle Paul wrote that the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. That is either true or it’s not. I believe it is and have had that belief confirmed by personal experience. I haven’t thought about this a lot and don’t know what the solution is. But I also know that government does a pretty bad job at doing most anything (though I will grant it has done some things well). I think you’d have to be willfully ignorant of the facts to think otherwise. So I guess the question is how can government wisely and effectively temper the excesses of greed?
DebbieDoRight
July 5th, 2011
1:07 pm
APS: The evidence suggests that its the Democrats who want all the people to be uneducated tools. If you don’t believe that than look at the APS news on the homepage of the AJC today. The big education teacher’s unions and the Democrats who run school boards in most of the big cities couldn’t give 2 flips about whether or not the kids are being educated.
Yes, yes I know — it’s all the evil Teacher’s Union fault for wanting to be paid what they’re worth!! It’s all the evil teacher’s union’s fault for cutting salaries and education budgets. It’s all the Evil teachers’ union fault for trying to put “creative design” on stickers in Cobb county schools. It’s all the Evil Teacher’s Union’s fault for trying to rewrite history, by adding disclaimer’s to science books, and by taking out the arts, humanities and physical education in the budget.
Darn those EVIL TEACHER’S UNIONS!!!!! Darn them to HELL!!!
Logical Dude
July 5th, 2011
1:08 pm
Dusty: Now, what was it you wanted illegal immigrants to do? Uphold/lift the debt limit?
Well, if we legalize ‘em all, then they’d be sucked into the taxpayer system, so they’d likely HELP the debt limit by paying their own insurance, taxes, etc, etc, etc.
It’s a lot cheaper than rounding ‘em all up and sending ‘em all back.
Bosch
July 5th, 2011
1:08 pm
“Ever studied the stages of moral development?”
Paul,
Isn’t that Abraham Maslow among others? I liked his little pyriamid thing. You see lots here that seem to never get past the whole “safety” level.
Tundra Dude
July 5th, 2011
1:24 pm
SwedeAtlanta@12:59 wrote, in part:
For those that underestimate the impact a complete shutdown of illegal agricultural workers would have on supply and price, think again.
—————-
The good news is, most Georgia crops are non-essential. No one’s ever been diagnosed with a deficiency of onions, peanuts, pecans, peanuts,or corn. Cotton’s not as critical as in the past.
The prescription would likely mean a doubling in the price of domestic agricultural products that are dependent on manual labor
———————
Not even close. The pickers typically earn a few % of the retail price of crops. I bought one cuke yesterday for 69 cents. The picker (in NC) get about 3 cents for a half-pound cuke. Tomato pickers in So. Florida get a whopping 2 cents per pound. (maybe more for the vine-ripened?) Doubling their wages would only add pennies to the retail price, it seems.
DwayneL
July 5th, 2011
1:32 pm
The only thing that matters is that these people are illegal criminals that broke our country’s laws to get here and many of them break more laws when here. They need to be deported immediately! The framers will find people or new ways to get their crops to market.
SwedeAtlanta
July 5th, 2011
1:35 pm
Tundra Dude
I don’t disagree that many of Georgia’s crops are non-essential. The broader issue is if we as a country do not recognize that a substantial amount of the U.S. domestic produce is in one form or another dependent on workers that are willing to do the back-breaking work. I for one would prefer a program that permitted them to come her legally and a system that enabled us to track them and ensure that when the season was over they returned to their home country.
As for doubling of cost….we aren’t talking about the picker getting 3 cents for a cuke. We are talking about Americans demanding $20+ per hour plus benefits to do the work. So how many cucumbers does that picker pick today in an hour? If he picks 100 he gets $3.00 according to your statistics. I am suggesting the wages will be 6-7 times that if we cut off a supply of pickers.
I do not see any scenario under which you are going to get any substantial number of Americans to go do this work without it being financially worth their while and even then most Americans don’t want to or will not do that kind of work.
reusha2000
July 5th, 2011
1:42 pm
Jay, You miss, your Mexico Legal Citizens-USA Illegal Aliens?
Farmers receive subsidies from the government and want to continue receiving ILLEGAL taxpayer funded subsidies, through education, healthcare, foodstamps, and now trying to do the dream act again!!
You invite them all to “your House”!! The farmers owe the taxpayers and citizens, for the deaths of loved ones by ILLEGAL Aliens!!
The Crop Picking is not your worry, stay out of it!!
The farmers will adjust without Illegal Aliens!!
Go do the work you said you needed so bad
July 5th, 2011
1:49 pm
Everyone got what they wanted. They are gone so why are you people still on here bad mouthing them? I have read for years that you people needed the jobs, so there they are. You people obviously didn’t need a job that bad or you wouldn’t be on here still complaining. I know as well as anybody that the real reason you don’t like people from other countries has nothing to do with their citezenship status. You don’t like them because they don’t eat like you, look like you, or talk like you. They do not belong here illegally. They broke a law. They do need to be punished just like anyone else. But what everyone is commenting on has nothing to do with laws. You don’t like them so you run them off. Why not make them pay for their crimes here in the U.S.? If an American goes to Mexico or any other country, does he not get punished and sentenced there in that country? What is sending them back teaching them? They have money saved up and thats all they need to get back here. Teach them a lesson. Scaring them out of a state is not going to work. They will just move. Otherwise, quit hiding behind your computer and do something about it instead of filling up these comment boards. Come on there are 357 comments about nothing but hating hispanics. America is supposedly about pitching in and standing together. Well if those crops need to be picked, Why not pick them? Show the hispanics you don’t need them.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
1:59 pm
“The evidence suggests that its the Democrats who want all the people to be uneducated tools.”
I think you are greatly overshooting the mark here. Education is something I know and have thought about a bit. First, let me suggest that the biggest problem with the educational system is NOT the system (though that is deeply flawed), but poor parenting. Parents don’t do a good job of teaching their kids how to behave and instilling values and aspirations in them. Instead, they sedate or babysit them with drugs, television and video games. And should a teacher ever suggest their little Johnny or Suzy has misbehaved, a lawsuit is impending.
As for the system itself, I believe this is yet another instance of government (not necessarily Democrats) doing something badly. For one thing, it apportions far too much of its budget to physical plants (bright, shiny new school buildings) rather than to the people without whom education wouldn’t be possible: the teachers. You could almost teach kids in a barn with more good, well-paid teachers with much smaller class sizes and get far better results. Does anyone aside from a teacher or mother know how insane it is to stuff 30-35 kids in a classroom and expect a teacher to be effective teaching them five to six times a day? I’m certified to teach at the secondary level. Am I doing that? No! I make twice or three times what a teacher makes developing software. I love teaching, but it doesn’t love me.
For another thing, it now micromanages everything a teacher must do. Can you imagine Socrates following an extensive state-mandated curriculum? I think great teaching comes from a teacher’s individual expression of his or her desire or passion to turn a light bulb on in someone else’s head. It’s kind of a talent – either you have it or you don’t. We can reasonably expect teacher to cover essential material without making them slaves to some form of ritualized transference of knowledge.
For a third thing, sitting at a desk for 7 hours is NOT conducive to learning. Sure, some naturally academic types will do well in that setting (and perhaps always have), but most probably learn best by seeing (or reading) and doing – by moving around and physically engaging the subject matter.
For a last thing, it often forces most students through high school on a largely academic track. Let’s face it, not everyone is born to be a physicist or doctor. There’s is nothing wrong with that – and it doesn’t necessarily relate to intelligence. There should be a universal academic and technical track for students to pursue in high school (like there is in England). Why make a boy with a love of cars and an aptitude for troubleshooting sit in a desk for 4 years?
HEAR YE ALL LIBS
July 5th, 2011
2:03 pm
Question for you Libs. Why oh why, on Gods green earth would you want to work so hard for what you have, only to have the govt take MORE of it away to give to people that aren’t worth a damn? And… those people feel they are entitled to your money?
Then lastly…. who the hell gives you the right to decide for ME, what’s the best use of MY money? Just curious as to how that brain thinks so illogically.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
2:06 pm
“The broader issue is if we as a country do not recognize that a substantial amount of the U.S. domestic produce is in one form or another dependent on workers that are willing to do the back-breaking work. ”
How about this for a solution: establish a voluntary program for inmates at minimum security prisons to work at various low paying jobs “no one will take” (moving them around to different jobs to broaden their work experience) and place most of the money they earn aside in escrow for them. That way, when they get out, they will have 1) real work experience 2) money to get them started in a new, better life and 3) hope for a future. Has this ever been tried?
@SKH
July 5th, 2011
2:10 pm
Yes… it’s been tried. Sort of. People on parole were given the jobs and paid the same rate. They were “less than productive” at best. Many of the migrant workers are used to the very hot and punishing labor that they do day in and day out, therefore they were able to go at it, full speed all day long. The paroled workers started later, took more breaks, worked slower and quit earlier.
They also complained more.
SwedeAtlanta
July 5th, 2011
2:15 pm
Ref Hear Ye All Libs
I don’t know where you get the idea that liberals want the government to take more of our money and give it to others. I don’t know of a progresssive or liberal that is so cavailer about their money. The philosophical difference between many conservatives and liberals/progressives is that convservaties want to very strictly limit what government does beliving that the private sector and/or charity can do the other things. Liberals and proressives believe that there is a role for government beyond the military.
Do you consider yourself a spiritual person? Maybe even a Christian? Who are you to place a value on “people who aren’t worth a damn”. If you are a Christian that statement shows how little you understand your own faith.
And who gives you the right to decide for me what is the best use for my money? I for one want the military budget cut by 70% and spend that money here at home. But I can’t make that decision because I live in a society that has made a value decision that military spending is important. I can try to influence the discussion and vote for candidates that support my values but I have to accept that others will indeed influence and/or decide how my money is spent. That is the sacrifice I make for living in a civilized society. The only way to avoid that is to find an island and be a world unto yourself.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
2:21 pm
“Yes… it’s been tried. Sort of. ”
Then I would guess there is a problem in the implementation of the idea. To my thinking, it’s all about attitude. I wasn’t talking about paroles, first of all. I was thinking about people (such as those in prison) who might be eager for such an opportunity. Second of all, maybe there needs to be some kind of football camp or boot camp instruction (teaching not drills) to help these people get a better attitude about things – someone to shout at them, make them angry and perhaps think like they never have before. A good many of these people may have been failed by their parents in one way or another, and really don’t (from an experiential point of view) know their right hand from their left. Lastly, maybe allowing convicts to lounge around watching television, lifting weights and fighting each other is not conducive to reform. So maybe that has to change first.
poison pen
July 5th, 2011
2:24 pm
Doggone/GA
“The illegals have a child here and then use that SS# to scam the Govt. this is only one way”
” If that child is born on US soil, then you are talking about a US Citizen.”
Doggone, Read the piece that I posted to and you will see what I said. Everybody knows that their child is a US citizen, they use the childs SS # to get free aid, while the parents are illegals.
You always ask for facts so I presented them to you.
poison pen
July 5th, 2011
2:27 pm
Bosch
” No poison it doesn’t, because that wasn’t an absolute sweeping genrealization about a group of people or a false statement. There are two neighborhoods in my town where most of the inhabitants (I’d say about 90%) have up and left. If you don’t believe me, I simply do not care.”
Bosch, What town & what neighborhood? Maybe someone else on this site lives there and they can coorborate your claim.
poison pen
July 5th, 2011
2:35 pm
Well it looks like we have another OJ jury, Casey Anthony gets away with MURDER.
GT
July 5th, 2011
2:38 pm
The nature of this country and particularly the south is to not stay in lock step, and it was only a matter of time before even the hard header would break from the pack. I watch the New Hampshire Republican debate a few weeks ago. I have never seen such unity from normally mean selfish people. In our legislatures any question asked about Democrats was answered in the negative by the Republicans. “We need to breath to live”, no it’s a socialistic lie.
The farmers will be the first to break the blockade of common sense, watch the public thank the government and ask for more when food prices shoot above present conditions. There is really such a small few that lead this stupidity, but it was so easy to be “in” before the wheels fell off, no one protested in fear they would be considered un-American or un Christian. Maybe a few can survive to rule the masses, Hitler did it. Maybe this is just a test to see how far the powerful and dumb can push the envelope.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
2:40 pm
“The philosophical difference between many conservatives and liberals/progressives is that convservaties want to very strictly limit what government does beliving that the private sector and/or charity can do the other things. Liberals and proressives believe that there is a role for government beyond the military.”
I’m not sure I would state it that simply, but for me the problem I have with government doing things is that it does them so poorly. And I think where liberals go wrong is that they do not combine compassion with wisdom. For example, I personally feel compassion for homeless people. But I know as a matter of fact that many of the are alcoholics and don’t really want to change all that much. So, when I drive by them at an intersection asking for money, I either bring them to a restaurant and buy them a meal or hand out breakfast bars with a lot of nutrition. I do NOT give them money – because by doing so I am enabling them rather than helping them.
I find this to be SO characteristic of government help. Take the tenament buildings built for minorities in the inner cities for example. If instead of building for them places they could inhabit temporarily, they had given them materials, supervisors and paid construction workers to help them build their own dwellings they would then own, I am sure the areas in which they were built would not have devolved into slums. What perhaps was lacking was not a desire to help, but an understanding of how things really work in life. People who are invested in something are people who care.
LOL
July 5th, 2011
2:50 pm
Going after the businesses that hire illegals is only one part of shutting down the border. We still have parts of the United States of America where our government has erected wraning signs about armed illegals and drug runners being in the area. We need to do whatever it takes to secure the border from these types of individuals. I hear all of you about PAYING for it, and yes we do need to pay for it, but we can shift funds from the cowboy poets and NPR and all of the subsidies we currently allow, hell we can probably shift some defense funds if we get rid of a few overseas locations.
SKH
July 5th, 2011
2:52 pm
“I have never seen such unity from normally mean selfish people.”
All people, Republicans and Democrats alike, can be and often are selfish by nature. How much more are typical politicians that way! If you don’t realize that, you haven’t lived long or you haven’t been very observant. Do you really think people driven mostly by ambition are good hearted and not selfish? Consider JFK, an American icon – often quoted and revered. Do you know what he was really like? Read a biography sometime. He was NOT a good man.
NJ
July 5th, 2011
2:54 pm
As I said, Republicans should be renamed the Neurotic Party. Neurosis is a mental condition in which you do the same thing over and over again and expect different results every time.
Every state that has passed such legislation has seen a massive economic hit. Arizona has lost almost a quarter of a billion dollars…not in agriculture, but in tourism.
The net effects all over the Southwest where such legislation was put in effect has been catastrophic to their economies, but rather good for Mexico.
Farmers from Colorado,Arizona, and other states bordering or near Mexico have simply resorted to going INTO Mexico for the growing season, renting land, hiring local workers, and producing their crops, which are then imported under NAFTA, into the United States. The expense for additional costs are passed onto the customers. The worse elements of NAFTA was that NAFTA DID NOT allow Mexicans or Canadians to move to America for work, and Americans to do the same.
The reason that the European Union is kicking our asses economically is that they in fact ALLOW members of any member state to move into any OTHER member state. Therefore if Germany needs low wage workers, it can advertise in the poorer Balkan Nations and hire Serbs, Croats, Romanians, etc. As long as they are member states, you can move from one to the other for work. This Flexibility has now made the EU, the wealthiest region on the planet, displacing the United States over the last ten years. Even the hourly productivity of European workers often surpasses that of US workers in some of the most heavily unionized countries in the world.
No state has found a workable alternative to the so called “illegal” immigrants. More legal “migrant workers” work in the fields than illegals.
Simply put, when Republicans make these cockamamie assertions, there is little proof that they are actually effective, or have ever BEEN effective.
Tax cuts for example. We now have 98 years worth of data regarding the Federal Income Tax. The story to date is that cutting income taxes has NEVER resulted in higher investment in business, has barely created new jobs, and has rarely resulted in the creation of new businesses or upgrading of new plant equipment. The average estimate is that for every dollar give in tax cuts to the top two percent of Americans, 4 percent goes towards actual creation of jobs, new businesses and upgrading existing ones.
otherhalf
July 5th, 2011
2:55 pm
I am married to and illegal immigrant have been since 2006 and have done every piece of paper work and paid 1000s of dollars to us goverment officials to try and get him legal documentation. We have a 12 year old daughter that worries about her dad daily not knowing what going to happen next. If you dont know any illegals how can u know why they are here, they don’t come looking for the american dream they come to feed their families. They are not legal so they don’t draw welfare, not possible and after they get legal until they become citizen they still cant get any assistance including social security even though they pay in. Their checks are taxed just like yours and mine and that money just sets in a Goverment bank somewhere. They are not here to still from you they don’t want your charity. The system needs to be fixed, but you just can’t round them up, some are married to citizen and children born citizen which means at sometime that child can apply for their parent to get papers but with it like it is now it is almost impossible. I have tried and have many other friends that have tried to legalize their spouse and even their children and the goverment wouldn’t grant the papers. The way the laws are set up for immigration aren’t working either way, it needs a change but a humane and fair one.
DawgDad
July 5th, 2011
2:58 pm
What should be done with these people is a dilemma? Are you serious? Simple, simple answer – stop the incentives for them to come here and stay here illegally. Enforce laws against employers of illegal labor. Over time, lots of illegals will leave. Until these basic steps are accomplished don’t even bother to talk about the next steps.
This is all about the business and politics of labor racketeering. Stop it. It’s illegal, and it’s inhumane.
GT
July 5th, 2011
3:02 pm
The elephant in the room is we cannot organize anything well in America. Local government is corrupt at best, unethical and self-serving. A huge amount of the American economy is a Ponzi scheme with Los Vegas features. Charities take most for themselves and write it all off as tax deductable so the rich don’t have to pay taxes. Education is a foreign concept, yet we pay like we were delivered a product. The less education we get the more superstition becomes the catalyst that runs the masses over the cliff. The only hope we have is this systemic disease is passed on to our enemies as they enjoy the booty of freedom.
DawgDad
July 5th, 2011
3:07 pm
“I don’t know where you get the idea that liberals want the government to take more of our money and give it to others. I don’t know of a progresssive or liberal that is so cavailer about their money. ”
Of course they aren’t. They want the government to tax and spend OTHER PEOPLE’S money for their pet programs, otherwise they wouldn’t be looking to government to begin with, and very often the loudest proponents are profiting very nicely off the programs, directly or indirectly.
WOODSTOCK MIKE
July 5th, 2011
3:13 pm
Talk about hypocrisy, Democrats are in essence okay with paying illegal workers wages which are set at levels well below what they should be. In other words, because these are Mexicans the Democrats are just fine with paying them a wage that is exploiting the person because of their nationality and the fact they are illegal and willing to do work nobody wants to do.
Joe
July 5th, 2011
3:16 pm
It’s certainly laughable that you can sit in an office in Atlanta and spew non facts. Where exactly are these vegetable farms that are lying out rotting? I actually work in the agriculture community and have traveled all over the state and haven’t seen any. You could claim that some fields have not produced for drought related reasons but not because of lack of help. That’s simply false. Farmers are of course, one of the biggest welfare recipients so they will scream about pretty much anything for more government assistance. Unfortunately its people such as you along with elected officials that buy into this nonsense…. Illegals contribute absolutely nothing to Georgia except for using benefits paid for by the tax payer..
GT
July 5th, 2011
3:22 pm
Simple answer? I guess all of life has a simple answer. It is when you give the wrong simple answer that things get complicated. How do we compete against other states more less only countries when we are lazy, fat and dumb?
You will find a barter system you had no idea existed. Maybe these people got free benefits, but they gave free labor too. I seriously think they got the short end of the stick unless we are being misled by how bad government health and schools are. I think what Americans ,especially the right, is going to find out are they have lied so much they started believing it themselves. Now the crops sit in the field. You are going to find this country is worse off and ultimately you are going to have enough rope to hang the truth along with all the rest of us.
Ali
July 5th, 2011
3:29 pm
Federal law already has guest worker programs for seasonal agricultural laborers that Georgia farmers could and should have been using all along. H2-A has no caps. Another program, H2-B, for other unskilled labor has a cap of 66,000. Georgia farmers should start planning now to use it next year and to tell their illegal alien laborers to head back to their home country so they can apply to be sponsored for it.
Ali
July 5th, 2011
3:35 pm
Otherhalf, what other laws should people be able to break and not pay the penalty for because they marry an American?
It’s too bad you made a bad decision to marry an illegal alien and have a child with him. Fact is, there are ways that he can legalize already, but they require he return to his home country and have you file for a waiver of inadmissibility. For your daughter to legalize him, he’d need to return to his home country anyway and face the 10-year bar to re-entry.
And by the way, your act in having a child here, knowing your husband is deportable, is just as short-sighted as those illegal aliens who choose to have children in their home countries that they can’t afford to support.
Ali
July 5th, 2011
3:38 pm
Godothework, I haven’t noticed any shortages of any produce here in Virginia. Prices don’t seem higher either. If anything, we have an abundance of produce such as locally grown peaches, strawberries, etc. Guess the only ones feeling a “shortage” are farmers in Georgia.
SwedeAtlanta
July 5th, 2011
3:42 pm
Ali, I’m not sure how the federal guest worker program will work for these low-sklled workers that migrate with the crops. My understanding is a migrant farm worker might work in several states and for several employers over a 5 month period.
Wouldn’t they have to get a separate approval for each of those employers likely to have to return to their home country in between?
I am all for a program like that that will work. I just see the migrant worker’s situation being different than someone who is coming here to say work as a housekeeper or something that is a single employer, single location for the duration of their time.
GT
July 5th, 2011
3:44 pm
The hypocrisy is letting them in the country in the first place then using them for political target practice. And how do you lay that at the feet of the liberals. Humane is the liberty of the person to pick his or her fate. They have a choice to be here. Nope this is one of those power plays like Newt throwing out a half a million dollar bracelet to get what his dissipated reality could not. You lose drug wars, you lose regular wars, the price of oil goes sky high, and now in one fatal lapse because of desperation you have pleased the masses with an execution of its strongest economic machine, agriculture. We are out of pavement.
WOODSTOCK MIKE
July 5th, 2011
3:45 pm
@GT
Sounds like you hate America, why not try moving to Europe and see how things are?
WOODSTOCK MIKE
July 5th, 2011
3:47 pm
@GT
America’s strongest economic machine is called innovation, there isn’t another country even close, you need to wake up and realize where you live. For example, China wishes they could actually invent something, they are good for one thing, assembly lines because they abuse their workers like you couldn’t imagine…
floridaman
July 5th, 2011
3:56 pm
The only way I see to solve this problem is to legalize those immigrants who have been here undocumented for a number of years WITHOUT a path to citizenship. People who endure the burdens of living “under the shadows” are not people willing to leave this country regardless of how tough laws can get. Those who are here with their family can stay together, those who are here alone cannot petition for anyone. Give them a Federal ID form, so they can get a drivers license and get their own health insurance. Give them a travel parole so they can visit their family when they can. Enforce tax laws to keep update with Uncle Sam. One felony charge or 3 misdemeanors ends their right to be in the program. Help american farmers to keep their business here. Whoever is not willing to do the type of work that undocumented immigrants do should not be in the way of all those who need that kind of manpower.
oldguy
July 5th, 2011
4:02 pm
Ok,
I am NOT going to read all these posts sooooo:
Jay,
as usual Farmers DO NOT depend on Illegal immigrant labor, they depend on farm labor, it could be from Outer Mongolia as far as they care!! Soooo GUEST WORKER PROGRAM can you say the Jay??
Not illegal GUEST WORKER
Otherhalf has inadvertly made one of my points, her husband can here to work to support his family, not to get out of Mexico or become an American!!
Need proof??
Just look at the vids from the recent USA-Mexico Football match. The US booed, Mexico cheered, the ceremony in Spanish THE MATCH HERE!! Think these people want to be Americans???? Yeah right!!! THey are here for the money, their loyality remains in Mexico!!!!!!
GUEST WORKER DO IT!!!!!
otherhalf: you have been married since 2006 and you have a 12 year old daughter??? and they rag on us rednecks!!
GT
July 5th, 2011
4:04 pm
I love America. Most of America does not think the way we do down south or they do in Arizona. You want to talk innovation check out how this state treats solar power compared to, say, North Carolina. Duke Power and that state has an edict to be using 30% green energy by the end of the decade. They give long term contracts, up to 20 years, from Duke Power to the solar energy makers. Georgia Power won’t go longer than one year in most cases. Even Arizona comes out of the cave when it comes to self sufficient energy.
Cris
July 5th, 2011
4:09 pm
I laugh at the ignorance most people have in regards to immigrants. As a legal immigrant, I am here to tell you that many of the immigrants (both legal and illegal) have college degrees and often speak three languages. They often tend to work in construction or clean houses because these are the only jobs available to them. For those who have commented on how easy it is to obtain a visa and come to this country legally I have two questions:
Do you have $50K in a bank account which you can show the US Government?
Do you have a specialized degree (Chemical Engineer, Brain Surgeon) or is a company willing to pay around $2000 a month to bring you to this country?
If you answered no to the first question you could not even get a tourist visa to this country and if you answered no to the second you could not get a work visa. For those who are so quick to deport, you should be glad you were born in this country.
oldguy
July 5th, 2011
4:14 pm
Totally off the point:
NOT GUILTY!!!!!
You have got to be kidding!!! I knew Florida was full of senile people but thiS???
Can you say O J Jury!!
What do they think, The 2 year old committed suicide and then wrapped herself up in a traskbag and threw her own body in the swamp??!!
What DOLTS!!!
anyone need a better reason to junk the 12 dolt citizen Jury and go to the German professional jurist system.
Another murderer on the street!!! Wonder if she is planning to enter and “Hot Body” contests tonight!!
oldguy
July 5th, 2011
4:18 pm
really Cris???
Care to check the degree status at the non-fence in Texas!!
1 in 100,000 ? 1 in 1,000,000 more like it!
oldguy
July 5th, 2011
4:29 pm
Ah Jay,
you never fail to inspire me!!!
your UP is DOWN approach to problem solving never wavers!!
This ,of course, is the “Reverse Little Dutchboy” way;
Instead of “sticking your finger into the dike to stop the flow of the North Sea” into your country your solution is it forget the hole, go get a teacup and try to bale out the country a cup at a time.
Can you say “Gurgle….Gurgle”??
Cris
July 5th, 2011
4:31 pm
Immigrants don’t just cross the border – they also come on planses via student and tourist visas and overstay. These people are refered to as “out of status” and almost 90% have a college degree. Most of the “undocumented” come accross the border and have no papers – do you know how far Georgia is from the border. Most of the people I know in the state of Georgia came her via Hartsfield and not the border.
reha
July 5th, 2011
4:36 pm
The excuses for using an illegal workforce are the same ones used to justify slavery. Look at old articles and you will see that its true. Farmers have to set their worker models based on a legal work force. Everyone business wants to pay cheap and make more profit but workers should also receive a fair wage.
killerj
July 5th, 2011
4:36 pm
“BUSTED”, I Love It, now let,s go to construction “Work Forces”.
GT
July 5th, 2011
4:39 pm
Cris you have found the nerve that pains me so. If the south had the correct facts fed to them, not some pulp fiction and then came up with this conclusion just because they are a mean lot, it wouldn’t bother me near as much as how the conclusion is arrived. It is the man that doesn’t want to believe his wife is having an affair under his roof or the parent who doesn’t want to believe his kid is on drugs kind of thing we have here. When people make up things or believe weak stories it is a sure sign they know the true but just can’t face it. Southerners want to think they are good kind and all they wrong deserve it. Every man on death row thinks he has a real reason to kill someone; it’s all those other inmates that are crazy.
oldguy
July 5th, 2011
4:41 pm
Cris,
Then you are looking at the Legal Immigrants, not the problem at all (except for the “Students” who purposefully overstay their visas).
The distance from the border has little to do with the “undocumented” i.e. illegal entry people. They go where they can find work! Do you think the all stay in Brownsville? Even the Canadians are having to watch their border with the US for illegals from Mexico!
reusha2000
July 5th, 2011
4:42 pm
Move to Northern Mexico Jay!!
You can have a grand time there, including loosing your head !!
Also the farmers have made it for centuries in this country without your help !
Stewie
July 5th, 2011
4:55 pm
I usually find it funny when people say that the federal government is refusing to do it’s job. The feds don’t just drop from the skies. They are made up of elected officials who for the most part, are populists. They do what we (& the $$) tells them to do. The last time we had a serious debate about Immigration Reform was under Bush. Only 46 senators voted for it. So NO it’s not the feds who are refusing to do their job, it’s us. We put them there. We are the ones who want to whine but when a serious proposal comes, we say no. We deserve the Washington we have.
Next, regd. the substance of my argument: Under Obama, deportations are at an all time high (yes higher than Bush). Given finite resources, they are now choosing to deport those illegal immigrants who have other criminal convictions rather than than the guy who has no criminal convictions. How is that different from your police force or your local DAs office who makes a similar judgement every single day. They all prioritize.
Now, if your solution is deport them all: well let’s examine that solution: When you arrest someone for being illegal the federal govt takes them to immigration court. Nothing wrong with that. You want a judge to deport that guy not the copper who arrested him on “suspicion” of being illegal.
Let’s say this entire process is magically streamlined where we have in all 50 states, approximately 100 judges/state working 5 days a week, each judge adjudicating 5 cases a day.
That means in a month you would process .5M people.
At ~16M illegals, the whole process will take 32 months.
Those 5000 judges (at $100K/year) over the 32 month period will rake in $1.3B over that period. We haven’t even accounted for the cost of the police officers that seem to be catching people, the prisons that are needed to house them, the prosecuting attorneys etc.
Now tell me, from a cost-benefit perspective, is it worth it? Or would you prioritize like the Feds currently do?
Yep
July 5th, 2011
5:21 pm
Stewie,
Budget point in your statement. It costs California over 12B a year (on the low side) ALONE in benefits for illegals. I think a paltry 1.3 over 3 years to rid ourselves of these law breakers a “bargain”!
Yep
July 5th, 2011
5:23 pm
Why do you think the states are up in arms about illegals? The taxes to cover many of these illegals are coming directly from their budgets. If they are not in the census, the fed does not cover their costs…..
B
July 5th, 2011
5:55 pm
please tell me one job a law abiding citizen is “unable to do” that an illegal immigrant is…
Stewie
July 5th, 2011
6:00 pm
@Yep,
My $1.3B was just a fraction of this comical cost-benefit analysis. My model here assumes that no new illegals enter the country over the 32 months. It also does not take into account the full cost of incarceration and adjudication. It skips situations such as: They are married to a US citizen. They have won Pulitzers and are contributing members of society. They have a sick, US citizen kid, who is solely dependent on them. What do you do?
My model also ignores the revenue that is brought in. The IRS equates anyone who has been in this country for over 5 years to be a citizen, regardless of whether they are legal immigrants, illegal immigrants or residents or citizens. So an illegal immigrant pays taxes, pays social security (yes with a fake #) with no hope of ever collecting. You will lose all that money.
They run parts of our economy we don’t want to touch.
The point I’m trying to make is that this is not a problem as simple as: They are illegal, so let’s just deport them. That’s not practical.
Let’s ask our congressional leaders to come up with a practical solution. The practical solution is not amnesty. It means, come up with legal ways to work. Just for kicks, look up the different ways someone can legally immigrate to the US. The only ways are family sponsorship or if you already have high-tech speciality job.
So, the whole, get-to-the-back-the-line argument, well it’s just flawed. There is no line. So tell me, why would an illegal 22 year old who has been living here all his life ever voluntarily leave? Maybe if he knew that there was a legal way to work in this country and possibly immigrate.
yuzeyurbrane
July 5th, 2011
6:08 pm
Jay, you are too quick to reach a conclusion as to whether Americans, with fair wage and working condition incentives, will do the work. I would also like to know where you get the scientific data as to how many acres of crops are rotting because of insufficient labor? All of the data and “studies” I have seen are anecdotal only and hardly scientific. Otherwise, of course employers have been hypocrits, but your solution is to find a way to allow them to continue to exploit illegal immigrants to the detriment of unemployed Americans. I guess that makes you a hypocrt, too.
reyes
July 5th, 2011
6:43 pm
May I remind everyone here that at one point in history white American immigrants headed to texas, then a part of Mexico, indeed invading, to the point that they sought independence from Mexico! Now we call illegals invaders and make conspiracy theories that they want to take over? What changed? History repeats itself…..
So what
July 5th, 2011
6:52 pm
So what…we will eat fewer Gerogian blueberries, and survive. If we really really want them,w e will pay extra.
Steve
July 5th, 2011
7:04 pm
So if someone of any color or nationality robbed a bank or raped a woman would we say it is OK if they pick our vegetables? A crime is a crime and and illegal residence is a crime. A nation that does not uphold it’s own laws is doomed to failure.
gapride
July 5th, 2011
7:10 pm
This is such a great debate for Georgia. We say no to public transportation and cry on 400 during rush hour. We scream at illegals but gladly buy products built with their labor. We love effective tax rates for corporations being dropped to nil, and then ponder our crumbling infrastructure and ineffective school systems. Oh, and meanwhile the middle class shrinks. Of course its due to liberal policy and lazy minority work ethic. Could NOT be due to outsourcing of all manufacturing jobs. Getting gov’t out of the way will clearly solve everything. Yessir, this is a great debate. This is definitely the most pressing and important topic for Georgia. Rounding up and kicking out people who are employed and paid by Georgia businesses is the way to go. Even though it has gone on for decades it needs to change NOW. Because once they are rounded up and kicked out, somehow and someway, things are gonna get good.
Jack
July 5th, 2011
7:33 pm
Bookman is sounding a little desperate of late. Liberals always do when no one is taking them seriously.
Lisa
July 5th, 2011
7:50 pm
Good column Bookman. I wanted to post something positive to show not everyone in Georgia has their head in the sand. I live in rural Georgia, and I am 100% on Bookman’s side. If you ever ran a small business in Georgia that required manual labor, you would be too. And they are not cheap, they get paid like any American would. In my neck of the woods, very few Americans last more than a few weeks.
Mike Becker
July 6th, 2011
5:17 am
Guest worker visas for agriculture are unlimited. The law has proven that farmers would rather see their crops rot than follow the laws.
A small percentage of those here illegally are involved in agriculture, but the media likes to use them as examples, and ignore the fact that visas are unlimited for them.
Selvin
July 6th, 2011
5:42 am
More propaganda for the dishonest businessmen who live of state subsidized illegal labor. Sounds like welfare to me. There are visas available for the farmers, and the non agriculture jobs will all be done by Americans. Saying they won’t is a lie to justify the lawbreaking.
Give 12-30 million people amnesty, and the businessmen will dump them the first chance they get for new illegal immigrants. They are working because they get paid less that comparative wages in the area, and won’t complain. As citizens, they can complain and demand better pay. Think it through, amnesty is not a solution, it just makes the problem worse.
The farmers need to get off the welfare wagon, and start using the visa system that is in place. It makes them responsible for housing and medical care, and stops relying on the taxpayers to bail them out.
wigglwagon
July 6th, 2011
12:40 pm
“The answer to this dilemma will come not in piecemeal state legislation, but in a federal law that simultaneously tightens laws against hiring of illegal labor while” getting legal residents back to work and off unemployment and welfare. Any so called solution that leaves legal residents unemployed and employers still circumventing US labor protections will never be acceptable.
Ed Bright
July 6th, 2011
11:59 pm
The amount of hate. Amazing.
Sarah
July 7th, 2011
1:03 pm
Yes, field work is hard, hot, physical labor, and it is extremely difficult to earn minimum wage if you don’t pick fast enough. But it’s simply not true that non-hispanic workers cannot or will not work in agriculture, and I can’t imagine where this idea comes from. Growers systematically recruit undocumented workers and turn away American-born or documented workers for a reason. Why do you suppose the state is sending in probationers to fill the gaps? The growers need workers who have few other options, are easily intimidated, and are less likely to speak out for their rights. The real problem is that farm work is one of the most abusive and unjust work environments in this country– make it safe and fair, and Georgians of all stripes will apply for the job.
Brittanicus
July 9th, 2011
7:27 pm
WHY ARE WE FORCED TO PAY…?
Can anybody clarify to me, why American taxpayers are forced by law to support people who illegally entered America from foreign countries? It is disturbing this is not charitable giving, but that this money is extorted from our taxes. This is just incurable and has a similar ring to the Obamacare care, which without consent of the majority of the general public that has been also shoved down the throats of US taxpayers. I can truly understand that most Americans desire to aid citizens and legal residents a helping hand in periods of recession or even falling on hard times. But how can the US government make us pay for a foreigner’s education or health care? This is by far one of the most serious issues befallen America, because people who arrive here should not be encouraged to stay by the Democrats or Republicans, either with pandering to them while illegally squatting in America, crossing borders, overstaying visas or coming into the US by ship.
It just goes to show that we cannot trust the US administration or those we place in high authority, to run this country and then gives the American people the finger? I cannot even imagine this nation’s future, where foreign nations seem to have more rights, than birthright citizens? It’s only come to light over the last years, that unknown to most Americans politicians they have used cagey practices to pass six small amnesties behind our back, bring in millions with special visas. The major amnesty was in 1986, its inception starting the chain migration from its original population spiraling to 6 million, at a final cost of 76 billion. However, that was 25 year ago and trying to estimate today’s costs, ranges from 2 trillion to 2.5 trillion dollars in legalizing at least 20 million people. ( Statistics of the Heritage foundation) Currently the New York Times and its ultra Liberal activists are trying to convince us all, that illegal immigration has slowed to a trickle? My observation of thousands of sovereignty groups see no credence this revelation, but if these reasoning was solid, what about the millions that have arrived here. It’s completely inconceivable or rational to the prudent mind in any government bureaucracy authoring another amnesty of any kind, when this great country is 14 trillion dollars in debt, with Obama’s boys trying to lift the debt ceiling even higher.
The Liberals that have infested the Democrats have ruined America with the Tax and spend policies. But this time they are not only confronted by the House Republicans, but the emergence of the All-American Tea Party. Not at the assistance of the Liberal press, that this is just a timid group of dysfunctional people, but a very enthusiastic membership of all party affiliates that is straining to release itself from the usual, elitist GOP establishment. Thousands of cells or branches are reaching out to every moderate thinking American, to escape the Liberal extreme propaganda and even lies. This is the real people’s party, comprising of all races and religions and a rare representation of Blacks, Whites and Hispanics and other races. The general population who are joining the TEA PARTY means Liberal, Independents, Libertarians, Republicans and Democrats and other political associates, who realize finally how they have been deceived.
Leading the TEA PARTY front is Michele Bachmann (R-MN) chair of the Caucus and moderate Conservative by definition, who has taken the presidential race to the people. She makes no excuses for the financial mess the country is in, but is steadfast that unless the Liberal-Democrats start cutting the influence of giant government, we will arrive on August 2, without any guarantee of a compromise of passing the debt limit. Only majority leader Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada would look for answers, in raising taxes of any kind on taxpayers or industry. Unlike the wimps in the current Congress M. Bachmann speaks out about curtailing illegal immigration, constructing the real double fence, tracking visa over-stays and seeking out business owners who ignore the laws on the books. This lady has a strong resonating voice that draws attention to the principles of the TEA PARTY policies.
Bachmann is resolute in mandating E-Verify and Secure Communities, as these two tools alone could locate and apprehend illegal aliens in the workplace or by checking fingerprints, aides to inform ICE of violations. Through April 30, 2011, more than 77,000 illegal immigrants convicted of crimes, including more than 28,000 convicted of aggravated felony (level 1) offenses like murder, rape and the sexual abuse of children were removed from the United States after identification through Secure Communities,” ICE says on its Secure Communities website. A relative of mine who is a police officer informed me of a very new piece of technologically, that has been assigned to Los Angeles police station called “Blue Checks” He explains it in detail, that this new system allows officers to confront a suspect and request them to hold out their hand. The hand-held device digitally scans the digits of the suspect’s hands, and within minutes the official receives a full criminal background account on the person. Only those in the system have reason to fear if they are wanted for a crime of some classification.
This new piece of equipment is under bombardment by a whole group of left leaning activists, as seeing it as an evasion of a person’s privacy. The “Politically Correct” are already coming out of their grubby holes in the rotting woodwork, crying foul and hoping that the lawmakers rescind its use. The ACLU doesn’t like “Blue Checks “saying the device is an invasion of privacy. Imagine criminal aliens who have reentered the United States being apprehended immediately that may save thousands of American lives. Supporters say they’ll be able to find out if someone has prior arrests, in seconds, instead of hours. I see it as a brilliant compact that all should be placed with law enforcement including ICE. This small unit should have access to national Security agencies, connecting to the Social Security Administration, US Citizenship and Immigration Services and of course ICE. Every patrolman should be issued with this module as it offers instant recognition and could catch, illegal aliens using fraudulent ID.
Immigration laws have been ignored for far too long, and the last I heard there were an estimated 8 million aliens in jobs that Americans should have been hired for? This is incomprehensible when 9.3 percent of own people remain out-of-work. This is plain stealing and employees should be held to the highest penalty allowed by law. WHY COMING TO A SOVEREIGN LAND ILLEGALLY IS NOT A FELONY, MAKES NO SENSE TO THE MAJORITY OF THE AMERICAN POPULATION. Michelle Bachmann said she will enforce the 1986 Immigration laws, with no exception and zero tolerance that breaks these laws. It is the same with Governors and mayors who abuse city and State laws, applying a blind eye to Sanctuary Cities and States. This illegal immigration battle has been brewing for thirty years or more, except the law abiding people have finally come out of their somnolence.
Everyday blogs, articles and commentaries are crammed full of the abusiveness of previous and current administrations, overlooking intentionally the people’s needs and who have become supplicants to majority major organization, that place pack money in favorable politicians pockets. Bloggers and conservative entities describe the overcrowded schools full with the children of illegal parents; classrooms crammed to legal capacity. In the Southwest the phenomena of closing hospitals overrun with continuous streams of foreign nationals filling the waiting room seats, for every type of medical emergency and even minor colds and ear infections. The uninsured have silently entered this nation, with the purpose of applying for welfare with the backing of taxpayers’ money. These are mostly unfunded mandates forced on States, which have finally found a voice within the Canyon State of Arizona. Others have been quick to follow, including Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, Maryland, Utah already enforcing selective laws, not restricted by federal court system. E-Verify are the best tool available to prevent jobs from going to illegal aliens, no matter what the other side of the aisle says? More than 260,000 businesses are already using E-Verify at nearly one million work sites, nationwide.
Remember foreign nationals have been voting in federal and State elections; authorities are should be obligated to ID everybody who registers.
This is about illegal immigration? An immigrant is not illegal and people need to be enlightened. Highly skilled Professional workers are always welcome, not indigent ECONOMIC illegal aliens who are driving this country, into a third world condition. We cannot accommodate any longer those who come here to steal welfare and public benefits from legitimate Americans. It is estimated that illegal aliens send home by wire transfer around $40 billion dollars annually, that should be going into state treasuries.
Don’t hesitate to reach the Senate phone switchboard—202-224–3121 and House—202-225–3121, and inform them you will not be manipulated into another clandestine Amnesty, disguised as the DREAM ACT.