John Edwards, Ed Schultz and Eric Bolling in Hall of Shame

I’d like to propose three items to include in the file labeled “Wrong is wrong,” and you have to pay the consequences.

First, from the WSJ:

“WASHINGTON — Justice Department prosecutors and lawyers for former Sen. John Edwards are in last-ditch plea agreement talks that could avert felony charges over alleged campaign-finance violations, people familiar with the matter said.

If the talks fail Wednesday, Justice Department prosecutors are expected to seek a grand-jury indictment against Mr. Edwards, these people say….

Prosecutors have been examining whether donors to various political entities affiliated with Mr. Edwards funneled money to a woman with whom Mr. Edwards had an extramarital affair and with whom he fathered a child, these people said. More than $1 million was allegedly paid to the mistress and to an Edwards aide who Mr. Edwards initially said was the child’s father. The money was allegedly aimed at keeping the affair quiet and avoiding problems for Mr. Edwards’s 2008 campaign.”

Edwards has been trying to squirm and wriggle his way out of accountability for this lurid mess for several years now. The gig’s up, dude. Time to face the music, although whatever the law hands out in penalties can’t fully square accounts.

And in less important but still notable matters, MSNBC host Ed Schultz and Fox Business News host Eric Bolling are both in hot water — and deservedly so — for their rhetorical excesses. In a rant on his radio show, Schultz called conservative talk-radio host Laura Ingraham a “right-wing slut” and a “talk-show slut.” On Twitter, Bolling condemned President Obama for being in Ireland “chugging 40s” instead of returning home to deal with the tragedy in Joplin. (Bolling is also the genius who accused Obama of spending $200 million a day on his trip to India, telling people that he wasn’t making up that fact because he found it on the Internet.)

I don’t know what’s going to happen to either man, and in a larger sense it almost doesn’t matter. What matters is that we live in a culture where there is a market for such viciousness.

– Jay Bookman

460 comments Add your comment

Themistocles (a.k.a. Left Wing Mgmt)

May 25th, 2011
5:14 pm

Rough week for Schultz. He also got into a nasty on-air feud with fellow liberal David Sirota.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
5:17 pm

“That’s exactly why we do it, Josef. It’s not a bug, it’s a feature…”

From below, Jay. The above comment should have been followed by a ;)

Logical Dude

May 25th, 2011
5:19 pm

See, Edwards would have SO much better off if he just said early on. ..

“Yep, I slept with her, it was great! I’d do it again in a heartbeat! Hopefully my wife will joins us.”

But instead, steals huge amounts of hush money from his campaign.

Oh, when will the honest politician arrive?

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
5:20 pm

Jay, I believe it is brotha Brosephus who always claims that “Jackassery knows no political boundaries”.

And if he didn’t say it, he should have! :D

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
5:21 pm

All right, overly critical of the Bruin’s bias…Edwards, Democrat, Schultz-MSNBC, left wing media, Bolling, FOX…that’s two-to-one…just keepin’ ‘em honest…

southpaw

May 25th, 2011
5:22 pm

A salute to lack of partisanship, Jay. Shame isn’t restricted to a liberal or a conservative. I don’t often agree with you, but this time, you’re dead on.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
5:24 pm

Logical

Well, there WAS Edwin Edwards…

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
5:24 pm

It’s probably not the prudent thing to do financially but I wouldn’t mind seeing any plea deal withdrawn and let Edwards be indicted. There’s so much of this stuff going on now that when we actually get somebody in the crosshairs (rhetorically speaking, of course), we need to go ahead and make an example out of them.

I’ve never really watched Ed and his Ed Show. I tried to watch it once but after about 30-60 seconds, he struck me as just another big-mouth, blowhard (like TV ain’t got enough of those already). In a way, I think some of this is an off-shoot of Watergate. For the good they did, Woodward and Bernstein, unintentionally, created the journalist as star phenonomen that we are have suffered from, ever since. The rise of 24 hour news has done its part to make that even worse. We’ve got all these talking heads now that I believe in another life, really wanted to be movie stars or rock stars.

Eric Bolling, I never even heard of, so I won’t comment on him.

buck@gon

May 25th, 2011
5:26 pm

As you demonstrate every day, Jay, we live in a country of gullible people and poor newspaper managers who will tolerate mediocre writing, unsound logic and ignorance. I don’t understand how your theme of “vicious” theme applies to Edwards.

The viciousness is tolerable, when your boss, Cynthia Tucker engages in it. What is intolerable, seemingly is when the right does it, isn’t it? Or rather you seem to like it, no? Tucker’s you ignore. Talk radio and Fox News–now THERE’S something to be legitimately upset about.

What do you think does more damage, Jay, reports legitimizing right-wing conspiracies, (like say, 9/11 truthers or PNAC), or someone criticizing Obama for partying in Ireland when Joplin is gone with the wind? Which did you focus on in your columns, Jay? The truthers or the birthers?

Viciousness is a problem, a problem of civility, true. Truth is a problem of honesty and character.

Show some sometimes.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
5:27 pm

Hillbilly

I agree with you on Watergate…it was shortly thereafter that I decided journalism as it was going was not a profession I wanted to continue in and went elsewhere…the press has been going downhill ever since…not that there aren’t some good folks doing good work, but they’re not the ones getting attention…

Jefferson

May 25th, 2011
5:28 pm

Edwards and Arnald could ride to work together…

jewcowboy

May 25th, 2011
5:28 pm

Damnable attention sluts…

Logical Dude

May 25th, 2011
5:29 pm

An example of poor reporting is the AJC article about Kasim Reed complaining about the ethnic makeup of the consultants designed to help guide transit funds.

It says NOTHING about what the consultants actually came up with, but only that Kasim Reed was “stunned” that there were 4 white males. And “this is a big problem.”.

So, did Kasim like any of their ideas, or was he SO “stunned” by race that he couldn’t even pay attention?

I’m just a person aching for more information from the journalists here. I think there’s more to the story than Kasim crying “racism” but without more information, it’s hard to tell. Because the article basically says Kasim is crying “racism” when he should just be getting on with business.

Logical Dude

May 25th, 2011
5:29 pm

Jay, my 5:29 was actually posted at 5:32 (my computer time)

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
5:30 pm

Hillbilly

“We’ve got all these talking heads now that I believe in another life, really wanted to be movie stars or rock stars”

Or carnival barkers and tent revivalists…

N-GA

May 25th, 2011
5:31 pm

It’s not that he’s a Democrat or a Republican. What is more telling is that he’s a LAWYER!

Jay

May 25th, 2011
5:31 pm

So Buck, cite an equivalent example of viciousness from Cynthia.

Mary Elizabeth

May 25th, 2011
5:32 pm

“What matters is that we live in a culture where there is a market for such viciousness.”

———————————————-

There is, also, a pattern vicious, or rude insulting on blogs, at least here in Atlanta. That, too, is reflective of what has happened to the society-at-large. It is sad that that insulting viciousness could become a norm in today’s world.

I watched the last show of Oprah’s today and it was wonderful. She said we, each, give forth an energy, our energy, into the world. That energy is beyond words. It comes from inside. Bullies, she said, are missing something – they feel inadequate inside. All need validation. Real spiritual connection, and trust in that, is so needed in our nation today, not simply religious dogma and judgment of others.

Adam

May 25th, 2011
5:33 pm

OMG JAY CRITICIZED A DIRTY PINKIE COMMIE LIBERAL!

(/all caps)

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
5:33 pm

Buck

The Ireland trip has been on schedule for quite some time…Obama has acted appropriately in his response to the Joplin tragedy. He will be coming there this weekend. Right now, though, he’d probably just be in the way…

Haywood Jablome

May 25th, 2011
5:34 pm

Ed Schultz referring to Laura Ingraham as a “right-wing slut” is outrageous and completely incorrect. Everyone knows that she is actually right-wing whore.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
5:38 pm

He will be coming there this weekend. Right now, though, he’d probably just be in the way…

This is sort of off-topic but sort of relates to the same point. Back when the missing and murdered children thing was going on in Atlanta, Sammy Davis, Jr. came to town to help raise money and awareness. He chose not to go into the neighborhoods where the crimes had occured for what basically would have been a photo-op. He said something to the effect that, “I don’t want to go there and have people say, what the hell is he doing here?”. I thought he made the right choice in doing that.

It’s really a fine line, in a time of tragedy, between showing support and tooting your own horn.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
5:39 pm

I don’t see the whole “lifting 40’s” thing with Eric Boling as the same infraction as Ed Schultz calling Laura Ingraham a “slut”.

Now if Boling has used the term “lifting 40’s of Schiltz Malt Liquor”, THEN we’d be having a discussion . . . ;)

Kamchak

May 25th, 2011
5:40 pm

In a rant on his radio show, Schultz called conservative talk-radio host Laura Ingraham a “right-wing slut” and a “talk-show slut.” On Twitter, Bolling condemned President Obama for being in Ireland “chugging 40s” instead of returning home to deal with the tragedy in Joplin.

When Eric, son of Eric is held accountable for his statements I’ll get outraged, but until then — meh.

John Edwards is a slimo that should be held accountable for this.

Joe Mama

May 25th, 2011
5:40 pm

Themistocles — “Rough week for Schultz. He also got into a nasty on-air feud with fellow liberal David Sirota.”

Any video of said feud? For that matter, any video of Schultz’ dissing of Ingraham? I don’t have a very high opinion of her, but IMO a news host has no business calling someone that on the air.

ByteMe

May 25th, 2011
5:42 pm

Boling will get a raise out of it.
Schultz will (continue to) be ignored.
Edwards will pay a heavy fine and be kept out of prison because of his kids and his connections. He probably will not be able to practice law again, not like he needs to.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
5:45 pm

getalife

May 25th, 2011
5:46 pm

Corporate media missed the Edwards and Ahnald’s love children.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
5:47 pm

DAVE R

Yeah, that, too…and where’s SoCo when you need him! :-)

Billybob

May 25th, 2011
5:47 pm

“we live in a culture where there is a market for such viciousness.”
Jay,
You are right, just in the last few weeks it was implied that I was a racist by you on this blog without any evidence whatsoever…..YOU are helping THAT market…..there’s a word for that, it rhymes with lib-o-crite……can you help me?

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
5:48 pm

Here’s Bolling’s post from Facebook.

http://www.facebook.com/EricBolling/posts/10150192156951277

I never heard of him until Jay wrote this but he’s outta line, too.

Kamchak @ 5:40

Don’t follow Eric, so I’d never heard that before. It’s disgusting.

Billybob

May 25th, 2011
5:51 pm

Jay,
You more than most can probably get tucker to send you any and all posts she has written….I will ‘cite’ that and call it a day…..

getalife

May 25th, 2011
5:54 pm

You have to say something crazy to get attention in American politics today

The Senate will vote on the gop plan to end Medicare.

This vote is the 12 cycle.

It is a sure loser for the gop.

Like the special election in NY.

Themistocles (a.k.a. Left Wing Mgmt)

May 25th, 2011
5:54 pm

Joe Mama: “Rough week for Schultz. He also got into a nasty on-air feud with fellow liberal David Sirota. / Any video of said feud? ”

No video, but here’s a piece in Salon with a link to the clip :

http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/05/18/schultz_sirta_radio_battle/index.html

AmVet

May 25th, 2011
5:55 pm

“Now if Boling has used the term “lifting 40’s of Schiltz Malt Liquor”, THEN we’d be having a discussion . . .”

Now that’s funny!

One of the casualties of this lack of basic respect and civility for those with opposing views is that most have become exceeding thin-skinned and trigger happy. (in the verbal sense)

Most of us ain’t all that and a bag of chips!

Speaking of which, buck you really are on a damn near demonic tirade these days.

If you loathe the host so much, why do you feel compelled to read him so often?

Color me cornfused…

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
5:55 pm

ZamVet

“If you loathe the host so much, why do you feel compelled to read him so often?”

Well… “…everybody needs somebody sometime…”

Jay

May 25th, 2011
5:56 pm

In other words, Billybob, you’ve got nothing.

And still no word from Buck….

BADA BING

May 25th, 2011
5:57 pm

$1million is about the going rate for payoffs these days, it is a round number and has a nice ring to it. I bet that Edwards will have the nicest looking hair in whatever prision he is sent to.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
5:57 pm

“And still no word from Buck…”

Uh, Dave…jus’ sayin’ :-)

independent and depressed

May 25th, 2011
5:58 pm

Kinda like Neal Boortz referring referring to the resident “idiot” in the White House? I think right wing slut is appropriate for all the blond bimbos that Faux news trots out 24/7 who act like they are Gods gift to humanity but often act like paid mouthpieces for the right wing nuts.

Joe Mama

May 25th, 2011
6:00 pm

Themistocles — “No video, but here’s a piece in Salon with a link to the clip”

Ouch. 80

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
6:02 pm

Now josef, don’t go draggin’ me into Jay and Buck’s feud.

It’s enough for me to carry on my own, thank you, sir! :D

wet wiccan

May 25th, 2011
6:04 pm

Jay

Can I nominate Andrew Breitbart to your Hall of Shame?

Billybob

May 25th, 2011
6:04 pm

You can read her words just as well as I……that’s what I will give you, which is more than enough for this topic………

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
6:04 pm

What’s the difference in the people on MSNBC and the people on Fox? Other that they come from opposite sides of the political spectrum, none that I can see.

It’s like the old Braves, with Warren Spahn and Johnny Saine. One was a left-hander and one was a right-hander but they played the same game.

Themistocles (a.k.a. Left Wing Mgmt)

May 25th, 2011
6:04 pm

Joe Mama, painful listening indeed. Though I tend to agree with Schultz on many issues, here he’s completely caught with his proverbial pants down. Sirota’s right on principle. And Schultz is being the prima donna he tends to be.

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:04 pm

and still nothing….

Midori

May 25th, 2011
6:05 pm

how in the world did this subject become a referendum on Cynthia Tucker??

BADA BING

May 25th, 2011
6:05 pm

Hey Edwards, get you one of those ‘Shake Weights’(as seen on TV). You might as well start practicing for prision life.

Dusty

May 25th, 2011
6:06 pm

Well, no Zell; yet. Too bad. We get Edwards who is not running for anything except jail. I guess he is flip flopping over that too.

Did I mention that the BRAVES won the afternoon game? YES, they did. (I know I mentioned it before. But nobody reads old “threads”. Doncha know?)

Hmm …I smell England. I smell France. I smell my dinner burning in the pans. Hurrying off,,,,,

Jackie

May 25th, 2011
6:07 pm

All those cited in this post deserve having their actions called out to them. In the case of John Edwards, he may do jail time for his illegal actions.

Having said all that, former Sen. John Ensign(R-NV) and Sen. Tom Coburn(R-OK) will be next on the hot seat and deserve to have their day in court for EXACTLY the same misdeeds of John Edwards.

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:07 pm

midori, because the bizarre fixation of some apparently can’t be contained within the confines of the Tucker blog and must spill out elsewhere….?

Dusty

May 25th, 2011
6:07 pm

This one before my last post I’m sure.

The “Tucker fixation”? You mean like the “BUSH fixation”? I hope Tucker’s does not last over eight years. Gets kinda unpleasant.

Billybob

May 25th, 2011
6:08 pm

Jay,
Anyone who has read tucker would concede this point, which is what you will have to do to reel me in any further…..if not, good day

Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)

May 25th, 2011
6:08 pm

Well, it all goes to show we got class on this blog. Some people can call other people “slut” and such. On here, we use nice words like “tool” and “Kool-Aid drinker.” And every once in a while Bookman breaks in to remind us not to call names. We ignore him and call names anyway. But the nicer class of names. Like I said, we got class here.

pogo

May 25th, 2011
6:09 pm

And you thrive on this “visciousness” don’t you Jay? Can’t you find one thing wrong with Obama? Do you think that his appointment of Jesse Lee as the “Obama Negative Press” Czar is a good thing? It is an administration position funded by taxpayers that is created only to further Obama’s re-election bid in 2012. If Bush would have done this, the end of world (God is Dead) would have been proclaimed in the NYT’s and by you and the AJC. But with you and the rest of the press, this is completely OK. America doesn’t trust the press anymore and for very good reason. You are nothing but trained puppets who are making money off of maintaining one political position or the other.

As for John Edwards and Schultz, you know that critisizing them is “safe” because your cause (the progressive cause) doesn’t have anything to lose. These two are currently irrelavent and they are expendable to the progressives in terms of political damage to your sacred Obama. I certainly hope that you aren’t trying to claim some kind of political objectivity based upon this piece. If anyone reads either you or Cynthia (is she really your supervisor Jay?), we know that objectivity was thrown out the window years ago in the American press. Stick to what you know Jay, partisan politics.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
6:09 pm

When I posted my 6:04, when it refreshed, there were at least a half dozen posts after it, including the new page. Keep digging boys.

CJ

May 25th, 2011
6:10 pm

Generally speaking, Schultz’s heart is in the right place. But his head? Well, that’s up for debate.

As a liberal, I’d like to see him replaced in the MSNBC line-up with a higher quality liberal. Liberals have a hard enough time getting their message out via the corporate media without having one of the few big time spokespersons that we do have distracting from our message.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
6:10 pm

Jay

May 25th, 2011
5:31 pm

So Buck, cite an equivalent example of viciousness from Cynthia.- Jay

You’re right Jay. Cynthia never has anything viscious to say about conservatives.

Jay are you going to read the comments below and actually say they are not more vicious than someone saying someone was chugging 40 ouncers?

Newt Gingrich plays the race card

9:45 am May 18, 2011, by ctucker

WASHINGTON — I didn’t think it was possible, but Newt Gingrich has disappointed me. He has managed to be more cynical and more incendiary, more irresponsible and even less honorable than I had imagined him to be.

And my imagination gave him plenty of credit for pettiness, indiscipline, deceit and an overweening arrogance. I knew him to be capable of stunning chutzpah and cheap sensationalism. I’ve seen his over-the-top attacks on rivals, his situational ethics and his disregard for commonplace proprieties.

From her latest column on Saxby Chambliss
Congress is whipsawed by the demands of an angry minority of tea partiers, paranoid conspiracy theorists, leftover John Birchers and anti-government cranks.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
6:12 pm

Ed Schultz always struck me as someone just barely this side of crazy. Kinda like the Kimmer used to be on WGST years ago.

You always knew that one day that last rubber band would snap . . .

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
6:12 pm

Which is worse? Someone saying someone was chugging 40 ouncers?

Or someone calling someone-

cynical
more incendiary,
more irresponsible
less honorable
pettiness,
indiscipline,
deceit
overweening arrogance
stunning chutzpah
cheap sensationalism.
over-the-top attacks
situational ethics
disregard for commonplace proprieties.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
6:12 pm

Even I don’t consider Cynthia Tucker writings vicious in any way.

Clueless, bigoted, inconsistent; yes.

But in a calm and reasonable way . . . ;)

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
6:13 pm

You don’t care much for Cynthia? Then don’t go there. And Jay and Cynthia are not interchangeable..

Dusty

May 25th, 2011
6:14 pm

HillBilly,

Nobody is going to get ahead of you. You are top of the line! (No matter what.) Yep! “Tis true.

Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)

May 25th, 2011
6:14 pm

When I posted my 6:04, when it refreshed, there were at least a half dozen posts after it, including the new page. Keep digging boys.

Well, I ain’t complaining or nothing, but on the last thread I posted a piece and it showed up first on a new page. Then I refreshed and it showed up fifth from the bottom on the previous page. I just figured some of the AJC IT boys were starting the Memorial Day weekend a little early. I ain’t complaining because if they’re sellabrating early it means it’s good for my business. Got to keep the job and the 401k going.

Joe Mama

May 25th, 2011
6:15 pm

Dave — “Kinda like the Kimmer used to be on WGST years ago.”

He was two different people; one on-air and another one off the air. He had to get psyched up to put on the on-air persona. And he always had iced tea in the control room with him.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
6:17 pm

I ain’t complaining because if they’re sellabrating early it means it’s good for my business.

How in the world did you get off before 6, with a holiday weekend coming up? Don’t haul for Leon, do you?

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
6:18 pm

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:07 pm

midori, because the bizarre fixation of some apparently can’t be contained within the confines of the Tucker blog and must spill out elsewhere….?

Jay,

Come on now. Its not nice to talk about granny godzilla like that.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
6:18 pm

I know, Joe, but his on-air persona eventually got the best of him.

Although those Newsmaker Line segments were funny as hell! :lol:

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:19 pm

“It is an administration position funded by taxpayers that is created only to further Obama’s re-election bid in 2012. If Bush would have done this, the end of world (God is Dead) would have been proclaimed in the NYT’s and by you and the AJC.”

Pogo, does the name “Karl Rove” mean anything to you? Senior adviser to President Bush and head of the Office of Poitical Affairs, with his salary covered by taxpayers’ money?

Does any of this ring a bell, from an investigation into the Bush White House by the Office of Special Counsel:

“The entire [Office of Political Affairs] staff was enlisted in pursuit of Republican success at the polls and many OPA employees believed that effort was part of their official job duties,”the report concludes. “Based on the extent of the activities described below, OSC concludes that the political activities of OPA employees were not incidental to their official functions, and thus U.S. Treasury funds were unlawfully used to finance efforts to pursue Republican victories at the polls in 2006.”

The report also finds that, during the 2006 election cycle, Office of Political Affairs staffers “tracked the amount of money raised at fundraisers held by Republican candidates and national, state and local Republican groups.”

The Office of Special Counsel also found “a systematic misuse of federal resources” in 2006, when Bush administration cabinet members traveled to the districts of members of Congress whom the White House designated as priority candidates. The inquiry found that many of the trips that had been designated as official business and billed to the Treasury were primarily political and part of a White House-directed effort called the “final push.”

Now … you were saying?

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
6:20 pm

DAVE

Well, Sister Cynthia IS a little slow on the uptake and has trouble applying her perceptions and sensitivities to herself, in my opinion based on past experience…mean and vicious? Nyanh…

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:21 pm

I don’t know, Thulsa. Do you consider accuracy an adequate defense?

More seriously: No, I don’t think they’re comparable.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
6:21 pm

indiscipline,

I rarely get on Cynthia’s blog anymore but perhaps I should do so more often. Ya learn something new everyday. I never even knew indiscipline was a word. She may be vicious but at least ya can learn something from her.

Joe Mama

May 25th, 2011
6:22 pm

Dave — “Although those Newsmaker Line segments were funny as hell!”

I can’t recall the name of the — ahem — ‘flamboyant’ character who reported on the Braves, “chop, chop!” But he was kind of like “The Olympic Flame” on WGST’s Saturday Morning Live back before the 1996 Games, if you ever listened to that program.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
6:23 pm

JOE
@ 6:15

IcED tea? Where you from, Bubba…

AmVet

May 25th, 2011
6:24 pm

Billyb, are you familiar with the saying, “All hat and no cattle”?

Or as Mrs. Slocumb would say, “Weak as water!”

Finn McCool

May 25th, 2011
6:24 pm

Jay, I hope you posted your comment “•The year the world changed, and no one noticed” in the paper edition.

Those are great questions you post there – how do we come to deal with the new reality?

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
6:25 pm

Thulsa

I didn’t know it was a word, either, but these guys must have.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D76×0Vtb_Zc

(Apologies for soiling the political blog with music)

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:27 pm

No, Finn, I haven’t, but I may at some point. It even struck me that there may be a book in there somewhere.

AmVet

May 25th, 2011
6:27 pm

Does anyone remember one of the darling new words in Republispeak some years back – moral equivalence?

What we have here (besides a failure to communicate!) is verbal equivalence…

getalife

May 25th, 2011
6:28 pm

cons tend to focus on silly things.

Their minds should be studied in Universities.

Anyhoo, how many more have love children?

Perhaps, a love child document dump to clean up the record for all of them.

Trump said they all had mistresses in Washington.

Joe Mama

May 25th, 2011
6:28 pm

Josef — “IcED tea? Where you from, Bubba…”

I moved here from Hawaii, if you must know. And you can’t get good iced tea out there, though they do know how to butcher a hog and roast it up. :D

I think the only person in Atlanta radio who can get away with saying “ice tea” on air is prob’ly O’Neal Adams. ;)

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
6:29 pm

Now I’ve got a post lost in space and two reprimands for posting too fast.

RW-(the original)

May 25th, 2011
6:29 pm

josef,

At the risk of having my Southern naturalization papers rescinded the only ice tea I drink is unsweetened and bottled in California. It’s called Tejava and it’s fantastic.

Billybob

May 25th, 2011
6:29 pm

I’m no different than you Dusty, just happen to have a lower BS meter than you do when it comes to far left liberal hypocrisy. I am what the democrats hate to see…….an informed voter

Kamchak

May 25th, 2011
6:32 pm

I am what the democrats hate to see…….an informed voter

Not intended to be a factual statement.

WOODSTOCK MIKE

May 25th, 2011
6:32 pm

Hey Jay, didn’t you vote for John Edwards?

Billybob

May 25th, 2011
6:33 pm

I definitely can’t do that obama water trick where he lowers the sea level……

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
6:33 pm

“I can’t recall the name of the — ahem — ‘flamboyant’ character who reported on the Braves, “chop, chop!” But he was kind of like “The Olympic Flame” on WGST’s Saturday Morning Live back before the 1996 Games, if you ever listened to that program.”

Joe, that was the glorious Lesley Dove . . .

I’m not sure if that was another character made up by Jim Gossett (the voices for the Newsmaker Lines) or not.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
6:34 pm

Speaking of Karl Rove and campaign money how much money has Obama amassed so far in his war chest? I hear its quite a load of cash. Them special interests sure pony up the dough don’t they?

WOW- A BILLION FREAKING DOLLARS!!!!

While his campaign is downplaying speculation that it could be the first to raise $1 billion, it’s nonetheless building up a cash stockpile as the GOP, with the field wide open, gets off to a slow start.

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_18/b4226031196942.htm

When President Barack Obama visited California in February, he had a private dinner with Apple (AAPL) Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, and other technology chieftains.

Aaaaaaaaah. So that’s how google and other cali technology firms pay little in taxes- they cozy up to the Obama special favor/special interest administration. Just look at google for example.

Google 2.4% Rate Shows How $60 Billion Lost to Tax Loopholes
By Jesse Drucker – Oct 21, 2010 6:00 AM ET

Google cut its taxes by $3.1 billion in the last three years using a technique that moves most of its foreign profits through Ireland and the Netherlands to Bermuda.

Google’s income shifting — involving strategies known to lawyers as the “Double Irish” and the “Dutch Sandwich” — helped reduce its overseas tax rate to 2.4 percent, the lowest of the top five U.S. technology companies by market capitalization, according to regulatory filings in six countries.

“It’s remarkable that Google’s effective rate is that low,” said Martin A. Sullivan, a tax economist who formerly worked for the U.S. Treasury Department.

Obama-Google connection scares competitors

Google CEO Eric Schmidt didn’t say anything as he flanked President-elect Barack Obama during his first post-election press conference. He didn’t have to.

The image alone of Schmidt standing elbow-to-elbow with Obama’s top economic thinkers was enough to send shivers up the spine of Google’s competitors.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15487.html

Joe Mama

May 25th, 2011
6:34 pm

Kamchak — “Not intended to be a factual statement.”

I propose that this phrase be represented henceforth on AJC blogs as NIFS.

Billybob

May 25th, 2011
6:34 pm

nevertheless, a reality Kamchak…..

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
6:35 pm

JOE

Yep. They know what to do with little piggies! Since you ain’t from around here, you can get a pass on the iceD tea! You think you catch flack for that, though, I drink my ice tea unsweetened,don’t eat fried chicken and don’t eat grits either, get called a heretic a lot…’course it probably has as much to do with my accent… :-)

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:36 pm

To be honest, Woodstock, I don’t remember, but I don’t believe so. When we interviewed him during the 2004 primaries, he came across as very shallow in knowledge and understanding. But I can’t say I saw this in him…

Joe Mama

May 25th, 2011
6:38 pm

Josef — “Yep. They know what to do with little piggies!”

And goats, too, but the goats were a LOT harder to hunt than the hogs.

“Since you ain’t from around here”

Didn’t say that. I *am* from around heah. I just moved *back* here from Hawaii.

“you can get a pass on the iceD tea!”

Thankew. Thankew vurra much.

/elvis

“You think you catch flack for that, though, I drink my ice tea unsweetened, don’t eat fried chicken and don’t eat grits either, get called a heretic a lot…’course it probably has as much to do with my accent…”

I also drink my tea unsweet, and I prefer the divine swine to fried chicken. But to each their own.

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:38 pm

That is Obama’s doing, Thulsa?

Let’s do a little math here:

Google 2.4% Rate Shows How $60 Billion Lost to Tax Loopholes
By Jesse Drucker – Oct 21, 2010 6:00 AM ET

Google cut its taxes by $3.1 billion in the last three years using a technique that moves most of its foreign profits through Ireland and the Netherlands to Bermuda.

Story published in 2010. So tax years in question were 2006-2009.

Yup, Obama’s fault.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
6:38 pm

To be honest, Woodstock, I don’t remember, but I don’t believe so.

You don’t remember who you voted for? Or, am I reading that wrong?

Billybob

May 25th, 2011
6:38 pm

don’t make him say it HD……..

Kamchak

May 25th, 2011
6:39 pm

nevertheless, a reality Kamchak…..

Funny, that’s what 17th century phlogiston chemists said, too.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
6:39 pm

“When we interviewed him during the 2004 primaries, he came across as very shallow in knowledge and understanding.”

Wow. “The Breck Girl” shallow?

All you needed to do was listen to his “Two Americas” speech to figure THAT out.

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:40 pm

In the 2004 Dem primary, HD?

No, I honestly don’t remember. I’d have to look at the list of the candidates still in the race when the Ga. primary was held.

RW-(the original)

May 25th, 2011
6:41 pm

Phew…guess I’m off the hook on the unsweetened part. :-)

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:42 pm

He had the surface-level answers down pat, Dave R. But when you started to ask him WHY he thought that way, he began to founder quickly.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
6:42 pm

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:21 pm

I don’t know, Thulsa. Do you consider accuracy an adequate defense?

More seriously: No, I don’t think they’re comparable.

I hear ya Jay. So that whole plethora of nasty adjectives that Cynthia used to describe Newt isn’t as bad as the Fox commentator saying Obama was chugging 40s? Also the fox commentator may have believed those large mugs or whatever size glasses those were contained much more than 16- 20 ounces mugs over here. When i eat Mexican I definitely get one of those near 40 ounce big dos equis mega mugs Not sure if they’re 40 ouncers but that’s why I call them. I think they’re actually 30-36 ounces but whose counting?

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
6:43 pm

Jay

Fair enough. I’ve always been blessed/cursed with a good memory.

Joe Mama

May 25th, 2011
6:43 pm

Dave — “Joe, that was the glorious Lesley Dove . . . ”

Thank you! I thought someone would remember. :)

I’m out, wife needs attention. You have to maintain them frequently or else they can get petulant and rusty.

RW-(the original)

May 25th, 2011
6:43 pm

Kerry, Edwards, Sharpton, Dean, Kucinich, Lieberman, Clark, Mosley-Braun, & Gephardt all got votes.

You’re welcome :-)

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
6:45 pm

JOE

Okay…,maybe you are from round here…are you registered with the civil authorities of The People’s Democratic Republic of the South? :-)

Speaking of goat…now that’s some good stuff if you get it from somebody who knows what they’re doing…there’s a place out on Buford Hwy (can’t remember the name right now) that flat knows how to…a dive joint, but, hey, that’s where you get it…

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:46 pm

I have not been so blessed/cursed, HD.

I sometimes forget the names of people I know well. Bothers the hell out of me.

Joe Mama

May 25th, 2011
6:46 pm

Josef — “Speaking of goat…now that’s some good stuff if you get it from somebody who knows what they’re doing…there’s a place out on Buford Hwy (can’t remember the name right now) that flat knows how to…a dive joint, but, hey, that’s where you get it…”

Spanish markets often have it.

There was a barbecue shack in Tifton years ago, just off I-75, that served all the standards plus BBQ goat ribs.

Doggone/GA

May 25th, 2011
6:46 pm

“I sometimes forget the names of people I know well. Bothers the hell out of me”

By any chance, do you also have some form of dyslexia? Forgetting names can be a symptom of dyslexia.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
6:46 pm

But when you started to ask him WHY he thought that way, he began to founder quickly.

That doesn’t surprise me. In my lifetime, I can only remember one or two candidates that actually had a vision. Whether anybody agreed with that vision or not, depended on perspective. For the vast majority of candidates, the vision is to be President. If they happen to win, they’ve achieved their goal and they’re sort of like the dog who chases the car…….what do you do when you catch it?

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:46 pm

I was probably a Kerry guy, RW.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
6:47 pm

Jay @ 6:46

I wouldn’t worry about it. The memory thing ain’t all it’s cracked up to be. With Hillbillies in my neck of the woods, everything goes to the grave, and often beyond. That ain’t necessarily a good thing.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
6:47 pm

Story published in 2010. So tax years in question were 2006-2009.

Yup, Obama’s fault.- Jay

Ha. Ya got me there Jay! Bravo!. Of course Obama was potus in 08 and 09.

AmVet

May 25th, 2011
6:48 pm

I saw John Edwards speak here, when he was on the campaign trail (my girlfriend dragged me along).

It was like going to a rock show.

The guy had that kind of charisma.

I got a kick out of it, but it left me a bit more disillusioned than ever, seeing how easily people can be manipulated with some flowery, albeit empty, words…

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
6:48 pm

RW

Not to worry…your papers are in order!

JAY

So, do you drink ice or iced tea and is it sweetened or unsweetened….? :-)

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:48 pm

Sorry, still wrong, Thulsa.

My memory’s still good enough to recall he didn’t take the oath until January 2009.

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:48 pm

Ummmm, I can’t recall?

Unsweetened iced, Josef.

But then, you knew that.

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
6:49 pm

“I sometimes forget the names of people I know well. Bothers the hell out of me.”

At my age I suffer from CRS! Can’t Remember Shyte!

Billybob

May 25th, 2011
6:52 pm

many people were fooled by Edwards, my mother included…….More and more when someone starts to answer a question as if they are a lawyer, people are understanding and learning to wade through all of the BS flowinng like crap out of their mouth…..it’s funny how the mainstream media crowns hussein the best orator ever at the same time Letterman is having an ‘uh’ count of how may time obama uses that word in an interview…….jay, who says the ‘uh’ word more obama or vick? Be honest…..

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
6:53 pm

“I sometimes forget the names of people I know well. Bothers the hell out of me.”

Comes from being born in 1956, Jay! I know the affliction all too well.

Oh, and try having that problem when running for office. . .

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
6:54 pm

“I sometimes forget the names of people I know well. Bothers the hell out of me.”

I do, too, but it don’t bother me a’tall…now if I could just forget the people the names are attached to…

JAY

Well, yes, but I did need confirmation…don’t want to go making assumptions…

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
6:54 pm

By the way, I’m an Ed-o-maniac! THANK GOD for people like Ed Schultz! So what if he called Laura Ingraham a slut! Maybe she is, how should I know?

I know one thing’s for sure, Ed cuts through the BS and tells it like it is.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
6:54 pm

There is nothing illegal about all this. Google’s income shifting is tax avoidance, not tax evasion. But it is hugely disappointing news and suggests a serious level of hypocrisy in Google’s high command. Google’s leaders are ostensibly committed to the proposition that higher taxes are needed to pay for crucial national investments. CEO Eric Schmidt campaigned for Barack Obama, who pledged to raise taxes on the wealthy, and both he and cofounder Larry Page contributed generously to Obama’s inaugural committee. And as Drucker points out, Google and its founders have benefitted from government spending: “The U.S. National Science Foundation funded the mid-1990s research at Stanford University that helped lead to Google’s creation. Taxpayers also paid for a scholarship for the company’s cofounder, Sergey Brin, while he worked on that research.”

Hmmm. More DemoRAT special interest corporations not paying taxes. DemoRAT hypocrisy at play again. Do as I say- not as I do.

Revelations about Google’s foreign tax avoidance underscore the need for the Obama Administration to more aggressively push its crackdown on U.S. corporations engaged in offshore shell games. The Administration announced this effort amid much fanfare in May 2009, saying that closing tax loopholes on foreign profits could return $190 billion to the U.S. Treasury over the next decade. But that proposal disappeared into Congress and not much came of it.

Hmmm. Disappeared into Congress? Wonder who controlled Congress in 2009?

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:55 pm

Billybob, uh, I never, uh, counted.

Had better things to do, I suppose.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
6:56 pm

now if I could just forget the people the names are attached to…

You could do like I did once when a protagonist was lecturing me on how I should “forgive and forget” towards them. I said, “You can ask Jesus to forgive you and I’ll forget you”. ;-)

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
6:57 pm

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:48 pm

Sorry, still wrong, Thulsa.

My memory’s still good enough to recall he didn’t take the oath until January 2009.

Jay- I’m getting like Obama where everything is 2008. Ever since he signed that log the other day in Ireland saying May 24,2008 I keep thinking he came into office in 2008. Even he thinks it.

So what happened to the big initative in 09 to start closing the loopholes on this?

AmVet

May 25th, 2011
6:57 pm

The best orator ever?

No one is even within rifle range of the Master Thespian.

Ronnie could talk for hours and say nothing!

But lots and lots of people sure thought he was the cat’s meow…

kayaker 71

May 25th, 2011
6:57 pm

We haven’t seen a thread on how Bibi handed Bozo his hat in the recent tif at the WH. Just to watch Bozo’s arrogance float to the top….. why the audacity of this Jew coming to my White House and lecturing me on how to conduct foreign policy. The 67 borders…. Bozo sounded like Sarah Palin. Bibi received about the biggest ovation and approval rating that Congress has given a foreign head of state and all Bozo could do was go to Ireland. Someone really screwed up on the staff to let him get into this kind of position where he looked like a sophomore college student being lectured to by a professional. Photo ops at his great-great-great grandfather’s birth place. Give me a friggin’ break. No mention of all of this Bookman, or is it too embarrassing?

M

May 25th, 2011
6:58 pm

I do so enjoy being able to spot the people who came in here to yell at Jay no matter what the post was about.

Almost as fun as spying the ones who immediately try to change the topic when they realize there’s no arguing the one at hand.

RW-(the original)

May 25th, 2011
6:58 pm

I was probably a Kerry guy, RW.

Frontrunner!

j/k

But with your ties to the little pares in Western Mass it would seem like Kerry would be your guy in that mix. Probably would have been Dean before the scream I;m guessing though.

stands for decibels

May 25th, 2011
6:59 pm

I hadn’t heard about Ed Schultz’ comments about Ingraham, so…

Here’s a link…

HD thanks. Kind of funny to have to read about this particular incivility in a piece that calls the offender “Liberal Hate Talker”…

Anyway, from the 53 second clip I heard, yeah, it was pretty stupid, and he should apologize, unless he went on to make some bigger point about what “slut” was supposed to mean in this context.

(that said…part of me is extremely suspicious that the three audio links I’ve found online are edited to end at the same point…)

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:59 pm

Thulsa, I’d suspect it fell afoul of the no-new-taxes-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever crowd.

Schrodinger's cat

May 25th, 2011
7:00 pm

I’m impressed Jay !

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
7:01 pm

“By the way, I’m an Ed-o-maniac!”

You can’t make this stuff up . . . . :roll:

Jay

May 25th, 2011
7:02 pm

Dean? No, I don’t think so. He was interesting, but I never thought of him as stable enough politically. You could sense he got in over his head too quickly and knew it.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
7:04 pm

Once again, Jay proves he’s the cut-and-paste King!

(poke, poke) ;)

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
7:05 pm

sfd

I just googled Schultz-Ingraham and the first link I went to had that. I didn’t even pay any attention to what the site was. If it’s print I usually will but when it’s audio or video, it usually is what it is, no matter where it’s posted. As far as explaining the context, if I were Ed, I think I’d just cut my losses and let it fade away. No sense digging a deeper hole.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
7:07 pm

JAY

There is a book in it…you just got the wrong year. 1954. I was born halfway between Brown v Board and Dien Bien Phu…two events worlds away which determined a generation…I’ve often thought about the book that could be in that…and, K’chak and Doggone could ignore it since everything is not about me!

And Dean? Well, I personally liked him for my own off the wall reasons…when he made the comment about making the Democrat Party big tent big enough to include the rebel flag-pick up folks, he was on to something…then he got sheep hooked stage left…had an interesting correspondence with him on that one…he impressed me with the depth of what he had to say on that subject…

Dusty

May 25th, 2011
7:07 pm

Well, I have lost a friend. RW drinks ice tea from CALIFORNIA. Probably likes Chicgo hotdogs. Puts shrimp into grits instead of country ham. Eats chimichongers instead of Brunswick stew.

Is there no justice? I lay down my fried chicken in disgust. Give me grease and give me PeptoBisMol!! Or else… the chicken will rise in revolt!!

RW-(the original)

May 25th, 2011
7:08 pm

How did “papers” turn into “pares”

geez….

(IHB)

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
7:10 pm

“K’chak and Doggone could ignore it since everything is not about me! ”

Wait . . .

. . . it’s NOT all about you? :shock:

AmVet

May 25th, 2011
7:11 pm

I find Laura Ingraham rather innocuous. Yes, I disagree with her politics, but she’s smart, funny and reasonable. And though still misguided on the topic, she’s ameliorated the worst of her homophobia. (Cuz her bro is gay.)

She certainly doesn’t deserve to be called the s word.

Now Ann Coulter. That one probably deserves whatever invective is returned to her! (karma)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7NcfDOL71o&feature=related

stands for decibels

May 25th, 2011
7:12 pm

I just googled Schultz-Ingraham and the first link I went to had that. I didn’t even pay any attention to what the site was.

well interestingly, the HuffPost had the same clip.

As for cutting his losses, yeah, I don’t think there’s much of anything Ed should do except say “it was boneheaded, I know Laura, she didn’t deserve this…”

Jay

May 25th, 2011
7:12 pm

You write your own damn book, Nix, and I’ll write mine!

‘56 RULES!

GT

May 25th, 2011
7:13 pm

How can someone who uses that language stand in judgement of anyone. It says more about the speaker than the “talk-show slut.” What I like about CT is she defends a large group of people and in their defense and not her own, she makes people mad. She does it with fact, I can never remember her using a 200 million dollar a day figure or hate language. Lesser people try to egg her on and become hot when she is above this. These talk show host are like the drunks in the stands that thinks he can say anything he wants to the player on the court or field. Most of us feel uncomfortable with these people but few of us confront them. Their argument is denial they ever sayed it or just bullying any persons manhood who throws it back on them. What I cannot understand is how this group got the credentials of being religious. I know we are all sinners but because of that sin most of us have found humility in our lives. Not these guys and why not? I truly wish they did have the answers, and not be so obviously lost. We as a country could use the help.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
7:14 pm

kayaker

Two separate points…why nothing about g-g-g-g-grandfather’s birthplace…well, to get him from there to here requires having to deal with a certain period of history and “sides” which would run afoul of Yankee Sharia… :-)

But as for Bibi and Obama…I disagree with you on that one…I don’t see anything approaching a rift in relations…Obama merely stated that US policy would continue as previously, and Bibi had to play to an audience (and electorate) back home…the deals made under the table and in the back room will be apparant in the days to come…

Schrodinger's cat

May 25th, 2011
7:14 pm

That said…It sucks to be human….not defending anyone….just sayin’

stands for decibels

May 25th, 2011
7:15 pm

oh, and the only reason I tune in to MSNBC at all is Rachel; not much interest in the rest of their shows, although I guess Cenk’s ok (never watching at 6pm).

I’ve stumbled upon Ed Schultz on the radio, like some other people have said, he literally sounds a lot like Rush and that’s who I thought I was listening to at first.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
7:16 pm

‘56 RULES!

Whippersnapper!!!

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
7:16 pm

IMAM

Didn’t yore Mama teach you to respect your elders? Uppity lil whippersnapper… :-)

Jay

May 25th, 2011
7:16 pm

Codgers!

I’ll play on your lawn if I want to!

Jay

May 25th, 2011
7:16 pm

Schultz will apologize on air and then be suspended without pay for a week.

Bolling will be given a primetime show on Fox News.

(Just kidding about the Bolling part … I hope).

RW-(the original)

May 25th, 2011
7:16 pm

Dusty,

A Chicago dog goes quite well with my California ice tea, but I don’t let my shrimp anywhere near my grits, country ham will do just fine thankyouverymuch and I’m a big fan of Brunswick stew.

Midori

May 25th, 2011
7:16 pm

stands for decibels

May 25th, 2011
7:16 pm

It’d be nice if they let Sam Seder sub for Ed the week he’s suspended.

@@

May 25th, 2011
7:18 pm

In which of his “two worlds” will Edwards end up? Probably a country club prison where the only thing denied him is hairspray.

Themistocles (a.k.a. Left Wing Mgmt)

May 25th, 2011
7:20 pm

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
7:21 pm

“56 RULES!

What Jay said! :D

And “I’ll play on your lawn” is the polite version . . . ;)

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
7:22 pm

Hillbilly
@ 7:16
Josef
@ 7:16

Now maybe the IT folks can tell us who was first…could have been you, but mine came out top of the page, so there!

DAVE

If the universe is infinite, the every part is equidistant from me, therefore I AM the center of the universe and it IS all about me… :-)

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
7:23 pm

Hillbilly

Hell, now you’re not only first to say it, you’re top of the page, too…

I feel so persecuted….

RW-(the original)

May 25th, 2011
7:24 pm

I think I finally hit the ad rotation Jay B was talking about yesterday. Hat tip to the sales weasels for landing the ideeli account. :-)

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
7:24 pm

josef @ 7:22

Mine is at the top of the page on my screen, at least for now. And I’ve been flagged for posting too fast about a dozen times tonight. In the real world, nobody has ever accused me of doing anything too fast, except driving or getting mad. :lol:

AmVet

May 25th, 2011
7:24 pm

If the universe is infinite, the every part is equidistant from me, therefore I AM the center of the universe and it IS all about me…

Reminds me of the Big Bang and the red shift. Which may explain why Republicans keep moving farther and farther out there!

1956?

Is there an Eagles song titled, “Ol’ 56″?

Nosiree, there is not…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1_pJL5GfG0

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
7:25 pm

I always thought so, josef, but when you had the earlier quote I thought you had had a brain . . . cramp.

Mary Elizabeth

May 25th, 2011
7:25 pm

From Jay’s post this week, entitled, “The Year the World Changed, and No One Noticed”:

“The later Clinton years, in fact, can be seen in retrospect as the last gasp of the pre-’74 America, a period in which the old economic order seemed to reassert itself, if all too briefly.”

==================================

About Jay’s forthcoming column or book, please consider the possibility that instead of Clinton’s tenure being a “gasp” of the old order that reasserted itself, “if all too briefly,” that – projecting into the future – the second Bush years will have been, in fact, that “gasp” of the old order reasserting itself, if all too briefly, before the coming new age of common global economic interests and a common global egalitarian spirit.

(President Obama’s speech before the British Parliament, today, alluded to those possibilties being forthcoming in the remainder of the 21st century. It was an excellent speech. I recommend that all read it or view it in full.)

Mighy Righty

May 25th, 2011
7:26 pm

Themistocles (a.k.a. Left Wing Mgmt)

May 25th, 2011
7:20 pm
GOP “Ryan” budget plan goes down in Senate.

I am so glad! Now maybe the Democrats will come up with a plan.

John Doe

May 25th, 2011
7:27 pm

kayaker 71

May 25th, 2011
7:27 pm

Joseph,

If you didn’t see the obvious, I won’t bore you with a rebuff. Better men than Bozo have tried and failed to resolve the ME disputes. He plays to his Muslim friends, if he has any left after OBL, when he advocates a Palistinian state. He has a vision for the ME which is not in line with reality. Israel will survive and people like Bibi will make it so. The 67 borders statement was a mistake but Bozo doesn’t have the vision to realize it. The essential thing in this whole debate….. if you had to put your trust in either Bibi or Bozo to protect what you have, who would you chose? The answer is painfully obvious.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
7:28 pm

If the universe is infinite, then every part is equidistant from me,

Now see, that’s why science makes no sense to me. Most anybody knows that you’re closer to Mississippi than you are to Mongolia, no matter what the scientists say. (Can you tell I spend all my time in science class, arguing with the teacher?)

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
7:28 pm

LWM, not a surprise there.

What was a surprise was what followed: “Immediately after the vote on the Ryan budget, the Senate unanimously rejected President Obama’s 2012 budget proposal. The Obama budget did not secure the support of a single lawmaker, with all 97 senators present voting “no.”

Just damn! :lol:

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
7:29 pm

On the Medicare bill……

(Three senators – Republicans Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas and Pat Roberts of Kansas and Democrat Chuck Schumer of New York – declined to vote.)

Interesting that those 3 chose not to vote.

http://www.bing.com/search?q=senate+vote+on+house+medicare+bill&src=IE-SearchBox&FORM=IE8SRC

I think if they don’t vote, we ought to dock ‘em a day’s pay. As a friend of mine’s Daddy used to tell us, “Do something, even if it’s wrong”.

F. Sinkwich

May 25th, 2011
7:29 pm

Them, so a few RINO’s voted against it. I’m shocked, I tell you, shocked!

I love how well the demos have demonized Ryan’s plan so well without proposing any plan of their own regarding how to save the program.

I guess O’Bozo sucking out $500 billion out of it for Obamacare is cool with them.

Why don’t they run on that?

Themistocles (a.k.a. Left Wing Mgmt)

May 25th, 2011
7:30 pm

Paul Ryan: meets failure. Chin up, kid. They say you learn more from your failures than your successes (at least, that’s what Henry Ford said), so don’t get down. But you gotta stop whining first. Accusing the other side of “demagoguery” when you’re side gave us “death panels”, ain’t gonna cut it kid.

Dave R. : I got no problem with the Senate sticking its finger in the president’s eye. I got no problem with anybody sticking their finger in the president’s eye. I think we ought to have presidents who routinely walk around with eye patches. That’s only fittin.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
7:30 pm

“I feel so persecuted….”

But of course you do! :D

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
7:33 pm

Sorry, Mary Elizabeth, but Hope & Punt ™ and his ilk (I thought I’d throw out the “ilk” card tonight) are what are the “last gasp”, due to the policies that have bankrupted this nation and (if you believe the doomsday-ers) put this entire planet’s economic future in jeopardy.

If his day isn’t over in 2013, it will be in 2017, and hopefully we will never see the likes of him again.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
7:33 pm

Hillbilly

Been getting that flag a lot tonight myself…

Closer to Mississippi, eh, there are those who’ll claim I’m still there and, time being relative, 150 years ago,,,

DAVE

My brain hurts…

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
7:34 pm

I feel so persecuted….

You’re safe in our country, Scotland or Ireland. ;-)

Mighy Righty

May 25th, 2011
7:36 pm

Just remember the “New World Order” Obama spoke of today will confiscate all of the worlds wealth and redistribute that wealth equally among all of us. I believe it will come to less than $100 per person. There will be free health care if you can walk to he village.

Don't Forget

May 25th, 2011
7:36 pm

Correction: Schultz will apologize then be suspended (go fishing) for a week.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
7:39 pm

Hillbilly
@ 7:34

But what would the MAJOR historians say about that? :-)

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
7:41 pm

Mighty Righty

Is Obama’s “New World Order” newer than Bush’s “New World Order…”

Union

May 25th, 2011
7:41 pm

Three less idiots.. we should be so lucky

Dusty

May 25th, 2011
7:42 pm

Well, I’m just an outlier here (or a plain ol’ liar) but RW…I forgive you. After all, you were born in some foreign northern place. Pennsylvania, wasn’t it? You, sir, are not to blame for that mishap…

Just wondering Can we get special cards here to prove that we are not “blog speeding”? I haven’t gotten a speeding ticket since I hit a long stretch in west Texas. Nice Ranger. Still have his picture.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
7:43 pm

Give me control of a nations money supply, and I care not who makes it’s laws. Mater Amschel Rothschild

Don’t know if that’s an accurate quote or not, it’s widely attributed to be, but it’s something to think about, in the rush to a “New World Order”.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
7:44 pm

I’ll bet Jay never gets “You’re posting too quickly”. :(

And how can a two-fingered, hunt-and-peck typist like me ever get that message?

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
7:44 pm

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
7:45 pm

“Is Obama’s “New World Order” newer than Bush’s “New World Order…”

NewER World Order – now with enhanced MELANIN! :D

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
7:46 pm

Mighy Righty

May 25th, 2011
7:47 pm

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
7:49 pm
The first President I remember pushing the “New World Order” stuff was George H W Bush. I thought it was a mistake then and I still do.

Actually dates back to Woodrow Wilson. Jimmy carter was a big proponent.

Don't Forget

May 25th, 2011
7:47 pm

kayaker 71

May 25th, 2011
7:27 pm

Joseph,

If you didn’t see the obvious, I won’t bore you with a rebuff. Better men than Bozo have tried and failed to resolve the ME disputes. He plays to his Muslim friends, if he has any left after OBL, when he advocates a Palistinian state. He has a vision for the ME which is not in line with reality. Israel will survive and people like Bibi will make it so. The 67 borders statement was a mistake but Bozo doesn’t have the vision to realize it.

He didn’t realize it because it was nothing new.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6W73v4p6Yyg

Brosephus

May 25th, 2011
7:47 pm

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
5:20 pm
Jay, I believe it is brotha Brosephus who always claims that “Jackassery knows no political boundaries”.

And if he didn’t say it, he should have!

I guess I’m gonna have to start writing that as Jackassery knows no political boundaries™ from now on. ;)

Honestly though, Dave, I could not have said it better. It’s time out for all this crap. Edwards needs to have his ass indicted on as many charges as possible. The only way to stop this crap is to start slapping charges and prison time on these jackasses. I don’t care if they’re Dem/GOP, Black/White, or young/old. If you’re gonna put yourself in a position of public trust, I want to at least be able to trust half of what’s coming out of your mouth. Any regular Joe pull the kind of shenanigans that Congresspeople get away with, and ol’ Joe would have a prison ward named in his honor for living there so long.

As far as the talking dipsh*ts, easiest way to silence them is to quit watching them.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
7:49 pm

The first President I remember pushing the “New World Order” stuff was George H W Bush. I thought it was a mistake then and I still do.

wet wiccan

May 25th, 2011
7:49 pm

Josef

I am also a 1954 vintage. A very good year! BTW I always suspected you were going to write a book about this blog!

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
7:50 pm

OK, Brosephus. Spit take for me at 7:47. :D

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
7:56 pm

DAVE

“NewER World Order – now with enhanced MELANIN”

Yeah, that’s the ticket!

Wiccan

“BTW I always suspected you were going to write a book about this blog!”

A work in progress (no joke,,,comments on comments) but unfortunately I’d have to strike a deal with the Imam and the AJC to ever get it published…and I’d get the raw end of any deal with them!

Brosephus

May 25th, 2011
7:59 pm

Just remember the “New World Order” Obama spoke of today will confiscate all of the worlds wealth and redistribute that wealth equally among all of us.

Brother, you’re not ready for the nWo. When you’re nWo, you’re nWo 4 Life!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ShM-y4lWxk

Mighy Righty

May 25th, 2011
7:59 pm

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
7:41 pm
Mighty Righty

Is Obama’s “New World Order” newer than Bush’s “New World Order…”
trols
George Soros is the current pusher. George controls just about all of the media, NBC,ABC,CBS,CNN,MSnbc,N.Y. Times, Washington Post, etc. He controls the Democrat Party and most of the Unions. He controls Barack Obama.

Mary Elizabeth

May 25th, 2011
8:03 pm

Dave R @ 7:33

I agree with you that the election of 2012 will be a pivotal one in determining America’s future direction and budding consciousness, as well as the world’s future direction. I hope that you will take the time to read, or better yet, view and listen to President Obama’s British Parliament speech in full, if available to you. His words are quite exceptional and visionary, and I believe the world will move in the direction that he foresees. Here are my words, earlier this week on this blog (5/24/11 at 9:22 a.m.):
——————————-
“There are, IMHO, two worldviews pulling at the heart of the American soul, and it goes beyond the immigration issue. One worldview will supersede the other for the remainder of the 21st century in America. Those different worldviews can be presented as a question. Are we all interconnected, one with the other, or are we totally self-sufficient as individuals? The world will move in the direction of interconnected and egalitarianism. The proof of my assertion is shown through an emerging global economy and global warming, as well as in the spontaneous risings in Middle Eastern countries of that egalitarian spirit and need for individual freedom of expression.

America’s and Georgia’s citizens will choose to move with the future – and also with what is morally right above simply the law (as in the Civil Rights Era) – or they will attempt, futilely, to remain in the past and, thereby fail for themselves and others, both economically and morally.”
———————————-
Some may be interested in reading my entire post under the “immigration” post; and from the assessment I have offered above, the year of demarcation would have been 1954, as josef mentioned, not 1974, in that the Civil Rights law was decided that year, and that egalitarian spirit changed not only in our nation but throughout the world, i.e., in South Africa, and in India even earlier. In my post I gave video proof that during the 1970s, the far right deliberately tried to turn back the coming tide, and they have been successful since then, stealthily, until now. However, the world’s consciousness is now moving in a direction that cannot be stopped. It is the future. It is destined by a force larger than any of us.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
8:03 pm

Kayaker…

I didn’t miss that…that’s what I was saying…the 67 borders thingie has been pretty much the policy for several decades…all Obama did was state it clearly…

Now, as for Bibi and the survival of Israel…I readily confess to being whapped by an overdose of what Granddaddy called “the Hebrew Tarzan syndrome” and Bibi having a certain appeal…but that is an emotional response and not entirely rational…and as I said, Bibi and Barack are pretty much on the same page…
My jury is still out on a lot of this…Obama’s legitimate rapprochement with the Muslim-Arab world is not at odds with an unwavering support of Israel’s right to exist…it’s a sticky wicket and fraught with unintended consequences…

Is he up to it? We’ll see…

wet wiccan

May 25th, 2011
8:04 pm

Josef

OOOOOhh! I just knew it! You can call it “Nuts From the Peanut Gallery”

Recon (2nd.and 3rd.)

May 25th, 2011
8:06 pm

Jay, Amen….people who seek the public trust stepping so far over the lines of decency.

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
8:06 pm

stands for decibels

May 25th, 2011
8:08 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87b4a4a2wmY

…is what comes to mind when I hear the phrase “new world order”

(not that I especially want it to, it just does.)

Mary Elizabeth

May 25th, 2011
8:09 pm

President Obama did not use the word, “New World Order” in his speech today or at all as far as I recall. That is a fundamentalist Christian terminology and it generates fear. Please view the speech without preconceived ideas about “New World Order, ” which religious groups are perpetuating.

And, Dave R, the Great Recession happened on Bush’s watch; we are now slowly recovering from it under Obama’s watch.

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
8:10 pm

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
8:11 pm

Mighty Righty
@ 7:59

“George Soros is the current pusher. George controls just about all of the media, NBC,ABC,CBS,CNN,MSnbc,N.Y. Times, Washington Post, etc. He controls the Democrat Party and most of the Unions. He controls Barack Obama.”

And THERE’s the Soros card…

What IS it with Soros that so gets some in a state? He’s as crooked as a West Virginia highway, true, but its the same game as plenty of others…it’s just he shows the left can do it as well as the right…

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
8:12 pm

Didn’t see the speech so I don’t know what Obama said but Bush I, used the term “New World Order”.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g

jm

May 25th, 2011
8:13 pm

Jay, you might add this.

RIP, Mark Haines of CNBC. He was a great business news reporter.

RW-(the original)

May 25th, 2011
8:15 pm

Dusty,

It was worse than that, it was Massachusetts. Am I still forgiven?

Brosephus

May 25th, 2011
8:15 pm

dB

When I hear New World Order, my mind goes back to WCW Wrestling with Hogan, Hall, Nash, Steiner, and the rest of the nWo. Always been a wrasslin’ watcher. It’s my vice. :)

wet wiccan

May 25th, 2011
8:15 pm

Mary Elizabeth

I wish I had your optimism. When I think about what the future will probably be, I think it will be more like the movie “Blade Runner” or “Johnny Pneumonic” and hope I am dead and gone by then.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
8:16 pm

Mary Elizabeth, people have consciousness, not countries or worlds.

Anything else is psycho-babble clap-trap.

And there is no greater force than a free individual, acting on his or her own accord.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
8:16 pm

“And, Dave R, the Great Recession happened on Bush’s watch; we are now slowly recovering from it under Obama’s watch.”

Actually, the Great Recession happened due to over 30 years of collective liberal policies finally coming home to roost, Mary Elizabeth, but don’t let reality get in your way of thinking.

And if what is happening is considered “recovery” then the patient isn’t even off life support because the “doctors” don’t know what they are doing.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
8:16 pm

wiccan

Not a bad title…and, well, “Welcome to the Monkey House” was already taken!

And for the record, when I heard New World Order being used, a chill ran up my spine…and then when it caught on, well…it’s scarey if for no other reason than the popular culture seems to have forgotten what that term signifies…

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
8:18 pm

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
8:21 pm

wiccan, mary elizabeth

The future?

A Cherokee grandfather was teaching his grandson about life…

“A fight is going on inside me,” he said to the boy.
“It is a terrible fight and it is between two wolves.

“One is evil – he is anger, envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, self-doubt, and ego.

“The other is good – he is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith.

“This same fight is going on inside you – and inside every other person, too.”

The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather,
“Which wolf will win?”

The grandfather replied,
“The one you feed”

Don't Forget

May 25th, 2011
8:22 pm

“The one you feed”

Why can’t the lazy wolves feed themselves? lol

Recon (2nd.and 3rd.)

May 25th, 2011
8:23 pm

Moments when teleprompters just don’t work.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNRXGRFJdDY

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
8:23 pm

RW, where in Massachusetts? Me? Born and raised in Tewksbury.

Mary Elizabeth

May 25th, 2011
8:23 pm

Dave R @ 8:16

Dave, individual people do have consciousness, as well as nations and the world. Read any of the works of Carl Jung and you will come to see that that is true. He and and his mentor, Sigmund Freud, opened up ways of viewing the mind and consciousness that people had never known before. They both world famous, well-respected thinkers and psychiatrists – hardly “psycho-babble clap-trap.”

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
8:23 pm

josef, I kinda like Bibi.

Heard a quote from him yesterday when going over potential discussions with Hamas and their inability to recognize Israel’s right to exist. He said: “What are we going to discuss with them, the method of our immolation?”

Blunt, but given their history . . . .

Disgusted

May 25th, 2011
8:24 pm

I seem to recall some extremely tasteless nude pictures of Dr. Laura not too long ago. They were all over the Internet, and it is apparent they weren’t the product of some super-spy with a camera. The deliberate posing for such pictures would strike me as qualifying for the application of Ed’s epithet.

Dusty

May 25th, 2011
8:24 pm

RW…MASSACHUSETTS!!!!

Well, since I went to Boston University for awhile and everybody was real nice (I like your Southern accent!) even though they tried to feed me some awful stuff called Indian pudding, I call you an aristocrat of another kind. All is forgiven. BUT watch that California ice tea. There are limits, you know..

Mighy Righty

May 25th, 2011
8:25 pm

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
8:11 pm
Mighty Righty
@ 7:59

“George Soros is the current pusher. George controls just about all of the media, NBC,ABC,CBS,CNN,MSnbc,N.Y. Times, Washington Post, etc. He controls the Democrat Party and most of the Unions. He controls Barack Obama.”

And THERE’s the Soros card…

What IS it with Soros that so gets some in a state? He’s as crooked as a West Virginia highway, true, but its the same game as plenty of others…it’s just he shows the left can do it as well as the right…

Study old George. He is dangerous. He even scared NPR recently. They were conveninced he was trying to influence their programs.

Jay

May 25th, 2011
8:26 pm

I was born in Bourne, Mass.

Which on several occasions has inspired a true-life Abbott and Costello routine.

“Where were you born?”

“Bourne …”

“Yes, born. Where were you born?”

“Bourne …”

“Yes, born!”

“Well if you’d shut up a minute, I could tell you! I was born in Bourne, Massachusetts.”

“Oh.”

Mary Elizabeth

May 25th, 2011
8:26 pm

Dave R,
Your 8:16 is simply opinion; there are other points of view on what caused the economic crash of 2009.

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
8:26 pm

It’s amazing, really! The Republican momentum coming out of the 2010 elections is simply vanishing right before their eyes! As I have said many, many times before, the Republicans mistook the backlash from Obama’s Healthcare Reform Bill as a mandate for their entire kooky agenda.

Well, now the chickens are coming home to roost. Let’s eliminate unions for public workers! Let’s eliminate Medicare! After all, that’s what the Kochs (kooks) want isn’t it?

Imagine the insurance company profits with all those “high risk” seniors on the books! Why, it simply boggles the mind! Imagine the executive salaries with all those hapless seniors on board!

Forget about “living” wages and retirement for public workers. Heck, they can live in mobile homes!

The whole putrid, septic logic is now coming to a head! It’s time to excise the Republican boil that festers on the buttocks of America! Imagine what we can accomplish as a country without endless wars, corporate control of our government and a government of the people, for the people and by the people instead of the government we now have which answers only to their corporate masters.

DAMN! That felt good!

RW-(the original)

May 25th, 2011
8:27 pm

Dave R,

Brockton, but I escaped to Florida when I was 3. Married a girl from Pittsfield 13 years ago though. The weird thing is we met in Georgia.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
8:27 pm

Dusty, Indian Pudding is the Yankee version of grits!

And just as disgusting, IMHO.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
8:28 pm

Righty

I HAVE studied the life of Soros….

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 25th, 2011
8:28 pm

What’s the difference in the Kochs and Soros? None that I can see. They’re playing the same game they’re just on different teams.

Time to take my leave. Nite all.

getalife

May 25th, 2011
8:29 pm

I have 40 more that voted to go in the hall of shame.

“WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats wasted no time capitalizing on Tuesday’s Medicare-fueled upset in a New York special election, holding a vote on the GOP budget plan Wednesday designed to put Republicans on record backing the controversial House budget plan.

The measure failed, 57 to 40, with five Republicans breaking ranks: Sens. Scott Brown of Massachusetts, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Rand Paul of Kentucky”AOL

Shame on the gop.

Keep yelling at them.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
8:33 pm

“Your 8:16 is simply opinion; there are other points of view on what caused the economic crash of 2009.”

But as I’ve noted before, Mary Elizabeth, my opinion is so close to reality that there is literally no discernible difference. ;)

jm

May 25th, 2011
8:33 pm

suuuuuuucks to be John Edwards. :) Glad he’s getting his due. Can reporters get a clue?

Mark Haines was a guy who reported and questioned every CEO and Wall St guy as hard as it comes. He was always keeping an eye out for the small investor and beat guys up about corruption constantly, whether they were Congressman or CEO’s.

You have to despair about the quality of journalism these days. RIP Tony Snow, Louis Rukeyser as well. Argh.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
8:34 pm

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
8:34 pm

DAVE

Moshe Dayan once said, “if peace in the Middle East is dependent on the obliteration of Israel, what stake do we have in such a peace?”

Disgusted
“…seem to recall some extremely tasteless nude pictures of Dr. Laura”

Tasteless nude pictures? Dr. Laura…?

There’s something redundant there…. :-)

jm

May 25th, 2011
8:36 pm

getalife – keep up the mediscaring and we’ll have a good bankrupt country. way to go.

looks like a few abstentions as well

Mary Elizabeth

May 25th, 2011
8:37 pm

josef @ 8:21

josef, I had heard that story before. So true. That is why I believe when we “feed” incivililty and harshness toward one another, that is the kind of world we are creating by first creating it within ourselves.

I mentioned this afternoon on the blog that Oprah Winfrey, whom I hardly ever watch but did today as it was her last broadcast, spoke of how we each emanate an energy that is communicated from us into the world. We must first choose – and I would say know – our better angels before the world’s better “angel” will emerge. And this is not found by following rules of religious dogma; it is found by knowing oneself – good wolf and bad – and not judging harshly – just knowing.

(And as you all know very well I am sure, I definitely have a “bad” wolf, inside me, as well as a “good” one! But the good Lord has not given up on me yet!)

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
8:37 pm

“Read any of the works of Carl Jung and you will come to see that that is true. He and and his mentor, Sigmund Freud, opened up ways of viewing the mind and consciousness that people had never known before.”

Much of which is inferred, Mary Elizabeth. Little science and much belief. Kinda like religion.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
8:38 pm

Don’t Forget

“Why can’t the lazy wolves feed themselves? lol”

:-)

getalife

May 25th, 2011
8:38 pm

jm,

It will be over after all the dem ads and the 12 election.

Chin up con.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
8:38 pm

DAVE

There’s a lot of science in religion, and a lot of religion in science…Maimonides, d*mmit! He settled that question 700 years ago! :-)

stands for decibels

May 25th, 2011
8:39 pm

They were all over the Internet, and it is apparent they weren’t the product of some super-spy with a camera. The deliberate posing for such pictures would strike me as qualifying for the application of Ed’s epithet.

1) no, they wouldn’t; and in any case, the posting of those photos was anything but “deliberate” on Laura’s part.

also;

2) you’re thinking of the wrong radio Laura.

pandora

May 25th, 2011
8:39 pm

I would lump Jay’s idiotic comment last week that (white) Herman Cain supporters only support him so The Right can have their black guy too. That was lower than alligator squeeze – even for Bookman.

Now maybe if we can get the main stream liberal DNC media to stop slobbering over O’Bama – like their horror shown when Netanyahu had to “school” O’Bama on the Israeli’s situation in the region (THAT was priceless). Of course that will happen right after we see CNN report about Pelosiland and all those Obamacare wavers in her district.

Besides, at least the Bush crew were bright enough to know where a presidential limo could – and couldn’t – drive without getting stuck. And did The Queen give back that idiotic gift of CD’s and make any comments about enjoying the bust of Churchill that O’Bama threw back at them? Inquiring minds want to know. But that’s why we have a successful new media, of which the O’Bama administration has set up a new Goon Squad (at taxpayer expense) to attempt to intimidate and silence. Here’s to a fun 16 and a half months!

Logic 05

May 25th, 2011
8:42 pm

and Jay and make it four in the Hall of Shame…

Nomobama

May 25th, 2011
8:42 pm

I was expecting…Bookman, Tucker and Barr…oh well…

Recon (2nd.and 3rd.)

May 25th, 2011
8:42 pm

I thought Ed Schultz was smacked ass. I have to admit that I only watched him once in a Portland, Oregon motel room last year on vacation but his rants were way over the top.

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
8:44 pm

We know the true meaning of the latest Republiterm, “mediscare”. It’s Ryan’s attempt at diversion now that his yellowbrick roadmap has been revealed and people see that he wants to take money used to fund medicare and medicaid and food stamps and give it to the wealthiest in the form of yet another tax cut while also continuing to run up the national debt at the same time. We got your Mediscare.

jm

May 25th, 2011
8:45 pm

getalife – I’m not worried about the Presidential election. You might see an entire Republican Congress and a Republican President again, Obama’s gone too far.

BTW, you folks who love the idea of single payer. Go sign up for Medicaid if you qualify. Its single payer. Have fun.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
8:45 pm

For Jay and other Red Sox fans:

“Daisuke Matsuzaka is back in Japan, and if Boston Red Sox brass were slipped a dose of truth serum, they’d love for him never to return.”

TESTIFY! :D

AmVet

May 25th, 2011
8:47 pm

Born in Bourne, huh Jay?

I can’t think of anything that rhymes with Wichita.

And by the time I was 17 I figured out that the Midwest was a great place to be from.

FAR from!

Could be worse, I guess. I could have spent more than a week of my life in Massachusetts!

As we were waxing slightly metaphysical earlier…

“Phases and stages, circles and cycles, scenes that we’ve all seen before …” – Willie Nelson

“What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.” (Ecclesiastes 1:9-14)

“There is nothing new except what has been forgotten.” – Marie Antoinette

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
8:47 pm

“We know the true meaning of the latest Republiterm, “mediscare”. It’s Ryan’s attempt at diversion now that his yellowbrick roadmap has been revealed and people see that he wants to take money used to fund medicare and medicaid and food stamps and give it to the wealthiest in the form of yet another tax cut while also continuing to run up the national debt at the same time. We got your Mediscare.”

Well said, Taxpayer!

Mary Elizabeth

May 25th, 2011
8:48 pm

Dave, once you read and digest the work of Jung, then you will see how valid his work is. In fact, when an interviewer asks him about his thoughts on religion and the afterlife, Jung speaks of the fact that he does not think in terms of “belief,” but in terms of what he “knows and experiences” to be true. (You can see that interview on YouTube.)

You are stating gross generalities of what you assume to be true regarding Jung’s work. Better to read and study his work; then, you will not make such sweeping statements regarding his work. And Dave, science is only one discipline of knowledge. There are worlds of which you know not – but exist nevertheless. That is why we need to validate all disciplines, not just one. We limit ourselves so, when we do that. It would be (as a simile) like saying we should have on a Left Brain or a Right Brain, instead of both.

Dusty

May 25th, 2011
8:50 pm

NEW WORLD ORDER..new world order!!! Was that the German’s or the hippies or those in rapture??

What a crock! I don’t want a new world order. I just want the old world we ‘ve got to get in order. Since we are in the best place in the world already, I suggest we “straighten up and fly right” and appreciate what we have.

The rest of the world knows our history. I don’t care to change that into some nebulous notion of new neausous nonsense.

We cannot be the world’s mother. We can only assist them if possible in their own reach. Iraq! We are trying with Afghanistan!! The Middle East is turning over its own world. They struggle. We stand like a golden goal post already won for equality. Those without freedom wish to reach a similar goal..

New world order! Indeed! How about working on the old one before you order a new one?

AmVet

May 25th, 2011
8:52 pm

Dave, I saw that.

Too bad he didn’t take Lackey, Lester, Buchholz and Beckett with him!

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
8:53 pm

Mick

May 25th, 2011
8:53 pm

jm

I see the republican party imploding and the tea party going out with the tide. It’s not that the dems are so great, it’s more like the repubs are just so bad – they cannot be trusted to govern for the people, that perception is building…

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
8:53 pm

AmVet, he can have Lackey as far as I’m concerned. Wakefield’s a better pitcher as far as I’m concerned.

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
8:58 pm

And, let us not forget this chart

Just a reminder for those who want to blame Obama.

Mighy Righty

May 25th, 2011
8:59 pm

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
8:26 pm
It’s amazing, really! The Republican momentum coming out of the 2010 elections is simply vanishing right before their eyes! As I have said many, many times before, the Republicans mistook the backlash from Obama’s Healthcare Reform Bill as a mandate for their entire kooky agenda.

Well, now the chickens are coming home to roost. Let’s eliminate unions for public workers! Let’s eliminate Medicare! After all, that’s what the Kochs (kooks) want isn’t it?

Imagine the insurance company profits with all those “high risk” seniors on the books! Why, it simply boggles the mind! Imagine the executive salaries with all those hapless seniors on board!

Forget about “living” wages and retirement for public workers. Heck, they can live in mobile homes!

The whole putrid, septic logic is now coming to a head! It’s time to excise the Republican boil that festers on the buttocks of America! Imagine what we can accomplish as a country without endless wars, corporate control of our government and a government of the people, for the people and by the people instead of the government we now have which answers only to their corporate masters.

DAMN! That felt good

How do you explain tis poll taken today?

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
Wednesday, May 25, 2011 Email to a Friend ShareThisAdvertisement
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 25% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Thirty-five percent (35%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -10 (see trends).

The president holds a 45% to 44% edge over a Generic Republican in an early look at 2012. Republicans hold a two-point advantage over Democrats on the Generic Congressional Ballot.

That felt pretty good as well.

Kamchak

May 25th, 2011
8:59 pm

Your 8:16 is simply opinion; there are other points of view on what caused the economic crash of 2009.

Not the least of which is that supply-side, trickle-on alchemy was born with an expiration date.

Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)

May 25th, 2011
9:00 pm

Just in case anyone ever forgets.

Well, this Soothsayer must of misremembered what My President said. Anyhow, it sure sounded good when he was promising us a Tax Cut. It made alot of sense that if you give up about a third your income, your income will get bigger. I just let the experts tell me what I wanted to hear. It wasn’t my fault.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
9:00 pm

“In fact, when an interviewer asks him about his thoughts on religion and the afterlife, Jung speaks of the fact that he does not think in terms of “belief,” but in terms of what he “knows and experiences” to be true.”

Mary Elizabeth, science is that which can be proven true repetitively and without interpretation.

Someone speaking of “what he “knows and experiences” to be true”, is not science.

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
9:01 pm

That any Republican presents himself on this blog presuming to have the “answers” is beyond ludicrous. I never cease to be amazed at the bald-faced gall of the Republicans/Right on this blog as if somehow they have the “answers.” Heck, they caused all the problems in the first place.

WAKE UP AMERICA! It’s time for the fockees to revolt against the fockors.

Recon (2nd.and 3rd.)

May 25th, 2011
9:02 pm

Interesting that Obummer and the Democrats are taking 500 Billion out of Medicare while they demagogue the Ryan plan with no plan of their own to save Medicare for future generations. The party of irresponsibility sure sucks in some fools as evidenced on this blog.

getalife

May 25th, 2011
9:03 pm

jm,

This gop house is the worst ever.

You vote for failure and tried to steal Medicare like you tried to steal ss.

Pitiful.

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
9:05 pm

“Well, this Soothsayer must of misremembered what My President said. “

No, Redneck, we all “misunderestimated” his ability to destroy our country for the benefit of corporate America.

Disgusted

May 25th, 2011
9:06 pm

Interesting that Obummer and the Democrats are taking 500 Billion out of Medicare while they demagogue the Ryan plan with no plan of their own to save Medicare for future generations.

They’re taking $500 billion from Medicare Advantage, the super-luxury Medicare plan offered by private insurance companies. Why should I pay to fund Medicare benefits that regular Medicare subscribers don’t have? Why should my Medicare contributions go to wealthy subscribers who can afford to kick in an extra 20 bucks a month so that they can have the Mercedes Benz of all Medicare plans? Hell with those spoiled, wealthy people. Let them have the same Medicare the rest of us will have.

But keep your talking point, Recon. You reveal a bit of Himmler in your argument, much like those who argue that Obama’s failure to close Gitmo was a broken promise, even though it was the Republicans who blocked the closure in Congress.

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
9:06 pm

Yeah, Sooth, ’cause the Democrats have such a great plan to attack our deficits and debt.

Why, I can put my hand on it right here . . . wait, I know it was somewhere . . . around here. . . if I could just find it . . . .

Oh, well, I’m sure I’ll be able to put my fingers on it soon enough. After all, it does exist . . .

. . . doesn’t it? :(

buck@gon

May 25th, 2011
9:07 pm

From National Review:

“The Senate just finished voting on the Paul Ryan/House Republican budget resolution, as well as the budget put forward by President Obama in February. Both, as expected, were voted down, but only Ryan’s received any votes.

Indeed, the Obama budget failed by the astounding final count of 0 to 97. Not even Bernie Sanders (S., Vt.) could bring himself to support the president’s plan, begging the question, as one observer in the Senate gallery put it: “Are Democrats actually for anything?”

The Ryan budget, on the other hand, was voted down 40 to 57, with five Republicans — Sens. Brown, Collins, Murkowski, Paul and Snowe — voting ‘no,’ along with every Democrat.”

So, when it comes down to the serious work of passing a budget, the Democrats won’t cooperate. In supporting their party’s own leader’s budget they can’t even be bothered to vote PRESENT as Obama himself did so many times before he was selected as this amazing story he has become. What the Democrats did vote on his budget was a resounding NO!

Obama is just not a serious actor on the national stage anymore, much less the world stage. When the cameras are turned off (and perhaps for this reason they have turned away), serious people reject him and his ill-considered policies.

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
9:07 pm

Well, Jay done turned on the “post-o-meter” before he left. Heck, I thought Jay got paid by the number of posts! I’ll try not to post “too quickly.”

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
9:07 pm

Jay

May 25th, 2011
6:59 pm

Thulsa, I’d suspect it fell afoul of the no-new-taxes-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever-ever crowd.

Jay,

Didn’t the Dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems dems
control Congress in 2009???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

buck@gon

May 25th, 2011
9:07 pm

That is to say, Democrat would MUCH rather belittle serious Republican efforts than create. It has indeed been over two years since Democrats have passed a budget. They didn’t pass one last year because of the election.

The Presidential election is coming.

Look for the media and in this here blog in particular, to blame Republicans for any and all failure of a budget to be passed. If Democrat culpability can not be denied, then look for the Bookman media to blame BOTH Republicans and Democrats, and then to complain about how VICIOUS things are, and how that is just so very very sad.

Mary Elizabeth

May 25th, 2011
9:10 pm

Dave R @ 9:00

Dave, you are trying to give me a “sound bite” view of the work of Carl Jung, a man whose work you have, no doubt, never read. How futile. Why don’t you simply read his work and learn from a great mind. I am not trying to “win” a silly debate here with you this evening. You must see that.

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
9:11 pm

“Yeah, Sooth, ’cause the Democrats have such a great plan to attack our deficits and debt.”

I guess that’s the previous President left office with a quarter of a billion dollar surplus that was growing year by year.

In fact the Democrats do have a plan to reduce the deficits. It’s called letting the Bush tax cuts expire. However, they have been thwarted by being held hostage over the extension of unemployment benefits for people whose jobs have been shipped to China.

jm

May 25th, 2011
9:12 pm

getalife 9:03 – worse than the Democrat dominated House and Senate that didn’t pass a budget? I think not.

Worse than the current Democrat Senate that has the lowest legislative volume in decades? I think not.

Mighy Righty

May 25th, 2011
9:12 pm

See my 8:59

25% approval for the Bamster! WOW, TWENTY FIVE PERCENT APPROVAL. Was Bush ever that low? This is before the bafoon bumbled around the Queen in front of the entire world! Twenty five percent. You know a large percent of the 25 percent are illiterate. lt may be single digit approval among people who can read. My oh MY! Only 25%.

Dusty

May 25th, 2011
9:12 pm

RW,,,Indian pudding the same as grits? Awwww they told me it was dessert! Poor Indians.

Well, I wish the Braves were playing tonight (Did I tell you Conrad homered in the 11th?) or Masterpiece Theater was playing a nice Jane Austen story. Getting kinda slow around here again.. Busy day tomorrow…

Goodnite…

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
9:12 pm

DAVE

“Someone speaking of “what he “knows and experiences” to be true”, is not science.”

I beg to differ. The lexical entry “science” is from the present participle of the Latin verb “scire” meaning to “know” as inherent from the nature of the “thing” being observed, and, as the present participle, implies an ongoing process. The “experience,” is what goes beyond that which may be observed from the five senses. The “truth,” if there be such a thing, is the two in cosmic ohm…since both are mutuable, so is “truth…”

“When science and scripture appear in conflict, then the scripture (excepting the Torah for Jews) is to be taken as allegorical…” –Maimonides….

buck@gon

May 25th, 2011
9:12 pm

Mary Elizabeth @ 8:48pm

“And Dave, science is only one discipline of knowledge.”

I’m curious Mary Elizabeth. I don’t mean to intrude….

But….

I wonder. What is science to you, the etymology of the word, what you think of science as a field vs. say other disciplines of knowledge? What would you consider other disciplines of knowledge? Would be interested in what anyone else thinks on this…..

Thanks,

Recon (2nd.and 3rd.)

May 25th, 2011
9:13 pm

Disgusted, why of course you can go along with the duped and buy a supplemental plan from the AARP. I don’t think you really know much about. Talk about talking points, they sure sucked you in.

buck@gon

May 25th, 2011
9:13 pm

Add another just now,

What did he say?

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
9:13 pm

Mary Elizabeth…

Oh, I daresay Dave has read Jung…

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
9:14 pm

“I am not trying to “win” a silly debate here with you this evening. You must see that.”

I always see that, Mary Elizabeth. Your trying to do that which cannot be done would be an exercise in futility on your part. ;) Shows a maturity I did not think you possessed.

And I have read Jung and Freud. Not a great deal, because I tire easily of clap-trap.

Add another Blunderer Mr. Bookman --

May 25th, 2011
9:15 pm

That toast made by Mr. Obama to the Queen of England last night was the height of idiocy.

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
9:15 pm

Well, it’s time to leave to begin my “elbow exercises.” But I will leave you with this.

Goodnight everyone!

jm

May 25th, 2011
9:17 pm

If I may take a spare moment to chastise some of the Republican commentators. I heard a couple bemoaning the infringement on liberties by the Obama administration.

Excuse me? Where were these guys during Bush? While I agree that what Obama is doing is horrible, they should take a little extra time and chastise Bush for what he did that has infringed on a lot of rights (privacy and otherwise).

Obama is drunk again ----

May 25th, 2011
9:17 pm

“Michelle… I’m OK to drive.” — Get that limo stuck on the hill….. LMFAO !!

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
9:17 pm

“In fact the Democrats do have a plan to reduce the deficits. It’s called letting the Bush tax cuts expire.”

But that won’t reduce the debt, Sooth, nor will it make any appreciable dent in the deficit. Mathematics is your friend.

Your Dems didn’t even give their President’s budget a single, solitary vote in the Senate, Sooth!

USMC dawg

May 25th, 2011
9:18 pm

“This gop house is the worst ever.”

The Nancy Pelosi/DEMOCRAT led House of Representatives didn’t even pass a budget last year…

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
9:19 pm

“When science and scripture appear in conflict, then the scripture (excepting the Torah for Jews) is to be taken as allegorical…” –Maimonides….

josef, I think our definition of “science” has evolved since that time, especially given advances over the past 20 or 30 years. While I do not believe in a higher power, neither do I disbelieve in one until either one can be proven to me.

It may trouble some on this blog to read this, but I have little faith in “faith”.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
9:20 pm

Sometimes a person’s ignorance on a topic is of such a profound nature that I literally laugh until my ribs hurt. Disgusted has provided me with one of those such moments.

Let me help you out there disgusted. The main beneficiaries of Medicare Advantage plans are poor and middle class seniors. They are good plans but are hardly “cadillac” plans. I know because Medicare Advantage and Medicare Supplement plans are how I and my agents make a living.

Medicare Supplement plans are in fact the “cadillac plans” which are what the upper middle class and wealthier individuals tend to purchase- this is private insurance that the poorer and lower middle class people can’t afford. I always thought it was the poor and middle class people that the Dems purported to look out for.

“Super Luxury” medicare advantage plans? That is tooooooo funny. I can’t wait to tell my agents about your blog post.

Disgusted

May 25th, 2011
9:06 pm

Interesting that Obummer and the Democrats are taking 500 Billion out of Medicare while they demagogue the Ryan plan with no plan of their own to save Medicare for future generations.

They’re taking $500 billion from Medicare Advantage, the super-luxury Medicare plan offered by private insurance companies. Why should I pay to fund Medicare benefits that regular Medicare subscribers don’t have? Why should my Medicare contributions go to wealthy subscribers who can afford to kick in an extra 20 bucks a month so that they can have the Mercedes Benz of all Medicare plans? Hell with those spoiled, wealthy people. Let them have the same Medicare the rest of us will have.

But keep your talking point, Recon.

Dusty

May 25th, 2011
9:21 pm

Ha! Science….I’ll bet my microscope against your “vision” any day. I see . You dream. The two should not be confused.

I’ll go sleep on that .

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
9:22 pm

Dave @ 9:17 please see chart @ 8:58. Goodnight.

Recon (2nd.and 3rd.)

May 25th, 2011
9:22 pm

Well jay’s bolsheviks are on the blog this evening chirping the party line. Kind of boring so I’ll wish y’all a good evening. Taps.

jm

May 25th, 2011
9:23 pm

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
9:24 pm

Recon (2nd.and 3rd.)

May 25th, 2011
9:13 pm

Disgusted, why of course you can go along with the duped and buy a supplemental plan from the AARP. I don’t think you really know much about. Talk about talking points, they sure sucked you in.

Recon,

Its clear to me you know more about Medicare than the foolish one named disgusted. But allow me to handle this one since he has given me such a good laugh.

Mighy Righty

May 25th, 2011
9:24 pm

jm

May 25th, 2011
9:17 pm
If I may take a spare moment to chastise some of the Republican commentators. I heard a couple bemoaning the infringement on liberties by the Obama administration.

Excuse me? Where were these guys during Bush? While I agree that what Obama is doing is horrible, they should take a little extra time and chastise Bush for what he did that has infringed on a lot of rights (privacy and otherwise).

Please explain. Names, places, details. For example; Black thugs in Philadelphia at polling place carrying clubs threatening voters. In spite of video evidence charges dropped by Obama AG Holder! Or how about S.E.I.U. thugs beating a man in St. Louis. Again in spite of video tape, no charges.

Obama is drunk again --

May 25th, 2011
9:25 pm

Apparently there’s a photo going viral that shows Obama sniffing cocaine….

Uh oh…

Maybe it’s real, maybe it isn’t….

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
9:26 pm

“Dave @ 9:17 please see chart @ 8:58. Goodnight.”

Well, if Sooth’s whole argument is based on a Crayola picture, it MUST be correct.

Recon (2nd.and 3rd.)

May 25th, 2011
9:28 pm

Thulsa Doom, You’re on, the debate is yours but don’t be surprised if Disgusted is a no show.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
9:28 pm

The Doom dissects the talking points of the ignorant and the hapless!

Why should I pay to fund Medicare benefits that regular Medicare subscribers don’t have?- Disgusted

Disgusted, Clearly you are ignorant of that fact that nearly everybody that qualifies for regular medicare also qualifies for a Medicare advantage plan if they want one.

Why should my Medicare contributions go to wealthy subscribers who can afford to kick in an extra 20 bucks a month so that they can have the Mercedes Benz of all Medicare plans?- Disgusted

Wealthy subscribers? Really? That’s news to me and my hundreds of Medicare Advantage plan customers. Most of them take an Advantage plan because they can’t afford a far more expensive private supplement plan.

Hell with those spoiled, wealthy people. Let them have the same Medicare the rest of us will have.-Disgusted

The spoiled, wealthy people have the exact same Medicare that anybody who doesn’t want a Medicare Advantage plan have which is original Medicare. They simply chose to purchase a separate, expensive private supplement plan to cover the costs that Original medicare does not cover.

But keep your talking point, Recon.- Disgusted.

And you keep your ignorance talking points at home disgusted. Its obvious that whatever misinformed trash you read had to have come from some loony left wing site like the Huffington post.

Exactly where did you get these nonsensical ideas about Medicare??? Source please?????

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
9:28 pm

“Well, if Sooth’s whole argument is based on a Crayola picture, it MUST be correct.”

“The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.”

– Winston Churchill

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
9:29 pm

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
9:32 pm

And Crayola drawings trying to explain a complicated economic situation is about all Sooth and Taxxie can handle.

jm

May 25th, 2011
9:32 pm

USMC dawg 9:18 – don’t distract libs with facts.

Might Righty – Bush transgressions (in my book anyway): renditions, torture, and most importantly, significantly upping surveillance. Now the last one may be fully justifiable on national security grounds. But there needs to be damn good oversight by a separate branch of government in my book.

I see Obama trampling more on economic rights so far, more so than personal liberties.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
9:32 pm

DAVE

“josef, I think our definition of “science” has evolved since that time”

What I was doing was giving the DENOTATIVE of the lexical entry, the CONNOTATIVE is something else…it is not our definition of “science” which continues to evolve, but “science” itself…that is why I made the point…it is an ongoing process, as is the allegorical relationship of that which we are “knowing” in relation to that which we are “experiencing..” They need not be in conflict, but dealt with within their proper perspective…

That’s why I am such a Maimonidean…as I said, he laid the question to rest, imho, 700 years ago…these are the two spheres of the human search for enlightenment, the earthly and the spiritual…and as I “knowledge” of the one develops and evovlves, so too does the other…

The “problem,” as I see it, is when the acolytes of the one claim to have “the answers” and invalidate the other…it is a balance between the two, ever expanding…

jm

May 25th, 2011
9:33 pm

Obama is drunk again – it would explain why he thinks its 2008 :)

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
9:33 pm

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
9:28 pm

“Well, if Sooth’s whole argument is based on a Crayola picture, it MUST be correct.”

“The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.”

– Winston Churchill

Great post sooth. Kinda like your so called “truth” that 9/11 was an inside job done by the Bush administration.

Got another one for you on truth that pertains to liberal walls of lies.

Truth goes through 3 stages- At first it is mocked and ridiculed. Then it is violently opposed. Then at last it is accepted as a self–evident truth. Perhaps you will one day recognize the self evident truth that the Bush administration did not blow up the twin towers in some kind of loony, grandiose conspiracy.

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
9:35 pm

Soothsayer: Bush tax cuts and wars in Afghanistan and Iraq account for the lion’s share of our budget deficit.

Dave R.: Cheeseburgers are on sale at McDonalds!

Soothsayer: Wha-a-a-a-at?!!

Dave R.: Cheeseburger are on sale at McDonalds!

Soothsayer: Come back when you have something to say.

They BOTH suck

May 25th, 2011
9:35 pm

@ Dave R

What can be said that you just called names and didn’t have the intellect and honesty to debate Taxpayers last post?

We do not agree on much in terms of the what I read from your posts, however you beg the question today………….. even-though I have read some thought out posts from you at times

Mary Elizabeth

May 25th, 2011
9:35 pm

buck@gon @ 9:12

“I’m curious Mary Elizabeth. I don’t mean to intrude….

But….

I wonder. What is science to you, the etymology of the word, what you think of science as a field vs. say other disciplines of knowledge? What would you consider other disciplines of knowledge.”
——————————-

Buck@gon, you asked sincere questions of me. I will try to respond to you in a few days. Those are in-depth questions that you posed. I am a little tired now, so I would not do the answers to them justice, tonight. But I will respond to you, later. Thanks for your interest in my thoughts.
Have a nice evening.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
9:36 pm

Taxpayer,

Perhaps you have something you would like to add to our Medicare conversation? Perhaps you would like to erect a paper wall of liberal lies about Medicare in the same fashion as disgusted did. And perhaps then I will likewise lob a conservative missile of truth at your paper wall of liberal lies. Go ahead- make my day!

jm

May 25th, 2011
9:36 pm

“You are posting comments too quickly. Slow down.”

This is getting very tiresome. Oh yes, and it sounds like Stephen Colbert talking.

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
9:36 pm

The Doom dissects the talking points of the ignorant and the hapless!

How novel, this self-dissection The Doom will now attempt. Are the UTube cameras rolling.

jm

May 25th, 2011
9:37 pm

Cocaine use in WH. Not by Obama…… oops. Must be Obama’s dealer.

http://i.imgur.com/Vf7DA.png

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
9:37 pm

Thulsa…

See? We can TOO have an intellectual discussion…

So, what is your opinion of the Maimonidean-Jungian-Freudian, Josef-Dave-Mary Elizabeth paradox of the meaning of life? :-)

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
9:39 pm

Dave R’s 9:32 pretty much sums him up. If anything, Dave R is predictable.

Obama is drunk again --

May 25th, 2011
9:40 pm

jm – he’s skinny as a rail….

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
9:41 pm

“Kinda like your so called “truth” that 9/11 was an inside job done by the Bush administration.”

Forget my so-called truth how about these architects and engineers who may, as it turns out know a little more about these things than you do. By the way, they agree with me.

Obama is drunk again --

May 25th, 2011
9:42 pm

jm —– The link I wanted to post has been scrubbed already…

LMFAO again !!!

oldguy

May 25th, 2011
9:43 pm

Just got in;
Interesting, so Jay equivicates the words of nonelected pundits to the dispicable activities (planned misuse of contributions to hide behavior, fraud, lying, etc} of an elected official (and presidential candidate).
Edwards is slime, and always has been. I know people who have known him since he started law practice in Raleigh. He was and is an ambulance chaser. He made his millions taking problem pregency cases and “looking pretty” for the jury and playing to their emotions. A good friend (and the OB/GYN who delivered my younger daughter) quit delivering babies because the cost of insurance got so high that it cost him to do deliveries (due directly to Edwards lawsuits). Raleigh had fewer delivery OB/GYMs per 100,000 population than Bombay India!!! (directly due to Edwards lawsuits).
Yes, he is pretty! Women swoon, but he has NO integity!!

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
9:43 pm

Netanyahu= man giving a lecture

Obama = receiving a lecture.

I woulda said boy receiving a lecture but you know how some of the hyper sensitives out there woulda said it was a racist comment if I had used the word boy.

RW-(the original)

May 25th, 2011
9:45 pm

Indian pudding the same as grits?

Dusty

That wasn’t me bringing that news to the board. I’ve never even heard of the stuff, but I wouldn’t put it past these blog gremlins to start moving commentary around to other boxes if they’ve tired of just moving the boxes.

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
9:49 pm

Did someone say “Medicare Advantage” Well, that was an interesting read. I’m sure Thulsa can explain the discrepencies between it and his own “truth”.

They BOTH suck

May 25th, 2011
9:49 pm

Thulsa

make all the comparisons you like

But not once did Netanyahu say stop GIVING us aid, stop selling us technology and stop having your FBI and CIA corporate with our IDF and Mosad………… or did I miss something

You stupid fvks are all mad because Obama said what Presidents have been negotiating in some form or fashion for 40 yrs

Fox news and right wing pundits originally tried to spin it has it had NEVER been ever even implied.. it took all of ONE minute to debunk it than they went to well it was never said publicly

And yet YOU still cry

Doobie Bros wrote a song about YOUR ilk

“what a fool believes”

hahhhhahahhahhhahahahah

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
9:50 pm

Josef Nix,

I was hoping to talk about Newcomb’s paradox. Speaking of paradoxes

“There is a place where Contrarieties are equally True… .”
- William Blake (1757-1827) – from “Milton” Book the Second, Plate 30

Soothsayer

May 25th, 2011
9:50 pm

Thulsa: just as I expected — nothing to say. All hat and no cattle. Goodnight.

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
9:52 pm

I woulda said boy receiving a lecture but you know how some of the hyper sensitives out there woulda said it was a racist comment if I had used the word boy

“Boys will be boys” comes to mind when reading your posts, Thulsa. Of course I am assuming that you are of the male gender.

josef nix

May 25th, 2011
9:53 pm

Thulsa…

And we shall continue this at a later date, then…and contrarities do not, per force, equate with polarities…

I leave y’all to the name calling and sniping…end of the school year lunch tomorrow and have to make sure the hot barbecued sausage are crock-potting properly…

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
9:54 pm

TBS, I really don’t bother much with TaxPayer. He/she/it never answers questions, never replies to challenges, and never provides any meaningful discussion to any debate.

So I do not waste time with him/her/it.

You’ll notice that his/her/it’s answer to my reply to Sooth was completely in ignorance to my earlier post; that being that the Bush Tax cuts being repealed would NOT reduce the debt, and would only make a small dent in the deficit, which is fact.

Of course, the first thing he/she/it claims is that the debt will be reduced, against all facts to the contrary.

It is why I do not respect him/her/it in any way shape or form, and do not engage in debate with anyone who does not at least try to use a modicum of intelligence.

Got it? Good!

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
9:54 pm

They BOTH suck,

Sir. I never disputed any of what you said in your post about what previous presidents had said and yadda yadda yadda. Where did you read that in?

I just thought it was funny watching Bibi take him to school. Although I will admit I actually felt a little sorry for Obama. It was like being dressed down by your dad when you said or did something bad as a kid. Why you so sensitive?

Obviously Bibi and the Israelis agree with you- that Obama said nothing controversial when you mentioned the pre-1967 borders. Right?

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
9:56 pm

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
9:52 pm

Taxpayer, I can assure you that if I was a woman I would still disrespect you. Perhaps you need to google my handle. Then you’ll have an idea as to what kind of a bmf you’re talking to. Got that tough guy?

They BOTH suck

May 25th, 2011
9:58 pm

Thulsa

Just because the PM got mad that a US Pres said publicly what others before him R and D had already said in private

I don’t CARE…….

Many on the right are PISSED or it wouldn’t have been the out cry that came from it

Not given Palestinians a pass for their BS, but for Israel to be called on the carpet is NOT the end of the world

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
10:00 pm

Taxpayer and sooth,

I’ll admit it. I blog beat you guys down with some biting posts but I also made some valid points on Medicare. I’ve yet to see any of you make some valid points regarding a topic- just sniping. Taxpayer- you wanna try? Go ahead. Give it a try. I’ll hurt you with facts but I’ll take it easy on ya. I already asked if you had some valid points on the medicare discussion points I made and you had no ponts- you simply sniped.

They BOTH suck

May 25th, 2011
10:01 pm

Thulsa

Name the insurance company that is currently taking new clients over 65 with preexisting medical conditions at rates that the Ryan plan lays out…

Not saying changes are not require and fast, but lets start with the FACTS

Midori

May 25th, 2011
10:02 pm

big ed is apologizing now

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
10:03 pm

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
9:54 pm

TBS, I really don’t bother much with TaxPayer. He/she/it never answers questions, never replies to challenges, and never provides any meaningful discussion to any debate.

So I do not waste time with him/her/it.

Dave R.,

I’ beginning to find that out. The man never has any valid points about anything. Ever. Just sniping and then accusing others of sniping. He wouldn’t know a fact if it bit him in the ass.

Kamchak

May 25th, 2011
10:04 pm

Tick…tick…tick….

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
10:05 pm

TBS, in the big scheme of things the $3 billion or so we give in aid to Israel is small potatoes.

In addition, the information between the CIA, FBI and Mossad is not a one-way street, you know.

If you don’t think we aren’t getting valuable intelligence from them in regards to anti-terrorist activities, think again.

The ‘67 borders are NOT a starting point, TBS. The naivete displayed by this President, and the sophomoric way he made it public just before yet ANOTHER state visit by Netanyahu shows that he is either way, way over his head (no surprise there), or just wants to stick it to Israel.

Until Hamas tears up the Unity Agreement and publicly proclaims Israel’s right to exist, there can be no negotiations. Ever. As Bibi said the other day, “What are we going to discuss with them, the method of our immolation?”

@@

May 25th, 2011
10:06 pm

HEY! My post misappeared.

Although she shouldn’t have to, I’m pretty sure Ingraham can weather the insult…she’s weathered worse than being called a slut. I can recall the left’s attack on “her balding condition”. Turns out it was due to chemotherapy. Didn’t stop the left from taking a cheap shot.

“Chugging 40s”? Somebody’ll have to explain. My knowledge of booze is limited.

josef:

All right, overly critical of the Bruin’s bias…Edwards, Democrat, Schultz-MSNBC, left wing media, Bolling, FOX…that’s two-to-one…just keepin’ ‘em honest…

jay offers a bone of little consequence and you’re impressed???

You’re too easy.

(ISH)

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
10:07 pm

@@, chugging 40 oz. of beer.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
10:07 pm

They BOTH suck

May 25th, 2011
10:01 pm

Thulsa

Name the insurance company that is currently taking new clients over 65 with preexisting medical conditions at rates that the Ryan plan lays out…

Not saying changes are not require and fast, but lets start with the FACTS

Few if any of them do. You know that. The reason they don’t is because Medicare picks up at 65. It costs the Medicare system roughly a grand a month to insure each and every beneficiary. Now if we went to the voucher system you do know that it would necessarily eliminate the pre-existing conditions similar to what Medicare advantage does already.

Likewise folks going on Medicare at 65 can get a medicare supplement during their first 6 months of eligibility with guaranteed issuability- there is no underwriting. And this has been that way well before the new health law.

So assuming the Ryan plan cannot deny people due to pre-existing conditions what is it with the plan you object to?

@@

May 25th, 2011
10:11 pm

Oh lawd!

It’s become all too funny. How many times have I hit refresh only to find Kamchak “tick, tick, ticking” away?

Too many. He’s like our resident timekeeper. A stopwatch or sorts.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
10:12 pm

@@,

We gots to have a clown jester for our friendly little blog

Jay

May 25th, 2011
10:14 pm

Thulsa, one last time. If your purpose in posting here is to prove yourself the baddest ass in town, go prove it in the next town.

They BOTH suck

May 25th, 2011
10:14 pm

Ok Dave R

Was it naive for Bush Sr, Clinton and Bush Jr to negotiate and speak of the same thing in some form or fashion or you just jumping on the right wing cry wagon?

If Israel was embarrassed so much they could deny US money and intel on the spot

US should be calling out ALL countries we give money and intel too

Too bad we do not and both Parties bow to BS and lobbying from the interest who support the countries we give our tax money too

I’m calling out ALL of them not just Israel………….

Dave R.

May 25th, 2011
10:14 pm

And with that, I’m calling it a day. Red Sox kicked Cleveland Indian a$$, and I made me some money.

Night, all.

Doggone/GA

May 25th, 2011
10:14 pm

“Just because the PM got mad that a US Pres said publicly what others before him R and D had already said in private”

He didn’t get mad, he just wanted it to seem like he was. Standard operating procedure. In the speech he gave, he said – in different words – EXACTLY the same thing that Obama said. I caught it the moment I heard him say it. The borders are the borders, as they have been since 1967. Any changes will have to be negotiated. That’s what Obama said, that’s what Bibi said. Same thing, no difference.

They BOTH suck

May 25th, 2011
10:14 pm

Thulsa

Which ones are signing up to do what you say and are publicly advertising it?

Doggone/GA

May 25th, 2011
10:15 pm

“hehehe”

TaxPayer – you know what the translation of that is, don’t you? “He’s not afraid to call my BS what it is: BS”

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
10:16 pm

Jay, I’ll play nice but I’m not being any meaner than anyone else on here. Why am I being singled out?

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
10:16 pm

TBS, I really don’t bother much with TaxPayer. He/she/it never answers questions, never replies to challenges, and never provides any meaningful discussion to any debate.

hehehe

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
10:17 pm

Perhaps Thulsa has no comments regarding that link in my 9:49 post.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
10:18 pm

They both suck,

What on earth are you talking about? Are you talking about the Ryan plan and which companies are signing up for a plan that doesn’t exist? Please be specific in what you want to know or what your point is?

They BOTH suck

May 25th, 2011
10:20 pm

Thulsa

earlier…. I believe you made reference to Medicare

I responded by saying which ins companies are currently taking new clients that would fit into the Ryan plan when it comes to age, conditions and proposed voucher payments

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
10:23 pm

Doggone,

I use the “hehehe” as a taunt. It means nothing else to me. Other times I’ll use :roll: or even embed some sarcasm in my remarks or a little jab here or there.

Doggone/GA

May 25th, 2011
10:29 pm

“I use the “hehehe” as a taunt”

Yeah, I know…I guess I wasn’t clear enough that I was talking about the comment you were responding to! In case you haven’t noticed, that bit about “meaningful discussion” just means he’s getting tired of his BS being identified for what it is.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
10:29 pm

They both suck,

You’re speculating on a plan that doesn’t exist and won’t exist because it won’t pass. I’ll say it one more time to try to answer the question that I think you are trying to get at.

If Ryan’s plan passes you would have to naturally assume that as with Medicare Advantage plans that there is no underwriting- everyone qualifies except perhaps those with ESRD which would necessarily go under a different type plan.

If they are at all like the Medicare Advantage plans which in all likelihood is how they would be modeled then your questions are irrelevant. Age, physical conditions wouldn’t matter and no cherry picking for healthy seniors would be allowed.

Different plans would be offered with premiums commensurate with the plan benefits but the plan premiums and benefits would’nt be allowed to discriminate on the basis of health, age, etc. That way if a senior in pretty good health wanted a higher deductible plan that cost lower than the actual voucher amount he could take that plan and pocket the difference if that is allowed. Likewise a senior in poor health might opt for a more comprehensive plan that has a low deducible, low co-pays or co-insurance, etc.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
10:30 pm

teheheh means a taunt? I would hate it if Jay banned someone for taunting and not actually making some serious debate points such as what myself and they both suck are doing. As Jay said lets stick to the debate.

jm

May 25th, 2011
10:37 pm

Jay, I think you should get some apple programmer to provide some sort of “debate competition” board where people can become charicatures, face off mono-a-mono, and let people vote on the winner.

Though we know the lib will always win due to certain skewing in the local population political orientation. Maybe we could give conservatives 2 votes :)

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
10:37 pm

Does hehehe hurt your feelings, Thulsa. Boy! I never would have guessed it.

1811/1801 - 0311/0317

May 25th, 2011
10:39 pm

Granny:

Not sure if you are still up out there but I heard on the radio today why Obama is against funding “space exploration” as Kennedy did, etc.

NASA’s job is to reach out to Muslims and ……….. well ……….. there are no Muslims on the moon.

jm

May 25th, 2011
10:39 pm

FIRST UP! In the blue shorts, standing 5′8″, the liberal from out West, Jaaaaaaay Bookman!

In the red shorts, the radio show host full of hot air….. Neaaaaal Boortz!!

Doggone/GA

May 25th, 2011
10:41 pm

“Neaaaaal Boortz!!”

Ain’t gonna happen. Boortz has had ample opportunity to debate Jay. He won’t do it. Not here, not on his show, not in person. He’s had chances several times. It’s gotten where he doesn’t even have the courage to say No anymore. He just never responds.

@@

May 25th, 2011
10:43 pm

40 ounces of beer!!??!! Do those come in six packs? I’d swear I bought some by mistake once. They were in a box…I thought they were long necks. They were HUGE!

No need to respond. They’re long gone…my Cajun neighbor drank ‘em all.

Doggone/GA

May 25th, 2011
10:44 pm

Of course, now that I’ve got the thought in mind…it might be amusing for someone to call in to Boortz’s show and ask why he’s afraid to debate Jay…and then let us know how fast Boortz hung up!

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
10:48 pm

Taxpayer,

I’m cool. Just waiting for some substantive debate- mainly want to hear what they both suck has to say. Are you going to provide any substantive debate or not? If Jay got onto me for I don’t know what then I’m certain he can get onto you also. So far I’ve not seen a single point made from you that’s not a slight or insult or some kind of put down. Perhaps Jay needs to be alerted to other bloggers like yourself that have nothing but petty insults and not very good ones at that.

1811/1801 - 0311/0317

May 25th, 2011
10:48 pm

#1 Headline: “Gates warns of ‘hollowing effect’ ”

“Outgoing Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who cut major weapons programs during 4 1/2 years at the Pentagon, is warning against “hollowing out” the U.S. military through unwise spending cuts planned by the Obama administration. Published 8:45 p.m. May 24, 2011.”

What was that? Discord in the ranks?

#2 Headline: “Top Democrats criticize Obama’s Israel policy”

“Now the president — whom critics often accuse of employing a play-it-safe governing style in which he waits for others to take the lead — is largely isolated politically in raising the issue of 1967 boundaries.”

What was that? Discord in the blue party?

Mick

May 25th, 2011
10:51 pm

Even though you seem to think that you are quick draw mcgraw with the facts, you still push the myth about obama and spending. The truth and fact of the matter most of our trillion dollar debt was added during bush – fact. Another fact is that when clinton raised the tax rate in 94, every repub voted against it and predicted doom and what happened? More revenue paid down the debt and unemployment FELL – fact. So, here we are today with the same old repub party and their fear mongering about taxes, the repubs have been proven wrong and got us to where we are at, they have no credibility with balancing budgets, period…

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
10:53 pm

Thulsa,

Try my 10:17.

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
10:54 pm

Perhaps Jay needs to be alerted to other bloggers like yourself that have nothing but petty insults and not very good ones at that.

Whatever floats your boat, Thulsa.

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
10:55 pm

Unity in the Democratic Party. As in lock step behavior! As in just say NO! I Object!

Doggone/GA

May 25th, 2011
10:56 pm

“What was that? Discord in the blue party?”

shoot, that’s not even worth commenting on. Get back to us when you have some REAL news…like UNITY in the Democratic party. Now THAT would be worthy of comment.

Mick

May 25th, 2011
10:56 pm

doom

Last post (10:51)was for you….

1811/1801 - 0311/0317

May 25th, 2011
10:57 pm

Headline: “Hollywood Movie on the Killing of Bin Laden”

They better have good security especially at the premier !

http://www.military.com/entertainment/movies/movie-news/hollywood-deal-for-film-of-bin-laden-killing

Jay's Brain

May 25th, 2011
10:57 pm

My demorat bosses made me write about that has been john edwards now
that he is totally irrelevant and we haven’t found a way to get him out of
the charges. Said to add in fat ed as he has become another embarrassment for
our propaganda machine. I threw in bolling as I have to do all I can to try and help
drag down that ever so popular Fox news.
Thanks for reading my fellow sheep. Now I must get back to see if my idol obama
has yet to do the review of all federal cabinets and cut the fat and waste out as
he repeatedly promised to do while campaigning. ( of course I know he hasn’t and me and
my fellow flock of left wings zealots don’t want him to).
I will have another left wing opinion piece in the morning or as soon as msnbc or DNP leaders send me the right wing target of the day.

lynnie gal

May 25th, 2011
10:59 pm

Ed Shultz is a basically decent human being. Yes, he is passionate, and yes, he may have gone too far calling Ingram a slut. But much worse goes on over on Fox with more dangerous rhetoric. Did you see what Ted Nugent said, and how the Fox casters, including Huckebee, lavish praise on him. He called Hillary Clinton a bitch and said that Obama needs to suck the end of his machine gun. Now, that’s sick.

1811/1801 - 0311/0317

May 25th, 2011
10:59 pm

Doggone:

Since your up late check this out if you didn’t see my post this afternoon.

Can you figure it out?

Quite possibly the “ABSOLUTE BEST” trick(s) I’ve ever seen!

Make sure you watch it right to the end, even if you don’t understand a word anyone’s saying.

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=hwVy_2eOfsE#t=78

1811/1801 - 0311/0317

May 25th, 2011
11:00 pm

lynnie:

If that’s true then he should have been on his last Fox show.

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
11:00 pm

Uh Oh, Jay. I wrote and posted my 10:55 after Doggone’s 10:56 but it showed up before her post and with an earlier time stamp to boot.

Doggone/GA

May 25th, 2011
11:01 pm

“Since your up late check this out if you didn’t see my post this afternoon”

I just get the biggest kick out of people who have to beg others to read their posts.

Doggone/GA

May 25th, 2011
11:03 pm

“Uh Oh, Jay”

No “Uh Oh” – it’s been going on for close to a month now. It’s happened before. It’ll happen again sometime. They’ll get it fixed eventually…for a while.

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
11:03 pm

Doggone,

Jay had asked earlier today if folks were still experiencing the teleported posts so that’s why I labeled it as an uh oh.

Doggone/GA

May 25th, 2011
11:10 pm

“Jay had asked earlier today if folks were still experiencing the teleported posts ”

I don’t know why he’d even have to ask that. All you have to do is look at the timestamps.

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
11:15 pm

I don’t know why he’d even have to ask that. All you have to do is look at the timestamps.

That will not do. He would have to read posts and interpret whether or not they are in correct order.

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
11:19 pm

If you go back and check you’ll find that when the timestamps are out of order so are the messages.

I agree but Jay would have to read and understand each message in order to make that determination and it would definitely be easier for the bloggers to spot that and report it than for Jay to do it.

Doggone/GA

May 25th, 2011
11:20 pm

“That will not do”

Sure it will. If you go back and check you’ll find that when the timestamps are out of order so are the messages. Personally, I don’t think the problem is the timestamps, I think it’s probably something like the message queue for what we affectionately call the “blog god” I think the messages are timestamped correctly, but the “blog god” is not releasing them in the correct order for some strange reason.

Doggone/GA

May 25th, 2011
11:23 pm

“It’s the gremlins”

Yeah, in our house we blame stuff like that on the gremlins too. Gotta hit the hay, nite.

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
11:24 pm

Then again, I could be a mind reader too or Jay is messin’ with us or someone else is messin’ with us. It’s the gremlins.

BADA BING

May 25th, 2011
11:27 pm

Time stamps,don’t need them as all my words are timeless.

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
11:29 pm

TaxPayer

May 25th, 2011
10:17 pm

Perhaps Thulsa has no comments regarding that link in my 9:49 post.- Taxpayer

Taxpayer,

Thanks for the post. The article that you quoted is politifact from the St. Petersburg times.

And quite frankly the Doom has his own little truth o meter that detected a ahem, shall we say inaccuracy in the politifact report.

Finally, the 60 Plus ad also fails to mention new benefits for seniors under the health care law, such as a $250 rebate for prescription drugs purchased through Medicare Part D. (A statement on the 60 Plus website calls the drug rebate “the senior suckup.”) Currently, after an initial benefit period, enrollees are required to pay 100 percent of their prescription drug costs until they reach a level of catastrophic coverage. The rebate is meant to begin to close what is often called the doughnut hole in prescription drug coverage for beneficiaries. By 2020, Medicare will pay 75 percent of the total cost of generic prescription drug coverage in the gap, a marked improvement to the current program.

Um. No. Not quite. Enrollees are not required to pay 100 percent of their drug costs until they reach a level of catastrophic coverage- aka the doughnut hole which begins at $2840. They pay 93% of the generic costs and 50% of the brand name drug costs in the doughnut hole- so yes- they do have some coverage in the doughnut hole despite what politifact states about having zero coverage. They come out of the doughnut hole at $4500 at which point catastrophic coverage picks up. Bottom line is that politifact is not perfect either and they are wrong on this point.

On the rest of the article politifact is generally correct but their one big harping point is that this conservative group is harping on $500 billion being cut in Medicare. True enough $500 billion is being cut but it is being cut in the RATE OF GROWTH of medicare as politifact correctly states. The fascinating thing about this is how many times I’ve seen debates where Rebublicans insist on cutting the rate of growth of programs such as medicaid.

The predictable and dishonest response that we frequently see from the left is that Republicans want to cut medicare, SS, or whatever without telling the truth- that they simply want to cut the RATE OF GROWTH. I’ll give politifact credit for largely being right but even then they were factually inaccurate in their so called “FACT CHECKING”.

The Doom has spoken and he gives politifact a Mostly true rating but not completely true.

1811/1801 - 0311/0317

May 25th, 2011
11:33 pm

Doggone:

It wasn’t “my post” knucklehead it was a video of a magician doing some incredible magic tricks.

Your loss !

Thulsa Doom

May 25th, 2011
11:43 pm

Mick

Sorry for the late response.

Mick

May 25th, 2011
10:51 pm

Even though you seem to think that you are quick draw mcgraw with the facts, you still push the myth about obama and spending. The truth and fact of the matter most of our trillion dollar debt was added during bush – fact.- Mick

Mick they were both big spenders. I fully accept that Bush was terrible at spending. Why can you not say the same about Obama. The FY 2011 projected deficit is $1.65 trillion and his own administration projects deficits through 2020.

Another fact is that when clinton raised the tax rate in 94, every repub voted against it and predicted doom and what happened? More revenue paid down the debt and unemployment FELL – fact.- Mick

Mick, yes. And you should also acknowledge that most spending originates in Congress and the Republicans controlled Congress during the Clinton years. Clinton was a better president than Repubs give him credit for in my opinion. But come on Mick. This was the dawning of the age of the internet boom. Fidel Castro could have been in charge and the economy would have boomed. Clinton- and the Republicans in Congress- were both products of good timing.

So, here we are today with the same old repub party and their fear mongering about taxes, the repubs have been proven wrong and got us to where we are at, they have no credibility with balancing budgets, period…Mick

Mick,

This is where I disagree with you. The Dems could have raised taxes- they controlled both houses of Congress and the presidency. Why didn’t they? And just as you and the Dems said we needed massive spending to infuse the economy and avoid economic collapse its also important to remember that raising taxes and thus stifling job creation is also the last thing you want to do in the middle of a recession.

In any event this is my feeling on taxation issues. I think the cap gains tax right now is 15% unless I’m mistaken. I believe the long term rate that most effectively maximizes revenue to the govt is 17-18% according to the data I’ve seen which is readily available. If you adjust for extraordinary economic circumstances such as recessions you will see that at that level the treasury seems to bring in the most revenue. We should raise it soon now that the economy growing- albeit slowly.

Marginal tax rates on individuals could probably be raised to possibly Clinton era levels but no higher to bring in tax revenue to slice the deficit. I’ve no problem with this but I would want everyone to put aside the partisan politics and get to the level that realistically grows the economy while maximizing revenue to the govt.

What I do have a problem with is that the Dems absolutely refuse to regain control of out of control spending. Revenue collection is a problem but the overriding problem is the sheer volume of money our govt is spending. The sheer level of government spending is obscene. The original founders of this great country never intended for the federal govt to become so powerful. And yes- you can blame 2 expensive wars on Bush. I’m cool with that- its the truth. But a 3rd win isn’t helping out.

Anyway, there you have your answers.

Expert Beacon

May 26th, 2011
12:33 am

Ed should read this to help him find a new job. http://bit.ly/mQJmg6

USinUK

May 26th, 2011
5:02 am

good gravy. I’m no fan of Laura Ingraham, but, DAMN, Ed, look behind you – see that line?

Dave R.

May 26th, 2011
5:08 am

“In case you haven’t noticed, that bit about “meaningful discussion” just means he’s getting tired of YOUR BS.”

Fixed your typo, Doggone. No thanks needed.

USinUK

May 26th, 2011
5:25 am

btw, Dave – your 5:20 gave me a chuckle … :-)

and good morning to you!!

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
5:57 am

mornin’.

Ed’s apology is, blessedly, not a non-apology but a real one, that owns up to his misdeed in full.

http://ed.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/05/25/6719607-an-apology

Edwin Davis

May 26th, 2011
6:01 am

Please add Patrick McHenry to your Hall of Shame for his egregious,shameful treatment of Elizabeth Warren in his House sub-committee hearing.I hope his behavior generates scrutiny of his background,education,and motivation[who he's carrying water for].

Independent

May 26th, 2011
6:27 am

Honest politician. There’s an oxymoron for you.

Gordon

May 26th, 2011
6:34 am

Saw Ed’s apology last night and I have to say it was genuine. Refreshing change from the non-apologies you usually see.

AmVet

May 26th, 2011
6:41 am

Morning, early birds. Getting any worms?

stands, that is without a doubt, the most protracted and seemingly sincere apology I have ever seen by a person in a position of power. At least in regards to having a national audience.

As rank amateurs, many of us here say things on this forum that are also vile. Certainly, me included. I make no excuses and in retrospect, more often than not, regret those choices of words. I have also apologized to some of those I have offended and have worked hard to cage my own demons.

The good news is that the rank invective that plagues other such forums has been kept very much under control by our host. For which I am grateful. And his leadership makes me want to be less insulting, inciting and needlessly provoking.

I still fail occasionally, but often remember the old adage about healing oneself.

So with that, I offer you all some shared healing. Enjoy!

Have a great day, duty calls!

(Listen…)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILeuZcTrYgI

USinUK

May 26th, 2011
6:53 am

URGH. Just found out one of my friends in Ringgold had his house BOSCHED by a 100+ year old oak in his front yard. and that’s BEFORE they’re about to be pummeled by a storm.

what the heck is going ON over there!!??

Jack

May 26th, 2011
6:59 am

Politics and show business come under the same heading. Morals take a back seat in those two trades.

Jay

May 26th, 2011
7:00 am

This is what happens when we elect a Mooslem president, USinUK.

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
7:04 am

what the heck is going ON over there

Not a climatologist, don’t play one on TV, so it’s hard for me to know for sure just how out of the ordinary this year’s shaping up.

All I know is that for all the noisy storms that have brewed the past few weeks to our west, where I live it’s dry as a bone–I haven’t had to mow my lawn in a coupla weeks.

josef nix

May 26th, 2011
7:11 am

Ed Schultz

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa! Oh, come on, Girlfriend, get real…you meant it when you said it and the only reason you’re saying anything now is ’cause you got called out on it…you should have just gone ahead and admitted that you’re not ready for prime time…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k80nW6AOhTs

Okay, off to the last day, staff barbecue, and looking forward to a few days of being able to come in here and waste away a few hours of my life with the day crew… :-)

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
7:13 am

About your Hall?

I dunno, Jay, it’s getting mighty crowded, what with Operation Rescue joining the fray.

(and no, nothing that this wretched, evil organization does surprises me any more.)

USMC dawg

May 26th, 2011
7:16 am

“what the heck is going ON over there!!??”

Easy Answer: It’s Global Warming!

USinUK

May 26th, 2011
7:17 am

Jay – :lol: I knew it HAD to be something like that!!

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
7:17 am

really should’ve included this with my 7.13…

The anti-aborts love to cherry-pick Margaret Sanger’s history to portray her as an advocate of “black genocide” (a claim made, notably, by Herman Cain — “the objective was to put these centers in primarily black communities so they could help kill black babies before they came into the world”; it’s a claim for which he received a “Pants on Fire” award from PolitiFact. Yeah, Sanger gave a speech to a ladies’ auxiliary of the Klan. Yeah, she had an interest in eugenics. If that permanently taints Planned Parenthood to the n-th generation, then I’m waiting for Cain or the people who made the Johansson video to renounce their U.S. citizenship — after all, many of the Founding Fathers owned slaves, and slavery was enshrined in the Constitution. If you believe in permanent institutional guilt, it should apply to every institution, no?

USMC dawg

May 26th, 2011
7:17 am

“John Edwards, Ed Schultz and Eric Bolling in Hall of Shame”

Yeah, this Left-Wing Hate Radio is bad for the country :-)
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/05/25/ed_schultz_apologizes_to_ingraham_this_is_the_lowest_of_the_low_for_me.html

At least PMSNBC made Ed Schultz apologize for his misogynous Remarks. Unbelievable :-)

USinUK

May 26th, 2011
7:18 am

although, Jay, to be fair … I thought he was a Muslin.

http://rebello.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/000638.jpg

USinUK

May 26th, 2011
7:19 am

dB – they seem to think that clinics out to help the poor should be conveniently located in rich communities.

or something like that.

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
7:27 am

they seem to think that clinics out to help the poor should be conveniently located in rich communities.

It’d be more convenient to bomb them that way, I guess.

USMC dawg

May 26th, 2011
7:29 am

This is disturbing regardless of what your political persuasion is:

Elementary School Uses ‘Transgender Clownfish’ to Teach Children about Sex…
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Transgender-Clownfish-Controversy-122617749.html

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
7:34 am

Jay used to have Atrios on his blogroll. I’ve sometimes wondered why he dropped it. hence this inside-baseball-y post to follow…

Sometimes I think it’s sentiments like this… Jay, I don’t think you necessary take this personally, but it probably hits a bit close to home, yes?

[T]he point of having smart political journalists is that those journalists should be smart enough to understand what they’re really saying. So, yes, if given their way Republicans would destroy Medicare. They would hand your social security money over to the banksters.

But for years our smart political journalists have covered for them.

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
7:35 am

This is disturbing

…if you’re a dumb afterBirther, I guess.

USinUK

May 26th, 2011
7:35 am

USMC – sorry, but I’d dance nekkid in the hallways if it reduced incidents of bullying. these teachers were making a valid point – that there’s no one right/wrong – there’s variety in nature – and that variety should be celebrated (or at least respected)

Stupid is as stupid does, or says

May 26th, 2011
7:36 am

Always figured the easiest way with media types (and sleezy trial lawyers) is to simpy let them talk. When they say something really stupid, you have a choice to simply not listen to them.
The guy shows he’s an idiot when he says President Obama was chugging 40s. Guinness (stout) isn’t sold in 40s. That’s more the urban malt liquor size of choice.
Nice to see you at least wrote about some dumb Dems for a change. Plenty of them, too. Must be kind of nice having these buffoons just create material on a steady basis, Mr. Bookman.

Granny Godzilla

May 26th, 2011
7:36 am

I am especially disappointed by Ed’s remarks, but accept his apology.

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
7:37 am

from the “disturbing story”:

“That’s a lot of variation in nature,” Gender Spectrum trainer, Joel Baum, told the students. “Evolution comes up with some pretty funny ways for animals to reproduce.”

Principal Sara Stone said the lesson on gender differences was part of a larger effort to control bullying in the school, something parents supported last year.

Knowing that kids would learn such things is going to keep anyone up nights, why?

Mick

May 26th, 2011
7:38 am

Almost a tad too much humility from ed. Rush? Hannity? Ever see or hear an apology from those guys? Especially rush when he made fun of michael j. fox, what did he do? As always, the cowards way out – we actually didn’t hear what he said, we twisted it..uh-huh….

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
7:38 am

variety should be celebrated (or at least respected)

or at least recognized fercryinoutloud.

I think we can add the Pacific “Justice” Institute to the Hall. What wankers.

Granny Godzilla

May 26th, 2011
7:44 am

Can we add this knucklehead to the Hall of Shame:

During the House discussion there was predictably some disagreement over whether excluding rape pregnancies from coverage was perhaps the sort of callous treatment a recently violated woman shouldn’t have to deal with. Here’s DeGraaf’s response to Rep. Barbara Bollier’s challenge, as reported by the McPherson Sentinel:
Rep. Pete DeGraaf, a Mulvane Republican who supports the bill, told her: “We do need to plan ahead, don’t we, in life?”

Bollier asked him, “And so women need to plan ahead for issues that they have no control over with pregnancy?”

DeGraaf drew groans of protest from some House members when he responded, “I have a spare tire on my car.”

“I also have life insurance,” he added. “I have a lot of things that I plan ahead for.”

USinUK

May 26th, 2011
7:44 am

“The guy shows he’s an idiot when he says President Obama was chugging 40s. Guinness (stout) isn’t sold in 40s. That’s more the urban malt liquor size of choice”

um. the code-word “urban” is the point.

USinUK

May 26th, 2011
7:44 am

USMC – :-) just don’t picture me dancing nekkid to “too legit to quit”

;-)

funny thing – Hammer pants seem to be making a (hopefully short-lived) fashion come-back! :shock:

USMC

May 26th, 2011
7:44 am

“USMC – sorry, but I’d dance nekkid in the hallways if it reduced incidents of bullying. these teachers were making a valid point – that there’s no one right/wrong – there’s variety in nature and that variety should be celebrated (or at least respected)”–USinUK

-An interesting viewpoint that I can ponder during the day and maybe enlighten myself.

“This is disturbing …if you’re a dumb afterBirther, I guess.”–Stands for decibels

-Utter garbage that needs not be mixed with the plastics in the recycling bin :-)

John Edwards

May 26th, 2011
7:45 am

I would like to nominate Jay Bookman for the Hall of Shame.

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
7:50 am

Can we add this knucklehead to the Hall of Shame

better to mount his head on a pike just outside the Hall as a warning to others.

(whoops! Didn’t “plan ahead” for that, didja Pete?)

Peadawg

May 26th, 2011
7:50 am

Let’s see if Edwards is man enough to admit his wrong doings and take a plea deal (if it’s offered). I’m thinking his ego is too big and he’ll try his luck at a trial.

I guess 1 article about a Democrat every 2-3 weeks is good enough, Jay. Good job. You’re still a hack, though.

USinUK

May 26th, 2011
7:51 am

USMC – it’s because I’m 5 hours ahead of you … I’ve been waiting all morning to respond to your post!! ;-)

USMC

May 26th, 2011
7:53 am

Can we pull off to the side of the road. I am feeling motion sickness from all of these Posts reading my simple, little conservative mind and answering before I post :-)

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
7:54 am

Utter garbage that needs not be mixed with the plastics

USMC, note that I didn’t actually call you “dumb”. I think you’re smart enough to recognize when you’re being played, and you appear to acknowledge as much in your “interesting viewpoint” reply to UnU.

USMC

May 26th, 2011
7:56 am

“just don’t picture me dancing nekkid to “too legit to quit””

too late :-)

“funny thing – Hammer pants seem to be making a (hopefully short-lived) fashion come-back!”

Please no! But I can handle the tight jeans that women wore in the 70’s; you know the Gloria Vanderbilt, et al “above the hip” variety. Boy I was a sucker for those :-)

USMC

May 26th, 2011
7:59 am

“USMC – it’s because I’m 5 hours ahead of you … I’ve been waiting all morning to respond to your post!!’

And here I thought it was my slow, knuckle-dragging, Conservative mind.
Well, I am finally coming to grips with my limitations in life :-)

Mick

May 26th, 2011
8:00 am

usmc

I preferred the micro mini skirt…

USMC

May 26th, 2011
8:04 am

“USMC, note that I didn’t actually call you “dumb”. I think you’re smart enough to recognize when you’re being played, and you appear to acknowledge as much in your “interesting viewpoint” reply to UnU.”

Stands, I didn’t take your afterburner/birther??… or whatever comment, too seriously; no offense taken.

Carry on, Lad, I will be in the area all morning :-)

Interested observer

May 26th, 2011
8:06 am

Well, you just can’t fix stupid.

USMC

May 26th, 2011
8:09 am

“I preferred the micro mini skirt…”-Mick

You know Mick, you and I have a lot more in common than we may think :-)

I will say though, please don’t bring back that hideous “Disco Belt”; you remember the really thin belt that people would wrap around themselves twice? Just hideous!

DebbieDoRight

May 26th, 2011
8:18 am

DeGraaf drew groans of protest from some House members when he responded, “I have a spare tire on my car.”

“I also have life insurance,” he added. “I have a lot of things that I plan ahead for.”

What an idiot.

poison pen

May 26th, 2011
8:18 am

Stands,

Ed’s apology is, blessedly, not a non-apology but a real one, that owns up to his misdeed in full.

http://ed.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/05/25/6719607-an-apology

These people speak for a living so how can someone know when it’s real or not? I think it’s obvious what’s in his heart and I don’t think that changes the next day.
I’ll bet if your job was on the line you would start crying & begging not to get fired.

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
8:26 am

Oh, come on, Girlfriend, get real…you meant it when you said it

[…]

how can someone know when it’s real or not? I think it’s obvious what’s in his heart and I don’t think that changes the next day.

Ok, two very different people who’ve said essentially the same thing.

First off, to address PP’s point—by “real” I mean the content of the message being delivered. There were no weasel words, nothing even verging into the “if I offended anyone”; he even pre-emptively cut off any talk that it was somehow excused because it was just ad-libbing on the radio show, outside of his msnbc tv gig. That’s what was I perceived as “real.”

As to whether it was truly heartfelt, actually meant or not? I don’t claim to know.

But I’d like to know how you and J-Nix seem to know for certain what lurks inside this man’s soul, particularly when you’re basing it on a 53-second audio clip.

JKL2

May 26th, 2011
8:36 am

USinuk- what the heck is going ON over there!!??

It’s Bush’s fault…

GT

May 26th, 2011
8:43 am

“These people speak for a living so how can someone know when it’s real or not? ” You hit the nail on the head. We have allowed these guys margin because they are half journalist and half entertainment. When they make a comment that is off the line of logic of most Americans it was entertainment. They defend their position by entertaining, to some intellectually challenged, not by facts. The KKK, I’m sure was started with a few racial jokes. There are a huge number of people in the country that have no mental compass. They were brought up thinking what they heard on radio or television was gospel truth. The news agencies respected that trust and tried to deliver the news with some professionalism, they had a code. Broadcasting today is like pro wrestling. And there is a huge number of people out there who think what they are seeing in that ring is real. And there are many that know it is not real but enjoy the make believe world more than the real one. And like wrestling some people make more money doing this than in a real job which will always encourage more join in.

poison pen

May 26th, 2011
8:46 am

stands for decibels

May 26th, 2011
8:26 am
Oh, come on, Girlfriend, get real…you meant it when you said it

[…]

how can someone know when it’s real or not? I think it’s obvious what’s in his heart and I don’t think that changes the next day.

Ok, two very different people who’ve said essentially the same thing.

First off, to address PP’s point—by “real” I mean the content of the message being delivered. There were no weasel words, nothing even verging into the “if I offended anyone”; he even pre-emptively cut off any talk that it was somehow excused because it was just ad-libbing on the radio show, outside of his msnbc tv gig. That’s what was I perceived as “real.”

As to whether it was truly heartfelt, actually meant or not? I don’t claim to know.

But I’d like to know how you and J-Nix seem to know for certain what lurks inside this man’s soul, particularly when you’re basing it on a 53-second audio clip.

You can only judge a man by his words. Have you listened to him everyday to know what’s not in his heart? I doubt it.

poison pen

May 26th, 2011
8:50 am

GT, well said, they are all in it for the money and as I stated earlier if someones very lucrative job was at stake they could sell you the London Bridge in their apology.

JKL2

May 26th, 2011
8:55 am

USMC- I can handle the tight jeans that women wore in the 70’s;

Ditto. On the fashion side, can me move menswear back to the 80’s too? I hate the fact you can’t buy a pair of men’s short that don’t go past your knee (Making them actually knickers instead of shorts). When your shorts are soooo big you have to wear a second pair underneath them (NBA types) something is seriously wrong.

Bosch

May 26th, 2011
8:56 am

So is the new verb for having your house crushed by a 100 foot oak tree, “bosched” — I’m not quite sure if I’m comfortable with that. :)

Bosch

May 26th, 2011
8:59 am

And as for Edwards — what more is there to say than shame on him and I hope he gets the punishment he deserves. I don’t know if I think he should go to prison, but certainly he should have to pay out the nose for his transgressions. I’m really glad he had already stepped down before the Georgia primary because I was planning to vote for him and I’d have been pissed.

Don't Forget

May 26th, 2011
9:02 am

Wow, Mladic fianally caught

Chris Matthews

May 26th, 2011
9:05 am

NO!!!! That would be Obama, Reed and Puloosey! They have wrecked our country!!!!!!!!!

Joe Mama

May 26th, 2011
9:26 am

Dave — “Mary Elizabeth, science is that which can be proven true repetitively and without interpretation.”

No. You are clearly not a scientist and didn’t grow up with a professional scientist in the house, as I did.

Science doesn’t claim to *prove* anything true; simply to establish that, under the same test conditions and circumstances, replicable and predictable results can be achieved. Science is constantly revisiting and revising its own findings, because nothing — not even things previously accepted as valid — is beyond questioning, retesting and reevaluating.

Science is self-correcting and does not claim to have all the answers. Dogmatism claims to have them, but won’t bother explaining or testing itself.

GT

May 26th, 2011
9:50 am

We talked on the blog about a wonderful subject matter of the game changing. Excellent topic Jay brought up. When we pay for the hot air entertainment we contribute to the demise of this country, economically Real journalist are not that well paid in the scheme of things. They do what they do for a higher purpose and find their reward on a higher plain. I don’t blame people for going for the bucks, but we as the suppliers of the bucks should expect more for our hard earn money. You can get most of these talk show guys in a barber shop for free. They are not illegal so why is their price going up so much. It is like recycling, garbage has become a commodity.

marc

May 26th, 2011
9:59 am

stupid is as stupid does….enough said.

Bill Orvis White

May 26th, 2011
10:02 am

Pure and simple, Bolling’s right and the Socialist-Democrat from PMSNBC is wrong. Hussein Obama really did spend that kind of money going over to sleep in some prince’s house and he did pound the devil’s elixer in Ireland. Lil Hussein had a habit of drinking a lot of Maddog 20/20 as a hardcore young adult in Chicago and sometimes when he’s around certain folk, he goes back to his younger Chicago days.

Amen,
Bill

Junior Samples

May 26th, 2011
10:41 am

maybe the liberal hero (((((Rachael Maddow)))) can step in and take over for Schultz.

She’s kind of cute for a boy.