Federal inaction on immigration lets issue fester

Georgia legislators sponsoring anti-immigrant bills say they have been forced to act by frustration with the federal government, which they believe has been unwilling to address illegal immigration issues.

Unfortunately, those legislators have a point, at least about the federal government’s failure to act. In fact, they have every right to be frustrated, even if the solutions they propose to fill the void left by federal inaction are unworkable.

Thanks to a combination of cowardice and political opportunism, Congress has indeed abdicated its duty to deal with tough immigration issues. The few steps it has taken in recent years — such as efforts to tighten border security — have been little more than useless if expensive window dressing.

Certainly, our border with Mexico needs to be tightened as much as possible. In practical terms, however, a boundary more than 2,000 miles long through mainly undeveloped areas can never be made secure against people sufficiently motivated to cross it. That’s a fact.

It’s also a fact that at least 10 million illegal immigrants already live here, and at this point, most have every intention of staying. According to the 2010 Census, roughly 850,000 Hispanics live in Georgia, and by some estimates as many as half may be here illegally.

So what do we do about them?

That’s the question that elected officials at the federal level refuse to address. That’s the vacuum that state legislators such as Rep. Matt Ramsey, R-Peachtree City, and Sen. Jack Murphy, R-Cumming, claim to be trying to fill. And it is really the crux of the whole illegal immigration debate. With the economy in the tank and the flow of illegal immigrants greatly reduced, the real issue is how to deal with those already here.

There are two basic options: Either make those people go back where they came from, or they stay. Ramsey, Murphy and other conservative legislators prefer that they go back where they came from, and are trying to pass laws so punitive that they will leave on their own. (The option of tracking down, arresting and removing 10 million people, using law enforcement and the judicial system to sift the illegal from the legal, is understood by almost everybody to be hopeless.)

Personally, I have no faith that a policy of discouragement can work. Illegal immigrants have already proved themselves willing to endure great risk, sacrifice and hard work.

No matter how difficult we make things, no matter how inhumane or punitive we make our laws, most illegal immigrants are going to conclude that things are better for them and their children here than they would be back home. And if you think about it from their point of view, they’re right.

Changing that calculation would be very, very difficult.

The alternative, then, is to acknowledge the continuing presence of illegal immigrants while providing an avenue for them to leave the shadows and join the mainstream. That’s a step that only Congress can take — a step that it has so far refused to take, and that it shows no signs of taking in the foreseeable future.

Back in the ’80s, President Ronald Reagan supported legalization, explaining in a 1984 presidential debate that “I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally.” Thanks to his backing, Congress agreed.

A few years ago, President George W. Bush tried to convince members of his party to follow Reagan’s lead, but the effort failed. President Barack Obama has also expressed support for such a change, but with chances of passage almost non-existent, he has expended no political capital on its behalf.

As a result, we’re stuck with a choice between bad solutions and no solutions at all.

– Jay Bookman

710 comments Add your comment

Normal

March 29th, 2011
8:47 am

I say make ‘em legal and let them all become good Democrats… :lol:

carlosgvv

March 29th, 2011
8:48 am

“we’re stuck with a choice between bad solutions and no solutions”

What we’re stuck with is well over 10 million illegals who never should have been allowed to stay here. No other country in the world allows this many illegals to enter and stay. To make matters worse, any attemps to enforce the law bring howls of protest and lawsuits. This is just another nail in the coffin of the great country America once was.

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
8:49 am

“No other country in the world allows this many illegals to enter and stay.”

Quite right…because most other countries that are dependent on some level of immigrant labor deal with it by having things like “guest worker” programs so they can enter and leave the country LEGALLY and still be able to work.

Jay

March 29th, 2011
8:50 am

so Carlos, how do you propose we find and remove them?

Normal

March 29th, 2011
8:52 am

We are supposed to be “The Great Molting Pot”. Whatever happened to that?

Or…Make them legal and have to pay income tax…after a few years of that, they’ll want to go back on their own.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
8:53 am

Let’s see how many comments include “ship them all home!” and “secure the border!” Pointing out this is impossible never helps.

JKL2

March 29th, 2011
8:54 am

Georgia legislators sponsoring anti-immigrant bills say they have been forced to act by frustration with the federal government, which they believe has been unwilling to address illegal immigration issues.

I see veins popper out of Eric Holder’s forehead…

Maybe he should just file a preemptive lawsuit against every state?

ty webb

March 29th, 2011
8:54 am

“Georgia legislators sponsoring anti-immigrant bills…”

ah yes…”anti-immigration” and jay managed to type this and wave his pom poms at the same time. If you ask her Jay, I’m sure granny Godzilla will let you use the “GOP’s war on jobs” meme(you may have to clear with media matters for trademarking purposes)as a rallying cry in your next blog topic.

Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)

March 29th, 2011
8:57 am

Well, we got maybe 50 million rednecks in this country and every one of them owns a pickup truck. We only need about 3 million of them and some gas money to haul the illegals to the border and dump them over. We could keep maybe half a million rednecks on standby at jails to take care of the few that get brung in after the Great Haul. Problem solved.

NEXT PROBLEM!

ty webb

March 29th, 2011
8:59 am

…and kudos to obama for decreasing the number of illegals coming across the border…funny how Jay never refers to him as “anti-immigrant”.

cosby smith

March 29th, 2011
9:00 am

Jay, you are on this one..there has been no action by the Feds for years. Regan provided the first amnisty and we are right back there. Obama has even taken inaction to a new level…suing Arizona who is attempting to do Obama’s job by protecting the boarders of the USA. Illegals are costing billions to the taxpayers and those jerks in DC take no action. But then, if you are Obama and the Dems you are looking for votes.

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
9:00 am

We all should know by now after what, 25 years of this, that the government has absolutely no intention of doing anything about this. It’s much more fun just to gripe and bitch about it and let the xenophobes stomp their feet — face it bigots, nothing is going to be done to the scale you want.

Peadawg

March 29th, 2011
9:00 am

“I say make ‘em legal and let them all become good Democrats… ”

I hope you’re joking…what’s pathetic is some people actually think that’s a good option.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
9:01 am

At last! A workable plan! I propose appointing Redneck Convert as ICE Czar.

Peadawg

March 29th, 2011
9:01 am

zenophobe and bigot in the same post…i’m impressed, Bosch. :roll:

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
9:02 am

“Regan provided the first amnisty and we are right back there”

That’s mostly because Congress never funded the enforcement portions of that bill that gave amnesty.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:02 am

(sorry off topic) Councilman CT Martin stinks.

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
9:03 am

“I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally.”

Ronald Reagan

Thank God! When my ancestor left Sweden during the time of the Great Northern War…..he didn’t do it exactly legally….I admit it…I am an anchor great great great great grandbaby….course we are mostly blonde haired and blue eyed….so I guess it does not matter too much

carlosgvv

March 29th, 2011
9:04 am

Jay, there is a thing in this country known as law enforcement. If they were given the mandate, I believe they could find and deport most of the illegals here. Naturally, I hope you don’t think our law enforcement agencies are too incompentent to do this. As for cost, make the countries they originally came from pay by witholding their foreign aid if they don’t.

DebbieDoRight

March 29th, 2011
9:04 am

Dubya had a good idea concerning immigration – however the cry from his side of the aisle against it was deafening.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:05 am

“how do you propose we find and remove them?”

body implanted computer chips.

kidding.

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
9:06 am

“Dubya had a good idea concerning immigration – however the cry from his side of the aisle against it was deafening”

AMEN to that, it was one of the few things I agreed with him on.

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
9:07 am

“what’s pathetic is some people actually think that’s a good option.”

Like who Peadawg, or is that just conjecture on your part?

jm,

Jay did a thread on that once as a joke.

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
9:07 am

“zenophobe and bigot in the same post…i’m impressed, Bosch”

Why Peadawg, because you can relate to those so well?

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
9:09 am

“I believe they could find and deport most of the illegals here”

carlos,

And are you willing to pay for that?

Mr_B

March 29th, 2011
9:10 am

Doggone: And the fact that US immigration policy makes it next to impossible to get here legally from Central America. What never happened after the Reagan amnesty was the guest-worker program. Guest workers have to be accounted for and taxes paid on their wages. No percentage in that for anybody.

Mary Elizabeth

March 29th, 2011
9:10 am

“Ramsey, Murphy and other conservative legislators prefer that they go back where they came from, and are trying to pass laws so punitive that they will leave on their own.”

———————————————————————————————————

The expected thinking of those who have lived their lives in a state which, for generations, supported slavery, Jim Crow laws, and segregation.

Perhaps one day, in the near future, the drive for humanity will weigh more heavily in the conscience of those in power than the drive for political acceptance.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:11 am

“how do you propose we find and remove them?”

National Reconnaissance Office + Predator Drones?

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:11 am

Bosch 9:07 – yeah I know. The legislature…..

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
9:12 am

Mr=B – yes, all of that too…except there is an advantage for one group of people: the workers. But, hey! We can’t inconvenience our businesses, now can we?

arnold

March 29th, 2011
9:15 am

I think we should also deport anyone who’s forefathers were immigrants.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:17 am

Jay 8:03am “You mean Dennis Kucinich, all by his little lonesome self?”

Now let’s not excuse a nutjob’s rants here. We’re not going to do that for Herr Cain. Let’s not do it for any of the wingnuts….

Paul

March 29th, 2011
9:18 am

Key point: “most illegal immigrants are going to conclude that things are better for them and their children here than they would be back home.”

The legislators are making a mistake – doing what they think would work if they were immigrants. Shows their lack of understanding of who, and what, they’re dealing with.

It’s like winning at litigation. First you write the opening and closing statements and lay out the strategy you think your opponent will use. Then you craft your own strategy to address those points. These legislators aren’t close to comprehending the immigrant experience.

“President Ronald Reagan supported legalization, explaining in a 1984 presidential debate”

So the Republican Conservative True Faithfuls are what, 37 years behind the times of what their iconic leader believed? No surprises there. It’s always easier to believe in the legend rather than the reality.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:19 am

Libya – I’m a fence sitter on this one. Count me in the 7% that don’t know how long this is going to take and don’t know whether its a good idea or not.

Fence sitting is nice, enjoying it actually. Relaxing. Me and my Post Turtles Bush and Obama.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
9:19 am

You do have to give the BushCorp GOP credit for dramatically reducing the number of jobs available in this country for illegals.

AND citizens.

Neo-cons lied, the economy died.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
9:21 am

Morning, Granny!

“Thank God! When my ancestor left Sweden during the time of the Great Northern War….”

And my ancestor from the same country obtained his citizenship by having a citizen pay money to avoid the draft and have my ancestor serve in his place.

When you need them and want them to assume the risk, it’s a lot easier to tolerate them, eh?

Zedd

March 29th, 2011
9:23 am

It’s kind of like the deer over population here in Georgia. We need to have a no limit tag and bag day. The one good part of the proposed legislature is that every day citizens like you and me could sue local governments for failing to enforce the law.

TaxPayer

March 29th, 2011
9:23 am

What we need are Citizen’s Arrests! That’ll fix it and do it economically.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
9:23 am

Okay,so they’re 27 years behind Reagan. It’s early. It still makes it decades. So it’s still a true statement.

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
9:24 am

“When you need them and want them to assume the risk, it’s a lot easier to tolerate them, eh?”

No kidding. The “anti-immigration” crowd seems to have no problem profiting from them, but they don’t want them here (?)

TaxPayer

March 29th, 2011
9:25 am

I wonder how Zedd will take advantage of legislation to sue for failure to enforce some law.

Call it like it is

March 29th, 2011
9:26 am

No shipping off, just sour the milk and they will leave.

“Illegal immigrants have already proved themselves willing to endure great risk, sacrifice and hard work.”

Jay these people are not heros. They are breaking the law, no question. They use and abuse our health care system, no question, they ride on our roadways with no insurance, fact. Does a great majority of their money goes back home?, yes. Stop the abuse of our system and these people will slowly go back home where they can fix their own country, and vote in people that will get the job done. Now people will scream about this, but I dare each and every one of you to go park in front of your local health department and watch to whom goes in and out every day, sucking up your tax money, then come back and say I’m wrong.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:26 am

More off-topic. (I pretty much saw this headline and put it in 4 wheel drive).

Saw The Social Network this weekend. How ironic that a social incompetent builds the world’s biggest social interaction tool since the advent of email. Interesting movie…..

Also interesting: rented the movie from Blockbuster Express. They should’ve done this ages ago…. automation is wonderful.

TaxPayer

March 29th, 2011
9:27 am

Call it like it is,

You’re wrong.

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
9:28 am

“could sue local governments for failing to enforce the law.”

Local governments have no responsiblity for enforcing federal immigraion laws

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:28 am

Call it like it is – not saying you’re wrong per se. But who would want to go back to Mexico right now except in handcuffs on a bus? The place is a war zone…..

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
9:28 am

“The “anti-immigration” crowd seems to have no problem profiting from them, but they don’t want them here (?)”

Zactly.

deegee

March 29th, 2011
9:29 am

The risk for illegal immigrants if they choose to go back to their native country, Mexico, for example, is that they become targets of organized crime. The “Norteños” typically have some money in the bank so they end up paying protection money to keep themselves and their families out of the hands of kidnappers. They are damned if they stay here and they are damned if they go back. This is why many illegal immigrants are bound and determined to stay here.

Good luck with the ethnic cleansing laws. The laws aren’t going to work. The states that make it easier on hispanics rather than harder are going to reap the economic benefits in the long run.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
9:29 am

Well, you can break your local government by suing over immigration, or you can break your local government by making them attempt to round up and deport every illegal immigrant. Either way, I hope you enjoy life without police, firefighters, water, and sewer. But by god, you’ll be rid of them ill-eegals!

seabeau

March 29th, 2011
9:29 am

#1 Fence and/or Fortify the Border.(Authorize the use of Deadly Force to Prevent incrusions into our country) #2 Round up the Strays.#3 Send’em back home.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:30 am

WAR COST: $600 MILLION, IN 6 DAYS…

(Coulda built a pretty swift set of train tracks from Atlanta to Charlotte)

Or made 600 people very rich in the US. Or helped out a million people with some serious food subsidies. Or coulda helped all of us have lower taxes.

JohnnyReb

March 29th, 2011
9:30 am

“a boundary more than 2,000 miles long through mainly undeveloped areas can never be made secure against people sufficiently motivated to cross it.”

No, it can be made secure. Our government choses not to do so. Instead, they prefer to use our tax dollars for frisking granny at airport security, abiding by political correctness instead of profiling.

Thank goodness the invaders are coming for jobs, not war.

Deep Throat

March 29th, 2011
9:30 am

Amvet the name caller

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
9:30 am

“go park in front of your local health department and watch to whom goes in and out every day”

And you – naturally – do that every day, and you – naturally – stop each and every one of them, every day, to verify their immigration status…yes?

Paul

March 29th, 2011
9:31 am

Maybe Democrats could break the impasse (or, more properly, the willing inaction) by pointing out to Republicans that if their anti-immigrant strategy’s enacted, that costs to businesses for labor will increase dramatically?

Wait…. that means Republicans will want illegals to stay here because it keeps labor costs for businesses down…..

Nevermind…….

Normal

March 29th, 2011
9:31 am

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
9:29 am

Evev then, they will just come back like the tide…

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
9:32 am

“#1 Fence and/or Fortify the Border”

How high, and how deep? Shovels and ladders are cheap and easy to get.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:32 am

Maybe we should just open our borders and say “come one, come all”

Would solve the housing problem. Of course, the population would double in 5 years and we’d have tent cities….. whatever.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
9:32 am

Stop the abuse of our system enabling tens of thousands of businesses to profit handsomely by using illegal labor with complete impunity and these people will slowly go back home.

In other words, implement massive fines against these many corporations that violated US and state law and imprison a few of their imperious executives and watch the problem take care of itself…

ty webb

March 29th, 2011
9:33 am

“The place is a war zone…..”

jm, don’t say that..our new resident leftist “hawks” might start campaigning for intervention or some sort of “kinetic military action”.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
9:33 am

Call it like it is

“these people are not heros. They are breaking the law, no question”

For a second there I thought you were going to talk about the businessmen and women that employ illegals -

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
9:33 am

Normal, no they won’t! They’ll be stopped by JohnnyReb and Seabeau’s imaginary GigaFence.

Deep Throat

March 29th, 2011
9:33 am

Does anybody know what our goal in Libya is ?

kayaker 71

March 29th, 2011
9:34 am

Hispanics are now the second largest ethnic group in the US. They surpass blacks and asians by a large margin. Guess who will determine any future president and lots of members of Congress and the Senate? The sad part is the pandering that politicians exhibit to get elected or re-elected. As Hispanics become a more powerful political force in this country, they will determine much of our future. Is that what you want?

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
9:34 am

“They’ll be stopped by JohnnyReb and Seabeau’s imaginary GigaFence.”

I’m waiting to hear how they suggest we “fence” our sea borders!

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:34 am

Jay – on a serious note. Status quo serves both sides. Dems love to beat the “Republicans hate Hispanics” drum, and Republicans like to beat the “The Illegals are taking your jobs, you hard working non-illegals”.

So. Nothin done. Just goes to show, Congress is not trying to work in their favor, just serving their own interests.

Term limits anyone?

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
9:34 am

“Does anybody know what our goal in Libya is?”

yes

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
9:35 am

“Term limits anyone?”

We already have them. They’re called ELECTIONS

Deep Throat

March 29th, 2011
9:36 am

Lets load them all up ship them to Libya !

@@

March 29th, 2011
9:36 am

Leaving society to fester is what they do. While we focus on each other, they get away with all sorts of things.

I supported Bush’s immigration reform measures. I’m not here to condemn those who didn’t. It’s complex….needs to be simplified.

The alternative, then, is to acknowledge the continuing presence of illegal immigrants while providing an avenue for them to leave the shadows and join the mainstream.

Aside from a fine for having violated the immigration laws, my solution, radical as it may be?

Illegals who bring forth a known illegal criminal (drug dealer, child molester, murderer, burglar…etc.) will receive a pathway to citizenship.

(ISH)

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:36 am

ty webb – we’ve already been flying drone’s over Mexico…. Calderone is very unhappy about it.

Probably only a matter of time until we’re droppin bombs on Mexico too.

Deep Throat – uh, not exactly. Stopping a massacre? After that, things get a little foggy….

kayaker 71

March 29th, 2011
9:37 am

AmVet, 9:32

For once, and probably only once, we are in agreement.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:37 am

Doggone 9:35 – you must work as a political aide. Because that is the most bogus bunch of garbage.

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
9:38 am

kayaker 71

March 29th, 2011
9:34 am
Hispanics are now the second largest ethnic group in the US. They surpass blacks and asians by a large margin. Guess who will determine any future president and lots of members of Congress and the Senate? The sad part is the pandering that politicians exhibit to get elected or re-elected. As Hispanics become a more powerful political force in this country, they will determine much of our future. Is that what you want?

Yes. And if YOU don’t – breed faster

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:38 am

Jay – take note.

TPaw: Obama was born in the U.S.A.

Tim Pawlenty smacks down Trump and says people should stop raising the “birther” issue.

(from politico)

Mr. Snarky

March 29th, 2011
9:39 am

Two words: Thanks NAFTA!

getalife

March 29th, 2011
9:40 am

Hillary Clinton,

You complete me.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
9:40 am

Rock on kayaker. It’s pretty basic and American stuff. Hold the powerful white collar criminals accountable to the law of the land as well as the street criminals.

Deep Throat, for the umpteenth time, don’t take people’s words, not directed at you, personally. It makes you look petulant and petty.

And WAKE UP!

Libya was discussed downstairs to the tune of 355 comments.

Are you one of those clowns who strolls into a movie half way through and then pesters everyone to tell you what has happened so far?

Deep Throat

March 29th, 2011
9:40 am

Doggone, perhaps you will share with the rest of the country, because Oblamer did not outline any exit strategy, or what our goal is. He said NATO would take over command today, already thats not happening.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:40 am

Ah yes. A brilliant future for our country, Granny Godzilla has envisioned.

Those who use the least birth control of one sort or another get to rule our country. Brilliant, positively brilliant.

“Yes. And if YOU don’t – breed faster”

kayaker 71

March 29th, 2011
9:41 am

Granny,

What a solution. I’ve always thought that you were a bit off the wall and this proves it beyond doubt.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:42 am

#
The hypocrisy of the American left
By JOE SCARBOROUGH | 3/29/11 7:13 AM

Opinion: How can liberals call for Qadhafi’s ouster when they opposed the war against Saddam?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52062.html

@@

March 29th, 2011
9:42 am

Yes. And if YOU don’t – breed faster

A subversive racist comment.

Translation? Latinos are fast breeders.

Keep Up the Good Fight!

March 29th, 2011
9:42 am

k71….It is American citizens that vote for a president (well actually for electors). Whether they are irish, english, german, asian, white, hispanic or black in their heritage, they are citizens.

Deep Throat

March 29th, 2011
9:42 am

Amvet calling names make you look childish,

JohnnyReb

March 29th, 2011
9:43 am

Doggone – we agree. If I was in charge the Latinos would be coming by sea.

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
9:43 am

“Translation? Latinos are fast breeders”

Not neccessarily. They don’t have to breed faster, if other “races” breed slower

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:43 am

For a decade now, we have been told of George W. Bush’s and Dick Cheney’s moral failings. They have been regularly compared to Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Benito Mussolini and every other tyrant of the past century. Bush has been damned by the ministers of the far left as a war criminal, a fascist and a Nazi when labeling his policies as overly ideological and deeply flawed would have sufficed.

But that was never enough for the carnival barkers on cable news or the blogosphere. For the American left, Bush had to be condemned as an immoral beast who killed women and children to get his bloody hands on Iraqi oil.

That extremism required that the Bush years be filled with images of CODEPINK protesting on Capitol Hill, anti-war activists clogging the streets of New York City and left-wing commentators beating their chests with the self-righteous indignation of Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker.

But in the morally murky afterglow of the Obama years, the certainty of these secular saints has melted away.

President Barack Obama bowed to his generals’ demands by tripling troops in an unending war. CODEPINK did nothing.

Obama backed down on Guantanamo Bay. Anti-war protesters stayed at home.

America invaded its third Muslim country in a decade. The American left meekly went along. Without the slightest hint of irony, liberals defended the president’s indefensible position by returning again to a pose of moral certainty.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52062.html#ixzz1HzoFZwsX

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
9:43 am

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:40 am
Ah yes. A brilliant future for our country, Granny Godzilla has envisioned.

Those who use the least birth control of one sort or another get to rule our country. Brilliant, positively brilliant.

“Yes. And if YOU don’t – breed faster”

Why thanks, based on K71’s premise it is brilliant. People who didn’t use birth control ran the country for the first two hundred years…..not too shabby

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
9:44 am

The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007, which was the compromise of three previous attempts to help resolve the illegal immigrant problem, was a reasoned and reasonable step.

But the neo-cons went batshiite crazy and wrecked any and all progress on the matter.

Typical…

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:44 am

Democrats streamed to the floors of the House and Senate to praise the president for invading Libya. It was, after all, a moral mission that would stop the slaughter of innocent civilians. Whether protesting for peace or calling for war, these liberals once again convinced themselves of the moral superiority of their positions.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52062.html#ixzz1HzoUqcWJ

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:45 am

How can the left call for the ouster of Muammar Qadhafi for the sin of killing hundreds of Libyans when it opposed the war waged against Saddam Hussein? During Saddam’s two decades in Iraq, he killed more Muslims than anyone in history and used chemical weapons against his own people and neighboring states.

With the help of his equally despicable sons, Uday and Qusay, Saddam devastated Iraq, terrorized his people and destroyed that country’s environment. By the time American troops deposed him in 2003, Saddam had killed at least 300,000 of his own people — and human rights groups say that tally does not even include the million-plus casualties his invasion of Iran caused.

If Obama and his liberal supporters believed Qadhafi’s actions morally justified the Libyan invasion, why did they sit silently by for 20 years while Saddam killed hundreds of thousands?

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52062_Page2.html#ixzz1HzoiV4Iv

Liberals have no credibility anymore.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:46 am

oops typo. Never had credibility…. but they just put the nail in the coffin.

seabeau

March 29th, 2011
9:47 am

Guard towers(with armed guards) every 500 yards apart would prevent climbing the wall and ground sensors would identify underground intrusions. I also think that we would need to withdraw aprox.250 behind the existing border, mine the interval. In built up area we would need to level all existing structures for a clear field of fire. These steps would prevent all but the most determined incrusions.

pat

March 29th, 2011
9:47 am

Surely I thought you’d be talking about about obama’s war on iraq, uh, I mean lybia. This is what I call, dodge ball.

Chris

March 29th, 2011
9:47 am

The old Soviet Union had NO PROBLEMS sufficiently securing their borders from incursions by illegal aliens. Shoot onsite anyone aliens attempting to cross the border illegally. That will stop the flow immediately

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
9:48 am

kayaker 71

March 29th, 2011
9:41 am
Granny,

What a solution. I’ve always thought that you were a bit off the wall and this proves it beyond doubt.

The perfect solution actually. If if bothers you that Hispanic Americans may have more power than you do, breed more Xenophobic Americans. Simple. Practical. Affordable. (You can breed, can’t you?)

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:48 am

Libs. Living in glass house, sitting in the kitchen, on a burner in a black pot.

And how do they claim the moral high ground in Libya while not calling for the immediate invasion of Syria? The monstrous Bashar al-Assad regime is slaughtering his own people by the hundreds. More killings are sure to happen as that corrupt regime teeters on the brink of collapse.

In Yemen, the situation is no better. Government snipers shoot unarmed women and children from the rooftops of Sanaa. Should we follow Obama’s example in Libya and invade that country in the name of humanitarian relief? Or should we step into the breach in the Ivory Coast, where a terrifying civil war has led to a million refugees fleeing that country. And why do we not enter Sudan, where hundreds of thousands of innocents have been slaughtered over the past decade in a civil war of horrifying proportions?

Katrina vanden Heuvel, one of the few liberals to take a principled stand against what America is doing in Libya, has written in The Nation that the anti-war left has been silent since Obama took office because they don’t want to hurt the president’s reelection chances.

In defending Obama’s Libya offensive, they are compromising their own morals. The American left is also making it abundantly clear that it does not find all wars morally reprehensible — only those begun by Republicans.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52062_Page2.html#ixzz1HzpEwpER

Keep Up the Good Fight!

March 29th, 2011
9:48 am

Liberals have no credibility anymore.

Oh booo hooo….I am going to cry more because I am sure that for the past year jm has consistently told us all how liberals had absolute credibility and now we lost it suddenly in this single act. Woe is me.

Call it like it is

March 29th, 2011
9:48 am

“And you – naturally – do that every day, and you – naturally – stop each and every one of them, every day, to verify their immigration status…yes?”

Doggone, pick one, in any metro county in Atlanta as I stated and use your own eyes. And do I have proof yes. My wife is a 13 year employee of Cobb Health and her Aunt is a 20 year employee for Cherokee, and my sister is an RN in Atlanta, so yes day after day they have to give services out to illegal’s EVERY SINGLE DAY! This is not pie in the sky stuff and you would like to try an paint me as the bad guy, but these are facts. On any given day over 85% of the clients coming into the Health dept in Cobb on county service road is an illegal. Thats your money and mine going out the door!

ragnar danneskjold

March 29th, 2011
9:49 am

Good morning all. This issue seems to cut across party lines. I am a free immigrationist. I think the “illegals” are an unmitigated blessing to the country, albeit they are a threat to the welfare state. I can think of no “problem” arising from the presence of these hard-working, religious, family-oriented people that is not actually a problem of government mis-allocation of resources.

I would abolish immigration quotas, allow the free market to determine the number who should enter, and eliminate all Federal laws that create financial incentives for people to immigrate.

I broadly agree with my conservative friends that awarding citizenship and the vote should require some proof that it is deserved – perhaps English language-competency, perhaps some general awareness of the contents of the Constitution (although most democrat-appointed Federal judges would probably fail that portion of the test.)

deegee

March 29th, 2011
9:49 am

Calderon has to say that he is unhappy about Americans flying drones in Mexican airspace. He, too is a politician. Calderon has risked his life and that of his family by working with the U.S. on the interdiction of drugs and weapons across the border. When Calderon leaves office he and his family will be marked for life. The Mexican Mafia will hunt them down like dogs.

Calderon is either the bravest man in Mexican history by taking on organized crime, or he is the most foolish U.S. puppet. He thought he was exchanging a tough stance on drug trafficking for comprehensive immigration reform in the U.S. He was duped by Bush and now by Obama. Upwards of 30,000 Mexicans have died since Calderon took office. We are still sucking up the drugs as fast as they can get them here. Sad.

1811/1801 - 0311/0317

March 29th, 2011
9:49 am

A cancer left alone will eventually kill you.

A nation without borders will lose its sovereignty

We sent Gen. Pershing 100 years ago to punish Mexico for killiing U.S. citizens across the border.
This has been festering since then !!

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:49 am

Granny Godzilla. Clearly a credible kind of person.

pat

March 29th, 2011
9:49 am

You want to get rid of the illegals, get rid of thier jobs and they will leave.
Oh yeah, take a serious role against street gangs, that will get rid of the rest.

MarkV

March 29th, 2011
9:49 am

Jay Bookman uses demagoguery I would not expect from him in his blaming the federal government. Does he suggest a solution? He admits that “efforts to tighten border security — have been little more than useless if expensive window dressing, “ and that “a boundary more than 2,000 miles long through mainly undeveloped areas can never be made secure against people sufficiently motivated to cross it.” What is then the solution? To eliminate the motivation? How could that be done in a historically short time? Jay apparently favors some form of normalization for many of those already present, which necessarily would include some form of amnesty and which inevitably would strengthen the motivation. Another idea, favored by those whose financial interests it would not harm, is to substantially strengthen the laws against employing illegal immigrants. We have seen how much resistance to this is on the state level – is it right to blame the federal government for not making more effort to outlaw what so many citizens find advantageous?

Rafe Hollister

March 29th, 2011
9:50 am

The sad part is that the continuation of this foolishness serves as a vent, that allows the pressure for reform in Mexico to never to come to a head. You would think that if the 7th Century Muslim world in Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, and Libya have had enough with their governments, the Mexican people would get the hint. Rise up and demand a corrupt free government dedicated to law and order and prosperity for its people.

But, with all the disaffected potential leaders of the revolt moving to the US, the peasants are left to suffer with no recourse. Mexico is one of the richest countries in the world with natural resources, however, corruption siphons off the income.

We need to seal the borders, deport those here illegally, and watch the pressure rise on the government of Mexico to reform.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
9:51 am

seabeau, you’re going to shoot 12 year olds? Grandmothers? Pregnant women?

I’m gonna be charitable and think you’re proposing this simply because you haven’t thought it out, and want to save face. Otherwise, that’s a psychopath’s approach.

@@

March 29th, 2011
9:51 am

But the neo-cons went batshiite crazy and wrecked any and all progress on the matter.

Guess I’m not a neo-con. Over the years, I’ve seen several conservatives who were in favor of Bush’s immigration reform, but to here AmVet tell it, ALL are neo-cons.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

poison pen

March 29th, 2011
9:51 am

Granny,….Thank God! When my ancestor left Sweden during the time of the Great Northern War…..he didn’t do it exactly legally….I admit it…I am an anchor great great great great grandbaby….course we are mostly blonde haired and blue eyed….so I guess it does not matter too much

Do you know what they say about Blondes? Darn, couldn’t resist that.

ty webb

March 29th, 2011
9:52 am

Granny,
“breed faster”…I like it, but if it means the more you breed, the more power you have. How can you advocate any policy that takes power and a political voice away from gays and lesbians.

@@

March 29th, 2011
9:52 am

Oops! “here”…”hear”

Del

March 29th, 2011
9:52 am

“No matter how difficult we make things, no matter how inhumane or punitive we make our laws, most illegal immigrants are going to conclude that things are better for them and their children here than they would be back home. And if you think about it from their point of view, they’re right.”

First of all I disagree with the above statement in Jay’s commentary. We’ve made it far too hospitable for illegal immigrants for many years and over this time they’ve learned how to get what they can’t get through our generous hospitality by gaming our system. They’ve been costing this country billions of dollars that we can ill afford, much of it in health care. I do agree with Jay when he points out that sending them all back or effectively sealing the Southern border isn’t a workable solution but making it extremely inhospitable for them being here is a workable solution and we should being doing exactly that at every level of government, federal , state and local.

Secondly, we have many who have been going through the immigration process legally it costs them a good deal of money and the process takes several years due to a backlog of applicants. The immigration backlog is over 10 years behind for many classifications. It would be unfair indeed to move those who’re here illegally to the front of this process. The day’s when immigrants truly wanted to come here and become Americans has long since passed. The motive today for too many is all about what they can gain for themselves. Unfortunately, for politicians in both parties their motive is all about politics and not what’s in the American best interest.

poison pen

March 29th, 2011
9:53 am

Doggone, for your information we have guest worker programs for immigrants.

Keep Up the Good Fight!

March 29th, 2011
9:53 am

Using your “eyes” to determine immigration status? Is that x-ray vision to check papers or are you just picking out certain groups. Sorry, I often hear people when I walk who are not speaking english and who are obviously of asian descent or european or other…..I cannot look at a single person and tell that they are “illegal” based only on looking at them. Impossible.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:54 am

Granny Godzilla envisions a future along the lines of Palestine and Israel. A fight based on who has more babies. That’s a brilliant way to look at things.

poison pen

March 29th, 2011
9:54 am

Jay, while it’s true that a lot of illegals are hard working and honest, there are also a lot of them who have criminal records, not just a few but a lot.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:55 am

Rubio: ‘I’m not running’ in 2012

Good to see a Republican recognizes it takes more than 24 months in the Senate to qualify one to run the United States of America.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:57 am

Dick Durbin is schlep for retailers. Good news, for Home Depot, Durbin’s banking law will add $650 million to the bottom line.

Even the Fed thinks Durbin’s banking rule doesn’t make a lot of sense as crafted. Another liberal retarded scheme.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
9:58 am

cons hated my people too when we arrived in NYC.

So we whacked them and took over.

Moral of the story, the Latinos will take over this country too because will be the majority.

Do onto others as they do unto you.

DebbieDoRight

March 29th, 2011
9:58 am

kayaker: As Hispanics become a more powerful political force in this country, they will determine much of our future. Is that what you want?

AND? That’s the way of (most of) the world, majority rules.

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:58 am

Evil republicans. :)

A mural depicting vignettes of state and national labor history was removed over the weekend from Maine’s Labor Department headquarters in Augusta, Gov. Paul LePage’s office said Monday morning.

The 11-panel mural that includes images of worker strikes and “Rosie the Riveter” was moved into a storage facility over the weekend, said Dan Demeritt, the governor’s director of communications and legislative affairs. It will be kept in storage until it can be “transfer[red] to a more appropriate venue,” he confirmed to POLITICO.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52050.html#ixzz1HzrwY0lv

Keep Up the Good Fight!

March 29th, 2011
9:59 am

Jay, while it’s true that a lot of illegals are hard working and honest, there are also a lot of them who have criminal records, not just a few but a lot

There are also a lot of citizens who have criminal records…….that factor alone is meaningless.

Deep Throat

March 29th, 2011
9:59 am

jm, just a mere few weeks ago on this same blog all the pablum puking Liberals were attacking John McCAIN for proposing a no fly zone, everyone of these pathetic hypepocrits were telling us why it would not work and how we would have to declare war on Libya. They praise Obama when he goes to the bathroom. They call people who have a different opinion names ( chicken hawk, neo-con,bat whatever ) really makes one just wander who they really are. Are they the people that greet you at walmart ? Perhaps they are AJC employees, or maybe they work for the DNC.
I am glad there is a lot people who who can see thru their bs.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
9:59 am

Jay, there is a thing in this country known as law enforcement. If they were given the mandate, I believe they could find and deport most of the illegals here. Naturally, I hope you don’t think our law enforcement agencies are too incompentent to do this. As for cost, make the countries they originally came from pay by witholding their foreign aid if they don’t.

The law enforcement agencies who are responsible for those tasks you describe don’t need a mandate to do that. It’s already their job task and mission. You’re talking about maybe 18,000 agents trying to round up multiple millions of illegal immigrants. Even with CBP and Border Patrol, you have a total of about 40,000 officers (and that’s stretching it) protecting land borders, sea ports, international airports, and any other points of entry into this country. The question you should be asking is, “Do Americans want to pay the money to get what they’re asking for?”

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:00 am

Sweet karma coming for you cons.

Mr_B

March 29th, 2011
10:00 am

jm: Hate to point this out, but the Iraqis never ASKED for us to invade their country. A very significant portion of the Lybian population asked for air support, not “boots on the ground,” which we provided along with others. I seem to remember some indepence movement asking France for help once…..

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
10:00 am

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:49 am
Granny Godzilla. Clearly a credible kind of person.

Thanks

jm

March 29th, 2011
9:54 am
Granny Godzilla envisions a future along the lines of Palestine and Israel. A fight based on who has more babies. That’s a brilliant way to look at things.

OH MY! That’s the problem between those two? Babies? Don’t tell BeBe….

ragnar danneskjold

March 29th, 2011
10:02 am

Dear Keep @ 9:59, mark it down as a rare day, we are in full agreement on your post. Too many laws, too much government.

kayaker 71

March 29th, 2011
10:02 am

So, Granny, you claim to be a descendant of blond haired, blue eyed Swedes. Maybe I should collect on my debt after all.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:03 am

Deep Throat

“Does anybody know what our goal in Libya is ?”

Sure.

http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2011/sc10200.doc.htm

Chris

“The old Soviet Union had NO PROBLEMS sufficiently securing their borders from incursions by illegal aliens. Shoot onsite anyone aliens attempting to cross the border illegally. That will stop the flow immediately ”

Soviet military was about four times the size of our military today. You prepared to pay for all the troops necessary to do that?

Plus…. No way are American troops going to shoot women carrying toddlers. You strike me as either living in a tough-guy fantasy or are morally bankrupt. Or both.

Not a personal attack. Just an honest assessment.

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
10:03 am

ty webb

March 29th, 2011
9:52 am
Granny,
“breed faster”…I like it, but if it means the more you breed, the more power you have. How can you advocate any policy that takes power and a political voice away from gays and lesbians.

Rosie O’Donnell, Elton John, Neal Patrick Harris, Melissa Etherridge….

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:03 am

Mr B 10:00 am – that’s complete bunk. I suppose in a sense its true. The several hundred thousand people killed after their uprising in Iraq couldn’t still call for us and the rest of the people that were too scared to speak up after George the First ditched them, yeah I guess you’re right….

Dude, you’re logic is so inconsistent you should work for the IRS.

poison pen

March 29th, 2011
10:04 am

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
9:35 am
“Term limits anyone?”

We already have them. They’re called ELECTIONS

Doggone, this is the funniest post of the day, thanks for the laugh, as soon as I get 10 or 20 Million I’ll run for office. Term limits are the best thing that could happen to our country.

Please explain why the President has term limits, DUH!

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
10:04 am

kayaker 71

March 29th, 2011
10:02 am
So, Granny, you claim to be a descendant of blond haired, blue eyed Swedes. Maybe I should collect on my debt after all.

Oh? Details please?

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:04 am

After our cons supported daffy, lets deport them to Libya.

Fair is fair.

MikeR

March 29th, 2011
10:04 am

The solution is simple. No border fences are needed. If someone hires an illegal, be it a corporation or private company/ individual, the company must pay a $1 million fine per incident and the person(s) doing the hiring must spend 1 year in federal prison per incident. No jobs would stop the illegal flow.

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:05 am

But increasingly, the Illinois Democrat is squeezed between his own leadership team and the center of his caucus — and the choice he makes will say as much about the state of deficit talks as it will about Durbin himself.

As talks intensify over a sweeping deficit deal, the Senate majority whip is facing two competing choices: stick to his ideological roots by resisting changes to Social Security and other Democratic priorities — or cut a deal that could alienate some of his closest allies.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52079.html#ixzz1Hztaz1IV

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
10:05 am

Guard towers(with armed guards) every 500 yards apart would prevent climbing the wall and ground sensors would identify underground intrusions. I also think that we would need to withdraw aprox.250 behind the existing border, mine the interval. In built up area we would need to level all existing structures for a clear field of fire. These steps would prevent all but the most determined incrusions.

How are you going to pay for the construction and staffing? By my estimations, you’d need about 7000 guard towers to cover the complete Southern border. That means that you’d need at least 21,000 officers to staff those towers. That would give you coverage for 8hr shifts 24 hours a day, but that does not include days off. That 21,000 would only cover the Southern border as well. You’ll still have to staff the northern border, sea ports, and international airports.

bleeding liberal heart

March 29th, 2011
10:05 am

I say we open our borders and allow anyone who wants to be citizens become citizens. Let them have full citizenship right away, let them take full advantage of our great social safety net. How do we do this, raise taxes on the rich and the corporations, they are evil and they exploit us. Corporations shouldn’t be allowed to make a profit! Profits are evil, full of greed, Instead we should be distributing wealth. I’m entitled to your wealth, give me more of it, if you don’t, you are mean-spirited.

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:05 am

West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller bluntly said Durbin would get “substantial” pushback from much of the 53-member Democratic Caucus if Social Security reform ends up in a deficit reduction package.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52079.html#ixzz1HztiV51K

cause social security is just fine. harhar.

vomit

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
10:06 am

“These steps would prevent all but the most determined incrusions.”

and how much of an increase in taxes are you willing to accept to pay for all of that?

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:06 am

dirtbags

Democrats in the leadership and White House are extremely concerned about losing the senior vote in 2012 — and have made that case to Durbin in private meetings.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52079.html#ixzz1Hztvhu9N

let’s not worry about the country, just our constituency

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:06 am

Morning, Ragnar

“allow the free market to determine the number who should enter”

I notice none of our “Free Market Rules All” conservatives came on to agree with you on that!

Thanks – this blog needed a bit of levity!

Gator Joe

March 29th, 2011
10:07 am

Jay,
The bigots, mostly white, mostly not descendents of native Americans, and mostly not descendents of Africans brought here against their will in slavery, do not have any standing in this argument. Their ansectors were the first “illegals.” Produce humane, reasonable, and workable solutions to this issue, or shut up.

TaxPayer

March 29th, 2011
10:07 am

Well, I pulled up the most recent data I could find on the web for my county here in Georgia, 2009, and crunched a few numbers so I could call it like it really is. Drum roll please:

95% white, 2.5% Hispanic.

17% of county population received service from county health department.

6% of those receiving service paid nothing.

5% of those receiving service were covered by Medicaid.

Most of the remaining 6% that received service paid a reduced fee.

poison pen

March 29th, 2011
10:08 am

Keepup, do you really think being a criminal is meaningless? really? thanks for letting everyone know how that.

ty webb

March 29th, 2011
10:08 am

Granny,
now now…you didn’t say “adopt faster”. And wouldn’t the high costs of in vitro fertilization, on top of the costs of having a baby, be considered a “poll tax” in your proposed utopia.

Del

March 29th, 2011
10:08 am

MikeR@10:04, No quarrel with that approach. It would certainly and significantly reduce the illegal flow.

kayaker 71

March 29th, 2011
10:08 am

Debbie,

You are about as bright today as Granny. So a country should open their borders, take in all who want to live here and then rejoice in the fact that they can potentially take over the country politically because they produce more offspring. Man, that’s liberal logic of the first degree.

Libertarian

March 29th, 2011
10:08 am

I agree that no matter what we do to make their lives difficult here, it is still better than the alternative (Mexico in most cases). Here we give them free emergency health care and let their children go to our schools for free, while most of them don’t pay taxes (income). I think the only rational solution is amnesty. If they are going to be here, I at least want them to contribute financially. I’m tired of half the country carrying the load for the other half.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
10:09 am

I’m still wondering what we’d do with all the crazy border guards. Anyone who would shoot unarmed civilians over politics shouldn’t have a gun. What do you think they’d be doing in their off-time? Playing canasta?

Mr_B

March 29th, 2011
10:09 am

jm: pardon me, where is the inconsistancy? That fact that you don’t agree with me doesn’t make me inconsistant.

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:09 am

Liberals. Fair weather Hawks. :)

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:10 am

Mr B – you don’t have the facts jack. you’re a make it up as you go kind of person.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
10:10 am

One more thing on illegal immigration…

People want to make it seem like 10-12 million people walked into this country through the Southern border. I’ll be the first one to laugh at you or anyone who believes that bs. We have millions who simply enter legally and never leave. Our immigration problem isn’t just a Mexican problem. It’s Brazilian, European, Russian, African, and any other area where people travel from. People are so focused on the “Hispanic” element of immigration, that they miss the rest of the spectrum. Most people that are assumed to be Mexican are not even Mexican. They are usually from El Salvador, Honduras, or some other Cent. American country. To the average person though, they all look alike, so it’s hard to tell them apart.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:11 am

kayaker 71

Don’t you advocate a free market, not government, as a solution to problems?

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:11 am

Mr B – you’re inconsistEnt because you don’t have your facts correct.

ragnar danneskjold

March 29th, 2011
10:11 am

Good morning Paul @ 10:06, “I notice none of our “Free Market Rules All” conservatives came on to agree with you on that!” I thought I was the only one?

Jonas

March 29th, 2011
10:11 am

100% fully agree. Illegal immigration reform should have been done pari passu with healthcare reform as the two are inextricably linked. A complete failure.

Cobb Woman of Color

March 29th, 2011
10:12 am

During the march on the Georgia State Capitol protesting the immigration bills, there were a few Blacks in the crowd. However, they do not speak for the masses. The so-called Black leaders in the crowd do not speak for us.

The majority of people of color in America are opposed to illegal immigration. To compare their cause to the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950’s and 1960’s is a slap in the face.

If there is anything illegal immigrants should take from the Civil Rights struggle is this…fight for change in your country.

I feel sorry their families may be separated but they chose to put their families in this situation. All Americans ask is for them to process through the system properly so that we may know who is in our country.

==========

On immigration, who is considering black workers?

http://www.austinweeklynews.com/main.asp?SectionID=3&SubSectionID=3&ArticleID=3167&TM=80433.92

Mr_B

March 29th, 2011
10:13 am

jm: to exactly which facts are you referring? I’m waiting.

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:14 am

Oh its complex. But at its core, Obama is a hypocrite.

Why a double standard in U.S. foreign policy?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2011-03-29-column29_ST1_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip

But when it comes to using America’s military might to protect innocents, the Obama administration needs to explain why it has chosen to do so in the North African nation of Libya, while disavowing it in the Ivory Coast, a sub-Sahara African nation where a greater “potential humanitarian crisis” is unfolding.

Nearly 500 people have been killed by forces loyal to Laurent Gbagbo, the Ivory Coast president who lost a re-election bid in November but refuses to give up control. Many more people have been wounded in the fighting spawned by Gbagbo’s refusal to leave office. An estimated 500,000 have been displaced, and 90,000 more have fled the West African country, according to the Associated Press.

Recently, Gbagbo’s forces began attacking immigrants from neighboring African countries whose governments have refused to recognize his illegitimate regime. Some have been the victims of necklacing — a brutal practice in which a car tire filled with gasoline is forced over a person’s body and then ignited. When a group of unarmed women marched to protest Gbagbo’s power grab, an army tank fired upon them.

The violence in the Ivory Coast, a nation of nearly 22 million people, threatens to become a far bigger humanitarian crisis than the one the U.S. and its allies went to war to prevent in Libya, which has slightly less than 7 million people. But instead of threatening to use its military might to end the butchery in the Ivory Coast, the Obama administration says it “remains committed to finding a peaceful resolution” to that crisis.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
10:15 am

I agree that no matter what we do to make their lives difficult here, it is still better than the alternative (Mexico in most cases). Here we give them free emergency health care and let their children go to our schools for free, while most of them don’t pay taxes (income).

It’s not even that. Have you ever seen an entire village made from cardboard? That’s how some people in Central America live. The mere fact that they can come here, work, and have a solid roof over their head is enough. It doesn’t matter about schools or emergency rooms. Try living in a cardboard house for a month or so and tell me how it works out.

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:16 am

Mr. B the facts that many Iraqis wanted Saddam pulled down by the US, so many that they rose up against him and without US air support, were subsequently squashed just like the Libya rebels would have been without US intervention.

Dude, you’re such a hypocrite, either out of ignorance or out of deliberate partisanship. Either way, its equally despicable.

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:16 am

Wow Jay something we can agree about!

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
10:16 am

I would just like to say this:

Microsoft Word 2010 sucks.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
10:16 am

Sheesh, another African-American clutching “civil rights” in their tight little fists like it’s the last cookie in the jar.

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:16 am

Mr B – further research you will have to do on your own. Go take a history lesson. Go use the web. Its not my job to educate the ignorant and biased.

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:17 am

Bosch 10:16 – agreed! :)

Mr_B

March 29th, 2011
10:17 am

jm@10:14 in other words, you can’t show an inconsistancy on my part. Glad we got that cleared up.

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:17 am

Aqua….hahahaha

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:17 am

SoCom

Excellent point on the composition of illegals. I once cited the number of illegal Irish in Massachusetts. Funny how just substituting one country for another changes the emotions, isn’t it?

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:18 am

If preventing a humanitarian crisis is the tripwire for American intervention, then U.S. Tomahawk missiles and war planes should have pummeled targets in the Ivory Coast long before they entered Libyan airspace.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2011-03-29-column29_ST1_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:18 am

Paul…..illegal irish!!! hahahahaha Now THAT is funny!

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
10:18 am

Jay

I could almost take offense at your title. It could suggest that my co-workers and I are not doing anything too. I know you mean Congress and other elected officials, however, there are some people on the federal level who do something about immigration on a daily basis. Many have even given their lives doing something.

Obama is over

March 29th, 2011
10:19 am

Right or wrong, at least your column expresses opinions on an important issue. The problem is that nothing is going to come out of the White House for the next two years that may be controversial. Obama does not care about all U. S. citizens or illegal immigrants. He is only concerned about getting re-elected. If an immigration bill will benefit him personally, then he will create one. This is yet another example that Obama is over his head and is an ineffective leader because he only knows how to react rather than create. Thus when his pollsters tell him that there are potential votes from Hispanics, he will start acting on immigration. Until then, while the rest of the world is mired in chaos, we are going to get more basketball brackets and speaches on school bullying.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:19 am

Bosch

One reason I stuck with the 2007 version.

Newer isn’t always better. Particularly when it comes to Microsoft.

kayaker 71

March 29th, 2011
10:19 am

Paul,

Free markets do not enforce our laws. I think we should start with that. Most free markets work within a framework of laws to protect the participants. Meantime, who is going to pay all of the bills while the free market levels itself and we come to some sort of equilibrium? There are much better solutions to the problem than just opening up all of our borders, allowing anyone to enter and then see what happens. Try entering Switzerland with that type of scenario. Takes years to obtain Swiss citizenship and then only if you have a skill that they need, which is not too often. They protect their country against an onslaught of illegal immigration which would bankrupt them if they handled it the way we are doing.

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:19 am

Southern…..too bad it was in vein!

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:20 am

And while we’re on the topic of Iraq and historical revisionism, it’s worth pointing out that the attempts at diplomacy with Saddam Hussein lasted through 12 years, 17 UN Resolutions, and two administrations, including the Clinton administration (which went so far as to bomb Iraq in 1998 without UN or NATO approval). It ranks among history’s longer diplomatic efforts to avoid war. And under President Bush, five separate Iraq-related UN Security Council Resolutions were passed unanimously, including 1441, which found Iraq in material breach of its obligations and warned Iraq of “serious consequences” (which all parties understood to mean war) for continued violations. For four-and-a-half months, the United States and its allies worked within the Security Council to enforce that Council’s long-standing demands. Yet, some permanent members of the Security Council publicly announced they would veto any resolution that compelled the disarmament of Iraq. These governments shared America’s assessment of the danger but did not share America’s resolve to meet it. More than three dozen nations, however, did have the resolve to act against Saddam Hussein.

As for Iraq and Congress: On October 10-11, 2002, the House voted 296-133 in favor of the Use of Force Resolution, while the vote in the Senate was 77-23. All told, 110 Democrats in the House and Senate voted in favor of going to war – including then-Senator Hillary Clinton who, in speaking about the United Nations (whose support in the war she, like President Bush, preferred), said,

It often lacks the cohesion to enforce its own mandates. And when Security Council members use the veto, on occasion, for reasons of narrow-minded interests, it cannot act. In Kosovo, the Russians did not approve NATO military action because of political, ethnic, and religious ties to the Serbs. The United States therefore could not obtain a Security Council resolution in favor of the action necessary to stop the dislocation and ethnic cleansing of more than a million of Kosovar Albanians… In the case of Iraq, recent comments indicate that one or two Security Council members might never approve force against Saddam Hussein until he has actually used chemical, biological, or God forbid, nuclear weapons.

Which brings us back to Mrs. Clinton’s comments yesterday about “unilateral action.” Since the idea of a Clinton knowingly spreading untruths is inconceivable, we’ll simply assume that her charges of unilateralism are the product of extraordinary sloppiness and an unusual memory lapse.

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/03/28/hillary-clinton%E2%80%99s-falsehoods/

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:20 am

Mr B 10:17 – I just did. Glad you choose to remain ignorant.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
10:21 am

Libertarian

March 29th, 2011
10:21 am

“Try living in a cardboard house for a month or so and tell me how it works out.”

No thanks, I’m good.

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
10:21 am

Paul,

I’ve always said that if the anti-illegals crowd had someone like this living next door to them who they knew to be illegal:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1065454/

who cuts the grass in her bikini, they wouldn’t be all that quick to complain.

Cobb Woman of Color

March 29th, 2011
10:21 am

@Call it like it is

You are correct. I would put it more at 90%. The Health department on County Services Road looks as if one stepped into Central or South America.

Our government has let us down and of course pandering to big business and those who they feel are future voters.

It is causing a lot of resentment. Americans need to designate a day and march on the Capitol against Amnesty. Let’s step up to the plate and organize and let our voices be heard visually as they have done.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
10:21 am

Aquagirl, you know the cons have gone Dr. Demento when they advocate becoming exactly like the murderous Russians in dealing with the issue.

@@, the damn RINO’s! Seriously though, I was incorrect. I’ll do some more checking but according to the one source I saw (ABC News), the act was initially approved by 43% of Repubs, while 53% opposed it. But that was at the very beginning of the debate. I presume it dropped precipitously.

Oops, that didn’t lst very long. The duplicitous Mr. Thin Skin/Talk Out of Both Sides of his Mouth has joined the dark side!

Pablum pukers.

LOL…

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:21 am

George W

Glad you liked it. You may also like this column:

“Illegal? Better if You’re Irish”

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-op-rodriguez8apr08,0,1081193.column

I wonder if Chris and seawhat’shisname want to shoot them, too?

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
10:22 am

Southern…..too bad it was in vein!

You doing drugs this early in the am?

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:22 am

So CO…..Yep those darn Irish…such a drain on our economy and filling up or prisons!! hahaha

Mr_B

March 29th, 2011
10:22 am

By the way, JM, I will agree that if you could make a difference in the Ivory Coast, short of occupying the country, we should do it.

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
10:22 am

Paul,

I’ve been trying to learn how to “mail merge” this morning, and I think I’m just going to slit my wrist instead.

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:22 am

Black And Blue 2: Blacks Flee Blue States in Droves
http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2011/03/27/black-and-blue-2-blacks-flee-blue-states-in-droves/

Moral of the story. Democrats, dumb, bad government. Republicans, smaller, good government that helps create growth and jobs. Vote Red.

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:22 am

So Co……Think about it….if they gave their lives…did it help?

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
10:23 am

Paul

Beat ya to it!!!!!

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:24 am

Mr B 10:22 – I’m not arguing we should or shouldn’t. I don’t really have a dog in this fight. I’m just enjoying point out the complete hypocrisy.

If Americans have their heads screwed on straight, they’d be most worried about the federal deficit and debt….

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:24 am

kayaker 71

Your first few sentences are fair enough. But really, my impression is, on this blog, many, if not most, of the free marketers couch their arguments in the form of market forces make regulation (laws) unnecessary. That laws/regulations should be eliminated or not enacted to allow free market principles to work.

I may have misinterpreted that, but that’s how I recollect it.

deegee

March 29th, 2011
10:25 am

My experience at the Hall County health department is that illegal immigrants pay up front for their health care. The health department doesn’t turn them away. If you can’t prove legal residence then you have to pay – up front.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
10:25 am

Think about it….if they gave their lives…did it help?

Do you even have to ask such a fu*ked up thing???? You’re damned right it helped. At least those men/women died doing something other than sitting on a damned computer bitching about it on a blog. What have you done?

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:26 am

Immigrants. People have lived on this continent since 15,000 years before Christ popped out of his womb. Whatever. People migrate.

I’m about ready to emigrate.

Mick

March 29th, 2011
10:26 am

**Moral of the story. Democrats, dumb, bad government. Republicans, smaller, good government that helps create growth and jobs. Vote Red**

Yeah, everybody should flee to that great bastion of republican deficits – texas….

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:27 am

deegee- that’s why they just steal SS ID Numbers…..

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:27 am

Bosch

Complain?!!?

Heck they’d offer to give her shelter and hide her from the authorities. “Here you go, you poor thing. I’ve expanded this closet in my bedroom. You can stay here….”

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:28 am

Mick – numbers don’t lie bucko. But don’t listen to me. Have fun eating sand.

deegee

March 29th, 2011
10:28 am

no, jm. they steal SS ID numbers so that they can work, not to go to the doctor.

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:28 am

Thank heavens GA is a red state….

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:29 am

deegee – true. just a nice side bene.

Bud Wiser

March 29th, 2011
10:29 am

Sorta resembles Obozo’s inability as a ‘leader’ in dealing with the Libya situation, doesn’t it?

And to top it off, his UN rep has said that the US might supply arms to the Libyan rebels?

What has this fool done now, besides making America a simple 3rd world arms dealer, destroying the economy, devaluing the dollar, heaping trillions of dollars in debt upon us, and trying to have us as the ultimate fools in the eyes of the rest of the world?

Keep Up the Good Fight!

March 29th, 2011
10:29 am

Poison…You really don’t know what you are talking about. You seem unable to logically apply discernable thinking. To your post that “a lot of “illegals” haave criminal records, I responded:
There are also a lot of citizens who have criminal records…….that factor alone is

Your response is then: Keepup, do you really think being a criminal is meaningless? really? thanks for letting everyone know how that

Not really on point are you. I never said being a criminal was meaningless. As a factor to determining an immigration system, “criminal” alone without the ability to discern more is meaningless. There is a significant difference to a rational mind.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:30 am

Bosch

“I’ve been trying to learn how to “mail merge” this morning, and I think I’m just going to slit my wrist instead.”

Don’t do it! I know this guy who’ll address your envelopes for $5 an hour. Cash. Don’t ask for a SS number to 1099 him.

His name is Sean.

TaxPayer

March 29th, 2011
10:30 am

deegee- that’s why they just steal SS ID Numbers…..

Of course jm has proof to support his claim and has withheld it from the authorities. Who’s that knocking at your door, jm.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:30 am

SoCom

Thbppppttttt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

jm

March 29th, 2011
10:31 am

outta here. got stuff to do.

Liberals, have fun tying yourself in knots over completely inconsistent foreign policy and promoting the bankruptcy of our nation.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:31 am

Lets load up the cons on buses and send them to the country they love.

Libya because they love daffy.

Our country will be a greater country without cons.

A utopia if you will.

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:31 am

Speaking of immigration…

Does anyone here have any idea why a man born in America and claiming to be a Christian would change his name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama?

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
10:31 am

deegee- that’s why they just steal SS ID Numbers…..

……………………………………..________……………………
………………………………,.-‘”……………….“~.,………………
………………………..,.-”……………………………..“-.,…………
…………………….,/………………………………………..”:,……..
…………………,?………………………………………………\,…..
………………./…………………………………………………..,}….
……………../………………………………………………,:`^`..}….
……………/……………………………………………,:”………/…..
…………..?…..__…………………………………..:`………../…..
…………./__.(…..“~-,_…………………………,:`………./……..
………../(_….”~,_……..“~,_………………..,:`…….._/………..
……….{.._$;_……”=,_…….“-,_…….,.-~-,},.~”;/….}………..
………..((…..*~_…….”=-._……“;,,./`…./”…………../…………
…,,,___.\`~,……“~.,………………..`…..}…………../………….
…………(….`=-,,…….`……………………(……;_,,-”……………
…………/.`~,……`-………………………….\……/\……………….
………….\`~.*-,……………………………….|,./…..\,__………..
,,_……….}.>-._\……………………………..|…………..`=~-,….
…..`=~-,_\_……`\,……………………………\……………………
……………….`=~-,,.\,………………………….\…………………..
…………………………..`:,,………………………`\…………..__..
……………………………….`=-,……………….,%`>–==“…….
…………………………………._\……….._,-%…….`\……………
……………………………..,<`.._|_,-&“…………….`\…………..

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
10:33 am

What has this fool done now, besides making America a simple 3rd world arms dealer, destroying the economy, devaluing the dollar, heaping trillions of dollars in debt upon us, and trying to have us as the ultimate fools in the eyes of the rest of the world?

Carrying on the longstanding precedents and traditions of his predecessors?

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:33 am

“Our country will be a greater country without cons.”

Good luck with that…it’s the “cons” as you call them who pay all the taxes to support your socialist/liberal big-government lifestyle.

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
10:33 am

Paul,

I give up, what is Sean’s number?

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:34 am

“Carrying on the longstanding precedents and traditions of his predecessors?”

Exactly…he is carrying out Jimmy Carter’s 2nd term.

TaxPayer

March 29th, 2011
10:34 am

Does anyone here have any idea why a man born in America and claiming to be a Christian would change his name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama?

To give folks like Sarah Palin and birthers, et al, something else to whine about.

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:34 am

hahaha Southern you are hilarious…..you are right they spent thier lives fighting a cause that our f’ed up government will not support. As a matter of fact this tool we have in office would rather sue a state that is attempting to pass and enforce a federal law…….Great job oh Lord Obama!!!

Great work, thanks for proving my point!

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:34 am

Bosch

1-800-foxnews

x666 for Sean

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:34 am

Love it or leave it cons.

Get on the back of the bus cons.

Next stop Libya.

You did it to yourselves.

Mick

March 29th, 2011
10:35 am

**Have fun eating sand.**

Sorry to rock your fantasy world of republican superiority but I’ll remind you again that both partys are part of the same hypocrisy. I’ll take the dems while you can carry the water for the rich…

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:35 am

“Lets load up the cons on buses and send them to the country they love.”

“Libya because they love daffy.”

Good luck getting to Libya on a bus, fool.

wigglwagon

March 29th, 2011
10:35 am

“The alternative, then, is to acknowledge the continuing presence of illegal immigrants while providing an avenue for them to leave the shadows and join the mainstream. That’s a step that only Congress can take — a step that it has so far refused to take, and that it shows no signs of taking in the foreseeable future.”

The reason Congress refuses to address the issue is very simple. As Mr. Bookman puts it, “providing an avenue for them to leave the shadows and join the mainstream” leaves 20-30 million legal residents and citizens unemployed while rewarding the illegal aliens and their employers. Either way, there are going to be a lot of ticked off voters in ‘12.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:36 am

Hillary Clinton,

You had me at vast rw conspiracy.

You complete me.

Mick

March 29th, 2011
10:36 am

**it’s the “cons” as you call them who pay all the taxes **

Sounds good, but no basis in fact, try again..

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
10:36 am

Paul,

Know what’s sad? The time I’ve taken fooling around with this stupid command, I could have just typed out the damn letters.

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:36 am

Hey getalife, did you find any of those $500 lies I told yet?

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:37 am

Taxpayer……haha yeah great point for a 3rd grader!

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:37 am

“Good luck getting to Libya on a bus, fool”

The bus will take you to Delta.

They are ready when you are con.

Love it or leave it..

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:38 am

“To give folks like Sarah Palin and birthers, et al, something else to whine about.”

I guess he extended the Bush tax cuts to give liberals something else to whine about.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:38 am

hjarry.

Your name is a lie.

Pay up welcher.

Kamchak

March 29th, 2011
10:39 am

Either way, there are going to be a lot of ticked off voters in ‘12

Late to the party with that little nugget of wisdom.

There’s always ticked off voters.

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:39 am

Mick…..”Sounds good, but no basis in fact”…..Really look at how the demographics in voters amoung Repubs and Dems……

The wealthest 7% pay 42% of the taxes….which way to they vote again?

The lady in the welfare office that pays no taxes….which way does she vote?

Wisen up.

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:39 am

Getalife…..”love it or leave it”…..isnt that what the right said to you about Bush?

TaxPayer

March 29th, 2011
10:40 am

Taxpayer……haha yeah great point for a 3rd grader!

I’m glad I was able to connect.

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:40 am

“Love it or leave it..”

No thanks, I’ll choose C) None of the Above

We took over the House in 2010, and kicked Democrats entirely out of the state of Georgia. We’ll finish the job in 2012.

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:40 am

There are more blacks in prison today that were ever in slavery…..interesting fact eh?

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:41 am

Taxpayer….with your lib base? Great job!

Mick

March 29th, 2011
10:41 am

georg

The lady in the welfare office probably doesn’t vote plus everyone who is wealthy is not a repub…wisdom forwarded..

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:41 am

Maybe he failed to close gitmo to give you libbies something else to whine about.

Kamchak

March 29th, 2011
10:41 am

The lady in the welfare office that pays no taxes…

This crap again?

Every consumer pays taxes, sport.

Like getalife says, this is a no lie zone.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
10:41 am

Southern you are hilarious…..you are right they spent thier lives fighting a cause that our f’ed up government will not support. As a matter of fact this tool we have in office would rather sue a state that is attempting to pass and enforce a federal law

No, you are hilarious. You talk about something that you’re so ill informed on, it’s amusing to see you continuously put your foot in your mouth. Under Obama, the number of deportations have increased year after year. Processes have been put in place to streamline the court processes on the Southern border to cut down on the length of time someone is held in custody before being returned to their home country.

Contrary to what you believe, those people who have given their lives ARE the government doing something about immigration. Just because something doesn’t make the news does not mean that nothing is happening. If you want to do something other than sideline bitching on a blog, go to http://www.usajobs.opm.gov and search for Border Patrol Agent or Customs and Border Protection Officer. You’ll get all the immigration training needed to do the job.

Cynthia Who?

March 29th, 2011
10:41 am

Nice spin Jay, “anti-immigration law”. Didn’t catch it at first.

TaxPayer

March 29th, 2011
10:42 am

I guess he extended the Bush tax cuts to give liberals something else to whine about.

I’m sure it had that effect on some.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:42 am

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:42 am

Bosch

I was kinda hopin’ Sean’s phone number (800-foxnews) and “666″ extension was worth a little coffee spew on your monitor and letters -

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:42 am

“The bus will take you to Delta.”

Conservatives drive luxury cars and SUVs. Buses are for liberals.

kayaker 71

March 29th, 2011
10:42 am

getalife,

And when all of the ‘cons” are gone, what’s left over will not last long. Who is going to make the money needed to pay the bills? We’ll take all of the “evil rich” with us who pay more than 70% of the nation’s bills. Then when the riots start from the unions who were “promised” all of these benefits and all of the blubber butt welfare brood mares descend on the capital demanding their slice of the entitlement pie, you will indeed be screwed. If it were not for “cons” in this country, we wouldn’t have a country. You are just to stupid to realize that.

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:43 am

Mick….just take the percentages and averages….that will be fine….I think you get my point.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
10:43 am

George W, no wonder the “woman of color” from Cobb can’t rally her troops. Maybe she’d have better luck staging her rally at the local jail.

TaxPayer

March 29th, 2011
10:43 am

Taxpayer….with your lib base? Great job!

So far, only you responded to that post but I’ll let you know if anyone claiming to be a lib responds, k.

zeke

March 29th, 2011
10:43 am

There are plenty of laws to deal with illegals! Do not call it immigration. It is an invasion and democrats love it because it gives the voters. And it meets their agenda of a Caucasian minority in future years. However that will not happen in the next 100 or 200 years unless illegals are allowed to continue to invade the USA and are made citizens, The most ridiculous thing about the census is that no one was required to verify that they were indeed citizens, But, the government uses those numbers from the census to determine the total number of people living in a particular town, city, county or state in order to give out money for agenda programs. Non citizen, illegals should not count as population for the spending of taxpayer money!

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:44 am

“Every consumer pays taxes, sport.”

If a welfare queen gets a $500 check from government, and 5% of that goes to sales taxes when she buys stuff, who really paid he taxes there, sport?

JKL2

March 29th, 2011
10:45 am

aquagirl- you’re going to shoot 12 year olds? Grandmothers? Pregnant women?

How do you shoot women and children? Easy, just don’t lead them as much. The Berlin Wall worked very well. It didn’t work because it was some gigantic thing a couple goofy college girls couldn’t climb over. It worked because the penalty for climbing over it was instant death. Our current policy is “if you get caught, you get free clothes, food, healthcare, and a trip back to start.” Why even have immigration laws if there is no punishment for breaking them?

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:45 am

Kammy-poo…hello? Time for the Skittles-crapping unicorn rejoinder now? It’s SOOOOOO intellectual….

Soothsayer

March 29th, 2011
10:45 am

Rather than build a fence along our border with Mexico, we should build a fence around employers who hire illegal immigrants — much cheaper! and more effective.

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
10:45 am

Paul,

Under normal circumstances it would have been. I need a secretary.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:46 am

Dusty and you cons used to call out people that did not support our President in war.

Called them saddam lovers, traitors, unAmerican, unpatriotic, bla, blah, bla.

Fair is fair hypocrites.

As far as deporting, there is only one group of so called Americans that deserve to be deproted.

You cons.

Mick

March 29th, 2011
10:46 am

georg

You have not made a point, just a warped opinion…

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:47 am

Since we just proved Kamchak’s statement that “every consumer pays taxes” to be a lie, I wonder what’s next? He’ll tell us socialism doesn’t exist? LMAO

John Birch

March 29th, 2011
10:47 am

1) Withdraw the troops from Obaminiation’s pointless and costly wars.
2) Use said troops to round up the illegals.
3) Ship them all into Mexico, regardless of country of origin, Mexico has been the biggest problem, let them deal with everyone.
4) Use 20% of the troops to patrol the border with the use of deadly force.
5) Levy huge fines against all employers found to be emplying illegals. Use the money to pay for the deportation.
Why is it all the limp little libs always say it’s impossible to do anything to improve our country? We transported, armed and fed millions of troops using 1940’s technology, rounding up 20 million illegals (everyone knows there’s way more than the ‘official’ number) should be a piece of cake.

ragnar danneskjold

March 29th, 2011
10:47 am

Dear Bosch @ 10:16, and jm @ 10:17, one word: OpenOffice. I’ve used it more than five years. The only thing it does not do is print mail bar-codes on the envelope.

Kamchak

March 29th, 2011
10:47 am

If a welfare queen gets a $500 check from government, and 5% of that goes to sales taxes when she buys stuff…

Continuing the myth of silly Ronnie.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:47 am

kay.

Imagine a country without cons.

You can do it if you try.

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:48 am

Aqua….agreed.

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:48 am

JKL2…..yes.

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:48 am

“Fair is fair hypocrites.”

Yeah…like bashing the Iraq’Afghanistan wars but enbracing this one isn’t hypocritical.

Critical thinking really isn’t your forte. is it?

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:49 am

Kamchak….you didnt answer the question.

tscali

March 29th, 2011
10:49 am

people can have as many babies as they want, just do not ask me to support them. any party who asks me to pony up will not get my vote. just wait until the other minorities (in name only) lose a piece of their government pie.

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
10:49 am

“Continuing the myth of silly Ronnie.”

Prove it.

Libertarian

March 29th, 2011
10:49 am

When the “cons” leave, the entire country will look like the “Twentieth Century Motor Company.”

@Harry…why would you bother to argue with someone as infantile and uninformed as “getalife?”

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:49 am

Harry….he cant….that is the point.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:50 am

Bosch

One secretary, coming up!

http://tinyurl.com/4skgwny

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:50 am

Where is my money hairy?

Your name is a lie so pay up welcher.

Donate 500 to St Joseph’s hospital and post the check if it clears.

Do it now.

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
10:50 am

Ragnar,

I’ll bet that’s cheaper than a secretary, huh? Even an illegal alien one? :-)

Kamchak

March 29th, 2011
10:50 am

Kamchak….you didnt answer the question.

And which question is that.

seabeau

March 29th, 2011
10:50 am

Aquagirl!! You’ll only have to shoot a few!! Its the threat that counts! This is how every other country in the world does it! Its how Mexico’s southern boarder is controlled,with armed guards!!!

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:51 am

Harry Callahan

“He’ll tell us socialism doesn’t exist? LMAO”

Define socialism.

Thought I’d get that out of the way –

“-)

deegee

March 29th, 2011
10:51 am

Wow!, Southern Comfort. That was very artistic!

I really think that people should have to present a tamper proof SS card when applying for social security benefits. We need a tamper proof national ID card to establish that a person is in the country legally and is eligible to work. The drivers license should be used strictly for operating a motor vehicle, and the voter registration card should be used strictly for voting.

We are deluded into thinking that we are somehow more free because we don’t have a national ID card. I think that we are actually less free because of the consequences we suffer from the fraudulent use of SS cards and drivers licenses.

TaxPayer

March 29th, 2011
10:52 am

If a welfare queen gets a $500 check from government, and 5% of that goes to sales taxes when she buys stuff, who really paid he taxes there, sport?

Five percent! Which county does Harryet live in.

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
10:52 am

Thanks Paul! :-) I’m feeling better already!!

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
10:52 am

No, you are hilarious. You talk about something that you’re so ill informed on, it’s amusing to see you continuously put your foot in your mouth.

It is not all the time that one sees a tape measure home run of a smack down…

ragnar danneskjold

March 29th, 2011
10:52 am

Dear Bosch @ 10:50, ha.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:53 am

“Define socialism.”

Our US military that just won a war in Libya.

Joe

March 29th, 2011
10:53 am

I wonder How much money is going to cost the State if all this bills go into law?

Joe

March 29th, 2011
10:54 am

Does any body know?

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
10:54 am

“Aquagirl!! You’ll only have to shoot a few!!”

Yeah, Aquagirl, what’s a few freaking kids! :roll:

Let me guess, this person is pro-choice as well, but if some kids are crossing the border, shoot ‘em.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
10:54 am

2) Use said troops to round up the illegals.

Troops can not be used on US soil in police actions.

3) Ship them all into Mexico, regardless of country of origin, Mexico has been the biggest problem, let them deal with everyone.

Negative ghostrider. Mexico can simply refuse to accept all non-Mexican Nationals. You’re right back to square one then. Mexico probably has the largest population totals, but I don’t think there’s any evidence that would show that they’ve been the biggest problem.

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9214730/Lawsuit_against_Infosys_turns_light_on_B_1_visa?taxonomyName=Careers&taxonomyId=10

If you haven’t heard about that lawsuit, anyone, working for Infosys, who entered the US on a B-1 visa to do work that required an H1B visa, was an illegal immigrant. Simply violating visa requirements renders someone’s status to that of illegal immigrant. How do you determine who has violated their visa status while still here in the US?

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
10:54 am

Damn, I meant pro-life.

TaxPayer

March 29th, 2011
10:54 am

I wonder How much money is going to cost the State if all this bills go into law?

Not to worry. It’s nothing that a few tax cuts will not pay for.

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
10:55 am

“I was kinda hopin’ Sean’s phone number (800-foxnews) and “666″ extension was worth a little coffee spew on your monitor and letters -”

I was for me…I only just read it

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:55 am

Joe….not as much as it is costing us not to imprison the trash!

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:56 am

Bosch….I am sure you could open up your crib and let them live with you.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:56 am

liebertarian.

Mind your business or I will rule you too.

Bring it son.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:56 am

getalife

The military has a world-class socialistic health care system, too.

Admiral Sestak (retired) says if it’s good enough for him it’s good enough for the country.

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
10:56 am

” as it is costing us not to imprison the trash!”

Ya’ just gotta love George’s Christian compassion.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
10:56 am

To SoCo’s point about jackassery…

1) The few cons here prevaricate all day long.

2) They get caught doing so, all day long.

3) They forge ahead with more lies, all day long.

Rinse and repeat.

Shameless but great spectacle….

George W

March 29th, 2011
10:57 am

Bosch…..sorry they are criminals helping to bankrupt this country. I have no compassion.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
10:57 am

Morning, Doggone/GA

Bosch’ll ship you some monitor cleaner -

TaxPayer

March 29th, 2011
10:57 am

Joe….not as much as it is costing us not to imprison the trash!

If you had to post facts to back up your claims, George W… ahhhhhh, the silence.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:58 am

Thanks Paul,.

I think you can stay but the cons need deported.

clark howard's war czar

March 29th, 2011
10:59 am

Load the illegals on B-52s and bomb Libya with them!

Yippee

March 29th, 2011
10:59 am

“No matter how difficult we make things, no matter how inhumane or punitive we make our laws,…”

What is inhumane about enforcing the law of the land? Should we each be allowed to pick the laws we wish to obey and get amnesty from the others? “Did you say DUI officer? I think not, as I don’t follow that law.”

“Rape sweetie? Not me, I never liked that rule too much ma’am.”

“Pay you for these groceries? You must be kidding me, dude!”

I do like the concept of charging them an excise tax or tarriff to cover the expense of supporting them in numbers disproportionate to their contributions. New York and New Jersey have run most of their eeeevil conservative money grubbers out of town with high taxes. It could just work.

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
10:59 am

“I have no compassion.”

Oh, that’s perfectly obvious there George. Since you stated they are “bankrupting” this country, I’m sure you have the stats available to share of the percent illegal immigrants cost us, vs. say, tax subsidies to corporations and such, right?

@@

March 29th, 2011
10:59 am

We’re moody!

NEW YORK (Reuters) – U.S. consumer confidence fell in March a month after hitting a three-year high as expectations about jobs and income growth worsened, according to a private sector report released on Tuesday.

The Conference Board, an industry group, said its index of consumer attitudes fell to 63.4 in March from an upwardly revised 72.0 in February.

The median of forecasts from analysts polled by Reuters was for a reading of 65.0. Forecasts ranged from 55.0 to 72.0.

The expectations index slipped to 81.1 from 97.5, while consumers’ expectations for inflation in the coming 12 months hit the highest level since October 2008.

Consumers’ labor market assessment worsened. The “jobs hard to get” index rose to 44.6 percent from 44.4 percent the month before, while the “jobs plentiful” index slipped to 4.4 percent from 4.9 percent.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
10:59 am

Where is my money welcher?

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
10:59 am

“The military has a world-class socialistic health care system, too.”

Six days in the ICU. Two major operations. Countless other proceudres. 24/7 care by the best of the best.

In other words, the best health care on the planet and the new Gold Standard.

And it cost me $77.

Thank you Uncle Sam!

Bosch

March 29th, 2011
11:00 am

Here ya’ go Doggone [passing monitor cleaner......now]

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:00 am

Load the cons on B-52s and bomb Libya with them!

Better idea.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
11:00 am

We need a tamper proof national ID card to establish that a person is in the country legally and is eligible to work.

That was the intent of the REAL ID initiative. That one went over like a sack of nickles in a pool.

deegee

March 29th, 2011
11:01 am

It slays me that people are so worked up over illegal immigrants taking jobs that require one to toil 8-10 hours a day in the hot sun for $6.00 an hour. Yet they could care less about illegal immigrants that have overstayed their visas or violated the terms of their visas in order to work in air conditioned offices while pulling in $60K a year. Stupid Americans.

JKL2

March 29th, 2011
11:01 am

SoCo- Mexico can simply refuse to accept all non-Mexican Nationals.

Can we just deport them to Israel? I’m sure they wouldn’t have any problem taking care of the situation for us.

George W

March 29th, 2011
11:02 am

The ANSWER $2.399 BILLION last year alone!

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
11:03 am

I think JK and seabeau don’t get it—many illegals already risk their life coming here. Our snipers would be the least of their worries. They think people are crossing the border for cheap tacos or something.

And seabeau, how “few” did you want some 20 year old guard to shoot? Don’t we have enough PTSD cases for you already after Iraq and Afghanistan?

The Snark

March 29th, 2011
11:03 am

America was a great country until the [insert ethnic group here*+] started coming in waves. They don’t want to learn our ways, they don’t want to meet out standards, they just want to enjoy the benefits of the society we created while insisting on their own culture. Those [insert ethnic group here*+] are just bringing us down to their level. We had a good thing going until [insert ethnic group here*] got here. We don’t need ‘em. Send ‘em back where they came from.

* Mexicans, Indians and Pakistanis, Italians, Irish, eastern Europeans, Jews, Chinese, Poles, Africans.
+ Optional for Native Americans: All of the above.

Bob Marley

March 29th, 2011
11:04 am

I say let them all stay, but cut off healthcare and food stamps and well fare and see how many want to after that Mon! Me thinks most would bolt faster than Hussein Bolt himself.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
11:04 am

JKL2

Same scenario. The US has agreements with many countries where their Consular officials here have to be notified if they are detained for any reason. Most countries will not accept someone being deported from any country if it’s not one of their own citizens being returned home. That situation comes up quite often.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:04 am

hairy cut an ran.

Did not want to pay 500 out of his welfare check.

Just another welcher con.

Tundra Dude

March 29th, 2011
11:05 am

seabeau@10:50 wrote, in part:

Mexico’s southern boarder is controlled,with armed guards!!!

Plus, they’re building their own wall down there….to keep out the illegals….

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
11:06 am

“Where is my money welcher?”

Hey take a number, brother!

He’s into me for a G!

“Load the cons on B-52s and bomb Libya with them!”

getalife, what a funny mental image I’m getting from that one!

First to clear the bomb bay doors?

Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and Paul Wolfowitz.

Even if they are duds…

buck@gon

March 29th, 2011
11:07 am

“Certainly, our border with Mexico needs to be tightened as much as possible. In practical terms, however, a boundary more than 2,000 miles long through mainly undeveloped areas can never be made secure against people sufficiently motivated to cross it. That’s a fact.”

No, that’s a lie.

Our border with Canada is far longer, and their crossing is not a threat. We are secure with Canada. The secret then is in the motivation. Both Bush and Obama refuse to employ their exective authority to enforce the border. Whether or not Congress is rushing to action, is irrelevant at least to the extent that the executive branch has not fulfilled its role in enforcement either. It seems that Obama is actually doing worse than Bush, if that’s possible, even if he is talking a better game.

George W

March 29th, 2011
11:07 am

getalife….yeah you are right the cons are welchers and those on welfare and great society contributing members of our population.

DebbieDoRight

March 29th, 2011
11:08 am

kayaker: Debbie, You are about as bright today as Granny. So a country should open their borders, take in all who want to live here and then rejoice in the fact that they can potentially take over the country politically because they produce more offspring. Man, that’s liberal logic of the first degree.

Please point out to me where in my post did I say ANY of the above^^. I’ll wait.

PS: Reading is Fundamental; but comprehending what you’ve read is the key. :wink:

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
11:08 am

Snark, I’d laugh, but I need to see your papers first.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
11:08 am

AmVet

I can’t help but wonder how the health care reform effort would have gone if advocates had, right from the start, invoked ideas such as “we’re going to take some of the best health care in the world – the health care we provide our military and their families – and make it available to all Americans.”

Then let the cons figure out how to attack military health care. If they say it’s not good enough, they’ve got a huge problem.

Yippee

March 29th, 2011
11:08 am

When a non-english speaking charismatic type wins the governors seat in California; Arizona; or Texas, you can bet your sombrero that the lib elites will then want to see a birth certificate.

buck@gon

March 29th, 2011
11:09 am

And it needs to be said that amnesty without border enforcement (as we had for decades after 1986) is just nothing less than legalizing invasion.

George W

March 29th, 2011
11:10 am

For all those in favor of illegal immigration….can you tell me why we have a fence on the border.

John Birch

March 29th, 2011
11:11 am

SoCo – The portion of troops that are National Guard can be used here; just change their status from Title 10 activation to ADSW.
As to shooting women and children…we firebombed 100,000 Japanese women and children in a single evening to try and end one war. This is just a different type of war, we have been invaded and we’re entitled to defend ourselves by any means necessary.
BTW, the correct term is illegal alien. Immigration implies the process of entering a country legally, therefore immigrants are legal, illegals are aliens.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
11:11 am

Hey Snark, lay off the Hebes!

Haven’t you hear? We’re god’s chosen people!

And get a load of this Republihag…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVS4Zgjm8HE

Paul

March 29th, 2011
11:11 am

getalife – AmVet

Here ya’ go.

Gotta watch it to the end.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcW_Ygs6hm0

Keep Up the Good Fight!

March 29th, 2011
11:12 am

AmVet….you’re lucky. I was in Emergency for 4 hours. $150 so far out of my pocket. Another follow up visit for $50 out of my pocket. Took out my own stitches rather than pay $50. More to come. Can’t wait to see the bills and see how much more I may have to pay.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:12 am

A G AmVet?

Well it was you that got hairy to cut and run.

That would take all his welfare money.

AmVet got one welcher.

getalife got one welcher.

We are tied.

Any other cons want to bet?

I am going for the lead.

carlosgvv

March 29th, 2011
11:12 am

Someday we will be able to tell our grand-children and great-grandchildren what a great country this once was before it was ruined by worthless politicians and millions of illegal aliens. When we explain this was done in the name of political correctness and because we were such a rich country, I’m sure they will understand. Maybe they will even forgive us.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
11:13 am

John Birch, the Japanese weren’t trying to mow our lawns and clean our hotel rooms.

Joe

March 29th, 2011
11:13 am

they still have to go to a process and is goint o cost money not to mantion the ones that are here more than 10 years and have kids they have the chance to apply for cancellation of removal and that takes more than a year and that cost money.
So just think how many are here in that same position.
And thats why I think this bills are not good for the State.

Name (required)

March 29th, 2011
11:13 am

We NEED the illegal immigrants. They take the jobs that even the blacks don’t want.

(And that’s not my quote….Mexico’s president said that so don’t get your panties in a wad)

George W

March 29th, 2011
11:14 am

NAME…..HAHAHAHAHA GREAT HAHAHAHAH!!!

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:15 am

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
10:56 am
To SoCo’s point about jackassery…

1) The few cons here prevaricate all day long.

2) They get caught doing so, all day long.

3) They forge ahead with more lies, all day long.

AmVet, Critical thinking skills- you lack them. I see I need to help you out a bit with your typos.

1)Libs accuse cons of prevaricating all day long but never provide one iota of proof.

2)Libs get called out all day long on this BS but never can back up their charges of cons lying- they just come up with more rhetoric as if rhetoric makes em right. The basis of the lib argument is to shout louder.

3)Libs forge ahead with more baseless charges of cons lying all day long without providing any shred of proof.

buck@gon

March 29th, 2011
11:16 am

Paul,

“Then let the cons figure out how to attack military health care. If they say it’s not good enough, they’ve got a huge problem.”

Uhhhh….. I’m a conservative, and the military healthcare–excluding that for Presidents and cabinet members–sucks. It is perhaps a shade better than Medicare or Medicaid, and VA healthcare per se is abyssmal. Not only that, but Obama and the Democrat Congress had done its best to make it worse.

You might consider it a political problem, because you are a liberal–the foremost question on your mind being, “how can I call names to those **#)@*# conservatives.” Well, I consider the VA healthcare situation, and your own state of mind projected across millions of other people two separate national tragedies co-complicit in revealing the shear incompetence of government to both medically treat and inform its citizens.

jconservative

March 29th, 2011
11:16 am

Interesting discussion.

Since Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, and legalized the “illegals”, nothing has been done by either the Democrats or the Republicans. Yet part of today’s’ commenters blame only the Democrats and the others blame only the Republicans. Reagan’s bill passed with bi-partisan support.

A similar bill can be passed and signed into law by June 1, 2011 if the following takes place:
1. introduce the Kennedy-McCain Bill,
2. both party bases agree to the necessary compromises

Of course, that will not happen. Which means that the problem is not a very big important problem. If immigration was a Big Important problem a majority would demand that something be done Now. But the majority have not demanded a solution.

And that tells me that immigration is just not that big of a problem.

Yippee

March 29th, 2011
11:16 am

It is socially unacceptable to use the words “job” and “wad” in the same post.

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
11:16 am

Off Topic but interesting

“Last year, candidate Barack Obama stood on a sidewalk in Toledo, Ohio, and first let it slip to Joe the Plumber that he wanted to quote, ’spread the wealth around. At that time, I have to admit, that I went on TV on Fox News and publicly engaged in what I guess was some rather mischievous speculation about whether Barack Obama really advocated socialism, a premise that privately I found rather far-fetched.

Audio of current Fox News DC Bureau Chief Bill Sammon in 2009

Who’s makin’ the kool aid and who’s drinkin’ it????

Keep Up the Good Fight!

March 29th, 2011
11:17 am

1)Libs accuse cons of prevaricating all day long but never provide one iota of proof

Posted without posting one iota of proof.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:17 am

That is perfect Paul.

Yeeehaw.!

Ride that nuke.

Tundra Dude

March 29th, 2011
11:17 am

JB wrote, in part:

we’re stuck with a choice between bad solutions and no solutions

Maybe not. Supposedly, Eisenhowers “Operation Wetback” worked, back in 1954.
Once the roundup began, most/many just went back on their own.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
11:17 am

Our border with Canada is far longer, and their crossing is not a threat. We are secure with Canada.

No, that’s a lie. Canada’s asylum laws are far more lax than the US. There’s a growing population of asylum seekers from the ME that are entering Canada. The only actual terrorist apprehended attempting to enter the US at the border was in the State of Washington.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/news/nation-world/terroristwithin/chapter12.html

Paul

March 29th, 2011
11:18 am

buck@gon

There are millions of active-duty and reserve military and their families who would take issue with your characterization of military health care.

If it really is bad, then why did eight years of Republican governance during two wars not fix it?

ButtHead

March 29th, 2011
11:18 am

I love the liberal crowd, all they can say is NO we can’t do that about ANY immigration issue, or how can we possibly sent them home? Come on Libs get real, we have busses, and every journey starts with a small step, so one bus at a time. We take their DNA and send them home, and then if they get back here illegally they go to jail then sent home. The whole reason the border is NOT secure is because libs think they are new dimacrats coming over the border. Funny how we can send thousands of troops overseas to protect other peoples borders and ours look like Swiss cheese…

Cobb Woman of Color

March 29th, 2011
11:18 am

@jm

March 29th, 2011, 10:22 am post…

I vote Republican

Thanks for the link to the article.

John Birch

March 29th, 2011
11:19 am

Aquagirl – No, they just dropped bombs on Pearl and left. The Mexdicans, and others, won’t leave without assistance.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:19 am

doom is going to help us think.

doom is comedy gold.

Keep posting man.

Glad you are hear to make us laugh.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:20 am

getalife,

Your points are weaker than the Libyan air force.

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
11:21 am

“Here ya’ go Doggone [passing monitor cleaner......now]”

Thanks!

Yippee

March 29th, 2011
11:22 am

Thulsa,

Mood Asluht. You were looking in a mirror dumb a$$.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:22 am

Yea do I walk through the valley of the shadow of liberal gobbledeegook and have no fear. Cause a conservative is always the smartest one here.

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
11:22 am

Paul

The VA has been doing a FABULOUS job with my Pop…..

As his sight and hearing fails, they have opened up a world of
options and alternatives for him.

We are a family that is very grateful to the Veterans Administration.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
11:23 am

Thelma, even Louis knows that you and you’re Tucker refugees are serial liars.

Not to mention the vast majority of contributors here.

Own it, live it.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
11:23 am

Mr. Birch, my grandfather would have disagreed with you, as he “assisted” some Japanese SOLDIERS in leaving islands during WW II.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:23 am

Yippee,

A mind is a terrible thing to waste. But you did it anyway.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
11:24 am

BTW, the correct term is illegal alien. Immigration implies the process of entering a country legally, therefore immigrants are legal, illegals are aliens.

Nope. An alien can be removed from this country under the Immigration and Nationality Act according to Section 212 a(7) as an immigrant without an immigrant visa.
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/ineligibilities/ineligibilities_1364.html
Just because someone is labeled as an immigrant doesn’t necessarily make them legal.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:24 am

My point is you are hilarious doom.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:24 am

AmVet,

I was going to say that you’re as dumb as my box of rocks. But I like my box of rocks. I will not dishonor them in such a fashion.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
11:24 am

Louis, Louise…

You know what I mean Oh Derided One…

Mick

March 29th, 2011
11:25 am

doom

Please spare us the white horse you come riding in on….

Paul

March 29th, 2011
11:25 am

Granny Godzilla

Good to get another first-hand account. Also nice to know we as a nation are taking care of him.

Good mental picture to keep in mind this April 15th.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:25 am

getalife,

You pert near had a rational thought there buddy. Still a little on the rambling side of incoherency. Try again.

Yippee

March 29th, 2011
11:25 am

Mood,
Reach your little hand up, grab the handle, and flush. Googles up, enjoy the ride.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:26 am

Mick,

Can’t help it. Its just too easy shooting fish in a barrel.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
11:26 am

The funny thing about Thelma is that he really believes he is Mensa material.

Mensa for Cons – available if you have an IQ over 75!

Paulo977

March 29th, 2011
11:26 am

Normal

March 29th, 2011
8:47 am
“I say make ‘em legal and let them all become good Democrats” Of course …whether they become “goody” democrats of course is up to them isn’t that the American way?

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:27 am

“I was going to say that you’re as dumb as my box of rocks. But I like my box of rocks. I will not dishonor them in such a fashion.”

Having a box of rocks is pretty dumb doom.

Do you use the like gravel in the last cycle?

That guy was hilarious too.

Yippee

March 29th, 2011
11:27 am

Googles, goggles, whatever.

George W

March 29th, 2011
11:27 am

I have yet to hear one single person from the left, state a solution to illegal immigration and illegal aliens…..is it easier just to point fingers at the right?

Mick

March 29th, 2011
11:27 am

doom

It’s amazing how you can keep missing those fish…

willie lynch

March 29th, 2011
11:28 am

I don’t think there is a policy that will satisfy everyone concerning what should be done with those who are illegally in the country. I do think the “let’s swoop them all up and dump them back across the border” is foolish talk but consider the source.

The alienation of the countries largest minority is not the smartest move. This issue needs to be handled, but respectfully.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:28 am

Yippee,

I would call you a moron but then the moron anti defamation league would sue me.

carlosgvv

March 29th, 2011
11:28 am

Granny

I think you said your hubby was a P-38 pilot. Did he do combat flying? If so, was he fighting for the right of 12 million illegal aliens to come and stay here? Inquiring minds would really like to know.

Yippee

March 29th, 2011
11:29 am

And as my public education taught me: nanner nanner poo-poo

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:29 am

Mick,

They are all floating at the surface belly up. They must have been rotting for awhile cause they stink just like I imagined they all would.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:30 am

Yippee,

Is that all ya got ma’am? Try again.

Mick

March 29th, 2011
11:30 am

georg

Actually, I like birch’s suggestion, we should be doing all our national guard training along the border and assist the illegals back in the other direction..

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:30 am

doom,

Tell us the joke about the con with a brain.

Love that one.

Soothsayer

March 29th, 2011
11:30 am

DebbieDoRight

March 29th, 2011
11:31 am

I have yet to hear one single person from the left right, state a solution to illegal immigration and illegal aliens…..is it easier just to point fingers at the right left?

Mick

March 29th, 2011
11:31 am

doom@11:29

I expected better but you’re still a quick draw…

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:31 am

doomed has turned into wow.

Joe

March 29th, 2011
11:32 am

Most of you miss one point, most of immigrants share the same value as the republicans.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
11:33 am

Thelma, I did enjoy your cameo as the car salesman in the opening scene…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiQJ9Xp0xxU

DebbieDoRight

March 29th, 2011
11:33 am

Ughhhhhh!!! That should read:

I have yet to hear one single person from the left, state a [reasonable, viable] solution to illegal immigration and illegal aliens…..is it easier just to point fingers at the right?

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:33 am

Joe,

They cheat on their wives and spew family values?

Yippee

March 29th, 2011
11:35 am

Perhaps so on some fronts. The missing link is that they are breaking the law.

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
11:35 am

carlosgvv

March 29th, 2011
11:28 am
Granny

I think you said your hubby was a P-38 pilot. Did he do combat flying? If so, was he fighting for the right of 12 million illegal aliens to come and stay here? Inquiring minds would really like to know.

Nope, My dad flew P-38’s in the Pacific, my hubby jumped outa choppers during Tet…..Both fought (and still do) for human rights for all people including refugees from nations so poor they can’t feed their people…some folks call that American, some Christian – for us it’s just the right thing to do

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:35 am

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:30 am
doom,

“Tell us the joke about the con with a brain.

Love that one.”- getalife

getalife,

Actually the story was about you.You just forgot about it because of that limited 2 cell brain capacity.

It was when the docs performed that brain surgery on you. They were astounded when all they uncovered was 2 brain cells already stretched to the limit surrounded by a mass of feces. Hence the term sh$t or brains was coined in your honor.

George W

March 29th, 2011
11:36 am

Mick….I like that idea as well. However it is up to the states to individually call the National Guard for assistance.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:36 am

Joe,

They think they are better than others and discriminate against others?

They collapsed our economy and spew they never saw it coming.

They steal American wages using tyranny?

Do tell Joe.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:36 am

getalife,

Back down quick my child. You’re no match for me.

Joe

March 29th, 2011
11:36 am

Republicans are not doing anything to atract them, all republicans Nation Wide by coming up with harsh laws and they are shooting themselves in the foot.

Yippee

March 29th, 2011
11:37 am

Wow Mood,
Now we can see that you really are as smart as you think.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:37 am

That is a lie doom.

They found more than two.

Mick

March 29th, 2011
11:38 am

georg

All right then we should start building army training centers along the border for you know, simulated desert ops….

George W

March 29th, 2011
11:38 am

Joe….you mean by enforcing federal law? You are right the Demoncrats are not enforcing the laws to gain votes….hmmmm noble idea eh?

@@

March 29th, 2011
11:38 am

My husband avails himself of V.A.’s medical. Only when it comes to annual/bi-annual check-ups. He’d never have major surgery at their facility. They didn’t do such a good job with his Dad. Went in for what they call a drug holiday (El Dopamine) and left frozen and rigid. Spent his last 10 years a bedridden invalid. He was fine up until then. They thought the drug holiday would benefit him in some way. They were grossly mistaken.

My neighbor, whose husband recently died, did so after having surgery at the V.A.. While it was a pretty straightforward procedure, something went terribly amiss. She’s trying to get to the bottom of it.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:39 am

doom,

I crush you like an insect.

MC

March 29th, 2011
11:39 am

The Mexicans are a better class of people than you white trash xenophobes.

lkdhf

March 29th, 2011
11:40 am

“ship them all home!” and “secure the border!”

misterbill

March 29th, 2011
11:40 am

Bookman says “let them out of the shadows,(an extremely boring response, used thousands of times), I will agree when and if Bookman’s job is up for the taking as many middle class jobs are. Young people who want to join the work force without college education, our black youth are most st risk. Many laid off, older workers would gladly take many of the jobs, but the employers rather have the illegal for lower pay with much of it off the books.

I am a retiree, but I notice that most who support the illegal immigrants are those whose livelihood is not at stake and who benefit from cheap labor.

I support Americans. We can all do our part. I had my house expanded a few years back and I told the GC that he could not have the contract unless he used American workers.

Bookman’s job first, then maybe I can be swayed.———————- Nah!

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:40 am

AmVet,

You remind me of that 7 foot tall, 300lb Texan that died and was wayyy too big for his coffin. So they performed an enema on his corpse to get him down to size. When they were done he was a 3 foot tall midget weighing 46 lbs. You must be from Tejas AmVet!

Joe

March 29th, 2011
11:40 am

getalife, examples like maybe you neighbour your coworker who?

Paul

March 29th, 2011
11:40 am

AmVet

That was great!!

“If the label says it’s food, that’s good enough for me”

George W

March 29th, 2011
11:41 am

MC……great move to Mexico….I am sure you would be more welcome there than you are here.

misterbill

March 29th, 2011
11:42 am

A PS-

Bookman’s salary is not paid by the illegals buying the AJC. He needs a bog wake up call. Typical liberal slobbering over foreign others as his fellow countrymen bite the bullet.

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
11:42 am

“That was the intent of the REAL ID initiative. That one went over like a sack of nickles in a pool”

and it can’t be done anyway. Any ID we can create can be forged, or just plain stolen

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:42 am

getalife,

You crush me like an insect? Really? Haven’t seen one witty post from you in response. Your responses are weak, worthless, and witless. Try again. This is yet another stupid post from you- should be deleted.

buck@gon

March 29th, 2011
11:42 am

“The Georgia Legislative Black Caucus filed a lawsuit Monday against the state of Georgia seeking to dissolve the city charters of Dunwoody, Sandy Springs, Johns Creek, Milton and Chattahoochee Hills. Further, the lawmakers, joined by civil rights leader the Rev. Joseph Lowery, aim to dash any hopes of a Milton County.”

Wow. I suppose that chartering a city itself can be seen as a racist enterprise designed to dilute minority voter representation–that is, in fact, what these dum-dums are claiming. Good luck to the last vestiges of legacy “racial justice” in this country.

MC

March 29th, 2011
11:43 am

I hope all the CITIZEN 2nd,3rd,and even 4th generation children will give you white trash cowards what you so richly deserve at the polls. In 15 years it won’t matter how you ignorant nativists think or feel. I can’t wait.

Name (required)

March 29th, 2011
11:43 am

http://articles.cnn.com/2005-05-14/us/fox.jackson_1_immigration-policy-mexican-immigrants-mexican-leader?_s=PM:US

“There is no doubt that Mexicans, filled with dignity, willingness and ability to work, are doing jobs that not even blacks want to do there in the United States.” -Vicente Fox, May 2005

Joe

March 29th, 2011
11:43 am

you can not judge people by the way you frame them “illegal aliens”

George W

March 29th, 2011
11:44 am

Buck…..you are SPOT ON!

George W

March 29th, 2011
11:44 am

MC…..I dont know I am really enjoying where we are now in society…>Good luck catching up!

Thulsa Doom's definition of blogger getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:45 am

dumb (dʌm)

— adj
1. lacking the power to speak, either because of defects in the vocal organs or because of hereditary deafness
2. lacking the power of human speech: dumb animals
3. temporarily lacking or bereft of the power to speak: struck dumb
4. refraining from speech; uncommunicative
5. producing no sound; silent: a dumb piano
6. made, done, or performed without speech

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:46 am

@@,

It happens at all hospitals.

I was a nervous wreck before my heart surgery. Scared to death.

When I look back now, they did a great job.

carlosgvv

March 29th, 2011
11:47 am

Granny – “some folks call that American, some Christian”

And some folks say that since no other country in the world allows so many illegal aliens into their country as we do then either we know something that they don’t or they know something we don’t. Which do you think is the most likely?

Paul

March 29th, 2011
11:48 am

@@

Very sorry to hear that. I’ve run across more than my share of inadequate doctors on the civilian side – way more than my share. Hope you’re able to hold someone accountable.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:48 am

doom,

If you have to look up dumb in a dictionary, you just might be a i d iot.

You just got crushed like an insect.

Want some more?

MC

March 29th, 2011
11:49 am

misterbill, maybe it is time that these uneducated young people get it through their heads that nobody is going to give them a desk to sit at all day or a computer to play on all day. Give them a damn shovel and tell them to get off their lazy asses and go take those jobs from the Mexicans. But don’t hold your breath waiting for that.

snoqualmiepass

March 29th, 2011
11:49 am

This is truly funny, funny in the sense that y’all don’t remember recent history. For those who have forgotten… Saint Reagan gave amnesty to over 13 million illegals. So by logic, if you are against this type of action, you are against the pillar of the GOP… Saint Ronnie. That’s all folks.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:50 am

buck@gon

March 29th, 2011
11:42 am
“The Georgia Legislative Black Caucus filed a lawsuit Monday against the state of Georgia seeking to dissolve the city charters of Dunwoody, Sandy Springs, Johns Creek, Milton and Chattahoochee Hills. Further, the lawmakers, joined by civil rights leader the Rev. Joseph Lowery, aim to dash any hopes of a Milton County.”

Buck@gon,

As you know its all about the money. They just want to reign these cities back in so that they can feed off them like parasites. Its really all about looting someone of their wealth and using the gubment to do it.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:50 am

snoqualmiepass,

Smack down.

Ouch that hurt the cons.

Dekalb taxpayer

March 29th, 2011
11:50 am

Someone suggested legalizing them and said that once they start paying taxes, they’ll want to go home. Unfortunately, most of them would not earn enough to pay income taxes; they would instead end up with earned income CREDITS. You think that’s going to make them want to leave?

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:51 am

getalife,

I would call you stupid but the word stupid just doesn’t deserve that.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
11:52 am

Paul, good times in the once Grand Old Party, huh?

To wit, Pawlenty says Donald Hairpiece needs a new comb over on the birther non-issue.

Along with some great left-handed compliments…

As for his thoughts on a seemingly improbable Trump presidential candidacy, Pawlently said, “I think he’s talented. I think he’s funny. I think he’s interesting.”

And being a typical (lying) con:

Trump followed those comments up by releasing what he said was his own birth certificate to the conservative website Newsmax.com. The certificate Trump released however is not an official one, according to Politico.

He must have lost his long form version!

Thelma would vote for the television clown though.

His fave show from his early 20’s…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FIbPJx7HJ4

MC

March 29th, 2011
11:52 am

eorge W

March 29th, 2011
11:44 am

MC…..I dont know I am really enjoying where we are now in society…>Good luck catching up!

Obviously it is you that needs to come into the 21st century George W. Get with the way things are. Understand that you either deal with diversity or you get the hell out of the way before it buries you. The 50s aren’t coming back bozo. Get used to all the brown around you or get the hell out. Start your own homeland or something.

Joe

March 29th, 2011
11:53 am

Dekalb taxpayer, mayority of them pay taxes already.

Jefferson

March 29th, 2011
11:53 am

Live and let live, 10 mil try 16 mil. People are people, no different so quit treating anyone different. Money talks and bs walks.

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:54 am

And now you double down on st upid.

doom,

You are not smart.

We all see it.

We are laughing at you.

But Jay does not like personal attacks here.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
11:54 am

Granny

Your dad flew P-38s? He has my utmost respect. That was a particularly tricky twin-engined fighter.

N-GA’s dad flew P-47 Thunderbolts. My mom was an inspector for the cylinders. 19-year old could shut down the entire line if she found a defect.

My dad was in charge of the engine room on an Infantry landing Ship in the South Pacific. Said they called the captain the “Old Man” (not to his face) as he was the oldest guy on board. He was about 27.

They really were the Greatest Generation.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:55 am

getalife,

If you study and try real hard. You can be the best bagger at Kroger even with an IQ of 60.

George W

March 29th, 2011
11:55 am

MC…..sorry dude most of the “brown” I see are in prison or the welfare line. You should really work on improving your class. FYI….your current leadership will not get you there…..keep working.

Joe

March 29th, 2011
11:55 am

well said jefferson

Tundra Dude

March 29th, 2011
11:56 am

JKL2@10:45 wrote in part:

The Berlin Wall worked very well. It worked because the penalty for climbing over it was instant death

Which is why Smartfellers, like my dad, took us to the West German border and simply crossed there.

Secrets Exposed

March 29th, 2011
11:56 am

“The Mexicans are a better class of people than you white trash xenophobes.”

You support illegals because you need a class of people that are lower than you. Stop being a hypocrit and label yourself accordingly. Those that support illegals have the most to loose.

Rhode Island Red

March 29th, 2011
11:56 am

“There is no doubt that Mexicans, filled with dignity, willingness and ability to work, are doing jobs that not even blacks want to do there in the United States.” -Vicente Fox, May 2005

I’ll take two hard working Mexicans over generation upon generation of government dependents. Support the productive before the demwits cripple them.

DebbieDoRight

March 29th, 2011
11:57 am

Most of you miss one point, most of immigrants share the same value as the republicans

Which is what exactly? Most immigrants will actually FIGHT for this country, while there are some republicans like our old friend James O’Keefe (ACORN Scandal, and others), who are eligible to go but somehow, although he is vigilantly fighting liberalitis in the US, refuses to go and fight for the democracy he’s trying so hard to tear down.

RB from Gwinnett

March 29th, 2011
11:57 am

I sure wish you liberals would make up your minds. You want to punish the companies who hire illegals severely, but you don’t want to send the illegals home. How does that work? They can stay, but can’t work? Or they can stay for the purpose of fining companies who hire them?

Make up your minds please. Your inconsistant thinking is NUTS!!

getalife

March 29th, 2011
11:57 am

doom,

I am retired so you lied again.

You know nothing about anything,

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
11:57 am

Thelma, quit being a racist.

Or go back to Tucker’s, where it is ubiquitous from you cons…

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:58 am

AmVet,

I see you’re still stuck on the liberal groupthink reservation.

WillieRae

March 29th, 2011
11:58 am

Democrats refused to join Bush on immigration because the politics of deying a “victory” was more important to them than any progress on the issue. It was a clear case of partisan politics among our so called progressives.
One of the arguments against the AZ law is that immigration is a federal issue. Perhaps but it’s clearly an issue that the feds don’t want any part of. They have fiddled on this issue for a long time, neglecting thier responsilbity and the country is worse off as a result.

WOODSTOCK MIKE

March 29th, 2011
11:58 am

@MC

What you don’t get is that there is nothing wrong with acknowledging the fact that there is a point where immigrants can cause a system to collapse. How about taking a look at how other countries handle immigration? Much more strict than America. This is the most diverse country in the world. You are ranting and raving but it’s very clear that you are not educated on the topic. It’s not about Americans not wanting to give other people an opportunity, it’s about acknowledging the fact that there are many serious consequences involved and they must be factored in. Everyone wishes this was some Utopia but that’s not the real world.

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
11:58 am

“If you study and try real hard. You can be the best bagger at Kroger even with an IQ of 60″

I see we’ve reached the stage of infantile insults. Sad to think that this sort of thing actually passes for DEBATE with that crowd

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
11:59 am

AmVet’s Racism Scorecard

David Duke- not okay
Louis farrakan Aokay
Reverand Wright Aokay
Jessie ‘Hymietown’ Jackson- Aokay
Black racist legislators attempting to rob majority white cities? Aokay

George W

March 29th, 2011
12:00 pm

Woodstock….dont bother MC is not that smart.

Secrets Exposed

March 29th, 2011
12:00 pm

The US is no longer a melting pot, we are a toxic waste dump for the World.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
12:00 pm

I see we’ve reached the stage of infantile insults. Sad to think that this sort of thing actually passes for DEBATE with that crowd

Yep!!

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
12:01 pm

“You want to punish hold accountable to the rule of law the companies who hire illegals…

Welcome to the Pro-Crime Republican Party, where precluding organized, corporate, criminal activity is considered punishment…

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
12:02 pm

Doggone/GA,

I’m more than happy to debate. But ya gotta understand that when the libs start with childish insults I just have to beat them into submission for a little bit. I fight fire with fire and it always ends the same way. They can’t match up with me and so then they just start complaining about it. It is what it is.

Doggone/GA

March 29th, 2011
12:03 pm

“Welcome to the Pro-Crime Republican Party, where precluding organized, corporate, criminal activity is considered punishment”

And this from the ones who bleat “What part of endorcing our LAWS don’t you get?”

Back atcha folks!

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
12:03 pm

“hairy cut an ran.

Did not want to pay 500 out of his welfare check.

Just another welcher con.”

No, punk, I have a job. I don’t play on the internet 24/7 like you.

Just another bedwetting liberal.

George W

March 29th, 2011
12:04 pm

AmVet…..and how do you plan on “holding accountable” the criminals who are in this country illegally? It works both ways.

RB from Gwinnett

March 29th, 2011
12:06 pm

Has anybody else noticed our governments; local, state, and federal, have resorted to a game of “find the money” and are doing anything and everything they can to take more money from us. They’re going to tax sattelite TV, cell phones, have diverted funds from anything possible, are telling everybody their house is going to burn down without a property tax increse, blah blah blah. They’re proposing casinos in underground and the Doraville GM plant for tax revenue reasons. They’re keeping the GA400 tolls for the revenue. The list is endless.

Does anybody think they’ll ease up these new taxes when the economy improves ant their revenue returns? Or do you think they’ll just spend their newfound money recklessly?

Enough already!

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
12:06 pm

“I am retired so you lied again.”

Being on welfare doesn’t count as being “retired.”

Just sayin’…

md

March 29th, 2011
12:06 pm

“Saint Reagan gave amnesty to over 13 million illegals. So by logic, if you are against this type of action, you are against the pillar of the GOP… Saint Ronnie. That’s all folks.”

Is this what passes for logic these days??

If so, we are in big trouble………

Paul

March 29th, 2011
12:07 pm

Thulsa

“when the libs start with childish insults I just have to beat them”

You just have to?

It must be pretty trying, when others have power over you to compel you how you choose to live -

@@

March 29th, 2011
12:07 pm

Paul:

Hope you’re able to hold someone accountable.

My father-in-law passed away years ago. Way too young, but pass, he did.

The neighbor? The V.A. has “sovereign immunity”. Although she could take legal action, I doubt seriously her resources would succeed in outlasting theirs.

Stuff happens!

George W

March 29th, 2011
12:07 pm

Harry….hahah great post!

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
12:07 pm

AmVet,

The Republican pro-crime party? Man that is too funny. Yep! The jails are just filled with Republicans. Hell there knocking down liquor stores every night. Carjackings too! Matter a fact the prisons are filled with them Republicans.

AmVet I would probably even concede that the Athens cop that got gunned down the other night by that worthless thug was a Democrat. And of course I’m sure that thug that shot and killed him was a card carrying Republican.

If idiocy were measured on the Richter scale your idiocy level would require a brand new mega richter scale. The Japan earthquake wouldn’t even register as a fart on the new AmVet mega idiocy scale.

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
12:08 pm

“The funny thing about Thelma is that he really believes he is Mensa material.”

AmVet, what university did you graduate from? Thanks in advance.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
12:09 pm

Harry

[["“I am retired so you lied again.”

Being on welfare doesn’t count as being “retired.]]

The high road would have been “sorry, getalife, I shot off a remark before I read your post.”

The high road. That means….. oh, never mind…..

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
12:09 pm

Paul,

Nice psychoanalyzing there buddy. But its really just about having fun. I’m just laughing my duff off as I blast away.

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
12:09 pm

Has anybody else noticed our governments; local, state, and federal, have resorted to a game of “find the money” and are doing anything and everything they can to take more money from us.

Oh well, you voted the GOP in. Deal with it. Only 3.5 years until you can vote them out.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
12:10 pm

@@

I’m interested in that sovereign immunity part. Knew a young lady, captain in the Air Force, member of their legal corps, her main duty was preparing the government case for accusations of medical malpractice. Maybe it’s different for the active duty than for the VA.

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
12:10 pm

Paul, when you depend on government for all your needs, that’s when people have power over you.

Just sayin’…………..

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
12:11 pm

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
12:08 pm
“The funny thing about Thelma is that he really believes he is Mensa material.”- AmVet

AmVet,

Didn’t you graduate magna cum laude from the international school of buffoonery? Why yes. You did! Valedictorian also! Bravo! Pigeon clap!!!

md

March 29th, 2011
12:12 pm

“Oh well, you voted the GOP in. Deal with it. Only 3.5 years until you can vote them out.”

well…..you addressed one of the three……………

How many local gov’ts are gop??

Paul

March 29th, 2011
12:12 pm

Thulsa

All righty, then -

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
12:12 pm

Paul,

Harry do have a point there. I can always just quit posting and go back to work which is what I shall do shortly. I have freedom. But a ward of the govt? Nope-he’s a slave on the gubment dependency plantation.

Harry Callahan

March 29th, 2011
12:13 pm

AmVet’s posts reveal a deep-seated insecurity over his intellectual abilities (or lack thereof), most likely exacerbated by his failure to attend/graduate from college and his inability to survive without government assistance.

RB from Gwinnett

March 29th, 2011
12:14 pm

Amvet, what is wrong with holding the company and the individual responsible for their criminal action? Are you and your brethern not capable of maintaining both schools of thought in your simple minds?

Get off the “corporations are evil and must be opposed” mantra long enought to think for a change.

DebbieDoRight

March 29th, 2011
12:15 pm

WillieRae: Democrats refused to join Bush on immigration because the politics of deying a “victory” was more important to them than any progress on the issue. It was a clear case of partisan politics among our so called progressives.

WTF??!!! “I’m not for allowing illegals to stay in this country,” said Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va. “I think they should have to go back to their home countries … and get in line with Jack, Suzy and John and apply for a guest worker position.”

Doom: But its really just about having fun. I’m just laughing my duff off as I blast away…

Ewwwww!!! Pull up…….pull up!! T.M.I.!! T.M.I.!!!!

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
12:15 pm

md

Depends on the city/county. I’d wager that the majority in GA are GOP controlled. The urban areas probably would be Democratic controlled, but outlying areas like Cobb, Gwinnett, and even here in Henry are GOP territory.

garep

March 29th, 2011
12:16 pm

I guess the way you can sum it up is that the US has been busy in illegal acquiring land such as Hawaii. Majority of the country has been stolen in the first place. So if you build a house on a bad foundation you are bound to have a bad house no matter how pretty you want to dress it up.

You do bad, you will get bad that’s god’s way just because it happened hundreds of years ago doesn’t mean that we are not still paying for it. I guess how many people look at it “It’s okay for us to engage in illegal activity but if others do it then it is a violation”

Also other countries are more so the entire world is looking at us sideways the way we deal with people but try to tell others how they suppose to “humanely” treat them.

Donna P.

March 29th, 2011
12:17 pm

You have to the secure the borders (with Canada and Mexico) and then go after businesses that hire illegals. Promise them no corporate taxes for the next four years if they only hire LEGAL citizens. Also, close them down if they don’t use E-verify, etc. to ensure their employees are using the correct social security numbers, green cards, etc. Be tough with them. We should also make identity fraud a felony. I thought if one uses false information on an I-9 form when applying for a job was a felony but no one is enforcing that rule unless you are a LEGAL citizen.

I know I am a racist or xenophobe. You just can’t win….

RB from Gwinnett

March 29th, 2011
12:18 pm

“Oh well, you voted the GOP in. Deal with it. Only 3.5 years until you can vote them out.”

SC, if you really think this is a Republican issue and your cherished little Democrats wouldn’t be doing this, YOU ARE A COMPLETE IDIOT!! You are the problem SC. You can’t see issues without D and R attached to them. Wise up or do us all a favor and stop voting.

George W

March 29th, 2011
12:18 pm

TODAYS ILLEGALS = TOMORROWS DEMONCRATS!

md

March 29th, 2011
12:21 pm

“I’m not for allowing illegals to stay in this country,” said Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va. “I think they should have to go back to their home countries … and get in line with Jack, Suzy and John and apply for a guest worker position.”

And they should…………unless one is advocating that line jumpers have a right to stay in front of those they jumped………..

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
12:23 pm

SC, if you really think this is a Republican issue and your cherished little Democrats wouldn’t be doing this, YOU ARE A COMPLETE IDIOT!! You are the problem SC. You can’t see issues without D and R attached to them. Wise up or do us all a favor and stop voting.

I do believe it is a Republican issue as they are the party who signs “No tax increase” pledges. If, as you stated, governments are looking everywhere for more money, then why sign the pledge in the first place if you’re going to raise taxes? It’s always assumed that the Democratic Party is the “Tax and spend” party. Yet, Georgia is a GOP dominated state. If the GOP were true to their “no tax increase” pledges, you wouldn’t have to worry about the governments looking for ways to get more money, would you?

For the record, I don’t cherish Democrats OR Republicans. I don’t know how many times I have to tell you and others here. I wised up a long time ago, and realized the only difference between the two is the place where campaign contributions are sent. Maybe you should follow your own advice and wise up……

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
12:24 pm

George W @12:04, of course.

It is patently obvious that those who’ve entered this country illegally, have to pay the piper. And I have said so repeatedly. I’m not pro-crime Republican.

The comprehensive immigration act of 2007, addressed that in great detail.

Substantial fines, rigorous requirements, timetables, deportation of criminals and others, etc.

I also advocate the elimination of social services otherwise.

It wasn’t perfect, but it was one helluva start.

Now what?

joe suggs

March 29th, 2011
12:24 pm

Bookman, how many illegals are you willing to let invade the U.S. ? I am tired of my taxes supporting them .

George W

March 29th, 2011
12:25 pm

AmVet…..so are you for or against the Arizona immigration Law that Obama is suing over?

Paul

March 29th, 2011
12:26 pm

Harry

“Paul, when you depend on government for all your needs, that’s when people have power over you.

Just sayin’…………..”

No argument there. But the point is, getalife said he was retired. You made the error of assuming he’s on welfare, then compounded it with a red herring about reliance on the government.

The point remains, getalife’s retired and you implied he has the views he does because he’s on welfare.

You should apologize. Really.

But your point about gov’t reliance and loss of freedom. Over here in Texas we have a huge budget shortage (thanks, Republicans). The Republican legislature, to their credit, has proposed eliminating many high-dollar tax write-offs and credits for the oil and gas industry (major player, here). Industry says without that they can’t survive or will have to greatly reduce their operations.

So in that sense, you do indeed have a point. Corporations who can’t survive without welfare do lose their freedom.

But if we stop giving them so much of our money, maybe we’ll get back some of our freedom, eh?

Jefferson

March 29th, 2011
12:27 pm

time to ban some ip addys.

@@

March 29th, 2011
12:28 pm

“I’m not for allowing illegals to stay in this country,” said Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va. “I think they should have to go back to their home countries … and get in line with Jack, Suzy and John and apply for a guest worker position.”

The wheels of government like to grind us down slowly.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
12:29 pm

Arizona’s law orders immigrants to carry their alien registration documents at all times and requires police to question people if there’s reason to suspect they’re in the United States illegally.

It also targets those who hire illegal immigrant laborers or knowingly transport them.

I have zero problems with those clauses, George W.

Ed Weirdness

March 29th, 2011
12:31 pm

Why attempt to make this more complicated than it is. Secure the borders to the greatest extent possible, enforce our immigration laws fully. Those who are here illegally will eventually run into the bureaucracy of our state and nation and once it’s determined that they are here in violation of our laws, they should be expelled to their country of origin. Cold as this may seem, it’s they only way we have of encouraging illegals who are already here and benefiting from U.S. tax dollars to return to their native country and do things the right way by applying for legal immigration and waiting in line. Those who refuse to do so, should be arrested, their assets forfeited as well as those of employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens, to be used to offset the costs of identifying, incarcerating and ultimately deporting illegal aliens. Overpopulation, congestion, urban sprawl, diminishing resources, crumbling infrastructure, overcrowded schools, hospitals, and jails, vanishing farm land and green space, water and energy shortages, crime, pollution, the balkanization of our communities, depressed wages, increased tax burdens, the marginalization of American workers, taxpayers and voters, the overall decline in quality of life, are all the result of unconstrained immigration and lax enforcement. Like it or not folks, too many people competing for the same limited resources is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, sane, sustainable social, economic or environmental policy. Under no circumstances can we allow any illegal to flaunt our laws. If police, educators, social services, health care workers encounter anyone they suspect of being in our country illegally, their next step should be to report them to ICE. As for those who assert that enforcement will lead to profiling, our laws never pretended to put citizens or legal immigrants above suspicion, our laws do however provide ample opportunity for anyone who might be detained to demonstrate that they are a legal resident, and that’s a damned sight better than American’s receive in other countries.

RB from Gwinnett

March 29th, 2011
12:32 pm

“If the GOP were true to their “no tax increase” pledges, you wouldn’t have to worry about the governments looking for ways to get more money, would you?” That would be the case, yes. Unfortunately, too many of them are too spineless to tell all the liberals whining at the feeding trough “NO!!”.

When the fire department chief tells the public their homees will burn if there isn’t a property tax increase to pay for his department, somebody needs to tell the people, “you’re going to have to choose between fire services and libraries, because the well is dry”

@@

March 29th, 2011
12:32 pm

I have zero problems with those clauses, George W.

And yet AmVet’s “fans” never call HIM a xenophobe but sit silently by while he calls conservatives who support those same measures xenophobes.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
12:34 pm

“Well, you can break your local government by suing over immigration, or you can break your local government by making them attempt to round up and deport every illegal immigrant. Either way, I hope you enjoy life without police, firefighters, water, and sewer. But by god, you’ll be rid of them ill-eegals!”

So you would rather have illegals here draining the entitlement system and wrecking our education system then pay for essential employees like police, fire, education, etc? How talk about threats? Didn’t know that you loved illegals so much and hated public servive employees as well.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
12:36 pm

@@, it’’s tough, but try to avoid your silly logical fallacies and irrelevant appeals.

Or at least just quit the outright lying…

Southern Comfort (aka The Man)

March 29th, 2011
12:37 pm

When the fire department chief tells the public their homees will burn if there isn’t a property tax increase to pay for his department, somebody needs to tell the people, “you’re going to have to choose between fire services and libraries, because the well is dry”

Sounds like an opportunity for an enterprising individual to formulate a successful business model for either providing fire protection or access to books. I agree with your point about spending vs taxes. I think that ALL people, liberal and conservative, need to understand that the things they want cost money. They then need to determine whether it’s a need or a want and whether or not they need or want to pay for it.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
12:37 pm

“When the fire department chief tells the public their homees will burn if there isn’t a property tax increase to pay for his department, somebody needs to tell the people, “you’re going to have to choose between fire services and libraries, because the well is dry”

These are empty sick threats! They don’t want to get rid of illegals draining our economy yet they act is they can play games with the lives of the taxpaying citizens. It’s disgusting!

misterbill

March 29th, 2011
12:37 pm

MC-
Your last post to me indicates that you truly do not understand what is happening. My son’s circle of friends cover the gamut of good success to “tough luck” Two of them have felony charges. So they apply for hard work, low paying jobs. They are turned down even when their status is not known. Why, they are competing in the low wage market where it is very common for folks to be paid off the books.They cannot get a job anywhere, even when they apply at the all the low paying locations. They are not hired yet the illegals are.

One is a certified welder. He has only had a few weeks this year as a welder. Most of his competition are illegals.

You are not an American, if you truly understand the problem. You take the side of foreign nationals over our own citizens who would gladly take the jobs that the illegals have taken.

I will wager that your job is not threatened by low paid foreigners.

I had always though that part of being an American was the freedom to be or do what one wants to do no matter what schooling we have had or not had. So, a PHD who wants to be a carpenter, a waiter, a cab driver, and many other jobs, cannot do so in America anymore because people with your attitude shelter and support foreigners who are here illegally.

PS I bet you are thrilled to buy Chinese made shoes, etc. It doesn’t matter to you how Americans a suffer as long as you save money.

You probably don’t stand for the national anthem , either.

PPS If you respond to this, please pus “1″ for English. Eat your tacos when we become a 3rd world country.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
12:39 pm

firewoman, tell me how much it would cost to round up and deport all illegals. When you find that amount lying around, let us know.

I didn’t know you loved ignorance so much and hated actual thinking as well.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
12:39 pm

“I think that ALL people, liberal and conservative, need to understand that the things they want cost money. They then need to determine whether it’s a need or a want and whether or not they need or want to pay for it.”

Illegals are a want, not a NEED! We certainly don’t need them to continue to drag down our economy!

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
12:42 pm

carlosgvv

March 29th, 2011
11:47 am
Granny – “some folks call that American, some Christian”

And some folks say that since no other country in the world allows so many illegal aliens into their country as we do then either we know something that they don’t or they know something we don’t. Which do you think is the most likely?

Without a doubt, we know something they don’t…..well actually something you know too but can’t take to heart…the true meaning of American Exceptionalism

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
12:44 pm

Aquagirl, you can give up your welfare check and food stamps for a month. That should be enough to send a few back. Just think, if all the entitled banded together and gave up something. Better yet, you can chaperone your illegal friends back home and stay and that will be a Win Win in future savings for US!

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
12:46 pm

firewoman, the math defeated you? How surprising.

Truthpaste

March 29th, 2011
12:47 pm

Folks like Aquagirl, AmVet and Granny stand to loose most if the illegals are gone. Their breath stinks with hypocrisy.

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
12:47 pm

Paul

During “grandpa winter sleep away camp” this year we took Pop to several WWII museums and historical sights and they are all clamoring for P-38 to have on display. (Going to Oshkosh this summer to see one)

Funny, now, to see him nearly blind and talking about taking off from Papua heading into the darkness with the directions written on his hand
and having to navigate by the stars…..he misses the incredible independence of those times.

And yes, they were the greatest generation.

md

March 29th, 2011
12:49 pm

“firewoman, tell me how much it would cost to round up and deport all illegals. When you find that amount lying around, let us know.”

Close all the doors, and they will go home on their own……………..and get in line like the other poor folks around the globe.

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
12:49 pm

Truthpaste

March 29th, 2011
12:47 pm
Folks like Aquagirl, AmVet and Granny stand to loose most if the illegals are gone. Their breath stinks with hypocrisy.

You are mistaken, but the new name du jour is minty fresh

Paul

March 29th, 2011
12:50 pm

misterbill

People with felonies are most times automatically rejected for jobs.

Most Americans do not believe in “you’ve paid your debt to society.” They want punishment to continue forever.

So those trying to make an honest living aren’t hired and the cycle of crime continues.

But let a politician propose doing away with such job discrimination and see what happens to his political career.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
12:50 pm

The biggest thing about AmVet is that in practically every other post he accuses cons of lying. Yet he never provides one iota of proof as to why this or that con is lying.

This propensity to accuse others of lying without a single shred of proof of said person lying indicates an irrational, mindless tendency towards dogmatic thinking.

2 ways to go through life. Believing everything you hear or not believing anything. Both keep us from thinking.

And in AmVet’s case is is guilty of both. He believes everything from the liberal groupthink dogma and believes nothing from the conservative side- he instead just calls them liars if he disagrees with them.

My prognosis is that his case is hopeless. He will be forever shackled on the groupthink plantation.

RB from Gwinnett

March 29th, 2011
12:52 pm

Aquagirl, your argument it would cost money to deport illegals is just plain dumb. I can load up a bus with 60 of them and have them at the border in less than 48 hours. If that’s 45 adults and 15 kids, I just saved $135,000 a year for educating those 15 kids at 9 grand per.

How’s that for math sweetie?

Paul

March 29th, 2011
12:52 pm

Granny Godzilla

What struck me was how absolutely huge those fighters are. Big, big aircraft.

If you ever get a chance to go to the Air Force Museum at Wright Patterson AFB next to Dayton, Ohio, please go. It’s worth a trip. Don’t think they have a P-38 but they sure have a lot.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
12:52 pm

Mystery meat, please expound.

LOL…

BTW, Einsteen, the word is lose, not loose…

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
12:53 pm

OK, md, how much is it going to cost to “close all the doors?” And how do you propose to do it? Contrary to WND wisdom, there’s not one big door down there in Texas.

@@

March 29th, 2011
12:54 pm

AmVet:

Or at least just quit the outright lying…

You’re denying that “xenophobe” is not among your vast repertoire of name calling?

Libertarian

March 29th, 2011
12:55 pm

“I see we’ve reached the stage of infantile insults. Sad to think that this sort of thing actually passes for DEBATE with that crowd”

No one said anything when your pal “getalife” suggested putting all “cons” in a plane and letting them be blown to bits over Libya.

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
12:55 pm

Paul

What stikes me is they put 19 year olds in the pilot seat….

The best and the brightest, after batteries of tests, but still 19….

Amazing.

I’ll look into Dayton…As long as he can still see, I want to be able to show him the world.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
12:57 pm

Paul,

That is true and not true about felonys. One of my best friends in Atlanta finally got a job and a damn good one with a pending felony. He had to explain the felony indepth- domestic disturbance where he lost control and beat his wife up when she told him she had been having an affair. Probably didn’t help that he is black and his wife white. He got a letter from her stating it was all a misunderstanding and the felony is only pending- it falls off after 5 years of not having any legal troubles or arrests. It can be done but it depends on the nature of the felony. If it was for embezzlement or theft or robbery, etc. then a guy can probably kiss his chances of ever getting a serious job goodbye. Such is the price of crime.

md

March 29th, 2011
12:57 pm

“OK, md, how much is it going to cost to “close all the doors?” And how do you propose to do it? Contrary to WND wisdom, there’s not one big door down there in Texas.”

Expand your definition of “door”………………….no jobs, no assistance, no housing……they will go home.

And since you seem to be advocating for them, maybe you can explain why their rights are greater than the rights of those they jumped in front of??

I’d love to hear your side of that story…………

RB from Gwinnett

March 29th, 2011
12:58 pm

Granny, not many 19 year olds flying jets in the USAF. Without a college degree, you won’t get much further than fueling them and college degrees for 19 year olds are pretty rare.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
12:59 pm

RB, the problem with your scenario isn’t math, it’s lack of reality. I suppose I should have specified “non-bizarro world math” for some of y’all who live there.

Granny Godzilla

March 29th, 2011
1:00 pm

RB

Good thing it was early in the 1940s and the Army Air corp…..

@@

March 29th, 2011
1:01 pm

Oops! Let me reword that.

You’re denying that “xenophobe” is among your vast repertoire….?

Paul:

I’ve been doing a little research of medical malpractice and the V.A..

Claimants do have to pay attorneys to move their cases thru the court system. From a veteran’s site.

If you believe that you have a valid claim against the VA, you should seek the advice of an experienced Attorney, immediately. The FTCA provides a limitation on Attorney fees for claimants of 20% in settlement and 25% once the case is in litigation.

Not to say that some haven’t been successful. The V.A. has paid out some big bucks in damages. I guess it comes out of our pockets in the end.

I’m not into suing. It’s discouraged in The Bible.

Jefferson

March 29th, 2011
1:03 pm

Granny, Paul there is a great aviation museam (sic?) down in Warner Robins at the end of the AFB. Free, very interesting.

md

March 29th, 2011
1:03 pm

“it’s lack of reality”

Lack of reality is accepting that the solution is to allow folks to jump the line and get away with it…….the first amnesty situation compounded the problem by setting the precedent…….and your reality is to do it again??

Paul

March 29th, 2011
1:05 pm

Thulsa

Part of my outlook is based on my brother-in-law’s brother. Did time for drugs. Applied for a truck driving job. Company said “we’d hire you, but we’re subs for a nationwide company and their policy is ‘no felons.”

Guy said “this was 25 years ago….”

They said ’so sad, too bad.”

I’m of the ‘you’ve paid your debt, don’t hold it over their head and keep them from getting a job’ camp.

AmVet

March 29th, 2011
1:05 pm

“Oops! Let me reword that.”

Good! Because that first post made no sense at all.

And the answer is nope, no denials here.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
1:05 pm

“no jobs, no assistance, no housing”

lets not forget no public education for the kiddos.

Paul

March 29th, 2011
1:07 pm

Jefferson

I’ve been there! You are correct, it is great.

@@

I’ve often thought one of the best reforms that could be made for malpractice and other cases is to do what the VA did – limit the attorney’s share of the settlement.

@@

March 29th, 2011
1:07 pm

People with felonies are most times automatically rejected for jobs.

There’s a company here in Clayton County who sets their own quota for hiring felons. Most of ‘em turn out to be pretty good employees. Not all, but most.

I won’t divulge the name here. jay’s bloggers may desert their blogging post and diverge on them all at once.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
1:07 pm

RB from Gwinnett,

Yes. They were talking about pilots in the 1940s. Incidentally George Bush 1 was at the time of his service as a bomber pilot reputed to be the youngest naval aviator in history at that time. He was only 19. Shot down twice over the Pacific. I always found it odd that libs would call him a “wimp” given these accomplishments.

Clayton County

March 29th, 2011
1:09 pm

No doubt about it @@. We have or fair share of felons here and then some!

RB from Gwinnett

March 29th, 2011
1:09 pm

Aquagirl, in the big kids blog, we generally expect people to defend arguements with facts or logic. If you would care to explain to us all why there is something wrong with my math or my plan, I’d be glad to hear it. If all you have is silly retorts with nothing of value in them, go play somewhere else.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
1:09 pm

RB, Aquagirl has no basic math skills, besides her argument is she loves illegals and wants them to stay. False compassion and stupidity is a classic combination!

@@

March 29th, 2011
1:10 pm

I’ve often thought one of the best reforms that could be made for malpractice and other cases is to do what the VA did – limit the attorney’s share of the settlement.

Agreed, but then lawyers would have no incentive to protect the downtrodden. Public defenders don’t hang around government for too long. There’s a reason for that.

There’s big money to be made in and off Washington.

poison pen

March 29th, 2011
1:11 pm

AmVet, if you are going to correct spelling and call people names for misspelling, then they might start calling you dumb, as you have made your share of them. We all make mistakes in spelling and grammar and I think we should at least try to be civil about that.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
1:12 pm

Well, md, we should spend hundreds of billions of dollars we don’t have, because you have your undies in a bunch over line-jumpers? Did someone shove you at Kroger’s and you now feel compelled to take that out on somebody? And why do you want to legislate like a screaming drama queen who has lost a glittery pump?

@@

March 29th, 2011
1:13 pm

Clayton County:

It’s a family owned company. Been here since 1947. They’re looking to relocate. They’ll be missed.

JKL2

March 29th, 2011
1:13 pm

aquagirl- many illegals already risk their life coming here.

How??? Malpractice from the free healthcare we give them?

md

March 29th, 2011
1:17 pm

“Well, md, we should spend hundreds of billions of dollars we don’t have, because you have your undies in a bunch over line-jumpers? Did someone shove you at Kroger’s and you now feel compelled to take that out on somebody? And why do you want to legislate like a screaming drama queen who has lost a glittery pump?”

Once again, why not just answer the question………why are their rights greater than those of others???

It is a very simple premise……follow the laws and treat others as one wants to be treated………

So, you have no problems with picking and choosing laws and treating others as inferior to yourself????

And spare me the drama queen rhetoric, etc……just debate the topic and answer the questions…..

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
1:20 pm

Paul,

I would tend to agree but I also think it depends on the crime and there should be some subjectivity but of course with some companies there is none. 25 years ago and its still following him? That indeed sucks. In the case of my buddy he is 50, former Marine, never been arrested in his life before the incident with his wife, was sincerely sorry or hitting her, and they have since reconciled and are friends.

I also have a woman I’m thinking about hiring. She is 62 and had a drug problem over 12 years ago. Has been clean since. What was her drug problem? Oxycontin and lortab. She developed an addiction to both after suffering pain from an operation. When she explained it to me I had no reservations. My only consideration now is how she would do on the job. And btw she is currently employed but is just looking around because her company is cutting hours due to economic conditions.

The state of Georgia has a youthful offender law where first time felony offenders can be forgiven ONE time depending on the nature of the felony. The conviction doesn’t show up on employment or other checks- only the police see it when they run records. Personally I think that’s a good thing since so many youngsters can do something really stupid early in life. Give em one break to realize the seriousness of what a felony record can do to their job prospects.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
1:20 pm

“we should spend hundreds of billions of dollars we don’t have, because you have your undies in a bunch over line-jumpers?”

hundreds of billions of dollars? How old are you?

illegals are line jumpers? Grow up Aquagirl, and stop pretending to be some silly blogging superhero.

It’s pitiful when you have to resort to cyberbullying as a way to express yourself!

Hillbilly Deluxe

March 29th, 2011
1:23 pm

I think that ALL people, liberal and conservative, need to understand that the things they want cost money. They then need to determine whether it’s a need or a want and whether or not they need or want to pay for it.

Agree with that but where the rub comes in, at the local, state and federal levels is most groups, all across the spectrum, think everybody “needs” to pay for what they themselves “want”. Most people’s attitude is “if it benefits me, it’s a good thing; if it benefits somebody else and I have to pay for it, it’s a bad thing”. In some ways, humans are predictable creatures.

Hillbilly Deluxe

March 29th, 2011
1:27 pm

I’ve often thought one of the best reforms that could be made for malpractice and other cases is to do what the VA did – limit the attorney’s share of the settlement.

That brings to mind a class action case in the Anniston, Alabama area, a few years back. I forget all the details but the people won their case and each got a few thousand dollars a piece, while the lawyers got millions. Don’t remember the exact figure but the total plantiff group got an extremely small percentage of the award; the lawyers got the lion’s share.

JKL2

March 29th, 2011
1:29 pm

granny- (Going to Oshkosh this summer to see one)

I’d rent you my house but hopefully it will be gone by then. Let me know if you need any advice.

poison pen

March 29th, 2011
1:30 pm

Well it’s started, 2,200 Marines from Camp Lejeune are being sent to Lybia, but hey, don’t worry we were assured that we would have no troops on the ground. I think that they are really just going on a sight seeing trip.

Thank you, Obama

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
1:32 pm

Yes, firewoman—hundreds of billions of dollars. Really. I realize in RB’s world you can stick “illegals” on the side of a bus and they’ll show up, ready for the ride. If that fails, you’re gonna have to spend a little more cash.

You have to find all the illegals, figure out where they’re from, process them, and ship them home. The Chief of ICE, who should know a little about these things, gave a ballpark figure of $94 billion. And that was several years ago. You’d also have to build that GigaWall on the border to keep them out, and enlarge the Coast Guard by god knows only how much.

Mass deportation fantasies should stay where they belong—in the letters section of Soldier of Fortune, heating the loins of those who just hate, hate, HATE! “those people.”

Jerome Horowitz

March 29th, 2011
1:35 pm

Want to stop illegal immigration – make it a felony to hire one. See how fast they disappear. Did anyone note that the GA legislation started out with this provision? Then the businesses that hire them went ape stuff and the legislature backed down.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
1:37 pm

Simplest way of eliminating the illegal problem is 2 fold. One is the v-check verification program if indeed it actually works. Assuming it works any and every employer has to verify a job applicant through v check to see if he is legal or not.

Secondly send out a 100-200 man force throughout Georgia that does nothing but show up on job sites and check workers to verify that they are legal immigrants or U.S. citizens. $500 fine for employing illegals first time, $1,000 second time, and so on until its simply not affordable to businesses to hire them. The proceeds of the fines more than pays for the new force of employment verifiers.

If a business says it has a hardship need for those employees cause American workers can’t be found then they can immediately file for those workers under a guest worker program. That way the worker is documented- we know who they are. The legal worker has to then pay a 10% surcharge on their earnings as a tax for the privilege of working here. This will help pay for the burden they put on our education system, social svcs system, criminal justice system, etc.

Also an American first policy for empoyers. The onus must be on employers to prove that there are no eligible American workers willing to do what the illegals are doing. With 10.4% unemployment in Georgia I find it hard to believe that there are no Americans willing to take some of these jobs such as carpet mill work. Who in the hell was working these jobs before illegals started coming en masse to begin with?

One huge problem we have is that illegals in big plants throughout Georgia claim crazy #s of dependents like 15 or so in an effort to avoid paying any tax on the stolen or fake soc sec #s. This robs our govt of revenue and puts a serious tax crunch on people whose real soc sec #s they stole and are using. No allowing the illegals to claim crazy #s of dependents. They pay the soc sec taxes, other applicable taxes, and that 10% surcharge. Also,no access to our social svc programs such as food stamps. Access to health clinics and education yes.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
1:38 pm

“heating the loins of those who just hate, hate, HATE! “those people.”

Aquagirl – Drama Queen (& Hypocrit) :)

Paulo977

March 29th, 2011
1:38 pm

carlosgvv
“And some folks say that since no other country in the world allows so many illegal aliens into their country “Oh sure go and preach that to the NATIVE AMERICANS……!!!!!!!!!!!!

md

March 29th, 2011
1:39 pm

“limit the attorney’s share of the settlement.”

That’s my biggest beef with bankruptcy cases………these companies can’t even pay what they owe their employees and creditors, but the lawyer fraternity (judges) almost always allows the attorneys full fees before any other money is paid out………..

Just a scam………….

Hillbilly Deluxe

March 29th, 2011
1:40 pm

Jerome Horowitz @ 1:35

I’ve suggesting fining anyone who knowingly hires an illegal, $50,000 per illegal employee. It’ll never happen, though.

1811/1801 - 0311/0317

March 29th, 2011
1:42 pm

Poison Pen:

I hear you but there could be several reasons (or all):

1) Sends a mesage
2) For use of evacuation of U.S. or other ciitzens
3) Possible use in rescue of pilot(s)
4) That’s only a reinforced battalion. Marines are darn good but it would take a lot more than that to invade, conquer and hold the peace.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
1:42 pm

… The Chief of ICE, who should know a little about these things, gave a ballpark figure of $94 billion. And that was several years ago.

Well since the national debt is already at around $4 billion dollars a day, I’d say a little more pain is well worth the gain.

And no need for that GigaWall, that’s what we have an Armed Services for. It’s high time we let our soldiers stay home and fight for their own country on their own soil!

md

March 29th, 2011
1:43 pm

“in the letters section of Soldier of Fortune, heating the loins of those who just hate, hate, HATE! “those people.””

Please define “those people”, since illegals are made up of a very diverse group of people……

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
1:43 pm

Aquagirl,

We could shut down the border if we really wanted to. Politics simply don’t allow for it. 2,000 miles? So what. Close down a few of the 30 or 40 military bases in Germany and voile- we got 50,000 troops we can put on a 2,000 mile border- 25 troops per mile.

But the easier way would be my solution above. Fine the hell out of employers who employ them and we won’t have to round them up. They will leave of their own accord.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
1:44 pm

“I’ve suggesting fining anyone who knowingly hires an illegal, $50,000 per illegal employee. It’ll never happen, though.”

What if Aquagirl can’t pay the fine? Does she go to prison? :)

md

March 29th, 2011
1:45 pm

“You have to find all the illegals, figure out where they’re from, process them, and ship them home. The Chief of ICE, who should know a little about these things, gave a ballpark figure of $94 billion. And that was several years ago.”

What good is one variable from an equation?

Now give us the figure for letting them all stay……………..and then we can all do the math.

poison pen

March 29th, 2011
1:45 pm

What happened to all the Libs on here who were supporting us being in the lead on Lybia, now that we are sending Marines there? Damn it’s awfully quite.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
1:45 pm

firewoman,

True enough. The stimulus was almost 1 trillion. What’s wrong with spending 100 billion. Plus we would get a tremendous cost savings back in terms of a reduced load on social svc systems, criminal justice systems, education systems, etc. The savings alone would possibly pay for sealing the border.

md

March 29th, 2011
1:49 pm

I’ll even give you a head start……..it costs 10.5 billion a year (each and every year) in CA alone……..

I’m guessing that 94 bill is a one time cost…………the money would be recouped over a 6-9 year period in CA alone………………..

Got anything else????

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
1:54 pm

md, ask firewoman, she’s convinced illegal immigrants are strangling the economy or whatever. Oh, and that ICE figure didn’t even include the cost of the roundup, BTW.

Thulsa, for god’s sake, can’t the military have at least a couple of years break? We’ve been at war for 10 years now. Besides, unless you’re into blowing off the Geneva Convention (which I’m sure some folks here are) what are they going to do to unarmed civilians? Yell at them?

poison pen

March 29th, 2011
1:55 pm

1811, I agree, but I remember Vietnam and Kennedy only started with a small crew also, they were called Advisors.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
1:55 pm

md,

I saw a stat on Los Angeles alone a week or 2 ago. It said that the free benefits given to illegals in Los Angeles alone cost something crazy like 800 million per year. But when you think about 9 million Angelenos and probably at least 10% of them illegal then 800 million a year isn’t that much after all. I’m actually surprised its not more.

Teacher 404

March 29th, 2011
1:57 pm

We need to stop using US law as a reason that we must to educate illegals. They break the law by just being here and use fake documents to get in our public schools. We need to cut out ESOL and other enticements and makes those extras that even legal immigrants have to pay for.

Our country can no longer afford to be everything to everybody. Saving the World is costing us dearly. People argue that we want our kids in the US to excell like they do in China. Well guess what, China educations one culture where US schools are FORCED to education dosens of cultures.

The US public education system is is ruinsand getting rid of illegal aliens is just the frest start we need.

Teacher 404

March 29th, 2011
1:58 pm

dozens of cultures

WOODSTOCK MIKE

March 29th, 2011
2:00 pm

LA is a fantastic example of what happens when illegals become a large percentage of a population. They are being bankrupted by illegals.

I guess LIBS would rather collapse the entire system instead of saving our country.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
2:01 pm

“md, ask firewoman, she’s convinced illegal immigrants are strangling the economy or whatever. Oh, and that ICE figure didn’t even include the cost of the roundup, BTW.”

Can’t play dodgeball in your flip flops, sweetie … it can be dangerous!

Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)

March 29th, 2011
2:02 pm

Redneck Convert, Czar, ICE. Yup, I like the sound of that.

poison pen

March 29th, 2011
2:02 pm

It seems to me that if we do nothing about Illegals in our country then in 10 years we will probably have 5 or 10 million more. I just want someone to explain to me kow we can support this?
I know the Libs think that money grows on trees, but I don’t want you picking off my tree.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
2:03 pm

The 10.5 billion is at least some kind of number, even if it’s from an anti-illegal think tank. But 7.7 of it is for the children of illegal immigrants, not all of whom are illegal. Until the 14th Amendment is repealed, it’s anyone’s guess how much of that $7.7 billion you’d save.

poison pen

March 29th, 2011
2:03 pm

Woodstock, Amen brother, Amen

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
2:04 pm

Thulsa, for god’s sake, can’t the military have at least a couple of years break? We’ve been at war for 10 years now. Besides, unless you’re into blowing off the Geneva Convention (which I’m sure some folks here are) what are they going to do to unarmed civilians? Yell at them. – Aquagirl

Aquagirl,

You seem to be having some reading comprehension problems. Specifically where did I say we were going to war on the border? I said station them on or near the border. I didn’t say we were going to fight another war. God help you and your reading comprehension issues.

What are they going to do to unarmed civilians? Yell at them?-Aquagirl

Could you possibly have a more asinine statment? Have you ever heard of the term deterrence? And if troops do meet head on with illegals they simply hold them until border patrol agents come and round them up. Or you simply train these already highly trained troops to slap on some cuffs. Is it really that hard to do?

And for your information troops and especially U.S. troops all over the world are used for peackeeping duties, for keeping order, and basically as backup for all sorts of things. Why do you think we often call out the national guard in times of natural disaster? Ever heard of UN troops in their blue hats which are basically peacekeeping and order keeping forces? God you are dumb.

Last of all you really need to educate yourself. You are of a profound ignorance. The Mexicans are building a fence on their border to keep out other Central Americans. And they have troops not only all along their border to keep out Central Americans but also at regular checkpoints all through the interior to check identification. Only an ignoramus like yourself would not know these things.

@@

March 29th, 2011
2:05 pm

Thulsa’s plan for addressing illegal immigration makes perfectly good sense.

Couldn’t ‘ya throw in an illegal criminal into the package though? The way things are going, we’re gonna be short on law enforcement. The honest illegals can do the job for us.

(ISH)

I’m reading article after article that reports there is no legal recourse for veterans who have suffered medical malpractice at V.A. facilities.

Here’s a sampling of cases in which lawsuits have been barred over the years:

When sailor Dawn Lambert went to have a fallopian tube removed, military surgeons left five sponges and a plastic marking device in her abdomen. They remained there for months until a second surgery left her infertile.

For 11 months, Navy Lt. Cmdr. Walter Hardin’s red lesions were classified as eczema. His condition was correctly diagnosed as cancer shortly before he died.

Air Force Staff Sgt. Dean Witt’s appendicitis was misdiagnosed and he was sent home with antibiotics. When he collapsed at home, he was rushed into surgery and came out brain-dead.

According to his medical records, Marine Sgt. Carmelo Rodriguez was correctly diagnosed with melanoma when he entered the service. But no one told him about it or suggested any treatment. The cancer spread throughout his body and he died 10 years later.

Navy Petty Officer Joe Cragnotti went to a military hospital with pneumonia, which is treatable with antibiotics. It went untreated, and he suffered permanent brain damage.

“People don’t know about the Feres Doctrine until it happens to them,” she said. “Once you sign on the dotted line, the military can treat you any way they want without any recourse because of this law.”

The ruling has been criticized by judges all across the ideological spectrum. A 5-4 Supreme Court decision reaffirming it in 1987 drew dissents from Justices John Paul Stevens on the left and Antonin Scalia on the right. Scalia wrote that Feres “was wrongly decided and heartily deserves the widespread, almost universal criticism it has received.”

http://hamptonroads.com/2009/05/service-members-have-little-recourse-against-malpractice

When my interest is piqued, I go lookin’.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
2:09 pm

Aquagirl,

One thing about Los Angeles and San Diego hospitals that is not in dispute. The health care system in southern Cal is on the verge of collapse. Why? Because of the cost of treating illegals. It also raises premiums so high on health insurance purchasing Americans that many of them end up dropping insurance due to the ever rising premiums and the viscious cycle gets even worse. Now you’re probably going to deny that this every day event is actually taking place.

md

March 29th, 2011
2:10 pm

“Oh, and that ICE figure didn’t even include the cost of the roundup, BTW. ”

OK…so what is that cost? And what is the long term cost/benefit of the operation?

If it cost 500 billion over a 5 year period, but saves 5 trillion over the long haul, then the 500 billion is a relative figure…………….

Throwing out numbers is useless without factoring everything in……….

And where is the answer to my question? Why do you continue to avoid an answer?

Why are their rights greater than those they jump??

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
2:11 pm

“But 7.7 of it is for the children of illegal immigrants, not all of whom are illegal.”

Anchor children are allowed to return home with their families. Afterall, we are not totally without compassion – families need to stay together.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
2:15 pm

@@,

If its an incredibly violent illegal alien then we just bite the bullet and incarcerate them for a very long time before deporting them. Small time arrests for shoplifting stuff like that we just fine them silly and then deport them if its monetarily more feasible to deport them. I would just want to deport them deep into Mexico rather than a border town so that they can just run right back over again.

md

March 29th, 2011
2:16 pm

“But 7.7 of it is for the children of illegal immigrants, not all of whom are illegal.”

Uh huh…….so the family puts the money in the bank under the childs name….right?

It goes to the family, of which only one may be legal.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
2:17 pm

md,

Like I said fine the employers until the employers refuse to hire illegals due to cost alone. At that point they will find their own way home. We won’t even have to lift a finger.

Kamchak

March 29th, 2011
2:17 pm

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
2:18 pm

Thulsa—if you’re deployed on border duty, you’re not at home, you’re not training, you’re not repairing your equipment, and people are shooting at you. Don’t be a dipwad, you know what it takes to deploy a unit. Also, using the military for cheap labor sucks. It’s disgraceful treatment.

Who cares what the Mexicans are building? Their fence obviously isn’t working, since we have Guatemalans, etc. here.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
2:21 pm

“The health care system in southern Cal is on the verge of collapse. Why? Because of the cost of treating illegals.”

Thulsa, just take a look at Grady. There was a dialysis center there that was forced to shut down not long ago because the overwhelming majority of patients serviced there were illegal, meaning the center was bankrupt. Grady even offered to retun those people home, locate and pay for some costs to get those patients life saving care elsewhere. The illegals balked!

My children’s former pediatricians office is nothing but illegals with peachcare. The gals in that office will tell you that no less than 10 years ago the cleintele was totally different.

Our federal government and supporters of illegal immigration should be ashamed of what they have done to encourage the untold ravages our country has endured. Yet they want to continue to use the economy and labels like racism in their little arsenal against the majority of US citizens.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
2:23 pm

“Don’t be a dipwad, you know what it takes to deploy a unit.”

Do tell SFC Aqugirl? Enlight us!

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
2:25 pm

Wednesday’s hearing focused on whether the Obama administration is doing enough to round up people working illegally in the U.S. ICE deported almost 393,000 people from the U.S. in 2010. At $12,500 per person the cost to remove them was almost $5 billion.

So at that cost with 10 million illegals to be removed the cost would be 125 billion dollars. Money well spent! In a cost/benefit analysis it would actually be worth it. Hell we just spent almost a trillion on porkulus uh, I mean stimulus and we have not a damn thing to show for it.

And the reality is that if employers can show hardship where they need illegal labor because they can’t find American labor then we wouldn’t even have to deport many of those illegals. We simply grant them guest worker status, tax them, and do not allow them to be a burden by disallowing access to food stamps and other social services.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
2:25 pm

I’d favor letting Mexico take care of Mexicans. But since they’re fighting our Drug War on their soil, don’t look for that anytime soon. And expect more illegal immigrants fleeing the collapsing country.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
2:26 pm

“Also, using the military for cheap labor sucks. It’s disgraceful treatment.”

I have two family members who are active military, they would LOVE to call your bluff!
PS … Using illegals as cheap labor sucks. That’s disgraceful treatment, sweetie!

@@

March 29th, 2011
2:27 pm

Thulsa:

Just trying to figure out a way to bring violent illegals into the open. They couldn’t care less about whether they work legitimate jobs. They’ll make their living as predators.

Kinda like coupons at the grocery store. Discount on retail price.

Hypocrit (D)

March 29th, 2011
2:30 pm

… A high-level immigration official (D) says it costs $12,500 to arrest, detain and deport each person removed from the U.S.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
2:31 pm

Firewoman, I can’t argue with you there—if your relatives are anything like you, I’m sure they’d love to blow some teenager’s brains out.

seamusoshea

March 29th, 2011
2:34 pm

Jay, Let them commit a crime and deport them. Illegals are seven times more likely to committ a crime using a weapon than a caucasian, or check to make sure they are legal before we educate their children or give them a job or give them free health care.
No brainer Jay!

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
2:35 pm

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
2:18 pm
Thulsa—if you’re deployed on border duty, you’re not at home, you’re not training, you’re not repairing your equipment, and people are shooting at you. Don’t be a dipwad, you know what it takes to deploy a unit. Also, using the military for cheap labor sucks. It’s disgraceful treatment.

Who cares what the Mexicans are building? Their fence obviously isn’t working, since we have Guatemalans, etc. here.- Aquagirl

Aquagirl,

I’m going to help you some more with your critical thinking skills- free of charge!

1)Thulsa—if you’re deployed on border duty, you’re not at home, you’re not training, you’re not repairing your equipment, and people are shooting at you.

Don’t be a dipwad, you know what it takes to deploy a unit- Aquagirl.

yes. I do. And ya know what? We can deploy rapidly, quickly, and efficiently as we’ve always done. What an absurd point.

Aquagirl you simply move your equipment and facilities to U.S. border townss. We’ve moved materials and bases for hundreds of years. What a ridiculous point.

2)And people are shooting at you- Aquagirl?

What the hell? These are soldiers you abject fool? They know how to shoot back.

3)Also, using the military for cheap labor sucks. It’s disgraceful treatment.

Good grief. Your full of perfectly asinine points today. Its cheap labor? The border patrol does it! Going by your logic I guess they are ‘cheap labor’.

4)Protecting the border is “disgraceful treatment”. Um. Isn’t that what you sign up for when you joing the military? To protect the nation? Your stupidity is infinite in its vastness.

5)Who cares what the Mexicans are building? Their fence obviously isn’t working, since we have Guatemalans, etc. here.

More reading comprehension problems aquagirl? Mexico is building a fence as in present tense as in it hasn’t been completed yet. That’s why some Guatemalans and others still get through.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
2:37 pm

“if your relatives are anything like you, I’m sure they’d love to blow some teenager’s brains out.”

Aquagirl, how old are you? 13? The drugs have already blown your brains out, sweetie!
Did you not see the meth commercials?

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
2:43 pm

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
2:25 pm
I’d favor letting Mexico take care of Mexicans. But since they’re fighting our Drug War on their soil, don’t look for that anytime soon. And expect more illegal immigrants fleeing the collapsing country- Aquagirl

Unbelievable. Aquagirl’s statement here hit a new level of anti-logic.

1)Letting Mexico take care of Mexicans? The reason Mexico lets their citizins run over here is precisely because Mexico can’t take care of its own people. Sheeesh! Where do people like Aquagirl come from?

2)Their fighting OUR drug war on THEIR soil. More ignorance endemic of the blame America first crowd. The drug lords and cartels are Mexican. That is why its being fought on Mexican ground dum dum. And its mostly various Mexican drug gangs killing each other.

3)And expect more illegal immigrants fleeing the collapsing country- Aquagirl

Um. Excuse me aquagirl. Didn’t you just say you were in favor of Mexico taking care of Mexicans yet now you are talking about a collapsing country???

Gwinnett

March 29th, 2011
2:43 pm

Let them commit a crime and deport them. Illegals are seven times more likely to committ a crime using a weapon than a caucasian, or check to make sure they are legal before we educate their children or give them a job or give them free health care.

Gwinnett is doing exactly that! Let them commit more crimes! That will look really good on an application for US citizenship!

John Birch

March 29th, 2011
2:44 pm

Some great ideas here, unfortunately the game is over and the illegals have already won. By 2050 America will be majority minority and by 2100 majority hispanic. The invasion is a success and the illegals will take over without every firing a shot. Maybe by 2100 global warming will have enough impact to make Canada habitable and we can just invade them!

Hypocrit (D)

March 29th, 2011
2:46 pm

John Birch (D) – and a delusional one at that!

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
2:49 pm

John Birch,

Imagine that. One day we could be a new version of Mexico- corrupt, backwards, 3rd world status, dirt freaking poor.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
2:55 pm

OK, Thulsa—help for your critical thinking skills. First, moving and deploying takes money and troops. Just what we need right now, another military commitment.

Two, you sign up to protect the country against enemies, not housekeepers and day laborers. And no, sucking down tax dollars is not equal to lobbing ICBM’s. (Oh, I’m sure this will provoke the screams.)

Three, Mexico can’t even defend their own internal territory, drug lords control sections of the country. I’m sure they’re committed to maintaining their parts of the fence.

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
2:56 pm

Thulsa Doom — “Secondly send out a 100-200 man force throughout Georgia that does nothing but show up on job sites and check workers to verify that they are legal immigrants or U.S. citizens”

Mr. Doom, I would like to present you with a thought experiment.

Imagine that you are walking down the street. Suddenly you are accosted by one of these inspectors (or a cop or deputy sheriff; someone empowered to do what you’re suggesting) and you’re directed to verify your citizenship or work authorization on the spot.

Can you do it? You can only use what you have on your person (and in your briefcase or purse or backpack, as applicable).

Driver’s licenses and voter registration cards don’t count, as both are easily forged or fraudulently obtained. Birth certificates (I know, I just made the birthers start drooling) and passports would work.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
2:59 pm

…And yes, I blame Americans for consuming drugs that Mexico produces. Or do you want us to be the whining junkie who blames their pusher? There would be no drug war without the demand in this country. Duh.

Hypocrit (D)

March 29th, 2011
3:04 pm

And yes, I blame Americans for consuming drugs that Mexico produces. Or do you want us to be the whining junkie who blames their pusher? There would be no drug war without the demand in this country. Duh.

You mean like the woman in Gwinnett that blew her kids up in her meth house? I had no idea she was an “American”.

John Birch

March 29th, 2011
3:05 pm

The majority of Americans would like the governement to address the illegal alien problam but they don’t. Why? Because the illegals are not a problem for the privileged Americans who hold most federal offices. When you can afford private schools for your children and first rate health care and live in a gated community the illegals become a valuable source of cheap labor that doesn’t complain for fear of deportation.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
3:07 pm

I’m going to help you out some more Aquagirl

1)First, moving and deploying takes money and troops. Just what we need right now, another military commitment.

Well of course it costs money to move stuff. But we reap the benefits of those U.S. soldier’s paychecks being spnt over here and not Germany- a boom to our economy. Plus supplying those bases adds more money into OUR economy. Or did your mind not think about that? Um. Its not a military committment as in a war. Its moving troops from one base to another. Apparently your mind has problems distinguishing between war and being stationed somewhere as a deterrent- which is what they do in places like Germany anyway.

2)Two, you sign up to protect the country against enemies, not housekeepers and day laborers.

Wrong again aquagirl. You sign up for the military to protect the U.S. and that includes the borders of the U.S. And besides the mission of our military is whatever the govt or commander in chief decides it is. It doesn’t matter why a soldier signed up for. His feelings are irrelevant. When I signed up we were cleaning pots and pans and bathrooms in boot camp. Not what I envisioned when I signed up. So the hell what? Really dumb statement.

JKL2

March 29th, 2011
3:10 pm

aquagirl- Firewoman, I can’t argue with you there—if your relatives are anything like you, I’m sure they’d love to blow some teenager’s brains out.

How do you feel like policemen? You train them to do a job, hoping they never have to do it. Just be grateful people are willing to stand up and protect others like yourself.

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
3:10 pm

Thulsa Doom: “You sign up for the military to protect the U.S. and that includes the borders of the U.S.”

IIRC, the oath I (and millions of other Americans) swore was to defend the people and the Constitution of the US from all threats, foreign and domestic. Respectfully, no mention was made of our national borders.

rwh

March 29th, 2011
3:11 pm

Migrating to America legally is, and should be, a long, drawn-out procedure
meant to protect the interests of American citizens. It involves more than
simply jumping a fence and heading north in pursuit of free health care,
education, food stamps, and other handouts paid for by U.S. taxpayers.

Legal immigration means enduring rigorous hurdles like background checks to
detect a criminal background or possible ties to terrorists; medical
examinations to detect diseases still prevalent in third-world nations, but
long since eradicated here; proof of financial solvency so as to prevent
newcomers from becoming a burden on U.S. taxpayers, and testing for
knowledge of American history and English skills.

Those who have jumped a fence into America in order to avoid our
immigration checks are not immigrants. Rather, they are invading criminals,
with no claim whatsoever to the welcome mat extended to legal immigrants

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
3:14 pm

Joe Mama,

I am in no way shape or form talking about stopping people on the street. I’m talking about going to an employer or employer worksite and asking the employer to provide documentation of their employees. County health departments go to restuarants all the time to inspect their restaurants. We don’t have a problem with this. And so we shouldn’t have a problem with an inspector coming to an employer workplace on spotchecks to verify random employees work eligibility.

I get asked for ID when I’m in a dept. store, bank, at a bar, at police DUI checkpoints, and at a number of other places that I probably haven’t even thought about. If they state can be required that I be asked for ID for a beer than why can’t they ask to verify if someone is legally working here which is a much more serious event than a 40 year old man buying a beer.

ann

March 29th, 2011
3:14 pm

They are not leaving. That is their decision. What is ours? Do we welcome law breakers, support them with free education, health care, subsidized housing, allow then to work off the books taking jobs from Americans who deserve a fair wage while they flaunt ATZLAN in our face and demand more rights? Where is the appreciation for all the Americans have given then. Any time we say no, we are considered bigots and racists. Probably the only 2 ENglsh words they know. NO effort to assimilate; they think we owe them. I have always been taught to take responsibility for my actions. 50 hispanics DUIs, no insurance and no license in my town in 3 weeks.How many people have to be killed before we wake up? They came here illegally, we owe them nothing. There is a legal way to come here and America takes more immigrants legally than the rest of the world combined on a yearly basis. We do not have the resources to take everyone in the world who wants to come here and we are turning away many people who can contribute because of the influx of illegals. Do we take in everyone from Darfur? Middle Eastern countries who kill their young women for being raped? Don’t talk to me about humanity. Where is the humanity for the Americans who follow the law? If you allow the illegals to stay, then every American is entitled to one law they can ignore.

Hillbilly Deluxe

March 29th, 2011
3:15 pm

rwh

The three people I know who are most opposed to illegal immigration are all legal immigrants, themselves.

John Birch

March 29th, 2011
3:16 pm

“The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 18, 1878, after the end of Reconstruction, with the intention (in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807) of substantially limiting the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. The Act prohibits members of the Army, and Air Force, from exercising nominally state law enforcement, police, or peace officer powers that maintain “law and order” on non-federal property (states and their counties and municipal divisions) within the United States.”

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
3:17 pm

Joe Mama,

I took the same oath and respectfully that is an absurd argument. You normally have very credible points but come on? Are you seriously going to say that our border is not part of our country? If so then why does the coast guard protect it as well as our waters miles out at sea? Our border is part of our country- every inch of it and the oath doesn’t specifically spell it out because it is self evident that our border is part of our country.

JKL2

March 29th, 2011
3:19 pm

aquagirl-

FYI: You swear(or affirm for athiest like yourself) to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
3:23 pm

Thulsa Doom: “I am in no way shape or form talking about stopping people on the street.”

I didn’t say you were. Please reread my questions and respond substantively, if you’d be so kind. I’m going somewhere else with this, not trying to play ‘gotcha.’

“I’m talking about going to an employer or employer worksite and asking the employer to provide documentation of their employees.”

I understand. Would you please reread my questions and respond substantively?

“County health departments go to restuarants all the time to inspect their restaurants. We don’t have a problem with this.”

Horse of a different color. Restaurants don’t have to carry ID or proof of citizenship because their facilities are being inspected for compliance with health regulations.

“And so we shouldn’t have a problem with an inspector coming to an employer workplace on spotchecks to verify random employees work eligibility.”

I didn’t say I had a problem with it, but I do want to outline something that I believe you have overlooked. Please reread my questions and respond substantively, if you don’t mind.

“I get asked for ID when I’m in a dept. store, bank, at a bar, at police DUI checkpoints, and at a number of other places that I probably haven’t even thought about.”

I understand. However, the bar for that sort of ID is a lot lower than the bar for proving citizenship. In fact, I sincerely doubt that more than one percent of Americans could, if you stopped them on the street or accosted them in their workplace, conclusively *prove* their citizenship or authorization to work in the US.

“If they state can be required that I be asked for ID for a beer than why can’t they ask to verify if someone is legally working here which is a much more serious event than a 40 year old man buying a beer.”

Sure it’s more serious; no argument there. That’s why it requires more proof than just whipping out a driver’s license. Respectfully, I think you may not know what’s involved in actually proving what you’d like for people to prove.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
3:24 pm

Thulsa, I’ll go with your helpful spirit of the day…

1) No, as far as money goes, deployments are pretty much the same. A gallon of gas doesn’t care if it’s used speeding through Iraq or Texas. You may spend more or less depending on the particular mission, but it still costs money.

2) If you didn’t know about the pots and pans and cleaning the latrines, you need to beat the crap out of your recruiter. If they’re still alive.

It does matter what a soldier thinks, especially when you’re shooting at unknown people in the desert. Ordering somebody to fire on a civilian who is unarmed? I’d never consider that a lawful order. There’s also the Posse Comitatus act.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
3:27 pm

And JLK, as I’ve already said, it’s hard to classify someone as an enemy combatant because they want to mow my lawn or pick vidalia onions.

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
3:27 pm

Doom: “I took the same oath and respectfully that is an absurd argument.”

Respectfully, the argument is *yours.* You appeared to be arguing that the oath says something it doesn’t.

“You normally have very credible points but come on? Are you seriously going to say that our border is not part of our country?”

Come now; I said no such thing. You argued that the military swear to protect our borders; I contend that no such matter exists in the oath itself. Surely we can agree that that is not in the *oath* without disagreeing on the job of the military.

“If so then why does the coast guard protect it as well as our waters miles out at sea? Our border is part of our country- every inch of it and the oath doesn’t specifically spell it out because it is self evident that our border is part of our country.”

Yes, correct — it’s not in the oath. That’s all I was saying. Thank you for agreeing with that, Mr. Doom.

John Birch

March 29th, 2011
3:33 pm

“However, federal military forces have a long history of domestic roles, including the occupation of sovereign Southern states during Reconstruction and the confiscation of private firearms in the Katrina aftermath.[14] The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the use of federal military forces to “execute the laws”; however, there is disagreement over whether this language may apply to troops used in an advisory, support, disaster response, or other homeland defense role, as opposed to conventional law enforcement”
Sounds like we could use troops to round up illegals and/or protect the border as part of our homeland defense. It’s be quicker and a lot cheaper just to put a bounty on ‘em!

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
3:35 pm

Actually, the Coast Guard is specifically exempt from posse comitatus limitations that apply to the military.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
3:36 pm

“it’s hard to classify someone as an enemy combatant because they want to mow my lawn or pick vidalia onions.”

Don’t you mean because YOU want them to mow your lawn and pick your Vidalia onions for cheap?

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
3:37 pm

Aquagirl,

1)I’m not talking about gas. Where a soldier’s paycheck gets spent has a profound impact on the local economy- just a fact. Secondly various local contractors are paid to perform and supply all sorts of goods and services to local bases- from food supply to all manner of things. That’s money that would go to local merchants

2)I did know that I would be doing some menial point in the military. I knew that. You apparently did not when you made the ridiculous point that protecting the border is not what you think a soldier signed up for. What a soldier does or wants is irrelevant. What he is ordered to do is all that is relevant.

3) Ordering a soldier to fire on unarmed civilians? Who the hell said anything about that? Where and how and why did you come up with such a moronic hypothetical of soldiers being ordered to shoot unarmed civilians? So now you’ve made a gigantic leap to some nonsense about soldiers shooting civilians. Sheesh! Do you have any idea just how ridiculous that sounds? I see that you live in the land of loony hypotheticals of what if.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
3:39 pm

No, firewoman. I take care of my own stuff. I pay more for local produce when I can get it, so higher food prices are acceptable to me. Especially since I pay for those lawns and onions in taxes—I think we can both agree on that last point.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
3:39 pm

“There’s also the Posse Comitatus act.”

Do you double as John Birch on the blog as well, or would you like to credit him with your faux knowledge of the law?

md

March 29th, 2011
3:40 pm

“Washington (AP) – A high-level immigration official says it costs $12,500 to arrest, detain and deport each person removed from the U.S.”

Again……only part of the equation………..now what does it cost to let them stay??

And that doesn’t even cover the precedent being reinforced that it is OK to enter illegally….

You folks also think paying the pirate ransoms has reduced the number of attacks?

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
3:41 pm

Joe Mama,

I reread your post and I still don’t get what you’re itching at. I’m not talking about just stopping or infringing upon people’s civil rights. If that’s what your point is then I’m here to tell you that the police and border patrol seem to do a good job of finding out someone’s status without just blindly stopping people. I’m sure it can be done in a compliant manner without violating civil rights. Ya gotta tell me what point you want to make. I gotta get going very shortly.

catt11daddy

March 29th, 2011
3:43 pm

Enforce the immigration laws, (ICE in Atlanta,ga) we are at war with terroist and cartels, theres no justification for immigration laws not to be enforced,give police the auth.to question these illegals, send armed troops to our boarders and ports. Fine and jail employers that hire their criminal butts, and deportation isn’t a bad word, but,take your family with you.
Americans are tired of paying 92 billion a year to host criminals, no where else would this be allowed,to walk our streets with no ID or fake ID, get welfare, free health care, free education and other social services.These liberals ,and greedy businesses are allowing this country to be drained at the sake of its citizens, La Raza a radical Mexican group aim is to bring this country to its knees, and I hate to say it we are well on our way America to being on our knees if the citizens of this country don’t take a stand against this illegal invasion allowed by this goverment and elected representatives.
To Mr . Deal, I voted for you for one reason your stand on illegal immigration, I hope you don’t fall for the big farm lobby that get millions from the goverment to operate, and stand on your word, Georgians aren’t worried about the fall- out so you shouldn’t either.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
3:45 pm

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
3:27 pm
And JLK, as I’ve already said, it’s hard to classify someone as an enemy combatant because they want to mow my lawn or pick vidalia onions

Pay attention aquagirl. No one is pegging illegals as “enemy combatants”. That’s just heated rhetoric and absurd hyperbole that you guys came up with. We never said to treat them that way.

md

March 29th, 2011
3:47 pm

Aquagirl……still here and yet to answer………why are their rights greater than the rights of the folks they jumped????

And why do you advocate for them vs for the millions around the globe waiting patiently for their turn…..what kind of person turns their back on them??

Must be the out of sight out of mind mentality coming into play……….

Ed Weirdness

March 29th, 2011
3:51 pm

Like I said before, overpopulation, congestion, urban sprawl, crumbling infrastructure, diminishing resources, vanishing farm land and green space, overcrowded schools, hospitals and jails, water and energy shortages, lack of affordable housing, crime, pollution, depressed wages, increased tax burdens, the balkanization of our communities, the marginalization of American workers, taxpayers, students, voters, the cost of lost opportunity for all, indeed; the overall decline in quality of life, are all the result of unconstrained immigration and lax enforcement. Like it or not, too many people competing for the same limited resources is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, sand, sustainable social, economic or environmental policy. Assertions that we cannot deport all the illegals we can identify ignore reality. The costs to sustain an enormous and growing population of illegal aliens will be infinite. However; the costs of deporting all we can apprehend would be reductive, as the population of illegals operating in our communities declines. Spread over a period of say 5 years, and factoring in the deterrent effect of strict enforcement policies and the attrition of those who simply ‘voluntarily go home’ as the jobs and benefits run out, enforcement with deportation offers the only responsible solution. Indeed, if one were to consider ‘asset forfeiture’ of both the illegals ‘ill-gotten gains’, as well as the ‘ill-gotten gains’ of their employers as a means of offsetting the taxpayers cost of identifying, incarcerating and deporting illegal aliens. Further considering the overall reduced costs to taxpayers by reducing the costs on our education, health care, and courts and jails that a declining population of illegals would represent, the actual costs of enforcement would be substantially less than many suggest, and would continue to decline from that point forward. In fact, enforcement of our immigration policies, while constraining employers to compete for legal American workers and legal immigrants would certainly have a stimulative impact on the economy, it might also create an unexpected stimulus as entrepreneurs exploit opportunities in identifying illegal aliens, processing and transporting them back to their native countries.

md

March 29th, 2011
3:51 pm

Why is it that Mexico requires law abiding US citizens to have and carry a passport, yet folks here balk when it is mentioned we do the same??

I’ve been stopped in numerous roadblocks and asked for license and registration………and some folks here want to complain that we are violating rights by asking for papers??

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
3:55 pm

Mr. Doom — I don’t have a problem with checking work authorizations and the like in the workplace. FWIW, my mother (before she retired) dealt a LOT with INS (now ICE) and my wife works in HR for a major retailer that’s headquartered here in the metro area. She also deals with ICE quite a bit.

The problem with checking work authorizations is that most of the time, the documents that are acceptable for employment are fairly easy to forge (or simply to get falsified versions), and most of them are not really the sort of things you’d carry around on you. And proving citizenship is even harder; unless you carry around a validated copy of your birth certificate and a US passport, you’re kinda screwed on that score.

All that adds up to a really hard row to hoe for any sort of workplace inspectors checking on workers’ authorization. This is what I’m getting at.

So here’s what usually happens, at least at my wife’s employer. They collect and copy the documents that the worker present in support of their I-9. No effort is made to validate the documents and none is required. My wife tells me she has no idea how her company would even go about doing that. Employment commences, based on those documents, but all new employees get their SSNs validated through SSA.

Once in a while, a number gets flagged by SSA. When that happens, the employee is called at their workplace, and they and their manager are told there’s an issue with their work documentation. The employee is instructed to clock out, go home, get the documents and bring them back the next day (there’s a fat fine for NOT making them do this). 99% of the time, the employee simply vanishes, never to return. The other 1% of the time, the employee brings the needed documents in, and the issue is addressed with SSA.

What I’m getting at is that verifying citizenship or work authorization *on the fly* is virtually impossible, given the system we currently have. Unless you’re going to recommend some sort of hi-security national ID card or something, I frankly don’t see how your suggestion (workplace spot checks) could be done in any sort of effective manner.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
4:00 pm

Thulsa, if they aren’t enemy combatants, why do you want to use the military? If no one is shooting out there, we could send all the unemployed teachers. Or better yet, the whole APS bunch; Beverly Hall, the entire school board, and cheating principals.

md, the only thing I’m advocating for is reality. “Deport ‘em all” is not part of reality. I do see illegal immigrants in a different light than many folks here. Many are poor, as in starving poor, and many don’t want their kids to starve or to be pressed into labor for a drug lord. Show me a parent who won’t steal for their starving child, and I’ll show you a monster. It’s hard to argue an abstract like the rule of law, however important it may be, to somebody like that. They aren’t going to listen. Our government hasn’t punished employers who have encouraged illegal immigrants. Thousands of guns go south from our country to fuel the drug war. If we can’t stop guns, why do we think Mexico can stop their people?

mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack the Liar Obama - BEND OVER, Here comes the CHANGE!

March 29th, 2011
4:01 pm

Increase the border patrol and add reservists to the problam and add more patrols to the border.

NO brainer, I’d much rather my taxes go to that than some worthless welfare, section 8 housing or long term unemployed (2 years) lowlife. Make it tougher so the dead beats will find a job, ANY job, and get OFF the State/Federal tit.

WOODSTOCK MIKE

March 29th, 2011
4:06 pm

@Aquagirl

Your main issue is that you don’t understand that it’s not America’s job to take support the entire world. Sure, there are horrible stories of poverty all over the world, you keep mentioning that people aren’t facing reality, you are not facing the reality that one country can’t support the entire world. It’s sad and I wish we could but that is not reality, as you say…

md

March 29th, 2011
4:13 pm

“And proving citizenship is even harder; unless you carry around a validated copy of your birth certificate and a US passport, you’re kinda screwed on that score.”

I carry a passport card in my wallet……..right under my drivers license……….so not as hard as one might think.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
4:13 pm

“I do see illegal immigrants in a different light than many folks here. Many are poor, as in starving poor, and many don’t want their kids to starve or to be pressed into labor for a drug lord. Show me a parent who won’t steal for their starving child, and I’ll show you a monster.”

Aquagirl, I really feel pity for you. You show more compassion for those that have stolen from you and your fellow Americans than you have shown for anyone than opposes illegal immigration. YOU are the monster!

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
4:14 pm

md,

I’ve traveled extensively in Central America. Ironic isn’t it. When we travel there we come upon road blocks with police with machine guns who want our documentation and yet if ask the same of them we are somehow bigots, racists, etc.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
4:17 pm

“Our government hasn’t punished employers who have encouraged illegal immigrants.”

Blah, blah, blah! And why would they punish American citizens when they won’t even punish the illegals that broke the law to begin with?

md

March 29th, 2011
4:19 pm

“I do see illegal immigrants in a different light than many folks here. Many are poor, as in starving poor, and many don’t want their kids to starve or to be pressed into labor for a drug lord.”

And what you don’t seem to see is that same family all around the globe trying to get here too………folks like you don’t seem to care much for their plight.

You seem to have the survival of the fittest mentality……those that can get here first……win. To heck with those poor starving families that don’t live close enough to our borders to play the same game…………..

Yes, they are poor, and yes, they are doing what they can for their families……but doing so at the expense of an equally deserving family is hardly the answer………..

For every family you feel sorry for, there are xx times that around the globe that will NEVER get the chance…….

Google the gumball video……….telling folks the answer is to trample their neighbor to get here is not the appropriate way.

WOODSTOCK MIKE

March 29th, 2011
4:22 pm

@firewoman

Don’t you understand liberals are much more concerned about foreigners than their own fellow Americans??

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
4:22 pm

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
4:00 pm
Thulsa, if they aren’t enemy combatants, why do you want to use the military?- Aquagirl

Aquagirl,

When there is a natural disaster govts such as ours and Japan’s in the wake of their recent earthquake send out troops to help with order and provide humanitarian relief. You are making an incorrect assumption that if troops are called that it is to treat people as enemy combatants.

Do UN troops treat people as enemy combatants when they are dispatched to keep peace? No.

Do the Jap. troops dispatched in the aftermath of the quake treat their people as “enemy combatants”. No.

And if we dispatch our military it is for the purpose of acting as a deterrent and stopping the immigration flow. It is not to treat them as “enemy combatants” and shoot them. Nobody wants that.

md

March 29th, 2011
4:23 pm

“When we travel there we come upon road blocks with police with machine guns who want our documentation and yet if ask the same of them we are somehow bigots, racists, etc.”

It is nothing but an excuse used to justify a position………….

Much like the definition of an embryo to justify getting rid of a mistake……………..

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
4:25 pm

md: “I carry a passport card in my wallet……..right under my drivers license……….so not as hard as one might think.”

As I said, *unless you do,* (which you’re doing right now) you’re kinda screwed on that score. You’re the exception that proves the rule, it would seem.

Besides, a lot of folks simply don’t have passports, and they’d have to go to some trouble and expense to get one. I’m guessing that the people who don’t like the idea of being ‘forced’ to buy health coverage also wouldn’t care for the notion of being forced to pay for a government document (and to possibly take time off from work to get it) simply in order to be able to prove that they were citizens and therefore authorized to work in the US.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
4:28 pm

Aquagirl,

I think Woodstock Mike hit the nail on the head. Its not our job to become the haven of every Mexican who is poor. 90% of the world is poor relative to us. But does that mean we can up and invite the whole world to come and live here. No. We can’t.

By having all these illegals come here we’re also enabling Mexico from facing its own problems such as rampant corruption and cleaning up its own mess.

We’re broke in case you haven’t noticed and we can’t afford to take on masses of poor people who are draining us of even more money in the social services they use up- not to mention the burden they place on our criminal justice and education systems. Enough is enough.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
4:35 pm

“Don’t you understand liberals are much more concerned about foreigners than their own fellow Americans??”

@ WOODSTOCK MIKE – That sad reality is starting to sink in with me. One of my favorite jabs at liberals, as seen here on the AJC blogs … the liberal mantra: love thy enemy, hate they neighbor.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
4:38 pm

woodstock mike and everybody else: I don’t think we should be supporting the world. It’s not our job. But I do understand how people living in extreme poverty aren’t going to play by the rules. You can scream and pitch tantrums all you want, but it’s not going to solve the problem. Deporting the masses isn’t going to work. Cutting off the jobs would be a much better fix, but if you think our current politicians are really doing anything, they’re doing a good job of pandering to your bitterness, and that’s it. They aren’t gonna get rid of illegal aliens—look at the bill in the GA legislature, it’s completely toothless. The Governor went belly up when businesses complained. There will be some photo-ops like the girl from Kennesaw State being deported, and y’all will jump around and holler with satisfaction, like they’ve accomplished anything beyond a symbolic gesture to appease angry people. Then they’ll go quail hunting with the CEO’s who hire illegal aliens.

The main objective is not indulging my anger over being drained by illegals. I prefer solutions.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
4:44 pm

Joe Mama at 3:55,

I read your post and I see what you’re saying.But what I’m saying is that in this day and age there is no way in hell that we shouldn’t be able to identify someone quickly. For example everyone I know can be identified quickly by their driver’s license. How is it that the police and state can’t do this but the soc sec system can’t.

What I’m talking about is the soc sec system should be updated to where someone’s work or residency status can be verified instantly just like with driver’s licenses. It would cut down immensely on identity fraud and on employing illegals- the problem of hiring illegals could be solved literally overnight if we could instantly verify real ss numbers vs fraudulent ones. This is what I’m really getting at is validating if a ss # is real or not. Instead of that info coming back to your wife 2 months after the employee has been there why can’t it be done in a day or a week at most?

I’ll give you a great example. I know a guy who worked as a supervisor at a south Georgia sawmill. They eventually ran off all the white and black employees in favor of low wage illegals. Every 2 months the illegals all leave work for a day because every single one of their soc sec cards comes back as being non-existent. So what do they do? They report the next day with new fake ss cards. 2 months later the whole cycle is repeated all over again.

Meanwhile they all put down like 15 depedent so that no tax is being taken out other than FICA. So now Uncle Sam is being ripped off as well as the state of Georgia.

Its ridiculous and there is no way in hell that in this day and age that we shouldn’t be able to verify legit ss #s on the spot. And as for the employer they should be required to take a photo of each person that applies so that if a social comes back as being illegit then they don’t keep hiring the same person over and over with different ss #s because they then know that that person is illegal.

So yeah I do understand its hard for the employer to know what documentation is real and not real but if they keep some sort of photo id on file for 5 years of applicants whose ss #s came back fraudulent then they can’t keep saying they didn’t know who this person is.

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
4:47 pm

I know this will infuriate the libertarians and tea party adherents here (and probably any apocalyptic christian folks), but IMO a much more cost-effective and sure solution is to come up with some sort of hi-security nigh-uncopyable national ID card.

You want to work? Show your card and let the employer run it through the national database before you start work. If it checks out, get on the job. If it doesn’t, no job for you.

Couple that with a national guest worker program so that *some* unskilled or semi-skilled workers can come here (the business lobby will squeal like a stuck pig if they don’t get this), and ensure that guest workers, H1Bs and the like can get the same sort of cards (but only good on a temporary basis).

Levy harsh penalties, including jail time, for employers who hire or employ people without the authorization card after a date certain, and make examples of a few executives by throwing them in jail. The illegosos will get the message and go elsewhere, and the shady employers will get the message and stop hiring them under the table.

Don’t spend a heap of money with a brute-force approach (like mass roundups, incarcerations and deportations) that will still leave holes for people to slip through. Use a cost-effective approach like this that makes employers not want to hire illegals and that makes illegals unemployable.

JDK

March 29th, 2011
4:50 pm

“Deport ‘em all” is not part of reality”

Well giving them amnesty and allowing them to stay is certainly not a reality either. Are you libs that far off into space that you don’t see what is happening to your own country? More and more Americans citizens are speaking out against illegal immigration.

Personally, I have talked to many legal immigrants who are now US citizens and encouraged them to speak out. They are admitting in greater numbers that they have they most to loose by ignoring that we have an illegal immigration problem. Heck, many of these same legal immigrant citizens admit that immigration as a whole needs to be curbed until our federal government can get it’s act together on many levels. We are not just talking about Mexico either, were talking back door political promises our government has made with many countries around the World.

This is not your grandparent’s Ellis Island immigration days of old.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
4:51 pm

Look out Thulsa—the Rapture-Ready crowd will accuse you of being in league with the devil. Because checking somebody’s SSN is just like having 666 plastered on your forehead. Or something.

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
4:52 pm

See there, Mr. Doom? Great minds think alike.

And they say conservatives and liberals can’t find common ground.

In the case of your friend at the sawmill, I think that’s a perfect example of *knowingly* hiring illegals, and he (and employers like him) are the reason that illegosos are coming here in the first place. Under the Joe Mama ID system, your friend will either stop hiring illegals toot sweet or else spend some time at the Holiday Inn With Bars.

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
4:54 pm

Oh, Joe’s taken the Mark of the Beast too. Jesus is gonna toss you into the fiery lake.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
4:56 pm

Aquagirl,

I would have no problem with that. Its the same principle as the driver’s license is on the state level.

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
4:56 pm

Aquagirl, if I were a christian, I might actually worry about that. But since I’m not, I won’t.

As my wife tells the firebreathers, “It’s *your* hell; *you* go there.” :D

Kamchak

March 29th, 2011
4:57 pm

Well giving them amnesty and allowing them to stay is certainly not a reality either.

It was good enough for St. Ronnie of the Ray-Gun in 1986.

Why are you whinging now?

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
4:58 pm

“I know this will infuriate the libertarians and tea party adherents here (and probably any apocalyptic christian folks)”

Joe Mama, I will bring it down to your level (ie schoolyard bully) … sticks and stones, little coward, stick and stones.

md

March 29th, 2011
5:00 pm

“t was good enough for St. Ronnie of the Ray-Gun in 1986.”

Not entirely……….there was accompanying legislation that Congress never bothered to follow through on……..hence the compounded problem now.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
5:02 pm

The libs are running out of fire so they are bringing the evangelical christian label out and just when the word racist has lost it’s luster … :(

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
5:02 pm

Firewoman: “Joe Mama, I will bring it down to your level (ie schoolyard bully) … sticks and stones, little coward, stick and stones.”

No coward here, ma’am — just calling it like I see it. You’re certainly free to disagree with me to your heart’s content.

I fail to see how one can be ‘bullied’ on an internet forum; if you feel I have done so to you, I apologize, but I will not retract or amend my comment.

Somehow, I do not believe that you and I will be able to have a fruitful or a polite discussion, so I shall simply conclude by saying ‘have a nice day, Firewoman.’

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
5:03 pm

Saying someone is libertarian, tea party adherent, or Christian apocalyptic is name-calling? What’s the PC name for any of those people? I wouldn’t want to offend them, y’know.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
5:03 pm

Joe Mama,

OK I would agree with everything on your 4:47 post. And if people squeal about a national ID card then just update the soc sec system to where real vs fake ss #s can be verified instantly. Problem solved. And yes throw some execs in jail to make an example.

I’m in favor of the guest worker program also. I would just like to see some sort of provision that gives Americans preference first in work over an illegal. Something that you have to hire an American who is equally qualified for the same job over an illegal. I’ve seen too many blue collar jobs that used to go to poor or lower middle class blacks and whites get taken by illegals that are willing to work for much lower wages and live 20 people to a house.

Looks like we just solved the whole problem Joe Mama with a bi-partisan approach. There is just one problem with the whole thing. It makes too much sense and is doomed for that reason alone. We gave it a nice try though.

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
5:07 pm

“You can scream and pitch tantrums all you want, but it’s not going to solve the problem.”

The only folks I’ve seen of late throwing temper tantrums was last Thursday in front of the state legislature. I just think the illegals had an allergic bad reaction to the high pollen count that day!

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
5:08 pm

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
5:03 pm
Saying someone is libertarian, tea party adherent, or Christian apocalyptic is name-calling? What’s the PC name for any of those people? I wouldn’t want to offend them, y’know.

You’re right aquagirl

Libertarian- someone who believes in individual freedom and liberty with little govt meddling. I would hate to be called one of them.

Tea party adherent- Someone who thinks govt has gotten too big, too outta hand with taxes, I guess they’re just bad people too.

Christians who believe in a God and the apocalypse and what the bible says about it- just another bad name for people who believe in the infinity of a good God. I’ld hate to be called one of them. Didn’t you know- its the abortionists who are the really good people on Earth.

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
5:11 pm

Thulsa Doom — “I’m in favor of the guest worker program also. I would just like to see some sort of provision that gives Americans preference first in work over an illegal. Something that you have to hire an American who is equally qualified for the same job over an illegal. I’ve seen too many blue collar jobs that used to go to poor or lower middle class blacks and whites get taken by illegals that are willing to work for much lower wages and live 20 people to a house.’

My wife used to be an IT recruiter back during the dot-com boom, and she saw all kinds of tricks used by employers to get H1B visa authorizations. They’d advertise a job opening with a *laundry list* of qualifications that no human could ever have, and for some incredibly low salary that no American would possibly take. When the ‘position’ went unfilled for several months, they’d to go INS, get their H1B authorization and then *rewrite* the job for what they *really* wanted in the first place, and then bring some clueless Indian kid over to work for half of what an American would demand. She (and I) saw it over and over back then. So IMO, you’d need some sort of mechanism to curb that abuse of the system, because I firmly believe that American businesses would keep those kinds of shenanigans up.

I definitely have no problem with some sort of ‘hire an American first’ provision; I’m just not sure how it could be done. Maybe you have ideas on that score?

“Looks like we just solved the whole problem Joe Mama with a bi-partisan approach. There is just one problem with the whole thing. It makes too much sense and is doomed for that reason alone. We gave it a nice try though.”

Here’s our campaign slogan: Doom/Mama 2012 — You Could Do Worse ;)

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
5:13 pm

“Somehow, I do not believe that you and I will be able to have a fruitful or a polite discussion, so I shall simply conclude by saying ‘have a nice day, Firewoman.”

I don’t recall any of your opinions, expressed thus far, as being fruitful or polite. What’s stopping you now?

Aquagirl

March 29th, 2011
5:14 pm

…which is why I’m mystified, Thulsa. Calling someone a butthead is name-calling. Calling them a libertarian seems like a neutral descriptive to me.

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
5:15 pm

You have a nice day, Firewoman. :)

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
5:19 pm

Joe Mama,

I’ve seen the same crap also in IT. My best friend is a systems analyst in B’ham. I know most of the computer programmers that work under him. Its weird but his co. would bring in 5-10 Indians at a time to train and work for a month or 2 at the corporate office and then send them back to India. Then like clockwork 5-10 programmers would get laid off. Trade off a 50-60k programmer for an equally good Indian programmer at $7 an hour. It sucks for them.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
5:22 pm

Joe Mama,

I’m not sure exactly on a hire American first provision but from various studies I’ve seen that illegal immigration has hurt our poorest, most unskilled labor force by forcing labor costs down 15-20% depending on what study. Not sure how to implement or if it could be implemented but that is why I would like to see an American first provision to help lower skilled American workers.

tamika

March 29th, 2011
5:23 pm

you know i am sick of you people trying to make white conservs look like evangelicals. we evangelicals are black and there are lots of us. i know lots of people that go to my church are in the tea party and we can not be racist against ourselves. lationos are more white than black and we dont really view the hispanics as equal to any of us. they just cannot be here anymore

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
5:23 pm

Mr. Doom, the crowning moment came when I came across a contract opening at the Department of Defense. One of the requirements was three years of experience with a software package that had only been released *six months before.*

I made a mental note never to work with the contractor that was advertising that position. I kinda wanted the position; I was interested in the work and I thought it would be a kick to work at the Pentagon for a while (plus, one of my former OICs was posted to the Pentagon at the time), but I wasn’t interested in working for a company that was so obviously trying to jerk the H1B system around. I really didn’t think I’d get a fair shake from them if I pursued the job.

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
5:23 pm

I’m out. Ya’ll have a nice day.

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
5:24 pm

Thulsa Doom — “various studies I’ve seen that illegal immigration has hurt our poorest, most unskilled labor force by forcing labor costs down 15-20% depending on what study. Not sure how to implement or if it could be implemented but that is why I would like to see an American first provision to help lower skilled American workers.”

This. +100

firewoman

March 29th, 2011
5:24 pm

The day is over, sweetie. Good evening to you! :)

Thulsa Doom

March 29th, 2011
5:27 pm

Joe Mama,

That was probably a wise choice avoiding that employer. My brother is a lieut colonel in the Army who worked at the Pentagon. He thought it was pretty cool also. Now I’m really out.

Kamchak

March 29th, 2011
5:34 pm

Brittanicus

March 29th, 2011
5:51 pm

Every prudent American should stand by those candidates, who are fighting for your sovereignty. By the tens of millions patriotic Americans and legal residents are joining the TEA PARTY, to halt the illegal immigration invasion. This has become a financially vicious circle that will not end, with either the deep entrenched Liberal-Democrats, Republicans or any political entity other than the committed TEA PARTY. The TEA PARTY is growing much faster from the dominant Republicans, and certain politicians are discarding there old parties to join this third party. Pro-sovereignty, anti-occupational organizations are connecting with their regional tea party. The Tea Party is secular in definition, non-partisan with open registration for all legal races, including ethnic majorities and minorities. The Tea Parties core values of Fiscal Responsibility, Limited Government, Free Market and a Strong National Security. We have great substance in the leadership who are fighting against the old, tired “Business as Usual” political hard liners, who will keep our taxes spiraling and mortgaging our grand children’s futures. ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DOOMED BY THE POLICIES OF THE TEA PARTY

Joe Mama

March 29th, 2011
5:53 pm

This has been a paid political announcement by the Tea Party USA, INC.

Patent pending, batteries not included.

Pogo

March 29th, 2011
5:58 pm

GE made about 14 billion in profits last year but did not pay 1 cent in taxes. In fact, they were paid back. Write about that Jay.

Pogo

March 29th, 2011
6:13 pm

The answer to the immigration problem is to prosecute those buseiness that hire them and to deny illegals access to government services which are paid for by legal, citizen taxpayer funded money. No, I am not talking about sales taxes. I am talking about SSN taxes, medicare taxes, property taxes and income taxes. If illegals don’t have access to the programs that these taxes pay for, they won’t come here anymore. Either that or they will go through the legal immigration channels under existing immigration laws to become certified citizens. There is nothing wrong immigration if they do so under the laws of our country. Right now we have nothing but a burgeoning dependent class on our hands. That is why they want to come here because they know they can take advantage of everything being a citizen of the US entails without having to pay the price.

Independent

March 29th, 2011
6:41 pm

If you all will take your Social Security card out from wherever it is stored and look at it, you will see a line on which you have signed your name. If you examine that line closely, you will see that it is actually composed of very tiny letters closely spaced. I doubt that the fake SS cards have this. But no business is required even to check to see if that little detail is there. E-verify! E-verify! E-verify!

TruthBe

March 29th, 2011
6:43 pm

Dear Normal, there isn’t any “good democrats”. Just corrupt career perverted politicans without any morals.

Independent

March 29th, 2011
6:46 pm

And for those of you who say that illegals claim 15 deductions so no tax is taken out of their paycheck – so where is the IRS when they either file their taxes and have underpaid, or don’t file their taxes and there is no match so the IRS shows up at their employer’s door to look for them? Do these people leave their employment every year? Where is the IRS, huh? Where also was the IRS when last year those good American fishermen in Lousiana couldn’t document their income to BP for reimbursement because they had been paid “under the table”, what many claim is done with illegal immigrants? We complain about not having enough money for the government but we don’t go after tax cheats?

Lancer

March 29th, 2011
9:43 pm

“Ramsey, Murphy and other conservative legislators prefer that they go back where they came from…”

Tongue in cheek, but not completely: let’s cut a deal with Mexico to temporarily merge our two countries for, say, 90 days. Call it the United States of Meximerica or some such. Voila, all the border jumpers who’re here illegally are automatically “back where they came from”, then after 90 days they’re automatically back in as full fledged Americanos. Ariba, ariba!

catt11daddy

March 29th, 2011
9:45 pm

hey, America is broke, them coming here ain’t helping the picture, sorry to here there country is in strife, cartels, terroist, proverty,do like the rest of the world is doing take your country back instead of carrying all that s..t here, if we Americans don’t watch it this country will be a 3rd world country soon.
America has enough labors, we met our quota back in 1996, go to China they have the money.

catt11daddy

March 29th, 2011
10:51 pm

Amnesty for 12 -20 million illegals, add another 40 million because we’ll have every laborer in South America up here, our boarders are open , my question is Obama Care ,who is going to pay for an added 20 million criminals?
Second , illegals have more rights than Americans do , get caught with a fake ID , fox 5 Atlanta,ga Randy Travis showed 25 illegals working on a contract for city of atlanta stimlus funded with fake ID and nothing is done ,where is ICE? or Mayor Reed? , in Calif.10 illegals dressed up in military uniforms with the name tag Perez on all the uniforms, driving a van with a stolen goverment tag headed toward San Diego stopped by Boarder Agents.They were sent back to Mexico, and uniforms taken.See if the fed.’s will just spank your hand and send you home.
Hell, no how about forgery, impersonating a goverment personal,theft,ect. by the time fed’s got done you’d have 40 charges and facing 30 years on each count.
Whats wrong America, have we become too politically correct or compassionate, or just fools while this country is being drained?

misterbill

March 29th, 2011
11:21 pm

paul,
I know that you are right about the felonies. I am confident that these kids would have a better chance if there were not a half million, (FAIR US est.), Invaders working in our state. At one point , new home construction, road building crews, supermarkets and restaurants all gave our young ones a second chance. I don’t remember exactly when but the supers started background checking and –pow–killed it for a lot of them. Restaurants pay off the books and get slave labor.
And the worst –government projects allow companies who hire the illegals to get the contracts and staff with and the Georgia Assoc of County Managers fights to keep immigration checking off the table.

Treason, by my standards.

misterbill

March 29th, 2011
11:25 pm

Independent–
the illegals are using real American SS numbers. Where have you been? On vacation, out of country??

Are you positing that the IRS functions differently than the census? Or the employers?

For those who argue that it is impossible to deport 10 million, I argue that it would be easier than trying to track them and all their lying and cheating.

[...] Federal inaction on immigration lets issue fester | Jay Bookman. [...]

misterbill

March 29th, 2011
11:33 pm

Joe Mama

what you are talking about is Attrition through Enforcement. The problem is the Chamber of Congress and even public official group like the Ga County Managers Assoc. look the other way. It is all about bottom dollar and no regard for the American worker.

I read a supposed economics wizard arguing with another blogger on a blog site about Global Business and how it made American lives better via less expensive, shoes, clothes, etc. He cited WalMart as an example of how they had grown selling Chinese goods.

The other fellow who was not an economist suggested that was good up until te point where so many people in America were unemployed that they didn’t have the money to cash in on this great–offshoring manufacturing- comparative advantage theory.

So the net is== illegals take the jobs, buy the foreign made goods and Americans sit home and die. without jobs and unemployment pay..

misterbill

March 29th, 2011
11:39 pm

I served in the military. I am too old now, but , in spite of that, I would go if my country asked me. I m having doubts about who would ask me to go though and why they would ask me.

Perhaps to get rid of me and make more room for illegals?????

These invaders are here for themselves. You cannot blame them. The ones to blame are their employers, the same ones who import labor and send our manufacturing jobs overseas.

An and anecdote about allowing them to serve in our military , yet felons cannot—–

In ancient Rome , two Senators were discussing the large number of slaves in Rome. One suggested to the other, “perhaps we should make them wear armbands to recognize them.” The other Senator replied, “When they see how many of them there are, they will take over Rome in a day.”

Be cautious , my fellow Americans.

Joel Wischkaemper

March 30th, 2011
12:26 am

The illegal aliens are out in force telling all that the sky will be falling if we deport the illegal aliens. Actually, we will save a lot of money and significantly reduce crime. Napolitano suggested that without all those squealers in the illegal alien community, the world would be a lot worse. We are paying them an outrageous amount of money for welfare, and if they are gone… we will save a bundle. Not a whole lot of people seem to understand Americans always did those jobs the illegal aliens stole. They earned a living wage, and the illegal aliens are not. The employers do like those illegal aliens and I believe you can tell there are more than just a couple on this board.

They are going. Growers can find something else to grow for a change. That will be good for the country and good for the people so lets get an I.D. in place and E-Verify humming along. THAT will put a smile on everyone face.

se659

March 30th, 2011
12:48 am

“I have no faith that a policy of discouragement can work.”

Translation: You don’t WANT a policy of discouragement to work. Why else would you be willing to write it off as unworkable before it’s even tried? If the country makes it increasingly difficult to live here outside the framework of the law of course it will have an impact on illegal immigration!

Attrition through enforcement isn’t perfect but it’s a far better policy than another stupid mass amnesty.

LawsThatWork

March 30th, 2011
4:52 am

Citizens are losing their desire to support a federal government that does not support or protect them. Here are simple federal laws that would protect citizens.

(1) It is illegal to take up permanant residence or work in the U.S. without applying for legal immigration. Legal immigration is limited in order to protect the economic security of U.S. citizens.

(2) Any foreign national lacking appropriate visa or work permit attempting to take up residence in the U.S.(i.e., rent an apartment) is in violation of an infraction, having a fine of $1,000, payable on arrest (violator detained until bail met).

(3) Any foreign national lacking an appropriate visa or work permit attempting to obtain employment is in violation of an infraction, having a fine of $2,000, payable on arrest (violator detained until bail met).

(4) Any foreign national found employed for cash wages is in violation of an infraction, having a fine of $5,000, payable on arrest (violator detained until bail met).

(5) Employers will pay a fine of $5,000 for knowingly hiring an illegal employee, along with immediate termination of the illegal worker. Repeated offenses will result in larger fines and possible loss of business licenses.

(6) No employer is allowed to deduct as a business expense, wages paid to anyone other than a legal worker.

(7) The IRS will validate the legal status of workers at the time of hire and at tax filing time.

We need to file a CLASS ACTION SUIT representing ALL U.S. CITIZENS demanding the federal government protect our economic interests if they want our $2 trillion in tax revenues. We need an attorney who will freeze that $2 trillion in tax dollars, preventing the federal government from spending our money until they start responding to our needs. Businesses like GE and agriculture that cannot make it without foreign workers or federal government benefits can find another source of easy money.

Independent

March 30th, 2011
6:32 am

Illegal aliens are using real SS numbers? so show a real SS card. Also, if they are using a real SS number, the IRS should notice something fishy about a guy who has two full-time jobs, one in Seattle Washington and one in Vidalia, Georgia. Plus when the mexican-looking guy shows up with the name John Smith, there should be a clue that something ain’t right. It really is not as hard as it seems, but it starts with requiring businesses to verify their employees through e-verify. And improve e-verify so it not only tells you if it is a real SS number, but matches the name and the age. And don’t let a guy who looks 20 tell you he is a 65-year-old grandfather from Minnesota!

anonymous

March 30th, 2011
7:09 am

leticia olalia morales of 15501 pasadena ave #8 tustin ca 92780 submitted fake documents and paid 5000.00 dollars to obtain a US tourist visa. she is now applying for citizenship.

TnGelding

March 30th, 2011
7:37 am

Isn’t that the way the business community wants it?

It isn’t hopeless, but it would be a daunting task. I suspect the feds know who 75% of these folks are and could find them fairly easily since they are here on expired visas. Let those that have proven themselves to be decent, hard-working, law-abiding people stay and deport the rest under expedited procedures. But no citizenship unless they’re willing to leave and come back into the country legally.

ButtHead

March 30th, 2011
7:38 am

LOL Thulsa Doom good post

anonymous

March 30th, 2011
8:18 am

leticia olalia morales of 15501 pasadena ave #8 tustin ca 92780 submitted fake documents and paid 5000.00 dollars to obtain a US tourist visa. she is now applying for citizens

HostileLogic

March 30th, 2011
12:22 pm

This article is a hat looking for a head.

catt11daddy

March 30th, 2011
3:46 pm

“We feel we need to do something to attract attention ,” said Archie Archuleta, La Raza chairman.

“Behind the National Council of La Raza lies the
real agenda of La Raza, the agenda led to thousands
of illegal immigrants in the streets of American cities, waving Mexican
flags, defying our laws, and demanding concessions.
Among the secondary organizations is the radical racist group Movimiento
Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan
(MEChA), one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has
permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a
racist nation out of the American West.
One of America’s greatest strengths has always been taking in immigrants
from cultures around the world, and assimilating them into our country as
Americans. By being citizens of the U.S. we are Americans first, and only,
in our national loyalties.
Opposed by MEChA for the hordes of illegal immigrants
pouring across our borders, to whom they say:
“Chicano is our identity; it defines who we are as people. It rejects the
notion that we…should assimilate into the Anglo-American melting
pot…Aztlan was the legendary homeland of the Aztecas … It became
synonymous with the vast territories of the Southwest, brutally stolen from
a Mexican people marginalized and betrayed by the hostile custodians of the
Manifest Destiny.” ( University of Oregon MEChA Website, Jan. 3,
2006)
MEChA isn’t at all shy about their goals, or their views of other races.
Their founding principles are contained in “El Plan
Espiritual de Aztlan” ( Spiritual Plan for Aztlan):
“In the spirit of a new people that is conscious not only of its proud
historical heritage but also of the brutal gringo invasion of our
territories, we, the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern land
of Aztlan came our forefathers, reclaiming the land of their
birth and consecrating the determination of our people of the sun, declare
that the call of our blood is our power, responsibility, and inevitable destiny
Aztlan belongs to those who plant , water
the fields, and gather the crops and not to the Europeans…. We
are a bronze people with a culture. Before the world, before all of
North America, before all our brothers in the bronze continent, we are a
nation, we are a union of free pueblos, we are Aztlan.
Closing motto : “For The Race everything. Outside The Race,
nothing.”

Jim B

March 30th, 2011
6:19 pm

We sent he Republicans to Washington to stop illegal immigration, so far they have not impressed us.