According to U.S. Rep. Peter King, R-NY, more than 80 percent of the mosques in this country are headed by imams who espouse radical Islamic jihad.
Eighty percent. King has offered that estimate in the past, and did so again this week in a radio interview:
King did not claim to have a list of those subversive enemies of American freedom in his suit pocket, as Sen. Joe McCarthy did 60 years ago. But like McCarthy, King does have the chairmanship of a prominent congressional committee, in his case the House Homeland Security Committee. And next month, King’s committee is scheduled to hold public hearings into the alleged disloyalty of the Muslim-American community.
That ought to go so very well, don’t you think?
And then we’ve got U.S. Rep. Allen West, a newly elected Republican from Florida. In a recent interview with a cable TV program called “The Shalom Show,” West was asked a rather odd question about U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison, a Minnesota Democrat and a Muslim, and he responded with an equally odd answer (The interchange begins at 1:47 in the video below):
Interviewer Richard Peritz: “Since you’re with a new crowd, people you haven’t really met before and will be very closely associated with in the future, including Keith Ellison, who supports Islam. How will you manage that, if I may ask? Because it’s not really easy to be that … polite, often, with individuals one totally disagrees with, which I believe may be the case.”
Rep. West: “I think it’s most important that I stand upon the principles that people elected me to go to Washington DC and represent them on Capitol Hill. So that when you run into someone that is counter or someone that really does represent the antithesis of the principles upon which this country was established, you got to be able to defeat them intellectually and in debate and discourse.”
It really is astounding. Is it possible to be polite to a Muslim-American? Does Ellison, by the mere fact of being a Muslim, “represent the antithesis of the principles upon which this country was established?”
Or is that all just vile, ugly bigotry spouted by men wearing nice suits?
– Jay Bookman
588 comments Add your comment
TaxPayer
January 25th, 2011
2:15 pm
Is this King fella related to Scout.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
2:17 pm
LOL @ TaxPayer!!!!!!!!
Del
January 25th, 2011
2:17 pm
Of course there’s a mistrust of the Muslim community. Why shouldn’t there be? I don’t know the accuracy of Peter King’s estimate but I do know that nobody has an accurate estimate as to the percentage of Muslims who disavow the acts of terror committed in the name of Islam.
Granny Godzilla
January 25th, 2011
2:17 pm
I would say that it is Allen West is “the antithesis of the principles upon which this country was established” AND that he appears be a
vile, ugly bigot wearing a nice suits.
And after checking the fabric I may have to change that to “cheap” suits.
jm
January 25th, 2011
2:22 pm
Asymmetrical information Jay.
I don’t know if he’s fear mongering or not. But I highly suspect he has information about said Mosques that you and I don’t have, courtesy of Homeland Security…
Road Scholar
January 25th, 2011
2:24 pm
Del: Is that the same distrust shown to jews and catholics in the south in the past? How about Italians,Hispanics, etc.? Allright conserves, I know I’ll hear otherwise.
jm
January 25th, 2011
2:25 pm
Jay, BTW, I read the Peritz question as off base. This seems out of context. Does he disagree with the guy solely because he’s muslim? I doubt it. Because he’s a Dem? Maybe. Who knows.
As someone said on the other page, I think this is a bit of tempest in JB’s teapot….. bee in the bonnet, whatever. Hard to assess what’s going on with the Peritz West interview
carlosgvv
January 25th, 2011
2:26 pm
Muslim extremists in this country and other countries have shown they will stop at nothing to kill and maim as many people as possible. The Muslim community worldwide, for the most part, has been extremely reluctant to comdemn these actions. This suggests the ugly possibility they quietly approve of this violence. We have to protect ourselves and being nice and politically correct doesn’t help much if you wind up dead. You have to see things as they really are and not as you might want them to be.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
2:26 pm
Del
I understand where you’re coming from. However, there’s been mistrust in this country as long as we’ve been here. The only thing that changes are the two groups involved.
*Did the Native Americans have an accurate estimate of those who disavowed acts of terror committed against them?
*Did the Western Settlers have an accurate estimate of the Natives who committed acts agains them?
*Did the Northerners have an accurate estimate of the Southerners who were against Seccession in 1861?
*Did Blacks have an accurate estimate of the number of people who committed acts of terror against them from 1865-1965?
There’s always going to be distrust when people don’t know each other. There are good Muslims and there are bad Muslims, just as there are good Christians and bad Christians, and so on…
TaxPayer
January 25th, 2011
2:26 pm
I was thinking about sending some CDs to our compassionate conservatives in congress. Something like this comes to mind.
Ragnar Danneskjöld
January 25th, 2011
2:27 pm
Jay, since we defeat you intellectually and in debate and in discourse here daily, are you saying we are not polite? I respectfully suggest you close with an unsubstantial logic.
Normal
January 25th, 2011
2:28 pm
TaxPayer
January 25th, 2011
2:15 pm
Tax,
I don’t know about that, but I do know I feel a whole lot safer now that I know Scout takes a gun to Church….
saywhat?
January 25th, 2011
2:28 pm
I’m still waiting for one of the 80-100,00 Muslims in Atlanta to try and blow me up, and hate me for my freedoms and such. Southern Muslims must be lazy, or just really bad at the terrorism thing.
Normal
January 25th, 2011
2:30 pm
And next month, King’s committee is scheduled to hold public hearings into the alleged disloyalty of the Muslim-American community.
Tailgunner Joe is alive and well it seems…
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
2:30 pm
Just like Iraq and Afghanistan will never be the same after
encountering thousands of GIs, We are experiencing change
from an influx of muslims and a realization that they have been
here as long as the rest of us. They will change just as their
former countrymen have changed and become more like us,
not necessarily a good thing. This guy too will go away.
Del
January 25th, 2011
2:31 pm
Road Scholar, perhaps you can point us to some events in your lifetime that should cause concern here in America about committed terrorist acts associated with the religious and ethnic groups you’ve identified.
Del
January 25th, 2011
2:32 pm
Check back later.
jm
January 25th, 2011
2:32 pm
saywhat? It’s the sweat tea.
jm
January 25th, 2011
2:33 pm
sweat tea? yuck. sweet tea.
Jay
January 25th, 2011
2:33 pm
That’s bull, jm.
What’s King gonna do, trot out this “secret” information in these public show trials he’s planning?
Nobody in law enforcement or national security has offered estimates that would come even close to that number. And we’d certainly have more home-grown terror incidents than the isolated, random cases we’ve seen so far.
As to context, you have the entire interview available to you.
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
2:33 pm
Normal
January 25th, 2011
2:28 pm
———————————————–
Hope the preacher doesn’t say…Shoot, Jesus….
Scout
January 25th, 2011
2:34 pm
“A civilzation fights to preserve itself or it dies. Has ours become so hollow, such a pale imitation of its former self? Do we lack the capacity even to speak of the evils arrayed against us? Have we become so cowardly that our censure is reserved for our saviors, not our pillagers?”
Andrew C. McCarthy
Lead Federal Prosecutor
First World Trade Center Bombing
“The Grand Jihad”
Now, don’t you think he knows more about what is going on in this country regarding radical Islam than any of us on this thread including Jay ?
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
2:34 pm
” since we defeat you intellectually and in debate and in discourse here daily”
Some people are such champions in their own minds.
One Nation Under educated
January 25th, 2011
2:35 pm
“Jay, since we defeat you intellectually and in….blah…blah”
Dude. I know how to end the U.S. deficit. We could buy
you for what you’re worth, and sell you for what you
think you’re worth. Bam
Guy Incognito
January 25th, 2011
2:36 pm
Andrew McCarthy???? From, “Less Than Zero”?
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
January 25th, 2011
2:37 pm
Well, when we get the Rev. Huckabee in the White House the towelheads will be finished. We’ll get back to holding prayer meetings in the guvmint offices and maybe bring Gonzalez back as AG to take out after these Muslim Traders. Right now they know they got a Kenyan Socialist Muslim there to protect them. What we need is a Southren Baptist President. Which ain’t quite as good as a Holiness President but will do.
Anyhow, I been thinking about downstairs and how Scout brings his gun to church. I figure people are well behaved in his church. There’s nothing like somebody that’s a little crazy and has a gun to make people think twice about what they say and do.
Have a good p.m. everybody.
jm
January 25th, 2011
2:37 pm
Jay – referring to context, I was talking about the second interview.
As far as King – the guy is a complete blowhard. So I discount what he says. But I’ve heard other gov’t officials say paranoid sounding things, and turns out they’re right…..
I’m ok with Obama having an “off switch” for the internet for this reason. As loopy and disgraceful as McKinney was, when she said something along the lines of “Bush knew about 9/11 beforehand”, she was about 50% or more correct….
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
2:38 pm
Now, don’t you think he knows more about what is going on in this country regarding radical Islam than any of us on this thread including Jay ?
Considering one of us on this thread works in a capacity dealing with this very topic, I’d beg to differ somewhat.
Jay
January 25th, 2011
2:38 pm
Guy, you gave me a heart attack. I saw your comment and thought, OMG, did I write “Andrew McCarthy?”
Now i see it was Scout.
kayaker 71
January 25th, 2011
2:39 pm
Road Scholar,
I don’t recall Catholics and others blowing up buildings in this country or Jews as well. I don’t recall these same people vowing to kill the infidel and declaring jihad on anyone who disagreed with them. Apples and bananas, my friend.
jm
January 25th, 2011
2:39 pm
“(The interchange begins at 1:47 in the video below)”
Jay, the “video below” appears to be missing.
Guy Incognito
January 25th, 2011
2:39 pm
Jay, I was funnin off of Scout’s quote. You correctly put ’sconsin’s own, Joe Mc
Mick
January 25th, 2011
2:41 pm
Allen west is the rep from boca raton and is a certifiable loon. He will most definately be a one termer.
DWTOO
January 25th, 2011
2:41 pm
Nobody escapes the Spanish Inquisition. Perhaps there are still some of the internment camps used to house Japanese Americans available to house American Muslims.
At least illegal immigrants can breathe easier knowing we have a new bogeyman.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
2:43 pm
I think Road Scholar’s point is that at some point and time, there has been a group that was distrusted by others here in the US. All new immigrant groups go thru similar processes of assimilation.
Mick
January 25th, 2011
2:44 pm
yakker
Tim Mcvey was a catholic..
Scout
January 25th, 2011
2:44 pm
Jay, et al:
You have your heads in the sand (no pun intended).
Why would you disrespect the opinion (and it’s more than that since he had acces to all the T/S information needed to prosecute) of a federal prosecutor who risked his life and the life of his family to prosecute that case?
Make fun or him ………… or debate his quotes. Your choice.
“The disposition that we must not critically examine Islam is both unneccessary and self-defeating. It is unneccessary because the Framers gave us a Constitution that guarantees freedom of conscience, not freedom from examination. You can believe whatever you wish to believe, but you do not foreclose your beliefs from inspection by labeling them ‘religion’ – even if the label is accurate.”
Andrew McCarthy
ByteMe
January 25th, 2011
2:46 pm
At least illegal immigrants can breathe easier knowing we have a new bogeyman.
Don’t bet on it. Call it a “co-bogeyman” and include gays in that list of bogeymen trotted out every time the Republicans need to incite a little fear to get their base to stick together.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
2:46 pm
Mick:
So where is McVey’s terrorist network composed of million of followers. Did Catholic Bishops around the world laud him for his “martrydom”?
Wake up !
ByteMe
January 25th, 2011
2:47 pm
Scout thinks it’s important for someone to debate someone else’s book. Weird.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
2:47 pm
You have your heads in the sand (no pun intended).
Once again, I’ll say AHEM!! Without me and others like me, he wouldn’t get that info Scout. So, when you make broad swipes about who knows what, make sure your swipe is correct.
Suckers
January 25th, 2011
2:47 pm
If America is truly the promoter of tolerance and acceptance of others, than a religion that espouses a “with us, or against us” mentality is unlikely to be able to co-exist.
Adam
January 25th, 2011
2:48 pm
Conservative Commenters: Let me get this straight.
GOvernment cannot be trusted. No way, no how. It must be reduced and spending must be decreased and taxes must be decreased until we have a smaller government because we JUST CANNOT TRUST THEM GOSHDARNIT…
That is, unless one of them comes out and says that he estimates 80 percent of mosques house jihadists. That guy can be trusted, because he MUST know more about what’s going on, since he’s in the government.
Do I have that about right?
Jay
January 25th, 2011
2:48 pm
My apologies, jm. It should be up now.
And Scout, you now want government to be “examining beliefs”, huh?
ByteMe
January 25th, 2011
2:49 pm
Sshhhh, Adam. Don’t make their heads explode so early in the day.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
2:49 pm
“Islam is not simply a religion. It is nothing more than an old way to oppress people.”
Author Unknown
Keep up the good fight!
January 25th, 2011
2:50 pm
Scout is back to recycle the same tired old quotes. Does not change the end result. I can tell you of many prosecutors and attorneys who have risked their lives for their clients. Scout would not care to listen to many of them unless they spout his particular religious inanity.
ByteMe
January 25th, 2011
2:50 pm
Now Scout quotes something that just as easily could have been said about Christians by Bill Maher, but he can’t attribute it.
ByteMe
January 25th, 2011
2:50 pm
When Ronald Reagan cut funding for mental health in this country, who knew that it would increase the number of conservative voters?
Scout
January 25th, 2011
2:50 pm
Jay:
If those “beliefs” include terroristic acts, support, guidance and funding ……………… ABSOLUTELY !
Jay
January 25th, 2011
2:50 pm
You mean like that tolerant and accepting interviewer, Suckers?
Adam
January 25th, 2011
2:50 pm
“Christianity is not simply a religion. It is nothing more than an old way to oppress people.”
Fixed your typo. Actually my point is you could apply that to any religion
jm
January 25th, 2011
2:51 pm
jay 2:48 – no worries.
Keep up the good fight!
January 25th, 2011
2:51 pm
In 1775, John Adams wrote: “All sober inquirers after truth, ancient and modern, pagan and Christian, have declared that the happiness of man, as well as his dignity, consists in virtue. Confucius, Zoroaster, Socrates, Mahomet, not to mention authorities really sacred, have agreed in this.”
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
2:51 pm
I’m still in my 30’s, but I remember a time before the 24/7 cable television news cycle, when one only had to read about and be embarrassed by ones own shallow minded, moronic representatives.
Adam
January 25th, 2011
2:51 pm
ByteMe: I suspect someone somewhere on Reagan’s team knew that, and that’s why he did it (/conspiracy-theory)
Mick
January 25th, 2011
2:51 pm
scout
Mcvey and the turner diaries…I guess…doesn’t matter much innocents died that day…so what exactly are you proposing anyway? A litmus test for muslim clerics? Interment camps?
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
2:52 pm
If those “beliefs” include terroristic acts, support, guidance and funding
And how do you go about proving that those “beliefs” indeed do as you think they do???
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
2:53 pm
Keep,
I love that Scout has so many “author unknown” quotes — all that tells me is that he likes to make up sh*t.
jt
January 25th, 2011
2:53 pm
I read somewhere,
that since 1980, more people have been kilt by DOLPHINS,
than radical Islamic extremists.
There is just no money involved in a War agin Sea Mammels.
stands for decibels
January 25th, 2011
2:53 pm
So where is McVey’s terrorist network composed of million of followers.
Gosh, wherever could one go to find millions of anti-government extremists?
Scout
January 25th, 2011
2:53 pm
ByteMe:
I repeat:
So where is the Christian terrorist network composed of million of followers. Do Christian ministers around the world laud terrorists for their murders of thousands of innocent people? Are Christian churches hotbeds of terrorist networks ?
Your naivete’ is astounding.
Guy Incognito
January 25th, 2011
2:53 pm
Hey Mick,
How active was McV in church? Lib’s LOVE to tout McV as an example of a Christian terrorist, but it is a weak-minded link. If you can show that his priest told him to blow up the fed bldng in OK, than you would have a point
Paul
January 25th, 2011
2:56 pm
This shouldn’t take all that long to dispense with. The first part, anyhow. Rep King should call Sheik Kabbani to testify…. or…. he could just read into the record what Kabbani said, what King said formed the basis of his concern:
“Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani testified before a State Department Open Forum: “The most dangerous thing that is going on now in these mosques, that has been sent upon these mosques around the United States – like churches they were established by different organizations and that is ok – but the problem with our communities is the extremist ideology. Because they are very active they took over the mosques; and we can say that they took over more than 80% of the mosques that have been established in the US. And there are more than 3000 mosques in the US. So it means that the methodology or ideology of extremist has been spread to 80% of the Muslim population, but not all of them agree with it.”
Then he can read into the record follow-up questions and comments which sought to clarify those remarks:
http://www.meforum.org/61/muhammad-hisham-kabbani-the-muslim-experience-in
“”Extremist Ideology”
MEQ: You spoke last year, at a forum sponsored by the U.S. Department of State, of a “threat that will grow” if Americans do not “quickly stop the kind of extremist ideology that is filtering in.”4 What is that threat?
Kabbani: This is a delicate point, so allow me to make a couple of introductory comments. First, we should remember that the problem of extremism is not confined to the Muslim community. Extremists come out of a variety of traditions and focus on a variety of issues – paranoia about the growth of the federal government and obsession with abortion being two well-known issues that have led individuals to the kind of extremism I am talking about, sometimes with violence resulting.
Second, I used the word extremist in an ideological sense. I did not intend to imply that much of the leadership has engaged in acts of violence, or could be described as terrorists. In Arabic, my native language, extremism and terrorism have very different meanings and cannot be used interchangeably.
MEQ: How do you define extremism?
Kabbani: Extremism is an unwillingness to accept any viewpoint but one’s own. It is un-Islamic. In Arabic, ghulu means ideas that deviate from the center. The Prophet Muhammad specifically stated, “Do not go to the extreme in your religion.” Extreme ideas are not violent in themselves but they do on occasion lead to violent acts. That is the context in which I used the word “extremism” to describe ideas currently expressed in Islamic centers across America.
Ideological extremism can result in an act of violence when an individual pursues his ideas to such an extreme that he thinks only his ideas are correct and must therefore be enforced on everyone else.
MEQ: Is there a specifically Islamic quality to this extremism?
Kabbani: No, such extremism is found in every religion and ideology. In fact, in Islam it is specifically stated that “There is no compulsion in religion.”
Of course, the majority of Muslims are not extremists. Like any other group in America, Muslims as a whole are a peaceful people simply pursuing their lives and do not constitute a threat to anyone. But Islamic doctrine can be perverted by ideologues to justify harming others. The threat represented by those willing to use violence to pursue their goals—to terrorize people by throwing bombs and killing innocents—is a danger to all peace-loving people, Muslim and non-Muslim alike. Such acts, I should add, are expressly forbidden in Islam.
MEQ: What should Americans do to protect themselves from this threat?
Kabbani: The responsibility is on the American Muslim community to reject extremism and to condemn any act of violence. We must keep to a moderate line, as Prophet Muhammad said, “We are a moderate nation.”
Then Rep King might learn to instruct his staff on how to conduct research and he may want to think about stripping away his cultural biases when assessing remarks.
As to the second point, about Rep West: Rep King could invite him over for a drink and discuss his ‘lessons learned’. If that fails, well, 20 percent of any group will believe anything. Including Congress.
Guy Incognito
January 25th, 2011
2:56 pm
Sorry Scout, I seemed to have typed your thoughts
Misty Fyed
January 25th, 2011
2:56 pm
The person is smart but people are stupid. Whether or not 80% of mosques are radical isn’t really the issue and I doubt that number is based on any serious research. I mean what did they ask…Are you radical?
The problem is the most vile cowardly attacks in the world (today) consistently are committed by those claiming to be Muslim. Not Catholics, Baptists, Mormons, JWs, Buddhists, Hindu or whatever. It is difficult to convince the “people” how peace loving Islam is when all they have to do is turn the television on; regardless of how many non radical muslims there may be.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
2:57 pm
stands for decibels :
“Gosh, wherever could one go to find millions of anti-government extremists?”
What you mean is millions of anti-big government. A legitimate political battle.
Now, concerning your “anti-government extremists” in this country how many thousands and thousands of innocent people have they murdered? Any heads cut off? Kidnappings? Stoning of women lately? Cutting off of hands and feet for petty crimes ?
Scout
January 25th, 2011
2:57 pm
Misty Fyed :
Thank you.
stands for decibels
January 25th, 2011
2:57 pm
Still can’t fathom where one would go to find millions of extremists bent on bringing this Republic to its knees. think, think, think.
Jefferson
January 25th, 2011
2:58 pm
Sound like this chicken King should carry a gun with him everywhere as the big bad boogie islamist my jump up and get him.
TaxPayer
January 25th, 2011
2:58 pm
And Scout, you now want government to be “examining beliefs”, huh?
And it involves stirrups and… well, that’s our Scout. Always ready to get out in front and scope things out for us.
Christopher Logan
January 25th, 2011
2:58 pm
Enter your comments hereJay,
Here is a partial list of Mosques in America that are preaching for Sharia Law.
http://loganswarning.com/islamsharia-101sharia-mosques-in-america/
Now show me just one Mosque that is condemning Sharia. Do you know that Ellison has given speeches at Sharia conferences? Do you have any actual knowledge on the threat of Islam at all? Why do you stand up for a religion that condones rape and slavery?
Keep up the good fight!
January 25th, 2011
2:58 pm
Bosch — easier to edit. Of course it is amazing how many false quotes are attributed or truncated to make them appear to intend something they did not. Too bad that there are no real standards in blogs like courts. Blogs have all of the worse in breaches of real rules of evidence.
jm
January 25th, 2011
2:59 pm
Ok, bad idea for West to do the interview with Peritz. He should probably wack his staffers over the head a time or two. Second, West seemed to respond that one has to debate “these people” and defeat them intellectually. I’d say its a step up from what some of the nuttier folks have said.
I couldn’t watch the rest of the interview. The pandering made me to ill to watch the rest of the absurdities sure to follow.
If I had to assign “quack levels” to the two of them, Peritz gets an 8 or 9 (although I think some of his views might be common at AIPAC), and West only scores a 5 or 6.
@@
January 25th, 2011
2:59 pm
So it’s just King and Allen, jay?
Maybe you should talk to the F.B.I. ’cause they’re infiltrating mosques for SOME “unknown” reason. Unknown to you maybe, but not those with a higher security clearance. You’re the low man on the totem pole.
They’re using informants to infiltrate mosques throughout the U.S.
Who monitors or oversees the FBI?
The FBI’s activities are closely and regularly scrutinized by a variety of entities. Congress—through several oversight committees in the Senate and House—reviews the FBI’s budget appropriations, programs, and selected investigations. The results of FBI investigations are often reviewed by the judicial system during court proceedings. Within the U.S. Department of Justice, the FBI is responsible to the attorney general, and it reports its findings to U.S. Attorneys across the country. The FBI’s intelligence activities are overseen by the Director of National Intelligence.
Just following orders from the higher ups, they are.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
2:59 pm
“There are many moderate Muslims, but Islam is not moderate.”
Me
Scout
January 25th, 2011
2:59 pm
@@:
Thank you.
Jimmy62
January 25th, 2011
3:00 pm
Here’s the thing…. If he’s just making that up, then yeah, he’s got an irrational issue with Muslims. But what if he’s right? That’s the thing. You just assume he’s wrong and present no evidence to the contrary.
If 80% of US Mosques are led by Imams who espouse jihad (which, may I remind you, is a part of their religion), then that’s a problem. If you dispute what he calls a fact, then show us your evidence, don’t just say “He’s a bigot.”
And Keith Ellison is actually a pretty scummy guy, but that’s got nothing to do with his religion.
I’d also like to point out that Peter King has been in office since 2003, was not up for election in November, and there’s a decent chance the Tea Party woulda voted him out. No matter how much you like to repeat it, most folks who identify with the Tea Party are not bigots and do not like bigotry.
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
3:00 pm
The life cycle of an extremist…from birth to death:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wZPYhgZ4RY
kayaker 71
January 25th, 2011
3:00 pm
Granny,
Is Alan West another Uncle Tom for his views? “A certifiable loon”, as Mick states? This man retired as a LTC, Infantry and served in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was airborne qualified and a commander of troops. He is the 1st conservative black congressman to serve since JC Watts, probably another Uncle Tom, in your opinion. For Christ’s sake, he even joined the Congressional Black Caucus with a little arm twisting and cajoling.
He might be remembered for having the balls to save American lives while interrogating an Iraqi when he encouraged the prisoner to talk by firing a pistol near the prisoner’s head, thereby avoiding an ambush planned for the unit in question. For that, he was given the thanks of his country and forced to retire from the Army. His men would have jumped off a bridge for him. He is a decorated, tell it like it is, hardcore infantry officer who is the first black person to win his Congressional district since 1876, and by a wide margin, I might add. All of you brothers and sisters cheered when Bozo took the Presidency but this guy is just not black enough for you and never will be.
stands for decibels
January 25th, 2011
3:00 pm
Then Rep King might learn to instruct his staff on how to conduct research and he may want to think about stripping away his cultural biases when assessing remarks.
heh. I’m trying to picture that Lawn Guyland wad-o-jerk setting about “stripping away cultural biases…”
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
3:01 pm
Soooo.. TWO congressmen speak out about the possibility of a problem with Muslims and that is a strong “anti-Muslim bigotry” movement with our legislators in Washington? Think what it would be if there were THREE who spoke out about a possible danger? Wow!
Oh, oh, Jay, the jaunty juggler of facts when he can jiggle political parties. Two Republican congressmen who would shake hands with anybody in congress at any time but they are BIGOTS! BooHoo Bigots ’cause they keep an eye on American security. Those naughty boys!!! They act like they have not forgotten 9/11 !! How awful!!!! Don’t they know they are suppsoed to forget??
Jay
January 25th, 2011
3:01 pm
Scout writes:
“If those “beliefs” include terroristic acts, support, guidance and funding ……………… ABSOLUTELY !”
And I absolutely agree. But that little two-letter word, “if”, does an awful lot of work in that sentence. If King has evidence that 80 percent or 8 percent or .08 percent of American mosques are preaching radical jihadist Islam, he ought to turn that evidence over to authorities, who will act.
But without such evidence — and King has none — a responsible person wouldn’t spout such nonsense likely to turn innocent people in their houses of worship into targets of hate and violence.
ByteMe
January 25th, 2011
3:02 pm
Scout: Your paranoia is astounding as well. So where is the “Islamic network with millions of followers” in this country? How big is the Christian kiddie-diddlers network? You going after them with the same gusto or do they look too much like you?
Tariq
January 25th, 2011
3:03 pm
As a Muslim, I feel that at least 80% of the mosques in this country are apolitical and shun any type of political involvement. In fact that was part of the problem, Muslims are now waking up to the fact that we have to get involved politically in our towns and cities, no matter how dirty one’s hands get when playing the game of politics- at the very least to save us from the bigotry and vile mis-information campaign going around.
Rep. King’s statement is laughable at best, never have I heard any Imam espouse these beliefs at any khutba (Friday sermon) that I’ve been to. Sure, they’re may be some nuts out there, but those are few and far between.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:03 pm
Jay:
You must be kidding.
The FBI is up to it’s neck in this matter including infiltrating mosques all over this country.
How naive can you be …………………
And yes, I still have contacts in that organization that you don’t have or you would be telling the truth.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:03 pm
Jay:
What if the figure is 80% or 50% or 30 % (all huge numbers).
What is your course of action ?
getalife
January 25th, 2011
3:04 pm
Perhaps they should encourage the people protesting for freedom in Tunisia and Egypt instead.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:04 pm
Tarig:
Thank you “stands for decibels”.
@@
January 25th, 2011
3:04 pm
Oh, and jay? I’ve always admired Lanny Davis as a Democrat I could admire. He wrote a fond farewell to Sen. Lieberman.
Take a good look at how a gentlemen behaves.
You could learn a thing or two from Lanny although I doubt you’re interested.
@@
January 25th, 2011
3:05 pm
Oops! Too many “admires” in there, but when I admire, I admire.
Adam
January 25th, 2011
3:05 pm
I have yet to see a conservative commenter respond AT ALL to my 2:48p, much less reasonably.
This says a lot doncha think?
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:05 pm
getalife:
No, they want to install Islamic states.
In addition, Islam uses democracy to further its goals of domination.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
3:06 pm
Of course, the majority of Muslims are not extremists. Like any other group in America, Muslims as a whole are a peaceful people simply pursuing their lives and do not constitute a threat to anyone. But Islamic doctrine can be perverted by ideologues to justify harming others. The threat represented by those willing to use violence to pursue their goals—to terrorize people by throwing bombs and killing innocents—is a danger to all peace-loving people, Muslim and non-Muslim alike. Such acts, I should add, are expressly forbidden in Islam.
Paul
I highlighted that for you. People like Rep. King are more of the problem than they are the solution. I can’t go into detail here, because this is not the proper venue. This country really needs to educate itself on the true beliefs of Islam. Not the soft, cuddly version, not the radicalized version, but the true un-abridged version. Islam is as varied in it’s beliefs as Christianity is. There are some who eat, sleep, and breath each and every written word of the Holy Book as if it is life itself, while there are others who live the principles but not down to the very last letter.
If people would just step back from the Islam bashing for a while and open their eyes, the true nature of the problem can be seen. Once the true nature is known, then the true solution will be easy to find.
Mick
January 25th, 2011
3:06 pm
guy
All I was stating is that mcvey was catholic…but by the same token do you believe every muslim cleric is ordering bombings? Tis a slippery slope and trust me, I have no great love for radical islam or
radical __________(fill in blank).
stands for decibels
January 25th, 2011
3:06 pm
I’ve always admired Lanny Davis as a Democrat
oh, yeah, he’s such a mensch, that Lanny.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:08 pm
Adam:
Go back and read the 10th Amendment.
And no, I do not trust Obama.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
3:09 pm
(which, may I remind you, is a part of their religion)
Do you even know what jihad is or how many different versions of jihad there are?
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
3:09 pm
Adam,
“This says a lot doncha think?”
I suppose it’s kind of the same way election results mean nothing when Democrats wins, but if Republicans win it is a mandate from the people.
Northern Songs LTD
January 25th, 2011
3:09 pm
See, Scout, and his kind, want the big bad government out of their lives, but not the lives of anybody they disagree with.
Keep up the good fight!
January 25th, 2011
3:09 pm
And yes, I still have contacts in that organization that you don’t have or you would be telling the truth
Why that there is real proof? Law abiding FBI agents sharing information with someone who is not in the organization about infitrations, etc. The conspiracy goes all the way up I tell you. I want to know who is giving Scout this info and why? This is plain unamerican. Scout should be investigated. If he has confidential information, then really made it wise to blab that info on a blog like this for all to see.
Either Scout is lying or he is endangering law enforcement.
JohnnyReb
January 25th, 2011
3:09 pm
I received this from a friend. It has some history on Col. West, plus he nails it in the video. And, I’m glad some of you overly bleeding hearts are not in charge, else we might end up being house boys.
Col West, a Republican is from Southern Florida, a bastion of the Democratic Party. He won in a walk. This new Congressman was an extremely popular commander in Iraq. He was forced to retire because during an intense combat action a few of his men were captured. At the same time his men were captured, an Iraqis was captured by his team. Knowing that time was crucial and his interrogators were not getting anywhere with the prisoner, COL West took matters into his own hands. He burst into the room and demanded through an interpreter that the prisoner tell him where his men were being taken. The prisoner refused so COL West took out his pistol and placed it into the prisoner’s crotch and fired. Then the COL told the prisoner that the next shot would not miss. The prisoner showed where the captured American service members had been taken. The soldiers were rescued. Someone filed a report on incorrect handling of prisoners. COL West was forced to retire.
During the Florida election Col West was part of a panel discussing how to handle or how to relate to Muslims. His answer is at the link below. Here is a new congressman from Florida explaining very definitively in just over a minute the truth about Islam.
http://secure.afa.net/afa/activism/takeaction.asp?id=384
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:09 pm
None of you libs have described the worldwide, clergy led, Christian terrorist network involving millions of followers and responsible for thousands and thousands of murders and carnage.
I’m waiting.
getalife
January 25th, 2011
3:10 pm
Scout,
I thought you cons are against dictators?
Adam
January 25th, 2011
3:10 pm
Scout: Try again. It’d be nice if you actually addressed the point I was trying to make instead of making points to only a small segment of it.
jewcowboy: That is true!
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
3:11 pm
“See, Scout, and his kind, want the big bad government out of their lives, but not the lives of anybody they disagree with.”
Bingo!
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:11 pm
Keep up the good fight!:
You obviously don’t know the difference between classified and unclassified information.
Check it out. Much of it has been released to the press and public by the FBI.
Do your own research.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:12 pm
jewcowboy:
Your putting words in my mouth. Not nice.
Read the 10th Amendment.
Jay
January 25th, 2011
3:12 pm
It wasn’t that long ago that we had the Irish Republican Army, Scout. And in Bosnia, we had the Christians committing mass murder of thousands of Bosnian Muslims. And in India, the anti-Muslim Hindu riots.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:13 pm
Adam:
You answer this one and we’ll see:
None of you libs have described the worldwide, clergy led, Christian terrorist network involving millions of followers and responsible for thousands and thousands of murders and carnage.
I’m waiting.
@@
January 25th, 2011
3:13 pm
stands:
Don’t know anything about the Gbagbo fella, but I do know leftists were in favor of leaving Saddam Hussein to oppress HIS people, so-o-o-oooo….
don’t know how you can criticize Lanny.
I was referring to Lanny’s political approach.
Keep up the good fight!
January 25th, 2011
3:14 pm
If it is unclassified, Scouty, and can be looked up then you claim to have information that others dont because of “contacts” is nonsensical. You have no idea whether or not anyone has looked up that info but you pretend to have special knowledge. Sorry, you fail.
Adam
January 25th, 2011
3:14 pm
Also Scout, you can’t describe Al Qiada or Muslims that way. Muslims are clergy led and have millions of followers but are not responsible for thousands of murders and carnage in modern times (though if you want to go back to the middle ages, I can show you Christians doing far worse). Al Qiada is not clergy led and does not have millions of followers, but is responsible for murders and carnage.
I can only come to the conclusion that you are incorrectly equating the two. Good job not being prejudiced! *wink* Doncha know!
TaxPayer
January 25th, 2011
3:14 pm
Isn’t that Sharia Law just an offshoot of Southern Baptist Law.
Guy Incognito
January 25th, 2011
3:14 pm
Come-on Scout, you may as well ask them to find a “Home Security System” commercial that shows a minority breaking into a home
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
3:15 pm
Now Jay says that congressman King has NO evidence to support his statements. How does Jay know that? Does Bookman have access to security information sent to Congress? NO. Or the House Homeland Security Committee ? NO.
He is simply drumming his old dance against Republicans. And all his little buddies dance with him. Here’s the bait so JUMP he says.and they do.
Normal
January 25th, 2011
3:15 pm
There he is, in a closed dark room, lit only by the monitors glow. He types furiously hoping to get his message out before they find him. He must hurry. Suddenly he hears the a squeak, turns to see the door knob slowly turning. He reaches for his pistol and takes aim as the the door opens. He sees a turban. In a panic, he fires…only to find his wife with a towel wrapped around her head after a shower.
Adam
January 25th, 2011
3:15 pm
Now it’s your turn to answer mine Scout. I will respond to your response to my last post only AFTER you have done so.
I’m waiting.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:17 pm
“It is delusional to regard as ‘moderate’ people whose designs are radical. If the threat to freedom is geometrically broader that the threat of mass-murder attacks, it is national suicide for a free, self-determining people to pretend that our problems are limited to Muslim terrorists.”
“For Islamists, democracy is a tool for acquiring power, not a culture of governance.”
“The central imperative of Islam is the propagation of its doctine and law.”
idaslaptor
January 25th, 2011
3:17 pm
Good!
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
3:17 pm
Scout,
“Your putting words in my mouth. Not nice”
You do a fine job of putting your own foot…er, words in your mouth.
“Read the 10th Amendment.”
I have thank you very much.
Peadawg
January 25th, 2011
3:18 pm
bigotry – another word for i don’t agree with you.
Adam
January 25th, 2011
3:18 pm
Scout your quotes seem to be by non Muslims. What do they know about Islam?
Paul
January 25th, 2011
3:20 pm
SoCom
Well, it’s nice to know at least one person read the link on Kabbani’s expanded remarks. How he stated ‘extremism’ is not the same as ‘terrorist’ or ‘violent’ and how he defined ‘extremism’ as deviating from the middle way, from moderation, as rejecting others, as not assimilating into America.
But, I guess if a lot of bloggers actually read what he said and thought about it, they’d be less inclined to make a great leap of illogic and display ignorance.
Or not.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:20 pm
Jay:
We’re talking about this country !
Was the Irish Republican Army a religion? Where were their churches? I must have missed that.
Joe the paleo-neo-Plutocrat
January 25th, 2011
3:21 pm
somebody needs to tell Batman; oh wait, that was ADAM West. somebody needs to tell the FNG Rep from FL the oath he took upon being sworn in as a member of Congress requires him to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…” it doesn’t say anything about “stand(ing) in the principles of the people that elected me and sent me to Washington…” wanna know why? ’cause what if “the people that sent me to Washington…” are “domestic enemies” of the United States? see, the Constitution allows for Muslims to be elected, just as it allows ex-military xenophobes to be elected. but here’s my rhetorical chin rubber, could you imagine if the Muslim rep from Minnesota played THAT card? “…well, since my district is primarily Muslim, screw the Constitution, I’m gonna stand on the principles of Islam…” that’s all for now, folks…
Doggone/GA
January 25th, 2011
3:21 pm
“What do they know about Islam?”
Same as Scout: be afraid, be very afraid!
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
3:21 pm
Y’all have fun with this one. So far off base, there’s no need to even try to correct any of it.
Later
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:21 pm
Adam:
More than you know.
At least he prosecuted them.
You would probably have let them go under the guise of religious persecution.
Lord help us.
kayaker 71
January 25th, 2011
3:22 pm
Alan,
I’ll take on your 2:48. No we don’t trust this clown of a president and most everyone who agrees with him. I would not trust you if you were an elected official and supporting Bozo’s policies. He has given us no reason to trust him. He has lied, cajoled, berated and demonized the opposition at every turn, only to get soundly thumped in the last election. And he still doesn’t get it, as do most Democrats. We don’t like whats going, Adam, we don’t like it at all. And trust….. you can forget that, my friend.
USMC dawg
January 25th, 2011
3:22 pm
More Chicagoland Obama Style Politics:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/25/breaking-illinois-supreme-court-to-take-up-rahm-appeal/?hpt=T1&iref=BN1
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
3:22 pm
Scout,
Do you believe there is sufficient evidence against Muslims in this country to take action?
If so, what action do you think is needed?
Internment camps?
Raid Mosques?
Make the practice of Islam illegal?
Jimmy62
January 25th, 2011
3:22 pm
Adam: No one responded to your comment at 2:48 because it was an inane interpretation of conservative beliefs that show you don’t know a damn thing about how the other side thinks.
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
3:24 pm
All you folks jumping on Scout would do better to jump on Jay Bookman. He’s the one who can jump to a conclusion over two people and make a serious judgment without any particular facts to prove his point.
We do know that Scout worked in a government protection agency for many years. (He is truthful.) How long has Bookman worked in one? I’m talking about protection, not rabble rousing.
@@
January 25th, 2011
3:24 pm
Claims of bigotry. A liberal “journalist’s” only line of defense. His last hurrah. HIS allah akbar.
schnirt
I’m out! jay’s become too predictable.
jm
January 25th, 2011
3:24 pm
“I will respond to your response to my last post only AFTER you have done so.”
Scout. Don’t blink.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
3:24 pm
Time to go see my grandchildren.
Try to be nice to each other.
I’ll leave you liberal ostriches with this:
Multiple Choice Quiz:
Which of the following “religious” entities in the United States requires untold millions in taxpayer money and immense NSA, Military Intelligence, CIA, FBI (to name a few) assets to conduct investigations and physical surveillances of places of worship, community service establishments, places of education, etc. via undercover FBI agents, paid informants and sophisticated electronic means:
a) Roman Catholic Church
b) Methodist Church
c) Church of Latter Day Saints (Mormons)
d) Church of God
e) Southern Baptist Church
f) Judaism (all forms)
g) Lutheran Church
h) Presbyterian Church
i) Episcopal Church
j) Mennonnite Church
k) Church of the Brethren
l) Nazarene Church
m) 7th Day Adventist Church
n) Quakers
o) Church of Christ
p) Islam
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
3:24 pm
Paul
Stuff like that is kinda like required reading for the job. I don’t know nearly as much as some of the other guys I work with, but I do know enough to say that much of what’s said here on this blog is like trying to apply wings to the Titanic to keep it from sinking. People who are unaware of what they are doing are actually giving extremists the fuel they need to stoke their fires. All one has to remember is that we are a nation of laws, and the highest law of the land is the US Constitution.
gone now….
Adam
January 25th, 2011
3:25 pm
kayaker: What about the part about trusting the guy who inspired this blog post in the first place? You know, that you trust him implicitly to tell us how much of a domestic terrorist threat we have because he’s in the government and obviously has more information than we do? Can you respond to that?
I already know you don’t trust government, and particularly you don’t trust the “Kenyan Marxist Usurper.” I don’t care about that. Tell me why your tune changes when we talk about someone ELSE in government.
jconservative
January 25th, 2011
3:25 pm
I liked one part of Allen West’s remarks – “…you got to be able to defeat them intellectually and in debate and discourse.”
This indicates he is not into third grade name calling, like the guy who asked the question, but has the idea that one can debate ues and maintain civility.
The interviewer said: “…Because it’s not really easy to be that … polite, often, with individuals one totally disagrees with…”
The interviewer is saying that he lacks the intellectual ability to debate issues without third grade name calling.
Fascinating. The interviewer made a fool of himself and does not have a clue…………..
Paul
January 25th, 2011
3:25 pm
JohnnyReb
That account, complete with the crotch shot and prisoners rescued, appears to be….. embellished.
http://www.webcitation.org/5uL7JlWF8
kayaker 71
January 25th, 2011
3:25 pm
Joe,
First time in a long time that I have read about an FNG. It’s been a long time.
Jimmy62
January 25th, 2011
3:26 pm
Jay: The IRA was killing other Christians, but even so, I’ll give it to you. And the Bosnians killed Muslims, yes. And Bill Clinton let them do it when he could have stopped it. But I’ll give you that one, too.
Thing is, none of those are happening anymore, and when they were, plenty of people were upset about it.
TaxPayer
January 25th, 2011
3:26 pm
If our compassionate conservative bloggers do not feel safe yet, then perhaps they should be pushing for fifty-round clips for their handguns. And just think of the bulge their concealed weapons will cause. The Republican men will swoon every time they see one of their heavily-armed womenfolk walk by.
jconservative
January 25th, 2011
3:26 pm
That is “debate issues”. Sorry re the typo.
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
3:26 pm
‘Time to go see my grandchildren.’
Hope none of them are Muslim…
jm
January 25th, 2011
3:26 pm
Adam 3:18 – “Scout your quotes seem to be by non Muslims. What do they know about Islam?” Afraid that’s not a very persuasive argument.
What does Obama know about being a Georgian? He’s never lived here. So he shouldn’t have any insight into, or control over, how we should live our lives….. beautiful logic.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
3:26 pm
Dusty
Scout worked for the Secret Service. Check the mission of the SS versus the FBI, CIA, NSA, CBP, and other agencies. Scout probably knows people and knows a few things, but definitely not everything. If there was someone in the US that knew everything, we wouldn’t have a problem at all with extremists or extremism.
Adam
January 25th, 2011
3:27 pm
Jimmy62 @ 3:22p If more of what your side thinks made more sense and wasn’t full of contradictions then maybe I would understand it better. I do welcome you to explain to me how you can distrust all government EXCEPT the guy who tells you 80 percent of mosques have jihadists, because, you know, his information gleaned from the government is clearly superior to the information we have.
Normal
January 25th, 2011
3:27 pm
He forgot one:
Multiple Choice Quiz:
Which of the following “religious” entities in the United States requires untold millions in taxpayer money and immense NSA, Military Intelligence, CIA, FBI (to name a few) assets to conduct investigations and physical surveillances of places of worship, community service establishments, places of education, etc. via undercover FBI agents, paid informants and sophisticated electronic means:
a) Roman Catholic Church
b) Methodist Church
c) Church of Latter Day Saints (Mormons)
d) Church of God
e) Southern Baptist Church
f) Judaism (all forms)
g) Lutheran Church
h) Presbyterian Church
i) Episcopal Church
j) Mennonnite Church
k) Church of the Brethren
l) Nazarene Church
m) 7th Day Adventist Church
n) Quakers
o) Church of Christ
p) Islam
q) All of the above
Joe the paleo-neo-Plutocrat
January 25th, 2011
3:28 pm
Scout, enough with the drama. MILLIONS? try thousands. there are hundreds of millions of Muslims, but al Qeada is lucky if it claims 10,000 members. OH, and did you forget who initially “designed” trained and funded al Qaeda. of course back then (1980’s) they were our pals and we didn’t care about religion because they were the Mujhadeen (freedom fighters) against the Soviets in Afghanistan.
Adam
January 25th, 2011
3:29 pm
jm: I know it’s not a persuasive argument. I was throwing it out there to see what kind of response Scout would give. I knew it wouldn’t be something as reasonable as pointing out the logical fallacy. Instead it was just silence.
kayaker 71
January 25th, 2011
3:29 pm
Normal,
Well said.
Tommy Maddox
January 25th, 2011
3:30 pm
“….that this is a propaganda war – this is an information war…”
Man is he right.
Paul
January 25th, 2011
3:31 pm
Adam
“I do welcome you to explain to me how you can distrust all government ”
Having been here a while, I’ll observe I don’t believe even some of our most conservative regulars have spoken in the absolutes that form the basis for your question(s).
Tommy Maddox
January 25th, 2011
3:31 pm
Sorry Jay – this fellow knows his stuff.
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
3:33 pm
Off topic and stop the presses:
http://www.accessatlanta.com/celebrities-tv/medical-marijuana-users-getting-813717.html?cxntlid=thbz_hm
Adam
January 25th, 2011
3:33 pm
Paul: Now it begins to make sense. They only distrust government when there are Democrats or liberals there. So if it was all conservative and there were no Kenyans or Muslims, would that be satisfactory?
Big D
January 25th, 2011
3:35 pm
The vast majority of Americans have finally found a place where our voices are heard, we tore you a new one and what is your answer …FAIRNESS DOCTRINE…and control of the internet. You cannot match wits with us so you are not going to be happy unless you dominate the forum. I have a question for all you liberal intellectuals….Guns have not changed much in 100 years and it is much harder to get guns now than it has been in the past 50 years. If guns are not anymore dangerous than they were 100 years ago and harder to get …why is there more violence here now. Sure I know the answer….do you.
Joe the paleo-neo-Plutocrat
January 25th, 2011
3:36 pm
kayaker71, I have no firsthand experience with the acronym, but I thought it appropriate for Rep West, given his military background, and if I am not mistaken, FNG is not a term of endearment – more like, you gotta earn the right to be called by name, until you do, you’re just a FNG. you’d think an experienced soldier would know when he walks into an ambush.
Jimmy62
January 25th, 2011
3:37 pm
Adam: I don’t distrust all government. When government sticks to what the Constitution says it should do, government tends to do a decent job. It’s only when a government official starts talking about how much better off we would all be if he could just make everyone buy certain things, eat certain ways, and espouse certain ideas that I find I don’t trust them.
Anyone who completely trusts their government and refuses to question authority is a fool. Whereas you seem to have a problem with Conservatives for not trusting everything government says. I’m not here to call people names, so I will let you connect the dots.
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
3:37 pm
‘FAIRNESS DOCTRINE…and control of the internet.’
Oh. My. God.
The turdblossom parade never ends…
HDB
January 25th, 2011
3:37 pm
stands for decibels
January 25th, 2011
2:53 pm
“Gosh, wherever could one go to find millions of anti-government extremists?”
Try Idaho…and Eastern Washington state…by Spokane!!
Big D
January 25th, 2011
3:37 pm
Do you think Putin may have had enough of the Islamic terrorists in Russia ???
Paul
January 25th, 2011
3:39 pm
Adam
Seriously, what I’ve gleaned is many conservatives think private sector generally does things better than government; that government will consume whatever resources are made available and will still want more; that government is inefficient, altho they’ll grudgingly concede it is at times effective; they oftentimes adhere to federalism; they see bureaucracies, at times, pursuing their own agendas and more interested in perpetuating their power than in serving the publlic.
And yeah, they often direct that ire towards liberals or Democrats. But many seem to have the same view of the extra-Congressional bureaucracy regardless of the political affiliation of the current administration of of the majority party in the House or Senate.
They can go overboard with the mantras (review Jay’s column on ‘gov’t never created a job) but that seems to be an area where the farfarRight is in sync with the lalalandLeft.
Jimmy62
January 25th, 2011
3:39 pm
Adam: Once again you rise to the occasion, demonstrating for all your lack of, well, knowledge. Plenty of conservatives railed against Bush for things like Medicare Part D, and TARP I.
But I guess it would be hard to maintain your blinders if you actually bothered to remember anything that happened more than 5 minutes ago.
Adam
January 25th, 2011
3:40 pm
Jimmy62: I have a problem with conservative double speak, and the ridiculous argument that we should trust this guy because he has more information than we do. It’s ridiculous for MANY reasons.
Big D
January 25th, 2011
3:40 pm
LHU, we didn’t bring it up when liberals dominated the air waves…it’s you whinee babies who keep throwing it out there and hoping it will stick somewhere.
Paul
January 25th, 2011
3:41 pm
Hey Bosch!
I think you just made getalife’s day -
LHU
I think Big D was trying to yank some chains -
At least… I hope that’s what it was….
kayaker 71
January 25th, 2011
3:42 pm
Joe,
My apologies for misinterpreting your meaning. In the context where I used the term, it was a term of endearment for a new guy that had just reported into a military unit serving in VN. It depicted a really fresh,inexperienced person who someone would have to look after for awhile until he got acclimated. It had just been a very long time since I had heard it mentioned.
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
3:42 pm
Bosch @ 3.33,
I wonder what would happen if you mixed one of those with a Redbull? And what would it be called?
Big D
January 25th, 2011
3:43 pm
Paul…BINGO.
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
3:43 pm
‘it’s you whinee babies who keep throwing it out there and hoping it will stick somewhere.’
What is the name/number of the Legislation, who is sponsoring it, who has held any hearings? etc…
Why dont’cha gather those little bits of information and get back to me.
Thanks in advance…
jm
January 25th, 2011
3:43 pm
Sidebar. It’s raining today. You think they’ll shut the city down tomorrow? Has anyone alerted the state DOT?
Given that…. Atlantans seem to have difficulty driving in the rain.
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
3:44 pm
‘At least… I hope that’s what it was…’
It appears Big D was serious…
Adam
January 25th, 2011
3:45 pm
Johnny62: You can pull a couple of things out of the sky that I failed to mention, but I would have to write my own article that’s at least 4 times as long as Jay’s longest post in order to put enough background in for you to get that I actually DID know that conservatives were against those things. I’m talking about right here, right now. The current debate, which is we need to make the government smaller coming from the very people who seek to make it larger for their purposes and smaller for any purposes they don’t support (increase military, Patriot Act, outlaw abortions, decrease taxes, decrease anything that could be called “entitlement”).
If you’re going to invoke the past, you have to recognize how horrible of a job conservatives have done in the past if indeed they were trying to make government smaller.
But I guess it would be hard to maintain your blinders if you actually bothered to remember anything that happened more than 5 minutes ago.
Wait, what were we talking about again?
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
3:45 pm
“FAIRNESS DOCTRINE…and control of the internet. You cannot match wits with us so you are not going to be happy unless you dominate the forum.”
With one more brain, someone who makes comments such as this might constitute a half-wit.
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
3:46 pm
Hey Paul!
I’ve been working on a something today and have had complete writer’s block. I HATE that. Hell, forget getalife, I just made MY day. (j/k getalife)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Okay wingnuts, I’m waiting on the answer to the poster who asked what we were to do about Isam, ban it? Make it illegal? Concentration camps?
What?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LHU,
You forgot the word “freaking”
Monterey
January 25th, 2011
3:46 pm
Jay, Neville Chamberlain would be proud of you. You’re an appeaser to the bitter end. You and your PC brethren just provide cover for the Muslims when you attack the people who oppose their evil as “bigots”. Many of those imams that you’re kissing up to would lop off your infidel head in a second if they could.
Maybe you were hibernating on 9/11/2001.
Big D
January 25th, 2011
3:46 pm
My problem with liberals are they can never answer a question directly they dodge, bob, weave, throw down road blocks , insult everything about you well before an intelligent answer.
Paul
January 25th, 2011
3:47 pm
jewcowboy
If you asked my son when he was 10 what the Fairness Doctrine is, he’d have said “Life isn’t fair. Deal with it.”
Tommy Maddox
January 25th, 2011
3:47 pm
Jay: Rep. West is simply stating that Islam is the antithesis of the basis upon which the US was founded and that would be correct. If you prefer a stretch, however, there is however, that blurb in the Declaration of Independence relating to the Indians out West…
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
3:47 pm
jewcowboy,
“I wonder what would happen if you mixed one of those with a Redbull?”
Probably nothing — they’d cancel each other out!
Big D
January 25th, 2011
3:48 pm
LHU…I own your goat.
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
3:48 pm
“Clay Butler says he plans to supply medical marijuana dispensaries with his soda pot, which contains the psychoactive marijuana ingredient THC.”
Now…this has be intrigued. I am not quite that up on the medical benefits of marijuana, but it would seem to me the health benefits being touted are not derived from the psychoactive effects.
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
3:48 pm
‘My problem with liberals are they can never answer a question directly they dodge, bob, weave, throw down road blocks , insult everything about you well before an intelligent answer.’
Methinks an intelligent answer would be a waste of time…
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
3:48 pm
Road Scholar
@ 2:24
“Del: Is that the same distrust shown to jews and catholics in the south in the past? How about Italians,Hispanics, etc.? Allright conserves, I know I’ll hear otherwise.”
The sixth post and already time for a history lesson. This is not the same distrust show in the South in the past. Number one, the South has a record of Jewish and Catholic firsts in American politics which would be astounding to those who like Road Scholar think that South equates such bigotry. The South also led the nation in electing Hispanics and Italian-Americans. That can be verified very easily from a simple search.
Anti-Semitism from the congressional body, which this anti-Muslim rhetoric smacks of, was not only prevalent in speeches of the 1860 period, but were totally absent from the Southern body. See Senator Wilson, Senator (later vice-president) Andrew Johnson for some of the more scurrilous utterances by elected officials. The federal congress refused to commission rabbis as chaplains and as late as the 1850s was refusing to commission Catholic priests, a practice brought to an end under pressure from the Texans and Louisianans. In the first election of the nation as a whole in which a Catholic ran for president, Al Smith, the only states to cast their electoral votes for him were from the South.
That’s history.
Rather than gratuitously smear the South out of prejudicial bigotry, it might better be held up as a positive model, And it is just this type of ignorance that permits such as these two Congressmen to come out of the woodwork spouting their venom.
Adam
January 25th, 2011
3:49 pm
Big D: Do you think Putin may have had enough of the Islamic terrorists in Russia ???
You mean that question? How’s this direct answer for you:
Yes.
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
3:49 pm
Big D,
We do answer your questions, y’all are just too stupid to realize it.
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
3:49 pm
‘LHU…I own your goat’
He’s a virgin…please be gentle…
Joe the paleo-neo-Plutocrat
January 25th, 2011
3:49 pm
Normal, n – Quakers? just kidding, unless, of course you’re a native American, pre-1791. just kidding, ogf course, BUT you’re really showing your arse (exposed while you hide under the bed) with the use of the word “requires”. requires? according to whom? the DHS threat level color bar? but speaking of the George Bush monstrosity known as the Department of Homeland Security; you forgot to include the fundamentalist Christian Hectare sect, which seems to garner a fair amount of attention these days. OH, and Eric Rudolph, he sure turned the FBI, ATF and local law enforcement on their collective ear. And didn’t that other Christian soldier Tim McVeigh allude to some “Muslim terrorist” assistance or complcity (via his legal team) during his trial? the tail is wagging the dog, here. the DHS and the M-I complex has to have a boogeyman, now that the Rooskies are no longer Communists, and I ain’t saying bin Laden and his minions aren’t worthy of attention, it’s just the 100 million OTHER Muslims we’re (they’re) wasting their time “monitoring and observing” on our dime.
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
3:50 pm
Paul,
“If you asked my son when he was 10 what the Fairness Doctrine is, he’d have said “Life isn’t fair. Deal with it.””
Isn’t that true!
USMC dawg
January 25th, 2011
3:50 pm
Make Mine Freedom:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6H63CD7uQA
jm
January 25th, 2011
3:50 pm
I wonder if Obama will us the SOTU to tell the judges that Rahm qualifies. And to thank the Eagles for taking Vick under their wing. And to thank the Boston Cop and Gates for getting together.
Maybe he’ll opine on snowmaggedon in Atlanta, or the volcano under Yellowstone. Maybe he’ll say that 5 of the 9 supreme court justices don’t know their legal precedents very well. Inquiring minds want to know. What stupid things might Obama say tonight? Or will he stick to empty promises?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1350123/Worlds-largest-volcano-Yellowstone-National-Park-wipe-thirds-US.html#ixzz1C3ZLrxbc
retired early
January 25th, 2011
3:51 pm
Wasn’t this country founded to escape ‘religious prosecution’ by England. Was England not ‘Christian’…isn’t the goal of The King James version of Christianity to ‘convert’ all of mankind to ‘believers’…did early Christian Kings fund massive crusades…invading whole countries of ‘heathens’…slaughtering every person in their way…Did English Protestant Kings burn Catholics at the stake…and Catholic kings do likewise to their Protestant citizens.
The similarities between Islam and Christianity are compelling…think it might be because both come from ancient origins… Maybe they are both grossly outdated for modern thinkers and modern science.
Both have caused much bloodshed from their overzealous ‘true believers’…so which one is worse…historically…
Paul
January 25th, 2011
3:51 pm
Big D
“My problem with liberals are they can never answer a question directly”
Some do
http://tinyurl.com/5rmoqpf
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
3:52 pm
Big D,
You got that info on the Fairness Doctrine yet?
Should be simple, what’s the holdup?
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
3:53 pm
Bosch,
“Probably nothing — they’d cancel each other out!”
How about a shot of Jack dropped into a glass of Canna Cola…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aowSGxim_O8
jm
January 25th, 2011
3:54 pm
Think Obama will declare that Gore did create the internet tonight?
But now he needs the off switch…. has he asked Gore for permission?
Paul
January 25th, 2011
3:55 pm
retired early
“The similarities between Islam and Christianity are compelling”
Seems you’re equating the political entity of Christendom, not Christianity, of a thousand years ago with modern Islamic radicals.
“Maybe they are both grossly outdated for modern thinkers and modern science.”
Not if they know what and how they’re assessing -
Big D
January 25th, 2011
3:56 pm
Bosch…that was just sad.
LHU….D Rep. Jim Clybern
D Rep. Bob Brady
D Rep. Anna Eshoo
Paul…Most don’t/can’t.
jm
January 25th, 2011
3:56 pm
I wonder if Obama will opine on the APS or Dekalb school board issues tonight…. or maybe the dysfunctional Gwinnett County Commission. Or Clayton county which is FUBAR in every facet.
Maybe he’ll talk about the Beltline. Or he’ll take issue with Jay’s criticism of his administration…. wait.
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
3:56 pm
jm,
“Given that…. Atlantans seem to have difficulty driving in the rain.”
My you give them credit…to me it seems most Atlantans have difficulty driving…period.
Joe the paleo-neo-Plutocrat
January 25th, 2011
3:56 pm
kayaker71, as I said, my familiarity is via written accounts, and a few “war stories” from vets. but it was my understanding, a “fresh/inexperienced” solider in country for the first time was a “cherry”. but I do agree, West’s inability to respond in a manner becoming of a memeber of Congress, could be dismissed as “inexperience”.
Paul
January 25th, 2011
3:58 pm
Big D
I personally think Republicans were better off when they had more mods and libs. And Dems were better off when thy had more Blue Dogs.
And the country was better off, too -
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
3:58 pm
SoCo,
I don’t think Scout knows “everything”. But he surely knows more than Bookman who is ready to judge at a moments notice on the basis of statements from TWO congressmen.
Normal,
We are all aware that you feel no need for religion. but you seem to need to incriminate those who have it. and usually without any evidence whatsoever.
If the FBI, etc. are investigating that list of religious groups that you mentioned, they are wasting their time.
Maybe they would like to investigate what Lutherans sent to Haiti last year. Lutheran World Relief raised more than $7 million for a long term response. From their central warehouse to which all Lutheran churches send items, here’s the list of supplies from the first year: 25,545 quilts (homemade), 77,585 health kits, 2500 layettes, 35,700 school kits, 39 large tents, 17,500 tarps and $1.1 million to local partners to provide food, water, sanitation services and shelter.
Now that is what just one Christian denomination has done. I am sure other groups can equal that. That is what is being done now. not some historical thing of long ago. My point? Quit knocking a good thing just because you don’t have it. That would be nice!
chuck
January 25th, 2011
3:59 pm
Wouldn’t the CHAIR of the homeland security committee have access to the data concerning the mosques? I would think that an intrepid reporter like the Great Jay Bookman could pick up a PHONE and call his office and ask where the data came from? Please enlighten us.
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
3:59 pm
‘LHU….D Rep. Jim Clybern
D Rep. Bob Brady
D Rep. Anna Eshoo’
What is the wild world of sports is this? 3 Dem Lawmakers…
Are you inferring that these three dems are sponsors of the Fairness Doctrine?
What is the name/number of the legislation? How many hearings have been held?
Simple questions…
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
3:59 pm
First S. King of Iowa misusing the word mendacity. (But in an a ironic and unwittingly truthful way, as he was referring to his party’s “leadership”!)
And now S. King of NY puking up an 80% figure. (I’d be shocked if it was even 8%)
Brought to you by your friends at the Republican Bookstore of Made Up Definitions and Facts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Kz7YUdy-Cg
Big D
January 25th, 2011
4:01 pm
Paul… this country is financially and morally bankrupt and it is going to take some very drastic measures to correct it and liberalism is NOT the answer…period, it is the problem.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
4:01 pm
PAUL
Quite frankly, I’ve given up on trying to get the yahoo know-it-alls to grasp the concept of the culture in which a particular religious faith is the predminant. The idea that the same concept applied to Turkey being a “Muslim country” applies to the United States being a “Christian country” simply is lost on those with an axe to grind with the majority faith of their cultural weltanschauung. And the ignorance is just as prevalent on the left as it is the right. The Crusades reflected a conflict of cultural world views and neither side was any “better” than the other when it came to “kill ‘em all and let G-d (All-h) sort ‘em out…”
Old Flat Top
January 25th, 2011
4:02 pm
“Okay wingnuts, I’m waiting on the answer to the poster who asked what we were to do about Isam, ban it? Make it illegal? Concentration camps?”
Fit all muslims with explodable dog-collars and then micro-chip them…
Then send them to Gitmo for some motivational training a la “clockwork orange”.
And yes….I did cheer at the end of “Easy Rider”.
godless heathen
January 25th, 2011
4:02 pm
“A future in which Islam and the West do not stand on the brink of mutual annihilation is a future in which most Muslims have learned to ignore most of their canon, just as most Christians have learned to do. Such a transformation is by no means guaranteed to occur, however, given the tenets of Islam.” – The End of Faith – Religion, Terror and the Future of Reason by Sam Harris.
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
4:04 pm
Hello? Blog God?
Big D
January 25th, 2011
4:05 pm
LHU…you are like trying to stack greasy beebees …my statement was that the LIBERALS were now calling for a return to the Fairness doctrine are ya stupid. Did I say once that there was pending legislation..no..you made that up. Just can’t do it can you.
Kamchak
January 25th, 2011
4:05 pm
Hey AmVet
Harry Callahan next door at CT’s keeps insisting that you and I are the same person.
I thanked him for the compliment, then he insisted that Mary Elizabeth was also involved somehow.
USMC dawg
January 25th, 2011
4:05 pm
Obama to seek 5 year SPENDING FREEZE(with caveats of course):
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/sc-dc-0126-address-main-web-20110125,0,6024545.story
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
4:05 pm
Anyone got a body count? Christians. Moslems. Jews. Hindus. Buddhists.
Do any of these actually do the killing? Do the killers pretend to embrace
one of the religions rather than follow its precepts? Who can we hate next?
Mexicans. That should work. We can invade them. They will be waiting with
open arms.
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:06 pm
jewcowboy 3:56 – indeed. I find “out of towners” or new residents (with out of state tags) to be the worst. But you’re right. I pray for mass transit. Simply so I won’t have to contend with the complete morons on our roads….
pat
January 25th, 2011
4:06 pm
Interesting how a thread on islamic bigotry spurs so much hatred and bigotry towards Christians. I supposed it’s ok to insult and berate Christians, that’s not bigorty.
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
4:07 pm
And to Road’s point at 2:24, and as I have observed before.
A few decades ago it was blacks and Jews who were despised by the conservatives like the scumbag Old Flat Top.
Now it is gays, Mexicans and Muslims.
Yes, the faces have changed, but the same paranoid, irrational hatred remains the same.
Fortunately men of conscience have made it MUCH more difficult for the repugnant, hate-filled right-wingers to murder and get away with it…
kayaker 71
January 25th, 2011
4:07 pm
Joe,
If you meant that West’s response was one of inexperience and can be forgiven due to his lack Congressional experience, you are dead wrong. His constituents in Florida’s 22 district must have liked what he had to say, as he reiterated it more than once on the campaign trail. He has first hand experience with dealing with radical Islam in a way that let political correctness get in the way and he was fired for it. There are a lot of us out there that believe him. BTW, the Congressman that Bookman is berating for his Muslim opinion was just echoing what Shiek Obani (sp) was saying and agreeing with him. One of their own made the original statement in 1999. Wonder how much worse it is today?
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:08 pm
USMC – he’s trying to avoid the Republican cuts. I think a compromise of “cut $30B’s and freeze” would be an a-ok compromise.
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
4:08 pm
‘Did I say once that there was pending legislation..no’
In other words…you got nuthin…
Any other red herrings I can help you out with?
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
4:08 pm
jewcowboy,
I’m thinking this:
http://www.drunkpeople.org/drunk-guy-yoga/
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
4:09 pm
Bother Kam, poor Hairy Calloused Hands needs an entire team of doctors.
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
4:10 pm
“LIBERALS were now calling for a return to the Fairness doctrine are ya stupid”
Um, no they aren’t
Paul
January 25th, 2011
4:10 pm
josef nix
It IS challenging, isn’t it?
godless heathen
““A future in which Islam and the West do not stand on the brink of mutual annihilation is a future in which most Muslims have learned to ignore most of their canon, just as most Christians have learned to do.:\”
Some would argue that, rather than having learned to ignore most of their canon, they have finally learned what the religion truly means and requires.
______________________________________________________
Kamchak, AmVet and Mary Elizabeth.
Funny, House last night was about a guy who got in trouble with a threesome, too!
Tommy Maddox
January 25th, 2011
4:11 pm
“men of conscience”? Oh brother.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
4:12 pm
PAT
@ 4:06
Point. But try and tell them that.
frog
I keep trying to nominate the ragpickers…
Big D
January 25th, 2011
4:12 pm
OFT…my answer is “are you with us or against us” to Islam. It is they who have declared war on us, it is we who have responded right or wrong. War is the apex of insanity and the one who wins will be the one who is willing to get the most crazy.
Big D
January 25th, 2011
4:12 pm
Bosch…UM…yes they are.
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:13 pm
What President Obama needs to do tonight
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/48135.html
I wonder how many of these “what Obama needs to do” columns get written. There must be 20 or so of these out there. They’re so stupid. As if Obama gives a —- about what they write.
Paul
January 25th, 2011
4:13 pm
Big D
And if we’d just get out of there then maybe they’d turn their attention back on their own region’s regimes and we’ll see how well that works out for them.
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
4:13 pm
Big D,
“my answer is “are you with us or against us” to Islam”
You do realize that is actually a question to Islam, right?
StJ
January 25th, 2011
4:14 pm
When Rep. West said “when you run into someone that is counter or someone that really does represent the antithesis of the principles upon which this country was established, you got to be able to defeat them intellectually and in debate and discourse”, I’m sure he was referring to liberalism and not religion (although religion was mentioned in the question). Answered out of context of the question?
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
4:14 pm
Big D.,
“Bosch…UM…yes they are.”
Who is THEY?
Big D
January 25th, 2011
4:15 pm
LHU…
Thanks for your involvement today in how to prove a Liberal can completely miss the point.
You and Bosch both get the Gold Stars.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
4:15 pm
PAUL
And the worst part is, they never seem to grasp the conflict and it comes down to a “do as I say and not as I do.” They come down on, say Scout, with whom I’ve had more than one respectful set-to, and then throw out EXACTLY the same ignorant vitriol they accuse him of. If it weren’t so dangerous, it would be funny…
Big D
January 25th, 2011
4:16 pm
Bosch…my 3:56 just to name a few….you don’t out of this blog much do you.
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:16 pm
Jay, I gotta say, I used to take an interest in these speeches (SOTU). But not anymore. Most of it is fluff, and that portion that isn’t, is unlikely to happen anyway. All talk. No substance. As others have said, may be time to end the State of the Union and just have the POTUS send Congress a report.
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
4:17 pm
‘Thanks for your involvement today in how to prove a Liberal can completely miss the point.’
You had a ‘point?’
It better have had nothing to do with my goat…
Old Flat Top
January 25th, 2011
4:17 pm
And Round up AmVet too.
With his hippie music, I think he’s on the pot.
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
4:18 pm
Big D.,
The thing is….that claim about the Fairness Doctrine has been made so many times, and debunked even more…..one of two people mentioning it does not warrant an
“OH MY GOD THE LIBERALS ARE GONNA THROW OUT THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE”
Adam
January 25th, 2011
4:19 pm
We don’t need the fairness doctrine. We do, however, need less of this talk of shooting each other and blowing each other up. And calling each other Nazis and so on. Name calling and threats and calling people “enemies” is a bad idea and doesn’t lead to progress, only to more of the same.
Big D
January 25th, 2011
4:20 pm
Paul..I agree to a point. I was one of those young men who did two tours where he really didn’t want to be and I would love more than anything to get everyone of those men out of there today. Problem is these “Islamic” believers will just get bored with killing each other and come after us again.
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
4:20 pm
And when I write, “throw out” — it was meant as in “put it on the table”
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:20 pm
boooooyah. Obama is in deep doodoo.
But Obama’s aides say the speech won’t be heavy on numbers – for instance, he’s unlikely to put a $50 billion price tag on the transportation projects, like he did during a Labor Day speech last year.
Instead, it’s intended to give Democrats a framework for negotiations heading into the epic showdown over the budget and the debt ceiling that is likely this spring. And here the GOP seems, at first glance to hold powerful leverage: Recent polls show a majority of Americans opposed to raising the debt limit without significant spending cuts.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/48135.html#ixzz1C5HpTQ37
People have no idea how hard it is to close the deficit without drastically changing entitlements. And they’re against tax increases and against a debt ceiling increase.
Obama is so FUBAR, I just have to laugh.
kayaker 71
January 25th, 2011
4:20 pm
Those F22s that are flying up and down the East and West corridors of this country are sure not protecting us from Catholics and Jews. Think you have to take your shoes off at airports because some Lutheran threatened our security? I don’t know if 80% of mosques in this country are trying to raise jihad funds and train suicide bombers but I do know that is sure isn’t Episcopalians who are doing it. Someone is responsible for organizing cells in this country, raising funds, providing support for dissidents and putting us in the cross hairs and it sure ain’t Sarah Palin or George Soros. Wonder who it could be?
Kamchak
January 25th, 2011
4:21 pm
Problem is these “Islamic” believers will just get bored with killing each other and come after us again.
One if by land, two if by sea!
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:22 pm
The most important area of bipartisan agreement between Obama and Republicans is on Afghanistan, with the GOP likely providing the margin for extending the U.S. commitment in the face of opposition from liberal Democrats. But Obama isn’t likely to highlight that fact. It would antagonize his own progressive, largely anti-war base.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/48135.html#ixzz1C5IU2jCA
Adam
January 25th, 2011
4:22 pm
kayaker: Glenn Beck might disagree with you on the funding source. George Soros is the source of all evil to him.
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
4:24 pm
JB, one other thought. To your point about Joe McCarthy, this is perhaps one of the greatest of the innumerable failures of the modern day GOP. In fifty plus years, that sleazebag is still revered by the faithful and remains one of their giants of intellectual thought.
No wonder they are hopelessly _____.
Old Flat Top @4:14, LOL.
Ironic that your moniker is straight out of a song by John Lennon. You, yourself are not a filthy hippie in disguise are you?
heathen, my ongoing point to Scout and other Christian bigots and fanatics is that their religion too had the exact same murderous stranglehold on civilizations. For centuries.
Only when enlightened men of conscience took that power away from them, did the murders, witch burnings and torture finally end.
The same will have to happen with these Muslim fanatics.
And it will…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8LZGQ4MkvQ
Paul
January 25th, 2011
4:24 pm
Old Flat Top
“With his hippie music, I think he’s on the pot.”
“Yo man there ain’t been no hippies around here for centuries,”
(Corporal Jones to Gunny Highway, Heartbreak Ridge)
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:24 pm
How he deals with these issues is vitally important to his 2012 prospects: So far core Democrats have stuck with him, but he can’t show contempt for their concerns, and he needs to offer some promise he will eventually get around to carrying the flag – as he did when he vowed to work on passage of the “don’t ask don’t tell” repeal in last year’s speech.
The list of topics he can’t comfortably discuss is long and getting longer: besides Afghanistan, there’s Guantanamo Bay, his failure to move climate change legislation, his “evolving” position on gay marriage, school vouchers, the state debt crisis and the deficit commission’s hard-to-swallow entitlement and tax reform recommendations.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/48135.html#ixzz1C5J0VW3J
I’ll settle for Mitt Romney for President, and Mitch Daniels for VP. 2012. 2012 can’t come soon enough….
@@
January 25th, 2011
4:27 pm
O.K., jay. I found out where the 80% comes from. 80% of U.S. mosques receive their support from Saudi Arabia’s Wahhabi sect. If you can prove otherwise, please do.
Freedom House seems like a pretty progressive group:
Freedom House is an independent watchdog organization that supports the expansion of freedom around the world. Freedom House supports democratic change, monitors freedom, and advocates for democracy and human rights.
Since its founding in 1941 by prominent Americans concerned with the mounting threats to peace and democracy, Freedom House has been a vigorous proponent of democratic values and a steadfast opponent of dictatorships of the far left and the far right. Eleanor Roosevelt and Wendell Willkie served as Freedom House’s first honorary co-chairpersons.
Anyhoo, this is what NGO Freedom House has to say about Wahhabism:
Some Wahhabist books and pamphlets teach that Muslims should reject absolutely any non-Muslim ideas and practices, including political ones. A study by the NGO Freedom House found Wahhabi publications in a number of mosques in the United States preaching that Muslims should not only “always oppose” infidels “in every way”, but “hate them for their religion . for Allah’s sake”, that democracy “is responsible for all the horrible wars of the 20th century”, and that Shia and other non-Wahhabi Muslims were infidels.
I’ve got the link to Freedom House. If you want me to bring it, I will, but in all honesty, I think you’ve gotten lazy, jay. You look no further than a Republican to make your case.
Work, jay!!!! Have you forgotten what it is?
Paul
January 25th, 2011
4:28 pm
“With his hippie music, I think he’s on the pot.”
IF he can weave around the party fanatics who so heavily influence the primaries, that is -
Paul
January 25th, 2011
4:29 pm
jm,
ummm, what I meant was…
I’ll settle for Mitt Romney for President
IF he can weave around the party fanatics who so heavily influence the primaries, that is -
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
4:29 pm
@@
Wonder why we haven’t heard from the Bruin on the Hezbollah coup in Lebanon? I guess the memo hasn’t arrived yet. ISH
Big D
January 25th, 2011
4:29 pm
LHU…
I now bow and and thank you once more. I’m sorry you most likely have sheep.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
4:30 pm
PAUL
Romney? Ain’t he a Mormon?
Abrazos
January 25th, 2011
4:31 pm
It looks like the Republicans are ahead of schedule.
1. Announce they will make “big changes”.
2. First big change: make meaningless gesture by passing “Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Act”
3. Follow first meaningless gesture by implying they’re not going to be able to do anything anyway by stating “Republicans don’t run things” (Eric Cantor parroting Haley Barbour)
4. Start throwing up smokescreens and diversions like Peter King’s Muslim investigation, Darrell Issa’s Oversight Committee investigations, Roger Wicker’s Life Begins at Conception bill, etc.
5. Spend next two years driving around in circles like Keystone Cops
6. During 2012 campaign, blame Democrats and Obama when asked about the time they wasted on everything except what really impacts American families’ lives
7. Pack up boxes in Congressional offices and move back to oblivion.
NM
January 25th, 2011
4:32 pm
please check out http://www.islamicsolutions.com/my-log-9-why-they-hate-islam-and-muslims/
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
4:32 pm
Bosch @ 4.08,
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
4:33 pm
Paul,
Have you seen this?
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi3449461529/
I’m totally breathless with excitment.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
4:33 pm
PAUL
I’m thinking Cantor and Issa…that ought to set ‘em all to twirlin!
Paul
January 25th, 2011
4:33 pm
josef nix
Yup.
If he can get elected in Massachusetts, I guess they are kinda libs, eh?
Wait, wait…. those guys are all neocons, right?
Hmmm…. maybe we have a truly bipartisan candidate after all!
@@
January 25th, 2011
4:33 pm
josef:
Wonder why we haven’t heard from the Bruin on the Hezbollah coup in Lebanon?
I’m guessing it’s because he’s got his nose imbedded so far up the dems’ “butts” that he can’t see beyond.
You ASKED!!!
(ISH)
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
4:33 pm
‘I’m sorry you most likely have sheep.’
Reminds me of a joke:
Why do Scotsmen where kilts?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Cause sheep can hear zippers…
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
4:33 pm
jewcowboy,
Well, you should have seen the picture I was gonna post….it was so awesome Blog God ATE it.
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:34 pm
Paul 4:29
Paul
January 25th, 2011
4:35 pm
josef nix
Cantor and Issa? Aaarghhhh….
Then again, Republicans just might love having the richest gazillionaire in Congress on the ticket.
jewcowboy
Earl Grey iced tea? Never considered that, may have to give it a try, thanks -
Bosch
You’ll probably not want to hear I fell asleep during I and II -
DHS, Sub-Department Civility Implementation
January 25th, 2011
4:37 pm
Abrazos
January 25th, 2011
4:31 pm
Please refrain from using the word “killing”.
This is your first warning.
Thank You and…….Carry on.
Jimmy62
January 25th, 2011
4:37 pm
Adam: Considering all the money he took from the British through currency manipulation, if any rich people should be thought of as evil, Soros is one of them. It’s amazing that liberals seem to love the guy. He says the right “liberal” things, but his wealth did not come from actually creating or producing anything, it came from moving money around and taking billions of dollar from the aggregate British populace. There are more poor people in Britain because of Soros.
I guess it’s like the left wing fascination with Che. It’s ok to be oppressive, to murder people who disagree with you, to torture people, to jail people with different politics, as long as your politics are left wing.
Had Che been a free market advocate, and acted the same way otherwise, the left would look back at him as a horrible villain. But since he was a communist, lefties wear Che t-shirts with pride.
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
4:37 pm
pat,
“I supposed it’s ok to insult and berate Christians, that’s not bigorty.”
I choose mock all those who worship a Spéir Faerie. An equal opportunity mocker…
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:38 pm
SOTU – I wonder if Obama will comment on the stalled housing development in my neighborhood. Or the new bottle shop going in…. maybe he can comment on what the 2011 Hartsfield security screening procedures will be. Or maybe he’ll compliment a member of our city council. Surely he’ll comment on Mayor Reed. There’s bound to be a long section about Atlanta water rates….
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
4:39 pm
@@
That rapprochement with Damascus is going to be a hard one to do the Levantine two-step around…!
PAUL
unh, hunh, Cantor-Issa done got you to twirlin…
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
4:40 pm
Paul,
“You’ll probably not want to hear I fell asleep during I and II”
WHAT??
Big D
January 25th, 2011
4:40 pm
Dat upity negro Allen West done gone and made dim liberals mad cause he done escaped from da plantation…. usin all dim big words…we just make fun of the material of his suit..dat will teach him.
God forbid Jay that a Black man can be an Officer in the Military, get elected to Congress, have a mind of his own and be a conservative…that must make you want to throw up.
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:40 pm
I wonder why Obama didn’t give the Falcons a pat on the back for a job well done, even though they came up short…
Kamchak
January 25th, 2011
4:40 pm
Well, you should have seen the picture I was gonna post….it was so awesome Blog God ATE it.
A few months ago I tried several time to post links to pictures of Manon Rheaume with the same result.
Del
January 25th, 2011
4:41 pm
Since we’re in the 21st. century it would make sense to focus current events and behaviors. My ancestors haven’t shot any American Indians for several generations. The fact is we’ve had several Islamic jihadist terrorist attacks that have been successful , along with several that have failed. Some of the failures were close calls. I don’t believe King would pull a percentage out of the air, however, I do believe that political correctness would attempt to obscure percentages from the public. It has nothing to do with bigotry. It has everything to do with recognizing a danger and dealing with it.
Jimmy62
January 25th, 2011
4:41 pm
Paul: At least Issa made his money by running a business. He’s a self made man. John Kerry made his by marrying a rich woman. Issa’s money shows he might have some good economic sense. Kerry’s shows that everything he ever had was handed to him. Had John Kerry, former Democratic candidate for President, been born into the same level of wealth as Issa, he’d probably be a janitor now, rather than the life-long beneficiary of left-wing rich people nepotism.
Don’t be dissing on a self-made man like Issa for being rich, he’s accomplished more than you could ever hope to.
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
4:41 pm
Paul,
“Earl Grey iced tea? Never considered that, may have to give it a try, thanks -”
My Earl Grey martini is even better…
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:41 pm
When is Obama going to comment on the lawsuit between King and Spalding and the Hawks partnership? Surely that is getting his attention…..
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
4:42 pm
‘God forbid Jay that a Black man can be an Officer in the Military, get elected to Congress, have a mind of his own and be a conservative…that must make you want to throw up.’
You seem to be the only concerned with the man’s race…
Bosch
January 25th, 2011
4:42 pm
Kamchak,
“A few months ago I tried several time to post links to pictures of Manon Rheaume with the same result.”
Well….now THAT I could see…..
Adam
January 25th, 2011
4:43 pm
Jimmy62: I admit to not knowing everything. As such, I have no fascination with Che, someone I know nothing about.
As for Soros, if what you claim is true for both he and Che, then the two are not equivalent and you missed the civility memo.
Where exactly are you getting your info about Soros that you just stated?
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:43 pm
I wonder if Obama has ordered his seeds for the White House organic garden. Surely that’s a top priority…. I assume that will be in the State of the Union.
@@
January 25th, 2011
4:44 pm
Can ANYONE here either confirm or deny that 80% of U.S. mosques are supported by Saudi Arabia’s Wahhabi sect? If not, then Rep. King’s claims may not be motivated by bigotry. He, at the very least, deserves the benefit of a doubt.
If you can’t give him that, then I declare you a bunch of Democratic bigots. jay being the biggest among his bunch.
Jimmy62
January 25th, 2011
4:44 pm
Lord Help Us: Interesting you should say that. When I criticize Obama for policy reasons, I’m told I’m a racist. When a black liberal is elected, it’s all wonderful how diverse the left is. But then when a black conservative is elected, all of the sudden the left tells us race shouldn’t be an issue (right before implying he’s an Uncle Tom).
Big D
January 25th, 2011
4:45 pm
LHU…
I can do that…he would not be getting any attention were he not.
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
4:45 pm
Bosch,
My mention of Redbull earlier reminded me of this…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0BDo5fu3xg
Now think of those stuck without their Canned Cola…yikes.
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:45 pm
Why hasn’t Obama called Arthur Blank to compliment him on a team that has largely stayed out of the headlines, absent the typical unethical behavior?
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:46 pm
I hope Obama will give us an update on his smoking habits. And I wonder how things went on the Hawaii vacation. These are important things….
Adam
January 25th, 2011
4:46 pm
@@: Whether or not it’s bigotry, it’s an absurd claim and very irresponsible. It doesn’t have to be said by a bigot for the bigots not to latch on and issue death threats to their local mosques.
Jimmy62
January 25th, 2011
4:46 pm
Adam: You mentioned him in reference to Beck. It sure sounded like you were saying that he’s not the source of all evil. And he’s not. But he’s done a lot of evil things, but is celebrated on the left because he says the right (left?) things.
Paul
January 25th, 2011
4:47 pm
Bosch
“WHAT??”
I think there might have been more than one pineapple mojito involved….
Jimmy62
“Don’t be dissing on a self-made man like Issa for being rich, he’s accomplished more than you could ever hope to.”
And you were doing so well until you surrendered to your baser self -
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
4:47 pm
‘When I criticize Obama for policy reasons, I’m told I’m a racist.’
By who?
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
4:47 pm
ADAM
I would suggest that you do look into the lives and times of both Soros and Che…do it with an open mind on both counts and draw your own conclusions…
Big D
January 25th, 2011
4:47 pm
Jimmy…In case you have not noticed LHU has a mouth on both sides of his face and he hails from Scotland.
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
4:47 pm
@@,
I may be wrong on this, but aren’t the Saudi royal family adherents of the Wahhabi sect?
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
4:47 pm
Josef,
At 4:15 you mentioned the vitriol poured out by both sides. You did not mention the torch bearer who sets the fire going every morning. Vitriol gets more bloggers and Bookman knows what will get them going. He is not responsible for what the bloggers post but he is responsible for the bait.
@@ I like your research. As far as Bookman, somebody’s got to do it. He’s only out looking for fresh “meat” every day. Wonder if Wahhabism is taught outside of Saudi Arabia? Like Indonesia??
Bosch, have you ordered a case of those mj drinks from California? I hope not. Children pick up on what their parents approve very quickly. Oh well, just think. You. ,too, could be like getalife and live in the land of therapeutic marijuana. Wheee..
WHAT???? Kamchak, Amvet & Mary Elizabeth a threesome? I’ve heard that opposites attract but that grouping is just plain IMPOSSIBLE!!!
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:47 pm
You have to wonder why Obama hasn’t either come out for or against SACS putting APS on probation. As well as the court case between the members of the board. Obama, we’re waiting to hear what you have to say!!!
Kamchak
January 25th, 2011
4:48 pm
Bosch
The same pictures that were on her hockey trading cards, nothing risque.
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
4:48 pm
‘he would not be getting any attention were he not.’
And you know this, how?
Jimmy62
January 25th, 2011
4:48 pm
Adam: If it’s true, then how can it be absurd? And are we no longer allowed to criticize anyone because some psycho might decide to kill the person we’re criticizing? If so, then you may want to delete a lot of your posts.
Going home, good bye, don’t expect me to reply.
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
4:49 pm
jm,
“Why hasn’t Obama called Arthur Blank to compliment him on a team that has largely stayed out of the headlines, absent the typical unethical behavior?”
Shh…you might jinx them.
@@
January 25th, 2011
4:50 pm
Adam:
80%….support/funding. Can you confirm or deny? Freedom Works points to the philosophy within the sect. Do you agree or disagree with their philosophy?
Big D
January 25th, 2011
4:50 pm
On the road again….had fun..
God Bless you all.
Paul
January 25th, 2011
4:51 pm
jewcowboy
“Earl Grey martini”
You yankin’ my chain?!!?
@@
For you, from earlier:
This shouldn’t take all that long to dispense with. The first part, anyhow. Rep King should call Sheik Kabbani to testify…. or…. he could just read into the record what Kabbani said, what King said formed the basis of his concern:
“Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani testified before a State Department Open Forum: “The most dangerous thing that is going on now in these mosques, that has been sent upon these mosques around the United States – like churches they were established by different organizations and that is ok – but the problem with our communities is the extremist ideology. Because they are very active they took over the mosques; and we can say that they took over more than 80% of the mosques that have been established in the US. And there are more than 3000 mosques in the US. So it means that the methodology or ideology of extremist has been spread to 80% of the Muslim population, but not all of them agree with it.”
Then he can read into the record follow-up questions and comments which sought to clarify those remarks:
http://www.meforum.org/61/muhammad-hisham-kabbani-the-muslim-experience-in
“”Extremist Ideology”
MEQ: You spoke last year, at a forum sponsored by the U.S. Department of State, of a “threat that will grow” if Americans do not “quickly stop the kind of extremist ideology that is filtering in.”4 What is that threat?
Kabbani: This is a delicate point, so allow me to make a couple of introductory comments. First, we should remember that the problem of extremism is not confined to the Muslim community. Extremists come out of a variety of traditions and focus on a variety of issues – paranoia about the growth of the federal government and obsession with abortion being two well-known issues that have led individuals to the kind of extremism I am talking about, sometimes with violence resulting.
Second, I used the word extremist in an ideological sense. I did not intend to imply that much of the leadership has engaged in acts of violence, or could be described as terrorists. In Arabic, my native language, extremism and terrorism have very different meanings and cannot be used interchangeably.
MEQ: How do you define extremism?
Kabbani: Extremism is an unwillingness to accept any viewpoint but one’s own. It is un-Islamic. In Arabic, ghulu means ideas that deviate from the center. The Prophet Muhammad specifically stated, “Do not go to the extreme in your religion.” Extreme ideas are not violent in themselves but they do on occasion lead to violent acts. That is the context in which I used the word “extremism” to describe ideas currently expressed in Islamic centers across America.
Ideological extremism can result in an act of violence when an individual pursues his ideas to such an extreme that he thinks only his ideas are correct and must therefore be enforced on everyone else.
MEQ: Is there a specifically Islamic quality to this extremism?
Kabbani: No, such extremism is found in every religion and ideology. In fact, in Islam it is specifically stated that “There is no compulsion in religion.”
Of course, the majority of Muslims are not extremists. Like any other group in America, Muslims as a whole are a peaceful people simply pursuing their lives and do not constitute a threat to anyone. But Islamic doctrine can be perverted by ideologues to justify harming others. The threat represented by those willing to use violence to pursue their goals—to terrorize people by throwing bombs and killing innocents—is a danger to all peace-loving people, Muslim and non-Muslim alike. Such acts, I should add, are expressly forbidden in Islam.
MEQ: What should Americans do to protect themselves from this threat?
Kabbani: The responsibility is on the American Muslim community to reject extremism and to condemn any act of violence. We must keep to a moderate line, as Prophet Muhammad said, “We are a moderate nation.”
Then Rep King might learn to instruct his staff on how to conduct research and he may want to think about stripping away his cultural biases when assessing remarks.
.
pat
January 25th, 2011
4:51 pm
That’s ok, Jew Cowboy, I think athiests are the dumbest of all. They believe in randomness and that things come from nothing, yet there is no a single shred of evidence, not a citilla, not even a good lie to assert such a claim.
What you can prove something from nothing, then I let you continue with your ignorant ’sky fairy’ B.S.
I tell you, for not being a religion and having a single ideoligical book, you lot say all the same thing. ‘Sky fairy’, ‘flying spaghetti monster’, etc.
You mock with out fact or logic. I think that’s petty and idiotic.
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:51 pm
jewcowboy – sorry. But inquiring minds want to know. What does Obama think?
@@
January 25th, 2011
4:51 pm
Cowboy:
Yes they are, and I’m no big fan. As it stands, our relationship is forced and will be for some time to come.
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
4:51 pm
‘had fun..’
My poor goat…
Doggone/GA
January 25th, 2011
4:52 pm
“Wasn’t this country founded to escape ‘religious prosecution’ by England”
No, it wasn’t. If you are thinking of the Pilgrims they came here because they could not impose THEIR form of religious persecution on England.
But the ORIGINAL settlements here were economic – check out why France and Spain, in particular, settled people here. But even Jamestown, which was English, was an economic community – not a religious one.
Kamchak
January 25th, 2011
4:53 pm
‘had fun..’
My poor goat…
I thought it was My Pet Goat.
jm
January 25th, 2011
4:54 pm
pat – devil’s advocate here. please provide your evidence of a god…. I’m not saying you’re wrong, just holding you to the same standard you just espoused.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
4:55 pm
pat
You must have missed mine and jewcowboy’s exchange on Sk- F-iry!
Del
January 25th, 2011
4:57 pm
The Pilgrims came here because they could not impose their form of religious persecution on England.
Oh, the efforts to rewrite history.
USMC dawg
January 25th, 2011
4:58 pm
“USMC – he’s trying to avoid the Republican cuts. I think a compromise of “cut $30B’s and freeze” would be an a-ok compromise.”
Yeah, jm, this is mere window dressing for Obama’s re-election campaign kickoff.
My question is with all of the propaganda that the White House is spouting about Obama being pro-business and pro-spending cuts……. Where has he been for the last two years when we needed a leader in the White House? His actions spoke said otherwise.
He pushed the Socialist agenda/ Obamacare and spent like a drunken sailor.
NOW he is dressing it up for his re-election campaign in 2012.
pat
January 25th, 2011
4:58 pm
Jay fails here on three points. He can’t and does not prove that 80% of mosques have not been infected with radicalism. The second gentleman, made no comment wat so ever regarding islam or muslims at all, and on loose association here by two people, he asserts that anti-muslim bigotry is gaining a ‘foot hold’ in congress. 1-2-3 strikes your out.
Can you prove the claim that 80% of mosques have not been infiltrated? Because you did not. And I don’t see where West said anything anti-muslim. The muslim rep in question is not only a muslim, but a democrat. What evidence do you have that he was refering to the man’s faith? None? Ok, case closed.
And you accuse others of inciting and inflamatory rhetoric…Pot, meet Kettle.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
4:59 pm
The Carolina Charter had as Artcle 14 “equal rights of citizenship for Jews, Heathens, and Dissenters.” The first place in the Judeo-Christian-Islamic cultural sphere that such was made fundamental law. Thus began the American tradition of no religious test for citizenship…
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
4:59 pm
pat,
“They believe in randomness and that things come from nothing, yet there is no a single shred of evidence, not a citilla, not even a good lie to assert such a claim.”
Kindly provide proof that your Spéir Faerie exists in scientifically supportable terms.
“What you can prove something from nothing, then I let you continue with your ignorant ’sky fairy’ B.S”
Umm…you have no say so over what I can say.
“You mock with out fact or logic. I think that’s petty and idiotic.”
Pot meet kettle…
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
5:00 pm
jcb, NOW you gone and done it! And without a citilla of evidence.
Abrazos, notwithstanding the overall accuracy of your post, the reference to the cons as a bunch of Keystone Cops really did make me chuckle.
In this episode, Boner, McConnell, Cantor, McCarthy (Kevin, not Joe, I think.) and Tom Price go for a ride. But alas, they “run into Sarah”, and oops!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZBdxvego1E
kayaker 71
January 25th, 2011
5:00 pm
@@,
Your 4:44 is the best post of the day. Looks like Bookman should do his homework.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
5:01 pm
jm
Evidence there is a G-d? The same evidence that there isn’t. Can’t either “side” prove its point. Personally, I’m an optimist. Afforded the option I choose to believe.
ATF
January 25th, 2011
5:01 pm
Well, Georgia’s own Paul Broun serves on the Homeland Security Committee. In fact, he is vice-chair of the Counterterrorism and Intelligence SubCommittee. He is probably good at it. Broun is the one who sponsored that legislation that would give the legal rights of a person to a fertilized egg from the moment a sperm penetrates the cell membrane. Now that is counterterrorism of the highest order against those Choicers! I am sure he will be equally intelligent about the Intelligence side of the committee work.
so Broun and King are quite a pair. Will we have another McCarthy moment?
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:02 pm
USMC 4:58 – I agree. His view on where this country should go, and that of the electorate, are not on the same wavelength. So to speak.
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:02 pm
Paul,
“You yankin’ my chain?!!?”
There are couple of recipes out there (some with egg whites..ick) but mine is pretty simple.
Gin, simple syrup, concentrated brewed Earl Grey, ice…shake well and garnish with a lemon twist. Great for summer.
Paul
January 25th, 2011
5:02 pm
pat
You may want to read the post at 4:51 -
Paul
January 25th, 2011
5:04 pm
jewcowboy
Now that sounds good.
Anything with gin sounds good….
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
5:04 pm
Now Doggone dun messed up my Thanksgiving picture. There’s the big turkey, the pilgrims and Squanto all saying the blessing and having a good time together. Now she’s going to tell me they did not even have cornbread dressing and cranberry sauce!! They were having THANKSgiving, weren’t they? To whom were they giving thanks???? Besides Squanto (the turkey giver ), that is….
Doggone/GA
January 25th, 2011
5:05 pm
“Oh, the efforts to rewrite history.”
yep, in just about every history book in every school in the USA. If you want to know more, check out THEIR laws imposed on their communities here. They didn’t invent them for just the people who emigrated to this continent.
”
Ostensibly to escape religious persecution in England. Interestingly, many of the pilgrim communities, most of them Protestant Christians, went on to persecute other religious communities, such as Catholics. ”
Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_did_Pilgrims_come_to_America#ixzz1C5TLqT4T
pat
January 25th, 2011
5:06 pm
jm, I can do it. But the arguments and argument style lends itslef to long prose. This is not the forum it takes to long establish and to refute counter arguements.
It’s called cosmology, not to be confused with the theorhetical quantum mechanic’s meaning. It’s a philisophical argument style, that always, with out fail leads to the same conclusion, no matter where it starts. It apply both to the material and the metaphyscial.
I invite to to google it if you are really curious. There are arguements and counter arguments everywhere. This has never been refuted in over 2000 years ever since Aristotle postulated the first form of the arguement.
Stay away from the Kalam Cosmological Argument. That is a poorly concieved version.
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:06 pm
The internet, great invention. Electronic stock trading, great idea.
But the rest of Wall Street must be one of the dumber inventions of all time…. aside from some M&A advisory work…. their stock analysts in particular are beyond stupid. The rating agencies (off wall st.) also incredibly dumb. The quants – too smart to know they’re dumb. And the securitization junkies belong in a back alley.
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
5:09 pm
jo and others, not that anybody gives a flying ____, but to me, the one thing that terrifies people the most, seems the most plausible.
Oblivion.
Nothingness.
Sorry to disappoint (Linda can say a “prayer” for me) but I just can’t swallow all the claptrap about contrived saviors and devils, heavens and hells, and angry, vengeful gods.
Perhaps if I lived 500 years ago…
pat
January 25th, 2011
5:10 pm
Jewcowboy, see my 5:06, I adressed you’re ‘pot meet kettle’ refutation. You should look it up too. If you can refute it, I personally will write the Nobel folks for you…
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:11 pm
@@,
“Yes they are, and I’m no big fan.”
I’m trying to follow the logic of this…you are saying the reason King said that more than 80 percent of the mosques in this country are headed by imams who espouse radical Islamic jihad is because they are funded by the Wahhabi sect. The Saudi royal family who rules Saudi Arabia are adherents of the Wahhabi sect. Which probably means the mosques are funded by the Saudi royal family.
Does that mean the Crillon Hotel in Paris is headed by imams who espouse radical Islamic jihad? Does that also mean the News Corp. is headed by imams who espouse radical Islamic jihad?
kayaker 71
January 25th, 2011
5:12 pm
One of West’s better quotes was when some interviewer asked him if he had it to do over again, would he have discharged his weapon while interrogating a prisoner. His response, ” I would carry a gasoline can through hell if it would save one of my men”. All of you armchair liberal warriors out there listen up. If you haven’t served, that’s the kind of commander you want, plain and simple. He would sure be my first choice.
Jay
January 25th, 2011
5:12 pm
To those demanding evidence that 80 percent of US mosques aren’t radical jihadist, that’s not how things work in this country. In this country, when government figures make allegations against individuals, the burden of proof lies with government and the individuals in question are presumed innocent.
If you object to that system, you should probably try to change it. But until then, that’s how it works.
Lord Help Us
January 25th, 2011
5:13 pm
‘I thought it was My Pet Goat.’
Different turdblossom…
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:14 pm
AmVet,
“And without a citilla of evidence.”
How about a chinchilla?
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:16 pm
pat,
“If you can refute it, I personally will write the Nobel folks for you…”
Just as soon as you provide verifiable scientific proof your Spéir Faerie exists…
Jay
January 25th, 2011
5:16 pm
And kayaker, any recounting of that incident should also include the facts that none of the “information” obtained from the prisoner in question ever panned out, and a search of the prisoner’s home turned up nothing. He may well have been an innocent man.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
5:16 pm
AmVet
Oblivion and its contemplation lies at the base of it all, yea or nay. But we don’t KNOW that either! I say that it is all a search for order and meaning to the universe and we refuse to believe there is none…be it scientific or theological..
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:17 pm
AmVet – what do you remember before being born? Not a mucho…. nothingness probably not too painful.
Non-existence and life are some pretty odd conundrums….
People could end up living for a long time depending on medical advances, and then who knows how long before the next Bill Gates will figure out how to upload your mind onto some hardware. And then, if you’re a computer, do you still exist and what are you?
One day our sun will blow up and the remaining particles from our being, which will have been smothered all over earth by then, will be cast into vast unknown…. and a zillion years from now we’ll probably be all snuggled up in a black hole or cooking on a star. Pretty far out when you think about it.
Who the hell knows what exists? Not I.
Ok, enough discussion of the waaaaaaaaaaaaay far out nutty crap.
I want to know when Obama is going to comment on my new Hemlock tree in my back yard. Or at least give me an opinion on his favorite Atlanta restaurant. For pete’s sake.
Kamchak
January 25th, 2011
5:18 pm
Different turdblossom…
Oh well, if you’ve smelled one, you’ve smelled them all….
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:18 pm
Paul,
“Anything with gin sounds good….”
Just had a Hendricks over ice with a slice of cucumber at the Park 75 Lounge the other day. I have a new favorite.
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:18 pm
AmVet – Heaven is a sailboat, some rum, and a few mixers. And a fishing pole.
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
5:20 pm
Well, Amvet,
I am sorry for you and I know that does not interest you in the least. Faith is the one thing that gets beyond the pale of oblivion. You haven’t found it and your usual unhappiness reveals that.
I won’t invite you to anything anywhere. You would act insulted. But I do hope you will find whatever it is your heart is missing.
Paul
January 25th, 2011
5:23 pm
jewcowboy
Hendricks is different, definitely good.
I tried a new tonic water a while back – by Stirrings. About 8 bucks for a four-pack, but it’s light, clear and wonderful. ‘Bout the closest I can come with the other two major brands is to squeeze a bit of lemon in.
USMC dawg
January 25th, 2011
5:24 pm
“AmVet – Heaven is a sailboat, some rum, and a few mixers. And a fishing pole.”
JM, You forgot the woman and cigars…
Paul
January 25th, 2011
5:25 pm
jewcowboy
Try Citadelle gin sometime and let me know what you think. From France. And if the bartender says “we serve only Freedom Martinis here” just leave……
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:26 pm
Items I expect the President to opine on:
1. What to spend money on.
2. What not to spend money on.
3. How to get said money.
4. How much money to spend in total and why.
5. What the hell is going on with the rest of the crazy world.
6. How’s the deficit reduction thingy coming?
Things that I really could care less to hear, and would prefer the leader of my country to ignore as distractions:
1. Whatever some thug football player is up to.
2. The legal status of any lawsuits your buddies are engaged in.
3. What you think about the arrest of any of your friends.
4. Damn near anything else that would generally qualify as a purely local / state issue.
kayaker 71
January 25th, 2011
5:26 pm
Off topic but an interesting sidelight to Hu’s state dinner.
Rush had an interesting story today about the entertainment following the state dinner. It seems that a Chinese pianist by the name of Lang Lang played a cherished Chi Com melody for all assembled which is a classic in China and revered by all of it’s citizens. It was the main musical background for a movie that depicted the Chinese efforts in the North Korea…. a sort of Chinese Gone with the Wind. During the movie, with the music playing in the background, the narrator in the movie calls American soldiers, “jackels” and revels in how many were killed by the Chinese. Hu, not known for his emotion, rose and hugged Lang Lang warmly following the piece. That all happened while Mr. and Mrs. Bozo were munching on their chocolate mousse and applauding loudly to the latest slap in the face by the Chinese. First the Biden incident, now this. And don’t tell me it wasn’t on purpose. They are getting more and more bold and the more money we borrow from them, the worse it gets. Wake up Bozo!!!!
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:27 pm
Dusty,
“Faith is the one thing that gets beyond the pale of oblivion.”
To each their own…faith helps YOU get beyond the pale of oblivion. Some simply accept oblivion as neither negative nor positive, simply inevitable, and live their life accordingly.
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:29 pm
USMC – “Woman and cigars”. Indeed I did. Not a smoker myself, but I do like cigars.
Some might take issue with the first item. For a variety of reasons. But I did include that in my provisioning list, sort of an assumption, really….
USMC dawg
January 25th, 2011
5:29 pm
IHOP much?
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/internet/cops-probe-ihop-melee-caught-tape
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:30 pm
Paul,
French gin…interesting. I’ll have to check it out. There is a liquor store near my house that seems to have everything…they have 3 brands of bacon infused vodka.
“And if the bartender says “we serve only Freedom Martinis here” just leave……”
Sheesh…I can’t even fathom a place like that…
Kamchak
January 25th, 2011
5:30 pm
Off topic but an interesting sidelight to Hu’s state dinner.
You’re about 24 hrs late with that particular poutrage. It was debunked yesterday.
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
5:30 pm
I see that Jay has gone back to “innocent until proven guilty”. I do believe that Homeland Defense & King are trying to prove that their suspicions are correct. That is known as an investigation. Without investigating you cannot prove guilt or innocence.
Jay wants us to believe that such an investigation is bigotry. If that is true, everyone in the Justice system is a bigot..
Doggone/GA
January 25th, 2011
5:30 pm
“it was the main musical background for a movie that depicted the Chinese efforts in the North Korea…. ”
Man oh man, are you WAY, WAY behind on that one. We hashed that one all out yesterday. Try to keep up will you?
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:31 pm
“Rush had an interesting story today …”
Why do I doubt that?
USMC dawg
January 25th, 2011
5:31 pm
“Some might take issue with the first item.” or man, what ever “floats” your boat.
@@
January 25th, 2011
5:31 pm
Let me preface this by saying….I do not believe Keith Ellison to be a radical extremist. He grew up Catholic fercryinoutloud.
Instead of focusing on Republicans only, jay should question whether Chuck Schumer or Dick Durbin are equally as bigoted ’cause they alleged CAIR’s “ties to terrorism” AND “its association with groups that are suspect”.
CAIR contributed to Ellison’s campaign. Do they think Ellison, by extension, is tied to terrorism….is suspect?
You really do go out of your way, jay!
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:32 pm
kayaker – I’m sure just a gesture of good will. or this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC8jAd84VyQ
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:32 pm
“I do believe that Homeland Defense & King are trying to prove that their suspicions are correct.”
Funny how they are doing that in the press…
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:33 pm
USMC – my wife would kill me if I took off in a boat without her….. especially if it had rum. She likes seafood too…..
Paul
January 25th, 2011
5:34 pm
jewcowboy
I lost a devoted pet of 15 years this morning. Gin and a toast sounds appropriate. Have to make a run to the store. Even all this wasn’t distracting enough. Off for the evening.
Thanks -
Doggone/GA
January 25th, 2011
5:36 pm
“I do believe that Homeland Defense & King are trying to prove that their suspicions are correct.”
Are you actually saying they are looking for evidence THEY are corret, not evidence that proves the FACTS – whichever way that evidence leads?
TaxPayer
January 25th, 2011
5:37 pm
The compassionate conservative bloggers here must really lead sad and miserable existences. They seem to be mad about everything and wish to blame everyone else for whatever it is that they stay mad about all the time. They are such sad people. I think their churches are letting them down by not giving them the comfort that they seek or something so they must feel a need to blame others for their emptiness.
@@
January 25th, 2011
5:37 pm
Paul:
Sorry about your pet.
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:37 pm
Paul – huge bummer dude. I think its cheaper by the handle.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
5:38 pm
jewcowboy
And how do you KNOW oblivion is inevitable…you don’t and not any more than those who claim it isn’t can KNOW…personally, I think those out to make it certain that oblivion is the finis are the ones who are TRULY afraid of judgment day!
“…I can swear there ain’t no heaven, and I pray there ain’t no hell…” Laura Nyro
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
5:41 pm
jewcowboy,
So your faith is proving the absence of it. That IS truly oblivion, one that I would not enjoy. But let us not argue about religion. How about…. how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
While you count them, I’ll be cooking up some chili. Ahhh….chili…the coup de grace of cold weather… It never fails..
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:43 pm
Paul,
Condolences…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/25/poll-pet-or-lover-animals_n_813563.html
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:44 pm
Congress really is about as mature as a bunch of kindergardeners. That might be generous. His whole political seating coupling thing borders on ridiculous.
A decent gesture gone absurd. As always. States rights… please.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
5:44 pm
JAY
Hezbollah-Lebanon-Syria? No, not poking the Bruin, but I am really interested in hearing your take on it…
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:45 pm
Dusty,
“I’ll be cooking up some chili. ”
Making some tomato bisque myself…as I said…to each their own
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:45 pm
jewcowboy 5:43 / USMC – have to add my dog to my provisions list. the crazy mutt. good thing I’ll have a boat big enough where I won’t have to choose between my dog and my wife.
Kamchak
January 25th, 2011
5:46 pm
“…I can swear there ain’t no heaven, and I pray there ain’t no hell…” Laura Nyro
I did not know she wrote that song. Thanks
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
5:46 pm
jm
You leave my kindergartners out of this! They’re much more mature and to compare them to this lot is, well, disrespectful….
Jay
January 25th, 2011
5:47 pm
Ask me again later, Josef. Headed out for app’t.
Old Retired English Professor
January 25th, 2011
5:48 pm
as I said…to each their own
. . . to each his/her own, josef. Each is singular.
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:48 pm
josef nix
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:49 pm
josef nix,
“And how do you KNOW oblivion is inevitable…you don’t and not any more than those who claim it isn’t can KNOW…”
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” ~ Carl Sagan
“I think those out to make it certain that oblivion is the finis are the ones who are TRULY afraid of judgment day!”
“The idea that God is an oversized white male with a flowing beard who sits in the sky and tallies the fall of every sparrow is ludicrous. But if by God one means the set of physical laws that govern the universe, then clearly there is such a God. This God is emotionally unsatisfying… it does not make much sense to pray to the law of gravity.” ~ Carl Sagan
@@
January 25th, 2011
5:50 pm
Cowboy:
In response to your post regarding the Saudi royals. Business is business…religious beliefs are religious beliefs. I wouldn’t even put forth the argument that all within Wahhabism hold to the edicts put forth, but the very fact that they exist are reason to be cautious. King seeks to exercise that caution in the interest of all who reside within the U.S.
I don’t see anything wrong with that. That’s what he was elected to do. Whether or not someone feelings get hurt is their problem, not his.
It’s all so silly.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
5:50 pm
cappolini…
K’chak
Bad visual but good vocal rendention
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiXdnxYFJZg&feature=related
JohnnyReb
January 25th, 2011
5:51 pm
Paul, my condolences on loss of your pet. I have noticed in this mix of opinion over the months that if there is one thing most always agreed, it is love of pets. We have cats, but love all animals. God bless children and the animals.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
5:51 pm
I take it y’all are still hammering away at Islam and Muslims in general?
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:51 pm
Sidebar – just saw some geese fly over. They know spring is on its way…. though it don’t feel like it yet.
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:52 pm
“. . . to each his/her own, josef.”
I know we are the only two ‘mo’s on here most of the time, but are we really that interchangeable?
jm
January 25th, 2011
5:53 pm
jonix 5:44 – had a conversation with a certain PAC person about this issue. You can probably put another Israeli war on the clock in 90 to 180 days….
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
5:53 pm
jewcowboy
And THAT view of G-d, I would posit, is a highly limited one lacking in imagination and wonder…and I do admire Sagan…
OREP
Yep. One that grates on me, and I fall heir to it constantly!
JAY
Will do…
jewcowboy
January 25th, 2011
5:54 pm
@@,
“Business is business…religious beliefs are religious beliefs.”
Not in a theocratic state.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
5:55 pm
jewcowboy
@ 5:52
You’ll note I accepted that I had done it! Ain’t guilt grand?
jm
That’s what I’m thinking.
They BOTH suck
January 25th, 2011
5:57 pm
@ @@
I could careless if there is an House investigation, however if King feels that his 80% figure and whatever other accusations he has put forth are true, I would hope that the CIA, FBI and local authorities are already doing their homework……..
Both Parties love to grandstand when it comes to these type panels and investigations……… Hopefully something comes out of it besides pundit hyperbole and a bunch of name calling and unfounded innuendo……… as is the result many times
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
5:57 pm
jewcowboy
Are we MOTmos?
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
5:58 pm
jewcowboy,
So King etc are” proving guilt in the Press”. That’s as far as YOU know and Bookman too.
Has the FBI reported to you lately????
——————————
Paul,
I am sorry about your pet. I had to say “Go ahead” to the vets for my Harley. She had been the cleveret and cutest kitty for seventeen years and now she was half paralyzed. There wasn’t much choice but that did not make it any easier. I know you miss your pet., your four legged friend.
—————————–
Taxpayer, Why don’t you go to church and find how just how wrong you are? It surely does take one who never goes to church to know all about it.
Gotta leave…
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
5:59 pm
SoCo
The Baptists got the day off…
They BOTH suck
January 25th, 2011
5:59 pm
JohnnyReb
Whats up? We bantered back and forth a week or so back.
Hope all is well with you and your family……..
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
6:00 pm
Dusty
Rest assured, if that 80% estimate was anywhere near accurate, there would be weekly roundups of extremists by the thousands. I wouldn’t put that number anywhere near that high, and that’s based on a professional guess.
@@
January 25th, 2011
6:00 pm
Cowboy:
Saudi Arabia is not ruled by an Ayatollah. It’s ruled by a king.
jm
January 25th, 2011
6:02 pm
out later folks
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
6:02 pm
josef, Bruin to 6pm appointment? job interview? too much snow
on the roof? out to pasture like wooten? nahhh
Normal
January 25th, 2011
6:03 pm
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
3:58 pm
Dusty,
I’m just using my first amendment rights and I’ll knock what I choose.
And, if you would read without preconceived notions about me, you would realize that all I’m trying to do is to get you Christians to act a little more like your Jesus.
Gandhi nailed it when he said,”I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”
But the best thing about Jay’s blog is if you don’t like what I say…scroll on friend.
They BOTH suck
January 25th, 2011
6:06 pm
@@
Yes S.A is ruled by a King but they allow the Mullahs, Clerics, Imams or whatever the correct term is to dictate much of the day to day live of the population as long as it doesn’t interfere too much with their oil industry…..
Many of the Kings family and associates adhere to Islamic Law while is S.A. to show a united front with the religious leaders, but own homes elsewhere in the world so they can get their secular groove on………
For interesting relationship the Kings family and associates have with the religious leaders who have the ‘ears’ of the lower classes……
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
6:07 pm
jm, nice sentiment. And even better after Dawg’s addendum!
Dusty, interesting because the one and only time we had this discussion I told you I would go to church with you if you would go to Humanist meeting with me. And YOU were the one who said now way, Jose. (Closed minds, etc…)
So save your faux sorrow and good wishes for me, and good luck in finding whatever redemption you can.
josef, I’ve never professed to have any answers to any of these questions. This is what separates me from the absolutists and the dogmatists. I find freedom in the questions themselves.
Hang tough, brother Paul. Unconditional love from an animal is a wonderful thing. And now the memories of it will have to sustain you…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCI5wZRn9iE
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
6:08 pm
frog
I think it’s code word for the Missus Bruin calls…I hope so, anyway!
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
6:09 pm
Right, Normal, and I am using my first amendment rights too. Scroll on yourself. I’ll never know.
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
6:09 pm
josef, yep, that would do it..
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
6:10 pm
AmVet
“I find freedom in the questions themselves…”
Likewise, my ole Curmudgeon friend. And I really take solace in there being no answers…but that just makes it all the more intriguing to me…
Dusty
January 25th, 2011
6:12 pm
AmVet , I don’t remember your invitation. Dang!!! What IS a humanist meeting anyway? Kinda like riding the MARTA train?
Done that. Been there…
bye..
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
6:13 pm
josef
Then, the Muslims should have gotten the day off too. Islam is not the problem, and neither are Muslims. What we’re up against is a group of extremists and an idea. Whenever people stop long enough to realize that we’re fighting an idea and not a person, then we will begin to solve our problems.
JohnnyReb
January 25th, 2011
6:14 pm
They BOTH suck – greetings to you. All is well, and with you the same I hope. We are self employed around here. I try to run a food brokerage and my wife has a retail shop. It continues to be a busy time of year with taxes, inventory, etc. So, my goof-off time is limited. I just pop in and out with an occasional kind comment, but most often a dig at the honorable opposition.
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
6:14 pm
josef, and to that point,
William Shatner and Joe Jackson said/sang it best…
You’ll never live like common people
You’ll never do whatever common people do.
You’ll never fail like common people.
You’ll never watch your life slide out of view,
and dance and drink and screw
because there’s nothing else to do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ainyK6fXku0
They BOTH suck
January 25th, 2011
6:18 pm
@Johnny
Doing well, thanks, …… I do contract and consulting work in Supply Chain and Inventory Mgmt…………. Get to work from home a good amount so it works out
I’m sure you do well already, but good luck and continued success to both your wife and yourself
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
6:18 pm
SoCo
I would agree entirely. The hijacking of a faith/doctrine to serve extremist ideology is, from what I have seen, a universal tendency. Making it so personal accomplishes nothing more than to push the individual who feels attacked toward the extreme in reaction.
stands for decibels
January 25th, 2011
6:19 pm
William Shatner and Joe Jackson said/sang it best…
I suppose they might’ve, although Pulp actually composed it.
(by the way, for the longest time I thought the line was “you’ll never watch your life slide out of you.” Still think that’s better.)
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
6:20 pm
You haven’t found it and your usual unhappiness reveals that….. But I do hope you will find whatever it is your heart is missing.
If it makes you feel any better, Am, Dusty tried to run the same rap on me a while back.
And I really take solace in there being no answers…but that just makes it all the more intriguing to me…
josef–Spoken like a true Scientist. In the words of Richrd Feynman, who was the greatest Phycisist of the second half of the 20th century:
“You see, one thing is, I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it’s much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different degrees of uncertainty about different things, but I am not absolutely sure of anything and there are many things I don’t know anything about, such as whether it means anything to ask why we’re here . . . I don’t have to know an answer. I don’t feel frightened not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without any purpose, which is the way it really is as far as I can tell. It doesn’t frighten me.”
Hillbilly Deluxe
January 25th, 2011
6:20 pm
It’s ironic that columns against hate seem to bring out the most of it, and from all directions. Think I’ll sit this one out.
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
6:21 pm
SoCo 6:13 Unfortunately they believe that we are the problem
that needs solving by any means available. I disagree with their
methods but I can understand their reasoning.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
6:21 pm
The hijacking of a faith/doctrine to serve extremist ideology is, from what I have seen, a universal tendency.
We tend to see that on display on this here blog from time to time. What you said is exactly what is happening. It’s now becoming a chess match of actions and reactions. If we don’t gain control over our actions, we could find ourselves in checkmate.
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
6:22 pm
Oops– (-1) points for poor spelling ^^^^
That would be Richard Feynman, the greatest Physicist of the second half of the 20th century.
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
6:22 pm
Kinda like riding the MARTA train?
Touché and fabulously funny.
Humanism encompasses a variety of nontheistic views (atheism, agnosticism, rationalism, naturalism, secularism, and so forth)
http://www.americanhumanist.org
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
6:23 pm
frog
That’s not entirely right. I’ve had to re-examine my understanding of Islam in recent months. They believe we are the problem based on Islamic principles that, when applied in specific cases and methods, actually furthers the claims of the extremists and give them credibility in the words of Islam.
The Leg Lamp is a "major award".....
January 25th, 2011
6:24 pm
Why not ask Putin what he truly thinks about muslims at this time?
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
6:25 pm
SC–If you get a moment, take a listen to this number and give me your opinion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNchhLT2abo
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
6:28 pm
SoCo 6:23 I was speaking of the extremists.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
6:31 pm
AmVet
“…my baby takes the MARTA train, he works from 9 til 5 and then he takes another home again..”
BRUNO
Or a true Maimonidean!
SoCo
Checkmate…yes, and we’re getting ever closer with each partisan, dogmatic swipe…
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
6:31 pm
frog
Oh, I misinterpreted. My fault….
@@
January 25th, 2011
6:34 pm
josef:
Christianity’s promise is that you’ll never have all the answers until…..
ODDOWL
January 25th, 2011
6:35 pm
Peter King is a racist redneck. His racist antics have a long history. Now we can add anti-semitism (anti Islam) to his reportoire. Peter King and his cohorts are a dying breed. His attempts to disunite America will backfire in his face.
Lil' Barry Bailout
January 25th, 2011
6:35 pm
Jay, if you’re going to make such a claim, don’t you think you should have some sort of factual information to support it? What you’ve brought is weak.
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
6:35 pm
Funny on the “mishear”, stands. I love it when that happens. Out of view, out of you? Nice…
Hillbilly, something about discussing religion that seems to bring out the most powerful reactions. That’s how big a deal it (still) is to us, I guess.
Bruno!
I read some more in the Zen Mind/Beginner’s Mind this weekend. The passage I was reading was, at that exact time (and state of mind), perfect for me to grok it! I was fairly surprised. And joyous.
And I have only scratched the surface.
This seems apropos…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9eQ8_T1ytU
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
6:36 pm
josef & frog
There is a term, fitna, that if you haven’t heard, you may want to research just a little. By claiming fitna, or oppression, the extremists can declare jihad as they are being oppressed. I can’t remember the passages of the Koran where it comes from, but it’s an interesting logic to follow.
In the land of religious freedom, they are being oppressed in their view. With the hubbub about the NY Center, and now Rep. King, we’re adding fuel to that fire. Notice the increase in claims of Islamophobia and such. That’s why I say we all need to take a collective deep breath and stop the fear mongering. We are not fighting people anymore. It is an idea now. You can’t fight an idea with physical force.
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
6:37 pm
Or a true Maimonidean!
For many folks, uncertainty is extremely uncomfortable, so they invent explanations to questions which are essentially unanswerable. I put this into a scientific rather than a philosophical context due to my training, though it ultimately is an epistemological consideration.
@@
January 25th, 2011
6:37 pm
Medvedev has vowed to hunt down the terrorists tied to the airport attack.
Why am I thinking he’s not kidding? Turn it over to Putin, bystanders be damned.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
6:38 pm
Bruno
Interesting track. I’m not too gung ho on the finger snaps, but the lyrics were oddly tame for this generation. Sounds like that guy has listened to some of the older singers who were more suggestive in their lyrics as opposed to just getting downright explicit. I’d give it an 8 on a 10pt scale.
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
6:40 pm
“And I have only scratched the surface.”
Buddy, I’ve been contemplating Suzuki for more than 30 years and still feel like I’m only scratching the surface. “Zen Mind, Beginners Mind” has an I Ching quality to it insofar as you can open it to any random page, and it will offer some nugget which informs your current quandary. I guess the same could be said for any great book, the Bible included.
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
6:41 pm
I’d give it an 8 on a 10pt scale.
Cool. This guy is one of my clients and is trying to make in the music business. I like the sound of his recording, has somewhat of a Nelly feeling to it. I’ll tell him you like it.
Lil' Barry Bailout
January 25th, 2011
6:42 pm
Following the SOTU, the messianic Odumbo will exit the chamber by flapping his ears until airborne, circle above the assembly, and fly out a little-known hatchway through the roof. Several of his Democrat acolytes will faint, others will prostrate themselves and praise his name.
pat
January 25th, 2011
6:44 pm
Jew Cowbody, no sky fairy does not exists. I have provided an argument though it may requiare a bit of work on your part. Therefore the burden of proof lies with you. Usually, the burden of proof does lie with atheists, as they assert the absurd notion of ’something from nothing’.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
6:45 pm
Bruno
Don’t take this the wrong way, please, but I have a problem with your choice of “invent explanations.” I know it’s seems petty, and probably is, but I like the term develop or arrive at since they are less, to me, scientific…the reason I say that is that the Maimonidean clearly distinguishes between the known, the scientific for which we “invent” explanations, and the spiritual, the unknown for which our explanations are freed of the scientific, allowing us to develop or arrive at without being bound by the restraints imposed by scientific inquiry…
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
6:46 pm
Bruno
No prob. I kinda think the finger snap thing has been overdone, but that’s just me. He’s got a good voice though. He doesn’t sound timid or weak at any point through that entire track.
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
6:48 pm
Usually, the burden of proof does lie with atheists, as they assert the absurd notion of ’something from nothing’.
Actually, pat, the concept of ex nihilo (something from nothing) is part and parcel of all cosmological explanations because our minds can’t conceptualize anything differently. Genesis 1 and 2 rely heavily upon it as well, though “God” is presumed to predate time itself.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
6:48 pm
SoCo
And fitna in a society such as ours where we all want to argue who is more oppressed, it finds fertile ground and we need to be aware of that…
pat
January 25th, 2011
6:49 pm
Jay: the assertion wasn’t that 80% of mosques were radical, the assertion was 80% of mosques had radical imams. You say it’s not true, you need to prove that. The burden of proff is on you. You started it, therefore it’s your job to prove it.
Matti
January 25th, 2011
6:52 pm
HEY Y’ALL!
What are our shot words for this evening’s address? (Did I miss this discussion? Sorry, I’ve been working.)
They BOTH suck
January 25th, 2011
6:53 pm
@Pat
You need to proof your God exists not that he or she doesn’t.
Burden of proof is on you, not the non-believer
@@
January 25th, 2011
6:53 pm
My fondest hope is that Bruno’s reincarnation will result in womanhood and that she will then meet a man like Bruno.
Kharma’s a b*tch, baby.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
6:54 pm
josef
I’m willing to bet that upwards of 90% of our society (outside the Muslim population) does not have a clue to that word’s existence let alone it’s meaning.
pat
I can attest with pretty good confidence that if 80% of the mosques here were radical, we’d see raids and busts on a weekly basis. I wouldn’t put that number nearly that high at all.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
6:55 pm
Somewhat still on the thread…the reason my Grandfather was so Maimondean in outlook and his first lesson in introducing me to that thought, was that he was the greatest spokesperson from that moment in time in Spain when Muslim, Christian and Jewish thinkers of all disciplines came together with the single goal of finding their commonalities…sadly, Christians and Muslims rejected him and he wasn’t always in favor with the Jewish inquistors…
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
6:56 pm
SoCo, that review reminded me of this:
American Bandstand’s Dick Clark would often interview the teenagers about their opinions of the songs being played, most memorably through the “Rate-a-Record” segment. During the segment, two audience members each ranked two records on a scale of 35 to 98, then the two opinions were averaged by Clark, who then asked the audience members to justify their scores. The segment gave rise, perhaps apocryphally, to the phrase “It’s got a good beat and you can dance to it”. In one humorous segment broadcast for years on retrospective shows, comedians Cheech and Chong appeared as the record raters.
You’re comin’ up like a flower
You’re comin’ up through the cracks
That live ’round here
Everybody knows we have no fear
This is my generation .
‘Cause we just want to dance all night
Live inside the spark of life
This might be the only time around
We wanna know the face of freedom
We wanna make a place where we can learn to love
Build a world that we can be proud of
This is my generay-ay ay ay tion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NyQnrHqByg
Matti
January 25th, 2011
6:58 pm
Aww, man. Are we still on religion? C’mon people. We’re humans. We’re temporary moving specs on the planet. Our little bitty minds are simply not great enough to comprehend the true nature of the Creator of the entire infinite universe. (Helllooooo?) Whoever or Whatever He is, He’s bigger than anything we can conceive in our tiny little fleshy earth brains. Men wrote those books to hornswaggle us out of our earnings and scare us into ceding to authority and conforming to the norms of whatever the current authority happens to be. Get over it. We’re specs.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
6:59 pm
gotta run, but just to let you know what our glorious GOP majority accomplished in the House today..
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/112/house/1/votes/18/
House Resolution 43:
Providing for Consideration of the Resolution (H.Res. 38) to Reduce Spending Through a Transition to Non-Security Spending at Fiscal Year 2008 Levels
passed today.
Committees:
House Rules: Full Committee. On H.R. 359 – To reduce Federal spending and the deficit by terminating taxpayer financing of presidential election campaigns and party conventions. H-313 Capitol.
I guess the committee is wanting to do away with public money altogether and leave election financing to deep pocketed individuals and entities. I can see it now: The Home Depot GOP Convention, or the Del Monte Democratic Convention.
Matti
January 25th, 2011
6:59 pm
Okay, if we do a shot every time we hear “nu-ku-lar” we probably won’t wet our whistles. If we do one every time he says “together,” we’ll get alcohol poisoning.
Any ideas?
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
6:59 pm
@@
I like Bruno, myself, but I must confess I share your wish for his reincarnation!
SoCo
It’s like the word for the concept of jihad…we have decided to see it only in it’s bellicose and completely miss the spiritual aspect of “struggle…”
BOTH
And why is that burden of proof on the non believer? Have you read “Guide for the Perplexed?”
jack bull
January 25th, 2011
7:00 pm
this is a big world isn’t it? just don’t understand why this group can’t live here, and that group live over there, and so on and so on…same with democrats and republicans….if everyone is so opposite in their views, religion, etc… lets just all agree to live with those who we get along with…or would that be too boring?
Lil' Barry Bailout
January 25th, 2011
7:00 pm
Shot words for those intrigued by alcohol poisoning: “I”, “me”, and “my”.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
7:00 pm
Catch y’all later. Got a little one to entertain.
@@
January 25th, 2011
7:00 pm
specs….God with freckles.
I’m out.
Southern Comfort (B.P.O.I.B.W.)
January 25th, 2011
7:01 pm
josef
I asked earlier if anyone knew the definition of and how many different jihads there were. Nobody answered. Kinda par for the course here. Catch ya later, bro.
Lil' Barry Bailout
January 25th, 2011
7:02 pm
How about “corpseman”?
TaxPayer
January 25th, 2011
7:03 pm
Damn! That just cracked me up. That’s just too much.
Matti
January 25th, 2011
7:03 pm
AtAt,
It’s a frightening realization [to think like you sometimes], but I also have wished this very fate on a number of men. So much so, that I’m convinced that I was much like Bruno in a previous life, and am now being punished. (Yes, they only THINK life with a big rack is gravy. Heh…) If you’re really really bad in this life, you go to Heck. In other words, you’re born a few minutes later in Haiti. Hey, my guess is just as good as anybody else’s!
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
7:03 pm
Don’t take this the wrong way, please, but I have a problem with your choice of “invent explanations.”
My choice of wording reflects the fact that ALL human explanations are just that: human in origin. It kind of ties in with Jay’s New Year’s column which highlighted the difference between man-made measurements such as the inch or the pound vs. natural or “Godly” measurements involving repeating cycles of time. Jay’s column sturck a deep chord with me because that is ultimately why I left the world of Science and got involved with health care instead. healing is one of those “Godly” things which exists independently of our efforts to quantify it.
@@
January 25th, 2011
7:04 pm
josef:
You can have him before his reincarnation.
(ISH)
Keep up the good fight!
January 25th, 2011
7:06 pm
Taxpayer…Jon is almost always on point for Fox faubles.
Trent Reznor
January 25th, 2011
7:08 pm
Matti @ 7:03–C’mon now, give my buddy Bruno a break already!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEW8riKU_tE
@@
January 25th, 2011
7:08 pm
Matti:
I wouldn’t buy his crap as a man, and I SURE don’t it as a woman. I hold myself in higher regard. Not sure what you’re going through.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
7:10 pm
matti
You may be a spec…I’m not…I’m one of G-d’s noblest creatures who, given dominion over the earth, went in a matter of a few thousand years from the trees to the stars…
“The pathology and creativity of the human mind, after all, are two sides of the same medal coined in the evolutionary mint. The first is responsible for the splendor of our cathedrals, the second for the gargoyles that decorate them to remind us that the world is full of monsters, devils, and succubi. They reflect the streak of insanity which runs through the history of our species, and which indicates that somewhere along the line in its ascent to prominence something has gone wrong.”
–Arthur Koestler
Matti
January 25th, 2011
7:15 pm
jo nix,
I was holding my friend when her heart stopped beating and the last breath left her disease- and chemo-battered body. Deep in a cold dark night, there was only silence, but I felt her presence there in the room with us, toward the ceiling. I felt her congnizance that had been shut off from us a few minutes before. I felt her love. Since you know so much, tell me, WHERE did she go?
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
7:15 pm
@@
I’ll take him…he’s not beyond redemption…
BRUNO
I will agree that they are all human, but I would argue that the scientific and the spiritual exist in separate realms and the terminologies were use should reflect that separation…
Matti
January 25th, 2011
7:19 pm
We’ll never know. At least, we’ll never know until we, too, stop breathing air into these bodies.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
7:20 pm
matti
Okay, I’ll go there. When I had the big one, I died. I was brought back. So, I’ve been there. I could define it in physiolgical or spiritual terms, but unless you’ve had the experience it would be something you would have to “choose” between the two. Let’s just say they were both in harmony and, yes, it even had its highly human and humorous twist!
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
7:21 pm
For what it’s worth, given the choice of spending a night with josef or a night with @@, I’m going with josef even though I’m not gay. Of course, throw Matti into the mix and I’m:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGqPzrNypzw
Matti
January 25th, 2011
7:23 pm
Bru Baby,
You’ve got good game tonight. LOVING both of these!
jo nix,
So…. you’re saying I’m not just believing what I want to believe, and that she really WAS there in the room with us, outside her spent shell?
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
7:25 pm
Bruno
I’m not at all sure Matti would go with that! We’d be fighting over the hair shirt!
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
7:27 pm
Creation or devolution has us move from perfection to our
present state. Evolution has us move from nothing to our
present state. Either way we are here as we are.
Jack
January 25th, 2011
7:28 pm
It’s been said before, but vile ugly men bombed our buildings and killed our citizens. Coddling makes us look even weaker.
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
7:28 pm
Have you read “Guide for the Perplexed?”
No, but I have read The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. (”So long, and thanks for all the fish.”)
The Home Depot GOP Convention, or the Del Monte Democratic Convention.
Welcome to the Corporatocracy!
Wow, Jimi Hendrix. Very colorful and trippy, B.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_P45feBkrg
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
7:32 pm
matti
I can’t speak to her experience, only mine. And, yes, that is much the case. Okay, the story and the human element…when I went into the ER at Unmentionable’s hospital, I got the red carpet treatment, or so I thought, due to who brought me in. I had no idea what was going on. There were all kinds of people doing all kinds of things. I recall quite well the feeling of absolute harmony with all that was, is (and no, not will be, but it was definitely a place I had no angst about going to). Call it the out of body experience, but the paddles were being applied and the doctor was “don’t go, dammit, come back…” I can recall “thinking” as I was watching from wherever it was I was, “well, honey, I don’t want to be any trouble. If it’ll make you happy…” And I did “come back.” Only later did I find out what the paddles meant and why she was “in such a state.”
Like I said, this is just my experience. In talking to others who have gone through it, a similar “experience” is at work.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
7:33 pm
AmVet
Love Hitchhiker’s Guide!
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
7:36 pm
The desire to survive forever is a logical extension of
self preservation the only instinct we have. Survival of
the fittest is a statement of the obvious. Fear is the
only emotion. All the other labels are just degrees of it.
A tidy package.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
7:38 pm
frog
You forget the instinct to procreate!
Keep up the good fight!
January 25th, 2011
7:39 pm
I agree Jack. Let’s stop coddling those like the killer of Dr. Tiller and his Christain supporters. Those are vile ugly people.
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
7:42 pm
josef 7:38 the instinct of self preservation, a little of us
survives.
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
7:42 pm
I will agree that they are all human, but I would argue that the scientific and the spiritual exist in separate realms and the terminologies were use should reflect that separation…
Even though they use different standards of “proof”, I don’t separate the spiritual and the scientific, since they are both ways that our brains try to make sense of the world. The reality is that we only perceive an extremely small slice of the electromagnetic spectrum along with a small slice of the sound spectrum and a small piece of the chemical soup which surrounds us, yet our brains are able to assemble a coherent picture which is accurate enough to allow us to put a man on the moon. Yet through all of this, our understanding is strictly “human” since our human brains are the organ which is making sense of it all, a fact that seems to be lost on many a pontificator.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
7:44 pm
matti
Question and please don’t feel obliged to answer, but were you born after August 3, 1964?
Scout
January 25th, 2011
7:44 pm
I’m back …………. Oh, I hear the liberal moans ………. their not into free speech much.
In any case, I haven’t the time to catch up on all the posts but as far as I can tell no one answered my very easy question:
Multiple Choice Quiz:
Which of the following “religious” entities in the United States requires untold millions in taxpayer money and immense NSA, Military Intelligence, CIA, FBI (to name a few) assets to conduct investigations and physical surveillances of places of worship, community service establishments, places of education, etc. via undercover FBI agents, paid informants and sophisticated electronic means:
a) Roman Catholic Church
b) Methodist Church
c) Church of Latter Day Saints (Mormons)
d) Church of God
e) Southern Baptist Church
f) Judaism (all forms)
g) Lutheran Church
h) Presbyterian Church
i) Episcopal Church
j) Mennonnite Church
k) Church of the Brethren
l) Nazarene Church
m) 7th Day Adventist Church
n) Quakers
o) Church of Christ
p) Islam
q) All of the above
Scout
January 25th, 2011
7:48 pm
By the way, there is no way we conservatives are going to change you liberal’s views on this subject.
There is only one thing that will eventually do it and that is “Islamists”.
When that time comes, we will still welcome you with open arms because we will need everyone we can get !
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
7:48 pm
Bruno
“I don’t separate the spiritual and the scientific…”
And I would argue that this failure to do so lies at the heart of your angst and that’s not meant to be snippy. You want rationality. It ain’t there, IMHO…
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
7:50 pm
WHERE did she go?
Matti–The tricky part about talking about “spirit” is that, by definition, a spirit is non-corporal, i.e. it has no “substance”, no “mass”. Yet spirits exist and they can influence us. I won’t bore you with what I think is a valid Scientific explanation for this, but suffice it to say that the idea of “spirit” is not incompatible with a strictly scientific view of the world.
Matti
January 25th, 2011
7:50 pm
jo nix,
Thanks for sharing that with me. I’m glad you came back! It’s nice to know that I might not be crazy. I looked up and for a moment, I just knew we were looking right at each other, and she was glad I’d come. I felt her a couple times after that, but not for awhile now.
Bruno makes good sense about the science thing. I fail to understand the war that religion wages on science. Did God create everything or didn’t He? If so, then He created science and understanding it is not a negation of God.
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
7:52 pm
Yeah jo, the names, the devices (improbability drive?), the plot, everything about it is special. A must read for sci fi and other literary connoisseurs.
I remember devouring books from Asimov, Heinlein, and of course a little later, Tolkien.
And if you ever get the chance, read Wells The Outline of History. It is the recorded history of man from 10,000 years ago to 1919 (mine is copyrighted 1927.) Several revised editions were made up until 1971.
I consider it one of my greatest treasures…
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
7:52 pm
You want rationality. It ain’t there, IMHO…
josef–You know me too well!! Yet, at the same time, I feel that it’s possible to characterize irrationality in rational terms, if that makes any sense.
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
7:52 pm
Scout
January 25th, 2011
7:48 pm
——————————————————-
What do you think the Islamic religion really wants?
Matti
January 25th, 2011
7:54 pm
Scout,
Despite my loathing for your labels and venom, I would like to try to put your mind at ease. I’ve got a steady hand, I’m not afraid, and I aint never wearin no burkah, so when it’s time to mount the defense of this here land of SEC football and Wensdee nite nanner puddin’ at the church, I’m all in. Feel better?
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
7:56 pm
I fail to understand the war that religion wages on science. Did God create everything or didn’t He? If so, then He created science and understanding it is not a negation of God.
What perplexes me even more than that, Matti, is how people can use religion to make war on one another. We are all part of the Creation.
Matti
January 25th, 2011
7:57 pm
jo nix,
Negatory. Sorry.
Keep up the good fight!
January 25th, 2011
7:59 pm
Police: SC woman kills dog because it chewed Bible
Who is going to defend the animals against the thumpers Scout. Are you adding these costs into your diatribe?
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
8:00 pm
Scout–Put your mind at ease re: Matti. She may be a card-carrying liberal, but she isn’t going to let any man subjugate her, whether Muslim or Southern Baptist. You can count on that.
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
8:01 pm
On the political side, does everyone understand how
important your congressional representative is to you?
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
8:07 pm
matti
I’m glad to be able to share that with you…as you know, “down home” we have no problem with the spiritual world in our daily conduct of our lives…and, yes, I agree with you on G-d and science…I see no conflict between the two, they just each have their sphere…in our Western tradition, G-d gave to man the earthly and essentially said, “here ya go, Pombo, this is yours. Make of it what you will. I’ll be watching ‘from a distance.’”
AmVet
The Outline of History is it! I have several copies…one for marking up, one for just reading, and then the leather bound from Granddaddy’s library…
Frog
January 25th, 2011
7:48 pm
——————————————————-
What do you think the Islamic religion really wants?
An explantion for the meaning of it all and a guide for how to live a moral and just life?
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
8:10 pm
matti
Okay…why did I ask? I was sure you were the reincarnation of Flannery O’Connor!
Bruno
How? As Koestler said,”… in its ascent to prominence, something has gone wrong…”
Matti
January 25th, 2011
8:11 pm
barking frog,
My Congressman is much more important to me than I am to him, that’s for sure! I write to him, come to his little town hall meetings, visit his facebook page…. He treats me like *bleep!* It’s like I’m invisible, like he’s not listening, and he doesn’t CARE what I need or how I feel! I tried to break up with him, but…. dang. He’s all I got on the Hill!
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
8:12 pm
“…the leather bound from Granddaddy’s library…”
I thought you might! Fantastic.
It took me a bout a year to finish it. But I would only read a few pages a night. You remember, before we all got digitized…
Hillbilly, you’re right. Bo Belinsky (not Bo Pelini) was the original cool cat with an amazing life story.
He said, “If music be the food of love, by all means let the band play on.” The 1962 season was a raucous one for Belinsky in that he became glittering copy for southern California sportswriters with his wit and unapologetic womanizing. “Within days of his no-hitter Belinsky would be heralded as sport’s most original and engaging playboy-athlete,”
His no-hitter was the first of eight thrown by Jewish pitchers in one decade. The others: Sandy Koufax in 1962, 1963, 1964 and 1965; Joe Horlen in 1967; and Ken Holtzman in 1969 and 1971.
In addition to pitching the first no-hitter in Angels’ history, Belinsky was also on the losing end of the first no-hitter ever pitched against them—Earl Wilson’s 2–0 gem at Fenway Park that same 1962 season. The Boston Red Sox pitcher hit a home run in that game, one of three no-hit pitchers ever to do so.
19 days until pitchers and catchers report…
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
8:13 pm
Am–What’s up with all the William Shatner tonight????
I feel the need to wipe the board with some TP:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exPyw8OM41k
Love this song ^^^^^
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
8:13 pm
josef 8:07 Do you think that’s what Scout thinks?
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
8:15 pm
Matti
January 25th, 2011
8:11 pm
That’s excellent Matti. Keep it up. He affects your day to day
life more than any other Federal Official.
barking frog
January 25th, 2011
8:18 pm
Matti, send him a couple of bucks, tell him you will
send more when you can afford it. Your correspondence
will change.
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
8:20 pm
Am–In case you didn’t see it, your boy Suh was the only rookie selected to the Pro Bowl this year.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
8:24 pm
frog
I think in the stillness of the night, yes, he does…he would consider it apostasy to admit it,,,Scout’s is an emotional faith, and I can respect that even when I am in polar opposition to what he “feels…” And, yes, he does have a good heart and a good soul…IMHO…
Bruno
January 25th, 2011
8:26 pm
Catch you all later……
godless heathen
January 25th, 2011
8:32 pm
Pat: “Therefore the burden of proof lies with you. Usually, the burden of proof does lie with atheists, as they assert the absurd notion of ’something from nothing’.”
That is the most convoluted logic I have ever heard, but that’s what it takes to believe in Sky Fairies.
If something from nothing is the notion of atheists, then I simply ask, where did the Sky Fairy come from?
I am an atheist and I don’t believe in something from nothing, I believe things just are, always were and always will be. I believe we do not currently have the intellect to completely understand the universe and that’s what makes the ride so friggin’ much fun. This would be such a dull place if we knew all the answers.
My dog is pretty smart but he just can’t grasp the simplest algebraic equation. In the same way, there are explanations to things we observe in this universe that we simply don’t have the mental capacity to understand in current state of development. Infinity is an example. What man will know in another 50000 years (if we survive) is hard to even to begin to comprehend.
I am so happy that for me all the answers aren’t contained in some book of fables recorded by men many hundreds of years ago. What a dull life that would be.
AmVet
January 25th, 2011
8:33 pm
Hey B, nothing really, other than that I love that LP.
Getting the words wrong
wasting the meaning
Losing the rhyme
Nice Petty.
And Woo Hoo on Suh! Arguably already, the most dominant defensive player of his era.
Be good…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM02WcvlKn0
@@
January 25th, 2011
8:40 pm
Came to see if jay was live-blogging.
given the choice of spending a night with josef or a night with @@, I’m going with josef even though I’m not gay.
Accept the reality, dude. The choice isn’t ALWAYS yours. I wouldn’t give you the time of day, much less a choice.
The minute you opened your mouth with “What’s your sign?” I’d hold up the big DETOUR….
Dream on, Loser.
moonbat betty (sotu)
January 25th, 2011
8:40 pm
We dose and drink a shot every time he says, “e-con-o-mi”
if you dare…
moonbat betty (sotu)
January 25th, 2011
8:42 pm
@@, you go girl friend.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
8:44 pm
barking frog @ 7:52
World domination.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
8:44 pm
Adapted from the book “Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat” by Dr. Peter Hammond.
“Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.
Here’s how it works:
1) As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to other citizens (i.e. United States – 0.6%).
2) At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs (i.e. Denmark – 2%).
3) From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia Law (i.e. France – 8%).
4) When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam (i.e. India – 13.4%).
5) After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues (i.e. Ethiopia – 32.8%).
6) At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare by Muslims (i.e. Chad – 53.1%).
7) From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels (i.e. Sudan – 70%).
9) 100% is to usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ (the Islamic House of Peace) because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word (i.e., Afghanistan – 100%).
Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states, the most radical Muslims satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims for a variety of reasons.”
Mick
January 25th, 2011
8:45 pm
scout
Don’t take this the wrong way but you have a focused paranoia about islam. Were we worrying about islam in the 60’s, 70’s, or 80’s? What changed things? The first mistake was maintaining an american air base in saudi arabia after the first gulf war. The second great mistake was the iraq war. It is estimated that our “collateral damage” was anywhere from 100k to 1million dead iraqi’s. We are the good guys but to the people in occupied territory we are more like alien invaders in their land. We need to pull back, create a steel defense and here is where we find agreement, curtail or discourage people of that faith from coming to america. Why? Their religion conflicts with our beliefs, culture and our constitution. They don’t need america and america doesn’t need them. People of that faith already here will eventually assimilate and become more american each succeeding generation.
pat
January 25th, 2011
8:46 pm
Hey Godless if you prefer self imposed ignorance and you do not care, I don’t give a flying sh*t.
Now you call it convoluted logic but you fail to prove it. You choose not to seek and understand that which is true and real. You are free to do that, but do go telling people they are wrong or stupid for believing in God when not only you don’t know, but you don’t bother to find out.
Your mind may be to small to understand the matter, but mine is not. So you can shove you ’sky fairy’ based hubris, which is obviously based in nothing more that intellectual lazyness.
The truth is, I can prove I am right and you cannot. But you are an abomination to atheists. Most of them try, at least.
You must believe in something from nothing, and randomness to prove there is no causal properties to the universe. The brightest minds have and continue to try to only fail, but their science is facinating.
I can respect an atheist who can make an arguement, bbut you are asserting the following ‘I don’t know how existance came to be, but it can’t be God! That’s just silly.’
This is a crappy forum to take on the topic, but I have taken on the best and they have lost because truth and logic are on my side.
I won’t provide the dissertation here, but my 5:06 @ jm provides the path to find it. You got to do your research first, before I destroy your silly notions of ‘I don’t know, but there ain’t no God’ and from nothingness, something came.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
8:49 pm
heathen
And I posit that you have a pretty high opinion of yourself!
Seriously, though, where is your sense of poetry and literature? Where is your wonder at the metaphor? Gilgamesh, Genesis, Aesop, Brothers Grimm–gevalt, man, are you saying they are without intrinsic value in understanding who we are? Talk about your boring life…
killerj
January 25th, 2011
8:50 pm
Good,reminds me of the media………
@@
January 25th, 2011
8:50 pm
moonbat betty:
O.K., but before I go, I want to reiterate what pat said earlier. King said 80% of mosques are headed by imams who espouse radical islamic jihad. Doesn’t denounce all Muslims. Could be Rep. King wants to protect American Muslims from radical imams.
jay’ll never accept the possibility. Liberal journalists need bigots…racists. Without that claim they’ve got nuthin’.
G’nite.
Matti
January 25th, 2011
8:51 pm
barking frog,
My Congressman is alreay loa-ho-ho-ded. His golf tab is probably more than my whole house is worth. My measly little $50 means nothing. It’s about power for him, and that means pleasing the powerful and telling folks like me to pizz off.
BTW, I already started drinking. Was I supposed to wait?
moonbat betty (sotu)
January 25th, 2011
8:53 pm
Question?
Why is it the last thing someone thinks before they die is, “Oh God, or “I want my Mommy?”
Scout
January 25th, 2011
8:53 pm
Headline: “Arizona to pass 2012 eligibility law?”
“Obama will ‘have to produce birth certificate’ to run again. A number of states are considering similar legislation.”
Hummmm ……………..
This is going to get interesting.
godless heathen
January 25th, 2011
8:54 pm
No Pat, I can’t prove I’m right but neither can you. I can’t prove that I am not an angel.
So happy for you that you have all the answers, however simplistic they are. In about 100 years look me up in hell and gloat.
As quoted to you before, Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You have no evidence to support your claims of a god’s existence. Oh, I forgot, lack of evidence of god’s existence is the evidence. Go on your merry way.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
8:55 pm
Mick:
“What changed?”
Very simple:
Islamic terrorism and mass immigration into the U.S.
Enoch
January 25th, 2011
8:56 pm
Remins me of Cynthia Tucker knowing what percent of the crowd is racist just by looking.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
8:57 pm
Mick:
You are a very intelligent person and a very good debator.
I challenge you to read “The Grand Jihad” by Andrew McCarthy and then see if you think I am being paranoid.
Mr. McCarthy is not some politician, media personality or educator.
He prosecuted those responsible for the first World Trade Center Bombing.
You owe it to yourself.
Matti
January 25th, 2011
8:58 pm
This is going to get interesting.
Only if we bet on it, sucker.
godless heathen
January 25th, 2011
8:59 pm
joseph, I thought I made the point for discovery and wonder, not that all is known. Pat is the one that knows all the answers. I say we never will, but as a scientist I am interested in the search.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
8:59 pm
moonbat betty (sotu):
No I don’t but I have heard those very words on the field of battle. Most often …….. “mother, mom, etc.”
Jay
January 25th, 2011
8:59 pm
Fresh SOTU sheets upstairs
Scout
January 25th, 2011
9:00 pm
Matti:
There goes a puppy !
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
9:00 pm
moonbat
What’s the last thing I thought? “Well, evidently it ain’t just a bad case of gas!” Seriously,,,it was!
godless heathen
January 25th, 2011
9:00 pm
Scout you might want to read Sam Harris’s book. He’s pretty hard on the Islamists and the threat they pose. But he is also hard on the Christians.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
9:01 pm
Does anyone want to challenge Dr. Peter Hammond at 8:44 ???
Scout
January 25th, 2011
9:02 pm
godless heathen:
Thank you for the tip.
Does he mention a modern day threat by Christians involving their leadership all over the world, their terrorists bombings in the name of Christ, their goal to control the world by force ?
Keep up the good fight!
January 25th, 2011
9:04 pm
Here’s how it works:
1) As long as the Christian
Muslimpopulation remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to other citizens2) At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs
3) From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves and attempt to post their commandments in courts and government buildings. They will require that “In God We Trust” be imposed on the entire population on currency and in pledges.
4) When Christian approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. Any non-Christian action offends them. They will demand silent prayers be imposed and that creationism be taught as a legitimate science.
5) After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, christian militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Islamic churches and Jewish synagogues
Etc. etc. But hey, enjoy your non-factual diatribe.
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
9:06 pm
heathen
You said this…
“I am so happy that for me all the answers aren’t contained in some book of fables recorded by men many hundreds of years ago. What a dull life that would be.”
That provoked my response.
You an others say “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” Agreed, but since the theological/spiritual ARE the ordinary, that which is “extra” i.e. beyond, would fall into your camp…just being EOI here…
The Engrish language is a tricky little vixen…
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
9:08 pm
Look, folks, I keep telling ya, but nobody wants to listen…it’s the Ragpickers…they’re the ones!
josef nix
January 25th, 2011
9:17 pm
g’night…
TruthBe
January 25th, 2011
9:19 pm
Rep.Keith Ellison is a racist muslim that supports Islam and the enemy that attacked America and the same Islam that is at war with America. Keith Ellison is a traitor and a total disgrace to America and to the Citizens of America. He should be thrown out of office at once. And take your muslim brother Obama with you. Obama the communist will be lying to all of us tonight in his propagandist speech.
Darwin
January 25th, 2011
9:33 pm
U.S. Middle East policy = Oil and Israel. Until that changes, don’t blame the Muslims. We have overthrown democracies and enslaved entire nations in the pursuit of oil. Decades of this abuse by OUR HANDS has brought about radical Islam. Yes, we are exceptional alright.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
9:43 pm
Keep up the good fight!
Take it up with Dr. Edwards.
Funny how what’s happening in Europe is right down the line with his thesis.
Ignore if you want to.
Scout
January 25th, 2011
9:46 pm
godless heathen :
“Scout you might want to read Sam Harris’s book. He’s pretty hard on the Islamists and the threat they pose. But he is also hard on the Christians.”
Thanks for the tip.
Does he mention any worldwide terrorism promulgated by Christian leadership all over the world, involving tke murder of thousands, kidnappings, beheadings, stoning of women for adultery, cutting off hands and/or feet for petty crimes?
If he is talking about past history so be it but we are living now and the problem is now.
Sean
January 26th, 2011
12:30 am
“Jay, since we defeat you intellectually and in….blah…blah”
Dude. I know how to end the U.S. deficit. We could buy
you for what you’re worth, and sell you for what you
think you’re worth. Bam
Apply the same to Jay and CTucker and msnbc or even better Obama.
iloveislam
January 26th, 2011
12:46 am
If the time Sharia Law comes to USA, all of the dogs everywhere will be killed, you the owner will be forced to watch, while they cut-off your beloved dog’s head. HAHAHA … GO GO GO Sharia Law in USA
not only dog, but also being gay, no alcohol, no nude in public I LOVE THIS HAHAHA…
Scout
January 26th, 2011
1:01 am
HEADLINE: “Mock city rises at Marine base ….. ”
“The new center expanded a similar training program called Mojave Viper that launched in 2005 to prepare troops for the Iraq war.
In November, the Marine Corps unveiled a $30 million expansion of its mock Afghan village at Camp Pendleton that nearly quadrupled its size. In that facility, Marines scramble through a maze of mud walls leading to mosques, schools and carpet sellers, as Hollywood-style explosions go off.
Similar immersion training facilities are slated to open this year at Marine Corps bases in North Carolina, Hawaii and Okinawa.
More than 15,000 Marines and sailors can train simultaneously in the massive simulator to experience the difficulties they will face during deployments as they communicate, coordinate, maneuver and operate in such settings, according to the Marine Corps.
Along with what they can plainly see, Marines in training will search for escape tunnels, hiding places, weapons caches and other dangerous spaces. The facility has almost 1,900 feet of underground tunnels, a manmade riverbed and dozens of courtyards and compounds.”
Well, well it sure doesn’t look like these millions are being spent and thousands of Marines training for an assault on the Vatican or Southern Baptist Headquarters does it ?
JD
January 26th, 2011
3:01 am
iloveislam said:
If the time Sharia Law comes to USA, all of the dogs everywhere will be killed, you the owner will be forced to watch, while they cut-off your beloved dog’s head. HAHAHA … GO GO GO Sharia Law in USA
not only dog, but also being gay, no alcohol, no nude in public I LOVE THIS HAHAHA…
—————
YES THE LESS THEN 1% OF THE POPULATION IN A DEMOCRACY WILL TAKE OVER AND CHANGE THE LAWS OF A COUNTRY MUHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
SOMEONE DID NOT TAKE THERE HAPPY PILLS TODAY
JD
January 26th, 2011
3:11 am
scout think they training to look for WMD…………
JD
January 26th, 2011
3:14 am
Scout
January 25th, 2011
9:46 pm
godless heathen :
“Scout you might want to read Sam Harris’s book. He’s pretty hard on the Islamists and the threat they pose. But he is also hard on the Christians.”
Thanks for the tip.
Does he mention any worldwide terrorism promulgated by Christian leadership all over the world, involving tke murder of thousands, kidnappings, beheadings, stoning of women for adultery, cutting off hands and/or feet for petty crimes?
If he is talking about past history so be it but we are living now and the problem is now.-
———————————————
the bomb detected before detonation at Spokane’s Martin Luther King Day parade, the Glen Beck-inspired kooks who have launched multiple murderous attacks,anti-abortion terrorism, the attack on Rep. Giffords, Oklahoma City, the “Minutemen” vigilantes, and other
PilgrimSoul
January 26th, 2011
4:24 am
Note that the interview is in a format with an Israeli background, and appears to originate either with a right-wing Israeli commentator or a neo-con. Check out also the way the interviewer tries to elicit Islamophobia right from the gate, without stopping to discuss any issues.
This suggests something many of us have been uncomfortably aware of for some time, that much of the Islamophobia is originating in right-wing Israeli political parties, and their American supporters, mainly neo-cons. If you like irony, this is rich. Just a hundred years ago fascists and nationalists in Europe were blaming Jews for everything bad, and now right-wing Jews are disseminating religious bigotry in the form of Islamophobia, which is nothing more than an updated form of anti-Semitism. Such are the effects of religious nationalism (i.e., Zionism) on the Israelis, who seem to be galloping to the right.
In Congress, anti-Muslim bigotry gaining a strong foothold | Jay Bookman | Slinking Toward Retirement
January 26th, 2011
5:47 am
[...] In Congress, anti-Muslim bigotry gaining a strong foothold | Jay Bookman. This entry was posted in Bigotry and tagged american freedom, anti-Muslim bigotry gaining a strong foothold, cable tv program, disloyalty, Eighty, estimate, freedom, Homeland, House, In Congress, Islamic, islamic jihad, Jay Bookman, jihad, keith ellison, new crowd, percent, rep keith ellison, s committee, sen joe mccarthy, someone, suit pocket. Bookmark the permalink. ← Opinion: Don’t let ‘miracles’ trump science – Michael Kinsley – POLITICO.com [...]
mike
January 26th, 2011
8:08 am
How about just getting rid of all the Muslims in this country. Then we can start with the Irish, next the Hispanics and every group that is not indigenous to this land. That would leave only the Native Americans since they happened to be living here when this country was founded by some white guys looking for India. Of course the Blacks can stay since they arrived here by being murdered, kinapped and enslaved. But the rest of you need to go back to where your ancestors came from.
SPSU
January 26th, 2011
8:42 am
Funny to see the liberals here defending this “religion” who have absolutely no idea about the relision itself.
(1) The clueless Ellison (what do you expect from the people of Minnesota with their frozen brains – they have elected Ventura, Franken, etc) proudly was sworn in using the Koran owned by Jefferson. Jefferson owned this Koran to understand the Islamic enemy who were attacking ships off the Barbary Coast & turning Americans into slaves
(2) Muslims integrate rather peacefully in areas for hundreds or thousands of years until they are called into a jihad.
(3) Marrying 8 year-old girls off to 50+ year-old men
etc.
etc.
Real American
January 26th, 2011
8:44 am
What we need to do is concertrate on these crazy white boys that are killing Americans.
Lets see, who killed more Americans, white males or Ameerican muslims?
SPSU
January 26th, 2011
8:45 am
JD – blaming Beck for the Arizona incident. Man you liberals are really in desperate mode since last November. Thank goodness the new US rep district in this state will be safely in republican hands as opposed to falling in the hands of a moonbat like Hank “Guam will tip over” Johnson.
Scout
January 26th, 2011
9:13 am
JD:
A flea vs. a Mad Dog !
Just add up the numbers !
Scout
January 26th, 2011
9:15 am
Mike:
If any of them have the goal of Sharia law in the U.S. and/or trying to dominate the world by force ……………….. yes.
But they don’t. There’s no comparison.
As I told JD: Flea vs. a Mad Dog.
Sad you can’t see the difference.
Scout
January 26th, 2011
9:15 am
JD:
They are training to fight terrorists to keep you A** safe.
Real American
January 26th, 2011
9:17 am
Who have killed more Americans with their terroist acts? White males in America or Muslim Americans?
Idiot Watch
January 26th, 2011
9:38 am
The idiot bookman has found another black conservative to attack. The left can’t stand it when populations with historical political alignment shifts ideology. So this is just the fool bookman beginning an attack on one of the really promising freshman representatives.
I refuse to pay the AJC for subscriptions as long as this fool is on their staff.
Brad
January 26th, 2011
10:00 am
But you’ll leach off the free web version, right Idiot?
Brad
January 26th, 2011
10:04 am
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/conservatives-fear-center-brain/
SaveOurRepublic
January 26th, 2011
10:32 am
King is a shill for the (growing) Orwellian police state. He & his Neocon cohorts continue the “islamofascist” boogeyman rhetoric to further empower the totalitarian DHS. I’m no “fan”/advocate of the muhamedans, but they’re (largely) being used as patsies to advance the police state agenda.
P.S. – …and NO, I’m not a Democrat (nor Republican) but an Independent (strict) Constitutionalist.
Thulsa Doom
January 26th, 2011
10:35 am
Makes me think about what’s going on in Europe- especially in Britain, France to a lesser degree, and Germany. Got news for ya folks. The Muslims aren’t assimilating very well at all- especially in England. Many of them want Sharia law, they bring their own backward 3rd world values and beliefs, its just a mess over there with these people and its only getting worse. Ignore it if you want but it doesn’t change the fact that there are Muslims that are radical and want us to adhere to their beliefs rather than vice versa.
As for here in the US the overwhelming majority of Muslims such as the large community in Dearborn, MI. are very pro American so I think King is greatly exaggerating. Its the students coming over from Arab countries that end up never leaving that need to be rounded up and shipped off after they overstay their visa. I’ll be back later to beat up granny godzilla, keep up, and others. Gotta do some work to pay the taxes to pay their unemployment checks.
Jack Spratlin
January 26th, 2011
10:40 am
Why do you automatically refer to anyone who mistrusts someone else as a “bigot”? Can’t we dislike someone/something simply because they have not earned our trust? That’s not like a blanket “hate” for a group based on color/race/ethnicity/religion/sex/height or whatever. The majority of Muslims seem to be peaceful, caring people who just want to worship in their own way, but they have all been given a bad name by the relatively few radical violent ones among them. But this situation screams for an answer – why haven’t the majority of Muslims spoken out against the violence, not on a personal level, but from Islam’s highest levels? Is it because they secretly DO endorse the violence or perhaps they are afraid of retaliation? This is why the rest of the world distrusts Muslims – they are doing no PR work at all to separate themselves from the violence. If that makes me a bigot, so be it.
straitroad
January 26th, 2011
10:51 am
Jay,
You seem like a nice guy, but you, like most liberals are ruled by emotion. Multiculturalism cannot work. One culture has to be dominant and I would just as soon live in a culture, even with it’s faults, that is primarily Judeo-Christian at it’s core. Defend Islam at your own peril. I hope that you don’t have grandchildren who might one day suffer from your unwillingness to confront unpleasant truths.
BuzztheKiller
January 26th, 2011
11:34 am
It is impossible by definition to be impolite or bigoted towards RADICAL Islam, as it is a disease, not a religion. That is what we are talking about here, not the average, quiet, peaceful Muslim next door. .
BuzztheKiller
January 26th, 2011
11:37 am
“Real” American. Put down the crackpipe and get a job and stop blaming the “man”.
Dr.EB
January 26th, 2011
11:44 am
As a Black person, I would not want Allen West as my member in Congress. OK, Georgia has its share of Tea Party members, but that is for another discussion. As a Georgian who did live in Minneapolis for a few years, I am glad that Keith Ellison reacted in a very classy way. Mr. West could learn a thing or two.
gatorman770
January 26th, 2011
12:08 pm
I’ll began to trust muslims in the US when muslims show they want to accept the laws and traditions of the US, practice their faith without trying to impose sharia laws in the US (for example if you feel the need to wash your feet, bring your own washbowl, water and waste water receptical instead of wanting taxpayers to add friggin’ footwashing stations in public buildings and property and if you don’t want to handle pork don’t work in a friggin’ grocery store), and muslim congregations of the mosques in this country publicly remove radical imams who espouse radical Islamic jihad.
Darryl
January 26th, 2011
12:13 pm
Hey Jay, since 9-11, Muslims have to prove to us that they place THIS nation first and not a radical Islamic group. until then, their allegiance will always be suspect to me.
Darryl
January 26th, 2011
12:17 pm
Hey Dr. EB… go ahead and say what you were going to say about the Tea Party in Georgia. Are you fearful that your derogatory words toward them would have to be supported by some kind of facts, and those you just don’t have? Spit it out “Dr.”… go for it!
Get Real
January 26th, 2011
12:20 pm
Looks like some things never change…the same liberal, progressive porridge placed in a bowl by Bookman being spooned up by his lackeys…
Darryl
January 26th, 2011
12:33 pm
Hey Real American, are you that stupid… I ask you to not vote, please, not at any level. I ask that you not have children as well… if you do, Child Protective Services may have to intervene.
Dr.EB
January 26th, 2011
1:28 pm
Darryl, you asked for it. I am having a lot of problems-their racist elements included. I guess when they say they want their country back that they mean the days of 1951 or ‘61 and not 2011. I guess they want the White and Colored signs to return. Who can forget about the actions of some members of the Tea Party when some members of the Congressional Black Caucus headed to the capitol for a vote over a year ago? I am not just talking about the Civil Rights Act of 1964 but also issues due to voting. You may like their actions, but as a descendant of slaves I find them disturbing.
http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2011/jan/13/tea-parties-cite-legislative-demands/
BADA BING
January 26th, 2011
1:35 pm
Yes, there is a lot of religious bigotry going around. Look at the anti-Christian bigotry on this very site.
Atlas Shrugging
January 26th, 2011
2:14 pm
It warms my heart to see you DEM-wits and REP-ugants playing so well together. Bookman you must be proud of your role in helping the Obomonation bring those of different opinions together as one.
Tweets that mention In Congress, anti-Muslim bigotry gaining a strong foothold | Jay Bookman -- Topsy.com
January 26th, 2011
7:33 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Matt Cleary and Chas Licciardello, suitsmen. suitsmen said: In Congress, anti-Muslim bigotry gaining a strong foothold: … the antithesis of the principles upon which this… http://bit.ly/f8Zprt [...]
Rashad AbdulAzeem
January 26th, 2011
9:28 pm
How ignorant some Americans are, King is a bigot pure and simple. This 80% figure is garbage, and Homeland Security I’m sure does not support such figures. What strange times we live in. Repeat something so outrageous enough and sure enough you’ll find ignorant Americans who will buy into it. BTW, all you smart folks who are afraid of Muslims blowing you up one day, here’s a news flash for ya: Your chances of being jacked up in ATL streets by a fellow ‘thug’ Christian is far greater than your illusion of a so-called Muslim terrorist doing the same to you.