‘ … the last leaf dangling on an empty tree’

One day left on the 2010 calendar.

One day — the last of December — in a year that is all but spent.

This day is the remnant, the orphan. It is the last customer in the bar come closing time, the last leaf dangling from an empty tree in winter. And soon that leaf too will blow away in a cold, sweeping wind.

On the other hand, it’s also a day no different from the day that came before it, or the day that comes next. If it’s the last of its old kind, and tomorrow the first of a new kind, it’s only because we proclaim it to be so. Or at least the calendar does.

And the calendar is our creation, an ancient tool born of a still-more-ancient human drive to measure things, quantify things and categorize things. What we can measure, quantify and categorize, we can also control, or so we like to tell ourselves. We’re wired to think that way from birth.

The instinct is so powerful that by now, every physical phenomenon of which we are aware has been broken down into units so it can be quantified. What cannot be measured in inches and miles is measured in longitude and latitude, pounds and ounces, ohms and amperes, joules and BTUs, becquerels and curies, parts per million and billion.

And we measure ourselves as well. We measure how much we weigh, how tall we stand, how much money we have in the bank, how many friends we have on Facebook, our blood pressure and cholesterol, all because of the reassuring if false sense that what we measure, we also control.

But our oldest, most basic units of calibration measure the passage of time. They go back to the calendars of Stonehenge and ancient Babylon, and far, far beyond.

The circadian rhythm of day and night — light and darkness — provides a unit of measurement known to almost every life form on the planet, no matter how simple.

The monthly tidal pull of the moon as it waxes and wanes is known to influence the reproductive cycles of plankton, fish and human beings alike. And the orbit of the Earth around the sun has given us the rhythm of the seasons and the years.

Those measurements of time — astronomical time — differ profoundly from other units of measurement.
Days and months are not inches or pounds. They are not man-made, abstract external measures that we have imposed on nature to give it an illusion of order. Quite the opposite: Days, months and years represent an order that nature has imposed on us. We did not invent the lunar cycle or the solar cycles; we merely recognize and submit to them. They existed long before we arrived, and will continue long after we disappear.

That’s because they measure the flow of time, something that we experience intimately yet have no hope of altering. It is immutable.

A speedometer, for example, records our velocity in miles per hour, which we can then increase or decrease depending on road conditions and, of course, the absence or presence of police officers bearing radar guns.

Our bank statements reveal our financial condition, knowledge that allows us to adjust our spending and saving accordingly.

But no matter how intensely or accurately we measure it, the passage of time cannot be adjusted to suit our fancies. We cannot alter its velocity, and while we can and do measure how many years each of us has spent so far, we have no way of knowing how much time, if any, remains in our accounts.

All of which brings us back to where we began — completing the circle, so to speak. If we cannot control time, we tell ourselves, we can at least try to control how we use it. Today, the closing of the old year and the opening of a new one offers an opportunity to both look back and look forward, to adjust ourselves to time.

It is decay followed by renewal, or at least renewal in a symbolic sense. The old calendar comes down, the fresh, unmarked calendar is posted in its place. At midnight the tree once stripped of days is suddenly green and alive with possibility again.

But tomorrow, the first leaf falls.

– Jay Bookman

107 comments Add your comment

Recent Grad

December 31st, 2010
1:42 pm

I’m just teasing you Jay. That was a lovely essay and I’ll think of you tonight when I toast the New Year.

Woe is US

December 31st, 2010
5:31 pm

Dave R:
“Another two years (minimum) of the least qualified person in forever to be President – no optimism.”

“Mick, if you read this blog on a regular basis, you know I do not. Dems are just MORE responsible for our debt than the GOP.”

Do you think that making ridiculous statements like these makes them true, or do you just throw them out there for outrageous effect, to annoy others? Because both statements are patently false. Obama will be proven to be one of our most talented presidents, and the national debt when Carter left office was less than a trillion. After Bush who doubled it AND caused the great collapse it was well over 10 T. I don’t expect facts to affect you much but our statements can’t stand unchallenged.

Woe is US

December 31st, 2010
5:42 pm

Mary Elizabeth: I appreciate your comments, which seem to have their moral basis in Biblical teachings. I am not a practicing Christian but wish more Christians actually took the teachings of Jesus to heart. One of the largest chuches in our community have members that carry weapons in the santuary and fill childerns heads with all manner of lies anout our president and other issues. I know because I teach them in school and hear about it. One came in bitterly stating that Obama had signed a law to allow abortions in the ninth month. When I asked her where she had heard such things, she responded, “Church”. Your voice is refreshingly approprite in these woeful times.

Mary Elizabeth

December 31st, 2010
5:58 pm

Woe is US @ 5:42

Thank you for taking the time to write to me, Woe is US. Happy New Year to you and yours.
I have quoted before the words of MLK Jr on this blog that, “the moral arc of the universe is long but it bends toward justice.” I believe we will continue to see that moral arc bend toward justice in days to come. Patience and astute observation is needed to witness it unfold – in its time.

Paulo977 – Thank you, once again, for your kind and wise words. Happy New Year!

JKL2

December 31st, 2010
10:32 pm

Mary Elizabeth-

I like to quote MLK too. My favorite is “”I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”

Not that I was ever a McCain fan, but he’d be president if only people had listened to these words of wisdom. Hopefully people have learned to vote on credentials rather than the novelty of our future President’s skin color.

Common Sense isn't very Common

December 31st, 2010
10:36 pm

In the last Presidential election we voted for credibility instead of skin color

JKL2

January 1st, 2011
9:55 pm

common dense-

If credibility was a factor, Hillary would be president now. America voted on the novelty of a black president. His credibility was never a factor because all the media ever talked about was his novelty and how evil Sarah Palin was. (Even though she is vastly more experienced as a leader than BO is).

If credibility or substance is ever brought up regard obama you are immediately cast as a racist (no matter what the topic). It’s impossible for Demwits to get pass the color of his skin so his glaring lack of character doesn’t seem to matter since “he won”.